June 2004 Archives

June 30, 2004

In Iran, Khadijeh Shahla Jahed, the temporary wife of soccer star Nasser Mohammad Khani, is likely to be executed for murdering Khani's wife, Laleh Saharkhizan. This Telegraph story (thanks to jonascot) calls Khadija the "mistress" of Nasser, but way down in the story we discover that that is not quite what she was.

Temporary wife? That's right. In Islam Unveiled I discuss this phenomenon, which Shi'ites defend as founded upon the Qur'an and a command of Muhammad. Iranian men can enter into marriage with women for a specified period: a week, a month, or just a weekend or a single night. "Temporary wives" proliferate in holy cities where lonely seminarians congregate.

Many people assume that such legalized victimization of women is a relic of the distant past. In Iran, it lives.

After a one week closed trial, Khadijeh Shahla Jahed was found guilty of the premeditated stabbing of Laleh Saharkhizan, the wife of the former international player and top coach Nasser Mohammad Khani.

If the sentence - which was disclosed yesterday - is confirmed by the supreme court, she will be hanged. ...

Shahla Jahed had been his temporary wife, a practice approved of in the Islamic republic. Their temporary marital status meant that Khani escaped any charges of adultery.

In Shi'ite Islam, Muslim males can take temporary wives for periods ranging from a few hours to several decades.

| 11 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Israel is manipulating Ethiopia to steal water from the Nile!!! This story, which has about as much credibility as the claim that all the Jews who worked in the World Trade Center called in sick on September 11, 2001, is being spread by news services in Muslim countries. It seems that the dhimmis in Ethiopia have had the temerity to establish ties with Israel, thus earning the enduring ire of their Muslim neighbors. From Arutz Sheva, with thanks to Tziona:

Petros Olango, deputy speaker of the Ethiopian parliament, denied allegations against his country and Israel made in the Arabic and African press regarding a conspiracy to deprive Egypt and Sudan of Nile water.

According to articles that periodically appear in the Arabic and Muslim African press, Israel is pushing Ethiopia to construct dams along Nile tributaries in order to cut back on Nile water shared with Sudan and Egypt. Of late, the accusations were made after Ethiopian president Meles Zenawi signed taxation, cultural, educational and scientific cooperation agreements with Israel during a visit to the Jewish State earlier this month.

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

More trouble coming from Iran: two guards at the Iranian UN mission in New York have been sent out of the country. Question: how much more jihad activity is going on under cover of diplomatic immunity? From CNN, :

The two were seen taking still photos and video of New York City subways, buses and tunnels, and were expelled last weekend for conduct inconsistent with their official duties, the State Department said.

But an Iranian official said: "Like anybody who visits New York, they visit tourist sites -- sightseeing and videotaping themselves, looking at the Metropolitan Museum [of Art], places like that."

Adam Ereli, deputy spokesman at the State Department, said the guards were expelled after being observed by the FBI "videotaping various locations from New York deemed to be sensitive."

Ereli called the activity a "recurring problem, as this was the third time the United States has required the departure of Iranian security guards for videotaping and photographing landmarks in New York.

"In the case of the Iranian mission to the United Nations, it represented a unique pattern that raised concerns of law enforcement," he said.

| 24 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Members of air crews from three unidentified countries have turned up among the tiny minority of extremists in terrorist databases. From CNN, with thanks to US Action:

Nine of the 12 had associated with terrorists or supported terrorist organizations, two were using fraudulent passports and one had a criminal record for assaulting a U.S. law enforcement officer, according to Department of Homeland Security Undersecretary for Border and Transportation Asa Hutchinson. ...

Hutchinson said a similar check of 2.7 million truck drivers who were licensed to carry hazardous materials in the United States has not turned up anyone with clearly established ties to terrorism, but he said 29 "potential persons of interest" are undergoing additional checks by law enforcement.

One of the 29 has already been expelled from the U.S. for unrelated reasons.

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Friends, by this time tomorrow I hope to be back in sunny Secure Undisclosed Locationville, where, free at last of this laptop, I will do what I can to figure out some of the technical problems that many of you have sent to me. I am confident that the registration system will be working smoothly, without any hitches, soon. Thank you very much for your patience.

Also: over the last week (and before that, too) many of you have emailed me, sent me links, etc. I am traveling and have thus been unable to answer or acknowledge most of them; in fact, the sheer volume of email is impossible for me to keep up with. So I apologize here for not being able to answer each message, and thank you for your kindness and support.

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

June 29, 2004

Turkey, of course, is the only majority Muslim secular state. It lives in constant tension between resurgent political Islam and the principles of secularism. This story has interesting implications for France and Europe in general, where it is still taboo even to admit that Islam has a political aspect that may impinge upon the secular character of the established governments. But Turkey, for all its many faults, doesn't have that problem. Ataturk established the secular state as an explicit rejection of political Islam. They don't have to try simultaneously to deny that it exists and fend it off, the way the French seem to think they have to do. From the BBC, with thanks to JScott:

Turkish state universities have the right to ban Muslim headscarves, the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg has ruled.

It rejected an appeal by a Turkish student who said the ban - and her subsequent exclusion from class - violated her freedom of religion.

Turkey's government had argued that headscarves violated the secular nature of the state.

Correspondents say the decision could have implications for other countries.

| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This won't stop any of the American Muslim spokesmen and their allies from telling us that Islam respects non-Muslims and teaches tolerance, but it is more evidence that the reality is different, and that many Muslims today hold tenaciously to the sharp distinction between believers and unbelievers that runs through the Qur'an. From CNN:

The Arabic-language television network Al Jazeera reported earlier Tuesday a group led by Jordanian-born Islamic militant Abu Musab al-Zarqawi had freed the men contractors, who were kidnapped last week.

"For the sake of you, our brothers, and Muslims of the people of Turkey ... we will release these hostages and send them safely home," the statement said.

| 20 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Why do they hate us? Well, aside from the jihad imperative and the competition to Sharia hegemony that the US presents in Iraq and elsewhere, it doesn't help that they lie about us at the highest levels. This sort of thing keeps happening in Saudi Arabia, and here is a report from Iran. From MEMRI:

The editor of the Iranian conservative daily Kayhan, Hossein Shari'atmadari, who is close to Iranian Leader Ali Khamenei, wrote in an editorial that the true perpetrators of the decapitations of foreign hostages are none other than the Americans themselves. The following are excerpts from his article on June 24:

[...]

'Why Did Americans Slaughter Their Citizens and the Citizens of America's Allies?'

"Why did the Americans slaughter their citizens and the citizens of America's allies [so] horrifyingly and terribly...? [Why] do they construct ridiculous scenery and attribute the slaughter of the hostages to Muslims when their ugly and repulsive faces are exposed as a result of the crimes they committed and the massacre of innocent civilians and the barbaric tortures of the detainees and captives?

"The answer to this question is too clear for us to explain and analyze in depth... With these terrible crimes, the Americans aspire to attain the following goals:

1. "To present a hate-inspiring image of Islam and of the Muslims and to justify barbaric military attacks on them - that is, exactly the same goals as when they established the Taliban and the Al-Qa'ida group...

2. "To respond to public opinion, particularly that of the U.S. and England, which sees the invasion of Iraq as unjustified, aggressive, and entangling and demands that the occupiers leave Iraq. In this way, America seeks to justify the continuation of the occupation of Iraq and the attack on the rest of the Muslim peoples. America is doing it under the cover of a struggle against peoples - which, it claims, know no humanity and commit various types of crimes.

3. "Some of the countries that sent forces to Iraq, such as South Korea, are facing harsh protests by their peoples. By slaughtering hostages and attributing it to Muslims, America sows the seed of hatred and loathing of Muslims in the hearts of these peoples, and encourages their governments to continue cooperating with it.

4. "Among the Americans' main goals in organizing the ridiculous and certainly terrible performance of the slaughters is the distracting of public opinion from America's and England's barbaric crimes against the Abu Ghureib detainees."

III) Official Iranian TV Channel Claims Jews Were Involved in September 11th

MEMRI's TV Monitor Project (www.memritv.org) includes monitoring Iranian television stations such as Jaam-E-Jam 1, the Iranian government TV channel directed at Europe. On June 1, 2004, the station broadcasted a series about the September 11 terror attacks. The show included video clips of the O.J. Simpson murder case. The following an excerpt of the broadcast:

"Ever since the establishment of the Zionist regime, the American strategy has been under the Zionist lobby's influence. Zionism, as expressed in the Jewish Protocols, nurtures in its mind the dream of taking over the world. With Bush's rise to power, it controls the White House with greater force. ...

"A while afterwards, a source in American military intelligence raised details pertaining to an intelligence memo regarding Israel's espionage organization, the Mossad, and its role in the events of September 11. In fact, the claim that Israel was involved in the blasts of September 11 and used it as a basis of America's new strategy for fighting the world of Islam, disappeared in the media coverage, but world public opinion still believes this possibility."

| 64 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

June 28, 2004

Authorities aren't sure yet whether the video of the murder actually depicts Pfc. Matt Maupin, but in any case this just underscores the fact that the turnover of sovereignty in Iraq is not going to change a thing. The jihadists are fighting to establish an Islamic state, and they aren't going to be any more favorably disposed toward what they perceive as a U.S. client state than they have been toward the U.S. military presence there. That unrest will continue, and that the new Iraqi government will face fierce challenges and may not survive, are the only certainties in Iraq today.

| 13 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Some exceedingly important information on the Sami Al-Hussayen case from Michael P. Tremoglie at FrontPage. An activist judge running wild may be a more accurate picture of this case than the usual one of an innocent Muslim victimized by racism, etc.:

Al-Hussayen, a Saudi national, was charged with using the website of the Islamic Assembly of North America (IANA) to promote terrorism. Specifically, Al-Hussayen, was charged with two counts of conspiracy to support terrorism, one count of providing material support to terror groups and eleven counts of visa and immigration fraud.

Among the messages posted by Al-Hussayen to the websites were four fatwas - or religious edicts blessing suicide missions. One specifically mentioned a kamikaze type mission using an airplane. This was prior to 9-11.

According to US Attorney Kim Lindquist, as quoted in the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, the websites were "part of his passionate, religious commitment to violent jihad - not to legitimate violence, but to suicide operations and to terrorism."

His defense was that he was merely the moderator and not concerned with the content of the messages, only posting them. It is important to note that the founder of IANA, Bassem K. Khafagi, already pled guilty to bank fraud and visa fraud in relation to his activities with IANA, which is believed to be financing terrorist activities.

One juror, John Steger a retired U.S. Forest Service worker, who was interviewed afterwards provided some insight as to why Al-Hussayen was acquitted. He referred to Judge Lodge's instruction - that the Constitution protects speech even if it advocates the use of force or violation of the law unless imminent lawlessness occurs - as influencing his choice.

Steger said ninety-five percent of what Al-Hussayen posted was "innocent" and said the "inflammatory" articles did not lead to an "imminent act. ... According to the First Amendment, that is all right." When he was asked if it could lead to a terrorist act, he said, "I don't know."

There is much more about how judges and journalists jimmied this case. It's a story that is nothing less than shameful.

| 15 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

That quotation comes from an Islamic discussion board (thanks to Susan). I'm all for clearing up misconceptions, too, so here is a bit of the discussion:

:sl:

some muslims have the misconception that slavery is abolished. certainly if this was an evil thing that had no benefit the righteous caliphs would have been the first to annul it. slavery in Islam is not the same as the west's slave trade. it is the states handling of the dependants of the men (that we were at battle with) that died... captives of war.

this is what nasiruddin says:


QUOTE
Islamic history of the last centuries is depressing, but one positive thing is that most Muslim states have abolished slavery. (Prophet Muhammad (sallalahi wa salam) stated that releasing a slave is an excellently good deed, hence it must be also a very good and valuable deed to liberate all slaves and to prohibit all slavery.)

I do not change deen, because this is no subject of belief itself, it is a subject of politics, society structure and Islamic law and we Muslims are ordered by Allah (ta'ala) to enforce justice, hence we must seek to clear our society of injustices and slavery is an injustice.


i want to see how many other people have this view of slavery being evil? and dont forget that the prophet :saa: captured slaves.


whynot Posted: May 31 2004, 15:51

And from the responses:

If Allaah enables the Muslim mujahideen to defeat kaafir enemies in war, then the men may be killed, ransomed, set free without ransom or enslaved. The choice between these four options is to be made by the ruler, according to what he thinks is the best course.

With regard to the women, they become slaves and "those whom one's right hand possesses" (described as a "right hand servant" in the question). Male children also become slaves. The ruler shares out these slaves among the mujaahideen.

Shaykh al-Shanqeeti (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: The reason why a person may be taken as a slave is his being a kaafir and waging war against Allaah and His Messenger. If Allaah enables the Muslims who are striving and sacrificing their lives and their wealth and all that Allaah has given them to make the word of Allaah supreme over the kaafirs, then He allows them to enslave the kuffaar when they capture them, unless the ruler chooses to free them or to ransom them, if that serves the interests of the Muslims.

Adwa' al-Bayaan, 3/387

Islam limited the sources of slaves which existed before the mission of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) to just one source, namely slavery resulting from capturing prisoners from among the kuffaar.

Islam treated female slaves more kindly in their enslavement than other cultures did. Their honour was not considered to be permissible to anyone by way of prostitution, which was the fate of female prisoners of war in most cases. Rather Islam made them the property of their masters alone, and forbade anyone else to also have intercourse with them, even if that was his son. Islam made it their right to become free through a contract of manumission; it encouraged setting them free and promised reward for that. Islam made setting slaves free an obligation in the case of some kinds of expiation (kafaarah), such as the expiation for accidental killing, zihaar (a jaahili form of divorce in which a man said to his wife, "You are to me as my mother's back"), and breaking oaths. They received the best treatment from their masters, as was enjoined by the pure sharee'ah.

Secondly:

A mujaahid does not have to be married in order to gain possession of a "slave whom one's right hand possesses." None of the scholars expressed such a view.

Thirdly:

If a mujaahid takes possession of a female slave or male slave, it is permissible for him to sell them. In either case - whether one acquires a slave through battle or through purchase - it is not permissible for a man to have intercourse with a female slave until she has had a period from which it may be ascertained that she is not pregnant. If she is pregnant then he must wait until she gives birth.

It was narrated that Ruwayfi' ibn Thaabit al-Ansaari said: I heard the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) say on the day of Hunayn: "It is not permissible for any man who believes in Allaah and the Last Day to irrigate the crop of another else - meaning to have intercourse with a woman who is pregnant. And it is not permissible for a man who believes in Allaah and the Last Day to have intercourse with a captured woman until he has established that she is not pregnant. And it is not permissible for a man who believes in Allaah and the Last Day to sell any booty until it has been shared out."

Narrated by Abu Dawood, 2158; classed as hasan by Shaykh al-Albaani in Saheeh Abi Dawood, 1890.

For many reasons, including the fact that the Muslims have long since given up jihad, slavery is now very rare. This means that the Muslims must be extra cautious by examining any case in which it is claimed that someone is a slave, whether male or female.

For more information see question no. 26067

And Allaah knows best.

Given up jihad?

Then some question the notion:

I can understand the keeping the pow's, but i dont understand the ability of men to have concubines. It seems to go against everything ive learned about Islam. Its having illegal sexual relations w/ a woman. The woman is not your wife. I dont think i can ever understand this.

And some responses:

uh shayrob?
what is Islam? submission to God
how do you know what is forbiden and allowed in Islam? you look at the Koran and Sunnah to find out.

So if you have evidences stating concubines are hallal then where is the confusion?
how is sex with concubine ilegal if Allah has allowed it?

:sl:

Din: I understand that but i just want to understand why its allowed b/c it doesnt seem like there is any morality in it. Why is dating haram while having a concubine halal?



hey thats where you go wrong

What is good? whatever Allah says is good
What is bad? whatever Allah says is bad
What is immoral? whatever Allah says is immoral
your way of thinking makes me wonder on how excactly do you understand Islamic Aqeda?
this is an ayat of Koran:
"There are things which you like that are bad for you,
and there are things which you hate that are good for you,
You dont know but Allah knows best."
So stick to this ayat brother and dont say something is immoral when Allah has allowed it,
well you can say it if you want, but you see if you think Allah's law is immoral then gess what he is going to think about you and your sins? and where you should belong.
I dont want to be sarcastic or rude brother, i just want to make you understand this important thing.

There is much more. You will find the whole thread illuminating.

| 10 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

When asked about Crown Prince Abdullah's comments, Prince Turki al-Faisal just dug the hole deeper. From The Telegraph, with thanks to Teri:

In a television interview, to be broadcast today, Prince Turki al-Faisal is asked about comments made by Crown Prince Abdullah, Saudi Arabia's de facto leader, that "Zionist hands" have been behind the attacks.

The ambassador replies: "When you're under attack by people who come and kill your countrymen and visitors to your country, and you see at the same time an attack on the kingdom from the outside, from Zionist circles, it is natural to make a connection."

| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

June 27, 2004

This AP story (thanks to James) chronicles some ugly anti-Muslim incidents that have occurred in the US since the beheading of Paul Marshall Johnson. If these reports are accurate -- people writing "Kill all Muslims" on mosque walls and that sort of thing -- they are deplorable and inexcusable: targeting innocent people is just the sort of thing the jihadists are despicable for doing, and it is not justified in any way.

However, buried deep in the article, as if it were just another anti-Muslim incident, is this. I have included a couple of the lead-in paragraphs to give you a sense of the context:

In the St. Louis suburb of Ballwin, Mo., vandals painted a swastika and the word "Die" on the wall of the Dar-Ul-Islam mosque.

In Texas, dead fish were dumped near the entrance sign to a mosque under construction in a suburb of Houston.

And in the Chicago suburb of Orland Park, residents urged officials this past week to reject a mosque's building application. A Baptist pastor told a public hearing he feared it would attract Islamic extremists and violence. The center was approved over boos and catcalls from the audience.

Now wait a minute. Swastikas and dead fish are suddenly equivalent to residents urging officials to reject a mosque's building application? When that Orland Park story broke, I asked here what assurance the local Muslims had given area non-Muslims that the mosque would NOT attract extremists. How can any mosque assure people that extremists will not enter and recruit there? What safeguards do American mosques have against Islamic radicalism?

If they would spell this out, answering such questions honestly and openly, they would do a great deal to dispel the suspicions and resentment of people who wonder where their loyalties really lie. And dhimmi articles like this one, which lump people with legitimate concerns in with real hatemongers and bigots, just fuel that resentment.

| 15 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Yesterday I had occasion to speak with several people who have no idea that jihad activity is still going on in the US. They never heard of the Lackawanna Al-Qaeda cell, or the Virginia paintball gang, or the Portland group, or any other. Nor were they ignorant or ill-informed -- far from it. But the mainstream media is simply not giving stories like these adequate attention, to the detriment of us all. How different would the average American's view of terrorism and the war on terror be if all the stories like this one were common knowledge? From the Boston Globe, with thanks to nevermindlv:

A former Boston cabdriver who allegedly admitted training in an Afghanistan terrorist camp was charged yesterday in federal court in Minnesota with lying to the FBI about helping a convicted terrorist get a Massachusetts driver's license.

Mohamad Kamal Elzahabi, 41, a Lebanese national, is charged with lying about providing support to Raed Hijazi in 1997 and 1998, when both were working as taxi drivers in Boston, according to a complaint and FBI affidavit unsealed yesterday in US District Court in Minnesota.

Hijazi was later convicted in Jordan of the failed millennium bombing plot that targeted American and Israeli tourists in that country.

The complaint also charges Elzahabi with lying to federal agents by denying he had shipped radios and other communications equipment to Pakistan between 1995 and 1997.

Elzahabi, who has been held in New York since his arrest in May, will be transferred to Minneapolis to face the two counts of making false statements to federal investigators.

| 18 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Dear friends,

I am writing this from far away from Secure Undisclosed Locationville -- so far away, in fact, that since Friday I have been unable to connect to the Internet. Hence the lack of updates. Also I now have such a backlog of work that there may not be many updates right away. My apologies. Jihad Watch will be back, better than ever, absolutely as soon as possible.

But I am pleased to announce that the comments system seems to be up and running. I am sure there are still a few bugs in the system, so I ask your patience. We will be working them out over the next few days. Just for fun, even though this is old news now, I am reopening the comments on the last few days of postings. So if you see something you would like to say something about -- here or at Dhimmi Watch -- have at it. I am opening the top posts on the main pages now.

Thanks again for all your patience and support.

Kindest regards,
Robert Spencer

| 15 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

June 25, 2004

Yeah, they're reforming, all right. Note the section entitled "Allah willing, the U.S. will collapse." It looks as if the double game the Saudis have been playing for years is still in full swing. From MEMRI:

As part of MEMRI's TV Monitoring Project, Saudi government controlled television channels including TV1, TV2 and satellite channels such as Iqraa TV, are continually monitored.(1) These channels include shows with leading Saudi religious figures, professors, members of the royal family, government leaders and intellectuals. Constant themes within Saudi television shows include: calls for the annihilation of Christians and Jews, rampant anti-Americanism and antisemitism, support for Jihad, incitement against U.S. troops in Iraq, and the coming Islamic conquest of the U.S. Segments from these TV shows can be found at www.memriTV.org. Saudi Religious Establishment 'Demonstrated that It is the Body Most Competent ... at De-Legitimizing Al Qa'ida's Cultist Ideology'

In a June 15 press release, the Saudi Ambassador to the United States, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, maintained that "senior religious scholars in Saudi Arabia have continually and unequivocally condemned terrorism. In our war against terrorism, these condemnations are a powerful weapon." In this statement, as well as in close to two dozen others by the Saudi embassy in Washington D.C. since the Riyadh bombings on March 12, 2003, the government of Saudi Arabia promoted the idea that the royal family and religious establishment have been espousing a message of tolerance. As Nail Al-Jubeir, director of the Saudi information office, said on May 6, 2004: "Our religious establishment has taught moderation to our people. The religious establishment has demonstrated that it is the body most competent and effective at de-legitimizing Al Qa'ida's cultist ideology."

In fact, on June 20, 2004, Saudi cleric Dr. Muhammad Bin Suleiman Al-Mani'i hosted a talk show on Saudi TV 1 and spoke out against killing Jews and Christians. Excerpts of his statements include: "Islamic law in general prohibits any Muslim from raising a weapon against any lover of peace - dhimmi (protected person), Jewish or Christian, a merchant, or anyone who enters (the country) on a work contract. Islamic law permits raising a weapon only against whomever aims a weapon at the Muslim in order to fight him."

While Al-Mani'i's statement against killing Jews and Christians is almost unprecedented within Saudi Arabia, he went on to explain that if non-Muslims are treated well by Muslims, they will eventually convert to Islam: "The Jewish, Christian, and Zoroastrian subjects had their autonomous rule under Islam, and at the same time these Muslim states, and the caliphs, preserved their rights, treated them well, maintained neighborly relations and dealt with them honestly and in good faith, treated their sick, granted them their rights, and called them to convert to Islam. Therefore, the Jewish, Christian, and other subjects converted to Islam."

Saudi Professor: Allah Permits Annihilating Christians and Jews

Sheik Dr. Ahmad Abd Al-Latif, a professor at Um Al-Qura University, was asked the following question on Saudi channel TV1 on May 24: "Some imams and preachers call for Allah to annihilate the Jews and those who help them, and the Christians and those who support them... Is it permitted according to Islamic law?" Professor Al-Latif responded: "What made them curse the Jews is that the Jews are oppressors... The same goes for the Christians, because of their cruel aggression against Islamic countries ... while the truth is that this is a crusading war whose goal is to harm Muslims. This is why a Muslim is allowed to curse the oppressors from among the Jews and Christians... Cursing the oppressing Jews and the oppressing and plundering Christians and the prayer that Allah will annihilate them is permitted."

Former Saudi Embassy Official on 'Big Explosion' Coming

Sheik Muhammad Al-Munajid, a disciple of one of Saudi Arabia's most revered religious leaders, Sheik 'Abd Al-'Aziz ibn 'Abdallah ibn Baaz, was identified in a report in the Washington Post on December 11, 2003, as running "a Web site that promotes intolerance of Christians and Jews and calls for holy war on Shiite Muslims," and was included as one of sixteen clerics associated with the Saudi embassy's Islamic Affairs Department who was stripped of diplomatic credentials.

Al-Munajid stated on Iqraa TV on April 15: "The issue is not one person, two, ten or a hundred going out with their guns to support their brothers. Defeating the infidels requires a much greater effort. It requires the mobilization of the nation. How can the nation be mobilized? I believe that the stupid acts of these Jews and Crusaders mobilize the nation. The big explosion will come! In spite of everything, it will happen!"

Much of Saudi TV is based upon religious programming. Many of these programs refer to the spread of Islam throughout the world and the battle against non-Muslims. On a May 20 episode of Iqraa TV's 'Mushkilat Min Al-Hayat' (Problems from Life), Saudi Sheik Abdallah Al-Muslih, chairman of the Commission on Scientific Signs in the Koran and Sunnah of the Muslim World League, used evidence from early Islam to support his claim that suicide bombings on enemy land are permitted according to Islamic law: "... Regarding a person who blows himself up, I know this issue is under disagreement among modern clerics and jurisprudents... There is nothing wrong with [martyrdom] if they cause great damage to the enemy. We can say that if it causes great damage to the enemy, this operation is a good thing. This is when we talk of Dar Al-Harb. But, if we speak of what happens in Muslim countries, such as Saudi Arabia ... this is forbidden, brothers! This is the land of the Muslims. We must never do this in a Muslim country."

Prominent Saudi Professor: Allah Willing, the U.S. Will Collapse

Supporting Jihad against U.S. troops in Iraq is the topic of many Saudi TV programs. On May 10, Dr. Yassin Al-Khatib, a professor of Islamic law at Um Al-Qura University, declared on the UAE's Al-Majd TV, which frequently has Saudi guests on it, that "the honor, blood, property and mostly the fact that they entered the country [i.e. Iraq] ... make it every Muslim's duty to go out against them, not only the Iraqis. This is every Muslim's duty. Jihad today has become an individual duty that applies to each and every Muslim. It is forbidden for a person to remain silent... When the Muslims fought in Afghanistan they destroyed the Soviet Union, which was a superpower. It collapsed and Allah willing, so will this [the U.S.] collapse."

The Coming Islamic Takeover of the U.S.

Saudis often discuss the issue of the U.S. becoming a Muslim state in the future. On a March 17 broadcast on Iqraa TV, Saudi preacher Sheik Said Al-Qahtani discussed this issue, as well as the cases in which Muslims are permitted to declare a defensive Jihad: "... We did not occupy the U.S., with 8 million Muslims, using bombings. Had we been patient, and let time take its course, instead of the 8 million, there could have been 80 million [Muslims] and 50 years later perhaps all the US would have become Muslim... What should a Muslim do if he is attacked in his country, on his land? In this case, there is no choice besides defense, self-sacrifice, and what religious scholars call - Defensive Jihad... We attacked their country, and this caused them to wake the dormant enmity in their hearts... Especially since there is global Zionism, the enemy of Islam, and Judaism, and fundamentalist Crusaders... They interpret this whole incident as only the beginning and thus there is no choice but a preemptive strike."

Al-Qahtani added on another Iqraa TV show on May 5: "Allah said, 'prepare against them all the force and horsemen that you can.' What for? In order to strike fear into their hearts... At the same time, [we should] establish strategies for the future, even if only for the short term, and prepare ... so that one of these days, even 100, 200, or 400 years from now, we will become a force that will be feared by the infidel states."

There is a lot more. Read it all. You may never get a clearer picture of what's really being said about us by our friend and ally.

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This morning at Front Page there is a symposium on the Qur'an and anti-Semitism, featuring Islamic reform advocate Professor Khaleel Mohammed, the renowned scholar Bat Ye'or, and Jihad Watch director Robert Spencer. I think it is illuminating in several important ways. Read the whole thing; here are my closing remarks:

Spencer: I thank Professor Muhammad for his kind words, but some lingering questions remain. He says that my remarks are cogent and grants that there is a problem, but then says: "Yes, some imams do preach as Mr. Spencer said; but many others preach differently, and they are in the majority--as is well-known to the Muslim community." I must confess that I am confused as to how the "minuscule minority" of the professor's last remarks has now become a majority. Also I wonder why we do not see more of the fruits of this alleged majority in the words and actions of Muslims in the United States and around the world.


As for Saffiyah, all of Professor Muhammad's remarks are obviated by the fact that she was a convert to Islam. Her being called "al yahudiyya" was only an identifying mark, but the lack of a stigma was due to the fact that she was no longer a Jew but a Muslim. I expect that Professor Muhammad and I will disagree on this. As for Jesus, since he was a Jew with Jewish followers, his remarks do not have remotely the same force that Suras 2:62-65, 5:59-60, and 7:166 of the Qur'an do. The latter speak of "the Jews" collectively; whatever group of Jews was originally meant, most exegetes today take these passages to refer to all those who identify themselves as Jews nowadays. (Professor Muhammad seems to have granted that previously, although in this go-round he seems to be charging me with ascribing these views to the Qur'an when actually they come from tradition.

Allow me to remind him that I am not ascribing them to anything, but merely reporting on the exegetical habits that are currently dominant in the Islamic world.) But when the New Testament speaks of "the Jews," it is as one group of Jews speaking of another, and thus cannot be properly taken as a condemnation of the whole race. This understanding was significant in mitigating Christian anti-Semitism, particularly in the 20th century.

There is no such mitigating factor in the Qur'an: while an informed reading of the New Testament reveals the Jewish identity of most of the authors, and thus defangs any exegesis that would blame "the Jews" as an aggregate for the Crucifixion or anything else, the situation is different in the Qur'an. The distinction that the professor is trying to make by saying that only one group of Jews is meant in these Qur'anic passages is, whatever its merits as an exegetical argument, nowhere found in the Qur'anic text itself. This difference is something that Professor Muhammad, as a sincere reformer, must eventually acknowledge: no problem can be solved without a realistic prior appraisal of its nature and dimensions.

When Professor Muhammad says of me: "For him to say then that the Qur'an speaks of "the" Jew, as if referring to a monolithic group is wrong." Well, I never actually said that. But many Muslims do, and that is the problem. The fact that "the mosques have largely prevented" him from doing what he loves is an indication of how large this problem is. That seems to be still understated by the Professor, while he wildly overstates the dangers of the Christian "reconstructionist" movement that is supposedly "threatening all progress." I am confident that as he goes farther with his reform efforts, he will acknowledge this more clearly.


Finally, although I am sorry about Professor Muhammad's ungallant words for the groundbreaking, courageous, and brilliant scholar Bat Ye'or, I much appreciate this statement of his: "Mr Spencer's ideas can and ought to be taken seriously by Muslims and his voice should be sought further; I am prepared to promote this." I have been down so long it looks like up to me: every American Muslim spokesman I have encountered in the public forum, including leading figures of CAIR, ADC, MPAC, and other groups, have roundly mischaracterized my work and smeared me as a "hatemonger."

I am simply raising honest questions and concerns about Islam, and this response has been disheartening not only personally but for my appraisal of the prospects for the reform within Islam that is so urgently needed. If Professor Muhammad can get together a group of Muslims who would be willing to engage -- honestly, and without dissimulation -- my questions about jihad, terrorism, and related issues, I would be happy to work with him. As he says: "reform cannot occur when there are lies and disinformation about Islam." That statement is just as true when the lies and disinformation come from Muslims themselves.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

I know that if I get shot, the first thing I will want to know is who manufactured the bullets. From Reuters, with thanks to the many people who sent this along:

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Israeli-made bullets bought by the U.S. Army to plug a shortfall should be used for training only, not to fight Muslim guerrillas in Iraq and Afghanistan, U.S. lawmakers told Army generals on Thursday.

Since the Army has other stockpiled ammunition, "by no means, under any circumstances should a round (from Israel) be utilized," said Rep. Neil Abercrombie of Hawaii, the top Democrat on a House of Representatives Armed Services subcommittee with jurisdiction over land forces.

The Army contracted with Israel Military Industries Ltd. in December for $70 million in small-caliber ammunition.

The Israeli firm was one of only two worldwide that could meet U.S. technical specifications and delivery needs, said Brig. Gen. Paul Izzo, the Army's program executive officer for ammunition. The other was East Alton, Illinois-based Winchester Ammunition, which also received a $70 million contract.

Although the Army should not have to worry about "political correctness," Abercrombie was making a valid point about the propaganda pitfalls of using Israeli rounds in the U.S.-declared war on terror, said Rep. Curt Weldon, the Pennsylvania Republican who chairs the subcommittee on tactical air and land forces.

"There's a sensitivity that I think all of us recognize," Weldon told the Army witnesses, including Maj. Gen. Buford Blount, who led the U.S. Third Infantry Division that captured Baghdad in April 2003.

Oh yes, and this will alleviate it. The mujahedin will drop all their talk of this being a war against Islam, etc., if only we don't use those ... Zionist bullets.

| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Comments, as you may have noticed, have been disabled for several days now, after some persistent and obnoxious attacks by a loathsome spammer or two. I was hoping they would be up and running by now, but it will be a little while longer. When they do return, registration will be required (including a valid email address). I am sure that will cut down on the activities of the loathesome spammer and his friends. Once again, apologies for the inconvenience, thank you for your patience, and be sure to keep coming to the site, as updates will continue when possible.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

June 24, 2004

This is only a test.

| 22 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The real reason why the Iranians seized the British ships? According to London's Al-Sharq Al-Awsat, it was all an ingenious plan. From MEMRI (with thanks to Romy):

"A source close to the [Iranian] Revolutionary Guards told Al-Sharq Al-Awsat of the real reasons and factors in the apprehension of the three British Navy vessels and the arrest of the sailors by Iranian Coast Guard patrol forces on Monday [June 21, 2004]. He indicated that the British Army command in Iraq had understood the message sent them by the Iranian Revolutionary Guards command by their capture of the ships."

'Detention of 40 Volunteers for Suicide Operations Was Great Concern to the Revolutionary Guards'

"According to the source, the content of the message was very simple: 'Release our comrades, whom you are holding, and we will release your soldiers.' The source clarified that the detention of 40 volunteers for suicide operations by the Ukrainian forces acting in Iraq was of great concern to the Revolutionary Guards command, because they [the 40] constituted the first group of volunteers participating in the Organization for the Commemoration of the Shahids, which was established recently by Revolutionary Guards Commander Col. Dhu al-Qadr.

"Al-Sharq Al-Awsat was informed that one of the senior leaders of the Revolutionary Guards, who had formerly held the post of head of the Committee for Iran-Ukraine Military Cooperation, had gone to Kiev for talks regarding the Iranian detainees. However, it turned out that the Ukrainian units had already handed the volunteers for suicide operations over to British forces acting in southern Iraq.

"Despite contacts between the Iranian and British military committees at the borders and daily contact between them in small conflict resolution - [such that] this has become routine since the British forces entered southern Iraq - the British command has so far refused to acknowledge that it is holding 40 Iranian volunteers in one of its detention camps. According to the Iranian source, this caused the Revolutionary Guards leadership to seek a semi-military solution to bring its men back from Iraq."

| 1 Comment
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

An interesting revelation in the Lynne Stewart case, courtesy the New York Times :

A co-defendant in the trial of Lynne F. Stewart, a lawyer accused of aiding terrorism, worked with an associate of Osama bin Laden to draft an October 2000 call to Muslims worldwide to fight Jews and "kill them wherever they are," the defendant's lawyer acknowledged yesterday in court.

That sounds like a quote from the Qur'an, Sura 9:5, more commonly translated as "slay them wherever you find them."

The lawyer, Kenneth Paul, conceded in his opening remarks to the jury that his client, Ahmed Abdel Sattar, had helped write the call, or fatwa, because he was angry about surging clashes at the time between the Israeli government and the Palestinians.

An astonishing defense. As if anything could justify a call to genocide.

Mr. Paul said the trial, being held in Federal District Court in Manhattan, would show that Mr. Sattar intended the message to be provocative but not "a terrorist statement." The lawyer said, "It was never his intent for anyone to be killed."

The fatwa was issued in the name of Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman, a blind Muslim cleric who is serving a life sentence in an American prison for inspiring a terrorist conspiracy against the United States.

Yeah, it was never Sheikh Omar's intent that anyone be killed. That's why he had his followers leave such a small bomb in the World Trade Center in 1993.

Ms. Stewart, who was the sheik's defense lawyer, is accused of helping him convey instructions to his followers in a militant group in Egypt to launch terrorist attacks.

Federal prosecutors have given Mr. Sattar, a Postal Service employee from Staten Island, a central place in their case against Ms. Stewart. They charge that Mr. Sattar, 45, was a liaison to Mr. Abdel Rahman's most violent followers in Egypt and Afghanistan and through them to Al Qaeda.

They say Mr. Sattar laid plans with some of those followers to launch new terrorist attacks against the Egyptian government and sent messages through Ms. Stewart to Mr. Abdel Rahman to secure his approval from prison. The sheik is the spiritual leader of the Islamic Group, a militant Egyptian organization.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Here is Eurabia in action: European politicians doing the bidding of their Muslim masters. From Arutz Sheva, with thanks to the many who sent this to me:

A former French Prime Minister, and currently a leading member of the European Parliament, has called Great Britain's Balfour Declaration that paved the way for the creation of the State of Israel as a "historic mistake." Michel Rocard, who is said to be in the running for president of the European Parliament for the coming two and a half years as part of a political deal, spoke about Israel in a lecture last week in Alexandria, Egypt. Israel is a "unique and abnormal condition," he said, "because it was created with a promise, and [because] millions of Jews gathered from all around the world, creating an entity that continues to pose a threat to its neighbors until today."
| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

An attempt to intimidate the jihadists' Target #1? From AP, :

ANKARA, Turkey (AP) -- A small bomb exploded Thursday in front of the hotel where U.S. President George W. Bush is expected to stay when he visits Ankara for meetings with Turkish leaders. One police officer was badly injured, a security official said.

The injured police officer was standing near the bomb when it went off, tearing off one of his legs, the security officer said on customary condition of anonymity.

Police had been notified of a suspicious package on the street some 75 meters (yards) from the entrance to the hotel. The bomb exploded as officers approached the package to investigate. ...

Militant Islamic groups, Kurdish separatists and leftists have carried out attacks in Turkey in the past.

UPDATE: This one may not have been a jihad attack. A leftist organization has claimed responsibility.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

As June 30 approaches, the jihad intensifies (when the major media says "insurgents," they mean "jihadists.") From CNN, :

BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) -- Insurgents have staged simultaneous attacks on police stations and other targets in four cities across Iraq, killing at least 40 people and injuring scores more.

In the biggest attack on Thursday, a series of explosions struck the northern city of Mosul, killing more than 30 people and wounding 170 others.

The violence in Mosul -- which includes three car bombings, a rocket attack, a raid on a security company and clashes between coalition forces and insurgents -- has virtually paralyzed the predominantly Kurdish city.

Iraqi police stations and training facilities were the worst hit in Mosul, with seven Iraqi policemen and one U.S. solider among those killed.

In a coordinated series of attacks across Iraq just six days before power is handed over to an interim government, insurgents also targeted police stations in Baqubah and Ramadi and battled American forces in Fallujah.

Insurgents have taken over parts of Baqubah after launching a series of attacks that killed two U.S. soldiers and four Iraqi soldiers.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

June 23, 2004

More unsurprising news from the World Tribune, with thanks to Manny:

Saudi opposition sources said Saudi security commanders knew of the location of Al Qaida chief Abul Aziz Al Muqrin at least three days before he executed a U.S. hostage.

The Washington-based Saudi Institute said Saudi authorities knew of the whereabouts of the Al Qaida cell that abducted and threatened to kill Lockheed Martin engineer Paul Johnson. But the institute said the Saudi government decided not to move until Johnson, captured on June 12, was executed.

"The Saudi government knew the location of a number of the terrorists but waited until they killed American hostage Paul Johnson before moving against them," the Saudi Institute said in a statement on Tuesday.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

One of the most dispiriting things about the comments shutdown, which we are working to end as quickly as we possibly can, is that we have all missed out on remarks from our friend Hugh Fitzgerald, one of the most erudite and articulate anti-jihadists on the scene today. In fact, I can't think of anyone who tops him in either erudition or elegance of speech, and everything I have read of his is a sheer delight to read.

A note to the many people who have recommended that Hugh get his own blog, and write his own book: rest assured that work is being done on both fronts. Watch for updates.

Anyway, for those of you who are going through Hugh withdrawal, here is something to tide you over: Douce France, a typically perpiscacious meditation on our erstwhile friends in the land of Lafayette:

Imagine that you are a cosseted member of the French elite. One child is doing the khâgne, aiming for rue d’Ulm. Another is now a politechnicien. You are very comfortable, working for the state. You and your spouse are journalists, or writers, or one of that vast tribe of people conducting “recherches” and life is comfortable, good, the way it should be. Yes, you do notice more and more Muslims about you as you walk, no longer in the banlieues, but in the center of Paris, or Toulouse, or Lyon. And you remember how uneasy you felt, four years ago, when you happened to be walking on the Cannebière in Marseille. You decided, then and there, that you would not return.

And you have friends who live in the south. And they tell you that the beurs – some call them maghrébins -- make life hell for everyone. They attack French children on the way to school. They vandalize cars. They threaten, and do more than threaten, anyone who is still foolish enough to walk out wearing a kippah or a cross. Whole areas of cities in the south, as in the north, and east, and west, have become off-limits to non-Muslims. In the schools, the teachers have lost authority. They cannot even cover the subjects of World War II, the Resistance, and the murders of the Jews as the state prescribes; they fear, with reason, the violent reaction of the Muslim students.

And as the schools become more and more dangerous for non-Muslim students and teachers, with more time and resources devoted to discipline rather than to learning, French parents and would-be parents are now silently factoring into their childbearing plans the present value of the future cost of what, they see, will now have to be added: private school tuition. And that means, of course, that those French people will plan on smaller families. And they will also be factoring in the growing cost, paid by them, those French taxpayers, for the whole expanding edifice of security, the guards in the schools, the guards at the train stations and métro stations and airports and at government buildings everywhere, the costs of keeping the gravestones from being vandalized, the costs of protecting the synagogues and the churches, the costs for all those tapped phones and agents in mosques, and subsidies to lawyers and judges to hear charges and try cases against Muslims, and the costs of monitoring da'wa in the prisons (more than 50% Muslim).

