June 2004 Archives

June 30, 2004

In Iran, Khadijeh Shahla Jahed, the temporary wife of soccer star Nasser Mohammad Khani, is likely to be executed for murdering Khani's wife, Laleh Saharkhizan. This Telegraph story (thanks to jonascot) calls Khadija the "mistress" of Nasser, but way down in the story we discover that that is not quite what she was.

Temporary wife? That's right. In Islam Unveiled I discuss this phenomenon, which Shi'ites defend as founded upon the Qur'an and a command of Muhammad. Iranian men can enter into marriage with women for a specified period: a week, a month, or just a weekend or a single night. "Temporary wives" proliferate in holy cities where lonely seminarians congregate.

Many people assume that such legalized victimization of women is a relic of the distant past. In Iran, it lives.

After a one week closed trial, Khadijeh Shahla Jahed was found guilty of the premeditated stabbing of Laleh Saharkhizan, the wife of the former international player and top coach Nasser Mohammad Khani.

If the sentence - which was disclosed yesterday - is confirmed by the supreme court, she will be hanged. ...

Shahla Jahed had been his temporary wife, a practice approved of in the Islamic republic. Their temporary marital status meant that Khani escaped any charges of adultery.

In Shi'ite Islam, Muslim males can take temporary wives for periods ranging from a few hours to several decades.

| 11 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Israel is manipulating Ethiopia to steal water from the Nile!!! This story, which has about as much credibility as the claim that all the Jews who worked in the World Trade Center called in sick on September 11, 2001, is being spread by news services in Muslim countries. It seems that the dhimmis in Ethiopia have had the temerity to establish ties with Israel, thus earning the enduring ire of their Muslim neighbors. From Arutz Sheva, with thanks to Tziona:

Petros Olango, deputy speaker of the Ethiopian parliament, denied allegations against his country and Israel made in the Arabic and African press regarding a conspiracy to deprive Egypt and Sudan of Nile water.

According to articles that periodically appear in the Arabic and Muslim African press, Israel is pushing Ethiopia to construct dams along Nile tributaries in order to cut back on Nile water shared with Sudan and Egypt. Of late, the accusations were made after Ethiopian president Meles Zenawi signed taxation, cultural, educational and scientific cooperation agreements with Israel during a visit to the Jewish State earlier this month.

| 4 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

More trouble coming from Iran: two guards at the Iranian UN mission in New York have been sent out of the country. Question: how much more jihad activity is going on under cover of diplomatic immunity? From CNN, :

The two were seen taking still photos and video of New York City subways, buses and tunnels, and were expelled last weekend for conduct inconsistent with their official duties, the State Department said.

But an Iranian official said: "Like anybody who visits New York, they visit tourist sites -- sightseeing and videotaping themselves, looking at the Metropolitan Museum [of Art], places like that."

Adam Ereli, deputy spokesman at the State Department, said the guards were expelled after being observed by the FBI "videotaping various locations from New York deemed to be sensitive."

Ereli called the activity a "recurring problem, as this was the third time the United States has required the departure of Iranian security guards for videotaping and photographing landmarks in New York.

"In the case of the Iranian mission to the United Nations, it represented a unique pattern that raised concerns of law enforcement," he said.

| 24 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Members of air crews from three unidentified countries have turned up among the tiny minority of extremists in terrorist databases. From CNN, with thanks to US Action:

Nine of the 12 had associated with terrorists or supported terrorist organizations, two were using fraudulent passports and one had a criminal record for assaulting a U.S. law enforcement officer, according to Department of Homeland Security Undersecretary for Border and Transportation Asa Hutchinson. ...

Hutchinson said a similar check of 2.7 million truck drivers who were licensed to carry hazardous materials in the United States has not turned up anyone with clearly established ties to terrorism, but he said 29 "potential persons of interest" are undergoing additional checks by law enforcement.

One of the 29 has already been expelled from the U.S. for unrelated reasons.

| 7 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Friends, by this time tomorrow I hope to be back in sunny Secure Undisclosed Locationville, where, free at last of this laptop, I will do what I can to figure out some of the technical problems that many of you have sent to me. I am confident that the registration system will be working smoothly, without any hitches, soon. Thank you very much for your patience.

Also: over the last week (and before that, too) many of you have emailed me, sent me links, etc. I am traveling and have thus been unable to answer or acknowledge most of them; in fact, the sheer volume of email is impossible for me to keep up with. So I apologize here for not being able to answer each message, and thank you for your kindness and support.

| 7 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

June 29, 2004

Turkey, of course, is the only majority Muslim secular state. It lives in constant tension between resurgent political Islam and the principles of secularism. This story has interesting implications for France and Europe in general, where it is still taboo even to admit that Islam has a political aspect that may impinge upon the secular character of the established governments. But Turkey, for all its many faults, doesn't have that problem. Ataturk established the secular state as an explicit rejection of political Islam. They don't have to try simultaneously to deny that it exists and fend it off, the way the French seem to think they have to do. From the BBC, with thanks to JScott:

Turkish state universities have the right to ban Muslim headscarves, the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg has ruled.

It rejected an appeal by a Turkish student who said the ban - and her subsequent exclusion from class - violated her freedom of religion.

Turkey's government had argued that headscarves violated the secular nature of the state.

Correspondents say the decision could have implications for other countries.

| 3 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

This won't stop any of the American Muslim spokesmen and their allies from telling us that Islam respects non-Muslims and teaches tolerance, but it is more evidence that the reality is different, and that many Muslims today hold tenaciously to the sharp distinction between believers and unbelievers that runs through the Qur'an. From CNN:

The Arabic-language television network Al Jazeera reported earlier Tuesday a group led by Jordanian-born Islamic militant Abu Musab al-Zarqawi had freed the men contractors, who were kidnapped last week.

"For the sake of you, our brothers, and Muslims of the people of Turkey ... we will release these hostages and send them safely home," the statement said.

| 20 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Why do they hate us? Well, aside from the jihad imperative and the competition to Sharia hegemony that the US presents in Iraq and elsewhere, it doesn't help that they lie about us at the highest levels. This sort of thing keeps happening in Saudi Arabia, and here is a report from Iran. From MEMRI:

The editor of the Iranian conservative daily Kayhan, Hossein Shari'atmadari, who is close to Iranian Leader Ali Khamenei, wrote in an editorial that the true perpetrators of the decapitations of foreign hostages are none other than the Americans themselves. The following are excerpts from his article on June 24:

[...]

'Why Did Americans Slaughter Their Citizens and the Citizens of America's Allies?'

"Why did the Americans slaughter their citizens and the citizens of America's allies [so] horrifyingly and terribly...? [Why] do they construct ridiculous scenery and attribute the slaughter of the hostages to Muslims when their ugly and repulsive faces are exposed as a result of the crimes they committed and the massacre of innocent civilians and the barbaric tortures of the detainees and captives?

"The answer to this question is too clear for us to explain and analyze in depth... With these terrible crimes, the Americans aspire to attain the following goals:

1. "To present a hate-inspiring image of Islam and of the Muslims and to justify barbaric military attacks on them - that is, exactly the same goals as when they established the Taliban and the Al-Qa'ida group...

2. "To respond to public opinion, particularly that of the U.S. and England, which sees the invasion of Iraq as unjustified, aggressive, and entangling and demands that the occupiers leave Iraq. In this way, America seeks to justify the continuation of the occupation of Iraq and the attack on the rest of the Muslim peoples. America is doing it under the cover of a struggle against peoples - which, it claims, know no humanity and commit various types of crimes.

3. "Some of the countries that sent forces to Iraq, such as South Korea, are facing harsh protests by their peoples. By slaughtering hostages and attributing it to Muslims, America sows the seed of hatred and loathing of Muslims in the hearts of these peoples, and encourages their governments to continue cooperating with it.

4. "Among the Americans' main goals in organizing the ridiculous and certainly terrible performance of the slaughters is the distracting of public opinion from America's and England's barbaric crimes against the Abu Ghureib detainees."

III) Official Iranian TV Channel Claims Jews Were Involved in September 11th

MEMRI's TV Monitor Project (www.memritv.org) includes monitoring Iranian television stations such as Jaam-E-Jam 1, the Iranian government TV channel directed at Europe. On June 1, 2004, the station broadcasted a series about the September 11 terror attacks. The show included video clips of the O.J. Simpson murder case. The following an excerpt of the broadcast:

"Ever since the establishment of the Zionist regime, the American strategy has been under the Zionist lobby's influence. Zionism, as expressed in the Jewish Protocols, nurtures in its mind the dream of taking over the world. With Bush's rise to power, it controls the White House with greater force. ...

"A while afterwards, a source in American military intelligence raised details pertaining to an intelligence memo regarding Israel's espionage organization, the Mossad, and its role in the events of September 11. In fact, the claim that Israel was involved in the blasts of September 11 and used it as a basis of America's new strategy for fighting the world of Islam, disappeared in the media coverage, but world public opinion still believes this possibility."

| 64 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

June 28, 2004

Authorities aren't sure yet whether the video of the murder actually depicts Pfc. Matt Maupin, but in any case this just underscores the fact that the turnover of sovereignty in Iraq is not going to change a thing. The jihadists are fighting to establish an Islamic state, and they aren't going to be any more favorably disposed toward what they perceive as a U.S. client state than they have been toward the U.S. military presence there. That unrest will continue, and that the new Iraqi government will face fierce challenges and may not survive, are the only certainties in Iraq today.

| 13 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Some exceedingly important information on the Sami Al-Hussayen case from Michael P. Tremoglie at FrontPage. An activist judge running wild may be a more accurate picture of this case than the usual one of an innocent Muslim victimized by racism, etc.:

Al-Hussayen, a Saudi national, was charged with using the website of the Islamic Assembly of North America (IANA) to promote terrorism. Specifically, Al-Hussayen, was charged with two counts of conspiracy to support terrorism, one count of providing material support to terror groups and eleven counts of visa and immigration fraud.

Among the messages posted by Al-Hussayen to the websites were four fatwas - or religious edicts blessing suicide missions. One specifically mentioned a kamikaze type mission using an airplane. This was prior to 9-11.

According to US Attorney Kim Lindquist, as quoted in the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, the websites were "part of his passionate, religious commitment to violent jihad - not to legitimate violence, but to suicide operations and to terrorism."

His defense was that he was merely the moderator and not concerned with the content of the messages, only posting them. It is important to note that the founder of IANA, Bassem K. Khafagi, already pled guilty to bank fraud and visa fraud in relation to his activities with IANA, which is believed to be financing terrorist activities.

One juror, John Steger a retired U.S. Forest Service worker, who was interviewed afterwards provided some insight as to why Al-Hussayen was acquitted. He referred to Judge Lodge's instruction - that the Constitution protects speech even if it advocates the use of force or violation of the law unless imminent lawlessness occurs - as influencing his choice.

Steger said ninety-five percent of what Al-Hussayen posted was "innocent" and said the "inflammatory" articles did not lead to an "imminent act. ... According to the First Amendment, that is all right." When he was asked if it could lead to a terrorist act, he said, "I don't know."

There is much more about how judges and journalists jimmied this case. It's a story that is nothing less than shameful.

| 15 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

That quotation comes from an Islamic discussion board (thanks to Susan). I'm all for clearing up misconceptions, too, so here is a bit of the discussion:

:sl:

some muslims have the misconception that slavery is abolished. certainly if this was an evil thing that had no benefit the righteous caliphs would have been the first to annul it. slavery in Islam is not the same as the west's slave trade. it is the states handling of the dependants of the men (that we were at battle with) that died... captives of war.

this is what nasiruddin says:


QUOTE
Islamic history of the last centuries is depressing, but one positive thing is that most Muslim states have abolished slavery. (Prophet Muhammad (sallalahi wa salam) stated that releasing a slave is an excellently good deed, hence it must be also a very good and valuable deed to liberate all slaves and to prohibit all slavery.)

I do not change deen, because this is no subject of belief itself, it is a subject of politics, society structure and Islamic law and we Muslims are ordered by Allah (ta'ala) to enforce justice, hence we must seek to clear our society of injustices and slavery is an injustice.


i want to see how many other people have this view of slavery being evil? and dont forget that the prophet :saa: captured slaves.


whynot Posted: May 31 2004, 15:51

And from the responses:

If Allaah enables the Muslim mujahideen to defeat kaafir enemies in war, then the men may be killed, ransomed, set free without ransom or enslaved. The choice between these four options is to be made by the ruler, according to what he thinks is the best course.

With regard to the women, they become slaves and "those whom one's right hand possesses" (described as a "right hand servant" in the question). Male children also become slaves. The ruler shares out these slaves among the mujaahideen.

Shaykh al-Shanqeeti (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: The reason why a person may be taken as a slave is his being a kaafir and waging war against Allaah and His Messenger. If Allaah enables the Muslims who are striving and sacrificing their lives and their wealth and all that Allaah has given them to make the word of Allaah supreme over the kaafirs, then He allows them to enslave the kuffaar when they capture them, unless the ruler chooses to free them or to ransom them, if that serves the interests of the Muslims.

Adwa' al-Bayaan, 3/387

Islam limited the sources of slaves which existed before the mission of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) to just one source, namely slavery resulting from capturing prisoners from among the kuffaar.

Islam treated female slaves more kindly in their enslavement than other cultures did. Their honour was not considered to be permissible to anyone by way of prostitution, which was the fate of female prisoners of war in most cases. Rather Islam made them the property of their masters alone, and forbade anyone else to also have intercourse with them, even if that was his son. Islam made it their right to become free through a contract of manumission; it encouraged setting them free and promised reward for that. Islam made setting slaves free an obligation in the case of some kinds of expiation (kafaarah), such as the expiation for accidental killing, zihaar (a jaahili form of divorce in which a man said to his wife, "You are to me as my mother's back"), and breaking oaths. They received the best treatment from their masters, as was enjoined by the pure sharee'ah.

Secondly:

A mujaahid does not have to be married in order to gain possession of a "slave whom one's right hand possesses." None of the scholars expressed such a view.

Thirdly:

If a mujaahid takes possession of a female slave or male slave, it is permissible for him to sell them. In either case - whether one acquires a slave through battle or through purchase - it is not permissible for a man to have intercourse with a female slave until she has had a period from which it may be ascertained that she is not pregnant. If she is pregnant then he must wait until she gives birth.

It was narrated that Ruwayfi' ibn Thaabit al-Ansaari said: I heard the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) say on the day of Hunayn: "It is not permissible for any man who believes in Allaah and the Last Day to irrigate the crop of another else - meaning to have intercourse with a woman who is pregnant. And it is not permissible for a man who believes in Allaah and the Last Day to have intercourse with a captured woman until he has established that she is not pregnant. And it is not permissible for a man who believes in Allaah and the Last Day to sell any booty until it has been shared out."

Narrated by Abu Dawood, 2158; classed as hasan by Shaykh al-Albaani in Saheeh Abi Dawood, 1890.

For many reasons, including the fact that the Muslims have long since given up jihad, slavery is now very rare. This means that the Muslims must be extra cautious by examining any case in which it is claimed that someone is a slave, whether male or female.

For more information see question no. 26067

And Allaah knows best.

Given up jihad?

Then some question the notion:

I can understand the keeping the pow's, but i dont understand the ability of men to have concubines. It seems to go against everything ive learned about Islam. Its having illegal sexual relations w/ a woman. The woman is not your wife. I dont think i can ever understand this.

And some responses:

uh shayrob?
what is Islam? submission to God
how do you know what is forbiden and allowed in Islam? you look at the Koran and Sunnah to find out.

So if you have evidences stating concubines are hallal then where is the confusion?
how is sex with concubine ilegal if Allah has allowed it?

:sl:

Din: I understand that but i just want to understand why its allowed b/c it doesnt seem like there is any morality in it. Why is dating haram while having a concubine halal?



hey thats where you go wrong

What is good? whatever Allah says is good
What is bad? whatever Allah says is bad
What is immoral? whatever Allah says is immoral
your way of thinking makes me wonder on how excactly do you understand Islamic Aqeda?
this is an ayat of Koran:
"There are things which you like that are bad for you,
and there are things which you hate that are good for you,
You dont know but Allah knows best."
So stick to this ayat brother and dont say something is immoral when Allah has allowed it,
well you can say it if you want, but you see if you think Allah's law is immoral then gess what he is going to think about you and your sins? and where you should belong.
I dont want to be sarcastic or rude brother, i just want to make you understand this important thing.

There is much more. You will find the whole thread illuminating.

| 10 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

When asked about Crown Prince Abdullah's comments, Prince Turki al-Faisal just dug the hole deeper. From The Telegraph, with thanks to Teri:

In a television interview, to be broadcast today, Prince Turki al-Faisal is asked about comments made by Crown Prince Abdullah, Saudi Arabia's de facto leader, that "Zionist hands" have been behind the attacks.

The ambassador replies: "When you're under attack by people who come and kill your countrymen and visitors to your country, and you see at the same time an attack on the kingdom from the outside, from Zionist circles, it is natural to make a connection."

| 3 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

June 27, 2004

This AP story (thanks to James) chronicles some ugly anti-Muslim incidents that have occurred in the US since the beheading of Paul Marshall Johnson. If these reports are accurate -- people writing "Kill all Muslims" on mosque walls and that sort of thing -- they are deplorable and inexcusable: targeting innocent people is just the sort of thing the jihadists are despicable for doing, and it is not justified in any way.

However, buried deep in the article, as if it were just another anti-Muslim incident, is this. I have included a couple of the lead-in paragraphs to give you a sense of the context:

In the St. Louis suburb of Ballwin, Mo., vandals painted a swastika and the word "Die" on the wall of the Dar-Ul-Islam mosque.

In Texas, dead fish were dumped near the entrance sign to a mosque under construction in a suburb of Houston.

And in the Chicago suburb of Orland Park, residents urged officials this past week to reject a mosque's building application. A Baptist pastor told a public hearing he feared it would attract Islamic extremists and violence. The center was approved over boos and catcalls from the audience.

Now wait a minute. Swastikas and dead fish are suddenly equivalent to residents urging officials to reject a mosque's building application? When that Orland Park story broke, I asked here what assurance the local Muslims had given area non-Muslims that the mosque would NOT attract extremists. How can any mosque assure people that extremists will not enter and recruit there? What safeguards do American mosques have against Islamic radicalism?

If they would spell this out, answering such questions honestly and openly, they would do a great deal to dispel the suspicions and resentment of people who wonder where their loyalties really lie. And dhimmi articles like this one, which lump people with legitimate concerns in with real hatemongers and bigots, just fuel that resentment.

| 15 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Yesterday I had occasion to speak with several people who have no idea that jihad activity is still going on in the US. They never heard of the Lackawanna Al-Qaeda cell, or the Virginia paintball gang, or the Portland group, or any other. Nor were they ignorant or ill-informed -- far from it. But the mainstream media is simply not giving stories like these adequate attention, to the detriment of us all. How different would the average American's view of terrorism and the war on terror be if all the stories like this one were common knowledge? From the Boston Globe, with thanks to nevermindlv:

A former Boston cabdriver who allegedly admitted training in an Afghanistan terrorist camp was charged yesterday in federal court in Minnesota with lying to the FBI about helping a convicted terrorist get a Massachusetts driver's license.

Mohamad Kamal Elzahabi, 41, a Lebanese national, is charged with lying about providing support to Raed Hijazi in 1997 and 1998, when both were working as taxi drivers in Boston, according to a complaint and FBI affidavit unsealed yesterday in US District Court in Minnesota.

Hijazi was later convicted in Jordan of the failed millennium bombing plot that targeted American and Israeli tourists in that country.

The complaint also charges Elzahabi with lying to federal agents by denying he had shipped radios and other communications equipment to Pakistan between 1995 and 1997.

Elzahabi, who has been held in New York since his arrest in May, will be transferred to Minneapolis to face the two counts of making false statements to federal investigators.

| 18 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Dear friends,

I am writing this from far away from Secure Undisclosed Locationville -- so far away, in fact, that since Friday I have been unable to connect to the Internet. Hence the lack of updates. Also I now have such a backlog of work that there may not be many updates right away. My apologies. Jihad Watch will be back, better than ever, absolutely as soon as possible.

But I am pleased to announce that the comments system seems to be up and running. I am sure there are still a few bugs in the system, so I ask your patience. We will be working them out over the next few days. Just for fun, even though this is old news now, I am reopening the comments on the last few days of postings. So if you see something you would like to say something about -- here or at Dhimmi Watch -- have at it. I am opening the top posts on the main pages now.

Thanks again for all your patience and support.

Kindest regards,
Robert Spencer

| 15 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

June 25, 2004

Yeah, they're reforming, all right. Note the section entitled "Allah willing, the U.S. will collapse." It looks as if the double game the Saudis have been playing for years is still in full swing. From MEMRI:

As part of MEMRI's TV Monitoring Project, Saudi government controlled television channels including TV1, TV2 and satellite channels such as Iqraa TV, are continually monitored.(1) These channels include shows with leading Saudi religious figures, professors, members of the royal family, government leaders and intellectuals. Constant themes within Saudi television shows include: calls for the annihilation of Christians and Jews, rampant anti-Americanism and antisemitism, support for Jihad, incitement against U.S. troops in Iraq, and the coming Islamic conquest of the U.S. Segments from these TV shows can be found at www.memriTV.org. Saudi Religious Establishment 'Demonstrated that It is the Body Most Competent ... at De-Legitimizing Al Qa'ida's Cultist Ideology'

In a June 15 press release, the Saudi Ambassador to the United States, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, maintained that "senior religious scholars in Saudi Arabia have continually and unequivocally condemned terrorism. In our war against terrorism, these condemnations are a powerful weapon." In this statement, as well as in close to two dozen others by the Saudi embassy in Washington D.C. since the Riyadh bombings on March 12, 2003, the government of Saudi Arabia promoted the idea that the royal family and religious establishment have been espousing a message of tolerance. As Nail Al-Jubeir, director of the Saudi information office, said on May 6, 2004: "Our religious establishment has taught moderation to our people. The religious establishment has demonstrated that it is the body most competent and effective at de-legitimizing Al Qa'ida's cultist ideology."

In fact, on June 20, 2004, Saudi cleric Dr. Muhammad Bin Suleiman Al-Mani'i hosted a talk show on Saudi TV 1 and spoke out against killing Jews and Christians. Excerpts of his statements include: "Islamic law in general prohibits any Muslim from raising a weapon against any lover of peace - dhimmi (protected person), Jewish or Christian, a merchant, or anyone who enters (the country) on a work contract. Islamic law permits raising a weapon only against whomever aims a weapon at the Muslim in order to fight him."

