Scotsman.com reports on claims by terror suspect Jack Roche to have had lunch with Bin Laden in March 2000. (Thanks to Jean-Luc.)
“Yeah a very nice man ... I would rather meet him than George Bush I can tell you,” he told the reporter. “He is a very nice man, but I only met him for a short time ... just outside Kandahar.”Roche told the reporter he sat down to start eating, “and I looked across and I said ‘whoah – that’s like the bloke on the telly.”’
Prosecutors say Roche was in Afghanistan to undergo explosives training with al-Qaida.
Roche, a convert to Islam said,
“If someone punches you, you are allowed to punch them back. I am very concerned about my brothers and sisters of Islam who are being punched by these people,” Roche said during the interview.
Oh yeah, a very nice man! What a load of bullshit! He's such a nice man and yet he's hiding from our troops, let me guess, he's done nothing wrong. And, no, he's not teaching others where to strike next. This Roche needs to be shot. Nuke both the bastards, we don't need them breathing anymore!
One million dead as a result of alledged US santions, over 3 million dead since 1980 as a result of Muslim militancy.
Yeah, he picked the right side.
And just what did this man do? Oh, he "plotted" and he "conspired". He committed no overt act whatsoever other than embracing Islam. Oh, and he may once have had lunch with Shiekh bin Ladin, who may have exchanged a few polite words with him.
Well, there is no doubt, is there? He is guilty of being Muslim. Torture and abuse him and send him off to one of your concentration camps!
I beseech you: stop warring against Almighty Allah (swt) and oppressing the believers. Embrace Islam and know true peace and freedom by submitting to Allah's (swt) divine will.
Allahu akbar
Reza,
And what did this man do?”
Did you actually, read the article, or just make the assumption that since he was a Muslim, he could do nothing wrong? He briefly met your beloved “Minister of Peace” Usama bin Laden while in Afghanistan learning how to make explosives for a truck bombing of the Israeli embassy in Canberra.
He is not guilty of “being a Muslim.” He is guilty of plotting a mass murder.
Just another glowing example of how Islam purports to spread “true peace and freedom” to the rest of the world.
Oh My! I only want to take your women and your beautiful children and use them as my sex slaves and destroy all the ways of the west!
Thank You No! Now in NJ they can't profile this is what happens when you elect libs they cannot see what is in front of them only what is behind. just look at the 9/11 comis. we should have spent that 15mil. on radios or some thing And now N.Y.C is cry-ing for more money but felt it important to build an oprah center what is with that? look at how your city people are spending your money is it on Parks or on what will protect you this is what is important!!OR would have protection in the furture! And the Calls to prayer in America broadcast 5 times a day LIBS this is what we will get more of with Kerry do you think that the French will protect you well go to france than! Me I am American and will not live in Fear! We the American People Know what the words Stricget Reserves mean that is so when things get bad like the arabs stop pumping oil our farmers can still feed us and our jets can fly. This high gas price is cause you elected libs to the Senate the house passed the enegery bill in 2002 this is 2004 and the senate is still try-ing to bring Bush down and can't see what has been in front of their faces.
And do what is right for the American People Let us hope november is not to late to get a change of the gaurd meaning the libs out and anyone who will not fight to protect America. Now the Dems in the Senate want to get rid of the Patriot Act would that be to put the Wall Back in Place that will stop the people trying to find the bad guys or what?
Pissed off today
Part of the American Tribe
God Bless the USA and Her Fighting Forces and All who Fight with her give them Strength and Courage to stay the Course to Victory Amen
Remember there are many Fighting Forces in this prayer not all carry a gun ! Although my thought is you should have one near
bob-
the only thing i see islam
being able to spread
is people who can't/don't/won't
think for themselves.
some sort of sin apparently.
God?(Allah!) gave us intelligence
only so he could punish us for it.
he's a cruel sadistic bastard.
besides ,everything is already determined.
go back to sleep,Reza.
"In the home of the brave Jefferson turning over in his grave. Fools glorify themselves trying to manipulate Satan" Bob Dylan Slow Train Coming 1979.
The terms liberal and conservative are thrown around a lot and most people (like myself) in this country probably are pretty middle of the road, which is moderately conservative. The true liberal probably fits Jack Roche who probably has a lot in common with the American Taliban who now sits in jail.
These folks like all liberals share two common traits, gullibilty and rebellion. For all the good they want to do they cannot escape these two flaws. Hitler often fooled people in the 1930's because they would have lunch with him and he would seem harmless. All they had to do was pick up Mein Kampf but they didn't. Before September 11 anyone could read the newspapers to see what Bin Laden was responsible for but he seemed nice to those that interviewed him.
