More on the Internet jihad from Financial Times:
According to research by Jane's Terrorism and Security Centre, which closely follows terrorism developments, the internet has probably become the main global source of literature promoting jihad, or "holy war".Richard Evans of Jane's cites research that concludes: "It is virtually impossible to control the spread of jihad material among similar web pages once it has been published in one location." All the websites linked to al-ansar.biz were hosted by the same Malaysian company, Acme Commerce, based in Kuala Lumpur. The company says it hosts 5,000 websites from up to 50 countries and cannot be blamed for their content. ...
According to Jane's, they had been used to distribute publications under the title Voice of Jihad, as well as an online jihadist magazine called al-Battar. Issued every two months, it carries essays on religious issues, advice on military strategy and training, and guidance on creating the "basic conditions for successful guerrilla warfare".
The growth in the number of similar sites and the regularity with which they change addresses while retaining readers who rapidly communicate the new addresses, has overwhelmed law enforcement agencies. In some cases other websites have found themselves hijacked by Islamist programmers who write their material on to existing sites.
"It's nearly impossible to police them," said Kevin O'Brien, a terrorism expert with RAND Europe, a think-tank. "It's a question of whether or not you can find them in the first place," he said, adding that the cost of establishing the sites was negligible or even nil if service providers offered web space as a free addition to e-mail users.
Saudi Arabian Islamists distributing a web-based jihadist magazine called Sawt al-Jihad are now so confident of outwitting the authorities that the publication is distributed at the same time every two weeks. It has yet to be snared.
But some security experts say they may be left to operate deliberately. "It seems increasingly likely that security agencies are content to let these websites run, because it's a way of monitoring what these people are up to," said Bill Durodié, a security expert at King's College, London.
So is Jihad Watch.
Is there no way for those infuriatingly clever hackers in the Western world, to be employed by our government, in order to exercise their skills in the war of self-defense against the Jihad? Let those hackers, backed by the full power and money of the American government, and by private industry which should be willing to pitch in, to find ways to selectively attach viruses -- new and improved viral malefactors that have wreaked all sorts of havoc on computers worldwide -- to the kinds of messages, and the kinds of machines, that are likely to be used by terrorists and their fellow-travellers.
What if, for example, there were a virus that destroyed all messages sent over the cyber-ether in Arabic, the presumed main language of such terrorists? Or all those in Urdu? Or, taking a different tack, a virus that would attach to any message, in any language, in which certain formulaic Qur'anic phrases were found to occur or re-occur? Yes, a certain amount of innocent traffic would be destroyed, but really, how much? And such selective viruses would have almost no effect on the non-Muslim world we are trying to protect, and there would, in fact, be little loss to true intellectual activity, such as it is, among the handful of real scholars in the Arabic or Urdu-speaking world, which in North Africa is conducted in French, in Iran in English and French, in the Middle East in English, in Pakistan in English. And if the messages of Allah cannot use the Internet -- well, it was not invented, nor developed, by the followers of Allah. Let them be confined to their old ways of spreading Islam, their tried-and-true methods of da'wa aside from conquest: the human voice.
Or what if the home computers of those who receive such messages were also to be flooded with unstoppable pornography, possibly to be glimpsed by the women of this Muslim household? Imagine if all the 180,000 subscribers to Al-Jazeera in the United States, or the tens of millions around the world (all of whom, save for the members of security services monitoring the programs, if they subscribe not only to Al-Jazeera, but to its view of the universe, can confidently be described as not wishing us well), were to receive, unordered but as a special bonus from Infidel hackers, along with the regular programming of Al-Jazeera, pornographic images that would pop up, here and there at random. This might lessen the desire of the Muslim male to have Al-Jazeera come into his home, what with the possibility that his womenfolk might catch sight of something they most definitely should not see, and one has read a good deal about Muslim concern for the womenfolk and their "honor." If it were known that one saw Al-Jazeera, and that, therefore, one's women were being exposed to such images, would this not wound that "honor"? Since appeals to the ruling Al-Thani family in Qatar to do something about Al-Jazeera have proved unavailing, and since the American government appears not to be considering ways to put out of commission otherwise Al-Jazeera and similar satellite stations, even though the cumulative effect of those stations is far more dangerous to us than Der Stuermer or Leni Reifenstahl's filmed Nuremberg rally or Lord Haw-Haw's broadcasts, or Pravda or TASS or Soviet-inspired "Peace Congresses" in Helsinki ever were,even all put together, is it not time to get cracking on this? Some American deaths in Iraq can be directly attributable to the nonsense and lies of Al Jazeera. Why the caution and hesitation? Is someone confusing the "free marketplace of ideas" with the sinister propaganda of people who are malevolently -- and often murderously -- inclined toward us> Let not the domestic right of free speech be confused with the worldwide propaganda of a dangerous, implacable enemy. Al-Qaeda tapes of decapitation should not be confused with the domestic dissents of John Peter Zenger. Holmes would know what to do. And so would those celebrated wartime presidents, Thomas Jefferson (the Alien and Sedition Acts), Abraham Lincoln (who during the Civil War suspended many rights), and Franklin Delano Roosevelt. A la guerre comme a la guerre.