While Al-Mani'i's statement against killing Jews and Christians is almost unprecedented within Saudi Arabia, he went on to explain that if non-Muslims are treated well by Muslims, they will eventually convert to Islam: "The Jewish, Christian, and Zoroastrian subjects had their autonomous rule under Islam, and at the same time these Muslim states, and the caliphs, preserved their rights, treated them well, maintained neighborly relations and dealt with them honestly and in good faith, treated their sick, granted them their rights, and called them to convert to Islam. Therefore, the Jewish, Christian, and other subjects converted to Islam."

Saudi Professor: Allah Permits Annihilating Christians and Jews

Sheik Dr. Ahmad Abd Al-Latif, a professor at Um Al-Qura University, was asked the following question on Saudi channel TV1 on May 24: "Some imams and preachers call for Allah to annihilate the Jews and those who help them, and the Christians and those who support them... Is it permitted according to Islamic law?" Professor Al-Latif responded: "What made them curse the Jews is that the Jews are oppressors... The same goes for the Christians, because of their cruel aggression against Islamic countries ... while the truth is that this is a crusading war whose goal is to harm Muslims. This is why a Muslim is allowed to curse the oppressors from among the Jews and Christians... Cursing the oppressing Jews and the oppressing and plundering Christians and the prayer that Allah will annihilate them is permitted."

Former Saudi Embassy Official on 'Big Explosion' Coming

Sheik Muhammad Al-Munajid, a disciple of one of Saudi Arabia's most revered religious leaders, Sheik 'Abd Al-'Aziz ibn 'Abdallah ibn Baaz, was identified in a report in the Washington Post on December 11, 2003, as running "a Web site that promotes intolerance of Christians and Jews and calls for holy war on Shiite Muslims," and was included as one of sixteen clerics associated with the Saudi embassy's Islamic Affairs Department who was stripped of diplomatic credentials.

Al-Munajid stated on Iqraa TV on April 15: "The issue is not one person, two, ten or a hundred going out with their guns to support their brothers. Defeating the infidels requires a much greater effort. It requires the mobilization of the nation. How can the nation be mobilized? I believe that the stupid acts of these Jews and Crusaders mobilize the nation. The big explosion will come! In spite of everything, it will happen!"

Much of Saudi TV is based upon religious programming. Many of these programs refer to the spread of Islam throughout the world and the battle against non-Muslims. On a May 20 episode of Iqraa TV's 'Mushkilat Min Al-Hayat' (Problems from Life), Saudi Sheik Abdallah Al-Muslih, chairman of the Commission on Scientific Signs in the Koran and Sunnah of the Muslim World League, used evidence from early Islam to support his claim that suicide bombings on enemy land are permitted according to Islamic law: "... Regarding a person who blows himself up, I know this issue is under disagreement among modern clerics and jurisprudents... There is nothing wrong with [martyrdom] if they cause great damage to the enemy. We can say that if it causes great damage to the enemy, this operation is a good thing. This is when we talk of Dar Al-Harb. But, if we speak of what happens in Muslim countries, such as Saudi Arabia ... this is forbidden, brothers! This is the land of the Muslims. We must never do this in a Muslim country."

Prominent Saudi Professor: Allah Willing, the U.S. Will Collapse

Supporting Jihad against U.S. troops in Iraq is the topic of many Saudi TV programs. On May 10, Dr. Yassin Al-Khatib, a professor of Islamic law at Um Al-Qura University, declared on the UAE's Al-Majd TV, which frequently has Saudi guests on it, that "the honor, blood, property and mostly the fact that they entered the country [i.e. Iraq] ... make it every Muslim's duty to go out against them, not only the Iraqis. This is every Muslim's duty. Jihad today has become an individual duty that applies to each and every Muslim. It is forbidden for a person to remain silent... When the Muslims fought in Afghanistan they destroyed the Soviet Union, which was a superpower. It collapsed and Allah willing, so will this [the U.S.] collapse."

The Coming Islamic Takeover of the U.S.

Saudis often discuss the issue of the U.S. becoming a Muslim state in the future. On a March 17 broadcast on Iqraa TV, Saudi preacher Sheik Said Al-Qahtani discussed this issue, as well as the cases in which Muslims are permitted to declare a defensive Jihad: "... We did not occupy the U.S., with 8 million Muslims, using bombings. Had we been patient, and let time take its course, instead of the 8 million, there could have been 80 million [Muslims] and 50 years later perhaps all the US would have become Muslim... What should a Muslim do if he is attacked in his country, on his land? In this case, there is no choice besides defense, self-sacrifice, and what religious scholars call - Defensive Jihad... We attacked their country, and this caused them to wake the dormant enmity in their hearts... Especially since there is global Zionism, the enemy of Islam, and Judaism, and fundamentalist Crusaders... They interpret this whole incident as only the beginning and thus there is no choice but a preemptive strike."

Al-Qahtani added on another Iqraa TV show on May 5: "Allah said, 'prepare against them all the force and horsemen that you can.' What for? In order to strike fear into their hearts... At the same time, [we should] establish strategies for the future, even if only for the short term, and prepare ... so that one of these days, even 100, 200, or 400 years from now, we will become a force that will be feared by the infidel states."

There is a lot more. Read it all. You may never get a clearer picture of what's really being said about us by our friend and ally.

| 6 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

This morning at Front Page there is a symposium on the Qur'an and anti-Semitism, featuring Islamic reform advocate Professor Khaleel Mohammed, the renowned scholar Bat Ye'or, and Jihad Watch director Robert Spencer. I think it is illuminating in several important ways. Read the whole thing; here are my closing remarks:

Spencer: I thank Professor Muhammad for his kind words, but some lingering questions remain. He says that my remarks are cogent and grants that there is a problem, but then says: "Yes, some imams do preach as Mr. Spencer said; but many others preach differently, and they are in the majority--as is well-known to the Muslim community." I must confess that I am confused as to how the "minuscule minority" of the professor's last remarks has now become a majority. Also I wonder why we do not see more of the fruits of this alleged majority in the words and actions of Muslims in the United States and around the world.


As for Saffiyah, all of Professor Muhammad's remarks are obviated by the fact that she was a convert to Islam. Her being called "al yahudiyya" was only an identifying mark, but the lack of a stigma was due to the fact that she was no longer a Jew but a Muslim. I expect that Professor Muhammad and I will disagree on this. As for Jesus, since he was a Jew with Jewish followers, his remarks do not have remotely the same force that Suras 2:62-65, 5:59-60, and 7:166 of the Qur'an do. The latter speak of "the Jews" collectively; whatever group of Jews was originally meant, most exegetes today take these passages to refer to all those who identify themselves as Jews nowadays. (Professor Muhammad seems to have granted that previously, although in this go-round he seems to be charging me with ascribing these views to the Qur'an when actually they come from tradition.

Allow me to remind him that I am not ascribing them to anything, but merely reporting on the exegetical habits that are currently dominant in the Islamic world.) But when the New Testament speaks of "the Jews," it is as one group of Jews speaking of another, and thus cannot be properly taken as a condemnation of the whole race. This understanding was significant in mitigating Christian anti-Semitism, particularly in the 20th century.

There is no such mitigating factor in the Qur'an: while an informed reading of the New Testament reveals the Jewish identity of most of the authors, and thus defangs any exegesis that would blame "the Jews" as an aggregate for the Crucifixion or anything else, the situation is different in the Qur'an. The distinction that the professor is trying to make by saying that only one group of Jews is meant in these Qur'anic passages is, whatever its merits as an exegetical argument, nowhere found in the Qur'anic text itself. This difference is something that Professor Muhammad, as a sincere reformer, must eventually acknowledge: no problem can be solved without a realistic prior appraisal of its nature and dimensions.

When Professor Muhammad says of me: "For him to say then that the Qur'an speaks of "the" Jew, as if referring to a monolithic group is wrong." Well, I never actually said that. But many Muslims do, and that is the problem. The fact that "the mosques have largely prevented" him from doing what he loves is an indication of how large this problem is. That seems to be still understated by the Professor, while he wildly overstates the dangers of the Christian "reconstructionist" movement that is supposedly "threatening all progress." I am confident that as he goes farther with his reform efforts, he will acknowledge this more clearly.


Finally, although I am sorry about Professor Muhammad's ungallant words for the groundbreaking, courageous, and brilliant scholar Bat Ye'or, I much appreciate this statement of his: "Mr Spencer's ideas can and ought to be taken seriously by Muslims and his voice should be sought further; I am prepared to promote this." I have been down so long it looks like up to me: every American Muslim spokesman I have encountered in the public forum, including leading figures of CAIR, ADC, MPAC, and other groups, have roundly mischaracterized my work and smeared me as a "hatemonger."

I am simply raising honest questions and concerns about Islam, and this response has been disheartening not only personally but for my appraisal of the prospects for the reform within Islam that is so urgently needed. If Professor Muhammad can get together a group of Muslims who would be willing to engage -- honestly, and without dissimulation -- my questions about jihad, terrorism, and related issues, I would be happy to work with him. As he says: "reform cannot occur when there are lies and disinformation about Islam." That statement is just as true when the lies and disinformation come from Muslims themselves.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

I know that if I get shot, the first thing I will want to know is who manufactured the bullets. From Reuters, with thanks to the many people who sent this along:

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Israeli-made bullets bought by the U.S. Army to plug a shortfall should be used for training only, not to fight Muslim guerrillas in Iraq and Afghanistan, U.S. lawmakers told Army generals on Thursday.

Since the Army has other stockpiled ammunition, "by no means, under any circumstances should a round (from Israel) be utilized," said Rep. Neil Abercrombie of Hawaii, the top Democrat on a House of Representatives Armed Services subcommittee with jurisdiction over land forces.

The Army contracted with Israel Military Industries Ltd. in December for $70 million in small-caliber ammunition.

The Israeli firm was one of only two worldwide that could meet U.S. technical specifications and delivery needs, said Brig. Gen. Paul Izzo, the Army's program executive officer for ammunition. The other was East Alton, Illinois-based Winchester Ammunition, which also received a $70 million contract.

Although the Army should not have to worry about "political correctness," Abercrombie was making a valid point about the propaganda pitfalls of using Israeli rounds in the U.S.-declared war on terror, said Rep. Curt Weldon, the Pennsylvania Republican who chairs the subcommittee on tactical air and land forces.

"There's a sensitivity that I think all of us recognize," Weldon told the Army witnesses, including Maj. Gen. Buford Blount, who led the U.S. Third Infantry Division that captured Baghdad in April 2003.

Oh yes, and this will alleviate it. The mujahedin will drop all their talk of this being a war against Islam, etc., if only we don't use those ... Zionist bullets.

| 8 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Comments, as you may have noticed, have been disabled for several days now, after some persistent and obnoxious attacks by a loathsome spammer or two. I was hoping they would be up and running by now, but it will be a little while longer. When they do return, registration will be required (including a valid email address). I am sure that will cut down on the activities of the loathesome spammer and his friends. Once again, apologies for the inconvenience, thank you for your patience, and be sure to keep coming to the site, as updates will continue when possible.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

June 24, 2004

This is only a test.

| 22 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

The real reason why the Iranians seized the British ships? According to London's Al-Sharq Al-Awsat, it was all an ingenious plan. From MEMRI (with thanks to Romy):

"A source close to the [Iranian] Revolutionary Guards told Al-Sharq Al-Awsat of the real reasons and factors in the apprehension of the three British Navy vessels and the arrest of the sailors by Iranian Coast Guard patrol forces on Monday [June 21, 2004]. He indicated that the British Army command in Iraq had understood the message sent them by the Iranian Revolutionary Guards command by their capture of the ships."

'Detention of 40 Volunteers for Suicide Operations Was Great Concern to the Revolutionary Guards'

"According to the source, the content of the message was very simple: 'Release our comrades, whom you are holding, and we will release your soldiers.' The source clarified that the detention of 40 volunteers for suicide operations by the Ukrainian forces acting in Iraq was of great concern to the Revolutionary Guards command, because they [the 40] constituted the first group of volunteers participating in the Organization for the Commemoration of the Shahids, which was established recently by Revolutionary Guards Commander Col. Dhu al-Qadr.

"Al-Sharq Al-Awsat was informed that one of the senior leaders of the Revolutionary Guards, who had formerly held the post of head of the Committee for Iran-Ukraine Military Cooperation, had gone to Kiev for talks regarding the Iranian detainees. However, it turned out that the Ukrainian units had already handed the volunteers for suicide operations over to British forces acting in southern Iraq.

"Despite contacts between the Iranian and British military committees at the borders and daily contact between them in small conflict resolution - [such that] this has become routine since the British forces entered southern Iraq - the British command has so far refused to acknowledge that it is holding 40 Iranian volunteers in one of its detention camps. According to the Iranian source, this caused the Revolutionary Guards leadership to seek a semi-military solution to bring its men back from Iraq."

| 1 Comment
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

An interesting revelation in the Lynne Stewart case, courtesy the New York Times :

A co-defendant in the trial of Lynne F. Stewart, a lawyer accused of aiding terrorism, worked with an associate of Osama bin Laden to draft an October 2000 call to Muslims worldwide to fight Jews and "kill them wherever they are," the defendant's lawyer acknowledged yesterday in court.

That sounds like a quote from the Qur'an, Sura 9:5, more commonly translated as "slay them wherever you find them."

The lawyer, Kenneth Paul, conceded in his opening remarks to the jury that his client, Ahmed Abdel Sattar, had helped write the call, or fatwa, because he was angry about surging clashes at the time between the Israeli government and the Palestinians.

An astonishing defense. As if anything could justify a call to genocide.

Mr. Paul said the trial, being held in Federal District Court in Manhattan, would show that Mr. Sattar intended the message to be provocative but not "a terrorist statement." The lawyer said, "It was never his intent for anyone to be killed."

The fatwa was issued in the name of Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman, a blind Muslim cleric who is serving a life sentence in an American prison for inspiring a terrorist conspiracy against the United States.

Yeah, it was never Sheikh Omar's intent that anyone be killed. That's why he had his followers leave such a small bomb in the World Trade Center in 1993.

Ms. Stewart, who was the sheik's defense lawyer, is accused of helping him convey instructions to his followers in a militant group in Egypt to launch terrorist attacks.

Federal prosecutors have given Mr. Sattar, a Postal Service employee from Staten Island, a central place in their case against Ms. Stewart. They charge that Mr. Sattar, 45, was a liaison to Mr. Abdel Rahman's most violent followers in Egypt and Afghanistan and through them to Al Qaeda.

They say Mr. Sattar laid plans with some of those followers to launch new terrorist attacks against the Egyptian government and sent messages through Ms. Stewart to Mr. Abdel Rahman to secure his approval from prison. The sheik is the spiritual leader of the Islamic Group, a militant Egyptian organization.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Here is Eurabia in action: European politicians doing the bidding of their Muslim masters. From Arutz Sheva, with thanks to the many who sent this to me:

A former French Prime Minister, and currently a leading member of the European Parliament, has called Great Britain's Balfour Declaration that paved the way for the creation of the State of Israel as a "historic mistake." Michel Rocard, who is said to be in the running for president of the European Parliament for the coming two and a half years as part of a political deal, spoke about Israel in a lecture last week in Alexandria, Egypt. Israel is a "unique and abnormal condition," he said, "because it was created with a promise, and [because] millions of Jews gathered from all around the world, creating an entity that continues to pose a threat to its neighbors until today."
| 5 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

An attempt to intimidate the jihadists' Target #1? From AP, :

ANKARA, Turkey (AP) -- A small bomb exploded Thursday in front of the hotel where U.S. President George W. Bush is expected to stay when he visits Ankara for meetings with Turkish leaders. One police officer was badly injured, a security official said.

The injured police officer was standing near the bomb when it went off, tearing off one of his legs, the security officer said on customary condition of anonymity.

Police had been notified of a suspicious package on the street some 75 meters (yards) from the entrance to the hotel. The bomb exploded as officers approached the package to investigate. ...

Militant Islamic groups, Kurdish separatists and leftists have carried out attacks in Turkey in the past.

UPDATE: This one may not have been a jihad attack. A leftist organization has claimed responsibility.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

As June 30 approaches, the jihad intensifies (when the major media says "insurgents," they mean "jihadists.") From CNN, :

BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) -- Insurgents have staged simultaneous attacks on police stations and other targets in four cities across Iraq, killing at least 40 people and injuring scores more.

In the biggest attack on Thursday, a series of explosions struck the northern city of Mosul, killing more than 30 people and wounding 170 others.

The violence in Mosul -- which includes three car bombings, a rocket attack, a raid on a security company and clashes between coalition forces and insurgents -- has virtually paralyzed the predominantly Kurdish city.

Iraqi police stations and training facilities were the worst hit in Mosul, with seven Iraqi policemen and one U.S. solider among those killed.

In a coordinated series of attacks across Iraq just six days before power is handed over to an interim government, insurgents also targeted police stations in Baqubah and Ramadi and battled American forces in Fallujah.

Insurgents have taken over parts of Baqubah after launching a series of attacks that killed two U.S. soldiers and four Iraqi soldiers.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

June 23, 2004

More unsurprising news from the World Tribune, with thanks to Manny:

Saudi opposition sources said Saudi security commanders knew of the location of Al Qaida chief Abul Aziz Al Muqrin at least three days before he executed a U.S. hostage.

The Washington-based Saudi Institute said Saudi authorities knew of the whereabouts of the Al Qaida cell that abducted and threatened to kill Lockheed Martin engineer Paul Johnson. But the institute said the Saudi government decided not to move until Johnson, captured on June 12, was executed.

"The Saudi government knew the location of a number of the terrorists but waited until they killed American hostage Paul Johnson before moving against them," the Saudi Institute said in a statement on Tuesday.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

One of the most dispiriting things about the comments shutdown, which we are working to end as quickly as we possibly can, is that we have all missed out on remarks from our friend Hugh Fitzgerald, one of the most erudite and articulate anti-jihadists on the scene today. In fact, I can't think of anyone who tops him in either erudition or elegance of speech, and everything I have read of his is a sheer delight to read.

A note to the many people who have recommended that Hugh get his own blog, and write his own book: rest assured that work is being done on both fronts. Watch for updates.

Anyway, for those of you who are going through Hugh withdrawal, here is something to tide you over: Douce France, a typically perpiscacious meditation on our erstwhile friends in the land of Lafayette:

Imagine that you are a cosseted member of the French elite. One child is doing the khâgne, aiming for rue d’Ulm. Another is now a politechnicien. You are very comfortable, working for the state. You and your spouse are journalists, or writers, or one of that vast tribe of people conducting “recherches” and life is comfortable, good, the way it should be. Yes, you do notice more and more Muslims about you as you walk, no longer in the banlieues, but in the center of Paris, or Toulouse, or Lyon. And you remember how uneasy you felt, four years ago, when you happened to be walking on the Cannebière in Marseille. You decided, then and there, that you would not return.

And you have friends who live in the south. And they tell you that the beurs – some call them maghrébins -- make life hell for everyone. They attack French children on the way to school. They vandalize cars. They threaten, and do more than threaten, anyone who is still foolish enough to walk out wearing a kippah or a cross. Whole areas of cities in the south, as in the north, and east, and west, have become off-limits to non-Muslims. In the schools, the teachers have lost authority. They cannot even cover the subjects of World War II, the Resistance, and the murders of the Jews as the state prescribes; they fear, with reason, the violent reaction of the Muslim students.

And as the schools become more and more dangerous for non-Muslim students and teachers, with more time and resources devoted to discipline rather than to learning, French parents and would-be parents are now silently factoring into their childbearing plans the present value of the future cost of what, they see, will now have to be added: private school tuition. And that means, of course, that those French people will plan on smaller families. And they will also be factoring in the growing cost, paid by them, those French taxpayers, for the whole expanding edifice of security, the guards in the schools, the guards at the train stations and métro stations and airports and at government buildings everywhere, the costs of keeping the gravestones from being vandalized, the costs of protecting the synagogues and the churches, the costs for all those tapped phones and agents in mosques, and subsidies to lawyers and judges to hear charges and try cases against Muslims, and the costs of monitoring da'wa in the prisons (more than 50% Muslim).

But the Muslims are indifferent to expenses incurred by the French state. France is part of the world; the world belongs to Allah, and to his Believers. That doctrine has remained immutable for 1400 years. Imam Bouziane, the one they keep trying to deport, had 16 children by two wives, all living on the French state: a representative Muslim man. Over time, the difference between average family size of Muslims and non-Muslims steadily increases. And, over time, the education system continues to disintegrate. Right now, perhaps, you cannot see it. Your children go to the best schools, followed by the best lycées. You vacation in Normandy, or Brittany, or the Ile de Ré. And you do not take the metro often enough, or walk in the right districts, or work in the right factories or offices, to understand what tens of millions of your fellow Frenchmen now have to endure. You, for the moment, are still immune, still willfully unaware. You have spent the last few decades learning about the Muslim world from Eric Rouleau, and his epigones (after they silenced Peroncel-Hugoz, the one journalist who reported the truth) in Le Monde. You are deeply-versed in the constantly reported-upon, endlessly dilated-upon, perfidy of the mighty empire of Israel. You know what we have all had dinned into us: that the Arab Muslims are reasonable people, with clearly-justified grievances, grievances so reasonable and so limited in scope, that justice demands they be satisfied. Everyone agrees on the “solution.” It is called a “two-state solution” and of course it is a “solution” for otherwise, of course, it would not have been called a “solution.”

And everything looks the way it always has looked: the linden trees, the river, the bridges, the réverbères, the étalage in the neighborhood boulangerie. Douce France, cher pays de mon enfance. At the end of the school day, chic mothers still congregate in little towns, or small cities, outside the school – this or that Ecole Jules Ferry -- waiting to pick up their children. Here come the littlest ones, from Maternelle, running up now -- just look at how small they are. And here are the CE1 group, with those huge cartables on their tiny backs. Run, run, run, to Mommy. Oop-la. And then the years of study, study, study marked by ever-larger cahiers -- "cahier" and "cartable" are the words that identify French DNA better than Piaf or gauloises, isn't that true? And now we will read the books, and study the subjects, set down so completely and precisely by the Ministry of Education. And now we are up to the final year, preparing for the Bac, with copies of blue-backed BALISES, guides to Les Châtiments and La Peau de Chagrin. And just look at the results listed in the newspaper: Claire-Alix has a mention très bien. Fantastic. Everything is fine, everything will always stay the same, whole countries cannot change. It’s not possible.

