Statement From The Supporters Of Shari’ah On Sheikh Yasin

yassin.story.jpeg
Yassin: No negotiations, no compromise, no peace without total jihad victory

When world leaders tut-tut over the death of Yassin, these people take heart. Is this kind of thinking really something that Jack Straw wants to encourage? From Supporters of Shari'ah via Jihad Unspun, with thanks to Nicolei:

Supporters Of Shari’ah condemns in the strongest terms the Zionists criminal assassination of Shaykh Ahmad Isma'il Yasin, the renowned Islamic scholar and founder of the leading Palestinian Resistance Movement - Hamas.

• We reiterate the Zionist Entity does not have the right to exist in its illegitimate capacity as the so-called “state of israel”.

• We reiterate that the Zionist Entity is a colonialist-imposed state, which the colonialists never had the right to give to the jews after robbing Muslim Lands including Palestine via colonialism and its policy of divide and rule.

• Justifying its right to exist is tantamount to supporting colonialism, as the Zionist Entity is itself a by-product of colonialism. Any State supporting the Zionist Entity is either a colonialist sympathiser or an actual colonialist state like Britain; who has shown through its continual support for the existence of the Zionist Entity that it has never really severed itself from its colonialist past.

• The only legitimate solution is a solution derived from the Islamic Shari’ah. All other Laws including International Law have no legitimacy for Islam and Muslims.

• The Zionist Government and its citizens can either peacefully surrender, dissolve the Zionist Entity and migrate to non-Muslim territories (like Austria, Germany, Poland, UK etc), or face a permanent state of war against Muslims until the Zionist Entity is physically destroyed in its entirety.

• The Zionist Entity has officially been a war zone since its illegal conception in 1948; no individual life is guaranteed safety on this occupied soil.

• Muslims have the obligation to conduct this war through Jihad operations [i.e., suicide bombings and more] and to support the cause militarily, financially and verbally - against the colonialist-imposed Zionist Entity and those States who give it military, financial, or vocal support. Such States are belligerent enemies to Islam and Muslims.

• Our Muslim Martyrs shall remain alive with Paradise as their Eternal Reward, but the dead Disbelievers will be cast into the Hellfire and abide therein Forever.

Supporters Of Shari’ah
Enemies Of Israel & Her Allies

| 23 Comments
Print | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

23 Comments

This has just GOTTA sound better in Arabic...

And now you wonder, (scratches head), "Why is it that Israel can't make peace with the Palestinians??" Gee, It's such a difficult question to answer.

I SHAKE IN MY SHOES. IT REALY JUST SUPPORTS THE BELEIF THAT THESE PEOPLE ARE PITIFUL. FULL OF HATE FOR EVERYONE THAT HAS RULE AND LAWS AS A BASIS OF CIVILIZATION INSTEAD OF FINATISISM.

Peter:

STOP SHOUTING!!! Don't worry, we're listening to you (and we'd listen closer if you'd use spell check)

I disagree with Israel's policy of using missiles and bombs to assassinate terrorists leaders. I believe even with vermin like the Israel-eradicating Palestinians, rules of law and war must prevail. Sharon is pushing things too far. Killing innocents by collateral damage is barely acceptable even in a full scale war. Israel will never be able to satisfy 90% of her critics but it shouldn't alienate those that might. Don't get me wrong, killing that Sheik was a positive thing, but what about the six others who died alongside him?

"what about the six others who died alongside him?"

Well, for a start, it's a pity there weren't a few dozen other Islamist psychopath wheelchairguards killed along with the "spiritual leader". But, then, that's the outcome of Israel carefully controlling collateral damage. There just isn't much of it.

As for the six crispies, live by the sword...

Jakester, In a perfect world, they would not have died. But tell me something... If this sheik had of been Adolf Hitler in 1945 and he was surrounded by six of his SS generals, would you be as upset about their deaths, in the same way as you are about Yassin's bodyguards?

People who support evil men should not be surprised when they also find themselves as targets in the target site of someone else's cross hairs.

Perhaps a bit dry, but informative nonetheless...

http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/casey_rivkin200403250848.asp

I was pleased to hear that the missile which took out yassin was a direct hit, leaving only his greasy little head rolling down the alley..hopefully he saw the missile in the instant
before his dispatch to hell!
willy

Anyone remember it was A 19 year old with a gun who started WWI ?

Sorry Jakester, but I believe Israel has demonstrated way to much retraint over the years when dealing with Hamas, and its founder and Spiritual leader Sheik Yassin who has been blowing up people indiscriminatly for years. Last count was estimated to be 377 souls of which 51 where Americans, not to mention all the children he has killed. Jakester; Read the 36 articles of the Hamas Charter if you can stomach them. Sheik Yassin was Israels Osama Bin Laden.

Zionist state is a colonial entity.

Why did 'nt you mention it three thousand years ago? Oh i forgot you were not around then !
ah ! what's the use. what we sorely need is a some western jihad of our own.

