
Source: "Force Protection: Today's Reality" by Colonel Ron Torgerson, USAF (Ret), at the Defense Technical Information Center. (Thanks to Arnaud.)

Source: "Force Protection: Today's Reality" by Colonel Ron Torgerson, USAF (Ret), at the Defense Technical Information Center. (Thanks to Arnaud.)
It just boggles my mind that we know these terrorists are operating in these places and no one stops them. Freedoms are fine, but allowing these god forsaken idiots the freedom to come here and plan mass murder of infidels just doesn't make any sense. And it makes even less sense that the so-called moderate muslims shelter these murderers and make excuses for them. Frankly, islam gives me a very sick feeling in my stomach--barflike. The fact that the Ten Commandments are taboo in public places, while the Koran can be displayed in a New York police building makes me believe there is something gone awry. What the hell is wrong with us. Islam is not peace--only an imbecile believes that--so let's just demand some accountability from these so called religions of peacers. Talk is cheap--let's see some action from this religion of peace.
It's essential that we uphold the rule of law. Never let circumstances spook you into doing things in an un-American way.
It's also essential that an informed public asks for accountability and enforcement of existing laws from those who are supposed to serve and protect us.
Problem is, that these people use our very laws to attack us--they have, in short, the democratic right to plan murder of innocents on our soil. Terrorism is not a guaranteed right--yet that is exactly what is happening in America--in the name of political correctness we allow terrorists to terrorize.
I read this recently,and it fits today:
{In any given democracy, the constitution protects individuals from other individuals. In the old world (since the Greeks, who invented these very principles) this principle was called bound liberty.
The democracy protects its citizens only as long as these same citizens respect its civil laws (and therefore each individual's fellow citizen) and of course its constitution.In return the citizen who respects the lawmaker is protected by the very state.The latter is the base of the very existence of the state, in which laws are made by chosen representatives from these same citizens.In the antique form of democracy, anyone actively going against the constitution OR not respecting law, was sort of placed "outside of" it.
Most Western democracies have never been confronted with religious groups that are potentially anti-democratic or able to bring political instability.Lately however, Immans in Europe. have, for instance, openly declared to have understanding for the punishment of homosexuals.Luckily they will probably be sentenced to jail for a few months, since homosexuals are treated like other citizens over there, unlike in Muslim states...
Democracy can only offer freedom as long as it is not used against others with equal rights.
A society should give us all freedom but at the same time protect us from others who abuse it.Most democracies are extremely reluctant to "address" in a political or legal sense, religious groups, political parties or ethnic groups from within their society, simply because their freedom is guaranteed by its very constitution.
As soon as these groups' behaviour becomes politically destabilising or a clear and proven danger to others (like, say, a nazi-statement or a terrorist threat)....than that may need to change.}
Islam claims to be a complete way of life, valid for all men for all times.
It is not a religion in the sense that most people in this country understand a religion. It is not just about a personal relationship with God, it is also a political ideology (and more, an economic system, etc), that desires to enslave the whole world under sharia law, by force if neccesary.
As a political ideology it is no longer shielded by any freedom of religion clause.
This is what people have to remember.
Is there some signifigance to some Orange/Black "target" circles being larger than others, or is it simply the logisitical challenges of the map? I have a wall-sized map which I have used to input such data from Steven Emerson's book and other sources. For example, we definitely know other groups in NY state, Vermont, Colorado, etc., so we can assume that while this is good work, it is not intended to be a complete list.
I have a general list from Emerson's book (only) on my web site at:
http://www.unitedstatesaction.com/us_militant_islamist_extremists.htm
Does anyone know of a site where such information is kept up to date? For example, given all of the arrests in Buffalo area, it would be logical to assume terror groups in upstate NY. I have updates on my wall map, but it would be good to have a single source to refer to in list format.
Appreciate any suggestions.
I'm just surprised there are no cells in Montana...
It is known that the two following hate groups are in Montana. That's why I urge more pooling of information; we might find out more. The two hate groups in Montana are: (a) Big Fork - League of the South - Neo-Confederate, and (b) Noxon - Church of True Israel - Christian Identity
Visit this ant-islam site:
http://www.faithfreedom.org