But it is changing, coming apart, quietly, slowly --let’s not look too closely, we mustn't pay too much attention -- the streets, the schools, the hospitals, the ability to speak the truth about things, about life as it is lived, la vita vissuta as they like to say in a neighboring country. Dominique de Villepin always knew there was nothing to worry about; he was born, after all, in Salé, next to Rabat, even spent a few years of his infancy there; of course he knows his Arabs, his Muslims. And surely Eric Rouleau, who for decades in Le Monde was the resident expert on the Middle East (he was so knowledgeable that he never had to so much as mention the teachings of the Qur’an and Sunna), surely he knew everything, didn't he? And those French translations of Edward Said that denounced with such passion the Islamophobia, and those vicious cliches with which the blind and rotting West has always caricatured the Arab Muslim world. Oh, we have been so terrible to the Arabs, we colonialists, we French, we Westerners. And then there is the never-ending outrage of Israel, that running colonial sore. Of course, they have every right, those Muslims, to come here to France. We went to their countries once, now they come to ours. And they have every right to hate us, don’t they?

So now we have decided not to understand, and to cut all ties of sympathy to, Israel -- and how did we ever have any sympathy for it in the first place, the way some of our parents did back in 1948 or 1956 or 1967? How could they not have seen what the "Palestinian people" had to endure? Hanan, Yasser, Said, Saeb, Aziz, Walid, Rashid, Mohammed -- you have won our hearts and minds. Take us, do with us what you will.

No one will mention what is happening or what kinds of things we must begin to think about doing to save ourselves. No one of any decency. And whatever Le Pen and Megret say, we must say the opposite (except, of course, when they show their hostility to "the Jews"). Do not say those things, do not think them. Free thought is all very well in theory, but really -- consider the consequences. Don't dare to think outside that box brimming with idées reçues. Défense de penser au dehors du box.

No, everything will be all right as you stroll down the Avenue Paule-Anne. Those Muslims will never be a match for us. Why, just look at those legionnaires marching à pas lent down the Champs-Elysées, think of that string of desert victories. Inside our heads, it is 1930 and over here is the Exposition coloniale. You remember, tu t’en souviens, that painting by le Douanier Rousseau, don't you, with the burnoosed Arab standing next to the black Senegalese? I have it right, don’t I? France will always be France. Nothing will ever change.

At a certain point, and despite everything that causes you not to see what is staring you in the face, you realize that something has gone irreparably wrong with your country, and you, and your children, are in danger of losing that country, down to every village and house, qui m’est une province et beaucoup davantage. And you do not know what to do, or how to explain this feeling to others, or in whom to confide your secret fears, or what can be done. It is so confusing, and so upsetting. You cannot vote for Le Pen. You cannot endorse "cowboy" Bush or those ridiculous Americans. You have no place to go.

And then you learn what Jacques Chirac -- who now has a Muslim grandchild himself -- and Dominique de Villepin, do not wish you to learn. For if you did, you might be very angry. You discover that 1 out of every 3 babies born in France today is a Muslim baby. And that means, in 20 years, one of every three 20-year-olds in France will be a Muslim twenty-year-old. And that means, twenty years after that, at present rates of reproduction, France will have a majority Muslim population. Where shall we hide the statues from Marly-le-roi? And the Venus de Milo? And what about all those paintings of animated life -- all those portraits in the Louvre, and the Grand Palais, and the Musée Guimet down there in linden-lined Aix, and everywhere else in art-filled artful France, mère des arts, des armes, et des loix -- that are absolutely forbidden according to the immutable strictures of the Qur'an. Should they be sent for safekeeping to those Americans across the seas? By then most of the Jews in France will have left, gone across the oceans for their own safekeeping, to Israel or to English-speaking Canada (they were worried about the Muslim population of Quebec, you see, which had been allowed to grow under the Province of Quebec's policy of encouraging francophone immigrants, preferring North Africans to potential immigrants from Italy, Greece, Spain), and above all, to America. What luck those Americans have had. No more bequests to France by the likes of the Rothschilds, or Nissim Camondo. No more Donations from another Pierre Lévy. Enjoy the Kufic calligraphy; some find it endlessly fascinating.

For the moment, you allow yourself to believe that something will come up. Most likely, all those Muslims will simply convert. I mean, they do that, don't they, quite easily I'm told. Of course, why didn't I think of it, that is exactly what will happen. The situation is always saved in time. Just like during the war. Nothing to worry about. Nothing.

| 1 Comment
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

This morning it looked as if those British soldiers had already been released, or would soon be released by Iran. Now the situation doesn't look as positive. From This Is London:

Talks are taking place to secure the release of the eight British sailors paraded blindfold on Iranian television and forced to make public confessions.

Earlier reports coming out of the country had said that the men were already free, it was then claimed that they would not be released until Thursday.

Negotiations are now believed to be taking place between the Iranian and British delegations in the city of Mahshahr.

The breakthrough came after a day of diplomacy amid anger and revulsion at the way the servicemen were treated. As part of a deal designed to save face in Tehran, Britain was expected to make a statement of regret the men had strayed into Iranian waters.

Remember when Argentina took over the Falkland Islands? That was a different Britain, of course.

UPDATE: At last they have really been released.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

An egregious example of dhimmitude from the LA Times, with thanks to kfir:

LONDON — Daniel Pearl, Nicholas Berg, Paul M. Johnson Jr. and now a threat against a South Korean: Militants in the Middle East and South Asia have adopted beheading, vaguely invoking religious justifications or Arab tradition for the method of killing. Yet most Muslims would consider that a gross misinterpretation of their religion.

There is nothing particularly Islamic about decapitation, no exhortation in the Koran to carry out beheadings, and no religious prescription for the killing of innocents in any form, religious scholars and academics say.

Oh really? Well, let's look at the record:

Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): "I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instil terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them." (Qur'an, Sura 8:12)
Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers (in fight), smite at their necks... (Qur'an, Sura 47:4)

And during the massacre of the Jewish Qurayzah tribe, Ibn Ishaq, Muhammad's earliest biographer, describes the scene:

The apostle [Muhammad] went out to the market of Medina (which is still its market today) and dug trenches in it. Then he sent for [the men of Banu Qurayza] and struck off their heads in those trenches as they were brought out to him in batches.

Ibn Ishaq puts the number of those massacred at "600 or 700 in all, though some put the figure as high as 800 or 900."

So why is the LA Times repeating this arrant nonsense about there being nothing in Islam sanctioning beheading? Are they ignorant, or willfully deceptive? In the final analysis, it doesn't matter -- the outcome is the same either way. But it does show why most analyses of Islam and terrorism in the mainstream media simply cannot be trusted.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

LGF has posted a horrifying link to a Scandinavian Muslim bulletin board on which someone has posted ("Look how cute!") a video of Muslim kids reenacting the Nick Berg decapitation video.

If anyone has any doubts about what we are up against in the war on terror, see this video. It isn't bloody. It's just sickening. What will become of these children who are being brought up to glorify murder and violence?


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

No sign of the desired dhimmitude from the Bush White House or its allies. From FoxNews, with thanks to DC Watson:

NEW YORK — Although Al Qaeda-linked groups recently executed two kidnapped civilian workers, the United States continues to maintain it will not negotiate with terrorists, whatever the price — even if violence against Americans and their allies gets worse.

"I think there's a likelihood [attacks could escalate in Iraq and Saudi Arabia] and that's certainly the philosophy behind refusing to negotiate with terrorists," said Robert Jordan, a former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia. "I think it's a sound philosophy — one that's proved the test of time … that should be continued."

Jordan's comments came after news broke Tuesday that suspected Al Qaeda terrorists had beheaded hostage Kim Sun-il, a South Korean who worked for a U.S. military supplier.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Schumer included a detailed proposal for mall security. I doubt this will fly, however, as not enough Americans are convinced that this is a real threat. From WND, :

The recent plot by an al-Qaida freelancer to blow up an Ohio shopping center and revelations that the Madrid bombers' next intended target was a suburban mall – coming on the heels of the terror group's reported plans to hit the U.S. hard this summer with a massive attack – is causing at least one congressman to demand security at the nation's shopping malls be radically beefed up with high-tech, high-dollar equipment like that used in airports.

U.S. Sen. Charles Schumer, D.-N.Y., says the government's indictment of Nuradin Abdi for plotting with al-Qaida to bomb shopping malls, coupled with recently uncovered documents showing the March 11 Madrid train bombers also planned to attack Parquesur, a large suburban shopping center there, are "clear proof" the U.S. is not doing enough to protect the nation's shopping malls from terror attacks.

"Everyone who listened to the audio tapes released by the 9/11 Commission this week couldn't help but feel their hair stand on end when they heard how unprepared we were to deal with an aerial attack," Schumer said while standing in Greeley Square outside the Manhattan Mall in New York City. "More and more evidence is mounting that if they want to attack again, they'll do it someplace closer to home like a shopping center. We've gone all-out to shore up air security, and now we have to catch up with mall security as well."


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

From the Chosun Ilbo, with thanks to Ali Dashti:

Korean Muslim Imam Lee Hang-rae said during an interview at a mosque in Itaewon, Seoul on Wednesday that, “We Muslims were also shocked and felt heartbroken like everyone else. I am worried that this incident may damage the perception of Islam on the whole. The group that kidnapped and murdered Kim Sun-il is a political group that has nothing to do with Islam. They do not obey Islamic doctrines and are even against Islam. Islam itself is peace. The Koran also forbids murder in a phrase, “Do not take any precious life without proper reasons.”

It would be refreshing if just one time, we weren't asked to accept that this sort of thing "has nothing to do with Islam" just on the word of other Muslims. I wish that just one time, Muslims who say these beheadings have nothing to do with Islam would explain why Sura 47:4 ("when you meet the unbelievers, smite their necks") doesn't apply here, and why the example of Muhammad's beheadings doesn't apply -- in short, why the reasons that the radicals themselves give for what they are doing don't qualify as "proper reasons" under the Qur'anic caveat cited by Lee Hang-rae.

But they never do. Instead, all we get from one side are detailed arguments based on the Qur'an and Sunnah justifying what they do, and the other side shouting, "It's against Islam!" Never mind which side I believe; which side do you think young Muslims who are trying to live their faith properly believe?


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

The New York Post has a somewhat different view of dhimmi lawyer Lynne Stewart from that of the Washington Post.

June 23, 2004 -- Radical defense attorney Lynne Stewart unleashed danger on the world when she helped a jailed terrorist spread messages of hate from his prison cell, prosecutors charged yesterday in their opening arguments.

The feds laid out their case against Stewart, 64, an Arabic translator, Mohammed Yousry, and a Staten Island postal worker, Ahmed Abdel Sattar.

All three are charged with helping Sheik Omar Abdel-Rahman communicate with his terrorist followers from his Minnesota prison cell, where he is living in virtual isolation from the rest of the world.

"Abdel-Rahman was a man the U.S. government believed was so dangerous they tried to cut him off from the outside world," prosecutor Christopher Morvillo told Manhattan Federal Court. "His words and speeches were as dangerous as weapons."

The former school librarian and mother of six created a "secret underground communication channel to get around the prison restrictions," he argued.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Just how are young men like Asaha Dajing recruited? Is it really a matter of their being "fooled"? Or are they shown convincing passages of the Qur'an and Sunnah that show that they should do what the radicals are doing if they want to be good Muslims? From USA Today, with thanks to Ali Dashti:

Asaha Dajing, 19, appeared to be thriving at an Islamic college in Yala, 20 miles north of this remote village. He had just won a $125 creative writing scholarship, big money in these parts. His family was proud.

But Asaha had friends his parents didn't know about: Islamic radicals who were recruiting impressionable young men for a mysterious holy war here in the jungles of southern Thailand.

Asaha's secret life was exposed only by his death. He was killed by police along with 13 other militants April 28 when they staged a suicidal assault on a government office near this village. Most were armed only with machetes.

"They used my son because he was young," says his father, rubber farmer Tama Dajing, 49. "He could be fooled very easily. ... I blame myself because I just worked. I went out in the morning and I came home at night, and I didn't know what was going on."

No one seems to know exactly what is going on here in the predominantly Muslim southern tip of Thailand. Mysterious insurgents are terrorizing the countryside, bewildering the government in Bangkok and raising fears that radical Islamic groups from outside Thailand may have found a new base in Southeast Asia.

"It's still a witch's brew. It's still incubating," says Paul Quaglia, a former CIA official now working as a security consultant in Bangkok with Pacific Strategies & Assessments. "Regional Islamic terrorists are looking at the area for a possible jihad (holy war). Disgruntled Muslim youth form a potential labor pool" for terrorists.

Southeast Asia already is seething with Islamic violence. The group Jemaah Islamiyah, which has been linked to al-Qaeda, was behind bombings that killed 202 people, mostly foreign tourists, in Bali, Indonesia, in October 2002. A group called Abu Sayyaf has terrorized the traditionally Muslim region of Mindanao in the southern Philippines for several years, kidnapping tourists and attacking local Christians. Authorities fear that extremists also want to use the lawless jungles of southern Thailand to launch a holy war.

The United States has not turned southern Thailand into a new front in the war on terror and considers the insurgency an internal Thai matter. No Thai insurgent groups appear on the U.S. list of terrorist organizations. However, there is some evidence that Jemaah Islamiyah, which is on the U.S. terror list, has been active in Thailand. One of the group's leaders was captured in central Thailand last year, and some of the attackers in a wave of violence April 28 reportedly wore Jemaah Islamiyah T-shirts and in some cases showed knowledge of sophisticated military tactics.

The fact that the United States doesn't see the Thailand conflict as the same conflict that is raging in Iraq, Israel, Indonesia, Nigeria, the Philippines, and elsewhere in the world today is evidence of an analytic myopia that could prove fatal.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Not that the ideology that they have fostered for years in the madrassas had anything to do with it. From PNS, with thanks to Ali Dashti:

WASHIGNTON, USA : June 22 (PNS) - Pakistan Sunday "strongly rejected the insinuations" made by the 9/11 Commission that Pakistan, in any way, was involved with the perpetration of the horrific 9/11 attacks. "This is pure speculation," said Deputy Chief of the Mission of the Pakistan Embassy, adding:"we emphatically reject it."

"The unchecked succession of events in Afghanistan had led to the tragic events of 9/11." Mohammad Sadiq was commenting on the news reports which tried to implicate Pakistan being amongst those countries having allegedly supported or funded those involved with perpetration of the horrific 9/11 attacks. Pakistan, he reminded, had itself been a victim of terrorism, and that it was waging fight against terrorism "much before the astounding 9/11 attacks." ...

The DCM underscored that historically, Pakistan has recognized all governments in Kabul, including the Taliban government. It did not, however, mean that Pakistan agreed to the policies of the Taliban regime." "We did try to persuade [the] Taliban [to] comply with U.N. resolutions and international norms on terrorism," he added.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Another heartening sign that maybe the Europeans aren't quite ready to roll over and play dhimmi. From the BBC, with thanks to many, many wonderful people who sent it:

European police are meeting in The Hague to look at ways of tackling the rising phenomenon of "honour killings".

They aim to set up a pan-European unit to combat the killings and crack down on related issues such as trafficking.

Police are re-opening murder files related to families of Turkish, Middle Eastern, Asian, Arabic and Eastern European origin over the past 10 years.

Many victims of "honour killings" are women involved in relationships their family felt brought dishonour on them.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

An unsurprising story from The Halifax Herald Limited:

A man with no identification and no money spent nearly 24 hours in an off-limits area of the Halifax International Airport before being arrested, a Dartmouth provincial court heard Monday.

Federal Crown attorney James Martin said Vlad Sandulescu, a Canadian citizen of Romanian descent, scaled a fence Wednesday night and gained entry to the terminal through an unlocked door.

Mr. Martin said the 29-year-old man spent the night hidden above the ceiling tile of a washroom.

The next day, he said, Mr. Sandulescu tried to board at least three planes without a boarding pass or ticket. One flight was headed to Frankfurt, Germany, a second to New York and the third to Boston.

RCMP arrested Mr. Sandulescu about 8:30 p.m. Thursday after being told by airport security that workers had refused to allow a man without a boarding pass to enter the departure lounge and get on the flight to Boston.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

He will keep fighting "until Islamic rule is back on Earth." But of course, this conflict has nothing to do with religion. A suggestion for CAIR: why don't you develop, since you folks are so moderate and all, an Anti-Sharia Kit, that will explain to Muslims why they need not and should not fight to establish Islamic rule on Earth? Because there are, of course, a lot more Muslims who think like Zarqawi. I await your positive response.

From AP:

BAGHDAD, Iraq - A recording purportedly made by the mastermind of bombings and kidnappings in Iraq threatened to assassinate Iraq's interim prime minister and fight the Americans "until Islamic rule is back on Earth."

The audio recording was found Wednesday on a Web site that serves as a clearinghouse of Islamic extremist statements. It is supposedly from Jordanian-born terrorist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, whose network has been targeted by two U.S. airstrikes since Saturday.

Al-Zarqawi's group, Monotheism and Jihad, claimed responsibility for the beheading of American hostage Nicholas Berg and Kim Sun-il, a South Korean whose decapitated body was found Tuesday evening between Baghdad and Fallujah. ...

In the audiotape, the speaker thought to be al-Zarqawi told Iraq's interim prime minister, Iyad Allawi, that "we will continue the game with you until the end." The speaker said "we will not get bored" until "we make you drink from the same glass" as Izzadine Saleem, the Iraqi governing Council president killed last month in a car-bombing claimed at al-Zarqawi's group.

"We will carry on our jihad against the Western infidel and the Arab apostate until Islamic rule is back on earth," the voice said.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

After a good bit of saber-rattling, the eight British soldiers arrested for straying into Iranian territorial waters have been released.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

A new article by Jihad Watch director Robert Spencer, "Stay Quiet and You’ll Be OK," is up at FrontPage this morning.

Here’s a new slogan for the zeitgeist: stay quiet and you’ll be OK. This was the message, according to the tapes released last week, that Muhammad Atta gave to the passengers on the ill-fated airplane that he and his fellow terrorists had commandeered.

Stay quiet and you’ll be OK. Don’t mention that a Saudi imam who spoke at the opening of a large new Islamic center in London once preached a sermon in which he called Jews “evil offspring, infidels, distorters of [others’] words, calf-worshippers, prophet-murderers, prophecy-deniers... the scum of the human race ‘whom Allah cursed and turned into apes and pigs,” and “an ongoing continuum of deceit, obstinacy, licentiousness, evil, and corruption.” AP noted that in London he said that Islam’s history was “the best testament to how different communities can live together in peace and harmony.” The BBC called him “one of Islam’s most renowned Imams” and reported his praise for British Muslims for having “taken great steps towards achieving community cohesion.” Neither said anything about his hate speech.

Stay quiet and you’ll be OK. Have you heard about the churches destroyed in Kosovo? “To keep the Serbs from claiming this area as part of their national heritage,” says Mikhael de Thyse of the Council of Europe, “some Albanians are attacking their churches.” In March, the cathedrals in Pristina and Prizren, Kosovo’s two main cities, were burned to the ground. Others that have been destroyed include the Holy Archangels Monastery, a charming and, of course, irreplaceable jewel dating from the fourteenth century. The local bishop has had harsh words for NATO peacekeepers, who he says have done little or nothing to protect the churches. But the media establishment has kept mum. Jihad in Kosovo? Come on. Everyone knows the Balkan Muslims are the victims, not the perpetrators! ...

As Ralph Peters has had the courage to declare, “It’s time to end the politically correct baby-talk insisting that Islam isn’t the problem. In the decaying Arab world, Islam is the problem — because of the way bitter old men interpret and deform its more humane precepts while embracing its cruelest injunctions.” It’s time to end the baby talk, and the silence. For whatever combination of political correctness, fear, and indifference has made for the silence on these stories and others like them, it does nothing but play into the hands of those who would destroy us.

Stay quiet, and the jihad will continue to advance: in Iraq, and Afghanistan, and Israel, and Indonesia, and Nigeria, and the Philippines, and Western Europe, and elsewhere — and if you think we will not feel its impact here, just remember where Atta was when he said those words, and what happened next.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Comments are, alas, still disabled, but the last stagecoach to Secure Undisclosed Locationville should be bringing the tools we need to fix up a new troll-proof comments feature by this afternoon, and it should be up by tomorrow or Friday. Apologies for the long delay, and many thanks for your patience. But when it is all done, I think you will find the Jihad Watch Comments section to be a cleaner, better-lighted, less menacing neighborhood, free of thugs and graffiti.

Subscribers please note: 35 of you will not receive the Jihad Watch Daily Digest today. Something called "Spamcop" has "blacklisted" Jihad Watch, such that the Digest began bouncing back from your addresses. Uncertain what to do, I sent a notice to each of you Monday but heard back from no one, so yesterday I deleted all the blocked addresses from the subscriber list rather than just have them bounce back continually. So if you stop getting the Digest and would like to do so, please remonstrate with these "Spamcop" people (I would have, but they don't have contact info on their "blacklist" site) and then re-subscribe. I apologize for any inconvenience.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

June 22, 2004

When I posted about the offer, some people were angry. Stop picking on liberals, they said. Just because Hizballah made the offer doesn't mean that Moore is on their side. Well, now the picture is a bit different. From WND:

The company distributing filmmaker Michael Moore's Bush-bashing movie "Fahrenheit 9/11" says it won't reject an offer of help from Middle East terrorist organization Hezbollah.

As WorldNetDaily reported, terrorists affiliated with the Iran-backed network last week offered to help promote the film in the United Arab Emirates.

The movie industry publication Screen Daily reported, "In terms of marketing the film, [distributor] Front Row is getting a boost from organizations related to Hezbollah which have rung up from Lebanon to ask if there's anything they can do to support the film."

The story then quotes Front Row Managing Director Gianluca Chacra: "We can't go against these organizations as they could strongly boycott the film in Lebanon and Syria."


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

"Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers (in fight), smite at their necks ..." (Qur'an, Sura 47:4).

From AP:

CAIRO, Egypt (AP) - An Iraqi militant group has beheaded its South Korean hostage, Al-Jazeera television reported Tuesday.

The pan-Arab station said it had received a videotape showing that Kim Sun-il had been executed. ...

Al-Jazeera, which had not broadcast the tape, said the execution was carried out by the al-Qaida-linked group Monotheism and Jihad.

Let us not lose our resolve to end this scourge of humanity.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Heartening news from the World Tribune:

The United States has sent a tough message to Saudi Arabia that did not rule out abandoning of the kingdom's oil sector.

