The SITE Institute has published excerpts of a training manual for Muslim kidnappers. The entire article is well worth reading at that site. One illuminating point is that the manual clearly sees kidnapping as an Islamic religious act, and even — astonishingly enough — as an opportunity to call people to Islam:
• Abide by Muslim laws as your actions may become a Da’wa [call to join Islam].
You may be annoyed when proselytizers knock on your door, but one thing you can say about the Mormons, Jehovah's Witnesses, and others: they aren't under any illusions that kidnapping and murder will make their faiths any more attractive to nonbelievers.
This proves it all, once again:
"In the name of God, try forming a cell or a group, through which you can work on fighting the blasphemers, until you get the chance to join the Mujahideen brothers in Al-Haramain country [Saudi Arabia]."
This was quoted from that manual to teach nothing but hatred and VIOLENCE IN THE NAME OF THEIR RELIGION. How much more prove do we need?
This call has started in the USA by people like raza and mohannod and the call to prayer in Mich. outside Detroit and it was the lib dems that have allowed this to happen!!!
Part of the American Tribe
God Bless the USA and her Fighting Forces and All who Fight with her give them Strength and Courage to stay the course to Victory Amen
The view that violence for the cause of Islam also aids in converting unbelievers is a view that goes back to early Islam. When 'Umayr bin 'Adi killed Asma' Bint Marwan for Muhammad because she had written an angry poem about Muhammad and Islam, then according to Ibn Hisham the result was as follows:
"That was the day when Islam first showed its power over the [clan of the] Banu Khatma. 'Umayr had been the first among them to become a Muslim. On the day the daughter of Marwan was killed, the men of the Banu Khatma were converted because of what they saw of the power of Islam."
[Source: Rodinson, Muhammad, 171. Rodinson is again quoting Ibn Hisham, Das Leben Muhammeds, 996.]
After the 9/11 attacks, Bin Laden made a statement that suggested that these attacks advanced the cause of Islam among unbelievers:
"[I]n Holland, at one of the centers, the number of people who accepted Islam during the days that followed the operations were more than the people who accepted Islam in the last eleven years. I heard someone on Islamic radio who owns a school in America say: 'We don’t have time to keep up with the demands of those who are asking about Islamic books to learn about Islam.' This event made people think (about true Islam) which benefited Islam greatly."
["Transcript of Usama bin Laden Video Tape," Yahoo Daily News, December 13, 2001 (http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/World/Osama_Bin_Laden/)]
Bin Laden's words concerning his view of the attack's religious effect recall the words of that Muslim chronicler who described the men of the Banu Khatma as having "converted because of what they saw of the power of Islam" in reaction to the assassination of Asma' Bint Marwan.
To the extent that violence works in converting people to Islam, then it probably does so primarily through causing them to fear Islam and consequently to join it to avoid being killed as an infidel.
Jeffery Hodges
Not in America will fear win.
For personal protection every American should own a firearm to fight against any attempt to conquer this land in the name of islam or any other despotic religion/government. Our second Ammendment gives us that Right; and, I believe even duty to own a gun to protect ones self, family, and property. Jihad can't win if American citizens are armed and ready for them.
This is America - Love it or Leave it.
Maybe it is time to show Islam the power of the USA and her mighty MOAB's we can start small?
We are letting the fox gaurd the hen house a Muslum is in charge of looking into Irans nukes????
Now me when I go hunting I take the brid away from the dog so he don't eat it.
Part of the American Tribe
God bless the USA and her Fighting Forces and All woh Fight with her give them Strength and Courage to stay the course to Victory Amen
Libya’s Colonel Muamar Gadafi, flounced out of the Arab League Summit in Tunis; only 14 of the 22 members’d turned up anyway, He was offended that the others wouldn’t pass his proposal for settling of the “Question of Palestine” through the “one state solution” - so fashionable today in the soirées and salons of the Western élitists, but a preposterously unviable notion “on the ground”: “two people, one country”, “sharing” (like the proverbial Swiss lovers).
That isn’t to say that the potentates of the League favour the “two-state solution”, as authorized by the US, together with the UN, either. They seek a “one state solution” all right (as they have since 1947, haughtily spurning the UN’s partition-plan then) - except that they want it for ONE people alone, the “Palestinian” Arabs, with genocide for the Israelis.
Not that implementing Gadafi’s “one state solution” wouldn’t end up in the mass-murder of the Jews as well, but with his tactic it could be perpetrated less OBTRUSIVELY than so crudely driving them into the sea, shooting, bludgeoning and slitting throats all the way to the shore. It’d be less objectionable to the “sensibilities” of Europeans, in particular. The Colonel’s would be a more “æsthetic” method, which, indeed, ought to be greatly appreciated by the Europeans.
Iran’s Grand Council of Islamic Guidance, however, suffers no such encumbrances. Once Iran’s got a fleet of nuclear-tipped missiles, adequate for it to believe it can conduct an overwhelming first strike (keeping a reserve for regional deterrence), it will launch, at Israel. Two years ago, Council President, former PM Ayatollah Ali-Akbar Rafsanjani, said that the Islamic Guardians are fully aware that Israel can’t survive a brace of atomic first strikes - fancying that the dar el-Islam WOULD be able to “absorb” Israel’s several hundred retaliatory warheads.
Chillingly, he didn’t voice a syllable about the fate of Iran itself, in the event of this exchange. Can the Ayatollahs calculate that Iran will live through taking on America? Or is destroying Israel worth so much to them that they don’t they care? Or are they smugly banking on the EU, Russia and/or China to dissuade the US from smiting Iran when Iran suddenly hits Israel?
Tragically, they can count on the EU. In the profound denial and delusion nowadays stupefying Europe, especially, a gross fallacy’s been implanted: once the “Question of Palestine” is solved, then the dar el-Islam’ll promptly burst into eternal peace and amity, and be the EU’s best friend forever. With purblind idealism, dreamily, simplistically, they’ve convinced themselves that if Europe can enjoy peace for the first time ever, so can anybody, anywhere, everywhere.
Tired of the hassle of the Middle East challenging their utopian reveries, they’re happy for this “resolution” to take place BY ANY MEANS AT ALL, including imposing an embargo on defence-materials for Israel as it’s attacked by Arab forces, or by their own, sly, diplomatic arch-appeasement, such as selling out Israel in a second Munich, or via Israel’s elimination by an Iranian-initiated, nuclear Pearl Harbor….
The Arab League confab agreed on peripheral “reforms” so nebulous that they’re sheer nonsense and opposed “Israeli terrorism” - but none other. The League demonstrated again that it’s merely united on one thing: wiping Israel off the map. It’s never been able to cope with any other topic.
Without Israel to DISTRACT to, the Arabs would rapidly be at daggers drawn, while urgently compelled to deal with their own grave political, social, economic, cultural and psychological realities. Instead of facing up to their priorities, they prefer to think, just like in Europe, that as soon as the “Palestine Question”’s answered “satisfactorily”, all of their problems’ll evaporate.
Hg
Saw the first day and it was Braahriane that wanted one state. I think the Press once again Lies Lies
Momar is worried about his borders has bunch of people fleeing the slaughter across and is worried. These people have AIDS Momar is worried at the arab plan Bush has said nothing is off the Table I mean Noithing. Momar is a suiver and wants to stay that way why do you think he gave all that fo?
Part of the American Tribe
God Bless the USA and her Fighting Forces and All who Fight with her give them Strength and Courage to stay the course to Victory Amen