Paula,you are 100 % right.
But don`t forget this is 2004 not 1945.
If Hitler and his SS bodyguards were killed today,it would have triggered an international uproar,depending ofcourse on who exactly did the killing.
What i`m saying here is the fact that in 1945 there was no political corectness and no liberal media,and thank god for that.
Unfortunatelly in 2004 the liberal oriented media and their political correct "dictatorship" along with the activist judges, are making more damage than the terrorists themselves,for they are weakening the moral basis of this nation and its capacity to defend itself.

Correction adela
there are still no liberal media today! they have stolen the liberal mantle under which they hide as the New left or the marxist left.
Since the murderous actions of marxist POL POT and the khmer rouge they have changed their identity to "liberals", a label which is still untainted in the perceptions of the public.
Nazis have tried the same ploys and largely failed.
You are of course quite right
If the Israelis targetted and killed Adolf Hitler and Himmler today they would be presented as murderers by most of the British press.

wow adela you are so influenced by the conservative system your choice of word is straight out of sean hannitys mouth.

liberal media
political correctness
activist judges (did you pull that one from the state of the union address)

we dont live in the 1950's anymore and im glad that we dont.

you do not want a palistinian state or for them to have there own land and peace of mind you probably would be happy if they where ethnicaly clensed and forced to move to lebanon,egypt,syria,etc...

and whats scary is i suspect you will probably get your wish

Joey, activist Judges have been interpreting our Constitutional laws from the bench. It's a fact. When will you understand that it usn't ethnic cleansing we want, it's simply peace throughout.

You being a liberal should understand this. I don't want death to come upon anyone. By the same token, I don't want anyone bringing death upon my family or myself. I also refuse to bow to Islamic rule. Simply because I don't agree with it.

You continue to call everyone racists and Nazis on this site. I believe you've mistaken our defiance to Islamic extremists as racism, which in turn is not helping your cause to appear intelligent.

D.C.

You don't look too smart by accusing folks of plagarism when you disagree with them. Do you deny that political correctness has become the law of the land? How do you refute the findings of the MRC, who have demonstrated conclusively over and over again that the media are biased (hint: when was the last time you read about a "liberal" action group or senator)?

When the Palestinians decide to stop murdering innocent people and stop rejoicing in the streets over the deaths of our own countrymen, then I will support their right to a state. Giving murderers and their support apparatus a permanent base of operations is simply suicide.

Adela,
I agree with you. Joey, when are you going to wake up and smell the coffee? Just like in Vietnam, when Ho Chi Mihn declared that the American Left (the war protesters) were his second front against the Americans - that is a domestic front. The American Left is continually trying undermine the actions of Americans trying to defend themselves. Americans die in battle so that you can sit there behind your computer and sip your coffee and tell us what you really think about our "conservative" views. There is a reason they call "the right" right.

its funny every time when there was basically a ceasefire of suicide bombings what does israel do it then prevokes the palistians by either doing a "targeted killing",incursion,or bulldozing or blowing up houses. hamas then responds with a suicide attack and the whole cycle repeats. now i wont say that hamas is innocent because they are not but every time in past year in a half of some attempt at a new peace plan it has almost always been israel who has destroyed it. and by peace what do you want. if its for the palistinans to stop attacking israel then it has to be done in a way where both sides stop. it cannot be that the palistians have to stop but israel continues to do incursions and targeted killing because if that is the case then the violence will never stop until israel completely baracades itself with a wall or expels the palistians from the region completely...

and by the way why cant you not call me joseph that is by name i do not make some prickish play on anyones name here. you all do not agree with me but at least give me respect by using my proper name

Joey,

You are less than respectful yourself. I have seen you call people morons, dimwits, racists, etc. Also, I for one don't respect your fuzzy, inconsistent ideas, off-topic comments, and general blather. Sorry, but you are Joey to me.

Joseph, If you read the article of topic in the first place, you'll notice that they want more death and destruction to avenge their fallen sheikh. Does this tell you anything?

Like I said in an earlier post...Sheikh Yassin, in pace requiescat, in the lake of fire. He was an evil man, wanting the total obliteration of Israel at any cost. The world is for now, a better place with him heading toward judgement.

I say for now, because another goof will eventually be considered the new leader of this mass of murderers. You should look at what you're saying on here, you really should. Joey, the fly in sanity's soup.

Joseph,
Go read the Hamas charter! There is no peace for Israel, only its destruction. Its right there in black and white.
The only peace Hamas wants is the temporary one that allows them to rest and become stronger so they may rise up another day to defeat their enemies.
Can someone please tell me what this is called. I thought it was an Islamic term. I can't remember.
anyway, Israel is quite aware of what Hamas's meaning of peace is. Its unfortunate that no other country outside of Israel does

Joey, Joey, Joey.

You are so full of vague and unverifiable statements about Israel and Hamas. Like "Israel starts it just about every time," as if it's some game like checkers where you get one move and then your opponent has to move.