Liberals are easily fooled by folks that embrace other religions or ways of life. To them they are exploring and not part of the mainstream which they hate. It's been happening in this country for the better part of 40 years with the "cool" types embracing first "Eastern religions and now cults like Scientology. They have contempt for what others do. They try to push the envelope embracing the "far out" and seeing everyone as the victim from Judas to Bin Laden. All of their actions can be excused. In their mind, it was all that damn mainstream, boring thought that corrupted them.
Bob Dylan's controversial 1979 masterpiece points out all of these themes. He himself was attacked for embracing religion and pointing out the hypocrisy of his 1960's friends. The album was recorded 25 years ago and it was a harbinger of things to come. Shortly after it's release Iran held us hostage and the world hasn't been the same since.
Very astute and intellectually provocative analysis, DJH.
Thank you
I am starting to get tired of hearing muslims like Reza complaining about sanctions, as if the UN just spun a big wheel and randomly chose a country to apply sanctions to....
The dead are dead as a result of sanctions? The Sanctions were applied as a result of the subhuman actions or inaction of their rulers...SO the dead are dead as a result of their own governments...
Spoiled children use this tactic...You made me miss the fun! You grounded me! No thought of what THEY DID to rate the punishment!
Same with the Crusades..Any non-muslim that apologizes to a muslim is crazy and a bit ignorant..What prompted the Crusades? Islamic Jihad is the answer.
Reza does your religion allow you to be this immature and dishonest?
Hehehe... (Rhetorical Question)
so what happens if kerry wins and the dem's take back the seats?
Sanctions are placed on nations whose Governments are corrupt, dishonest, and threatening to other cultures.
Don't try to explain this to Reza, it's a complete waste of time. He's one Jihad supporter that we'll never be able to get through to. Brainwashed to the point of actually believing that bin Laden is a good person. Brainwashed into believing that Muslims and especially Muslim fanatics can do no wrong.
Brainwashed into thinking that America is going to be an Islamic state. While his skull is dense, his rationale and idealogy is paper thin.
Remember, he supports a faction that will walk in front of a tank and be shot or run down, because they're told that they'll go to paradise if they do it. Islam's biggest problem outside of being elitests, is the fact that their illiteracy rate is astounding.
Reza, and the others like him are simply members of a cult, trying to pass itself off as a true religion. Perhaps at one time over the last 1400 years, Islam may have been respected as a religion. However, people like Reza, who tell us our grandchildren will be Muslim, and who tell us our Armed Forces are cowards, further ruin the Islamic cult every time they open their mouthes and speak, or move their fingers to type. People like Reza dig Islam into a deeper hole every time they spread commentary like this.
Forget reasoning with him, it's no use. They lie, they steal, the rape, they torture, they kill, and they mutilate dead bodies. Yes, they are truly the "religion of peace, love, and equality."
Roche is is an extreme version of the english poms we have let into our country and now control it along with all the other immigrants. I went to England to work but they wouldn´t allow me to live and work there without a passport, so I had to take the crap jobs then when I came back to Australia and went to Sydney I found that the English immigrants in the agencies wouldn´t employ me as they had all ¨these english candidates with better experience¨ well no fuckin wonder when they refused me the experience in England. So now I can´t lkive in Sydney and have to go back to one job creek in the outback. THEY REFUSE ME THE RIGHT TO LIVE THERE AND I AM CORNISH. Message for Roche - cockroaches like you are legitmate targets for resistance by me....should the government release you, I promise you I will find you and kill you as an example of the occupation of Cornwall by the english and all the other problems you English have caused Australians in Australia....
Reza, the only time I'd "embrace" islam would be to squeeze the life out of it. Islam has an absurd sense of 'manifest destiny,' as if all non-muslims are simply too stupid to decide for themselves what they believe and should, therefore, be presented with a false choice between accepting dhimmitude or becoming a muslim.
Allah--puke be upon him--will never be my god.
Ummmm......Bob, until Islam and Muslims begin to behave like they belong to a peaceful faith, I will consider them nothing more than a jailhouse cult. Buddhists, Jews, Shintos, Hindus, in my eyes are all followers of true and prudent religion. So please, spare me with the lecture.
I know, and have seen enough about Islam to tell me that if they worshipped a true God like they claim, they wouldn't do what they do. Until they correct themselves, and reform their "faith", they get no kudos from me.