But the Muslims are indifferent to expenses incurred by the French state. France is part of the world; the world belongs to Allah, and to his Believers. That doctrine has remained immutable for 1400 years. Imam Bouziane, the one they keep trying to deport, had 16 children by two wives, all living on the French state: a representative Muslim man. Over time, the difference between average family size of Muslims and non-Muslims steadily increases. And, over time, the education system continues to disintegrate. Right now, perhaps, you cannot see it. Your children go to the best schools, followed by the best lycées. You vacation in Normandy, or Brittany, or the Ile de Ré. And you do not take the metro often enough, or walk in the right districts, or work in the right factories or offices, to understand what tens of millions of your fellow Frenchmen now have to endure. You, for the moment, are still immune, still willfully unaware. You have spent the last few decades learning about the Muslim world from Eric Rouleau, and his epigones (after they silenced Peroncel-Hugoz, the one journalist who reported the truth) in Le Monde. You are deeply-versed in the constantly reported-upon, endlessly dilated-upon, perfidy of the mighty empire of Israel. You know what we have all had dinned into us: that the Arab Muslims are reasonable people, with clearly-justified grievances, grievances so reasonable and so limited in scope, that justice demands they be satisfied. Everyone agrees on the “solution.” It is called a “two-state solution” and of course it is a “solution” for otherwise, of course, it would not have been called a “solution.”

And everything looks the way it always has looked: the linden trees, the river, the bridges, the réverbères, the étalage in the neighborhood boulangerie. Douce France, cher pays de mon enfance. At the end of the school day, chic mothers still congregate in little towns, or small cities, outside the school – this or that Ecole Jules Ferry -- waiting to pick up their children. Here come the littlest ones, from Maternelle, running up now -- just look at how small they are. And here are the CE1 group, with those huge cartables on their tiny backs. Run, run, run, to Mommy. Oop-la. And then the years of study, study, study marked by ever-larger cahiers -- "cahier" and "cartable" are the words that identify French DNA better than Piaf or gauloises, isn't that true? And now we will read the books, and study the subjects, set down so completely and precisely by the Ministry of Education. And now we are up to the final year, preparing for the Bac, with copies of blue-backed BALISES, guides to Les Châtiments and La Peau de Chagrin. And just look at the results listed in the newspaper: Claire-Alix has a mention très bien. Fantastic. Everything is fine, everything will always stay the same, whole countries cannot change. It’s not possible.

But it is changing, coming apart, quietly, slowly --let’s not look too closely, we mustn't pay too much attention -- the streets, the schools, the hospitals, the ability to speak the truth about things, about life as it is lived, la vita vissuta as they like to say in a neighboring country. Dominique de Villepin always knew there was nothing to worry about; he was born, after all, in Salé, next to Rabat, even spent a few years of his infancy there; of course he knows his Arabs, his Muslims. And surely Eric Rouleau, who for decades in Le Monde was the resident expert on the Middle East (he was so knowledgeable that he never had to so much as mention the teachings of the Qur’an and Sunna), surely he knew everything, didn't he? And those French translations of Edward Said that denounced with such passion the Islamophobia, and those vicious cliches with which the blind and rotting West has always caricatured the Arab Muslim world. Oh, we have been so terrible to the Arabs, we colonialists, we French, we Westerners. And then there is the never-ending outrage of Israel, that running colonial sore. Of course, they have every right, those Muslims, to come here to France. We went to their countries once, now they come to ours. And they have every right to hate us, don’t they?

So now we have decided not to understand, and to cut all ties of sympathy to, Israel -- and how did we ever have any sympathy for it in the first place, the way some of our parents did back in 1948 or 1956 or 1967? How could they not have seen what the "Palestinian people" had to endure? Hanan, Yasser, Said, Saeb, Aziz, Walid, Rashid, Mohammed -- you have won our hearts and minds. Take us, do with us what you will.

No one will mention what is happening or what kinds of things we must begin to think about doing to save ourselves. No one of any decency. And whatever Le Pen and Megret say, we must say the opposite (except, of course, when they show their hostility to "the Jews"). Do not say those things, do not think them. Free thought is all very well in theory, but really -- consider the consequences. Don't dare to think outside that box brimming with idées reçues. Défense de penser au dehors du box.

No, everything will be all right as you stroll down the Avenue Paule-Anne. Those Muslims will never be a match for us. Why, just look at those legionnaires marching à pas lent down the Champs-Elysées, think of that string of desert victories. Inside our heads, it is 1930 and over here is the Exposition coloniale. You remember, tu t’en souviens, that painting by le Douanier Rousseau, don't you, with the burnoosed Arab standing next to the black Senegalese? I have it right, don’t I? France will always be France. Nothing will ever change.

At a certain point, and despite everything that causes you not to see what is staring you in the face, you realize that something has gone irreparably wrong with your country, and you, and your children, are in danger of losing that country, down to every village and house, qui m’est une province et beaucoup davantage. And you do not know what to do, or how to explain this feeling to others, or in whom to confide your secret fears, or what can be done. It is so confusing, and so upsetting. You cannot vote for Le Pen. You cannot endorse "cowboy" Bush or those ridiculous Americans. You have no place to go.

And then you learn what Jacques Chirac -- who now has a Muslim grandchild himself -- and Dominique de Villepin, do not wish you to learn. For if you did, you might be very angry. You discover that 1 out of every 3 babies born in France today is a Muslim baby. And that means, in 20 years, one of every three 20-year-olds in France will be a Muslim twenty-year-old. And that means, twenty years after that, at present rates of reproduction, France will have a majority Muslim population. Where shall we hide the statues from Marly-le-roi? And the Venus de Milo? And what about all those paintings of animated life -- all those portraits in the Louvre, and the Grand Palais, and the Musée Guimet down there in linden-lined Aix, and everywhere else in art-filled artful France, mère des arts, des armes, et des loix -- that are absolutely forbidden according to the immutable strictures of the Qur'an. Should they be sent for safekeeping to those Americans across the seas? By then most of the Jews in France will have left, gone across the oceans for their own safekeeping, to Israel or to English-speaking Canada (they were worried about the Muslim population of Quebec, you see, which had been allowed to grow under the Province of Quebec's policy of encouraging francophone immigrants, preferring North Africans to potential immigrants from Italy, Greece, Spain), and above all, to America. What luck those Americans have had. No more bequests to France by the likes of the Rothschilds, or Nissim Camondo. No more Donations from another Pierre Lévy. Enjoy the Kufic calligraphy; some find it endlessly fascinating.

For the moment, you allow yourself to believe that something will come up. Most likely, all those Muslims will simply convert. I mean, they do that, don't they, quite easily I'm told. Of course, why didn't I think of it, that is exactly what will happen. The situation is always saved in time. Just like during the war. Nothing to worry about. Nothing.

| 1 Comment
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This morning it looked as if those British soldiers had already been released, or would soon be released by Iran. Now the situation doesn't look as positive. From This Is London:

Talks are taking place to secure the release of the eight British sailors paraded blindfold on Iranian television and forced to make public confessions.

Earlier reports coming out of the country had said that the men were already free, it was then claimed that they would not be released until Thursday.

Negotiations are now believed to be taking place between the Iranian and British delegations in the city of Mahshahr.

The breakthrough came after a day of diplomacy amid anger and revulsion at the way the servicemen were treated. As part of a deal designed to save face in Tehran, Britain was expected to make a statement of regret the men had strayed into Iranian waters.

Remember when Argentina took over the Falkland Islands? That was a different Britain, of course.

UPDATE: At last they have really been released.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

An egregious example of dhimmitude from the LA Times, with thanks to kfir:

LONDON — Daniel Pearl, Nicholas Berg, Paul M. Johnson Jr. and now a threat against a South Korean: Militants in the Middle East and South Asia have adopted beheading, vaguely invoking religious justifications or Arab tradition for the method of killing. Yet most Muslims would consider that a gross misinterpretation of their religion.

There is nothing particularly Islamic about decapitation, no exhortation in the Koran to carry out beheadings, and no religious prescription for the killing of innocents in any form, religious scholars and academics say.

Oh really? Well, let's look at the record:

Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): "I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instil terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them." (Qur'an, Sura 8:12)
Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers (in fight), smite at their necks... (Qur'an, Sura 47:4)

And during the massacre of the Jewish Qurayzah tribe, Ibn Ishaq, Muhammad's earliest biographer, describes the scene:

The apostle [Muhammad] went out to the market of Medina (which is still its market today) and dug trenches in it. Then he sent for [the men of Banu Qurayza] and struck off their heads in those trenches as they were brought out to him in batches.

Ibn Ishaq puts the number of those massacred at "600 or 700 in all, though some put the figure as high as 800 or 900."

So why is the LA Times repeating this arrant nonsense about there being nothing in Islam sanctioning beheading? Are they ignorant, or willfully deceptive? In the final analysis, it doesn't matter -- the outcome is the same either way. But it does show why most analyses of Islam and terrorism in the mainstream media simply cannot be trusted.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

LGF has posted a horrifying link to a Scandinavian Muslim bulletin board on which someone has posted ("Look how cute!") a video of Muslim kids reenacting the Nick Berg decapitation video.

If anyone has any doubts about what we are up against in the war on terror, see this video. It isn't bloody. It's just sickening. What will become of these children who are being brought up to glorify murder and violence?


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

No sign of the desired dhimmitude from the Bush White House or its allies. From FoxNews, with thanks to DC Watson:

NEW YORK — Although Al Qaeda-linked groups recently executed two kidnapped civilian workers, the United States continues to maintain it will not negotiate with terrorists, whatever the price — even if violence against Americans and their allies gets worse.

"I think there's a likelihood [attacks could escalate in Iraq and Saudi Arabia] and that's certainly the philosophy behind refusing to negotiate with terrorists," said Robert Jordan, a former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia. "I think it's a sound philosophy — one that's proved the test of time … that should be continued."

Jordan's comments came after news broke Tuesday that suspected Al Qaeda terrorists had beheaded hostage Kim Sun-il, a South Korean who worked for a U.S. military supplier.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Schumer included a detailed proposal for mall security. I doubt this will fly, however, as not enough Americans are convinced that this is a real threat. From WND, :

The recent plot by an al-Qaida freelancer to blow up an Ohio shopping center and revelations that the Madrid bombers' next intended target was a suburban mall – coming on the heels of the terror group's reported plans to hit the U.S. hard this summer with a massive attack – is causing at least one congressman to demand security at the nation's shopping malls be radically beefed up with high-tech, high-dollar equipment like that used in airports.

U.S. Sen. Charles Schumer, D.-N.Y., says the government's indictment of Nuradin Abdi for plotting with al-Qaida to bomb shopping malls, coupled with recently uncovered documents showing the March 11 Madrid train bombers also planned to attack Parquesur, a large suburban shopping center there, are "clear proof" the U.S. is not doing enough to protect the nation's shopping malls from terror attacks.

"Everyone who listened to the audio tapes released by the 9/11 Commission this week couldn't help but feel their hair stand on end when they heard how unprepared we were to deal with an aerial attack," Schumer said while standing in Greeley Square outside the Manhattan Mall in New York City. "More and more evidence is mounting that if they want to attack again, they'll do it someplace closer to home like a shopping center. We've gone all-out to shore up air security, and now we have to catch up with mall security as well."


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

From the Chosun Ilbo, with thanks to Ali Dashti:

Korean Muslim Imam Lee Hang-rae said during an interview at a mosque in Itaewon, Seoul on Wednesday that, “We Muslims were also shocked and felt heartbroken like everyone else. I am worried that this incident may damage the perception of Islam on the whole. The group that kidnapped and murdered Kim Sun-il is a political group that has nothing to do with Islam. They do not obey Islamic doctrines and are even against Islam. Islam itself is peace. The Koran also forbids murder in a phrase, “Do not take any precious life without proper reasons.”

It would be refreshing if just one time, we weren't asked to accept that this sort of thing "has nothing to do with Islam" just on the word of other Muslims. I wish that just one time, Muslims who say these beheadings have nothing to do with Islam would explain why Sura 47:4 ("when you meet the unbelievers, smite their necks") doesn't apply here, and why the example of Muhammad's beheadings doesn't apply -- in short, why the reasons that the radicals themselves give for what they are doing don't qualify as "proper reasons" under the Qur'anic caveat cited by Lee Hang-rae.

But they never do. Instead, all we get from one side are detailed arguments based on the Qur'an and Sunnah justifying what they do, and the other side shouting, "It's against Islam!" Never mind which side I believe; which side do you think young Muslims who are trying to live their faith properly believe?


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The New York Post has a somewhat different view of dhimmi lawyer Lynne Stewart from that of the Washington Post.

June 23, 2004 -- Radical defense attorney Lynne Stewart unleashed danger on the world when she helped a jailed terrorist spread messages of hate from his prison cell, prosecutors charged yesterday in their opening arguments.

The feds laid out their case against Stewart, 64, an Arabic translator, Mohammed Yousry, and a Staten Island postal worker, Ahmed Abdel Sattar.

All three are charged with helping Sheik Omar Abdel-Rahman communicate with his terrorist followers from his Minnesota prison cell, where he is living in virtual isolation from the rest of the world.

"Abdel-Rahman was a man the U.S. government believed was so dangerous they tried to cut him off from the outside world," prosecutor Christopher Morvillo told Manhattan Federal Court. "His words and speeches were as dangerous as weapons."

The former school librarian and mother of six created a "secret underground communication channel to get around the prison restrictions," he argued.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Just how are young men like Asaha Dajing recruited? Is it really a matter of their being "fooled"? Or are they shown convincing passages of the Qur'an and Sunnah that show that they should do what the radicals are doing if they want to be good Muslims? From USA Today, with thanks to Ali Dashti:

Asaha Dajing, 19, appeared to be thriving at an Islamic college in Yala, 20 miles north of this remote village. He had just won a $125 creative writing scholarship, big money in these parts. His family was proud.

But Asaha had friends his parents didn't know about: Islamic radicals who were recruiting impressionable young men for a mysterious holy war here in the jungles of southern Thailand.

Asaha's secret life was exposed only by his death. He was killed by police along with 13 other militants April 28 when they staged a suicidal assault on a government office near this village. Most were armed only with machetes.

"They used my son because he was young," says his father, rubber farmer Tama Dajing, 49. "He could be fooled very easily. ... I blame myself because I just worked. I went out in the morning and I came home at night, and I didn't know what was going on."

No one seems to know exactly what is going on here in the predominantly Muslim southern tip of Thailand. Mysterious insurgents are terrorizing the countryside, bewildering the government in Bangkok and raising fears that radical Islamic groups from outside Thailand may have found a new base in Southeast Asia.

"It's still a witch's brew. It's still incubating," says Paul Quaglia, a former CIA official now working as a security consultant in Bangkok with Pacific Strategies & Assessments. "Regional Islamic terrorists are looking at the area for a possible jihad (holy war). Disgruntled Muslim youth form a potential labor pool" for terrorists.

Southeast Asia already is seething with Islamic violence. The group Jemaah Islamiyah, which has been linked to al-Qaeda, was behind bombings that killed 202 people, mostly foreign tourists, in Bali, Indonesia, in October 2002. A group called Abu Sayyaf has terrorized the traditionally Muslim region of Mindanao in the southern Philippines for several years, kidnapping tourists and attacking local Christians. Authorities fear that extremists also want to use the lawless jungles of southern Thailand to launch a holy war.

The United States has not turned southern Thailand into a new front in the war on terror and considers the insurgency an internal Thai matter. No Thai insurgent groups appear on the U.S. list of terrorist organizations. However, there is some evidence that Jemaah Islamiyah, which is on the U.S. terror list, has been active in Thailand. One of the group's leaders was captured in central Thailand last year, and some of the attackers in a wave of violence April 28 reportedly wore Jemaah Islamiyah T-shirts and in some cases showed knowledge of sophisticated military tactics.

The fact that the United States doesn't see the Thailand conflict as the same conflict that is raging in Iraq, Israel, Indonesia, Nigeria, the Philippines, and elsewhere in the world today is evidence of an analytic myopia that could prove fatal.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Not that the ideology that they have fostered for years in the madrassas had anything to do with it. From PNS, with thanks to Ali Dashti:

WASHIGNTON, USA : June 22 (PNS) - Pakistan Sunday "strongly rejected the insinuations" made by the 9/11 Commission that Pakistan, in any way, was involved with the perpetration of the horrific 9/11 attacks. "This is pure speculation," said Deputy Chief of the Mission of the Pakistan Embassy, adding:"we emphatically reject it."

"The unchecked succession of events in Afghanistan had led to the tragic events of 9/11." Mohammad Sadiq was commenting on the news reports which tried to implicate Pakistan being amongst those countries having allegedly supported or funded those involved with perpetration of the horrific 9/11 attacks. Pakistan, he reminded, had itself been a victim of terrorism, and that it was waging fight against terrorism "much before the astounding 9/11 attacks." ...

The DCM underscored that historically, Pakistan has recognized all governments in Kabul, including the Taliban government. It did not, however, mean that Pakistan agreed to the policies of the Taliban regime." "We did try to persuade [the] Taliban [to] comply with U.N. resolutions and international norms on terrorism," he added.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Another heartening sign that maybe the Europeans aren't quite ready to roll over and play dhimmi. From the BBC, with thanks to many, many wonderful people who sent it:

European police are meeting in The Hague to look at ways of tackling the rising phenomenon of "honour killings".

They aim to set up a pan-European unit to combat the killings and crack down on related issues such as trafficking.

Police are re-opening murder files related to families of Turkish, Middle Eastern, Asian, Arabic and Eastern European origin over the past 10 years.

Many victims of "honour killings" are women involved in relationships their family felt brought dishonour on them.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

An unsurprising story from The Halifax Herald Limited:

A man with no identification and no money spent nearly 24 hours in an off-limits area of the Halifax International Airport before being arrested, a Dartmouth provincial court heard Monday.

Federal Crown attorney James Martin said Vlad Sandulescu, a Canadian citizen of Romanian descent, scaled a fence Wednesday night and gained entry to the terminal through an unlocked door.

Mr. Martin said the 29-year-old man spent the night hidden above the ceiling tile of a washroom.

The next day, he said, Mr. Sandulescu tried to board at least three planes without a boarding pass or ticket. One flight was headed to Frankfurt, Germany, a second to New York and the third to Boston.

RCMP arrested Mr. Sandulescu about 8:30 p.m. Thursday after being told by airport security that workers had refused to allow a man without a boarding pass to enter the departure lounge and get on the flight to Boston.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

He will keep fighting "until Islamic rule is back on Earth." But of course, this conflict has nothing to do with religion. A suggestion for CAIR: why don't you develop, since you folks are so moderate and all, an Anti-Sharia Kit, that will explain to Muslims why they need not and should not fight to establish Islamic rule on Earth? Because there are, of course, a lot more Muslims who think like Zarqawi. I await your positive response.

From AP:

BAGHDAD, Iraq - A recording purportedly made by the mastermind of bombings and kidnappings in Iraq threatened to assassinate Iraq's interim prime minister and fight the Americans "until Islamic rule is back on Earth."

The audio recording was found Wednesday on a Web site that serves as a clearinghouse of Islamic extremist statements. It is supposedly from Jordanian-born terrorist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, whose network has been targeted by two U.S. airstrikes since Saturday.

Al-Zarqawi's group, Monotheism and Jihad, claimed responsibility for the beheading of American hostage Nicholas Berg and Kim Sun-il, a South Korean whose decapitated body was found Tuesday evening between Baghdad and Fallujah. ...

In the audiotape, the speaker thought to be al-Zarqawi told Iraq's interim prime minister, Iyad Allawi, that "we will continue the game with you until the end." The speaker said "we will not get bored" until "we make you drink from the same glass" as Izzadine Saleem, the Iraqi governing Council president killed last month in a car-bombing claimed at al-Zarqawi's group.

"We will carry on our jihad against the Western infidel and the Arab apostate until Islamic rule is back on earth," the voice said.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

After a good bit of saber-rattling, the eight British soldiers arrested for straying into Iranian territorial waters have been released.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

A new article by Jihad Watch director Robert Spencer, "Stay Quiet and You’ll Be OK," is up at FrontPage this morning.

Here’s a new slogan for the zeitgeist: stay quiet and you’ll be OK. This was the message, according to the tapes released last week, that Muhammad Atta gave to the passengers on the ill-fated airplane that he and his fellow terrorists had commandeered.

Stay quiet and you’ll be OK. Don’t mention that a Saudi imam who spoke at the opening of a large new Islamic center in London once preached a sermon in which he called Jews “evil offspring, infidels, distorters of [others’] words, calf-worshippers, prophet-murderers, prophecy-deniers... the scum of the human race ‘whom Allah cursed and turned into apes and pigs,” and “an ongoing continuum of deceit, obstinacy, licentiousness, evil, and corruption.” AP noted that in London he said that Islam’s history was “the best testament to how different communities can live together in peace and harmony.” The BBC called him “one of Islam’s most renowned Imams” and reported his praise for British Muslims for having “taken great steps towards achieving community cohesion.” Neither said anything about his hate speech.

Stay quiet and you’ll be OK. Have you heard about the churches destroyed in Kosovo? “To keep the Serbs from claiming this area as part of their national heritage,” says Mikhael de Thyse of the Council of Europe, “some Albanians are attacking their churches.” In March, the cathedrals in Pristina and Prizren, Kosovo’s two main cities, were burned to the ground. Others that have been destroyed include the Holy Archangels Monastery, a charming and, of course, irreplaceable jewel dating from the fourteenth century. The local bishop has had harsh words for NATO peacekeepers, who he says have done little or nothing to protect the churches. But the media establishment has kept mum. Jihad in Kosovo? Come on. Everyone knows the Balkan Muslims are the victims, not the perpetrators! ...

As Ralph Peters has had the courage to declare, “It’s time to end the politically correct baby-talk insisting that Islam isn’t the problem. In the decaying Arab world, Islam is the problem — because of the way bitter old men interpret and deform its more humane precepts while embracing its cruelest injunctions.” It’s time to end the baby talk, and the silence. For whatever combination of political correctness, fear, and indifference has made for the silence on these stories and others like them, it does nothing but play into the hands of those who would destroy us.

Stay quiet, and the jihad will continue to advance: in Iraq, and Afghanistan, and Israel, and Indonesia, and Nigeria, and the Philippines, and Western Europe, and elsewhere — and if you think we will not feel its impact here, just remember where Atta was when he said those words, and what happened next.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Comments are, alas, still disabled, but the last stagecoach to Secure Undisclosed Locationville should be bringing the tools we need to fix up a new troll-proof comments feature by this afternoon, and it should be up by tomorrow or Friday. Apologies for the long delay, and many thanks for your patience. But when it is all done, I think you will find the Jihad Watch Comments section to be a cleaner, better-lighted, less menacing neighborhood, free of thugs and graffiti.

Subscribers please note: 35 of you will not receive the Jihad Watch Daily Digest today. Something called "Spamcop" has "blacklisted" Jihad Watch, such that the Digest began bouncing back from your addresses. Uncertain what to do, I sent a notice to each of you Monday but heard back from no one, so yesterday I deleted all the blocked addresses from the subscriber list rather than just have them bounce back continually. So if you stop getting the Digest and would like to do so, please remonstrate with these "Spamcop" people (I would have, but they don't have contact info on their "blacklist" site) and then re-subscribe. I apologize for any inconvenience.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

June 22, 2004

When I posted about the offer, some people were angry. Stop picking on liberals, they said. Just because Hizballah made the offer doesn't mean that Moore is on their side. Well, now the picture is a bit different. From WND:

The company distributing filmmaker Michael Moore's Bush-bashing movie "Fahrenheit 9/11" says it won't reject an offer of help from Middle East terrorist organization Hezbollah.

As WorldNetDaily reported, terrorists affiliated with the Iran-backed network last week offered to help promote the film in the United Arab Emirates.

The movie industry publication Screen Daily reported, "In terms of marketing the film, [distributor] Front Row is getting a boost from organizations related to Hezbollah which have rung up from Lebanon to ask if there's anything they can do to support the film."

The story then quotes Front Row Managing Director Gianluca Chacra: "We can't go against these organizations as they could strongly boycott the film in Lebanon and Syria."


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers (in fight), smite at their necks ..." (Qur'an, Sura 47:4).

From AP:

CAIRO, Egypt (AP) - An Iraqi militant group has beheaded its South Korean hostage, Al-Jazeera television reported Tuesday.

The pan-Arab station said it had received a videotape showing that Kim Sun-il had been executed. ...

Al-Jazeera, which had not broadcast the tape, said the execution was carried out by the al-Qaida-linked group Monotheism and Jihad.

Let us not lose our resolve to end this scourge of humanity.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Heartening news from the World Tribune:

The United States has sent a tough message to Saudi Arabia that did not rule out abandoning of the kingdom's oil sector.

U.S. officials said the Bush administration has warned that Americans would not stay in Saudi Arabia unless the kingdom takes significant steps to protect them. The officials said the warning came in wake of the Al Qaida execution of Lockheed Martin engineer Paul Johnson on June 18.

Fewer than 30,000 Americans live in Saudi Arabia, with many of them working in the defense and oil sectors. More than 5,000 Americans were said to have left the kingdom over the last year and many more were said to planning to leave for the summer.

"It could have an effect [on the Saudi oil industry]," State Department spokesman Richard Boucher said. "Saudi authorities, as commendable as their overall effort is, have not yet been able to stop the terrorists to the point that everybody doesn't have to worry anymore."


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

From This Is London:

The threat of a terrorist attack using nuclear weapons is "real and imminent", the head of the UN's nuclear watchdog said today.

Mohammed al Baradei, chief of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said it was a "race against time" to prevent terrorists from obtaining nuclear materials. ...

"We are actually having a race against time which I don't think we can afford," he told the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace conference in Washington. "The danger is so imminent... so the sooner that we start, the better for everybody involved."


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

More on Mohammed Junaid Babar, from WND (thanks to Margelfand). He turns out to be the Muhammad Junaid who was widely reported after 9/11 to be on his way to Afghanistan to fight against Americans, even though his mother had survived the World Trade Center attack. I tried to track him down then, but since the "Babar" part of his name wasn't reported, I couldn't find him. Others who followed the same dead end suggested that that whole story had been fabricated. Well, it turns out it was all too real.

Al-Muhajiroun, of course, is the radical British group that is working toward the day when the "black flag of Islam," that is, the jihad flag, flies from #10 Downing Street.

A U.S.-based leader of Al-Muhajiroun who operates openly in Queens told WND on condition of anonymity: "I've known Junaid [Babar] for a long time. I met him about seven years ago in a local Mosque in Queens before we both became involved with Muhajiroun."

The leader would not comment on Babar's involvement with his group, except to say Babar was involved in "organizational operations" in Queens and later in Pakistan, where he traveled after leaving a $70,000-a-year computer job because he wanted to join the jihad in Afghanistan. ...

Al-Muhajiroun's branch in Queens claims to be involved in "only peaceful activities." The group holds closed-door meetings and study sessions at a mosque in Jackson Heights, Queens, led by an older spiritual cleric identified as a Sheikh Choudray. ...

At one Al-Muhajiroun event at Queensborough Community College sponsored by the MSA and attended by WND, a Muhajiroun speaker working with Yousuf said, "We reject the U.N., reject America, reject all law and order. Don't lobby Congress or protest because we don't recognize Congress! The only relationship you should have with America is to topple it!"

The speaker continued, "The so-called terrorists are the only people who truly fear Allah. ... They are the only worthy causes, and the mighty superpower only fears them."

In a private interview with WND, a Queens based Al-Muhajiroun leader said he would be "absolutely honored" to give up his life in a "martyr operation" against American civilians. The leader warned that "a jihad is coming to America because of the moves of the Bush administration." ...

In custody, Babar reportedly told investigators al-Qaida is planning more attacks in the United States, and he allegedly revealed a detailed plan to smuggle al-Qaida agents across the Mexican border.

Babar's assertions were reportedly part of the intelligence that led to recent warnings about a summer threat from the terror network.

Babar first appeared on the FBI's radar and was put on a terror watch list after he made anti-U.S. remarks to a Canadian news reporter in Pakistan following the Sept. 11 attacks.

He said that despite the fact his mother had escaped from the ninth floor of one of the World Trade Center towers, his loyalty was "to the Muslims, not the Americans." He also announced his intention to fight with the Taliban against U.S. forces in Afghanistan.

WND was told an Al-Muhajiroun leader in Pakistan, who appeared behind Babar in a British documentary aired on ITN television network in November, 2001, may have been instrumental in arranging for Babar to travel there.

"I'm willing to kill Americans," Babar said in the television interview, adding that he had no plans to return to New York.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The Washington Post just loves this woman, despite the fact that she is accused of aiding terrorists. Just look at the opening of this story. Why do they love her? Is it her Ashcroft-baiting? Her belief in "armed struggle" (by whom, and for what cause)? Her "left-leaning" activism? Her grandmotherly cuteness? Whatever the case, what if it's true, and she really was helping out a terrorist plot? Would she seem so cute and cuddly then? (Thanks to stevez.)

NEW YORK -- She's the New York Mets fan with a belief in armed struggle, the pink-faced grandmother who stands accused of helping a jailed terrorist sheik order followers to kill and kidnap in his name. Lynne Stewart, a proudly radical lawyer, could face 40 years in federal prison if she's convicted. But she's in no mood to curl up in a fetal position.

"How could I be happier? I feel like I've waited my whole life for this fight," she told a crowd of supporters at a pretrial fundraiser in a Manhattan Quaker church a few weeks back.

"I say this to John Ashcroft: Bring it on!"

The very public trial of the 64-year-old Stewart -- she plans to testify at length and write a Web log throughout -- commences this week in U.S. District Court in Manhattan and likely will stretch until autumn. A left-leaning pillar of this city's boisterous defense bar, Stewart has worked these courtrooms for two decades, representing leftists and mobsters, antiwar demonstrators and dope smugglers. She's been ranked among the city's 10 best trial lawyers.

"I love helping a jury cut through the crap," she said in an interview in her Manhattan law office a few blocks northeast of Ground Zero. "But I can't be sanguine about having the T-word hung around my neck."

The federal indictment accuses Stewart and two men -- an Arabic translator and a former U.S. postal worker -- of aiding a plot to kidnap and perhaps kill people to obtain the release of the imprisoned blind Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman, who is serving a life sentence for conspiring to blow up the United Nations, two Hudson River tunnels and Manhattan's FBI building.

The indictment alleges that while visiting her client in prison, Stewart spoke gibberish in English as a cover while the sheik gave instructions in Arabic to a follower posing as a translator. She then allegedly violated federal regulations by publicly announcing in 2000 that Rahman had withdrawn his support for a cease-fire with the Egyptian government.

Rahman is held in a maximum-security prison in Colorado and is prohibited from contacting his followers.

The federal government's indictment of Stewart in April 2002 marked the first time that it had brought charges of conspiring to provide material support for terrorist activity against a defense attorney in a terrorism case.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Now let's see. There is a large, growing, and vocal group in England that is virulently anti-Semitic and sometimes violent. Could they have anything to do with the attacks on 100 synagogues since 2000? Could that at least be investigated? No: to do so would be "racism."

From This Is London, with thanks to Andy:

The charred remains of priceless prayer books scattered on the floor are all that remain after arson attacks left two north London synagogues wrecked.

In Hendon, more than £250,000 of damage was done by vandals who broke into the UK headquarters of Jewish educational body Aish HaTorah. ...

A day earlier, vandals smashed a CCTV camera at the South Tottenham Synagogue before breaking a window and throwing a burning rag inside. Many prayer books were incinerated - some more than 100 years old and others which were smuggled out of Germany and Poland by Jews fleeing the Nazis in the 1930s.

Rabbi Michael Biberfeld said his congregation mourned the loss of the priceless books. He said: "Some of them have never been reprinted after the Holocaust. The people who saved them from the Nazis in Germany and Poland after Kristallnacht in 1938 risked their lives. For them to be destroyed is a tragic end." ...

Although police are not linking the attacks they admit it is "unusual" for two synagogues to be targeted in such a short space of time. More than 100 British synagogues have been desecrated since September 2000.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Yes, it's a jihad in Chechnya. And the surrounding areas. From AP, with thanks to Nicolei:

VLADIKAVKAZ (Russia) - Assailants armed with grenade- and rocket-launchers seized the Interior Ministry headquarters in Ingushetia, a Russian region bordering warring Chechnya, killing the acting minister, a ministry official said on Tuesday. Attacks were also reported elsewhere in Ingushetia.

The Interior Ministry official said it was not immediately clear who the attackers were, but said some of them were shouting 'Allahu akhbar' - a frequent cry of Chechnya's separatist rebels ever as their insurgency increasingly comes under the influence of radical Islam.

Fighting from the 4-year-old Chechen war has occasionally spilled into Ingushetia, highlighting the Russian military's ineffectiveness against the rebels despite having heavier weapons and far superior manpower.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Holland's first convicted terrorists are appealing. From Expatica, with thanks to Nicolei:

AMSTERDAM — Two of the four Muslims convicted by an appeals court in The Hague on Monday will take their cases to the Supreme Court to have their sentences quashed. One of the men was sentenced to six years jail for involvement in a criminal gang linked to a plot to bomb the US embassy in Paris.

The Supreme Court will thus make a final ruling whether information from the Dutch secret service AIVD can be used in court. Rotterdam Court ruled at the end of 2002 against the use of the evidence, but the appeals court in The Hague reversed that ruling on Monday.

The appeals court sentenced two Muslim men to six and four-year jail terms after convicting them of involvement in an international criminal organisation, which was planning a bomb attack on the US embassy in Paris. The attack was never carried out.

The convicted men were identified as 29-year-old Jerome Courtailler, a French convert to Islam and Algerian Abdelghani Rabia, 32. But the lawyer representing the Frenchman said later on Monday an appeal will be lodged with the Dutch Supreme Court.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Musharraf hasn't gotten them all. And what is he doing about the madrassas again? From HiPakistan:

WANA, June 21: The head of 'mujahideen' shura in South Waziristan on Monday said they wanted to live in peace with Pakistan, but vowed to continue waging a jihad against the United States.

"We want peace for Pakistan, but not for the US," Haji Muhammad Omar, amir of the mujahideen shura in Waziristan, told Dawn. The hitherto unknown Muhammad Omar called the BBC Pushto Service on Sunday to claim that he had been made the acting commander of the mujahideen in place of Nek Muhammad who had been killed in a missile attack last week.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The courageous Anne Bayefsky of Columbia University at the UN conference on Confronting Anti-Semitism: Education for Tolerance and Understanding. From Opinion Journal, with thanks to all who sent it to me:

I appreciate the opportunity to speak to you at this first U.N. conference on anti-Semitism, which is being convened six decades after the organization's creation. ...

This meeting occurs at a point when the relationship between Jews and the United Nations is at an all-time low. The U.N. took root in the ashes of the Jewish people, and according to its charter was to flower on the strength of a commitment to tolerance and equality for all men and women and of nations large and small. Today, however, the U.N. provides a platform for those who cast the victims of the Nazis as the Nazi counterparts of the 21st century. The U.N. has become the leading global purveyor of anti-Semitism--intolerance and inequality against the Jewish people and its state.

Not only have many of the U.N. members most responsible for this state of affairs rendered their own countries Judenrein, they have succeeded in almost entirely expunging concern about Jew-hatred from the U.N. docket. From 1965, when anti-Semitism was deliberately excluded from a treaty on racial discrimination, to last fall, when a proposal for a General Assembly resolution on anti-Semitism was withdrawn after Ireland capitulated to Arab and Muslim opposition, mention of anti-Semitism has continually ground the wheels of U.N.-led multilateralism to a halt.

There has never been a U.N. resolution specifically on anti-Semitism or a single report to a U.N. body dedicated to discrimination against Jews, in contrast to annual resolutions and reports focusing on the defamation of Islam and discrimination against Muslims and Arabs. Instead there was Durban--the 2001 U.N. World Conference "Against Racism," which was a breeding ground and global soapbox for anti-Semites. When it was over U.N. officials and member states turned the Durban Declaration into the centerpiece of the U.N.'s antiracism agenda--allowing Durban follow-up resolutions to become a continuing battlefield over U.N. concern with anti-Semitism. ...

The record of the Secretariat is more of the same. In November 2003, Secretary-General Kofi Annan issued a report on Israel's security fence, detailing the purported harm to Palestinians without describing one terrorist act against Israelis which preceded the fence's construction. Recently, the secretary-general strongly condemned Israel for destroying homes in southern Gaza without mentioning the arms-smuggling tunnels operating beneath them. When Israel successfully targeted Hamas terrorist Abdel Aziz Rantissi with no civilian casualties, the secretary-general denounced Israel for an "extrajudicial" killing. But when faced with the 2004 report of the U.N. special rapporteur on extrajudicial executions detailing the murder of more than 3,000 Brazilian civilians shot at close range by police, Mr. Annan chose silence. That's discrimination. ...

Start putting a name to the terrorists that kill Jews because they are Jews.

Start condemning human-rights violators wherever they dwell--even if they live in Riyadh or Damascus.

Stop condemning the Jewish people for fighting back against their killers.

And the next time someone asks you or your colleagues to stand for a moment of silence to honor those who would destroy the state of Israel, say no.
Only then will the message be heard from these chambers that the U.N. will not tolerate anti-Semitism or its consequences against Jews and the Jewish people, whether its victims live in Tehran, Paris or Jerusalem.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Bruno Guiderdoni isn't concerned about Westerners who go to Iraq in order to rebuild the country and end up being beheaded; he is concerned that someone might look askance at the Muslims in France as a result. Of course, no one should target innocent people in France, Iraq, or anywhere, but where exactly is the actual violence coming from? Note that he invokes a couple of old news items about remarks he didn't like, but no acts of violence against Muslims in France. From UPI, with thanks to Ali Dashti:

BORDEAUX, France, June 21 (UPI) -- European specialists on Islamic affairs fear that the beheadings of Americans and other foreigners in the Middle East will trigger a severe anti-Muslim backlash.

"These barbaric acts have been catastrophic for the prospects of Muslims in France," said Bruno Guiderdoni, one of the country's foremost Koran scholars. "A discernable shift has occurred in public attitudes," he said. "Its most dangerous aspect is a new hostility even among the once-liberal French intellectuals against our religion."

Two years ago, a three-judge panel cleared bestselling author Michel Houellebecq of inciting racial hate for describing Islam as "the most stupid religion." Later he explained: "I have never displayed the least contempt for Muslims. But I have as much contempt as ever for Islam."

Last fall, Claude Imbert, founder and editor in chief of the newsmagazine Le Point, declared: "To be honest, I am somewhat hostile to Islam. I am not embarrassed to admit that."

To Guiderdoni, such blunt remarks from members of the intellectual elite are alarm signals. To observers it seems that Europeans no longer buy into statements of disassociation by prominent Islamic leaders such as Dalil Boubakeur, president of the French Council of Muslim Faith.

Boubakeur said: "Islam is not a religion that beats women, kills kids and desires the death of the West. What shocks the French is ... even more of a shock to us." Muslim extremists have by now beheaded three Americans and are threatening an abducted South Korean and a European -- possibly German -- journalist with a similar fate. ...

On the one hand, the Muslim Holy Book counsels a broad-minded attitude toward other faiths, insists Sheikh Mohammed Mohammed Ali, a Shiite Muslim scholar who is currently running for a seat in the new Iraqi assembly.

On the other hand, the Koran clearly advises the faithful to slay and main infidels: "Strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them" (Surah 8:12).

In a telephone call from Baghdad, Ali explains that under religious law decapitation is only permissible if approved by a ranking scholar whose role would then be comparable to that of the Supreme Court of the United States. "Nobody in al-Qaida has this competence. None has even ever attended an Islamic university or similar institution."

OK. So you're telling me that only someone who has gone to college can behead a non-Muslim? The absurdity of this is breathtaking, particularly since those Al-Qaeda operatives have all probably memorized the Qur'an, including 8:12, and they didn't read the verse as "Strike off their heads if a university-trained scholar approves."


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

One of the most active Islamic radical leaders in North Africa has been killed. No doubt he was waging jihad in North Africa because of his rage over Abu Ghraib and Israel. From AP, with thanks to Ali Dashti:

ALGIERS, Algeria -- Troops killed one of North Africa's most wanted Islamic militants, who had sought to link his bloody insurgent movement in Algeria to Usama bin Laden's Al Qaeda terror network, the military said Sunday.

The death of Nabil Sahraoui, head of the Salafist Group for Call and Combat, marked a major victory for Algerian government efforts to suppress Islamic militant violence and left his armed extremist organization with no clear leader.

Sahraoui and three of his lieutenants were killed in a "vast anti-terrorist operation" that continues in the Kabylie region east of the capital, Algiers, the army general staff said in a statement.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

For those of you who may be checking in just now, I thought I'd repeat the notice that comments are temporarily closed. We have been hearing from a high volume of jihadists here at Jihad Watch, who are both enraged that we would tell the truth about jihad terrorism and ready to do violence to us for doing so. It's the same old story: say it's a religion of peace, or we'll kill you.

So anyway, we are installing new features that will, I hope, once again enable people to comment but make it easier to screen out those whose idea of jihad is to steal other people's names and post comments making lewd remarks. Until then, I ask for your patience and hope you will keep checking in, and posts will continue to be made when possible.

Thanks for all your support. Jihad Watch is, once again, an endeavor to defend human rights for all people, Muslim and non-Muslim, female and male, and anyone who is able to pierce through the fog of political correctness and misinformation to realize that has my gratitude.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

June 21, 2004

Ralph Peters says it all at FrontPage (thanks to Charles):

Religions are what men make of them. In the Arab heartlands of Islam, Muslims are making a gory mess of their faith. It's time to end the politically correct baby-talk insisting that Islam isn't the problem. In the decaying Arab world, Islam is the problem--because of the way bitter old men interpret and deform its more humane precepts while embracing its cruelest injunctions.

The decapitation of yet another American civilian can't be dismissed as an aberration from "true" Islam. The tradition of beheading unarmed prisoners dates to the earliest decades of the Muslim faith. The butchering of Paul Johnson, Nick Berg and others isn't a new phenomenon--it's revivalism, "that old-time religion" returning for a re-match with secular devils.