U.S. officials said the Bush administration has warned that Americans would not stay in Saudi Arabia unless the kingdom takes significant steps to protect them. The officials said the warning came in wake of the Al Qaida execution of Lockheed Martin engineer Paul Johnson on June 18.

Fewer than 30,000 Americans live in Saudi Arabia, with many of them working in the defense and oil sectors. More than 5,000 Americans were said to have left the kingdom over the last year and many more were said to planning to leave for the summer.

"It could have an effect [on the Saudi oil industry]," State Department spokesman Richard Boucher said. "Saudi authorities, as commendable as their overall effort is, have not yet been able to stop the terrorists to the point that everybody doesn't have to worry anymore."


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

From This Is London:

The threat of a terrorist attack using nuclear weapons is "real and imminent", the head of the UN's nuclear watchdog said today.

Mohammed al Baradei, chief of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said it was a "race against time" to prevent terrorists from obtaining nuclear materials. ...

"We are actually having a race against time which I don't think we can afford," he told the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace conference in Washington. "The danger is so imminent... so the sooner that we start, the better for everybody involved."


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

More on Mohammed Junaid Babar, from WND (thanks to Margelfand). He turns out to be the Muhammad Junaid who was widely reported after 9/11 to be on his way to Afghanistan to fight against Americans, even though his mother had survived the World Trade Center attack. I tried to track him down then, but since the "Babar" part of his name wasn't reported, I couldn't find him. Others who followed the same dead end suggested that that whole story had been fabricated. Well, it turns out it was all too real.

Al-Muhajiroun, of course, is the radical British group that is working toward the day when the "black flag of Islam," that is, the jihad flag, flies from #10 Downing Street.

A U.S.-based leader of Al-Muhajiroun who operates openly in Queens told WND on condition of anonymity: "I've known Junaid [Babar] for a long time. I met him about seven years ago in a local Mosque in Queens before we both became involved with Muhajiroun."

The leader would not comment on Babar's involvement with his group, except to say Babar was involved in "organizational operations" in Queens and later in Pakistan, where he traveled after leaving a $70,000-a-year computer job because he wanted to join the jihad in Afghanistan. ...

Al-Muhajiroun's branch in Queens claims to be involved in "only peaceful activities." The group holds closed-door meetings and study sessions at a mosque in Jackson Heights, Queens, led by an older spiritual cleric identified as a Sheikh Choudray. ...

At one Al-Muhajiroun event at Queensborough Community College sponsored by the MSA and attended by WND, a Muhajiroun speaker working with Yousuf said, "We reject the U.N., reject America, reject all law and order. Don't lobby Congress or protest because we don't recognize Congress! The only relationship you should have with America is to topple it!"

The speaker continued, "The so-called terrorists are the only people who truly fear Allah. ... They are the only worthy causes, and the mighty superpower only fears them."

In a private interview with WND, a Queens based Al-Muhajiroun leader said he would be "absolutely honored" to give up his life in a "martyr operation" against American civilians. The leader warned that "a jihad is coming to America because of the moves of the Bush administration." ...

In custody, Babar reportedly told investigators al-Qaida is planning more attacks in the United States, and he allegedly revealed a detailed plan to smuggle al-Qaida agents across the Mexican border.

Babar's assertions were reportedly part of the intelligence that led to recent warnings about a summer threat from the terror network.

Babar first appeared on the FBI's radar and was put on a terror watch list after he made anti-U.S. remarks to a Canadian news reporter in Pakistan following the Sept. 11 attacks.

He said that despite the fact his mother had escaped from the ninth floor of one of the World Trade Center towers, his loyalty was "to the Muslims, not the Americans." He also announced his intention to fight with the Taliban against U.S. forces in Afghanistan.

WND was told an Al-Muhajiroun leader in Pakistan, who appeared behind Babar in a British documentary aired on ITN television network in November, 2001, may have been instrumental in arranging for Babar to travel there.

"I'm willing to kill Americans," Babar said in the television interview, adding that he had no plans to return to New York.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

The Washington Post just loves this woman, despite the fact that she is accused of aiding terrorists. Just look at the opening of this story. Why do they love her? Is it her Ashcroft-baiting? Her belief in "armed struggle" (by whom, and for what cause)? Her "left-leaning" activism? Her grandmotherly cuteness? Whatever the case, what if it's true, and she really was helping out a terrorist plot? Would she seem so cute and cuddly then? (Thanks to stevez.)

NEW YORK -- She's the New York Mets fan with a belief in armed struggle, the pink-faced grandmother who stands accused of helping a jailed terrorist sheik order followers to kill and kidnap in his name. Lynne Stewart, a proudly radical lawyer, could face 40 years in federal prison if she's convicted. But she's in no mood to curl up in a fetal position.

"How could I be happier? I feel like I've waited my whole life for this fight," she told a crowd of supporters at a pretrial fundraiser in a Manhattan Quaker church a few weeks back.

"I say this to John Ashcroft: Bring it on!"

The very public trial of the 64-year-old Stewart -- she plans to testify at length and write a Web log throughout -- commences this week in U.S. District Court in Manhattan and likely will stretch until autumn. A left-leaning pillar of this city's boisterous defense bar, Stewart has worked these courtrooms for two decades, representing leftists and mobsters, antiwar demonstrators and dope smugglers. She's been ranked among the city's 10 best trial lawyers.

"I love helping a jury cut through the crap," she said in an interview in her Manhattan law office a few blocks northeast of Ground Zero. "But I can't be sanguine about having the T-word hung around my neck."

The federal indictment accuses Stewart and two men -- an Arabic translator and a former U.S. postal worker -- of aiding a plot to kidnap and perhaps kill people to obtain the release of the imprisoned blind Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman, who is serving a life sentence for conspiring to blow up the United Nations, two Hudson River tunnels and Manhattan's FBI building.

The indictment alleges that while visiting her client in prison, Stewart spoke gibberish in English as a cover while the sheik gave instructions in Arabic to a follower posing as a translator. She then allegedly violated federal regulations by publicly announcing in 2000 that Rahman had withdrawn his support for a cease-fire with the Egyptian government.

Rahman is held in a maximum-security prison in Colorado and is prohibited from contacting his followers.

The federal government's indictment of Stewart in April 2002 marked the first time that it had brought charges of conspiring to provide material support for terrorist activity against a defense attorney in a terrorism case.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Now let's see. There is a large, growing, and vocal group in England that is virulently anti-Semitic and sometimes violent. Could they have anything to do with the attacks on 100 synagogues since 2000? Could that at least be investigated? No: to do so would be "racism."

From This Is London, with thanks to Andy:

The charred remains of priceless prayer books scattered on the floor are all that remain after arson attacks left two north London synagogues wrecked.

In Hendon, more than £250,000 of damage was done by vandals who broke into the UK headquarters of Jewish educational body Aish HaTorah. ...

A day earlier, vandals smashed a CCTV camera at the South Tottenham Synagogue before breaking a window and throwing a burning rag inside. Many prayer books were incinerated - some more than 100 years old and others which were smuggled out of Germany and Poland by Jews fleeing the Nazis in the 1930s.

Rabbi Michael Biberfeld said his congregation mourned the loss of the priceless books. He said: "Some of them have never been reprinted after the Holocaust. The people who saved them from the Nazis in Germany and Poland after Kristallnacht in 1938 risked their lives. For them to be destroyed is a tragic end." ...

Although police are not linking the attacks they admit it is "unusual" for two synagogues to be targeted in such a short space of time. More than 100 British synagogues have been desecrated since September 2000.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Yes, it's a jihad in Chechnya. And the surrounding areas. From AP, with thanks to Nicolei:

VLADIKAVKAZ (Russia) - Assailants armed with grenade- and rocket-launchers seized the Interior Ministry headquarters in Ingushetia, a Russian region bordering warring Chechnya, killing the acting minister, a ministry official said on Tuesday. Attacks were also reported elsewhere in Ingushetia.

The Interior Ministry official said it was not immediately clear who the attackers were, but said some of them were shouting 'Allahu akhbar' - a frequent cry of Chechnya's separatist rebels ever as their insurgency increasingly comes under the influence of radical Islam.

Fighting from the 4-year-old Chechen war has occasionally spilled into Ingushetia, highlighting the Russian military's ineffectiveness against the rebels despite having heavier weapons and far superior manpower.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Holland's first convicted terrorists are appealing. From Expatica, with thanks to Nicolei:

AMSTERDAM — Two of the four Muslims convicted by an appeals court in The Hague on Monday will take their cases to the Supreme Court to have their sentences quashed. One of the men was sentenced to six years jail for involvement in a criminal gang linked to a plot to bomb the US embassy in Paris.

The Supreme Court will thus make a final ruling whether information from the Dutch secret service AIVD can be used in court. Rotterdam Court ruled at the end of 2002 against the use of the evidence, but the appeals court in The Hague reversed that ruling on Monday.

The appeals court sentenced two Muslim men to six and four-year jail terms after convicting them of involvement in an international criminal organisation, which was planning a bomb attack on the US embassy in Paris. The attack was never carried out.

The convicted men were identified as 29-year-old Jerome Courtailler, a French convert to Islam and Algerian Abdelghani Rabia, 32. But the lawyer representing the Frenchman said later on Monday an appeal will be lodged with the Dutch Supreme Court.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Musharraf hasn't gotten them all. And what is he doing about the madrassas again? From HiPakistan:

WANA, June 21: The head of 'mujahideen' shura in South Waziristan on Monday said they wanted to live in peace with Pakistan, but vowed to continue waging a jihad against the United States.

"We want peace for Pakistan, but not for the US," Haji Muhammad Omar, amir of the mujahideen shura in Waziristan, told Dawn. The hitherto unknown Muhammad Omar called the BBC Pushto Service on Sunday to claim that he had been made the acting commander of the mujahideen in place of Nek Muhammad who had been killed in a missile attack last week.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

The courageous Anne Bayefsky of Columbia University at the UN conference on Confronting Anti-Semitism: Education for Tolerance and Understanding. From Opinion Journal, with thanks to all who sent it to me:

I appreciate the opportunity to speak to you at this first U.N. conference on anti-Semitism, which is being convened six decades after the organization's creation. ...

This meeting occurs at a point when the relationship between Jews and the United Nations is at an all-time low. The U.N. took root in the ashes of the Jewish people, and according to its charter was to flower on the strength of a commitment to tolerance and equality for all men and women and of nations large and small. Today, however, the U.N. provides a platform for those who cast the victims of the Nazis as the Nazi counterparts of the 21st century. The U.N. has become the leading global purveyor of anti-Semitism--intolerance and inequality against the Jewish people and its state.

Not only have many of the U.N. members most responsible for this state of affairs rendered their own countries Judenrein, they have succeeded in almost entirely expunging concern about Jew-hatred from the U.N. docket. From 1965, when anti-Semitism was deliberately excluded from a treaty on racial discrimination, to last fall, when a proposal for a General Assembly resolution on anti-Semitism was withdrawn after Ireland capitulated to Arab and Muslim opposition, mention of anti-Semitism has continually ground the wheels of U.N.-led multilateralism to a halt.

There has never been a U.N. resolution specifically on anti-Semitism or a single report to a U.N. body dedicated to discrimination against Jews, in contrast to annual resolutions and reports focusing on the defamation of Islam and discrimination against Muslims and Arabs. Instead there was Durban--the 2001 U.N. World Conference "Against Racism," which was a breeding ground and global soapbox for anti-Semites. When it was over U.N. officials and member states turned the Durban Declaration into the centerpiece of the U.N.'s antiracism agenda--allowing Durban follow-up resolutions to become a continuing battlefield over U.N. concern with anti-Semitism. ...

The record of the Secretariat is more of the same. In November 2003, Secretary-General Kofi Annan issued a report on Israel's security fence, detailing the purported harm to Palestinians without describing one terrorist act against Israelis which preceded the fence's construction. Recently, the secretary-general strongly condemned Israel for destroying homes in southern Gaza without mentioning the arms-smuggling tunnels operating beneath them. When Israel successfully targeted Hamas terrorist Abdel Aziz Rantissi with no civilian casualties, the secretary-general denounced Israel for an "extrajudicial" killing. But when faced with the 2004 report of the U.N. special rapporteur on extrajudicial executions detailing the murder of more than 3,000 Brazilian civilians shot at close range by police, Mr. Annan chose silence. That's discrimination. ...

Start putting a name to the terrorists that kill Jews because they are Jews.

Start condemning human-rights violators wherever they dwell--even if they live in Riyadh or Damascus.

Stop condemning the Jewish people for fighting back against their killers.

And the next time someone asks you or your colleagues to stand for a moment of silence to honor those who would destroy the state of Israel, say no.
Only then will the message be heard from these chambers that the U.N. will not tolerate anti-Semitism or its consequences against Jews and the Jewish people, whether its victims live in Tehran, Paris or Jerusalem.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Bruno Guiderdoni isn't concerned about Westerners who go to Iraq in order to rebuild the country and end up being beheaded; he is concerned that someone might look askance at the Muslims in France as a result. Of course, no one should target innocent people in France, Iraq, or anywhere, but where exactly is the actual violence coming from? Note that he invokes a couple of old news items about remarks he didn't like, but no acts of violence against Muslims in France. From UPI, with thanks to Ali Dashti:

BORDEAUX, France, June 21 (UPI) -- European specialists on Islamic affairs fear that the beheadings of Americans and other foreigners in the Middle East will trigger a severe anti-Muslim backlash.

"These barbaric acts have been catastrophic for the prospects of Muslims in France," said Bruno Guiderdoni, one of the country's foremost Koran scholars. "A discernable shift has occurred in public attitudes," he said. "Its most dangerous aspect is a new hostility even among the once-liberal French intellectuals against our religion."

Two years ago, a three-judge panel cleared bestselling author Michel Houellebecq of inciting racial hate for describing Islam as "the most stupid religion." Later he explained: "I have never displayed the least contempt for Muslims. But I have as much contempt as ever for Islam."

Last fall, Claude Imbert, founder and editor in chief of the newsmagazine Le Point, declared: "To be honest, I am somewhat hostile to Islam. I am not embarrassed to admit that."

To Guiderdoni, such blunt remarks from members of the intellectual elite are alarm signals. To observers it seems that Europeans no longer buy into statements of disassociation by prominent Islamic leaders such as Dalil Boubakeur, president of the French Council of Muslim Faith.

Boubakeur said: "Islam is not a religion that beats women, kills kids and desires the death of the West. What shocks the French is ... even more of a shock to us." Muslim extremists have by now beheaded three Americans and are threatening an abducted South Korean and a European -- possibly German -- journalist with a similar fate. ...

On the one hand, the Muslim Holy Book counsels a broad-minded attitude toward other faiths, insists Sheikh Mohammed Mohammed Ali, a Shiite Muslim scholar who is currently running for a seat in the new Iraqi assembly.

On the other hand, the Koran clearly advises the faithful to slay and main infidels: "Strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them" (Surah 8:12).

In a telephone call from Baghdad, Ali explains that under religious law decapitation is only permissible if approved by a ranking scholar whose role would then be comparable to that of the Supreme Court of the United States. "Nobody in al-Qaida has this competence. None has even ever attended an Islamic university or similar institution."

OK. So you're telling me that only someone who has gone to college can behead a non-Muslim? The absurdity of this is breathtaking, particularly since those Al-Qaeda operatives have all probably memorized the Qur'an, including 8:12, and they didn't read the verse as "Strike off their heads if a university-trained scholar approves."


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

One of the most active Islamic radical leaders in North Africa has been killed. No doubt he was waging jihad in North Africa because of his rage over Abu Ghraib and Israel. From AP, with thanks to Ali Dashti:

ALGIERS, Algeria -- Troops killed one of North Africa's most wanted Islamic militants, who had sought to link his bloody insurgent movement in Algeria to Usama bin Laden's Al Qaeda terror network, the military said Sunday.

The death of Nabil Sahraoui, head of the Salafist Group for Call and Combat, marked a major victory for Algerian government efforts to suppress Islamic militant violence and left his armed extremist organization with no clear leader.

Sahraoui and three of his lieutenants were killed in a "vast anti-terrorist operation" that continues in the Kabylie region east of the capital, Algiers, the army general staff said in a statement.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

For those of you who may be checking in just now, I thought I'd repeat the notice that comments are temporarily closed. We have been hearing from a high volume of jihadists here at Jihad Watch, who are both enraged that we would tell the truth about jihad terrorism and ready to do violence to us for doing so. It's the same old story: say it's a religion of peace, or we'll kill you.

So anyway, we are installing new features that will, I hope, once again enable people to comment but make it easier to screen out those whose idea of jihad is to steal other people's names and post comments making lewd remarks. Until then, I ask for your patience and hope you will keep checking in, and posts will continue to be made when possible.

Thanks for all your support. Jihad Watch is, once again, an endeavor to defend human rights for all people, Muslim and non-Muslim, female and male, and anyone who is able to pierce through the fog of political correctness and misinformation to realize that has my gratitude.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

June 21, 2004

Ralph Peters says it all at FrontPage (thanks to Charles):

Religions are what men make of them. In the Arab heartlands of Islam, Muslims are making a gory mess of their faith. It's time to end the politically correct baby-talk insisting that Islam isn't the problem. In the decaying Arab world, Islam is the problem--because of the way bitter old men interpret and deform its more humane precepts while embracing its cruelest injunctions.

The decapitation of yet another American civilian can't be dismissed as an aberration from "true" Islam. The tradition of beheading unarmed prisoners dates to the earliest decades of the Muslim faith. The butchering of Paul Johnson, Nick Berg and others isn't a new phenomenon--it's revivalism, "that old-time religion" returning for a re-match with secular devils.

Millions of Muslims find such atrocities inspiring. Millions more view such cruelty as just. It's the vicarious revenge of the self-made failure. And for every rent-a-cleric the Saudi government pushes in front of a television camera to condemn such acts, thousands of other mullahs continue to preach anti-Western hatred--the brutal specificity of which would horrify even America's leftists, if only they stopped apologizing to terrorists long enough to listen. ...

Arab Muslims are allowed to spew anti-Western, anti-Christian, anti-Jewish, anti-Hindu, anti-everybody-else hate speech. That's just their culture, you see. But it's taboo for a Westerner to suggest that the roots of terror may go a bit deeper than a black sheep or two in a few Middle-Eastern families.

Leftist apologists for terror here in the United States attack any attempt at a frank discussion of the Middle East's problems with charges of bigotry and neo-imperialism. But if we examine the madness of the American Left dispassionately, we find that it's the Noam Chomskys, Susan Sontags and their acolytes from the campus greensward who are the true bigots. Imperialists, too.

By refusing to hold Middle Eastern civilization to reasonable standards of behavior and responsibility, our domestic Left has given new life to the "little brown brother" school of colonialist thought. According to the Left's internal logic, Arabs aren't capable of the same moral reflection and behavioral maturity well-educated whites demonstrate. And, of course, Arabs are oppressed (no matter that their oppressors are all Arabs).

Arab extremists and dictators have become the ghetto blacks of hard-Left foreign policy. They're all victims of Washington and bear no personal responsibility for their own errors, failures or crimes. It isn't the Saddams, Abdullahs, Assads or Mubaraks who oppress the Arab masses, you see. Despots are never guilty--unless they get too chummy with the Americans. Anyway, dictators are victims, too. The mass graves and misery that haunt the Middle East (if such inconveniences must be mentioned at all) are my fault. And yours, dear reader. We're to blame for all that's wrong with the world. And don't you forget it!

The family secret of the hard-Left is that its followers share one powerful trait with Osama bin Laden: They need to look down on others, to feel superior and just. If the lords of terror dispense with displays of pity for their victims, it's only because they haven't yet attained the leftist's level of hypocrisy.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Given the state of higher education today, this is a jaw-dropping story. From the Review Journal, with thanks to Twostellas:

Patrick Boylan, a member of the state's board of education, brought out the Quran before 19 of the state's highest emergency responders.

"It says it right here. Do not take the infidels as your friends," he said, citing Sura 5:51. "I'm making statements straight from the Quran and these are what terrorists are using to justify terrorism."

The topic of his lecture, "The terrorist mind-set, why do they hate us?" was part of a federally funded pilot master's degree program at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas' Institute of Security Studies. ...

"I have studied the Quran for this very purpose to understand why they behave the way they do," said Boylan, an Irish Catholic, who grew up in Pakistan. "There is going to be a war on terrorism that is never going to stop, and Islam is behind it."

Boylan's lecture made more than a few students in the classroom shift in their seats as he said the Islamic religion advocates killing Christians and Jews.

"I have a little bit of a different opinion," Sheriff Bill Young said during a class break. "Historically, Muslims, particularly in our country, are good citizens."

That was not relevant to what Boylan said, and this kind of red herring prevents the truth from getting out. Saying that elements of Islam give rise to terrorism is not saying that all Muslims are terrorists. As in all religions, many people go along culturally without having a deep familiarity with the teachings. Others choose to ignore them. But it is an obvious fact that radicals use the Qur'an and Sunnah to justify their actions, and I applaud Boylan's courage for saying so.

Retired U.S. Army Col. Lee Van Arsdale, the institute's director, stood up during the class to offer a legal disclaimer that Boylan's views do not represent those of UNLV.

All right. But what if the American Muslim groups sued? What could they do? Prove that the verse Boylan quoted is not in the Qur'an? Of course, they would fall back on the old "out-of-context" defense. For that, read Onward Muslim Soldiers, which examines key jihad verses of the Qur'an within the context of Islamic history, tradition, theology, and law.

Boylan knows his views are controversial. He resided in Pakistan for the first 26 years of his life, where he said he saw firsthand discrimination and violence against non-Muslims.

"Non-Muslims have been discriminated against all over the world," he said. "We are in a battle of religion right now."

In Pakistan and other countries of Islamic rule, Christians are treated as second-class citizens and cannot obtain high-level positions in government, he told students.

"There are no non-Muslims that hold significant positions of power," he said. ...

Boylan said the moderate Muslims, should they speak up, are drowned out by the radicals. He told students that obedience to a holy book which advocates subjugating, and in some cases killing, those who don't follow it will forever divide Muslims from non-Muslims.

"Those people who have taken (the Quran) to heart are doing (terrorism)," he said.

Americans tend to be too politically correct and are blind to the religious motivations behind terrorism, he said.

Brother, you can say that again.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Charles at LGF has posted a Times article revealing that Hizb-ut-Tahrir, the "peaceful" Islamic group that wants to establish Sharia wherever it can, was behind the girl who sued for the right to wear Islamic dress to school in England.