DCWatson,
Who gets to demarcate between a cult and a religion? You?
I didn't say they weren't violent or expansionist, but they ARE a religion, whether we like it, or not.
Anyone can call it anything they want to call it. I choose the term cult. That's the way it's going to stay until I'm convinced otherwise.
Free country, free speech, free expression of opinions. Arguement complete. Move on.
Bob Owens
Thank you for the kind words. You certainly have some inciteful posts yourself. There are some great posters on here. God knows I could probably read Hugh for hours. It's too bad someone couldn't publish some of these posts. There are soms loons that post here but they shouldn't take away from those like Hugh that really make you think.
I must take exception to your comments on Catholic priests being more of a threat than radical Islam. The highest percentage of any diocese in the US where priests were accused of sexual misconduct was around 3%. Most areas were around 1%. This is in line with any other denomination or males in general. Pedophila is the attraction to pre-pubescent children whereas 95% of the priests accused were involved with children (male or female) that were adolescents.
Islam is not immune to having molestation in their society. Friends of mine who are serving in our armed forces in Afghanistan have reported to me they are shocked at having come across this in Kabul and in the outlining villages. It is has not been widely reported but does occur more so than most westerners previously thought. There were reports of Al Qaeda detainees detailing consensual homosexual activity in Al Qaeda camps in Afghainstan. Bin Laden himself was made aware of one case in particular, to which he personally witnessed the execution of the accused.
Just to add one thing regarding the elite, flawless Islam. There was a story a couple of months back regarding an Afghan soldier being tossed from the Afghan Army for having sex with a donkey.
Sad, but the story was in the media.
Bob Owens:
In your view, is Satanism a religion or a cult?
How do YOU define the difference between the two? It can't be based on numbers alone; there has to be some kind of rational evaluation of the ideology.
Why?
CGW, much love........but you may be wasting your time on this. Or, perhaps I'm just haunted by some of Joseph's irrational, appeasing process he sometimes presents with.
Save your fingers, and use them for someone you may be able to reach.
GGW,
Satanism, in my opinion, is a cult. While widely known, the numbers just don't exist to call it a religion. I guess I'd also have to list longevity as another criteria in deciding which is religion and which is a cult. Cults tend to have fairly short lifespans of a few generations.
I'd never really given the religion or cult argument a lot of thought before, but those two criteria strike me as reasonable, though I'd keep a mind open to the suggestion of a formula.
Of course, what do I know. The Brits came damn close to making Jedi (Yoda, Luke, and Darth) an official religion in 2001:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2757067.stm
As for teh commetns about priests, I apologize.
It's the bishops I'm terrified of.
DCWatson,
An Afghan had sex with a donkey, and half of Abu Ghraib had sex with Lindy England.
Can we call that a draw? ;-)
OBL must have some charismatic traits, mustn't he? Only stands to reason. The moslems are winning the numbers game (population dominance) while the Christian West is busy discussing absurdities like "Gay Marriage". A culture that does not protect and courage the most fundamental institution on the planet, the institution that preceded the state and the church/temple/mosque, (i.e. the family), is doomed.
Reproduction is the answer but no one wants to make the sacrifices necessary. Westerners want SUVs and TVs and DVDs. While we are mindlessly watching Seinfeld re-runs, the moslems are winning the numbers game.
OBL must have some charismatic traits, mustn't he? Only stands to reason. The moslems are winning the numbers game (population dominance) while the Christian West is busy discussing absurdities like "Gay Marriage". A culture that does not protect and encourage the most fundamental institution on the planet, the institution that preceded the state and the church/temple/mosque, (i.e. the family), is doomed.
Reproduction is the answer but no one wants to make the sacrifices necessary. Westerners want SUVs and TVs and DVDs. While we are mindlessly watching Seinfeld re-runs, the moslems are winning the numbers game.
Reza,
It's scary that you can't absorb facts and analyze the data. If OBL is just drinking tea then why was (is) he raising an army. I doubt they were to plant flowers in his backyard. I may not be perfect but al least I still have the ability to reason.
God Bless the USA
Mike:
If OBL is just drinking tea then why was (is) he raising an army.
To defend himself against the evil, Godless West, silly.
Peggy,
Even though I understand what you are saying in your post, I must point one little fact out:
there are those of us who want children or want more children but however are having fertility problems. I feel it's unfair to say that the Christian West are idolizing material things and not reproducing. Some of us can't.
