February 2004 Archives

February 29, 2004

r3545761275.jpeg
Kissing the Qur'an probably won't help this time

Adel Smith is trying to make Christianity illegal in Italy. The statements quoted below from the Pope and Ratzinger are merely expressions of the Christian Faith. If this most frivolous of all frivolous lawsuits goes forward, it should also render illegal Islamic statements about Muhammad's being the last and perfect revelation, correcting and abrogating all previous ones. From AP, with thanks to Susan and Mrs. Obelix:

A Muslim activist sued the pope, a top cardinal and other church officials Saturday, claiming their comments about the superiority of Christianity violated the Italian constitution.

Activist Adel Smith said he was seeking a court condemnation of the comments but no monetary or other punitive damages.

Smith, who is president of the Muslim Union of Italy, has previously made headlines here for his court battle to have a crucifix taken down from his son's classroom. Several other Islamic organizations distanced themselves from that effort.

In his latest legal effort, Smith said Pope John Paul II and other church officials have violated the Italian constitution which proclaims that all religions are equal under the law. Italy is officially secular, but largely Roman Catholic.

Smith cited a passage of John Paul's 1994 book, "Crossing the Threshold of Hope," in which the pope writes that the "richness of God's self-revelation" in the Bible's Old and New Testament's has been "set aside" in Islam.

The suit also cites comments by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, head of the Vatican's orthodoxy watchdog, who in a 2000 document said the faithful of other religions were in a "gravely deficient situation" concerning their salvation compared to Catholics.

Calls placed to the Vatican spokesman weren't immediately returned Saturday.

| 11 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Fox News reports that the Muslim extremist group Abu Sayyaf claimed responsibility Sunday for a ferry explosion and fire that killed at least two people, though 180 more were missing, according to a radio report.

MARIVELES, Philippines -- The Muslim extremist group Abu Sayyaf claimed responsibility Sunday for a ferry explosion and fire that killed at least two people, though 180 more were missing, according to a radio report.

The Radio Mindanao Network said Abu Sayyaf spokesman Abu Sulaiman claimed Friday's explosion was revenge for government attacks in the southern Mindanao area. Abu Sayyaf has often called the radio network in the past.

Fire raced through the Superferry 14 on Friday shortly after it left Manila for central and southern islands, killing one person and injuring 12 others. Witnesses reported a powerful explosion that sparked an inferno.

The fire occurred the same day that two alleged Abu Sayyaf members were convicted of kidnapping an American in 2000 and another was arraigned in a separate mass abduction.

Remember that American kidnapping? No? You're in good company. But Abu Sayyaf has kidnapped and even killed other Americans in the Philippines as well. abusayyef.jpeg
Before 9/11, Americans tended to slough off overseas terrorist attacks on Americans, our embassies, and even our soldiers, sailors and Marines. Such attacks were merely passing outrages somewhere out there beyond our borders, and indifference allowed our enemy to thrive and grow. With the War on Terror slipping steadily in the polls as an important issue to voters, that is something to think about.

| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Here's a feelgood story from the Rochester Democrat and Chronicle about clearing away post-9/11 misconceptions about Islam. Of course, the main misunderstanding is about jihad:

On Sept. 11, 2001, just after he watched the World Trade Center towers fall on television, Aly Nahas received a call from a rabbi offering him shelter.

The rabbi was a friend of Nahas' who was worried that people might take out the horror of that day on local Muslims. But rather than seek shelter, Nahas rushed to the Islamic Center of Rochester, where he was a volunteer.

When he got there, his rabbi friend, two priests and a minister were waiting. Within two hours, the group held a news conference to assure the public that the Muslim community condemned the attacks. In the year and a half after Sept. 11, Nahas gave 45 lectures on Islam. . . .

Carman hopes that the two-hour sessions, which include an hour lecture as well as time for questions, help demystify Islam. One important misconception, he said, is about jihad. The Egyptian-born Nahas said that jihad, often used synonymously with terrorism, essentially means to strive to better oneself.

That's wonderful. I am sure that Nahas's non-Muslim audience will go away feeling reassured. I hope that the Rochester paper will run a follow-up story about Nahas's activities among Muslims, in which he convinces them that the radical understanding of jihad as violence against unbelievers is wrong on Islamic grounds. I wonder what Nahas would say about the almost daily stories posted at Jihad Watch in which Muslims commit violence and call it jihad. Until those Muslims are confronted and that understanding of jihad definitively refuted, dialogues like the one described in this story are essentially meaningless.

| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

0,3772,26938_1,00.jpeg
Becoming a reality?

A 13-year-old would-be suicide bomber. From AP:

Israeli security forces arrested three Palestinian youths who planned to carry out a suicide attack out of anger over Israel's West Bank barrier, relatives said Sunday.

The youths, ages 13 and 14, were among the youngest ever arrested for planning suicide attacks. Parents of one of the boys expressed outraged that militant groups had taken to drafting young boys to carry out suicide attacks.

Most suicide bombers have been in their 20s. The youngest was 16 years old.

The army did not immediately comment.

Mohammed Abu Mahsen said his 13-year-old son, Tarek, along with his friends, Jaffer Hussein, 13, and Ibrahim Suafta, 14, left a letter saying they planned to carry out a shooting attack at an Israeli military checkpoint or army base, he said.

The 13-year-olds claimed to be members of Islamic Jihad, while Suafta said he belonged to the Al Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades, a militant group linked to Yasser Arafat's Fatah movement, family members said. The boys were arrested last Thursday.

"I want to carry out an attack against (Prime Minister Ariel) Sharon's fence. This fence, we will blow it up also, the Islamic Jihad youth movement," Tarek wrote in the letter.

"We want you to give out candies and don't cry for us and hold a big demonstration," he added, referring to traditional salutes given to "martyrs" who die for the Palestinian cause.

| 19 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

porkgold.jpeg
Aieeee!

Even in the supermarket, delicate Muslim sensibilities require discrimination against non-Muslims. To keep a Muslim child from being defiled by picking up a can of pork, Muslims in Brunei are asking that products for non-Muslims be hidden away. From BruDirect, with thanks to Nicolei:

Members of the public particularly shoppers in a prominent supermarket in Kuala Belait are expressing discontent over the arrangements of "non-halal" foods which are placed not far from the daily needs items of Muslim customers at the supermarket.

A number of customers here stated that the arrangements of food for non-Muslims at the stated shop are placed near essential products such as soaps and detergents and next to daily use items such as tissue paper and other goods.

One customer who refused to be named stated that the racks on which are placed the non-halal foods should be moved far away from aisle frequented by Muslim customers.

The customer said that on one occasion his 7-year-old daughter was at the said supermarket to buy instant noodles when she unknowingly picked up a can from the rack to ask him about its contents.

"I was shocked to see that the word 'pork' was inscribed on the can that she was holding. The can was taken from a rack which was placed just across the rack from which I took the instant noodles," he claimed.

He had pointed out the matter to the workers there, but till now the problem remains.

When the supermarket was visited again, it was found that racks containing a number of canned and plastic packaged foods for non-Muslims were still placed alongside racks holding washing soaps and tissues, and facing the rack displaying varieties of instant noodles.

The shop owner should have understood the situation surrounding the community and is advised to consider the full interests of the customers, particularly in terms of sale item arrangements.

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

What's that? You thought British Muslim women had the same rights as anyone else in Britain? Guess again. Some Muslim men aren't happy about it, but Muslim women have just been granted a whole list of new rights by Britain's Sharia Council. From AsiaNews.co.uk, with thanks to Nicolei:

DETAILS of a new Islamic marriage contract that will protect women's rights have been unveiled for the first time in the North West. At a meeting of top mullahs and Islamic scholars in Bury it was predicted that mosques throughout the UK will use the new contract and revolutionise Islamic marriages.

Called the nikah namah provisions in the contract include:

l A wife's right not to have children
l Equal rights in divorce
l A wife's right to work and control over her own pay . . .
l Outlawing all verbal, physical and sexual abuse by the husband
l The right of a wife to visit relatives in the UK or abroad

The draft contract is the work of the UK Shariah Council and the Muslim Parliament of Britain - organisations that have voiced their concern that Muslim women can get a raw deal from existing Islamic marriage custom. . . .

The response from men was less welcoming and some were shocked over its clauses.

One man, who did not want to give his name, said he was amazed at some of the women's rights proposed.

He said: "The purpose of an Islamic marriage is to have a family but the contact is saying that a woman cannot get pregnant unless she wants to. How can that be increasing the Muslim line in the family?"

Molana Barkatullah said he knew that some men would be unhappy about it.
He added: "During the time of the Prophet, women were given rights for the first time and some of the men found that hard to deal with, but they eventually accepted these rights. That was 1400 years ago and it will happen again."

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

hambali.jpeg
Hambali

Hambali, who has been involved in many Asian terrorist adventures, has been charged in Cambodia. From AP, with thanks to Nicolei:

Asia's top terror suspect, Hambali, and eight other alleged Muslim militants were charged yesterday with attempted murder in an unspecified terrorist plot to bomb targets in Cambodia.

A Cambodian court levelled the charges against Hambali and three others in absentia midway through the trial of five men who were arrested last year for allegedly training terrorists and planning attacks in the country.

Though the five were originally charged with terrorism, Judge Ya Sokhan changed the charge to 'attempted premeditated murder with the goal of terrorism' after a defence attorney argued that Cambodia had no anti-terrorism law.

The five men were ordered to remain in detention pending a new trial. No date was set.

In another surprising twist, the judge said Hambali and three others - identified only as Ibrahim, Zaid and Zakariya - faced the same charges.

It was the first time their names were mentioned in connection with the case.

Prosecutor Yet Chakriya told the court that all the suspects were 'plotting a plan to cause explosion, destruction of property and human life' in Cambodia.

He did not elaborate, and officials would not give details about the alleged plot.

The attempted murder charge carries a life imprisonment sentence - the same as the earlier terrorism charge. . . .

Hambali, an Indonesian whose real name is Riduan Isamuddin, is said to be a key leader of the Jemaah Islamiah, Al-Qaeda's South-east Asian arm. He is believed to have spent several months in Cambodia last year and reportedly used the country as a staging ground from which to launch regional terror attacks. He was arrested in Thailand last August and is now in US custody.

It was not immediately clear where Ibrahim, Zaid and Zakariya were or what they were accused of doing.

The suspects present in court yesterday were Esam Mohammed Khidr Ali of Egypt, Abdul Azi Haji Chiming and Muhammad Yalaludin Mading of Thailand and Sman Ismael of Cambodia. Another Egyptian, Rousha Yasser, 33, also known as Yasser Elsayed Mohamed, is a fugitive.

Their trial stemmed from their membership of the Umm Al-Qura group, which operated a Saudi-funded Islamic school outside Phnom Penh.

Prosecutors accused them of using the school as a cover for training terrorists and planning attacks against Western interests in Cambodia.

| 1 Comment
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This Pakistan Times op-ed by Yamin Zakaria contains familiar moral equivalency arguments, but it is notable for what it says about the meaning of jihad. It's a bit different from the sanitized version offered by Muslim spokesmen in the West. (Thanks to Twostellas.)

Jihad can be both defensive and offensive, preferably by the Islamic state. At times, the distinction between the two modes of operation is blurred, depending on the political and military situation. At present it may be academic to discuss offensive Jihad, as the Islamic state does not exist in the world today. In addition the Muslims are facing an onslaught in their own lands, but nevertheless, it is worth examining it briefly to clarify some of the misconceptions.

Offensive Jihad

The Islamic state reserves the right to use military force against foreign states that engage in persecuting Muslims or, preventing the spread of Islam within their lands. Note, in principle there is no concept of forceful conversion of non-Muslims to Islam. Even today, there are non-Muslims in most of the majority Muslim countries.

Note that jihad should "preferably" be waged by the Islamic state -- evidently, under some conditions others can wage it as well. Also, Zakaria's point about forced conversion is absolutely true: forced conversion is against Islamic law. Under Islamic law, which is not fully enforced in most majority Muslim states today, non-Muslims are allowed to live in Islamic states as inferior dhimmis.

In any case, this understanding of jihad is used by radical Muslims worldwide today to justify their actions.

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The headscarf controversy comes to the US. It's a strange incident: it seems that this instructor had a policy against headgear in class, as it obstructed the view of other students. So he asked a Muslim girl to remove her headscarf. Now he has resigned under pressure, to the delight of the Council on American Islamic Relations. But was this really an anti-Islamic incident? From NBC4TV, with thanks to Twostellas:

An Antelope Valley College instructor resigned Thursday, a week after ordering a Muslim student to take off her religiously mandated head scarf or leave class, school officials said.

Robert Daniel, described as a part-time instructor, taught an introduction to computer science information course. He resigned in writing this morning, school officials said.

The college's Board of Trustees was expected to decide Friday night what action to take against Daniel. The school said other instructors will be brought in to teach the two spring semester courses that had been assigned to Daniel.

Daniel could not be reached for comment.

Fajr Burhan is a 19-year-old electrical engineering student. She was born in Phoenix but her parents are from Syria. About five years ago, Burhan began wearing the traditional Muslim hajib head scarf.

Burhan said the garb had never been a problem at the school until last week, when Daniel told her to remove the hajib.

Daniel told her "to either stay and follow his rules (by removing the scarf) or leave the class," Burhan said.

Burhan is in her last semester at Antelope Valley and hopes to graduate this year and transfer to UCI. To graduate, she needed to pass the course Daniel taught.

Burhan said Daniel made the demand knowing the scarf's religious significance, although she acknowledged that Daniel told her he does not allow hats or headgear because they can block the view of other students.

After a discussion with Tom Miller, the school's dean of business and computer studies, Burhan returned to class wearing the hajib, but said Daniel ignored her when she tried to answer questions.

Interim AVC President Jackie Fisher, who said the school does not have a dress code and has a zero-tolerance policy on discrimination, later apologized to Burhan.

Ra'id Faraj of the Southern California office of the Council on American- Islamic Relations applauded the move.

"It's really bizarre that we would encounter this in a college," Faraj said.

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Brushing aside abundant evidence that Islamic schools in Pakistan have become training grounds for terrorists, Pakistani Information Minister Rashid Ahmed defended the schools (madaras) as vital for the safeguarding of Islam. Oh, and don't worry about nukes. Pakistan's "nuclear assets are in safe hands." From NNI, with thanks to Twostellas:

Minister for Information and Broadcasting Sheikh Rashid Ahmed has lauded the role of Madaras in the promotion of Islam.

Addressing an International Peace and Martyrs Conference at Jamia Sirajia Nazamia here Friday, he said that most of the Madaras are play real role in the service of Islam, but one or two have to be restructured and government has evolved a strategy to safeguard the Islam and the country.

He said that our nuclear assets are in the safe hands and we will not hesitate to play the historical role if Pakistan faces any danger. . . .

He rejected the impression that Pakistan is a terrorist country and its Madaras are promoting terrorism and said that our Madaras are the biggest NGOs, they are not promoting terrorism, but work to safe guard Islam.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

February 28, 2004

More damaging words and implausible explanations from Sheikh Al-Hilali. From Smh.com.au, with thanks to LGF:

The powerful leader of Australia's 300,000 Muslims, Sheik Taj el-Din Al Hilaly, has praised the September 11 terrorist attacks as "God's work".

The controversial Mufti also appears to have lent support to Arab suicide bombers in an inflammatory sermon during a Middle East lecture tour.

Sheik Al Hilaly, who is based at the Lakemba mosque, last week vehemently denied that he called for a jihad against Israel in one of his sermons. But a translation of a sermon, delivered at the Sidon mosque in Lebanon and obtained by The Sun-Herald, is littered with references to Arab martyrs and Americans being punished by God.

Sheik Al Hilaly spoke of an "Islamic revolution", and told his audience not to be surprised if one day a muezzin called out "Allah is Great!" from the "top of the White House".

"September 11 is God's work against oppressors," he said. "Some of the things that happen in the world cannot be explained; a civilian airplane whose secrets cannot be explained, if we ask its pilot who reached his objective without error: 'Who led your steps?'

"Or if we ask the giant that fell: 'Who humiliated you?' Or if we ask the president: 'Who made you cry?' God is the answer."

Declaring there was a "war on infidels" around the world, the Mufti praised the boy who, "despite his mother's objections", went to war to become a martyr.

Bemoaning the lack of "real men" in the Arab world, he said the "true boy" was one who told his mother not to cry for him if he died. The boy who cried: "Oh mother, jihad has been imposed on me and I want to become a martyr [was a son of Islam]." The boy would cry to his mother: "Oh mother, I'm going with a stone in my hand to become a martyr."

After seeking clarification from Sheik Al Hilaly in Egypt, his spokesman, Keysar Trad, said the Mufti had taken bits from poems, which he often incorporated into his sermons.

The September 11 reference meant that "evil can reach everywhere and everything", and the power of terrorism should not be belittled. Stating that September 11 was God's work against oppressors meant "people only do these things when they feel oppressed".

He denied the Mufti had supported suicide bombers, saying the "boy with a stone" could not possibly mean that.

A week ago, the Australian Federal Police decided against investigating the Mufti's overseas activities.

| 17 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The war on terror is expanding into Africa. From AP, :

The United States is scaling up its military presence in Africa as concern mounts over terrorist threats - both immediate and future - on the continent, the deputy head of American forces in Europe said Friday.

"The threat is not weakening, it is growing," Air Force Gen. Charles Wald said in a telephone interview with The Associated Press from Luanda, Angola. "We can't just sit back and let it grow."

The focus on Africa is part of major restructuring as U.S. forces in Europe reposition for the war against terror. . . .

European Command is not looking to station large concentrations of troops on the continent, Wald said. But it intends to make its presence felt through joint exercises, training initiatives and other exchanges.

U.S. forces have also negotiated access to a number of sites, including air strips in Angola and Gabon, that can be used for stopovers, refueling, or to position troops and equipment.

Wald said this will allow U.S. forces to respond with light, mobile troops - whether for peacekeeping, crisis response or a specific terrorist threat.

"We're actually going to get more capability with less force because of our ability to move around fast," he said.

Key to the effort is supporting the development of regional security groups, im-proving the capabilities of African police and soldiers, and building relationships with governments and militaries, Wald said. . . .

Wald's trip includes stops in regional military powers Nigeria and South Africa; oil-rich Angola, Gabon, Sao Tome and Principe; and Algeria and Niger, whose vast desert expanses are seen as a potential haven for terrorists.

At the same time, U.S. Air Force Maj. Gen. Jeffrey Kohler, the European Command's point man on planning for force reconfiguration, has been visiting the Saharan nations of Mauritania, Mali and Niger.

| 11 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

More civilians murdered in the jihad in Israel. From the New York Post, :

A young Israeli couple driving on the road between two West Bank cities were shot to death last night in a drive-by ambush by suspected Palestinian terrorists, Israeli authorities said.

The unidentified husband and wife, believed to be in their late 20s, were traveling between Hebron and Beersheba when their car came under fire.

There was no immediate claim of responsibility from any Palestinian faction.

The violence came during in a week of escalating tensions as Palestinians fiercely protested Israel's construction of the West Bank barrier.

Israel considers the controversial barrier, which is one-fourth completed, as a protection against Palestinian homicide bombers, while Palestinians claim it is nothing more than a land grab.

In the Gaza Strip yesterday, a bicycle-riding Palestinian homicide bomber blew himself up near a military jeep outside the Jewish settlement of Kfar Darom.

There were no other casualties, the army said.

The Islamic Jihad claimed responsibility.

Earlier, in Jerusalem, Israeli police clashed with stone-throwing Palestinians in a square outside the al-Aqsa mosque, one of Islam's holiest sites.

Israeli police spokesman Gil Kleiman said officers fired rubber bullets and tossed stun grenades after hundreds of Palestinians tried to stone worshippers standing below the compound at the Western Wall, the most sacred site of Jewish prayer.

| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

A Lebanese patriarch sees a threat to Lebanese culture from Islamization. From Zenit News Agency, with thanks to Nicolei:

Cardinal Nasrallah Boutros Sfeir, patriarch of Antioch of the Maronites, warns that an attempt is being made to Islamize public and private education in Lebanon.

In a Lenten message to the faithful and all the population of Lebanon, published on the patriarchate's Web page (www.bkerke.org.lb), the Maronite patriarch invites the Lebanese to a "clear cooperation characterized by transparency."

Cardinal Sfeir focuses on problems that affect the Lebanese governing class, including corruption, nepotism and the impossibility of making free decisions.

To safeguard coexistence in a democratic system, the people must have the right to "ask for explanations from" those who govern them, he said.

The cardinal lamented that drugs, alcoholism and gambling are ever more widespread in the country, making it harder for families to ensure the education of their children.

Cardinal Sfeir is especially concerned about the attempt to Islamize both public and private education, given that the Islamic Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization -- a sort of Muslim UNESCO -- is allowed to operate in the country and exercise its influence on the Lebanese school system.

Such Islamization of education is "a threat not only to schools but to all of Lebanese culture," he said.

To promote Islamic education as an absolute ideal for schooling is to ignore that in Lebanon "there are two religions, two cultures and two civilizations at work, pertaining to Christianity and Islam," the cardinal said. "Both together form one people."

| 1 Comment
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Would Al-Qaeda be short-sighted enough to destroy the ultimate source of worldwide funding for jihad? From the World Tribune, :

Saudi Arabia has bolstered its forces in the Eastern Province after an alert of an Al Qaida attack on the kingdom's oil fields and nearby Shi'ite communities.

Saudi opposition sources said Riyad has reinforced National Guard troops and has constructed barriers around the regional capital of Qatif. The sources said the main concern is that Al Qaida would launch a suicide car bombing in the city.

So far, Saudi authorities have closed off sections of the Shi'ite-populated city of Qatif. Police also banned cars to the Al Qalaa section of that city.

The Al Qaida threat comes amid an effort by the state-owned Saudi Aramco to increase oil production at Qatif, Middle East Newsline reported. The effort has been plagued by safety difficulties because of the proximity of the oil fields to Shi'ite communities.

Saudi opposition sources said Al Qaida has been encouraged by Saudi clerics to launch attacks on the Shi'ite minority amid demands for equal rights with the Sunni majority. They said ruling clerics in Saudi Arabia have been concerned that the destruction of the Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein would result in a Shi'ite-dominated Iraq that would encourage separatism in Saudi Arabia.

Al Qaida has already issued several fatwas, or religious rulings, that encourage violence against Sh'ites. On Jan. 14, Sheik Salman Al Odeh, a pro-Al Qaida Saudi cleric, termed Shi'ites infidels and enemies. Another pro-Al Qaida cleric, Sheik Safar Al Hawali, warned the Shi'ites that they would be massacred while others called for the removal of Shi'ites from all government positions.

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Despite obfuscations and denials by many Muslims in the West, jihad is (as I demonstrate in Onward Muslim Soldiers) a quite coherent and comprehensive set of laws for warfare against non-Muslims and their treatment as dhimmis after the successful conclusion of that war. These laws cover virtually every aspect of that warfare, and they are still part of the Sharia — they have not been set aside or repudiated by any Muslim sect. This is underscored by a question on Ask-Imam.com answered by the South African Mufti Ebrahim Desai. It takes violent jihad, slavery, and the rape of slave women for granted — since, after all, they are declared legal by the Sharia. (Thanks to LGF.)

In the "Jihads" (Islamic wars) that took place, women were also, at times, taken as prisoners of war by the Muslim warriors. These women captives used to be distributed as part of the booty among the soldiers, after their return to Islamic territory. Each soldier was then entitled to have relations ONLY with the slave girl over whom he was given the RIGHT OF OWNERSHIP and NOT with those slave girls that were not in his possession. This RIGHT OF OWNERSHIP was given to him by the "Ameerul-Mu'mineen" (Head of the Islamic state.) Due to this right of ownership, it became lawful for the owner of a slave girl to have intercourse with her.

It may, superficially, appear distasteful to copulate with a woman who is not a man's legal wife, but once Shariah makes something lawful, we have to accept it as lawful, whether it appeals to our taste, or not; and whether we know its underlying wisdom or not. It is necessary for a Muslim to be acquainted with the laws of Shariah, but it is not necessary for him to delve into each law in order to find the underlying wisdom of these laws because knowledge of the wisdom of some of the laws may be beyond his puny comprehension. Allah Ta'ala has said in the Holy
Quraan: "Wa maa ooteetum min al-ilm illaa qaleelan" which means, more or less, that, "You have been given a very small portion of knowledge". Hence, if a person fails to comprehend the underlying wisdom of any law of Shariah, he cannot regard it as a fault of Shariah (Allah forbid), on the contrary, it is the fault of his own perception and lack of understanding, because no law of Shariah is contradictory to wisdom.

Nevertheless, the wisdom underlying the permission granted by Shariah to copulate with a slave woman is as follows: The LEGAL possession that a Muslim receives over a slave woman from the "Ameerul-Mu'mineen" (the Islamic Head of State) gives him legal credence to have coition with the slave woman in his possession, just as the marriage ceremony gives him legal credence to have coition with his wife. In other words, this LEGAL POSSESSION is, in effect, a SUBSTITUTE of the MARRIAGE CEREMONY. A free woman cannot be 'possessed', bought or sold like other possessions; therefore Shariah instituted a 'marriage ceremony' in which affirmation and consent takes place, which gives a man the right to copulate with her. On the other hand, a slave girl can be possessed and even bought and sold, thus, this right of possession, substituting as a marriage ceremony, entitles the owner to copulate with her. A similar example can be found in the slaughtering of animals; that after a formal slaughtering process, in which the words, "Bismillahi Allahu Akbar" are recited, goats, cows, etc.; become "Halaal" and lawful for consumption, whereas fish becomes "Halaal" merely through 'possession' which substitutes for the slaughtering.

| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

European Muslim leaders like Dyab Abou Jahjah of the Arab European League, as I show in Onward Muslim Soldiers, fiercely oppose any attempt to integrate Muslims into European society. But now, for the first time, a Norwegian court has declared that illegal. From Aftenposten, with thanks to Ali Dashti:

An Oslo court has convicted an African-Norwegian not only for abusing his Algerian wife but also for preventing her from integrating into Norwegian society. It's the first time a Norwegian court has ruled such practices as illegal, and the offender was sentenced to three years in jail.

Prosecutors are calling the sentence "very important" for efforts to ensure the rights of immigrants, especially women, and promote integration.

The 48-year-old offender has been in Norway for 30 years. Nine years ago, he married an Algerian woman 20 years younger than he was and brought her to Norway as well.

The court claimed in its ruling that he then launched years of physical abuse against his wife and prevented her from leaving their home without his permission. If she did leave home, she was ordered to cover her face and hair.

He also abused the couple's children, and when his wife started attending Norwegian classes at the advice of juvenile authorities, he picked her up directly after the class to prevent her from mingling with other students.

She eventually broke out of the marriage and brought charges against him with the help of public prosecutors.

They used a 102-[year-]old law that states that a man can be punished with prison if he fails to exercise his duties towards his spouse or their child. Given the state's efforts to promote integration and prosecute domestic violence, Hanne Kristin Rohde of the Oslo Police District said "we saw that we had to try" invoking the little-used law.

The man tried to appeal his conviction, but his effort was rejected. The length of his sentence, considered harsh in Norway, is under appeal, however.

| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

February 27, 2004

Two pizzeria workers have been arrested in Paris. From AP:

Anti-terrorism judges placed two Paris pizzeria workers under investigation Friday in a probe into radical Islamic training camps set up in France during the 1990s, judicial officials said.

Mustapha Boussaffa of Tunisia and Hazdine Sayeh, a French-Algerian, were being investigated for "criminal association with a terrorist enterprise," the officials said on condition of anonymity. In France, being placed under investigation is one step short of formal charges.

Boussaffa ran a pizzeria that is believed to have become a meeting place for radical Muslims and Sayeh worked there, the officials said.

The men, who are both about 30, were taken into custody Tuesday in the Paris region during the investigation into a network of Islamic radicals that once ran training camps for new recruits, the officials said. One camp was set up in the late 1990s in the Fontainebleau forest south of Paris.

The men are believed to have played only marginal roles in the case, the officials said.

The wider probe focuses on the death of anti-Taliban military commander Ahmed Shah Massood in Afghanistan. The anti-terrorism judges are looking into an alleged support network for Massood's killers.

Massood was slain Sept. 9, 2001, in northern Afghanistan, two days before the terror attacks in the United States, by two men posing as journalists.

Willie Virgile Brigitte, a French man extradited from Australia in October, is believed to be at the heart of the case. He is suspected of running false passports to Massood's assassins.

Brigitte organized the survival training lessons in Fontainebleau and spent months in al-Qaida training camps in Afghanistan and Pakistan, according to French judicial officials.

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The Saudi tourist site saying that Jewish people were ineligible to apply for visas was up as late as last night; I sent it to a friend at 7:44 PM yesterday. But now image-conscious Saudis have taken it down. Does that mean their policy has changed? That question is as yet unanswered. From AP:

Rep. Anthony Weiner, a frequent critic of United States policy toward Saudi Arabia, said Thursday that the Middle East country's new visa policy outlined on a tourist Web site should be quickly condemned by American officials.

The Web site, promoting a new Saudi program to offer tourist visas to encourage more foreign visitors, lists four groups not entitled to tourist visas, including "Jewish People."

The Saudi government has traditionally only issued travel visas for employment, Hajj pilgrimages, and other visits with official sanction.

In addition to Jews, the Web site by the Supreme Commission for Tourism also says it will refuse visas to anyone with an Israeli passport or a passport that has an Israeli stamp.

"It is very difficult to see the Saudis as anything other than a backward country with backward ideals and this reaffirms that," said Weiner. "I think the administration should take a hard look at this Web site and decide whether a country that has these policies should be considered our ally."

Weiner said the U.S. should close its doors to Saudis until they "clarify" their immigration policy.

| 11 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

A lot of people complain about Christian missionaries, but I have never heard of them doing military recruiting. This is just another example of activities going on in mosques that must be halted if terrorism is ever going to end. From AP:

Muslim missionaries from Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Pakistan have been visiting mosques in East Africa to recruit young men for holy war.

Moderate Muslim leaders say the part-time preachers go from mosque to mosque spouting sermons of hate, then offer young men a chance to wage holy war in Iraq, Afghanistan or Pakistan.

A moderate Muslim leader in Tanzania says most older clerics try to warn their congregations that the extremists distort Islam.

Most people in Zanzibar follow a mystical form of Sufi Islam, which emphasizes peace and harmony, so they tend to reject the missionaries' fiery rhetoric.

But the missionaries appeal to a frustrated minority who believe Islam is at war.

| 39 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Gamal Abdel-Hafiz, the FBI agent who allegedly refused to tape a fellow Muslim, has been reinstated. Did he really refuse to tape a Muslim? He says he was misunderstood. From MSNBC, with thanks to LGF:

Overturning the action of its senior disciplinary officer, the FBI has reinstated a high-profile Muslim agent who had been fired last year amid a swirl of controversy over allegations of conflicting loyalties in the war on terrorism, NEWSWEEK has learned. . . .

But congressional aides noted that it comes at a time when the bureau is under fire for its failure to recruit more Muslim and Arabic-speaking agents. The move also comes barely two months after Abdel-Hafiz filed a lawsuit against a current and former FBI agent, as well as ABC News for making statements in a December 2002 broadcast that left viewers with the impression he was a “sympathizer to terrorism and other religious fanatics.”

Until only a few years ago, Abdel-Hafiz had been one of the bureau’s prized counterterrorism assets, winning promotions and commendations for his work on such cases as the bombings of the Khobar Towers military barracks in Saudi Arabia in 1996 and the Navy destroyer USS Cole off the coast of Yemen in October 2000.

Promoted to the post of deputy legal attaché in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, in February 2001, Abdel-Hafiz was a pivotal figure in the investigation into the September 11 terror attacks. He also extracted a crucial confession that led to the arrest of the so-called Lackawanna 6—six Buffalo, N.Y.-area men who had attended an Al Qaeda camp in Afghanistan, a case that has been publicly touted by top Justice Department officials as one of the Bush administration’s biggest successes in the war on terrorism. “You couldn’t ask for a better job by an FBI agent,” Paul Moskal, the FBI spokesman in Buffalo, told NEWSWEEK last fall about Abdel-Hafiz’s work on the Lackawanna 6 case.

But Abdel-Hafiz’s career turned sour in the fall of 2002, when a fellow FBI agent in Chicago, Robert Wright, accused him of refusing to cooperate in an earlier 1999 case targeting fundraising by the militant Palestinian group Hamas. Wright claimed that Abdel-Hafiz, who was then assigned to the bureau’s Dallas field office, had refused his request that he wear a hidden wire in a meeting with a suspect in the case on the grounds that “a Muslim does not record another Muslim.” Abdel-Hafiz has insisted that his comment was misunderstood and that his reluctance to wear the wire stemmed from his concerns that it could undermine his effectiveness in the Muslim community and jeopardize his family if word got out that he had done so. In any case, Abdel-Hafiz pointed out that his supervisor at the time, Danny Defenbaugh, then the special agent in charge of the Dallas office, made the final decision that Abdel-Hafiz should not wear a wire in the Hamas investigation.

Wright’s allegations, first made at a Washington press conference and later repeated in his December 2002 interview with the ABC News show “Primetime Live,” led to increased scrutiny of Abdel-Hafiz’s work in Riyadh. By then, Abdel-Hafiz’s chief supervisor, Wilfred Rattigan, had converted to Islam. When both Abdel-Hafiz and Rattigan flew off to Mecca for the hajj, a top FBI official in Washington complained and an auditing team was dispatched to review the office’s work. During the course of the audit, Abdel-Hafiz told NEWSWEEK, the chief inspector from headquarters concluded that there was too much “clutter” in the office and ordered the “shredding” of over 2,000 documents related to the September 11 terror investigations. Although most of the documents were duplicated in the FBI’s computers, a small number were not, according to Abdel-Hafiz. These consisted of between 50 and 100 letters written by Saudi security officials responding to FBI requests for information about terror suspects. When the FBI was forced to ask the Saudis for new copies of the letters, the Saudis—who were being severely criticized in Congress for failure to cooperate on terrorism cases—complained to senior U.S. officials.

| 11 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

When was the last time you heard of the U.S. Army building a church, or a synagogue? What's that? A wall of separation? Well, the wall is down in Afghanistan, where a plaque in front of one mosque proclaims: "Matachina mosque, reconstructed in 2002... with the help of the American people." From AFP, with thanks to Daniel Pipes:

"Matachina Madrassa" reads a rusty, battered metal plaque. A metre away is a brand-new stone on which is written in fresh lettering: "Matachina mosque, reconstructed in 2002... with the help of the American people."

On November 16, 2001, during the heat of the US-led war against the Taliban regime, at least 34 people lost their lives here. The dead included fighters but also religious students, women and children, killed during the bombardment of this Islamic school and mosque in the suburbs of Khost.

Reconstructed

The building has since been reconstructed almost identically with the financial support of the United States army.

Some rubble and a toppled brick wall are the only evidence of the bombing.

And a new mosque has been rebuilt on the site of the carnage. A wooden door, decorated with Arabic writing, opens on to a large, empty vault. Inside, a painted niche indicates the direction of the holy city of Mecca, towards which the faithful pray.

An already dusty plastic floor covering sits between the imposing stone pillars supporting the building. The only exaggerated decoration in this spartan decor is a made-in-China plastic gold clock fixed high on the wall.

Nobody ever comes

"Nobody ever comes into this mosque, what are you doing here," asks a soldier from a neighbouring garrison.

The mosque's guard lives just metres from the building, in a mud-brick home. The door is padlocked shut. "The man has gone to pray in another mosque."

The new Matachina mosque is almost always empty. Hardly refinished, it is already abandoned as the faithful prefer to pray elsewhere.

So the American taxpayers financed a mosque in Afghanistan as a gesture of good will, and nobody goes to it anyway. I hope the Army will henceforth stay out of the mosque-building business.

| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Some Muslims seem to have no trouble turning from calls for the freedom to wear headscarves in France to denying the freedom not to wear them elsewhere. From AP, with thanks to Twostellas:

Three Islamic rebel groups in Indian-controlled Kashmir have demanded that women in the region wear head-to-toe veils and that all beauty parlors close, a newspaper reported Thursday.

The groups want restaurants to shut partitioned areas supposedly reserved for families - but in reality also used by young couples. It also wants tutoring centers, which prepare teenagers for college examinations, to segregate girls and boys, the Times of India newspaper said.

The demands were made by the Al-Madina Regiment, which the newspaper described as a collection of the Lashkar-e-Tayyaba, Al-Umar and Hezb-ul-Mujahedeen militant groups.

The rebels have been fighting Indian security forces since 1989, seeking independence for Kashmir or its merger with Pakistan. More than 65,000 people have died.

Anyone failing to meet the demands by March 1 would "face the consequences," the newspaper quoted Al-Madina Regiment chief Umar Khalid as saying.

Similar demands have been made in the past - and few are adhered to.

Muslim women in Jammu-Kashmir, India's only Muslim-majority state, usually don't wear head-to-toe burqa veils and instead cover their heads with loose scarfs.

| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This "Muslim-Christian violence" is rather predictably one-sided. From AP, with thanks to Peter Rockas:

Suspected Muslim militants armed with guns and bows and arrows killed at least 48 people in an attack on a farming village in central Nigeria. Most of the victims died as they sought refuge in a church, police said. The latest bout of Muslim-Christian violence in the region occurred Tuesday night in Yelwa, a mainly Christian town in Nigeria's Plateau State, police commissioner Innocent Ilozuoke said.

Army and police reinforcements helped restore calm, Ilozuoke told a news conference Wednesday in Jos, the state capital.

The killings appeared to be the latest retaliatory attack in a sporadic conflict that has rocked the central region since an outburst of sectarian violence in 2001, pitting Christians against Muslims in once-peaceful Jos. In the initial outburst in Jos more than 1,000 people died in one week.

Since then, several hundreds more have died as rival Muslim-Christian militias attacked isolated villages and towns.

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Is terrorism really the last desperate resort of the poor? Dawood Ibrahim has 430 million dollars. From Asia Times, with thanks to Jean-Luc:

While all attention is focused on Osama bin Laden and his cohorts allegedly cornered in western Pakistan, in India there is an equal amount of interest in the one man who is wanted just as desperately - Dawood Ibrahim. . . .

The hunt for Dawood is taking place following Pakistan's realization that flushing out terrorists and jihadi elements has become a necessity for its own survival. Pakistan has currently amassed 20,000 troops along the Afghanistan border for what is being believed to be a decisive battle against bin Laden and al-Qaeda militants. But what might be more than a coincidence is that Pakistan's sudden willingness to flush out Dawood comes amid reports in the Indian media that a timely tip-off by the Indian intelligence agency Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) helped foil a third assassination plot against Musharraf. Two abortive attempts have been reported in the past few months. There is, however, no doubt in anyone's mind that Dawood is indisputably the number one criminal wanted by India, and what has rankled is that he has for long used Pakistan as a base. . . .

It is the nature of the crimes attributed to Dawood that place him at the top of India's most wanted wish list. The son of a police constable, he is the prime suspect in masterminding a series of bomb blasts that occurred in a single day in 1993 in Mumbai (formerly Bombay), the financial heart of India, killing 260 people and injuring 1,000. . . .

It is estimated that in Mumbai alone, Dawood and his family own assets worth US$430 million. This includes several buildings at prime locations such as Colaba, Crawford Market, Bhendi Bazar, Bandra, Oshiwara and Versova. Many of these are benami (fictitious names), which makes it difficult to seize them. The family has several builders, stockbrokers and jewelers fronting for it. Apart from this, Dawood has vast business interests in the hospitality industry in the United Arab Emirates, Canada, Australia and India. Several shopping malls in the West and Australia are also reportedly owned by the family. Dawood has also allegedly began operating an airline from a Central Asian republic.

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The New York Post (as if you couldn't tell from the headline) reviews a new book about female suicide bombers, Barbara Victor's Army of Roses (Rodale Press).

The Israeli occupation, Victor finds, does not fully explain Palestinian terrorism. Rather, its roots lie in the "culture of death" that Palestinian leaders have promoted. Hamas and Islamic Jihad have been at the forefront of fusing martyrdom with patriotism. The popularity of these groups prompted Yasser Arafat to authorize his own al-Aqsa Martyr's Brigade to engage in terrorism and in 2002, Arafat began calling for the recruitment of women as Shihada (female martyrs) to create "an army of roses that will crush Israeli tanks."

Not to be outdone, Hamas, normally religiously conservative, issued a fatwa permitting women to become suicide bombers. . . .

This book explodes the myth that Palestinian terrorism would cease if Israel's occupation ended. Terrorism now functions in Palestinian society in ways that are independent of Israel.

The lesson is that peace will necessarily require a sea change within Palestinian society, one that, unfortunately, shows little sign of occurring.

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

There is a great deal of value in this MEMRI report on Muslim Anti-Semitism, but one passage in particular caught my eye, as I discuss this phenomenon at length in Onward Muslim Soldiers:

It is indeed unfortunate that the status of the Jews as a tolerated minority in the Muslim world before the advent of Zionism has come to figure prominently in the competition between Jews and Arabs to enlist public opinion. The lay reader is often at a loss between the arguments on both sides. On the one hand, he hears that Jews (and Christians) had the status of a protected minority under Islam, and that Jews in Muslim Spain enjoyed a golden age of peace and prosperity; on the other, he is told that Jews and Christians had no legal equality and were never anything other than second-class citizens. These conflicting versions are put into a balanced perspective by Bernard Lewis:

Even at its best, medieval Islam was rather different from the picture provided by Disraeli and other romantic writers. The golden age of equal rights was a myth, and belief in it was a result, more than a cause, of Jewish sympathy for Islam. The myth was invented by Jews in 19th-century Europe as a reproach to Christians - and taken up by Muslims in our own time as a reproach to Jews.

Like most powerful myths, this story contains an element of historic truth. If tolerance means the absence of persecution, then classic Islamic society was indeed tolerant to both its Jewish and its Christian subjects - more tolerant perhaps in Spain than in the East, and in either incomparably more tolerant than was medieval Christendom. But if tolerance means the absence of discrimination, then Islam never was or claimed to be tolerant, but on the contrary insisted on the privileged superiority of the true believer in this world as well as the next.

Read it all.

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

An official webpage on the U.S. State Department site celebrates "Muslim Life in America." I looked in vain for similar pages celebrating Christian, Jewish, Hindu, and Buddhist Life in America.

Daniel Pipes, whose own site alerted me to this (with thanks to LGF), points out that "the State Department provides links to and thereby endorses groups that the federal government has either effectively shut down (the American Muslim Council), is currently investigating (Islamic Society of North America), or has arrested multiple employees of (Council on American-Islamic Relations). Additionally, other organizations on the list (Council on Islamic Education, Islamic Institute, Muslim Public Affairs Council) were long ago exposed as sympathetic to militant Islam."

No links, however, to danielpipes.org. Or Jihad Watch.

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

February 26, 2004

She will try again, and kill even children. From the Telegraph:

A woman suicide bomber arrested by Israeli forces as she prepared to blow up a Tel Aviv bus station vowed yesterday to carry out a successful "martyr attack" as soon as she is freed from jail. "Yes, I will do it again if I can," said Obeida Khalil, 27. "When I put the suicide explosives belt on I felt very happy, very content. I was angry when they caught me because I was not able to be a martyr.

"I wanted to be the first female martyr and to kill as many Israeli soldiers as possible. I chose the bus station because my brother blew himself up there."

There have been seven female Palestinian suicide bombers. Two of them alone have claimed 25 lives. Another 24 bombers, including Khalil, have been stopped before they could strike.

Speaking to The Telegraph in her cell in HaSharon prison near Netanya, Khalil, a member of Islamic Jihad from the village of Beit Wazan, near Nablus, said she had been pushed to act because of the Israeli occupation and the "murder" of her fiance.

"Four days before our wedding, he went up on the roof and he was shot dead by an Israeli helicopter. If we had been married, then I would have had children. I would have done other things for the jihad besides being a martyr.

"But before he died we had discussed being martyrs by blowing ourselves up together. With the help of God, we said, maybe both of us would do it and then we would be together forever."

Khalil is one of 74 female Palestinian prisoners kept in a special wing at HaSharon. It is divided between prisoners linked to Yasser Arafat's Fatah movement in one segregated group and Hamas and Islamic Jihad inmates in the other. They are kept locked up 21 hours a day in tiny shared cells and allowed three hours exercise in the wing's central yard. One prisoner had a baby and will be allowed to keep him until he is two.

Kaiera Sa'idi, 26, serving a life sentence for driving a suicide bomber, said she knew what she was doing might mean she would never see her four children again. "But I felt it was my duty and I believe God will take care of them."

Most of Khalil's time is spent reading the Koran, doing needlework and preparing what she feels she must do when released. Arrested 20 months ago, Khalil is serving a five-year sentence. Relatives are not allowed to visit because several family members have been suicide bombers.

Her mother, she said, understood why she wanted to kill herself. "Every Muslim wants to be a martyr. It was in me before I was born. The Israelis took my land and our state was conquered.

"People in Europe do not understand us but if they lived in Palestine they wouldn't ask questions about why we do what we do."

Although Khalil wanted to blow up soldiers in her planned attack in Tel Aviv she said it was legitimate to kill Jewish children because one day they would serve in the Israeli army.

| 45 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

_39857688_milan_ap203body.jpeg
Milan's Duomo: possibly a target

Several imams have been arrested on suspicions of terror plotting in Italy. The spectacle of religious teachers being arrested for this kind of activity has become so commonplace as to escape notice. But it points up vividly the problem that Muslims face globally: radicalism is coming from those who should be most familiar with the supposedly peaceful teachings of the religion. Global reform is needed, but it is not at all on the horizon. From the BBC, with thanks to Jean-Luc.

Italian police have arrested three North Africans suspected of plotting to bomb Milan's metro and a cathedral in the north of the country. Arrest warrants had been issued for five men from Morocco and Tunisia, who served as Muslim religious leaders in the city of Cremona.

The suspected cell members are under investigation for conspiracy to commit "international terrorism". . . .

The crackdown targeted an alleged cell linked to a mosque in the city of Cremona.

Investigators believe the men planned to blow up the Milan metro stop below the cathedral in December 2002 and also to bomb the Cremona cathedral.

"The subversive cells have maintained themselves over time, working out of the mosque of Cremona and led by the successive imams," Brescia's attorney general said.

Another ex-imam of the Cremona mosque was arrested last October, after being accused by Morocco of links to the suicide bombings in Casablanca that killed 45 people in May.

| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Gulf News thinks that the notorious Zarqawi letter is a forgery, for some interesting reasons.

The London-based daily Al Hayat recently published a letter allegedly written by Abu Musab Al Zarqawi, America's most sought after man in Iraq due to his connections with Al Qaida.

The US has placed a reward of $10 million on his capture.

If true, the letter provides invaluable insight into the workings of a terrorist's mind. Its publication has stirred much debate and received wide condemnation - as well as scepticism - from Arab writers and intellectuals.

Some analysts have expressed doubt over the letter's authenticity, since all of Al Qaida's content is marked by optimism for future actions and plans.

This particular letter, according to critics, more or less harbours pessimism as it repeatedly mentions how all doors are being shut in the face of the mujahideen. The contents of the letter are highly inflammatory and full of religious overtones.

Gulf News publishes this letter to give the reader some understanding of the writer's perspective, and it should be read in this context.

The letter, according to the website Elaph, was found on a man - captured by Kurdish troops - who they claim was a close confidante-cum-messenger of Al Zarqawi. The man captured was en route to delivering the letter to his supporters in Iraq.

The Jordanian Al Zarqawi was sentenced in absentia in 2000 by a Jordanian court to 15 years in prison for his role in plotting to carry out a series of attacks against Western interests in Jordan.

The US State Department last year also labelled Al Zarqawi as one of the most senior Al Qaida leaders with close ties with Osama bin Laden and Ayman Al Zawahiri.

Addressed to 'two brothers', a reference that is assumed to be made to bin Laden and Al Zawahri, the letter maps out in detail the agenda for the coming four months in carrying out attacks against the Americans. It calls for turning Iraq into a new battlefield against the Americans.

It further details the ethnic break-up of Iraqi society, describing each group in detail, whether they are supporters of Al Qaida or not, and how they are to be treated accordingly.

Gulf News has translated excerpts of the controversial letter.

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The harsh situation of Christians in postwar Iraq. From VOANews, with thanks to Jean-Luc:

Many Iraqis who fled to Syria for safety before, during and just after the war in Iraq say they still are afraid to go home.

Nearly a year after the war in Iraq, Seita Daoud sits in a sparsely furnished, badly heated apartment in a poor neighborhood of Damascus. She says she is afraid to go home. "It was not easy to leave my country," she says. "I was born in Iraq. I raised my children there. But it is too hard and too uncertain there now."

A few days after Baghdad fell to U.S. forces, Seita Daoud packed up her family of nine and headed for safety across the border in Syria. She had already sold off most of their possessions, keeping only a few family photos, including a portrait of her husband who had died years before.

Speaking the ancient language of her Assyrian Christian community, Seita says she is still not sure what to do. "I am ready to go back," she says, "but first I must be sure of security to raise my children. They all left their schools and their jobs. What will we find when we go back," she asks.

Seita is not alone. She says most of her Assyrian Christian neighbors, several hundred families, are here in Damascus with her. "Some," she says, "have arrived in the past few months. They say Iraq is too unstable for religious minorities."

Her son Yvan is blunt. "We number fewer than two-million," he says, "with no strong tribal leaders or big politicians to protect us."

U.S. officials and members of the Iraqi Governing Council insist ethnic and religious minorities, which make up about three-percent of the population, will be legally protected by any future government.

Yvan is not convinced. He says minorities suffered under Saddam Hussein and he does not want to see it happen again.

He acknowledges that Iraq's majority Shiite Muslim community was harshly persecuted by Saddam Hussein. Now, he worries how Christians and other religious minorities would be treated if strict Islamists gain control of a future government.

His mother worries more about the violence and lack of jobs. "Where would we find work," Seita asks. "You need a connection to get work with the Americans." But she shakes her head. "And, those who do work with the Americans are afraid," she says, "because the Americans are targets and Iraqis working with them are too."

For 26-year-old Taygor, the decision to leave was easy. Like other university students, he says he had to sign up for military training and he did not want to fight to defend Saddam Hussein. He left school and Iraq well before war began. "Saddam ruined our lives. He ruined our society," Taygor says. "Everything that is happening now is a result of what he did when he was in power."

Taygor cheered when the U.S.-led coalition took control of his country, but he says he has no desire to go back even now that Saddam Hussein is gone.

Neither does 33-year-old Anwar Deriyawish, another Iraqi Christian from Baghdad. The former welder lived in a rented house with his wife and children. "I have nothing there. Why should I go back," he asks.

Anwar has applied for a visa to Australia, but speaks no English and is not optimistic he will ever go there.

In contrast, Seita Daoud has no doubts she and her children will return to Iraq one day. She just cannot say when that day will come.

| 1 Comment
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Megawati.jpg
Megawati (AFP)

The US and its allies are behaving with "exceptional injustice" toward Muslim countries, says Indonesian President Megawati Sukarnoputri. From Smh.com.au, with thanks to Jean-Luc:

Mrs Megawati sought to contrast the way Indonesia had used the law to find and prosecute its terrorists with the "unilateral" US-led invasion of Iraq. The remarks opened an international conference of Islamic scholars, which her government partly funded.

"It may be due to either coincidence or intention, but an exceptional injustice is apparent in the attitude and action of big countries towards countries [whose] major populations are Muslims," she told 300 delegates from Islamic universities and governments around the world.

Indonesia, she said, had the right idea:

Indonesia was a genuinely moderate Muslim society that used the justice system to oppose terrorism, such as the bombings in Bali, she said. "The nation resolutely repudiates and legally prosecutes those perpetrating acts of violence against others, despite their conviction that those are religious acts."

Hmm. What about the light treatment meted out to Abu Bakar Bashir?

Megawati was also exercised about France:

Although France had staunchly opposed the Iraqi invasion, she said it was guilty of perpetrating a "far smaller" injustice towards Muslims by its recent move to restrict women and girls from wearing the Islamic head scarf.

Such discriminatory acts would be seen as test cases in Muslim countries to judge whether "those big countries are serious in practising the human rights they have preached to the whole world since the past 20th century".

What tests, if any, meanwhile, would Muslim countries themselves have to take regarding human rights? Megawati did have a few comments:

But she also criticised Islamic society and said it too needed to change and present "a more peaceful facade". She urged Islamic leaders to become more open to ideas and technological advances in the West that were leaving Islamic societies behind.

"Islamic scholars need to formulate and develop a socio-religious conception that is more open, more inclusive, which provides space to the pluralism of mankind that is so diverse."

Indonesia's 40 million strong Islamic group Nahdlatul Ulama organised the meeting with government help to redress the "stigmatisation of Islam as a religion that accommodates acts of violence", a conference document said.

If Nahdlatul Ulama really wants to do that, it will have to address jihad ideology. I doubt that was on the agenda.

| 13 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

February 25, 2004

Until Muslim groups worldwide face up to the involvement of "Islamic teachers" in terrorist acts, and do something to prevent it, military actions will not win a decisive or lasting victory in the war on terror. From Reuters:

An Indonesian court on Wednesday sentenced an Islamic teacher, believed to have been a leader of the most feared militant group in South-east Asia, to three years in jail for hiding one of the Bali bombers.