Here is Hizb-ut-Tahrir's agenda, as I summarized it at Jihad Watch last October:

1. Restore a worldwide Caliphate, uniting the world under Islamic rule;

2. Ban all faiths apart from Islam, Judaism and Christianity (members of other religions are not listed as "People of the Book" in the Qur'an);

3. Regulate all religious practice according to Sharia law;

4. "Give all non-Muslim states a choice between either joining the Caliphate under Sharia law, or paying a tax to the Caliphate. Failure to pay the tax would be punished by military attack."

Isn't it nice that these good folks can operate freely in Britain?


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Why is it unthinkable that Saudi officials could have helped Al-Qaeda kidnap Paul Johnson when a Saudi ex-policeman is going to head Al-Qaeda there? From the BBC, with thanks to Nicolei:

An ex-Saudi policeman has become leader of the al-Qaeda militant group in Saudi Arabia, according to media reports from the troubled kingdom.

Saleh al-Oufi, 38, will take over from Abdul Aziz al-Muqrin, who was killed by police on Friday.

Saudi security forces have been hunting al-Qaeda members in Riyadh, following the execution of a US hostage.

Saudi analysts say the new leader will be a formidable foe as he been a key figure in the group since 1985.

Al-Qaeda is believed to have been behind the abduction and beheading of US defence worker Paul Johnson, the latest foreign victim of a series of militant operations in the kingdom.

Correspondents say the rise of Mr Oufi will do nothing to dispel suspicions that al-Qaeda is closely linked to members of the security forces in Saudi Arabia.

That's for sure!


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

The South Koreans seem unwilling to follow the Spanish into dhimmitude. From Reuters, with thanks to Nicolei:

South Korea will go ahead with its plan to send 3,000 troops to help rebuild Iraq despite a televised threat from Iraqi militants to behead a South Korean hostage, the Foreign Ministry said today.

The government would do its best to seek the release of 33-year-old businessman Kim Sun-il, who has been shown repeatedly on South Korean television pleading for his life, Vice Foreign Minister Choi Young-jin told reporters after a meeting of President Roh Moo-hyun's National Security Council.

Choi said Kim, an Arabic graduate, had been kidnapped in Fallujah on June 17 - the day before South Korea announced where its troops would be deployed after months of agonising because of security concerns and public opposition.

The group holding Kim said South Korea had 24 hours from Sunday night to withdraw its decision or they would behead him, Arabic television station Al Jazeera reported.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Something is happening here, but no one knows what it is. From AP, with thanks to EPG:

TEHRAN, Iran - Iran confiscated three British military vessels Monday and arrested eight armed crew members, state-run television reported.

The three British ships entered Iranian territorial waters not far from the Iran-Iraq border, the Arabic language Al-Alam television reported. The station is part of the state-run Iranian radio and television network. ...

In London, the Ministry of Defense said it was investigating the report but did not know if it was true. There were no British warships operating in the Shatt al-Arab waterway, but some smaller vessels were there, the ministry said. ...

The Foreign Office said British diplomats in Tehran had been in contact with the Iranian government but it was still unclear what had happened.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Well, of course this is no surprise. But there is no real reason why Saudi officials couldn't or wouldn't have helped out with this. After all, the ideology of Al-Qaeda was nurtured and supported by high-level Saudis for years. Must we assume that all this support abruptly vanished? From AP, :

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia -- The Al Qaeda group responsible for abducting and killing an American engineer says it was aided by sympathizers in the Saudi security forces, a claim that was denied by Saudi authorities. ...

Sunday's Al Qaeda article said the militants decided to behead Johnson when Adel al-Jubeir, foreign affairs adviser to Crown Prince Abdullah in Washington, declared that Saudi Arabia would not negotiate with the kidnappers.

The group said it beheaded Johnson, 49, of Eagleswood Township, N.J., when its deadline expired Friday.

Asked about the Al Qaeda statement in a televised interview, al-Jubeir said, "We have never negotiated with terrorists. We don't intend to do so.

"I believe what the Al Qaeda people were trying to do is trying to justify a murder that is unjustifiable under any faith or under any principle of humanity."

Mm-hmm. If these high-sounding words had actually been Saudi policy for the last twenty years or so, we might not be in this fix.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

What happened to their commitment to multiculturalism? How can they pass such a racist law?

(Folks, don't get excited. That's an example of what you Americans call "sarcasm.")

From The Telegraph, with thanks to Twostellas:

The Irish government confirmed yesterday that it has ordered all men from Islamic countries seeking residency to sign a sworn affidavit rejecting polygamy.

Muslim men also have to agree they will not seek residency for a second wife if granted Irish citizenship. A man must swear he has "one spouse only" and "has no intention of entering into a simultaneous marriage".

A spokesman for the Department of Justice in Dublin said: "Obviously, we don't recognise polygamy under Irish law."

The Irish Council of Civil Liberties said the enforcement was "despicable".

Did you catch that? The Irish Council of Civil Liberties. Will the ACLU start plumping for polygamy soon? Where will the human rights groups come down on this issue? And it would seem that feminists would have something to say about treating women as commodities. We'll see, I'm sure.

CORRECTION: We already have seen. The ACLU already supports polygamists in the USA. Thanks to GL for the link.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

June 20, 2004

You don't hear too much about another group often designated as "People of the Book," and thus entitled to dhimmi status: the Zoroastrians. Here is an article about how they are disappearing from Iran. Hmmm; I wonder why, given the tolerant, peaceful system they've been living under? From AFP, with thanks to Ali Dashti:

"We are a species on the road to extinction," laments Babak, a man in his sixties who came from Tehran with his wife for the annual pilgrimage to one of the Zoroastrians' holiest sites -- the rocky peak of Chak-Chak. ...

"It may just be folklore, but it is undeniable that somebody important or a group of Zoroastrians took refuge here," added Kasra Vafadari, a respected member of the community and a teacher of history at the University of Nanterre, France. Furthermore, scholars point out that the route was used in following centuries for Zoroastrians fleeing Iran -- or Persia as it was formerly known -- to escape religious persecution. Once inside the grotto, women shrouded in white cast off their veils -- obligatory in Islamic Iran -- and drink tea and wine, which is permitted for religious use by non-Muslims in the Islamic republic.

Along with Judaism and Christianity, Zoroastrianism is a recognised -- and therefore permitted -- religion in Iran, where officially 99 percent of the 66 million-strong population are Muslims. ...

In a concession to their Persian roots and in contrast to many Sunni Muslim scholars, the Shia regime here recognises them as Kittabiyah -- or people of the book and fellow monotheists as opposed to Kufr, or infidels.

But their numbers are declining sharply. Centuries of persecution have forced many to flee to India, where they are known as the Parsi and number between 80,000 and 100,000.

Discrimination in Iran continues today, for example in seeking employment in the state sector where Muslims are preferred. ...

"People are leaving because they have no future here."


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Sanctioned by the example of the Prophet Muhammad and the dictates of Islamic law, beheading -- as the rest of the world is learning -- is a perfectly acceptable practice for the Muslim warrior. From AP, with thanks to nevermindlv:

BAGHDAD, Iraq - The Arab satellite TV network Al-Jazeera aired a videotape Sunday purportedly from al-Qaida linked militants showing a South Korean hostage begging for his life and pleading with his government to withdraw troops from Iraq.

The kidnappers, who identified themselves as belonging to a group led by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, gave South Korea 24 hours to meet its demand or "we will send you the head of this Korean."

"Please, get out of here," the man screamed in English, flailing his arms. "I don't want to die. I don't want to die. I know that your life is important, but my life is important."

Of course it is. But none of our lives will be important if these thugs start getting their way by means of threats and murder.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Are the Saudis finally getting serious about combatting terrorism? The jury is still out. But this doesn't bode well, although it's not in the least surprising. From AP, with thanks to DC Watson:

CAIRO, Egypt -- The al-Qaida cell that kidnapped and killed American Paul M. Johnson Jr. said in an online periodical Sunday that sympathizers in the kingdom's security forces supplied it with police uniforms and vehicles and set up fake checkpoints to facilitate last week's abduction.

The details of the kidnapping appeared in Sawt al-Jihad, or Voice of Holy War, a semimonthly online periodical published by al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula. A separate article, the final one written by cell leader Abdulaziz al-Moqrin, killed in a shootout Friday night, justified Johnson's slaying.

The first article said militants wearing police uniforms and using police cars set up a fake checkpoint on al-Khadma Road, leading the airport, near Imam Mohammed bin Saud University.

When Johnson's car approached the checkpoint June 12, the militants in police uniforms stopped his car - a Camry - detained him, anesthetized him and carried him to another car, the article said.

It said they then blew up Johnson's car.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

From Signonsandiego.com, with thanks to Twostellas:

SOKOTO, Nigeria - Saluted by sword-waving Muslim warriors on horses and camels, African presidents and emirs on Sunday celebrated the 200th anniversary of a holy war that launched the sub-Sahara's greatest Islamic empire and urged an end to rising Christian-Muslim violence that has killed thousands here.

Appeals for peace - evoking six years of fiery religious rampages by machete-waving mobs in Nigeria, Africa's most populous nation - overlaid a day of musket-blasting pageantry in Sokoto, capital of the 19th-century Sokoto caliphate, or kingdom.

Later on in the article is a bit of history that sounds a lot like today's headlines:

Itinerant preacher Shehu Usman dan Fodio had catapulted the kingdom into being with a 1804-1808 holy war launched against infidels and wayward Muslims.

The June 19, 1804, battle of Tafkin Kwatto, a village about 60 miles from Sokoto, was widely seen as the war's turning point.

The victory of what some historians term West Africa's "French Revolution" sparked copycat jihads across the arid savannah plains of Senegal, Mali, Ivory Coast, Chad, Central African Republic and Sudan.

But even amid a day of gunfire and pageantry, the celebrants were quick to insist that any resemblance between those days and today was purely coincidental:

In rare public comments, the current sultan of Sokoto declared that the 19th-century jihad fighter's cause had nothing to do with the rampages of today.

"I wish our own leaders would hold these values close to our hearts and entrench unity and peaceful coexistence," Sultan Mohammed Maccido told the crowd and the warriors.

He mourned "the loss of intolerable numbers of lives, and destruction and loss in property" in Nigeria's religious violence.

Sokoto today is part of 12 predominantly Muslim states that have adopted strict Islamic Shariah laws since 2000. Christians in Sokoto are few.

Dan Fodio is still widely revered by Muslims as a hero for spreading piety and Arabic literacy. Yet some Christians remember his uncompromising attitude toward nonbelievers, for whom he was once quoted as saying "there is no free place of the intellect."

Battle sites and burial grounds for Dan Fodio and his followers have been turned into monuments and mausoleums.

"He fought for Islam. He captured many places and spread knowledge," said Muhammadu Tambari, Dan Fodio's great-great-great grandson, an ostrich farmer.

"The jihad we are doing now is teaching and preaching to our children and the children of others. Spreading Islam," Tambari said. Modern day religious violence had no value, the jihad fighter's descendant said - only "creating more problems."

That's certainly true. Now if only Tambari could convince his fellow Nigerian Muslims.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Read all of this trenchant commentary in Arutz Sheva by Yocheved Golani (thanks to Nicolei):

The defenseless passengers on an Air France plane, a BOAC aircraft, a Japanese jumbo jet, aboard KLM, Lufthansa, Pan Am, Sabena, TWA and other airliners were not "occupying" the planes conveying them to innocuous destinations when Islamic terrorists kidnapped, terrorized and slaughtered them throughout the 1960s and 1970s. The civilian victims scattered across the countryside of Lockerbie, Scotland in 1988 had not "occupied" Pan Am 103, either.

Vacationing Christian Puerto Rican tourists weren't "occupying" Ben-Gurion airport on May 20, 1972. when pro-Islamic terrorists ambushed and sprayed them with bullets upon arrival.

Sleeping Israeli athletes invited to 1972's peace-promoting competitions in Munich were not "occupying" the Olympic Village when Arab radicals besieged and murdered them, disrupting the games promoting international friendship and trust.

Unarmed children at Ma'alot weren't "occupying" their school the day Arab terrorists forced them to jump to their deaths from the building during interrupted celebrations of 1974's Israel Independence Day.

Elderly Dora Bloch and her fellow travelers were not "occupying" Athens airport in 1976 when Arab terrorists hijacked a planeload of passengers to Uganda, resulting in Dora's murder and the rescue of her terrorized former companions.

Wheelchair-bound tourist Leon Klinghoffer was not "occupying" the Italian ship Achille Lauro when fundamentalist terrorists humiliated, then drowned the man by throwing him overboard, on October 7, 1985.

Teen hikers Yosef Ish-Ran and Koby Mandell of Biblical Tekoa did not seek to "occupy" the cave they were dragged to in 2001, and where their captors bludgeoned them to a terrifying death, then smeared their blood on the walls.

The employees of various faiths and ethnic backgrounds who reported for work that day were not "occupying" New York's Twin Towers when they were shocked, burned, smothered, blasted and shattered to death by Arab terrorists on September 11, 2001.

Daniel Pearl was not "occupying" Pakistan when he researched the links between Richard Reed and bin Laden before he was betrayed and beheaded for being a Jew, and therefore an "enemy" of Islam, in 2002. Entrepreneur Nicholas Berg was not "occupying" Iraq when Arab terrorists slowly, agonizingly, carved his Jewish head off his neck for public intimidation in 2004. The American businessmen murdered in Saudi Arabia were minding their own business when they were doing business with Muslim colleagues.

So why are they all dead? Is it truly because the Jews of Israel will not cede land to the rabble that, prevented by their compatriots from returning to their native countries in 1948, now fraudulently claim to be Palestinians? No. There are two glaring contradictions to the specious argument.

One: In 1948, Arab leaders wouldn't permit Arabs unwilling to live among Jews to live in any Arab state. The artificially created refugees were used and abused by their own brethren as violent political pawns against a nascent Israel.

Two: Sharon promised in June 2004 to "evacuate" disputed land before 2005. Within hours of that announcement, Yasser Arafat and Hamas respectively swore to annihilate and kidnap/murder military and civilian Jews. Clearly, the problem is not about "giving back" land, which never legitimately belonged to Arabs anyway.

The chaos, murder and mayhem are not about the merits or demerits of democracy, the West or Christianity, or international law. It's not about the Jews "controlling" the very same "media" that incongruously condemns Judaism, its practices and the Knesset. It's not about Israel inside or outside red, green, yellow or blue lines. It's not about the Israeli Right, or Jewish settlers (they'd be called "citizens" in any other society that inherited, purchased, won and/or annexed land). It's not about present-day Israel versus the borders of ancient Israel, nor about the alleged occupation of Arab lands.

It is about armed insanity, the calculated manipulation of public opinion via propaganda, coercion and attacks against unarmed civilians and their political leaders. And the scale of horror stands to rise now that Iran has saluted the world with a nuclear arms program.

It's about jihad.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Sure, France will play the dhimmi and help the Iranian mullahs round up the proponents of freedom -- if the price is right. Or at least so goes the charge here. From The Telegraph, with thanks to LGF:

France has been accused of agreeing to a crackdown on exiled opponents of Iran in return for lucrative commercial contracts.

Lawyers for France's human rights league, speaking on the anniversary of a huge police raid on the National Council of Resistance of Iran near Paris, pointed out "troubling coincidences" in the timing of the operation and a series of deals with Teheran.

In March last year, the regime signed a large contract with the French telecommunications group Alcatel for a telephone network.

In April last year Teheran offered the petrol giant TotalFina a £660 million gas fields contract. At the same time, a contract was signed with Renault to produce 500,000 cars over four years, the lawyers said.

Then, in June, police arrested 164 members of the Iranian opposition and placed 17 under investigation for having links with or funding terrorism. The authorities said they were looking for a link with a mortar attack on the office of the supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, in Teheran in 2000.

"The public should ask itself why this type of operation [was made] at the same time as commercial contracts were signed with a tyrannical and terrorist regime," said Patrick Baudoin, a lawyer.

One year on, not a shred of evidence incriminating the 17 had been found, said Mr Baudoin, who will file for the case to be closed next Tuesday. The French state had "flouted the rule of law to gain from petro-dollars", he said.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Are the Saudis finally getting serious about combatting terrorism? The jury is still out. But it seems increasingly likely that they are choosing their economic over their religious interests -- which also means, for the House of Saud, that they are attempting to choose survival. From AP:

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia - Police cars and armored vehicles flooded the al-Malaz neighborhood in the Saudi capital Sunday as security forces surrounded a house where suspected militants were believed to have taken refuge after a shootout with police.

The massive operation was under way in the same district that was the focus of a huge security sweep against militants sought in the beheading of American hostage Paul M. Johnson Jr., whose body has still not been found.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

My friends,

Comments are closed for now. Upgrades are in the offing that will allow them to be opened again. I apologize for all inconvenience -- but this is just a battle, not the war.

Sincerely
Robert Spencer


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

An interesting precedent has been set here. From the Chicago Sun-Times, with thanks to EPG:

Attorney Reem Odeh said Saturday that her client, Mae Sallal, of Frankfort, should be able to collect her $15,000 dowry, pending a court ruling in Jordan expected soon.

"They have respect for the American judicial system,'' Odeh said.

Sallal won what Odeh thinks is a virtually unprecedented legal victory last month before Will County Circuit Court Judge Robert Baron. He ruled that an Islamic marriage contract -- known as an Aqed Zawage -- could be enforced in the United States. In the past, Odeh said, judges have been reluctant to uphold religious contracts as binding law.

In that contract, which the couple signed in Jordan where they were married eight years ago, husband Rami Sallal agreed to pay $10,000 Jordanian dinars as a Muacher, or deferred dowry, if the couple split up. He also agreed to give her gold and other jewelry at her wedding as a dowry. In Muslim culture, dowries are given from males to females, said Mae Sallal, who is Palestinian. Rami Sallal is from Jordan.

Here is the main point:

Aaron Jaffe, a Cook County Chancery Court judge who formerly worked in the domestic relations division, said there are no legally binding religious contracts in American law. Jaffe, who is Maria Jaffe's father-in-law, could recall no instances when he upheld Islamic religious law.
| 8 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

You gotta hand it to that 9/11 panel. Now they've uncovered -- get this -- evidence that Saudi Arabia and Pakistan aided Al-Qaeda! Sharp as tacks, these guys. You'd almost think they were reading Jihad Watch. From the LA Times, :

WASHINGTON -- Pakistan and Saudi Arabia helped set the stage for the Sept. 11 attacks by cutting deals with the Taliban and Osama bin Laden that allowed his Al Qaeda terrorist network to flourish, according to several senior members of the Sept. 11 commission and U.S. counter-terrorism officials.

The financial aid to the Taliban and other assistance by two of the most important allies of the United States in its war on terrorism date at least to 1996, and appear to have shielded them from Al Qaeda attacks within their own borders until long after the 2001 strikes, those commission members and officials said in interviews.

| 26 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

More evidence of the thin line, if there is any line at all, between the official Palestinian Authority governmental structures, such as they are, and jihad terror groups that glorify the murder of innocent children. Ahmad Qurei, the Palestinian Prime Minister, has declared that the PA will not dismantle the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades. From IMRA:

Qurei ... explained ... that instead they would be integrated into Fatah "institutions".

This position appears to coincide with the Egyptian plan that the various
armed terrorist groups operating in the Gaza Strip retain their weapons (in
fact they can bring in more weapons) while Israel promises not to take
action against them.

| 5 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

June 19, 2004

I get a lot of hate mail, most of it uninteresting. One more entertaining one recently warned me that "1.2 billion mostly poor Muslims are coming to get you." Really? All of them? Even the vast majority of moderates? What a windfall that will be for local hotels and cabbies! But I doubt my neighbors here in Secure Undisclosed Locationville will appreciate the traffic snarls.

Anyway, this one from a "Frank Atry" is less entertaining, but more instructive:

Came across your site in an online search. Let me tell you...*Everybody* has got an agenda, and *your* anti-Muslim propaganda and misinformation campaign is no different from those you set out to criticize. Now, *that* is the epitome of hypocrisy! ;-)

So, go on about your "speaking engagements," book
deals, and all that other garbage (let me guess, you
are Jewish, right???), but you didn't fool me.

F. Atry
P.S. Don't wait up for any speaking engagement
invitations from me. :-p

I'll unpack my bags, Frankie, but meanwhile: there you go again. Why do you and your jihadist friends assume that anyone willing to stand up against radical Islam and expose the jihadist agenda is Jewish? After all, the jihad is -- and this ain't misinformation or propaganda, Frankie baby, but the plain words of Osama bin Laden, Abu Bakar Bashir, Omar Bakri, Abu Hamza, Zaraqawi, etc. etc. -- directed against every non-Muslim, and will subjugate Christians and others as well as Jews under the discriminatory laws of dhimmitude. (Hindus may fare even worse, as they are not technically "People of the Book," but pagans, although they have been accorded dhimmi status by Muslim rulers in history.)

The assumption that anyone who resists the jihad must be Jewish is based on the erroneous view that this is all about Israel, and that the Islamic world would live in peace with the rest of the planet if only that tiny state were swept into the sea. The news articles I post here about Nigeria, Thailand, Indonesia, Kashmir, the Philippines, and elsewhere show just how wrong that is. And I, who am not Jewish, am proud to stand with Jews and women and Christians and Hindus and Buddhists and unbelievers and everyone else against this great scourge that would destroy free societies and relegate us all to second-class status -- or worse.

UPDATE: Friends, I'm sorry to say that the loathesome spammer has compelled me to end this thread as well. However, help is on the way: soon we will have an upgrade that will take care of this problem once and for all. So I thank you for your patience.

| 71 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

But as long as Paul Johnson was not a Muslim, that love was unrequited. From AP:

Johnson had worked in Saudi Arabia for more than a decade and over the week his friends and family had described him as devoted to the culture of his adopted land.

For what ultimately killed Paul Johnson was the conviction that non-Muslims have no right to be in Saudi Arabia, in accord with the Prophet Muhammad's dictum: "Turn out all Al-Mushrikun [unbelievers] from the Arabian Peninsula" (Sahih Bukhari, vol. 4, book 58, no. 3168 -- in the hardcover edition; the numbering in the online edition is different, but for some reason I can't get into it today).