Millions of Muslims find such atrocities inspiring. Millions more view such cruelty as just. It's the vicarious revenge of the self-made failure. And for every rent-a-cleric the Saudi government pushes in front of a television camera to condemn such acts, thousands of other mullahs continue to preach anti-Western hatred--the brutal specificity of which would horrify even America's leftists, if only they stopped apologizing to terrorists long enough to listen. ...

Arab Muslims are allowed to spew anti-Western, anti-Christian, anti-Jewish, anti-Hindu, anti-everybody-else hate speech. That's just their culture, you see. But it's taboo for a Westerner to suggest that the roots of terror may go a bit deeper than a black sheep or two in a few Middle-Eastern families.

Leftist apologists for terror here in the United States attack any attempt at a frank discussion of the Middle East's problems with charges of bigotry and neo-imperialism. But if we examine the madness of the American Left dispassionately, we find that it's the Noam Chomskys, Susan Sontags and their acolytes from the campus greensward who are the true bigots. Imperialists, too.

By refusing to hold Middle Eastern civilization to reasonable standards of behavior and responsibility, our domestic Left has given new life to the "little brown brother" school of colonialist thought. According to the Left's internal logic, Arabs aren't capable of the same moral reflection and behavioral maturity well-educated whites demonstrate. And, of course, Arabs are oppressed (no matter that their oppressors are all Arabs).

Arab extremists and dictators have become the ghetto blacks of hard-Left foreign policy. They're all victims of Washington and bear no personal responsibility for their own errors, failures or crimes. It isn't the Saddams, Abdullahs, Assads or Mubaraks who oppress the Arab masses, you see. Despots are never guilty--unless they get too chummy with the Americans. Anyway, dictators are victims, too. The mass graves and misery that haunt the Middle East (if such inconveniences must be mentioned at all) are my fault. And yours, dear reader. We're to blame for all that's wrong with the world. And don't you forget it!

The family secret of the hard-Left is that its followers share one powerful trait with Osama bin Laden: They need to look down on others, to feel superior and just. If the lords of terror dispense with displays of pity for their victims, it's only because they haven't yet attained the leftist's level of hypocrisy.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Given the state of higher education today, this is a jaw-dropping story. From the Review Journal, with thanks to Twostellas:

Patrick Boylan, a member of the state's board of education, brought out the Quran before 19 of the state's highest emergency responders.

"It says it right here. Do not take the infidels as your friends," he said, citing Sura 5:51. "I'm making statements straight from the Quran and these are what terrorists are using to justify terrorism."

The topic of his lecture, "The terrorist mind-set, why do they hate us?" was part of a federally funded pilot master's degree program at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas' Institute of Security Studies. ...

"I have studied the Quran for this very purpose to understand why they behave the way they do," said Boylan, an Irish Catholic, who grew up in Pakistan. "There is going to be a war on terrorism that is never going to stop, and Islam is behind it."

Boylan's lecture made more than a few students in the classroom shift in their seats as he said the Islamic religion advocates killing Christians and Jews.

"I have a little bit of a different opinion," Sheriff Bill Young said during a class break. "Historically, Muslims, particularly in our country, are good citizens."

That was not relevant to what Boylan said, and this kind of red herring prevents the truth from getting out. Saying that elements of Islam give rise to terrorism is not saying that all Muslims are terrorists. As in all religions, many people go along culturally without having a deep familiarity with the teachings. Others choose to ignore them. But it is an obvious fact that radicals use the Qur'an and Sunnah to justify their actions, and I applaud Boylan's courage for saying so.

Retired U.S. Army Col. Lee Van Arsdale, the institute's director, stood up during the class to offer a legal disclaimer that Boylan's views do not represent those of UNLV.

All right. But what if the American Muslim groups sued? What could they do? Prove that the verse Boylan quoted is not in the Qur'an? Of course, they would fall back on the old "out-of-context" defense. For that, read Onward Muslim Soldiers, which examines key jihad verses of the Qur'an within the context of Islamic history, tradition, theology, and law.

Boylan knows his views are controversial. He resided in Pakistan for the first 26 years of his life, where he said he saw firsthand discrimination and violence against non-Muslims.

"Non-Muslims have been discriminated against all over the world," he said. "We are in a battle of religion right now."

In Pakistan and other countries of Islamic rule, Christians are treated as second-class citizens and cannot obtain high-level positions in government, he told students.

"There are no non-Muslims that hold significant positions of power," he said. ...

Boylan said the moderate Muslims, should they speak up, are drowned out by the radicals. He told students that obedience to a holy book which advocates subjugating, and in some cases killing, those who don't follow it will forever divide Muslims from non-Muslims.

"Those people who have taken (the Quran) to heart are doing (terrorism)," he said.

Americans tend to be too politically correct and are blind to the religious motivations behind terrorism, he said.

Brother, you can say that again.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Charles at LGF has posted a Times article revealing that Hizb-ut-Tahrir, the "peaceful" Islamic group that wants to establish Sharia wherever it can, was behind the girl who sued for the right to wear Islamic dress to school in England.

Here is Hizb-ut-Tahrir's agenda, as I summarized it at Jihad Watch last October:

1. Restore a worldwide Caliphate, uniting the world under Islamic rule;

2. Ban all faiths apart from Islam, Judaism and Christianity (members of other religions are not listed as "People of the Book" in the Qur'an);

3. Regulate all religious practice according to Sharia law;

4. "Give all non-Muslim states a choice between either joining the Caliphate under Sharia law, or paying a tax to the Caliphate. Failure to pay the tax would be punished by military attack."

Isn't it nice that these good folks can operate freely in Britain?


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Why is it unthinkable that Saudi officials could have helped Al-Qaeda kidnap Paul Johnson when a Saudi ex-policeman is going to head Al-Qaeda there? From the BBC, with thanks to Nicolei:

An ex-Saudi policeman has become leader of the al-Qaeda militant group in Saudi Arabia, according to media reports from the troubled kingdom.

Saleh al-Oufi, 38, will take over from Abdul Aziz al-Muqrin, who was killed by police on Friday.

Saudi security forces have been hunting al-Qaeda members in Riyadh, following the execution of a US hostage.

Saudi analysts say the new leader will be a formidable foe as he been a key figure in the group since 1985.

Al-Qaeda is believed to have been behind the abduction and beheading of US defence worker Paul Johnson, the latest foreign victim of a series of militant operations in the kingdom.

Correspondents say the rise of Mr Oufi will do nothing to dispel suspicions that al-Qaeda is closely linked to members of the security forces in Saudi Arabia.

That's for sure!


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The South Koreans seem unwilling to follow the Spanish into dhimmitude. From Reuters, with thanks to Nicolei:

South Korea will go ahead with its plan to send 3,000 troops to help rebuild Iraq despite a televised threat from Iraqi militants to behead a South Korean hostage, the Foreign Ministry said today.

The government would do its best to seek the release of 33-year-old businessman Kim Sun-il, who has been shown repeatedly on South Korean television pleading for his life, Vice Foreign Minister Choi Young-jin told reporters after a meeting of President Roh Moo-hyun's National Security Council.

Choi said Kim, an Arabic graduate, had been kidnapped in Fallujah on June 17 - the day before South Korea announced where its troops would be deployed after months of agonising because of security concerns and public opposition.

The group holding Kim said South Korea had 24 hours from Sunday night to withdraw its decision or they would behead him, Arabic television station Al Jazeera reported.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Something is happening here, but no one knows what it is. From AP, with thanks to EPG:

TEHRAN, Iran - Iran confiscated three British military vessels Monday and arrested eight armed crew members, state-run television reported.

The three British ships entered Iranian territorial waters not far from the Iran-Iraq border, the Arabic language Al-Alam television reported. The station is part of the state-run Iranian radio and television network. ...

In London, the Ministry of Defense said it was investigating the report but did not know if it was true. There were no British warships operating in the Shatt al-Arab waterway, but some smaller vessels were there, the ministry said. ...

The Foreign Office said British diplomats in Tehran had been in contact with the Iranian government but it was still unclear what had happened.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Well, of course this is no surprise. But there is no real reason why Saudi officials couldn't or wouldn't have helped out with this. After all, the ideology of Al-Qaeda was nurtured and supported by high-level Saudis for years. Must we assume that all this support abruptly vanished? From AP, :

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia -- The Al Qaeda group responsible for abducting and killing an American engineer says it was aided by sympathizers in the Saudi security forces, a claim that was denied by Saudi authorities. ...

Sunday's Al Qaeda article said the militants decided to behead Johnson when Adel al-Jubeir, foreign affairs adviser to Crown Prince Abdullah in Washington, declared that Saudi Arabia would not negotiate with the kidnappers.

The group said it beheaded Johnson, 49, of Eagleswood Township, N.J., when its deadline expired Friday.

Asked about the Al Qaeda statement in a televised interview, al-Jubeir said, "We have never negotiated with terrorists. We don't intend to do so.

"I believe what the Al Qaeda people were trying to do is trying to justify a murder that is unjustifiable under any faith or under any principle of humanity."

Mm-hmm. If these high-sounding words had actually been Saudi policy for the last twenty years or so, we might not be in this fix.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

What happened to their commitment to multiculturalism? How can they pass such a racist law?

(Folks, don't get excited. That's an example of what you Americans call "sarcasm.")

From The Telegraph, with thanks to Twostellas:

The Irish government confirmed yesterday that it has ordered all men from Islamic countries seeking residency to sign a sworn affidavit rejecting polygamy.

Muslim men also have to agree they will not seek residency for a second wife if granted Irish citizenship. A man must swear he has "one spouse only" and "has no intention of entering into a simultaneous marriage".

A spokesman for the Department of Justice in Dublin said: "Obviously, we don't recognise polygamy under Irish law."

The Irish Council of Civil Liberties said the enforcement was "despicable".

Did you catch that? The Irish Council of Civil Liberties. Will the ACLU start plumping for polygamy soon? Where will the human rights groups come down on this issue? And it would seem that feminists would have something to say about treating women as commodities. We'll see, I'm sure.

CORRECTION: We already have seen. The ACLU already supports polygamists in the USA. Thanks to GL for the link.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

June 20, 2004

You don't hear too much about another group often designated as "People of the Book," and thus entitled to dhimmi status: the Zoroastrians. Here is an article about how they are disappearing from Iran. Hmmm; I wonder why, given the tolerant, peaceful system they've been living under? From AFP, with thanks to Ali Dashti:

"We are a species on the road to extinction," laments Babak, a man in his sixties who came from Tehran with his wife for the annual pilgrimage to one of the Zoroastrians' holiest sites -- the rocky peak of Chak-Chak. ...

"It may just be folklore, but it is undeniable that somebody important or a group of Zoroastrians took refuge here," added Kasra Vafadari, a respected member of the community and a teacher of history at the University of Nanterre, France. Furthermore, scholars point out that the route was used in following centuries for Zoroastrians fleeing Iran -- or Persia as it was formerly known -- to escape religious persecution. Once inside the grotto, women shrouded in white cast off their veils -- obligatory in Islamic Iran -- and drink tea and wine, which is permitted for religious use by non-Muslims in the Islamic republic.

Along with Judaism and Christianity, Zoroastrianism is a recognised -- and therefore permitted -- religion in Iran, where officially 99 percent of the 66 million-strong population are Muslims. ...

In a concession to their Persian roots and in contrast to many Sunni Muslim scholars, the Shia regime here recognises them as Kittabiyah -- or people of the book and fellow monotheists as opposed to Kufr, or infidels.

But their numbers are declining sharply. Centuries of persecution have forced many to flee to India, where they are known as the Parsi and number between 80,000 and 100,000.

Discrimination in Iran continues today, for example in seeking employment in the state sector where Muslims are preferred. ...

"People are leaving because they have no future here."


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Sanctioned by the example of the Prophet Muhammad and the dictates of Islamic law, beheading -- as the rest of the world is learning -- is a perfectly acceptable practice for the Muslim warrior. From AP, with thanks to nevermindlv:

BAGHDAD, Iraq - The Arab satellite TV network Al-Jazeera aired a videotape Sunday purportedly from al-Qaida linked militants showing a South Korean hostage begging for his life and pleading with his government to withdraw troops from Iraq.

The kidnappers, who identified themselves as belonging to a group led by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, gave South Korea 24 hours to meet its demand or "we will send you the head of this Korean."

"Please, get out of here," the man screamed in English, flailing his arms. "I don't want to die. I don't want to die. I know that your life is important, but my life is important."

Of course it is. But none of our lives will be important if these thugs start getting their way by means of threats and murder.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Are the Saudis finally getting serious about combatting terrorism? The jury is still out. But this doesn't bode well, although it's not in the least surprising. From AP, with thanks to DC Watson:

CAIRO, Egypt -- The al-Qaida cell that kidnapped and killed American Paul M. Johnson Jr. said in an online periodical Sunday that sympathizers in the kingdom's security forces supplied it with police uniforms and vehicles and set up fake checkpoints to facilitate last week's abduction.

The details of the kidnapping appeared in Sawt al-Jihad, or Voice of Holy War, a semimonthly online periodical published by al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula. A separate article, the final one written by cell leader Abdulaziz al-Moqrin, killed in a shootout Friday night, justified Johnson's slaying.

The first article said militants wearing police uniforms and using police cars set up a fake checkpoint on al-Khadma Road, leading the airport, near Imam Mohammed bin Saud University.

When Johnson's car approached the checkpoint June 12, the militants in police uniforms stopped his car - a Camry - detained him, anesthetized him and carried him to another car, the article said.

It said they then blew up Johnson's car.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

From Signonsandiego.com, with thanks to Twostellas:

SOKOTO, Nigeria - Saluted by sword-waving Muslim warriors on horses and camels, African presidents and emirs on Sunday celebrated the 200th anniversary of a holy war that launched the sub-Sahara's greatest Islamic empire and urged an end to rising Christian-Muslim violence that has killed thousands here.

Appeals for peace - evoking six years of fiery religious rampages by machete-waving mobs in Nigeria, Africa's most populous nation - overlaid a day of musket-blasting pageantry in Sokoto, capital of the 19th-century Sokoto caliphate, or kingdom.

Later on in the article is a bit of history that sounds a lot like today's headlines:

Itinerant preacher Shehu Usman dan Fodio had catapulted the kingdom into being with a 1804-1808 holy war launched against infidels and wayward Muslims.

The June 19, 1804, battle of Tafkin Kwatto, a village about 60 miles from Sokoto, was widely seen as the war's turning point.

The victory of what some historians term West Africa's "French Revolution" sparked copycat jihads across the arid savannah plains of Senegal, Mali, Ivory Coast, Chad, Central African Republic and Sudan.

But even amid a day of gunfire and pageantry, the celebrants were quick to insist that any resemblance between those days and today was purely coincidental:

In rare public comments, the current sultan of Sokoto declared that the 19th-century jihad fighter's cause had nothing to do with the rampages of today.

"I wish our own leaders would hold these values close to our hearts and entrench unity and peaceful coexistence," Sultan Mohammed Maccido told the crowd and the warriors.

He mourned "the loss of intolerable numbers of lives, and destruction and loss in property" in Nigeria's religious violence.

Sokoto today is part of 12 predominantly Muslim states that have adopted strict Islamic Shariah laws since 2000. Christians in Sokoto are few.

Dan Fodio is still widely revered by Muslims as a hero for spreading piety and Arabic literacy. Yet some Christians remember his uncompromising attitude toward nonbelievers, for whom he was once quoted as saying "there is no free place of the intellect."

Battle sites and burial grounds for Dan Fodio and his followers have been turned into monuments and mausoleums.

"He fought for Islam. He captured many places and spread knowledge," said Muhammadu Tambari, Dan Fodio's great-great-great grandson, an ostrich farmer.

"The jihad we are doing now is teaching and preaching to our children and the children of others. Spreading Islam," Tambari said. Modern day religious violence had no value, the jihad fighter's descendant said - only "creating more problems."

That's certainly true. Now if only Tambari could convince his fellow Nigerian Muslims.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Read all of this trenchant commentary in Arutz Sheva by Yocheved Golani (thanks to Nicolei):

The defenseless passengers on an Air France plane, a BOAC aircraft, a Japanese jumbo jet, aboard KLM, Lufthansa, Pan Am, Sabena, TWA and other airliners were not "occupying" the planes conveying them to innocuous destinations when Islamic terrorists kidnapped, terrorized and slaughtered them throughout the 1960s and 1970s. The civilian victims scattered across the countryside of Lockerbie, Scotland in 1988 had not "occupied" Pan Am 103, either.

Vacationing Christian Puerto Rican tourists weren't "occupying" Ben-Gurion airport on May 20, 1972. when pro-Islamic terrorists ambushed and sprayed them with bullets upon arrival.

Sleeping Israeli athletes invited to 1972's peace-promoting competitions in Munich were not "occupying" the Olympic Village when Arab radicals besieged and murdered them, disrupting the games promoting international friendship and trust.

Unarmed children at Ma'alot weren't "occupying" their school the day Arab terrorists forced them to jump to their deaths from the building during interrupted celebrations of 1974's Israel Independence Day.

Elderly Dora Bloch and her fellow travelers were not "occupying" Athens airport in 1976 when Arab terrorists hijacked a planeload of passengers to Uganda, resulting in Dora's murder and the rescue of her terrorized former companions.

Wheelchair-bound tourist Leon Klinghoffer was not "occupying" the Italian ship Achille Lauro when fundamentalist terrorists humiliated, then drowned the man by throwing him overboard, on October 7, 1985.

Teen hikers Yosef Ish-Ran and Koby Mandell of Biblical Tekoa did not seek to "occupy" the cave they were dragged to in 2001, and where their captors bludgeoned them to a terrifying death, then smeared their blood on the walls.

The employees of various faiths and ethnic backgrounds who reported for work that day were not "occupying" New York's Twin Towers when they were shocked, burned, smothered, blasted and shattered to death by Arab terrorists on September 11, 2001.

Daniel Pearl was not "occupying" Pakistan when he researched the links between Richard Reed and bin Laden before he was betrayed and beheaded for being a Jew, and therefore an "enemy" of Islam, in 2002. Entrepreneur Nicholas Berg was not "occupying" Iraq when Arab terrorists slowly, agonizingly, carved his Jewish head off his neck for public intimidation in 2004. The American businessmen murdered in Saudi Arabia were minding their own business when they were doing business with Muslim colleagues.

So why are they all dead? Is it truly because the Jews of Israel will not cede land to the rabble that, prevented by their compatriots from returning to their native countries in 1948, now fraudulently claim to be Palestinians? No. There are two glaring contradictions to the specious argument.

One: In 1948, Arab leaders wouldn't permit Arabs unwilling to live among Jews to live in any Arab state. The artificially created refugees were used and abused by their own brethren as violent political pawns against a nascent Israel.

Two: Sharon promised in June 2004 to "evacuate" disputed land before 2005. Within hours of that announcement, Yasser Arafat and Hamas respectively swore to annihilate and kidnap/murder military and civilian Jews. Clearly, the problem is not about "giving back" land, which never legitimately belonged to Arabs anyway.

The chaos, murder and mayhem are not about the merits or demerits of democracy, the West or Christianity, or international law. It's not about the Jews "controlling" the very same "media" that incongruously condemns Judaism, its practices and the Knesset. It's not about Israel inside or outside red, green, yellow or blue lines. It's not about the Israeli Right, or Jewish settlers (they'd be called "citizens" in any other society that inherited, purchased, won and/or annexed land). It's not about present-day Israel versus the borders of ancient Israel, nor about the alleged occupation of Arab lands.

It is about armed insanity, the calculated manipulation of public opinion via propaganda, coercion and attacks against unarmed civilians and their political leaders. And the scale of horror stands to rise now that Iran has saluted the world with a nuclear arms program.

It's about jihad.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Sure, France will play the dhimmi and help the Iranian mullahs round up the proponents of freedom -- if the price is right. Or at least so goes the charge here. From The Telegraph, with thanks to LGF:

France has been accused of agreeing to a crackdown on exiled opponents of Iran in return for lucrative commercial contracts.

Lawyers for France's human rights league, speaking on the anniversary of a huge police raid on the National Council of Resistance of Iran near Paris, pointed out "troubling coincidences" in the timing of the operation and a series of deals with Teheran.

In March last year, the regime signed a large contract with the French telecommunications group Alcatel for a telephone network.

In April last year Teheran offered the petrol giant TotalFina a £660 million gas fields contract. At the same time, a contract was signed with Renault to produce 500,000 cars over four years, the lawyers said.

Then, in June, police arrested 164 members of the Iranian opposition and placed 17 under investigation for having links with or funding terrorism. The authorities said they were looking for a link with a mortar attack on the office of the supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, in Teheran in 2000.

"The public should ask itself why this type of operation [was made] at the same time as commercial contracts were signed with a tyrannical and terrorist regime," said Patrick Baudoin, a lawyer.

One year on, not a shred of evidence incriminating the 17 had been found, said Mr Baudoin, who will file for the case to be closed next Tuesday. The French state had "flouted the rule of law to gain from petro-dollars", he said.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Are the Saudis finally getting serious about combatting terrorism? The jury is still out. But it seems increasingly likely that they are choosing their economic over their religious interests -- which also means, for the House of Saud, that they are attempting to choose survival. From AP:

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia - Police cars and armored vehicles flooded the al-Malaz neighborhood in the Saudi capital Sunday as security forces surrounded a house where suspected militants were believed to have taken refuge after a shootout with police.

The massive operation was under way in the same district that was the focus of a huge security sweep against militants sought in the beheading of American hostage Paul M. Johnson Jr., whose body has still not been found.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

My friends,

Comments are closed for now. Upgrades are in the offing that will allow them to be opened again. I apologize for all inconvenience -- but this is just a battle, not the war.

Sincerely
Robert Spencer


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

An interesting precedent has been set here. From the Chicago Sun-Times, with thanks to EPG:

Attorney Reem Odeh said Saturday that her client, Mae Sallal, of Frankfort, should be able to collect her $15,000 dowry, pending a court ruling in Jordan expected soon.

"They have respect for the American judicial system,'' Odeh said.

Sallal won what Odeh thinks is a virtually unprecedented legal victory last month before Will County Circuit Court Judge Robert Baron. He ruled that an Islamic marriage contract -- known as an Aqed Zawage -- could be enforced in the United States. In the past, Odeh said, judges have been reluctant to uphold religious contracts as binding law.

In that contract, which the couple signed in Jordan where they were married eight years ago, husband Rami Sallal agreed to pay $10,000 Jordanian dinars as a Muacher, or deferred dowry, if the couple split up. He also agreed to give her gold and other jewelry at her wedding as a dowry. In Muslim culture, dowries are given from males to females, said Mae Sallal, who is Palestinian. Rami Sallal is from Jordan.

Here is the main point:

Aaron Jaffe, a Cook County Chancery Court judge who formerly worked in the domestic relations division, said there are no legally binding religious contracts in American law. Jaffe, who is Maria Jaffe's father-in-law, could recall no instances when he upheld Islamic religious law.
| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

You gotta hand it to that 9/11 panel. Now they've uncovered -- get this -- evidence that Saudi Arabia and Pakistan aided Al-Qaeda! Sharp as tacks, these guys. You'd almost think they were reading Jihad Watch. From the LA Times, :

WASHINGTON -- Pakistan and Saudi Arabia helped set the stage for the Sept. 11 attacks by cutting deals with the Taliban and Osama bin Laden that allowed his Al Qaeda terrorist network to flourish, according to several senior members of the Sept. 11 commission and U.S. counter-terrorism officials.

The financial aid to the Taliban and other assistance by two of the most important allies of the United States in its war on terrorism date at least to 1996, and appear to have shielded them from Al Qaeda attacks within their own borders until long after the 2001 strikes, those commission members and officials said in interviews.

| 26 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

More evidence of the thin line, if there is any line at all, between the official Palestinian Authority governmental structures, such as they are, and jihad terror groups that glorify the murder of innocent children. Ahmad Qurei, the Palestinian Prime Minister, has declared that the PA will not dismantle the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades. From IMRA:

Qurei ... explained ... that instead they would be integrated into Fatah "institutions".

This position appears to coincide with the Egyptian plan that the various
armed terrorist groups operating in the Gaza Strip retain their weapons (in
fact they can bring in more weapons) while Israel promises not to take
action against them.

| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

June 19, 2004

I get a lot of hate mail, most of it uninteresting. One more entertaining one recently warned me that "1.2 billion mostly poor Muslims are coming to get you." Really? All of them? Even the vast majority of moderates? What a windfall that will be for local hotels and cabbies! But I doubt my neighbors here in Secure Undisclosed Locationville will appreciate the traffic snarls.

Anyway, this one from a "Frank Atry" is less entertaining, but more instructive:

Came across your site in an online search. Let me tell you...*Everybody* has got an agenda, and *your* anti-Muslim propaganda and misinformation campaign is no different from those you set out to criticize. Now, *that* is the epitome of hypocrisy! ;-)

So, go on about your "speaking engagements," book
deals, and all that other garbage (let me guess, you
are Jewish, right???), but you didn't fool me.

F. Atry
P.S. Don't wait up for any speaking engagement
invitations from me. :-p

I'll unpack my bags, Frankie, but meanwhile: there you go again. Why do you and your jihadist friends assume that anyone willing to stand up against radical Islam and expose the jihadist agenda is Jewish? After all, the jihad is -- and this ain't misinformation or propaganda, Frankie baby, but the plain words of Osama bin Laden, Abu Bakar Bashir, Omar Bakri, Abu Hamza, Zaraqawi, etc. etc. -- directed against every non-Muslim, and will subjugate Christians and others as well as Jews under the discriminatory laws of dhimmitude. (Hindus may fare even worse, as they are not technically "People of the Book," but pagans, although they have been accorded dhimmi status by Muslim rulers in history.)

The assumption that anyone who resists the jihad must be Jewish is based on the erroneous view that this is all about Israel, and that the Islamic world would live in peace with the rest of the planet if only that tiny state were swept into the sea. The news articles I post here about Nigeria, Thailand, Indonesia, Kashmir, the Philippines, and elsewhere show just how wrong that is. And I, who am not Jewish, am proud to stand with Jews and women and Christians and Hindus and Buddhists and unbelievers and everyone else against this great scourge that would destroy free societies and relegate us all to second-class status -- or worse.

UPDATE: Friends, I'm sorry to say that the loathesome spammer has compelled me to end this thread as well. However, help is on the way: soon we will have an upgrade that will take care of this problem once and for all. So I thank you for your patience.

| 71 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

But as long as Paul Johnson was not a Muslim, that love was unrequited. From AP:

Johnson had worked in Saudi Arabia for more than a decade and over the week his friends and family had described him as devoted to the culture of his adopted land.

For what ultimately killed Paul Johnson was the conviction that non-Muslims have no right to be in Saudi Arabia, in accord with the Prophet Muhammad's dictum: "Turn out all Al-Mushrikun [unbelievers] from the Arabian Peninsula" (Sahih Bukhari, vol. 4, book 58, no. 3168 -- in the hardcover edition; the numbering in the online edition is different, but for some reason I can't get into it today).

NOTE: Last night's loathsome spammer has returned, so I have had to close comments on this one too.

| 59 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Despite denials, apparently Al-Moqrin is still dead. From AP, :

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia (AP) -- An al-Qaida cell fulfilled its threat to kill an American hostage, beheading him and showing the grisly photos on the Internet. Saudi officials claimed they later gunned down four militants including the cell leader who allegedly masterminded Paul M. Johnson's kidnapping.

State-run television showed pictures of the four slain militants' bodies Saturday. Among them was one it said was Abdulaziz al-Moqrin, the reputed leader of al-Qaida in Saudi Arabia and Saudi Arabia's most-wanted terror suspect.

Hours earlier, a message on an Islamic militant Web site said the reports of al-Moqrin's saying were false. The message could not immediately be verified, but it appeared on a Web site that has had similar messages in the past.

A U.S. official who spoke on condition of anonymity Friday had confirmed al-Moqrin's killing, while a Saudi official had said forensic tests would confirm its identity.

| 51 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Christians in Iraq have been excluded from aid distribution. From KurdishMedia News, with thanks to Andy:

New York (KurdishMedia.com) 18 June 2004: Christian Democrat MEP Albert Jan Maat has asked the European Commission questions about the distribution the 160 million euro in funds approved for the distribution in Iraq by the European Commission. These questions, which regarded the Assyrian Christians of Iraq, were as follows:

"The Commission has decided that 160 million EUR can be devoted to the reconstruction of Iraq. What guarantees can the Commission give that religious minorities can benefit from these funds on the basis of proportionality?"

"Is the Commission aware that Assyrian Christians are systematically excluded from the distribution of aid by local leaders?"

MEP Maat cited an element of religious favoritism as a root cause of the lack of aid being received by the Assyrians, stating, "International aid is mainly distributed through regional, and therefore Muslim, leaders and seldom or never reaches the Assyrians."

| 22 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Now Al-Qaeda is saying that Abdulaziz al-Muqrin is not dead after all. Perhaps he is sharing an apartment with Osama bin Laden. From The Australian, with thanks to Nicolei:

THE leader of al-Qaeda in Saudi Arabia, Abdulaziz al-Muqrin, is not dead, according to a statement posted today on a website which regularly publishes statements from the al-Qaeda terrorist network.

Security men at the scene of a shootout in the Saudi capital of Riyadh said that Muqrin had been gunned down along with three other militants last night.

"Following the lies ... about the death of Abdulaziz al-Muqrin, we affirm that such allegations, spread by the tyrants in Saudi Arabia, are intended to undermine the morale of the mujahideen on the Arabian peninsula," said the communique.

Posted on the site http://alsaha.fares.net, its authenticity could not be ascertained immediately.

| 15 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

From the New York Times via The Straits Times, with thanks to Nicolei, who also noted that only among Muslims is the question of whether the killing of an innocent civilian is justified or not "reduced to the banality of a debate. In all other major religions, the answer is so clear that one does not even think of it."

In one unusual website posting, a Saudi man who said he had worked with the kidnap victim, and had even discussed Islam with him, went so far as to try to extend a kind of religiously inspired traditional tribal form of protection known as 'ijara' that would forbid killing Mr Johnson.

'I hereby declare my protection and rescue for this man along with all his colleagues who work with us in the company, who ate with us and accepted our gifts of Islamic books which they promised to read,' wrote Mr Saad Al-Moemen.

He also described visits that Mr Johnson had made to his home and said the engineer had expressed distaste for United States foreign policy. ...

The fatwa was attacked by a number of readers who said all foreigners came to the kingdom with bad intentions, acting as the vanguard for the US military.

'Whoever gives them security is an apostate,' read one posting.

Others scoffed at the idea that an official visa somehow bestowed legitimacy on visitors.

'Who gave them the visa? It is the infidel agent regime,' read one posting in part.

'So I tell the mujahideen to keep killing them until the Arabian peninsula is cleared of the filth of the crusaders.'

Others suggested that the militants try to convert Westerners to Islam rather than killing them, because that way they would be spared from going to hell, and the image of the faith around the world would not be so tainted with blood.

One religious leader, identified as Abdel Rahman bin Saleh al-Mahmoud, said Prophet Muhammad's followers had commanded that all non-believers be expelled from the Arabian peninsula.

But it has never been clear, he wrote, whether that includes just the holy city of Mecca or some larger area. In addition, foreigners visited at the time of the Prophet, he noted, it was just the idea of permanent communities that was abhorrent.

| 22 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

June 18, 2004

Looks as if they got Al-Moqrin. This is the guy they let go before because he memorized the Qur'an. From AP:

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia (AP) - The leader of al-Qaida in Saudi Arabia was believed killed in a raid in the capital Friday, hours after his group claimed the beheading of an American engineer, Saudi security officials said.

A U.S. official confirmed that al-Moqrin has been killed. The official spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the information.

To establish identities, one Saudi official said forensic tests would be conducted on three bodies of militants killed in a shootout in a downtown neighborhood shortly after the discovery of Paul M. Johnson Jr.'s body.

The killing of Abdulaziz al-Moqrin, 31, would be a coup for the Saudi goverment, which has been under intense pressure to halt a wave of attacks against Westerners in the kingdom.

| 67 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Another beheading. From AP:

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia - The al-Qaida group that kidnapped American Paul M. Johnson Jr. posted a statement on a Web site Friday saying it killed him, and displayed still photographs on the Internet of his beheaded body. ...

Johnson was kidnapped last weekend by militants who threatened to kill him by Friday if the kingdom did not release its al-Qaida prisoners.

UPDATE: Here is the message accompanying the beheading photos (via The Guardian):

In answer to what we promised ... to kill the hostage Paul Marshall after the period is over ... the infidel got his fair treatment ... Let him taste something of what Muslims have long tasted from Apache helicopter fire and missiles. We, God willing, will continue our road to fight the enemies of God.

Yet people still doubt that religion plays any real or essential role in all this. Also, I wonder if the mujahedin really called Mr. Johnson "Paul Marshall." Could they be reading Paul Marshall's Islam At the Crossroads? (Marshall was actually Johnson's middle name; I was just struck by the coincidence.)

UPDATE: The photos, via Drudge.

ANOTHER UPDATE: I'm sorry, but I've had to shut down the comments. A loathsome spammer keeps trying to post on this thread; also, although comments here are largely unmoderated, I really don't want this thread or any other to fill up with calls to genocide and the like. I still believe that we can and must defeat jihad while remaining within the bounds of Judeo-Christian morality and American Constitutionality. And no, that doesn't mean I'm not appalled and angered by what has been done to Mr. Johnson.

| 82 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

I am not inclined to revisit all this, as it doesn't seem to be doing much to make people aware of the fact that there are many Attas still at large. Nevertheless, this piece gives an interesting glimpse into the day-to-day workings of the most notorious jihad strike of our age, and this one some of the harrowing highlights of the flight tapes.

"Stay quiet and you'll be OK," Atta told the passengers. This could be the new slogan for all of today's anti-anti-terrorism. Stay quiet and you'll be OK: stop fighting terrorists in Iraq and elsewhere, accept the preposterous claim that there was no Iraq Al-Qaeda link, don't talk about the roots of Islamic violence in the core texts of Islam, keep mum about how the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is just one arena of a global jihad that is being waged against non-Muslims by people with quite readily identifiable motives and goals, and on and on. Stay quiet and you'll be OK.

No thanks.

| 52 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

He can't call it genocide or ethnic cleansing yet. And don't hold your breath waiting for him to call it a jihad. From AP, with thanks to DC Watson:

UNITED NATIONS — Secretary-General Kofi Annan raised the possibility Thursday of international intervention to protect more than 1 million people threatened by fighting in the Darfur region of western Sudan. ...

Annan said he wasn't ready to describe the situation in Darfur "as genocide or ethnic cleansing yet" but he did call it "a tragic humanitarian situation."

| 33 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Meet Shannen Rossmiller. From the Seattle Times, with thanks to ahoymite:

CONRAD, Mont. — Shannen Rossmiller finds early mornings are best for hunting terrorists.

When it's 4 a.m. in this one-stoplight prairie town, it's 3 p.m. in, say, Karachi, Pakistan, the sweltering hours just before the evening call to prayer. That's when Rossmiller, while her husband and three children sleep, finds the Internet chat rooms and bulletin boards frequented by radical Muslims and jihad warriors are busiest.

It is when Rossmiller pursues her deadly serious hobby: citizen cyberspy.

Two success stories of "freelance" anti-jihadists:

Spc. Ryan Anderson, National Guardsman: Fort Lewis soldier charged with attempting to aid the enemy. Private citizen Shannen Rossmiller posed as a terrorist on the Internet and lured the 26-year-old soldier into an FBI sting operation. The Army arrested Anderson in February and plans to court-martial him, saying he tried to provide information to the enemy as his unit prepared to deploy to Iraq. Anderson, a Muslim convert, could face the death penalty if convicted.
James Ujaama, former Seattle resident: Thirty-eight-year-old prosecuted for planning to set up a terrorism training camp in Bly, Ore., in 1999. Videotapes provided to the FBI by a self-proclaimed "freelance intelligence agent" in London, Glen Jenvey, played a significant role in the 2002 prosecution. Jenvey infiltrated the Finsbury Park mosque in North London to obtain the tapes, which showed Ujaama sitting alongside radical cleric Abu Hamza al-Masri and talking about jihad. Ujaama pleaded guilty last year and has agreed to testify against Abu Hamza, who was arrested last month in London and is accused of aiding al-Qaida.
| 30 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

More news of the international character of the jihad. Or was it just a mercenary action? From the Washington Times:

Mercenaries believed to be from Chechnya are suspected of carrying out the deadly ambush of civilian security contractors on a road outside Baghdad earlier this month.

The attackers killed four civilians working with Blackwater USA. Three contractors who managed to escape concluded that the assault was the work of trained gunmen.

If so, said a former U.S. Special Forces fighter recently in Baghdad, "this opens a whole other can of worms for the coalition to deal with."

But what kind of can of worms?

Professional analysis of the incident concluded that the attackers were well-trained and were most likely Syrian or Chechen hired guns. They wanted to survive and not leave any bodies.

"The ambush on the [airport] highway was done by Chechen imports. Very switched on and well experienced," said the former Special Forces member.

"Hitting a moving car at [72 mph], plus from another moving car, with an RPG is no small feat ... [and] the fact that they policed up their dead [and] wounded and all the weapons also indicates their level of professionalism.

"I personally don't think they were good Muslims doing their jihad duties, or politically motivated. I think they were high-tech, highly trained mercenaries in it for the bucks."

Why? Because they were experts? Jihadists can't be skillful? I'm not sure that's a very effective or accurate assumption to make. Also, even if they were hired guns, who hired them, and why?

| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The Hudood laws in Pakistan cover sexual crimes. Under them, women are actually imprisoned for being victims of rape. But these laws will not be changed, even in the new, anti-extremist Pakistan. From Pakistan's Dawn, with thanks to Nicolei:

ISLAMABAD June 15: Prime Minister Mir Zafarullah Khan Jamali on Tuesday declared in unequivocal terms that the government will not make any un-Islamic amendment to the Hudood Ordinance under external or individual pressure.

Speaking at a meeting of women parliamentarians of the ruling Pakistan Muslim League-Q at the residence of party president Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain, the prime minister said: "Parliament is the proper platform for making or amending any law and whatever changes will be proposed in any law of the land, including the Hudood Ordinance, they will come through parliament." ...

He said the proposed amendments to the Hudood ordinance would first be sent to the Islamic Ideology Council for its advice before taking them to parliament's debate and approval.

He said that in a parliamentary democratic dispensation any amendment could only be brought about through parliament and the parliament itself was not authorized under constitution to pass any law repugnant to Islam.

He, however, said that any man-made law would be considered carefully for amendment for which the government was not in a hurry. He said the government would only follow those principles as had been laid down by Islam.

| 26 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

But obviously this work of memorization didn't make him non-violent. From the New York Post, with thanks to Nicolei:

IN recent months, he has been the world's second- most active terrorist, his roll call of atrocities eclipsed only by that of the ubiquitous Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi.

But this past weekend, Abdulaziz Al-Muqrin, al Qaeda's chief of operations for the Arabian Peninsula, upped the ante considerably in his jihad against the West.

In a statement issued on several Islamist Web sites, Al-Muqrin's group has claimed responsibility for the murder of one American, Kenneth Scroggs, and kidnapping of another, Lockheed Martin employee Paul Johnson, in Riyadh on Saturday.

Al-Muqrin, also known as "Abu Hajar," seems hell-bent on upholding his recent pledge to make this summer "bloody and miserable for infidels."

Just last week, he vowed through an Islamist Web site that al Qaeda would target Western airlines, military bases and residential compounds in "the near future." And on May 29, he claimed responsibility for the chaotic assault on Western oil facilities in the Saudi city of Khobar that killed 22 people, including one American. ...

Al-Muqrin is suspected of having engineered suicide bombings in Riyadh in May and November 2003 that took 53 lives (including nine Americans) and is thought to have been the architect of an April 21 attack in the Saudi capital that killed five people and wounded 148. And he claimed responsibility for a May 1 shooting spree in the Saudi oil center of Yanbu that killed six Westerners and one Saudi.

According to Al-Muqrin, the Yanbu attack, like the one in Khobar, was designed to stem the flow of Saudi oil, thereby harming the country's economy. ...

It is unclear how the Saudi government will deal with Al-Muqrin, if it catches him. In 1997, after being extradited to Saudi Arabia by Ethiopian authorities, Al-Muqrin was sentenced to eight years in prison. But the Saudi Interior Ministry released him in the summer of 2001, reportedly because he had memorized the Koran while behind bars.

| 36 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Alan Caruba echoes and underscores points I have made many times in this Insight piece (thanks to Nicolei):

I think a lot of Americans, certainly those favoring withdrawal from Iraq and efforts to negotiate with al-Qaeda and the nations supporting its holy war, have not yet figured out that the Islamic fundamentalists who beheaded Daniel Pearl and Nick Berg, who attacked this nation on 9/11, and who represent the insurgents in Iraq, want us dead. Unless, of course, we convert to Islam. ...

According to the extremists, the prophet left a trail of assassinations and other bloody acts behind him until his own death, all of which they insist are recorded by Muslim historians. This is cited as a tradition among Muslims in the early centuries of Islamic development. As the Internet essay notes, these are not just isolated incidents or aberrations. "Such violence in fact goes to the very roots of Islam as found in the Quran and the actions and teachers of the prophet of Islam himself." And that is the view of the extremists who have declared a war of terror on all those who do not see the world as they do.

The holy war that has been declared against us leaves us no choice but to fight for our lives.

| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Peacekeepers are regarded with the same suspicion as are all non-Muslims. From Reuters, with thanks to Nicolei:

KABUL (Reuters) - Four Afghans died in a bomb attack on Wednesday apparently targeting NATO peacekeepers, officials said, a day after President Bush held up Afghanistan as a role model for Iraq.

The blast in the northern Afghan town of Kunduz killed two children and two men, the officials said, the latest attack in a spate of violence ahead of presidential and parliamentary polls supposed to be held in September.

The blast was possibly triggered by a remote-controlled device as a vehicle from a NATO Provincial Reconstruction Team passed along a crowded road in the center of the city, Afghan officials said.