Abu Rusydan, who is believed by authorities to have taken over cleric Abu Bakar Bashir's role as leader of the shadowy Jemaah Islamiah (JI) group six months before the deadly 2002 Bali bombings, was found guilty of involvement in acts of terror.

Prosecutors had asked for nine years in jail for Rusydan.

"The defendant has been proven guilty of purposely carrying out acts of terror by giving leeway to a terror suspect and hiding information on a terror crime," Judge Machmud Rochimi told the South Jakarta court.

About 200 supporters of the 43-year-old Central Java religious teacher chanted "Allahu Akbar" (God is greatest) after the verdict was read out and punched their fists in the air.

Rusydan was charged with hiding Mukhlas, top controller of the Bali blast operation, while he was on the run from the police.

Prosecutors had told the court Rusydan led a meeting a few days after the blast that killed 202 people and a participant heard Mukhlas say "the perpetrators of the Bali bombings were us".

Prosecutors say Rusydan became JI caretaker after Bashir took over leadership of the Indonesian Mujahidin Council, a hardline Islamic group advocating full implementation of Islamic sharia law in Indonesia, the world's most populous Muslim country.

Rusydan has admitted he led the meeting and helped Bashir but has denied he had anything to do with a terror organisation.

About 30 people, including many accused of being JI members, have been convicted for their role in the Bali attacks, the worst since the September 11 strikes on the United States.

Three, including Mukhlas, have been sentenced to death.

A separate Jakarta court in September found Bashir guilty of treason and sentenced him to four years, but said accusations he was JI's chief were unproven. A higher court later acquitted Bashir of treason and reduced his jail term to three years.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

So said British Home Secretary David Blunkett, who also had some choice words for opponents of anti-terror measures. From the Australian, with thanks to Nicolei:

A TERRORIST attack in Britain was inevitable, British Home Secretary David Blunkett said.

Security measures alone were not sufficient to stop the threat, he said. Asked if such an attack was a question of "when, not if", Blunkett told BBC television: "Yes, it's the view that's been expressed by the head of the (home) security service", Eliza Manningham-Buller.

Blunkett said that a suicide attack was "the most likely" scenario in Britain, which has been a staunch supporter of the US in its so-called war on terror.

Blunkett told the BBC that Prime Minister Tony Blair "and I have confirmed that whatever we do - and we are doing everything we can - we can't guarantee and nor should we pretend to that we can protect ourselves forever by security alone.

"But we can do a damn good job if we enable the security services to be able to apprehend people before rather than after they have committed the act," Blunkett said, adding: "In this country the threat is extremely real."

His comments came the day before he was due to publish a controversial paper setting out possible options for introducing tough new counter-terrorism laws in Britain.

The proposed measures were expected to feature radical proposals such as lowering the standard of proof in terrorist-linked court cases and introducing secret trials heard by security-vetted judges.

The plans have been fiercely criticised by human rights campaigners.

But Blunkett argued that Britain now faced a threat different from that of attacks carried out by Northern Ireland paramilitary groups during decades of violence in the British-ruled province.

"Whatever they (such groups) did, and it was horrendous, they actually always tried to save their own lives."

But they were not "as terrorism is from Al-Qaeda and the network around it, geared up to suicide bombers who can take our lives at any time in ways that we never perceived before.

"So prevention rather than simply prosecution and punishment have to be the way forward. Because prosecution and punishment to a terrorist who is prepared to take his or her own life as well as everyone else's is a meaningless concept."

Blunkett said that the document he was to unveil today "explains more of how al-Qaeda cells organise and operate".

"Without this information, we cannot have an informed debate about how to balance our security with our rights," he said in an interview with Britain's domestic Press Association.

Blunkett called for a debate to produce solutions to the international terrorist threat, a step he admitted risked attracting the derision of his political opponents.

"I am fed up with what little debate we have in this country being dictated by the campaigners and lawyers who only say how rights are being damaged rather than come up with some solutions. In short, I want answers and ideas, not just brickbats."

Blunkett added: "I live with constant, never-ending worry day and night about the threat we face and whether we are doing everything we can to make this country as safe as possible."

The Home Secretary was also expected to unveil details of a 50-per-cent expansion of Britain's home security service, known as MI5, which is to hire 1000 new staff to counter the threat of terrorism.

| 44 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

I have long argued that the worldwide jihadist movement is not restricted to any single organization. Now, after virtually everything has been blamed on Al-Qaeda for awhile, this is being acknowledged. From AP, with thanks to EPG:

Al-Qaida is damaged seriously, but it has spread its radical agenda to other groups that now pose the leading threat to the United States, CIA Director George Tenet and other intelligence chiefs said.

Tenet described a terrorist organization lacking central leadership and squeezed financially. Al-Qaida remains determined to attack U.S. interests, however, and still is capable of carrying out assaults on the scale of Sept. 11, 2001, he said Tuesday.

In addition, dozens of smaller Islamic extremist organizations with ties to al-Qaida have emerged, in places like Libya, Iraq and Uzbekistan, to constitute the next wave of terrorist threats, Tenet told the Senate Intelligence Committee in an annual public session on national security threats.

"The steady growth of Osama bin Laden's anti-American sentiment through the wider Sunni extremist movement and the broad dissemination of al-Qaida's destructive expertise ensure that a serious threat will remain for the foreseeable future, with or without al-Qaida in the picture," Tenet said.

At Tuesday's politically charged hearing, given recent debate over the intelligence community's prewar assessments on Iraq's weapons, Tenet and other officials walked gingerly through questions on the intelligence agencies' cooperation and effectiveness. They touched on instability in countries from Haiti to Afghanistan, although Iraq dominated much of the discussion.

On Iraq, Vice Adm. Lowell E. Jacoby, director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, said allies of deposed Iraqi President Saddam Hussein are thought to be responsible for most anti-U.S. attacks. Foreign fighters, including those from al-Qaida, have carried out some of the most significant attacks and may be behind the high-casualty suicide bombings largely against Iraqi targets, he said.

"Left unchecked," Jacoby said, "Iraq has the potential to serve as a training ground for the next generation of terrorists."

Further, many in the country's Sunni minority, which prospered during Saddam's Baath party control, have yet to decide whether to support the U.S. coalition or the resistance, Jacoby said. "The key factors in this decision are stability and a future that presents viable alternatives to the Baathists or Islamists," he said.

Largely ignoring an appeal from the committee chairman, Pat Roberts, R-Kan., to focus on current threats, Republican and Democratic lawmakers questioned the intelligence chiefs about intelligence mistakes before the Sept. 11 attacks and the war in Iraq. The agencies' performance in those crises has called into question the reliability of intelligence and the Bush administration's pre-emptive strike doctrine.

Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, asked Tenet how, since a National Security Strategy promulgated in September 2002 set up a strategy of pre-emption, Bush and other administration officials used words like "grave and gathering threat" to describe the level of Saddam's danger to the United States. International law traditionally requires that a threat be "imminent" before a nation can defend against it.

"If it wasn't an imminent threat in your mind, how would you have characterized or assessed the threat?" Snowe asked.

Tenet said intelligence analysts were "quite worried " about surprise attacks and what they didn't know, given Saddam's history of deception. Estimates also indicated he had biological and chemical weapons, and other programs. "Whether it stands up or it doesn't stand up over the course of time is something we're going to look at quite carefully," he said.

"People voted to authorize the use of force based on what we read in these reports," said Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif. "It's a pretty bitter pill to swallow, particularly with a pre-emptive war."

After the hearing, Roberts told reporters that "everybody would have some second thoughts" about the rationalization for war, but he believes that Saddam posed a national security threat, "in some ways even more dangerous" than expected, due to the deterioration of his leadership.

Also at the hearing:

-Tenet said officials have uncovered plans to recruit pilots and evade security measures in Southeast Asia, the Middle East and Europe. In the last year, officials also have seen an increase in threats from more sophisticated chemical, biological and radiological weapons. They've learned of widely disseminated instructions for an improvised chemical weapon, he said.

-When asked if the country is safer today than a year ago, Tenet, Jacoby and FBI Director Robert Mueller all said yes. Mueller later cautioned that threats may be more significant because of the decentralization that followed the undoing of many terrorist leaders and their sanctuaries in Afghanistan. He said the country is safer, however, because of government protection.

-Tenet rejected suggestions that the CIA did not follow up on a 1999 German intelligence tip about one of the Sept. 11 hijackers, a first name and a phone number. "You got a name, named Joe, and here's the phone number," Tenet said. "We didn't have enough, but we didn't sit around."

-Tenet praised "great cooperation" from Muslim leaders, including Pakistani Gen. President Pervez Musharraf, who "remains a courageous and indispensable ally who has become the target of assassins for the help he's given us."

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The more civilians are killed in those buses and restaurants, the better Hizballah likes it. From the Dow Jones Newswire, :

Hezbollah is paying bonuses for each person Palestinian suicide bombers kill, the head of Israel's parliamentary defense and foreign affairs committee said Tuesday.

Committee chairman Yuval Steinitz told Dow Jones Newswires that the Lebanese guerrilla group is rewarding the cell organizers for each victim of suicide bombers.

Steinitz confirmed an Israel radio report citing the head of the Shin Bet security
service, Avi Dichter, who appeared before the committee earlier Tuesday, saying Hezbollah was making the payments. The Iranian-backed Hezbollah has been helping to finance attacks carried out by groups affiliated with Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat's Fatah movement since the Palestinian uprising against Israel broke out nearly 3 1/2 years ago.

But more recently, Hezbollah has begun paying individual terror cells a "bonus" of several hundred dollars for each individual victim killed, Steinitz said.

Hezbollah refused to comment on the report.

Steinitz said Israel is unsure how much money in total the Lebanese guerrilla group has paid to finance uprising-related terror activity.

Palestinian militants didn't immediately comment on the report, but have previously said that Hezbollah has said the payment depends on the size of the attack, although there is no fixed scale for victims.

The militants have said they get monthly payments from Hezbollah for basics such as ammunition and cellular phone cards, as well as larger lump sums of tens of thousands of dollars for individual attacks.

Israel and Hezbollah have been bitter enemies since Israeli troops occupied southern Lebanon more than two decades ago. Israel's withdrawal from Lebanon in 2000, and a Jan. 29 prisoner swap that also led to the release of 400 Palestinians from Israeli prisoners, haven't reduced the tensions.

Bounty payments for acts of terrorism are a familiar item on the Mideast landscape. Two years ago, then-Iraqi president Saddam Hussein began paying $25,000 to the families of suicide bombers, more than doubling previous payments of $10,000.

Israel also accuses Saudi Arabia of sponsoring Palestinian terror through payments to Islamic charities in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Saudi Arabia says the money is used for humanitarian purposes only.

A spokesman for the Al Aqsa martyrs' brigade, a militant group loosely affiliated with Arafat, later denied they were getting bonuses for killing more people.

Said Abu Mujahed: "Hezbollah is supporting the Al Aqsa brigades and the intifada financially as the Jews all over the world are supporting Israel. They are supporting us on the basis that they are Arabs and Muslims and they are supporting their brothers in resisting the occupation."

However, he said they weren't getting a lot of money from Hezbollah. "We get just enough to survive and struggle."

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Wage jihad, fight the Crusaders, topple the apostates of the House of Saud -- that's right, it's a new issue of the Al-Qaeda magazine "Voice of Jihad." From the SITE Institute, :

The 11th issue of the al-Qaeda biweekly "Sawt al-Jihad" [Voice of Jihad] online magazine has been released. In this issue, we find three main points of emphasis:

This issue places great emphasis on propaganda, especially through the internet. Time and again, the magazine states that one of the great successes of the mujahideen in the past year was managing to spread their ideas and mobilize public support, despite the Saudi regime's effort to stop them. In this context, the new Al-Qaeda video entitled "Badr Al-Riyadh" is referred to at length, with great emphasis on its impact. This video, we learn, has set the stage for a new phase, in which people will move from passively supporting the mujahideen to actively joining them in their holy war against the infidels.

As is characteristic of the magazine, we find the usual rhetoric calling on all Muslims to "fight the crusaders" in Saudi Arabia and in Iraq and to sacrifice themselves as martyrs for this holy cause.

The magazine continuously reemphasizes its clear, unambiguous hate-filled stand against the Saudi royal family ruling Saudi Arabia. They are presented as traitors who are collaborating with the "crusaders," and must be dealt with accordingly.

Propaganda

In an article summarizing the achievements of the mujahideen, the "most prominent victory" at this stage is ascribed to the mujahideen's ability to "prove the truth of their belief." The article goes on to explain that "this theoretical and theological war stands in the center of the current struggle."

This statement sheds some light on the mujahideen's view of their main objectives over the past months. Performing attacks against western targets was important, but the main objective had been that of mobilizing public support and gaining grass root legitimacy among the Muslims, despite the "vicious campaign against the mujahideen which has been carried out lately" by the "renegade regime."

Crowning these informative efforts was the video, "Badr Al-Riyadh." "This video had a great impact on the tyrants of the Peninsula, it baffled them, it destroyed everything they had done... Months, and even years of organized deceit went to waste in a mere 90 minutes."

Furthermore, this movie, we are told, has set the stage for a new phase, in which the mujahideen will move from gaining public support to mobilizing it for the holy war: "God willing, this will be the start of a new phase, the most prominent characteristic of which will be the movement of the jihad firebrand into the midst of the people." Instead of only passively sympathizing with mujahideen, people will move to "giving all possible support to the mujahideen, standing by them with heart and soul, with prayers and by urging sons to become time bombs and heroic commandos against the crusaders and their allies...".

According to this article about the video, between three and four hundred thousand people downloaded the movie from the internet in less than five days, parts of the video were broadcast by various TV news channels, and the video was also copied "in great numbers" on video cassettes and distributed all over Saudi Arabia.

Fighting the Crusaders

Opening the new Hijra year 1425, the 11th issue of the magazine begins with a summary of the "great events in the land of the two holy Mosques [Saudi Arabia]," in which "The mujahideen brigades set out to fight the crusaders and launch painful attacks against them...giving them a taste of what the Muslims are being subjected to everywhere by the criminal infidels, be it in Palestine, Chechnya, Afghanistan, Iraq, or Kashmir." The article describes and glorifies the two attacks that were carried out in the past year against western targets in Riyadh--the attack on the residential compounds in May and the attack on the Mahyah residential complex in November. The magazine stresses that despite their small number, "the quality of these attacks, as well as their actual and media impact, was great, creating havoc in the calculations of the crusaders and of their collaborators in the region."

In subsequent articles our attention is directed to the great power the Mujahideen have accumulated in the past year, managing "to establish training camps..., accumulate weapons, missiles, new equipment, and multiply the number of cells...; truly, they have become a country within a country!"

Characteristically, we also find fervent calls upon the Muslims to join this holy war: "We will bring our ardently desired Ummah back to the times of glory and honor...We will continue on this path until Allah will bring this about, or until we die...We will put all our efforts into fighting the crusaders, in order to raise the flag of the religion, so that the holy law of Allah, the Creator of the Worlds, may rule...O, Muslims, perform your duty! Persist, persevere, and fight. Place your trust in Allah, so that you may be successful."

Stand against Saudi Royal Family

It is impossible to overlook the hate-filled position held by the magazine against the Saudi regime, in general, and the Saudi royal family, in particular. In fact, such is its contempt for the regime that the magazine consistently abstains from referring to the family by its name, instead degradingly calling it "Al-Salul," meaning "the infiltrated family." The magazine further attacks the royal family, stating, "the collaborating governments of the [Arab] Peninsula have rendered logistical support to the crusading American army in its fight against Iraq" and are still continuing to do so.

The issue maintains that the way to handle a situation in which a country has been occupied and is being employed as a base for launching operations against Islam is clear. This country must be fought, "together with all who collaborate with it." Throughout the magazine, the Saudi government continues to be denounced in the context of aiding the Americans, arresting holy warriors, launching media campaigns against them, and doing all in their power to stand in their way.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The tragic story of Shafilea Ahmed is not necessarily one of honor killing; however, the girl was upset enough at the prospect of an arranged marriage to swallow bleach. As young Muslims in the West are increasingly caught between two cultures, we will see more of such stories. From the Telegraph, :

The parents of Shafilea Ahmed, the murdered Asian teenager, upstaged detectives yesterday when they gatecrashed a televised police briefing to deny that they were guilty of a so-called "honour killing".

Senior officers had just given details of how their daughter's badly decomposed body was found concealed in undergrowth when Iftikhar Ahmed, 44, and his wife, Farzana, 41, arrived with their legal team.

The couple, from Warrington, both of whom are on police bail after being arrested on suspicion of kidnap, were weeping and dabbing their eyes with handkerchiefs as they entered a privately-hired suite in a Cheshire hotel.

Det Chief Insp Geraint Jones, who is leading the investigation, looked surprised at their arrival and refused to allow them to sit at a table positioned in front of a Cheshire Police screen. A few minutes later, clearly embarrassed by the interruption, he and his team left the building.

Neither of the Ahmeds spoke during their protest. However, through their solicitor they insisted they were in no way involved in the death of their "beautiful and irreplaceable daughter".

They went on to accuse police of having become blinkered by a racial stereotype which dictated that as Asian parents they must have been involved in their daughter's murder. This was a course of action, they claimed, that was allowing "the real culprit" to remain at large.

Shafilea, 17, disappeared six months ago, shortly after returning from a trip to Pakistan where she had resisted the overtures of a distant cousin to take part in an arranged marriage.

While in Pakistan she became so distraught she swallowed a quantity of bleach. This burned her gullet so severely that she required hospital treatment both there and once she had returned to Britain. Shafilea spent most of Sept 11, 2003, at Priestley Sixth Form College and later went to a local call centre where she worked four nights a week.

Her mother picked her up and drove her home. She went to bed, as she did every night, with her seven-year-old sister. When the household awoke she had gone. She was reported missing eight days later by her former teachers at Great Sankey High School.

Cheshire Police have been convinced almost from the outset that Shafilea was kidnapped and possibly murdered. At press conferences they consistently refused to rule out the possibility that she was the victim of an honour killing.

Instead, they portrayed the "intelligent, ambitious and popular" teenager as a girl torn between traditional family ties and the Western culture she sought to embrace.

At home she spoke Urdu and observed Muslim prayers with her three sisters and younger brother. But at the same time she idolised R&B singers, wore tight jeans and secretly stored the mobile telephone numbers of male friends at college.

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

When under pressure, blame the Zionists. The Tehran Times is resorting to this in the face of IAEA findings about Iran's nuclear program. From MEMRI, :

"Pressured by U.S. officials and supported by the Zionists, some officials from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and its official website have started fabricating lies about the Iranian nuclear program, and even allowing some secret news about the Iranian nuclear program to leak to Western media. Such moves show the Iranian officials should have considered suspending cooperation with the IAEA rather than suspending enriching uranium.

"Recently, diplomats from the Vienna-based IAEA have warned about the increasing U.S. pressure on the IAEA top officials, including its director Muhammad El-Baradei and some inspectors, in order to egg on them [sic] to give a negative report on Iran's cooperation with the IAEA. Even an expert from the IAEA told the Mehr News Agency about secret meetings between the IAEA senior officials and some envoys from the U.S. and Israeli intelligence services in recent weeks. The expert even didn't rule out the possibility of bribing or threatening IAEA officials by these secret services.

"Some observers in Vienna have evaluated the U.S. pressure on El-Baradei as so high that he has become depressed and passive. Even a Western diplomat from the UN nuclear watchdog has said there is no certainty the statements aired inside the IAEA headquarters are not eavesdropped. Some evidences including recent statements by El-Baradei, stressing the necessity of tough inspection of the members' nuclear sites, especially after unfounded allegations by the U.S. officials over Iran's nuclear program and a wide coverage of these rumors by the Western media despite a close cooperation between Tehran and the IAEA would clearly show that the agency has been degenerated into an international political tool for pushing forward the U.S. unilateral policies in the world. There are some other indications to substantiate the point."

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

February 24, 2004

From the Observer, with thanks to Susan:

Ayse was 14 when she was smuggled into Britain and forced to marry her cousin. Family members turned out in large numbers to welcome her at the illegal ceremony in a north London public hall.

'They kept whispering in my ear to ask why I wasn't smiling,' recalls Ayse, now 20 and living in a refuge in east London. 'I told them I was terrified and desperate, that I was just a child and far too young to get married. I pleaded with them to help me escape, but no one saw anything wrong in what was happening. I begged my husband not to marry me, but he told me I had no choice.'

Despite being two years below the British age of consent, Ayse was moved into her cousin's family home, where she lived openly as his wife in the local Kurdish Turkish community.

'I was all alone in a foreign country, unable to speak the language,' she said. 'I was trapped. Until I escaped, I didn't even realise that marrying at 14 wasn't legal in Britain: everyone I knew in London regarded it as normal.'

In the two years before she reached 16, the sex Ayse was coerced into having with her cousin was statutory rape. 'It was disgusting, awful,' she said. 'I used to scream and cry all night. I was too young, too tender. It killed me inside. Life became meaningless.'

Ayse's new family refused her permission to continue school and kept her a virtual prisoner in their home. During her four-and-a-half year marriage, Ayse was treated as a servant by her new family and prevented from speaking to anyone outside their immediate circle.

As she matured, Ayse became increasingly desperate and, after twice attempting suicide, found the courage to climb through a window and flee.

'I knew the cost escaping would have on my life. I now live in fear of being tracked down and killed by my husband's family. I have been rejected by my family back home and by the Kurdish community here. As a young girl, I could not face the thought of how my life would be if I escaped. But once I became a woman, I developed the strength to take that step.'

Authorities have long battled to stop the traffic in underage British girls taken back to their country of origin to be married off by their parents. But an Observer investigation has discovered that a growing number are now being married without leaving Britain. The ceremonies are known as community marriages.

'They're happening and numbers are growing,' said Peter Cripps, head of the Community Safety Unit at Shoreditch police station in east London. The Metropolitan Police is one of the few forces to admit that such marriages take place on its territory.

'I'd say we were at the stage with community marriages now that we were at with honour killings six years ago. That is, the idea is so horrible and incredible most people don't accept they're happening. Six years ago, honour killings were barely even talked about, but now the police are getting convictions. Basically, we're waiting for community marriages to hit the news the same way, then we expect a flurry of cases.'

Community marriages are held in accordance with the religious laws of many south Asian, Turkish, Middle Eastern and north African cultures. After the ceremony, the girl is moved into the home of her 'husband'. She is raped in the name of marital sex, frequently abused by her new family and allowed to attend school only if it would attract the attention of the law if she left.

Ann Cryer, MP for Keighley, has demanded an urgent meeting with the Minister for Children, Margaret Hodge, next week to discuss the issue. Cryer, who drove through Labour's action plan on forced marriages now wants to create similar guidelines for underage community marriages.

'Entire communities are complicit in this,' she said. 'And unless the Government does something about it, a rapidly increasing number of underage girls will be forced into situations where they are subjected to statutory rape in the name of culture and tradition.'

Cryer learnt this specific form of forced marriage existed only when she received a call from a school concerning a 15-year-old who is now believed to have been married to a 41-year-old relative.

'A young girl had gone to her teachers one Friday before Christmas, saying she didn't want to go home because she suspected her parents intended marrying her off that weekend,' she said.

But when the teachers phoned social services, they were told the earliest appointment available was the following Tuesday. 'The school protested, but social services were unmoved,' Cryer said. 'It was a completely inappropriate response and we've launched an investigation.'

The teachers were eventually forced to take her back home. Their intervention, however, seemed to have dissuaded the parents from carrying out their plans, but a few weeks later the school contacted Cryer again. 'Apparently the child's demeanour has completely changed in the past few weeks,' she said.

She has begun missing school for long periods of time and when she attends, a man waits for her at the gates at break times, lunch and after school. 'When she does turn up, she is completely introverted,' said Cryer. 'It's like she's in deep trauma or shock.'

Cryer is investigating, but her attempt is complicated by the fact the child is now refusing to talk. 'If the case is going to stick, we have to persuade the girl to give evidence against her family and if we go in, all guns blazing, she could deny the whole thing,' she said.

The hermetic nature of the communities involved means that in the vast majority of cases no one who is not a close family friend is aware that any specific ceremony is taking place.

'We know this happens a lot, but it tends not to come to wider notice until much later when the girl seeks help and is able to find a way of doing so,' said Dave Macnaghten, who sits on the Association of Chief Police Officers' forced marriage steering group. 'Unfortunately, if that happens at all, it takes place many years afterwards when the girl has found the maturity and courage to escape.'

Even those who live and work in the community have been unable to solve the problem 'We don't hear of the cases where the marriage takes place in this country any more than the authorities do,' said Houzan Mahmoud, a domestic violence adviser for the Middle East Centre for Women's Rights. 'These communities have become ghettoised. The girls don't know where to go for help. They believe the prestige of their whole family is at stake.'

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

F4B177313624466F87EAAADFD186E2CE.jpeg

Celebrating 9/11 at the Royal Scottish Academy. From AFP, with thanks to "Allah":

Art show organisers have defended a sculpture of Mickey Mouse flying a plane into the World Trade Centre, saying it was about "making you think".

Mickey's Taliban Adventures is one of almost 300 pieces in the Royal Scottish Academy's student exhibition in Edinburgh, which opened to the public on Saturday.

The exhibition by final-year and postgraduate students from Scotland's art and architectural schools also includes a short film showing the dying moments of a poisoned mouse.

The Twin Towers work - based on the attack on New York on 11 September 2001 in which 2752 people died - was made by Alan Bennie of the Edinburgh College of Art.

It shows the Disney figurehead flying a toy plane into cartoon-like foam models of the World Trade Centre, which have been given eyes to lend them a surprised expression, as well as flames made of felt.

"I don't think it's a particularly shocking piece," said Colin Greenslade, exhibitions co-ordinator for the Royal Scottish Academy.

Universal icon

"The Twin Towers have become an icon and everyone has their own feelings about it, whether they knew people who were involved or can just remember where they were when it happened," he said.

"This is about making you think."

The film of the poisoned mouse, by student Jock Mooney, is exhibited next to a statement explaining the circumstances, following complaints from animal rights activists.

In it, Mooney said the mouse had already been poisoned when he found it outside his flat and that his film was intended to show the effects of the methods used to get rid of rodents.

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Al-Qaeda is still full of threats and murder -- oh, and they're not too happy about France and that headscarf thing, either. From AP, :

Audiotapes purported to be from Osama bin Laden's top lieutenant aired on Arabic TV stations Tuesday, one taunting President Bush and threatening more attacks on the United States, the second criticizing France's decision to ban Islamic headscarves in schools.

Portions of separate audiotapes attributed to Ayman al-Zawahri were broadcast a few hours apart on Al-Arabiya and Al-Jazeera, competing pan-Arab satellite channels based in the Persian Gulf. Officials at both stations said they had aired only excerpts judged newsworthy. The two stations said they had received different tapes.

In Al-Jazeera's tape, the voice believed to be that of al-Zawahri challenged Bush's claim to have liberated Iraq and indicated al-Qaida is still running operations from Afghanistan.

"We remind Bush that situation is not stable in Afghanistan, or else how do we wage, with God's support and might, our attacks on your troops and agents. ... How do we send our messages that challenge you and reveal your lies," the tape said.

"We remind Bush that he didn't destroy two-thirds of Al-Qaida. On the contrary, thanks be to God, al-Qaida is still in the holy war battleground raising the banner of Islam in the face of the Zionist-Crusader campaign against the Islamic community," it added.

In his State of the Union address in January, Bush said "nearly two-thirds" of al-Qaida's known leaders had been captured or killed.

"Bush, fortify your targets, tighten your defense, intensify your security measures," the voice warned, "because the fighting Islamic community -- which sent you New York and Washington battalions -- has decided to send you one battalion after the other, carrying death and seeking heaven."

The audiotape aired by Dubai-based al-Arabiya also criticized France's decision to ban religious symbols in public buildings, including headscarves worn by Muslim women. The law is expected to go before the French Senate early next month, where little opposition exists.

"The decision of the French president to issue a law to prevent Muslim girls from covering their heads in schools is another example of the Crusader's envy, which Westerners have against Muslims," the voice said in Al-Arabiya's tape. "This envy boils in their hearts and overflows in their chests and they pass it on to the generations."

Both stations identified the voice on their tapes as that of al-Zawahri, and both said they had received the material on Tuesday. Officials at both stations spoke on condition of anonymity.

The Al-Arabiya official said his station's analysts believed the voice to be al-Zawahri's and that the station believed it was authentic primarily because of the source from which it received the tape, which he would not disclose. The Al-Jazeera official said only that his station had received the material over telephone lines and that al-Zawahri's voice was familiar to his staff.

The voice on both tapes sounded identical. The tone and rhetoric were familiar from previous videotapes and audiotapes also believed to be from al-Zawahri, though it was not possible to independently confirm the speaker's identity.

Al-Zawahri, an Egyptian-born physician, is thought to be in hiding along with bin Laden in the mountains somewhere along the rugged border between Afghanistan and Pakistan.

The tapes come at a time when Pakistani forces backed by helicopters were searching villages in a remote border region between Pakistan and Afghanistan where bin Laden and Taliban suspects are believed to be hiding. The fugitives were believed to have taken refuge among tribes.

The voice on Al-Arabiya's tape singled out Egypt's foremost religious leader, Mohammed Sayed Tantawi, the grand sheik of Al-Azhar, calling his support of the French decision "a scandal."

Tantawi issued an edict early this year asking Muslim women living in France to comply with French laws on religious symbols. His first remarks defending the ban were made Dec. 30, so the tape would have been made sometime after that.

The French decision has sparked protests across the Islamic world.

A French Foreign Ministry official, responding to the tape, reiterated Tuesday his country's position that the law is meant to protect the country's secular foundations and is not directed at Muslims or any particular religion.

Al-Qaida is blamed for the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in the United States. Tapes by the group have focused on the wars with the Americans and their allies in Afghanistan and Iraq. France has strongly opposed the U.S.-led war in Iraq.

The last time a videotape of al-Zawahri was released on Arab television was in September. It showed the bearded, turbaned cleric climbing down a craggy mountainside with bin Laden.

| 67 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The CIA had a chance in 1999 -- and blew it. From the New York Times:

American investigators were given the first name and telephone number of one of the Sept. 11 hijackers two and a half years before the attacks on New York and Washington, but the United States appears to have failed to pursue the lead aggressively, American and German officials say.

The information -- the earliest known signal that the United States received about any of the hijackers -- has now become an important element of an independent commission's investigation into the events of Sept. 11, 2001, officials said Monday. It is considered particularly significant because it may have represented a missed opportunity for American officials to penetrate the Qaeda terror cell in Germany that was at the heart of the plot. And it came roughly 16 months before the hijacker showed up at flight schools in the United States.

In March 1999, German intelligence officials gave the Central Intelligence Agency the first name and telephone number of Marwan al-Shehhi, and asked the Americans to track him.

The name and phone number in the United Arab Emirates had been obtained by the Germans by monitoring the telephone of Mohamed Heidar Zammar, an Islamic militant in Hamburg who was closely linked to the important Qaeda plotters who ultimately mastermined the Sept. 11 attacks, German officials said.

After the Germans passed the information on to the C.I.A., they did not hear from the Americans about the matter until after Sept. 11, a senior German intelligence official said.

"There was no response" at the time, the official said. After receiving the tip, the C.I.A. decided that "Marwan" was probably an associate of Osama bin Laden, but never tracked him down, American officials say.

The Germans considered the information on Mr. Shehhi particularly valuable, and the commission is keenly interested in why it apparently did not lead to greater scrutiny of him.

The information concerning Mr. Shehhi, the man who took over the controls of United Airlines Flight 175, which flew into the south tower of the World Trade Center, came months earlier than well-documented tips about other hijackers, including two who were discovered to have attended a meeting of militants in Malaysia in January 2000.

The independent commission investigating the attacks has received information on the 1999 Shehhi tip, and is actively investigating the issue, said Philip Zelikow, executive director of the commission.

American intelligence officials and others involved with the matter say they are uncertain whether Mr. Shehhi's phone was ever monitored.

An American official said: "The Germans did give us the name `Marwan' and a phone number, but we were unable to come up with anything. It was an unlisted phone number in the U.A.E., which he was known to use."

| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Kenneth Timmerman in Insight has valuable background on Khaled Saffuri, a man whose influence has reached to the White House:

The rise of Khaled Saffuri to political prominence within the U.S. Muslim community has all the ingredients of a Horatio Alger success story. Brought up as a stateless exile in Kuwait, Saffuri came to America as a student in 1982, went to college in San Diego, and soon gravitated into the world of Muslim activism.

A talented fund-raiser and behind-the-scenes power broker, Saffuri built bridges to politicians in both parties by generously contributing to their election campaigns, from California libertarian Rep. Dana Rohrabacher in the GOP to Rep. Cynthia McKinney, the hard-left Georgia Democrat. He has worked to get President Bill Clinton to intervene in Bosnia. He has taken members of Congress on trips to Arab countries. He has lobbied hard but quietly against pro-Israel legislation. In 1998, along with Republican activist Grover Norquist, Saffuri established the Islamic Institute in Washington with the stated purpose of promoting free-market ideals in the Muslim world and of bringing American Muslims into the Republican Party.

Recognition of his role came with a thunderclap during the 2000 presidential campaign, when Karl Rove named him the Bush campaign's point man for Muslim outreach. With George W. Bush in the White House, Khaled Saffuri had arrived.

By all accounts, Saffuri put his new prominence to use, promoting the friends who had helped him achieve his newfound status and advocating for the issues about which they cared. One by one, he introduced them to President Bush and his entourage. With Saffuri frequently smiling in the background, they proudly posed for campaign photographs and, later, attended White House events.

Now, however, some of the very people Saffuri introduced to Bush and Rove are in federal prison on terrorism-related charges. Others have been expelled from the country. Still other former colleagues and donors have become subjects of a massive federal probe into U.S. funding of terrorist organizations that is code-named Operation Greenquest.

In a series of interviews with Insight over the course of more than two years, Saffuri and his supporters claim he has been given a bum rap by critics who point to the alleged terrorist ties as a reason why the White House should distance itself from Saffuri and his friends.

Norquist, the conservative fund-raiser and antipork president of Americans for Tax Reform, insists that any attempt to tie Saffuri to terrorist supporters is "guilt by association." Those who make such accusations, Norquist tells reporters, are "racists and bigots."

But Saffuri's ties to radical Islamists and apologists for terror are neither superficial nor coincidental. An Insight investigation has uncovered a consistent pattern of fund-raising and influence operations in which Saffuri played a prominent role side by side with Abdurahman Alamoudi, a well-known Muslim activist who was Saffuri's employer at the American Muslim Council (AMC). Alamoudi was arrested last September on charges of illegally taking cash payments from the government of Libya in exchange for lobbying the Bush administration to lift sanctions against the Qaddafi regime.

Alamoudi also was one of the leaders of a vast network of Hamas supporters operating across the United States under the guise of American Muslim activist groups.

At a rally in front of the White House on Oct. 28, 2000, Alamoudi told the audience that reports he was a supporter of Hamas were accurate. "Anybody support this Hamas here? Anybody's [sic] is a supporter of Hamas here? Anybody's [sic] is a supporter of Hamas here? Hear that Bill Clinton? We are all supporters of Hamas! Allah akbar [God is great]! I wish to add here I am also a supporter of Hezbollah!"

On June 2, 2000, the U.S.-based al-Zaitounah newspaper interviewed Alamoudi in English on his pro-Hamas activities at the AMC. "Our position with regard to the peace process is well-known," he said. "We are the ones who went to the White House and defended what is called Hamas." According to the Jerusalem Post, Alamoudi attended a leadership conference in Beirut in January 2001 along with top leaders of Hamas, Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad and al-Qaeda. These and other Alamoudi actions and statements were cited by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent Brett Gentrup in a September 2003 affidavit in support of Alamoudi's arrest.

Saffuri tells Insight that Alamoudi won praise from American Jewish leaders for his work on Bosnia in the 1990s. "I have a letter from 1997 from the AJC [American Jewish Committee] to Alamoudi and cc'd [copied] to me," he says. Saffuri promised to send Insight a copy of the letter, but an aide later reported he was unable to locate it. Officials at the AJC could find no trace of such a letter either. Saffuri also told Insight that the AJC "joined" the American Task Force on Bosnia, which AJC officials say is untrue.

"The only time Jewish organizations did something - not really together - but in coordination with Muslim groups were demonstrations against the genocide in Bosnia," says Yehudit Bartsky, an aide to AJC President David Harris. But that cooperation evaporated in 1994, once statements by Alamoudi and other Muslim leaders condemning the Oslo agreements became public. "Everybody was shocked to see they were opposed to Oslo, which all the Jewish organizations supported at the time," she says. After the horrific spate of suicide bombings in 1996, which the AMC and other Muslim organizations refused to condemn, those ties - such as they were - evaporated. "So 1997 would be really late," Bartsky adds.

Saffuri tells Insight that the suicide bombings used by Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Hamas and others is "a condemned tactic. It's horrible, it's wrong, it's un-Islamic, it's unethical, because you're targeting innocent civilians."

Saffuri claims he broke with Alamoudi "after a year-and-a-half of bickering and arguing." But the arguments weren't over Alamoudi's support for suicide bombing, but over the latter's demand for a strict Islamic lifestyle in the office. "When I came, I was the first one to hire women without cover," Saffuri says. "Most people would hire from the mosque. I told him this was wrong. I hired peoples with skills. I ended up leaving because I couldn't work with that style of work."

Another key Saffuri ally, Sami Amin al-Arian, was arrested on Feb. 20, 2003, by federal agents in Tampa, Fla., because of his alleged ties to Palestinian terrorists. Like Saffuri, al-Arian is a Palestinian who came to this country from Kuwait. He was the subject of a long-standing criminal investigation because of the leadership role he allegedly played in Palestinian Islamic Jihad, a group that has claimed responsibility for the murder of hundreds of Israelis and more than a dozen Americans, and that raises money for terror in the United States [see "Controversial Professor Arrested in Florida on Terrorism Charges," posted March 4, 2003, at Insight Online].

Al-Arian was one of a group of Muslim leaders who met with President Bush in the White House in May 2001 as part of White House outreach to the Muslim community. The person who helped set up that meeting and who chose the participants was Khaled Saffuri, White House officials tell Insight.

| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The official PA radio is contradicting official condemnation of the latest bus bombing. From IMRA:

Voice of Palestine Radio (VOP) (that is run by the PA and under the tight control of Yasser Arafat) referred to the man who committed the bombing of the bus in Jerusalem yesterday as a martyr ("shahid") in their news programs. They treated him royally both yesterday and today.

Shahid is an honorary term given to someone who dies in battle. It is not conferred to a criminal. If the act was considered a criminal act then he would not be termed a martyr "shahid".

It should also be noted that the pro forma condemnation broadcast in Arabic on VOP never said anything against the person who carried out the attack itself. Instead the "condemnation" explained the act - blaming it on Israel and voicing concern regarding its timing.

It is also noteworthy that yesterday's bombing was repeatedly described on VOP as "an explosive operation" without any negative terminology associated
with it. In sharp contrast, the announcement of the demolition of the "martyr's house" by the IDF was termed "barbaric" with VOP urging Palestinians to come out of their houses to show resistance to the "racist Israeli threats".

At 6:00 PM last night, right before the main evening news program last night, PA TV broadcast film clips openly encouraging attacks against Israelis. For example, they ran a clip of a small child no older than 6 - 7 years old singing to himself "by stone or by knife I will attack the enemy".

The clip was several minutes long and this chorus was repeated many times. The clip demonstrates that the PA is actively encouraging attacks - even by youths.

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Joel Mowbray has more insight on the Ryan Anderson case. From the Jewish World Review, with thanks to Nicolei:

To those who worry about the extremism that Saudi influence can foster here in the United States, the joint Muslim community at Washington State University and the University of Idaho — just nine miles apart — might provide a classic case study.

It also happened to be the home of detained National Guardsman Ryan Anderson, aka Amir Talhah, when he converted to Islam five years ago.

Anderson, who was nabbed while allegedly trying to pass secret information on to al Qaeda through an Internet chat room, graduated from Washington State University in 2002. Though the strength of his ties to the local Muslim community is unclear, there is no denying that it could have provided the perfect breeding ground for a radical Islamist.

And perhaps not coincidentally, there is a strong Saudi influence.

Last year, the FBI made several arrests while investigating alleged terror activity in Pullman, Washington (home to WSU) and Moscow, Idaho (home to UI). Because of the close proximity and the relative small numbers of Muslim residents (fewer than 200 total), the two towns have essentially a single Muslim community, according to many local Muslims.

Four people total were arrested. Two were affiliated with WSU and two with UI. Three were arrested as material witnesses and have since been released.

Still at large, though, is Saudi national Abdullah Aljughaiman, who was a lecturer at UI and received his religious training King Saud University in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Investigators have been unable even to speak with him, however, because he is most likely in Saudi Arabia, where he's off-limits to U.S. authorities.

At the probe's center was Sami Omar al-Hussayen, a graduate student and computer whiz at UI who was also seen as a leader in the local Muslim community. The Saudi national, who goes to trial this spring, is charged with visa fraud, making false statements, and providing material support of terrorism.

The terrorism charge does not seem to have adversely affected al-Hussayen's popularity in the local Muslim community. Several Muslims in the Pullman-Moscow area contacted by phone spoke favorably of the alleged abettor of terrorism. One who had attended the preliminary hearings opined, "The evidence against him doesn't seem that strong."

In addition to allegedly designing web sites for two radical sheikhs with direct contact with Osama bin Laden, al-Hussayen is charged with handling financial and administrative functions for supposed charities that allegedly supported terrorism.

The most chilling part of the indictment, though, is a section describing an e-mail group managed and edited solely by al-Hussayen, in which an appeal was made for information from Muslims in the U.S. military that would aid terrorist attacks on American personnel, including the murder of a "specifically identified high-ranking American military official."

Although the charges do not tie the Saudi national to 9/11, some evidence surrounding al-Hussayen is troubling. Reportedly found on his computer hard drive were thousands of photos of the World Trade Center, both before and after September 11.

Then there's the family connection.

According to court documents, al-Hussayen's uncle traveled to the U.S. from Saudi Arabia and "stayed in the same hotel in the Herndon, Va., area as three of the Sept. 11 hijackers of Flight 77 that crashed into the Pentagon."

Though northern Idaho or eastern Washington might seem like a strange destination for students from the Middle East, roughly one-half of the Muslims in Moscow, Idaho and one-fourth in Pullman, Washington are Saudis, according to estimates of several local Muslims.

The Saudi ties appear to be longstanding. When the mosque at WSU was built in the late 1970's, most of the funding came from the Gulf — principally from Saudi Arabia — according to a longtime Muslim resident in the area.

What remains uncertain at this point is what role the local Muslim community had in impacting Anderson's Islamic development. Several local sources claim he was a member of the Muslim Students Association, whose national organization was Saudi-created and funded. (Al-Hussayen was president of Idaho's MSA chapter.)

Several members of Washington State's MSA deny that Anderson was an active member, however, including past MSA president Irshad Altheimer. Altheimer said that he accompanied Anderson to mosque services for a month during Ramadan in 2000, but that he never saw much of the now-detained National Guardsman after that.

Investigators are not ruling out a connection to the local Muslim community in eastern Washington and northern Idaho. A spokesman for the U.S. Attorney's office in Boise, Idaho said that no ties have yet been found, but quickly added, "Our investigation is still ongoing."

| 1 Comment
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Now comes a report that the hunt is continuing and intensifying. From the Dow Jones Newswires, :

U.S. spy chief George Tenet made a secret visit to Islamabad last week as American and Pakistani troops began a major operation to hunt for Osama bin Laden and other al Qaeda fugitives believed to be hiding along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border, U.S. and Pakistani officials said.

The director of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency met with senior Pakistani military and intelligence officials as Pakistan's leader, Gen. Pervez Musharraf, started deploying thousands of his nation's troops into the semi-autonomous tribal region of Waziristan. The territory has become a sanctuary for al Qaeda fighters who fled Afghanistan after the U.S. toppled the Taliban regime in 2001.

U.S. troops are searching for al Qaeda leaders inside Afghanistan. Pakistani officials have said the operation on their side of the border with Afghanistan will be the biggest yet to hunt for Mr. bin Laden and other al Qaeda leaders. But Pakistani officials have denied some media reports that American troops would be participating in the offensive inside Pakistani territory.

| 1 Comment
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Andrew Bolt in the Herald Sun has some pointed observations about the situation in Australia. (Thanks to Kevin.)

IT goes like this. First, Australia's Mufti, Taj El-Din El-Hilaly, praises terrorists in Arabic.

Then, when his words leak out, the sheik's spokesman, Keysar Trad of the Lebanese Muslim Association, tells us in English how we've again got the peace-loving cleric all wrong.

Roll the tape. Just before the September 11 attacks, Hilaly was filmed by SBS in his Sydney mosque endorsing suicide bombers.

Afterwards, Hilaly went to Lebanon and signed a statement by clerics endorsing suicide attacks in Israel -- like those which have killed so many civilians.

Trad tried to explain away both incidents, just as he this week claimed Hilaly was again taken out of context by reports this week of his visit to Lebanon.

Those reports said he'd again called for a jihad against Israel, praised suicide bombers as "martyrs", and met the head of Hezbollah, a terrorist group he called a "model for all the Mujahideen in the world".

And how credible is Trad as an apologist for this?

After all, Trad was a translator for the extremist Islamic Youth Movement of Australia, which has been linked to al Qaida.

And although denouncing terrorism himself, he is a zealot who has called Australians "the descendants of ... criminal dregs".

Lovely. So why do Muslims call Hilaly their Mufti?

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

February 23, 2004

From the Simon Wiesenthal Center ():

Monday, February 23, 2004

German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder

We join with the Simon Wiesenthal Center in demanding your public rebuke of the Friedrich Ebert Stiftung Foundation, the flagship of your Social Democratic Party, for funding the three-day Beirut International Conference on 'The Islamic World and Europe: from Dialogue towards Understanding that featured speakers from Hezbollah and Hamas - two terrorist organizations that murder Jews and promote the most libelous anti-Jewish canards including the 'Blood Libel' and The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. As you know these organizations are blacklisted by the European Union for their murderous activities. Other speakers included one associated with the Moslem Brotherhood who is notorious for sowing the seeds of Jew hatred in France; another is believed to have ties to al-Qaeda, and a leading Hamas idealogue and former activist in Islamic Jihad.

All this happened simultaneously while Germany’s Foreign Minister Fischer gave his speech at the European Commission’s Antisemitism Conference in Brussels where he sought to reassure Elie Wiesel and other Holocaust survivors that your nation stands in solidarity against the antisemitic venom emanating from the Arab world.

Chancellor Schroeder, if the Foreign Minister’s speech is indeed German policy, it is a message that needs to be delivered not so much to Jews, but to the Arab Nations. We await your public rebuke of the Foundation and a commitment that Germany will no longer invest any more of its funds and prestige to legitimize mass murderers and Jew haters.

You can add your name to this petition here.

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The Taliban is attempting to keep the jihad alive in Afghanistan by murdering construction workers. The focus on non-combatants accord with the provisions of Islamic law that forbid killing them unless they are considered to be aiding the war effort. This is used to justify bombings on buses in Israel, and by Osama for his attacks in the U.S. From the Guardian:

An Australian helicopter pilot was killed and a British security officer seriously injured in southern Afghanistan yesterday after their team, working for an American construction company, was attacked by a gunman. An American woman employed to build cottage hospitals was also seriously injured in the attack, while another Briton, a security guard, was unharmed, a US diplomat in Kabul said yesterday.

The diplomat said the helicopter belonged to the Louis Berger Group, an American company carrying out road-building and other construction projects in southern Afghanistan, where the remnants of the former Taliban regime and other Islamic extremist groups are active.

Mullah Mohamed Omar, the Taliban's fugitive leader, has pronounced death penalties on anybody, Afghan or foreign, working to support the government of Hamid Karzai.

Khalid Pashtoon, a spokesman for the government of Kandahar province, where the attack occurred, said the team of four foreigners and an Afghan interpreter were inspecting a school in a remote village about 40 miles south-west of the province's capital, Kandahar.

After inspecting the school, the team boarded the helicopter, which was then attacked by a man with a Kalashnikov rifle. He fled after killing the pilot and injuring two other foreigners.

"The helicopter had not taken off when it was attacked," said Mr Pashtoon.

Abdul Samad, a man claiming to speak for the Taliban, told the Associated Press news agency that the militia was responsible for the attack.

American troops, more than 10,000 of whom are stationed in Afghanistan, airlifted the wounded to Kandahar airbase, where they were being treated, the diplomat in Kabul said.

Louis Berger group has been awarded some of the most lucrative reconstruction contracts in Afghanistan since the fall of the Taliban two years ago.

This includes a $250m (£135m) contract to resurface one of the country's main roads, which runs from Kabul to Kandahar, but the project has been blighted by the Taliban's frequent kidnapping of foreign and Afghan workers.

More than 550 people have died in an insurgency blamed on the militia in less than seven months, and Taliban fighters have vowed to step up the campaign in the run-up to democratic elections in June.

| 19 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

I was starting to think that the message John Kerry's campaign sent to an Iranian news agency was just a blanket email in which the Iranians were included, but was not specifically a message to the mullahs. That may be true. But Kerry's wife is a major donor to a group that funds all sorts of organizations the mullahs would love. From WND:

If John Kerry becomes president, the first lady will have a track record of support for the causes of radical, anti-American groups – including Islamists, terrorist-defense law firms, abortionists and homosexual activists – that, by comparison, would make much of the country nostalgic for the days of Hillary Clinton, a study of her philanthropy patterns by Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin concludes.

One of heiress Teresa Heinz Kerry's favorite charities is the Tides Foundation, a 28-year-old grant-making institution that funds to the tune of hundreds of millions radical groups that, among other things, protest the U.S. invasion of Iraq, demand open U.S. borders, provide the legal defense of suspected terrorists and promote the spread of Islamist ideology in the U.S.

Heinz Kerry, worth an estimated three-quarters of a billion dollars, working through the Howard Heinz Endowment, oversaw the donation of more than $4 million to the Tides Foundation between 1995 and 2001, reports G2 Bulletin, a premium, online intelligence newsletter published by WorldNetDaily.

While John Kerry criticizes the way President Bush has conducted the war in Iraq, he actually cast a Senate vote to support it. Yet, Tides' Iraq Peace Fund and Peace Studies Fund supports the War Resisters League and Ramsey Clark's International Action Center. Clark actually offered to defend Saddam Hussein. His center also sponsored International ANSWER and United for Peace and Justice, both of which were run by long-time communist revolutionaries.

The Democratic Justice Fund, created through the efforts of Tides and George Soros, seeks to ease U.S. restrictions on Muslim immigration from countries designated by the State Department as “terrorist nations.” Tides also supports the Council for American Islamic Relations, a group that bills itself as a “Muslim civil rights group,” but one whose leaders have links to the terrorist group Hamas.

CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad openly stated in 1994, “I am a supporter of the Hamas movement.” Community Affairs Director Bassem K. Khafagi has been arrested for visa and bank fraud. Randall Royer, a communications specialist and civil rights coordinator at CAIR, was arrested along with a group of Islamic radicals in Virginia for allegedly planning jihadist activities. CAIR has defended terrorist fronts posing as “charities” – some of which have shut down by the Bush administration.

Tides supports the National Lawyers Guild, which began as a Communist Party front. Last October, Lynne Stewart, an indicted terrorist NLG lawyer, gave a rousing closing speech at the organization's convention. Stewart was arrested for helping her client, convicted 1993 World Trade Center bombing mastermind Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman, communicate with terrorist cells in Egypt.

"And modern heroes, dare I mention?" she said. "Ho and Mao and Lenin, Fidel and Nelson Mandela and John Brown, Che Guevara, who reminds us, 'At the risk of seeming ridiculous, let me say that the true revolutionary is guided by a great feeling of love.' Our quests like theirs are to shake the very foundations of the continents."

Heinz Kerry not only serves as chairman of the Howard Heinz Endowment, she also sits on the board of the Vira I. Heinz Endowment.

The Earth Island Institute is a recipient of Heinz cash. Three days after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on America by Islamists, the group published a statement on its website rationalizing the terrorist actions. Under the headline, "U.S. Responds to Terrorist Attacks with Self-Righteous Arrogance," the statement explained that the destruction of the World Trade Center, the crash at the Pentagon, the four airline hijackings and the 3,000 Americans killed "was not an 'attack on all American people,'" but "an act of anger, desperation and indignation." . . .

In addition to its support of CAIR, Tides supports the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee and the Arab American Action Network.

A group called "Barrio Warriors" is also a recipient of Tides grants. This race-conscious Hispanic organization calls for the "liberation of Aztlan," the American southwest, including California, New Mexico, Arizona and Texas.

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The world is gradually waking up to the fact that Al-Qaeda is far from the only radical Islamic group out there. This new tape takes responsibility for several recent bombings in Iraq, and purports to come from a "new" terror group, Ansar Al-Sunnah. "A key purpose of the video is for propaganda — to attract recruits and raise money. 'The tape shows a more sophisticated organization that is thinking well beyond the roadside bombings of tomorrow'" says an analyst. From MSNBC:

On Feb. 1, two suicide bombers simultaneously destroyed two Kurdish party headquarters in Irbil, Iraq. More than 100 people were killed.