NOTE: Last night's loathsome spammer has returned, so I have had to close comments on this one too.

| 59 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Despite denials, apparently Al-Moqrin is still dead. From AP, :

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia (AP) -- An al-Qaida cell fulfilled its threat to kill an American hostage, beheading him and showing the grisly photos on the Internet. Saudi officials claimed they later gunned down four militants including the cell leader who allegedly masterminded Paul M. Johnson's kidnapping.

State-run television showed pictures of the four slain militants' bodies Saturday. Among them was one it said was Abdulaziz al-Moqrin, the reputed leader of al-Qaida in Saudi Arabia and Saudi Arabia's most-wanted terror suspect.

Hours earlier, a message on an Islamic militant Web site said the reports of al-Moqrin's saying were false. The message could not immediately be verified, but it appeared on a Web site that has had similar messages in the past.

A U.S. official who spoke on condition of anonymity Friday had confirmed al-Moqrin's killing, while a Saudi official had said forensic tests would confirm its identity.

| 51 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Christians in Iraq have been excluded from aid distribution. From KurdishMedia News, with thanks to Andy:

New York (KurdishMedia.com) 18 June 2004: Christian Democrat MEP Albert Jan Maat has asked the European Commission questions about the distribution the 160 million euro in funds approved for the distribution in Iraq by the European Commission. These questions, which regarded the Assyrian Christians of Iraq, were as follows:

"The Commission has decided that 160 million EUR can be devoted to the reconstruction of Iraq. What guarantees can the Commission give that religious minorities can benefit from these funds on the basis of proportionality?"

"Is the Commission aware that Assyrian Christians are systematically excluded from the distribution of aid by local leaders?"

MEP Maat cited an element of religious favoritism as a root cause of the lack of aid being received by the Assyrians, stating, "International aid is mainly distributed through regional, and therefore Muslim, leaders and seldom or never reaches the Assyrians."

| 22 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Now Al-Qaeda is saying that Abdulaziz al-Muqrin is not dead after all. Perhaps he is sharing an apartment with Osama bin Laden. From The Australian, with thanks to Nicolei:

THE leader of al-Qaeda in Saudi Arabia, Abdulaziz al-Muqrin, is not dead, according to a statement posted today on a website which regularly publishes statements from the al-Qaeda terrorist network.

Security men at the scene of a shootout in the Saudi capital of Riyadh said that Muqrin had been gunned down along with three other militants last night.

"Following the lies ... about the death of Abdulaziz al-Muqrin, we affirm that such allegations, spread by the tyrants in Saudi Arabia, are intended to undermine the morale of the mujahideen on the Arabian peninsula," said the communique.

Posted on the site http://alsaha.fares.net, its authenticity could not be ascertained immediately.

| 15 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

From the New York Times via The Straits Times, with thanks to Nicolei, who also noted that only among Muslims is the question of whether the killing of an innocent civilian is justified or not "reduced to the banality of a debate. In all other major religions, the answer is so clear that one does not even think of it."

In one unusual website posting, a Saudi man who said he had worked with the kidnap victim, and had even discussed Islam with him, went so far as to try to extend a kind of religiously inspired traditional tribal form of protection known as 'ijara' that would forbid killing Mr Johnson.

'I hereby declare my protection and rescue for this man along with all his colleagues who work with us in the company, who ate with us and accepted our gifts of Islamic books which they promised to read,' wrote Mr Saad Al-Moemen.

He also described visits that Mr Johnson had made to his home and said the engineer had expressed distaste for United States foreign policy. ...

The fatwa was attacked by a number of readers who said all foreigners came to the kingdom with bad intentions, acting as the vanguard for the US military.

'Whoever gives them security is an apostate,' read one posting.

Others scoffed at the idea that an official visa somehow bestowed legitimacy on visitors.

'Who gave them the visa? It is the infidel agent regime,' read one posting in part.

'So I tell the mujahideen to keep killing them until the Arabian peninsula is cleared of the filth of the crusaders.'

Others suggested that the militants try to convert Westerners to Islam rather than killing them, because that way they would be spared from going to hell, and the image of the faith around the world would not be so tainted with blood.

One religious leader, identified as Abdel Rahman bin Saleh al-Mahmoud, said Prophet Muhammad's followers had commanded that all non-believers be expelled from the Arabian peninsula.

But it has never been clear, he wrote, whether that includes just the holy city of Mecca or some larger area. In addition, foreigners visited at the time of the Prophet, he noted, it was just the idea of permanent communities that was abhorrent.

| 22 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

June 18, 2004

Looks as if they got Al-Moqrin. This is the guy they let go before because he memorized the Qur'an. From AP:

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia (AP) - The leader of al-Qaida in Saudi Arabia was believed killed in a raid in the capital Friday, hours after his group claimed the beheading of an American engineer, Saudi security officials said.

A U.S. official confirmed that al-Moqrin has been killed. The official spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the information.

To establish identities, one Saudi official said forensic tests would be conducted on three bodies of militants killed in a shootout in a downtown neighborhood shortly after the discovery of Paul M. Johnson Jr.'s body.

The killing of Abdulaziz al-Moqrin, 31, would be a coup for the Saudi goverment, which has been under intense pressure to halt a wave of attacks against Westerners in the kingdom.

| 67 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Another beheading. From AP:

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia - The al-Qaida group that kidnapped American Paul M. Johnson Jr. posted a statement on a Web site Friday saying it killed him, and displayed still photographs on the Internet of his beheaded body. ...

Johnson was kidnapped last weekend by militants who threatened to kill him by Friday if the kingdom did not release its al-Qaida prisoners.

UPDATE: Here is the message accompanying the beheading photos (via The Guardian):

In answer to what we promised ... to kill the hostage Paul Marshall after the period is over ... the infidel got his fair treatment ... Let him taste something of what Muslims have long tasted from Apache helicopter fire and missiles. We, God willing, will continue our road to fight the enemies of God.

Yet people still doubt that religion plays any real or essential role in all this. Also, I wonder if the mujahedin really called Mr. Johnson "Paul Marshall." Could they be reading Paul Marshall's Islam At the Crossroads? (Marshall was actually Johnson's middle name; I was just struck by the coincidence.)

UPDATE: The photos, via Drudge.

ANOTHER UPDATE: I'm sorry, but I've had to shut down the comments. A loathsome spammer keeps trying to post on this thread; also, although comments here are largely unmoderated, I really don't want this thread or any other to fill up with calls to genocide and the like. I still believe that we can and must defeat jihad while remaining within the bounds of Judeo-Christian morality and American Constitutionality. And no, that doesn't mean I'm not appalled and angered by what has been done to Mr. Johnson.

| 82 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

I am not inclined to revisit all this, as it doesn't seem to be doing much to make people aware of the fact that there are many Attas still at large. Nevertheless, this piece gives an interesting glimpse into the day-to-day workings of the most notorious jihad strike of our age, and this one some of the harrowing highlights of the flight tapes.

"Stay quiet and you'll be OK," Atta told the passengers. This could be the new slogan for all of today's anti-anti-terrorism. Stay quiet and you'll be OK: stop fighting terrorists in Iraq and elsewhere, accept the preposterous claim that there was no Iraq Al-Qaeda link, don't talk about the roots of Islamic violence in the core texts of Islam, keep mum about how the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is just one arena of a global jihad that is being waged against non-Muslims by people with quite readily identifiable motives and goals, and on and on. Stay quiet and you'll be OK.

No thanks.

| 52 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

He can't call it genocide or ethnic cleansing yet. And don't hold your breath waiting for him to call it a jihad. From AP, with thanks to DC Watson:

UNITED NATIONS — Secretary-General Kofi Annan raised the possibility Thursday of international intervention to protect more than 1 million people threatened by fighting in the Darfur region of western Sudan. ...

Annan said he wasn't ready to describe the situation in Darfur "as genocide or ethnic cleansing yet" but he did call it "a tragic humanitarian situation."

| 33 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Meet Shannen Rossmiller. From the Seattle Times, with thanks to ahoymite:

CONRAD, Mont. — Shannen Rossmiller finds early mornings are best for hunting terrorists.

When it's 4 a.m. in this one-stoplight prairie town, it's 3 p.m. in, say, Karachi, Pakistan, the sweltering hours just before the evening call to prayer. That's when Rossmiller, while her husband and three children sleep, finds the Internet chat rooms and bulletin boards frequented by radical Muslims and jihad warriors are busiest.

It is when Rossmiller pursues her deadly serious hobby: citizen cyberspy.

Two success stories of "freelance" anti-jihadists:

Spc. Ryan Anderson, National Guardsman: Fort Lewis soldier charged with attempting to aid the enemy. Private citizen Shannen Rossmiller posed as a terrorist on the Internet and lured the 26-year-old soldier into an FBI sting operation. The Army arrested Anderson in February and plans to court-martial him, saying he tried to provide information to the enemy as his unit prepared to deploy to Iraq. Anderson, a Muslim convert, could face the death penalty if convicted.
James Ujaama, former Seattle resident: Thirty-eight-year-old prosecuted for planning to set up a terrorism training camp in Bly, Ore., in 1999. Videotapes provided to the FBI by a self-proclaimed "freelance intelligence agent" in London, Glen Jenvey, played a significant role in the 2002 prosecution. Jenvey infiltrated the Finsbury Park mosque in North London to obtain the tapes, which showed Ujaama sitting alongside radical cleric Abu Hamza al-Masri and talking about jihad. Ujaama pleaded guilty last year and has agreed to testify against Abu Hamza, who was arrested last month in London and is accused of aiding al-Qaida.
| 30 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

More news of the international character of the jihad. Or was it just a mercenary action? From the Washington Times:

Mercenaries believed to be from Chechnya are suspected of carrying out the deadly ambush of civilian security contractors on a road outside Baghdad earlier this month.

The attackers killed four civilians working with Blackwater USA. Three contractors who managed to escape concluded that the assault was the work of trained gunmen.

If so, said a former U.S. Special Forces fighter recently in Baghdad, "this opens a whole other can of worms for the coalition to deal with."

But what kind of can of worms?

Professional analysis of the incident concluded that the attackers were well-trained and were most likely Syrian or Chechen hired guns. They wanted to survive and not leave any bodies.

"The ambush on the [airport] highway was done by Chechen imports. Very switched on and well experienced," said the former Special Forces member.

"Hitting a moving car at [72 mph], plus from another moving car, with an RPG is no small feat ... [and] the fact that they policed up their dead [and] wounded and all the weapons also indicates their level of professionalism.

"I personally don't think they were good Muslims doing their jihad duties, or politically motivated. I think they were high-tech, highly trained mercenaries in it for the bucks."

Why? Because they were experts? Jihadists can't be skillful? I'm not sure that's a very effective or accurate assumption to make. Also, even if they were hired guns, who hired them, and why?

| 5 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

The Hudood laws in Pakistan cover sexual crimes. Under them, women are actually imprisoned for being victims of rape. But these laws will not be changed, even in the new, anti-extremist Pakistan. From Pakistan's Dawn, with thanks to Nicolei:

ISLAMABAD June 15: Prime Minister Mir Zafarullah Khan Jamali on Tuesday declared in unequivocal terms that the government will not make any un-Islamic amendment to the Hudood Ordinance under external or individual pressure.

Speaking at a meeting of women parliamentarians of the ruling Pakistan Muslim League-Q at the residence of party president Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain, the prime minister said: "Parliament is the proper platform for making or amending any law and whatever changes will be proposed in any law of the land, including the Hudood Ordinance, they will come through parliament." ...

He said the proposed amendments to the Hudood ordinance would first be sent to the Islamic Ideology Council for its advice before taking them to parliament's debate and approval.

He said that in a parliamentary democratic dispensation any amendment could only be brought about through parliament and the parliament itself was not authorized under constitution to pass any law repugnant to Islam.

He, however, said that any man-made law would be considered carefully for amendment for which the government was not in a hurry. He said the government would only follow those principles as had been laid down by Islam.

| 26 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

But obviously this work of memorization didn't make him non-violent. From the New York Post, with thanks to Nicolei:

IN recent months, he has been the world's second- most active terrorist, his roll call of atrocities eclipsed only by that of the ubiquitous Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi.

But this past weekend, Abdulaziz Al-Muqrin, al Qaeda's chief of operations for the Arabian Peninsula, upped the ante considerably in his jihad against the West.

In a statement issued on several Islamist Web sites, Al-Muqrin's group has claimed responsibility for the murder of one American, Kenneth Scroggs, and kidnapping of another, Lockheed Martin employee Paul Johnson, in Riyadh on Saturday.

Al-Muqrin, also known as "Abu Hajar," seems hell-bent on upholding his recent pledge to make this summer "bloody and miserable for infidels."

Just last week, he vowed through an Islamist Web site that al Qaeda would target Western airlines, military bases and residential compounds in "the near future." And on May 29, he claimed responsibility for the chaotic assault on Western oil facilities in the Saudi city of Khobar that killed 22 people, including one American. ...

Al-Muqrin is suspected of having engineered suicide bombings in Riyadh in May and November 2003 that took 53 lives (including nine Americans) and is thought to have been the architect of an April 21 attack in the Saudi capital that killed five people and wounded 148. And he claimed responsibility for a May 1 shooting spree in the Saudi oil center of Yanbu that killed six Westerners and one Saudi.

According to Al-Muqrin, the Yanbu attack, like the one in Khobar, was designed to stem the flow of Saudi oil, thereby harming the country's economy. ...

It is unclear how the Saudi government will deal with Al-Muqrin, if it catches him. In 1997, after being extradited to Saudi Arabia by Ethiopian authorities, Al-Muqrin was sentenced to eight years in prison. But the Saudi Interior Ministry released him in the summer of 2001, reportedly because he had memorized the Koran while behind bars.

| 36 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Alan Caruba echoes and underscores points I have made many times in this Insight piece (thanks to Nicolei):

I think a lot of Americans, certainly those favoring withdrawal from Iraq and efforts to negotiate with al-Qaeda and the nations supporting its holy war, have not yet figured out that the Islamic fundamentalists who beheaded Daniel Pearl and Nick Berg, who attacked this nation on 9/11, and who represent the insurgents in Iraq, want us dead. Unless, of course, we convert to Islam. ...

According to the extremists, the prophet left a trail of assassinations and other bloody acts behind him until his own death, all of which they insist are recorded by Muslim historians. This is cited as a tradition among Muslims in the early centuries of Islamic development. As the Internet essay notes, these are not just isolated incidents or aberrations. "Such violence in fact goes to the very roots of Islam as found in the Quran and the actions and teachers of the prophet of Islam himself." And that is the view of the extremists who have declared a war of terror on all those who do not see the world as they do.

The holy war that has been declared against us leaves us no choice but to fight for our lives.

| 9 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Peacekeepers are regarded with the same suspicion as are all non-Muslims. From Reuters, with thanks to Nicolei:

KABUL (Reuters) - Four Afghans died in a bomb attack on Wednesday apparently targeting NATO peacekeepers, officials said, a day after President Bush held up Afghanistan as a role model for Iraq.

The blast in the northern Afghan town of Kunduz killed two children and two men, the officials said, the latest attack in a spate of violence ahead of presidential and parliamentary polls supposed to be held in September.

The blast was possibly triggered by a remote-controlled device as a vehicle from a NATO Provincial Reconstruction Team passed along a crowded road in the center of the city, Afghan officials said.

No peacekeepers were hurt in the attack, a spokesman for the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force said.

But an Afghan driver of the reconstruction team vehicle was among those killed, General Mohammad Dawood, the senior military commander in Kunduz, told reporters. None of the 250 German troops from the Kunduz team was in the car.

| 2 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

The British National Party, which has often justly been accused of racism, is under fire again for opposing mass immigration. From icWales, with thanks to Twostellas:

Police are investigating claims that a British National Party European election leaflet contained inflammatory statements which could incite racial hatred. ...

Headed "Asylum is making Britain explode", the leaflet was delivered to households in the area in the run-up to this weekend's elections as part of the far-right party's Europe campaign.

It stated that the "Government is planning to build five giant new cities, each the size of Birmingham, over the next 30 years, to house over five million new immigrants".

It also claimed "around two million illegal immigrants and asylum seekers" were pushing the benefits system and health service "to breaking point". ...

But spokesman for the BNP Dr Phillip Edwards denied the leaflet, which was delivered to up to 30 million homes across the country, was racist and said it was important for all political parties to be able to air their views.

He added: "There is a problem in this democracy if we are not allowed to open the debate without being thrown into jail.

"But in fact the leaflet does not carry anything about race - it is about immigration and asylum."

While concern about immigration seems to be ipso facto racism, the notorious British Muslim group Al-Muhajiroun is gearing up for another conference.

Secular Fundamentalism

In light of the recent government proposals to introduce ID cards, as well as to dump the policy of multiculturalism, in favour of integration and the promotion of Britishness; Muslims must ask where they stand on these issues?

This is especially so since Muslims are now being asked to participate in ceremonies which involve taking an oath of allegiance to the Queen, and a pledge to uphold the British Law and British values such as Freedom, Democracy and Liberalism, when trying to attain British citizenship.

Since Al-Muhajiroun has made it quite clear that they're opposed to taking an oath to the Queen and upholding freedom, democracy, and liberalism, one must ask: will the tide of immigrants strengthen Al-Muhajiroun? Will this not threaten British society and government? Consequently, isn't it legitimate, and not racist (whatever the sins of the BNP), to be concerned about immigration?

| 62 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

June 17, 2004

Score one for truth and justice. Fawaz Damra is guilty. From AP, :

AKRON, Ohio June 17, 2004 — The Palestinian-born leader of Ohio's largest mosque was convicted Thursday of lying about his connections to terrorist organizations when he applied for U.S. citizenship.

Fawaz Damra, imam of the Islamic Center of Cleveland, showed no emotion as the verdict was read in federal court.

He could be sentenced to up to five years in prison, stripped of his citizenship and deported for providing false information to become a citizen in 1994.

His attorneys will fight on.

Prosecutors claimed that Damra, 41, concealed ties to Afghan Refugee Services, the Islamic Committee for Palestine and Palestinian Islamic Jihad, groups the government classifies as terrorist organizations.

"We feel this is a victory in the war on terrorism," prosecutor Cherie Krigsman said.

Prosecutors showed video footage of Damra raising money for an arm of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, which has been listed as a major terrorist group by the State Department since 1989.

Jurors also were shown footage in which Damra called Jews "the sons of monkeys and pigs" during a 1991 speech and said "terrorism and terrorism alone is the path to liberation" in a 1989 speech.

"He was the guy that they brought in to raise the money for Islamic Jihad," Krigsman said after the verdict. "Without the money they could not operate." ...

Many members of Damra's mosque have continued to support him, voting in March to allow him to continue leading prayers and performing other functions. ...

"Unfortunately, I don't believe justice was served," said Haider Alawan, a member of the Cleveland mosque's board of elders and a Damra backer.

| 45 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

In Onward Muslim Soldiers I included a chapter entitled "Everybody must get stoned: The strange alliance between radical Islam and the post-Sixties Left." People on the Left and the Right have remonstrated with me since, saying I was too hard on American liberals.

But remember: the struggle against jihad is not a liberal or conservative issue. It's a human rights issue that all Americans should support. The fact that large segments of the Left do not is an outrage and a scandal, but it is by no means something I am exaggerating. Just yesterday I got a hateful, slanderous, and ignorant email from a representative of a New England leftist group. And then there is this, which indicates that at least some segments of the global jihad network see allies on the American Left. From The Guardian, with thanks to Susan:

The controversy over Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11 just won't go away. ...

Meanwhile, in the United Arab Emirates, the film is being offered the kind of support it doesn't need. According to Screen International, the UAE-based distributor Front Row Entertainment has been contacted by organisations related to the Hezbollah in Lebanon with offers of help.

| 62 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Hugh Fitzgerald points out some of the deficiencies in the work of the much-lionized Bernard Lewis:

Bernard Lewis is an acute scholar about many aspects of Islam. He writes beautifully. He is well-trained in languages. He lived during the war in Egypt. He is lionized in Turkey. Even in small shops off Taksim Square, the proprietors, when they discover a visitor is from the United States, ask if that visitor may happen to know "Professor Lewis."

He has all the right enemies: notably, the absurd Said, who knew nothing about Islam but for some reason thought his being an Arab entitled him to act as an expert (the footnote alone, on "thawra," in Lewis' "The Question of Orientalism," is enough to delicately dismember all of Said's pretentions; he does not survive the essay); and the apologist Esposito, who is not fit to be mentioned at the same time as Lewis. Esposito is an out-and-out apologist, an ignoramus, and the producer of glossy picture-books about Islam that win the reader over and distract from the apologetic or vapid texts he has chosen, with plenty of local color -- venerable mosques, turbans and Iznik tulips, the usual Mughal miniatures of hunting scenes, or Majnoun and Leyla, an apothecary jar or two from Abbassid Baghdad, the obligatory Persian poetry in nastaliq, and of course the Dome of the Rock. Meanwhile, he ignores so many subjects, including Jihad and the treatment of non-Muslims under Islam, or minimizes them to the point of disappearance.


Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

A damaging video in the Damra case in Ohio. From AP, with thanks to LGF:

In the 1991 video played in U.S. District Court, Damra implores members of the audience to donate money for the Islamic Committee for Palestine. Damra tells the audience the committee "is the active arm of Palestinian Islamic Jihad in America."

Matthew Levitt, senior fellow in terrorism studies at the Washington Institute for Near East Studies, testified that the Palestinian Islamic Jihad is "bent on the destruction of Israel."

Damra has pleaded innocent to a charge of obtaining U.S. citizenship in 1994 by providing false information. If convicted, he could lose his citizenship, be fined $5,000 and be sentenced to up to five years in prison before being deported.

The video showed Damra standing in front of a wall with an American flag on it at the Beit Hanina Club in Cleveland, a social club for Palestinians.

Jurors watched video monitors in front of their seats that had subtitled translation of Damra's speech, which was in Arabic.

Expressionless, Damra watched most of the video on a monitor at a defense table.

On the tape, Damra also introduces Sami Al-Arian as the head of the committee.

Al-Arian, a former University of South Florida professor, has pleaded innocent to federal charges that he financed terrorists. He has been held for 15 months at a Florida prison on charges he used an Islamic think tank and a charity he founded to raise money for the Palestinian Islamic Jihad.

The hour-long video included Al-Arian's speech in which he spoke of Palestinians martyrs and describes them as heroes. He shouted into the microphone in Arabic that Muslims in America cannot forget their brothers and sisters in Palestine.

Levitt testified that the Palestinian Islamic Jihad has been listed as a major terrorist group in a U.S. State Department publication titled "Patterns of Global Terrorism" since 1989. He testified that the group opposes peace with Israel and a two-state system.