and now there is a phone virus by the terrorist it affects cell phones YES Nextel? S.Korean phones.?
What does this tell you my Friends? Buy American!!
They only hurt their own?
I heard a rumor Mr. Johnson is a convert to Muslum yes once again the hurt themselfs?
UCLA grad. Students to honor hamas and hisbella Fox hate to say it Bill Oriely?
June 17, 2004
Anti-communism Efforts
Asked if he believed entertainers today were more anti-American, Boone answered with a resounding "Yes!"
"I feel like a salmon swimming upstream," he said. "I've been trying to turn the tide."
For example, he said that he and Reagan, as well as other stars, had attended anti-communism rallies in the late 1950s and early 1960s. Most stars today seem to support the leftist, anti-American stances often espoused by yesterday's communists, even going so far as to criticize the U.S. from abroad, Boone said.
Nowhere are these sentiments more prevalent than on America's college campuses. Boone said even 40 years ago, the sentiment had begun to spread to colleges and universities, at the peak of the Cold War with the communist Soviet Union.
"There was this phrase, 'Better Red than dead,'" Boone told NewsMax.com. "The idea was 'Let's not get into a fight about this. Even if we become a communist United States, that's better than going to war, isn't it?'"
He said that pacifist anti-war sentiment taught the belief "where anything is better than standing up for our rights." He said he often spoke out against the atheism of communism, and, in a phrase that disturbed his wife, Shirley, Boone said he once told a crowd during a speech, "I'd rather be blown into Heaven in an atomic blast than taught into hell under a communist United States."
Boone said Shirley "thought I was inviting that somehow, but I told her, 'No, but when you say something like that, you hope you can get people's backbone up to where they want to defend themselves.'"
Jon E. Dougherty, NewsMax.com
Tuesday, June 15, 2004
Tuesday, June 15, 2004
Reporters Fear Being Seen as Anti-terrorist
What are they afraid of? Reporters for left-of-center media are so eager to avoid appearing anti-terrorist (or being exposed as another Jayson Blair) that they refuse to say their stories were accurate.
Four journalists at the New York Times, Newsday and Reuters are resisting subpoenas issued by federal prosecutors in New York in the trial of a lawyer charged with conspiring to abet terrorists.
John L. Perry
Tuesday, June 15, 2004
The reasons being given why George W. Bush will not be reelected are the very reasons he will be reelected – and by an impressive margin.
This is because his opponents have grossly failed to judge the nature of America and the character of the man, himself – the same way and for the same reasons Ronald Reagan’s opponents grossly misjudged him and the nature of America during his presidency.
It’s no accident that many of those now maligning Bush are of the same crowd in the news media who maligned Reagan. They are still making the same self-defeating mistake of actually believing what they see in the mirrors of distortion they are holding up to America. They didn’t understand America then; they don’t understand America now.
Can you imagine what would have happen if we had shot down a plane!!
How the Dems would be saying ! How did you know? Where the proof?? I don’t see it?? You are hiding something??
Wednesday, June 16, 2004 1:13 p.m. EDT
Media Mislead on 9/11 Commission Finding on Iraq-al Qaida Link
Reports Wednesday morning that the 9/11 Commission has determined there was no cooperation between Iraq and al-Qaida are completely false - and are undoubtedly driven by the media's determination to contradict the Bush administration's claims that such a link exists.
"9/11 Panel Says Iraq Rebuffed Bin Laden" reads the headline on the Associated Press report on today's Commission staff statement.
But that's not what the Commission staff report actually said.
The below passage, for instance, does more to confirm the Bush administration's claims of an Iraq-al Qaida link than it does to contradict them.