On Nov. 20, a truck bomb in Kirkuk killed five.

On Sept. 9, there was another deadly suicide car bombing in Irbil — this time at U.S. intelligence headquarters.

All the violence is claimed to be the work of a new terror group named Ansar al Sunnah, which U.S. intelligence believes is trying to unite all Islamic militants in Iraq.

A tape now circulating on the Internet attempts to put the group on the map — showing terrorists preparing for suicide missions. “We will hit the American forces!” one militant proclaimed through a translator.

According to terrorism expert Ben Venzke of Intelcenter, “This is the first time we’ve seen them actually put a face on the current series of attacks that are occurring in Iraq.”

Based on their dialect, most of the terrorist fighters appear to come from outside Iraq. At least two are seemingly from Saudi Arabia.

Their goal? One translator’s voice on the tape says, “The goal is not only to get rid of the occupiers of Iraq, but to establish an Islamic state.”

One sequence displays the identity cards of Spaniards and Canadians whom the group claims to have killed, including Spanish intelligence officers ambushed on a highway near Baghdad.

A key purpose of the video is for propaganda — to attract recruits and raise money.

“The tape shows a more sophisticated organization that is thinking well beyond the roadside bombings of tomorrow,” Venzke added.

Senior U.S. officials say this group is a threat and its claims are credible. They say the group’s propaganda has actually helped U.S. forces figure out who’s doing what and who’s to blame for much of the violence.

| 14 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

More on the global reach of radical Islam, from the New York Times. (Thanks to Filtrat.)

Government forensic investigators examining how terrorists manufacture improvised explosives have found indications of a global bomb-making network, and have concluded that Islamic militant bomb builders have used the same designs for car bombs in Africa, the Middle East and Asia, government officials said this week.

"Linkages have been made in devices that have been used in different continents," said one forensic expert involved in the intelligence effort. "We know that we have the same bomb maker, or different bomb makers are using the same instructions."

The previously undisclosed intelligence operation has expanded on studies of past cases like investigations of the thwarted shoe-bomb attack aboard a Paris to Miami flight in December 2001. In a test, detonation of a similar bomb on a grounded aircraft blew a 2 feet by 2 feet in the fuselage — a potentially catastrophic event aboard a pressurized plane in flight.

In another example of the investigators' work, bomb analysts have collected fragments from hundreds of improvised devices detonated in attacks in Iraq, including large car and truck bombings and smaller assaults using explosives packed in empty artillery shells and even concrete blocks. That project has led to a better understanding of the devices and to efforts to provide commanders in Iraq with faster countermeasures to help protect American troops.

But there are many questions still unanswered about who is behind various bombings, including some of the major suicide bombing attacks in Iraq. Intelligence analysts have said they believe that Al Qaeda has been weakened by the campaign against terrorism and lacks a central command, as well as financial and recruiting structures. But the bomb investigations suggest that the terrorist network still may be disseminating bomb-making skills to a generation of militants who have fanned out around the world.

Many bomb makers may have learned how to make improvised explosives in the 1990's at Osama bin Laden's training camps in Afghanistan, and the methods taught there may now be showing up elsewhere.

Intelligence analysts did not say there was evidence of a single controlling entity behind the construction of the larger car and truck bombs often used in the most deadly attacks, although they suggested that there might not be many people with the technical skills to build larger bombs.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

AP reported that the rejection of the polio vaccine by a polio-ravaged Nigerian state was due to anti-American sentiment and conspiracy theories. That is true, but it is also true that these fears are being stoked by the local Islamic authorities: "But fears mounted last year after Datti Ahmed, a Kano physician who heads a prominent Muslim group, the Supreme Council for Shariah in Nigeria, said polio vaccines were 'corrupted and tainted by evildoers from America and their Western allies.'" From News24.com, with thanks to pgrockas:

Polio left Dauda Abdullahi with twisted limbs, unable to walk. But he refuses to allow his children to be immunised against the disease that crippled him three decades ago.

"Only Allah can save us. I don't trust medicine," the 42-year-old roadside shoemaker said.

Immunising toddlers with mouth drops has reduced the number of polio cases from 350 000 children annually in the 1980s to fewer than 800 worldwide last year. Yet the virus is spreading again from Nigeria, where UN officials say a third of the world's cases are the result of a vaccine boycott.

Amid rising Muslim-Western tensions worldwide, Nigeria's Muslims are heeding allegations that the vaccine is a US plot to spread Aids or infertility.

Since October, three northern Nigerian states have banned door-to-door vaccinations until they are satisfied the vaccines do not contain harmful substances.

"Since September 11, the Muslim world is beginning to be suspicious of any move from the Western world," said Sule Ya'u Sule, speaking for the governor of Kano, one of the states where the vaccine is banned. "Our people have become really concerned about polio vaccine."

UN and Nigerian federal government officials stress the vaccines have repeatedly been proven safe. But detractors don't believe it, and meanwhile polio strains are spreading from northern Nigeria's trading centre of Kano to at least seven nearby countries where the disease was previously eradicated, says the World Health Organisation's Bruce Aylward.

Dozens of recent cases

Aylward, WHO's global co-ordinator for the polio eradication campaign, cited dozens of recent cases in Ghana, Togo, Benin, Burkina Faso, Central African Republic, Chad and Cameroon.

On Sunday, Nigeria sent a team of 12 scientists, government officials and Muslim leaders to South Africa, Indonesia and India to spend a week witnessing tests that would dispel the suspicions.

Muslims in Nigeria's arid north have become increasingly wary of vaccine initiatives since 1996, when families in Kano accused New York-based Pfizer Inc of using an experimental meningitis drug on patients without fully informing them of the risks.

The company denied any wrongdoing and a US court dismissed a lawsuit by 20 disabled Nigerians alleged to have taken part in the study, but a US appeals court revived it late last year.

Zubairu Shaba, a former journalist who has lobbied the Nigerian government for compensation on behalf of the Pfizer patients' families, said he and others distrust the entire Western medical establishment.

'They prefer to die'

"So many families won't go to hospitals again. They prefer to die," Shaba said. "We are suspicious of people who come to our doors with liquid for our children's mouths. We don't know who they are or what they want."

Not everyone agrees. "I've heard lots of people saying bad things about polio vaccine. I don't believe it," 22-year-old Habiba Nara said as a nurse at a clinic in northern Nigeria put vaccine drops in the mouth of Abubakar, her screaming 40-day-old baby boy.

Community health worker Jammai Bala says she encourages the nervous "to believe in God".

But fears mounted last year after Datti Ahmed, a Kano physician who heads a prominent Muslim group, the Supreme Council for Shariah in Nigeria, said polio vaccines were "corrupted and tainted by evildoers from America and their Western allies".

Subsequent tests initiated by the federal government in Nigeria and South Africa proved conclusively the vaccines were free of all harmful substances, officials say.

Muslim groups rejected the results. Kano state officials insisted their own scientists tested the vaccines and found trace amounts of oestrogen and progesterone, female sex hormones which the officials feared could cause infertility.

Jama'atu Nasril Islam, an influential Muslim group, said it sponsored its own tests in Britain and India and got similar results.

Modern day Hitlers

"We believe that modern-day Hitlers have deliberately adulterated the oral polio vaccines with anti-fertility drugs and contaminated with certain viruses which are known to cause HIV and Aids," Ahmed said.

Aylward, the UN official, says any test results showing hormones are "false positives" arising from improper testing methods or the mixing of foreign materials during testing.

Even hormones at the levels alleged by critics would be of "absolutely of no health consequence" and amount to less than the amount found naturally in mothers' breast milk, Aylward said.

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

February 22, 2004

From CNN:

A suicide bomber on Sunday killed at least seven passengers on a crowded bus in Jerusalem at the height of rush hour, according to police in the city and Israeli ambulance services.

Jerusalem police spokesman Gil Kleiman said the suicide bomber also died in the terrorist attack, which wounded more than 50 people, 11 of them seriously.

The blast happened in West Jerusalem about 8:30 a.m. (1:30 a.m. ET) on Sunday, the first day of Israel's working week.

Video showed the number 14 bus with its windows blown out and its interior mangled, as rescue workers removed the wounded and remains from the vehicle.

One of the people killed in the attack was an 18-year-old high school student identified by the Jerusalem daily Haaretz as Lior Azulai, a pupil at the Gymnasia Rehavia. Nine other students at the school were wounded in the blast, Haaretz reported.

The Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades -- the military offshoot of Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat's Fatah movement -- claimed responsibility for the blast in a statement.

The group said the attack was in response to a February 11 Israeli military incursion into Gaza, in which 12 Palestinians were killed in gunbattles. The Israeli Army said the Palestinians were all armed, and that its forces were fighting the terrorist infrastructure. Palestinians say many of the killed were civilians.

Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades has claimed responsibility for numerous attacks against Israeli civilians and military targets, and is designated by the U.S. State Department as a foreign terrorist organization.

| 11 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Here is an apology from the Presbyterian church for anti-Semitic remarks made by a Muslim speaker sponsored by a Presbyterian group, speaking at Wooster College in Ohio.

The following statement is made by the Presbyterian Peacemaking Program, the Office for Interfaith Relations and the Office for the Middle East and Europe of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) in response to concerns about a presentation made at the College of Wooster last October. The speaker appeared through a Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) program that itinerates individuals involved in peace and justice efforts in other countries to presbyteries, synods, and Presbyterian colleges and seminaries to help Presbyterians understand concerns for peace around the world.

FOR RELEASE, February 10, 2004

The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), by action of its General Assembly, has adopted and re-affirmed clear policies abhorring, renouncing and opposing
all forms of racism, including anti-Semitism.

Consistent with those policies, the church's Peacemaking Program, Office for Interfaith Relations and Office for the Middle East and Europe, unequivocally disavow remarks and images reportedly used by a speaker at a
church-sponsored event at the College of Wooster last October. We regret
that some in the audience may have been offended.

While the church cannot take responsibility for expressions made by an individual, it categorically rejects harmful attitudes or the use of demeaning language. It is committed to resist and overcome anti-Semitism and all other attitudes, expressions, or actions that deny or defame the full humanity of another.

In this regard, our offices restate the PC(USA)'s long-standing position affirming Israel's right to exist within legitimate and secure borders; calling for justice and the restoration of dignity and freedom for the Palestinian people; and advocating for an end to the Israeli occupation, a cessation of all forms of violence on all sides, and an urgent return to sanity through negotiation for an honorable and enduring peace in Israel and Palestine.

Sara P. Lisherness
Coordinator
Presbyterian Peacemaking Program
100 Witherspoon Street, Rm. 1625
Louisville, KY 40202-1396
888.728.7228 x5779
slishern@ctr.pcusa.org

| 17 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

From the BBC, with thanks to Nicolei:

Police in Pakistan's remote Northern Areas said on Friday that a ninth school in five days had been attacked and destroyed. Local officials have blamed hardline Islamists opposed to female education. Eight of the schools were for girls, although the latest - burned down in a village near the town of Chilas on Thursday - was a boys' school. Three people have been arrested, taking the total detained over the spate of attacks to 20. The schools attacked were mostly set up by non-governmental organisations with foreign assistance. The BBC's Haroon Rashid in Peshawar says observers view the attacks as a setback to efforts to promote literacy in the under-developed region. Thursday night's attack was on a two-room community school in a remote village called Akhrot, near Chilas, 120km south of the regional capital of Gilgit.

Police said unidentified people torched the school, destroying the furniture and wooden parts of the building. No one was injured.

On 15 February seven girls' schools under the government's Social Action Programme were destroyed in the Daarayle Valley.

On 19 February a primary school in Chilas was dynamited.

Some local officials blame people opposed to the education of girls.

However, others believe the latest incident shows a more general targeting of international aid agencies by people who regard the construction of community schools with their funding as un-Islamic.

Last year attacks at the offices of the International Fund for Agriculture Development (Ifad) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in Chilas caused severe damage.

Local officials say they have formed committees to investigate the matter.

A senior government official in Gilgit told the Reuters news agency: "We have about 100 community schools and the attacks have not stopped girls from going to them."

The Northern Areas have a population of around 1.5 million.

The literacy rate is among the lowest in the country at 12% but efforts by aid agencies to raise it have been met with suspicion by some hardline Islamists.

This week's attacks came shortly after President Pervez Musharraf appealed to Muslim religious leaders to help curb extremism.

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

whizb21.jpeg

There are several jihadist video games out there. I wrote of a children's version a couple of years ago. This from the Telegraph, with thanks to EPG:

Perching on the edge of a chair in a darkened room in Beirut, seven-year-old Hassan el Zein takes aim with his pistol and pumps three bullets into the forehead of Ariel Sharon.

He leaves the Israeli prime minister for dead and moves into the next room, swiftly dispatching Shaul Mofaz, the defence minister of "the Zionist enemy", with a commando knife. Twenty more points.

"May Allah's blessings and peace be upon you," flashes across the screen in Arabic as stirring martial music urges Hassan on. An Israeli special forces soldier is blown up by a hand grenade.

Welcome to Champions computer arcade in Beirut's southern suburbs, the urban stronghold of Hizbollah, Lebanon's self-styled "Islamic resistance fighters" and the heroes of young Shi'ite Muslims such as Hassan.

This is the Haret Hreik district, Hizbollah's heartland. Behind the stacks of fruit and vegetables at the grocer's is a portrait of Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah, the group's leader, wielding a Kalashnikov. Along the main road is a mosque with a Hizbollah-run hospital built around it.

Inside Champions, Hizbollah flags hang from the ceiling and there are pictures of Nasrallah and Ayatollah Khomeini of Iran, the group's spiritual inspiration, in the entrance. The game is called "Special Forces" and has been produced by the Hizbollah Internet Bureau. Hassan and his friend Ali Dikmak, also seven, are eagerly awaiting an updated version that will feature more advanced weapons.

Although it is not as technologically advanced as some American products, Ali says it is his favourite because it shows Arabs can be strong. "I don't like Israelis and I want to shoot them because they're bombing us and they're bombing the Palestinians. I want to shoot them in real life as well. In this game the Israelis don't win - the resistance always wins."

Hassan Jomass, 21, who is helping out in the arcade, explained the purpose of the game. "It serves a certain goal. It's not just for fun. It's a way to teach the youngsters to know their enemy better and be patriotic."

Hizbollah recognised, he argued, that American games could corrupt the Lebanese youth. "Look," he said, pointing at a child playing Command and Conquer Generals at another console.

"This is even showing Arabs as terrorists."

Sure enough, the game's Global Liberation Army, an Arab guerrilla force, is described as preferring "underhand and sneaky tactics to defeat its enemies" while US forces "utilise high-tech weaponry and skill".

Hizbollah, which means Party of God, was founded in 1982 by young graduates of Shi'ite seminaries in Iran who were intent on taking Khomeni's revolution to Lebanon, then in the throes of a bloody civil war.

Believed by intelligence agencies to have been behind the 1980s kidnappings of people such as John McCarthy and Terry Waite, the group was also responsible for the killing of 241 American marines in a 1983 suicide bombing. Since then, Hizbollah has established itself as a social and political, as well as military, force in Lebanon. Its popularity surged when Israeli forces withdrew from the south of the country in 2000.

Although it aspires to an Islamic state, Hizbollah is happy to work with Lebanon's secular government - which sanctions it as the "resistance" against Israel - and use western inventions such as computer games to help to spread its revolutionary message. But many women in the southern suburbs do not wear the veil and close to Champions there is even a shop that sells sexy lingerie.

A beauty shop called Beckham features a huge faded photograph of the Real Madrid star. Such pragmatism and concentration on social programmes has helped Hizbollah quietly to increase its influence.

With the backing of Iran and Syria, it hopes in time to extend its fight throughout the Islamic world.

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Can such actions be compatible with a free society? From the Hindustan Times, with thanks to TwoStellas:

Bangladesh has banned controversial feminist author Taslima Nasrin latest book for allegedly containing "objectionable" comments about Islam and Prophet Mohammad.

The government in a notification issued on Thursday banned the printing, reprinting, sale and stockpiling of the book, Shai Sob Andhakar (Those Dark Days) published last month in West Bengal.

The government banned the import, sale and printing of the book in the country because it contains "grave and objectionable comments about Islam and Prophet Mohammad" and "may cause hatred in the society," an official notification said.

The exiled author's autobiography was banned on the day it was to be released at the ongoing book fair in Dhaka on the occasion of language day. This is Nasreen's second book, which has been banned by the government in the last four months.

The new book is the follow-up volume of the controversial book Ka, which was banned late last year after the country's leading poet Syed Shamsul Haq filed a defamation suit alleging that the book portrayed him in bad light.

Nasreen, a physician-turned-writer now in exile, fled Bangladesh in 1994 after Islamic fundamentalists threatened to kill her following publication of her novel Lajja.

She is currently researching secularisation and women' emancipation in Islamic countries at Harward University.

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Which Brigitte is to be believed? From The Australian, with thanks to Jean-Luc:

SUSPECTED French terrorist Willie Brigitte has retracted statements about his knowledge of a possible bomb plot in Australia, according to French judicial sources.

In his first detailed interrogation by investigating magistrate judge Jean-Louis Bruguiere about his activities in Australia, Brigitte went back on his initial statements made in October to officers of the French counter-espionage service, the DST.

At the closed-door hearing this week, Brigitte said the Pakistani national in Sydney who uses the alias Abu Hamza, who is at the centre of Australian investigations into an alleged foiled terrorist plot, had never told him about an explosives expert coming to Sydney.

According to his initial statements, Brigitte said the explosives expert might have been a Chechen named Abou Salah, whom he met in a training camp in Pakistan.

Brigitte also denied all statements French police say were made by his Australian wife, Melanie Brown, who was detained and questioned recently by French authorities before visiting her husband in a Paris prison.

The judicial sources said that in his latest interrogation by Judge Bruguiere, Brigitte claimed he spoke to Ms Brown about the US-Australian spy base at Pine Gap only because he and his wife were both ex-service personnel.

In contradiction to his wife's testimony, he claimed he did not receive a mysterious visitor every morning with whom he surfed the internet.

He said that, unlike Ms Brown's reported testimony, he had never burnt his passport with his Pakistani visa; he said he simply lost it. He was just burning papers on which were written prayers and religious phrases in the name of Allah.

| 1 Comment
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Interesting court case going on in Australia. Two Christian pastors are on trial for "vilifying Muslims" during a 2002 seminar. But as they make their defense, they are going on the offensive. From The Age, with thanks to Jean-Luc:

Islam was an illegal religion because the Koran preached violence against Christians and Jews, a Christian group told a judge yesterday.

The group's barrister, David Perkins, said that Christianity was established under Australia's constitution and had special protection, especially through the blasphemy law.

Mr Perkins told the Victorian and Civil Administrative Tribunal that if the state's new religious hatred law intended to fetter the teaching of Christian doctrine it was invalid.

Victoria's Racial and Religious Tolerance Act 2001 referred to lawful religion, and it was in that sense, he said, that by preaching violence Islam was disqualified.

"The Koran contradicts Christian doctrine in a number of places and, under the blasphemy law, is therefore illegal," he said.

In the first case under the act, the Islamic Council of Victoria has complained that Catch the Fire Ministries, Pastor Danny Nalliah and speaker Daniel Scot, also a pastor, vilified Muslims at a seminar in March 2002.

| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The Australian Mufti, Sheikh Al-Hilali, who reportedly called for jihad against Israel recently (as well as claiming that Australia was originally Muslim), is now singing a different tune — and Australia's Federal Police are accepting that he does not support an armed uprising against any state. From News.com.au, with thanks to Jean-Luc:

THE Australian Federal Police has rejected a request for a formal investigation into the conduct of Australia's most senior Muslim leader.

Attorney-General Philip Ruddock yesterday asked the AFP to look into the activities of the Sheik Taj Aldin Alhilali, the Mufti of Australia, while overseas.

Sheik Alhilali reportedly called for a jihad against Israel and met Hizbollah leaders during a recent visit to Lebanon.

An AFP spokeswoman said the force was not investigating Sheik Alhilali but refused to comment further.

"We are not investigating the matter," the spokeswoman said.

Prime Minister John Howard yesterday condemned Sheik Alhilali for incredible insensitivity over the meeting with Hizbollah.

Hizbollah's military wing is listed as a terrorist organisation in Australia but its political wing is not.

Mr Howard today denied he was out to get Sheik Alhilali but said he was seeking further information about what was said and attempting to get a copy of the speech.

"I'm not out to get him," Mr Howard told Sydney radio 2GB.

"As Prime Minister, I am reacting to something which on the face of it, from somebody who is the titular leader of 300,000 people in this country is quite unacceptable."

Sheik Alhilali last night told SBS radio's Arabic language program that he had not called for a jihad and did not support suicide bombing, a Sydney newspaper reported today.

| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

M. A. Niazi in HiPakistan contributes a complex theological argument about whether or not Pakistan's President Musharraf has been speaking correctly about jihad. In the course of the article he makes a number of statements that are revealing in that he seems to assume that his readers will take them for granted. One is that jihad involves "weapons, and intent to kill." Another is that suicide bombing is jihad martyrdom, as declared by Sheikh Muhammad Sayyid Tantawi of Cairo's prestigious Al-Azhar University.

Jihad (with weapons, and intent to kill) is an obligatory duty (farz). It can be either farz kifaya (in which the participation of some fulfills the duty of all) or farz ain (in which all have to participate). It is a farz ain when it falls within a certain distance of one's home, or if the Amir [the ruler of an Islamic state] or his duly appointed subordinate has ordered a general mobilisation, and a farz kifaya when the jihad is elsewhere. An Amir may call for volunteers either for a jihad beyond the borders of the Islamic state, but it is a moot point whether he can forbid anyone from going abroad to participate in a jihad elsewhere. Actually, the traditional Sharia does not account for borders, though it recognises the possibility of different subordinate Amirs administering different territories independently, and owing a token allegiance to a single Caliph. Therefore, even if one assumes that Musharraf is indeed an Islamic ruler within the context of Sharia, his right to order people not to participate in a jihad outside the territory under his control is dubious.

In other words, he has no right on Islamic grounds to prevent Pakistanis from leaving Pakistan to join Al-Qaeda or other radical Muslim groups in other countries.

It should be noted that the entire analysis above is based on a traditional view, which is no longer tenable because there is no Khilafat, not even in name. The Caliphate abolished by Mustafa Kemal in 1924 was a poor battered thing anyway, far, far removed from the original concept, but it still provided a legal, or rather sharai cover of sorts. Obviously, there is a need for ijtihad [new interpretation of the sacred texts] on the issue.

One clever way of avoiding ijtihad is to re-establish the Caliphate.

That is exactly what Osama and other radicals want to do, for precisely these reasons.

This would immediately restore the Islamic system to its correct footing. Theologically, in fact, it is still the only feasible solution, but there are political difficulties in its path too numerous to discuss. This solution has been proposed by a number of groups. In Pakistan, the most eminent is Dr Israr Ahmed's Tanzeem Islami, while the Hizbut Tahrir has recently set up a branch here. The Hizb is an interesting organisation, for it does not consist of sister parties (such as the Jamaat Islami in India, Pakistan, Kashmir and Bangladesh, which are separate and independent parties), but claims to be one single party spread throughout the Muslim world.

However, there is a practical difficulty. The Kashmiris, the Afghans, the Iraqis, the Palestinians and the Chechens cannot wait for Dr Israr or the Hizb to establish the Caliphate. They are faced with oppression and foreign occupation right now. They have no option but to engage in jihad, by whatever means available. This is why the Grand Mufti of Al-Azhar (no firebrand, but enlightened and moderate enough to support the Frnech headscarf ban) has issued a fatwa declaring suicide bombings not just a valid means of jihad, but its highest form. In fact, this is the only formal fatwa holding the field on this issue. Though many Muslims have condemned suicide bombings as suicide, no scholar has issued a prohibitory fatwa. And these jihads are a farz kifaya for Muslims outside these areas.

Note well: no scholar has issued a prohibitory fatwa [ruling] against suicide attacks.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

February 21, 2004

This weekend a number of sources have been reporting a stepped up hunt for Osama bin Laden. Word from Pakistan is that they have soldiers combing the mountains. Word from London is that Osama is surrounded. Word from The Washington Post is that we are, of course, to blame.

UPDATE: U.S., Pakistan Deny They're Closing in on Osama

| 10 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Skynews has a chilling look inside the mind of a female suicide bomber:

In the terrorist wing of Israel's Hasharon Prison, Obaydeh Khalil sat in her tiny cell and spoke calmly of murder.

"I wanted to kill as many of them as possible," she said. "To me all the Jews are soldiers and I want to kill them."


Osama bin Laden, of course, used the same justification for the indiscriminate killing of Americans.

Obaydeh was just days away from carrying out a devastating suicide bombing when she was arrested by the Israeli security forces.

She is one of a frightening new breed of female militants who are prepared to die and kill for the Palestinian cause.

Adjusting her veil, the placid 27-year-old told me she had no reservations about targeting civilians. She was even prepared to kill children.

"If I had got to my target and there were kids there I would still have done it," she said. "I knew I would still go to heaven even if I killed children."


As I have pointed out many times, jihad theology can take a bad situation and exacerbate it to the point that it is well nigh insoluble.

| 20 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

A new policy in Alabama is not in and of itself an example of dhimmitude, but it is interesting to contrast this with the French headscarf ban:

Responding to complaints from Muslims and Sikhs, Gov. Bob Riley's administration is changing a policy that prohibited the wearing of head scarves and turbans in driver's license photos.

The new policy says head coverings and headgear are acceptable for religious beliefs and medical conditions, but for no other reason. State Public Safety Director Mike Coppage said his department was delivering the rule change to county probate judges on Friday, and that it would take effect Monday.

Muslim women who had complained were glad to see the state's quick response. "This is a victory for religious freedom for everyone in this country," said LaTonya Floyd of Mobile.


The new policy draws the line at face coverings such as veils.

| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The Washington Post reports that a member of a Virginia jihad group was acquitted. It seems that among other things he dozed off at a key meeting.
Those who doubt the relevance of the Kashmir conflict to the war on terror should be reminded that one of the key features of the war is a new kind of enemy: a loosely affiliated network of jihad warriors eager to go wherever the fight for radical Islam takes them. Today Kashmir, tomorrow -- perhaps right here at home.


A federal judge yesterday threw out the case against a member of an alleged Virginia jihad network, ruling that prosecutors had failed to present any evidence that the man was involved in a conspiracy to train for jihadist combat abroad.

U.S. District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema said that although Caliph Basha Ibn Abdur-Raheem subscribed to a "radical form of Islam" and played paintball in the Virginia countryside, there was no evidence that he was training for jihad. Prosecutors contend, and several witnesses have testified, that the paintball games played by the network of 11 men simulated warfare.

"He is an ordinary run-of-the-mill paintball player. . . . Paintball by itself is not an illegal enterprise. Many people do participate in paintball,'' said Brinkema, who noted that Abdur-Raheem had attended meetings of alleged co-conspirators but had dozed off at a key one.

Although Brinkema also dismissed various counts against the other three men on trial in Alexandria, she refused to drop the most serious charges, that some of them trained with a foreign terrorist group and that one had conspired to support al Qaeda and the Taliban.

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

February 20, 2004

This group had been spreading its message in American prisons, mosques, and Islamic schools. From the Washington Post, with thanks to EPG:

The Treasury Department ordered banks yesterday to freeze the accounts of the Oregon and Missouri branches of a large Saudi charity that U.S. officials say has been used to finance the al Qaeda terrorist network around the world.

FBI and Internal Revenue Service agents searched a home in Ashland, Ore., that is the U.S. headquarters for the charity, the al-Haramain Islamic Foundation. The search is part of an investigation into allegations that the Oregon branch was involved in money laundering and income tax and currency-reporting violations, Treasury officials said.

Over the past two years, U.S. and Saudi authorities have intensified a joint crackdown on al-Haramain offices around the globe after concluding that they had funneled money, personnel and equipment to al Qaeda. Branches in Bosnia and Somalia were shuttered in 2002, and last December others were closed in Indonesia, Kenya, Tanzania and Pakistan.

U.S. officials continue to investigate the foundation's headquarters in Saudi Arabia. Several weeks ago al-Haramain's chief, Aqeel al-Aqeel, was fired by top Saudi clerical authorities amid growing suspicions about his role at the charity.

Lawrence Matasar, an attorney for the al-Haramain office in Oregon, said charity officials in that state are cooperating with the government in the investigation. "We believe no crimes have been committed," he said.

Al-Haramain's headquarters in Saudi Arabia launched its Oregon office in 1997 by funding the work of an Ashland landscaper, Pete Seda, who had been sending Korans to prison inmates. The two people now mainly under investigation are Seda and Soliman Albuthe, a Saudi citizen who also helped run the Oregon organization.

Officials are investigating numerous financial transactions involving Albuthe and Seda, also known as Pirouz Sedaghaty, including allegations of transporting large sums of undeclared traveler's checks across U.S. borders. Under U.S. law, anyone transporting $10,000 or more in or out of the country must declare it to customs agents.

Agents are looking into $131,000 that was wired by a man in London to the Oregon foundation, which then dispatched Albuthe to transport the funds by traveler's checks to Saudi Arabia. The transaction was not properly reported to U.S. authorities, according to an affidavit filed in court in Oregon. The funds were ultimately destined for Muslim fighters or refugees in Chechnya, it said.

The affidavit also disclosed that a federal grand jury has been investigating al-Haramain's U.S. operations.

The U.S. branch of the charity has mainly distributed Islamic books and videos to Americans, and also helped establish a mosque in Springfield, Mo., with more than $370,000 provided by the Saudi headquarters.

One of the top leaders of that mosque was Kamran Bokhari, a student at Southwest Missouri State University, who was also the U.S. representative of a radical London-based group called al-Mujahiroun, which supports al Qaeda, according to the Site Institute, a terrorism research group.

It's no secret that Al-Muhajiroun supports Al-Qaeda. They're quite open about it.

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Common sense from Dan Greenberg in the MetroWest Daily News (thanks to Nicolei):

It has become almost impossible to have a detached discussion -- one that takes historical considerations into account -- about the war on terror, and the position of Iraq in the context of that war. Here, I would like to do my best to contribute to such a discussion.

Let's begin with some basic facts. First, for some time now, radical Islam has engaged in a brutal war on Western culture, seeking to eliminate all vestiges of that culture within the Muslim world and to undermine its existence in the Western world. This is a no-holds-barred attack, governed by none of the so-called "rules of war" that supposedly civilized nations claim to have put in place. There are no distinctions made between belligerents and non-belligerents; any and every person in the West is a target, apparently including even Muslims who live in the West or are at peace with the West.

Second, there is no single coordinated command structure to radical Islam. New terror groups form, old groups disband, but all have a common goal, and all applaud each other's successes and support each other's efforts. They try to infiltrate official Islamic governmental structures and, where this does not succeed, they gain cover and support through the threat of violence.

Third, these groups use a broad range of tactics and strategies to achieve their goals. They employ unfettered physical violence; they take advantage of people's greed in order to purchase their weapons and influence; and they use normal diplomatic means to insert themselves into international power politics.

Fourth, these groups gain succor from willing supporters and unwitting fellow-travelers in all countries, who aid them in achieving their goals.

Finally, the radical Islamists have gained strength and momentum in more recent years, thanks to the increasing availability of sophisticated weapons having far greater destructive power than any before. With each passing year, it has become easier to create or purchase weapons that can disable planes and tanks, that can spread disease and toxic chemicals, and even those that can create a nuclear disaster, either in the form of "dirty bombs" or in the more sinister form of atomic warheads.

For years, the terrorists have been refining their tactics and preparing for ever more destructive operations. Israel has been a fertile proving ground for them, and continues to be. Throughout the world, they have experimented with hijacking and destruction of planes and ships, bombing embassies and military bases, and individual assassinations of opponents.

Sept. 11, 2001 was distinguished from other days only in that it was a clear, unambiguous declaration of global war, just as Dec. 7, 1941 differed from preceding days and years in that it made Japanese intentions of world conquest manifest to everyone.

We are dealing with an insidious, cruel enemy that has spread its tentacles throughout the world. We are also dealing with particular places that are havens for these terrorists. It took no genius to identify Afghanistan as one such place, and the operation to neutralize that haven has indeed eliminated it as a safe base from which terrorists could operate unmolested.

Iraq was a much more insidious focal point, because in that country, the ambitions of a monstrous dictator coincided with those of the terrorists. Saddam Hussein was open about his intention to dominate the entire Middle East -- a new Babylonian empire, in his eyes -- and control Western access to its major source of energy, oil.

Using his own vast resources, he converted his plans into action, first by trying to conquer Iran, another major supplier of oil, and then, when that did not succeed, by turning south to conquer Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. In the process, he supported radical terrorists operating against other governments in the Middle East, including Israel, and operating against the West in general.

He was assiduous in developing or obtaining every dangerous weapon known to man. He was the first Muslim ruler to develop a program for atomic weapons, which the Israelis were intelligent enough to hamper by destroying his main nuclear reactor 20 years ago. He developed chemical and biological weapons that he perfected by using them against his own people, and then against the Iranians.

When he was defeated in Kuwait by a wide coalition of powers, including many Muslim governments who felt threatened by him, he continued with his development programs throughout the 1990s, openly defiant of agreements he had made and repeated demands made by the United Nations Security Council.

To say that this regime was not a direct menace to the United States and to world stability in general is to bury one's head firmly in the sand. Perhaps we shouldn't have gone to war against the Japanese after Pearl Harbor, but only sought to find and prosecute in a court of law the bombardiers who dropped their bombs and torpedoes on the American ships. Indeed, why did we fight the Axis powers -- Nazi Germany, fascist Italy, Romania, Bulgaria, and Hungary -- at all? All they did was make a paper declaration of war on us in 1941; they didn't actually attack any American troops or cities.

Notice that I am not talking about Saddam Hussein being a "bad person." I am not even addressing the question of whether one should use military force to rid the world of horrendous mass murderers, of whom he ranks as one of the worst in history. We don't seem to have reached any sort of consensus on that question.

We certainly didn't go to war against Hitler or Stalin when they slaughtered their own people, or against the Hutus in Rwanda (or any of the other mutually murderous tribes in Burundi and the Congo). We intervened in the Balkans, ostensibly to prevent further "ethnic cleansing," but that reason was hardly plausible; the numbers involved there were far from comparable to those that were killed in other places, even during the same years.

No, the world has not decided that mass murderers have to be eliminated, nor have we in this country reached that point.

But we are certainly clear that we will do everything necessary to defend ourselves against declared enemies who have taken overt actions that threaten our safety and security. Radical Islam is top on the list, and Iraq was far and away the most dangerous and menacing official government that actively promoted the same belligerent goals.

| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Continued strange goings-on in the Yee case. From the Miami Herald:

For the fifth time, the Army on Tuesday delayed the pretrial hearing for a Muslim chaplain accused of mishandling classified information at the U.S. terror prison at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba.

The Southern Command in Miami said Capt. James ''Youseff'' Yee's hearing at Fort Benning, Ga., will resume March 10 -- not today, as previously announced. Prosecutors sought the delay because the military has not completed a security review of potentially classified documents in the case, Southcom said.

Yee's civilian attorney responded that the government should drop its case, which began with the West Point graduate's arrest Sept. 11 in Jacksonville.

'I don't know what takes so long about completing this classification review, but it certainly supports our position that there is no `there' there,'' said Yee's civilian defense attorney, Eugene Fidell.

``Whatever else you can say about the downward trajectory of this case, this latest delay affords the government time to take a hard look at whether the time has come to pull the plug.''

Early in the case, investigators told Yee's Army attorney to prepare for an espionage trial. No capital crime charges were ever leveled. Yee, 35, is accused of mishandling classified material, adultery and downloading pornography onto his government computer, crimes that could carry a maximum 13-year sentence.

The latest delay, announced late Tuesday, was the fifth blamed on confusion over the classification of documents.

Army Col. David McWilliams, a Southcom spokesman, also disclosed a delay in another Guantánamo case -- hearings against Army Col. Jackie Duane Farr, 58, also slated to open today at Fort Gordon, Ga.

Charged Nov. 29 with making a false statement and failure to obey an order, Farr is the most senior military official caught up in last year's crackdown on mishandling of intelligence by soldiers and civilians working at Guantánamo.

Unlike Yee, who was confined for 76 days at a Navy brig, Farr was allowed to continue working as an Army officer at Guantánamo pending his investigation. Conviction on his charges could bring a seven-year jail sentence.

| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This one seems motivated by a desire to get votes. From Sify.com:

The BJP has strongly protested against the Mulayam Singh Yadav Government's decision to cut short school hours on Fridays to allow Muslim students to offer Jumma ki namaz.

The move is being perceived as an effort to appease the Muslim votebank ahead of the Lok Sabha elections. According to a Government order issued on February 16 to all schools and colleges affiliated to the UP Board, the school hours would now be from 8 am to 12 pm on all Fridays.

Reacting strongly to the "absurd Government decision", state BJP chief Vinay Katiyar, demanded that the Government order be withdrawn immediately.

"It smacks of the Government's appeasement policy. Mulayam Singh Yadav is scared of his shifting mass base in the coming Lok Sabha polls. Hence he's using such tactics to draw minority votes. Such a step will create a divide between Hindu and Muslim children in schools," he said.

Katiyar further said the BJP would take to the streets to protest this decision. He argued: "In that case even the bhakts of Lord Shiva would demand a holiday on Monday and devotees of Lord Hanuman would demand a holiday on Tuesday."

He said the party would stage an agitation in front of the Assembly. "The protest would continue till the Government withdraws the order," he added.

The order issued by the Principal Secretary, Education, Neera Yadav on February 16, says that the State Government, after due consideration, has decided to change the school timings on Friday's from 8 am to 12 pm.

The changed timing would be applicable to all aided, unaided, and Government-run primary schools, junior schools, high schools and intercolleges in the state. So far, school timings have been six hours -- from 8 am to 2 pm or 10 am to 4 pm, Monday to Friday, with Saturday being a half day.

District Inspector of Schools Vikas Srivastava said the order would be implemented with immediate effect in the state Capital and students can look forward to the new timings from this Friday.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

_39750841_president_afp203body.jpeg
Musharraf's anti-jihad jihad: too late?

What's this? Pakistan's Musharraf has called upon his countrymen to stop "loving Allah above everything else and resisting worldly temptations"? Well, not exactly. He has denounced the jihadi culture, and he, his hearers, and the rest of the world know what he meant: the culture of violence and murder that justifies itself by the traditional Muslim concept of jihad -- that is, warfare against unbelievers, as it has been understood by Muslims since the seventh century. From the BBC:

Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf has warned religious and political parties against promoting the culture of jihad, or holy war.

He said foreign nationals would not be allowed to use Pakistani territory to carry out militant activities in the region.

Speaking at a conference of several hundred clerics and religious scholars in Islamabad, the president said only by eliminating religious extremism can the growing perception about Pakistan being an intolerant society be changed.

Pakistan has arrested more than 500 al-Qaeda suspects who fled Afghanistan in the wake of US-led attacks that ousted the hardline Taleban regime in late 2001.

The president's hard-hitting and candid remarks about militancy and Islamic extremism in front of so many clerics left little doubt that the Pakistani military leader means business.

Intolerant society

His real targets were the relatively small number of militant groups that had been involved in sectarian violence within the country and were encouraging trouble in nearby countries like Afghanistan.

President Musharraf said a handful of extremists have taken the entire country hostage and were directly responsible for the growing perception in the world about Pakistan being an intolerant society.

They had been targeting religious minorities in the country, he said, and were spreading the culture of jihad in neighbouring states.

President Musharraf said there was no room for jihadi culture in the country and no individual or political party would be allowed to preach violence in the name of religion.

He said the tribesmen in the country's border region with Afghanistan have been warned against giving shelter to foreign militants and the armed forces have been instructed to take strict action against those using Pakistani territory to create trouble in neighbouring countries.

President Musharraf said even though Pakistan regards the ongoing insurgency in Indian administered Kashmir as a freedom struggle, it would like to resolve the outstanding dispute with India through the recently started peace process.

He described the elimination of extremism from the country as his biggest challenge and asked the religious scholars to support him in his mission to create a culture of tolerance in Pakistan.

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Discrimination against women is so deeply ingrained into the Sharia in so many ways (women's testimony is devalued, they cannot marry or even leave the house without permission, they may be beaten (Qur'an, Sura 4:34), etc.), that many Islamic radicals consider the very idea of education for women to be an affront to Islam. This article shows how far some are willing to take this. Non-Muslims should take note, for these radicals would no doubt enforce the Sharia's provisions for dhimmis with equal ferocity, given the opportunity. From the Gulf Daily News, with thanks to Nicolei:

Islamic militants dynamited seven primary schools for girls in Pakistan's remote north in the past week in a bid to discourage female education, a government official said yesterday..

The attacks occurred in two districts of the Northern Areas but caused no injuries as they were carried out at night, a senior government official from Gilgit said.

Unknown men planted a low intensity explosive device in the three-room school building which exploded on Wednesday without causing any casualties, local police officer Zaheer Khan said.

"The attack caused minor damage to the building, but no casualties," he said.

It was the fifth incident in less than a week in which schools had been targeted.

He blamed the attacks on local tribesmen encouraged by "religious elements" opposed to education of girls.

"The majority of the people are supportive of girls' education but a tiny minority is opposed," said the official.

"We have about a 100 community schools and the attacks have not stopped girls from going to them."

Police said they had detained 16 people in connection with the attacks, six of which happened in Diamir district and the seventh in Chilas.

Khan said non-governmental organisations had set up several schools in Diamir district which Khan said had upset extremists in the region.

The latest attack, which badly damaged the school, occurred just three days after a group of men, angered over increasing activities of foreign-funded charity organisations, set fire to seven schools for girls, damaging the buildings and furniture.

However, it was not immediately clear whether the same people were behind Wednesday's attack, said Mohammed Jan, a government official in Chilas.

| 1 Comment
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

February 19, 2004

Those Virginia paintballers hoped to strike in the U.S. From AP, :

Testimony in the case of a Maryland man charged with trying to join the Taliban and fight U.S. troops indicates that he was asked by members of a militant Islamic group to perform a special mission inside the United States.

Yong Ki Kwon testified for the prosecution against Masoud Khan yesterday in Alexandria, Virginia.

Khan is being tried for conspiracy to levy war against the United States and conspiracy to support Osama bin Laden's al-Qaida terrorist network. Three other defendants face lesser conspiracy and firearms charges. Prosecutors allege the group used paintball games near Fredericksburg in the summers of 2000 and 2001 to prepare for holy war against India and other nations with whom the United States is at peace.

Kwon testified that the exact nature of Khan's mission was never fully explained -- but that it involved gathering information, sending e-mails and spreading propoganda.

Kwon also testified that he and Khan went to Pakistan after the September eleventh terror attacks to train with a group seeking to drive India from the disputed Kashmir region. The group is considered a terrorist organization by the U.S. government.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

From Fox:

Spc. Ryan G. Anderson, a National Guardsman accused of trying to aid the Al Qaeda terror network, has been formally charged, the Army said. Anderson, 26, a Muslim convert, was arrested last week after U.S. officials discovered he allegedly tried to give military data to Al Qaeda. If convicted, he could face the death penalty.

According to the charging documents, Anderson disclosed information about U.S. troop strength, movements, equipment, tactics, weapons systems and methods of killing soldiers to U.S. military personnel he believed were members of the terror network. He also allegedly shared sketches of tanks and a CD with copies of his identification documents.

He was charged Feb. 12 -- the day of his arrest -- with three counts involving attempts to supply intelligence to the enemy, but that information was not made public until Wednesday, Army spokesman Lt. Col. Stephen Barger said.

In each count, Anderson was accused of "attempting to provide intelligence to the enemy" by disclosing information or making contact with U.S. military personnel.

Attempts to aid the enemy can be punished by death, according to the Uniform Military Code.

The charges did not allege that Anderson ever actually passed information to real Al Qaeda members.

Anderson, 26, of Lynnwood, is a tank crew member from the Fort Lewis-based 81st Armor Brigade. The 2002 Washington State University graduate converted to Islam in college. He joined the Guard on May 15, 2002, Barger said.

Barger refused to say whether the investigation was continuing or whether others might be involved. He also refused to discuss how Anderson's activities came to the Army's attention or how the Army set up the sting that led to his arrest. Anderson is being held at Fort Lewis.

In the first count, Anderson, also known as "Amir Abdul Rashid," is alleged to have attempted to provide information about U.S. Army troop strength, movements, equipment, tactics and weapons systems, as well as methods of killing U.S. Army personnel and vulnerabilities of Army weapons systems and equipment.

Anderson is also alleged to have communicated by "oral, written and electronic communication" to the supposed "terrorists" that "I wish to meet with you, I share your cause, I wish to continue contact through conversations and personal meetings."

| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

A disquieting story about the propagation of jihadist "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" slander in the United States, unconscionable dhimmitude from a Presbyterian "peacemaking group" -- and nothing but supine silence from officials at an American college. From Cleveland Jewish News, with thanks to EPG:

Last October, Samir Makhlouf, invited to speak at the College of Wooster, delivered a diatribe against Jews.

During his presentation, he presented the fraudulent, antisemitic screed The Protocols of the Elders of Zion as a factual book that "explains" how Zionists have been taking over the world's political, economic, religious and communication organizations.

Makhlouf's 15-20 minute slide presentation was rife with dead Palestinian bodies "proving" Israeli war crimes. The slide show ended with a Star of David morphing into a swastika, and had frames equating Zionism with Nazism. The "equals" sign was then replaced by a "greater than" sign, suggesting that Zionism was even worse than Nazism.

While no one disputes that this is what Makhlouf presented, to date, no one from the College of Wooster, or Presbyterian Peacemakers, the organization that provided the speaker, has issued an apology or acknowledged those who were offended by the presentation.

Bettysue Feuer, regional director for the Anti-Defamation League, says she has been working on this issue with the College of Wooster for quite a while. A public apology, she says, "would go a long way." Noting that Makhlouf is not the first antisemitic speaker the College of Wooster has hosted, Feuer says she is disturbed by the seeming lack of supervision over who is permitted to air their views.

"It's a shame there is not more sensitivity shown to the diverse population of the campus. To allow a speaker who shows such bigotry shows a real lack of understanding on (the College of Wooster's) part."

Feuer is also interested in knowing the criteria the Presbyterian Peacemakers use to choose their speakers.

Mark Wilson, a Jew who is a professor of geology at the college, says he was approached by a number of students following Makhlouf's presentations, one held during an ethics class, and another at an open public lecture. The students told him they "were rather amazed" by what they saw and heard.

Relatively few Jews attend the college, notes Wilson, so there didn't seem to be much of an outcry against Makhlouf's presentations. Nevertheless, he says, an apology should have been issued.

Also disturbing, Wilson adds, is the response some of the more virulently antisemitic speakers receive. "Fawaz Damra (imam of the Islamic Center of Cleveland and recently cited for lying about his ties to terrorist organizations) was invited here, and while I don't mind having him on campus, I was disturbed that no mention was made of his recent past."

While he's not sure how many students or faculty came to hear Damra, Wilson says there was a "very large turnout of people from the area who cheered him and cheered him."

The Presbyterian Peacemaking Program, under the auspices of the Presbyterian Church, proclaims a "commitment to peacemaking" on its Web site. They profess "a journey of racial justice and understanding" as well as commitment to overcoming prejudice.

Sweet Young, an administrative assistant for the Presbyterian Peacemaking Program, told the CJN that no one from the organization would be available to comment on the October presentation by Makhlouf until some time in February. She directed questions to Gordon Shull, who hosted the speaker in Wooster.

Shull, a Presbyterian and former professor at the College of Wooster, admits he understands some students may have been offended. He is also aware that non-Jewish students may have come away with erroneous and harmful information about the validity of the Protocols. However, he says, he "would not encourage them (Peacemaker organization) to issue an apology. I'm not into apologies or casting blame."

Shull sent out e-mails to the College of Wooster faculty intimating that the speaker's presence at the college was actually the responsibility of the Israeli government because the Palestinian speaker he had initially tried to get was unable to secure a travel visa. He repeated the charge several times in a phone interview with this reporter that he felt the speaker's appearance could be blamed on the Israeli government. Shull later called back saying he would like to retract that sentiment.

In further deflecting responsibility from himself, Shull said, "I regret that the director of the Hillel Foundation (Professor Peter Pozefsky) chose to be offended by it, rather than take it as a teachable event."

Pozefsky a professor of history who has assumed the Hillel post as a volunteer, has pretty much singly-handedly raised concerns to fellow staff and administration about speakers such as Makhlouf and Damra. He estimates that at least seven such individuals making antisemitic remarks have spoken at the college in the past few years.

"There are plenty of people who are willing to say this is awful, but no one is willing to put their necks on the line," he says. "I shouldn't be the only one making sure Jews aren't trashed on this campus."

Pozefsky likens the Makhlouf fiasco to the response he received to requests he raised before Damra came to speak. "I didn't want to censor him," he says. "I just wanted students to know who he was before he spoke."

Pozefsky e-mailed his concerns on the faculty listserve, but the response he got "was a combination of hostility and complacency." On one occasion, a colleague accused him of trying to violate free speech. Another time, he was accused of harassment.

After the Presbyterian Peacemaker presentation, Pozefsky found himself once again in the position of attempting to rectify the damage made by a speaker's slanderous allegations against Jews. While he didn't attend the lectures, some of the students expressed their concerns to him. One student told him that he found "the illusion Makhlouf painted about Jewish bankers and their domination of the West" particularly disturbing. So was a slide that read, "May God bless our martyrs; may they find peace in the heavens."

"There are very few Jewish students on campus," Pozefsky points out, "and they don't want to be activists or seem like crybabies." However, he notes, these young people are in the care of the college, and their feelings and well-being should be taken into consideration. Further, he says, non-Jewish students have gotten "terribly shamefully biased, unscholarly and misleading, stridently antisemitic information as part of their (college) education.

"If women or blacks were spoken about like this, or if someone came and spread homophobic hate speech, that would never be tolerated," he says. "Is this acceptable because it was directed toward Jews?"

R. Stanton Hales, president of the College of Wooster, did not return calls to the CJN. John Hopkins, assistant vice president for college relations and marketing, e-mailed the CJN to say that Hales will "make a statement once he has determined all the facts to his satisfaction." He did not give a date when that would be.

| 11 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Jihadist khutbas are not welcome in Denmark. From the Guardian, with thanks to Andy Bannister:

Denmark is tightening its immigration rules to make it harder for fundamentalist Muslim clerics to settle in the country and establish radical communities.

The move is designed to encourage Muslims to integrate into wider Danish society but is bound to attract criticism that it is discriminatory.

Indeed, it is bound to. But where is the guarantee that imams will not preach jihadist hatred in the mosques?

Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the prime minister, said the measure would affect all religious groups, but a rightwing political party admitted it was principally intended to tackle Islamic extremism.

Denmark's 170,000 Muslims account for 3% of the population and are the second largest religious community after the Lutheran church, followed by four-fifths of the country's 5.3 million strong population.

"Access to obtaining a Danish residence permit for foreign missionaries has been too easy up until now," Mr Rasmussen said. "That is why we are putting forward new requirements for residing in the country."

Critics complained that the influence of radical imams had been exaggerated, while the government said it merely wanted to encourage integration.

"This is to make sure that they are worthy of the trust society shows by letting them in," a spokesman said yesterday.

Supporters of the measure accuse foreign clerics of urging Muslim immigrants to stick to customs such as wearing the veil, female circumcision and stopping women from working and learning Danish.

Mr Rasmussen's minority centre-right government relies on the anti-immigrant Danish People's party's to pass legislation. The proposed changes are part of a deal reached last year with the People's party and the opposition Social Democrats.

The new rules will require any person coming to Denmark on a religious visa to show that they are a "worthy" candidate, are educated, financially self-supporting and connected with one of 200 recognised religious communities.

The DPP, which proposed the changes, confirmed they were aimed to curb the activities of Muslim clerics, or imams. "In theory, these rules concern all clerics from all religions," said Peter Skaarup, a party spokesman. "But in practice, they target the imams."

Like France, the Netherlands and other western European countries, Denmark has been struggling with Muslim issues since before, but especially after, the September 11 attacks on the US.

Danish media have reported the case of an imam who praised Osama bin Laden in his Friday sermons.

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This article chronicles the jihad activities of Hafiz Saeed and his Lashkar-e-Taiba organization in Pakistan, which threatens to derail the India/Pakistan peace process before it really starts. From KRT Wire:

Alighting swiftly from a smoky windowed minibus on the edge of a small park in central Islamabad, the man blamed by India for orchestrating the 2001 suicide attack against India's parliament seemed anxious to avoid attracting too much attention.

Hafiz Saeed, founder of the outlawed Lashkar-e-Taiba organization and a member of Osama bin Laden's International Islamic Front for Jihad, had come to town to address a gathering to mourn the death of a militant fighter killed in Kashmir.

He must have been aware that another, highly significant meeting was taking place in Islamabad that day, one that made his presence in the capital a matter of acute political sensitivity.

Just an hour earlier, Indian and Pakistani diplomats meeting nearby had proclaimed the successful conclusion of their first round of peace talks, talks made possible in part by Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf's solemn promise to put an end to the activities of the extremists waging war against India in Kashmir.