Levitt said that to reach its goals the group "engages in acts of violence and murder."

On a second video, Damra shouted for contributions for orphans in Palestine.

Levitt began testifying that these donations are raised to recruit people for acts of violence with the understanding that their children will be cared for after their deaths.

Defense attorney Nancy Hollander objected to the statements and Judge James Gwin told jurors to disregard it.

| 76 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

From The Guardian, with thanks to Tziona2, who comments: "What is missing from all the reports in the newspapers is what the girl's lawyer, Yvonne Spencer, said on Channel Four news yesterday evening: the real reason the girl objects to wearing the shalwar khameez (and the reason the school approved it as uniform) is that Sikhs and Hindus also wear it. In the Dar al-Islam the authorities enforced this rule of the Dhimma by making dhimmi wear a coloured patch on their clothes, so if Miss Begum wants to distinguish herself from the kuffar as being a muslim, let her sew a patch onto her clothes. If it works one way, it works the other." Indeed.

A 15-year-old Muslim girl yesterday lost her high court battle for the right to wear strict Islamic dress to school.

Shabina Begum has not attended Denbigh high school in Luton since September 2002 when she was sent home for turning up in a jilbab - the full-length gown worn by many Muslim women that covers all of the body except the face and hands.

Shabina's claim that she had been "constructively excluded" from her school was dismissed by Mr Justice Bennett. He said the school's refusal to let her wear the jilbab did not breach her right to education and freedom of religion as laid down in the European convention on human rights.

The school, a 1,000-pupil comprehensive where almost 80% of pupils are Muslim, said it had a flexible uniform policy to ensure that the religious and cultural sensitivities of its students were respected. Girls have the option of wearing trousers, skirts, or a shalwar kameez (trousers and a tunic).

| 37 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

A realistic appraisal. From AP, with thanks to Nicolei:

General Peter Schoomaker compared the global war on terrorism with fighting cancer. And he says the threat from Islamic militants who want to destroy the United States is "never going to go away in our lifetime."

He says people eventually get cured of pneumonia. When it comes to cancer, he says the disease may go into remission -- but never really goes away.

| 47 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

More on the Internet jihad from Financial Times:

According to research by Jane's Terrorism and Security Centre, which closely follows terrorism developments, the internet has probably become the main global source of literature promoting jihad, or "holy war".

Richard Evans of Jane's cites research that concludes: "It is virtually impossible to control the spread of jihad material among similar web pages once it has been published in one location." All the websites linked to al-ansar.biz were hosted by the same Malaysian company, Acme Commerce, based in Kuala Lumpur. The company says it hosts 5,000 websites from up to 50 countries and cannot be blamed for their content. ...

According to Jane's, they had been used to distribute publications under the title Voice of Jihad, as well as an online jihadist magazine called al-Battar. Issued every two months, it carries essays on religious issues, advice on military strategy and training, and guidance on creating the "basic conditions for successful guerrilla warfare".

The growth in the number of similar sites and the regularity with which they change addresses while retaining readers who rapidly communicate the new addresses, has overwhelmed law enforcement agencies. In some cases other websites have found themselves hijacked by Islamist programmers who write their material on to existing sites.

"It's nearly impossible to police them," said Kevin O'Brien, a terrorism expert with RAND Europe, a think-tank. "It's a question of whether or not you can find them in the first place," he said, adding that the cost of establishing the sites was negligible or even nil if service providers offered web space as a free addition to e-mail users.

Saudi Arabian Islamists distributing a web-based jihadist magazine called Sawt al-Jihad are now so confident of outwitting the authorities that the publication is distributed at the same time every two weeks. It has yet to be snared.

But some security experts say they may be left to operate deliberately. "It seems increasingly likely that security agencies are content to let these websites run, because it's a way of monitoring what these people are up to," said Bill Durodié, a security expert at King's College, London.

So is Jihad Watch.

| 15 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Maybe it's all true, and mall bombing suspect Nuradin Abdi has been tortured in prison in Ohio, but I doubt that prosecutors would give themselves that large a self-inflicted wound. Instead, it looks as if CAIR and Abdi's other defenders are trying to set up some kind of abuse case, along with the usual charges of discrimination. Maybe they have calculated that this is the sort of thing that will play well after Abu Ghraib. From AP:

In the courtroom, Nuradin Abdi pressed his face onto a glass-covered tabletop, jerked his head randomly and muttered as his attorney successfully sought the evaluation before trial begins.

Many of Abdi's supporters who attended Wednesday's hearing said they were disturbed to see his shuffling gait and distracted behavior. Abdi has been held in federal detention since his arrest in November.

"It was like a different person," said his 17-year-old brother, Mohamed AbdiKarani, who said Abdi is innocent. "He looked at me; he didn't know who I was." ...

"The government took a healthy man, and what we have here is a broken man, mentally," said his lawyer, Mahir Sherif. Assistant U.S. Attorney Dana Peters said he did not object to the evaluation but added, "We have no evidence of any abuse of Mr. Abdi." ...

Jad Humeidan, executive director of the Ohio office of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, said Abdi was his friend, and always quick to volunteer to help new Somali immigrants find translators, jobs and housing.

"Just seeing Nuradin in court was an emotional experience," Humeidan said. "This wasn't the Nuradin that we know. This was just the shell of a man."

About 100 supporters, including Abdi's family, filled the seats in the courtroom and stood along the walls. Afterward they joined about 200 other supporters in front of the courthouse, where many waved small American flags and a few held up signs that read "Nuradin is 100 percent innocent" and "Patriot Act Religious Profiling." ...

Sherif said it was too early for him to comment about the charges but added, "It's not beyond the government to make mistakes for whatever reason."

That is true. Still, I doubt that this man was tortured. We'll see what evidence comes in.

| 21 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Michelle Malkin has some important revelations about Nuradin Abdi, the "shopping-mall terrorist," and other recently apprehended characters.

Nuradin M. Abdi, who was indicted last week for plotting with al Qaeda to blow up an Ohio shopping mall, flew here from Somalia and received bogus "refugee" status in 1999, according to authorities. Prosecutors allege that Abdi then fraudulently obtained a refugee travel document, which he used to fly to Ethiopia for jihad training. After returning, Abdi blended back into the American landscape along with tens of thousands of other refugees from a country known to be a breeding ground for Islamic terrorists. Columbus, Abdi's home base, is home to more than 30,000 Somalis -- the second-largest Somali community in the United States, after Minneapolis.

The Somali-al Qaeda connection is well-established. Intelligence reports indicate that Osama bin Laden sent extremists to Somalia in the early 1990s to train and organize the Somali Islamic radical group al-Ittihad al-Islamiya. Bin Laden claimed responsibility for the deaths of 18 American soldiers in Mogadishu. In addition, a Saudi Arabian-based Muslim charity with alleged ties to al Qaeda has been funding refugee camps in Somali border towns. The feds have frozen the Al-Haramain Foundation's assets based on terrorism grounds, but the flow of refugees from the overseas camps subsidized by the group has not been stanched.

Not every Somalian refugee or asylum-seeker is a terrorist, of course. But the system for screening out the well-meaning from the menaces is completely overwhelmed. Claims of "credible fear of persecution" are almost impossible to document but are rarely rejected. Federal homeland security officials are unable to detain asylum-seekers for background checks without the civil liberties brigade screaming "racial profiling." And there is still a woeful shortage of detention space -- just 2,000 beds nationwide -- to hold those with suspect claims.

| 4 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Unconscionable jihadist posturing at UC-Irvine. From Roberta Leguizamon in Front Page:

The Muslim Student Union (MSU) of University of California-Irvine has asked graduating Muslim students to wear green sashes bearing the word “shahada,” the Arabic word for "martyrdom.” The Muslim world refers to a suicide bomber who kills innocent civilians in Israel as a “shahid.” Pilots and their cohorts who fly airplanes into skyscrapers are also celebrated for their “martyrdom.” Children in Palestinian schools are taught, “blessed with shahada and honour, his soul returns to its Creator to live a different life, content with the rewards and honour bestowed upon it, a life of grace thanks to Allah.” ...

It is hard to believe that the UC-Irvine would silently endorse this culture of death at its graduation ceremony, yet to date, not a single member of its administration has spoken against the MSU’s promotion of the suicide sashes. The proposed sashes don’t just represent Palestinian “freedom fighters” and their crusade against Israel. They also glorify the actions of those 15 “martyrs” who brought the World Trade Center to the ground on top of American citizens. And this institution of higher learning has chosen to support pro-terrorist advocacy while this country is at war with terrorism (or rather, vice-versa). ...

This isn’t the first time anti-Semitism and anti-Americanism have reared their ugly heads at UC-Irvine. Many Christian and Jewish students at UC-Irvine say that they have been threatened and harassed by members of the MSU. UC-Irvine allowed the MSU to bring Amir Abdemalik Ali to its campus to provide a racist, hate-laced presentation called “America Under Siege: The Zionist Hidden Agenda.” He has made the outrageous claim that Jews staged September 11 in order to promote a universal war against Muslims. Not coincidentally, Amir also praises Hamas and Hezbollah, which have both been named terrorist organizations by the United States. Hamas also offers financial rewards to the families of “shahid.”

Read it all.

CORRECTION: The entire premise of this article seems to have been an error. I have now seen photos of the stole in question (courtesy the last poster in this thread), and this LA Times article is correct in saying that all it said was "'There is no God but Allah, and Muhammad is his messenger,' and on the other was a symbol meaning, 'God, increase my knowledge.'" The confusion probably started because someone was told that the inscription was "Shahada," that is, "witness." In Islam this word refers to the Muslim confession of faith, quoted here. But it is the same word as "martyrdom," which for Hamas and other groups has become virtually synonymous with suicide bombing.

In any case, I don't see anything inherently wrong with these graduates wearing a stole bearing the Islamic confession of faith, as long as those of other faiths are also allowed to make a similar display.

| 27 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

A new article by Jihad Watch director Robert Spencer is at Human Events this morning. Here's a sampling:

Eisenhower once famously said that he wanted Americans to have a religion, but he didn't care which one, and that is that.

But Islam is different -- and it isn't just Franklin Graham and Jerry Falwell who say this, but Muslims themselves. At the Jihad Watch website I recently posted a link to an article in which the author recommends that the United States make repudiation of violent jihad a condition for peace and alliance. One would think that moderate Muslims in America, given their claims about themselves, would be tripping over themselves in haste to make this repudiation, but no such luck. One Muslim responded at Jihad Watch: "It is indeed amazing that the unbelivers [sic] presume not only to define Islam, but also prescribe changes ('reforms') to Allah's (swt) commands. Just how do you imagine that you will impose your will on the ummah? … The Islamic Caliphate will soon encompass the Earth, and all corrupt and unjust man-made law will be replaced by Allah's (swt) holy Sharia (Islamic law)."

Ah, but he was no doubt an extremist. Here, then, is an exchange I had recently with another Muslim, an English convert and self-proclaimed moderate. I wrote: "I would like nothing better than a flowering, a renaissance, in the Muslim world, including full equality of rights for women and non-Muslims in Islamic societies: freedom of conscience, equality in laws regarding legal testimony, equal employment opportunities, etc." He retorted: "So, you would like to see us ditch much of our religion and, thereby, become non-Muslims."

In light of attitudes like these, the widespread Western assumption about Islam -- that because it is a religion, it contains core teachings of love, peace and brotherhood that people of good will can emphasize against those who would twist the religion to contrary purposes -- begins to ring hollow. Self-proclaimed moderate Muslims in the United States have insisted that they be regarded at all times as unflaggingly patriotic and filled with civic zeal, whatever unpleasant evidence to the contrary that individual cases may provide. But the forthright rejection of some of the central beliefs of the Western world by the Muslims I have quoted here and millions of others at least raises the possibility that those professed moderates are bluffing. Americans should call their bluff whenever and wherever possible by insisting that they acknowledge the elements of Islamic theology, law, tradition and history that radical Muslims use to justify violence and terrorism, and repudiate those elements not only in words, but in forthright and honest anti-terror efforts within the Islamic community.

It may be, however, that American Muslims as an aggregate will reject those calls to clean their own house, as they have done implicitly up to now. That in itself will be revealing. Those in the West who are as decent as Reagan was must avoid the cardinal temptation of decent men: to assume that others share their fundamental goodness. It is long past time to regard Islam more realistically.

| 25 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Of course, he isn't in Jordan. He's in Norway, where he has so far skillfully worked the laws to his advantage. From Aftenposten, with thanks to Filtrat:

A military tribunal in Jordan convicted 15 men - nine living and six presumed dead - as accessories to terrorism and connections to the al-Qaida network. A report from French news agency AFP named one of the convicted as Najmuddin Faraj Ahmad, who is better known as Mullah Krekar. Krekar and seven others were sentenced in absentia to 15 years of hard prison labor while Ahmad Mahmoud Saleh al-Riyati, named the ringleader of the 15-man terror cell and the only one physically present at the trial, had his term reduced to seven and a half years prison labor. ...

Norwegian prosecutors dismissed all charges against Mullah Krekar on Tuesday after deciding that they had insufficient reliable evidence to pursue his alleged links to terrorist activities. The prosecution cited the alleged torture of a potential witness against Krekar as undermining their case.

| 3 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

One of these was Mullah Krekar. From SkyNews, with thanks to DC Watson:

A military court in Jordan has convicted 15 men of plotting terror attacks against American and Israeli interests. ...

The court in Amman said Ahmad Mahmoud Saleh al Riyati, 34, was the mastermind of the terror cell, which it said was also associated with the Ansar al-Islam militant group.

Al Riyati is the only one of the suspects in custody. But the court halved his original 15-year sentence to "give him another chance in life".

Eight of the other 14 - 12 Jordanians and two Iraqis - received jail terms of 15 years with hard labour. All the guilty verdicts can be appealed.

The court formally dropped charges against the remaining six, saying they had died.

It did not say how but military prosecution sources have said they were killed battling American forces in Iraq.

| 1 Comment
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

What kind of fathers do these girls have? From the Jerusalem Post, with thanks to J:

In a similar operation in various West Bank locations, 28 suspects were detained. They included two girls, Majda Kohon, 14, and Assil al-Hindi, 15, suspected of planning a terror attack. They were arrested in Nablus along with their fathers. Israel Radio reported one of the girls had recruited the other to carry out a suicide bombing.

A report on Ma'ariv's Web site quoted security sources as saying it is likely the girls had been recruited by the same terrorist who had sent teenage boys on suicide missions that were thwarted by troops several weeks ago.

The report quoted the mother of one of the girls as saying that she believes her daughter, whom she described as disciplined and who did not leave the house much, to be completely innocent.

| 13 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

June 16, 2004

Peace, or a hudna? An end, or a pause? From Reuters:

NAJAF, Iraq (Reuters) - Radical cleric Moqtada al-Sadr sent his fighters home on Wednesday in what may mark the end of a 10-week revolt against U.S.-led forces that once engulfed southern Iraq and Shi'ite Islam's holiest shrines.

With the formal end of U.S.-led occupation just two weeks away, Sadr issued a statement from his base in Najaf calling on his Mehdi Army militiamen to go home.

"Each of the individuals of the Mehdi Army, the loyalists who made sacrifices...should return to their governorates to do their duty," the statement said.

That call came a day after President Bush said the United States would not oppose a political role for Sadr -- only weeks after branding him an anti-democratic thug.

| 20 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

"The real thing -- a dangerous terrorist." Or another bungled arrest? Babar may have been trying to raise money for Al-Muhajiroun. From CNN, :

(CNN) -- The FBI has had in custody since April a Pakistani-American who is believed linked to al Qaeda and who allegedly participated in plots to attack Americans overseas, law enforcement sources said.

Mohammed Junaid Babar is cooperating with authorities, the sources said. He is being held as a material witness as part of an ongoing investigation, which means details of his case are under seal. ...

Babar, a naturalized American citizen, was arrested in Queens. The sources said he is believed to have been involved in a financing operation in the United States to send money to a group in London known to law enforcement as "al Muhajiroun," which includes Pakistani terrorists.

That group allegedly was plotting bombings and assassinations overseas. ...

Law enforcement sources said Babar "is the real thing -- a dangerous terrorist."

| 8 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

This may be why there has been so much mayhem in Iraq recently. From the World Tribune:

In a message posted on Islamic websites, a message said to be from Al Zarqawi betrayed hints of desperation at prospects for the Islamic insurgency against the U.S.-led coalition in Iraq. In the nine-page message to Al Qaida leader Osama Bin Laden, Al Zarqawi reiterated that his insurgents were racing against time to destabilize the post-Saddam Hussein government and its security apparatus.

"We are not competing with you," Al Zarqawi said in his message. "We just want to be the head of the spear, a bridge by which the [Islamic] community can reach victory." ...

In his latest purported message, entitled "The Text of Al Zarqawi's Message to Osama Bin Laden About Holy War in Iraq," Al Zarqawi reviews the Islamic strategy as well as his organization's achievements. He said his group, "Monotheism and Holy War," plans to continue targeting Iraqi police and security forces in the effort to destabilize the U.S.-supported government in Baghdad.

"We are planning to heavily target them during the coming stage before they are in full control," the statement said. "What is coming will be more [attacks], God willing." ...

"The room for maneuver has started to become smaller," Al Zarqawi said. "The grip is getting tighter around the necks of the holy warriors. With the deployment of soldiers and police, the future has become frightening." Al Zarqawi said his group was trying to organize battalions to take over Iraq before national elections, scheduled for January 2005. Once again, he raised the prospect that Islamic insurgents would fail and either be expelled or killed.

"[If we fail,] we will have to leave for another land to uphold the Islamic banner, or until God chooses us as martyrs," the statement said.

| 67 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Seifullah Chapman got 85 years; Hammad Abdur-Raheem, eight years. Masoud Khan? Life. From Indystar.com:

Alexandria, Va. -- A Maryland man convicted of traveling to Pakistan and seeking to fight with the Taliban against the United States just days after 9/11 was sentenced Tuesday to life in prison.

Masoud Khan was one of three people sentenced Tuesday on charges they trained for holy war against the United States by playing paintball games in the Virginia woods as part of a "jihad" network.

| 64 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

From Reuters, with thanks to Nicolei:

ALGIERS, June 13 (Reuters) - Algeria's leading Islamic militant group, which has ties to al Qaeda, has declared war on foreign people and companies in the oil-rich north African country, an Islamic website said on Sunday.

The "foreigners war statement" appeared shortly after the Salafist Group for Preaching and Combat (GSPC) claimed responsibility for killing more than a dozen soldiers in an apparent escalation of violence in the strife-torn country.

"The Salafist Group for Preaching and Combat decides...to declare war on everything that is foreign and atheistic within Algeria's borders, whether against individuals, interests or installations," GSPC leader Nabil Sahraoui said in a statement.

| 33 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

The Turkish prime minister would find a soulmate in Nabil Bebawi. From TurkishPress.com, with thanks to Nicolei:

Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan said that terrorism did not have any religion, language, race or country.

The expression ''moderate Islam'' was also wrong, Erdogan stated.

Erdogan said, ''Turkey is not a country where moderate Islam prevails.'' ...

Reacting to the expression ''moderate Islam'' used by panelist Harmon, Erdogan said, ''Turkey is not a country where moderate Islam prevails. This expression is wrong. The word Islam is uninflected, it is only Islam. When you say moderate Islam, then there will be another alternative like nonmoderate Islam. As a Muslim, I can't accept such a concept. Islam rejects extreme concepts. I am not an extreme Muslim.''

Fair enough, Erdogan. I use "radical" and "moderate" to denote those who pursue violent jihad and those who do not, but I acknowledge that both groups read out of the same books. Yet I too have read those books, and I don't see how they teach peace and tolerance, even though you seem to be insisting that the rest of the world assume that they do.

Reacting to panelist Bernard Lewis, who used the expression ''Islamic terrorism'', Erdogan said, ''this expression will sadden not only the Muslims but also those who believe in other religions. None of the religions allows terrorism. Therefore, it is very ugly to put the word Islam before terrorism. You may say religious terrorist but you can't say Islamic terrorist.''

I'd like to see how Erdogan would explain the copious references to the Qur'an and Sunnah in the writings of Osama and other radical Muslims. They themselves quite explicitly operate in the name of Islam. The PM seems to be zealous not to combat their version of Islam, but only to make sure that the rest of the world doesn't commit the faux pas of noticing their use of Islam to justify terrorism.

| 30 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Wait a minute. I thought suicide attacks were only carried out by desperately poor Palestinians with no weapons or any other recourse. How inconvenient for the apologists for jihad that reality keeps interfering with their romantic notions. From Newindpress, with thanks to Nicolei:

NEW DELHI: The Lashker-e-Taiba, a powerful Pakistan-based terror group active in Jammu and Kashmir, has raised a "full-blown unit for suicide squad operations against Western forces" in Iraq, a media report said on Sunday.

Up to 2,000 men between the ages of 18 and 25 have reportedly signed up for the Lashker's armed operations in Iraq, the authoritative 'The Hindu' reported in a lead story.

Sources close to Lashker's overall head, Hafiz Mohammad Saeed, were quoted as saying the group hoped to send at least some suicide squad members to Iraq overland through the porous Iran-Pakistan border. ...

A majority of volunteers were drawn from the ranks of seminary students at Muridke near Lahore, Jamaat-ud-Dawa's main centre. Some volunteers were raised from the Binori town seminary in Karachi, run by fundamentalist cleric Mufti Nizamuddin Shamzai until he was assassinated, it said.

Seminary students? All together now: "Don't they know the Qur'an forbids suicide???"

| 27 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

"Dhimmi" is not part of the original IslamOnline headline (thanks to Twostellas) to this story, but from the looks of this article, Dr. Nabil Loqa Bebawi would wear the title proudly. For he is the epitome of the subservient dhimmi who denies and covers up the sins of his masters.

The study, entitled "Rights and Duties of Christians in an Islamic State and its Impact on National Security", would be the first PhD in the Shari`ah by a Christian in the Middle East, Dr. Nabil Loqa Bebawi told IslamOnline.net.

Elaborating on his choice of the subject, he said that after the 9/11 attacks "the western and U.S. media started propagated false concepts about Islam that were adopted by the governing groups in Washington."

Bebawi, a professor of criminal law, stressed that the "Islamic civilization and Islam are under a vicious smear campaign."

The Christian scholar regretted that this campaign pictured Islam as a faith inciting terrorism and having no humanitarian values.