Incredible. Evidence there's no saving these kinds of people.
The most financially successful, most giving and supporting nation in history, having forgiven nations around the world of billions and billions of dollars of debt, after having reached out to all continents and supported many peoples in their times of need, not to mention having single handedly saved entire nations from starvation... once in a while decides it will not continue giving to those nations that wish to kill its people and their way of life... and at that point the moron loonies come up with some BS about how "one million children had died across the world as a result of US sanctions."
Bob a lib with guns we love you turn bambi into burger
Part of the American Tribe
God Bless the USA and her Fighting Forces and all who fight with her give them Strength and Courage to stay the course to Victory Amen
Reza,
Conspiring to commit a crime IS a crime, whether it is a muslim or nonmuslim who does the conspiring.
yabba dabba akbar
Reza has a talent for ignoring the obvious and playing the victim, doesn't he? Too bad it doesn't work any more.
I would like to make one personal comment, just so I don't have to keep hearing about it.
I may or may nor be liberal.
Thank you, that is all.
Bob sez:
"Any zookeeper will tell you that about ten percent of all mammals exhibit behaviors with other animals of their gender that would be considered "gay" in a human context."
I may be stepping in a pile here BUT…….
OMG! You have got to be joking Bob.
To equate human perversion with simple animal reaction to hormones and myopia is the height of desperation seeking justification!
Animals are not lust driven...No Animals "Bathhouses" last time I checked Bob.
Animals that mate for life are always of opposite genders. To say that when one male animal jumps another male animal they are gay is asinine. Male animals jump other males for the same reason some doggies hump human legs...They have no choice but to react to hormones.
Humans on the other hand DO HAVE A CHOICE...
SO instead of drawing conclusions that animals can be gay...Try taking the example of Mourning Doves or geese that mate for life with members of the opposite gender and stay single if their mates die...
I can hardly believe that you would even say this Bob...I thought you were brighter than that...
Mankind is not defined by his URGES He is defined by his choices...Choosing to take or not take an action is the domain of Humans...Not animals...
Besides, why penalize the animals with labels of "Gay",? When was the late time you or anyone saw a male animal accept the sodomy of another male animal?...When has it been documented that all or even a small percentage of the young males animals in a herd hung together and only mated with other males? Answer....NEVER
There is nothing natural about homosexuality...It is a lust driven activity. The goals are physical satisfaction. So if you want to liken homosexuals to animals go ahead...Just do not liken animal behavior to perverse human activity. And, remember, animals are hormone driven, Humans have a CHOICE.
I wish all humans would choose to do what is biologically sound...What is morally and spiritually uplifting and beneficial to society. I also wish that humans would choose to not lie cheat and steal even when the URGES are strong, and I wish homosexuals would CHOOSE not to be active in gay relationships...
But I get the feeling gays could give a "flying flip" about what I wish...
SusanC,
You are dead wrong when you say:
“Animals that date for life are always of opposite genders.”
There is a brnach of science called biology. Study it.
It is quite common among animals to have same sex pairs. A very fascinating aspect of this from a sociological perspective is that these animals commonly act identical to “correct” opposite sex mating pairs. They follow the same mating rituals, and occasionally adopt, since they obviously can’t conceive.
One of the larger U.S. zoos had a penguin exhibit with two younger male penguins that were exhibiting behaviors best left to opposite sex couples. The zookeepers figured they were just reaching “that age,” and needed to find a mate, so they split them up, putting each in an enclosure with several female penguins, hoping the would mate.
Well, the two male penguins had absolutely no interest at all in the female penguins, and exhibited signs of depression: lethargic behavior, loss of appetite, etc. The zoo keepers scratched their heads, shrugged their shoulders, and put them back together, at which point the when back to what can only be described as mating behavior.
It got REALLY interesting when it got to be the time of year that little baby penguins would be entering the world. Like other birds, penguins lay eggs, though this particular species, instead of building a nest, places the egg on top of its feet and incubates it by gently lowering its body onto it.
The zoo staff was astounded to find this same-sex pair doing the exact same thing… with a rock they found in their enclosure that was roughly the right size and shape. They took turns “incubating “it in exactly the same manner as normal mating pairs did real eggs.
Obviously, they rock didn’t hatch, but one of the other penguin pairs did not want their egg for some reason, and so the zoo staff...