But despite Saeed's attempts at discretion, there was no way to hide the gathering of 500 or so solemn, heavily bearded men who had assembled alongside one of Islamabad's smartest shopping centers to hear him speak. Brightly colored carpets were strewn around the grass, and banners were strung up around the park extolling the virtues of the "jihad" being waged against Indian rule in Kashmir. "Beat the infidels so harshly that they run away," said one.

Denouncing Musharraf's support for the United States in its proclaimed war against terrorism, Saeed told his supporters that the jihad for Kashmir "will continue until Kashmir is free."

"The time is near when all these oppressors will be crushed by this jihad," he promised.

The public appearance of such a prominent extremist, just as India and Pakistan were announcing their agreement on a new "road map for peace," underscored the difficulties that lie ahead, not only for the fledgling peace process but also for Musharraf's efforts to crack down on extremists.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Stephen J. Kohn in Arutz Sheva states plainly and courageously some obvious truths that are all too widely ignored these days: "This is the time for collective wisdom and judgment to declare that any manifestation and glorification of The Jihad World War must be fought, unceasingly and aggressively. To lose this war may indeed mean the end of civilization as we have known it, and perhaps the deprivation of immeasurable others who would otherwise have the opportunity to experience it."

It is uncomfortable linking together events that put us all at risk anywhere on our planet, but ignoring them is far worse. And "all" is not Jews or Russians or Australians or Americans -- it is all of the developed nations and all that want to develop. It is all civilization as we know it that is at risk. It is also Iraqis who want to change over to a democratic society.

What is at risk is the preservation and promotion of rights that have emerged as a standard of behavior over millennia, as well as perhaps our survival. The rights of freedom, of equality, of tolerance, of the ability to think freely and act within limits of decency - whether defined by traditional religious values or common sense. At risk is our ability to wake in the morning and return in the evening without fear that our lives will be taken from us by the blind ferocity of those who hate the advances in civilization and all those, including fellow Moslems, who do not share their views.

When we hear that a leading Pakistani nuclear scientist has spread his knowledge to other governments, with malice and greed his objectives, the wise recognize that it is essential to initiate, to continue and to combat this scourge. The ignorant can bury the fear with the acceptance of an alien philosophy. But we will be burying the bodies of those whose deaths have been caused by an inability to face the reality of a war now underway.

It is hard to think of a common enemy that can chase us, relentlessly, but this enemy exists, and we have been too polite in defining its dimensions and potential horrors. It has been abetted by a blind Western mentality of know-nothingness, which justifies the death of innocents when it meets seemingly loftier goals. Goals not built of tolerance, but of blindness. Not of acceptance, but naivete. Not of enlightenment, but irresponsibility.

It is hard to hear of subway trains being blown up in Moscow, buses in Jerusalem, nightclubs in Bali, the Twin Towers in New York, American embassies in Africa, houses in the Philippines, or Iraqis in Baghdad and threats of future attack that seem to be unending. It should be hard to ignore the common links between them. It should be hard to ignore them because these assaults on humanity all have two - all too clear - common elements.

Firstly, in almost all cases, they are aimed at innocent civilians whose only common characteristic is that they fall into some ethnic group other than that of the Moslem terrorists that set off the bombs. It is racism at its most profound level.

Secondly, increasingly, there are links between the terrorists and a number of countries that allow them to operate with growing freedom, explicitly or implicitly. It is "non-collusive collusion" -- the independence of the groups, but their shared goals joining them together - to create a lethal force that we cannot ignore.

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Jihad Watch director Robert Spencer's new article, "Jihad: The Real Terrorist Enemy," is available today at FrontPage. The title refers to the continued lack of clarity coming from Washington about just who America is fighting in the war on terror, and how this is causing domestic and international damage to the anti-terror effort -- damage that could easily be avoided.

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

February 18, 2004

Bernard-Henri Levy writes in Opinion Journal that Pakistan "--in the shelter of its alliance with an America that is decidedly not counting inconsistencies--could furnish al Qaeda with the means to take the ultimate step of its jihad." Indeed, it may already have done so.

We observed the Abdul Qadeer Khan affair, the incredible story of this Pakistani nuclear scientist who delivered over 15 years--freely and with impunity--his most sensitive secrets to Libya, Iran and North Korea. Then we learned that President Musharraf in person, after an interview from which little or nothing has been divulged, ended up granting Khan his "pardon." Case closed? End of story? That's what the American administration, falling oddly in step with the official Pakistani doctrine, would have us believe. But knowing something of the case--and being the first French observer, to my knowledge, to have tried to alert public opinion to the extreme gravity of the situation--I believe that we are only at the very beginning this story.

Far from ending on Sept. 11, 2001--the day, we are told, on which "the world changed"--this terrifying nuclear traffic continued until well after: A last trip to Pyongyang, his thirteenth, was made in June 2002 by the good doctor Khan; not to mention the ship inspected last August in the Mediterranean, transporting elements of a future nuclear plant to Libya. The eyes of the world, emulating the eyes of America, were fixed on Baghdad, while the tentacles of nuclear proliferation were being extended from Karachi.

We will soon learn that far from being the overexcited, but in the end isolated, "Dr. Strangelove" that most of the press has described, Khan was at the center of an immense network, an incredibly dense web. There were Dubai front companies, meetings in Casablanca and Istanbul with Iranian colleagues, complicities in Germany and Holland, Malaysian and Philippine agents, and detours through Sri Lanka, with Chinese and London connections--a world of crime and dirty war that the West, mired in a big game that is beginning to get ahead of it, has so blithely allowed to develop.

We will find that, since Pakistan is steered by the iron hand of its secret service and its army, it is inconceivable that Khan operated alone without orders or cover. We will understand more precisely that we cannot repeat without contradiction that, on the one hand, the Pakistani nuclear arsenal is under control, and that not a warhead can budge without the authorities' knowledge, and, on the other, that Khan was acting alone, working on his own account, with no official connivance. To put it simply and disconcertingly: Pakistan's nuclear weapons need to be secured. They cannot--will not--be secured by Pakistan alone.

We will come back to Gen. Musharraf--and Pakistan being what it is, we will come back also to other generals and ex-generals, such as Mirza Aslam Beg and Jehangir Karamat, both former army chiefs of staff. But we must not shift our gaze from the president himself, whose knowledge of Khan's dark machinations no one in Islamabad doubts, and who, at the very moment of his confounding, celebrated Khan once more as a "hero." What does Khan know of what Gen. Musharraf knows? And what does Khan's daughter, Dina, who announced in London that she has suitcases of compromising files, know?

And at last, sooner or later, we will come to the real secret: that of al Qaeda; and of Khan's links to Lashkar-e-Toiba, the fundamentalist terrorist group at the heart of al Qaeda; and the fact that this "mad scientist" is first of all mad about God, a fanatical Islamist who in his heart and soul believes that the bomb of which he is the father should belong, if not to the Umma itself, at least to its avant-garde, as incarnated by al Qaeda. So let us not shrink from measuring the probability of a nightmare scenario: to wit, a Pakistani state which--in the shelter of its alliance with an America that is decidedly not counting inconsistencies--could furnish al Qaeda with the means to take the ultimate step of its jihad.

How much time will it take for all this to be said? How much longer will Islamabad's masquerade endure? Next month the American Congress will vote on the question of three billion dollars in aid to Pakistan: Will this aspect of things be taken into account? Will demands be made, at last, in exchange for this aid, for inspections of Pakistani sites, as well as the installation of a double-key system--a system that some of us here in Europe have been calling for?
These are just a few elements I offer--as part of a debate that has scarcely begun.

| 20 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

They weren't just playing paintball. Note also that they were recruited based on an Islamic religious appeal, right in Virginia. From AP:

Just weeks after the Sept. 11 attacks, three Americans spent a month on a remote Pakistani mountaintop, training with a militant Islamic group, AK-47 assault rifles and anti-aircraft guns and hoping to eventually fight in Afghanistan against U.S. troops, one of the men testified Tuesday.

Khwaja Mahmood Hasan described the scene during the trial of four members of what prosecutors call a Virginia-based "jihad network."

Hasan testified that he and the other two Americans _ Yong Ki Kwon and Masoud Khan _ left the training camp run by a Pakistani militant group called Lashkar-e-Taiba only after it became apparent that they would not be able to cross the border into Afghanistan and fight alongside the Taliban.

"We started hearing reports from the BBC that the war was coming to a quick end," Hasan testified, recalling his time at the mountaintop camp called ibn Masood. He said Taliban leader Mullah Omar was no longer calling for Muslims to come to Afghanistan's aid.

Khan, of Gaithersburg, Md., is one of the four defendants on trial and faces the most serious charges, including conspiracy to levy war against the United States and conspiracy to provide material support to Osama bin Laden's al-Qaida network.

Three other defendants face lesser conspiracy and firearms charges; prosecutors allege the group used paintball games near Fredericksburg in the summers of 2000 and 2001 to prepare for holy war against India and other nations with whom the United States is at peace.

Hasan and Kwon, who trained with Khan at the Lashkar camp, have already pleaded guilty to firearms and conspiracy charges and been sentenced to 11 years in prison. Both agreed to testify for the government as part of their plea agreements and could have their sentences reduced for their cooperation.

Khan's lawyers said in opening statements last week that their client, who was born in Pakistan, traveled to that country primarily to take care of family affairs and that his visit to Lashkar camps was simply a way to fulfill his Islamic duties of learning self-defense.

Yeah, that's it. Just as a hot war was breaking out between the U.S. and an Islamic regime, he decided to join up with forces allied with that regime to learn a little self-defense. But the fact that they were fighting the U.S. was no doubt purely coincidental.

Hasan said the three spent five weeks at three different camps run by Lashkar, which was designated a terrorist organization by the U.S. government in December 2001.

He said the group learned to use weapons including AK-47s, handguns and rocket-propelled grenades. They took turns firing an anti-aircraft gun at the side of a mountain.

Their first trip to the camp was thwarted by a government checkpoint, because Kwon's Korean nationality drew suspicion. They made it to the camp a second time when they were personally escorted by Lashkar's leader.

While at the camp, they once had to hide from Pakistani intelligence officers who swept through the camp looking for foreigners.

"They took us and hid us on the side of a mountain" for several hours when the when the intelligence officers made their sweep, Hasan said.

Hasan, a northern Virginia resident and graduate of Marymount University in Arlington, said he and the others trained in a group of 12 to 15 along with British and Saudi citizens.

Hasan said he decided to fight for the Taliban after a Sept. 16, 2001, meeting in Fairfax, Va., in which a Muslim scholar named Ali al-Tamimi told members of the paintball group that Islam required them to defend the Taliban against the imminent U.S. invasion of Afghanistan.

The group viewed Lashkar as a means to obtain the training necessary to join Taliban fighters.

"I knew they (Lashkar) could get us to Afghanistan," Hasan said.

Also on Tuesday, an expert in paintball games testified for the defense that 8.7 million Americans play the sport.

Jessica Sparks, editor of Paintball magazine, said it is common for paintball players to learn basic tactics like providing cover fire and how to advance in formation.

Prosecutors have said such tactics are evidence the group was engaging in military training.

| 1 Comment
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

When dhimmis get out of line, they forfeit their contract of protection. One of the ways they do that is by proselytizing. Thanks to FreedomNowNews for forwarding this:

On Saturday, February 14, 2004 at approximately 4:30 pm local time in Baghdad, a van loaded with four Americans was attacked in an execution style attack. The attack occurred near the village of Mahmodia which is about one half hour south of Baghdad. The four passengers were: Pastor John Kelley, Pastor Kirk Di Vietro, Pastor David Davis and Pastor Garland Carey. Their van was sprayed with automatic weapon fire. The attack came from a small passenger car that was behind the van. The car passed the van on the right side and repeatedly sprayed the vehicle with bullets. Three of the men in the van received minor wounds, but Pastor John Kelly of the Curtis Corner Baptist, Wakefield Rhode Island, was killed in the attack. The driver of the van saved the lives of the other three men by evasive driving tactics and delivering the en to an Iraqi hospital. He was not injured, although the van was damaged considerably. The US Army got involved at the hospital and supervised their examinations and medical attention. A member of the US Consulate contacted me and delivered the three survivors safely into my hands at approximately 10:30 pm. They have each one talked with their families and they are resting today. We have been assured that they will be able to fly from Baghdad soon. I personally called Mrs. Kelley with this information. We are in contact with the US Military command and are awaiting instructions.

This was a tragic loss. Pastor Kelley has been a close associate of mine for many years. We have worked on a number of projects together in the work of the Lord. he was volunteer for this team, as were the other members. He requested permission to come and he has certainly been a blessing to all with whom he has had contact. My grief is without description. He was a great man. He served in the US Marines, pastored for more than 25 years and was a pillar of Christian manhood.

Robert Lewis, in Baghdad

If you would like to send a sympathy card to Mrs. Kelly, you may do so at
the following address.

Mrs. Kelley
Curtis Corner Baptist Church
591 Curtis Corner Rd
Wakefield, RI

| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The jihadis who killed Daniel Pearl seem to have been caught. From Reuters, with thanks to Nicolei:

Pakistani police have arrested two Islamic militants, including one suspected of involvement in the kidnap and killing of U.S. reporter Daniel Pearl, an officer says.

The two men, Sajid Jabbar and Mohammad Athar, were arrested in an overnight raid in the port city of Karachi and belong to the outlawed Lashkar-e-Jhangvi group, Fayyaz Leghari, chief of the investigation branch of Karachi police, told Reuters.

Another senior officer, who did not want to be identified, said Jabbar was suspected of involvement in the kidnapping and murder of Wall Street Journal reporter Pearl in 2002 as well as several other militant attacks.

"He carries a reward of 500,000 rupees on his head," the officer said.

He said Jabbar was a close associate of Asif Ramzi, another suspect in the murder of Pearl, who blew himself up while making bombs in Karachi in December 2002.

Leghari said Jabbar and Athar were suspected of planning fresh attacks in Karachi. "We have seized a huge amount of weapons and explosives from their possession," he said.

Athar was the chief of the Sindh provincial wing of the Lashkar-e-Jhangvi and wanted for at least 10 separate terror attacks, including sending parcel bombs to senior police officers.

"Their arrest is a big success for the police and a blow to the terrorists," Leghari said.

Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, which has ties with the Taliban regime which formerly ruled Afghanistan and the al Qaeda network of Osama bin Laden, is also blamed for a May 2002 suicide bombing in Karachi in which 11 French technicians and three Pakistanis were killed.

Pearl was kidnapped and murdered in Karachi in early 2002 while researching a story on Islamic militants against a backdrop of the September 11 attacks on the United States.

A British-born militant, Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh, better known as Sheikh Omar, was sentenced to death in July 2002 for masterminding his murder. Omar has denied the charge and lodged an appeal.

| 16 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The Mufti of Australia and New Zealand, Taj Al-Din Hamed Abdallah Al-Hilali (the one who claimed Australia was originally Muslim), has come under fire for his remarks praising jihad and suicide bombing. His defense? His remarks were "taken out of context."

I couldn't begin to count the times that Muslim spokesmen have told me I am taking Qur'an quotes, or Hadith quotes, or the words of radical Muslims, out of context. It is an all-purpose defense, but it's a lazy and ultimately ineffective one. What possible context could justify or mitigate incitements to mass murder? And even if the Qur'an's injunction to "slay unbelievers wherever you find them" (Sura 9:5) really does only apply to some of the Prophet Muhammad's opponents, it is not being wrenched out of this context by "venomous Orientalists" like me, but by radical Muslims around the world who seem unimpressed by arguments that this behavior was restricted to Muhammad's day. And why are they unimpressed? Because the entire context of the Qur'an and the way it is traditionally interpreted by Muslims does not teach that this verse cannot be applied to contemporary situations. Moreover, if the Prophet behaved that way, his actions in this as in everything else are exemplary -- so even the argument used by the "out-of-context" folks doesn't blunt the force of this verse or keep it from being used by radicals.

What is needed is thoroughgoing reform that will rule out radical Muslim exegesis of the Qur'an as an option for Muslims. Shallow, tiresome bleats of "out of context" and "religion of peace" don't quite accomplish this.

From The Australian, with thanks to Kevin:

A SENIOR Liberal MP today urged the Federal Government to consider action against the leader of Australia's Muslims for praising Islamic suicide bombers and calling for a holy war against Israel. . . .

Christopher Pyne, parliamentary secretary to the Minister for Family and Community Services, said he was appalled and horrified by Sheik Alhilali's alleged support for violence.

But a spokesman for the Sydney-based Mufti said he had been taken out of context. . . .

The Mufti's spokesman in Sydney, Keysar Trad, said MEMRI had taken the Muslim leader out of context.

"The Mufti is a proponent of peace and peaceful solutions to any conflict," he told ABC radio.

"I spoke to him today and he assured me that the context in which he made his message was not in the way that it was reported by these people."

Mr Trad said the Mufti believed Muslim resistance fighters may target occupying military forces, but not civilians.

He said the Mufti was not urging people to carry out suicide bombings.

"He is saying, let's not condemn them because these people are making a major sacrifice to protect their country," said Mr Trad, of the Lebanese Muslim Association.

Nor was the Mufti calling for a war against Israel.

"He was not so much calling for a jihad in the nature of war, but in the nature of what will get that country to respect the United Nations resolutions."

Hmm. A peaceful jihad to force respect for UN resolutions. That's a new one.

| 11 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Israel and Saudi Arabia have security fences to try to keep jihad terrorists out. Now Thailand is building one to keep them in. From Reuters, with thanks to Nicolei:

Thailand will build security fences along part of its 650-km (400-mile) border with Malaysia to try to stop militant Muslims escaping after attacking Thai forces, Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra said on Tuesday.

The army would build the fences across suspected escape routes used by militants in predominantly Buddhist Thailand's largely Muslim south, where a new wave of violence began last month when gunmen raided an army base, he said.

"We will focus on areas with cross-border smuggling problems which are not too many. We don't have to build fences all along the entire 600-km border," Thaksin told reporters in Bangkok.

A massive security operation has failed to catch the gunmen who stole more than 100 weapons, mostly M-16 assault rifles, in the attack, or the people who set ablaze 21 state schools in an operation officials believe was a diversion.

Since then, several Buddhist monks and police and civil servants of both religions have been killed by machete-wielding raiders or gunmen.

Some officials believe those behind the attacks may have links to Jemaah Islamiah, widely regarded as the Southeast Asian branch of al Qaeda.

In the latest border incident last Saturday, two people were shot dead in the southern province of Narathiwat province while Thaksin was talking to officials about how to halt the violence.

Police believe the attackers were connected to apparently resurgent separatist groups in a region that is home to most of Thailand's six million Muslims, almost 10 percent of the population. The attackers fled after the ambush.

| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

_38925701_faisal_pa_body203.jpeg
El-Faisal

He was just interpreting the Qur'an, says Sheikh Abdullah el-Faisal. From the BBC, with thanks to Nicolei:

A Muslim cleric jailed for urging followers to kill non-believers, Jews, Hindus and Americans has lost an appeal against his conviction. Sheikh Abdullah el-Faisal was jailed for nine years last March for soliciting murder and using threatening and insulting words in taped lectures.

On Tuesday, the Court of Appeal, while upholding the conviction, reduced his sentence to seven years.

The 39-year-old had preached at Brixton mosque in south London.

El-faisal's trial was the first prosecution of a Muslim cleric in England.

When he was originally sentenced the Common Serjeant of London, Peter Beaumont, told him: "Instead of being a calming force you fanned the flames of hostility."

Koran interpretations

The judge also recommended el-faisal, of Stratford, east London, serve at least half his sentence before being deported.

The Jamaican convert to Islam told young British Muslims they would be rewarded with 72 virgins in paradise if they died in a holy war.

He was sentenced to seven years on three charges of soliciting the murder of non-believers, Jews, Hindus and Americans in his speeches.

And he was sentenced to an additional two years on charges of using insulting words and distributing tapes of insulting words.

During his trial he argued he was interpreting and updating the words of the Koran, the Islamic holy book.

Interesting defense. Did he think that if he could convince the Court that his hatred and incitement to murder was religious instruction, he would get a pass?

| 14 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The seriousness of those who want to impose Sharia and all its restrictions (including the prohibition of music) upon Pakistan (where dhimmi Christians already have it bad enough) is illustrated by this Telegraph story about the terrorization of a Pakistani pop singer. It also contains interesting information about how these radical Muslims want to force women to wear the veil.

Fame was no protection for one of Pakistan's most celebrated pop stars when he indulged in the "un-Islamic" practice of singing in public.

Gulzar Alam was beaten with rifle butts and fists when 20 policemen armed with AK47s raided a wedding party where he was performing.

"They are trying to be the Taliban," said Mr Alam. "They are trying to impose this Islamic system. But music is our tradition and it reflects our culture."

Covered in bruises, he was dragged to the cells in the frontier city of Peshawar and locked up for four hours before friends secured his release.

Mr Alam, 42, said: "The police said, 'This music is banned'. They swore at me. They treated me like a very low person. This province has become a police state."

Mr Alam had fallen foul of the Islamist coalition running Pakistan's North-West Frontier Province. For the first time, extreme religious parties have won outright control of the government of this crucial area near the border with Afghanistan.

They have a simple manifesto: to reinvent the Taliban in a corner of Pakistan.

Since winning power less than 18 months ago the coalition has banned anyone from playing music or singing in public and confiscated thousands of music tapes from the bazaars. These were heaped on a huge bonfire in Peshawar and set alight by the local police chief.

Videotapes of test cricket matches were also thrown on to the flames because the authorities had noticed that shots of the crowds showed fleeting glimpses of unveiled women.

The ritual - a conscious imitation of the frequent bonfires of "un-Islamic" material staged by the Taliban regime in Kabul - was followed by the closure of Peshawar's only theatre.

Near the deserted Nishter Hall, once the centre of a community of 350 actors and musicians, a billboard carrying an advertisement for shoes was damaged. Black paint covered the faces of two women.

Across the province almost all billboards carrying pictures of women have been torn down or sprayed. At the Shabistan cinema in Peshawar colourful hoardings that once tempted passers-by with pictures of women clad in bright saris and men brandishing guns have been removed. Anodyne pictures of eagles and lions have replaced them.

Mr Alam believes that the Islamists are waging a vendetta against the entire artistic community. As the province's most famous performer, he has been singled out for harassment.

Two months after beating him up at the wedding party, police raided Mr Alam's house in Peshawar's Old City.

By chance, he was away, so they arrested his brother, Alam Khan, 25, and his sons, Salman, 19, and Shan, 13. They were beaten and held in the cells overnight on trumped-up charges of kidnapping two Afghan children.

When the provincial assembly meets next month the authorities will press ahead with the next stage of their campaign. They will introduce a law creating a new body modelled on the Taliban's "ministry for the promotion of virtue and prevention of vice".

This will have sweeping powers to intervene in any area of life and uphold "Islamic standards". The law will also create a parallel police and judicial system to implement a Sharia Law Act passed by the provincial assembly last year.

"This is the most dangerous development," said Afrasiab Khattak, from the Pakistan Human Rights Commission. "It will allow the government to intervene in anything, without challenge from the courts." The Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal coalition which runs the provincial government insists that there is no cause for concern. Malik Zafar Azam, the justice and parliamentary affairs minister, shies away from comparisons with the Taliban and points out the Islamists won 67 of the local assembly's 124 seats in free elections in 2002.

"We are doing what the people want us to do," he said. "We have given them security. You can go where you want in safety here."

The Islamists have also pledged to segregate tertiary education by building a new women's university in Peshawar, with women forced to wear veils. "The value of a person is in one's mind, not in what one wears," said Saman Mushtaq, 20, a business studies student at Peshawar University.

"They should not impose the veil upon us."

| 1 Comment
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

February 17, 2004

Before shrimp on the barbee, Foster's Lager, and Crocodile Dundee, evidently there was the burqa, the book, and the Prophet. MEMRI is reporting that the Mufti of Australia and New Zealand, Taj Al-Din Hamed Abdallah Al-Hilali, is claiming that Australia was originally Muslim land, settled by Afghans. The Aborigines are their descendants:

"The strange thing was that when our muezzin [who accompanied Sheikh Al-Hilali on his visit to Alice Springs] stood up to call for prayer, the old people of the town came out, and so did men and youths, and they looked different than the black Aborigines. They were a mixture of Afghan and Aborigine, as a result of marriages of Afghan men and Aborigine women. When the muezzin called 'Allahu Akbar,' they said, 'We have heard this song from our ancestors...' When they asked us 'What is this song you are singing?' we told them that this was an announcement of prayer time. When we asked them their names, they answered John, or Steve, but their names ended with Saraj Al-Din, Abdallah, or Muhammad..."

This sort of thing may just seem silly, or even cute, until one realizes that to anyone who takes the Sheikh's claim seriously, Australia is now Muslim land. Islamic law stipulates that Muslims possess by right any land that once formed part of the House of Islam; this is a key element of the claim to Israel put forward by Hamas and Islamic Jihad. The same claim has been advanced, by the way, for America.

Al-Hilali, meanwhile, has already endorsed violent jihad in other contexts:

Following a meeting with Hizbullah leader Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah, Sheikh Al-Hilali said: "I blessed Hizbullah for liberating the prisoners and the bones of the Shahids and I praised it and its sacrifice. Hizbullah has become a model for all the Mujahideen in the world... Most of the Australian people do not support the policy of the Australian government, which has placed Hizbullah on the terror list out of submission to the U.S., and the Australian prime minister will pay the price for this in the next elections..." . . .

"We are proud of the Islamic resistance in Palestine, Lebanon, Kashmir, and everywhere in the world that seeks to achieve its legitimate rights in accordance with the international resolutions, the human rights conventions, and the U.N. resolutions...

"We are also proud of the Islamic resistance that liberated southern Lebanon, led by Hizbullah, the legitimate Lebanese national movement, that forced the Israeli occupation army to withdraw from southern Lebanon, dragging trails of disappointment and shame behind it.

"We are also proud of what Hamas and the Islamic Jihad are both doing in the occupied territories. We support the resistance and support, with all our might, the martyrdom operations carried out by the Palestinian liberation movements, operations that are a legitimate act against the cruel occupation, according to all international norms and conventions.

"Also, whoever carries out a martyrdom [operation] is a pure Shahid and one of the men of Paradise. Moreover, he stands at the head of the Shahids."

That is, of course, a suicide bombing.

Al-Hilali also memorably dubbed Bush, Blair, and Australian PM John Howard the "axis of evil." But who is really behind it all? One guess:

Sheikh Al-Hilali said on another occasion: "The media all over the world are controlled by Zionist fingers, particularly the Western media, and that includes Australia, in which the media are under Zionist hegemony. But in Australia, which unlike the West and the U.S. is multicultural, the media are less racist in their enmity to Muslims and Islam. This is evidenced by the fact that we won the last media battle in Australia and succeeded in forcing the Australian people to treat us with respect. We have not suffered from persecution or disrespect to the same extent that Islamic communities in Western countries and in America have suffered."

ADDENDUM: Susan has referred me to two particularly egregious examples of Islamic mythmaking about a pre-Columbian Muslim America. Go here and click on "History."

UPDATE: After being condemned by the Australian Prime Minister and many others, Hilali is denying he called for jihad at all. No one seems concerned about his claim that Australia was originally Muslim. (Thanks to Kevin and Jean-Luc.)

| 33 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Canada has become a place where terrorists congregate. From the Globe and Mail, with thanks to Jean-Luc:

Canada has been branded a "favoured destination for terrorists and international criminals" by the research arm of the U.S. Congress.

Generous constitutional freedoms, weak law enforcement and lightly patrolled borders have made the country an inviting place for dangerous extremists to set up shop, says a new report by the Library of Congress in Washington.

"Canada has played a significant role as a base for both transnational criminal activity and terrorist activity," the report says.

The report, titled Nations Hospitable to Organized Crime and Terrorism, was completed in October by the congressional library's federal research division under an arrangement with the Central Intelligence, Crime and Narcotics Center. . . .

Numerous other countries, including leading industrialized nations like Britain, France and Germany, are also critiqued in the 234-page report, along with the likes of Algeria, Indonesia and Russia.

But only a handful of jurisdictions in the Western Hemisphere — Canada, Colombia, Mexico and the notorious tri-border region of Argentina, Brazil and Paraguay — are the focus of attention.

The report highlights the case of Ahmed Ressam, the Algerian-born Montrealer caught trying to slip across the border in 1999 to bomb Los Angeles International Airport. While planning the attack, Mr. Ressam supplemented his welfare payments by stealing cash and credit cards.

| 19 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

From Compass Direct:

Muslim protestors have attacked at least four churches over the past three weeks in the regions of East Java, West Java and North Sumatra, Indonesia.

A crowd of approximately 100 people attacked the Gereja Protestan Indonesia (GPI) church in East Bekasi on January 9. Government officials had given permission for the church to renovate an old house which they had used as a church since 1975. However, leaders of the local Amar Ma’arut mosque encouraged Muslim neighbors to protest against the renovations. Church members met with local government and mosque officials on January 12 and agreed to suspend renovations temporarily.

Meanwhile, two other churches were attacked in Surubaya in late December and early January, and a bomb was placed in another church in Medan, North Sumatra. Muslim protestors forced the two churches in Surabaya, East Java, to close their doors. The pastor of one of the churches received death threats from the attackers.

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

British MP Jenny Tonge, who ran into trouble last month for her remarks in "empathy" with suicide bombing, has done it again. She was sent by BBC Radio 4's Today show to meet families and victims of suicide bombers, and filed this report (thanks to Andy Bannister for the link).

My remarks last month, expressing empathy with suicide bombers, had been misinterpreted by the tabloids as meaning sympathy and approval.

It was, therefore, with some trepidation that I travelled from Jerusalem to the checkpoint out to Bethlehem and the Occupied Territories. . . .

In Israel, the armed forces have F16 fighter planes, helicopter gun-ships, tanks, even nuclear weapons.

The disparity was pointed out to me by a civil society group in Bethlehem, when I asked why Palestinians used suicide bombers.

"Tell the US to give us the arms that Israel has and we will stop such attacks," was the response.

What then is the explanation for suicide bombings against civilians in Chechnya, Kashmir, Bali, etc.?

We met up with some al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade terrorists after lurking guiltily in Manger Square waiting for them to arrive.

We were taken to a safe Christian house, where two bearded, shaded, skull-capped men, one with a black Kalashnikov, sat on a sofa near a huge wall hanging of Jesus the Good Shepherd.

They had heard about my remarks and were pleased that I understood the reasons why they were terrorists, even "proud" of me. This was spine-chilling.

More re-assuring was the statement that they now accepted that Israel had a right to exist and their campaign would stop when Israel withdrew to its 1967 borders, removed settlements and returned Jerusalem to the Palestinians.

It is a different message from the one we have been used to.

Yet one to be taken at face value, Ms. Tonge?

We visited the family of a suicide bomber. The stories of indoctrination of little children right through their schooldays didn't seem to apply here.

The brothers of Mohamed showed no signs of this and his mother claimed she had no idea her son was planning this until the al-Aqsa Brigade delivered his "memorial" picture taken before the mission.

It is certainly true that suicide bombers are regarded as national heroes here, but what else do they have - born out of despair and the desire to resist occupation, laced with religious belief.

Civilian targets are chosen because there is no way of getting at military targets.

That may be the most credulity-straining phrase in this whole piece. It also blissfully ignores the many justifications issued by Islamic spokesmen for attacks against civilians, proclaiming that "there are no civilians in Israel."

We visited the spot where the Angel Gabriel "came down" to the shepherds in their fields and drove back to Jerusalem as a rainbow formed over the golden city - surely one of the most beautiful places on earth.

The next day back in Israel, I couldn't find anyone who was willing to see why the Palestinians resorted to suicide attacks.

You don't say!

Some of the Israeli arguments had truth in them, but it was all so negative.

Well then, how could they be true? The truth is always positive, of course!

Until, late in the day, we met a single mother whose 15-year-old daughter had been killed in the local supermarket by an 18-year-old female suicide bomber.

Grief-stricken, she had tried to contact the bomber's family, only to find they were "proud" of their daughter.

The idea that anyone could see this kind of thing justified in any way is barbaric.

But then she received a letter from a Palestinian mother expressing her condolences and asking for a meeting. Her young, civilian son had been killed by an Israeli soldier. They were going to meet.

I left this woman feeling that there was the first sign of reconciliation; we know there are many such people in Israel and Palestine, fed up with the stupidity of their leaders.

I hope these people win out in the end. But Tonge isn't helping.

| 13 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"A clear terrorist threat still exists in East Africa, and greater military co-operation is needed to defeat it, a top U.S. general warned Monday during a visit to Ethiopia." This from AP, with thanks to Jean-Luc.

Gen. John Abizaid, whose Central Command is responsible for Afghanistan, Iraq and East Africa, said closer "military and intelligence co-operation" is needed between East African governments to prevent extremist groups like al-Qaida from gaining an "ideological foothold" in the region.

"The threat is clear, but the threat can be deterred and can be defeated," he told journalists in the Ethiopian capital, Addis Ababa.

"This terrorist threat knows no boundary, and when we operate only on a nation-state basis we will be unable to really get at the heart of the terrorist problem, which is transnational."

Abizaid cited Somalia - which has had no central government since 1990 - as a potential trouble spot in the region.

"We know the terrorists gravitate toward ungoverned spaces, and these are areas where they look for the opportunities to gain recruits, establish safe-havens and move money," he said. "We certainly have indications to believe that people associated with these groups operate in and around areas such as Somalia."

| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Good thing they read the papers down at the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO). From the Sydney Morning Herald, with thanks to Jean-Luc:

Australia's intelligence agency first became aware of a Somalian man - who is alleged to have links to terrorist financing organisations, is being prosecuted in the US and had visited Australia five times since 2000 - only after reading a media report about him last month.

ASIO's director-general, Dennis Richardson, told a Senate estimates hearing yesterday this was "not surprising" because the man, 41-year-old Omar Mohamed, was not on any terrorist database or movement alert list and his prosecution in the US was for immigration fraud.

Then where did the media get their info about him?

The fraud charges relate to Mohamed's failure to reveal on his US citizenship application that the Western Somali Relief Agency, of which he is president, received funds from Global Relief Foundation, a group listed in the US as a terrorist organisation.

Mr Richardson told the hearing that Mohamed visited Australia between December 2000 and December 2003. Since the media report, Mohamed's movements have been the subject of an ASIO investigation.

"They are of some interest, not in terms of fund-raising, but they are of some interest in terms of getting a better handle on the relationships he may or may not have had in Australia," Mr Richardson said.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

According to the Strategic Foresight Group of Mumbai, the tiny minority of extremists is doing big business in Pakistan. From the Times of India, with thanks to Jean-Luc:

Pakistan's "terror-economy" accounts for Rs 264 billion, or 6.6 per cent, of the country's gross domestic product (GDP), a Mumbai-based think tank said in a report Monday.

Pakistan's "conflict economy" accounts for more than 10 per cent of its GDP, the report contended.

In what it described as a "comprehensive assessment of the cost of conflict between India and Pakistan", the Strategic Foresight Group said it had not only taken into account military expenditure and loss of trade, but also factors like economic costs, socio-political damage, diplomatic costs, human costs and even the "implications of the nuking of Mumbai and Karachi".

In the forward to the study, conducted by Ilmas Futehally and Semu Bhatt, former Pakistani foreign secretary Niaz Naik said: "It is the first time that we have such all encompassing information and analysis in one place on the implications of adversarial relations between India and Pakistan."

Excerpts from the report, released here Monday did not refer to the basis on which it had predicated its conclusions.

Some of the main observations of the report:

[. . .]

* Pakistan's GTP (gross terror-economy product) is Rs 264 billion or 6.6 percent of its GDP.

* Pakistan's Conflict Economy is more than 10 percent of GDP. The Conflict Economy includes GTP and military expenditure.

* Kashmir's GTP is estimated to be Rs 3.5 billion.

* Pakistan's jehadi forces are expected to increase from 200,000 at present to 300,000 at the end of the decade and the army from 620,000 at present to 646,000 at the end of the decade.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

February 16, 2004

Paul Bremer has apparently weighed in against Sharia in Iraq. From AP:

The top U.S. administrator in Iraq suggested Monday he would block any interim constitution that would make Islam the chief source of law, as some members of the Iraqi Governing Council have sought.

L. Paul Bremer said the current draft of the constitution would make Islam the state religion of Iraq and "a source of inspiration for the law" — as opposed to the main source.

Many Iraqi women have expressed fears that the rights they hold under Iraq's longtime secular system would be rolled back in the interim constitution being written by U.S.-picked Iraqi leaders and their advisers, many of them Americans. U.S. lawmakers have urged the White House to prevent Islamic restrictions on Iraqi women.

Asked what would happen if Iraqi leaders wrote into the constitution that Islamic sharia law is the principal basis of the law, Bremer suggested he would wield his veto. "Our position is clear. It can't be law until I sign it," he said.

Bremer must sign into law all measures passed by the 25-member council, including the interim constitution. Iraq's powerful Shiite clergy, however, has demanded the document be approved by an elected legislature. Under U.S. plans, a permanent constitution would not be drawn up and voted on until 2005.

Bremer used the inauguration ceremony at a women's center in the southern city of Karbala to argue for more than "token" women's representation in the transitional government due to take power June 30.

"I think it is very important that women be represented in all the political bodies," Bremer said.

"Women are the majority in this country, in this area probably a substantial majority," he said, referring to the Saddam Hussein's 1991 purges of Shiite Muslim men. Those killings left the holy city of Karbala and other Shiite cities dotted with mass graves and brimming with thousands of widows.

| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

I was uneasy when I read Lt. Col. Stephen Barger's reply to questions about Ryan Anderson's religion, and Joel Mowbray puts his finger on why:

When asked if recently “detained” National Guard soldier Ryan Anderson—who allegedly tried to pass on sensitive information to al Qaeda—was a Muslim, the unit spokesman, Lt. Col. Stephen Barger replied, “Religious preferences are an individual right and responsibility, and I really can’t get into it.”

On one level, of course, Barger is right. Sadly, however, Anderson’s religion may be the only prism through which his alleged behavior can be understood.

Various media reports have pegged Anderson as a convert to Islam. Why is this significant?

Because if he had converted to Buddhism or Hindu, for example, he almost certainly would not have not been caught up in a sting operation that found him trying to deliver to al Qaeda closely-guarded details about vulnerabilities and capabilities of armed tanks and Humvees.

This is obviously not to suggest that Muslims cannot be trusted or that, as a group, they should be viewed with suspicion. But it is just as true that Anderson’s reported conversion to Islam cannot be ignored.

We call our struggle against al Qaeda and the rest of the worldwide terror network the “War on Terror.” But to al Qaeda and its ilk, it is not a “war.” It is a Jihad.

In a Jihad, where the terrorists unite under the rallying cry of defeating the Infidels in the name of Islam, the most likely—if not the only—people to betray America in order to help the enemy are going to be Muslim.

That group of Muslims willing to commit horrific acts is certainly tiny, but a tiny number of Benedict Arnolds is all al Qaeda needs to wreak enormous havoc.

And as anyone who knows folks who have converted to any religion can attest, the converts often become, for lack of a better expression, hard-core. “Hard-core” indeed sounds harsh, as most passionate converts are devout in the best sense. Yet from the likes of John Walker Lindh and Jose Padilla, converts can become among the most radical.

Should Anderson have been denied the opportunity to serve his country because he is a convert to Islam? Of course not. But just as we give psych exams and various personality tests to soldiers, thorough examination of Islamic converts—at the least—would not seem to be such a bad idea. And for people working in sensitive positions, then rigorous screening would seem to be nothing if not prudent.

Some would undoubtedly scream “profiling.” But it is precisely because of “profiling” that authorities might be inclined to focus more on Arabs, meaning al Qaeda is more likely to prefer Muslims who are not Arabs.

As we witnessed with Asan Akbar, the Muslim Army Sergeant who killed two and wounded 14 of his fellow soldiers last year in Kuwait, it only takes one soldier to harm many innocents. And if he hadn’t been such a coward—he was found hiding in a bunker—he probably could have murdered many more Americans.

Questions of profiling aside, however, specific facts about Anderson should have prompted investigation long ago. The 26-year-old attended Washington State University, which the FBI believes has been a base of operations for people affiliated with al Qaeda.

Throughout 2002 and 2003, federal authorities probed a possible terror cell operating out Pullman, Washington (home of WSU) and the University of Idaho campus, which is just nine miles away in Moscow, Idaho. At least two current or former WSU students have been arrested.

Others were also arrested, including former Idaho football player Abdullah al-Kidd (born Lavoni T. Kidd), who was nabbed at Dulles International Airport, just outside of Washington, D.C., holding a first-class, one-way ticket to Saudi Arabia.

The man reportedly at the center of the investigation, Sami Omar Al-Hussayen, allegedly helped design website for radical Islamic sheikhs who had direct ties to Osama bin Laden and he also allegedly had on his computer hard drive thousands of photos of the World Trade Center, both before and after 9/11.

According to court documents, al-Hussayen’s uncle traveled to the U.S. from Saudi Arabia and “stayed in the same hotel in the Herndon, Va., area as three of the Sept. 11 hijackers of Flight 77 that crashed into the Pentagon.”

Graduating in 2002, Anderson attended WSU—where he converted to Islam—as the alleged terror activity was ongoing. The question investigators must not be shy about asking is: how did Anderson’s Islamic experience at WSU help shape him?

ADDENDUM: A fuller explanation by Bassam M. Madany.

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The former British chancellor of the exchequer, Lord Norman Lamont, has criticized the French headscarf ban in a speech in Pakistan. Lamont talked some sense about Islamic terrorism, but then lapsed into nonsense. From HiPakistan, with thanks to Bassam Madany and Nicolei:

He observed that 9/11 dramtically [sic] increased awareness in the US and Europe of terrorists who claimed to be acting in the name of Islam. "Most Muslims are not fundamentalists, and most fundamentalists are not terrorists, but most terrorists are Muslims and proud of it. When Muslims ask why are Irish terrorists and Basque terrorists not described as Christian, the answer is simple. They do not describe themselves like that. Many in the West react in an enormous information vacuumm [sic]. Many see only media stereotypes portraying Islam through distorted lenses focussing purely on terrorists, religious extremists and oppressed women. Others see the religious revival of Islam throughout the world. They fear that fundamentalists, who too often they equate with extremists, want to turn every Muslim society into a theocracy fanning the flames of hatred against the West in order to wage Jihad and restore the Caliphate throughout a large part of the world," he said.

But then came the nonsense:

Mr Lamont said: "Islam's attitude towards other religions is more tolerant than that of Christianity. The Prophet (PBUH) and his community in Medina accepted the co-existence of Muslims, Jews and Christians. The Prophet (PBUH) discussed and debated with, and gave freedom of religious thought and practice to, Jews and Christians. When the Catholic rulers of Spain, Ferdinand and Isabella, drove out the Jews many found refuge in North Africa and the Ottoman Empire. When Muslims conquered Byzantine [sic] they were welcomed by some Christians who were persecuted as heretics. The Muslim conquerers proved to be far more tolerant than imperial Christianity had been. During the Crusades despite the conflict Muslims tolerated the practice of Christianity, an example not emulated by the other side. The Ottoman Empire, for the most part, is an example of the positive treatment of religious minorities in a Muslim majority context."

Lord Norman should look again at the history of dhimmitude, as I outline it in Onward Muslim Soldiers and as has been amply documented by the renowned historian Bat Ye'or in her books The Dhimmi, The Decline of Eastern Christianity Under Islam, and Islam and Dhimmitude. It is nice to dream of Islamic tolerance, but the fact is that discrimination against non-Muslims is part of Islamic law and always has been. It does no good to anyone to pretend otherwise. What is needed instead of obfuscations like Lord Norman's is a forthright effort to reform Islamic law, so that it comes into line with true equality of rights as outlined by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Australian commentator Tanveer Ahmed thinks it does. He writes in The Australian (with thanks to Nicolei):

Numerous perpetrators of the September 11 attacks, remember, were raised and educated in the West. A French study looked at the life of one of them, Moussaoui.

He came to France as a young child and had a relatively normal upbringing in the outer suburbs of Paris where there are large numbers of Muslim immigrants. He was an average student in school and showed no signs of pathological behaviour.

His first moves towards extremist Islam coincided with being discriminated against in the workplace and in leisure situations.

There was one clear incident where a bouncer denied him entry to a Parisian nightclub, telling him openly it was because he was an Arab. Moussaoui's brother tells the French sociologists that his interest in Islam began soon afterwards. The rest is history.

The study went on to hypothesise that extremist Islam was only an option when being French no longer seemed a possibility.

The man who kidnapped The Wall Street Journal writer, Daniel Pearl, was born in Britain, studied at an English public school and then at the London School of Economics - not known for its "madrasah" qualities. His parents were Pakistani migrants. Ahmed Omar Sheikh said he wasn't British or Pakistani, just Muslim. He said he could never be accepted by the "racist" British.

It is something I see in my younger, second-generation Arab or Asian psychiatric patients in Sydney. It is difficult for them to feel deep ties to the country of their parents. They see the pictures on the walls, may speak some of the language but ultimately have never lived there. And when they have visited, for the majority, it is the first time they have felt Australian.

But living in Australia, the recurring motifs of Australian life - sun, beer and sport - do not connect with the migrant experience. Nor do the myths and legends of outback Australia have resonance. Their non-white appearance is often commented upon at work or school. These are not usually racist or discriminatory remarks but highlight a sense of the foreign nevertheless. Perhaps notions of mateship and egalitarianism do resonate but they are not enough to drive home a feeling of being Australian.

What often fills the void is religion. This is where their search for identity finds a voice. And it is not necessarily Islam. Christianity or Buddhism can have just such a transformative effect.

But for groups that may suffer from feelings of exclusion or discrimination, Islam provides the deepest connection. Islam has become the religion of choice for the dispossessed, the poor or the oppressed.

From African-Americans to Afghan refugees, Islam cushions a feeling of disconnection. A religion now defined by its ability to turn feelings of frustration and defeat to outright defiance, it can win the hearts of those longing to belong.

I visited a weekly gathering of Muslims, led by a charismatic Egyptian cleric, that a young Arab patient began attending in Sydney. The patient was of Lebanese background and had been depressed. His malaise was deeply rooted in a feeling of disconnection.

But he seemed to be improving since attending these meetings. The group was dominated by those under the age of 30. Everyone I met had a university degree and spoke in an Australian accent.

Despite having plenty of great things to say about Australia as a country and a sense of gratitude at the opportunities they were given, many of the youths felt they could never be accepted as an Australian, that they would remain on the cultural fringes. They felt their ties could not extend beyond the economic.

But I saw no evidence of a turn towards extremism. This would require a stimulus from the outside world. For Moussaoui, it came when he was rejected from somewhere as apolitical as a nightclub. For others, it may be a missed promotion, an unjust encounter with the police or perhaps expulsion from school for inappropriate dress.

This ignores, of course, the role of traditional Islamic jihad ideology in fomenting this extremism. As Nicolei points out, "to blame Islamic militancy on their host/adopted nations is shift the blame from themselves and the religion that fosters jihad. Other migrants such as non-Muslim Indians, Chinese, Vietnamese, Black Africans face the same struggles as the Muslims, yet they do not turn to militancy to solve their problems."

| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

From the Sun-Herald, with thanks to Jean-Luc:

A week after a Pakistani-born man was named publicly as a terror suspect he is still free, walking the streets of Sydney.

And it is almost four months since anti-terror forces searched the man's home in south-western Sydney, along with those of six others who were identified as key associates of terror suspect Willy Brigitte, who is in a French jail cell.

But despite accusations that the man, named as Abu Hamza, was part of a group allegedly planning a terror attack in Sydney, police are powerless to put him behind bars.

The Federal Government says it cannot detain him as he has not broken any law.

A spokesman for Attorney-General Philip Ruddock said that while there were "still concerns" about the Sydney group connected with Brigitte, their activities were restricted once they knew they were being watched.

The ABC's Four Corners program filmed Hamza last weekend as he went about his business in Lakemba. The program said Australian authorities were confident Brigitte and Hamza were involved in a terrorist plot.

Hamza has cut off his phone and moved house several times since he came to the attention of ASIO.

His lawyer, Stephen Hopper, said Hamza denies being involved in any terrorist group.

He said Hamza has an explanation for the photos and chemical inquiries that would point to something other than preparing a terrorist strike.

"But I can't discuss any of that as I am restricted in what I can say by the new ASIO laws," Mr Hopper said.

Mr Hopper said Hamza does admit to helping Brigitte settle in Sydney when he arrived here in May 2003, but said he did it as he is obliged to do so under the Muslim custom of helping a traveller.

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

A Spanish member of the tiny minority of extremists is going home from Gitmo. From the Sydney Morning Herald, with thanks to Jean-Luc:

The sole Spanish prisoner held at the US military base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, arrived at an air base near Madrid last night to face charges of belonging to Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda network.

Dubbed "the Spanish Taliban", Hamed Abderrahman Ahmed, a 30-year-old Muslim from the Spanish enclave of Ceuta adjoining northern Morocco, had been held since his capture more than two years ago in Afghanistan.

He arrived at the Torrejon base on a Spanish air force plane with eight police escorts and was met by a judge.

From there he was driven to the country's top court, the Audiencia Nacional in the centre of Madrid, where a forensic doctor was to examine him.

US Secretary of State Colin Powell had said on Wednesday that the Spanish citizen would be repatriated at the request of the Spanish Government.

He was to undergo medical, physical and psychological tests for 10 days before being questioned.

Sources said the public prosecutor would seek jail for Hamed as an alleged member of al-Qaeda.

He is one of 660 prisoners from 42 countries, including 21 Europeans and two Australians, who have been held for more than two years in legal limbo at Guantanamo Bay.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Says Australian Muslim teenager Feda Abdo: "People think we have no choice -- that we are forced to wear it. Most young Muslim women choose to wear it."

That's great. But what if Ms. Abdo lived in an Islamic state — say, Iran? We recently saw that there, "Women had fought in the revolution so that their choices would be expanded. They had donned the veils at the demonstrations against the Shah to say that nobody could stop them from wearing the veil if they wanted. The Islamic regime reversed their statement and made it impossible for women to choose not to practice the hijab." Would Feda Abdo defend the rights of non-Muslims and non-practicing Muslims not to wear the hijab?

From the Daily Telegraph, with thanks to Jean-Luc:

More young Sydney women are choosing to wear the hijab, or head scarf, to show pride in their religion and encourage others to understand Islam rather than fear it.

At a time when the wearing of the veil has come under intense attack in Europe, Muslim women in Sydney are taking up the practice in unprecedented numbers.

Shops and internet sites selling the hijab have reported a spike in sales in recent months.

The shift in visibility of Muslim women in post-"war on terror" Australian society has also led to the introduction of a magazine aimed at twenty-something Muslim women, featuring fashion articles and cooking tips.

Nineteen-year-old student Feda Abdo said more of her friends were choosing to identify their religion.

"More Muslim women are taking a stand and asserting their identity," Ms Abdo told The Daily Telegraph.

"The hijab is an expression of your identity."

Ms Abdo has worn the veil for seven years since her parents allowed her to make a decision.

Her sister did not make the transition until she was well into her teens.

"People think we have no choice -- that we are forced to wear it," said Ms Abdo, who has two drawers full of scarves.

"Most young Muslim women choose to wear it."

Ms Abdo said that by wearing the veil, she was encouraging non-Muslims to ask questions about her religion and help them "understand".

Abdul Shukr, who runs an internet store selling "traditional" Muslim attire for men and women, said there had been an increase in demand in recent months.

"I do believe there are more and more Muslim, and non-Muslim, women donning the hijab," Mr Shukr said.

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"The major international and Palestinian NGOs were conspicuously silent following the January 29, 2004 Jerusalem suicide bombing that murdered 11 people. Indeed, Oxfam, Miftah, HRW, and Save the Children, all of whom claim to advocate the universal human rights, failed to even produce a passing news item." This from NGO Monitor, with thanks to IMRA.

However, in sharp contrast to the above-mentioned NGOs, Amnesty International “strongly” condemned the attack, and demanded that, “Palestinian armed groups put an immediate end to suicide bombings and other deliberate attacks against civilians.” In addition, Amnesty noted that such “deliberate and systematic targeting of civilians constitutes crimes against humanity.”

It should be noted that Amnesty International released its condemnation of the Jerusalem suicide bombing on the same day the attack took place – a marked improvement over the organizations’ previous response to the November 15, 2003 Istanbul Synagogue bombings, which was voiced five days after the assault.

EMHRN, founded “to promote dialogue and respect for human rights and diverse cultures throughout the Euro-Mediterranean region”, simply recycled the above-mentioned Amnesty press release condemning the Jerusalem bombing. EMHRN reacted similarly to the November 15, 2003 Istanbul Synagogue bombings, when it re-posted press releases of Amnesty and HRW regarding the attacks.

The failure of the major international and Palestinian NGOs to explicitly condemn the latest Jerusalem suicide bombing and previous attacks against Jewish and Israeli targets both in Israel and abroad raises serious questions about their adherence to an unbiased human rights agenda.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Salim Mansur, a professor of political science at the University of Western Ontario, has written an intriguing opinion piece in the Toronto Sun: "Islamism: Dirty little secrets." (Via Mathaba.net, with thanks to Ruth King.) I am not sure that he can sustain his contention that Muslim leaders have discarded the principles of Islam and reduced it to a nationalist entity, since from its beginning Islam has been political and has formed the basis for the laws of nations. But he is absolutely correct about Muslim anti-Semitism, apologies for tyrants, and the suffering that modern-day political Islam has caused for Muslims themselves.

