"All this jaw about jihad": just "tosh"?

Melanie Phillips has kindly alerted me to a Peter Preston piece in the Guardian: "All this jaw about jihad is just tosh," subtitled "It is crazy to confect an image of a world ravaged by violence."

Preston seems to think that the White House created the terror threat, and that they're still at it with the recent grounding of airplanes:

One thing - subconsciously, as we now say in polite society - goes with another. Just like the CIA and George Bush. Finally on the back foot about duff Iraqi dossiers? Can't understand how all those pesky WMD got lost? Then here comes another babble of awful warnings, rubbishing British Airways and Air France schedules (with Continental as an afterthought) but leaving United, American and the rest magically untouched. Does Osama have a frequent flyer deal with BA? Why can't Halliburton run airlines too?

It is all pretty desperate stuff - even by the standards of this White House and the chattering chorus of mystic messages they rely on whenever the political heat turns sweaty. Sure, Baghdad is a bit of a bust. But look what we got on those al-Qaida guys!

Preston touts a new book by Emmanuel Todd, whom he describes as "a distinguished Parisian demographer and historian":

Al-Qaida, Todd concludes, "is a band of mentally disturbed but ingenious terrorists". No more; no less. "It emerged from within a relatively small and circumscribed part of the planet, Saudi Arabia, even if Bin Laden recruited a few Egyptian turncoats and a handful of lost souls from the poor suburbs of western Europe.

"However, America is trying to portray al-Qaida as an omnipresent terrorist threat, as evil as it is widespread - from Bosnia to the Philippines, from Chechnya to Pakistan, from Libya to Yemen - thus legitimising any punitive action it might take anywhere at any time. This elevation of terrorism into a universal force institutionalises a permanent state of war across the globe."

I agree, as should be clear in Onward Muslim Soldiers, that it is unlikely that all Islamic terror activity around the world can be ascribed to Al-Qaeda. But to say that these threats have been manufactured in America to legitimize military activity is just naive, or worse.

Preston goes on, quoting Todd:

We may reasonably worry about places like Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, where such change has barely started. "But one can in no way deduce the existence of universal terrorism from the anti-American feelings of the populations of two Muslim countries, both intimately linked to America's power structure. A large part of the Muslim world is already in the process of finding a new peaceful equilibrium." Too much mindless jaw about jihad is tosh. . . .

Where, please, is the evidence of universal threat that underpins this all-justifying "war on terror"?

Preston concludes with a nice rhetorical jab, calling the terror threat "a weapon of mass delusion."

That's neat, and will be quite popular in some circles. But let's look a little more closely. I suppose Preston believes and would have us believe that in the last few days, the CIA or some even more secretive arm of the Bush clan and Halliburton has, besides creating airline scares:

• Produced this British jihadist video;
• Set up some poor stiffs in Italy as Al-Qaeda operatives;
• Paid off a Saudi cleric to pray before millions at the Hajj (which was filled with troops to forestall a terrorist attack): "Oh God, give victory to the mujahedeen (holy warriors) everywhere. . . . Give them victory in Palestine. Oh God, make the Muslims triumphant and destroy their enemies, and make this country and other Muslim countries safe. Oh God, inflict your wrath on the criminal Zionists";
• Staged a bomb attack on an Indonesian cafe in the name of jihad;
• Ordered Norway to keep holding a Muslim leader they want to blame for terrorist attacks in Iraq;
• Forced a Pakistani nuclear scientist to admit that he gave nuclear secrets to Islamic states and rogue regimes;
• Planted jihadist literature in an Australian bookstore and on a radical Muslim website;
• Persuaded the French to announce that they had foiled a plot by Muslim radicals in Mali;
• Claimed that another member of the Al-Qaeda cell that operated in Lackawanna, New York has been caught in Yemen.

Let's see: Britain, France, Italy, Norway, Australia, Pakistan, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Mali, the United States, and Yemen, all involved in various ways in news items having to do with jihadist activity since January 29. I suppose Preston would say that these are all manufactured. No doubt Mossad has a hand in it all as well.

| 10 Comments
Print | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

10 Comments

From the original article: "There is turbulence in the change, to be sure. Bin Laden is turbulence. "

So that's what happened on 9/11 - turbulence.

jay

The pathetic scribblings of a second-tier thinker at a left-wing newspaper fortunately have no traction at State, the CIA or the White House. That said, these thoughts of a naif identify that the Fifth Estate generates a disproportionate number of islamist apologists, whose wrtings must constantly be monitored and debunked.

Robert, you have him pegged. We should sign him at the "Flat Earth Society" and get him in touch with all those conspiracy theorists at the tabloids. Ooops, he already is one! Pardon me.

He just doesnt care about Islamic terrorism, and if it ever did affect him then he would blame the US for making the terrorists upset.*sigh*
So all in all, he doesn't blame islamists and terrorists for what they do, and nothing could ever convince him.
I'm sure the local Imam will be knocking on his door to convert him after reading this piece!

Well. After reading this piece I've come to a few conclusions. The first being that Preston's first name is certainly fitting for him. You know, I don't figure that a reporter or journalist would have the ability to do his or her job properly without staying current on the world events around them.

Through all of the different channels the news is provided, this, and many other lefty writers must either be blind or just plain ignorant to their surroundings. My guess is the latter.

When Paul O'Neill (spelling) came forward in front of the world with the many accusations he presented, I don't remember him mentioning any conspiracy about the United States Government manipulating us with terrorism. That was a perfect opportunity, on national television, for someone that was involved in the daily workings of the Bush administration to make that statement, yet, nothing was uttered from him.

I really enjoy all of the commentary that I see on this site from everyone.

With that being said, I think that this liberal jackass has gotten enough of my time. He is just one in a long line of cheek turners that are tucked away safely, writing crap articles that are disrespectful to the country that gives them the right to do so, while our soldiers are being shot at by non-bathing, foul-smelling, cave-rat terrorists. What does he care? Just another thumb sucker.


D.C. Watson

I don`t understand one thing:are these liberals suicidal?!
It is impossible for them not to see the threat of ISLAM against this country as well as against the whole civilized world.
Are these people ready to sacrifice themselves,their children and grandchildren,this country,just for the sake of being politically corect?!
If Todd thinks muslim terrorism is exagerated,is he willing to travel to a muslim country and show everybody there his american passport?!

The big difference between liberal and conservative journalists - what few there are - is that conservative journalists KNOW that they are conservative. Most liberal journalists think that they are mainstream.

jay

I suppose Bush wrote the Koran, too.

"Where, please, is the evidence of universal threat that underpins this all-justifying "war on terror"?"

http://www.ridgewoodcameraclub.org/Photo%20Gallery/9-11-01.3PM.jpg

I don't know whether I hate or pity these 10th September people.

I AGREE WITH ROBERT SPENCER FULLY. WORLD NEEDS TO WATCH FOR ISLAMIC MILITANTS IN EVERY NATION.