Well I did look it up because I didn’t want to mangle the story, so you can read one of the articles below about this couple. Their names happen to be Roy and Silo, by the way, and they have been together for eight years. I think they are coming up on thier "sardine" anniversary.
http://www.jrn.columbia.edu/studentwork/cns/2002-06-10/591.asp
http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2002/03/08/gay_penguins/
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/4352011/
Face it folks: gay animals happen.
Somewhere in the woods near you is a herd of bucks wearing pink bandanas, chanting:
“We’re here! We’re queer! We’re whitetail deer!”
Now I have to explain to my wife why I did a search for “gay penguins" on Google. Thanks SusanC. Anyway, enough about the animals, at least until I cook one for dinner.
SusanC, I gather from reading your post that you seem to be among the people holding the view that homosexuality is a matter of choice. I guess my first clue would be when you said, “Humans on the other hand DO HAVE A CHOICE.” See how I catch subtle things like that?
I’ve always held that to be a fascinating concept, as you are getting down to the whole nature versus nurture argument.
Every single person I’ve discussed the subject of homosexuality with and decries it a matter of choice obviously holds that it is NOT a natural act.
Now despite the facts and links above that completely blow that antiquated idea all to hell, lets run with that theory for a second.
If you believe that homosexuality is a matter of choice, you then must believe it is a learned behavior acquired during the nurturing process. In nature versus nurture, there are no third parties. If it isn’t natural, it is a matter of nurturing, or how people are brought up. Right?
So essentially, you believe that children brought up in a stable, moral, Judeo-Christian home will grow up to be moral, stable heterosexual adults, attracted to the opposite sex, as you and I and ninety percent of the people reading this are (Hang on, ten-percenters, this is about to get fun).
SO, are you saying, SusanC, that if you were brought up differently, that is, brought up in a culture to believe that the right thing for you to do was to pair off with another woman, that you would therefore automatically accept being gay? If the holy book your society espouses said that “gay is the way,” would you go with the flow, get a Harley Sportster and the last season of XENA on DVD?
I’m sure you are at least mildly revolted at the idea, and that is exactly my point.
You are attracted to men. Women, presumably, just don’t do it for you. Being gay is not in your nature.
NATURE, not choice.
You are wired to find men attractive, and I doubt that we can get you hot and bothered over Brittany Spears, or any other pop tart, no matter how much we tried.
But for some, they simply aren’t wired that way. There are women who simply find women attractive, and have no interest in men unless they work for Triple A. There are guys who only want to be with other guys, except maybe to shop.
Being homesexual isn’t wrong, and isn’t a choice, any more than you “choose” to be straight. It is who they are, and something they can’t choose any more than they can choose to be tall, or white, or smart.
Get your dogma out of the road before it gets run over.
And can we please get back on-topic?
Bob Owens:
I think that your "friendliness report card" idea is crucial. Its implementation should be immediate.
Guys:
You are WAY off-topic on the "gay" issue. Last time I checked, gays did not have an organized agenda to take over the world and force us to "convert or die". It's OK to voice your opinions, but remember that Americans of all "persuasions" will have to stand shoulder to shoulder and fight - perhaps to the death - to preserve freedom and democracy.
Silvester, I don’t know your Collins reference from a hole in the ground. But I know a selective definition when I see one.
I know and trust Webster.
Here is what Webster had to say about cults and religions, unabridged:
cult
Etymology: French & Latin; French culte, from Latin cultus care, adoration, from colere to cultivate -- more at WHEEL
1 : formal religious veneration : WORSHIP
2 : a system of religious beliefs and ritual; also : its body of adherents
3 : a religion regarded as unorthodox or spurious; also : its body of adherents
4 : a system for the cure of disease based on dogma set forth by its promulgator
5 a : great devotion to a person, idea, object, movement, or work (as a film or book); especially : such devotion regarded as a literary or intellectual fad b : a usually small group of people characterized by such devotion
religion
Etymology: Middle English religioun, from Latin religion-, religio supernatural constraint, sanction, religious practice, perhaps from religare to restrain, tie back -- more at RELY
1 a : the state of a religious b (1) : the service and worship of God or the supernatural (2) : commitment or devotion to religious faith or observance
2 : a personal set or institutionalized system of religious attitudes, beliefs, and practices
3 archaic : scrupulous conformity : CONSCIENTIOUSNESS
4 : a cause, principle, or system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith
Whoopi. Now we have more definitions.
Webster also makes cults and religions synonyms for each other. Quite frankly, I find the semantics tedious and pointless.
CAN WE PLEASE GET BACK ON TOPIC?
Bob:
I know you find this tedious, but I'll post it anyway, and then basta!