In the latter half of the 20th century, the struggle for Islam's soul turned most bloody and relentlessly continues that way.

The seeds for this were sown in the first half of the last century, when most Arab-Muslim lands were under European rule.

It was then that many Muslim enthusiasts for reconciling traditional Islam with the scientific and democratic values of the modern world embraced the doctrines of nationalism in their most reactionary form, as found in post-1914 Germany.

The result reduced Islam into a nationalist identity for Arabs and Muslims. Many Muslim fundamentalists later incorporated this reactionary nationalism for their own purpose of constructing totalitarian states.

The pernicious effect of such a fusion of nationalism with religion was to empty Islam of its transcendent message of faith in a supreme God as the common ground of unity among all people.

In India, for instance, Islamic nationalism generated the whirlwind of communal carnage in the 1947 partition of the subcontinent. Wounds of that bloody division remain today.

But it was in the Middle East where nationalism fused with Islam into a political ideology - Islamism - whose effects have brought ruin to the region - and beyond.

The dirty secret apologists for this tragedy in North America and elsewhere refuse to address is how Muslims have suffered as a result of Islamism, have been driven from their homes, tortured and killed across the Arab-Muslim world.

There has been no systematic collection of this horrible data over the past five decades, but the numbers run into millions.

It matters little within the larger context of the struggle for Islam's soul whether Muslims have been primarily the victims of tyrannical authority in Muslim majority states, or of Islamists waging battles against corrupt power elites.

No one in the Arab-Muslim world during this period exceeded the bloody-mindedness of Iraq's fallen despot, Saddam Hussein, who blended a Nazi-type nationalism with his version of Islamism into a sheer hell for Iraqis.

| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

More on the jihad in South America, courtesy Donald Rumsfeld. From WND, :

Pentagon officials have confirmed human smuggling rings in Latin America are attempting to sneak al-Qaida operatives into the U.S., information first reported in Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin more than a year ago.

In a Defense Department briefing Friday about National Guardsman Ryan Anderson, suspected of trying to give al-Qaida information about U.S. capabilities and weaponry, reporters were also told to expect Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to provide details on two other subjects: Guantanamo Bay prisoners freed only to rejoin al-Qaida and Taliban cells in Afghanistan and al-Qaida's Latin America connection.

No further announcements were forthcoming from the Pentagon, prompting some sources to wonder whether the administration was conflicted over this news - given President Bush's political problems with his illegal-alien amnesty program.

Before the U.S.-led coalition attacked Iraq last year, the U.S. State Department offered congressional testimony that both al-Qaida and the Shiite terrorist group Hezbollah were taking firm hold in "America's backyard."

Mark F. Wong, the State Department's acting coordinator for counterterrorism, told the House International Relations Committee about the threat posed by both groups in Latin America.

Yet, then the matter seems to have been dropped - perhaps for diplomatic reasons, perhaps for political reasons.

But last November, G2 Bulletin reported authorities in Silvio Pettirosi International Airport in Asuncion, the Paraguayan capital, reported the arrival of a growing number of visitors carrying European passports, but undoubtedly appearing to be more Middle Eastern than anything else.

Some of these "Europeans" could not even speak the language of their so-called mother land.

A police officer in touch with a Middle Eastern embassy said he had conducted a review trailing back on the moves of a certain Belgian, with a distinct Vallon name. This Belgian's trip began in Cairo on Egypt Air 203 en route to Milan. From there he continued to London on board a BA 209 flight, which continued to Miami where he boarded American flight 995 to Asuncion.

Details of the suspicious Vallon were passed on to the Paraguayan authorities and then to a number of western embassies and representatives of intelligence agencies. This case, described to G2B by a western diplomat, is a rare example. Due to the devious intricacy of such a trip the Paraguayan authorities cannot be absolutely sure how many of these "Europeans," speaking fluent Arabic, but just basic French, Spanish or English, had entered the country during the last few weeks. However, there was very little doubt most of these visitors went on to find their way to the triple border region where Argentina, Brazil and Paraguay meet. This region, often described as a lawless area, is nicknamed by some intelligence station agents as "The Muslim Triangle meeting zone."

Intelligence experts have been warning since the late 1990s they had noticed a tendency among Islamic terrorists to operate from Paraguay, a landlocked country in the heart of South America, with a territory slightly smaller than California, and with geographic extremes perfect for hiding illegal activities. Information surrounding such activities arrived in the U.S. before 9/11 but failed to sound any alarms. Today dealing with Islamic terrorism in Latin America is still not considered to be of high importance and often even politically incorrect.

G2 Bulletin reported last fall the terrorists using Argentina are organized in active cells around the country with safe houses in neighboring Paraguay. An Argentinean document seen by G2B describes part of the drug-smuggling trail, as well as that of weapons and people. These elaborate trails run through a web of border crossings pointing also to the complex cooperation between various "smuggling experts." These belong to jihadi organizations such as al-Qaida, joining forces with local drug lords, developing and oiling their smuggling mechanism all the way to Mexico aiming ultimately to hit the U.S.

The Argentinean intelligence service assessment, privy among others, to European and Middle Eastern agencies, has reached a significant and grave conclusion, according to G2 Bulletin. It claims since 9/11 and the partial success in the war against terrorism, mainly in the Middle East, Afghanistan and Central Asia, the jihadi pendulum is tilting more and more toward South America. The reason terrorist cells in Paraguay, whether active or dormant, can continue to grow and flourish, is because of widespread corruption in South America.

Immigration is easy. There is a long tradition of harboring criminals. Even Nazi war criminals were welcomed for years.

The lawlessness and disorder in Paraguay, enabled operatives of such terrorist groups as al-Qaida, Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad and Hamas to feel safe, even in the heart of Asuncion. These organizations, and probably more, turned Paraguay into a logistical base, as one local journalist told G2 Bulletin: "It's easy. At this stage our country is not engulfed in a civil war or guerrilla campaign and, therefore, security forces are more prone to financial kickbacks."

At this stage, G2 Bulletin sources say, the growing danger is that of militant Islam penetrating Mexico, a country with an increasing Muslim community, including Muslim converts. Some of them have ties to the Mexican community and to illegal immigrants' smugglers operating in American states bordering Mexico, especially those with connections in the greater Los Angeles area and other major cities.

Anti-terrorism experts say extremist cells tied to Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad and al-Qaida network are operating in Argentina, Ecuador, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Paraguay and Uruguay. Although cooperation between al-Qaida and Hezbollah has been known for some time, the two groups have formed a much closer relationship since al-Qaida was evicted from its base in Afghanistan, according to G2 Bulletin.

Representatives of the two groups recently met in Lebanon, Paraguay and an unidentified African country.

Both al-Qaida and Hezbollah were active in the common border area of Colombia, Peru and Ecuador, according to an earlier statement of Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage in hearings before the Foreign Appropriations Subcommittee of the House Appropriations Committee, cited in a report from Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty.

Further to the south in Latin America, Hezbollah and the terrorist Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) are operating in the tri-border region of Paraguay, Argentina and Brazil. The suspected activities of these groups include counterfeiting U.S. currency and drug smuggling, with the area in which they function described as a "haven for Islamic extremists" by the administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration, Asa Hutchinson, in testimony before the House International Relations Committee.

Egyptian intelligence experts active in combating Muslim militancy in Egypt and aware of the role of Egyptian militants in the ranks of al-Qaida and the Taliban, told G2 Bulletin last year that Islamic terrorists shifted their interest from training pilots in the U.S. to schools in South America, where they can study and train practically without any security agencies on their heels.

In addition, another source al-Qaida also found Latin America to be more hospitable as an environment to build laboratories to manufacture non-conventional weapon systems, primarily biological agents, and for testing their effectiveness.

More recently, al-Qaida has become deeply involved in cocaine and heroine trafficking, arms and uranium smuggling, counterfeiting CDs and DVDs and money-laundering activities in the tri-border region of Argentina, Brazil and Paraguay. The tri-border region is known as the heart of Islamic activity in Latin America.

Of growing concern to some U.S. officials is the way the terrorists south of the border might use lax immigration standards to slip into the U.S.

Some 6 million people of Muslim descent live in Latin America and there are reports that many indigenous people are converting to Islam.

The terrorists even get some official support in Latin America, according to some sources. As WorldNetDaily reported, a Venezuelan military defector claims President Hugo Chavez developed ties to terrorist groups such as al-Qaida - even providing it with $1 million in cash after Sept. 11, 2001.

Air Force Maj. Juan Diaz Castillo, who was Chavez's pilot, told WorldNetDaily through an interpreter that "the American people should awaken and be aware of the enemy they have just three hours' flight from the United States."

Diaz said he was part of an operation in which Chavez gave $1 million to al-Qaida for relocation costs, shortly after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States.

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

In Canada, a Muslim association got Bill Baker to speak; in Britain, "prominent Jews in Britain are being targeted in a wave of anti-Semitic harassment by far-Right and Islamic fundamentalist organisations." From the Telegraph, :

The home of Lord Triesman, the former general secretary of the Labour party, has been attacked by Combat 18, the neo-Nazi group. Uri Geller, the Israeli television personality, and Barbara Roche, the former Labour minister, have been the victims of graffiti and hate mail. The incidents have emerged as police prepare to release figures this week showing that Britain saw a significant rise in anti-Semitic incidents in 2003.

Mike Whine, the security spokesman for the Board of Deputies of British Jews, said that the problem of prejudice directed towards Jews on the European mainland was spreading to Britain. "Tensions in the Middle East and the rise of far-Right activity have come together to produce a depressing increase in anti-Semitic activity," he said.

Mr Whine, who works closely with the police to monitor anti-Semitic attacks on synagogues and Jewish graves, said that extremist Islamic groups are behind many anti-Semitic incidents. "There is reliable evidence from the police to prove that an increasing number of incidents are committed by sympathisers of the Palestinians and Islamists.

"The promotion of anti-Semitism by the Arab media and by Islamist organisations worldwide is having a significant effect on the attitudes of Muslim communities around the world towards the Jews." . . .

Abu Hamza, the hook-handed former cleric of Finsbury Park mosque, north London, was reported to the police yesterday for preaching alleged anti-Semitic comments about the Holocaust.

He is one of a number of extremist Islamic clerics who have been accused of encouraging anti-Semitic views among young Muslims.

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

February 15, 2004

In the course of a Boston Globe story about a dispute over a Muslim school and mosque that Muslims are planning to expand in Morton Grove, Illinois, this exchange is reported:

Many residents expressed concerns regarding what they called the "side issue" of outside funding. "I read that most of the mosques in France are being built with money from Saudi Arabia, from the Saudi royal family, and is that the case with you?" one resident asked Kaiseruddin, who has said that funding for the mosque would not come from outside the United States. Students often pass around collection boxes at Friday services.

John Mauck, a lawyer for the Muslim Education Center, says the learning process for residents has been gradual. "That's not the question that would be asked if the Vatican were sending money for a church," Mauck said of the Saudi funding question. "To say that type of thing, I think people aren't thinking through whether they're being biased in their fears."

"That's not the question that would be asked if the Vatican were sending money for a church"?? You know, there's a reason for that: there is no evidence that the Vatican is funding international terrorism, and doing it through churches. Can the same thing be said for Saudi Arabia and the mosques it has established in the United States and around the world?

One would think that after all the publicity that Wahhabis have received, Mauck would not have been able to get away with a howler like that. But of course this is consistent with the strategy being used Congressman Peter King: distract and divert. Rebut questions about terrorist activity by charging that the questioner is just a bigot.

| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

More evidence of what most analysts still prefer to ignore: the power of religious appeals in recruiting and motivating terrorists. From Knight-Ridder, with thanks to Nicolei: "Iraqi teen tells how he joined Ansar al Islam."

Young, broke and living in a speck of a town where moss grows on the roofs of mud huts, Rebeen Ali decided to look for his way in the world.

After a few nights of arguing, his father, a local schoolteacher, forbade him to leave the house. But the 14-year-old Ali, tired of his hometown of Halabja, where graveyards are filled with the victims of Saddam Hussein's 1988 chemical attack, started out for the Iranian border, with plans to get construction work in Tehran.

Ali was stopped in Biyara by a checkpoint set up by members of Ansar al Islam, a radical Islamic group that had taken hold in the high reaches of the mountains of northern Iraq. They told him he was in big trouble. Before long, he had joined the group.

Ali's story took place between the summer of 2001 and the winter of 2002, but it's consistent with descriptions of how Ansar recruits, indoctrinates and trains fighters. Indeed, the lack of work and poor living conditions in Iraq, the ready supply of disaffected youth and the seduction of religious fanaticism haven't changed at all.

The Ansar members accused Ali of being a spy, of being an infidel. They shouted at him. They beat him. They threatened to kill him. For two hours, the threats and screams continued.

Then an older man walked in the room and in a calm, kind voice began to speak about Islam.

Trembling and crying, Ali was so shaken that he could hardly make sense of what the imam, or spiritual leader, was saying.

But slowly, the words began to filter through.

"He told me about paradise, about virgins, about Islam," Ali said.

The imam told him that, as a Muslim, Ali was part of a brotherhood that stretched back hundreds of years. He had an important role to play in the world, one that would bring prestige and glory. There were 70 virgins waiting for him in a promised land, a paradise just for him.

The conversation lasted for hours. At the end, Ali was taken to a little room and given some food and a blanket. The next morning, an Ansar official came by and said that while Ali wasn't a prisoner, they wanted to keep him for a few days to make sure he wasn't a spy. Ali was invited to attend religion classes.

Ali spent 15 days going between his little cell and a bare classroom. For the first time in his life, Ali began praying the prescribed five times a day. He had long considered the restrictions of the Muslim world backward and once planned to move to France to study. But now he realized the imam was right - he was a Muslim and had a duty.

Ansar offered to send Ali to training, where he learned about weapons and tactics for two months. He learned how to break down an AK47 and that he should keep his mouth open when firing a rocket-propelled grenade to avoid eardrum damage. He learned how to unscrew the cap of an artillery shell, pack in plastic explosives with two wires attached and then spool the wire to a simple battery that would serve as a detonator.

Ali spent about 11 months as a grunt soldier for Ansar, shooting off mortars and firing with machine guns at positions of fighters for the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan. Some months he was paid $20, others $100.

After a feud about politics - Ali was tired of the fighting and wanted to join a less radical group - he left Ansar in late 2002, a few months before U.S. Special Forces and Kurdish troops drove Ansar from Iraq.

Ali is 16 years old now. He has shaved his beard and grown out his hair. He lives in Halabja with his parents and has found only occasional work as a handyman.

He says he has no regrets about joining Ansar. Would he join again?

Maybe, he said, shrugging his shoulders.

| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Predictably, the Council on American Islamic Relations wants the President to denounce Congressman Peter King. From HiPakistan, with thanks to Nicolei:

An Islamic civil rights and advocacy group on Thursday called on President Bush and other political and religious leaders to repudiate remarks by a New York's Republican congressman Rep. Peter T. King, who claimed that the vast majority of American Muslim community leaders are "an enemy living amongst us" and that "no (American) Muslims" cooperate in the war on terror.

This is overstated. On the other hand, in light of the fact that it was a Muslim -- Sheikh Muhammad Hisham Kabbani -- who first asserted (before a State Department Open Forum) that 80% of American mosques are controlled by extremists, it is by no means clear that King is simply indulging in uninformed ranting. The extent of support for Islamic terrorism among American Muslims has never been investigated, and it should be.

Mr King, who serves on the Select Committee on Homeland Security and the International Relations Committee, made the assertion on Sean Hannity's nationally-syndicated Radio talk show while promoting a book he had written recently.

"It is unconscionable that an elected official would defame America's Islamic leaders and ordinary Muslims, including those in his own district, just to sell a few more books for personal gain," said CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad.

"President Bush and other political and religious leaders should repudiate these baseless smears and reject the growing exploitation of legitimate fears of terrorism to marginalize an entire community."

While promoting his new novel "Veil of Tears," King complained that "no (American) Muslims are cooperating" with law enforcement officials to combat terrorism.

He added: "I would say, you could say that 80-85 percent of mosques in this country are controlled by Islamic fundamentalists. Those who are in control. The average Muslim, no, they are loyal, but they don't work, they don't come forward, they don't tell the police."

Mr King's novel, which he described as "half truth and half fiction," deals with future terrorist attacks by "Muslim extremists" in Nassau County, New York. During his segment on Hannity's program, King was particularly critical of an unnamed mosque in Westbury, New York which he accused of failing to adequately condemn terrorism.

When questioned by Hannity whether he was really claiming that 85 percent of mosques in America are "ruled by the extremists," King said: "Yes. And I can get you the documentation on that from experts in the field.

Talk to a Steve Emerson, talk to a (Daniel) Pipes, talk to any of those. They will tell you. It's a real issue', I'll stand by that number of 85 percent. This is an enemy living amongst us."

Steven Emerson and Daniel Pipes are regarded by many Muslims as America's leading Islamophobes. Pipes has claimed that up to 15 percent of all Muslims are "potential killers" and that the enfranchisement of American Muslims presents "true dangers" to the United States. Both are strong backers of Israelis policies against the Palestinians.

Emerson and Pipes are only regarded as "Islamophobes" by those who use that ridiculous label to try to smear honest men who are courageous enough to speak out against radical Islam in the United States.

Mr King also said that while most American Muslims are loyal to this country: "They won't turn in their own. They won't tell what's going on in the mosques. They won't come forward and cooperate with the police."

Again, when credible sources allege that a Muslim FBI agent refused to tape his interrogations of terror suspects, saying, "A Muslim doesn't record another Muslim," there are reasonable questions that need to be answered. But no answers are forthcoming from CAIR.

CAIR's director Awad said that since being among the first to condemn the 9-11 terror attacks, American Muslim leaders have frequently worked with law enforcement officials on the national, state and local levels. He also invited King to meet with local and national Islamic leaders to learn more about Muslims in America and their contributions to society.
| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Majid Mohammadi explores the delicate and easily-wounded sensibilities of radical Muslims. As Muslims in Western Europe and the U.S. assert their right to maintain their culture and not assimilate, as Dyab Abou Jahjah of the Arab European League has insisted, we will see more of this sort of thing in the West: "In Saudi Arabia, for example, the Ministry of Commerce checks trademarks of imported goods to ensure there are no violations of religious law. . . . The criteria for recognizing something as "Western " or "Christian" are totally subjective. A good example is the necktie, which is considered Christian and hence is forbidden in Iran; or the letter "X" that is forbidden in Saudi Arabia in trademarks because it is shaped like a cross. Everything disturbing the delicate sensibilities of Islamists is banned. Every summer, Iranian men have their arms spray-painted by Ansaar-e Hizbullah, the Iranian morality police, when they visit shopping areas in insufficiently conservative clothing. The same thing takes place in Saudi Arabia." In fact, this sensibility has already manifested itself in France, in attacks on girls not wearing hijab. From the Daily Star, with thanks to Nicolei:

On this Valentine's Day, it is useful to examine how Western holidays and cultural habits are playing out in the Muslim world, particularly in two countries where a conservative version of Islam is buttressed by powerful religious establishments: Iran and Saudi Arabia. There are two strong ideological currents in both countries confronting one other. Reformers are offering more tolerant readings of Islam, against the proscriptions of religious establishments facing legitimacy crises.

The original arrangements between the Al-Saud and Mohammed Ibn Abdulwahab in late 18th-century Saudi Arabia, and between the Shiite ulama and the Qajar dynasty in early 20th-century Iran, were designed to resolve such crises of legitimacy. Clerics agreed to support the political leaderships, in exchange for Islam being made the ideology of the domain. Although this deal was breached in Iran during the Pahlavi era, culminating in the Islamic revolution, it was revived under the Islamic Republic. However, the new order was characterized by disagreements, first, between the Islamic left and right and, subsequently, between Islamists and reformists, amid a growing legitimacy crisis in an era of overwhelming democratic discourse.

These crises are best reflected in the policy toward public culture and morality. Morality and culture in Saudi Arabia and Iran are totally ideologized, and specifically enforced by religious policies of the state and government institutions, particularly "morality police" having a free hand in internal affairs ­ despite several catastrophic incidents where the actions of this "police" have led to violence against civilians, and indeed death. This free hand is granted because the Iranian and Saudi religious establishments offer legitimacy to the state. This has led to a crackdown on Western cultural commodities, ideas and institutions, amid increasing domestic demand for greater choice, democracy and vindication of human rights and the rule of law.

A good example is the different policies toward Christian and Western celebrations. There have always been major crackdowns on items related to Valentine's Day or Christmas in both Iran and Saudi Arabia. Stores have been closed down or fined, and merchandise has been confiscated after coordinated campaigns of raids against "disobedient" outlets. In Iran, shopping centers that belong to Christians must make this fact clear at the entrance. This is one way of controlling the sale of forbidden materials. The religious establishments regard the Christian or Western celebrations as "pagan" (in Saudi Arabia) and as an embodiment of "cultural invasion" (in Iran).

Iranian Islamists are not only harsh when it comes to Western holidays. They still cannot accept Iranian celebrations such as Sizdah Bedar (celebrating the 13th day of spring) or Nowruz (Iranian New Year). The only holidays accepted are those mentioned in the Koran or by the Prophet Mohammed.

Restrictions are not usually declared as official policy in Iran or Saudi Arabia, but their enforcement is seen as a way of reestablishing the eroding authority of the Wahhabi or Shiite states. There are those in both societies who buy into such restrictive policies, because of the deep identity crisis in the Muslim world. The public wants to define itself as something different from the West and usually picks the simplest and least expensive way of doing that, namely through a policy of rejection.

At the same time, the public also wants to celebrate love, as on Valentine's Day, in societies that prohibit worldly love other than between couples in prearranged marriages; people also want to dance and listen to music in public celebrations.

Enforcing religious policies is not limited to the morality police in Iran and Saudi Arabia. Every government office is obliged to implement such policies, and those who breach them are liable to bear the consequences. In Saudi Arabia, for example, the Ministry of Commerce checks trademarks of imported goods to ensure there are no violations of religious law. If the Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice objects to a name or a specific commodity, the commerce ministry may refuse to register or clear it.
The criteria for recognizing something as "Western " or "Christian" are totally subjective. A good example is the necktie, which is considered Christian and hence is forbidden in Iran; or the letter "X" that is forbidden in Saudi Arabia in trademarks because it is shaped like a cross. Everything disturbing the delicate sensibilities of Islamists is banned. Every summer, Iranian men have their arms spray-painted by Ansaar-e Hizbullah, the Iranian morality police, when they visit shopping areas in insufficiently conservative clothing. The same thing takes place in Saudi Arabia.

The members of the morality police consider themselves selfless. Indeed they must be. Could it be any different when these learned and faithful must confront apostates and infidels on a daily basis?


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Is the Sudanese government -- that is, the National Islamic Front regime that has been perpetrating a genocidal jihad against Sudanese Christians -- involved in international terrorism? So charge two Congressmen -- but the Sudanese government, evidently well-versed in how to manipulate American public opinion, says they're just right wingers. From the Sudan Tribune:

The deputy head of Sudan's diplomatic mission to the USA, ambassador Abd-al-Baqi Kabir, accused what he called the US "religious right wing" of being behind the message sent last week by two members of the US Congress to the White House.

In the message the two members, Donald M. Payne and Thomas Tancredo, asked the President Bush to open an inquiry on the involvement of some Sudanese officials in the attempt to assassinate Egyptian President Husni Mubarak and the likelihood of their involvement in "international terrorism".

Commenting on the message, and in a statement to the London based Al-Sharq al- Awsat, the Sudanese envoy said: "There is no doubt that the message originates from the well known religious lobby and its member organizations, and that Donald Payne represents the major opposition to the Sudanese government."

The Sudanese ambassador said that "Payne is linked with the rebel Sudan People's Liberation Movement (SPLM) in the south", led by John Garang.

The envoy added that "Khartoum government is now in talks with the SPLM for this reason and the Sudanese government regards the message as an attempt to put pressure on the Sudanese government".

The ambassador scorned the attempt to link Khartoum with the assassination bid against the Egyptian president during his visit to Addis Ababa in 1995 and pointed out that with regard to this, Khartoum government had already been cleared by both Egypt and the UN.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

A revealing Al-Qaeda manual has been found in Pakistan. From UPI:

A terrorist survival information kit, obtained by United Press International, reveals how the Taliban, al Qaeda and their sympathizers are preparing to survive a long and drawn-out U.S.-led war against terrorism. . . .

They show that the Taliban, al Qaeda and other militant groups are well aware of the changes brought about by the U.S.-led war on terrorism and realize they can no longer work openly, even in areas where there is widespread sympathy in the local population.

Documents in the kit repeatedly emphasize the need for Taliban and al Qaeda terrorists to "merge with the masses" and "become indistinguishable" from the rest of the people.

The instructions explain that large terrorist organizations have already divided themselves into three segments.

The first segment is the central command, which is referred to as "markaz" (center), or "nazm" (leadership)."

The second segment is that of small units, and the third and most important is that of individual members who are called "friends" and are warned "not to meet each other unless they must" and "not to communicate with the nazm."

"Merge completely in the environment you live in ... there will be no personal friendship, not even with the members of your own group," the kit advises.

The kit contains pictures of 18 terrorists who are on the FBI's most-wanted list. The first is that of al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, followed by his deputy, Ayman al-Zawahri, and other top al Qaeda operatives.

A caption above the pictures says: "These are mujahideen, not dangerous religious terrorists."

As I explain in Onward Muslim Soldiers and elsewhere, if we do not grasp the distinction they are making here (which radical Muslims often make), we will not fully grasp the nature of the conflict we are in.

The caption refers to a similar list issued recently by the government of Pakistan, which identified the 18 men as "dangerous religious terrorists" and which advised Pakistanis to inform the government if they see or hear anything about them.

An al Qaeda pamphlet in the kit cites a verse from the Koran:

"Those who believed [in God] and migrated and did jihad for Allah's sake and those who sheltered such people and helped them ... indeed, they are the real believers. They will be rewarded [by God]."

A manual begins with a general warning: "Every member will take all necessary precautions in his personal and social life to protect the group and its leadership ... in his personal life, each member shall merge completely with the society he lives in so that he is indistinguishable from other members of the society."

It features instructions for al Qaeda units:
• "If you live in an area where people wear Western dress, you also dress like them ... if the majority in that area has a secular mindset, do not express your religious sentiments."
• "Look closely at the ethnic complexion of your neighborhood ... if the area has a large number of people from Punjab [province in Pakistan], stay away from them because they often spy for intelligence agencies."
• "Don't visit the local mosque regularly. Instead say your prayers at your residence, even the weekly Friday prayer."
• "Know your neighbors but do not make too many friends ... do not travel unless you have to ... do not visit new cities and countries ... never keep illegal objects while traveling ... never carry audio or video cassettes and posters of your group or leader while traveling."

The kit offers tips on using a cell phone:
• "Use a cell phone only when you must and an alternative means of communication is not available ... it is better not to use cell phones at all ... if you must use a cell phone, use the one obtained under fake name and address ... never use a phone provided by your 'nazm' for calling a friend or a relative."

How to use the Internet:
• "For using the Internet, you must go to an Internet cafe ... never use the same Internet cafe again and again ... before leaving the cafe, remove all evidence ... while sending an e-mail, never use the language that could reveal your ideological commitment."

| 18 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

With all the overheated claims (thanks to EPG for the link) that have been made about conditions at Guantanamo, it is refreshing to hear this from an inmate: "We were not like prisoners there. We were not tortured. They didn't tie our hands. And they gave us education." What does this have to do with global jihad? Everything. Naqibullah was not part of the general prisoner population, but nevertheless, he was in Gitmo, at the mercy of the Americans. Maybe it will dawn on at least some people that something is off-kilter when the Great Satan keeps behaving humanely -- more humanely than its opponents. From the BBC, with thanks to Elisot:

An Afghan boy has told the BBC he feels no bitterness about being held in the US Guantanamo camp for terror suspects. More than a year after being captured by US troops fighting members of the Taleban and al-Qaeda, Naqibullah, 13, is back home in eastern Afghanistan. He spent much of his time in captivity in Camp Iguana, the children's section of the US detention centre on the tropical island of Cuba. . . .

"I hadn't done anything, but they suspected me because I was standing next to some men who had guns," he said.

"I told them I was innocent. I don't even know how to use a gun." . . .

Unlike most of those in Guantanamo Bay, he was not forced to wear an orange boiler suit, or shackled and hooded.

In fact, apart from the two other boys released with him, he says he saw no other detainees.

He even says he was treated like a guest of the US forces.

"We were not like prisoners there. We were not tortured. They didn't tie our hands. And they gave us education," he said.

There is no bitterness or anger, but the boy learned enough English to make this one demand of the Americans: "I want the Americans to pay me because I was not a criminal. I want them to help me become a doctor." . . .

You might think he would be angry with the Americans. Actually he thinks they have done Naqibullah a favour.

"He has learnt to speak English. He has come back with an education. He knows about things," Gul Mohammed said.

"He behaves better with his sisters and brothers, he shows me more respect, and he has been to big places like Kabul, and the rest of the world."

But it could be difficult for Naqibullah now. As I leave his village, he says: "I want to go to the city."

| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

They were planning to strike at the World Cup 2002. From AP:

A senior al Qaeda member told U.S. authorities the group had plans to carry out attacks in Japan during the 2002 World Cup soccer tournament, local media reported yesterday.

U.S. authorities advised Japan of the information, which is believed to have come from the militant Islamic group's third-ranking official, Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the daily Sankei newspaper reported, citing anonymous sources. The Kyodo news agency carried a similar report.

The attacks were not carried out because al Qaeda did not have a network in Japan, which hosted the 2002 event jointly with South Korea, according to the paper.

The report said Mohammed was familiar with Japan. During a three-month stay in 1987, he reportedly studied rock-drilling machinery.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Because of Islam's unique tradition as a political and social system as well as an individual faith, I have expressed doubts about the viability of democracy in countries where there is significant attachment to the Sharia. But at AEI (thanks to EPG) Charles Krauthammer makes the best possible case for going forward:

Yes, as in Germany and Japan, the undertaking is enormous, ambitious and arrogant. It may yet fail. But we cannot afford not to try. There is not a single, remotely plausible, alternative strategy for attacking the monster behind 9/11. It's not Osama bin Laden; it is the cauldron of political oppression, religious intolerance, and social ruin in the Arab-Islamic world--oppression transmuted and deflected by regimes with no legitimacy into virulent, murderous anti-Americanism. It's not one man; it is a condition. It will be nice to find that man and hang him, but that's the cops-and-robbers law-enforcement model of fighting terrorism that we tried for twenty years and that gave us 9/11. This is war, and in war arresting murderers is nice. But you win by taking territory--and leaving something behind.

Krauthammer's entire analysis is lengthy but well worth reading.

Also worth reading is this piece by David Brooks explaining the importance of working to establish democracy in the Middle East. (Thanks to Fanabba.)

| 1 Comment
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

February 14, 2004

Tolerance in Saudi Arabia means non-Muslims can work there, but note: not only are Muslims not to celebrate it, but they are not to offer non-Muslims holiday greetings, and stores are not to sell any Valentines Day material. So while the Muslim majority is free not to celebrate the day, non-Muslims are not free to celebrate it. From Reuters, with thanks to Nicolei:

Saudi Arabia's religious authorities have ordered Muslims to shun the "pagan" holiday of Valentine's Day so as not to incur God's wrath, the local al-Riyadh newspaper says.

"It is a pagan Christian holiday and Muslims who believe in God and Judgment Day should not celebrate or acknowledge it or congratulate (people on it). It is a duty to shun it to avoid God's anger and punishment," said an edict issued by Saudi Arabia's fatwa committee published in the Arabic-language daily on Friday.

"There are only two holidays in Islam -- Eid al-Fitr and Eid al-Adha -- and any other holidays, whether to celebrate an individual, group or event, are inventions which Muslims are banned from," said the committee, headed by Grand Mufti Sheikh Abdulaziz bin Abdullah al-Sheikh.

Eid al-Fitr and Eid al-Adha are Muslim feasts that follow the annual fasting month of Ramadan and the haj pilgrimage.

The kingdom, which implements a strict version of Islamic law, bans non-Muslim holidays and its morality police usually conduct raids to ensure shops do not sell gifts or ornaments on New Year, Christmas or Valentine's Day, which is named after a Christian saint.

About seven million foreigners live in Saudi Arabia, the birthplace of Islam. Many of them are from Asian countries where Valentines' Day is celebrated.

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

And what will be done to ensure that James Ujaama doesn't rejoin the worldwide jihad when he is released in July? Are moderate Muslim clerics going to meet with him regularly to explain to him the true peaceful teachings of the Qur'an? Is CAIR going to conduct moderate teach-ins in his prison? Somehow I doubt it. From The Scotsman, with thanks to Nicolei:

James Ujaama, 38, was arrested in July 2002 following an investigation into a Seattle mosque and was indicted for conspiring to set up a terrorist training camp in Bly, Oregon, and using a firearm to further the conspiracy.

The government dropped those charges and filed a superseding complaint alleging that Ujaama brought money, computer equipment and a recruit to Taliban officials in Afghanistan.

Prosecutors let him plead guilty in exchange for his cooperation in terrorism investigations. In particular, they wanted to hear what he knew about London cleric Abu Hamza al-Masri, whose web site Ujaama once ran.

Prosecutors agreed to recommend a sentence of two years in prison - most of which Ujaama has already served. He is due to be released from prison in July.

However, he faces three years of supervised release and must surrender his passport.

Ujaama, born James Earnest Thompson, converted to Islam in the early 1990s and became involved in the now-closed Dar-us-Salaam mosque in Seattle, whose members preached a more extreme version of Islamic teachings.

In 1997, Ujaama left his son and family and moved to London, where he became friends with al-Masri at the Finsbury Park Mosque.

The US State Department has classified al-Masri as a terrorist, and he is wanted in Yemen for his alleged role in the 1998 kidnappings of 16 tourists by the Islamic Army of Aden. Four hostages died during a shootout.

But Ujaama sometimes travelled back to Seattle, and in 1999, federal officials alleged, he joined others in trying to set up a terrorist training camp at a ranch in Bly. He sent al-Masri a fax, investigators have said, proposing the establishment of a camp there, and al-Masri sent two representatives to evaluate the site.

The two were reportedly disappointed that the property had no barracks for troops, and the camp was never developed. One of them was Oussama Kassir, who was arrested at his apartment in Sweden last year and is being held on weapons charges.

Investigators learned of the plot through an informant within the group.

In 2000, Ujaama returned to London and ran al-Masri's Web site, which advocated jihad, or holy war, against the United States. Later that year, at al-Masri's bidding, he escorted another man to a terrorist training camp in Afghanistan, Ujaama admitted in his plea agreement.

Ujaama initially contended he brought the computer equipment and money to benefit a girls school in Afghanistan.

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Here's a "bombshell" from Donald Rumsfeld: terror suspects freed from Guantanamo Bay have been rejoining Al-Qaeda and the Taliban. This is no surprise, really. Two weeks ago we posted a story about the same thing happening in Afghanistan. Why should it be any different at Gitmo? From the New York Daily News, with thanks to Jean-Luc:

Terrorists freed from the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay have rejoined Taliban and Al Qaeda cells in Afghanistan, sources tell the Daily News. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld is expected to make the bombshell admission today in a speech in Miami, military and political sources said yesterday.

But Rumsfeld's revelation about the few prisoners in Cuba who shouldn't have been let go will be used as justification for indefinitely detaining approximately 650 terror suspects still held there, said one defense official.

The Pentagon chief will argue for greater scrutiny of each detainee, but he'll also "talk about the intent to release more" than the 87 freed to date, the official said.

Pentagon officials have refused to discuss one reported case of a Taliban commander, Mullah Shehzada, who rejoined comrades in Afghanistan after his release from the Guantanamo prison camp in Cuba last October.

Shehzada convinced his interrogators he was an innocent civilian captured by Northern Alliance troops and turned over to the U.S., Time magazine reported late last year.

"[Shehzada] is not the only one," said a source briefed on the speech yesterday. "They're about to be a lot less tight-lipped about it."

Rumsfeld is also expected to reveal that detainees have provided intelligence about human smuggling rings in Latin America aimed at sneaking Al Qaeda thugs into the U.S.

| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

As news comes from France of possible terrorist attacks being planned for Australia, Australia itself is more concerned not to offend PC sensibilities. Broadcasters there can't refer to Hamas and Hizballah as terrorist groups, even though the Australian government lists Hizballah as a terrorist group and is likely to add Hamas soon. From CNSNews.com, with thanks to Jean-Luc:

Australia's national broadcaster has instructed its staff not to identify Hamas, Islamic Jihad and Hizballah as terrorist organizations, because they have not been designated as such by the United Nations.

The instruction comes despite the fact the Australian government has listed Hizballah as a terrorist group, and is likely to add Hamas and Islamic Jihad to the list soon.

The Australian Broadcasting Corporation's head of international operations, John Tulloh, confirmed the policy Friday, in response to emailed queries.

An internal memo to ABC staff reportedly reads: "Please be careful with Middle Eastern references. Several recent slip-ups have attracted justified complaints. The ABC follows U.N. guidelines on proscribed groups: Hamas, Hizballah, and Islamic Jihad are not included in the U.N.'s list of terrorist organizations and therefore must not be described as such."

Tulloh declined to elaborate on the "justified complaints," saying that correspondence from ABC listeners and viewers was private.

Tulloh's memo reportedly continues to say that while the groups shouldn't be called terrorist, it is appropriate for the ABC to describe "a suicide bombing or similar outrage" as an act of terrorism, and to call a suicide bomber a terrorist.

Last year, Australia's federal parliament passed a law specifically listing Hizballah as a terrorist group.

Tulloh confirmed on Friday, however, that the ABC policy regarding Hizballah stood despite that law. . . .

After the Oct. 2002 bombings in Bali, in which 88 Australians were killed, parliament passed a law enabling the government to ban terrorist organizations.

But a civil liberty safeguard, incorporated into that law at the opposition's insistence, prevented the government from listing as a terrorist group any organization not on the U.N.'s terrorist list.

The U.N. list, which was drawn up by a committee set up prior to the 9/11 attacks to monitor sanctions against al-Qaeda and the Taliban, is restricted to "individuals and entities" linked to al-Qaeda and the Taliban.

This has left Australia in the position of not being able to outlaw organizations that are not affiliated to al-Qaeda and the Taliban, despite serious concerns about other groups' activities. Hizballah is an exception, because of the specific legislation passed last year. . . .

Asked whether any future designation of Hamas and Islamic Jihad as terrorist groups would change the ABC's policy with respect to the two organizations, Tulloh replied: "not at this stage."

Terrorist criteria

Invited to comment, Tzvi Fleischer of the Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council (AIJAC) said Friday the identification of terrorist organizations was not the problem the ABC claimed it was.

"Terrorist attacks are attacks directed primarily at civilians, and are generally readily identifiable, as even the ABC's own memo concedes," he said.

"A terrorist organization is one whose leadership espouses or claims credit for such attacks, or which has been identified by a legitimate court of law as having carried out such an attack, regardless of the cause in which the attacks was carried out. By this criteria, Hamas, Islamic Jihad and Hizballah are unequivocally terrorist organizations."

Fleischer also questioned the policy of a taxpayer-funded Australian broadcaster to appeal to the U.N. as the "ultimate authority" when it came to designating organizations as terrorist.

"The U.N. is neither a judicial body, nor a world parliament, and the ABC was established to represent an Australian point of view, and not that of a political multinational organization in New York," he said. . . .

Critics have frequently accused the taxpayer-funded ABC of anti-establishment and left wing bias, and last year its coverage of the Iraq war came under fire from the minister responsible for communications.

Hamas and the Islamic Jihad, both Palestinian groups, have claimed responsibility for scores of suicide bombings and other attacks, costing hundreds of Israeli lives.

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

More on Willie Brigitte's antics from Channelnewsasia.com, with thanks to Jean-Luc:

The French authorities have warned of a likely terrorist attack in Australia this year, according to the Herald Sun newspaper.

It said the French had confirmed that a terrorist cell in Sydney with plans to launch a devastating attack was broken up after the arrest of French terrorist suspect Willie Brigitte.

But they said a sleeper cell still existed in Australia, which is regarded as "weak" by extremist organisations.

Senior French sources fear the cell is planning a post-Iraq war attack and believe it is linked to little-known groups in the Russian region of Chechnya and the former Soviet state of Georgia.

"An attack in Australia is inevitable. I would not be surprised if something occurred in this year," one senior official was quoted by the newspaper as saying.

Willie Brigitte had admitted that he trained under a Chechen explosives expert, Abu Salah, in a Lashkar-e-Toiba training camp in Pakistan.

Brigitte's wife, Melanie Brown, a former Australian army signaller, was detained and questioned by French authorities last month and has returned to Sydney.

Lashkar-e-Toiba is a highly organised terrorist group and was banned by the Australian government late last year.

Brigitte named Sydney man Abu Hamza as LET's representative in Australia and he claimed during interrogation that Salah had been due to arrive in Australia last year.

| 1 Comment
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Will there be democracy in Iraq, or Sharia? Or more jihad? Consider this: "It will be a grave mistake for America and the United Nations to pit themselves in a confrontation with Sayyid Sistani's followers. They will lose greatly if they oppose the Shi'ite religious authorities." An idle threat? Maybe, but the Shi'ites can't simply be wished away. From Reuters, with thanks to Peter Rockas:

Supporters of Iraq's top Shi'ite cleric Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani said on Friday an assessment by U.N. officials that elections are not possible before June 30 could stir revolt against their U.S. occupiers.

The United Nations sent a team to Iraq to gauge differences between Washington, which wants to hand over power to Iraqis by mid-year without holding polls first, and the country's majority Shi'ites, led by Sistani, who insist on a democratic election.

U.N. officials in Iraq said on Friday it would not be possible to organize polls before June 30, though they stressed it was important to hold elections as soon as security and technical arrangements permitted.

In Sistani's home town of Najaf, his supporters threatened to rise up if they did not get their way.

"If the United Nations and Americans do not fulfil the wish of our religious scholars then fatwas (religious edicts) will follow," Sheikh Rida Hamdani, a Sistani follower, said.

"At first there will be demonstrations or civil disobedience and finally armed struggle."

"We are all behind Sistani, and Shi'ites all have arms," Hussein Khalifa, a 43-year-old community elder, said.

"The ball is in the United Nation's court...if they do not achieve our goals we will open a front against them. What is this talk that conditions are not ready for elections?...Are the only conditions ready the ones that allow Americans to move about and do what they want freely in Iraq?"

DEMONSTRATIONS

In practice, how Shi'ites react to the U.N. decision will be dictated by the orders from their religious leadership.

When Sistani, a recluse who communicates through aides, made it known he was demanding elections, tens of thousands of Shi'ites came on to the streets to demonstrate peacefully.

The U.N. top envoy in Iraq, Lakhdar Brahimi, said after meeting Sistani he agreed time was needed to prepare elections, but there has been no official word on whether he would accept a view that elections be delayed beyond June.

If he does, it is likely his followers will do also. If he doesn't, his supporters say violence will follow.

"The Shi'ites represent the majority and they have a strong attachment to their religious leaders, so any fatwa to fight America will be followed by all Shi'ites," said Sheikh Ali Sweidi, a Sistani disciple.

"It will be a grave mistake for America and the United Nations to pit themselves in a confrontation with Sayyid Sistani's followers. They will lose greatly if they oppose the Shi'ite religious authorities."

Shi'ites make up 60 percent of Iraqis, and after years of oppression under Saddam Hussein, who came from the Sunni minority, feel it is time to assert their dominance.

Many supported the U.S. goal of toppling Saddam, but are against the occupation. Some said they thought Washington wanted to delay polls just so it could stay longer in Iraq.

"The elections will not take place because the United Nations and America will keep finding excuses for delaying them...for the Americans if the elections are held there would be no excuse for its troops to stay in Iraq,' Sheikh Hassan al-Naji al -Mussawi said.

Are the elections being delayed because the Sharia supporters will win?

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The Sharia not only denies equality of rights to non-Muslims and women; it also tends to a totalitarian extinguishing of free thought. From the Index on Censorship, with thanks to Nicolei:

A one-year prison sentence was handed down to writer, journalist and researcher Yasser al-Habib on 20 January 2004, when he was reportedly convicted of 'questioning the conduct and integrity of some of the companions of the prophet Muhammad' in a lecture he had delivered.

Al-Habib, who has worked for several Arabic-language newspapers, including the monthly al-Menbar (The Pulpit), was abducted in Kuwait City on 30 November 2003 by unknown individuals and taken away in an unmarked vehicle. His family was not informed that he had been detained by security forces until the following day.

Al-Habib was reportedly arrested in connection with an audio cassette recording of a lecture he gave to a small audience in a private lecture on Islamic historical issues. His research is believed to have relied heavily on Wahhabi references and texts, and is said to have angered hardline Wahhabi groups who have used their influence within the establishment to bring about the maximum punishment against al-Habib. . . .

Al-Habib has reportedly been subject to several orchestrated violent attacks in prison by Wahhabi inmates.

| 1 Comment
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Even more distressing than this shameful account of how Daniel Pipes was mistreated at UC Berkeley is the fact that this sort of reception greets him on other campuses as well. Daniel Pipes is a man of great courage speaking out against a great evil. From ChronWatch, with thanks to Nicolei:

Pipes had anticipated problems beforehand and had warned supporters that the Muslim Student Association was planning to make an appearance. They had posted an announcement about the lecture at the leftist website SFIndyMedia.org, raving that a ''Zionist'' was coming to town, and exhorting members to show up. In fact, the lecture was moved to another site on campus to accomodate a larger audience, but the MSA students still managed to sniff it out. . . .

The tension in the air was thick, tempers were rising, and yet amidst it all, Pipes kept his cool. He managed to deliver his lecture, which covered the War on Terrorism, the Arab-Israeli conflict, and Iraq, but he was forced to stop many times. Pipes spoke directly to the protesters on several occasions, pointing out the irony of their undemocratic behavior, as well as mentioning casually that it is only when he speaks at college campuses that he requires such heavy security. He even brought up the fact that members of the MSA are currently under investigation for possible ties to terrorism.

Their reaction to his speech was telling.

When Pipes brought up the need to support moderate Muslims over those who subscribe to militant Islam, they booed.

When he brought up the need to improve the status of women in Islamic countries, they booed.

When he warned that peace in the Middle East would never be achieved as long as the Palestinians continued to subscribe to a ''cult of death,'' they booed.

When he mentioned Middle East Studies professors who have been arrested under terrorism charges, they booed.

When he discussed the need to combat Islamic terrorism, they booed.

When he referred to the perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks as subscribers to militant Islam, they booed and shouted ''Zionism''--no doubt a reference to the myth that Jews were behind the attacks.

When Pipes brought up CampusWatch.org, the website he founded to provide a voice for students feeling oppressed by their leftist professors, they shouted out ''McCarthyism'' and of course ''racist'' yet again.

And when he mentioned Iraqis' ''liberation'' from Saddam Hussein's tyranny, they booed even louder.

''I'm sure the Iraqis were much better off under Saddam Hussein,'' Pipes responded sarcastically.

When it came time for the question and answer period, the group of MSA students all got up together and left, chanting ''racist'' and ''Zionist'' over and over again. However, a few stragglers were left in the audience and they eventually had to be escorted outside by the police because of their unruly behavior. One of them was the man who had been babbling outside about Gandhi. But this time he got down to basics, calling Pipes ''a racist Jew.'' Sadly, it took several more of these epithets before he was forcibly removed.

After the lecture, many Jews in the audience were visibly shaken. For those who hadn't yet encountered Muslim hostility up close and personal, it was an eye-opening experience. Perhaps not all of UC Berkeley's Muslim students subscribe to the anti-Semitic views of the MSA, but if that's the case, they certainly didn't make their voices heard that evening.

The fact is, radical Muslim students and their leftist counterparts are the most domineering, destructive, and dangerous forces in higher education today. If we're to win the War on Terrorism, we may have to start with our own college campuses.

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

February 13, 2004

CAIR is fuming over remarks made by Congressman Peter King (R-NY), but refreshingly, he is not backing down. From Newsday, with thanks to Nicolei:

Rep. Peter King said Wednesday he continues to believe that 85 percent of the mosques in the United States have "extremist leadership," and that while most Muslims are "loyal Americans," they are reluctant to come forward to cooperate with law enforcement when they hear anti-American rhetoric or plots.

King's comments, first made on the Sean Hannity radio show Tuesday, prompted outrage from the American Muslim community. Ghazi Khankan, director of the Westbury-based Islamic Center of Long Island, called King "out of touch with the Muslim community" and said he was particularly offended because King has visited the center many times.

King (R-Seaford) said Wednesday he based his belief on extensive conversations he has had with law enforcement officials, both in New York and Washington, D.C.. He said the issue crystallized for him in the weeks following Sept. 11, 2001. At a community "solidarity" meeting at Temple Beth-El in Great Neck, Dr. Faroque Kahn of the Islamic Center criticized America's foreign policy toward Arab and Palestinian communities, prompting some Jewish attendees to walk out.

King said he used the information he got on Muslim leaders from law enforcement officials for a plot line in his new novel "Vale of Tears." In the book, a Muslim extremist group cooperates with remnants of the Irish Republican Army to plan a terrorist attack on the United States.

King also could have referred to the 1999 testimony before a State Department Open Forum of Sheikh Muhammad Hisham Kabbani, a Sufi Muslim. As I detail in Onward Muslim Soldiers, Kabbani investigated American mosques (visiting them personally) and concluded that 80% were controlled by extremists. He has been similarly vilified by American Muslim advocacy groups since then, but he has them somewhat wrongfooted: they have to depart from their usual playbook, since it's hard to call him an anti-Muslim hatemonger.

"Most of the Muslim community is cooperating with police and local authorities," King said Wednesday . "But 85 percent of the mosques have extremist leadership in this country. Most Muslims, the overwhelming majority of Muslims, are loyal Americans but they seem unwilling to come forward."

The Council on American-Islamic Relations, a Muslim umbrella group based in Washington, D.C., and the Islamic Center both accused King of making the comments to sell his book.

"If he wrote about Muslim extremists in Nassau County, it is very much in poor taste, because extremists do not have a religion," said Khankan, adding that his mosque has offered cooperation in the fight against terrorism to Nassau, Suffolk and New York City police officials and FBI agents. "Would King write another fiction and say that some Catholic extremists would do a terrorist act, or that some Jewish terrorist would do some violent acts on Long Island? He wouldn't dare, but he thinks that because we are small in number, he could try to sell books on our backs."

This retort proceeds, of course, from the assumption that the Islamic identity of the terrorists is incidental and accidental. But if you read the actual words of the terrorists themselves (as you can do in Onward Muslim Soldiers), you will find that that is far from the case.

Council on American-Islamic Relations executive director Nihad Awad said that the council was among the first organizations to condemn the Sept. 11 terror attacks. Since then American Muslim leaders have frequently worked with law enforcement officials on the national, state and local levels, he said. Awad invited King to meet with local and national Islamic leaders to "learn more about Muslims in America and their contributions to society."

King said he would meet with them, but "on my terms. I'm not going to listen to propaganda. The purpose of the meeting will be to detail the cooperation they are giving to law enforcement and what they are doing to work against al-Qaida in this country."

He said criticizing American foreign policy is fine, but "not in the wake of the largest tragedy ever to strike this country."

"If the IRA had blown up lower Manhattan, I wouldn't be up defending the IRA the next week," said King, who has a long history working with the Irish peace process under former President Bill Clinton.

| 23 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

r107886205.jpeg
Ryan Anderson

Another American Muslim soldier has been arrested. From AP, with thanks to the many people who sent this to me:

National Guardsman tried to reach al-Qaida operatives through the Internet, offering the group information on U.S. military capabilities and weaponry, defense officials said.

Spc. Ryan G. Anderson, 26, was arrested Thursday, just days before he was to leave for duty in Iraq.

He was being held at Fort Lewis ``pending criminal charges of aiding the enemy by wrongfully attempting to communicate and give intelligence to the al-Qaida terrorist network,'' said Army Lt. Col. Stephen Barger. It was not immediately clear if Anderson had a lawyer.

Anderson, from Lynnwood, was taken into custody without incident as part of a joint investigation by the Army, Department of Justice and the FBI, Barger said.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, defense officials said Anderson signed on to extremist chat rooms and tried to get in touch with al-Qaida operatives. It is unclear how the U.S. government got wind of his alleged offer, but authorities began monitoring his communications, the officials said. It does not appear he transmitted any information to al-Qaida.

He became a Muslim during the last five years, officials said.

Jack Roberts, a neighbor, said he talked to Anderson's wife, Erin, after federal agents left the couple's apartment on Thursday.

``She was pretty damned shocked, as I was,'' Roberts told the Herald of Everett.

Phone messages left by The Associated Press at the couple's apartment were not immediately returned Thursday.

Anderson is a tank crew member from the National Guard's 81st Armor Brigade, a 4,200-member unit set to depart for Iraq. It is the biggest deployment for the Washington Army National Guard since World War II.

Washington State University spokeswoman Charleen Taylor said Anderson was a 2002 graduate with a degree in history. Anderson graduated from high school in Everett in 1995, the Herald reported, and at studied military history with an emphasis on the Middle East at Washington State.