"The Islamic civilization which was founded on the principles laid out by Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) presents fine example of tolerance and coexistence between people of different civilizations, cultures, religions and race" Bebawi averred.

"As a Christian living on Islamic lands, my thesis seeks to underline Islam's spirit of clemency in dealing with non-Muslims."

Bebawi stressed that Islam should not be hold to blame for the wrongdoings of what he termed as "extremists" hungry for power.

There have always been extremists in all civilizations and cultures, he said, noting that Christian extremists blew up a federal building in the American state of Oklahoma in 1995 killing 197 Americans and wounding 300 others.

They weren't Christian extremists, but leave that aside: even if they had been, one incident hardly balances the thousands of Islamic terrorist incidents that have occured since 1995.

Bebawi also seems to miss, at least from the looks of this article, some of the more unpleasant features of dhimmitude:

The first part of the six-chapter thesis addresses the tolerance of Islam with on-Muslims living in an Islamic state, and even in the event of war.

The second tackles the religious rights of non-Muslims in an Islamic state, such as the right to build their own places of worship and the right to choose their own religious leaders.

In the third chapter, Bebaw reviews the rights granted by Islam to non-Muslims to move freely and choose their place of settlement across the state.

It also examines their rights to education, casting their votes, running for elections as well as freedom of speech. ...

The fourth chapter of the thesis looks into how Islam grants non-Muslims the rights to social care, freedom of work and fair chance of promotion away from religious affiliations.

Gee, that all sounds swell. No wonder so many Christians are thriving in Muslim countries today. But Bebawi has neglected to mention that the laws of dhimmitude only allow non-Muslims to live in Islamic states under conditions that relegate them to second-class citizenship. "The subject peoples," according to a manual of Islamic law, must "pay the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya)" and "are distinguished from Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar); are not greeted with 'as-Salamu 'alaykum' [the traditional Muslim greeting, "Peace be with you"]; must keep to the side of the street; may not build higher than or as high as the Muslims' buildings, though if they acquire a tall house, it is not razed; are forbidden to openly display wine or pork . . . recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their funerals or feastdays; and are forbidden to build new churches." If they violate these terms, the law further stipulates that they can be killed or sold into slavery at the discretion of the Muslim leader. ('Umdat al-Salik, o11.3, 5.)

Bebawi's PhD thesis would really be valuable if he discussed all that.

| 22 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Last week I asked why the major media is ignoring this story. I'll ask again now. From Zenit, with thanks to Y. F. Nordstrøm:

A Catholic Indian citizen was arrested and tortured in Saudi Arabia because of his faith, according to L'Osservatore Romano. ... Brian Savio O'Connor was imprisoned about six months ago by the Mutawa, the Saudi religious police.

Taken to the Ali Hira prison in Riyadh, the accused was threatened with death if he did not convert to Islam ...

"Officially the Mutawa has accused O'Connor of using drugs and praying to Jesus Christ, accusations which imply he runs the risk of being punished with the death penalty," the Vatican newspaper stated.

"The family says that the proofs of his use of drugs have been fabricated by the police, while it does not deny that Brian is a good Christian," the newspaper added.

| 14 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

... from Canada. From the New York Times, :

But it was on the shores of the Niagara River, little more than a mile from the world-famous falls, that a small, inflatable, motor-powered raft was captured earlier this month, along with six adults and two children from India and Pakistan and the man accused of trying to smuggle them into this country.

While this locale is definitely not Miami or South Texas, the number of illegal immigrants trying to enter the United States here, by traversing the waterways and railroad bridges that separate much of New York from Canada, is actually growing.

This latest group failed largely because of security enhancements put in place after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, elevating from afterthought to priority the patrolling of a border long considered friendly.

"We treat everybody as a potential terrorist," said Edward Duda, deputy chief of the Buffalo sector of the United States Border Patrol. "Anyone that crosses the border illegally, we treat them all equally." ...

Smuggling humans is a lucrative business, with passage from India or Pakistan into the United States costing as much as $40,000 for each adult, Mr. Woodside said.

| 73 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Radical Muslims have declared on more than one occasion recently that they intend to try to disrupt their enemy economically if possible. From CNN, :

BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) -- Iraq's oil industry appears to be the latest target of insurgents, with an oil company security chief shot to death Wednesday and a second straight day of attacks on a key oil pipeline. ...

Revenues from Iraq's oil industry are in jeopardy in the wake of the latest attacks.

In Kirkuk on Wednesday, gunmen opened fire on a car carrying Ghazi al-Talabani, the security chief for Iraq's Northern Oil Company, killing him and wounding his driver, according to a police source in the northern Iraqi city.

Al-Talabani was a cousin of Jalal Talabani, the leader of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan and a member of the disbanded Iraqi Governing Council.

Over the weekend, three prominent residents of Kirkuk were killed in targeted attacks, including a well-known Kurdish cleric, a district mayor who also served as a police officer, and the father of Kirkuk's police chief.

Insurgents have been focusing their attacks on participants in the new Iraqi government in advance of the June 30 handover.

| 6 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

When is a sports center not just a sports center? Well, for one thing, when it's named for a terrorist. From the Washington Times, :

In one instance, about $410,000 in American aid helped finance the new Salah Khalaf Recreation and Sports Center in the West Bank city of Nablus.

The center, officially opened May 29, is named for the man considered the spiritual godfather of the Palestinian Black September faction responsible for the 1972 massacre at the Munich Summer Olympics.

The effort by U.S. lawmakers was triggered by a report in Palestinian Media Watch that U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) money was being funneled to Palestinian organizations even though they have refused to sign a pledge saying they would not work with officially designated terrorist groups such as Hamas, Islamic Jihad and the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade.

In addition, Palestinian municipalities and universities have accepted substantial U.S. aid, freeing up other funds for anti-Israel and anti-U.S. protests or to honor terrorist "martyrs."

So U.S. aid is paying for anti-U.S. protests. No wonder the jihadists are so confident of ultimate victory.

| 10 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

From CNN, :

PARIS, France -- French anti-terror police have arrested 12 men in Paris under anti-terrorism laws, authorities say. ...

The suspects are thought to be linked to radical religious groups, possibly Islamic, but Caillebot would not give further details about them.

She said police suspect they were using legitimate businesses to raise money for militant combatants overseas. During the arrests, police confiscated a pistol, computer disk and material for manufacturing false documents. ...

The news agency said it had seen an Italian detention warrant last week that included transcribed telephone conversations in which suspects discussed the Paris metro, security details and a "martyr" referred to as Mohammed.

Yeah, that sounds "possibly Islamic" to me. But of course, it could have been a Methodist who just happened to be named Mohammed.

| 6 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

June 15, 2004

Another. From AP:

CAIRO, Egypt (AP) - An Islamic Web site showed videotape Tuesday of a blindfolded American hostage in Saudi Arabia, and said abductors threatened to kill him unless Saudi authorities free al-Qaida prisoners within three days.

Paul Johnson, 49, of Stafford Township, N.J., was abducted Saturday by a group calling itself al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula. The organization is believed to be headed by al-Qaida's chief in the kingdom, Abdullah-aziz al-Moqrin, who was identified as speaking on the tape.

"My name is Paul Marshall Johnson, Jr.," the seated hostage says in the tape, an elaborate tattoo on his left shoulder. "I am an American. ... I work on Apache helicopters."

A U.S. official said the threat should be taken "very seriously" because the posting appears to be credible and militants have used the site before. "It has been a good indicator in the past," the official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity. ...

The Web site statement addressed Muslims all over the world, saying: "We have made a promise to ourselves to defend you. We will not let you down, and you should know that the treacherous tyrants who have helped the Americans against you, and shared your blood with them, do not represent the Muslims of Saudi Arabia. They are our enemies as much as they are your enemies. They are the enemies of God and his prophet."

| 117 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Another call to Americans to leave our friend and ally Saudi Arabia. This just in from AP:

WASHINGTON - The U.S. government is renewing its call for Americans to leave Saudi Arabia after the recent terrorist attacks, saying the safety of U.S. workers was more important than any effect on oil supplies or the Saudi economy. ...

Referring to U.S. workers in Saudi Arabia, State Department spokesman Richard Boucher said, "We first and foremost have a responsibility to Americans. We need to give them our best advice on how to handle any particular situation overseas."

"As far as the maintenance and continued flow of oil and the economy in Saudi Arabia, that is something I think the Saudis will have to describe, what provisions they can make and how they can operate those facilities."

| 124 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Common sense and clear thinking from Spengler in Asia Times (thanks to rickb):

Western polemicists felt at home on the moral high ground against communism, along with president Reagan. But they are tongue-tied before radical Islam, fearing to offend a religion with more than a billion adherents. Inadvertently they give credibility to the radicals. It is difficult to assess what proportion of today's Muslims are "radicals", because neither the world's Muslims nor the West has a clear definition of what is radical and what is not. Vitriolic sermonizing is so commonplace under the eyes of "moderate" regimes, for example Hosni Mubarak's Egypt, that the label of "radical Islam" has worn thin.

In reality, the West sooner or later will have to draw a bright line between "radicals" and "moderates". Under the circumstances there can be nothing in between. Islam's encounter with the West leaves room for nothing but radical jihadists on the one hand, or radical reformers. Islam is expansionist by construction and political by its original design. It is a fact of history that jihad, by which I mean specifically the propagation of the faith by violence, is a mainstream tradition. Even communal prayer in Islam has at its center the alignment of the individual believer to jihad (Does Islam have a prayer?, May 18). ...

The problem actually is quite simple. To advocate jihad today is the hallmark of the radical Islamist, and it is there that the West must draw a line in the sand. But to repudiate jihad in turn implies radical revision of the religion's mainstream, and that is the hallmark of the radical reformer.

Like other religions, Islam has reached a point in world history - or rather world history has caught up with Islam - such that it must undergo a fundamental change. By way of comparison, the Catholic Church accepts separation of church and state as well as religious tolerance, but it did so only after the likes of Count Camillo Benso Cavour in Italy stripped the papacy of temporal rule over anything but the square mile of the Vatican City. ...

Enemy is radical Islam

In short, the West must give the Islamic world a clear choice as to who is with it, and who is against it - words that President Bush has used but with muddled meaning. That would change the character of the intelligence war utterly. It may be harder to define who is friend and foe today than it was in 1981, but by the same token, it will be far easier to tell friend from foe once the West carves its criteria in stone. ...

If Washington were to make repudiation of jihad a condition for friendship with the United States, the demand would have unpredictable and destabilizing consequences for the Islamic world. Just as the race of Sovietologists viewed Reagan's determination to destabilize the Soviet Empire with horror, the whole profession of Mideast studies would rear up in horror against such a stance. But wars are won by ignoring the fat and complacent commanders of garrison troops, and forcing the burden of uncertainty on to the other side (Ronald Reagan's creative destruction, June 8). Decisive intelligence stems from destabilization of the opposing side, through defections and similar events.

Bravo.

| 83 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

This story and the one about jihadist French imams are, obviously, related. From AFP, with thanks to FreedomNowNews:

Jerusalem - The Jewish Agency is bracing itself for the immigration of tens of thousands French Jews into Israel as a result of a growing anti-Semitism in France, a spokesperson for the organisation said on Sunday. ...

Vatikai said that a report compiled by the agency had found 30 000 out of France's 575 000-strong Jewish community were considering immigrating to Israel. ...

French Justice Minister Dominique Perben said last week that 180 anti-Jewish acts had been recorded so far this year, including cases of assault, arson and verbal insults. ...

Vatikai said the situation for French Jews was becoming increasingly "difficult".

| 93 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

It's no wonder that people dance around charred corpses when Islamic radical leaders have attitudes like those expressed in the latest issue of "Sawt Al-Jihad" (Voice of Jihad). Note the consistent use of religious language, which is just another indication of the deep religious motives that underlie attacks like these.

From an interview with Fawwaz bin Muhammad Al-Nashami, who led the Khobar attacks of May 29, in a translation from MEMRI (thanks to Jerry Gordon):

"The infidel's clothing was torn to shreds, and he was naked in the street. The street was full of people, as this was during work hours, and everyone watched the infidel being dragged, praise and gratitude be to Allah. ...

"The brothers had exchanged fire with the patrols, all the while shouting, 'Allah Akbar,' and 'There is no God but Allah.'" ...

"The four of us entered the company together. We met the Arab clerks, and greeted them. We asked them: 'Where are the Americans?' They were all in shock, and said: 'What's going on? Who are you?' We told them, 'We are Mujahideen, and we want the Americans. We have not come to aim a weapon at the Muslims, but to purge the Arabian Peninsula, according to the will of our Prophet Muhammad, of the infidels and the polytheists who are killing our brothers in Afghanistan and Iraq. We want you to show us where they are.'"

What's that? You read the learned pundits saying that this idea that Arabia must be purged of non-Muslims is not really an Islamic religious tenet, but a cover for political goals? Look again. It was among the Prophet's dying wishes:

Ibn 'Abbas said, "Thursday! What (great thing) took place on Thursday!" Then he started weeping till his tears wetted the gravels of the ground . Then he said, "On Thursday the illness of Allah's Apostle was aggravated and he said, "Fetch me writing materials so that I may have something written to you after which you will never go astray." The people (present there) differed in this matter and people should not differ before a prophet. They said, "Allah's Apostle is seriously sick.' The Prophet said, "Let me alone, as the state in which I am now, is better than what you are calling me for." The Prophet on his death-bed, gave three orders saying, "Expel the pagans from the Arabian Peninsula, respect and give gifts to the foreign delegates as you have seen me dealing with them." I forgot the third (order)" (Ya'qub bin Muhammad said, "I asked Al-Mughira bin 'Abdur-Rahman about the Arabian Peninsula and he said, 'It comprises Mecca, Medina, Al-Yama-ma and Yemen." Ya'qub added, "And Al-Arj, the beginning of Tihama.") (Sahih Bukhari, vol. 4, book 52, no. 288)

Back to Fawwaz bin Muhammad Al-Nashami and his acts of devotion:

"We entered one of the companies' [offices], and found there an American infidel who looked like a director of one of the companies. I went into his office and called him. When he turned to me, I shot him in the head, and his head exploded. We entered another office and found one infidel from South Africa, and our brother Hussein slit his throat. We asked Allah to accept [these acts of devotion] from us, and from him. This was the South African infidel. ...

"We turned to the third site, which was the most fortified center of all the compounds. Our plan was to remain in the car until we were alongside the American Hummer. When we were next to it, the brothers appeared from the windows [of the car] and began shouting 'Allah Akbar,' and shooting them. And I saw the skull of the soldier standing behind the machine gun explode before my eyes. Allah be praised. I think the driver was also killed. ...

A little later on these religious fellows got in a bit of preaching:

"We went to one of the buildings. Brother Nimr, may Allah's mercy be upon him, shoved the door until it opened. We entered and in front of us stood many people. We asked them their religion, and for identification documents. We used this time for Da'wa [preaching Islam], and for enlightening the people about our goal. We spoke with many of them.

"At the same time, we found a Swedish infidel. Brother Nimr cut off his head, and put it at the gate [of the building] so that it would be seen by all those entering and exiting.

No doubt that was sure to win them some converts. Note the beheading and, below, the throat slitting. What happened to Pearl and Berg is common practice.

"We continued in the search for the infidels, and we slit the throats of those we found among them. At the same time, we heard the sound of the patrols and the gathering [of the security personnel] outside. These cowards did not dare to enter. About 45 minutes or an hour had passed since the beginning of the operation.

"We began to comb the site looking for infidels. We found Filipino Christians. We cut their throats and dedicated them to our brothers the Mujahideen in the Philippines. [Likewise], we found Hindu engineers and we cut their throats too, Allah be praised. That same day, we purged Muhammad's land of many Christians and polytheists.

Read the whole thing. These are common attitudes.

| 18 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Olivier Guitta in FrontPage (thanks to EPG) on the ticking time bomb in France:

France is home to the largest Muslim community in Europe -- estimated between 5 and 8 million, roughly over 10 percent of France's total population. In the past few years, the radical element of these French citizens has grown quickly, and is quietly overpowering more moderate Muslim voices. Many French Muslims idolize Osama bin Laden and consider the destruction of synagogues and assault of Jews to be justified retribution. These worrisome phenomena are caused by a number of things: increasing influence of radical imams in French mosques, the penetration of Saudi Wahhabism and extremist satellite networks spreading their propaganda.

I recently discussed these issues with Jean Francois Cope, spokesman of the French government, during a press conference in Washington DC. First, I asked Mr. Cope: knowing that 91 percent of the imams preaching in France are foreigners and most of them are illegal immigrants, does it not make sense to expel them, particularly those preaching hatred?

He answered that France cannot just expel them because these hate-mongering imams have been around for a while, as has their families. It would not be proper. ...

From Mr. Cope's position, it appears France is far less than enthusiastic about truly aiding the War on Terror. The country is starting to act against radicalism on a very limited basis when it has no choice, adopting half-measures that serve to quiet critics. There are many more imams to arrest. The government should forbid the funding of French Muslim organizations/mosques by Saudi Arabia. And finally, it should ban TV channels such as Al-Manar, which are only spreading violence and hate against the West. But these kinds of agressive tactics just aren't part of France's program to defeat radical islam. As a result, anti-Semitism and anti-American sentiment continue to increase in the land of our great "ally."

| 34 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

June 14, 2004

A Somali jihadist has been charged with plotting an attack on a Columbus, Ohio mall. From NBC4columbus.com, with thanks to Looney Tunes:

According to the FBI, Nuradin M. Abdi, a 32-year-old Somali national, was indicted and charged with conspiracy to provide material support to terrorists, conspiracy to provide material support to al-Qaida and two counts of fraud and misuse of government documents.

Attorney General John Ashcroft said that in March 2000, Abdi re-entered the United States from Africa, using a fraudulent immigration document. According to the FBI, one of his co-conspirators was Iyman Faris, a convicted al-Qaida operative, who picked him up from an airport.

Upon their return to the Columbus area, Abdi, Faris, and other co-conspirators, allegedly initiated a plot to blow up a Columbus-area shopping mall. It is also alleged that in pursuit of this plot, Abdi received bomb-making training from one of the co-conspirators.

The indictment alleges that on April 27, 1999, Abdi applied to immigration officials for a travel document, allowing him to leave the United States and later return. Abdi indicated in the application that he intended to visit Germany and Saudi Arabia.

The FBI alleges that Abdi's true destination was to attend a military-style terrorist training camp in Ethiopia. According to a detention motion, Abdi sought training in radio usage, weapons, guerilla warfare and explosives.

The FBI stated in a detention motion that Abdi's purpose in seeking training was to ready himself to participate in violent Jihad conflicts overseas and to lend support to activities that his al-Qaida co-conspirators might ask him to perform in the United States.

You'll never guess the reaction from his family:

Abdi's cousin, Asha Yassin Hassan, said that Abdi was targeted because he is a Muslim.
| 99 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

He says it's profiling: "Because I am a Muslim, I was stopped." Wouldn't it be refreshing if, even just one time, a Muslim said: "I was stopped, and I don't mind, because I wholeheartedly support any efforts to root out terrorism from the Islamic community, and I am willing to accept inconvenience to this end." But instead, CAIR and Co. are jumping on the bandwagon, looking for another victimization case. From AP, with thanks to Nicolei:

A Texas Muslim leader says he and his wife and daughter were detained for two days last weekend after officials at a Canadian airport told him he was considered a security threat.

Mohammed Zaki Alswij, an imam who moved to the United States from Iraq in 1987, said racial profiling may have been to blame for his detention in Vancouver, British Columbia. Alswij, 53, wears a cleric's robes and a turban as symbols of his religious stature and beliefs.

"This wouldn't happen to (just) anyone," Alswij said in Saturday's edition of the Houston Chronicle. "But because I am a Muslim, I was stopped."

Nancy Bray, a spokeswoman for Citizenship and Immigration Canada, said she could not discuss the Houston man's case because of privacy laws. But she said they would not deny a person entry based on his or her race.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations, a Muslim advocacy group, said it will ask the U.S. State Department and Canadian authorities to investigate the incident.

| 21 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

These "suspected rebels" are, you guessed it, jihadists. Note also the targeting of civilians: justified in Kashmir as in Israel by stipulations in Islamic law that forbid the killing of non-combatants unless they are perceived to be aiding the war effort in some way. From AP, with thanks to Nicolei:

A GRENADE attack on a crowded tourist restaurant and other weekend violence in Indian-controlled Kashmir killed seven people, including two tourists, and injured at least 47 others.

Police said suspected rebels lobbed a grenade into a popular restaurant in Pahalgam, a holiday resort in India's Jammu-Kashmir state, killing four people and injuring 25 others, mostly tourists. ...

Earlier on Saturday, a hand grenade thrown by a suspected Islamic rebel at an army vehicle in a border town missed its target and wounded 20 civilians, four of them critically, police said.

The blast occurred in Handwara, a town close to the Line of Control, which divides Kashmir between India and Pakistan.

Police blamed the attack on Islamic militants fighting for Kashmir's independence from India or its merger with neighbouring Pakistan.

| 25 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Jeff Jacoby in the Boston Globe (thanks to Looney Tunes) explores Islamic justifications for mutilation of corpses:

The popular "Ask the Scholar" feature of Islam Online (www.islamonline.net) was recently asked "how Islam views the issue of mutilating dead bodies of enemies." In a reply, Sheik Faysal Mawlawi, deputy chairman of the European Council for Fatwa and Research, began by declaring that mutilation is "not allowable" under Islam. But then came the loophole:

"It is possible to mutilate the dead only in case of retaliation. . . . If he inflicts any physical damage on anyone, he should be retaliated against in the same manner. In case of war, Muslims are allowed to take vengeance for their mutilated dead mujahids (fighters) in the same way it was done to them." This, the European sheik explained, is the teaching of the Koran (16:126), which counsels patience but authorizes revenge. ...

Ultimately it is up to the world's moderate, modern Muslims to rise up against the barbarians in their midst. Until that day comes, there is nothing the West can do to ameliorate or appease this enemy. We can only destroy it -- or be destroyed.

| 26 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

These dancers were no doubt outraged by Abu Ghraib, and denounced American atrocities. From AP:

BAGHDAD, Iraq - A car bomb tore through a convoy Monday in central Baghdad, killing at least 12 people, including an American and four other foreigners working to rebuild Iraq's power plants. A crowd gathered, shouting "Down with the USA!" and dancing around a charred body.

They were working to rebuild power plants, eh? Will these American villains stop at nothing?

| 30 Comments
Print this entry | FaceBook | Email this entry | Digg this | de