No peacekeepers were hurt in the attack, a spokesman for the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force said.

But an Afghan driver of the reconstruction team vehicle was among those killed, General Mohammad Dawood, the senior military commander in Kunduz, told reporters. None of the 250 German troops from the Kunduz team was in the car.

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The British National Party, which has often justly been accused of racism, is under fire again for opposing mass immigration. From icWales, with thanks to Twostellas:

Police are investigating claims that a British National Party European election leaflet contained inflammatory statements which could incite racial hatred. ...

Headed "Asylum is making Britain explode", the leaflet was delivered to households in the area in the run-up to this weekend's elections as part of the far-right party's Europe campaign.

It stated that the "Government is planning to build five giant new cities, each the size of Birmingham, over the next 30 years, to house over five million new immigrants".

It also claimed "around two million illegal immigrants and asylum seekers" were pushing the benefits system and health service "to breaking point". ...

But spokesman for the BNP Dr Phillip Edwards denied the leaflet, which was delivered to up to 30 million homes across the country, was racist and said it was important for all political parties to be able to air their views.

He added: "There is a problem in this democracy if we are not allowed to open the debate without being thrown into jail.

"But in fact the leaflet does not carry anything about race - it is about immigration and asylum."

While concern about immigration seems to be ipso facto racism, the notorious British Muslim group Al-Muhajiroun is gearing up for another conference.

Secular Fundamentalism

In light of the recent government proposals to introduce ID cards, as well as to dump the policy of multiculturalism, in favour of integration and the promotion of Britishness; Muslims must ask where they stand on these issues?

This is especially so since Muslims are now being asked to participate in ceremonies which involve taking an oath of allegiance to the Queen, and a pledge to uphold the British Law and British values such as Freedom, Democracy and Liberalism, when trying to attain British citizenship.

Since Al-Muhajiroun has made it quite clear that they're opposed to taking an oath to the Queen and upholding freedom, democracy, and liberalism, one must ask: will the tide of immigrants strengthen Al-Muhajiroun? Will this not threaten British society and government? Consequently, isn't it legitimate, and not racist (whatever the sins of the BNP), to be concerned about immigration?

| 62 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

June 17, 2004

Score one for truth and justice. Fawaz Damra is guilty. From AP, :

AKRON, Ohio June 17, 2004 — The Palestinian-born leader of Ohio's largest mosque was convicted Thursday of lying about his connections to terrorist organizations when he applied for U.S. citizenship.

Fawaz Damra, imam of the Islamic Center of Cleveland, showed no emotion as the verdict was read in federal court.

He could be sentenced to up to five years in prison, stripped of his citizenship and deported for providing false information to become a citizen in 1994.

His attorneys will fight on.

Prosecutors claimed that Damra, 41, concealed ties to Afghan Refugee Services, the Islamic Committee for Palestine and Palestinian Islamic Jihad, groups the government classifies as terrorist organizations.

"We feel this is a victory in the war on terrorism," prosecutor Cherie Krigsman said.

Prosecutors showed video footage of Damra raising money for an arm of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, which has been listed as a major terrorist group by the State Department since 1989.

Jurors also were shown footage in which Damra called Jews "the sons of monkeys and pigs" during a 1991 speech and said "terrorism and terrorism alone is the path to liberation" in a 1989 speech.

"He was the guy that they brought in to raise the money for Islamic Jihad," Krigsman said after the verdict. "Without the money they could not operate." ...

Many members of Damra's mosque have continued to support him, voting in March to allow him to continue leading prayers and performing other functions. ...

"Unfortunately, I don't believe justice was served," said Haider Alawan, a member of the Cleveland mosque's board of elders and a Damra backer.

| 45 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

In Onward Muslim Soldiers I included a chapter entitled "Everybody must get stoned: The strange alliance between radical Islam and the post-Sixties Left." People on the Left and the Right have remonstrated with me since, saying I was too hard on American liberals.

But remember: the struggle against jihad is not a liberal or conservative issue. It's a human rights issue that all Americans should support. The fact that large segments of the Left do not is an outrage and a scandal, but it is by no means something I am exaggerating. Just yesterday I got a hateful, slanderous, and ignorant email from a representative of a New England leftist group. And then there is this, which indicates that at least some segments of the global jihad network see allies on the American Left. From The Guardian, with thanks to Susan:

The controversy over Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11 just won't go away. ...

Meanwhile, in the United Arab Emirates, the film is being offered the kind of support it doesn't need. According to Screen International, the UAE-based distributor Front Row Entertainment has been contacted by organisations related to the Hezbollah in Lebanon with offers of help.

| 62 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Hugh Fitzgerald points out some of the deficiencies in the work of the much-lionized Bernard Lewis:

Bernard Lewis is an acute scholar about many aspects of Islam. He writes beautifully. He is well-trained in languages. He lived during the war in Egypt. He is lionized in Turkey. Even in small shops off Taksim Square, the proprietors, when they discover a visitor is from the United States, ask if that visitor may happen to know "Professor Lewis."

He has all the right enemies: notably, the absurd Said, who knew nothing about Islam but for some reason thought his being an Arab entitled him to act as an expert (the footnote alone, on "thawra," in Lewis' "The Question of Orientalism," is enough to delicately dismember all of Said's pretentions; he does not survive the essay); and the apologist Esposito, who is not fit to be mentioned at the same time as Lewis. Esposito is an out-and-out apologist, an ignoramus, and the producer of glossy picture-books about Islam that win the reader over and distract from the apologetic or vapid texts he has chosen, with plenty of local color -- venerable mosques, turbans and Iznik tulips, the usual Mughal miniatures of hunting scenes, or Majnoun and Leyla, an apothecary jar or two from Abbassid Baghdad, the obligatory Persian poetry in nastaliq, and of course the Dome of the Rock. Meanwhile, he ignores so many subjects, including Jihad and the treatment of non-Muslims under Islam, or minimizes them to the point of disappearance.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

A damaging video in the Damra case in Ohio. From AP, with thanks to LGF:

In the 1991 video played in U.S. District Court, Damra implores members of the audience to donate money for the Islamic Committee for Palestine. Damra tells the audience the committee "is the active arm of Palestinian Islamic Jihad in America."

Matthew Levitt, senior fellow in terrorism studies at the Washington Institute for Near East Studies, testified that the Palestinian Islamic Jihad is "bent on the destruction of Israel."

Damra has pleaded innocent to a charge of obtaining U.S. citizenship in 1994 by providing false information. If convicted, he could lose his citizenship, be fined $5,000 and be sentenced to up to five years in prison before being deported.

The video showed Damra standing in front of a wall with an American flag on it at the Beit Hanina Club in Cleveland, a social club for Palestinians.

Jurors watched video monitors in front of their seats that had subtitled translation of Damra's speech, which was in Arabic.

Expressionless, Damra watched most of the video on a monitor at a defense table.

On the tape, Damra also introduces Sami Al-Arian as the head of the committee.

Al-Arian, a former University of South Florida professor, has pleaded innocent to federal charges that he financed terrorists. He has been held for 15 months at a Florida prison on charges he used an Islamic think tank and a charity he founded to raise money for the Palestinian Islamic Jihad.

The hour-long video included Al-Arian's speech in which he spoke of Palestinians martyrs and describes them as heroes. He shouted into the microphone in Arabic that Muslims in America cannot forget their brothers and sisters in Palestine.

Levitt testified that the Palestinian Islamic Jihad has been listed as a major terrorist group in a U.S. State Department publication titled "Patterns of Global Terrorism" since 1989. He testified that the group opposes peace with Israel and a two-state system.

Levitt said that to reach its goals the group "engages in acts of violence and murder."

On a second video, Damra shouted for contributions for orphans in Palestine.

Levitt began testifying that these donations are raised to recruit people for acts of violence with the understanding that their children will be cared for after their deaths.

Defense attorney Nancy Hollander objected to the statements and Judge James Gwin told jurors to disregard it.

| 76 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

From The Guardian, with thanks to Tziona2, who comments: "What is missing from all the reports in the newspapers is what the girl's lawyer, Yvonne Spencer, said on Channel Four news yesterday evening: the real reason the girl objects to wearing the shalwar khameez (and the reason the school approved it as uniform) is that Sikhs and Hindus also wear it. In the Dar al-Islam the authorities enforced this rule of the Dhimma by making dhimmi wear a coloured patch on their clothes, so if Miss Begum wants to distinguish herself from the kuffar as being a muslim, let her sew a patch onto her clothes. If it works one way, it works the other." Indeed.

A 15-year-old Muslim girl yesterday lost her high court battle for the right to wear strict Islamic dress to school.

Shabina Begum has not attended Denbigh high school in Luton since September 2002 when she was sent home for turning up in a jilbab - the full-length gown worn by many Muslim women that covers all of the body except the face and hands.

Shabina's claim that she had been "constructively excluded" from her school was dismissed by Mr Justice Bennett. He said the school's refusal to let her wear the jilbab did not breach her right to education and freedom of religion as laid down in the European convention on human rights.

The school, a 1,000-pupil comprehensive where almost 80% of pupils are Muslim, said it had a flexible uniform policy to ensure that the religious and cultural sensitivities of its students were respected. Girls have the option of wearing trousers, skirts, or a shalwar kameez (trousers and a tunic).

| 37 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

A realistic appraisal. From AP, with thanks to Nicolei:

General Peter Schoomaker compared the global war on terrorism with fighting cancer. And he says the threat from Islamic militants who want to destroy the United States is "never going to go away in our lifetime."

He says people eventually get cured of pneumonia. When it comes to cancer, he says the disease may go into remission -- but never really goes away.

| 47 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

More on the Internet jihad from Financial Times:

According to research by Jane's Terrorism and Security Centre, which closely follows terrorism developments, the internet has probably become the main global source of literature promoting jihad, or "holy war".

Richard Evans of Jane's cites research that concludes: "It is virtually impossible to control the spread of jihad material among similar web pages once it has been published in one location." All the websites linked to al-ansar.biz were hosted by the same Malaysian company, Acme Commerce, based in Kuala Lumpur. The company says it hosts 5,000 websites from up to 50 countries and cannot be blamed for their content. ...

According to Jane's, they had been used to distribute publications under the title Voice of Jihad, as well as an online jihadist magazine called al-Battar. Issued every two months, it carries essays on religious issues, advice on military strategy and training, and guidance on creating the "basic conditions for successful guerrilla warfare".

The growth in the number of similar sites and the regularity with which they change addresses while retaining readers who rapidly communicate the new addresses, has overwhelmed law enforcement agencies. In some cases other websites have found themselves hijacked by Islamist programmers who write their material on to existing sites.

"It's nearly impossible to police them," said Kevin O'Brien, a terrorism expert with RAND Europe, a think-tank. "It's a question of whether or not you can find them in the first place," he said, adding that the cost of establishing the sites was negligible or even nil if service providers offered web space as a free addition to e-mail users.

Saudi Arabian Islamists distributing a web-based jihadist magazine called Sawt al-Jihad are now so confident of outwitting the authorities that the publication is distributed at the same time every two weeks. It has yet to be snared.

But some security experts say they may be left to operate deliberately. "It seems increasingly likely that security agencies are content to let these websites run, because it's a way of monitoring what these people are up to," said Bill Durodié, a security expert at King's College, London.

So is Jihad Watch.

| 15 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Maybe it's all true, and mall bombing suspect Nuradin Abdi has been tortured in prison in Ohio, but I doubt that prosecutors would give themselves that large a self-inflicted wound. Instead, it looks as if CAIR and Abdi's other defenders are trying to set up some kind of abuse case, along with the usual charges of discrimination. Maybe they have calculated that this is the sort of thing that will play well after Abu Ghraib. From AP:

In the courtroom, Nuradin Abdi pressed his face onto a glass-covered tabletop, jerked his head randomly and muttered as his attorney successfully sought the evaluation before trial begins.

Many of Abdi's supporters who attended Wednesday's hearing said they were disturbed to see his shuffling gait and distracted behavior. Abdi has been held in federal detention since his arrest in November.

"It was like a different person," said his 17-year-old brother, Mohamed AbdiKarani, who said Abdi is innocent. "He looked at me; he didn't know who I was." ...

"The government took a healthy man, and what we have here is a broken man, mentally," said his lawyer, Mahir Sherif. Assistant U.S. Attorney Dana Peters said he did not object to the evaluation but added, "We have no evidence of any abuse of Mr. Abdi." ...

Jad Humeidan, executive director of the Ohio office of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, said Abdi was his friend, and always quick to volunteer to help new Somali immigrants find translators, jobs and housing.

"Just seeing Nuradin in court was an emotional experience," Humeidan said. "This wasn't the Nuradin that we know. This was just the shell of a man."

About 100 supporters, including Abdi's family, filled the seats in the courtroom and stood along the walls. Afterward they joined about 200 other supporters in front of the courthouse, where many waved small American flags and a few held up signs that read "Nuradin is 100 percent innocent" and "Patriot Act Religious Profiling." ...

Sherif said it was too early for him to comment about the charges but added, "It's not beyond the government to make mistakes for whatever reason."

That is true. Still, I doubt that this man was tortured. We'll see what evidence comes in.

| 21 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Michelle Malkin has some important revelations about Nuradin Abdi, the "shopping-mall terrorist," and other recently apprehended characters.

Nuradin M. Abdi, who was indicted last week for plotting with al Qaeda to blow up an Ohio shopping mall, flew here from Somalia and received bogus "refugee" status in 1999, according to authorities. Prosecutors allege that Abdi then fraudulently obtained a refugee travel document, which he used to fly to Ethiopia for jihad training. After returning, Abdi blended back into the American landscape along with tens of thousands of other refugees from a country known to be a breeding ground for Islamic terrorists. Columbus, Abdi's home base, is home to more than 30,000 Somalis -- the second-largest Somali community in the United States, after Minneapolis.

The Somali-al Qaeda connection is well-established. Intelligence reports indicate that Osama bin Laden sent extremists to Somalia in the early 1990s to train and organize the Somali Islamic radical group al-Ittihad al-Islamiya. Bin Laden claimed responsibility for the deaths of 18 American soldiers in Mogadishu. In addition, a Saudi Arabian-based Muslim charity with alleged ties to al Qaeda has been funding refugee camps in Somali border towns. The feds have frozen the Al-Haramain Foundation's assets based on terrorism grounds, but the flow of refugees from the overseas camps subsidized by the group has not been stanched.

Not every Somalian refugee or asylum-seeker is a terrorist, of course. But the system for screening out the well-meaning from the menaces is completely overwhelmed. Claims of "credible fear of persecution" are almost impossible to document but are rarely rejected. Federal homeland security officials are unable to detain asylum-seekers for background checks without the civil liberties brigade screaming "racial profiling." And there is still a woeful shortage of detention space -- just 2,000 beds nationwide -- to hold those with suspect claims.

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Unconscionable jihadist posturing at UC-Irvine. From Roberta Leguizamon in Front Page:

The Muslim Student Union (MSU) of University of California-Irvine has asked graduating Muslim students to wear green sashes bearing the word “shahada,” the Arabic word for "martyrdom.” The Muslim world refers to a suicide bomber who kills innocent civilians in Israel as a “shahid.” Pilots and their cohorts who fly airplanes into skyscrapers are also celebrated for their “martyrdom.” Children in Palestinian schools are taught, “blessed with shahada and honour, his soul returns to its Creator to live a different life, content with the rewards and honour bestowed upon it, a life of grace thanks to Allah.” ...

It is hard to believe that the UC-Irvine would silently endorse this culture of death at its graduation ceremony, yet to date, not a single member of its administration has spoken against the MSU’s promotion of the suicide sashes. The proposed sashes don’t just represent Palestinian “freedom fighters” and their crusade against Israel. They also glorify the actions of those 15 “martyrs” who brought the World Trade Center to the ground on top of American citizens. And this institution of higher learning has chosen to support pro-terrorist advocacy while this country is at war with terrorism (or rather, vice-versa). ...

This isn’t the first time anti-Semitism and anti-Americanism have reared their ugly heads at UC-Irvine. Many Christian and Jewish students at UC-Irvine say that they have been threatened and harassed by members of the MSU. UC-Irvine allowed the MSU to bring Amir Abdemalik Ali to its campus to provide a racist, hate-laced presentation called “America Under Siege: The Zionist Hidden Agenda.” He has made the outrageous claim that Jews staged September 11 in order to promote a universal war against Muslims. Not coincidentally, Amir also praises Hamas and Hezbollah, which have both been named terrorist organizations by the United States. Hamas also offers financial rewards to the families of “shahid.”

Read it all.

CORRECTION: The entire premise of this article seems to have been an error. I have now seen photos of the stole in question (courtesy the last poster in this thread), and this LA Times article is correct in saying that all it said was "'There is no God but Allah, and Muhammad is his messenger,' and on the other was a symbol meaning, 'God, increase my knowledge.'" The confusion probably started because someone was told that the inscription was "Shahada," that is, "witness." In Islam this word refers to the Muslim confession of faith, quoted here. But it is the same word as "martyrdom," which for Hamas and other groups has become virtually synonymous with suicide bombing.

In any case, I don't see anything inherently wrong with these graduates wearing a stole bearing the Islamic confession of faith, as long as those of other faiths are also allowed to make a similar display.

| 27 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

A new article by Jihad Watch director Robert Spencer is at Human Events this morning. Here's a sampling:

Eisenhower once famously said that he wanted Americans to have a religion, but he didn't care which one, and that is that.

But Islam is different -- and it isn't just Franklin Graham and Jerry Falwell who say this, but Muslims themselves. At the Jihad Watch website I recently posted a link to an article in which the author recommends that the United States make repudiation of violent jihad a condition for peace and alliance. One would think that moderate Muslims in America, given their claims about themselves, would be tripping over themselves in haste to make this repudiation, but no such luck. One Muslim responded at Jihad Watch: "It is indeed amazing that the unbelivers [sic] presume not only to define Islam, but also prescribe changes ('reforms') to Allah's (swt) commands. Just how do you imagine that you will impose your will on the ummah? … The Islamic Caliphate will soon encompass the Earth, and all corrupt and unjust man-made law will be replaced by Allah's (swt) holy Sharia (Islamic law)."

Ah, but he was no doubt an extremist. Here, then, is an exchange I had recently with another Muslim, an English convert and self-proclaimed moderate. I wrote: "I would like nothing better than a flowering, a renaissance, in the Muslim world, including full equality of rights for women and non-Muslims in Islamic societies: freedom of conscience, equality in laws regarding legal testimony, equal employment opportunities, etc." He retorted: "So, you would like to see us ditch much of our religion and, thereby, become non-Muslims."

In light of attitudes like these, the widespread Western assumption about Islam -- that because it is a religion, it contains core teachings of love, peace and brotherhood that people of good will can emphasize against those who would twist the religion to contrary purposes -- begins to ring hollow. Self-proclaimed moderate Muslims in the United States have insisted that they be regarded at all times as unflaggingly patriotic and filled with civic zeal, whatever unpleasant evidence to the contrary that individual cases may provide. But the forthright rejection of some of the central beliefs of the Western world by the Muslims I have quoted here and millions of others at least raises the possibility that those professed moderates are bluffing. Americans should call their bluff whenever and wherever possible by insisting that they acknowledge the elements of Islamic theology, law, tradition and history that radical Muslims use to justify violence and terrorism, and repudiate those elements not only in words, but in forthright and honest anti-terror efforts within the Islamic community.

It may be, however, that American Muslims as an aggregate will reject those calls to clean their own house, as they have done implicitly up to now. That in itself will be revealing. Those in the West who are as decent as Reagan was must avoid the cardinal temptation of decent men: to assume that others share their fundamental goodness. It is long past time to regard Islam more realistically.

| 25 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Of course, he isn't in Jordan. He's in Norway, where he has so far skillfully worked the laws to his advantage. From Aftenposten, with thanks to Filtrat:

A military tribunal in Jordan convicted 15 men - nine living and six presumed dead - as accessories to terrorism and connections to the al-Qaida network. A report from French news agency AFP named one of the convicted as Najmuddin Faraj Ahmad, who is better known as Mullah Krekar. Krekar and seven others were sentenced in absentia to 15 years of hard prison labor while Ahmad Mahmoud Saleh al-Riyati, named the ringleader of the 15-man terror cell and the only one physically present at the trial, had his term reduced to seven and a half years prison labor. ...

Norwegian prosecutors dismissed all charges against Mullah Krekar on Tuesday after deciding that they had insufficient reliable evidence to pursue his alleged links to terrorist activities. The prosecution cited the alleged torture of a potential witness against Krekar as undermining their case.

| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

One of these was Mullah Krekar. From SkyNews, with thanks to DC Watson:

A military court in Jordan has convicted 15 men of plotting terror attacks against American and Israeli interests. ...

The court in Amman said Ahmad Mahmoud Saleh al Riyati, 34, was the mastermind of the terror cell, which it said was also associated with the Ansar al-Islam militant group.

Al Riyati is the only one of the suspects in custody. But the court halved his original 15-year sentence to "give him another chance in life".

Eight of the other 14 - 12 Jordanians and two Iraqis - received jail terms of 15 years with hard labour. All the guilty verdicts can be appealed.

The court formally dropped charges against the remaining six, saying they had died.

It did not say how but military prosecution sources have said they were killed battling American forces in Iraq.

| 1 Comment
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

What kind of fathers do these girls have? From the Jerusalem Post, with thanks to J:

In a similar operation in various West Bank locations, 28 suspects were detained. They included two girls, Majda Kohon, 14, and Assil al-Hindi, 15, suspected of planning a terror attack. They were arrested in Nablus along with their fathers. Israel Radio reported one of the girls had recruited the other to carry out a suicide bombing.

A report on Ma'ariv's Web site quoted security sources as saying it is likely the girls had been recruited by the same terrorist who had sent teenage boys on suicide missions that were thwarted by troops several weeks ago.

The report quoted the mother of one of the girls as saying that she believes her daughter, whom she described as disciplined and who did not leave the house much, to be completely innocent.

| 13 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

June 16, 2004

Peace, or a hudna? An end, or a pause? From Reuters:

NAJAF, Iraq (Reuters) - Radical cleric Moqtada al-Sadr sent his fighters home on Wednesday in what may mark the end of a 10-week revolt against U.S.-led forces that once engulfed southern Iraq and Shi'ite Islam's holiest shrines.

With the formal end of U.S.-led occupation just two weeks away, Sadr issued a statement from his base in Najaf calling on his Mehdi Army militiamen to go home.

"Each of the individuals of the Mehdi Army, the loyalists who made sacrifices...should return to their governorates to do their duty," the statement said.

That call came a day after President Bush said the United States would not oppose a political role for Sadr -- only weeks after branding him an anti-democratic thug.

| 20 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"The real thing -- a dangerous terrorist." Or another bungled arrest? Babar may have been trying to raise money for Al-Muhajiroun. From CNN, :

(CNN) -- The FBI has had in custody since April a Pakistani-American who is believed linked to al Qaeda and who allegedly participated in plots to attack Americans overseas, law enforcement sources said.

Mohammed Junaid Babar is cooperating with authorities, the sources said. He is being held as a material witness as part of an ongoing investigation, which means details of his case are under seal. ...

Babar, a naturalized American citizen, was arrested in Queens. The sources said he is believed to have been involved in a financing operation in the United States to send money to a group in London known to law enforcement as "al Muhajiroun," which includes Pakistani terrorists.

That group allegedly was plotting bombings and assassinations overseas. ...

Law enforcement sources said Babar "is the real thing -- a dangerous terrorist."

| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This may be why there has been so much mayhem in Iraq recently. From the World Tribune:

In a message posted on Islamic websites, a message said to be from Al Zarqawi betrayed hints of desperation at prospects for the Islamic insurgency against the U.S.-led coalition in Iraq. In the nine-page message to Al Qaida leader Osama Bin Laden, Al Zarqawi reiterated that his insurgents were racing against time to destabilize the post-Saddam Hussein government and its security apparatus.

"We are not competing with you," Al Zarqawi said in his message. "We just want to be the head of the spear, a bridge by which the [Islamic] community can reach victory." ...

In his latest purported message, entitled "The Text of Al Zarqawi's Message to Osama Bin Laden About Holy War in Iraq," Al Zarqawi reviews the Islamic strategy as well as his organization's achievements. He said his group, "Monotheism and Holy War," plans to continue targeting Iraqi police and security forces in the effort to destabilize the U.S.-supported government in Baghdad.

"We are planning to heavily target them during the coming stage before they are in full control," the statement said. "What is coming will be more [attacks], God willing." ...

"The room for maneuver has started to become smaller," Al Zarqawi said. "The grip is getting tighter around the necks of the holy warriors. With the deployment of soldiers and police, the future has become frightening." Al Zarqawi said his group was trying to organize battalions to take over Iraq before national elections, scheduled for January 2005. Once again, he raised the prospect that Islamic insurgents would fail and either be expelled or killed.

"[If we fail,] we will have to leave for another land to uphold the Islamic banner, or until God chooses us as martyrs," the statement said.

| 67 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Seifullah Chapman got 85 years; Hammad Abdur-Raheem, eight years. Masoud Khan? Life. From Indystar.com:

Alexandria, Va. -- A Maryland man convicted of traveling to Pakistan and seeking to fight with the Taliban against the United States just days after 9/11 was sentenced Tuesday to life in prison.

Masoud Khan was one of three people sentenced Tuesday on charges they trained for holy war against the United States by playing paintball games in the Virginia woods as part of a "jihad" network.

| 64 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

From Reuters, with thanks to Nicolei:

ALGIERS, June 13 (Reuters) - Algeria's leading Islamic militant group, which has ties to al Qaeda, has declared war on foreign people and companies in the oil-rich north African country, an Islamic website said on Sunday.

The "foreigners war statement" appeared shortly after the Salafist Group for Preaching and Combat (GSPC) claimed responsibility for killing more than a dozen soldiers in an apparent escalation of violence in the strife-torn country.

"The Salafist Group for Preaching and Combat decides...to declare war on everything that is foreign and atheistic within Algeria's borders, whether against individuals, interests or installations," GSPC leader Nabil Sahraoui said in a statement.

| 33 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The Turkish prime minister would find a soulmate in Nabil Bebawi. From TurkishPress.com, with thanks to Nicolei:

Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan said that terrorism did not have any religion, language, race or country.

The expression ''moderate Islam'' was also wrong, Erdogan stated.

Erdogan said, ''Turkey is not a country where moderate Islam prevails.'' ...

Reacting to the expression ''moderate Islam'' used by panelist Harmon, Erdogan said, ''Turkey is not a country where moderate Islam prevails. This expression is wrong. The word Islam is uninflected, it is only Islam. When you say moderate Islam, then there will be another alternative like nonmoderate Islam. As a Muslim, I can't accept such a concept. Islam rejects extreme concepts. I am not an extreme Muslim.''

Fair enough, Erdogan. I use "radical" and "moderate" to denote those who pursue violent jihad and those who do not, but I acknowledge that both groups read out of the same books. Yet I too have read those books, and I don't see how they teach peace and tolerance, even though you seem to be insisting that the rest of the world assume that they do.

Reacting to panelist Bernard Lewis, who used the expression ''Islamic terrorism'', Erdogan said, ''this expression will sadden not only the Muslims but also those who believe in other religions. None of the religions allows terrorism. Therefore, it is very ugly to put the word Islam before terrorism. You may say religious terrorist but you can't say Islamic terrorist.''

I'd like to see how Erdogan would explain the copious references to the Qur'an and Sunnah in the writings of Osama and other radical Muslims. They themselves quite explicitly operate in the name of Islam. The PM seems to be zealous not to combat their version of Islam, but only to make sure that the rest of the world doesn't commit the faux pas of noticing their use of Islam to justify terrorism.

| 30 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Wait a minute. I thought suicide attacks were only carried out by desperately poor Palestinians with no weapons or any other recourse. How inconvenient for the apologists for jihad that reality keeps interfering with their romantic notions. From Newindpress, with thanks to Nicolei:

NEW DELHI: The Lashker-e-Taiba, a powerful Pakistan-based terror group active in Jammu and Kashmir, has raised a "full-blown unit for suicide squad operations against Western forces" in Iraq, a media report said on Sunday.

Up to 2,000 men between the ages of 18 and 25 have reportedly signed up for the Lashker's armed operations in Iraq, the authoritative 'The Hindu' reported in a lead story.

Sources close to Lashker's overall head, Hafiz Mohammad Saeed, were quoted as saying the group hoped to send at least some suicide squad members to Iraq overland through the porous Iran-Pakistan border. ...

A majority of volunteers were drawn from the ranks of seminary students at Muridke near Lahore, Jamaat-ud-Dawa's main centre. Some volunteers were raised from the Binori town seminary in Karachi, run by fundamentalist cleric Mufti Nizamuddin Shamzai until he was assassinated, it said.

Seminary students? All together now: "Don't they know the Qur'an forbids suicide???"

| 27 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"Dhimmi" is not part of the original IslamOnline headline (thanks to Twostellas) to this story, but from the looks of this article, Dr. Nabil Loqa Bebawi would wear the title proudly. For he is the epitome of the subservient dhimmi who denies and covers up the sins of his masters.

The study, entitled "Rights and Duties of Christians in an Islamic State and its Impact on National Security", would be the first PhD in the Shari`ah by a Christian in the Middle East, Dr. Nabil Loqa Bebawi told IslamOnline.net.

Elaborating on his choice of the subject, he said that after the 9/11 attacks "the western and U.S. media started propagated false concepts about Islam that were adopted by the governing groups in Washington."

Bebawi, a professor of criminal law, stressed that the "Islamic civilization and Islam are under a vicious smear campaign."

The Christian scholar regretted that this campaign pictured Islam as a faith inciting terrorism and having no humanitarian values.

"The Islamic civilization which was founded on the principles laid out by Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) presents fine example of tolerance and coexistence between people of different civilizations, cultures, religions and race" Bebawi averred.

"As a Christian living on Islamic lands, my thesis seeks to underline Islam's spirit of clemency in dealing with non-Muslims."

Bebawi stressed that Islam should not be hold to blame for the wrongdoings of what he termed as "extremists" hungry for power.

There have always been extremists in all civilizations and cultures, he said, noting that Christian extremists blew up a federal building in the American state of Oklahoma in 1995 killing 197 Americans and wounding 300 others.

They weren't Christian extremists, but leave that aside: even if they had been, one incident hardly balances the thousands of Islamic terrorist incidents that have occured since 1995.

Bebawi also seems to miss, at least from the looks of this article, some of the more unpleasant features of dhimmitude:

The first part of the six-chapter thesis addresses the tolerance of Islam with on-Muslims living in an Islamic state, and even in the event of war.

The second tackles the religious rights of non-Muslims in an Islamic state, such as the right to build their own places of worship and the right to choose their own religious leaders.

In the third chapter, Bebaw reviews the rights granted by Islam to non-Muslims to move freely and choose their place of settlement across the state.

It also examines their rights to education, casting their votes, running for elections as well as freedom of speech. ...

The fourth chapter of the thesis looks into how Islam grants non-Muslims the rights to social care, freedom of work and fair chance of promotion away from religious affiliations.

Gee, that all sounds swell. No wonder so many Christians are thriving in Muslim countries today. But Bebawi has neglected to mention that the laws of dhimmitude only allow non-Muslims to live in Islamic states under conditions that relegate them to second-class citizenship. "The subject peoples," according to a manual of Islamic law, must "pay the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya)" and "are distinguished from Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar); are not greeted with 'as-Salamu 'alaykum' [the traditional Muslim greeting, "Peace be with you"]; must keep to the side of the street; may not build higher than or as high as the Muslims' buildings, though if they acquire a tall house, it is not razed; are forbidden to openly display wine or pork . . . recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their funerals or feastdays; and are forbidden to build new churches." If they violate these terms, the law further stipulates that they can be killed or sold into slavery at the discretion of the Muslim leader. ('Umdat al-Salik, o11.3, 5.)

Bebawi's PhD thesis would really be valuable if he discussed all that.

| 22 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Last week I asked why the major media is ignoring this story. I'll ask again now. From Zenit, with thanks to Y. F. Nordstrøm:

A Catholic Indian citizen was arrested and tortured in Saudi Arabia because of his faith, according to L'Osservatore Romano. ... Brian Savio O'Connor was imprisoned about six months ago by the Mutawa, the Saudi religious police.

Taken to the Ali Hira prison in Riyadh, the accused was threatened with death if he did not convert to Islam ...

"Officially the Mutawa has accused O'Connor of using drugs and praying to Jesus Christ, accusations which imply he runs the risk of being punished with the death penalty," the Vatican newspaper stated.

"The family says that the proofs of his use of drugs have been fabricated by the police, while it does not deny that Brian is a good Christian," the newspaper added.

| 14 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

... from Canada. From the New York Times, :

But it was on the shores of the Niagara River, little more than a mile from the world-famous falls, that a small, inflatable, motor-powered raft was captured earlier this month, along with six adults and two children from India and Pakistan and the man accused of trying to smuggle them into this country.

While this locale is definitely not Miami or South Texas, the number of illegal immigrants trying to enter the United States here, by traversing the waterways and railroad bridges that separate much of New York from Canada, is actually growing.

This latest group failed largely because of security enhancements put in place after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, elevating from afterthought to priority the patrolling of a border long considered friendly.

"We treat everybody as a potential terrorist," said Edward Duda, deputy chief of the Buffalo sector of the United States Border Patrol. "Anyone that crosses the border illegally, we treat them all equally." ...

Smuggling humans is a lucrative business, with passage from India or Pakistan into the United States costing as much as $40,000 for each adult, Mr. Woodside said.

| 73 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Radical Muslims have declared on more than one occasion recently that they intend to try to disrupt their enemy economically if possible. From CNN, :

BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) -- Iraq's oil industry appears to be the latest target of insurgents, with an oil company security chief shot to death Wednesday and a second straight day of attacks on a key oil pipeline. ...

Revenues from Iraq's oil industry are in jeopardy in the wake of the latest attacks.

In Kirkuk on Wednesday, gunmen opened fire on a car carrying Ghazi al-Talabani, the security chief for Iraq's Northern Oil Company, killing him and wounding his driver, according to a police source in the northern Iraqi city.

Al-Talabani was a cousin of Jalal Talabani, the leader of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan and a member of the disbanded Iraqi Governing Council.

Over the weekend, three prominent residents of Kirkuk were killed in targeted attacks, including a well-known Kurdish cleric, a district mayor who also served as a police officer, and the father of Kirkuk's police chief.

Insurgents have been focusing their attacks on participants in the new Iraqi government in advance of the June 30 handover.

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

When is a sports center not just a sports center? Well, for one thing, when it's named for a terrorist. From the Washington Times, :

In one instance, about $410,000 in American aid helped finance the new Salah Khalaf Recreation and Sports Center in the West Bank city of Nablus.

The center, officially opened May 29, is named for the man considered the spiritual godfather of the Palestinian Black September faction responsible for the 1972 massacre at the Munich Summer Olympics.

The effort by U.S. lawmakers was triggered by a report in Palestinian Media Watch that U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) money was being funneled to Palestinian organizations even though they have refused to sign a pledge saying they would not work with officially designated terrorist groups such as Hamas, Islamic Jihad and the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade.

In addition, Palestinian municipalities and universities have accepted substantial U.S. aid, freeing up other funds for anti-Israel and anti-U.S. protests or to honor terrorist "martyrs."

So U.S. aid is paying for anti-U.S. protests. No wonder the jihadists are so confident of ultimate victory.

| 10 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

From CNN, :

PARIS, France -- French anti-terror police have arrested 12 men in Paris under anti-terrorism laws, authorities say. ...

The suspects are thought to be linked to radical religious groups, possibly Islamic, but Caillebot would not give further details about them.

She said police suspect they were using legitimate businesses to raise money for militant combatants overseas. During the arrests, police confiscated a pistol, computer disk and material for manufacturing false documents. ...

The news agency said it had seen an Italian detention warrant last week that included transcribed telephone conversations in which suspects discussed the Paris metro, security details and a "martyr" referred to as Mohammed.

Yeah, that sounds "possibly Islamic" to me. But of course, it could have been a Methodist who just happened to be named Mohammed.

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

June 15, 2004

Another. From AP:

CAIRO, Egypt (AP) - An Islamic Web site showed videotape Tuesday of a blindfolded American hostage in Saudi Arabia, and said abductors threatened to kill him unless Saudi authorities free al-Qaida prisoners within three days.

Paul Johnson, 49, of Stafford Township, N.J., was abducted Saturday by a group calling itself al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula. The organization is believed to be headed by al-Qaida's chief in the kingdom, Abdullah-aziz al-Moqrin, who was identified as speaking on the tape.

"My name is Paul Marshall Johnson, Jr.," the seated hostage says in the tape, an elaborate tattoo on his left shoulder. "I am an American. ... I work on Apache helicopters."

A U.S. official said the threat should be taken "very seriously" because the posting appears to be credible and militants have used the site before. "It has been a good indicator in the past," the official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity. ...

The Web site statement addressed Muslims all over the world, saying: "We have made a promise to ourselves to defend you. We will not let you down, and you should know that the treacherous tyrants who have helped the Americans against you, and shared your blood with them, do not represent the Muslims of Saudi Arabia. They are our enemies as much as they are your enemies. They are the enemies of God and his prophet."

| 117 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Another call to Americans to leave our friend and ally Saudi Arabia. This just in from AP:

WASHINGTON - The U.S. government is renewing its call for Americans to leave Saudi Arabia after the recent terrorist attacks, saying the safety of U.S. workers was more important than any effect on oil supplies or the Saudi economy. ...

Referring to U.S. workers in Saudi Arabia, State Department spokesman Richard Boucher said, "We first and foremost have a responsibility to Americans. We need to give them our best advice on how to handle any particular situation overseas."

"As far as the maintenance and continued flow of oil and the economy in Saudi Arabia, that is something I think the Saudis will have to describe, what provisions they can make and how they can operate those facilities."

| 124 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Common sense and clear thinking from Spengler in Asia Times (thanks to rickb):

Western polemicists felt at home on the moral high ground against communism, along with president Reagan. But they are tongue-tied before radical Islam, fearing to offend a religion with more than a billion adherents. Inadvertently they give credibility to the radicals. It is difficult to assess what proportion of today's Muslims are "radicals", because neither the world's Muslims nor the West has a clear definition of what is radical and what is not. Vitriolic sermonizing is so commonplace under the eyes of "moderate" regimes, for example Hosni Mubarak's Egypt, that the label of "radical Islam" has worn thin.

In reality, the West sooner or later will have to draw a bright line between "radicals" and "moderates". Under the circumstances there can be nothing in between. Islam's encounter with the West leaves room for nothing but radical jihadists on the one hand, or radical reformers. Islam is expansionist by construction and political by its original design. It is a fact of history that jihad, by which I mean specifically the propagation of the faith by violence, is a mainstream tradition. Even communal prayer in Islam has at its center the alignment of the individual believer to jihad (Does Islam have a prayer?, May 18). ...

The problem actually is quite simple. To advocate jihad today is the hallmark of the radical Islamist, and it is there that the West must draw a line in the sand. But to repudiate jihad in turn implies radical revision of the religion's mainstream, and that is the hallmark of the radical reformer.

Like other religions, Islam has reached a point in world history - or rather world history has caught up with Islam - such that it must undergo a fundamental change. By way of comparison, the Catholic Church accepts separation of church and state as well as religious tolerance, but it did so only after the likes of Count Camillo Benso Cavour in Italy stripped the papacy of temporal rule over anything but the square mile of the Vatican City. ...

Enemy is radical Islam

In short, the West must give the Islamic world a clear choice as to who is with it, and who is against it - words that President Bush has used but with muddled meaning. That would change the character of the intelligence war utterly. It may be harder to define who is friend and foe today than it was in 1981, but by the same token, it will be far easier to tell friend from foe once the West carves its criteria in stone. ...

If Washington were to make repudiation of jihad a condition for friendship with the United States, the demand would have unpredictable and destabilizing consequences for the Islamic world. Just as the race of Sovietologists viewed Reagan's determination to destabilize the Soviet Empire with horror, the whole profession of Mideast studies would rear up in horror against such a stance. But wars are won by ignoring the fat and complacent commanders of garrison troops, and forcing the burden of uncertainty on to the other side (Ronald Reagan's creative destruction, June 8). Decisive intelligence stems from destabilization of the opposing side, through defections and similar events.

Bravo.

| 83 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This story and the one about jihadist French imams are, obviously, related. From AFP, with thanks to FreedomNowNews:

Jerusalem - The Jewish Agency is bracing itself for the immigration of tens of thousands French Jews into Israel as a result of a growing anti-Semitism in France, a spokesperson for the organisation said on Sunday. ...

Vatikai said that a report compiled by the agency had found 30 000 out of France's 575 000-strong Jewish community were considering immigrating to Israel. ...

French Justice Minister Dominique Perben said last week that 180 anti-Jewish acts had been recorded so far this year, including cases of assault, arson and verbal insults. ...

Vatikai said the situation for French Jews was becoming increasingly "difficult".

| 93 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

It's no wonder that people dance around charred corpses when Islamic radical leaders have attitudes like those expressed in the latest issue of "Sawt Al-Jihad" (Voice of Jihad). Note the consistent use of religious language, which is just another indication of the deep religious motives that underlie attacks like these.

From an interview with Fawwaz bin Muhammad Al-Nashami, who led the Khobar attacks of May 29, in a translation from MEMRI (thanks to Jerry Gordon):

"The infidel's clothing was torn to shreds, and he was naked in the street. The street was full of people, as this was during work hours, and everyone watched the infidel being dragged, praise and gratitude be to Allah. ...

"The brothers had exchanged fire with the patrols, all the while shouting, 'Allah Akbar,' and 'There is no God but Allah.'" ...

"The four of us entered the company together. We met the Arab clerks, and greeted them. We asked them: 'Where are the Americans?' They were all in shock, and said: 'What's going on? Who are you?' We told them, 'We are Mujahideen, and we want the Americans. We have not come to aim a weapon at the Muslims, but to purge the Arabian Peninsula, according to the will of our Prophet Muhammad, of the infidels and the polytheists who are killing our brothers in Afghanistan and Iraq. We want you to show us where they are.'"