The brigade has been training at Fort Lewis since November. Eighty percent of the soldiers--3,200--are from Washington state, and 1,000 are from guard units in California and Minnesota.

It includes two tank battalions, a mechanized infantry battalion, engineers, support troops, artillery and an intelligence company.

Anderson is the second Muslim soldier with Fort Lewis connections to be accused of wrongdoing related to the war on terror.

Capt. James Yee, 35, a former Fort Lewis chaplain, is accused of mishandling classified information from the U.S. prison for suspected terrorists at Guantanamo Bay. Yee ministered to Muslim prisoners there.

There were initial reports that Yee was being investigated as part of an espionage probe, but he was never charged with spying.

| 38 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

From the World Tribune, :

A Dubai-based company in the United Arab Emirates has been cited as the linchpin in the lucrative nuclear weapons black market that has supplied Iran, Libya and North Korea.

The United States and the International Atomic Energy Agency have determined that the UAE company served as the hub for the traffic of nuclear weapons components. Officials said the company coordinated with a range of nuclear suppliers for orders from such countries as Iran, Libya and North Korea.

The Bush administration identified the UAE firm as SMB Computers, a key element in the nuclear weapons black market operated by Pakistani scientist Abdul Qadeer Khan. The company was found to have served as a clearinghouse for nuclear components ordered by Iran, Libya and North Korea.

Another UAE company involved in the nuclear black market was Gulf Technical Industries, which worked closely with SMB's Tahir, Middle East Newsline reported. The Dubai-based Gulf Technical, founded by British engineer Peter Griffin, an associate of Khan, contracted with Malaysia's Scomi Group Berhad for the manufacture of centrifuge equipment identified as P-2.

| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

At least one angel of mercy didn't have just mercy on her mind. From the Jerusalem Post:

Security forces have arrested a nurse with the Palestinian Red Crescent organization on suspicion of helping terrorists hiding out in Yasser Arafat's Ramallah Mukata headquarters to organize attacks against Israelis.

The woman, arrested Wednesday, was identified as Sadah Said Ahmed Abdullah, 27, from Ramallah, Israel Radio reported. She is divorced, the mother of a child, and is a Jerusalem resident.

During her interrogation, she reportedly admitted helping a senior Fatah Tanzim fugitive and known murderer, Khaled Jamal Shuwish, plan terrorist attacks for the past few months. Shuwish is known to be hiding at the Mukata.

Abdullah was Shuwish's go-between with Hizbullah contacts in Lebanon, who were financing and planning attacks against Israeli targets, according to Israel Radio.

She reportedly told interrogators that Shawaish was planning a suicide bombing against Israelis in the near future.

Israeli security sources said that other Tanzim members were similarly planning attacks, using Arafat's headquarters as their base of operations. The sources said that the Tanzim is preparing terrorist cells with Hizbullah and Iranian financing.

| 1 Comment
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

February 12, 2004

"The feds suspect a Yemeni diplomat drummed up cash for terror groups during a visit to Brooklyn mosques in 1999, an FBI agent testified yesterday." This from the New York Post.

The allegations against Sheik Abdullah Satar came to light at the trial of Numan Maflahi, who the feds say acted as the diplomat's personal assistant in New York. Maflahi is accused of lying to the FBI.

Authorities watched Satar round-the-clock from the time he landed at JFK Airport Dec. 28, 1999, monitoring his whirlwind tour of mosques.

Satar later flew to Italy, where he gave a speech calling for jihad and met with an al Qaeda operative who has since been convicted of aiding terrorists, FBI agent Brian Murphy testified.

The diplomat was back on the feds' radar last year during an investigation into another Yemeni cleric, Sheik Mohammed Al Hasan Al-Moayad, who is awaiting trial on charges he supplied al Qaeda and Hamas with $20 million collected in Brooklyn.

An FBI informant learned that a sympathizer who was afraid to send money to Al-Moayad after Sept. 11, 2001, was secretly taped saying it would be safer to channel contributions through Satar, whose diplomatic passport reduced the risk of his bags being searched, Murphy testified.

Grilled by the feds on March 4, 2003, Maflahi, 30, denied helping Satar with his fund-raising activities.

| 15 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Some people have pointed to the fact that the Virginia jihad group trained by playing paintball games is evidence of scapegoating: how could they have been serious if they were just playing paintball? Well, yesterday ex-Marine Donald Surratt testified: "I wasn't sure I wanted to keep going. Some people were really serious about this. ... They really wanted to implement the training." It got very serious "after one group member returned from a 2000 trip to Pakistan, where he trained with a militant Islamic group called Lashkar-e-Taiba that has since been designated a terrorist organization by the U.S. government." From AP:

An ex-Marine who has pleaded guilty to his role in an alleged "Virginia jihad network" testified Wednesday that the group began playing paintball games to learn self-defense, but the games became more intense as some members used the games for military training.

Donald Surratt, 31, of Suitland, Md., said the games became more serious after one group member returned from a 2000 trip to Pakistan, where he trained with a militant Islamic group called Lashkar-e-Taiba that has since been designated a terrorist organization by the U.S. government.

The group as a whole never discussed using the games as a means to train and join Lashkar, Surratt testified at the trial of four purported group members. But the increasing intensity of the games and their use by some as a training platform for overseas holy war caused him and others to re-evaluate the games' propriety.

"I wasn't sure I wanted to keep going," Surratt said. "Some people were really serious about this. ... They really wanted to implement the training."

Four men--Masoud Khan, Seifullah Chapman, Hammad Abdur-Raheem and Caliph Basha ibn Abdur-Raheem, all U.S. citizens who live in the Washington suburbs--are on trial for conspiracy to aid the Taliban against the United States. Khan faces the most serious charges, including conspiracy to levy war against the United states and conspiracy to provide support to Osama bin Laden's al-Qaida terrorist network.

Surratt said he talked about the games with Hammad Abdur-Raheem, who shared his concerns. But they decided their participation was OK because they they had no plans to engage in holy war.

The government alleges that the men were part of a Virginia jihad network that used paintball games as a means to train and join Lashkar, which is seeking to drive India from the disputed Kashmir region. Engaging in a military expedition against India violates the federal Neutrality Act.

The government further alleges that the group's aims took a hostile turn against the United States after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, alleging that the groups' religious leader told his followers that Islam required them to defend the Taliban against the United States, and that the U.S. military was a legitimate target of holy war.

The defendants contend that the paintball was merely a way for the men to fulfill their religious duties to learn self-defense and that they never intended to fight against the United States.

Surratt, in his testimony, acknowledged that the religious leader, Ali al-Tamimi, recommended fighting alongside the Taliban as the optimal course of action. But if that were not possible, a person could simply leave the United States and live in a Muslim country, or even just pray on behalf of the Taliban to fulfill their obligation.

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Yesterday I wrote here that "Musharraf wants to examine Sharia law, particularly laws regarding rape (which I discuss at length in Islam Unveiled) in the light of "chivalry," but for millions of Muslims in Pakistan and elsewhere, it is the law of Allah. It is not to be judged or revised -- an idea that bodes ill for non-Muslims and women in Sharia societies." Here is more evidence of that problem: in chronicling human rights abuses, Amnesty International has run afoul of Nigerian Muslims, who protest that what AI calls abuses are just exercises of the Sharia, which cannot be abusive as it is Allah's law.

From the Mail and Guardian, with thanks to Nicolei:

An influential Nigerian Islamic body on Wednesday warned the London-based rights group Amnesty International to stop interfering in Islamic religion in the name of human rights campaigns.

The warning by the Jama'atu Nasril Islam (JNI), the umbrella body for Nigeria's Muslims, followed Tuesday's report by Amnesty condemning the use of the death penalty in 12 northern Nigerian states where the Sharia legal system is in operation.

JNI spokesperson Zubairu Jibrin told a local radio in a report monitored in Kano that the rights group is hiding under the guise of human rights to attack Islam or the Sharia legal system.

"We are warning Amnesty to desist from disparaging Islam under the guise of human rights," he said.

"The issue of stoning for adultery is an Islamic injunction which applies only to Muslims and every Muslim who commits adultery is aware of the consequence of this offence if he is prosecuted," he added.

"The issue of stoning for adultery is not confined to Islam. Both Judaism and Christianity prescribe same punishment for adultery, even in severer form," he added.

Of course this is a common dodge, but it is false on several levels. Christianity in fact does not prescribe stoning for adultery, and the laying aside of that punishment is the subject of the famous incident in which Jesus tells those ready to begin stoning an adulteress: "let the one who is without sin cast the first stone" (John 7:53-8:11.) As for Judaism, this punishment is nowhere practiced today, for the rabbinic tradition has elaborated methods of interpretation of the Torah that rule it out. In Islam, however, it persists.

Amnesty had said the death penalty violates women's human rights by curbing their right to a fair trial and by exposing them to homicide charges for abortion-related offences.

The London-based organisation said it "believes that the death penalty in its application in Nigeria in particular violates women's human rights to access to justice ... and has a discriminatory effect on women in certain cases and for certain crimes".

It said that the death penalty remains on the books in Nigeria in both its Constitution and in the Islamic law imposed in 12 northern states for a range of crimes including armed robbery, treason, murder and culpable homicide, with the latter "often" being used in abortion-related cases.

There have been "at least 33 death sentences since 1999", a summary of the report said.

"One of the convicted was a woman charged with a capital offence of culpable homicide, after allegedly having had a still-born baby, which event the court termed as an illegal abortion," it added.

Nigeria, Africa's most populous country of about 126-million people, is almost evenly spread between Muslims and Christians.

The reintroduction of the Sharia in 12 northern states since Nigeria returned to civil rule in 1999 after more than 15 years of military dictatorship has been widely criticised by local and international rights bodies, Christians and the country's central government.

Last month, President Olusegun Obasanjo told an international audience the Islamic legal system had fizzled out in Nigeria.

| 18 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

February 11, 2004

How extensive are those sleeper cells? This from The Herald, with thanks to Mohamed Ibn Guadi:

Islamic terror commandos are being infiltrated into the US in preparation for "an American jihad" from within, according to intelligence sources.

Dozens of radicals trained in camps in western Pakistan and Kashmir are already believed to have slipped into the country and been absorbed in sleeper cells in unsuspecting Muslim communities as the vanguard of a holy army estimated to be several hundred strong.

An FBI spokesman said al Qaeda and allied organisations were thought to be operating in 40 American states, awaiting orders for terror attacks.

| 53 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

More on Al-Qaeda's sleeper cells from the Washington Times, :

Al Qaeda terrorists, operating through "sleeper cells" scattered throughout the United States, continue to recruit new members, assist in the acquisition of safe houses and equipment, conduct pre-attack surveillance and relay messages from terrorist leaders and planners, U.S. law-enforcement authorities said yesterday.

Despite having been degraded by America's ongoing war on terrorism and an aggressive enforcement effort by the FBI, the organization also continues to raise millions of dollars through a vast network of U.S.-based bogus charities and foundations — used to finance, among other things, terrorist training camps abroad, the authorities said.

But U.S. law-enforcement officials and other government agencies declined yesterday to comment specifically on a Tuesday report by The Washington Times that Islamist radicals are being trained at terrorist camps in Pakistan and Kashmir as part of a conspiracy to send hundreds of operatives to sleeper cells in the United States.

U.S. and foreign intelligence and law-enforcement officials said dozens of Islamist extremists had been sent through Europe to Muslim communities in the United States from training camps in the remote regions of western Pakistan and in Pakistan-controlled Kashmir.

Asked about The Times report, one U.S. official said there is no doubt that training camps for terrorists are operating in Pakistan and Kashmir, but that recent focus of the groups largely has been on internal Pakistani issues. The official would not elaborate, referring further inquiries to the FBI.

"The FBI remains committed to investigating and disrupting terrorist activities in the United States. There is no more important mission," said FBI spokesman Bill Carter, adding that locating al Qaeda members and sympathizers "is our highest priority."

Mr. Carter confirmed that al Qaeda maintains a network of members and associates in dozens of countries, including the United States, but said the FBI had made "significant progress" in disrupting their activities and planning.

Despite denials by the Pakistani Embassy in Washington, the law-enforcement and intelligence officials told The Times that the camps in Pakistan were documented by the Indian government, which said its army had photographs and other evidence that had been turned over to U.S. officials.

That information included satellite photos and communication intercepts showing 60 to 70 camps in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir as well as in Pakistan.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

From Paul Sperry at FrontPage, a disquieting glimpse inside the FBI:

When linguist Sibel Dinez Edmonds showed up for her first day of work at the FBI, a week after the 9-11 attacks, she expected to find a somber atmosphere. Instead, she was offered cookies filled with dates from party bowls set out in the room where other Middle Eastern linguists with top-secret security clearance translate terror-related communications.

She knew the dessert is customarily served in the Middle East at weddings, births and other celebrations, and asked what the happy occasion was. To her shock, she was told the Arab linguists were celebrating the terrorist attacks on America, as if they were some joyous event. Right in front of her supervisor, one translator cheered:

"It's about time they got a taste of what they've been giving the Middle East."

She found out later that it was her supervisor's wife who helped organize the office party there at the bureau's Washington field office, just four blocks from the J. Edgar Hoover Building.

"This guy's wife brought the date-filled cookies for the celebration," Edmonds, 33, recalled.

At the time, the supervisor, Mike Feghali, a naturalized U.S. citizen from Beirut, was in charge of the FBI's Turkish and Farsi desks.

But he's been promoted since then, and now also runs the all-important Arabic desk, which is key to intercepting the next al-Qaida plot.

It gets worse.

The language service squad is the front line in the FBI's war on terrorism, collecting all foreign language tips, information and terrorist threats to homeland security. Agents act on what the squad translates and reports. The sooner they get the information, the sooner they can thwart terrorist attacks. Investigators had missed clues to both the 2001 and 1993 World Trade Center attacks because they were buried in a backlog of untranslated wiretaps and documents in Arabic.

Despite the backlog, Feghali told Edmonds and other translators to just let the work pile higher, according to Edmonds. Why? Money. She says Feghali, who has recruited family and friends to work with him at the high-paying language unit, argued that Congress would approve an even bigger budget for it if they could continue to show big backlogs.

"We were told to take long breaks, to slow down translations, and to simply say 'no' to those field agents calling us to beg for speedy translations so that they could go on with their investigations and interrogations of those they had detained," said Edmonds, who was fired without specified cause by the FBI after she reported breaches in security, mistranslations and potential espionage by Middle Eastern colleagues.

| 10 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Omar Bakri of Britain's radical Al-Muhajiroun, whom I profile in Onward Muslim Soldiers (detailing there his support for violent jihad and suicide bombing), is at it again. From the British Sun tabloid, :

A FANATICAL pal of evil cleric Abu Hamza had told British children as young as ten they must “kill and be killed” for Islam.

Muslim extremist Omar Bakri — speaking in London’s East End — said suicide bombers were assured a place in paradise.

Bakri described such bombings as “self-sacrifice operations”.

An example would be to crash a plane on to 10 Downing Street or the White House, he told a cheering audience of Muslims, including around ten young children.

In one outburst he raged: “You must fight for the way of Allah, for the sake of Allah, to kill first and to be killed.”

Bakri, 44, who has been nicknamed the Tottenham Ayatollah, preached his sick gospel of terrorism at a hall in Bethnal Green.

The full rant was captured by BBC reporter Paul Kenyon — who said: “There’s no doubt he was talking about what it takes to be a suicide bomber.”

The Syrian-born cleric read out a list where terrorist atrocities had been carried out — New York’s Twin Towers, the bombing of US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, the Bali blast, and the bomb attack on the destroyer USS Cole in Yemen.

And he praised the September 11 bombers as the “Glorious 19 hijackers”.

Bakri — who runs a group dedicated to creating an Islamic state in Britain — is a pal of Hamza, who is facing deportation for preaching hate.

Last night outraged Tory MP Patrick Mercer declared: “Omar Bakri should be locked up. He’s encouraging others to commit crimes in this country and other countries.

“It’s absolutely astounding that these things are being said inside Great Britain today. He’s clearly breaking the law. I’m sure he could probably be accused of treason.

“The fact there are ten-year-olds in the audience, who are vulnerable and highly persuasive, is very worrying”.

Journalist Kenyon, 37, added: “The sense of it was that you must prepare yourselves for glorious deaths as martyrs and that they had a duty to become martyrs if called upon.

“He’s clearly giving them advice on what to do and to have their affairs tidied up before they go. It made my skin crawl.”

| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

From AFP, :

The armed wing of the radical Hamas movement on Wednesday called on its activists to carry out large-scale suicide attacks against Israel in retaliation for a major gunbattle, which left nine Palestinians dead and 35 injured.

“The leadership ... calls on all its fighting cells in Jerusalem, Hebron, Nablus, Bethlehem, Jenin, Tulkarem and Gaza and in all the towns and villages to respond quickly to hit all the enemy positions it can reach with huge martyr operations,” the Ezzedine al-Qassam Brigades said in a statement.

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Israel is not the only country building a fence to try to keep terrorists out. An anti-terror fence is also going up in . . . Saudi Arabia. From The Independent, :

Saudi Arabia, one of the most vocal critics in the Arab world of Israel's "security fence" in the West Bank, is quietly emulating the Israeli example by erecting a barrier along its porous border with Yemen.

The barrier is part of a plan to erect what will be an electronic surveillance system along the length of the kingdom's frontiers - land, air and sea. The project, involving fencing and electronic detection equipment, has been in the planning stages for several years. It may cost up to $8.57bn (£4.58bn). Behind the plan is a deep-seated lack of trust in the Yemeni authorities' ability to arrest infiltrators before they make it into Saudi territory.

A Yemeni delegation arrived in Jeddah for emergency talks on the issue yesterday, after submitting an official complaint. Saudi officials have combated drug, alcohol, luxury-goods and arms smuggling across the mountainous and porous border with Yemen for years. And they have paid a high price in their battles with the smugglers.

In 2002, 36 Saudi border guards were killed in Jizan, a southern Saudi border town. The government says the smugglers provide the explosives and weapons used by radical Islamists inside the kingdom, who carried out two suicide attacks against civilian targets last year, killing more than 50 and injuring hundreds.

The perpetrators of earlier terrorist attacks in Saudi Arabia, spanning at least a decade, also used explosives from Yemen, state-controlled Saudi media has reported. They include the 1993 attack in the Bahah region, 200 miles south of Jeddah, in which 10 people were killed after a bomb was thrown into a mosque during Friday prayers, and a blast in Riyadh, the capital, in 1995 at an American compound, which killed nine.

Since the bombings on 12 May last year, Saudi border patrols have continued to seize large quantities of weapons and explosives daily - including more than 90,000 rounds of ammunition, grenades, more than 2,000 sticks of dynamite, hundreds of bazookas and more than 1,200 other weapons.

Sa'ada, 25 miles south of the border, has the biggest of Yemen's numerous arms souks. Here an 85mm surface-to-surface missile can be bought for $2,500. Anti-aircraft missiles are no longer on display, but they can still be had for the right price. The row of shops attracts thousands of buyers each day for weapons from China, Russia, Belgium, Spain and even Israel - a country Yemen does not recognise or trade with. There are about 60 million weapons owned by the 20-million strong Yemeni population.

Osama bin Laden's roots straddle both sides of the border. He was born and raised in Saudi Arabia, but has strong ancestral ties to Yemen - a tribal and largely lawless country, where all males past puberty outside the main cities openly bear arms. Yemen remains the place that al-Qa'ida operatives see as home. But Saudi Arabia is the source of ideological inspiration and financial support. Many are products of the Saudi education system, which breeds extremism.

Al-Qa'ida's leader in Yemen, the Saudi-born and educated Mohammed Hamdi al-Ahdal, who was arrested last year, is a case in point. He has revealed under interrogation to Yemeni authorities that Saudis and Yemenis were involved in funding two major terrorist attacks in Yemen - against the USS Cole in October 2000, which killed 17 American sailors, and the French supertanker Limburg in October 2002.

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"Two large vehicle bombs exploded in central Iraq over a 24-hour period, killing at least 75 Iraqis as many of them were applying for jobs with the new security forces, U.S. and Iraqi officials said early Wednesday." This from the Washington Post.

Jihad was in the air:

By afternoon, soldiers were still lined up near the police station, their guns pointed at men and women who threw rocks and cursed at them. Periodically, one side would charge the other and scuffles would break out.

"There is no God but Allah. America is the enemy of God," the protesters chanted. "Hell to the Americans. Hell to the Jews."

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Here is the charming story of Abu Walid, the Saudi responsible for the subway bombing in Moscow, and how he and others have turned Chechnya into a jihad battleground. From AP, with thanks to Nicolei:

A Saudi-born warrior so zealously Muslim that he is traumatized by even touching nonbelievers has risen to the top echelon of rebels in Chechnya, Russian officials and rebel sources say, a symbol of how a once-secular fight has come under the influence of radical Islam.

To the Russian security services, the rebel commander known as Abu Walid embodies Chechnya's place in the chain of international terrorism -- a connection they stress to win Western support for their military campaign in the southern Russian region.

He has surfaced as a suspect in myriad terrorist attacks in Russia, from the 1999 apartment house bombings that catapulted Russian forces back into Chechnya after they lost the 1994-1996 war to last week's explosion on the Moscow subway.

To the rebels, Abu Walid represents a growing trend toward strict Islamic practices, a tendency reflected in the appointment of a spiritual counselor as co-leader of even the smallest rebel unit.

Abu Walid, who is believed to be about 30 years old, has donned the mantle of Omar Ibn al Khattab, the flamboyant, Saudi-born rebel leader who died in 2002, apparently after being poisoned. Like Khattab, he is said to be second in authority only to Shamil Basayev, a Chechen known for a series of raids and brutal attacks.

An expert in explosives, Abu Walid trained in camps in Afghanistan and fought alongside Muslims in Bosnia before arriving in Chechnya in 1995, according to Russia's Federal Security Service.

Like Khattab, he is a money man for the rebels -- receiving and distributing funds smuggled in from abroad to support the Chechens' fight.

"It's understood that he has money. Since he took over from Khattab, lots of units answer only to him and no one else," said the liaison.

"The [Chechen] military leadership has recognized him," echoed Sergei Ignatchenko, the spokesman for the Federal Security Service, adding that Abu Walid had taken over Khattab's post of military emir.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Here is the difficulty: Musharraf wants to examine Sharia law, particularly laws regarding rape (which I discuss at length in Islam Unveiled) in the light of "chivalry," but for millions of Muslims in Pakistan and elsewhere, it is the law of Allah. It is not to be judged or revised -- an idea that bodes ill for non-Muslims and women in Sharia societies. From Reuters, with thanks to Nicolei:

Traditional Islamic laws that require multiple witnesses to prove a rape case or permit the stoning of adulterers must be put up for debate, Pakistan's President Pervez Musharraf said on Tuesday.


Addressing a summit of first ladies of 17 Asian countries, Musharraf said he was aware the "Hudood Ordinances" introduced during the Islamic dictatorship of the late General Zia-ul-Haq in 1979 were a "very touchy and thorny issue".

"But there is no doubt in my mind that it should be open to any debate," he said. "Why should we shy away from even discussing it?"

Appealing to Pakistani men to be "chivalrous", he added: "We must discuss it."

Powerful Islamic groups have vowed to resist attempts to change the laws opposed by secular political parties and civil rights and women's groups, who say rape and other violent crimes against women have soared since they were passed.

One of the most controversial provisions of the laws states that a woman must have four pious male Muslim witnesses to prove a rape, or face a charge of adultery herself. Men and women found guilty of adultery face stoning to death or 100 lashes.

The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) says the incidence of rape could be higher than the one every two hours reported in the local media.

But the HRCP estimates only a tiny percentage of cases ever go to court either because of the difficulty in proving a crime under Hudood Laws, the social stigma attached to rape, or the use of force by influential people to cover up such incidents.

Of the cases that do reach a lower court, fewer than half lead to prosecution, said commission member Afrasiab Khattack.

"Because of the strict requirement of evidence in Hudood cases, it is very rare that the accused gets convicted," said Naheeda Mehboob Elahi, a women's rights activist and secretary general of the Human Rights Society of Pakistan.

Musharraf stopped short of endorsing a government-appointed commission's recommendations for repeal of the laws, but looked to be preparing the ground for such a move by urging a debate.

Musharraf, who has taken a tough stance against Islamic militants since taking power in a 1999 coup, said there was a need to examine what Islam's holy book, the Koran, and the teachings of the Prophet Mohammad, said on the issue.

"The question is of correct interpretation of the Koran and Sunnah," he said.

The National Commission on the Status of Women, chaired by a former judge, recommended in September that the ordinances be repealed, but parliament has yet to take up the issue.

Successive governments have failed to change the ordinances given stiff opposition from Islamist groups, traditional allies of the military which Musharraf heads.

In his speech, Musharraf also urged Pakistanis to change their attitude towards honour killings, in which male relatives kill women deemed to have offended family honour by marrying without consent or bringing an inadequate dowry.

Musharraf said people in authority who were supposed to deal with the issue had a "negative mindset".

"I would like to urge these people, urge the population of Pakistan, all those who are in a position of authority to try cases, appear as witnesses, to deal with these cases," he said.

Musharraf said it was important for Pakistanis to demonstrate civilised behaviour, "to show we are a tolerant, progressive, educated society".

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The other side of the French headscarf debate, where Muslim women demand the freedom to wear the veil, is the fact that women in many Muslim countries have no freedom not to wear the veil. The most notorious example of this is Iran, where during the Khomeini revolution the veil was for many a symbol of freedom. This from Persian Journal, with thanks to Nicolei:

She walked into a public square in Tehran last March, doused herself with gasoline and set herself aflame. The last words of Dr. Homa Darabi, Iranian university professor and activist against the Islamic regime, were, "Death to dictatorship! Long live freedom!" . . .

Inspired by hopes for democracy, economic prosperity for all classes, gender equality and a leadership that would not allow Iranian culture to be swallowed up by Western values, many Iranian women joined the 1978-'79 rebellion against the rule of the Shah.

Women came together to protest such sexist attitudes as expressed by the Shah in 1973 when he said, "A woman is important in a man's life only if she is beautiful and charming. . . . You are equal to a man in the eyes of the law. But excuse me for saying so, you are certainly not equal [to a man] in your capabilities."

But did the Iranian Revolution and the Islamic Republic come through for women? Did it give them the freedom, the equality and the dignity that it promised? Fourteen years after the revolution, perhaps the most revealing answer to this question was given by Darabi when she sacrificed herself.

Zaria, a member of L'Association des femmes Iraniennes de Montr?al, said the public suicide of Darabi "was to show all the injustices against a woman [in Iran]."

Zaria said Darabi had repeatedly tried to leave the country to see her children, but was denied permission because her husband would not sign a consent form.

"In Iran, women are not allowed to leave unless their husbands give them permission," explained Zaria, noting that if a woman does not have a husband, it is the father who gives permission. "It is always the man who is in power."

Darabi's suicide speaks most loudly as a testimony for the conditions surrounding Iranian women because of the silence that surrounded her act. Neither the Iranian nor the international press took it seriously. Zaria claims her association tried to contact the Montreal press, "but nobody would listen."

At the start of the rule of the Islamic Republic, women were a central part of revolutionary activities. They used their influence to rally support for Khomeini through women's groups, charity work and propaganda in the Iranian women's journals, such as Zan-e-Rouz.

The Ayatollah recognized the participation of these women and made efforts to "praise" them.

He is quoted as saying, "In our revolutionary movement, women have. . .earned more credit than men, for it was the women who not only displayed courage themselves, but also had reared men of courage. . . . If nations were deprived of courageous women to rear true men, they would decline and collapse."

Iranian women began to receive the rewards for their support of the Islamic Republic soon after 1981. The first of these was the compulsory hijab (Islamic modest dress) in the work place.

This was followed by a law ordering the hijab in all public places, for all women, Muslim or not.

Women had fought in the revolution so that their choices would be expanded. They had donned the veils at the demonstrations against the Shah to say that nobody could stop them from wearing the veil if they wanted. The Islamic regime reversed their statement and made it impossible for women to choose not to practice the hijab. . . .

The new policy concerning women continued to be implemented in a series of laws between 1981 and 1983. Segregation of the sexes stretched to public pools, buses and, finally, to educational institutions. Women's voices were banned from the radio and female singers and actresses were no longer seen on television. Women were systematically purged from any high-level government positions and were banned from participating in the judiciary. More and more, the public role of women was equated with corrupted morality and lack of chastity.

An example of this policy in practice was the December 1979 execution of Farrokhru Parsa, the female minister of education. Parsa was accused of promoting prostitution, corrupting the earth, and "warring against God." . . .

At the same time as the new policies were being implemented, the constitution of the Islamic Republic enshrined women's right to vote, saying that both men and women were equal before the law.

The stipulation was qualified, however, by adding that the equality only went so far as the Shar'ia (Islamic law) allowed.

This meant that women were subject to many restrictions. One example, cited by Zaria, is the inability of women to divorce.

Another is the lack of credibility given to a woman's testimony in a court of law. Zaria explained that, whereas a male witness' testimony to the crime of assassination is accepted, "it takes two female witnesses to give the same credibility." . . .

When the women of Iran supported the revolution, they did so because of the promise of more equality for everyone. Unfortunately, women have fallen prey to a new, but no less drastic, form of oppression than that of the regime they helped to destroy.

| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Their recent threats haven't panned out, and Al-Qaeda is feeling the heat. From Reuters:

Al Qaeda is under pressure to strike another "high-value" Western target and may be looking at attacking chemical plants or shooting down planes with surface-to-air missiles, a top German intelligence official said Tuesday.

"A substantial decline in activities in the next couple of years is highly improbable," Rudolf Adam, deputy head of German's BND foreign intelligence agency, told a security conference in Berlin.

"On the contrary, we would feel that pressure is mounting on al Qaeda to reassert its effectiveness and its ability to strike another really big high-value target" in order to remain visible, he said. . . .

Adam said air transport remained a potential target, adding: "The next threat that we observe with great concern is the possibilities of shoulder-fired surface-to-air missiles, so called MANPADs."

Two such missiles narrowly missed an Israeli airliner taking off from the Kenyan port of Mombasa in November 2002, in an operation attributed to al Qaeda. They have also been used by insurgents in Iraq.

Adam said shipping, tourist sites and supply infrastructure such as oil pipelines, power stations, electricity grids and water supplies remained potentially at risk.

"We have unspecified hints that plans have been made or are still under way to target the chemical industry and chemical infrastructure," he said, without giving details.

Adam also said there was concern that al Qaeda might consider kidnappings -- a tactic it has not previously used -- as a bargaining chip to seek the release of prominent members captured during the U.S.-led war on terror.

"We have some disturbing evidence that kidnappings have been planned," he said.

Adam said the "first generation" of al Qaeda had been badly weakened in the war on terror, but even the capture or killing of its leader Osama bin Laden would leave behind a second generation of fighters, trained in Afghan camps, and a third generation currently being recruited.

"The cancer has already proliferated into innumerable metastases," he said.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The French Parliament "voted 494 to 36 to ban Muslim headscarves, Jewish skullcaps and large Christian crosses and to expel pupils who insisted on wearing them."

Meanwhile, according to the International Herald Tribune:

While the public discussion focuses on France’s vaunted secularism, on women’s rights and the definitions of Frenchness, racism is a silent but powerful undercurrent propelling the debate.

It’s an undercurrent that Sarah Aguado, a precocious 13-year-old, knows well. As the only Jew in a school with a large Muslim minority, she was repeatedly insulted and attacked and finally forced to flee.

Classmates called her a ‘‘dirty Jew.’’ One student slapped her and made a racist remark. Another asked whether her family in Israel ‘‘owned guns and killed Palestinians.’’

And in nearby Belgium, "Jewish children going to the Athénée Maimonide Bruxelles, a Jewish school, are not allowed to take the subway at the nearby Lemonnier station anymore."

Why? Were they forming gangs and terrorizing other passengers? Not quite:

Because of frequent attacks by 'muslim youths', the school board has decided that the kids are not allowed to use the station. One teacher said to the paper that the attacks follow current affairs, and have started when the 'second intifada' began. He also said hatred against Jews was something temporarily, and that it wouldn't take long for the situation to cool down.

I would like to know what he thinks is going to cool it down. (Thanks to LGF.)

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Jihadist activity, as well as retaliation to it, is increasing in Thailand. From the Taipei Times, with thanks to Filtrat:

Tension escalated between Thailand's Buddhist majority and its Muslim minority yesterday as the country's defense minister warned of a bloody war between the two communities.

Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra traveled to Pattani province in the heart of the Muslim-majority deep south in an attempt to head off a rising tide of violence.

In the latest of a series of attacks, two Muslim men were shot dead by unknown gunmen in separate incidents Sunday night in Yala province, 770km south of Bangkok.

Police said the motive of the killings was unclear but they suspected they might be part of a continuing effort to destabilize the region.

On Sunday the Islamic Central Committee of Thailand, along with Muslim leaders in the southern provinces of Yala, Pattani and Narathiwat, announced they were suspending cooperation with central government authorities because of "disgraceful" behavior by Thai soldiers. The Muslim leaders objected to a search of a local ponoh Muslim school in Pattani by about 70 soldiers who were looking for weapons stolen in a raid on a Thai army camp on Jan. 4.

Reacting to Muslim leaders' announcement, Defense Minister Thammarak Issarangkura said the government would not tolerate any kind of rebellion in the south.

Speaking in a radio interview in Bangkok, Thammarak compared the Muslim militancy in the south to the communist insurgency that was widespread in the area in the 1970s.

"During that time, many people died," he said. "Do we want that situation to happen again? The rest of the country won't let the people of these three provinces disrupt the lives of all 59 million people in Thailand. If there's war, a lot of people will be killed in those three provinces."

Like so many judges and officials in the West who have lectured Islamic radicals about their own faith, Thammarak took the rebels to task for violating the tenets of Islam. This widespread behavior is both presumptuous and short-sighted. It fails to recognize that Muslims aren't going to care what a non-Muslim tells them about Islam, and refuses to acknowledge the potency of the religious appeals that radical Muslims are making within the Islamic community worldwide:

Thammarak criticized the Muslim leaders for violating their own religion and the principles of the Koran.

"Their god does not teach this kind of thing," he said.

Police, soldiers, teachers and Buddhist monks have been the targets of shooting and bombing attacks in the past three months, mainly in the five southernmost, Muslim-majority provinces.

Government leaders have attempted to play down the attacks as being the result of local conflicts and banditry. But the rising number of attacks, combined with intelligence reports of Islamic separatist involvement, have forced him to take a more active role in easing tensions.

Thaksin had been scheduled to return to Bangkok yesterday from Phuket but instead traveled to Pattani.

He said he planned to go to Narathiwat later in the day and attempt to meet with local Muslim leaders.

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

February 10, 2004

"Islamic radicals are being trained at terrorist camps in Pakistan and Kashmir as part of a conspiracy to send hundreds of operatives to 'sleeper cells' in the United States, according to U.S. and foreign officials." This from the Washington Times:

The intelligence and law-enforcement officials say dozens of Islamic extremists have already been routed through Europe to Muslim communities in the United States, based on secret intelligence data and information from terrorists and others detained by U.S. authorities.

A high-ranking foreign intelligence chief told The Washington Times in an interview last week that this clandestine but aggressive network of training camps "represents a serious threat to the United States, one that cannot be ignored." The official said as many as 400 terrorists have been and are being trained at camps in Pakistan and Kashmir.

U.S. intelligence officials said the camps, located in the remote regions of western Pakistan and in Pakistan-controlled Kashmir, are financed in part by various terrorist networks, including al Qaeda, and by sources in Saudi Arabia. ...

Several other camps are being operated by an anti-U.S. Muslim group known as Lashkar-e-Taiba, according to U.S. and foreign intelligence officials. Listed by the State Department in 2001 as a terrorist organization, Lashkar-e-Taiba is the armed wing of the Pakistan-based religious organization Markaz-ud-Dawa-wal-Irshad.

Eleven men, including nine U.S. citizens, were arrested last year in Virginia in what authorities called the "Virginia jihad." The men were accused in a 41-count grand jury indictment of engaging in "holy jihad" to drive India out of the disputed Kashmir territory. Six have since pleaded guilty.

The indictment said some of the men traveled to Lashkar-e-Taiba terrorist camps in Pakistan, where they were trained in the use of various weapons, including small arms, machine guns and grenade launchers. The indictment also said the trips occurred both before and after the September 11 attacks.

| 11 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

I've been saying for a long time that many Muslims reject the idea of democracy as incompatible with what they see as God's law: the Sharia. As such, democratic forces in Iraq face an uphill battle, and this bodes ill for equality of rights for non-Muslims and women. From the Washington Post, with thanks to Nicolei:

Iraq's current top official has demanded that Islam be the principal basis for Iraq's laws, a move that breaches a previous agreement among the framers of the interim constitution and creates the possibility that Islamic law could rule the land. If approved, the proposal could have broad effects on secular Iraq, taking away rights of women in divorce and inheritance cases, shuttering liquor stores and banning gambling, legal advisers here say. Elements also run counter to President Bush's goal of turning Iraq into a beacon for democracy in the Middle East.

"There could be changes in the Iraqi state," said Salem Chalabi, a legal adviser to the Governing Council and a member of the 10-member committee framing the basic transitional law, which acts as an interim constitution and is to take effect at the end of this month.

"If someone proposes a law of inheritance that conflicts with sharia, or Islam, then it's invalid," Chalabi said. "The registration of liquor stores may become illegal." . . .

Islamic law influences the legal code throughout most of the Middle East, but in relatively secular countries, such as Egypt, loopholes are applied in certain areas, for example to allow Western-style banking and in rules governing women's dress.

On the other hand, Saudi Arabia follows an Islam-based legal code that provides for amputations for theft and public beheadings for murder and rape.

In an interview televised on NBC's "Meet the Press" Sunday, Bush said Iraqis would not approve of an extremist Islamic regime.

"They're not going to develop that. And the reason I can say that is because I'm very aware of this basic law they're writing," Bush said to NBC's Tim Russert.

Bush said he discussed the law with three Governing Council members who assured him a future constitution would enshrine minority rights and freedom of religion.

Abdel-Hamid's measure would not take away freedom to practice other religions, but would make Islamic codes the arbiter of future laws, with exceptions made for minority religions. The proposal sparked what framers of the law called "heated" discussions.

The problem is also that that freedom to practice other religions will be severely restricted, if the Sharia is implemented in its fullness, by the discrimination and humiliation mandated for the dhimmis.

Perhaps the largest effect would be to moot much of Iraq's 1959 Law of Personal Status, which grants uniform rights to husband and wife to divorce and inheritance, and governs related issues like child support, Chalabi said.

Representatives of Iraq's Kurdish and Christian parties, and those with liberal Western views have voiced opposition to the Islamization of Iraq's legal code, and the issue remains under discussion. Women would be most affected, said one opponent.

"If this happens 50 percent of Iraqi society will need to be liberated," said Younadem Kana, a Christian member of the Governing Council. "We need to fight for the rights of all Iraqis - women and minorities as well."

Speaking in defense of the proposal, Abdel Aziz al-Hakim, a Shiite cleric and member of the Governing Council, said on Saturday that future Iraqi legislators would be prevented from adopting laws that violate Islam. Al-Hakim also said special cases could be made for non-Muslim minorities, including Iraq's 1 million Christians, whose rights to purchase alcohol could be protected.

But that is granting nothing. This right is given to dhimmis under the Sharia.

Committee members said the law, if passed, would bring Iraq's legal code far short of those espoused by more conservative neighbors such as Saudi Arabia - where women aren't permitted to vote or drive.

"Nobody's suggesting that Iraq become an Islamic state," Chalabi said. "Nobody's really going that far."

I hope they don't.

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The terror cell in Portland was particularly noteworthy because for years, Mike Hawash had seemed to be a comfortable member of American society. But even he was susceptible to the call of jihad ideology. This just underscores the crying need for honesty and reform from American Muslim groups. From the LA Times, with thanks to Nicolei:

The last three members of the so-called Portland Seven terrorist cell were sentenced Monday for trying to join the Taliban shortly after the Sept. 11 attacks on the Pentagon and World Trade Center.

Palestinian-born Maher "Mike" Hawash, 39, expressed remorse for his actions and pledged loyalty to the United States before he was sentenced to seven years in prison. Two brothers, Ahmed Bilal, 25, and Muhammad Bilal, 23, were sentenced to 10 and eight years, respectively. Neither made a statement.

In the fall of 2002, federal investigators indicted six Portland-area Muslims on charges of conspiring to wage war against the United States. The seventh member of the cell was arrested later.

Hawash — a former software engineer — was the first of the group to plead guilty to a lesser charge of conspiring to help Al Qaeda and the Taliban during the war in Afghanistan. In exchange for a lighter sentence, he became the government's crucial material witness and testified against the others.

"I reiterate my acceptance of full responsibility for this act. I do not blame anyone else," Hawash said in a statement to U.S. District Judge Robert E. Jones.

"This act was done by me in a highly emotional state and was completely out of my character. When the media began to point at Muslims, I couldn't believe it…. I did not believe that the Afghan people had anything to do with this.

"I am still proud to be a U.S. citizen, and I regret my actions," Hawash said. "I wish to ask forgiveness from my family, my friends in this community and the people of the United States."

At the time of his arrest, Hawash was working at Intel Corp. — so well-liked by his colleagues that they began a "Free Mike Hawash" campaign.

"From the beginning, Mr. Hawash has been a mystery to the court," Jones said before handing down the sentence. "How a man of such extreme success could commit this act … I don't know."

Jones concluded by saying he was convinced that Hawash would "never commit a criminal act" again.

The Bilal brothers also pleaded guilty to conspiring to help Al Qaeda and the Taliban and to firearms charges in exchange for dismissing the main charge of conspiracy to wage war against the United States.

Daniel Feiner, the lawyer for Ahmed Bilal, said his client believed he was doing the right thing at the time but later concluded it was wrong and had been preparing to turn himself in when he was arrested.

The younger brother, Muhammad Bilal, was merely following his older brother's lead, according to his lawyer.

Muhammad Bilal's attorney Andrew Bates said: "My client is an ordinary person, 21 years old at the time of this misadventure. Like all 21-year-olds, he was seeking his path."

In November, two other members of the Portland Seven were sentenced to 18 years in prison. Patrice Lumumba Ford, 32, and Jeffrey Leon Battle, 33, had pleaded guilty to conspiracy to levy war against the U.S. Only Ford and Battle refused to cooperate in the investigation.

The only woman in the group, October Martinique Lewis, was sentenced in December to three years in prison after she pleaded guilty to wiring money to help the group. Investigators say the accused ringleader, Habis Abdulla al Saoub, 37, was killed in October during a Pakistani raid of an Al Qaeda encampment.

The seven got to know each other during gatherings at two local mosques: the Masjid As-Sabr in southwestern Portland and the Bilal mosque in nearby Beaverton, Ore.

They came to call themselves "Katibat Al-Mawt," which prosecutors said loosely translated to "squad of death."

Nothing loose about it. That's what it means.

Court documents that depicted the seven as a loose-knit group who studied books and films on jihad and participated in firearms and martial-arts training before the Sept. 11 attacks. Members expressed interest in becoming martyrs.

The U.S. invasion of Afghanistan, whose Taliban government supported Osama bin Laden, prompted the six men of the group to join the fight against U.S. forces.

In October 2001, they traveled to China, where they tried several times to cross into Pakistan but failed because of visa problems and heightened Chinese security. Most of the group eventually returned to Portland.

| 15 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The defense, of course, says that Islam is on trial. From the Washington Post:

Four men on trial for their roles in an alleged Virginia jihad network were caught up in a world of paramilitary training where fighting for Islam was a virtue and America was the enemy, prosecutors said in opening arguments yesterday.

As the trial began in U.S. District Court in Alexandria, prosecutors portrayed the men as militants who prepared for jihad, or holy war, abroad by playing paintball and firing weapons in the Virginia countryside. The men, the government said, exchanged videos that showed al Qaeda training camps and depicted fighters using pictures of former president Bill Clinton for target practice.

"In their world, the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks were justified. . . . This is the circle that these people swam in," said Assistant U.S. Attorney Gordon Kromberg, who criticized the world view of even his own witnesses, themselves former defendants in the case, as "very strange and repellant."

Defense attorneys portrayed the men as devoted Muslims who engaged in military training out of a religious duty to stay in shape and defend themselves against what they perceived as anti-Muslim bias. They called the defendants loyal Americans and criticized the government for making the case about Islam.

"Caliph Abdur-Raheem is not guilty of anything except playing paintball and shooting a gun, as his religious leaders told him was his responsibility to do," said Christopher Amolsch, attorney for defendant Caliph Basha Ibn Abdur-Raheem, who is charged with conspiracy and firearms violations.

The defendants are among 11 men -- all but one from the Washington suburbs -- who originally were indicted in June on weapons counts and charges of training with Lashkar-i-Taiba, a group trying to drive India from Pakistan. The U.S. government has labeled the group a terrorist organization and said the defendants' crimes took place over several years, starting in February 2000. Seven of the men were charged again in September in an updated indictment that accused two of them of conspiring to provide material support to al Qaeda and to the Taliban regime in Afghanistan.

Six of the men have pleaded guilty, and prosecutors indicated yesterday that their testimony would be key to the trial. . . .

Other defendants now on trial are Hammad Abdur-Raheem (who is not related to Caliph); Seifullah Chapman; and Masoud Ahmad Khan. Chapman and Hammad Abdur-Raheem are charged with firearms violations and conspiracy counts relating to Lashkar-i-Taiba. Khan faces the most serious charges: conspiracies to support al Qaeda and the Taliban and to levy war against the United States.

U.S. District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema will decide on the verdicts, because the defendants waived their rights to a jury trial. Defense attorneys said they feared that a Northern Virginia jury could not be fair to Muslim men facing allegations involving terrorism. The final defendant in the case, Sabri Benkahla, is scheduled to go on trial in March. . . .

Bernard Grimm, an attorney for Khan, disputed Kromberg's contentions that the case is not about the men's religion.

"This case is emphatically about Islam," he said, describing it as a faith that "requires you, in fact it is incumbent upon you, to always protect yourself and your family.''

Foreshadowing a likely defense strategy, Grimm criticized the cooperators as having changed their stories.

And he minimized the paintball games, which the defendants acknowledge having played, as "totally innocent."

He compared the games to a softball team that prosecutors might have at their law firm.

| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Yesterday we posted an article reporting that Iran's mullahs are hoping Bush loses the presidential election. Some comments criticized us for bringing politics into the struggle against global jihad. Well, actually I would love to keep politics out of it. In Onward Muslim Soldiers I make the case that the struggle against jihad terror is not a conservative issue, but should be one taken up by all those who value universal human rights.

Nevertheless, as Al Pacino would say, just when we think we're out, they pull us back in. Now the Tehran Times is reporting that John Kerry's office has warmed the mullahs' hearts, such as they are, by sending a note to an Iranian news agency promising to repair the damage Bush has done. (Thanks to dtrini.)

The office of Senator John Kerry, the frontrunner in the Democratic presidential primary in the U.S., sent the Mehr News Agency an e-email saying that Kerry will try to repair the damage done by the incumbent president if he wins the election. The text of the e-mail follows.

As Americans who have lived and worked extensively overseas, we have personally witnessed the high regard with which people around the world have historically viewed the United States. Sadly, we are also painfully aware of how the actions and the attitudes demonstrated by the U.S. government over the past three years have threatened the goodwill earned by presidents of both parties over many decades and put many of our international relationships at risk.

It is in the urgent interests of the people of the United States to restore our country's credibility in the eyes of the world. America needs the kind of leadership that will repair alliances with countries on every continent that have been so damaged in the past few years, as well as build new friendships and overcome tensions with others.

We are convinced that John Kerry is the candidate best qualified to meet this challenge. Senator Kerry has the diplomatic skill and temperament as well as a lifetime of accomplishments in field of international affairs. He believes that collaboration with other countries is crucial to efforts to win the war on terror and make America safer.

An understanding of global affairs is essential in these times, and central to this campaign Kerry has the experience and the understanding necessary to successfully restore the United States to its position of respect within the community of nations. He has the judgment and vision necessary to assure that the United States fulfills a leadership role in meeting the challenges we face throughout the world.

The current Administration's policies of unilateralism and rejection of important international initiatives, from the Kyoto Accords to the Biological Weapons Convention, have alienated much of the world and squandered remarkable reserves of support after 9/11. This climate of hostility affects us all, but most especially impacts those who reside overseas. Disappointment with current U.S. leadership is widespread, extending not just to the corridors of power and politics, but to the man and woman on the street as well.

We believe John Kerry is the Democrat who can go toe-to-toe against the current Administration on national security and defense issues. We also remain convinced that John Kerry has the best chance of beating the incumbent in November, and putting America on a new course that will lead to a safer, more secure, and more stable world.

WND reminds of us why this might not have been the wisest note to send to Iran. :

While Kerry's e-mail mentions combating terrorism, Iran has been long on the U.S. list of nations sponsoring terrorism. Two years ago in his State of the Union address, the president referred to Iran, Iraq and North Korea as an "axis of evil."

Iran is officially considered an Islamic republic, governed by Muslim Shia law.

Commercial relations between Iran and the United States are restricted by U.S. sanctions and consist mainly of Iranian purchases of food and medical products and U.S. purchases of carpets and food. The U.S. government prohibits most trade with Iran.

The U.S. State Department cites the following as "serious obstacles" to improved relations between the two countries:

• Iranian efforts to acquire nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction;
• its support for and involvement in international terrorism;
• its support for violent opposition to the Middle East peace process; and
• its dismal human rights record.

As reported in Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin, Tehran is sponsoring a 10-day conference of major terrorist organizations this week. The purpose of the conference is to discuss anti-U.S. strategy.

Among the groups headed to Iran to participate are: Hamas, Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad and al-Qaida allies Ansar Al Islam.

| 20 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This story in The Observer discusses the notorious jihad rap video we posted here not long ago. (Thanks to "Allah.") It leaves unchallenged this statement by the Saudi Islamic radical Mohammed al-Massari: "I believe the lyrics are only metaphorical. It is not like this is a fatwa."

Al-Massari also says:

I do not know of any young Muslim who has not either seen or got this video. It is selling everywhere. Everyone I meet at the mosque is asking for it.

Let's look at some of these peaceful metaphors. These either appear on the screen or are spoken by the rappers:

Kill the Crusaders

Kill the Zionazis

Be prepared for battle with the infidels

Send 'em home in body bags

Apostate rulers of Muslim lands must be overthrown

Burnin around the world like the Grand Poobah
We're gonna be taking over like we took over the Shah
From Kandahar to Ramallah we comin, sah
Peace to Hamas and the Hizballah
OBL grooving like a shining star
Like the way we destroyed the Two Tow-ahh, ha ha ha ha

Jihad against the Crusaders

All that is metaphor for striving to resist worldly temptations, I guess.

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This Reuters report sheds more light on how tiny the minority of extremists is, at least among Palestinians. (Thanks to Nicolei). It's the story of a print shop in Jenin:

The grimy, dimly-lit shop is one of two in Jenin that print what are known as "martyr" posters, which eulogise Palestinians who have killed or been killed in the conflict with Israel and cover almost every wall in town.

Since the Palestinian uprising began in 2000, they have become a regular feature of life across the West Bank and Gaza Strip, where they even adorn hospitals and classrooms.

Nowhere is this unsettling art form more visible than in Jenin and its refugee quarter, a militant stronghold seething with hostility towards Israel for its crushing military assault in 2002 and numerous raids since.

"If this continues, we will run out of wall space for our martyrs," said Mohammed Abu Hammad, leader of the Jenin cell of the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, part of Palestinian President Yasser Arafat's Fatah movement. . . .

Israel sees the glorified images of gunmen plastered throughout this poor town of 40,000 as incitement to further attacks, a point some Palestinians readily acknowledge. . . .

A typical poster features a photograph of the grimly staring deceased posing with an assault rifle superimposed against the al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem or a picture of Muslims kneeling in prayer. The images are often surrounded by Koranic verses and lavish praise written in Arabic script. . . .

If the dead person is a militant, his faction commissions the work. Al Aqsa is his biggest repeat customer. It picks the photo. The family has no say. When a non-combatant is killed, a coalition of local Islamic charities pays for the print run. . . .

Like many Palestinians, Abu Hamza sees suicide attacks not as terrorism -- as does Israel and much of the international community -- but as resistance to the occupation of Arab land.

In his work, he draws no distinction between suicide bombers who target Israeli civilians, gunmen killed fighting Israeli soldiers and unarmed bystanders shot dead during tank raids.

"Each one is a sacred 'shahid'," Abu Hamza said, using the Arabic word for martyr, defined by Islam as one who dies during "jihad", or holy war, a guarantee of instant entry to paradise.

Hanging on a wall above his printing press is a poster of a former schoolmate who blew himself up in 2001 in a bomb-laden car he and an accomplice tried to crash into a bus.

With ink-stained hands, Abu Hamza waved away the question of whether he felt any sympathy for the 60 people wounded. But he said: "I cried for my friend while I made his poster."

Once a poster goes up, no Palestinian will dare take it down because of fear of how the militants might respond.

Israeli troops raiding the town have left their mark, sometimes daubing Stars of David across pictures of dead gunmen. Wind and rain have also taken a toll.

Mindful of how Israelis regard his work, Abu Hamza, recently married and thinking of having children, keeps his guard up.