Yes, my definition is selective, but that doesn't make it any less valid. Webster's isn't the only reputable dictionary in the world. HarperCollins is right up there with it.
Even Webster's gives 'spurious', but of course one man's 'spurious' is another man's, well, non-spurious.
Here's another definition, which also fits the bill:
Cult (totalist type): A group or movement exhibiting a great or excessive devotion or dedication to some person, idea, or thing and employing unethically manipulative techniques of persuasion and control (e.g., isolation from former friends and family, debilitation, use of special methods to heighten suggestibility and subservience, powerful group pressures, information management, suspension of individuality or critical judgment, promotion of total dependency on the group and fear of leaving it, etc.), designed to advance the goals of the group's leaders, to the actual or possible detriment of members, their families, or the community. (West & Langone, 1986, pp. 119-120)
Does this remind you of any particular
'religion'?
I forgot to make my point! It being that yes, islam can be called a religion, but equally it can be called a cult. Let's call it a draw, shall we?!!
Bob Owens:
Bob, I'm with Silvester on this. Even by your own definitions, Islam qualifies as a cult (#2 under cult definitions) IF WE CHOOSE to classify it as such. Your designation is hardly more valid than ours; there's room for a difference of opinion.
"Quite frankly, I find the semantics tedious and pointless.
CAN WE PLEASE GET BACK ON TOPIC?
Posted by: Bob Owens at May 23, 2004 01:33 AM"
Do I detect the usually affable, always intelligent and informative and occasionally hilarious Bob Owens getting a little cranky? :)
Silvester, you asked:
"Does this remind you of any particular
'religion'?"
Scientology.
CGW, you said:
"Do I detect the usually affable, always intelligent and informative and occasionally hilarious Bob Owens getting a little cranky? :)"
Yep. I don't care for side issues, and care for them less when I have to provide support by hunting down dictionary definitions and stories on homoerotic waterfowl.
Bob Owens:
It seems to me that it's entirely up to you whether or not to get involved in side issues. If you don't care for them, why bother?
BTW, I LOVED the penguin story!
bob owens, if religion and cult are synonyms, as you claim, then christianity, judaism, and everything else commonly classified as a religion is now a cult, according to you, am i not right?
The words "religion" and "cult" are synonyms according to Websters online dictionary, and not a personal comment.
If you had bothered to read my previous posts on this page, I thik you'll see that I argue that Islam is a religion, based upon numbers of followers and longevity of the movement. I know of no other objective way to measure them.
Let me guess, you got all hot and bothered reading about Roy and Silo, and didn't get to that part...
Sorry,folks. I over-bolded. :-(
At what point do you not call Hitler a Catholic, Jim Jones a Baptist, or Osama Bin Laden's Wahhabi sect 'MUSLIMS'??? Wahhabis make Hitler's Nazis look like naughty children. Advertise the Wahhabi Sect as a demonic cancer on humanity, which it is!
------------------------------------------------
Email to KQED
MR. Michael Isip ( misip@kqed.org )
cc: Bill O Reilly (oreilly@foxnews.com)
KQED
At what point do you not call Hitler a Catholic, Jim Jones a Baptist, or Osama Bin Laden's Wahhabi Sect 'MUSLIMS'??? Although most Muslims would not agree with the methods adopted by Osama Bin Laden's Wahhabi Sect and the al-Qaeda movement, you are his greatest ally! KQED is Osama Bin Laden's greatest non fee based spokesman for Saudi Arabia’s radical Wahhabi Sect, of which Osama Bin Laden is the leader!!!
At what point do you not call Hitler a Catholic, Jim Jones a Baptist, or Osama Bin Laden's Wahhabi sect 'MUSLIMS'??? Wahhabis make Hitler's Nazis look like naughty children. Advertise the Wahhabi Sect as a demonic cancer on humanity, which it is!
------------------------------------------------
Email to KQED
MR. Michael Isip ( misip@kqed.org )
cc: Bill O Reilly (oreilly@foxnews.com)
KQED
At what point do you not call Hitler a Catholic, Jim Jones a Baptist, or Osama Bin Laden's Wahhabi Sect 'MUSLIMS'??? Although most Muslims would not agree with the methods adopted by Osama Bin Laden's Wahhabi Sect and the al-Qaeda movement, you are his greatest ally! KQED is Osama Bin Laden's greatest non fee based spokesman for Saudi Arabia’s radical Wahhabi Sect, of which Osama Bin Laden is the leader!!!