What's that? You read the learned pundits saying that this idea that Arabia must be purged of non-Muslims is not really an Islamic religious tenet, but a cover for political goals? Look again. It was among the Prophet's dying wishes:

Ibn 'Abbas said, "Thursday! What (great thing) took place on Thursday!" Then he started weeping till his tears wetted the gravels of the ground . Then he said, "On Thursday the illness of Allah's Apostle was aggravated and he said, "Fetch me writing materials so that I may have something written to you after which you will never go astray." The people (present there) differed in this matter and people should not differ before a prophet. They said, "Allah's Apostle is seriously sick.' The Prophet said, "Let me alone, as the state in which I am now, is better than what you are calling me for." The Prophet on his death-bed, gave three orders saying, "Expel the pagans from the Arabian Peninsula, respect and give gifts to the foreign delegates as you have seen me dealing with them." I forgot the third (order)" (Ya'qub bin Muhammad said, "I asked Al-Mughira bin 'Abdur-Rahman about the Arabian Peninsula and he said, 'It comprises Mecca, Medina, Al-Yama-ma and Yemen." Ya'qub added, "And Al-Arj, the beginning of Tihama.") (Sahih Bukhari, vol. 4, book 52, no. 288)

Back to Fawwaz bin Muhammad Al-Nashami and his acts of devotion:

"We entered one of the companies' [offices], and found there an American infidel who looked like a director of one of the companies. I went into his office and called him. When he turned to me, I shot him in the head, and his head exploded. We entered another office and found one infidel from South Africa, and our brother Hussein slit his throat. We asked Allah to accept [these acts of devotion] from us, and from him. This was the South African infidel. ...

"We turned to the third site, which was the most fortified center of all the compounds. Our plan was to remain in the car until we were alongside the American Hummer. When we were next to it, the brothers appeared from the windows [of the car] and began shouting 'Allah Akbar,' and shooting them. And I saw the skull of the soldier standing behind the machine gun explode before my eyes. Allah be praised. I think the driver was also killed. ...

A little later on these religious fellows got in a bit of preaching:

"We went to one of the buildings. Brother Nimr, may Allah's mercy be upon him, shoved the door until it opened. We entered and in front of us stood many people. We asked them their religion, and for identification documents. We used this time for Da'wa [preaching Islam], and for enlightening the people about our goal. We spoke with many of them.

"At the same time, we found a Swedish infidel. Brother Nimr cut off his head, and put it at the gate [of the building] so that it would be seen by all those entering and exiting.

No doubt that was sure to win them some converts. Note the beheading and, below, the throat slitting. What happened to Pearl and Berg is common practice.

"We continued in the search for the infidels, and we slit the throats of those we found among them. At the same time, we heard the sound of the patrols and the gathering [of the security personnel] outside. These cowards did not dare to enter. About 45 minutes or an hour had passed since the beginning of the operation.

"We began to comb the site looking for infidels. We found Filipino Christians. We cut their throats and dedicated them to our brothers the Mujahideen in the Philippines. [Likewise], we found Hindu engineers and we cut their throats too, Allah be praised. That same day, we purged Muhammad's land of many Christians and polytheists.

Read the whole thing. These are common attitudes.

| 18 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Olivier Guitta in FrontPage (thanks to EPG) on the ticking time bomb in France:

France is home to the largest Muslim community in Europe -- estimated between 5 and 8 million, roughly over 10 percent of France's total population. In the past few years, the radical element of these French citizens has grown quickly, and is quietly overpowering more moderate Muslim voices. Many French Muslims idolize Osama bin Laden and consider the destruction of synagogues and assault of Jews to be justified retribution. These worrisome phenomena are caused by a number of things: increasing influence of radical imams in French mosques, the penetration of Saudi Wahhabism and extremist satellite networks spreading their propaganda.

I recently discussed these issues with Jean Francois Cope, spokesman of the French government, during a press conference in Washington DC. First, I asked Mr. Cope: knowing that 91 percent of the imams preaching in France are foreigners and most of them are illegal immigrants, does it not make sense to expel them, particularly those preaching hatred?

He answered that France cannot just expel them because these hate-mongering imams have been around for a while, as has their families. It would not be proper. ...

From Mr. Cope's position, it appears France is far less than enthusiastic about truly aiding the War on Terror. The country is starting to act against radicalism on a very limited basis when it has no choice, adopting half-measures that serve to quiet critics. There are many more imams to arrest. The government should forbid the funding of French Muslim organizations/mosques by Saudi Arabia. And finally, it should ban TV channels such as Al-Manar, which are only spreading violence and hate against the West. But these kinds of agressive tactics just aren't part of France's program to defeat radical islam. As a result, anti-Semitism and anti-American sentiment continue to increase in the land of our great "ally."

| 34 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

June 14, 2004

A Somali jihadist has been charged with plotting an attack on a Columbus, Ohio mall. From NBC4columbus.com, with thanks to Looney Tunes:

According to the FBI, Nuradin M. Abdi, a 32-year-old Somali national, was indicted and charged with conspiracy to provide material support to terrorists, conspiracy to provide material support to al-Qaida and two counts of fraud and misuse of government documents.

Attorney General John Ashcroft said that in March 2000, Abdi re-entered the United States from Africa, using a fraudulent immigration document. According to the FBI, one of his co-conspirators was Iyman Faris, a convicted al-Qaida operative, who picked him up from an airport.

Upon their return to the Columbus area, Abdi, Faris, and other co-conspirators, allegedly initiated a plot to blow up a Columbus-area shopping mall. It is also alleged that in pursuit of this plot, Abdi received bomb-making training from one of the co-conspirators.

The indictment alleges that on April 27, 1999, Abdi applied to immigration officials for a travel document, allowing him to leave the United States and later return. Abdi indicated in the application that he intended to visit Germany and Saudi Arabia.

The FBI alleges that Abdi's true destination was to attend a military-style terrorist training camp in Ethiopia. According to a detention motion, Abdi sought training in radio usage, weapons, guerilla warfare and explosives.

The FBI stated in a detention motion that Abdi's purpose in seeking training was to ready himself to participate in violent Jihad conflicts overseas and to lend support to activities that his al-Qaida co-conspirators might ask him to perform in the United States.

You'll never guess the reaction from his family:

Abdi's cousin, Asha Yassin Hassan, said that Abdi was targeted because he is a Muslim.
| 99 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

He says it's profiling: "Because I am a Muslim, I was stopped." Wouldn't it be refreshing if, even just one time, a Muslim said: "I was stopped, and I don't mind, because I wholeheartedly support any efforts to root out terrorism from the Islamic community, and I am willing to accept inconvenience to this end." But instead, CAIR and Co. are jumping on the bandwagon, looking for another victimization case. From AP, with thanks to Nicolei:

A Texas Muslim leader says he and his wife and daughter were detained for two days last weekend after officials at a Canadian airport told him he was considered a security threat.

Mohammed Zaki Alswij, an imam who moved to the United States from Iraq in 1987, said racial profiling may have been to blame for his detention in Vancouver, British Columbia. Alswij, 53, wears a cleric's robes and a turban as symbols of his religious stature and beliefs.

"This wouldn't happen to (just) anyone," Alswij said in Saturday's edition of the Houston Chronicle. "But because I am a Muslim, I was stopped."

Nancy Bray, a spokeswoman for Citizenship and Immigration Canada, said she could not discuss the Houston man's case because of privacy laws. But she said they would not deny a person entry based on his or her race.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations, a Muslim advocacy group, said it will ask the U.S. State Department and Canadian authorities to investigate the incident.

| 21 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

These "suspected rebels" are, you guessed it, jihadists. Note also the targeting of civilians: justified in Kashmir as in Israel by stipulations in Islamic law that forbid the killing of non-combatants unless they are perceived to be aiding the war effort in some way. From AP, with thanks to Nicolei:

A GRENADE attack on a crowded tourist restaurant and other weekend violence in Indian-controlled Kashmir killed seven people, including two tourists, and injured at least 47 others.

Police said suspected rebels lobbed a grenade into a popular restaurant in Pahalgam, a holiday resort in India's Jammu-Kashmir state, killing four people and injuring 25 others, mostly tourists. ...

Earlier on Saturday, a hand grenade thrown by a suspected Islamic rebel at an army vehicle in a border town missed its target and wounded 20 civilians, four of them critically, police said.

The blast occurred in Handwara, a town close to the Line of Control, which divides Kashmir between India and Pakistan.

Police blamed the attack on Islamic militants fighting for Kashmir's independence from India or its merger with neighbouring Pakistan.

| 25 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Jeff Jacoby in the Boston Globe (thanks to Looney Tunes) explores Islamic justifications for mutilation of corpses:

The popular "Ask the Scholar" feature of Islam Online (www.islamonline.net) was recently asked "how Islam views the issue of mutilating dead bodies of enemies." In a reply, Sheik Faysal Mawlawi, deputy chairman of the European Council for Fatwa and Research, began by declaring that mutilation is "not allowable" under Islam. But then came the loophole:

"It is possible to mutilate the dead only in case of retaliation. . . . If he inflicts any physical damage on anyone, he should be retaliated against in the same manner. In case of war, Muslims are allowed to take vengeance for their mutilated dead mujahids (fighters) in the same way it was done to them." This, the European sheik explained, is the teaching of the Koran (16:126), which counsels patience but authorizes revenge. ...

Ultimately it is up to the world's moderate, modern Muslims to rise up against the barbarians in their midst. Until that day comes, there is nothing the West can do to ameliorate or appease this enemy. We can only destroy it -- or be destroyed.

| 26 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

These dancers were no doubt outraged by Abu Ghraib, and denounced American atrocities. From AP:

BAGHDAD, Iraq - A car bomb tore through a convoy Monday in central Baghdad, killing at least 12 people, including an American and four other foreigners working to rebuild Iraq's power plants. A crowd gathered, shouting "Down with the USA!" and dancing around a charred body.

They were working to rebuild power plants, eh? Will these American villains stop at nothing?

| 30 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

From Reuters, with thanks to Twostellas:

BANGKOK (Reuters) - Gunmen killed a Buddhist former policeman and fired three grenades into an army outpost in two separate incidents in Thailand's restive Muslim south, police said on Sunday.

The attacks came hours after Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra vowed to restore peace in a month in the troubled region where more than 200 people have been killed since January. ...

Thaksin, frustrated with his government's failure to restore peace in the mainly Muslim region and facing complaints of human rights violations by troops, said on Friday the military would step up patrols and intensify searches in the three southernmost provinces under martial law since January.

"We have to go on the offensive, otherwise bandits will come out and continue to kill our people one after another," Thaksin told reporters after chairing a meeting of security officials.

But his political opponents were skeptical.

"Judging from the continuing violence, the government can just forget about what it has wished for," said opposition Democrat Party leader Banyat Bantadtan on a visit to the region.

He said he expected the violence to continue for some time.

Indeed. It will continue until Thailand becomes an Islamic state or the radical Muslims are driven out of the country.

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

No assimilation in the UK. From The Guardian:

The British state education system is failing to meet the needs of Muslim pupils and parents, according to a report calling for special classes in Islamic subjects, more single-sex education and prayer rooms in secondary schools.

The Muslims on Education policy document, compiled by Muslim academics and educationalists and being launched in the House of Lords tomorrow, argues that Britain's largest minority community should have access to more Muslim state schools and that non-Muslim schools should adapt more fully to the community's needs. ...

The wide-ranging proposals include reform of the curriculum to accommodate Muslim needs, recommending compulsory religious education from 14 to 16, a new A-level in Islamic studies and a teacher of Islam in all Muslim-majority state schools for Muslim pupils who withdraw from religious education.

Some state schools should use private Muslim teachers for special classes on Islamic subjects, and all majority Muslim schools should provide a teacher of Islam for students who withdraw from collective worship, the study says.

The report also says state schools should do more to address the needs of Muslim pupils, including organising religious awareness training for staff and governors.

| 21 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Threats, threats, threats, plans, plans, plans. You may read this story, and then you will turn to other things. There is no chance that you will remember these failed plans for as long as you will remember 9/11. Nor is there any need for you to do so. Thank God that none of these plans have come to fruition. However, let us not let our guard down. From Expatica, with thanks to Ali Dashti:

BRUSSELS – A group of alleged Islamic fundamentalist militants arrested in Belgium and Italy earlier this week may have been plotting to blow up Nato headquarters or the European Parliament, both of which are housed in Brussels.

According to the Wednesday edition of Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera, Italian investigators say one of the militants, Rabei Osman Sayed Ahmed or 'Mohamed the Egyptian', may have been plotting to bomb a "symbolic target" in the Belgian capital.

| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

AP news item: "Extremists Using Web to Spread Terror." It's stating the obvious, yes, but there is some information about the latest video:

MANAMA, Bahrain - Web sites featuring videos of the beheading of Americans or captives pleading for their lives have become part of an electronic war of incitement, humiliation and terrorist outreach, experts say, providing a window into the minds of militant Muslims who hate the West.

The latest dramatic Web posting came Saturday, a short video that showed no faces but included a voice yelling in English: "No, no, please!"

The video showed a shot fired, then the scene of the falling body of what appeared to be a Western man — identified as Robert Jacobs, an American killed by suspected al-Qaida militants in Saudi Arabia last week. Two gunmen then fired at least 10 more shots, before one of them kneeled and motioned as if he was beheading the fallen man. ...

"The aim is really to spread as much terror as possible and make it available to as many people as possible, especially in the West," where Internet use is more common, said Dia'a Rashwan, a Cairo expert on Islamic militants.

In what Rashwan calls a a war of "ideology, images and perception," the Web is a place for militants and their sympathizers to exchange the latest news, debate their definition of Islam, share how-to manuals, extoll their heroes and vilify their enemies.

You don't say!

| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The headline of this Chicago Tribune story, which Charles of LGF kindly brought to my attention, is "After Jewish outcry, scholar bows out of testifying for imam." As Charles points out, it is evidence of media blinkers and dhimmitude for the Trib to assume that only Jews could possibly be offended by Scott Alexander's remarks. I myself am not Jewish, and I find it appalling that the Trib's lead sentence would identify Alexander as "a scholar of Islam who works to bridge the divide between Chicago's Muslims and Jews." Why? Consider what else the article says:

In one of the statements submitted to the court, Alexander provided an explanation for some incendiary language used by Damra.

At a 1991 Chicago rally, the imam called for "directing all the rifles at the first and last enemy of the Islamic nation and that is the sons of monkeys and pigs, the Jews."

Alexander, 42, serving as an expert witness for the defense, stated that Damra's remarks were part of the religious and political rhetoric used by Palestinians opposed to the Israeli occupation to draw supporters to their cause.

"As unquestionably hate-filled and thus morally reprehensible as such language is, when Palestinians refer to Jews as `descended from apes and swine,' or encourage support for those who `kill Jews,' they do so with the reasonably justifiable self-image of victim and persecuted, not of victimizer and persecutor," Alexander wrote in the summary of his proposed testimony.

Is that so? So Jews are not being victimized and persecuted by those who call them apes and pigs? Has Alexander read a newspaper in the last five years?

In his own defense, Alexander dug the hole deeper:

Alexander said he was not endorsing Damra's language, but was trying to provide a deeper understanding, based on the Koran and the ideas of Islamic theologians, of why a Palestinian opposed to the Israeli occupation would use violent language.

"I tried to emphasize the vile nature of the language," Alexander said. "I was asked to testify whether there were any Palestinian contexts in which this hateful and violent language would not be construed as persecution."

Alexander said he found in the teachings of Sayyid Qutb, an Egyptian ideologue and inspiration behind the current radical Islamic movement, that these curses are used to name oppressors.

"This is evidence that there might be people who use hateful and violent language in their minds to name those they perceive to be the oppressor," he said.

"This is not me talking, this is Qutb," he added.

I profile Qutb in Onward Muslim Soldiers, and it's true: nearly 40 years after his death, he remains an "inspiration behind the current radical Islamic movement." But what mental gymnastics Alexander employed to arrive at the conclusion that Qutb used this hateful language to "name the oppressor," as opposed to persecuting non-Muslims, I can't imagine. Qutb called for Muslims to wage war against non-Muslims. It would seem that one could only see that as a struggle of the oppressed against the oppressor if one identified fully with the Muslim perspective. And so we arrive at what Charles has aptly dubbed "the definition of a dhimmi."

Not surprisingly, another infamous dhimmi scholar agrees with Alexander:

John Esposito, a professor at Georgetown University and a leading Islamic scholar, said Alexander's explanation was "very accurate."

"Alexander is not espousing or agreeing with this language but simply saying how the holy texts in Islam are used and abused," Esposito said.

That's fine: Alexander may indeed not be agreeing. But the language he used suggests otherwise, and he is making a distinction without a difference. Qutb's naming of the oppressor has led to innumerable acts of violence by Muslims against Jews not only in Israel, but around the world. For Damra to use the same language suggests his approval of such violence, and for Alexander to invoke Qutb to try to establish that such language can be used in a non-violent context is beyond ludicrous.

| 18 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

June 13, 2004

Major arrests in Pakistan. From AP, :

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan (AP) - Pakistani authorities have arrested 10 suspected al-Qaida members, including a nephew of detained terror mastermind Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, who has been in U.S. custody the past year, the interior minister said Sunday. Mohammed was a senior aide to al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden.

The men were arrested over the weekend in separate raids in the southern port city of Karachi, Interior Minister Faisal Saleh Hayat said.

Among them was Masrab Arochi, a nephew of former al-Qaida No. 3 Mohammed, who was captured in March 2003 in a city near the Pakistani capital. Arochi had a $1 million US bounty on his head, Hayat said, and is believed to have been behind several attacks in Pakistan.

"It is a major breakthrough," Hayat said. "We have made a big dent in the al-Qaida network."

This is good news. However, even if all the terrorists in the world were caught tomorrow, the problem of Islamic terrorism would not necessarily go away. Why not? Because terrorists continue to recruit and gain support in mosques throughout the world. Until this changes, arrests like these are less than a drop in the bucket.

| 33 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Salman Rushdie has now lived with a price on his head for over a decade. Long after most Westerners have forgotten about him, Iranian Muslims are still raging about his case. Recently suicide bomber recruitment in Iran was explicitly advertised as targeting Americans, Israelis, and Rushdie. And now a discussion thread in an Iranian forum (which claims to be "the largest Shia online community") has a significant number of respondents claiming they would kill or hurt him if they had the chance. From the AhlulBayt discussion forum, with thanks to LGF:

What would you do if you saw Salman Rusdie unprotected walking down the street?

Kill him, and run to Iran for your BIG reward. [ 16 ] [14.55%]

Kill him, but NOT claiming the reward after. [ 25 ] [22.73%]

harm him without killing him [ 13 ] [11.82%]

Have a polite discussion with him saying his work is wrong. [ 20 ] [18.18%]

Praise him for his "work". [ 7 ] [6.36%]

Do nothing. [ 29 ] [26.36%]

Total Votes: 110

Guests cannot vote

| 59 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Solomon has a riveting account of the American Anti-Slavery Group's reaction to Kofi Annan's Harvard speech and honorary degree, including these indelible words from the indefatigable and fearless Charles Jacobs:

Kofi Annan is the top diplomat in the world, but today we need less diplomacy and more truth.

The truth is, Kofi Annan does not need to come to Harvard tomorrow, he needs to go to Sudan. He needs to be with the African Muslims in Darfur who are being slaughtered and dispossessed and starved to death. He needs to go to the South where Khartoum's militia has forced 100,000 Shilluks off their land. He needs to go to the North, and he needs to tell Khartoum to free the slaves.

There are tens of thousands of slaves like Francis Bok, still serving their masters in Sudan. Kofi Annan needs to tell the truth: For a decade Khartoum wages what it calls...what they call a Jihad against Christians and tribalists in the South.

Kofi Annan never once said that the war was a Jihad. It's not diplomatic to say...but it's the truth.

Two million people died because of this war. Tens of thousands were enslaved. Arab militias storm African villages, kill the men and capture the women and children like Francis Bok.

Kofi Annan needs to tell the world about Jihad slaves. It's not diplomatic...but it's the truth.

| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

If there are no churches, it must be Muslim land. From Reuters, with thanks to Ali Dashti:

PARIS, June 11 (Reuters) - European states must help rescue dozens of Orthodox churches and monasteries destroyed in Kosovo to show they are serious about fostering better ties between Serbs and Albanians there, a European expert said on Friday.

A large part of the Serbian Orthodox heritage in Kosovo, the province Serbs consider the hallowed birthplace of their nation, was destroyed or damaged by majority Albanian rioters last March in what a NATO official called "almost ethnic cleansing."

"Almost ethnic cleansing," eh? Of course, Reuters can't use the j-word.

For Thyse, Kosovo's religious heritage played a key role in the struggle to restore the multinational society that Kosovo enjoyed before Yugoslavia fell apart in 1991.

"The discussions on Kosovo's future status are starting," he said. Albanians make up 90 percent of the two million Kosovars.

"To keep the Serbs from claiming this area as part of their national heritage, some Albanians are attacking their churches."

To maintain its claim on parts of the province, the Serbian Orthodox Church has defiantly stayed on, with priests and monks hunkering down in the remaining icon-filled churches and frescoed monasteries under peacekeepers' protection.

Local patriarch Bishop Artemije has repeatedly criticised peacekeepers in the province -- officially part of Serbia although Belgrade does not control it -- for protecting the clergy but not the churches at the holy Serbian sites.

| 13 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Next week, if not sooner, this will be portrayed as a callous UN betrayal of the Palestinians, no doubt engineered by shadowy Zionist hands. It would be so easy to support the cause of Palestinian statehood if they weren't their own worst enemies, and if supporting Palestinians didn't mean endorsing terror, intimidation, and the ultimate establishment of a Sharia state. From the Jerusalem Post, with thanks to LGF:

The United Nations decided over the weekend to suspend its construction project in the Jenin refugee camp after Palestinian gunmen threatened crews rebuilding houses destroyed during Operation Defensive Shield in 2002.

Five men armed with M-16 rifles raided the UN Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) offices in the camp on Friday to protest that the new houses were two small. The gunmen threatened to harm the UN staff if their demands for larger houses were not met.

| 24 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

You would never get the impression from this AP story (thanks to LGF) that this Saudi imam who spoke in London was anything but a moderate, reasonable Muslim voice calling for peace and harmony between Muslims and non-Muslims. You would never get the idea, say, that he ever called Jews "evil offspring, infidels, distorters of [others'] words, calf-worshippers, prophet-murderers, prophecy-deniers... the scum of the human race 'whom Allah cursed and turned into apes and pigs," and "an ongoing continuum of deceit, obstinacy, licentiousness, evil, and corruption." But he did.

London, June 11--(AP) Several thousand Muslims filled London's oldest mosque and the streets outside Friday to hear a sermon by a top Saudi Arabian preacher who urged them to help dispel misconceptions that sometimes result from the war on terror. ...

"The history of Islam is the best testament to how different communities can live together in peace and harmony," Abdel Rahman bin Abdel Aziz al-Sudeis, the imam at the grand mosque in Mecca, Saudi Arabia, said in his sermon. "Muslims should exemplify the true image of Islam in their interaction with other communities and dispel any misconceptions in some parts of the media."

He praised Britain's Muslims for recently promoting peace and cooperation among the country's many different religions.

| 12 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Note how the jihadists identify their victim.

DUBAI, June 13 (Reuters) - A purported al Qaeda videotape posted on an Islamist website on Sunday claims to show the killing of a U.S. employee in the Saudi capital Riyadh last week.

"The murder of the Jewish American Robert Jacob, who worked for the Vinnell espionage firm," a statement announcing the video on the Website says.

| 36 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Just last Wednesday I wrote about a jihad manual in Thailand that was being reported as a book of "distorted" Islamic beliefs. It could be seen as false, said a news story, by anyone with a "deep knowledge" of Islam. I wrote: "But where, o where, is this deep knowledge of Islam that will refute the radicals? Virtually every analysis I've seen from self-proclaimed moderates is superficial and doesn't confront radical exegesis of the Qur'an and Sunnah at all."

But now, Thai Muslims are working on a refutation of this same jihad manual. It will be very interesting to see if it really does the job -- and if so, it should be translated into every language on earth. But I still doubt that it will convincingly refute the radicals' understanding of Islam, primarily because this has not yet been convincingly done by Muslims elsewhere. Nonetheless, I'll be watching this closely.

Vientiane, Laos, Jun. 13 (UPI) -- Thai Muslims are producing a booklet to counter distortions of their faith by extremist rebels, the Bangkok Post reported. ...

Phithakkumpol said the project was in response to a book entitled "Ber Jihad Di Pattani" that had been found on the bodies of slain Islamist extremist rebels in the Pattani region of southern Thailand. Some 611 sayings of the Koran had been distorted in the book and it was important to correct them, he said.

| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Why? Because, as I explained in Onward Muslim Soldiers, they object on Islamic grounds to the very existence of a state governed by non-Muslims on what they consider to be Islamic land. They will not rest until that state is obliterated, or they are. From WND:

Despite Israel’s decision to evacuate all Jewish communities and military positions in the [Gaza] area, Hamas leader Dr. Mahmoud al-Zahar says the "resistance" and war of "liberation" will go on.

"We do not trust the Israelis and we do not trust that the Israelis are going to withdraw from Gaza while they are speaking of controlling the sea and the air," he said. "Until the occupation completely ends, our resistance will continue."

| 12 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Why Iran is a threat to the free world. From AP, with thanks to JJP Mackie:

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) - Toughening its stance in advance of a meeting of the U.N. nuclear watchdog agency, Iran on Saturday said it would reject international restrictions on its nuclear program and challenged the world to accept Tehran as a member of the "nuclear club."

Foreign Minister Kamal Kharrazi rejected further outside influence on Tehran's nuclear ambitions two days before the International Atomic Energy Agency board of governors meets to discuss Iran's highly controversial program.

"We won't accept any new obligations," Kharrazi said. "Iran has a high technical capability and has to be recognized by the international community as a member of the nuclear club. This is an irreversible path."

Iran has repeatedly insisted its nuclear program is geared toward generating electricity, not making weapons, but the United States and its allies say Tehran has a secret nuclear weapons program. The IAEA has wrestled with the dilemma for more than a year.

| 18 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Yesterday Kubba was killed; today, Kamal al-Jarah, the Education Ministry's cultural affairs officer. Clearly the radical Muslims in Iraq are very, very nervous that republican government might actually succeed there. And it's easy to see why, of course; a successful republic could completely turn the tide in the Middle East, and end the radicals' political and spiritual ascendancy. From AP:

Al-Jarah was mainly responsible for dealing with exchange programs and relations with foreign countries and UNESCO. He had worked in the education field for 40 years, al-Amri said.

The attack came only one day after gunmen killed a deputy foreign minister as he went to work. Bassam Salih Kubba was Iraq's most senior career diplomat.

The attack on Kubba, a Sunni, was the second assassination of a senior Iraqi figure in the past month. The head of the now-disbanded Iraqi Governing Council, Izzadine Saleem, was killed in a suicide car-bombing May 17.

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

A domestic dispute? Really? From AP, :

SAN`A, Yemen (AP) -- A gunman opened fire with an automatic rifle on worshippers in a mosque outside the capital during midday prayers, killing four people and wounding six, according to Yemeni police.

The shooter, identified by a police official as Abdel Fattah Saleh, fired randomly during Friday prayers at a mosque in the province of Dhammar, 40 miles south of the capital, San'a. ...

An investigation was under way, the official said. But he said Saleh was not a wanted militant and that a domestic dispute may have prompted the shooting.

Yemen, a conservative country at the southern tip of the Arabian peninsula, has long been a hotbed of militant activity. It also is awash with weapons.

"Conservative" in this context, of course, doesn't mean that they're prolife and voted for Reagan. It means they believe in violent jihad and the institutionalized oppression of women and non-Muslim dhimmis.

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Probably another jihad attack. From CNN, :

The explosion came as the soldier was trying to defuse the device in front of the Honey Bee restaurant.

Some officials blamed the blast on Abu Sayyaf, one of several Islamic militant groups fighting the government on the country's southern islands.

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

June 12, 2004

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia (AP) - A purported al-Qaida statement Saturday claimed the terror group had kidnapped one American man in the Saudi capital and killed another American. It threatened to treat the captive as U.S. troops treated Iraqi prisoners.

Don't forget: their actions may become a Da'wa [call to join Islam].

The embassy confirms that an American is missing in Saudi Arabia.

| 23 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

And another. From AP:

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia - An American was shot and killed Saturday in the Saudi capital, police said, in the third slaying of a Westerner in the kingdom in a week. ...

Al-Arabiya satellite station said the American man was killed by two militants in his home's parking garage while he was about to get into his car.

On Tuesday, an American who worked for a U.S. defense contractor was shot and killed. Last Sunday, an Irish cameraman was killed and a British TV correspondent was wounded when fired on while filming in a neighborhood that is home to many Islamic militants.

| 40 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The blog Harry's Place (thanks to Clueless Joe) has an interesting piece about a preacher at London mosque:

I am assuming that Sheikh Abdur-Rahman al-Sudays, Imam of the Ka'ba who is in London today to preach at the East London Mosque is the same person as Sheikh Abd Al-Rahman Al-Sudayyis, Imam of the Al-Haraam mosque in Mecca who has delivered himself of the following gems:

In one of his sermons ... Abd Al-Rahman Al-Sudayyis... beseeched Allah to annihilate the Jews. He also urged the Arabs to give up peace initiatives with them because they are "the scum of the human race, the rats of the world, the violators of pacts and agreements, the murderers of the prophets, and the offspring of apes and pigs."

"Read history," called Al-Sudayyis in another sermon, "and you will understand that the Jews of yesterday are the evil fathers of the Jews of today, who are evil offspring, infidels, distorters of [others'] words, calf-worshippers, prophet-murderers, prophecy-deniers... the scum of the human race 'whom Allah cursed and turned into apes and pigs...' These are the Jews, an ongoing continuum of deceit, obstinacy, licentiousness, evil, and corruption."

| 48 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Iraqi's deputy foreign minister, Bassam Salih Kubba, has been assassinated. From AP:

Bassam Salih Kubba, Iraq's most senior career diplomat, was mortally wounded in Baghdad's Azimiyah district, Foreign Ministry spokesman Thamir al-Adhami said. The attack took place in a Sunni Muslim neighborhood where support for Saddam Hussein was strong.

The attack was the second assassination of a senior Iraqi figure in the past month. The head of the now-disbanded Iraqi Governing Council, Izzadine Saleem, was killed in a suicide car-bombing May 17 at an entrance to the heavily guarded Green Zone headquarters of the U.S.-run occupation authority.

Nevertheless, despite mounting evidence that significant forces in Iraq don't want the democracy that the U.S. is trying to establish, Al-Qaeda's Zawahiri has identified the chief obstacle to democracy in the Middle East: not the jihadists, but America. From CNN, :

The voice on the audiotape said al Qaeda is against such reforms, and that they would not benefit the Arab world.

"Americans do not want the reforms in the Arab world," the speaker said. "The Americans will not give us democracy and freedom. Democracy and freedom should come from within us, from our own souls, and our children and young generation will benefit from it.

"The Americans do not want democracy and freedom for Muslims."

The last audiotaped message believed to come from al Qaeda was from bin Laden, who issued threats against coalition officials in Iraq.

And it seems that they are following through. Is the assassination of coalition leaders an example of the "democracy and freedom that should come from within us, from our own souls"?

| 49 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

According to MEMRI, "two articles that appeared approximately a year apart in the Saudi daily Al-Watan, by Hamza Qablan Al-Mozainy, a lecturer at the Department of Arabic Language and Literature at King Saud University in Saudi Arabia, examined the 'culture of death' in Saudi schools and the role that teachers play in disseminating it." (Thanks to stevez.)

In his first article, Al-Mozainy spoke of an exhibit for Saudi junior high school students:

"At this exhibit there were several 'lectures,' the content of most of which was not far from a call to these schoolchildren to join the stream called 'The Islamic Awakening [movement]' or 'The Da'wa [movement],' which usually turns into 'The Jihad [movement].'

"This is not the first time such an exhibit was held. The establishment of similar exhibits is common in many schools... Likewise, many teachers preach on this matter during the lessons. One female teacher brought [to class] a mannequin [that looked like a dead body] and washed it before the schoolgirls. She involved [the schoolgirls] in washing [the body] and wrapping it in a shroud. Some of the girls stated that [following this] they were stricken by a certain anxiety....

"It seems to me that displays of this kind are only an example of the culture of death that has recently become widespread in our society. There is a bizarre insistence by some preachers on going overboard in including in their sermons frightening [statements] about the torments and horrors of the grave. This is developing to the point where the sermons include many words about the [physical] state of the dead, based on stories by those who prepare [the bodies] for burial, who usually tell fantastical tales about how signs of the good or bad end of the dead person they are washing appear on the bodies, and so on. This is also seeping into the activities within the schools..."

'Many Youths Are the Victim of Some Extremists'

"A possible reason for this method of preaching is that it is the beginning of the path that leads to the recruitment of supporters. A youth's absorption of the idea of death makes them abstain [from the pleasures] of this world and apply themselves more to religious activity, which can be managed by people with hidden goals. The distance is short from absorbing the idea of abstention from the life [of this world] and adapting to the idea of death, to the youth's becoming convinced that as long as he is going to die [anyway], this death must be 'for the sake of Allah?'

"Thus, many youths are the victims of some extremists who exploit them for the purpose of carrying out certain operations which [the extremists] make them believe are Jihad [operations]."

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Voting irregularities and outright fraud could cast Thursday's European elections into doubt. Why? "A cultural problem." It seems that Muslim leaders were dictating the way Muslims could vote -- yet another symptom of the cultural disjunction between Muslim immigrants and their new Western homelands. The group identity of the Islamic world doesn't translate well to a "one-man, one-vote" context. Yet everyone is too afraid of "racism" charges to address problems like this. From The Telegraph, with thanks to Foehammer:

Ann Cryer, Labour MP for Keighley, West Yorks, feared that the majority of the ballot frauds were part of "a cultural problem" that faced Asians in the North.

She said Muslims were coming under pressure from community elders to surrender their votes.

"People are going to homes, demanding that the voters give up their ballot papers - and that is what they are doing." She said the Asian community "tends to stick together" and, if one of its leaders knocked at the door and asked people to do something, "they by and large do it".

She said: "It is the sort of thing I was anxious about in the early stages of getting the Bill through to have an all-postal ballot. But I did not dare mention it because you are accused then of being a racist. But the chickens are coming home to roost."

It would be no surprise if the election results were challenged in the courts, she said.

| 21 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

June 11, 2004

No wonder Jacques Chirac was in such a hurry to get home. "No time for funerals, mes amis américains. I have some urgent documents to shred."

Breaking news from the World Tribune:

The United Nations has determined that Saddam Hussein shipped weapons of mass destruction components as well as medium-range ballistic missiles before, during and after the U.S.-led war against Iraq in 2003.

The UN Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission briefed the Security Council on new findings that could help trace the whereabouts of Saddam's missile and WMD program.

The briefing contained satellite photographs that demonstrated the speed with which Saddam dismantled his missile and WMD sites before and during the war. Council members were shown photographs of a ballistic missile site outside Baghdad in May 2003, and then saw a satellite image of the same location in February 2004, in which facilities had disappeared.

| 106 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

From AP, with thanks to DC Watson:

The suspects included the security guard of a coal mine from which the 440 pounds of explosives used in the March 11 train bombings were stolen, Interior Minister Jose Antonio Alonso said.

Two other suspects were the wife and brother-in-law of Jose Emilio Suarez, a former miner in Asturias who already has been jailed and charged with multiple murders in the attacks, which killed 191 people.

The six suspects have not been officially charged with a crime but were suspected of supplying the dynamite, Alonso said. The brother-in-law had been arrested once before on March 27 but was released after questioning.

Alonso declined to give details of how the dynamite was passed on to the suspected Islamic cell that staged the attacks. But officials previously have said the bombers paid for the dynamite with cash and drugs.

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The idea that such charges could be "purely political" is only reinforced by all the bungled terror-related trials we have seen. Here's hoping this won't be yet another one. From WFAA.com, :

The five Elashi brothers and their Richardson computer company InfoCom are accused of illegally exporting computer equipment to Libya and Syria.

InfoCom was raided by federal agents just before September 11. Originally the charges carried connections to terrorism, but the case has been split; the trial in Dallas now focuses on business practices.

One way or the other, the Elashi brothers say the charges are unfair.

"This is political," said defendant Ghassan Elashi. "This is purely political."

InfoCom's sale of computer equipment to Libya and Syria would be illegal, government officials said, because of those countries' terrorist connections. ...

The defense already argues that all of the equipment sold could be bought at any computer store, and that it wasn't sold to terrorist governments, but businessmen.

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Yet another terrorism case that may have been improperly prosecuted. From the Detroit News, :

The U.S. Justice Department plans to turn over 30 to 40 unclassified documents to defense lawyers in the Detroit terrorism case by the end of the month. ...

U.S. District Judge Gerald E. Rosen ordered the review after documents were discovered in November that he said should have been turned over to the defense before the trial. They included an FBI summary of a witness interview and a letter from a convicted drug dealer that raised questions about the credibility of a key government witness.

The Justice Department doesn't disagree that the documents were withheld, but it is sticking to its position that the men don't deserve a new trial. ...

Defense lawyers will get a month to review the documents, Rosen told them Thursday. He hopes to hold an evidentiary hearing in September, to determine why certain documents weren't turned over to the defense.

That could include testimony from the Justice Department, FBI, CIA and other intelligence agencies. ...

The case began when three men were arrested at a southwest Detroit apartment on Sept. 17, 2001, with phony immigration documents, expired airport ID badges and a day planner with cryptic drawings of possible targets in Jordan and Turkey.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

...no doubt in a protest against American power. Don't you see? If the American imperialists left, peace would reign. Or maybe this is just an attack by people with a grudge against road-builders. From Xinhuanet, with thanks to Ali Dashti:

A group of some 20 armed men attacked the Chinese workers compound in Jelogir area, 36 km away of Kunduz city at around 01:00 a.m. Thursday morning, killing 10 persons on the spot and injuring five others.

Many of the victims, who arrived in Afghanistan on Tuesday, worked with China Railway Shisigu Group, a leading construction company engaged in road construction in post-war Afghanistan.

| 22 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The Democrats are coming, and subway riders in Boston will be subject to search. From Reuters, with thanks to Allon:

Boston will be the first American city to employ random searches on public transport after March's deadly bombings in Spain, officials said.

"This is a proactive policy designed to deter and prevent a terrorist attack," Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Police Chief Joseph Carter said.

The random searches will begin in July, before July 4 Independence Day celebrations and ahead of the Democratic National Convention at the end of July. ...

"We want the MBTA to be inhospitable to terrorists. They can go someplace else," he said.

Carter said the planned searches will randomly pick out riders and are not aimed at singling out anyone.

Great. That should catch those 80-year-old Baptist grandmother terrorist rings.

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

What Janet Albrechtsen says in The Australian (thanks to Nicolei) about the way terrorists have been tried and sentenced in Australia could go double for the United States.

Last week, Australia's first convicted terrorist since the world changed on September 11, 2001, was sentenced by a Perth court to nine years' jail for conspiring to bomb the Israeli embassy in Canberra. But Jack Roche could be out on parole in three years.

That's a short spell behind bars for a man with a terrorist dance-card to die for. His travels saw him meet up with Bali bomber Hambali, senior al-Qa'ida terrorists Mukhtar and Abu Hafs and, of course, Osama bin Laden. While in Afghanistan, Roche also dropped in for some explosives training at an al-Qa'ida terrorist camp near Kandahar. ...

Then, last week, a NSW judge granted bail to Bilal Khazal pending his later trial for serious charges under Australia's new terrorism laws. It was a surprising decision given that Khazal's alleged links would warm the heart of any terrorist. He was named in a 2003 CIA report as a member of al-Qa'ida who received military training in Afghanistan in 1998. Documents from a Spanish court allege he has links with a Spanish al-Qa'ida operative. Late last year a Lebanese military tribunal sentenced Khazal and his brother, Maher, in absentia for donating money to an Islamic group involved in a series of bomb attacks in Lebanon. ...

Judges, take note: terrorism is part of our lives. While defendants such as Khazal and Jamal are entitled to the presumption of innocence, the community is also entitled to be kept safe. If judges fail to recalibrate how they exercise their discretion on matters such as sentences and bail to take account of the devastating consequences of terrorism, then parliament may do so for them.

| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

A suicide attack in Paris has been apparently headed off. From Reuters, with thanks to Nicolei:

On Monday, Italian police arrested Rabei Osman Sayed Ahmed, known as "Mohamed the Egyptian" and suspected of playing a lead role in the Madrid train bombings that killed 191 people in March. A second man was arrested as part of the raid.

Belgian police, acting on information from Italy, then arrested 15 people they said were preparing for an attack.

The warrant, used to detain Ahmed and the other suspect in Milan, quotes members of the group as saying they planned a rehearsal of an attack in Paris using mobile phone technology. The Milan prosecutor's office said the method was similar to that used in the Madrid bombings.

| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Muslims are angry about billboard ads placed near mosques that feature four nearly naked women. I'm not offended that these ads were taken down; after all, they're imposing their values on me just as much as the jihadists want to. Nonetheless, their removal is still an example of dhimmitude; there is not the slightest doubt in my mind that if, say, a church group had asked for removal of these ads, they would have been met with contempt and cries of censorship. From SkyNews, with thanks to Ali Dashti:

Complaints were made after the image appeared on billboards next to mosques in Leeds and Greater Manchester. ...

Triumph International, which owns the Sloggi brand, said it told its contractors to avoid using poster sites near mosques.

| 20 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Will anyone stop him? From ABC.Net.au, with thanks to Twostellas:

The spiritual leader of a Sydney-based Muslim prayer hall, linked to six men facing terrorist charges, is attempting to raise funds to purchase a new mosque.

Sheik Abdul Mohammed Zoud is urging Muslim businessmen to raise $1.8 million to purchase the mosque in the Sydney suburb of Belmore.

The fund-raising appeal has been placed in newspapers throughout the Arab world, expressing alarm that the mosque could be bought by other religious groups, including Jews.