Three months ago, soldiers ransacked his shop searching for information on the militant groups he does business with.

They found nothing. "I keep the plates and proofs hidden but within easy reach. You never know when I might need them."

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Remember Reem Raiyshi, the suicide bomber and mother of two? Remember how it came out that she had been caught in an affair with a Hamas member and given suicide bombing as an option to save her honor? Well, now the other shoe has dropped: her lover has been killed in an accident. Hamas blames Israel, but has anyone checked with the bomber's cuckolded husband? From the Jerusalem Post, with thanks to Take_the_Train:

Abdel Nasser Abu Shokeh, 37, of Al-Gourej was killed Friday in an explosion believed until now to be a "work accident," that is, a premature explosion that occurred while he was handling explosives meant for use against Israel. But in a report by Israel Radio, Hamas now says his death was a hit by Israel.

Shokeh was believed to be head of Hamas's military wing in Central Gaza. He was also the lover of suicide bomber who blew herself up at the Erez Checkpoint, killing three soldiers and one civilian and leaving behind two children.

After Reem Salah al-Rayashi's husband discovered the affair, her erstwhile lover apparently supplied her with explosives and chose the place where she should kill herself and any Israelis she could take along with her.

Hamas said that an Arab Israeli who had supplied Shokeh with an army uniform gave him a model of Al-Aqsa Mosque as a gift. A few hours later, the model exploded, killing its new owner.

The Erez attack killed St.-Sgt. Tzur Or, Cpl. Andre Kegeles, Border Policeman St.-Sgt. Vladimir Trostinsky, and Gal Shapira.

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

09INTE184.jpeg
Al-Zarqawi

Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the Al-Qaeda operative whose message inviting his colleagues to step up operations in Iraq was posted here yesterday, seems to behind at least three major car bombing attacks against Americans and Italians in Iraq. From the New York Times:

Intelligence information, including some gathered in recent weeks, has provided "mounting evidence" to suggest that Mr. Zarqawi was involved in the bombings, including the attacks in August on a Shiite mosque in Najaf and the United Nations headquarters in Baghdad, and the attack in November on an Italian police headquarters.

One official cautioned that the evidence stopped short of firm proof about involvement by Mr. Zarqawi. But the official said the intelligence had added significantly to concern about Mr. Zarqawi, who one official said was now "really viewed as the most adept terrorist operative in Iraq, in terms of foreigners planning terrorist activities." . . .

The largest of the three attacks that American officials now say may be linked to Mr. Zarqawi was the Aug. 29 explosion outside a mosque in Najaf, a city holy to Shiite Muslims, which killed more than 85 people, including Ayatollah Muhammad Baqr al-Hakim, one of Iraq's most important Shiite leaders.

The raid on the safe house in Baghdad used by associates of Mr. Zarqawi was said by one American official to have provided valuable new evidence. The items seized included a compact disc that contained the 17-page proposal to senior leaders of Al Qaeda as well as a seven-pound block of cyanide salt, which the officials said could have spread cyanide gas within an enclosed area.

"It's likely that he was involved in at least the three bombings," an American official said of Mr. Zarqawi. The car bomb attacks were three of the most deadly in Iraq since the American invasion last March. Besides the Najaf attack, they included the Aug. 19 bombing of the United Nations headquarters, which killed 23 people, including Sergio Vieira de Mello, the top United Nations envoy in Iraq; and the Nov. 12 attack on the headquarters of Italy's paramilitary police in Nasiriya, which killed more than 30 people, including 19 Italians.

Last fall, American military, intelligence and law enforcement officials said they did not know whether the August bombings were part of a coordinated campaign. At the time, they said they were wrestling with several competing theories about who might be behind them, including the possibility that they were carried out by former members of the Iraqi military or paramilitary forces.

Investigators said at the time that they had not seen a common signature in the bombings, but that the attack at the United Nations headquarters and another on the Jordanian Embassy had used vehicles packed with explosives drawn from old Iraqi military stocks. American officials have not said publicly what kinds of explosives were used in the attacks in Najaf and Nasiriya.

On Monday, senior American officials were careful to describe Mr. Zarqawi as "an associate" of Al Qaeda rather than a member. American military officials say that at least 90 percent of the attacks on United States troops are thought to have been carried out by Iraqi Sunnis opposed to the occupation.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Remember those Chechen "rebels" who carried out the bomb attack in a Moscow subway last week? I told you at the time that they were radical Muslim jihadists. Now it turns out that they are even led by a Saudi, Abu-al-Walid al-Ghamidi. He draws the same distinction between wanton murder of Muslims (not ok) and wanton murder of non-Muslims (ok) that radical Muslims have made elsewhere -- notably in Iraq and Saudi Arabia. From the Times Online, with thanks to LGF:

A Saudi Islamic militant based in the breakaway republic of Chechnya is suspected of being behind last Friday’s bomb attack on the Moscow metro, which killed 39 people and wounded more than 130.

Abu-al-Walid al-Ghamidi, 36, has been identified by the FSB, the Russian intelligence service, as one of the most powerful figures in the Chechen rebel leadership. As the commander of several hundred Arabs fighting alongside the rebels, he is thought to have been responsible for a wave of suicide bomb attacks that have killed more than 200 people in just over a year.

He is also believed to have been one of the masterminds of the Moscow theatre siege of October 2002, which ended with the deaths of 40 Chechen terrorists and 129 of their hostages.

Walid, a follower of the Wahhabi sect that dominates worship in Saudi Arabia, signalled the determination of Chechen extremists to take their war against the Kremlin to Russian soil when he broadcast a statement from the republic last year on Al-Jazeera, the Arab television network.

“If operations in Chechnya continue they will harm Chechen people, so we have decided to export operations inside Russia,” declared Walid, a bearded man with long black hair who wore a uniform and spoke against the backdrop of a Chechen flag.

“We consider all Russian people warriors because they elected this leadership when it pledged to crush the Chechen people. God willing they will pay for their fight with their blood and their sons.”


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

In Onward Muslim Soldiers I quote a speaker at a Muslim Student Association meeting in New York, who said: "The only relationship you should have with America is to topple it." Now the Senate is taking notice. From Accuracy in Academia, with thanks to LGF:

The Senate Finance Committee is investigating non-profit groups to determine whether those organizations might be a source of funding for terrorist activities. Among the groups that the Committee wants Internal Revenue Service records on: the Muslim Student Association (MSA), active on campuses throughout the United States.

"Many of these groups not only enjoy tax-exempt status, but their reputations as charities and foundations often allow them to escape scrutiny, making it easier to hide and move their funds to other groups and individuals who threaten our national security," Senators Chuck Grassley and Max Baucus pointed out in their letter to the IRS.

"Often these groups are nothing more than shell companies for the same small group of people, moving funds from one charity to the next charity to hide the trail," the senators write. "These groups also receive donations from foreign sources, including countries the government has identified as having a significant problem with terrorism." . . .

Nor is this the first time the MSA has come up in a federal investigation. Last February, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) agents arrested Sami Omar al-Hussayen, a computer science major from the University of Idaho at Moscow. The U.S. Justice Department indictment charged Hussayen with visa fraud and the transfer of large amounts of cash from Iraq to the Islamic Assembly of North America (IANA). Hussayen was head of his university's MSA, according to The Seattle Post-Intelligencer.

The U.S. indictment also connects Hussayen with a tacit endorsement of suicide bombers posted on a web site that he registered. Hussayen, the indictment charges, registered the site exactly one year before the September 11 attacks. The posting, which appeared in June 2001, about three months before the fateful hijackings, was entitled "Provision of Suicide Operations."

Written by a radical Saudi sheikh, the posting read, "the Mujahid must kill himself if he knows that this will lead to killing a great number of the enemies, and that he will not be able to kill them without killing himself first, or demolishing a center vital to the enemy or its military force, and so on."

"This is not possible except by involving the human element in the operation. In this new era, this can be accomplished with the modern means of bombing or bringing down an airplane on an important location that will cause the enemy great losses."

By this standard, of course, 9/11 was a great victory, as it brought down airplanes on two important enemy locations.

The MSA in turn links up to other organizations that are tacitly radical. For example, MSA events frequently feature speakers from the World Assembly of Muslim Youth (WAMY). Emerson told a congressional committee that "WAMY's U.S. office was incorporated in Falls Church, Virginia in 1992 by Osama bin Laden's brother, Abdullah bin Laden."

Another terrorism expert, Stephen Schwartz, told Congress that the form of Islam that governs such groups is Wahabism, the official sect in Saudi Arabia. "Shia and other non-Wahabi Muslim community leaders estimate that 80 percent of American mosques are under Wahabi control," Schwarz testified.

I mentioned that eighty percent figure to Ibrahim Hooper of CAIR on an MSNBC show last year and got the predictable reaction. It is good to see that the investigations are continuing despite enormous political pressure.

| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

February 9, 2004

Ma'ariv International reports that "the unfolding political crisis in Iran is intimately linked to the goings-on in Washington. The perception that Bush may be a one-term president is what has emboldened the conservatives [that is, the radical Muslim mullahs who run the present government] in Teheran to make a move on the reformists [that is, pro-democracy forces]. No peace talks between Israel and Syria will take place until it becomes clear how important it is to the White House to uncover the WMD Saddam stashed away in Syria shortly before the balloon went up." (Thanks to "Allah.")

The last thing the Iranian conservatives wanted was to provoke the US. Their ultimate fear was to see Uncle Sam’s boys cross the Euphrates to liberate Iran from a regime only slightly less bestial and inherently much more dangerous than Saddam’s. . . . Moreover the Iranian interest was to see the Shiites become the dominant political force in Baghdad.

At the same time President Bush seemed assured of a second term. No one, not even the arch reactionary Ayatollah Ahmed Jannati, chairman of the Council of Guardians was willing to risk taking on George W. Bush, who had demonstrated very clearly his willingness to wield a very big stick. The only thing to assure this was to give the appearance that the reformists were, slowly but surely gaining the upper hand.

Events in Washington over the past month changed that perception. The conservatives seem to have decided that Bush could be vulnerable. As a result, they decided to renegotiate their agreement with Khatami, since they believe Iran can afford to get away with presenting a less enlightened image to the world. The result is the current crisis. Supreme leader Khamenei, the leader of the conservative faction, which is between the reactionaries and the reformists, but on the whole tends to side mostly with the former, will not take any decisive step until he has to, meaning until he and his advisors decide what Bush’s chances are. If they decide that his defeat is not a sure thing, the compromise he will arrange will favor the reformists, at least somewhat. If he decides that Iran can take the risk of assuming that Bush will not be reelected, the compromise will, in effect be an ultimatum to the reformists to surrender or else. If he decides to wait and see, he will go along with the reformists’ demand to postpone the election, without necessarily acting to get the Guardians to reinstate the disqualified reformist candidates.

A hint at this was provided last week by foreign ministry spokesperson Reza Asefi, who said that the current row “could seriously impact Teheran’s foreign policy. In Iranian political talk this meant that it might be premature to assume that Bush is a lame duck, and that a premature push for power by the reactionaries could endanger Iran’s recent foreign policy achievements, primarily an informal understanding with the US that Iraq’s Shiites will take control of Iraq when the US departs. . . .

The latter have decided to take out the reformists, having decided that Bush is unlikely to be reelected, and therefore willing to risk US ire, which, as far as they are concerned, will be limited to words if Bush is no longer president. If there is one thing these men do not fear, it’s words. . . .

Teheran’s aim is to see Bush defeated. The thinking in Teheran is that a Democratic president would not have the stomach to go to war in order to save Iraq’s middle class. The result, snap elections won by the Shiites, the formation of a new anti-western Damascus-Baghdad-Teheran axis, armed with a large variety of lethal non conventional weapons,

The Iranians are confident that even if hard evidence of Hezbollah terrorism in Iraq shows up, Bush will not be able to do anything until the elections. However the one potential fly in the ointment the Iranians have so assiduously being concocting is if the Iraqi WMD that have been hidden in the remote corners of the Syrian desert were to be discovered, thus vindicating Bush and all but assuring him of four more years.

This could only happen if either the US invaded, or the regime fell. To ensure neither of these events occur, Iran suggested to Assad that he embark on a peace initiative. For Iran this is a win-win proposition. If the talks eventually fail, they would still have served their purpose, preempting a scenario that could vindicate Bush and assure him reelection. If, by some mischance the talks actually led somewhere, it would be no skin of their nose, since Syria, not Iran would be making the required concessions. In the long run Syria is less important to Iran than Iraq, since unlike Iraq, the majority of Syrians are Sunni Moslems, who intensely dislike the Baath regime dominated by the minority Alawis, who are theologically much closer to the Shiites than to the Sunnis (who unlike the Shiites regard them as heretics). Iran knows it may, and can afford to lose Syria as an ally. It cannot afford to lose Iraq.

Israel and the US however, were not taken for a ride. This means that all options are still open. The current administration is not about to see a virulently anti-western conservative dominated Iran become the ultimate benefactor of the war. American blood was not shed in order to facilitate unprecedented Iranian hegemony over the region. If, in order to prevent such an outcome it becomes imperative to vindicate the Bush administration by proving estimates of Iraqi non-conventional capabilities were essentially correct, then an invasion of Syria cannot be ruled out. The pretext would be either proof of Syrian complicity in allowing Hezbollah to operate in Iraq, or allow Israel to initiate a war with Syria over its support of terrorism.

For this reason Bush is willing to let Sharon make the road map as obsolete as the horse and buggy, despite the blow to his prestige. Both men may need a war with Syria to ensure their political survival, and the world may need it to take out another link in the axis of evil, and to prevent the emergence of an Iranian dominated Damascus-Baghdad-Teheran axis, which would soon become a Islamic regional superpower that could, and probably would pose as much of a threat to the west as it would to Israel.

The higher the probability of the Iranian domestic balance of power being shifted in favor of the ultra-conservatives, the greater the likelihood of a war with Syria becomes.

| 22 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Political correctness finds it offensive simply to question the commitment of Muslims in the West to secular principles. But here is evidence straight from a jihadist of the prevalence of radical ideas in one Paris mosque. From the Herald Sun:

A number of Willie Brigitte's associates were killed fighting Coalition forces in Afghanistan or arrested by the US during the war, the suspected terrorist has claimed.

Brigitte, who was deported from Australia in October, told French investigators jihad, or holy way, played a central role in the mosque he and fellow worshippers attended on the outskirts of Paris.

Investigative judge Jean Louis Bruguiere questioned Brigitte about extremist Islamic views preached at the Omar and Abu Bakar mosques in suburban Couronne.

"Yes, that is true, in the teachings given there by Mohamed El Magrebi, the jihad played a major part," Brigitte responded, according to a transcript of his interview aired on ABC's Four Corners last night.

Brigitte said many of his fellow worshippers were subsequently killed in the war on terror.

"Moreover, all those who took part in this teaching have either died in Afghanistan or have been arrested by the Americans because they have been led to that country," Brigitte claimed.

Good. But what is being done to stop these teachings in the mosques?

| 1 Comment
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

09INTE184.jpeg
Abu Musab al-Zarqawi

Al-Qaeda still active in Iraq, although it has suffered a loss of support. But some within Iraq are actively encouraging it. This from the New York Times, :

American officials here have obtained a detailed proposal that they conclude was written by an operative in Iraq to senior leaders of Al Qaeda, asking for help to wage a "sectarian war" in Iraq in the next months.

The Americans say they believe that Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, a Jordanian who has long been under scrutiny by the United States for suspected ties to Al Qaeda, wrote the undated 17-page document. Mr. Zarqawi is believed to be operating here in Iraq. . . .

The author offers his services and those of his followers to the recipients of the letter, who American officials contend are Al Qaeda's leaders.

"You noble brothers, leaders of the jihad, we do not consider ourselves people who compete against you, nor would we ever aim to achieve glory for ourselves like you did," the writer says. "So if you agree with it, and are convinced of the idea of killing the perverse sects, we stand ready as an army for you to work under your guidance and yield to your command." . . .

"We were involved in all the martyrdom operations — in terms of overseeing, preparing and planning — that took place in this country," the writer of the document says. "Praise be to Allah, I have completed 25 of these operations, some of them against the Shia and their leaders, the Americans and their military, and the police, the military and the coalition forces."

But the writer details the difficulties that he and his comrades have been experiencing, both in combating American forces and in enlisting supporters. The Americans are an easy target, according to the author, who nonetheless claims to be impressed by the Americans' resolve. After significant losses, he writes, "America, however, has no intention of leaving, no matter how many wounded nor how bloody it becomes."

The Iraqis themselves, the writer says, have not been receptive to taking holy warriors into their homes.

"Many Iraqis would honor you as a guest and give you refuge, for you are a Muslim brother," according to the document. "However, they will not allow you to make their home a base for operations or a safe house."

The writer contends that the American efforts to set up Iraqi security services have succeeded in depriving the insurgents of allies, particularly in a country where kinship networks are extensive.

"The problem is you end up having an army and police connected by lineage, blood and appearance," the document says. "When the Americans withdraw, and they have already started doing that, they get replaced by these agents who are intimately linked to the people of this region."

With some exasperation, the author writes: "We can pack up and leave and look for another land, just like what has happened in so many lands of jihad. Our enemy is growing stronger day after day, and its intelligence information increases.

"By God, this is suffocation!" the writer says.

But there is still time to mount a war against the Shiites, thereby to set off a wider war, he writes, if attacks are well under way before the turnover of sovereignty in June. After that, the writer suggests, any attacks on Shiites will be viewed as Iraqi-on-Iraqi violence that will find little support among the people.

"We have to get to the zero hour in order to openly begin controlling the land by night, and after that by day, God willing," the writer says. "The zero hour needs to be at least four months before the new government gets in place."

That is the timetable, the author concludes, because, after that, "How can we kill their cousins and sons?"

"The Americans will continue to control from their bases, but the sons of this land will be the authority," the letter states. "This is the democracy. We will have no pretexts."

| 10 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Britain's Sun tabloid reports some intriguing statements from Muddassar Arani, the lawyer for Abu Hamza, the former imam of the notorious terror-supporting Finsbury Park Mosque. (Thanks to Nicolei.)

Rallying support for her opinions in an interview she claimed: “There is clearly a war that is taking place against Islam.

“That is why our people have to wake up and realise that one day it will be them and not others that this is happening to.

“Once we learn to forget our differences and speak with one voice and realise that we all are viewed as Muslims, we will be able to win this war that is taking place against us Muslims.

“We have to wake up to the fact that this is only the beginning of the war.”

Yet Arani seems well aware of how she can win this alleged war by using the West's own mechanisms of justice:

Home Secretary David Blunkett has revoked [Hamza's] citizenship after a string of vile outbursts.

Yet Mr Blunkett is unable to remove him because of an appeal which Ms Arani — an expert in the minute detail of human rights — has warned will drag endlessly through the courts.

She said: “The appeals process under the immigration laws and, if necessary, before the European Court of Human Rights could take five years, seven years.

“There are going to be quite heavy legal arguments.”

Also:

Ms Arani, who wears the traditional hijab over her head and thick black-rimmed glasses, has admitted using her religion to win cases.

She said: “I have noted that having the Islamic background has helped me have the edge over my opponents, since I am able to use this to my client’s advantage.”

Question for Ms. Arani: if this is a war against Islam, why is her Islamic background an advantage?

| 19 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Some "clarification of Islamic structures" going on in Germany. This from AP, with thanks to LGF:

Police in Germany's Rhineland-Palatinate state searched dozens of mosques and Islamic organizations Friday, detaining one man, as part of efforts to clamp down on terrorism.

Across the western state, about 150 officers conducted searches that also involved checking the papers of more than 70 people, the state criminal office said in a statement. One man was detained on suspicion of being in the country illegally, it said.

The searches were part of efforts to "further clarify Islamic structures," the statement said.

Most of the searches were in the state capital of Mainz and the city of Worms.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Peter Taylor interviews Salim Boukhari, one of the men arrested for plotting a major terrorist attack in 2000. From The Guardian:

Two of the men convicted, Salim Boukhari and Lamine Maroni, were revealed to have been living in England but MI5 and Special Branch knew virtually nothing about them. Both had got under the pre-9/11 radar. Maroni was an Algerian asylum seeker living in Sheffield, housed by a Home Office-sponsored agency called Safe Haven. MI5 had their suspicions about Maroni's address and had local checks made a few weeks before the Frankfurt raid but they drew blanks.

Nothing was known about Boukhari, who was believed to be the ringleader of the cell. It transpired he had come to London from Algeria and lived and worked there on and off for almost 10 years. He had trained as a chef in Twickenham and done security work for Homebase and Safeways in Camden Town. He'd remarried a couple of months before his arrest and left a pregnant wife behind in England. . . .

Boukhari lived for a time in Leyton, east London, and attended the local mosque where he began to make friends. "It was just normal. There were no extremists speaking about Jihad," he said. But, like many young Muslims seeking refuge among their own, he was vulnerable to what Veness describes as "the predatory activities of the terrorists who are seeking to recruit". Some of the mosques were obvious locations for these "predators" - Boukhari also attended Finsbury Park mosque, which he described as "hotter than Leyton". There was talk of Jihad. At least four of its former alumni - including the so-called "shoe bomber" Richard Reid - are now in American custody.

Gradually Boukhari was drawn into these more radical circles, although he insists it was not through Finsbury Park. His new friends showed him propaganda videos of how Muslims around the world were being oppressed. Images of Palestinians being beaten by the Israeli soldiers had a profound effect on him: "To see Palestinians suffering like this, without reason, is hard," he said. "Israel is doing what it likes and no one is trying to stop them. For me, Israel and America are both the same." He also watched videos of the suffering of Muslims at the hands of the Russians in Chechyna. "They've killed thousands of people and it hurts me to see them getting slaughtered like this."

Predictably, the oppression wasn't the only thing that radicalized him. It was also the radicals' use of the religion the Chicago Tribune says "preaches tolerance, non-violence and respect for human life":

Boukhari was now radicalised, fired with the word of the Holy Koran and the obligation to help his Muslim brothers fight the oppression. And he couldn't do that in London. "To help our brothers you have to train and the only country where you could do that was Afghanistan. I wanted to go to Chechyna to fight."

Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Says Cofer Black: "We know beyond a shadow of a doubt that a number of these groups, if they had it, would use it." Now there are reports that they have it. From WND, with thanks to Fanabba:

According to a report in the Arabic newspaper al-Hayat, Osama bin Laden's al-Qaida terrorist network bought tactical nuclear weapons from Ukraine in 1998.

The report says the terrorists still have the "suitcase nuke" weapons and are storing them in safe places for possible use.

The newspaper said al-Qaida bought the weapons in suitcases in a deal arranged when Ukrainian scientists visited the Afghan city of Kandahar in 1998. The city was then a stronghold of the Taliban movement, which was allied with al-Qaida.

WorldNetDaily first broke the story of al-Qaida's purchase of suitcase nukes Oct. 3, 2002. Paul Williams, an FBI consultant on international terrorism said then bin Laden's al-Qaida terrorist network purchased 20 suitcase nuclear weapons from former KGB agents in 1998 for $30 million.

His book, "Al Qaeda: Brotherhood of Terror," also says this deal was one of at least three in the last decade in which al-Qaida purchased small nuclear weapons or weapons-grade nuclear uranium.

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Even though yet another terror threat from radical Muslims has passed its stated deadline with nothing happening, they haven't given up. From AP, with thanks to Nicolei:

Terrorists have the will and some of the expertise to make a chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear weapon, and are "doing everything they can" to acquire the materials, the U.S. State Department's top anti-terror official said in an interview with The Associated Press.

Cofer Black, U.S. ambassador at large for anti-terrorism, told The Associated Press that al-Qaida is still dangerous even though more than two-thirds of its leaders from the time of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks have been killed or arrested.

Speaking at the U.S. ambassador's residence in Jakarta on Saturday, Black said he and other U.S. officials are "killing ourselves" to make sure terrorists don't get a so-called "dirty bomb" or other unconventional weapons, but the threat remains.

"We know beyond a shadow of a doubt that a number of these groups, if they had it, would use it," said Black, who accompanied U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft to an Asia Pacific anti-terror summit on the Indonesian island of Bali last week.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

From the New York Times, with thanks to Nicolei:

The landscape of the terrorist threat has shifted, many intelligence officials around the world say, with more than a dozen regional militant Islamic groups showing signs of growing strength and broader ambitions, even as the operational power of Al Qaeda appears diminished.

Some of the militant groups, with roots from Southeast Asia, Central Asia and the Caucasus to North Africa and Europe, are believed to be loosely affiliated with Al Qaeda, the officials say. But other groups follow their own agenda, merely drawing inspiration from Osama bin Laden's periodic taped messages calling for attacks against the United States and its allies, the officials say.

The smaller groups have shown resilience in resisting the efforts against terrorism led by the United States, officials said, by establishing terrorist training camps in Kashmir, the Philippines and West Africa, filling the void left by the destruction of Al Qaeda's camps in Afghanistan. But what is also worrisome to counterterrorism officials is evidence that like Al Qaeda, some of them are setting their sights beyond the regional causes that inspired them.

The Islamic militant organization Ansar al-Islam, for example, has largely fled its base in northern Iraq, and elements of the group have moved to several European countries, where they are believed to be actively recruiting suicide bombers for attacks in Iraq and Europe, officials said.

The mutation of the cells was illustrated in October when the authorities in Australia arrested a Caribbean-born French citizen who they believe was sent by a little-known Pakistani group to scout possible targets for attacks. The group, Lashkar-e-Taiba, was previously thought to be focused only on the struggle of Muslims in Kashmir.

The activity of such organizations is one reason intelligence officials believe that the threat of terrorism against the United States and its allies remains high. But the mobility and murky associations of the groups, most of which were operating before the Sept. 11 attacks, makes it difficult for agents to monitor their communications or follow their money.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Accompanying a big story about the Bridgeview mosque, the Chicago Tribune appended a note from the editors. (Thanks to Bassam Madany and Paul Weyrich.)

Islam, the world's fastest-growing religion, preaches tolerance, non-violence and respect for human life. But a struggle for the soul of Islam is under way, one that poses challenges for Muslims and non-Muslims alike.

The editors should have asked themselves why, if they were able to find these teachings so easily in Islam, do these teachings so consistently elude the members of Al-Qaeda, and Hamas, and Hizballah, and Jemaah Islamiyah, and all the many other Islamic radical groups around the world.

Take, for example, this excerpt from a lecture from Iran available now at an Islamic website, explaining the marvelous Qur'anic verse of tolerance "there is no compulsion in religion" (Sura 2:256) and some related verses. (Thanks to Nancy Block).

There is no place for the use of compulsion in religion, no one must be obliged to accept the religion of Islam. . . . Whoever wants to believe will believe, and whoever wants to be a kafir [unbeliever] will be a kafir. So this verse has also stated that faith and rejection, iman and kufr, can only be chosen by oneself, they cannot be forced upon one by others. So Islam does not say that others must be forced into Islam; that if they become Muslims, well and good, and if they do not, they are to be killed, that the choice is theirs. Islam says that whoever wants to believe will believe, and whoever does not want to, will not.

The Trib continues on to portray religious teachers of this kind as (of course) a tiny minority of extremists:

Radical elements of the religion, bent on attacking America and its allies, use Islam and the notion of holy war to justify assaults by suicide bombers who believe a ride on a Jerusalem bus will buy them a trip to paradise.

The radicals who stoke the fires of violence aren't many. But their influence extends far beyond their numbers. They form a magnetic field of militancy that threatens to pull the entire religion rightward.

"Rightward"? There is no logic or consistency in calling people like Osama bin Laden "right-wing" -- unless the editors operate according to the philosophy of "Left Good. Right Bad."

Mainstream Muslim leaders insist they don't back their radical brethren. Nowhere in the Koran, Islam's holy book, these leaders say, is there any justification for the pageantry of terror that plays out in headlines nearly every day.

No single interpretation of the Qur'an is authoritative. The problem is that radical Muslims do quote the Qur'an copiously to justify themselves. See Onward Muslim Soldiers for many examples. For another from Chechnya, see here. For the moderates to insist that there is nothing in the Qur'an to justify what the radicals do ignores mountains of evidence to the contrary -- and does nothing to stop the radicals.

| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

From the Chicago Tribune comes a fascinating story of how Muslim radicals gained control of a mosque in Bridgeview, Illinois. (Thanks to Bassam Madany and Paul Weyrich.)

There is a great deal to this. It's all worth reading, but here are some highlights:

Among the leaders at the Bridgeview mosque are men who have condemned Western culture, praised Palestinian suicide bombers and encouraged members to view society in stark terms: Muslims against the world. Federal authorities for years have investigated some mosque officials for possible links to terrorism financing, but no criminal charges have been filed.

Mosque leaders deny encouraging militancy and have denounced terrorism, including the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. They shun the fundamentalist label, saying they follow the true form of Islam and others do not. They point out that an elected board sets mosque policy; if the worshipers wanted a more liberal mosque, they would vote for one.

"It's an election, a democratic process," mosque President Oussama Jammal said.

The mosque now attracts thousands of worshipers--most of them Palestinian-Americans--by offering pro-Palestinian sermons, a spiritual refuge and a strict version of Islam. The ultraconservative Saudi Arabian government partially pays the salary of prayer leader Sheik Jamal.

Moderate Muslims still pray at the mosque, but some say conservatives have created an environment that is overly political, too rigid in its interpretation of Islam and resistant to open debate. These members also worry that the Muslim Brotherhood, a controversial group with a violent past, has an undue influence over the mosque. Despite these concerns, the critics largely remain silent, fearful of being called "unIslamic" by mosque leaders.

That is precisely the problem in so many places. The hard-liners can take the Islamic high ground, adducing numerous texts in support of their views. The moderates are thus effectively silenced.

In this story, the moderates who founded the mosque

practiced a form of Islam that allowed Muslims to socialize freely. They viewed their religion as an important part of life, but not all of life. Men and women could mingle. The women wore short sleeves and did not cover their hair. The men sometimes ran liquor stores even though many Muslims believed Islam forbade selling alcohol.

This is why they are on the defensive. When someone comes saying, "Religion should govern all of life," especially in the context of a law-intensive religion like Islam, many Muslims fall susceptible. And soon these "moderate" trappings are swept away.

And where did this Islamic awakening come from? You guessed it:

The 35-year-old Najib, the only Muslim lawyer mosque leaders knew, became the mosque's attorney and helped write its constitution. Other mosque officials fired off telegrams overseas and traveled to the Middle East several times, targeting countries such as Saudi Arabia, which had started giving away its new oil wealth to help spread its rigid form of Islam.

One mosque fundraising brochure warned that Chicago's Muslims were at risk of "melting in the American society, culture and lifestyle." A plea to a Saudi charity asked for money "before it becomes too late and we may lose our children because they are living in an unIslamic society."

Such pleas illustrate the tug of war that faced many mosques in America--between the forces of assimilation and Islamic traditions, between the new country and the old.

The money poured into Bridgeview, more than $1.2 million in all, according to mosque records. Kuwaiti donors gave $369,000. The Saudi government donated $152,000. The religious ministry of the United Arab Emirates contributed $135,000.

The Muslim Brotherhood, which I show in Onward Muslim Soldiers to be the root of modern Islamic terrorism, was also involved.

Then the mosque leaders asked religious authorities in Jordan to send an assistant prayer leader. The authorities sent Masoud Ali Masoud, a 57-year-old Palestinian who worked for Jordan's religious affairs ministry.

He also belonged to the Muslim Brotherhood, a group that believed in spreading a strict form of Islam and creating states governed by Islamic law.

The Brotherhood had gained notoriety for repeatedly attempting to overthrow the Egyptian and Syrian governments. It spawned two violent Islamic groups: the Palestinian Islamic Jihad and the Egyptian Islamic Jihad, offshoots created by former Brotherhood members who believed the Brotherhood was not militant enough. And Brotherhood members would go on to form the militant Palestinian group Hamas, designated a terrorist group by the U.S. in 1995.

But the Brotherhood also organized political protests and ran charities, and many supporters, including Masoud, saw the group as a peaceful movement aimed at restoring Islam's greatness in the world. The Brotherhood did not operate openly in America, though its members quietly influenced some Muslim groups.

Soon, mosque leaders--adhering to a strict interpretation of Islam--told the congregation's women to cover their hair and wear looser clothing. During social events, the women were separated from the men.

And today:

Meanwhile, mosque attendance is booming. Friday prayers are so crowded that dozens cannot get inside, forcing them to place their prayer rugs on the front lawn. As many as 2,000 attend Friday prayers. Bridgeview remains one of the most popular of the Chicago area's 50 mosques.

Sheik Jamal and other mosque leaders still pursue a controversial agenda.

In March 2002, the mosque hired a new assistant prayer leader--the same man who had run the local office of an Islamic charity until it was closed by the federal government for alleged terrorism ties. Even a few board members questioned whether he should have been hired so quickly.

At a prayer service last May, Sheik Jamal raised $50,000 for Palestinian activist Sami Al-Arian, a former professor at the University of South Florida who is charged with being the U.S. leader of Palestinian Islamic Jihad. To rally donors, the sheik called Israel "a foreign, malignant and strange element on the blessed land."

Al-Arian denies the charges against him. Oussama Jammal, the mosque president, defended the fundraising for Al-Arian. "We raised for his legal defense. That's allowed under U.S. law," he said. "If people were against this, they wouldn't have paid."

In December, at an Islamic conference in Chicago, Sheik Jamal said that Muslims should not listen to contemporary music and that women should not travel long distances without chaperones. He also praised Sayyid Qutb, whose writings helped lay the foundation for Muslim Brotherhood beliefs.

The mosque remains so conservative, several former leaders said, because more and more mosque officials are Brotherhood members.

Mosque leaders declined to comment on the Brotherhood, but director Bassam Jody noted that most of the mosque's 24 directors belong to the Muslim American Society--a group with strong ties to the Brotherhood. The mosque vice president runs the society's local chapter.

| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

February 8, 2004

In Australia a refugee from Saddam Hussein's Iraq has not found the peace and safety she expected. This from News.com.au, with thanks to Kevin:

Iraqi refugee Guzin Najim thought she'd be safe when she escaped to Australia after her diplomat husband was murdered by Saddam Hussein's brutal secret police and she'd been forced to live, with her children, for three years under house arrest.

But the terror has reached Sydney. Religious fanatics faithful to the murderous tyrant have delivered death threats to her home in the city's south-western suburbs, forcing her once again to flee for her life.

Now Ms Najim, 47, has moved to a secret location to hide from the men who have ordered that her throat be cut for speaking out publicly against Saddam's brutal regime.

"At first, I was very frightened," said Ms Najim at her new home. "I thought, 'How can this happen in Sydney, where life is so peaceful and everyone smiles?' But then I became angry, and I decided that these fanatics will not succeed in intimidating me.

"I will not be silenced. I lived in fear for so long over there. I cannot let that happen again in Australia."

The threats started after the release of the book The Promise, in which author Sandra Lee told of Ms Najim's terrible ordeal at the hands of the Iraqi secret police.

Her husband Ra'ad was taken away from their home in Baghdad by two men and was dumped back, paralysed, fevered and barely able to speak a few hours later. After four days of agony he died, at the age of 48. It was thought he'd been fed rat poison, Saddam's favourite method of assassination.

Ms Najim was held with her two children under house arrest for three years, during which time she was beaten regularly and had her hand broken by her captors. Finally, she escaped to Jordan but, after death threats from those loyal to the Iraqi dictator, she and her children were accepted as refugees by the United Nations and chose to come and live in the relative sanctity of Australia.

But when the book caught the country's attention and she was asked to appear on national TV and radio to talk about her ordeal, the cold chill of religious fanaticism suddenly arrived on her Sydney doorstep.

She received two death threats over the intercom of her home, and another written death threat was slid under her front door. Bankstown police are investigating the threats and studying the letter.

"They wrote that I am out of Islam and I must be killed," Ms Najim said.

"It said that I support Americans.

"It was such a shock that this happened in Australia. But then I became very depressed. I didn't eat for two days. I started to think that I had brought my children to safety to this country, and now I am ready to die. I felt tired of it all and wanted to sleep and escape from reality.

"But then I became very angry. Even if they are determined to kill me, I will not stop talking. I will never change my mind."

In her new home with her son Mohammed, 23, and daughter Lina, 28, living nearby, Ms Najim is trying hard to rebuild her life.

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This Observer story on the Al-Qaeda suspect in Belfast reveals that jihadists may be entering Britain through Northern Ireland. .

Jaybe Ofrasio, who has been charged with raising money for Jemaa Islamiya, stands accused of being a senior lieutenant in the al-Qaeda-linked terror group. He and his family have denied they have any connections to the Islamist movement. . . .

The presence of an alleged Islamist terror activist in Northern Ireland has raised fears among the security services on both sides of the Irish border that the island is becoming a convenient 'back door' to the UK.

In Dublin, the Garda Siochana have kept several Islamic radicals under surveillance. A number of Algerian men have been questioned in connection with an investigation into al-Qaeda's financing throughout Western Europe. In October 2002 two Libyans and one Algerian were arrested on charges of fundraising and providing fake passports to al-Qaeda.

Ofrasio was arrested at his house in Hawthorn Street, West Belfast, last Friday. He has been living there since moving from Mindanao in the southern Philippines last July.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

A new strategy. From The Observer, :

Islamic militants have conducted dry runs of a devastating new style of bombing on aircraft flying to Europe, intelligence sources believe. The tactics, which aim to evade aviation security systems by placing only components of explosive devices on passenger jets, allowing militants to assemble them in the air, have been tried out on planes flying between the Middle East, North Africa and Western Europe, security sources say.

Concerns that militants might assemble a bomb or another weapon on board were a key factor in the series of recent cancellations of transatlantic flights. Last weekend British Airways stopped flights from London to Washington and Miami for fear of an attack and Air France also cancelled scheduled flights.

Security agencies are now hunting scores of militants who have been trained in the new tactics. The warning, passed to Western agencies by Middle Eastern intelligence services, is based on interrogations of Islamic militants captured in the Arabian Gulf and is corroborated by intercepted communications between terrorist cells and interviews with prisoners held by the US government at Guantanamo Bay.

Officials in Saudi Arabia and elsewhere are believed to have warned that at least 12dry runs may have been completed and to have said that the terrorists are aiming to try out their plans on flights around the Mediterranean and the Middle East before attempting to bomb a transatlantic route, where security precautions are now very tight. Militants know that individual components are far easier to smuggle through airport security than an assembled bomb.

In May 2002 nearly 100 grammes of pentrite, a plastic explosive used by the alleged shoe bomber Richard Reid, was found hidden in the armrest of a Moroccan jet when it landed in Metz, France. At the time, investigators said they thought it had been put there as a warning. Now French officials suspect the explosives were placed on the jet as a trial of the new tactics. Though some investigators fear they may be the victim of deliberate 'disinformation', officials say that they cannot risk ignoring the warnings.

| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Andy Bannister sends along a letter from today's Sunday Times (UK):

The tolerance of the West is justified only up to the point when it does not undermine the efforts of other societies struggling against the concept of political Islam, including the hijab (Comment, News Review and Letters, last week).

As an Iranian woman I witnessed at first hand how we suffered from our
naive tolerance 30 years ago when the hijab came into the political
arena of the Iranian opposition.

We too thought it would disappear. Nobody said a word for fear of being
considered a partisan of the Shah. And many preferred it to the
miniskirt anyway. But it did not end there, as we all know well.

You do not tolerate the wearing of black shirts in your schools; nor
should you tolerate the hijab. Both are used to promote ideologies that
are dangerous to our way of life.

Afsaneh Khalat-Bari
London W9

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

February 7, 2004

This is not a story about a jihad incident. But it is one about how much airport security has improved since 9/11. From AP:

A man walked past two security checkpoints at Los Angeles International Airport last month and boarded a plane without a ticket or identification before he was caught hiding inside a bathroom before takeoff, authorities said.

The FBI and Transportation Security Administration are investigating how Kareem Thomas, 19, of Decatur, Ga., was able to make it all the way onto the Atlanta-bound Delta Airlines flight at a time of heightened security at the airport.

FBI investigators are interviewing passengers and crew members of the Jan. 15 flight, and will submit their findings to the U.S. attorney's office for possible prosecution. Delta could be fined or warned for violating federal guidelines, said Larry Fetters, TSA director at the airport.

"Of course it's worrisome that this happened and we need to make sure that it doesn't happen again," Fetters said.

Delta is investigating the incident. The company said it may change security procedures but officials offered no details.

Los Angeles' airport, one of the world's busiest and a previous target of terrorist attacks, was one of eight airports nationwide that remained on high alert even after the national terror threat level was lowered from orange to yellow on Jan. 9.

Authorities said Thomas, who was on probation for a burglary conviction, was not armed and was not a threat to passengers. He was arrested on suspicion of burglary and is being held for violating his parole, said Deputy District Attorney Randi Kaplan. Thomas told authorities he "was trying to go home," Kaplan said.

Thomas' attorney, J. Joseph Modder, declined comment.

As Thomas boarded the plane and locked himself inside a restroom, he was spotted by a passenger who had seen him slip pass metal detectors and gate agents. The passenger told a flight attendant, who knocked on the door demanding to see a boarding pass.

When he didn't comply, airline employees called police, who arrested Thomas and escorted him off the plane.

"Clearly, this was a monumental security screw-up," said passenger John Hall, of Santa Monica. "Here I am, along with all the other passengers, taking off our shoes and waiting in endless lines to board a plane and this guy just strolls past the security net."

| 21 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This from AP, and Alyssa Lappen:

A video purported to be from Osama bin Laden's al-Qaida terror network shows Saudi militants planning, training for and carrying out what it claimed was the Nov. 8 bombing of a housing compound for foreigners in the Saudi capital that killed 17 people.

The 90-minute video, viewed on an Islamic Web site by The Associated Press in Dubai, shows a vehicle driving up to what it says is the Muhaya compound in Riyadh before loud explosions and gunfire erupt. That portion is blurry and badly lit, and the building is not visible.

It was not possible to verify the video's authenticity. However, it uses language similar to past statements attributed to al-Qaida, and the training scenes are like those seen in videos of al-Qaida camps in Afghanistan. The Web site that showed the video has released other seemingly credible al-Qaida statements.

In October, an al-Qaida-style recording surfaced on the Internet that included what was described as audio of militants launching May 12 attacks on Western housing compounds in Riyadh that killed 26 people and the nine attackers. Bits of video also were accessible with it, but the only clip allegedly of the assault itself showed a black screen with text identifying gunshot noises as a recording of the start of the attack.

The new video contains excerpts from several of bin Laden's previously broadcast comments, as well as the words of other al-Qaida members and Khattab, a Saudi-born Chechen military leader who was killed by Russian forces in 2002.

Militants are seen training with rocket-propelled grenades and surface-to-air missiles, and in hand-to-hand combat.

The video also showed training courses on bomb-making and displayed detonators, timers and wires. It calls the training camp al-Battar and says it is on the Arabian peninsula.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

A new movie, Osama, shows life under Afghanistan's Taliban government -- the society that radical Muslims around the world will emulate if ever given the chance. This from the New York Post, with thanks to the many people who alerted me to this film.

OSAMA

Quietly devastating.

In Dari, with English subtitles. Running time: 82 minutes. Not rated (adult themes). At the Lincoln Plaza and the Union Square.


IT'S amazing enough that "Osama" was made at all: This film about the oppression of women in the Taliban era was shot amidst the ruins of a Kabul that is still threatened by violence and general chaos.

That it is such a powerful and indeed beautiful film is simply extraordinary.

Everyone is at least vaguely aware of the crazed misogynistic bigotry of the Taliban, the fundamentalist peasant militia that ruled much of Afghanistan until its overthrow in late 2001.

But "Osama" uses a real-life story and non-professional actors from the streets of Kabul to make the medieval horrors of Taliban rule devastatingly, viscerally real.

Written and directed by Siddiq Barmak, a Russian-trained Afghan filmmaker who fled Kabul after the Taliban takeover, "Osama" tells the tale of a 12-year-old girl (Marina Golbahari) forced to take a terrible risk to save her family.

The girl's mother -- a widow like so many Afghan women after two decades of war -- is a nurse with a job in a decrepit hospital.

But she loses her job under the Taliban, which bans all women from working and even from going outside the home unless in the company of a male relative.

Faced with starvation, mother and granddaughter come up with the idea of cutting the little girl's hair and sending her out to work disguised as a boy.

Using the common Afghan boy's name of Osama and wearing her father's cut-down clothing, she gets work in a milk shop.

But when Osama makes mistakes during all-male prayers, the Taliban take her (and a nosy beggar boy who knows her real identity) to a schools to be trained in Islam and soldiering.

Sometimes the Osama character seems a little too stupid and naive to believe, and there are moments when the storytelling feels surprisingly crude given both the first-time director's ambitions (the opening sequence is a film within a film -- supposedly documentary video footage shot by a foreigner) and the elegance of the photography.

Yet the calm, restrained way "Osama" depicts the Gestapo-like ubiquity and viciousness of the Taliban -- whether they are abusing a bicyclist for letting his female passenger show her toes, or hammering on the door of a house where women are holding a secret wedding party -- makes it all the more effective.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"Frenchman Willie Brigitte was sent to Australia by Pakistani terrorists and planned to target military bases in Sydney, the French counter-terrorism unit DST alleges." This from News.com.au, with thanks to Nicolei and Jean-Luc.

Brigitte's key contact in Australia was a Pakistani man who was also believed to be part of the terrorist group Lashkar-e-Toiba, DST deputy director Jean-Francois Clair told the Nine Network's Sunday program.

This man, whom Sunday will name, used the Internet to view the layout of army bases and attempted to obtain chemical ingredients for explosives, the program will allege at the weekend.

The program cites the DST dossier on Brigitte compiled since he was deported from Australia in October last year.

"French terror suspect Willie Brigitte was sent to Australia by a Pakistani terrorist organisation and was in the process of considering which military targets the group would attack," Sunday said in a statement.

| 1 Comment
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The Islamic radicals in Pakistan have not been pacified by Musharraf's pardon of Abdul Qadeer Khan. They still think he has withdrawn his support not only from the Islamic bomb but from the Kashmir jihad. This from the Daily Times of Pakistan, with thanks to Jean-Luc:

The six-party religious alliance, the Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal (MMA) vowed on Thursday to wage jihad not only for Kashmir but also for the protection of Pakistan's nuclear technology, and it also accused the government and Army of withdrawing their support on both fronts.

"Our rulers as well as the army have withdrawn from the protection of Pakistan's nuclear assets of Pakistan and now it is the duty of the masses to wage a campaign to maintain nuclear deterrence and help liberate Kashmir from the Indian yoke," central MMA leader Qazi Hussain Ahmad, announced at a mass rally here on Kashmir Solidarity Day. . . .

Mr Hussain was very critical of the US government and accused it of disarming the country. "It is an effort to disarm Muslim states," he said. "America never wanted to see any Muslim country become a nuclear power."

He questioned why the nuclear programmes of India and Israel have not been criticised.

He said the government is paying lip service to the Kashmir cause. "Now the President talks about setting aside the UN resolutions on Kashmir and calls the Kashmir jihad terrorism," he said. "A stable nuclear Pakistan is necessary to win a war on the Kashmir front." . . .

Later Mr Hussain initiated a mass signatory campaign against the detention of the nuclear scientists.

Other parties in Pakistan evidently feel the same way. From another Daily Times story, with thanks to Mentat:

Atomic weapons, traditional weapons, a strong army and voluntary mujahideen are obligatory for jihad and the Jamaat ud-Daawa (JD) will continue protecting and arranging these resources for jihad against Hindus, the JD party announced Thursday at a Kashmir Solidarity Day rally.

Around 3,000 people participated in the rally on The Mall, the biggest Kashmir demonstration in the city. The Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal (MMA) also arranged a rally of about 1,500 people, mostly women and children.

JD Ameer Hafiz Muhammad Saeed said the organisation would not allow the government to disregard the sacrifices of Kashmiri mujahideen, and would start a countywide campaign to inform people about "conspiracies against the Kashmir freedom struggle". "Jihad is the only solution to the Kashmir issue and it was a fact and will remain a fact that jihad will free the Indian Muslims, who are looking to us," he said. He said no one could stop Pakistani and Indian Muslims when they joined Kashmiris in their struggle against the Indian occupation because it was their "obligatory duty".

"Muslims throughout the world have a bond of kalma. From Lahore to Srinagar, Kabul to Baghdad, Basra to Chechnya, they are fighting under this kalma, but the infidel world doesn't like it and describes it as terrorism," he said.

Mr Saeed said only jihad could guarantee the security of Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Afghanistan and the whole Islamic world. He praised Dr Abdul Qadeer Khan and said he hadn't committed any crime by transferring nuclear technology to Muslim countries. "He shared the technology for the supremacy of Islam and he acted on the Allah's command," Mr Saeed said, describing Dr Khan as a hero. "He is our hero, will remain our hero, and the government can't undermine his honour under American pressure."

JD Foreign Affairs Committee head Maulana Abdul Rehman Makki said in his speech that the Western media was linking terrorism with Islam, which were wrong. America, Britain, Israel and India are the biggest terrorists, who are occupying the resources of Muslims countries and violating human rights all over the world. "The media and the (Pakistani) parliament should know that there are 77 commands related to jihad in the Quran. They should follow these and fulfil their religious duty," he said.

An editorial reprinted in the Daily Times, "Our Meaning of Allah's Army," from Khaled Ahmed's Urdu Press Review declares jihadist principles plainly. (Thanks to Mentat and Nicolei.)

The idea of war under Islam is at the root of our belief. We have many meanings of jihad but one central meaning is fighting in the way of Allah. Many of us think that only defensive war is allowed in Islam and that covert or proxy wars are not permitted. Others think that aggressive war "to remove injustice" is also included. Here we are on interpretive territory. The idea of Islamic war joins us with other Muslims in other countries although this introduces complications into the discussion because nation-states cut into the concept of the "umma" or one transnational supra-nation.

Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

February 6, 2004

From AP:

A huge explosion blasted apart a subway car packed with morning rush hour commuters Friday, killing 39 people and wounding more than 130 in what some officials said was a suicide attack on the Russian capital's transport lifeline.

President Vladimir Putin drew a connection between the blast and Chechen rebels whom Russian troops have been fighting for most of the last decade, and said the blast appeared aimed at sowing discord ahead of next month's presidential elections.

There was no immediate claim of responsibility for the blast, but Chechen insurgents are blamed for a series of suicide bombings in Moscow and elsewhere in Russia. The blast came just three weeks after one of Chechnya's most feared warlords threatened new attacks in Russia.

You would never know it from this story, but these "Chechen rebels" are jihadists. Here is a recent report on the Chechen jihad from a leader of the movement, Abdallah Shamil Abu-Idris (Shamil Basayev).

| 12 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

From Concerned Women for America, an incisive article by Janice Shaw Crouse:

Perhaps nothing illustrates the hard-won liberation of Afghanistan and Iraq any more than the freedom of their women -- symbolized by, for instance, the removal of burqas, sending girls back to school and bringing women back into public life.

But nothing threatens that liberation any more than a naïve understanding of Islamic factions -- specifically how some Muslims interpret Islamic law to prevail over individual liberty, human rights and freedom, especially for women and girl children.

I used to teach parliamentary procedure which is based on the premise that rules of order for conducting a meeting must ensure that the majority prevails while seeing that the minority's rights are respected and their views freely and completely expressed. Likewise, freedom means that all have the right to be respected and to express their views freely and completely. That freedom is the essence of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; that everyone has the right of "freedom of thought, conscience and religion." Those same individual freedoms are essential in the broader, community or national context; democracy means that the majority prevails, though minority rights are fully protected.

Both individual rights and democracy are at risk now in Iraq, just as they were previously in Afghanistan. The new Afghan constitution is not all that it should be; it establishes institutional religious rights but fails to protect individual religious freedom. The new Iraqi constitution is not merely important for Iraq; it will also be a model for the whole Middle East. It must not be overlooked that the November 15 agreement mandates religious freedom as an integral aspect of the new constitution.

Iraq's Governing Council will complete the drafting of the interim constitution by the end of this month -- February 28 -- and that constitution will be in place until the permanent constitution is enacted -- not before mid-2005. At present, there are very real threats to the separation of church and state in Iraq: there is a big difference between the "freedom of worship" and the "freedom of religion," just as there are significant differences between "religious rites" and "religious rights."

Certain Islamist groups are seeking to establish an Islamic state and to bring back sectarian laws such as Sharia (which directly affects women's freedoms by limiting their involvement in public life as well as affecting inheritance and domestic laws). The conflict between the various Muslim groups is a power struggle with significant and long-range ramifications for freedom, democracy and the equality of women. It is not an exaggeration to say that ultimately the outcome will determine whether Iraq remains free and whether Iraqi women and children will have equal status and opportunity as citizens.

Two prominent women in Iraq have already felt the strong arm of Sharia. A woman lawyer in Najaf was dismissed from her job by a Shiite cleric who declared that judges must be "sane, mature and male." The woman deputy minister of agriculture, Dr. Sawson al-Sharafi, is under attack because some Islamists do not want to work for a woman.

In the same way, if Islam becomes the state religion, religious liberty will be curtailed by the extremists who are already introducing resolutions and proposals that seek to overturn religious neutrality and women's equality. We must never forget that religious freedom is essential to democracy and individual liberties.

