European Fatwa Council Urges Muslims To Respect Laws

Hmm. Weren't they respecting the laws in Europe already? Apparently not. From IslamOnline, with thanks to EPG:

LONDON, July 11 (IslamOnline.net) - The European Council for Fatwa and Research (ECFR) wrapped up its 13th session late Saturday, July 10, with a call to Muslims living in the West to abide by the laws in their respective countries and respects the rights of non-Muslims.

At the conclusion of their annual meeting, held in the London City Hall on July 7-10 at an invitation from London Mayor Ken Livingstone, Muslim scholars made several important recommendations, mostly directed to Muslim communities in the West.

"While abiding by the host country’s laws, Muslims are also asked to form Islamic bodies to organize their personal issues in accordance with Shari`ah," said the ECFR.

Most importantly, the body recommended that Muslims in the West to spare no legal or peaceful efforts to get the country where they live to recognize Islam as a religion and Muslims as a community that should enjoy full rights.

The recommendations also asked Muslims in the West to respect the lives and properties of non-Muslims.

"Muslims in the West should observe all duties and provide a good example for others in words, actions and behaviours," said the ECFR.

It also encouraged Muslims in the West to "adopt positive and innovative attitudes on all levels."

"They should do their utmost to raise the new generations - boys and girls - in a modern Islamic manner through establishing schools, educational and entertainment centres to protect them from deviation.

In other words, create a separate culture, with separate values. All right, but does that include an attachment to Sharia? And what does that suggest for the future of Europe?

| 17 Comments
Print | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

17 Comments

Is that their idea of integration? Notice emphasis
on Sharia, leopards don't change their spots even if pretending to be tame pussycats.

If a muslims first duty is to follow sharia there is no way they can follow the law of the land. Sharia is contrary to every man made law in the west.

Oh, by-the-way, make sure you respect the rights on non-Muslims you live among. Their attitude is outrageous. Certainly they believe themselves to be superior and above the law of countries where they reside, demanding changes in the laws and cultures where they reside.

They criticize and demean the West for being arrogant when in fact their hubris is legendary. There is really no language to adequately describe these people.

Of COURSE they are going to obey our laws. Just look how they plan to "obey" the French headscarf ban in schools:

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=14259

"Oh, by-the-way, make sure you respect the rights on non-Muslims you live among."

They mean the "rights" that are granted to us by their religious apartheid laws!

The answers provided by assorted fatwa-emitters are clear. In answer to the question, frequently posed by inquiring Muslims at various websites, as to whether they need obey the laws of an Infidel nation-state in which they now live (the particular nation-state is almost never specified because these INfidel nation-states are essentially, in Muslim eyes, unimportant fictions -- they are all part of dar al-harb)the answer is always the same: yes, but only insofar as those laws do not in any way contradict the Sharia. In other words, Muslim law is superior to any man-made law in those Infidel countries in which you now live. There is usually, as well, some statement about fitting in in order to promote Islam -- i.e., do what you must, so that the conditions in which Da'wa can take place unhindered and unobserved may prevail. This is simply a case of nudge-nudge-wink-wink, or taqiyya, or kitman.

Even terrorists have been known to shave their beards, drink wine, and eat pork -- that is, violate the rules of Islam about what is haram and what halal -- for the sake of achieving the highest goal of all, the destruction of Infidels and the triumph of Islam. So obeying a few Infidel laws to achieve the same goal, for the sake of Da'wa and to protect Muslim gains within Europe (including the secure implantation of Muslim populations, deemed difficult to dislodge), is hardly of note.

Indeed, the call for the Sharia to regulate their personal lives -- i.e. in family law, property and estate law -- as a parallel legal system does not show any real sign of comprehension that, in Europe, only the state's legal system can, and should, apply. Nor does the call for a "modern" upbringing, but one that carefully preserves Islam in every way, with "schools, educational and entertainment centers" to -- chilling words -- "protect them from deviation" -- give anyone much cause to believe that Muslims intend to treat Europe as anything more than Occupied Territory, for the moment inconveniently still ruled, at least in part, by the non-Muslims who happen to be there. But, like the Sudan, like Israel, like Kashmir, like the Caucasus, like all of West Africa, like Canada and America, it all belongs to Allah, and to the people who rightly are his, and have received his message rightly, unlike everyone else in the world.