Sheik Zoud today denied he is behind moves to buy the mosque but Lateline has obtained an email, from a local businessman, indicating Zoud's involvement.

| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

An English teacher in Pakistan seems to have fallen victim to jihadists. The remedy? The British Foreign Office is telling British dhimmis in Pakistan to stay away from houses of worship. From the Oldham Advertiser, with thanks to Twostellas:

Alan Cox, 60, was gunned down by three masked men carrying Kalashnikovs who burst into a room as he gave an English lesson in the city of Multan, in southern Punjab. He died at the scene after being hit by a hail of bullets.

Police in Pakistan say his murder may be linked to Islamic terrorists. Seven students have since been arrested. ...

Multan is a centre of radical Islamic groups. Several terrorist attacks targeting minority Muslim sects and Christians have taken place in the region over the past few years.

The Foreign and Commonwealth Office has recently urged Britons to avoid walking around parts of Karachi and keep away from places of worship in light of a resurgence in sectarian violence.

| 19 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Diana West has some kind words for yours truly in this column, but more importantly, she asks -- in the most incisive terms I have yet seen -- "What would Reagan do?"

Totalitarian Islam, however, is totalitarianism with a difference. Unlike both Nazism and communism, it is not godless. I can't help wondering what Ronald Reagan would have done had Marx and Engels been deemed prophets of God. What would he have said had the Communist Manifesto been regarded as a holy book? Communists always glowed with the zeal of religious fanatics, but communism, of course, is explicitly opposed to religion. Still, imagine that Lenin's tomb had been built as a holy shrine for sacred relics, not a ghoulish mausoleum for a moldering corpse: Would the history of the Cold War have been any different? Would Ronald Reagan have dared to define a religious faith in communism as the evil that launched the empire?

| 30 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

From the Boston Globe. So was Mousli planning anything, or does he simply have a very rich fantasy life?

The FBI, the Joint Terrorism Task Force and the Department of Homeland Security have joined local police in investigating a Syrian national after a search of his Revere duplex uncovered flight-simulation software, pictures of Osama bin Laden, two small-caliber weapons, police scanners, and radio-jamming equipment, law enforcement and court officials said yesterday.

Somerville and Revere police raided the Orvis Road home of Hammam A. Mousli, 45, at about 6 p.m. Wednesday, expecting to find computers, printers, and other equipment they believed Mousli was using in a sophisticated scheme to buy merchandise using fake UPC code stickers, said David Procopio, a spokesman for the Suffolk County district attorney's office.

But they found much more, prompting them to arrest Mousli and call in federal antiterrorism investigators, according to two law enforcement officials who both spoke on condition of anonymity.

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Lucknow is at this point closed to Western tourists. From Asia Times, with thanks to EPG:

Over the past week, a spate of protests as well as statements from clerics in the city have warned British, US and Israeli citizens to stay away from the state capital. There are also fears that the demonstrations may spread to the rest of the state, with calls being made to prevent foreigners from entering the precincts of the famous Taj Mahal in Agra, 363 kilometers away from Lucknow. India's Muslims, especially Shi'ites, have reacted sharply to the clash between US forces and Shi'ite militiamen last month in which one of the most sacred shrines of the Shi'ites, the shrine of Hazrat Ali, was damaged. Muslims form a sizeable population in Lucknow, as well as in Uttar Pradesh as a whole.

Such has been the nature of protests that the British Foreign Office issued a travel advisory on Tuesday warning its citizens against traveling to the city, as well as to postpone visits to holy sites. Visitors have been told to keep a safe distance from particular religious sites such as the imambaras (religious monuments) in Lucknow that are replicas of the holy shrines in Najaf and Karbala that were damaged by fighting in Iraq. It is rare for city-specific travel warnings to be issued as they are usually applied to a country as a whole in the wake of a terrorist attack, threat or such macro parameters. The last time the US and British offices issued a travel warning to its citizens concerning India was in 2002 when Indian and Pakistan relations reached a flashpoint and several signs indicated the two countries could go to war.

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Christians continue to suffer in the new Iraq. Now, they're leaving, as they already have from many other areas of the Islamic world. From Insight mag, with thanks to Nicolei, EPG, and Looney Tunes:

Facing a June 30 deadline for transfer of power, a temporary constitution that reads, in Article 7, that Islam is the "Official Religion of the State," and the most recent humiliation for the community -- the failure to receive even one position on the Executive Council and only one ministry post, the Ministry of Emigration -- the Christians of Iraq are voting with their feet.

"On a recent night the church had to spend more time on filling out baptismal forms needed for leaving the country than they did on the [worship] service," says Amir, a deacon at a local church who does not want his full name published. "We have been flooded with parishioners desperate to leave the country, and as they cannot get an exit permit without a baptismal certificate from the church we have been swamped with requests. ... In recent days nearly 400 families as far as we can tell have filled out baptismal forms to leave the country. Our community is being decimated."

Most of the Christians in Iraq are Assyrians -- people who claim to be the original inhabitants of Iraq. The Assyrians were the people of Nineveh -- present-day Mosul -- the city to which God sent the biblical Jonah.

Because they are Christians and seen as allies of the West, the Assyrians have long been subject to persecution. The Assyrian Church, known officially as the Assyrian Church of the East, is the oldest continually existing church in the world. Assyrians are the only people in the world who still speak Aramaic, the language spoken by Christ.

It's not just because they are seen as allies of the West that they are persecuted. Dhimmitude as a legal system and then as a cultural hangover has contributed a great deal to a culture of discrimination and harassment.

| 36 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Abdurrahman Alamoudi, the former high-profile "moderate" Muslim who is now accused of helping finance terrorism, is telling some interesting stories these days. From the New York Times:

ASHINGTON, June 9 -- While the Libyan leader, Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi, was renouncing terrorism and negotiating the lifting of sanctions last year, his intelligence chiefs ordered a covert operation to assassinate the ruler of Saudi Arabia and destabilize the oil-rich kingdom, according to statements by two participants in the conspiracy.

Those participants, Abdurahman Alamoudi, an American Muslim leader now in jail in Alexandria, Va., and Col. Mohamed Ismael, a Libyan intelligence officer in Saudi custody, have given separate statements to American and Saudi officials outlining the plot.

Mr. Alamoudi, has told Federal Bureau of Investigation officials and federal prosecutors that Colonel Qaddafi approved the assassination plan. Mr. Qaddafi's son, in an interview in London, called the accusation "nonsense."

American officials confirm that Mr. Alamoudi and Mr. Ismael have offered detailed accounts of a Libyan plot to assassinate Crown Prince Abdullah and that they appear to be credible enough to have launched an American investigation. But the officials said they are still examining the scope of the plot, how far it advanced and whether Colonel Qaddafi was involved. They said the accusations were one reason the United States had not removed Libya from the State Department's list of nations that support terrorism.

Here's some background on Alamoudi from the Jihad Watch archives:

From the Washington Post November 2, 2003:

...by the early 1990s, the Pentagon was working closely with U.S. Muslim activists to hire Islamic chaplains to minister to Philips's new converts and their co-religionists. One architect of this initiative was Abdurahman Alamoudi, who was indicted Oct. 23 on money-laundering charges for allegedly taking hundreds of thousands of dollars from Libya, which is designated by U.S. officials as a state sponsor of terrorism."

From Insight Magazine Nov. 20, 2003:

On Sept. 11, 2001, as people around the world opened their hearts and their checkbooks to victims of the terrorist attacks on New York City and Washington, a prominent Muslim activist laid out $3,000 of his own. But he didn't have the victims in mind. He used the occasion to help re-elect one of his favorite federal lawmakers: a feisty left-winger who kept the FBI in her political crosshairs.

According to Federal Election Commission records, Abdurahman Alamoudi wrote two checks that day totaling $3,000 to the campaign committee of Rep. Cynthia McKinney, the Georgia Democrat who would spend the next - and last - year of her short tenure in office attacking President George W. Bush and the post-9/11 war on terrorism.

Twelve months after McKinney's electoral defeat, in September 2003, Alamoudi would be a federal prisoner facing allegations that he laundered money from Libya to finance his political activity in Washington and that he served as a Virginia-based paymaster for terrorists whose members included al-Qaida. He was caught in London with a suitcase containing $380,000 in cash that he admitted he had been given in Libya.

Washington Post December 1, 2003:

In late October 2000, Hillary Clinton, who was running for the U.S. Senate in New York, returned thousands of dollars in campaign donations from Alamoudi and other Muslims after some media described them as supporters of Palestinian violence. Presidential candidate George W. Bush returned $1,000 at the same time.

Alamoudi was furious. When he arrived at a demonstration against U.S. Middle East policies in Lafayette Square on Oct. 28, 2000, friends recalled, he angrily took the microphone.

"'Anybody's a supporter of Hamas here?' he yelled as the crowd cheered. 'Hear that, Bill Clinton, we are all supporters of Hamas! . . . I am also a supporter of Hezbollah!'"


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

From Ben Johnson at FrontPage:

Patriotic Americans will always cherish their memories of Ronald Reagan's strong and courageous leadership during the Cold War. However, his funeral at the National Cathedral may uncap different emotions. Among those the Reagan family has invited to the ecumenical service is Mohammad Magid, a D.C.-area Muslim imam with disturbing ties to suspected terrorists.

Magid, who was born and educated in the Sudan, is the Director of the All Dulles Area Muslim Society (ADAMS). ADAMS has numerous close affiliations with the main targets of "Operation Green Quest," "the largest U.S. terror finance investigation anywhere in the world." In March 2002, federal agents raided ADAMS's facility in Herndon, Virginia, as part of an investigation into financial support for terrorism. Federal affidavits state that the "Grove Street addresses" (500 and 555 Grove St. in Herndon) housed more than 100 interlocking Muslim organizations, most headed by Jamal Barzinji, and these groups gave material aid to terrorists. Among those raided were several major ADAMS associates, including its chairman. Magid himself was present when federal agents raided the Herndon offices of ADAMS in March 2002.

Soon after the raid, Magid held a public meeting encouraging "community building" among the organizations investigated. Although 100 people showed up at the Sterling, Virginia, public library for the meeting, another 150 members of the overflow crowd met at ADAMS headquarters itself.

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

June 10, 2004

Cesare Mazzolari, Bishop of Rumbek, Sudan, is unusually forthright among Catholic bishops about the challenge of radical Islam. From Chiesa, with thanks to Nicolei:

Q. - Do you convert many Muslims?

A. - "Absolutely not. Getting close to Islamic people is like giving them the death penalty Those that convert freely are forced to flee. Yet they end up being caught and punished, anyway, thousands of kilometers away."

Q. - Are there Catholics who convert to Islam?

A. - "Yes, unfortunately. Pushed by hunger, at least 3 million have headed north and have had to profess the shahada, the public profession of Muslim faith, in order to find jobs. These converts are then fire-branded, literally being stamped on their sides like cows so as to distinguish them from infidels." ...

Q. - Is the God of Christians the same as the Allah of Muslim?

A. - "No way! Where would the concept of the Trinity fit in? And Christ is certainly not the greatest of their prophets." ...

Q. - Is it exaggerated when people talk about a clash of civilizations, as between the West and Islam?

A. - "No. This is just the beginning. The Church has defeated communism, but is just starting to understand its next challenge - Islamism, which is much worse. The Holy Father has not been able to take up this challenge due to his old age. But the next pope will find himself having to face it. The answer does not lie in thinking 'we're right and they're wrong'. We boast about a Christian tradition which in actual fact we don't live out. Yet Muslims are constant in practicing their faith, having a way of proselytizing superior to our own. When they teach you to say 'sukran' (thank you), for them this is missionary activity, since Arab is the language of the Koran."

Q. - And yet some of your fellow bishops in Italy have allowed chapels to be used as mosques.

A. - "It will be the Muslims who convert us, not the other way around. Wherever they settle down, sooner or later they end up becoming a leading political force. The Italians are intent on welcoming them in an easy-going manner. But soon they'll realize that the Muslims have taken advantage of their good-natured spirit, allowing ten times more to arrive than what was originally permitted. They are much more clever than we are. They knock my schools down and you leave your church doors wide open for them. If someone is a thief, you don't give them a room in your apartment, because sooner or later you'll find all your furniture gone."

Q. - Recent statistics say that only 20% of Muslims in Italy respect the Koran's teachings, just as only 20% of Catholics go to Mass every Sunday. Hence they are Muslims, but in name only.

A. - "But their Islamic culture remains. Religion is only a part of their civilization. No one can erase their belonging to the umma, the community of Muslim believers."

Q. - Does it make sense to export our democracy in agricultural and sheep-herding societies that make no distinction between religion and politics?

A. - "No. This is idiotic. Islamic people base their decisions only and exclusively on the umma. They don't even know what individual rights are. It's absurd to teach them the first amendment of the American Constitution, which says Congress can make no law to prohibit freedom of worship or to limit freedom of speech or the press. They have absolutely no comprehension of this."

Q. - Is the shariah in full effect in Sudan?

A. - "The fundamentalist government sustains it will only apply it to Islamic citizens. No one knows what will happen to an accused Christian, since the legal right to an attorney doesn't exist there".

Q. - Roberto Hamza Piccardo, secretary to the Union of Islamic Communities in Italy, told me the scourging that occurs in Sudan is merely symbolic, since "the flogger holds the Koran under his arm to ease up on the force of his lashings".

A. - "I met this man. If you stand around listening to him, he'll tell you another thousand lies just like this one."

Q. - But even St. Benedict approved of floggings for "evil, stubborn, haughty and disobedient men."

A. - "He didn't become a saint for this, but despite this. These are little things associated with great men."

Q. - Piccardo told me that some parts of the shariah enforced in Sudan, like the cutting off of hands, represent "the extremely rare cruel acts of local mafia bosses persecuting helpless people."

A. - "It's not true. It is the state that applies Koranic law most often. It cuts the hands and feet off of even non-Muslims and arrests them without evidence."

Q. - Piccardo also told me that the Sudanese Islamist leader Hassan Al Turabi, "the famous jurist", was against applying the death penalty, as the Koran would prescribe, against apostates - that is, Muslims who convert to other faiths.

A. - "Al Turabi is the cleverest person in the world. He's extremely intelligent, he's an attorney, and he speaks English and French better than English and French men themselves. He has a sly, forked tongue. He's always succeeds in getting what he wants from you. I'll give you a concrete example. It is stated in the English version of the Sudanese Constitution that Islam is the state religion and that other faiths are tolerated. However in the Arab version, there is not a trace of such a guarantee."

Q. - Yet last November Al Turabi went to congratulate Gabriel Zubeir Wako, the archbishop of Khartoum, the first and freshly appointed cardinal. Even you have been in Sudan for 23 years and no one has ever laid a hand on you.

A. - "You should note that my hair has turned white. The greatest punishment Arabs can inflict is oppression, a sense of falsity. If they can fool you, they do it with will all their might. They are proud of their ability to trick you, to behave like liars and compliment you. Al Turabi will take Bush for a ride, wherever and whenever he wants. And he could do much worse things. I, rather than being tricked and playing the fool, prefer being slapped in the face. Muslims fill you with fear, they keep you in a permanent state of uncertainty. It's a continuous psychological affliction, worse than torture."

Q. - Is there slavery in Sudan?

A. - "The government authorities swear there isn't. They went to say so at the United Nations, in Geneva. And yet my missions are full of former slaves. In 1990 I freed 150 of them personally, paying less than I would have for a full-breed dog: 50 dollars for females, 100 for males. I never did this again, since I realized that it could turn into a vicious circle, as they are then used as shepherds or sent to serve wealthy Arab families in Khartoum. And they force them to go to Koranic schools." ...

| 21 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

It's not that the websites Sami Omar Al-Hussayen maintained didn't contain pro-terror sentiments; it's that he didn't have much to do with them, and anyway they're constitutionally protected speech. Constitutionally protected speech? Really?

From AP:

Al-Hussayen set up and ran Web sites that prosecutors said were used to recruit terrorists, raise money and disseminate inflammatory rhetoric. They said the sites included religious edicts justifying suicide bombings and an invitation to contribute financially to the militant Palestinian organization Hamas.

Al-Hussayen's attorneys argued that he had little to do with the creation of the material posted. And they said the material was protected by the First Amendment right to freedom of expression and was not designed to raise money or recruit extremists.

Well, maybe there wasn't a sign-up sheet, but what exactly constitutes recruitment? If it isn't recruitment to include material justifying suicide bombings and contribute money, what is?

| 44 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

What race are Muslims again? This is the fourth time that Bardot, that recidivist, has been fined for inciting racial hatred -- this time for statements in her book A Scream In the Silence. From Reuters:

In the book, she laments the “Islamization of France” and the “underground and dangerous infiltration of Islam.”

“Mme. Bardot presents Muslims as barbaric and cruel invaders, responsible for terrorist acts and eager to dominate the French to the extent of wanting to exterminate them,” the court said.

France’s 5-million-member Muslim community is the largest in Europe.

Bardot, who was not present for the verdict, denied the charges in a tearful court appearance last month, saying her book did not target Islam or people from North Africa.

OK, so I guess it's racism to hold to anything less than the dogma that all Muslims in France are peaceful and law-abiding, and accept wholly the principles of Western secularism. No Muslims in France want to institute Sharia there, I suppose. But can someone explain to me what is supposed to happen when all the aging sex sirens have been silenced, and some Muslims start working in France to bring about the hegemony of Sharia? I guess we all just have to look the other way and let them go about their business. To do otherwise would be racist.

| 34 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

0406092310389038_c7826398.jpg
The offending shoe

Historically, many dhimmi communities weren't even allowed to wear shoes. But now the dhimmis are really getting uppity in Denmark: they're wearing sandals that bear a design that looks like the word "Allah" in Arabic. A Muslim organization is therefore suing a Danish supermarket, Føtex. From DR Nyheder, with thanks to Ali Dashti:

According to a spokesperson from Føtex, the sandals will not be taken off the shelves. He says that Føtex has had seven employees, who speak Arabic, to look closely at the sandals and they do not believe that the word says Allah.

I don't think it does either.

| 20 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

From MSNBC, with thanks to DC Watson, who notes: So much for the truce. But in Islamic law, truces are to be concluded only in order to allow the Muslim forces to gather strength to fight again.

BAGHDAD, Iraq - Shiite gunmen seized an Iraq police station Thursday in the Shiite holy city of Najaf in the first outbreak of fighting since an agreement to end weeks of bloody clashes between U.S. troops and militia forces. Four Iraqis were killed and 13 were injured, hospital and militia officials said.

Gunmen loyal to radical cleric Muqtada al-Sadr took control of the Ghari police station, which is 250 yards from the Imam Ali Shrine, witness Mohammed Hussein said. The station was looted and police cars were burned.

"We sent a quick reaction unit to assist the policemen defending the station, but they were overwhelmed by al-Sadr fighters," said Najaf Gov. Adnan al-Zurufi. "We will solve this problem as soon as possible. We will ask for the help of the Americans, if necessary."

| 50 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

I don't know how much more pointed you can get in seeing the war on terror as a struggle of good vs. evil. A clash of civilizations occurs precisely when there are two competing visions of what constitutes the good. But of course, there is no clash of civilizations. From MEMRI, with thanks to EPG:

Recently, several high-ranking Iranian leaders, among them Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and President Muhammad Khatami, expressed views on the achievements of Iran's Islamic Revolution and the legacy of Ayatollah Ruholla Khomeini, and on the relationship between Islam and Western culture and values. Both men attacked the U.S. for its handling of affairs in Iraq. Along with stressing the need to instill Ayatollah Khomeini's legacy among the younger Iranians who never knew him, Iranian Leader Ali Khameneistated that not only is Khomeini's political thought appropriate for all of humanity's needs, but that the source of human suffering is "liberal democracy." Khamenei attacked the U.S. and stated that the reason for the "disgrace" (that is, the abuse of prisoners at Abu Ghureib prison) was that "liberal democracy is devoid of morality." In contrast, Iranian President Muhammad Khatami expressed his support for borrowing from Western values and blending them into Islamic culture. At the same time, however, Khatami stated that the root of all terrorism is superpower violence.

You can read their actual statements at the MEMRI link.

| 41 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Information on the extensive ties between jihadists and Pakistan's military, from Kaushik Kapisthalam at FrontPage:

The whole Farooqi episode just illustrates the perils of Pakistan’s superficial crackdown on terror. For American authorities to continue to rely on agencies like the ISI to vet terror suspects is a dangerous proposition. Obviously the Pakistanis would want to shield anyone that would implicate their army. This means that for a successful war on terror, the US must insist on a bottom-up purge of the ISI to weed out al-Qaida sympathizers in the Pakistani army. Despite Musharraf’s promises on this regard, little has happened. Musharraf replaced the ISI’s Director General under US pressure but left the middle and lower levels untouched.

Pakistan today is the de facto epicenter of Al Qaeda’s operations, with suspects in terrorist attacks from Turkey to Indonesia all being traced back to training camps in that troubled nation. In that context, one can see that the current US war on terror in Pakistan is missing the forest for the trees. Instead of rehashing the “Over 500 Al Qaeda terrorists arrested in Pakistan” story, American authorities must ask themselves why there are so many Al Qaeda men in Pakistan in the first place. The fact is the terrorists feel they are safer there with so many connections to Pakistani agencies. Given this, trying to cherry pick some Al Qaeda Arabs from Pakistan without shutting down the ISI-jihadi nexus it is simply ineffective. American officials also need to ask Gen. Musharraf why all the Pakistani jihadi groups linked to Al Qaeda are still freely collecting funds and recruiting volunteers despite their supposed proscription.

If anything, the thought that Army officers of a nuclear-armed nation are involved in joint operations with an Al Qaeda mastermind should remind people of the seriousness of this dilemma. Who is to say that some other Al Qaeda friendly Pakistani army officers will not hand over a nuclear warhead to terrorists in the future? Isn’t it time for America to stop listening to the State Department status-quo artists and give Gen. Musharraf an ultimatum to purge his army and spy agencies of uniformed jihadists? Congress has reportedly cleared the Bush administration decision to make Pakistan a Major Non-NATO ally, which allows the Pentagon more freedom to grant military assistance to Pakistan and also virtually shields Pakistan from any future sanctions. It would only be prudent that the Pentagon makes actual aid and weapons transfer contingent on a full clean up of the Pakistani military. Anything less would be pure folly.

| 14 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

A bomb was thrown at a Catholic Church in Indonesia. No one was hurt, but a pattern continues: this was the fifth attack on a church this week. From The Australian, with thanks to Nicolei:

Mobs attacked four churches in two neighbouring suburbs of the Indonesian capital Jakarta on Sunday, slightly injuring a priest and causing some damage. Three of those churches were in buildings in commercial areas that had no permit for use as places of worship. Such unauthorised churches have come in for attack in the past.
| 28 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Why is the major media ignoring the torture of Brian O'Connor? He was arrested on questionable drug-related charges (as happens more often than it should to non-Muslims in Saudi Arabia) by the muttawa, Saudi Arabia's religious police, held in a mosque for a time, and tortured. From AsiaNews, with thanks to Nicolei:

New Delhi (AsiaNews) – “We request His Majesty to take appropriate steps to see that the religious police stop the torture, and that Brian is given a fair trial and released”. John Dayal, a Catholic activist, asks King Fahad bin Abdulaziz al Said to release the Indian citizen. Dayal has written a letter to the king through the Saudi ambassador in India.

John Dayal is the vice-president of the All India Catholic Union, which represents 16 million of Indian Catholics. In his letter to king Fahad, he recalls the historic and warm relationship between India and the Saudi Kingdom. “Many Indians, among them Catholics, are working in Saudi Arabia, peacefully”. Dayal affirms that he “received with a sense of deep injury and revulsion” the news that O'Connor was arrested by the Saudi police. He concludes his letter by saying that “freedom of Faith is integral to contemporary civilization. It is also part of the United Nations guarantees to all Human beings”.

| 31 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

June 9, 2004

The Telegraph has an article on "combat marketing" -- providing wells, roads and schools to win hearts.

It comes down to deep pockets.

As Sgt Maj David Turnbull, of the 1st Battalion 501st Parachute Infantry Regiment, said: "We can outspend al-Qa'eda and the Taliban.

"We are not bribing them, but making them realise that the Afghan government and American government are legitimate and we are the ones building wells, and schools for children. Their loyalties will shift and hopefully they will come out and talk."

On the other hand, the local bazaars still sell Osama bin Laden popcorn balls.

| 17 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Yet another story that assumes that Islamic radicalism is a distortion of Islam. But where, o where, is this deep knowledge of Islam that will refute the radicals? Virtually every analysis I've seen from self-proclaimed moderates is superficial and doesn't confront radical exegesis of the Qur'an and Sunnah at all. Unless and until that changes, there will be many more of these "distorted" books. From The Star Online, with thanks to Nicolei:

Written in Jawi, the book accuses the Thai government of oppressing the southern region and that Muslims should take up armed struggle to fight for separation.

“Our properties have been confiscated and our assets stolen from us. Our rights and freedoms have been curbed and our religion and culture have been sullied. Where is your commitment to peace among our people?” the book asked.

It said Muslims must rise against injustices inflicted upon them by the “enemies of God”.

“Let us go and spark this fire and look for them everywhere, night and day, and kill those infidels to show non-believers that Muslims are strong while living in this world,” according to the translation published by The Nation newspaper.

Those who died fighting for justice were martyrs, it added. ...

Islamic Committee of Yala deputy chairman Nimu Makajae said the teachings were disseminated to benefit certain groups only.

Its author had no deep knowledge of Islam, he added.

| 21 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Feel relieved?

From AP:

NEW YORK - The "dirty bomb" allegedly planned by terror suspect Jose Padilla would have been a dud, not the radiological threat portrayed last week by federal authorities, scientists say.

At a June 1 news conference, the Justice Department said the alleged al-Qaida associate hoped to attack Americans by detonating "uranium wrapped with explosives" in order to spread radioactivity.

But uranium's extremely low radioactivity is harmless compared with high-radiation materials — such as cesium and cobalt isotopes used in medicine and industry that experts see as potential dirty bomb fuels.

"I used a 20-pound brick of uranium as a doorstop in my office," American nuclear physicist Peter D. Zimmerman, of King's College in London, said to illustrate the point.

Zimmerman, co-author of an expert analysis of dirty bombs for the U.S. National Defense University, said last week's government announcement was "extremely disturbing — because you cannot make a radiological dispersal device with uranium. There is just no significant radiation hazard."

Other specialists agreed. "It's the equivalent of blowing up lead," said physicist Ivan Oelrich of the Federation of American Scientists. ...

"Granted, it (uranium) could have a psychological effect" because of unfounded fears, said physicist Ferguson. But he said a government information campaign should quell any panic if such a weapon appeared.

| 20 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

And I suppose the migrants themselves have no responsibility in all this? Forgive me if I doubt that the Holland of 2004 is really the kind of virulently racist and xenophobic society that Dijkstal seems to assume. Sure, there are racists and creeps everywhere, but no one in Holland or in Europe in general seems to be willing or able to address the fact that the problem of Islamic immigration is not racial, but ideological. This is the first time a large number of people have come holding a religion that contains a tradition that they must do violence in order to establish the political hegemony of that religion. How can non-Muslim Dutchmen be sure that Dutch Muslims will not try to institute Sharia there? An atmosphere in which such questions are of themselves considered discrimination and hatemongering is one that breeds the resentment that Dijkstal deplores.

From Expatica, with thanks to Ali Dashti:

AMSTERDAM — Dutch political culture is sowing hate and criminalising migrants, former Liberal VVD leader Hans Dijkstal has claimed. He particularly slammed a proposal to publicly identify migrants on how much they have integrated into Dutch society.

Dijkstal said the stigmatisation of Muslims and repeated attacks against the Islamic community cultivates fierce anti-Muslim reactions and breeds hate among Muslim youth for white Dutch nationals.

The former deputy prime minister, born in Egypt in 1943, placed much of the blame on VVD parliamentary leader Jozias van Aartsen, who he described as 'il capo'. He said under Van Aartsen's leadership, the VVD has opted for the hard line.

"Muslims are being stigmatised. An entire religion is being attacked even though most Muslims are moderate, respectable people," he said, admitting that it was unlikely that his criticism might spark a change in VVD policies.

| 22 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Why? Because these family laws were based on Sharia, which is considered the law of Allah. You don't reform the law of Allah. From VOANews, with thanks to Twostellas:

Thirty-three-year-old Heda made the mistake of having a child that her husband did not want. At least this is the version of the story she tells a reporter at a shelter for abused women in downtown Algiers.

Heda, who gives only her first name, comes from the rural village of Tebessa, about 600 kilometers east of the capital.

She says her husband divorced her eight-years ago, when he found out she was pregnant. Her family, she says, agreed to take her in, but only if she gave her infant son up for adoption. Heda refused, and found herself homeless.

Under Algeria's 1984 family law, men can divorce their wives without a reason, and have no obligations towards their former wives.

This is no innovation. It's straight Sharia, and so is this about polygamy and permission:

Algerian men can have up to four wives, although few actually do. Women must ask permission from a male member of the family before they can marry.

Nevertheless, all this is supposed to come from "twisted" Islamic principles. Which principles, exactly? How was it that all the major schools of Islamic law ended up twisting Islamic principles in the same way?

For years, Mrs. Belaala says, men have twisted Islamic principles to suit their purposes and to discriminate against women. It is about time, she says, to put an end to it.

Neighboring Tunisia has long boasted of having the most emancipated women in the Arab world. Morocco, to Algeria's west, recently amended its family law to nearly abolish polygamy, increase legal marriage age for women and to force men to seek divorces in court.

And upon what Islamic principles were these liberalizations based?

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Unlike his British coreligionists in Al-Muhajiroun, Mohamed Elmasry wants Canadian Muslims to vote. From The Globe and Mail, with thanks to Earl:

Canadian Muslims have a bigger stake in the outcome of this federal election than any other before. Like most Canadians, Canadian Muslims care about issues such as health care, having a balanced budget and defence spending. But the issues most on the minds of Canadian Muslims, issues that have not been so far debated in this campaign, are the issues of reviewing the anti-terrorist law C-36, how to stop the deterioration of civil liberties in this country and how to safeguard Canadians, especially Canadian Muslims, against racial profiling.

Wouldn't it be refreshing sometime to hear a Muslim spokesman say that Muslims should be concerned with anti-terror efforts, and should protest against anti-terror laws in an atmosphere of full-hearted and open cooperation with authorities? By not doing this, they leave themselves open to questions of whether they are concerned about anti-terror laws going to far out of legitimate fears of erosion of civil rights, or because their loyalties lie with the other side.

That is why I have been travelling the country in a religious, rather than a political, campaign style, to encourage Muslims to vote. I argue that "not voting is voting." I explain that it is a religious, as well as civic, duty to vote. I quote from the Koran and the teachings of the Prophet. And I give examples from early Muslim history.

He probably talks of ijma, consensus, and other Islamic principles that seem to be harmonious with democracy. Unfortunately, however, in Islamic law those principles don't extend to non-Muslims. That doesn't affect what he is doing now, but it raises questions for the future of Canada and Western Europe. Those questions revolve, of course, around what Elmasry calls -- you guessed it -- a "tiny minority."

But there is a very tiny minority of Muslims in this country who are advocating not voting to protest what they call "the illusion of democratic values."

One of them e-mailed me a three-page letter following a khotbah (Friday sermon) I gave recently at a large Toronto mosque where I urged that we Muslims should be informed, committed and multi-issue voters, for the sake of our future and the future of our children.

"I bear witness that you delivered your message: a misleading message of ignorance," the man wrote, "God accepts the repentance of a Muslim so long as his soul remains in his body. It is never too late. I pray that you will sincerely consider (your) words and that you will think about the day when we all shall stand in front of Him alone. Do you want to be blamed by thousands for misleading them? God will not accept the excuse of ignorance." I am told the man who wrote this was born in this country and is in his 30s. This worries me a great deal. I believe he is well-intentioned, but misguided.

Well, that is worrisome. I hope Elmasry has a comprehensive program to refute the understanding of the Qur'an and Sunnah that men like this have. But somehow I doubt it.

| 13 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

One would think, given Al-Azhar's anointing by the New York Times after 9/11 as a beacon of Islamic moderation, that these folks would have been more tolerant. Somehow I think the Times' view of Al-Azhar, home of Grand Sheikh Tantawi who has praised suicide bombing (and also condemned it, depending apparently on which way he perceived the wind was blowing), is more wishful thinking than reality. From AFP, with thanks to Mentat:

CAIRO (AFP) - Egypt's religious authorities raided book stores and stands Saturday, confiscating hundreds of publications as well as audio and videotapes they claim do not conform to Islamic teachings.

The raid came only three days after Justice Minister Faruq Seif al-Nasr granted Al-Azar, Sunni Islam's most prestigious institution, wide-ranging powers to ban and confiscate material it deems violate religious principles.

Novels by secular writers and even unorthodox versions of the Holy Quran, were seized in the raids, raising concerns the religious establishment might use its new powers to suppress free thought.

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The Thai jihad continues. From Reuters, with thanks to Nicolei:

BANGKOK, June 7 (Reuters) - Two gunmen on a motorcycle shot dead a Buddhist teacher in Thailand's restive Muslim south on Monday, the latest casualty in a spate of violence which has claimed over 200 lives since January, police said.

The 49-year-old, who was in charge of general studies at an Islamic school, was shot as he was about to start his car parked at a school in the province of Pattani, police said.

The shooting came just over a week after an elderly Buddhist man was beheaded at a rubber plantation in nearby Narathiwat province, an incident which heightened fears of sectarian tension between Buddhists and Muslims in the troubled region.

The teacher was killed despite stepped up security at schools, where at least 1,000 soldiers and police have been deployed since the new school year began in mid-May.

"We are investigating what might have been the motivation," Major General Paitoon Pattanasopon, head of the Pattani provincial police, told Reuters.

All General Pattanasopon has to do to discover the motivation is read the writings of Osama bin Laden and other radical Muslims. They have made their intentions and goals quite clear.

| 28 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

From CNN:

Almost half of all Saudis said in a poll conducted last year that they have a favorable view of Osama bin Laden's sermons and rhetoric, but fewer than 5 percent thought it was a good idea for bin Laden to rule the Arabian Peninsula.

The poll involved interviews with more than 15,000 Saudis and was overseen by Nawaf Obaid, a Saudi national security consultant.

It was conducted between August and November 2003, after simultaneous suicide attacks in May 2003 when 36 people were killed in Riyadh.

Imagine the figures before the Riyadh attacks.

| 48 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Looks like the Damra case is shaping up to be yet another bungled prosecution of a suspected Islamic radical. From AP:

CLEVELAND - A terrorist group's manifesto and other items seized by the FBI in a search of an Islamic cleric's home were taken in an illegal search and cannot be used at his trial, a federal judge has ruled.

U.S. District Judge James Gwin, in a decision filed late Monday, ruled in favor of Fawaz Mohammed Damra, 41.

The Palestinian-born imam is accused of concealing ties to terrorist organizations when he applied for citizenship, which he received in 1994.

FBI agents searched his suburban Cleveland home without a warrant after his Jan. 13 arrest and seized a computer, copies of sermons and political speeches, the manifesto of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad and stacks of financial records.

The agents said they had permission to search the home, but Damra's wife, Nasreen, was instructed to go to the basement during the arrest, apparently because she was upset. The judge said her absence prevented her from finding out she had the right to ask them to leave.

Federal prosecutor James V. Moroney Jr. said the manifesto was the only item from the search that the government intended to use at the trial. He said no decision had been made on whether to appeal the judge's ruling.

Prosecutors had said they wanted to use the manifesto to show the strength of Damra's ties to Palestinian Islamic Jihad, suggesting only a high-ranking official would have a copy.

But the judge was skeptical, noting Damra might have such a document for his teaching duties at colleges in Cleveland.

UPDATE: Charles as LGF has a wealth of illuminating information about the Catholic dhimmi who is serving as an expert witness for Damra.

| 55 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Sheikh Yusuf Qaradawi is the radical Muslim leader whose support for the new mosque in Boston was touted in their Arabic literature, but not in their English material. Today in Asia Times (thanks to Ali Dashti), Yukiko Ohashi explains his baneful influence on the contemporary understanding of Islamic law among Muslims in Malaysia and elsewhere.

Muslims in Malaysia, not unlike those in the Middle East, have resorted to appreciating Islam through the narrow prism of al Halal wal Haram fil Islam - which means abiding by the "lawful and prohibited acts in Islam", and which is detailed in a book of the same name by Yusuf Qaradawi.

In this philosophy, submission to God is reduced to a series of dos and don'ts - a binary moral code. This approach was systematized by Qaradawi, dean of Islamic law at Qatar University, and the methodology gained currency in the Middle East, and subsequently in Southeast Asia.

Since 1960, when Qaradawi wrote his book in Arabic, his narrow approach toward Islam has predominated. In Malaysia, his influence is deep, even among the governing Muslim elites. When former deputy premier Anwar Ibrahim was the president of the International Islamic University, Malaysia, he spent considerable time with Qaradawi, expressing his support for the latter's fiqh al aliyyah (introducing Islamic law according to priorities).

In his governmental post of deputy to prime minister Mahathir Mohamad, Anwar was able to bring some of Qaradawi's ideas into public policy. Eventually Anwar was dumped from the government and jailed on charges of sodomy and corruption; however, the thoughts and practice of Qaradawi have not been totally excluded from government policy, including the reductionist elements.

Islamic scholars and thinkers in Malaysia continue to look to Qaradawi for various Islamic interpretations and verdicts, such as on the legality of suicide terrorism. More important, the inspiration of Qaradawi is integral to the conceptual blueprint for an Islamic state as held by the opposition Parti Islam SeMalaysia (PAS), which controls the Kelantan state government.

PAS's Islamic state is based on the permissible and the prohibited as outlined by Qaradawi. Observe the "Islamic state document" produced by PAS last year, the first of its kind in the history of the party, after much demand from Malaysians as to what a PAS-style Islamic state would actually represent.

In this document, it was clearly stated that PAS would implement "the Shariah [Islamic law] to achieve the five imperatives of the Shariah; therein to protect a Muslim's beliefs, life, intellect, dignity and property".

In seeking to fulfill these five imperatives, the document read: "In implementing the Shariah all vices and crimes that pertain to the above stated aspects would be controlled. Man-made laws have been [proved] a failure in securing the security and dignity of the human race."

| 10 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

But where on the web are the moderate fatwas that forbid violence in the name of Islam and explain why these radical fatwas are wrong? Anyone? Anyone?

This is just another example of how radical Muslims are in the intellectual ascendancy everywhere in the Islamic world. There are many non-terrorist Muslims, but they have not refuted the radicals on Islamic grounds.

From the New York Times via the International Herald Tribune, with thanks to Ali Dashti:

KHOBAR, Saudi Arabia A recent fatwa posted on a popular Islamic Web site in Saudi Arabia explains when a Muslim may mutilate the corpse of an infidel. The ruling, written by a Saudi religious sheik, Omar Abdullah Hassan al-Shehabi, decrees that the dead can be mutilated as a reciprocal act when the enemy is disfiguring Muslim corpses, or when it otherwise serves the Islamic nation. In the second category, the reasons include "to terrorize the enemy" or to gladden the heart of a Muslim warrior.

The religious ruling was evidently posted to address questions about the conflict in Iraq, but is not limited by geography. In fact, in each of two gruesome attacks in Saudi Arabia last month that left 25 foreigners and five Saudis dead, a Western corpse was dragged for some distance behind a car. One was the body of an American engineer in Yanbu on May 1, the other a British businessman in Khobar last weekend.

That a cleric can post such an argument in an open forum goes a long way toward explaining how the most radical interpretations of religious texts flourish in Saudi Arabia.

Fatwas like this one help pave the way for bloody assaults against foreigners in Saudi Arabia, many Saudi intellectuals believe. The stakes are higher here than anywhere else because the world price of oil hinges on perceptions of Saudi Arabia's stability.

Still, the government remains cautious in confronting homegrown radicals, Saudi analysts and a few princes say, although security forces have done important work tracking down extremists.

"We are still using soft language when we talk about the problem of Al Qaeda in Saudi Arabia," said Sulaiman al-Hattlan, a Saudi columnist. "We have not addressed the ideology of these groups, which is the same one the government is promoting. They attack just the individuals."

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

More on the struggle being waged by Muslim women against Islamic law in Canada. From the Toronto Star, with thanks to Mentat and Nicolei:

When Britain's Muslim community requested the right to use Islamic law to settle family disputes, the government's refusal was unequivocal.

No, the petitioners were told: This is one nation, with one justice system for all.

Until last fall, no Western jurisdiction allowed the 1,400-year-old body of religious law called sharia to take root inside its secular legal system.

Then the province of Ontario quietly approved its use. Under the 1991 Arbitration Act, sharia-based marriage, divorce and family tribunals run by the Islamic Institute of Civil Justice are expected to begin later this year. The move has so horrified many Muslim women that they're vowing to stop the tribunals before they start.

"We've had a flood of e-mails from people, asking `How can we help?'" says Alia Hogben, president of the Canadian Council of Muslim Women, whose 900 members come from a variety of Islamic sects.

They were outraged that Muslim women could be coerced into taking part in sharia tribunals or face family and community ostracism -- or worse.

Why, they asked, should these women be treated differently from other Canadian women?

| 21 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

How local Muslims have manipulated Seattle Democrats, from Max Borders in FrontPage (thanks to EPG):

Muslims in King County are celebrating. In A Call to Action - an email by members of Seattle's Arab & Muslim Community - the authors write: "our pro-justice position is not a fringe voice held by only the most extreme liberals as some might have us believe, but rather, it is the voice of the majority." Sadly, this assessment may be correct--at least among Seattle Democrats. According to the Islamic-American group CAIR, the Seattle's Democratic Party Platform now officially states: "our tax dollars should not go to Israel while it violates international law."

Greg Rodriguez - Chair of the King County Democratic Party - recently went on a Seattle radio talk show to express "embarrassment" over the one-sided suggestion of punitive action against Israel. But the fact remains: the anti-Israel stance qualified as a plank in the city's Democratic platform. That means the position must not only have been given serious consideration, but that the world's only Jewish state had to have been singled out. ...