"The Sudanese, to protect their own ties with Iraq, reportedly persuaded Bin Ladin* to cease [support for anti-Saddam Islamists in Northern Iraq] and arranged for contacts between Iraq and al Qaeda*.
"A senior Iraqi intelligence officer reportedly made three visits to Sudan, finally meeting Bin Ladin in 1994. Bin Ladin is said to have requested space to establish training camps, as well as assistance in procuring weapons, but Iraq apparently never responded." [Staff Statement No. 15, Page 5]
Apparently never responded? How, pray tell, does the AP derive from those words the conclusive claim that Iraq "rebuffed" bin Laden?
The Commission statement continues:
"There have been reports that contacts between Iraq and al Qaeda also occurred after Bin Ladin had returned to Afghanistan, but they do not appear to have resulted in a collaborative relationship."
What's the evidence for this less-than-conclusive surmise?
"Two senior Bin Ladin associates have adamantly denied that any ties existed between al Qaeda and Iraq," says the Commission.
Such a statement begs the question: Why does the Commission, let alone the press, take the word of two senior bin Laden associates over, say, Iraq's new prime minister, Iyad Allawi.
Last December he told the London Telegraph, "We are uncovering evidence all the time of Saddam's involvement with al-Qaeda."
Reacting to the discovery of an Iraqi intelligence document placing 9/11 hijacker Mohamed Atta in Baghdad two months before the attacks, he continued:
"This is the most compelling piece of evidence that we have found so far. It shows that not only did Saddam have contacts with al-Qaeda, he had contact with those responsible for the September 11 attacks."
In fact, nowhere does the Commission make the claim that Iraq and al-Qaida never cooperated. What it does say is "We have no credible evidence that Iraq and al Qaeda cooperated on attacks against the United States." [NewsMax italics]
Apparently Dr. Allawi's asssement counts for nothing.
Even so, it's worth noting that elsewhere in today's staff statement, the 9/11 Commission asserts:
"With al Qaeda at its foundation, Bin Ladin sought to build a broader Islamic Army that included terrorist groups from Egypt, Libya, Saudi Arabia and Oman, Tunisia, Jordan, Iraq, Lebanon, Morocco, Somalia, and Eritrea. Not all [terrorist] groups from these states agreed to join, but at least one from each did." [Staff Statement No. 15, Page 3]
In other words, at least one terror group from Iraq did form an alliance with bin Laden.
Another problem: If the press is going to take today's staff statement as gospel, certain long-held media assumptions will need to be drastically revised, such as the widely accepted notion that al-Qaida was involved in the first World Trade Center bombing.
Not true, says the Commission.
"Whether Bin Ladin and his organization had roles in the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center ... remains a matter of substantial uncertainty," the staff statement says, before insisting, "We have no conclusive evidence" of a bin Laden link. [Staff Statement No. 15, Page 6]
The same goes for "Operation Bojinka," the 1995 plot to hijack 12 airliners hatched by Ramzi Yousef and Khalid Sheikh Mohammed that experts say was the blueprint for the 9/11 attacks.
"[Mohammed] was not, however, an al Qaeda member at the time of the Manilla [Bojinka] plot," Commission staffers say, even though they acknowledge that he went on to mastermind the 9/11 attacks.
The press is furiously spinning the 9/11 Commission staff statement in a bid to discredit the Bush administration. Americans should go to the Sept. 11 Commission Web site and read the conclusions for themselves: http://www.9-11commission.gov/ Commission spellings
OPEC Hopes to Compensate for Sabotaged Pipelines in Iraq
NewsMax.com Wires
Wednesday, June 16, 2004
LONDON – OPEC signaled it would boost oil production and said it would ask other major oil producers outside the group such as Mexico to do so as well to make up for lost crude exports from sabotaged pipelines in Iraq.
But analysts said pumping the extra oil would strain the world's limited spare production capacity and leave a wafer-thin cushion with which to absorb any future supply disruptions.
An attack on the two southern pipelines serving as Iraq's main export route for oil forced the suspension Wednesday of about 1.5 million barrels in daily Iraqi shipments from the Gulf. The explosion north of the coastal town of Faw was the second such attack in three days, and some analysts estimated that Iraqis would need 10 days to repair the damage.
In war on terror, Geneva Convention doesn't apply
Jonah Goldberg
June 16, 2004
If you sign a contract with your neighbor agreeing that neither of you will plant stinky ginkgo trees on your property, that contract is binding on you and your neighbor. It's not binding for the guy who lives across the street.
Well, Osama bin Laden lives across the street. He lives outside our neighborhood, our community, our laws. He lives outside all of the rules of civilization, at war and peace. Every day, he violates the Geneva Convention before he has his second bowl of muesli. He blows up passenger trains and hijacks civilian aircraft. His henchmen don't wear uniforms, and they don't abide by any of the rules governing professional armies.
We've all seen countless WWII movies about how soldiers out of uniform can be shot as spies under the Geneva Convention. Well, all of al-Qaida's soldiers are spies. And they most emphatically do not provide their prisoners with ping-pong tables and dormitories. They cut off their heads and put the pictures on the Internet and TV. The same goes for Osama's allies and fellow travelers in Iraq.
Malaysia Arrests Key Figure in Nuclear Trafficking
NewsMax.com Wires
Friday, May 28, 2004
KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia – A Sri Lankan businessman accused of brokering black market deals for nuclear technology was arrested Friday in Malaysia, government officials said.
Buhary Syed Abu Tahir, who allegedly worked with disgraced Pakistani scientist Abdul Qadeer Khan to sell nuclear secrets to rogue states, was detained for threatening Malaysia's national security, officials told The Associated Press on condition of anonymity.
Tahir is the most senior known member of Khan's network to have been arrested since details about its operations to sell nuclear know-how and equipment to Libya, Iran and North Korea came to light earlier this year.
Khan was pardoned by Pakistan's President Pervez Musharraf after admitting wrongdoing and pleading for clemency.
In a speech in February alleging details of Khan's proliferation activities, President Bush named Tahir as "the network's chief financial officer and money launderer."
Tahir was arrested Friday on an order signed by Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi under security laws that allow for indefinite detention without trial, and was immediately sent to a prison camp in northern Malaysia, the officials said.
Tuesday, June 15, 2004 1:59 p.m. EDT
Heinz Kerry-Funded Web Site Praises Hezbollah
A Web site partially funded by Teresa Heinz Kerry offers a report glorifying Hezbollah (Hizbullah) suicide bombers as "deified in paradise and venerated on earth for fighting Israel" - and praises the terrorist group's support network for women widowed by their husband's "martyrdom" attacks.
Women's eNews.org still features the September 2003 report, written by Sarah Smiles, who's identified as a "WeNews correspondent."
Smiles interviewed a number of Lebanese women who were widowed after their husbands decided to join in the cause of killing Israelis and Americans.
At the end of her screed, the Web site notes:
"Women's eNews is supported by our readers; reprints and licensing fees; and the Fund for the City of New York, the Teresa and H. John Heinz III fund of the Heinz Family Foundations, the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, the Barbara Lee Family Foundation, the Rockefeller Family Fund, The Helena Rubinstein Foundation, the Sister Fund, the Starry Night Fund."
First noted yesterday by OpinionJournal.com, the Heinz Kerry-funded report reads like a recruiting brochure for suicide bombers. Here are some highlights:
"Hizbullah has built up an impenetrable support network for the women. Through the Hizbullah martyrs' wives association some 2500 families in Lebanon receive a monthly salary, free health care and schooling for their children – to the tune of $1,200 each a month.
"'We do everything in our power to make them feel they are not missing anything,' says Mohsan Shaheen, a spokesperson for the association. 'Anything a martyr's wife wants, we will give it to her, basically, because her husband sacrificed himself. The only thing we can't provide for her is to bring him back.'
"On top of sending their children to the best schools and universities abroad if they choose, the association runs vocational training classes and seminars for the woman and offers a dating service to help them remarry if they wish. ..."
Comments from Hezbollah suicide widows:
"A staunch, pious woman veiled completely in black, Naji shows little regret about her ultimately fateful marriage.
"'When I married him, I knew he followed the party. I knew I had a martyr at home,' she says. Leaning closer, she confesses her ambitions for her sons, the youngest of whom was a nursling when Aboud died.
"'When my sons tell me: "I hope to become a martyr one day," I say: "I hope so too. I hope God chooses you as a martyr.'"
"'Although a mother doesn't need to tell the son of a martyr to do it,' she says, 'she may guide him towards it, but really, it's innate. He automatically has a feeling that he must follow his father.' ...
"Pregnant when her husband Ahmed Fadlallah was killed in a Hizbullah operation in 1999, Zoorgoof has struggled to come to terms with the loss.
"'I tell my daughter: "your father is a hero." I take her to his grave. But this feeling of loneliness and despair ...' she says, her voice growing distant.
"Since Fadlallah's death, Zoorgoof has relied heavily on the Hizbullah martyrs' wives association, which is helping her buy a house and pays for her to go to university, where she is studying Arabic literature.
"'Hizbullah is like a family. It takes care of us, provides for us,' she says."
Now how do you Want as President??
The more I find the More I support Bush!!
So do the People I talk to!
Part of the American Tribe
God Bless the USA and her Fighting Forces and All who Fight with her give them Strength and Courage to stay the course to Victory Amen
Huge
Yes war comes and is here!
My ? is why we are not fining Germeny they are useing their sats. Yes we must tell Germany either you are with us or you are with the terorist All they have to do is change some codes and no feed!
Washington Propaganda, Canadian Government style
by Judi McLeod
A new Web site, launched by the Canadian Embassy in Washington, blames rampant Canadian anti-Americanism on "urban legends".
Even in the face of anti-American shots by party leaders in last night’s first English federal election TV debate, CanadianAlly.com boasts about Canada’s "huge contribution to the war on terrorism". Canada, of course, sat it out on the sidelines when America and the coalition went to war against Saddam Hussein.
"Canada is better being under the United Nations than being under the Star Spangled Banner," Canadian Bloc Quebecois leader Gilles Duceppe said last night.
In a debate where Prime Minister Paul Martin continued to attack Conservative Leader Stephen Harper for being too pro-American, Martin blasted Harper for writing a letter to the editor "apologizing because we didn’t go to war" and for doing it in the Wall Street Journal, "a foreign newspaper".
Specifically designed to capture an American audience, CanadianAlly.com is both bought and paid for by the Canadian Embassy--the Canadian Government.
Listed among Canada’s "huge contribution to the war on terrorism" are "18 warships" and "11,000 troops that have been dispatched overseas since 2001.
Since the troops dispatched have been rotated over three years and considering that there have never been 11,000 troops on the ground at the same time, the figure while not exactly a whopper is seriously misleading.
Canada did dispatch 5 ships with 1,200 troops to Afghanistan.
"Since Osama bin Laden didn’t have submarines, they weren’t much use," military expert and Espirt de Corps publisher Scott Taylor told Canadafreepress.com.
Lieutenant Colonel Jamie Robertson, creator of CanadianAlly.com, listed as the embassy’s Counsellor Military-Media Affairs, is on the Canadian government payroll.
The site shows the thin skin of the Canadian Government with a "Myth Buster" section, in which visitors are reminded, among other things, that the massive blackout of last August did not originate in Canada, in a roundabout way of saying it was all the Americans’ fault.
"There is a lot of misinformation out there," according to Lt. Col. Robertson.
The election-bound Canadian Government is still touchy about news media accounts that some of the Sept. 11 hijackers came through Canada.
While no hijackers came through Canada, there is no mention of former Prime Minister Jean Chretien saving so-called "Canadian charity worker" Ahmed Said Khadr from a Pakistani prison where he was nabbed for plotting terrorist escapes. Neither is there any reference to Prime Minister Paul Martin speaking out in support of members of the Khadr family when they returned to Toronto for medical assistance. Family members who openly admitted to having close ties to bin Laden were entitled to their opinions as Canadian citizens as far as Martin was concerned.
Unveiled last month, after several months of no updating CanadianAlly.com is targeting Washington, D.C. bigwigs, all the way from the policy wonks on Capitol Hill to the think tanks and political commentators most often quoted by the U.S. media.
Marketing efforts for the site have been feverish with the recent distribution of pens, Thermos mugs and desk clocks emblazoned with the site’s domain name.
According to Lt. Col. Robertson "thousands" have already clicked on to the site.
The site’s main mission is to convince Americans that despite recent disagreements, Canada is fully committed to the war on terrorism and the protection of North America.
Tell it to Prime Minister Paul Martin and Bloc leader Gilles Duceppe.
Why does this matter? could it be they have let to many terrorist in their country and they need the Protection of the USA?
WE ARE WINNING!!!
Just sitting here in a short skirt with my Friend Mr. Ruger he goes every where I go!!
I feel like Pat and will not change!!!
Once again they kill more Iraqi People who are Muslum? They don't believe in their own book 5:32 Yes they want to kill all mankind!!! all muslum mankind?
Part of the American Tribe
God Bless the USA and her Fighting Forces and All who Fight with her give them Strength and Courage to stay the course to Victory Amen
"The growth in the number of similar sites and the regularity with which they change addresses while retaining readers who rapidly communicate the new addresses, has overwhelmed law enforcement agencies. In some cases other websites have found themselves hijacked by Islamist programmers who write their material on to existing sites."
Does anyone still believe the lie that "militant Islam" is endorsed by a "minority" of the Islamic population?
Hugh,
"Is there no way for those infuriatingly clever hackers in the Western world, to be employed by our government, in order to exercise their skills in the war of self-defense against the Jihad?"
I like it...it reminds me of White House and the Mafia versus Castro.I hate covert anything, but if you're going to go out on a limb,go for broke and hire the best.
Also...I think one of the diferences between the days of Zenger (thanks for reminding me BTW - I had all but forgotten this great man, "the unknown Founding Father")and the days of Reifenstahl and the present-day Internet is that today any yahoo (no pun intended)can get online and spout "official party line" free, ironically, of any "official party" control. Can you imagine what would have happened to the chic Nazi image of the late 1930's if Reifenstahl had filmed executions? Her outtakes from the Olympics, showing Nazi staffers pretending to be oblivious to Hitler's increasingly frequent psychotic episodes, would have changed history.
Catherine,
"In war on terror, Geneva Convention doesn't apply."
-Jonah Goldberg
Actually, Mr. Goldberg is wrong.Without going into detail, enough nations have been signatory to the Geneva Conventions to (I know this goes contrary to what's been said in the media, but I'm not making this up)enforce them on nations who are not! The closest analogy? According to legal precedent (in other words,international courts have executed people)the two neighbors can rule that the neighbor across the street, after a relatively short time and under specific conditions,don't need no stinkin' ginko, and compel him to lose it.
Now, the Neo-Cons,justifiably, are not comfortable with this arrangement. And I don't blame them - frankly, my libertarian sensibilities recoil from the idea that other countries may eventually compel the US to cease all production and distribution of tobacco,anti-personnel mines and DDT (no matter what I think of these articles personally). But, the only way to avoid the creation of an International Law Police is for the signatory nations to do exactly what they agreed to do - enforce the laws amongst themselves. If, for example, American GI's taken captive during WWII claim that their rights under the Geneva Conventions were violated (and for the record,they were, and the case is so solid that there are Japanese who could to this day be convicted and executed, although compensation,as if such a thing were possible, is more likely)
However, that is unlikely - because the American Government elected after the war to enter into a seperate treaty with Japan that included forbidding American Servicemen from ever bringing suit(remember when a nation signs a treaty, that treaty becomes part of that nation's law)against Japan or the Japanese people for war crimes.And, this treaty (commerce and trade, I believe)has been supported by every Administration, Democrat or Republican, to the present time. And frankly, that's their right (and authority)regardless of what I or anybody else thinks.
Still, I stick to what I've been saying on these posts all along - we don't need more laws, we need more enforcement and less corruption.
Correction:
One of the above paragraphs should have read:
"If, for example, American GI's taken captive during WWII claim that their rights under the Geneva Conventions were violated (and for the record,they were, and the case is so solid that there are Japanese who could to this day be convicted and executed, although compensation,as if such a thing were possible, is more likely)
then the Federal Government has the power, even a half-century later, to bring charges against the Japanese."
It is strange, it was alright for the Clinton administration to help out the terrorists in Kosovo against the native Serbs, but it was not all right to go against the terrorists in Iraq and Afghanistan. Talk about a double standard!!
This is the daily "POST A LINK PLEASE CATHERINE" message.
~NMJ
Everyone should check out Internet Haganah, its on the left side of the page in the links section.
They monitor all the jihad sites and track them.
So far, the guy that runs it has shut down something like 470 sites.
He puts up new postings everyday on where these sites come from, who the web host is and what the sites say on them.
Go take a look, you get a nice little chill down your spine.
Now, the Neo-Cons,justifiably
Posted by Phil at June 17, 2004 02:07 PM
True colors always come out yes phil with all your fancy words you are just another name caller!
In real life there are covents and yes contracts ! Yes if you build your house next to a pig farm do not complain about the smell! But there will not be alot you can do about it Many yanks here have found this out the hard way!
I find that name callers have a lot in common with the terrorist! Althought they do not want to admit it!! What it is! Is a low form of terrorism to make the people who do not think like you change their mind!
Well in my neck of the woods all it does is srur anger !
Phil people like you just don't get it and will never I hope for your sake that you have not chased all the rednecks out of your neigborhood!
Part of the American Tribe
God Bless the USA and her Fighting Forces and All who Fight with her give them Strength and Courage to stay the course to Victory Amen
SusanB
I went to that sight and find it confusen!
Wish I had a few computer skills and I would gladly help will bring them out so the sqirrel hunters can get them!
NMJ
some name callers are lazy and will not do their home work! Call it time to update! Spend some money and get with the speed! Isn't that what brings Jobs!
An My words are not as pretty as my leggs!
Report: Saudis Let Terrorists Escape; Throats of Hostages Slit
NewsMax Wires
Tuesday, June 1, 2004
A Saudi security official would not directly address whether the militants who led a bloody assault against a residential and resort complex in Khobar, Saudi Arabia, were allowed to escape. But he said, "Our main priority was the hostages, and those guys who ran away, we know how to find them," according to the Associated Press.
For phil! Tell their Familys about your convention!
Part of the American Tribe
God Bless the USA and her Fighting Forces and All who Fight with her give them Strength and Courage to stay the course to Victory Amen
Annan Opposes 'War Crimes' Exemption for U.S.
NewsMax.com Wires
Thursday, June 17, 2004
Read more about the many dangers of the U.N.'s globalist court.
UNITED NATIONS – Defying the United States, Secretary-General Kofi Annan urged the U.N. Security Council on Thursday to stop shielding American peacekeepers from international prosecution for war crimes.
Annan cited the U.S. prisoner abuse scandal in Iraq in opposing a U.S. resolution calling for the blanket exemption for a third straight year.
Once again who says libs like America???
What about that Jordanian who shot the American UN workers Christian Americans in kosovo????
I say the U.N is dead get the hell out of My country and take up space some where else We will not pay your Dimmi Tax!!!
Jon E. Dougherty, NewsMax.com
Tuesday, June 15, 2004
Reporters Fear Being Seen as Anti-terrorist
What are they afraid of? Reporters for left-of-center media are so eager to avoid appearing anti-terrorist (or being exposed as another Jayson Blair) that they refuse to say their stories were accurate.
Four journalists at the New York Times, Newsday and Reuters are resisting subpoenas issued by federal prosecutors in New York in the trial of a lawyer charged with conspiring to abet terrorists.
I say if you hate the USA get the hell out and when the terrorist come for you don't come cry-ing to the USA !!!
You and I have the courage to say to our enemies, "There is a price we will not pay." There is a point beyond which they must not advance. This is the meaning in the phrase of Barry Goldwater's "peace through strength." Winston Churchill said that "the destiny of man is not measured by material computation. When great forces are on the move in the world, we learn we are spirits--not animals." And he said, "There is something going on in time and space, and beyond time and space, which, whether we like it or not, spells duty."
You and I have a rendezvous with destiny. We will preserve for our children this, the last best hope of man on Earth, or we will sentence them to take the last step into a thousand years of darkness.
We will keep in mind and remember that Barry Goldwater has faith in us. He has faith that you and I have the ability and the dignity and the right to make our own decisions and determine our own destiny.
Reagan's "A Time For Choosing" Speech
Delivered October 27, 1964 in Los Angeles, California.
We are sick of these monsters I mean look at the money that the U.N stold from the oil for food what bunch of crap Let all those christians die in Africa yes they were christians look around the world and the U.N. has spread this muslum sh-t and done nothing can't even give out food unless the USA is there to help! Go get FU_KED U.N. FROM AN AMERICAN!!!
300,000 dead under the UN watch by saddam!!!
How many dead in kosovo??? what 1000 and they were fighters ??
Part of the American Tribe
God Bless the USA and her Fighting Forces and All who Fight with her give them Strength and Courage to stay the course to Victory Amen
Amazing. They can't invent anything besides a bomb vest but use everything for destruction. Let's say they destroy the rest of the world as they'd like to -- I shudder to think of their plans for Michelangelo's David and the Sistine Chapel's art -- do they have the capability to advance it forward? Nope. Here comes the dark ages.
The best place to see what is being said on these sites is at.......................
www.siteinstitute.org
The Search For International Terrorist Entities
Just came across it and they have more information than I've seen posted anywhere else.