The answers provided by assorted fatwa-emitters are clear. In answer to the question, frequently posed by inquiring Muslims at various websites, as to whether they need obey the laws of an Infidel nation-state in which they now live (the particular nation-state is almost never specified because these INfidel nation-states are essentially, in Muslim eyes, unimportant fictions -- they are all part of dar al-harb)the answer is always the same: yes, but only insofar as those laws do not in any way contradict the Sharia. In other words, Muslim law is superior to any man-made law in those Infidel countries in which you now live. There is usually, as well, some statement about fitting in in order to promote Islam -- i.e., do what you must, so that the conditions in which Da'wa can take place unhindered and unobserved may prevail. This is simply a case of nudge-nudge-wink-wink, or taqiyya, or kitman.

Even terrorists have been known to shave their beards, drink wine, and eat pork -- that is, violate the rules of Islam about what is haram and what halal -- for the sake of achieving the highest goal of all, the destruction of Infidels and the triumph of Islam. So obeying a few Infidel laws to achieve the same goal, for the sake of Da'wa and to protect Muslim gains within Europe (including the secure implantation of Muslim populations, deemed difficult to dislodge), is hardly of note.

Indeed, the call for the Sharia to regulate their personal lives -- i.e. in family law, property and estate law -- as a parallel legal system does not show any real sign of comprehension that, in Europe, only the state's legal system can, and should, apply. Nor does the call for a "modern" upbringing, but one that carefully preserves Islam in every way, with "schools, educational and entertainment centers" to -- chilling words -- "protect them from deviation" -- give anyone much cause to believe that Muslims intend to treat Europe as anything more than Occupied Territory, for the moment inconveniently still ruled, at least in part, by the non-Muslims who happen to be there. But, like the Sudan, like Israel, like Kashmir, like the Caucasus, like all of West Africa, like Canada and America, it all belongs to Allah, and to the people who rightly are his, and have received his message rightly, unlike everyone else in the world.

Thanks Suzan
Read this article and am dismayed situation in La Belle France is even worse than I thought.The French people will curse the day they let Muslims into their country.A great nation with a great culture is being destroyed.They're going to need another Joan of Arc to save them this time.

Morgane: And all they've got is Jack of Chirac!

They've got Jack-what?

Thats like telling lesbians that they must fancy men!!!

Muslims+Man-made laws= Disobediance

Recently I was informed by an Islamic scholar, that a certain section of the Qur’an requires Muslims to shave their rear-hind quarters. As such, I was inspired to compose the following:

Muzzie Wuzzie is so fuzzie,
Muzzie Wuzzie has much hair (especially around the anal orifice).
Then one day Allah said,
“Muzzie, shave that hairy butt.”
Muzzie said, “Oh yes, oh merciful and compassionate Allah, I will.”
Muzzie Wuzzie was so fuzzie,
Now he’s just a bald asshole!

Reza: FYI, I understand that several mosques have positions available for rectal inspectors for spot-checking of the above Islamic requirement (Allah doesn’t like 5 o’clock shadow).

Possibly in your spare time, when your not posting your islamo-fascist garbage, you could help service the Muslim community by availing yourself of the above employment opportunity.

Your grandchildren will be salespersons for Gillette razors and shaving cream.

Fondly,
Son of Infidel

How sad is it that the Governments of the countries that Muslims infest have to remind them to obey the law? It just demonstrates the lawlessness that they were spawned from before moving to other lands in a weak attempt to ruin everyone else's lives.

It's ridiculous that they even have to be told to obey the law........There goes that damn Muslim illiteracy problem again.

Gary: Jack of Chirac = Jacques Chirac -- the current President of France. Jack is the English version of the French name, Jacques.

Oh I know, Susan. What I meant was that means they have Jack $**T.

Yeah, I agree Gary :) Jack of Chirac is no Joan of Arc.

NEWSFLASH . Britains only political party warning of the dangers of Islam is facing a massive, concerted effort to shut it down. An unholy alliance of the pro-Islamic BBC, the Commission For "Racial Equalty" , the Sun newspaper, the leftist Trade Union Congress and Barclays Bank have all, in the last day or so, engineered a situation where it looks like the BNP who polled 808,000 votes standing on an anti-Islamic platform, look set to be unable to field any candidates at the next elections. In fact it's fast looking like the BNP will soon no longer exist as a political party. This is the FIRST time in British history that the Establishment has conspired to destroy and silence a legal political party !! It is no coincidence that this has occured just when the BNP was turning the searchlight on Islam. So this is the future..ANYONE objecting to the Islamification of their native country faces the full weight of the government to silence them. Surely this is fascism? Please visit www.bnp.co.uk. Like me you may not like all their views but what is happening in Britain right now is unbeliveable..