When the Jihadists regard America and Israel, they must continue to see a unified front. Minimally, US aid to Israel signals such unity. More importantly, however, our obligations to our ally rise to the level of moral commitment to a lone democratic island in a sea of Islamist rage--one whose enemies have vowed to push it into the Mediterranean. Continued bi-partisan support for Israel must not splinter in the face of those bent on Israel's demise, or such enemies will find a way through those very fissures in order to kill us as well. The Democrats should know this.

| 12 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

In a lengthy editorial on the genocide in Sudan, the Washington Post (thanks to Bob) never once mentions the words "jihad," "Islam," "Muslim," "Christian," etc. We get no idea that "rebellion broke out" in Darfur because of violence by Arab Muslims against black Muslims. We are evidently supposed to believe that the "ethnic cleansing" of "Southern rebels" just happened, like some great force of nature.

Yet the lead sentence of the story tells us:

THE EARLY PREPARATION for the genocide in Darfur, Sudan's vast western province, played out behind a veil of ignorance...

The Post seems to know a lot about veils of ignorance.

| 14 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The stupendously insightful and courageous Jamie Glazov at FrontPage uses the horrifying story of Souad, who survived an attempted honor killing, to remind us once again why we fight:

Islamic fundamentalists know -- all too well -- that the only way their cultures will survive is for one half of the human race to remain caged and enslaved. But the West stands in stark opposition to that pathological and death-seeking quest. And the West's values continue to spread with lightning speed. In the age of globalization, mass communication and the Internet, the reality of Western women's free choice and control over their own identity -- and sexuality - is a force that cannot be stopped.

And so, like a possessed individual who has holy water sprinkled on him in an exorcism, radical Islam shrieks and foams at the mouth in our modern world, tormented and enraged by the sprinkles of liberty that touch it -- and that it cannot withstand. Increasingly cornered by the nightmare of free and happy females, Islamism must lash out in rage and violence in its effort to preserve its tyranny over human life.

We begin to understand, therefore, why Souad was a mandatory victim in a demented and psychopathic culture that, in its lust for death, must necessarily despise the gender that fertilizes and bestows life. And we also begin to understand why the entity that has liberated its own Souads -- and threatens to liberate all the Souads of the world - must also, like Souad, be annihilated. And make no mistake: those forces who seek to suffocate love -- as Souad's mother suffocated her nine baby daughters - know exactly who and what they need to extinguish.

And so we are at war.

And this war is predominantly about women -- about who they are, where they belong and whether they are entitled to dignity, autonomy, liberty and respect.

Souad was doused with gasoline and set afire because she fell in love.

Because she yearned to be free.

And there is hope, for there are wonderful movements, like the Swiss foundation SURGIR, that works with women everywhere in the world who are subject to criminal traditions.[2]

And hope also resides in us taking an extra step.

That extra step is pooling together all of our voices, so that we can collectively affirm, with courage and forthrightness, that, unequivocally, We Are All Souad.

Because we stand with Souad.

And the fate of an abused woman is humanity's fate. And when women, our mothers, are violated, then life is violated, and every single one of us is violated.

The honor killer who sets a woman on fire operates out of the same impulse that motivated Mohammad Atta to give his life so that, on September 11, 2003, 3,000 American citizens would perish in flames -- like Souad was supposed to.

And so let us turn to life, rather than death, and extend our hand to Souad - and to every other Souad. And to every potential Souad.

And then at least the cards will be on the table. And we'll be honest in why we need to fight this war - and to win this war.

Because in so doing we will not only save our mothers.

We will save ourselves.

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Did you catch John Esposito with Feisal Abdul Rauf on CSpan? Bassam Michael Madany did. Here is his exclusive Jihad Watch commentary on the CSpan panel discussion "Understanding Islam":

On June 5 and 6, 2004, BookExpo America was held at McCormick Place Convention Center in Chicago. One of the panels dealt with "Understanding Islam: How Books Can Foster Dialogue in a Faith-fractured World." It was telecast twice on Saturday, June 5 on C-SPAN2

Lynn Garrett, religion editor of Publishers Weekly, announced before the beginning of the proceedings that one of the authors that was scheduled to participate in the panel, Irshad Manji "was not able to join us today." Then, she proceeded to introduce the remaining authors:

Feisal Abdul Rauf, "What's Right with Islam: A New Vision for Muslims and the West"
Asma Gull Hasan: "Why I Am a Muslim: An American Odyssey"
John Esposito, author, "Unholy War"

It should be noted that the subject of the Canadian Muslim Irshad Manji's book was "The Trouble With Islam."

Analysis and Comments

John Esposito, professor of Religion at Georgetown University in Washington, DC, began by giving an account of the status of books on Islam during the second half of the twentieth century. The Islamic revolution of Ayatollah Khomeini in Iran (1979) gave a great boost to the publication of many new titles on Islam in the West.

Islam and Muslims were almost invisible in the 1960s both in Europe and in America, but nowadays, Islam has become the second largest religion in those areas as well as in the rest of the world. Esposito deplored the fact that in the West, the media does not do a fair job in depicting Islam. This has continued to be the case even after the tragic events of 9/11. While several books and magazine articles on Islam have appeared lately, most of them remain deficient, according to Esposito, as their emphasis is not so much on "know Islam" but on "know the threat" of Islam, or of Islamic radicalism.

In attempting to understand "what makes John Esposito tick," I came to realize that the key is to be found in an often repeated theme during his presentation at McCormick Place Convention Center: "The transcendent and the dark side of religion exist in all religions." This is the basic motif that he finds in all religions, regardless of their sacred texts and histories. Actually, this reveals Esposito as having joined the ranks of such well-known Western pluralist theologians as John Hick, W. C. Smith, and Paul Knitter. His pluralist theology allows him to posit equivalence between Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. The noble and uplifting element in these theistic faiths is to be located in the transcendence they proclaim. However, all three have their dark side, which must be confessed and deplored.

Professor Esposito is impatient with the question that is put to him so often, as to whether Islam is a religion of peace. "How come we keep on asking the same question, [about violence in Islam,] and don't ask the same question about Christianity and Judaism. Jews and Christians have engaged in acts of violence. All of us have the transcendent and the dark side."

Esposito related how he gave his students at Georgetown selections from the Qur'an regarding violence as well as selections from the Hebrew Bible that dealt with the same subject. Having deliberately chosen those texts out of context, his students would naturally arrive at the same conclusion, that both Islam and Judaism taught and endorsed violence.

| 13 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

June 8, 2004

AP discovers that jihad groups are united by ideology.

In a coordinated strike across Europe, police arrested 17 suspected Islamic militants, including an alleged mastermind of the Madrid train bombings who authorities say was planning further attacks, officials said Tuesday.

Fifteen people, mostly Palestinian, Jordanian, Moroccan and Egyptian nationals, were arrested in raids on about 10 locations in Brussels and Antwerp, said Daniel Bernard, Belgian federal prosecutor.

Italian police picked up two suspects, including a 33-year-old Egyptian described as the ringleader who allegedly helped plan the March 11 attacks in Madrid that killed 191 people.

The suspect, identified as Rabei Osman Ahmed - also known as "Mohammed the Egyptian" - was arrested Monday night near his apartment in the northern outskirts of Milan in an operation that involved dozens of police.

The operation "confirms the welding that took place between holy war groups of various geographical origins," said Carlo De Stefano of the Milan police. These groups "are united not only by a single project of attack on the West and on the symbols representing it, but also by the actual sharing of resources and operational experiences."

Onward, Muslim Soldiers!

| 22 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Mrs. Obelix has sent a link to "Don't Worry, We Don't Kill Muslims" with the following comment: "Let's see. After I recite the Shahada in the presence of witnesses I become a Muslim. If I later deny Islam, I can be killed as an apostate. Perhaps it would be better if I just trampled a crucifix or spit on a mezuzah or something." I tend to share her view; I rather suspect that my skin is not worth saving if the price is such a deception.

Nor is this the first time Islamists have specifically targeted infidels. In Malaysia in 2000, for example, jihadists purposefully killed two non-Muslim hostages and spared two others, both Muslims. In Pakistan in 2002, a police chief noted killers "took a good fifteen minutes in segregating the Christians and making sure that each one of their targets gets the most horrific death." The murderers separated Christians from Muslims by requiring each hostage to recite a verse from the Koran. Those who could not were shot.

In all these cases, non-Muslims facing jihadists could have saved themselves by passing as Muslims.

Pipes goes on to give a handy guide to impersonating a Muslim.

It's a pity Frank Gardner didn't get a chance to read Pipes' article. He would have been far more convincing.

| 13 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Good thing that Muslims don't kill Muslims. These guys have nothing to worry about.

(AFP)Two Turkish men, senior employees of a Turkish construction company, have been taken hostage in Iraq by armed insurgents, a Turkish government official said today.
| 11 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

AP gives us this update on the Italian hostages.

Coalition forces freed Italian and Polish hostages in bloodless American commando operation Tuesday south of Baghdad, the top U.S. general in Iraq said.

All the hostages were freed from the same location and suspects were detained," Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez said. There was no reported exchange of fire in rescuing the three Italians and a Pole.

And let's pause a moment to remember Fabrizio Quattrocchi, the Italian hostage executed in Iraq who, moments before he was shot dead, tried to tear off his hood and shouted "Now I'll show you how an Italian dies."

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

AP reports:

An American citizen was shot and killed Tuesday in Saudi Arabia, a U.S. Embassy official said, the second deadly shooting of a Westerner in the kingdom in three days.

The article tells us that

There has been an upsurge of violence in the kingdom despite a high-profile anti-terror campaign that the government began last year following attacks on residential compounds.

Not "despite" but because of. The media seem constanty surprised that when one fights bad guys they fight back. But the alternative of doing nothing and allowing terrorist groups to fester is worse. Appeasement only allows terrorists to gather strength until finally they are too powerful to confront. Imagine these fanatics becoming the government of Saudi Arabia, and perhaps possessing nuclear weapons. Who would oppose them then?

All that is cold comfort to the dead American and his family, and for them I am sorry.

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

FOX reports some good news:

Three Italian hostages who have been held in Iraq for almost two months were freed and are in good condition, the Italian Foreign Ministry said on Tuesday.
| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

More on the sorry state of American campuses, from Arnold Steinberg in FrontPage:

At the University of California campus at Irvine (in Orange County), Jewish students pose these two questions. That's because of events sponsored by the Muslim Student Union (MSU) and the Society of Arab Students (SAS) related to their fourth annual "Zionism Awareness Week." ...

At UC-Irvine, the MSU and SAS members wore green armbands to support Hamas. The leaders of Jewish campus organizations protested in vain to the politically correct administration, which is (or pretends to be) unfamiliar with Hamas' charter. Indeed, an MSU member sent an e-mail to the MSU list concerning whether graduating students should wear sashes which say "shahada" (the Arabic word for suicide bomber).

Actually it's the Arabic word for "martyrdom," but since that is what suicide bombers think they are attaining, this may be a distinction without a difference.

| 74 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The great Walid Phares on how the Saudis tried and failed to play both ends against the middle. From FrontPage:

"And remember," said Osama bin Laden in his February 11, 2003 audio tape to al Jazeera, "those who deal with the infidels will be treated as infidels." The master of al Qaeda, angry with his former friends of the 1980s, blasted the Saudis for not cutting their relationship short with the US and its allies.

In this important speech, the man who ordered the September 11 massacres against the hated Kuffars (infidels in Arabic) wanted to see the Saudi monarchy sever all ties with Washington. Thus, as President Bush established his famous equation of being with us or with the terrorists, al Qaeda mimicked his words, threatening: "Either you're with the infidels or you're with us."

The Saudis understood bin Laden's message, but they had two different criticisms to deal with: the first from the US, blaming them for two decades of Wahabi teachings and noting the citizenship of fourteen of the 9/11 hijackers; and the other from international Jihadists warning them not to engage in the War on Terror, let alone participate in the War in Iraq.

From the Fall of 2001 to the Spring of 2003, Riyadh tried to survive these two opposing messages. Its spokespeople in Washington practiced all their PR skills to dodge questions on the subject. The media savvy Adel al Jubair dismissed media and legislative critics a hundred times, claiming "We are in the War against Terror in as much as you are."

But practically speaking, the Salafi clerics within the kingdom continued to hail al Qaeda and al Jazeera, amplifying their voices around the Muslim world. Crown Prince Abdallah promised war against terror, while his religious emirs vowed Jihad against the West. The Iraq war didn't help any.

| 10 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

That's sure to lessen jihadist fervor in Iraq. From AP, with thanks to DC Watson:

BAGHDAD, Iraq -- Iraq's new prime minister announced an agreement Monday by nine political parties to dissolve their militias, integrating some of the 100,000 fighters into the army and police and pensioning off the rest to firm up government control ahead of the transfer of sovereignty. The plan does not cover the most important militia fighting coalition forces -- the al-Mahdi Army of radical cleric Muqtada al-Sadr -- or smaller groups that have sprouted across the country since the collapse of Saddam Hussein's regime in April 2003.

Nevertheless, the announcement by Prime Minister Iyad Allawi is seen as a significant step toward extending the control of the central government that will take power at the end of the month. The agreement, if it works, would also significantly reduce the threat of civil war after the U.S.-led occupation formally ends. ...

"We want to disband the Badr Brigade and to enable its members to join the new Iraqi army and police forces and serve the new Iraq," said Dr. Haitham al-Husseini, a top official in the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq, which controls the 15,000-strong Badr Brigade, a Shiite group.

| 1 Comment
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This is news? I thought everyone knew that Al-Qaeda would be targeting airliners since, oh, around September 11, 2001. From AP:

CAIRO, Egypt - An Internet statement signed by an al-Qaida cell in Saudi Arabia warned Monday that the terror network will target Western airlines, military bases and residential compounds and told Muslims to stay away from Westerners.

The warning of attacks in "the near future" appeared on a Web site known for posting messages from militants, including the video in which a terror group with al-Qaida links executed Nicholas Berg, an American kidnapped in Iraq.

The authenticity of the statement, signed "Al-Qaida on the Arabian Peninsula," could not be confirmed. Al-Qaida uses the term "Arabian Peninsula" to refer to Saudi Arabia because it rejects the rule of the Al Saud dynasty, after whom the country is named.

| 15 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Al-Haramain is just the tip of the iceberg. From AP, with thanks to Ali Dashti:

NAIROBI, Kenya (AP) -- Al-Qaida has siphoned millions of dollars from Islamic charities that help poor Muslims in Africa and Asia, and U.S. and Saudi government efforts to cut the flow have largely failed, Western diplomats and former charity workers say.

Working with sympathizers inside the charities, al-Qaida has for years used humanitarian funds for terror attacks in Kenya, Tanzania and Indonesia, U.S. and other Western officials told The Associated Press.

In one case, donations to the Al-Haramain Foundation to support Islamic preachers ended up in the pockets of a suspect in the November 2002 bombing of an Israeli hotel in Kenya, a Western diplomat told AP.

A wholesale fish business financed with Al-Haramain funds also steered profits to the al-Qaida cell behind the August 1998 bombings of the U.S. Embassies in East Africa, U.S. officials told AP.

| 1 Comment
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Pirate attacks on ships in the South Pacific are increasing in frequency and sophistication. Some see a connection to Islamic terrorism. From Reuters, with thanks to Nicolei:

SINGAPORE: Attacks on ships by sea pirates in South-East Asia are resembling military operations - growing bolder, more violent and fuelling fears of an attack that would cripple world trade, Singapore said yesterday. ...

"But the last piracy attack that took place in the Straits of Malacca showed a different pattern," he added.

The pirates were well-armed, operating sophisticated weapons and commanding high-speed boats.

"They conducted the operation almost with military precision," Tan said.

"Instead of just ransacking the ship for valuables, they took command of the ship, and steered the ship for about an hour, and then eventually left with the captain in their captivity," he said.

"To all of us, this is reminiscent of the pattern by which terrorists mount an attack." ...

Singapore has repeatedly warned of the potential link between pirates and religious militant networks such as Jemaah Islamiah, blamed for the deadly 2002 bomb blasts in the Indonesian island of Bali and widely linked to Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda.

"We are concerned that terrorists may seize control of a tanker with a cargo of lethal materials, LNG (liquefied natural gas) perhaps, chemicals, and use it as a floating bomb against our port," Tan said.

"This would cause catastrophic damage, not only to the port but also for people, because our port is located very near to a highly dense residential area.

"Thousands of people would be killed," he said.

| 15 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Middle East Online (thanks to LGF) reports that the British reporter who was shot yesterday in Riyadh pleaded in vain for help by calling out, "I'm a Muslim, help me."

I don't know why nobody helped him; maybe passersby didn't believe him. Maybe he isn't even really a Muslim: the article isn't entirely clear on that point. But it's interesting to note the way he made his appeal. He evidently knew that, in accordance with the great divide of the Qur'an and Sunnah between believers and unbelievers, Saudis would be less inclined to help a wounded non-Muslim.

RIYADH - Riddled with bullets, BBC correspondent Frank Gardner pleaded for his life in the Saudi capital shouting to bystanders to help a fellow Muslim, a police officer said on Monday.

"I'm a Muslim, help me, I'm a Muslim, help me," the British father of two daughters cried in Arabic, the officer said.

Gardner was stretched on the road, covered in blood from multiple bullet wounds in a slum area of southern Riyadh known as a hotbed of hardliners.

A fluent Arabic speaker with a degree in Arab and Islamic Studies, he was carrying a small copy of the Koran, the Muslim holy book, a device used by Westerner reporters to try to reassure Islamist militants.

| 29 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The British radical Muslim group Al-Muhajiroun has once again come out against the peaceful assimiliation of Muslims into British secular society with a piece entitled "The Shirk of Voting to Man-Made Law" (thanks to LGF), by "Dr Abu Osama and Dr Abu Ziyaad." Shirk is the association of partners with Allah -- the cardinal sin in Islam. In other words, therefore, Al-Muhajiroun is asserting that to participate in the British political system is to worship false gods. In the article they make it clear that the only form of government acceptable to Muslims is the Sharia, which they consider to be divine law.

Yet even to suggest that Western Muslims may be attached to the Sharia is, as far as American Muslim advocacy groups are concerned, evidence of "Islamophobia." I guess we're just not supposed to notice Omar Bakri and Al-Muhajiroun. Pay no attention to the man wearing the caftan, eh?

Unfortunately for the Muslims in the West (who are living in the heartlands of the Kufr and the Shirk), election season is upon us, with voting for the European Parliament, the Mayor of London and the local UK elections taking place on the 10th of June. I say unfortunately because for the real Muslim Muwaahid (true monotheists) this is a time of great pain and sadness as they see how the kuffaar usurp one of the most important Names and Attributes of Allaah (swt), that of al-Hakam al-Adl (the Divine Just Ruler), and direct it to themselves.

However, the greater pain is caused because the people who call themselves by Muslims names and attribute themselves to the Muslim Ummah (falsely), saying that they care for its concerns, participate in these events, choosing, canvassing and even arguing with their Muslim brethren about which Kaafir (disbeliever) they should give their vote to so that they may take office and thereby rule and judge by Kufr (non-Islam). ...

Regrettably, of recent has surfaced a more manifest attack against the Islamic 'Aqeedah and the Tawheed (oneness) of Allaah (swt), in that so-called Muslims and their groupings (like Islamic Awakening (formerly known as Azzam publications) and Al-Muntada) are now calling other Muslims to vote for and choose Kufaar (disbelievers) to come into power, citing examples such as the story of Yusuf (as) and the principles of the "lesser of two evils" to further their cases whilst trying to cloak their actions of Shirk by wearing the negligee of Islamic Shariah in an attempt to look and appear legitimate in the eyes of the Muslims. ...

And we have mentioned numerous clear-cut, non disputable evidences before citing that the law is only for Allaah (swt) and that Allaah (swt) is the Supreme Legislator (Al-Musharri). How then can Islam be compatible with Democracy? How then can one engage in the process of voting or choosing an MP within such a system? A system that disregards the commandments of Allaah (swt); a system that performs istihlaal (making halaal what Allaah (swt) has declared haraam), changing the orders of Allaah (swt); Democracy is a system (nizaam) that says to Allaah (swt) "Our majority judgement is better and more wiser than what You (the Creator of man life and the universe) have sent to us in your Qur'an and in the Sunnah of Your Prophet (saw)."

| 15 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

More media dhimmitude: in this Newsday story, a Chinese woman remembers her ordeal at the hands of yet another unidentified mob in Indonesia, this one driven mad by anti-Chinese sentiment. Oh, and the mob was shouting "Allahu Akbar," and the woman just happened to be a Christian, but never mind about that.

When rioting swept Indonesia's capital of Jakarta for three days in May 1998, a wave of anti-Chinese sentiment caught Kwee and her sister. They were among 150 Chinese women stripped, beaten and gang-raped, according to human rights groups, and the sisters' hair salon was torched.

The pair's attackers, Kwee says, were men wearing military attire and shouting "Allah Hu Akbar" or "God is Good," and the Indonesian words for "Kill Chinese."

| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

June 7, 2004

Reuters can't guess who these unidentified mobs might be -- well, they can't guess till later in the story:

Unidentified mobs vandalised at least two churches near the Indonesian capital, Jakarta, during services and wounded a preacher who tried to stop them, police said on Monday.

One local newspaper said four churches were damaged in the incident on Sunday.

Reuters is quick to let us know that Muslims are tolerant and that poverty is the root cause of conflict.

More than 80 percent of Indonesia's 220 million people are Muslims, and most are tolerant of other religions. But many poor Muslims see minority groups, especially ethnic Chinese Christians, as controlling the country's economy.

Isn't it odd how there is so often a shadowy, powerful minority oppressing these peaceful Muslims?

Besides, when churches are outlawed, only outlaws will have churches:

The attacks happened at shops that had been turned into churches. We have a report that one priest suffered wounds in the attack," national police spokesman Inspector General Paiman said.

"We are looking into whether these churches had permits and whether this was (provoked) by locals displeased with them."

A permit would have no doubt made all the difference.

| 13 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

A long article in the LA Times tells us that Muslim convert Jack Roche, at least according to his lawyer, tried to tell Australian intelligence officials about Osama's plans for 9/11 -- but no one cared.

PERTH, Australia -- When Jack Roche telephoned Australia's intelligence agency in July 2000, he offered a tantalizing story: He had been to Afghanistan and ate lunch with Osama bin Laden. He had received training in explosives and plotted with Al Qaeda leaders to carry out a bombing in Australia.

A Muslim convert, Roche was prepared to become an informant, his attorney says, and provide information about Al Qaeda; its Southeast Asian affiliate, Jemaah Islamiah; and their goal of staging an attack in a Western country.

But at the time -- 14 months before the Sept. 11 attacks -- no one was interested.

It wasn't until 2 1/2 years later that authorities decided to take Roche seriously and arrested him on terrorism charges. Last week he was sentenced to nine years in prison for conspiring with Al Qaeda leaders to blow up the Israeli Embassy in Canberra.

While many Australians applaud the country's first conviction under new anti-terrorism laws, Roche's case is a tale of intelligence failures that illustrates how poorly Western security officials understood the threat posed by Islamic extremism.

I wonder if they understand it any better now.

| 14 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

A number of people have asked me how I could have written an article about Reagan and jihad without mentioning the Afghan mujahedin or the Beirut barracks. If time permits I will address that in another piece later this week. Meanwhile, however, the reaction of several Muslim leaders to Reagan's death doesn't give the impression that they theought of him as a friend. From AP, with thanks to EPG:

The former U.S. president was not remembered so fondly in many Arab nations. The Reagan years marked the beginning of what Lebanon's culture minister, Ghazi Aridi, called a "bad era" of American Mideast policy that he said continues to this day.

Political analyst and former Syrian ambassador to the United Nations Haitham al-Kilani agreed.

"Reagan's role was bad for the Arab-Israeli conflict and was specifically against Syria. He was the victim of the Israeli right wing that was, and still is, dominating the White House," al-Kilani said.

Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi said he was sorry that Reagan died without standing trial for 1986 air strikes he ordered that killed Gadhafi's adopted daughter and 36 other people.

Reagan ordered the April 15, 1986, air raid in response to a disco bombing in Berlin allegedly ordered by Gadhafi that killed two U.S. soldiers and a Turkish woman and injured 229 people.

"I express my deep regret because Reagan died before facing justice for his ugly crime that he committed in 1986 against the Libyan children," Libya's official JANA news agency quoted Gadhafi as saying Sunday.

| 98 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The article on Ronald Reagan I told you about last night is already up this morning at FrontPage: "Defeating Global Jihad: Reagan Showed the Way," by Jihad Watch director Robert Spencer.

By vilifying and attempting to marginalize those who dare tell the truth about Islamic radicalism as Reagan did about Communism, today’s intelligentsia provides ample cover to radical Islamic terrorists, allowing them to operate under the radar screen of media scrutiny and even law enforcement.

Freedom is under attack by the warriors of jihad; the battle lines do indeed resemble those of the Cold War. “There are very useful analogies to be drawn between communism and Islam,” says Ibn Warraq. “Communism has been defeated, at least for the moment; Islamism has not, and unless a reformed, tolerant, liberal kind of Islam emerges soon, perhaps the final battle will be between Islam and Western democracy.”

This is the war we’re in now. If only we had a Reagan to fight it.

| 65 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Indeed it does. From the Daily Times of Pakistan, with thanks to Ali Dashti:

“This is yet further proof of how religious intolerance and discrimination prevails in our society,” said Samson Salamat, a programme coordinator at the National Commission for Justice and Peace, a non-government organisation working for minorities’ rights. “It is another example of religious intolerance which is supported by the laws in the PPC,” Mr Salamat added.

“Mr Masih’s death is another example of how the blasphemy law, in effect since 1980, can be misused,” said Joseph Francis, who heads the Centre for Legal Aid, Assistance and Settlement.

“This is abuse of the law. Mr Masih was not even put on trial. Sections 295-B and C, and Sections 298-A, B and C of the PPC are vague and can be interpreted in ways that cause suffering and death and devastating pain to society,” the Archbishop of Lahore Lawrence J Saldhana told Mr Masih’s funeral on Saturday, according to newspaper reports. “The existence of these laws gives rise to injustices. It is usually the poor and the weak who are the victims.”

Particularly if they are not Muslim.

| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Jihad and anti-jihad in Saharan Africa. Where did the Salafist Group for Preaching and Combat get four million pounds to spend on jihad? Why, from ransom money paid by the dhimmi German government. From the Telegraph, with thanks to Ali Dashti and Nicolei:

America has launched a secret war against Islamic terrorists across the southern Sahara after it discovered that a group linked to al-Qaeda bought heavy weapons using the proceeds of a ransom deal with the German government. The realisation that a new Islamic fundamentalist force was building what officials call "garrisons in the sand" on the border of Algeria and Mali has led America to launch a new anti-terror campaign across a swathe of Africa's harshest and most sparsely populated terrain.

The Salafist Group for Preaching and Combat has spent about £4 million, which it received in return for releasing 17 European tourists kidnapped last year, on surface-to-air missiles, heavy machine-guns and mortars.

It also bought satellite positioning equipment to enable it to conceal and later return to weapons caches buried in the sands of the Sahara.

Major Sarah Kerwin of the US Army's European Command, which is responsible for north and west Africa, said: "There are clear indications that Muslim extremists from the Middle East and Afghanistan have moved into these massive open spaces, where they are as elusive as if they were out at sea.

"They bring a new threat where they can bury weapons in the sand, mark the exact position with their satellite equipment, and then move off along the camel trails with other tools and equipment."

Later on in the article, a "Western diplomat" tells us that what the Germans paid "was equivalent to 25 per cent of the defence budget of Niger last year. That gives the extremists a huge boost, an advantage which they can exploit to destabilise these governments."

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Some people just never know when to let go. But note the large numbers. Why would 10,000 people sign up? Don't they know the Qur'an forbids suicide? Yes, I ask that every time a story like this appears, but it is really the only important question: it illustrates the hollowness and disingenuousness of the American Muslim advocacy groups' response to Islamic terrorism. From Reuters, with thanks to Peter Rockas:

"Some 10,000 people have registered their names to carry out martyrdom operations on our defined targets," said Mohammad Ali Samadi, a spokesman for the Committee for the Commemoration of Martyrs of the Global Islamic Campaign.

But he said the group would need the green light from Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei to launch the attacks.

The independent group said it started to register Iranian men and women prepared to carry out the attacks after Friday prayers last week and sent forms to religious universities.

"Our targets are mainly the occupying American and British forces in the holy Iraqi cities, all the Zionists in Palestine, and Salman Rushdie," he said on Saturday.

"It is not our fault that the Zionists have brought their wives and children to the occupied territories and have turned them into shields for themselves," he added, when asked about the killing of civilians.

"Salman Rushdie is the only non-military target for us, because we believe his attack against Islam was much worse that a military assault," the spokesman said.

Hardline cleric Ayatollah Ahmad Jannati urged worshippers at Friday prayers in Tehran to attack U.S. and British interests.

"It is the duty of every Muslim to threaten U.S. and British interests anywhere," he said.

| 27 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Jihad against Western aid groups and UN refugee workers. This undrrscores the fact that Islamic law allows for the killing of innocent civilians when they are seen to be aiding the war effort. This justification is used routinely in Israel and was a major reason why 9/11 didn't meet with unanimous condemnation in the Islamic world.

Also, why is the Taliban still a factor? Why are they still able to operate? Could it be that high-placed elements in Pakistan are still fond of the group? From AP, with thanks to nevermindlv:

QUETTA, Pakistan (AP) — Pakistani authorities have warned Western aid groups and the U.N. refugee agency to strengthen security against threats of Taliban attacks, officials said Saturday.

The warning was directed to offices in southwestern Baluchistan province.

Mullah Hashim Sagzai, a formerly unknown Taliban fighter now believed to live in a refugee camp in Baluchistan, was identified as the lead planner of suicide plots against the non-governmental organizations.

"Only those NGOs (non-governmental organizations) will be targeted where U.S.-British nationals are working," said the Afghan Refugees Organization, a Pakistani government agency which is responsible for security at refugee camps in Baluchistan.

| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Marwan Barghouthi has been sentenced to life in prison. Charles at LGF calls this Reuters article "shamefully biased," and it is: Barghouti is called a "revolt leader" and a "fiery and articulate Palestinian lawmaker." Never mind that he was implicated in the murders of innocent people. Note also the behavior of the Israeli Arab lawmakers.

"The (Israeli) occupation is going to end one day. It is dying," Barghouthi, 45, said just before the Tel Aviv court handed down five consecutive life sentences for murder over the killings of five people by militants in his Fatah faction.

Barghouthi, who denied involvement in militant ambushes, received another 20 years for attempted murder and a further 20 for activity in a "terror group" -- 165 years in total -- in a high-profile case that Palestinians denounced as a show trial. ...

A fiery and articulate Palestinian lawmaker, Barghouthi did not recognize the jurisdiction of the court that convicted him of murder last month but acquitted him of 21 other killings, citing insufficient evidence. ...

Israeli Arab parliamentarians shook Barghouthi's hand and kissed him before he entered the courtroom. Relatives of 20 slain Israelis screamed at the Israeli Arab lawmakers: "You're garbage! Peace will come when terrorism ends!" ...

The court found Barghouthi guilty of murder and complicity in attacks that killed a Greek Orthodox monk in the West Bank in 2001, an Israeli at the Jewish settlement of Givat Zeev in 2002 and three people at a Tel Aviv restaurant in 2002.

| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

June 6, 2004

I just finished writing a column about President Reagan; maybe it will appear this coming week in some publication. But I thought I would include a note here about this great and vastly underestimated man, who was the only politician of his age with the courage and vision to call evil evil, and deal with it accordingly.

Today resembles the darkest days of the 1970s, when the Soviet Union was advancing with impunity and given a free pass by what were not yet known as the forces of political correctness. To tell the truth about jihad today is the same as telling the truth about Communism then: unpopular, even ridiculous. Few grasped the urgency of the moral imperative to rescue the oppressed and defend the threatened, and few do now.

Ronald Reagan did. In those days I despised him for it; only later did I realize that we campus radicals, with all our thirst for justice, were just tools of the totalitarians. Nothing has changed on that front. What may have changed are the spiritual and cultural forces that enabled America to bring forth Ronald Reagan when we needed him. Will we be able to do it again? Will we survive if we do not?

May his memory be eternal.

| 44 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Phyllis Chesler zeroes in on the dhimmi double standard of the Western media at JewishPress.com:

Leftists and "politically correct" progressives insist that Americans and Israelis are the real barbarians -- that we purposely and sadistically shoot innocent Arab civilian demonstrators from gunships and tanks and drop bombs on wedding parties, hospitals, and children.

I strongly disagree. Americans and Israelis only kill civilians by accident; Islamist terrorists kill civilians on purpose. The vast majority of American and Israeli soldiers have ethical standards that are far different from those of their Islamist opponents. The world, accordingly, holds them to a different, higher standard.

The world media are also quick to accuse the Israeli and American armies of crimes that they have not committed -- and slow to print retractions. ...

More recently, we have seen the international media gasp in horror -- but not in response to the videotaped beheading of Nicholas Berg, and not in response to the pitiless slaughter of the pregnant Tali Hatuel and her four young children. Some journalists blamed Berg for having been there at all; others spread rumors that he was a Zionist agent. And some blamed Hatuel for having lived in Gaza.

What the world media focused on instead were the photos of the psychologically humiliated and abused Iraqi prisoners in American captivity. They did not focus on the sight of Palestinian terrorists in Gaza as they exhibited the "trophy" body parts of Israeli corpses and held the body parts aloft for ransom. ...

May we have the strength of purpose to do whatever it takes to stop our
jihadic enemies for at least another 1000 years. If we don`t, they will annihilate
us.

| 25 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

No wonder the supporters of terror and their allies want his head. A refreshing dose of realism from Rumsfeld, speaking in Singapore on his way to Bangladesh. From AP, with thanks to Twostellas:

He said he fears "zealots and despots" may be turning out newly trained terrorists faster than the United States can capture or kill them.

And he said it's "quite clear" that "we do not have a coherent approach to this."

Rumsfeld said thwarting terrorists isn't enough. He said ways must be found to persuade young Muslims that "the way of the future is through education and opportunity, not through suicide and terrorism."

| 116 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

From Maariv International, with thanks to Filtrat:

According to the police, the assailant yelled "Allahu Akbar" ("God is Great" in Arabic) before attacking the student and fleeing the scene. A local television station reported that the assailant was apparently of North African or Pakistani descent. ...

The latest incident marks the second attack on a French Jew within a week. On Sunday, a 17 year-old rabbi's son was also attacked in a Paris suburb. The teen was beaten up by a group of youngsters who also hurled anti-Semitic insults at him.

Data released by France's Interior Ministry revealed that 67 anti-Semitic attacks were reported during the first quarter of 2004, a 60% jump compared to the same period last year. The data indicated that Arab youngsters were behind most of the incidents.

| 17 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Naked anti-Semitism and hatred at Berkeley, in the name, of course, of justice and peace. From the East Bay Express, :

On the day after September 11, Micki Weinberg walked to the UC Berkeley campus still in shock. At the entrance to campus, facing Telegraph Avenue, huge sheets of blank paper were spread out as an impromptu memorial on which students, faculty, and other passersby were invited to write comments. Glad to have found such a forum, Weinberg scanned the inscriptions. Then he saw one, large and clear, that stopped him dead in his tracks:

"It's the Jews, stupid."

The slender Weinberg, a year younger than most freshmen, had only just arrived at Cal from Beverly Hills, where he had been president of his high school's Shalom Club. As a young teenager, he had savored heady stories of how Mario Savio and his comrades in the Free Speech Movement danced the hora and sang "Hava Nagila" at sit-ins and peace rallies forty years ago. The son of left-wing, Jewish intellectuals, Weinberg viewed himself as one too, having spent the summer before his senior year of high school in Myanmar, cataloguing the archives of Rangoon's disintegrating and depopulated Jewish synagogue. "That's why I came to Berkeley -- because of its strong romantic aura of the Free Speech Movement and Mario Savio," he recalls. "Then I got here and discovered that that light seems to have been extinguished. You have this vitriol. You feel it everywhere. Berkeley is now the epicenter of real hatred."

Almost three years later, Weinberg graduates this month as a student whose days at Cal were marked by what he calls "pinnacles of horror," in the pinched tone of a man betrayed. He remembers pro-Palestinian protesters insisting that Israeli border crossings are as bad as Nazi death camps. He remembers the glass front door of Berkeley's Hillel building -- where he attends Friday night services -- shattered by a cinderblock, with the message FUCK JEWS scrawled nearby. He remembers the spray-painted swastikas discovered one Monday morning last September on the walls of four lecture rooms in LeConte Hall accompanied by the chilling bilingual message, "Die, Juden. "

In recent years the international press has documented the resurgence of anti-Semitism around the world. Jewish schoolkids have been attacked by epithet-shouting gangs in Belgium, Denmark, Sweden, France, and Brazil. Synagogues have been destroyed in Marseille and Istanbul; a Jewish school was firebombed this spring in Montreal; "Death to the Jews" was shouted through bullhorns outside a temple in South Africa. AP ran photos last month of a Jewish graveyard in eastern France where a hundred tombstones had been spray-painted with blood-red swastikas and the Nazi slogan Juden Raus: "Jews out." The Chicago Sun-Times and the British Guardian report that a ubiquitous chant at European soccer matches -- leveled at London and Rotterdam teams perceived as having Jewish roots -- is "Hamas, Hamas, Jews to the gas."

Such anti-Semitism has always seemed the sinister province of fascists and neo-Nazis, Spanish Inquisitors and tattooed skinheads. How topsy-turvy, then, to discover that some of the most virulent anti-Semitism in America today seethes amid the multicultural ferment of American college campuses. And at UC Berkeley, which owes as much of its allure to radical rhetoric as to academic excellence, it thrives.

Read the whole harrowing thing.

| 16 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Islamic terror spreads in Bangladesh. From the Daily Star via Asia News Network, with thanks to Twostellas:

For the Bangladeshi-born British envoy, Anwar Chowdhury, the forenoon of May 21 started without any clue of what was in the offing. It was 1:35 and a huge crowd of people greeted Anwar, as he was about to leave the Shrine of Shahjalal after saying Friday prayers. But as the envoy, only 18 days into his new job, reached the exit door of the 700-year-old tomb, a bearded man in his early forties halted the High Commissioner's way. "The man was telling Anwar to give him some money," recalls Advocate Abdul Hai Khan, Anwar Chowdhury's grandfather and a witness to the mayhem that would follow.

Khan was helping the envoy out of the melee and he smelled a rat when the man did not get out of their way after repeated requests. "I grew suspicious. I looked up at him; the man was well built and was wearing a fashionable Comillar fatua," he says. This man cannot be a beggar, Khan thought; so when the High Commissioner told Khan to give the "beggar" 100 Taka, he said, "Just look at him Anwar, this person is not at all a beggar." Don't be so rude nana, Anwar replied. Khan, in turn, obliged his grandson; the Sylhet-based lawyer reached down for his purse and handed the beggar a hundred-Taka note.

But within seconds, a grenade was thrown at the British High Commissioner; the bomb hit the parameter wall of the shrine as he threw it up after it bumped on his lower abdomen. "Anwar told me, 'Nana, save me; they have thrown a bomb at us'," Khan recalls. "Within a few seconds," he continues, "there was a huge bang; we both fell on the pavement; and I saw blood rolling on the ground from the High Commissioner's body."

Though no one has claimed responsibility for the attack; Advocate Abdul Hai Khan believes it was not at all unexpected. Only months ago, Jamaat-e-Islami (JI) MP Delwar Hossain Saiedi urged a gathering at the nearby Alyah Madrasah field to resist what he called bedat (heretical activities) in the shrine. Four days later, on January 12, a bomb was exploded at the shrine. The police arrested 24 people in connection to the blast; a probe body was formed headed by the superintendent of the police. But that committee's report has not yet seen the light of the day despite repeated extensions of time. No progress has also been made on nine other blasts that rocked the north-eastern city since 1997 and have claimed 14 lives.

In the last five years 140 have been killed and around 1,000 injured in several bomb blasts that ripped through different public places across the country. Whoever the perpetrators are, says security expert Brig-gen Shahedul Anam Khan, the intention was to create panic and reap political dividend of these blasts. Khan believes the subsequent governments' failure to nab the culprits means, "either we are not capable of doing it or the major political parties do not want to see the culprits on the dock."

Hmm. Why might that be?

| 23 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

What I want to know is: what are these preachers going to preach? How do they refute radical Muslim interpretations of the Qur'an and Sunnah? If they really have a way to do this, it needs to be spread to the rest of the world. From 7News, with thanks to Ali Dashti:

Malaysia is sending moderate Islamic preachers to the restive, Muslim-dominated south of Thailand, at Bangkok's request, to spread a message of peace and progress in hopes of curbing the region's wave of violence. ...

Malaysian Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi said the troubles there are a "very, very big concern" for Malaysia because of the close contacts across the border between southern Thai Muslims and northern Malaysians.

"We have been asked to provide, to give lectures on the role of Islamic development," Abdullah said in an interview with CNN's Talk Asia program.

"The idea is that (Thais) wouldn't want to deal with militant Islam, but an Islam and Muslims who are committed to progress, committed to development, who like peace and are moderate in their ways," he told CNN's Talk Asia.

| 16 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Shmuel Bar of the Institute for Policy and Strategy at the Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya in Israel has a fascinating, detailed piece in Policy Review (thanks to Ali Dashti) about what I have been insisting upon all along, in three books, seven monographs, and who knows how many articles: that Islamic terror is not simply an impulse to mayhem or a political response to Western power couched in religious terms. It is a fundamentally religious movement springing from a deeply held and amply attested understanding of Islamic religious principles.

All of Bar's piece is worth reading; here are some provocative points from his conclusion:

Taking into account the above, is it possible — within the bounds of Western democratic values — to implement a comprehensive strategy to combat Islamic terrorism at its ideological roots? First, such a strategy must be based on an acceptance of the fact that for the first time since the Crusades, Western civilization finds itself involved in a religious war; the conflict has been defined by the attacking side as such with the eschatological goal of the destruction of Western civilization. The goal of the West cannot be defense alone or military offense or democratization of the Middle East as a panacea. It must include a religious-ideological dimension: active pressure for religious reform in the Muslim world and pressure on the orthodox Islamic establishment in the West and the Middle East not only to disengage itself clearly from any justification of violence, but also to pit itself against the radical camp in a clear demarcation of boundaries.

Such disengagement cannot be accomplished by Western-style declarations of condemnation. It must include clear and binding legal rulings by religious authorities which contradict the axioms of the radical worldview and virtually “excommunicate” the radicals. In essence, the radical narrative, which promises paradise to those who perpetrate acts of terrorism, must be met by an equally legitimate religious force which guarantees hellfire for the same acts. Some elements of such rulings should be, inter alia:

• A call for renewal of ijtihad as the basis to reform Islamic dogmas and to relegate old dogmas to historic contexts.

• That there exists no state of jihad between Islam and the rest of the world (hence, jihad is not a personal duty).

• That the violation of the physical safety of a non-Muslim in a Muslim country is prohibited (haram).

• That suicide bombings are clear acts of suicide, and therefore, their perpetrators are condemned to eternal hellfire.

• That moral or financial support of acts of terrorism is also haram.

• That a legal ruling claiming jihad is a duty derived from the roots of Islam is a falsification of the roots of Islam, and therefore, those who make such statements have performed acts of heresy.

It is unlikely that the Muslim world will take these steps. This is not only because (as Bar points out) of the imperative of Islamic solidarity (cf. Sura 4:93 of the Qur'an) overrides other considerations, but also because the distinction he makes in this article between "radical" and "orthodox" Islam is problematic. While there are obviously millions of Muslims who are not and will never be radicals, the radicals energetically and persistently claim the mantle of orthodoxy, and by and large they are getting away with it. This is what must change, but the strong roots of the Islamic dogmas that Bar points out must be reformed will make that reform all the more difficult to accomplish.

| 37 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

June 5, 2004

story.adel.al.jpg
Al-Jubeir: Seeing Zionists everywhere

More paranoid Saudi fantasies, uncontradicted by American authorities. From MEMRI, with thanks to mussetassen:

The officials were asked by the media about comments made by Crown Prince Abdallah in reaction to the May 1, 2004 terrorist attack in Yunbu, Saudi Arabia, in which seven people were killed. On the day after the attack, Crown Prince Abdallah stated at a gathering of Saudi dignitaries that "Zionists" were to blame: "This is seduction. You all know who is behind it all. Zionism is behind it. It has become clear now. It has become clear to us. I don't say, I mean… It is not 100%, but 95% [certain] that the Zionist hands are behind what happened. But I tell you that you can be 100% sure that, Allah willing, this country will be victorious, whoever the faction that turns against it may be. But we are convinced that Zionism is behind everything. This has been established, I am not saying by 100%, but by 95%." [1]

Adel Al-Jubeir responded to questions about the statement by comparing American critics of Saudi Arabia to Al-Qa'ida terrorists, and E. Anthony Wayne of the U.S. State Department also did not criticize Crown Prince Abdallah's remarks. ...

On May 13, 2004, CNN's Wolf Blitzer questioned Saudi foreign Affairs Advisor Adel Al-Jubeir about Crown Prince Abdallah's statements:

Blitzer: "Your Crown Prince Abdallah, he made a very controversial statement, as you well know… He was accusing Zionists of that most recent terror attack in Riyadh. On the basis of what?"

Al-Jubeir: "I believe, Wolf, if you look at the context of it, the point that he was trying to make is that there are people in the United States who have been very harsh when it comes to Saudi Arabia, have called for regime change in Saudi Arabia, have called for the dismemberment of Saudi Arabia, and whose - the objectives that they have called for are the same objectives as those shared by the terrorists.

"Osama bin Laden wants to destroy the Saudi state. Osama bin Laden wants to destroy the Saudi government. And so you should understand these comments in that context, that those who are most critical of Saudi Arabia in a very hostile way in the United States, as well as in Israel, share the same objective as Osama bin Laden and those who committed these acts…"

Blitzer: "Is the crown prince, who's the effective leader of Saudi Arabia, equating Al-Qa'ida with Zionists?"

Al-Jubeir: "That's not what he was trying to say here. What he was trying to say is that the objectives of those people who have been most harsh toward Saudi Arabia are the same as the objectives of Osama bin Laden. It doesn't mean that they committed this crime."

Blitzer: "Because we listened closely to that tape and we had several Arab linguists listen precisely. And what he clearly said was that he believes 95% - not 100%, but 95% - that the people who undertook this most recent terror attack in Saudi Arabia was not Al-Qa'ida, but were Zionists."

Al-Jubeir: "… When you say behind them, it means supporting them intellectually. That doesn't mean financially. It doesn't mean that they put them up to it. It just means that they share the same objective…"

Blitzer: "… Do you want to issue any sort of apology for the comments of your boss, the Crown Prince Abdallah?"

Al-Jubeir: "Why apology? I was explaining it to you. There's no apology necessary."

Blitzer: "Because of the impression that he left that for that most recent terror attack he was blaming Zionists."

Al-Jubeir: "Because, Wolf, what happens with Saudi Arabia, unfortunately, after 9/11 is anything that Saudi Arabia does or says is perceived with a lot of criticism.

"It's sort of, we are guilty until proven innocent. It should be the other way around. And so nobody cuts us any slack. And every little thing is exaggerated. Every little thing is inflated. I can look at statements by American officials. I can look at statements by officials of other countries that are outrageous and that have not solicited apologies from them or from anyone else. But when it comes to us, we're always the ones who have to apologize. I don't see a reason to do this here."

| 23 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

megawati.jpg
Megawati

Indonesia's President Megawati Sukarnoputri has become the target of a fatwa forbidding votes for a female presidential candidate. (A fatwa is a religious decision, not necessarily a death sentence, as it is often understood by Western non-Muslims who know only the fatwa against Salman Rushdie.) From News24.com, with thanks to Ali Dashti:

"It was noted that the prohibition on women to assume positions of leadership was no longer a question still in dispute but already something that has been generally accepted among Muslim clerics," one of them, Anwar Iskandar, told Antara news agency.

Megawati's party won the 1999 parliamentary election. But Islamic parties in the legislature, which at the time chose presidents, blocked her bid for the leadership - partly on the grounds of her sex. ...

Koran Tempo in an editorial criticised the edict. "Not only does such a fatwa have no weight but the public can also consider it cheap," the paper said.

It will be interesting to see whether the vote goes with the clerics or with the perspective of Koran Tempo.

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Nacera.jpeg
Nacera Saoudi (BBC)

In this BBC piece (thanks to nevermindlv), the fault lies not with Islamic terrorists, but with those who hunt them -- as the French Muslim Nacera Saoudi says:

"We feel as if we're being pointed out as the guilty ones - even we Muslim people living here in France feel as if we are somehow held responsible for the climate of insecurity which prevails in much of the West now," she tells me.

But then there's this:

And for moderate Muslims in France, Nacera admits, there is an added fear - that more fundamentalist forms of Islam are seeking a foothold here, and often finding it among younger Muslims in the smaller mosques.

"Ten or 15 years ago, we were living a peaceful form of Islam in France, and all of a sudden foreign influences came in and are changing things. Imams are coming from Afghanistan or Pakistan, going in to the little mosques in Marseilles, preaching another Islam, an Islam we didn't know before," she says.

She has stopped going to the mosque where she used to worship, because of what she saw as the radical message being preached there. But Nacera says that most Muslims in France want and try to integrate, and it is only a tiny minority which is listening to that new, often anti-Western message.

Well, all right. Then why doesn't the Vast Majority rise up and cast out, and turn in to the police, the Tiny Minority? If it's really a tiny minority, how did it get control of her mosque and others? If she is really moderate and really loves France, is it really enough just to stop going there? Wouldn't it be a sign of her true loyalties and good will to alert French authorities to what is going on there, instead of doing nothing but complain about those very anti-terror efforts? Even granting that French anti-terror efforts are excessive and scapegoat innocent Muslims, it would seem that she would have an opportunity to carve out a third way and demonstrate the French allegiance of this alleged vast majority of moderates. But it ain't happening.

| 19 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

BushBerlusconi.jpeg
Bush with Berlusconi (AP)

That it is, but does he really know who the enemy is? Does he really understand the sources of Islamic radicalism? Does he know why democracy is not being welcomed enthusiastically in Iraq? I appreciate the President's refreshingly strong stand against terrorism, but I think as a nation we still have not gotten to the heart of the matter.

From AP:

ROME - President Bush is appealing to a new generation of Europeans and Americans to pull together on Iraq and said Saturday that the war against terror "is the challenge of our time."

The president spoke at a joint news conference with Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, one of his strongest allies in Iraq. Yet, Bush's itinerary in Italy — and later in France — represented a fresh reminder of the divisions on this side of the Atlantic.

Bush brushed off big demonstrations in Rome against his visit. "Democracy's a beautiful thing," he said. " I am pleased to be in a country where people are allowed to express their opinion. I believe the world understands the importance of a free Iraq emerging in the Middle East."

Acknowledging differences among allies over the war, Bush said, "Now the world understands the importance of working with Iraqis" to encourage the development of a free society.

| 142 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Al-Haramain is active in Holland. From Expatica, with thanks to Nicolei:

AMSTERDAM — The Dutch government faces questions on why it did not act earlier against a Muslim charity which has been accused of supporting terrorism.

On Wednesday, US and Saudi Arabian officials announced a joint crackdown on Muslim charities they accuse of aiding Islamic terrorists.

One of the groups singled out, al-Haramain, is active in the Netherlands, Afghanistan, Albania, Bangladesh and Ethiopia. The US media has reported that al-Haramain is suspected of supporting terrorism, newspaper De Telegraaf reported.



Perhaps it is because religion and politics are entwined in jihad ideology.

Al-Haramain shares a postal address in Amsterdam with the El Tawheed mosque.

The mosque has been at the centre of a controversy for some time and Shershaby has been accused of preaching hate against the west and claiming non-Muslims will burn in hell.

There was a media storm in April this year when it was reported the mosque was selling books advocating female circumcision and husbands beating their wives.

Mosque board member Farid Zaari has confirmed a member of the El Tawheed board is also a spokesperson for the charity al-Haramain. The building of the mosque was partly funded by a loan from the charity.

| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

June 4, 2004

Powell.jpeg
Has he forgotten Khomeini?

Fallujah has instituted Sharia in its pure form. Does this surprise anyone? Disappointing, but not really surprising, is Powell's remark, which contradicts earlier ones from Rumsfeld. From WND, with thanks to EPG:

The comparison to Afghanistan under the Taliban is not coincidental.

Many of the clerics who have taken over Fallujah either studied in Afghanistan or Saudi Arabia or were urged to adopt the Taliban example.

As a result, women must cover their hair and faces. If they don't, they are beaten in the streets. Naturally, beauty parlors have been shut down.

Men have been ordered to grow beards and barbers have been warned not to shave customers. Indeed, the barbers have been given strict guidelines on what kinds of haircuts are permissible.

Those selling or imbibing alcohol are now flirting with death. Already, several dealers have been flogged naked in the streets of Fallujah in full view of passersby. A man found drunk in Fallujah was also beaten to a pulp. ...

Last month, Secretary of State Colin Powell said the United States would not object to an Iraqi theocracy.

| 177 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

You may recall that the Jordanian Parliament declined on Islamic grounds to stiffen penalties for honor killings. From the Jordan Times, with thanks to EPG:

AMMAN — A 25-year-old woman was shot and killed on Wednesday, reportedly by her cousin, while recovering in hospital after a Caesarean delivery, official sources said.

The victim received six gunshot wounds on different parts of her body, allegedly by her enraged cousin, who turned himself in to the authorities shortly after the incident.

The victim, who delivered a baby boy, died instantly after the bullets penetrated her heart, lung and stomach, according to medical sources.

The 36-year-old suspect told the authorities he killed his cousin to “cleanse his family's honour,” the source told The Jordan Times.

The victim reportedly was involved with a married man for almost a year and became pregnant, the source explained.

She was admitted to hospital on Monday for delivery, the source added.

Her cousins learnt of her illegitimate pregnancy and decided to kill her, according to the source. ...

The victim became the third person to be killed in the Kingdom this week in a so-called honour crime. She is reportedly the ninth person in Jordan this year to be killed in a murder related to family honour, according to official figures.

| 18 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

A question of loyalty. From AP, with thanks to Nicolei:

BANGKOK: A ruling party lawmaker surrendered to police yesterday to face treason charges in connection with a deadly raid on a military arsenal in January that marked a resurgence of separatist violence in Thailand's Muslim south.

The charges against Muslim lawmaker Najamudeen Umar, which he denies, have deeply embarrassed the government of Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra.

Thaksin, who recently said he was perplexed by what's happening in the south, has not defended the lawmaker.

Najamudeen went by car yesterday to a police facility here along with four parliamentary colleagues from his Thai Rak Thai party and presented himself for arrest to the deputy national police chief, Lt-Gen Kovit Wattana.

Najamudeen was charged on March 23 with treason for alleged involvement in the daring guerilla raid on an army camp in the southern province of Narathiwat on Jan 4, in which four soldiers were killed and hundreds of guns stolen.

| 10 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Oil jihad. Yet if the US were really only interested in the Middle East to gain control of its oil fields, American forces could have kept Kuwait's in the early 1990s. Instead, they returned them to Kuwaiti control.

From Reuters, with thanks to Nicolei:

DUBAI (Reuters) - Al Qaeda's top leader in Saudi Arabia has praised a recent series of militant attacks in the kingdom which helped send oil prices to record highs on fears of instability.

The statement, issued by Abdulaziz al-Muqrin on an Islamist Web site, called on Saudis to support the militants' campaign against the U.S.-allied Saudi monarchy and accused the government of lying about details of the attacks.

"The operation in Khobar was a new victory which God bestowed upon the mujahideen and which put the Saudi government in a deep crisis," it said.

"It took the oil price to its highest levels of over $42, while Saudi Arabia is committed to America's prosperity by providing oil at the cheapest prices."

| 23 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Yet for some reason the Islamic states involved want no help from the US. From AP, with thanks to EPG:

SINGAPORE - Fears are growing of terrorism in the Malacca Straits, the pirate-ridden Southeast Asian waterway that is a conduit for half the world's oil supply.

Despite those concerns, the Muslim nations of Indonesia and Malaysia have rebuffed U.S. offers to help police the strategic route. Part of the agenda when Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld meets Asian officials Friday and Saturday will be Pentagon proposals to help provide intelligence, conduct joint patrols and send U.S. Marines into the straits.

The United States and Singapore believe the 50,000 commercial vessels - from cruise ships to supertankers - that travel through the straits each year are vulnerable targets for al-Qaida and its South Asian affiliates.

The narrow, 550-mile-long waterway straddling Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore has been a pirates' paradise since the 1800s. Piracy worldwide has tripled in the past decade, rising by 20 percent last year alone, said the U.N. International Maritime Bureau. It counted 189 incidents in Southeast Asia, more than 40 percent of the 2003 total.

"There is a fear that terrorists could resort to pirate-style tactics, or even work in concert with pirates," the maritime bureau's Secretary-General Efthimios Mitropoulos said.

"An uptrend in crew abductions could signal a move by terrorists to train themselves in operating and navigating large commercial vessels," he added during a late-May visit to Singapore.

| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

A feast for the conspiracy-minded, from NewKerala.com (thanks to Nicolei):

The NWFP unit of Pakistan's Islamic regilious coalition, the Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal (MMA), has squarely accused the United States for plotting the murder of Mufti Nizamuddin Shamzai, an Islamic scholar.

The venerated scholar was killed in Karachi earlier this week, though it is not actually known how.

"Eliminating Islamic scholars and intellectuals in the Muslim world is part of an American strategy to purge the world of the sources of hatred against global tyranny. The US killed Mufti Nizamuddin Shamzai for the same reason," The News quoted Mufti Kifayatullah, the secretary (information) of the MMA unit, as saying.

| 27 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

ElBaradei.jpeg
Mohammed El Baradei (IslamOnline photo)

As the Iran mullahocracy presses forward with its nuclear program, the IAEA is swinging into action ... against Israel. From the World Tribune, with thanks to Jeff, who notes that this is "a) the result of a concerted effort by Iran to shift focus away from its own nuclear program and broken promises to the IAEA and b) indicative of the moral relativism of the Arabs and Europeans which fails to draw a distinction between nukes in the hands of a Western, democratic state versus the hands of the terror states (like Iran)."

JERUSALEM – The International Atomic Energy Agency plans a campaign to force Israel to permit international inspections of its Dimona nuclear facility.

The agency has been under longterm pressure from the European Union, Arab states and Iran to focus more attention on Israel's nuclear program.

Several Arab countries reiterated their call for a nuclear free zone in the Middle East during a United Nations sponsored disarmament conference in Geneva on May 27. Arab envoys said the establishment of such a zone would be their priority over the coming year.

IAEA director-general Mohammed El Baradei plans to visit Israel over the next two months, officials said. The visit was expected to take place following the IAEA board of directors's meeting in mid-June to discuss Iranian compliance with international nuclear inspection efforts. The United States has charged that Teheran has violated its pledge to the IAEA.

I'm glad at least someone has noticed.

| 14 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

June 3, 2004

Jihad in Japan. From Reuters, with thanks to Nicolei:

TOKYO (Reuters) - Japanese police acting on suspicions al Qaeda may have set up a network in Japan arrested an eighth person on Thursday for violating immigration laws.

Six people were arrested last week as part of an investigation into the activities of Lionel Dumont, an Algerian-born French national suspected of being involved in delivering equipment and funds to al Qaeda while living in Japan.

The seventh was arrested late on Wednesday.

Media reports have said that Dumont, who was arrested in Germany last December, may have been trying to create a network of foreign contacts for al Qaeda.

Police said the latest arrests were of two Bangladeshis, one of whom had been employed by a man who was arrested last week.

One of those arrested last week is suspected of having links to an Islamic group in Pakistan seeking independence for Kashmir, a region claimed by both India and Pakistan, media reports said.

Of course, al-Qaeda has threatened Japan for sending troops to Iraq. To those who see conflicts as regional rather than ideological, Iraq has nothing to do with Kashmir. To the jihadis, each conflict- Afghanistan, Iraq, Israel, Kashmir- is but one battle in a single war.

The arrests have stirred calls in the media for tougher immigration controls and other steps to give authorities greater powers to prevent attacks.

Last Thursday, parliament passed a law toughening penalties on illegal aliens as part of an effort to deal with a rising number of crimes committed by foreigners.

Dumont, 33, lived in Niigata, northwest of Tokyo, with his German wife from July 2002 through September 2003 and traveled frequently between Japan, Malaysia and Germany, using the false passport, media reports have said.

He made some 45 bank deposits and withdrawals, each involving several hundred thousand yen (100,000 yen is about $900) in a one-month period after entering Japan in 2002, the reports said.

Dumont had been wanted by Interpol in connection with various incidents, including an attempted bomb attack against the Group of Seven summit in Lyon, France in June 1996. He was sentenced to life imprisonment by a French court in 2001 in his absence.

The man at the center of the investigation had an astonishing ability to blend in.

NIGITA (AP) To his neighbors, Lionel Dumont was a mystery. When police and immigration officials asked about the Frenchman, Dumont's landlord had no idea who he was, even though the landlord lived right across the street and had only 36 tenants in his apartment building.

"They showed me a black-and-white picture and asked if I remembered him," Jubei Sato said. "I couldn't place him at all. I don't think I saw him once the whole three months he lived here. He blended right in, never caused any trouble. But I found out after he left that he'd only paid half his rent."

| 80 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Another Muslim "charity" in hot water. We'll see just how "transparent" the new organization will be, but I don't tend to put much stock in what Al-Jubeir says. From Reuters, with thanks to Nicolei:

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Saudi Arabia on Wednesday said it was dissolving a Riyadh-based charity suspected of funding al Qaeda and will fold its assets into a new group that will channel all Saudi charitable contributions abroad.

In addition to winding down the Riyadh-based Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, Saudi and U.S. officials said they would seek to block the assets of its local branches in Afghanistan, Albania, Bangladesh, Ethiopia and the Netherlands.

The steps are designed to ensure Saudi charitable funds, which U.S. officials have long believed have helped to fund "terrorist" groups, do not get into the hands of militants.

Saudi Arabia has long practiced appeasement with terrorist groups but attacks within Saudi Arabia itself may shake up that unofficial policy.

U.S. and Saudi officials said the new entity -- the Saudi National Commission for Relief and Charity Work Abroad -- would help keep charitable donations out of the wrong hands.

"We do this in order to ensure that the charity of our citizens goes to those who need it and that we know where funds go when they leave Saudi Arabia," Adel Al-Jubeir, an adviser to Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah, said at a news conference.

Jubeir said the new entity would operate with transparency and provide quarterly reports on how funds are spent. ...

Jubeir said at its peak Al-Haramain raised $40 million to $50 million a year and he roughly estimated the new entity that will funnel all Saudi charity abroad could raise $100 million a year, spiking higher when there are natural disasters.

To block their assets, Washington added the Al-Haramain affiliates in Afghanistan, Albania, Bangladesh, Ethiopia and the Netherlands to its list of people or groups believed to have committed, threatened or supported "terrorism."

| 11 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The fearless Muslim women of West Virginia, from whom we have heard positive things in the past, are standing up for their rights. While the mistreatment of Muslim women is distinct from the mistreatment of non-Muslim dhimmis in Islamic law, this is a positive example of the Sharia being confronted by universal ideas of human rights -- a welcome development for dhimmis and prospective dhimmis everywhere. From IANS:

Seven prominent Muslim women in the US are launching a national organisation and campaign in Morristown, West Virginia, Friday to ensure that women are not deprived of the right to pray inside mosques.

The group is first holding a conference titled 'The Daughters of Hajar: A New Generation of American Muslim Women Speak,' sponsored by the West Virginia University Centre for Women's Studies. ...

They will then walk peacefully to a local mosque, enter through the front door and pray in the main hall, the organisers said.

"This conference of Muslim women will have a historic impact and help us re-script the current history and face of Islam," said Amina Wadud, professor of Islamic studies at Virginia Commonwealth University.

Hajar, known as Hagar in the Bible, was the historical mother of Islam and a symbol of a woman's strength, the organisers said.

"The Daughters of Hajar is bravely tackling traditions and taboos that deny women rights that Islam gives them," Sajida Nomani, one of seven the organisers, said.

"Their work will make the world a better place," said Nomani, a retired entrepreneur and president of rights group Morgantown Muslims and Friends.

The other participants are activist-poet Nabeelah Abdul-Ghafur, author Saleemah Abdul-Ghafur, novelist Samina Ali, author-activist Sarah Eltantawi, Arkansas professor Mohja Kahf and author-journalist Asra Q. Nomani.

Six months ago, Morgantown became a powerful symbol of Muslim women's rights in the US when Sajida Naomi and other women walked through the front door of the local mosque.

They prayed in the main hall of the mosque, saying they were reclaiming the rights Islam gave women in the 7th century.

Mosque leaders had asked the women to enter through a back door and pray in a balcony - a position that was subsequently reversed by the board.

| 28 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

He's a Muslim missionary, at least according to most people. The usual denials are even broader in this story: one includes a claim that he isn't even a missionary. And of course it's an uncomfortable fact; why would someone who presumably studies the Qur'an assiduously become a terrorist? Why indeed? No satisfactory answer has ever been forthcoming from self-proclaimed moderate Muslims. From Reuters, with thanks to Nicolei:

MANILA: Philippine authorities have arrested an Arab missionary who is suspected of being a member of Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda network in the southern island of Mindanao, military officials said yesterday.

The man, Hassan al-Bakre, 55, was detained by teams of immigration and security officials on suspicion of providing funds to Muslim rebels, said Major-General Emmanuel Teodosio.

He's just teaching the basics:

The military said Hassan had made trips to Camp Omar, a rebel enclave in the Mindanao region, three months ago where he taught Arabic, Islamic studies and bomb-making.

“Based on his own accounts, more than 500 students completed the courses he had supervised,” a senior navy official, who declined to be identified, told reporters.

He said Hassan had identified five Egyptian and seven Indonesian instructors at the MILF camp.

But a rebel spokesman said Hassan was a fisherman who had lived in the area for a long time and was married to a Philippine Muslim woman.

“We have nothing to do with him,” said the spokesman, Eid Kabalu. “He's not even a missionary.”

“He's not a terrorist,” said Eid. “He's a simple-living man. People there know him to be a fisherman, not a bomb-maker.”

| 34 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

From UPI, with thanks to Twostellas:

As France prepares for the D-Day anniversary, the French Defense Ministry said Tuesday that the Vigipirate plan terror alert has been raised.

The terror alert was raised to the red level as France prepares for the 60th anniversary of the D-Day landings in Normandy on June 6, reported Xinhua, China's main government-run news agency.

But code red isn't the highest level. The highest level is scarlet.

| 48 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Internet jihadist charged in Australia. From AAP, with thanks to Nicolei:

Sydney man Bilal Khazal was charged today over terrorism activities. He was later granted bail during a brief court appearance.

Australian Federal Police (AFP) said the 34-year-old, who allegedly published documents inciting terrorism on the internet, was charged with one count of collecting or making documents likely to facilitate terrorist acts.

Check out the court reporter's drawing accompanying the article.

It is alleged that among the documents was a book called Provisions In The Rules of Jihad - Short Wise Rules and Organisational Instructions Which Is The Concern of Every Fighter and Mujahid Against the Infidels.

Khazal allegedly compiled the book and then posted the material on the internet in late 2003.

Its publication was an offence under commonwealth law, the AFP said.

| 15 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

ayaan-hirshi.jpg
Ayaan Hirsi Ali

A bit of anti-dhimmitude from the magnificently courageous Dutch ex-Muslim Ayaan Hirsi Ali as she confronts a mujahid. English translation from Faithfreedom.org of this Dutch story, with thanks to Ali Dashti:

Ayaan Hirsi Ali [*], a Liberal Party member in the Dutch parliament put a knife in the hands of a young man who said she should be killed. The liberal politician handed him the weapon saying “if you want to see me dead, you should do it yourself”. Hirsi Ali writes about the event in her column for Algemeen Dagblad [a daily Dutch newspaper].

She describes how last Thursday in a bar in The Hague she was tapped on the shoulder and addressed by man of around 24 years that said: “Miss, I really hope with all my heart that the Mujahedeen will get you and kill you.” Confronted with this Hirsi Ali picked up a knife and gave it to the man. The man’s startled reaction was that he didn’t want to do it because he was afraid to go to jail.

After a discussion the man who spoke with a southern accent [soft spoken ‘g’] apologized for his actions. He said his name was S. and that he came from Tilburg. The liberal politician suspects it is a recently converted Dutchman to Islam because of his dark blonder hair. ...

[*] Ayaan Hirsi Ali is a Dutch politician of Somali origin who left the Social Democrats for the Liberal Party to fight for the emancipation of Muslim women in Holland. She one’s called the Mahomet ‘a thug, a pedophile and a dictator according to modern standards.’

| 24 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This article makes reference to the beheading of an Italian hostage in April -- more confirmation that this is an accepted pattern of behavior among the mujahedin. From CNN, with thanks to RAdams:

BAGHDAD , Iraq -- The Arabic-language television network Al-Jazeera showed video Wednesday of three Italian hostages taken captive in Iraq nearly two months ago. In the video, one of the men said the captors were treating them "excellently."

It marked the first time in more than a month the world has seen pictures of the hostages.

The three, all unshaven, were shown sitting around a table eating with spoons from a communal plate and talking among themselves. Another shot showed the three sitting in chairs. One identified himself as Salvatore Stefio.

"Today is May 31, 2004, Monday," he said on the video. "This statement we are giving is primarily directed to official Italian authorities, to the government, the holy pope, to the Catholic Church and to our families. They are treating us excellently up until now. We are in excellent conditions. We have not had any problems with the people holding us in this place."

The three hostages were among four Italians taken captive in Iraq on April 12. The other hostage was beheaded soon afterward -- a video that was given to Al-Jazeera at the time but never aired.

| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

From Reuters, with thanks to Nicolei:

RIYADH (Reuters) - Suspected militants shot at U.S. military personnel in Saudi Arabia on Wednesday, adding to fears over stability that have sent oil prices to record highs since 22 people, mostly foreigners, were killed in an al Qaeda attack.

Saudi Arabia continues to reap what it has sown.

| 81 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

From AP, with thanks to LGF:

Alexandria, Va. (AP) - Federal agents have raided the Alexandria headquarters of a Saudi-based charity founded by a nephew of Osama bin Laden.

Don't leap to conclusions; the charity insists it is all about immigration.

The charity strongly denies any terrorist ties and says the government had told them the probe is focused only on "immigration issues." The group acknowledged that bin Laden's nephew, Abdullah bin Laden, was involved in forming its branch in Northern Virginia, it says people shouldn't assume that means it has any terrorist connections.
| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

pals-un-ambulance-lg.jpeg
(Photo via LGF)

The UN and Red Cross seem to be allowing Muslim terrorists to use their ambulances. From Michelle Malkin at Town Hall via FrontPage, with thanks to Cathy J. Palmer:

Last week, an Israeli television station aired footage of armed Arab terrorists in southern Gaza using an ambulance owned and operated by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA). Palestinian gunmen used the UNRWA emergency vehicle as getaway transportation after murdering six Israeli soldiers in Gaza City on May 11. The footage shows two ambulances with flashing lights pull onto a street. Shots and shouts ring out during the nighttime raid. A gang of militants piles into one of the supposedly neutral ambulances, clearly marked "UN" with the agency's blue flag flying from the roof, which then speeds away from the scene.

AccessMiddleEast.org, a nonprofit global news monitoring service, posted the video (shot by a Reuters TV cameraman) on its Web site last week. To date, Access Middle East managing director Richard Bardenstein in Israel informs me, not a single U.S. television news station has expressed interest in showing the footage to American viewers.

Why should we care? Because since 1950, the U.S. has provided UNRWA with $2.5 billion in taxpayer subsidies -- about one-third of the relief agency's total budget. And because instead of investigating this latest black eye-inducing scandal, the U.N. is blasting American troops for defending themselves against such outrageous tactics -- now being emulated by Iraqi guerrilla warriors sniping at our men and women from ambulances in Fallujah. ...

While jihadists gain shelter in its emergency vehicles, the UN continues to lambaste the U.S. for assorted wartime "atrocities." Not one more American dime should go to fund the bloody self-righteousness of the world's most generous terrorist relief organization.

| 40 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Jonathan Dowd-Gailey on the Muslim Students Association in the Middle East Quarterly, via FrontPage (thanks to EPG):

Extreme Friends In 2002, when the number of anti-Semitic attacks in Europe hit a twelve-year high, French Jewish leader Roger Cukierman observed a peculiar phenomenon on the European street -a loose fusing of extreme Left, Right, and Muslim political forces-what Cukierman terms the "brown-green-red alliance."[24] The three disparate constituencies have incompatible ideologies, but all three have a shared hatred for the pluralized world order, globalized market economies, U.S. preponderance, and the state of Israel. Cukierman has observed these forces forming an alliance of convenience in the post-9/11 world with potentially dangerous results.

The same pattern is also emerging in the United States with groups of the extreme Left forging bonds with specific Muslim organizations, and here again we find the MSA figures prominently. Given the MSA's propensity for radical politics in a campus environment, it is no surprise that it has become arguably the Muslim organization most enmeshed with American leftists. Consider the following:

· Perhaps as a reward for its total opposition to every U.S. policy since the September 2001 attacks, the MSA has been given a seat on the steering committee for International ANSWER (Act Now to Stop War and End Racism). ANSWER is an organization dedicated to defending rogue states and fighting "U.S. imperialism," and has been distinguished by its ability to organize the largest peace demonstrations in North America. ANSWER was formed by International Action Center, a communist organization that supports Stalinist regimes worldwide, including North Korea and Hussein's Iraq. [25]

· In its aggressive protest activities against recent Middle East wars, the MSA has developed strong working ties with numerous activist groups of the extreme Left. Among them: Free Palestine Alliance, Nicaragua Network, Kensington Welfare Rights Union, Mexico Solidarity Network, Korea Truth Commission, Young Communist League, Young Peoples' Socialist League, and Black Radical Congress.

As these examples suggest, the MSA boasts institutional ties with a host of radical issue-specific activist groups, all of them vehemently opposed to U.S. policy, and many of them openly anti-American.

The Center for Security Policy's Alex Alexiev argues, "The majority of Muslim Student Associations at U.S. colleges are dominated by Islamist and anti-American agendas, as are most of the numerous Islamic centers and schools financed by the Saudis. Intolerance and outright rejection of American values and democratic ideals are often taught also in the growing number of Deobandi schools that are frequently subsidized by the Saudis."[26]

Read the whole thing.

| 44 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Secret plans to stop the spread of extremism among young Muslims. Do they include ways to counter the radicals' interpretation of the Qur'an and Sunnah? I doubt it: Western societies have trouble even admitting that the radicals use the Qur'an and Sunnah in the first place. From The Telegraph, with thanks to Filtrat:

Downing Street has drawn up secret plans to prevent the spread of extremism among young Muslims after confidential studies found that there are up to 10,000 "active" supporters of al-Qa'eda in Britain.

Reports commissioned by the Government, details of which were leaked to The Sunday Times, found that many young Muslims are recruited from among the poor and jobless, who are regarded by al-Qa'eda chiefs as more susceptible to exploitation.

According to a Whitehall audit, Muslims are three times more likely to be jobless than the average member of the population.

The studies also cite evidence from MI5 that al-Qa'eda is seeking out middle-class recruits in universities. There are also recruitment operations in schools.

In March Sir Andrew Turnbull, the Cabinet Secretary, initiated a strategy to try to establish the roots of discontent among young Muslims.

Dozens of Whitehall officials have been ordered to work on how to improve relations with the Muslim community and to encourage Muslim clerics to adopt moderate views.

Radical imams will be thoroughly vetted and, if they do not agree to comply with the Government's demands, will be barred.

| 20 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

A message from a radical Muslim website, from the SITE Institute ():

To the Mujahideen: Why aren’t we seeing any Jihadi activity in Qatar and Kuwait and Bahrain?

This message is addressed to the brothers who chose the path of Jihad to liberate the Nation:

“Why are we witnessing Jihadi activities in Saudi Arabia alone? More than any other country, Saudi applies the Shari’a [Islamic Law], which you claim is your ultimate goal. There are no bars in Saudi, no liquor, and no blending!!!

Why do we see you act only in Saudi when other neighboring countries such as Qatar, Kuwait and Bahrain are harboring the American Crusader Army?

They are talking the terrorist's language.

| 15 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Alia Hogben is president of the Canadian Council of Muslim Women and author of this courageous piece speaking out against Sharia tribunals in Canada. Thanks to the many who sent this to me from the Toronto Star:

The Canadian Council of Muslim Women is in a difficult position, as we speak out against our own government and some of our fellow Muslims, regarding the proposed application of Sharia/Muslim family law in Canada.

As citizens of Canada, we believe that the laws of the land must protect us, treat us equally and be applied to all of us, irrespective of our ethnicity, race, gender or religion.

We know that any benefits for women in Muslim family law also exist in Canadian family law, plus greater protection of other rights. For example, the ability to have a pre-nuptial agreement, no polygamy, laws against violence, and fairer child custody than in Muslim law.

The provincial Arbitration Act allows for the development of "sharia" tribunals outside the court system.

We want family matters to be dealt with under the Family Law Act and not the Arbitration Act.

Neither the government nor the proponents are being honest about the Arbitration Act.

It defines arbitration as a "private" matter without the safeguards of public scrutiny.

There are no principles underlying this act, no training requirements for arbitrators, no standards, no limits to their process, no legal representation is needed, no records need be kept and only the award goes to the court.

It has been repeated ad nauseam that the tribunals will adhere to the Charter, but we find no overseeing nor monitoring to ensure this. The woman would have to take a second legal step if she wants to challenge the binding arbitrated settlement.

Where's the protection of rights, where's the cost efficiency and where's the justice?

We fear that this discussion may increase anti-Muslim hostility, which, sadly, would be injurious for us as individuals and as a community. However, the issue is too important because it is about women's human rights and our treatment under the laws of Canada.

The confusing use of terminology (sharia, Islamic, Muslim) is hampering this discussion.

Sharia is an encompassing, value-laden term, and literally means the beaten path to the water, and metaphorically describes the way Muslims are to live.

It is far more profound than mere jurisprudence, (fiqh)or Muslim law.

The term "Islamic" connotes the teachings of the faith, while "Muslim" relates to matters of the believers. Muslim family law is the human interpretation, over centuries, of Islamic guidance and is not divinely ordained, as some would have us believe.

The proponents of these tribunals are deliberately using the term Sharia, knowing that this will silence discussion and give them "Islamic" legitimacy in the eyes of some believers. They play into the fears of us, newer Canadians, arguing that we need identity markers to remain Muslim. They are belittling the rights provided under Canadian laws and presenting an idealized version of Muslim law.

Based on research in different countries on the current application of Muslim family law, founded on a patriarchal model, the conclusion is that women's rights are adversely affected.

The Canadian Council of Muslim Women cannot be against sharia by definition; our concern is about the application of Muslim family law.

Unquestionably, 1,400 years ago Muslim women were given significant rights. However, it is misleading to think that these rights are adequate and that we should not have enhanced human rights under the Universal Declaration and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which we believe are congruent with the principles of Islam.

We appreciate that in our homelands many faced economic woes, authoritarian governments, lack of democracy and human rights, plus some western neo-colonialism. In reaction, some yearn for a recreation of the halcyon, glorious days of Muslim civilization and for an idealized legal system.

If Muslim countries want to apply Muslim law, we would support development of a legal system based on Islamic principles of compassion, social justice and equality of all individuals, coupled with a strong commitment to democratic values of citizenship. Many of their current laws are not in keeping with these principles.

In Canada, we can live fully as Muslims because of the values of fairness, social justice and acceptance of diversity. We should work with our fellow citizens when faced with injustices rather than segregating ourselves in fragmented communities.

However, on this issue, we, Muslim women, are being dealt with in a discriminatory and unjust manner by both our own government and by the proponents of sharia tribunals.

We appeal to our fellow Canadians to help us fight an act that not only fails to protect us but gives permission for us to be treated adversely.

| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

June 2, 2004

Is there any doubt that they would let in Yasser Arafat?

According to the Vancouver Sun:

A former PLO terrorist who was scheduled to speak against terrorism in Vancouver Monday was turned away by Canadian immigration officials as he tried to board a plane from California.

But organizers held the event anyway, arranging a live video link with Walid Shoebat, who spoke from his home in northern California.

"It's like he's here, but he's not here," said Gabriel Patrich, of the Israel Action Committee, one of the three Jewish and Christian groups that scrambled to the keep the event on track. Patrich said he was "very disappointed" by Canada's refusal to admit Shoebat. "This is against free speech. We thought our government would do the right thing. We look at it as if they're taking sides.

A press release from Shoebat's manager pointed out:

Shoebat has already visited Canada on three prior occasions in 2004 and spoken publicly at six different venues including universities and synagogues. Mr Shoebat has during his previous visits also shared his story and opinions to TV stations, major newspapers such Toronto Star, National Post, Calgary Sun, Montreal Gazette and many radio stations. Local Canadian Palestinian activists has branded him a "racist" and complained to both the Italian Cultural center in Vancouver and Canadian Border and Provincial police to block his entry. Mr. Shoebat was scheduled to speak before a gathering of the Jewish Federation of Vancouver on Monday 31st at the Italian Cultural Center in Vancouver. The Canadian government has invoked their anti terror legislation which states that known terrorists cannot enter Canada, even though Mr. Shoebat preaches for peace and reconciliation and loves the Jewish people, being a Palestinian. According to Shoebat's publicist/manager in the United States, Keith Davies: "Proud people who believe in democracy and fairness need to stand up and protest at the double standard of Canadian government officials and members of Parliament who shake the hand of Arafat and allow people who may not admit to be former or current terrorists, preach hatred to speak freely in Canada. Yet here the Canadian government denies Shoebat, a peacemaker, entry." The people of Canada and America need to protest vehemently at this wrong headed and prejudiced decision."

The Vancouver Sun reported that about 10 pro-Palestinian protestors were outside the presentation.

Shoebat, originally from Beit Sahour, outside of Bethlehem, has openly admitted his involvement in terrorist activities as a teenager. He said the purpose of his speeches is to "expose drug-pushers of the drug called hatred." Now -- a self-described "ex-drug addict" -- he says he denounces acts of terrorism in all forms.

Shoebat said "hatred for Jewish people was fed to him like milk" as a child through songs, art, school and religious studies. He was recruited by the PLO as a suicide bomber at the age of 16 and set out to bomb a home in Israel. Shoebat said he "abandoned mission" after he saw children playing nearby.

| 14 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us
WASHINGTON (AP) - Nabil al-Marabh was No. 27 on the FBI's list of terror suspects after Sept. 11. He trained in Afghanistan's militant camps, sent money to a roommate convicted in a foiled plot to bomb a hotel and boasted to an informant about plans to blow up a fuel truck inside a New York tunnel, FBI documents allege. The Bush administration set him free - to Syria - even though prosecutors had sought to bring criminal cases against him and judges openly expressed concerns about possible terrorist ties.

Al-Marabh served an eight-month jail sentence and was sent in January to his native Syria, which is regarded by the United States as a sponsor of terrorism.

You have to wonder what is behind this.

| 29 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

academy_bush.jpg

What about using the word "mission"? No, that won't work. The word has— you know— implications?

AIR FORCE ACADEMY, Colo. - (AP)President Bush deleted word "crusade" — considered an inflammatory reference by Muslims — on Wednesday as he recalled Gen. Dwight Eisenhower's message to allied troops before the D-Day invasion at Normandy, France, 60 years ago.

In a commencement address to Air Force graduates, Bush noted that he will be in France on Sunday to mark the anniversary of the World War II landing that led to the liberation of Europe.

"On this day in 1944, General Eisenhower sat down at his headquarters in the English countryside and wrote out a message to the troops who would soon invade Normandy," Bush said.

In that message, Eisenhower said: "Soldiers, sailors and airmen of the Allied Expeditionary Force! You are about to embark upon the Great Crusade, toward which we have striven these many months. The eyes of the world are upon you. The hopes and prayers of liberty-loving people everywhere march with you."

Bush quoted Eisenhower's greeting, omitted the next sentence with the words "Great Crusade" and picked up with the line, "The eyes of the world are upon you."