Nigeria is learning this lesson the hard way. Examples abound: 23 Christian women have been brought before Islamic courts charged with non-compliance of the Muslim dress code, prostitution (being unmarried and older than 13 years), or refusal to marry early. At the University of Maiduguri in Borno state, female students have been forced to adhere to the Islamic dress code in order to sit for exams, some are being expelled from the university. Eleven female nurses were fired in Azare when they refused to change their nurse uniforms for Islamic attire.

Individual religious liberty and women's equality must be guaranteed in Iraq's interim constitution, otherwise all that we have fought for in the Middle East will be lost -- not just for Iraq and its citizens, but for the United States' interests and democratic values as well.

| 11 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The Canadian citizen who was recently confirmed dead in Pakistan may have died in a suicide bombing against coalition troops. This from WND:

A Canadian family accused of having close ties to Osama bin Laden's al-Qaida terrorist network is in the news again with allegations by the Taliban that another son was involved in a deadly attack on a coalition soldier.

A Taliban spokesman claimed Abdullah Khadr of Toronto was the suicide bomber who killed Canadian Forces Corporal Jamie Murphy in Kabul Jan. 27, the Toronto Globe and Mail reported.

Khadr is the son of Ahmed Saeed Khadr, a Canadian citizen whom the U.S. has accused of having direct ties to bin Laden. He also is the brother of Omar Khadr, who, as WorldNetDaily first reported exclusively, is accused of killing a U.S. Special Forces medic July 28.

Omar Khadr was held by the U.S. in the prison for terrorism suspects at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, but was released because the U.S. had no charges and believed he no longer was an intelligence asset.

A third brother, Abdurahman Khadr, also was held at Guantanamo. He returned to Canada shortly after his release in October.

Abdurahman Khadr admitted he had been trained at an "al-Qaida-related camp" for three months in 1998, but played down his family's suspected ties to bin Laden. . . .

Abdullah is the eldest of four brothers and the only male member of the family who was not detained or shot as a terrorism suspect, the Toronto paper said yesterday.

Members of his family deny he is a suicide bomber, and Canadian officials believe the Taliban claim could be misinformation.

Members of the Khadr family described Abdullah, 23, as a "good boy" who is stuck in Pakistan and wanting to return to Canada. . . .

Abdullah's grandmother, Fatmah Elsamnah, strongly denied intelligence reports that Abdullah was a commander of a training camp.

"Abdullah was trying to come home, and that's it," she told the Toronto daily. "This news upsets me very much because Abdullah is a good boy and nobody has helped him - even his government."

The Khadr family's relationship with the government was an embarrassment to former Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chretien, who once intervened on behalf of the father.

The father was arrested in 1995 in connection with a bomb at the Egyptian embassy in Islamabad - a suicide attack that killed 17. According to the Ottawa Citizen, a Canadian Security Intelligence Service report says Khadr is "alleged to have moved ... money through" Human Concern International, a Canadian relief agency, "from Afghanistan to Pakistan to pay for the operation."

Chretien pressed then-Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto during a trade mission to give Khadr due process in Canada.

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The jihadist nuclear scientist who shared secrets with rogue states has been pardoned by Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf. This from AFP:

Pakistan's president said he had pardoned the founder of the country's nuclear programme, who has confessed to leaking nuclear secrets abroad.

"I give him pardon," President Pervez Musharraf told a news conference on Thursday, a day after Abdul Qadeer Khan's dramatic televised confession.

Khan admitted leaking secrets and begged for forgiveness following a lengthy investigation into the alleged transfer of nuclear techology to Iran, Libya and North Korea.

Musharraf called the scientist a "national hero" for bringing the bomb to Pakistan, but said he had made "mistakes".

Responding to a question, he said Pakistan will not share documents with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which passed on the information that launched the investigation.

He also said that Pakistan will not allow the United Nations to inspect its nuclear facilities.

| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This story is a couple of weeks old, but it is still relevant in light of the ongoing French headscarf controversy. In the Indonesian suburb of Tangerang, the headscarf is being imposed -- possibly on non-Muslims as well as Muslims. This from AsiaNews, with thanks to Nancy Block:

The mayor of Tangerang, a suburb of Jakarta, ordered all public employees to cover their heads and respect Islamic dress code on Fridays.

Friday is the holy day for Muslims. Women will be asked to wear Islamic headscarves and long-sleeved shirts to cover their arms; men will have to wear Islamic loose-fitting shirts. The mayor's spokesman, Achmad Chairuddin, told the Jakarta Post that "the new arrangement is a direct order from the mayor...Muslim dress reflects the municipality's devout image."

It is still not known if the rule is also true for Christian, Hindu and Buddhist employees.

Until now, state workers in Tangerang have all worn brown uniforms from Monday to Thursday and green ones on Friday.

Even if Indonesia is a secular state and Islam is only one of five officially-recognized religions, in recent years some local councils have started imposing Islamic dress and behavior codes to increase their image and popularity..

Last year the mayor of West Jakarta gave orders requiring students to respect Islamic dress habits on Fridays. Yet criticism came pouring in from other religious groups, accusing him of discrimination. The mayor then went back on his decree.

Also some districts, like West Java, Indramayu and Cianjur, have introduced Islamic laws which force state employees to wear Islamic dress every Friday and close offices to allow time for prayer. The local governments in Pamekasan, East Java, have moreover suggested that its employees hold monthly readings of the Koran.

Aceh, on the northern tip of Sumatra, is the only province in which the Islamic sharia law is applied. Jakarta's central government has accepted application of the sharia law as a compromise to appease a region marked by separatist conflicts for 27 years. Aceh has been under martial law since last May, yet Islamic sharia law has never become operational in a court of law.

| 1 Comment
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Chinese in Malaysia are getting a taste of what life is like in the Islamic society that radical Muslims want to impose upon the world. This from AP, with thanks to nevermindlv:

Malaysia's Islamic party has rejected permission for a major Chinese New Year celebration in a state under its control, criticizing plans for women performers to sing and dance.

Organizers vowed Thursday to defy the ban, saying the state government's refusal to grant a permit challenged traditions of tolerance between the Malay Muslim majority and the large ethnic Chinese minority.

The refusal put the state government of Terengganu, controlled by the Pan-Malaysia Islamic Party, on a collision course with the organizers, led by the national Culture, Arts and Tourism Ministry and the state chapters of two ethnic Chinese parties.

Abdul Hadi Awang, chief minister of Terengganu, was quoted as saying by the New Straits Times newspaper that permission had been denied because women would be performing during the time of Muslim evening prayers.

"We will not tolerate any activities with female performers dancing and singing, especially when Muslims are supposed to perform the evening prayers," Abdul Hadi was quoted Thursday as saying.

"If they insist on holding the program, we will take action against them later," said Abdul Hadi, who is also leader of the Islamic party.

But organizers vowed to go ahead with Friday's celebration with or without a permit and invited state authorities to take the case to court, the national news agency Bernama reported.

Culture Minister Abdul Kadir Sheikh Fadzir said the Malaysian constitution guaranteed ethnic minorities the right to hold traditional celebrations without interference.

The Islamic party controls two of Malaysia's 13 states and is gearing up to make more gains in general elections that the government is expected to call in the next few months. Though the party is unlikely to win power at the national level, it could capture another state.

The party has vowed to turn this moderate Southeast Asian country into an Islamic state if it forms a national government. The party has tried to impose harsh Islamic laws - including amputating the hands of thieves and stoning adulterers to death - in the states in controls, but has consistently been overruled by the national government.

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

A Norwegian teacher has been told he cannot wear the Star of David. Why? It might offend Muslims. This from Aftenposten, with thanks to Scandinavian Infidel and jboxell:

A municipally employed teacher in Kristiansand has been prevented from wearing a Star of David around his neck. Kristiansand Adult Education Center, where the man works, ruled that the Jewish symbol could be deemed a provocation towards the many Muslim students at the school, Norwegian Broadcasting (NRK) reports.

Not only that: the teacher wears it under his shirt.

Teacher Inge Telhaug said he feels this is a violation of his freedom of speech.

"I can't accept this. It is a small star, 16 millimeters (0.6 inches) that I have around my neck, usually under a T-shirt. I see it as my right to wear it," Telhaug told NRK.

However, the headscarf is just fine. Aftenposten also reports in a separate story:

Education Minister Kristin Clemet said during question time in parliament on Wednesday that she had no plans to ban the hijab - the head scarf worn by Muslim women that has recently become increasingly associated with Islamism. The Progress Party's parliamentary group agreed Wednesday to propose banning the hijab and the burka from elementary schools.
| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The tiny minority of extremists speaks in the January 16 edition of London's Al-Quds Al-Arabi, as well as in Al-Watan of Oman and Al-Hayat of Saudi Arabia. This from Arutz Sheva, with thanks to Nicolei:

Reacting to last month's repeated news items regarding theoretical Israeli-Syrian negotiations, London's Al-Quds Al-Arabi (January 16) declared that terrorism ("Palestinian armed resistance") is the Arabs' best tool for effective and productive peace negotiations.

This echoed the Omani Al-Watan newspaper of the same day, which reacted to British Prime Minister Tony Blair's remarks to the effect that the peace process would not continue unless Israel received assurances against terrorist operations. "For a start, the resistance against foreign occupation is not terrorism except in the eyes of imperialist countries and others that strive to oppress other people," the Gulf newspaper declared. In fact, the editorial continued, no one has ever proposed to the Arabs in Israel a "viable alternative to blowing themselves up and leaving orphans behind."

Furthermore, the editorial concluded, this is "true for Palestinians, but more so for the Iraqis." . . .

The Saudi-backed Al-Hayat newspaper the same week carried an article that was a paean to the woman suicide bomber who blew herself up at the Erez checkpoint in Gaza, and to the mother of a suicide bomber who fought so that her son would have the chance to die.

As for the Erez attack, the London-based newspaper eulogized: "They will say she went into history, to reserve her people a place in the future. They will add that she lit the way; the first female martyr in the books of Hamas, the first female martyr in the Gaza strip, the first female Palestinian martyr that leaves her children and embraces the nation. The small child will never get tired of the footage Hamas distributed. He will watch it over and over again, as this female holding the rifle, used to hold him in her arms. He will learn by heart what that woman repeated before blowing herself up in the face of occupiers of her nation's soil. She said: 'I have always wanted to be the first female to execute a martyrdom operation in which parts of my body would scatter.'"

The Al-Hayat article went on to relate the tale of Mohamad Fathi Farhat's mother. According to the story, as told by Hamas spokesperson Khaled Mash'al, "she wrote to the leadership of Al-Qassam Battalions, objecting her son's denial of the request to perform a martyrdom operation [suicide bombing]. When the leadership succumbed to her request, the mother got busy with her son's last preparations, and when she found out of his martyrdom, she wore her best clothes to accept congratulations."

| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

February 5, 2004

MEMRI reports that Al-Masaa, an Egyptian government daily, has justified the murder of children by suicide bombing:

"We have no argument regarding the question of the legitimacy of these operations, because they are considered a powerful weapon used by the Palestinians against an enemy with no morality or religion, [an enemy] who has deadly weapons prohibited by international law, that is not deterred from using them against the defenseless Palestinian people.

"Even if during [a martyrdom operation] civilians or children are killed - the blame does not fall upon the Palestinians, but on those who forced them to turn to this modus operandi.

"Ultimately, we should bless every Palestinian man or woman who goes calmly to carry out a martyrdom operation, in order to receive a reward in the Hereafter, sacrificing her life for her religion and her homeland and knowing that she will never return from this operation."

| 13 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

story.mzoudi.ap.jpeg
Mzoudi

From CNN, with thanks to Nicolei:

A Moroccan man accused of assisting the September 11 hijackers has been cleared by a court in the German city of Hamburg due to a lack of evidence.

Abdel-Ghani Mzoudi was charged with more than 3,000 counts of accessory to murder, based on the death toll in the suicide hijackings in the U.S, and being a member of a terrorist organisation, the Hamburg cell of al Qaeda.

The 31-year-old had faced up to 15 years in jail if convicted by the five-judge panel.

The court declared a verdict Thursday despite a last-minute request by lawyers for victims' families to delay it, citing alleged new evidence linked to the case of accused September 11 conspirator Zacarias Moussaoui in the United States.

Defense lawyers said Mzoudi had spent time at an al Qaeda training camp in Afghanistan in 2000 and knew Hamburg cell members while they lived in the city, but denied he was involved in the 9/11 plot.

German prosecutors had expected the acquittal because of a lack of evidence but continued to insist the accused was guilty. They could still appeal against the verdict to a higher court.

"For us it is clear Mzoudi is part of the Islamistic scene in Hamburg," Heino Vahldieck, chief of the Hamburg Federal Criminal Office, told CNN. "He has been part of the scene, he is still part of the scene."

Terror experts are worried the case demonstrates the West is ill equipped to defend itself.

"It is a war. In a war situation you need special laws and al Qaeda finds that it can operate wonderfully well in the democratic free society because they can move about freely and the courts cannot convict them," M. J. Gohel of the Asia Pacific Foundation told CNN.

Lawyers for Mzoudi, who wants to return to study electrical engineering in Hamburg, said before the acquittal his problems would remain whether or not he was freed.

They said he was afraid German authorities could deport him to Morocco where U.S. agents could try to snatch him. Mzoudi is also aware, they say, of rumors that al Qaeda might try to liquidate him to ensure he never talks.

In Germany's other 9/11 case, Mzoudi's friend and fellow-Moroccan Mounir el Motassadeq was sentenced to 15 years in jail by the same Hamburg court last February. He is awaiting a ruling on an appeal.

| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Their last few threats have proved to be empty -- in fact, virtually all of their threats have since 9/11. But Al-Qaeda is still playing scare warfare. From the World Tribune:

Al Qaida has again warned of a major strike in the United States.

The Al Qaida warning was relayed via the Tajamu Reform Party of Yemen in a statement proposing terms of reconciliation with the government which has been under pressure to cooperate with the United States in the war on terrorism.

"A major strike, a big event will take place in America soon," the statement said.

In its statement, Al Qaida termed Sanaa as the second most cooperative partner in the U.S.-led war against the Islamic insurgency movement. The group said Pakistan was the chief ally of the United States.

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"Losing the War of Ideas," a new article by Jihad Watch director Robert Spencer, is available today at FrontPage magazine.com.

| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Surprise: most of the Al-Qaeda/Taliban prisoners at Guantanamo are Saudis. Others come from nations you might never expect to harbor jihadis. From UPI, with thanks to Jean-Luc:

At least 160 of the 650 detainees acknowledged by the Pentagon being held at the United States military base at Guantanamo, Cuba -- almost a quarter of the total -- are from Saudi Arabia, a special UPI survey can reveal.

In UPI's groundbreaking and detailed breakdown of the nationalities of the detainees, some arrested far from the 2001 battlefield of Afghanistan, the other top nationalities being held are Yemen with 85, Pakistan with 82, Jordan and Egypt, each with 30.

Afghans are the fourth largest nationality with 80 detainees, according to the detailed UPI survey that has now for the first time established the homelands of 95 percent of the total number of prisoners.

One member of the Bahraini royal family is among those detained, according to his lawyer Najeeb al-Nauimi of Doha, Qatar, who was Qatar's 1995-97 justice minister and has power of attorney from the parents of about 70 prisoners.

The Pentagon's own list of nationalities detained at Guantanamo may be flawed. Yemeni officials have told UPI they fear more than twice as many of their citizens are held than the Pentagon count. . . .

Drawing on a wide range of sources, UPI has tentatively determined the nationalities of 619 of Camp Delta's inmates from 38 countries.

Until the U.S. government is more forthcoming with information, the figures below remain incomplete.

Complicating the issue is the sporadic release of a number of detainees; in the wake of last week's release of three teenagers, another 87 detainees have been transferred pending release. In addition, four detained Saudis have been transferred to continue their imprisonment in Saudi Arabia. . . .

The magnitude of the Saudi presence in Camp Delta raises troubling questions about their presence in Afghanistan and whether the U.S. forces succeeded in capturing more than a fraction of those who might have been there.

Emphasizing the global metastasizing of terrorism, among the 85 Yemenis is an individual arrested in Sarajevo. . . .

Jordan, a close ally of the U.S. in its war on terror, has 30 of its citizens detained in Camp Delta, as does Egypt. Jordan has worked closely with the U.S. in the initial processing of prisoners, providing both interrogators and interpreters.

Morocco, site of an al-Qaida attack on a synagogue in April 2002 that killed 21 people, has 18 of its nationals in Guantanamo. Algeria, currently in the throes of a violent conflict between Islamists and the government, has 19 prisoners in Camp Delta, six of whom were arrested in Sarajevo.

Kuwait, liberated from Saddam Hussein by Operation Desert Storm in 1991 has 12 citizens in Guantanamo; the Kuwaiti government insists that all of its citizen were involved in charity and relief work. China also has at least 12 its citizens in Guantanamo, although they are all identified as ethnic Uighurs rather than Han Chinese. Next on the list are Tajikistan and Turkey with 11 citizens each. Tajikistan fought a bloody civil war in the aftermath of the collapse of communism in 1991 and fundamentalists maintain a strong presence there. Turkey last November was subjected to al-Qaida bombing attacks in Istanbul, which killed 62 people.

Nine British citizens of Muslim background are in Guantanamo; they have proven to be a political liability for Prime Minister Tony Blair, as calls have been made in Parliament for their repatriation.

Both Tunisia and Russia have eight of their nationals at Camp Delta; a Russian embassy spokesman was careful to point out however that the eight Russian citizens are not ethnic Russians. Rustam Akmerov, Ravil Gumarov, Timur Ishmuradov, Shamil Khadzhiev (originally identified as Almaz Sharipov), Rasul Kudaev, Ravil Mingazov, Ruslan Odigov and Airat Vakhitov are members of Russia's Muslim community. The Russian embassy nonetheless is quietly pursuing negotiations with Washington to extradite its citizens.

France and Bahrain both have seven each of their nationals at Gauntanamo. Highlighting the problems of identification, France only recently discovered its seventh national at Camp Delta. The Bahraini detainees include a member of the royal family.

Kazakhstan has been quietly lobbying Washington for the return of its citizens, as have Australia (2) and Canada (2.) Australian David Hicks is one of the most high profile prisoners in Camp Delta; a convert to Islam, Hicks fought as a jihadi in the Balkans before shipping out to Afghanistan.

There are reportedly at least two Chechens, two Uzbeks and two Syrians in Camp Delta. The Syrian detainees especially interest U.S. intelligence, as one of the four workers at Camp Delta under investigation for possibly aiding the prisoners, Air Force translator Senior Airman Ahmad al-Halabi is accused of trying to pass messages from the prisoners to Syria. There are also two Georgian and two Sudanese nationals in Guantanamo.

Bangladesh, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Iraq, Kenya, Libya, Mauritania, Qatar, Spain and Sweden all have a single citizen in Camp Delta.

UPDATE: I have just learned from an informed source that one of the prisoners at Guantanamo is not just a Saudi, but a Saudi prince.

| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Michael Wolfe, a convert to Islam, was largely responsible for PBS's hagiographical biography of Muhammad that appeared about a year ago. Now he is touting a coming Islamic moment in the United States. This from Beliefnet.com via Al-Jazeera (with thanks to Nicolei):

The U.S. began as a haven for Christian outcasts. But what religion fits our current zeitgeist? The answer may be Islam.

Americans tend to think of their country as, at the very least, a nominally Christian nation. Didn't the Pilgrims come here for freedom to practice their Christian religion? Don't Christian values of righteousness under God, and freedom, reinforce America's democratic, capitalist ideals?

True enough. But there's a new religion on the block now, one that fits the current zeitgeist nicely. It's Islam. Islam is the third-largest and fastest growing religious community in the United States. This is not just because of immigration. More than 50% of America's six million Muslims were born here. Statistics like these imply some basic agreement between core American values and the beliefs that Muslims hold. Americans who make the effort to look beyond popular stereotypes to learn the truth of Islam are surprised to find themselves on familiar ground.

Is America a Muslim nation? Here are seven reasons the answer may be yes.

Islam is monotheistic. Muslims worship the same God as Jews and Christians. They also revere the same prophets as Judaism and Christianity, from Abraham, the first monotheist, to Moses, the law giver and messenger of God, to Jesus--not leaving out Noah, Job, or Isaiah along the way. The concept of a Judeo-Christian tradition only came to the fore in the 1940s in America. Now, as a nation, we may be transcending it, turning to a more inclusive "Abrahamic" view.

In January, President Bush grouped mosques with churches and synagogues in his inaugural address. A few days later, when he posed for photographers at a meeting of several dozen religious figures, the Shi'ite imam Muhammad Qazwini, of Orange County, Calif., stood directly behind Bush's chair like a presiding angel, dressed in the robes and turban of his south Iraqi youth.

Islam is democratic in spirit. Islam advocates the right to vote and educate yourself and pursue a profession. The Qur'an, on which Islamic law is based, enjoins Muslims to govern themselves by discussion and consensus. In mosques, there is no particular priestly hierarchy. With Islam, each individual is responsible for the condition of her or his own soul. Everyone stands equal before God.

Notice: "The Qur'an . . . enjoins Muslims to govern themselves by discussion and consensus." The extension of these principles to non-Muslims on an equal basis with Muslims is not found in Islamic law.

Wolfe also rather predictably corrects "misunderstandings" of the term jihad:

Islam is often viewed as an aggressive faith because of the concept of jihad, but this is actually a misunderstood term. Because Muslims believe that God wants a just world, they tend to be activists, and they emphasize that people are equal before God. These are two reasons why African Americans have been drawn in such large numbers to Islam. They now comprise about one-third of all Muslims in America.

Remember: those "activists" around the world today carry rifles and bombs.

Perhaps most egregious of all, in light of the Qur'an's injunction to husbands to beat their disobedient wives (Sura 4:34), and of a host of other Sharia regulations that discriminate against women, is this:

Meanwhile, this egalitarian streak also plays itself out in relations between the sexes. Muhammad, Islam's prophet, actually was a reformer in his day. Following the Qur'an, he limited the number of wives a man could have and strongly recommended against polygamy. The Qur'an laid out a set of marriage laws that guarantees married women their family names, their own possessions and capital, the right to agree upon whom they will marry, and the right to initiate divorce. In Islam's early period, women were professionals and property owners, as increasingly they are today. None of this may seem obvious to most Americans because of cultural overlays that at times make Islam appear to be a repressive faith toward women--but if you look more closely, you can see the egalitarian streak preserved in the Qur'an finding expression in contemporary terms. In today's Iran, for example, more women than men attend university, and in recent local elections there, 5,000 women ran for public office.

Finally:

Islam encourages the pursuit of religious freedom. The Pilgrims landing at Plymouth Rock is not the world's first story of religious emigration. Muhammad and his little band of 100 followers fled religious persecution, too, from Mecca in the year 622. They only survived by going to Madinah, an oasis a few hundred miles north, where they established a new community based on a religion they could only practice secretly back home. No wonder then that, in our own day, many Muslims have come here as pilgrims from oppression, leaving places like Kashmir, Bosnia, and Kosovo, where being a Muslim may radically shorten your life span. When the 20th century's list of emigrant exiles is added up, it will prove to be heavy with Muslims, that's for sure.

Not a word about dhimmi laws which mandate discrimination against non-Muslims in Muslim society. Because such laws exist, Wolfe's vision of a Muslim America would in reality not be quite the paradise he imagines.

| 22 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This from Gulf Daily News, with thanks to Nicolei:

BELFAST: A Filipino man was arraigned yesterday on charges of aiding Southeast Asian terrorists linked to Al Qaeda. Jaybe Ofrasio, 31, offered no plea in Belfast Crown Court to two counts of making funds and property available over the Internet to a Southeast Asian terrorist group "knowing they would be used for terrorist purposes" sometime between January 1 and October 19, 2003.

Detective Inspector Mark Brown testified that the charges concerned support for Jemaah Islamiyah, a militant group that seeks to create an Islamic state encompassing Indonesia, Malaysia and the southern Philippines.

The US and Australia have accused the group of forging ties with Osama bin Laden's Al Qaeda terror network and conducting several bombings in Indonesia.

Brown said police had seized telephone and financial records as part of their investigation, which focused on an e-mail sent from Malaysia.

"We conducted a number of searches in Belfast and a number of searches in the Philippines," Brown said. . . .

The couple are originally from Cotabato, in the southern Philippine island of Mindanao, where the separatist Moro Islamic Liberation Front operates.

| 1 Comment
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The Minneapolis Star Tribune has discovered terrorism. This from Honest Reporting, with thanks to EPG:

For the past three years, no matter how monstrous the Palestinian attack on Israeli civilians, the Minneapolis Star Tribune has consistently refused to apply the word 'terrorism.' One of the paper's editors explained their 'evenhanded' position in February, 2002: In the case of the term 'terrorist,' other words ― 'gunman,' 'separatist' and 'rebel,' for example ― may be more precise and less likely to be viewed as judgmental.

We also take extra care to avoid the term 'terrorist' in articles about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict because of the emotional and heated nature of that dispute.

Now, suddenly, the largest paper in Minnesota has discovered 'terrorism' in the Mideast.

No, it wasn't the horrific murder of 11 men, women and children on a Jerusalem bus on Jan. 29. That was described yet again in Star Tribune wire reports as the work of a 'militant group'.

Here were the rule-breakers:

1) On Jan. 31, the Star Tribune ran a profile of a local priest, Michael Ovikian, who grew up in Jerusalem. The reporter describes Ovikian surviving the 1946 Irgun bombing of the King David Hotel (emphasis added):

It was midday July 22, 1946. Ovikian was eating in the basement of the King David Hotel when Zionist terrorists struck... The Brits had fortified the hotel's eight-story southern wing with barbed wire and tanks. But the terrorists sneaked in the northern end dressed as delivery people, their milk cans filled with TNT.

So the Star Tribune, which has maintained a 'non-judgmental' refusal to call Palestinian terror by name, determined that the King David bombing was, in fact, 'Zionist terror'. This, despite the fact that (unlike any Palestinian terror) the Irgun issued specific warnings of the impending strike against the British command at the hotel, and that civilians were not intentionally targeted.

2) The Jan. 21 edition of the Star Tribune carried an AP article on IDF anti-Hezbollah actions, accompanied by a photo of the IDF dismantling a West Bank outpost and synagogue. The photo caption was careful to point out that the "synagogue was dedicated to the memory and teachings of American-Israeli Meir Kahane, whose anti-Arab Kach movement is on the U.S. State Department list of terror organizations," but the article describes Hezbollah (which is on that same State Department list) as mere "guerrillas." Moreover, the Star Tribune edited out the following passage from the original AP article, which described American support for the Israeli reprisal:

The United States blamed Hezbollah guerrillas for the escalation and cautioned Syria against giving support to the Lebanese militant group.

It seems that all the talk by the Star Tribune of sophisticated editorial policy was just a lot of hot air ― masking what is genuinely an anti-Israel double-standard.

A further indication of the double standard: The Star Tribune has a special section of its online edition devoted to world terrorism, which includes archived articles on terror threats and attacks in the US, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan - even Nigeria. But blowing up a Jerusalem commuter bus didn't qualify.

These latest blunders extend the Star Tribune's history of distorting the conflict. In 2002, after being caught red-handed, Star Tribune editors publicly admitted that the newspaper re-wrote wire service stories in a manner which radically distorted the meaning of a Human Rights Watch report on casualties in the Jenin refugee camp. The Star Tribune's own ombudsman called this an "embarrassing wart."

In response to the latest events, Minnesotans Against Terrorism clarified to HonestReporting that the issue is not whether Kach or the Irgun committed terrorist acts: "MAT's primary concern is that when innocent civilians are specifically targeted for death and terror, that conduct and its perpetrators be accurately and objectively referred to as 'terrorism' regardless of the cause, and regardless of the nationality of the victims. The Star Tribune should be honest with its readers and call all attacks specifically targeted against innocent men, women and children by its proper name, 'terrorism', and not play favorites with specific groups or causes. . . ."

UPDATE: Star Tribune editors have recognized the problem with both articles above, apologized, and expressed their commitment to more balanced Mideast coverage. For the text of the Star Tribune's response, see our weblog, BackSpin.

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Here is a call to remove the dhimmi provision hidden in the Indonesian Constitution. This from the Jakarta Post, with thanks to Nancy Block:

To avoid an endless wrangle between Islam and "nationalism", the preamble to the 1945 Constitution -- which thus far has been held sacrosanct despite constitutional reform -- must be changed. To allow amendments to the body of articles of the constitution, but not its preamble, does not make sense. ...

The ambiguity of the meaning of the first principle -- though never admitted, revealed, or discussed openly except in the Constitutional Assembly in the 1950s, prior to the vote on whether the republic should be a secular or theocratic state -- has always posed a threat to national unity and the integrity of the state.

It has resulted also in the perpetually ambiguous identity of the Indonesian state, which has always been understood as "neither a theocratic nor a secular state". Many Muslims tend to interpret the first principle as the obligation of every citizen to believe in God. And to believe in God is taken to mean the obligation to profess to a religion. This can only be one of those religions officially recognized by the state, although no religion needs to be state sanctioned.

Most non-Muslims take the principle of belief in God as an expression of religious freedom. But in some cases they feel discriminated against. They have to obtain not only permission from the government to build their house of worship, but also from the community in the vicinity of the proposed site.

In contrast, Muslims do not seem to require the government's permission to build mosques, nor the consent of the surrounding community. The mosques are free to use loudspeakers, without any apparent concern for possible non-Muslims nearby, elderly or sick people, or children who may need rest and sleep. Yet non-Muslims rarely, if ever, complain, not so much because of their "religious tolerance" but for fear of offending Muslim neighbors.

What is more serious is that because of the state's ambiguous identity, it is never clear whether religious law should be the source of state law, or at least form part of it.

If state law was to be clearly derived from religious law, would Islamic law, as the religion of the majority, be its foundation? Would the country then be defined as a theocratic state? In which fields would Islamic law be applied, and to what extent? The trend so far has been toward more and more elements of religious (Islamic) law creeping into state legislation "through the back door", as it were, namely, not clothed in the sharia.

Our nation was not built upon a common religious ground, but a common political ideal -- the establishment of a nation-state, independent of any foreign domination, to promote general welfare based on justice -- not to implement any religious law and teachings. Hence the independent republic was designed to be a secular state, separating state and religion.

The term "secular" or "secularization", however, is often misunderstood here as "anti-religion". Here one should note the words of noted scholar Fatema Mernissi. In a translation of her book Islam and Democracy: Fear of the Modern World, the noted female Muslim scholar from Morocco wrote the following:

"The .... argument is that if Islam is separated from the state, no one will any longer believe in Allah ... Since we are constantly bombarded via satellite by advertisements for all sorts of products ... the state must defend Islam.

"Such reasoning is in fact an insult to Islam, with its suggestion that Islam can succeed only if it is imposed on people in a totalitarian manner, through courts that punish those who drink wine or refuse to fast during Ramadhan ... Islam has nothing to offer a modern citizen, who would quickly abandon it if state surveillance were lifted ...

"As both Christianity and Judaism have done, Islam cannot only survive but thrive in a secular state. Once dissociated from coercive power, it will witness a renewal of spirituality."

She continues, "Christianity and Judaism strongly rooted in people's hearts are what I have seen in the United States, France and Germany. It has put a brake on the state's manipulation of religion. It took three centuries of effort by many European philosophers and several revolutions for this fundamental nuance to be developed, accepted, and made understandable ..."

The preamble to the Constitution should be changed so as to make the Republic of Indonesia a secular state. Otherwise this nation would continuously be subject to conflicts and threatened by disintegration. The principles of Pancasila [the ideology of the Indonesian state] are already embodied in democratic ideals -- equality and justice for all, and respect for human rights.

| 1 Comment
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

0,1658,318699,00.jpeg
Melanie Brown

"For Muslims," says Melanie Brown, wife of terror suspect Willie Brigitte, "the jihad is compulsory. It is the struggle . . . the struggle for God." Unfortunately, she doesn't mean the struggle to "resist worldly temptations." This from the Herald Sun, with thanks to Rusty Shackleford:

THE Australian wife of jailed terror suspect Willie Brigitte emerged from a long-awaited prison meeting with her husband to declare her support for jihad.

"One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter," said Melanie Brown, quoting a slogan adopted by many supporters of extreme militant groups -- including al-Qaida.

"I may get into trouble saying that . . . but I have heard it a lot, and I agree with it.

"For Muslims, the jihad is compulsory. It is the struggle . . . the struggle for God."

The former Australian soldier also told how her marriage to Brigitte in Sydney was arranged by mutual friends in the fundamentalist Muslim community, because both were keen to wed as the faith decreed.

Ms Brown said she confronted her husband in jail about aspects of his life he had never revealed to her, such as the two former wives and three children he left behind in France when he flew to Australia early last year.

"We did discuss those things. But it's all cool now," she said.

"As far as I understand, he is not married to them now."

Of course, nothing in Islamic law would make it wrong for him to still be married to them.

In her first interview since her life was abruptly and irrevocably changed by Brigitte's arrest in Sydney last October, Ms Brown proclaimed her husband's innocence.

But in the next breath she revealed her strident support for "the jihad", adding that acts of violence could be seen as part of such a struggle.

Meanwhile, another Herald Sun report reveals some of the content of Brown's meetings with Brigitte. (Thanks to Jean-Luc.)

SUSPECTED French terrorist Willie Brigitte tried to get information from his Australian wife about the top-secret spy facility at Pine Gap according to French police sources, it was reported yesterday. . . .

The Australian newspaper said Ms Brown is understood to have told French interrogators that Brigitte questioned her at length about the US-Australian electronic intelligence station at Pine Gap, near Alice Springs.

He asked her if she had ever been inside the base when she was in the Australian Army Signal Corps, whose members are experts in communication intercepts, the newspaper said.

While in the army, Ms Brown was reportedly training in Arabic and performed a tour of duty in East Timor.

The newspaper reported that Brigitte asked her about the transmission systems and the low-frequency electronic transmitting antennae the US had reportedly installed in Pine Gap.

French police sources said Ms Brown insisted she had not revealed any military secrets to Brigitte.

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This from The Guardian, with thanks to Nicolei:

The disgraced founder of Pakistan's nuclear programme has informed investigators that he supplied rogue states with nuclear technology with the full knowledge of the country's ruling military elite, including President Pervez Musharraf, a friend of the nuclear scientist was reported as saying yesterday.

Abdul Qadeer Khan has confessed to selling nuclear secrets to Iran, Libya and North Korea, senior officials said on Monday.

Many analysts and most Pakistanis suspect the government of seeking to pin the blame on Mr Khan for a potentially lucrative trade of which, they say, the country's all-powerful army chiefs must have been aware.

According to an unnamed friend who spoke to the Associated Press, the nuclear scientist last week told government investigators: "What ever I did, it was in the knowledge of the bosses."


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"In a Jan. 23 interview with 'Avvenire' (the daily newspaper of the Italian Bishops’ Conference) the influential Jesuit Islamicist, Khalil Samir, said that 'the headscarf is just the tip of the iceberg of a radical proposal to refuse the integration (of citizens) and, in the face of crisis of secular and Christian Europe, reintroduces Islam as a global, religious and political alternative.'" This from Chiesa, with thanks to Nicolei:

ROMA – Starting Feb. 3 the French Parliament will examine and vote on a law proposed by the Jacques Chirac administration which aims at banning the wearing of religious symbols in public schools.

The law proposal states: “In public schools, colleges and high schools it is forbidden to wear symbols or dress by which students ostentatiously (“ostensiblement” in French) reveal their associations with religious groups or creeds.”

It is not only the Islamic headscarf (or “veil”) that is forbidden, but also Christians crosses of certain sizes, the Jewish kippah, sikh’s turbans, and even “a certain shagginess of hair”, which according to the minister of education, Luc Ferry, is equal to long beards grown as prescribed by Muslim law.

But the Islamic headscarf is at the heart of the controversy. It is the headscarf which inspired the law proposal. Among those against the French law is Cardinal Jean-Marie Lustiger, archbishop of Paris.

Even John Paul II from Rome gave his indirect disapproval In his Jan. 12 speech to the Diplomatic Corps to the Holy See he condemned forms of secularity which act under the guise of “secularism”.

Cardinal Mario F. Pompedda, prefect of the Apostolic Signature and thus the highest legal authority in the Holy See, said in the Jan. 29 issue of the Italian daily, “il Giornale”, that the French prohibition of the headscarf is a patently clear example of wayward secularity, calling it “a principle of freedom converted in a refusal of liberty to individuals”; or worse still, that is has been transformed into “ life-dominating sort of divine rule.”

However, not all Catholics see things with the same eye. In a Jan. 23 interview with “Avvenire” (the daily newspaper of the Italian Bishops’ Conference) the influential Jesuit Islamicist, Khalil Samir, said that “the headscarf is just the tip of the iceberg of a radical proposal to refuse the integration (of citizens) and, in the face of crisis of secular and Christian Europe, reintroduces Islam as a global, religious and political alternative.”

Behind the headscarf’s symbolic nature –added Fr. Samir – “is a pretence to model society based on Islamic ideals, even using multiculturalism as a Trojan horse to permit the dissemination of political correctness.” The French government does well to “to put a check on Islam’s radical tendencies” and to defend “that form of secularity which the French believe to be an inalienable and well-established national heritage.”

Fr. Samir’s same concerns are growing also among Muslims who are adverse to extremist tendencies.

The president of Cairo’s University of Al-Azhar, Muhammad Sayyid Tantawi, said that Muslim women living in a non-Islamic state which bans the headscarf are free from the religious constraint of wearing it.

In France, while thousands of women protested against the law proposal, the Mufti of Marseilles, Soheib Bensheikh, accused them of acting like “those fake religious people who use secularity as a Trojan horse to favor obscurantist and political Islamism.”

Yet isn’t the woman’s headscarf an inherent obligation in Muslim religion? And if not so, why is it worn? It is first necessary to answer these questions before the topic can be further discussed. The following is a what an Algerian-born, Muslim professor of Islamic studies at the University of Trieste and Urbino, Khaled Fouad Allam, wrote in the Jan. 22 issue of the “la Repubblica”. The article comes from a professor who has a wide following among ecclesiastic circles.

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

A split has apparently formed in the Indonesian radical Muslim group Jemaah Islamiyah, and the new group is even more fanatical in its determination to wage jihad against non-Muslims — particularly the Christians of Indonesia. This from AsiaNews, with thanks to Nicolei:

The latest analysis report prepared by the Jakarta-based International Crisis Group (ICG) released early this week, stated that a radical new Islamic militia had emerged in the country. The newly established group “Mujahedden Kompak” was formed by hard-liners who split from “Jemaah Islamiyah”, considered to be Al-Qaeda’s affiliate in Southeast Asia. The report-analysis, written by ICG’s Chapter Director Sydney Jones, an American expert in Southeast Asian issues, describes the faction.

The Muslim militant group exists in the Central Sulawesi province, and is highly concentrated in the Poso region, where ‘Kompak’, an acronym roughly translated as “Action Committee for Crisis Response”, is responsible for a series of attacks against Christians. Their members are highly trained in international militant camps in Mindanao and Afghanistan. ‘Kompak’ is involved in the Muslim/ Christian conflicts in the Moluccas and aggressively seek new recruits. They are ideologically prepared to launch large-scale deadly attacks. “It suggests a need to revise assessments about the nature and gravity of the terrorist threat in Indonesia," Ms. Jones wrote in the report. "While the shorter-term prospects are somewhat encouraging, there is an underappreciated longer security risk. This organization presents a possible new partner for al-Qaeda.”

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

February 4, 2004

Jess Sadick has an interesting paper at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies: "The Globalization of Hamas Terrorism." In it he notes, as has been noted here, that Hamas has plans for America and Canada:

There is evidence that Hamas has discussed attacking targets in the US and Canada and has recruited foreign nationals who could be used to carry out such operations. US policymakers need to understand the threat posed by Hamas' emerging pan-Islamic interpretation of jihad and its perceived role in the global anti-American jihad. In the meantime, Hamas' rhetoric adds to the incitement fueling the jihadist movement worldwide, especially in encouraging young Muslims to go to fight US forces in Iraq.

The full report, which is fascinating, is at the FDD site as a pdf.

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Hussein Ibish of the ADC has taken a potshot at Daniel Pipes and Jihad Watch director Robert Spencer in a Philadelphia Inquirer op-ed.

The idea that Islam, and by extension Muslims, are inherently violent and irrational has become commonplace in our culture. . . .

Since 9/11, right-wing evangelical preachers such as Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell, and commentators such as Robert Spencer and Daniel Pipes, have spared no effort to spread fear and hatred of Islam and the growing American Muslim community.

This defamation probably has its greatest parallel in the anti-Semitic ideas that took hold in American culture between the First and Second World Wars. . . .

Violence, extremism and intolerance are universal human failings. They certainly are not particular to any culture or faith.

Pipes and Spencer sent this reply to the Inquirer:

How ironic that in an article purporting to deplore stereotyping and misrepresentation (“Violence is a human, not an Islamic trait,” op-ed, Feb. 1), Hussein Ibish resorts to his own mudslinging – in particular against ourselves.

Mr. Ibish falsely states that we have propagated the idea that “Islam, and by extension Muslims, are inherently violent and irrational.” We challenge him to document such a statement by either of us. Nor is their any more truth to his calumny that either of us has “spread fear and hatred of Islam and the growing American Muslim community.”

Rather what we have done, consistently and repeatedly, is point out the dangers of the totalitarian movement known as radical (or militant) Islam, one which threatens Muslims no less than the rest of humanity.

Mr. Ibish’s defamation also has a darker undercurrent. Whatever Mr. Ibish’s own views may be – and he loudly proclaims himself not to be a supporter of radical Islam – the fact is that in this and his other writings, he waves away the grisly record of radical Islam. Imagine a German in the 1930s dismissing Nazi atrocities, as Ibish writes about radical Islam’s violence, by saying that “violence, extremism and intolerance are universal human failings.”

This pattern has recurred throughout his career. Like the Italian Fascists who ignored Mussolini’s crimes but praised his efficiency in making the trains run on time, Ibish once lauded Hamas (which President Bush calls “one of the deadliest terrorist organizations in the world today”) for “running hospitals and schools and orphanages.”

In his Inquirer op-ed, Mr. Ibish has once again acted as an apologist for the crimes of a brutal totalitarian movement. He thereby makes himself one of its cadres.

In this context, that Mr. Ibish then dares compare our views to those of anti-Semites of the 1930s is a bit rich; and even more so when one realizes that the radical Islam he praises is the main source of anti-Semitism today, one which threatens a new Holocaust against Jews.

All this would be laughable were it not for the respect the media accords this man’s reckless and defamatory statements. We deeply regret that this newspaper has opened its pages to such an extremist as Hussein Ibish.

Daniel Pipes and Robert Spencer

| 16 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Norway's Aftenposten reports that Norwegian authorities are helping young people "with immigrant backgrounds" flee forced marriages. The immigrant backgrounds are never identified, but Norway has a sizable Islamic community, and of course arranged marriages are common in the Islamic world. It is refreshing that the Norwegians aren't legalizing forced marriage in the name of pluralism. (Thanks to jboxell and Susan.)

Norwegian authorities last year arranged new identities and other assistance for nearly 60 youth with immigrant backgrounds. All feared they'd be forced to enter into arranged marriages.

One local agency that offers assistance (SEIF, Selvhjelp for innvandrere og flyktninger) said pleas for help have tripled during the last five years.

The number of crisis cases skyrocketed after a young woman in Sweden was killed by her father in 2002, after she pursued a romantic relationship of her choice. A third of those seeking help in Norway are under age 18.

Even though many are equipped with new legal identities, new addresses and a portable alarm that summons police if they feel threatened, most say they won't feel secure until they're also allowed to change the number that everyone resident in Norway is issued by the government.

Many of those seeking help are escorted by teachers in whom they've confided at local public schools. Not all are girls who fear their fathers will force them to marry cousins or others handpicked by the parents. Several boys also have sought help, fearing for their lives if they refuse to accept the wife chosen by their parents.

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Bernard Lewis's reputation is richly deserved, but everyone has blind spots. Several appear in an admiring piece by Peter Waldman in the Wall Street Journal entitled "A Historian’s Take on Islam Steers U.S. in Terrorism Fight: Bernard Lewis’s Blueprint — Sowing Arab Democracy — Is Facing a Test in Iraq." (Thanks to Bassam Madany.) In it is this paragraph:

Mr. Lewis is also close to government circles in Israel and Turkey—non-Arab lands he describes as the only successful modern states in the region. He warmly praises Kemal Attaturk, who made Turkey a secular republic after World War I by suppressing Islam. (He has also said the Ottoman Turks’ killing of up to 1.5 million Armenians in 1915 wasn’t genocide but the brutal byproduct of war. It was a stance for which a French court convicted Mr. Lewis in 1995 under France’s Holocaust-denial statute, imposing a token penalty.) Israeli experts say Mr. Lewis’s contacts with Turkish generals and politicians helped cement Israeli-Turkish military ties in the 1990s.

Not genocide, eh? It was not only genocide; it was jihad. I examine the historical record in Onward Muslim Soldiers. In 1894, long before World War I, the Ottoman government began killing Armenians. According to the Chief Dragoman (Turkish interpreter) of the British embassy, when the Turks initiated the first wave of the Armenian genocide in 1894, they were "guided in their general action by the prescriptions of the Sheri [Sharia] Law. That law prescribes that if the 'rayah' [dhimmi] Christian attempts, by having recourse to foreign powers, to overstep the limits of privileges allowed them by their Mussulman [Muslim] masters, and free themselves from their bondage, their lives and property are to be forfeited, and are at the mercy of the Mussulmans. To the Turkish mind the Armenians had tried to overstep those limits by appealing to foreign powers, especially England. They therefore considered it their religious duty and a righteous thing to destroy and seize the lives and properties of the Armenians." (Vahakn Dadrian, The History of the Armenian Genocide, Berghahn Books, 1995. P. 147.)

The New York Times reported it in 1915: "Both Armenians and Greeks, the two native Christian races of Turkey, are being systematically uprooted from their homes en masse and driven forth summarily to distant provinces, where they are scattered in small groups among Turkish Villages and given the choice between immediate acceptance of Islam or death by the sword or starvation." ("Turks are Evicting Native Christians," New York Times, July 11, 1915.)

Over a million Armenians were killed -- mostly noncombatants.

The French were right to convict Lewis.

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Here is more cold water poured upon the idea that the Saudis are really going to stop supporting terrorist activity. Like most jihadists, they just don't call it that. But adhering to Islamic Sharia law in its fullness means adhering to the call to make war against unbelievers until they convert to Islam or submit to Islamic rule -- what Americans have come to know as the "lesser jihad." This from Gulf News, with thanks to Nicolei:

Saudi Arabia's leaders vowed yesterday not to deviate "an inch" from Islamic Sharia law.

"We in the kingdom are committed to Islamic law in our relations, commitments and decisions... This is our only faith which we would never substitute or deviate from, not even an inch," the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques King Fahd and Crown Prince Abdullah said in a joint message to pilgrims performing the annual Haj.

"(Islam) rules our domestic and foreign policy and our private and public dealings," they said.

In messages Monday to mark Eid Al Adha, King Fahd and Prince Abdullah also praised US President George W. Bush for leading the war against terror.

"I have been pleased by what you mentioned regarding the lessons that can be learnt by the Islamic nation by the sacrifice of the Prophet Abraham," said King Fahd in a message read on state-owned television.

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Here is a sign of hope that the love of life that is natural to the human spirit will win out over the bizarre culture of death nurtured by radical Islam (as Maulana Inyadullah of al-Qaeda once put it: "The Americans love Pepsi-Cola, we love death"). From AP:

A Chechen suicide bomber who was arrested after failing to detonate an explosive in a Moscow cafe last summer said in an interview published Tuesday that she had lost her will to die and purposely tried to attract attention to herself.

Zarema Muzhakhoyeva, 23, was detained in July after her strange behavior attracted the attention of security guards at Mon Cafe, a restaurant just off a main avenue leading to the Kremlin. A bomb disposal expert, Maj. Georgy Trofimov, was killed trying to defuse the explosive that she had carried in a bag and left on the sidewalk.

The arrest sent jitters through the Russian capital, still shaken by a double suicide-bombing at a Moscow rock concert five days earlier that killed the two attackers and 14 other people.

Muzhakhoyeva faces charges of terrorism, conspiracy to murder two or more people, and illegal possession and transfer of weapons, the Izvestia daily reported. If convicted, she could spend 25 years in prison.

Muzhakhoyeva told Izvestia that she hopes for acquittal under a law lifting criminal responsibility from people who warn of a terrorist act or its preparation. She described doing her best to attract attention to herself without provoking punishment from the controllers she was sure were following her - and who, she was convinced, could detonate her bomb by remote control.

"Briefly, I decided to surrender with the bomb and hide from everyone in prison - even though they could get me in prison, too," Muzhakhoyeva was quoted as saying. . . .

On the day the cafe attack was planned, the two men drove her to the square in front of St. Basil's Cathedral, at the end of Red Square, and instructed her to flag down a car to get to the cafe. She stared at the driver in the rearview mirror and muttered verses from the Quran, hoping he would turn her in to the police. But he dropped her off at her destination and sped away.

Muzhakhoyeva walked up to the plate glass front of the cafe and stuck out her tongue at men inside, then smirked. A trio of men came out, asked for her passport and asked what was in her bag.

"An explosive," she said. Within minutes, she was in police custody.

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

As I show in Onward Muslim Soldiers, the Muslim Brotherhood was the first modern radical Islamic organization, and most of today's radical groups are linked to it in one way or another. But the Brotherhood itself lives on. MEMRI reports on several recent interviews given recently by its new leader, Muhammad Mahdi Othman 'Akef:

In an interview with the Egyptian pro-Nasserite weekly Al-Arabi, 'Akef spoke about suicide bombing operations: "The Muslim Brotherhood movement condemns all bombings in the independent Arab and Muslim countries. But the bombings in Palestine and Iraq are a [religious] obligation. This is because these two countries are occupied countries, and the occupier must be expelled in every way possible. Thus, the [Muslim Brotherhood] movement supports martyrdom operations in Palestine and Iraq in order to expel the Zionists and the Americans." . . .

'Akef discussed Israeli civilian casualties resulting from Palestinian operations in Israel, telling the Saudi daily Al-Watan: "In Israel, there should be no [differentiation between] a civilian and a member of the military. All are enemies of the Arab homeland and of Islam. They are occupiers and have no right to one handsbreadth of the land of Palestine…

"We should differentiate between Jews and Zionists. The Jews have rights by virtue of their being the People of the Book [Ahl Al-Kitab, according to Islam], provided they are not occupiers. With regard to the Zionists, we will resist them with all our strength."

These rights, of course, are only the second-class status of the dhimmis.

In response to a question by the Egyptian weekly Al-Arabi on "relations with the U.S," 'Akef said: "We have no relations with the U.S. It is a Satan that abuses the region, lacking all morality and law." 'Akef also denied any "secret dialogue between the Americans and the [Muslim] Brotherhood," saying that this is "an unfounded lie."

Interesting. That rumor has circulated in connection with the recent appointment to the University of Notre Dame of Tariq Ramadan, the controversian grandson of the Muslim Brotherhood's founder, Hasan Al-Banna. Evidently it has circulated widely enough to make 'Akef take the trouble to deny it.

'Akef continues:

"The [American] tyranny is long known. In the past, they fought secretly, and now they are fighting openly. There is no logic or law in the world that agrees to their occupation of Iraq [and] before that of Palestine, or to what is happening. Allah is helping Syria, which found no savior. Had the Arab and Muslim countries been united, America and Israel would not have been able to withstand them.

This is why radical Muslims want to restore the caliphate, thus (they hope) restoring the unity of the Muslim world, so that it can fight more effectively against its enemies. 'Akef also exhibits some of the conspiracy paranoia that is so common in the Islamic world these days as a rationalization for defeat:

"I am certain that without the betrayal in Iraq, the Iraqis would have tormented the Americans with all kinds of torments. The American forces would not have remained [in Iraq]. I expect America to collapse soon. The elements of this collapse in America [already] exist, and Allah is the Savior."

'Akef adds a denial of Al-Qaeda responsibility for 9/11:

In response to the question from the Saudi daily Al-Watan, "Don't you think that the September [11, 2001] events are justification of America's [activity] in Afghanistan?" 'Akef said: "This is a false statement, because [America] has no proof. They held no fair trial for those arrested on the charge of the September explosion. All they say is a list of names whom they claim bear the responsibility for the September events. If [the Americans] provided proof of the truth of their version, I would fight together with the Americans and join President Bush in this war."

Regarding the claim that "the Al-Qa'ida organization acknowledged responsibility for these operations in the videocassettes aired on several Arab television channels," 'Akef said: "I do not pay any attention to these films, because they are part of the psychological war between these people [Al-Qa'ida] and the American administration.

"These cassettes came in response to the American operations. Washington must prove by trial that they [Al-Qa'ida] are the ones who carried out the explosions in September."

And on Europe and America:

On the question regarding the effect the veil ban will have on the future of Islam in Europe, 'Akef said: "I have complete faith that Islam will invade Europe and America, because Islam has logic and a mission.

"The Europeans and the Americans will come into the bosom of Islam out of conviction. In 1993, I went to America and I published a book, 'Political Pluralism and the Woman,' that was distributed in the mosque. Thirty [American] women converted immediately to Islam as soon as they read it. These are people who become convinced of the right path – but who will guide them there?"

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook |