US, Israel, Australia, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Palau: the Great Anti-terror Powers

Too bad the UN has no pull anymore. They've flushed any respectability they once had right down the commode with radical Islam.

Israel has the right to protect themselves. Palestinians should've thought about the results of their actions before blowing up innocent people.

Too bad for them.......The wall is still low enough for peanuts to be tossed over it so the Palestinians can eat. What more so they want? They did this to themselves.

No one owes them anything, even if they do happen to be great Muslims, rulers of the world. It's high time Islam comes down off of its imaginary high horse, before they're sent into oblivion.

I hope Bush gives these countries Most Favored Nation trading status, like, yesterday.

'This is the most troubling issue in the Muslim world and as long as that problem remains boiling, the governments that support this American foreign policy will be looked at with disfavour.' says Dr Ali
Now I would have taken this to be a scarcely veiled threat but I am only a lowly female in the eyes of Allah.
Note here the good Doctor only thinks of MUSLIMS,
no one else matters, certainly not the opinions of
Infidels.Arrogance of Dr Ali and others of his ilk
irritate me. I shall be rooting for Israel.

I posted some of the following commentary at another article. I am placing it here as it seems appropriate.

DC,please tell me when the UN had "any" respectability. To my recollection, the UN has always been the following:

The UN: an impotent group of left wing liberal apologists and Islamo-fascist sympathizers combined with third world anti-semitic, anti Christian slobs all headed by that appeasing idiot Koffi Annan.

The UN should be dismanteled and shipped to France.
Let the French have it,god knows they love it so much!

Speaking of France, they are rapidly becoming a "third world" Islamic toilet.It won't be long before the Islamists take over and implement "Sharia".

In addition, we can always count on the French whenever we are in a fight,count on them to run the other way.

They would be singing "Deutsch Land", "Deutsch Land" and eating sauerkarut, if American soldiers hadn't shed their blood.Ungrateful "Frogs", Jacques Chirac and the lot of them.

Their grandchildern will be bowing to Mecca, if they don't wake up.

As for the Palestinians, the Israelis would have taken out Yassir Arafat,the "supreme" Islamo-fascist terrorist, long ago if it weren't for pressure from the White House.Fortunately, it is not to late for such action.

Son of Infidel.....I concede. I can't tell you when the UN had any respectability, so I will retract that portion of that statement. Thank you for the call out.

Well gang, I have to head off to DCWatson's Supreme Court. I will review these articles and announce my decisions of judgement.

Talk with you soon.

The wall has really put the pals in a pickle...warehouses full of bomb vests just collecting dust, no cause for celebratory parades because another israeli child was killed therefore making the world a safer place, the pal population is booming because there has been no need to use the women and children as expendable shields, they havent been able to kill or mame in months...life must be really tough for the pals right now...and then pesky reporters had to show them with their new state of the art photo cell phones, meaning they had to work even harder to tug at the worlds heartstrings about being a "starving" people (starving people do not usually have expensive electronic equipment). Lets not forget that the evil US military had to go and take sadaam out of the picture, taking out their top paying job of suicide bomber....and on the other side of the fence those evil israelis, going about their daily lives, tending their overflowing fields, shopping, dining out, taking the bus....evil plain evil...

Perhaps france should offer the pals a home, lord knows chriac loves his muzzies...a few hundred thousand more would make him positivly giddy...or if he didnt want to take all of them because he didnt want to appear greedy...all the countries that voted for terror should get a piece of the pali terror pie...

Im beginning to wonder if the lot of the fools in the UN are closet muslims....I am sure some of them (france) are closet something else...

There were those who opposed the resolution, those who abstained, and even those who, while voting for it, did not really agree with it, but felt it was politic to go along with the Islamintern forces that now completely control the United Nations, its personnel, its inner workings, its choice of subjects to consider, its choice of what is deemed important and not important.

As far as personnel goes, Muslim countries supply a great number of those who make up the staff -- and these are by no means disinterested civil servants who somehow forget their Muslim worldviews or check them at the door. They, in turn, are able to work with fellow-travellers, or those too scared to oppose them, from many of the European countries. The general atmosphere at the U.N. is hostile to the United States, bitterly hostile to Israel, and supremely indifferent to any matters that might, just might, turn attention to the nature of Islam and to the Jihad.

A succession of American ambassadors, beginning with Goldberg, and Moynihan, and Buckley, have written memoirs detailing the anti-Israel attitudes. And, increasingly, ambassadors have begun to note how cleverly the Arab and Muslim lobby has become the one solid voting bloc, the one that is capable of giving marching orders to the black Africans, to some of the Bandung-Conference Thirdworlders in Asia, and even to the members of the EU, caught as it is in the net of its own making, the Euro-Arab Dialogue which institutionalized dhimmitude even before it was necessary, and which also permitted the unchecked immigration, into Western Europe, of Muslims who might, thirty years ago, had Islam been understood (unfortunately, even then it was, as the philosopher Jacques Ellul said, "forbidden to critize Islam" in any way) what this would mean for the future of Europe's own peoples and civilization.

What is happening at the U.N. often receives criticism -- but the criticism is directed only at the anti-Israel nonsense and lies. But Israel is only part of it, just as the Jihad against the Infidel sovereign state of Israel is only part of a world-wide phenomenon, now strengthened both by OPEC trillions, which the West has done little to diminish, and by the immigration into the very heart of the dar al-Harb, Western Europe, and now North America as well.

When the U.N.'s subsidiary groups turn every conceivable meeting into a meeting of vilification directed at Israel -- whether it be the lynch-mob behavior and rhetoric in Durban (Mary Robinson's handiwork -- and she has been rewarded, for her many sins, by the egregious Jeffrey Sachs, with a fat post at Columbia's absurdly-titled and grandly-funded "World Institute"), or in Cairo, or elsewhere, and whether the subject be Women, or Human Rights, or anything else under the sun, it always turns into another "Palestinian" rights fest.

Now if attention is always paid to the "Palestinians" it will not then be paid to AIDS, to human rights in Algeria, or Egypt, or Iran, or indeed in China, will not be paid to the position of women all over the Muslim world, will not be paid to the destruction of the environment. In other words, the celebrated word "hijacking" can be used fittingly here: the Arab Muslims have hijacked the U.N., and forced its agenda, the agenda of the Arab League, to become the U.N.'s agenda. It is truly extraordinary.

During this time, genocide has been committed against Christians in East Timor, with a respone finally coming only from the Australians, who provided the troops who protected the remaining Christian East Timorese (200,000 of them had already been murdered by their Muslim persecutors). Nearly 2 million black Sudanese non-Muslims have been murdered, and whatever the Special Rapporteur reported, nothing effective was done. And now, in Darfur, Arab Muslims make war on blacks, because they are black even if nomoinally Muslim, because in Arab history, Arabs are superior, given that the Qur'an was composed in Arabic, "in their language," and that Islam, for all of its phony universalism, is really a vehicle for Arab imperialsim, causing non-Arabs to forget their own culture and to want to ape the civilization of Arabia in the eighth century, its attitudes, its moeurs. The "mawalis" or non-Arab Muslims of Darfur can expect to be treated just as the Muslim Kurds were treated by the Arabs, or as the Muslim Berbers have often been treated by the Arabs -- cruelly, with indifference to their own culture, their own language (only last year did the
Berbers of Algeria obtain the right even to use their own language, Amazight, and that only because of terrific Berber resistance to Arab cultural imperialism).

The U.N. will do nothing about Darfur; it can do nothing. It did nothing when Egyptian planes helped to murder hundreds of thousands of Ibo civilians during the Biafra War. It will never do anything about terrorist --- or indeed other kinds of attacks -- against Israel. It will never, and can never do anything, against anything which its ruling Muslim lobby, the extensive Muslim presence which has made the U.N. as useless as the League of Nations was seen to be by the late 1930s, deems against Muslim interests.

The only time the U.N. has ever permitted action that would be taken against a Muslim country, or a Muslim interest, is during the Gulf War. And that action, authorized to be taken against Iraq, was only possible because Iraq had seized Kuwait, and threatened Saudi Arabia -- and thus, some Muslim countries were more concerned about their own survival.

Ambassador Danforth should undertand that the sample he has just received of anti-Israel injustice is simply the most obvious expression of a much wider, deeper, and sinister problem, that at the U.N. itself can not be dealt with unless the United States begins to identify the problem, and to work with those, especially in Latin America (who must watch with alarm as the Reconquista is undone on the Iberian Peninsula), and with those members of the EU that have not yet had time to condition themselves to the full panoply of appeasement measures favored by France, Belgium, and Germany -- the Czechs, the Bulgarians, the Hungarians, the Rumanians for example, who have historical reasons for being more clear-eyed about ideological threats, and in the case of the latter three, about Islam.

It is not that the U.N. is "anti-Israel." It is that it has been captured, lock, stock, and barrel, by the forces of Islam -- and their Western supporters. Just begin by googling the name "Edward Mortimer" -- and do not fail to find his ecstatic remark about the Ayatollah Khomeini's ascension to power ("Quite the most glorious morning in the history of mankind") and his praise for an antisemitic tract (oh, he will deny that up and down as so unfair, such a canard, but that is exactly what it is) that purported to show the "collaboration" between Nazis and Zionists. And who is Edward Mortimer? He is the Director of Communications at the U.N. He is the man who puts the words, and even the ideas, into the hapless Kofi Annan's mouth and brain.

Kofi Annan -- let it be remembered -- is the man who is most responsible for the deaths of millions of black Africans in Rwanda and in the Sudan. General Romeo Dalaire has recorded his own memories of the pusillanimous and, for the Tutsi and even some Hutu vicitms, fatal behavior of Kofi Annan just before, and even during, the massacres. As for Annan's behavior in the Sudan, his utterly ineffective calls for something to be done in Sudan, without actually daring to do anything (no, the Arab League would never permit the U.N. forces to do anything of permanent value to protect the non-Muslims, and the non-Arabs, in the Sudan) are absurd.

There is no one, with the possible exception of King Leopold the First of Belgium, who is responsible by his actions, for more deaths among the people of black Africa, than Kofi Annan. Quite a feat.

Maybe the israelis SHOULD take down the fence - & then REBUILD IT ALONG THE BORDERS OF HISTORICAL GREATER ISRAEL! Kick the palestinians out - they have proven time & time again that they are incapable of being good neighbors. Their aim is the destruction of Israel, not to live in peaceful co-existence. They have no true historical claim to the land. They "elected" arafat as their leader & have resisted all efforts to appoint someone sane & reasonable to try & achieve peace. The troll is an avowed terrorist, always has been, always will be, no matter how often the idiots at the (worthless) UN try & tell us differently. People who follow him are terrorists. Terrorists do NOT deserve our sympathy - or a country!

The Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau are American colonies in everything but name. The Australian government will fall within the year because of its participation in the colonial war on Iraq against the will of the great majority of the Australian people. (Furthermore, the Muslim population of Australia is growing fast and will soon be in a dominate position in that country.)

That leaves only the United States and her Zionist masters. Once the criminal usurper George Bush and his Crusader and Zionist henchmen are driven from office by the peace-loving majority of the American people, the illegal Zionist Entity will stand alone.

The struggle is all but over. Do you now begin to understand what Sheikh Osama bin Ladin meant when he spoke of the strong horse and the weak horse?

Your grandchildren will be Muslim.

Allahu akbar

The DCWatson Supreme Court of Justice has received and reviewed pleas from Palestinians, Muslim Civil Rights Organizations, and Islamic apologists over the past couple of hours.

Misspelled words are flowing in over e-mail and on paper to this Hall of American Justice.

The pleas for DCWatson to rule against the security wall being constructed by Israel have been reviewed thoroughly.

Decision: The Supreme Court of Justice, presided over by DCWatson, hereby rules that the Security Barrier being built by the Israelis is justified, necessary, and is to continue until the day of its completion. The court also rules that holes are to be drilled through the barrier one (1) per every 100 feet, and are to be at least 3 1/4 inches in diameter for the purpose of transporting bananas, pork rinds, deodorant, soap, and bottled water to the other side of said barrier aka (Wild Kingdom).

Part II , the barrier is to be manned 24 hours per day, 365 days per year, and is to be equipped with automatic weapons, mounted at the top for the purpose of repelling any efforts to climb/scale said barrier.

Part III, A 50 ft. wide moat is to be installed on both sides of the barrier with a depth of 72 (virgins) feet, stocked with any type of fish that is willing to eat flesh.

Appeals to this decision may be filed within the next 7 seconds. If appeals are not received within the prescribed time frame, they will not be honored.

"the illegal Zionist Entity will stand alone."

Right. And even if standing alone ('48, '56, '67, '73), they will kick your muslim butt back to where it belongs: burning above a fire with the rest of the pigs.

You radical muslims will never rule the world. You are too stupid and divided for that. If it wasn't for the oil, you still would be hearding camels and scraping dung of your feet.

Radical muslims harm their religion, harm their own people. You are only interested in one thing: world domination and that will never happen. Because even the moderate muslims will see who you are and hunt you down.

What reza & the rest of the impotent muslim drones fail to realize is that the US is actually holding back the Israelis. Israel of course makes it's own decisions in the end, but has always at least considered what impact their actions would have on the US before acting. We will not always agree, but we will consult & try to take actions which would be mutually beneficial. That is what friends & allies do. If it weren't for the resultant backlash against the US, Israel would long ago have sent the palestinians packing, torn down the al-aqsa monstrosity, kicked the syrians butts, kicked the iranian mullahs butts so we would not now even have any reason to debate a nuclear iran, wiped out hezbollah & stood ready to defend herself against any & all of her arab "neighbors" who will not even acknowledge her right to exist.

PEACE, ISLAM STYLE:
Bukhari:V9B84N59 “Allah’s Apostle said, ‘I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: “None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.” Whoever says this will save his property and his life from me.’”
Qur’an 8:58 “If you apprehend treachery from any group on the part of a people (with whom you have a treaty), retaliate by breaking off (relations) with them. The infidels should not think they can bypass (Islamic law or the punishment of Allah). Surely they cannot escape.”
Tabari VII:86 “Gabriel brought down the following verse to the Messenger: ‘If you apprehend treachery from any people (with whom you have a treaty), retaliate by breaking off (relations).’ When Gabriel had finished delivering this verse, the Prophet said, ‘I fear the Banu Qaynuqa.’ It was on the basis of this verse that Muhammad advanced upon them.”
Tabari VII:158 “Judayy went to Abd Allah Ibn Ubayy to ask for support. He said, ‘I found him sitting among a number of his companions while the Prophet’s crier was calling men to arms. He said, ‘This is a clever trick of Muhammad’s.’ The Messenger of Allah besieged the Nadir Jews for fifteen days. In the end they made peace with him on the condition that the Prophet would not kill them and that their property and their coats of mail would be his.”
Tabari VII:159 “The Messenger of Allah besieged the Nadir for fifteen days until he had reduced them to a state of utter exhaustion, so that they would give him what he wanted. The terms in which the Prophet made peace with the Jews were: he would not shed their blood, he would expel them from their lands and settlements, providing for every three of them a camel and a water-skin.”
Tabari VII:159 “The Prophet fought them until he made peace with them on condition that they evacuated Yathrib. He expelled them to Syria but allowed them to keep what their camels could carry, except for their coats of mail and weapons.”
Qur’an 47:33 “Believers, obey Allah, and obey the Messenger. Do not falter; become faint-hearted, or weak-kneed, crying for peace.”
Qur’an 9:3 “Allah is not bound by any contract or treaty with non-Muslims, nor is His Apostle.”
Qur’an 97:5 “There is peace until the dawning of the day!”
Ishaq:515 “When the people of Fadak heard what had happened, they sent word to the Messenger, asking him to banish them and spare their lives, saying they too would leave him their property. When the people of Khaybar surrendered on these conditions, the survivors asked Muhammad to employ them on their farms for a half share of whatever they produced. They said, ‘We know more about farming [seeing that you are terrorists and all].’ So Muhammad made peace with them for a half share, provided that: ‘If we want to expel you, we may.’ He made a similar arrangement with Fadak. So Khaybar became the prey of the Muslims, while Fadak belonged exclusively to the Messenger of Allah, becoming his personal property, because the Muslims had not attacked its people with cavalry.”
Qur’an 9:3 “And an announcement from Allah and His Messenger to the people on the day of the Pilgrimage is that Allah and His Messenger dissolve treaty obligations with the Pagans.”
Tabari VIII:104 “Peace to whoever follows the right guidance! To proceed; Submit yourself, and you shall be safe.’”
Qur’an 49:9 “If two parties among the Believers fall into fighting, make peace: but if one becomes aggressive, then fight against the one that transgresses until it complies.”
Tabari VIII:142 “The Messenger made peace with them on condition that the Zoroastrians should be required to pay the jizyah tax [so onerous, it’s akin to economic suicide] that one should not marry their women.”
Qur’an 9:7 “How can there be a covenant between Allah and His Messenger and the disbelievers with whom you made a treaty near the sacred Mosque?” Qur’an 9:8 “How (can there be such a treaty), seeing that they get an advantage, the upper hand over you? They do not pay you respect, or honor you or the ties of kinship or covenant. With (good words from) their mouths they entice you [out negotiate you], but their hearts are averse to you.”
Qur’an 9:12 “If they violate their oaths and break treaties, taunting you for your Religion, then fight these specimens of faithlessness.”
Tabari VIII:163 “The Prophet said, ‘I think you will see Abu Sufyan [the leading Meccan merchant] come to strengthen the pact and extend the term.’” Ishaq:543 “Abu Sufyan went to Muhammad in Medina to affirm the peace treaty, but Muhammad refused to speak to him.” Tabari VIII:164 “Sufyan went to Abu Bakr and asked him to intercede, but he refused. When Sufyan asked Umar to help [avert war], he replied, ‘No way. By Allah, if I had only ant grubs, I would fight you with them! Ali said, ‘Woe to you, Sufyan. When the Messenger has determined a thing it is useless for anyone to talk to him.’”
Tabari VIII:165 “There is nothing that you can do to make peace with him.”
Tabari VIII:165 “When Abu Sufyan reported back to the Quraysh that Muhammad had given him no reply, they said, ‘Woe to you! By Allah, he did no more than play with you.’”
Ishaq:544 “Muhammad commanded the people to prepare for the foray [raid, incursion, sortie, attack, or assault]. The Messenger informed his troops that he was going to Mecca. He ordered them to prepare themselves and ready their equipment quickly. He said, ‘O Allah, keep spies and news from the Quraysh until we take them by surprise in their land.’”
Tabari VIII:182 “Allah had enabled Muhammad to take the persons of the Quraysh by force, giving him power over them so they were his booty. Their lives were now his spoil.”
Ishaq:552 “When the populace settled down, Muhammad went to the Ka’aba and compassed it seven times on his camel, touching the Black Stone with a stick. Then he went inside the Temple. There he found a dove made of wood. He broke it in his hands and threw it away.” [The first idol Muhammad broke was the international symbol of peace.]
Tabari IX:58 “When the Messenger reached Tabuk the governor of Aylah [a seaport at the north end of the Gulf of Aqabah] came to him, made a treaty, and agreed to pay the jizyah tax. The people of Jarba and Adhruh also offered to pay him the tax.”
Ishaq:607 “The Byzantines encountered the Messenger’s cavalry which was led by Khalid. Ukaydir was seized and his brother Hassan was killed. Muhammad spared his life and made peace with him on the condition that he pay the zakat tax.”
Tabari IX:79 “In this year the zakat was made obligatory, and the Messenger dispatched his agents to collect it. The verse was revealed: ‘Take the zakat from their wealth to purify them.’”
Ishaq:316 “In peace you are wild asses—rough and coarse. And in war you are like women wearing corsets. But I care not so long as my hand can grasp my trusty blade.”
Qur’an 8:61 “But if the enemy inclines toward peace, do you (also) incline to peace, and trust in Allah. Should they intend to deceive or cheat you, verily Allah suffices: He strengthened you with His aid and with Believers.” [The small print is real important. “Should they intend to deceive or cheat” is an open invitation to invoke 8:57 to 60. The first to interpret this surah said:]
Ishaq:326 “If they ask you for peace on the basis of Islam (submission), make peace on that basis. Be of one mind by His religion.”
Tabari VIII:17 “The Muslims and polytheists stayed in their positions for twenty nights with no fighting except for the shooting of arrows and the siege. When the trial became great for the people, the Messenger sent for the leaders of the Ghatafan [Meccan comrades]. He offered them a third of the date harvest of Medina on condition that they leave. The truce between the sides progressed to the point of drawing up a written document, but there was no witnessing or firm determination to make peace; it was only a matter of maneuvering.”
Ishaq:454 “Now that Allah has conferred Islam on us, and made us famous, shall we give them our property? By Allah, we will offer them only the sword until Allah judges between us.’ ‘As you wish,’ said Allah’s Messenger.”
Tabari VIII:100 “Abu Sufyan said, ‘We were merchants but the fighting between us and Muhammad has prevented us from journeying, so our wealth is depleted. [This is the purpose of terrorism.] Even after the truce with the Muslims, we fear that we still are not safe. [Muslims, continuing to plunder Meccan caravans, violated the treaty twenty times.]’”
Qur’an 4:90 “For those who join a group between you and whom there is a treaty, or (those who become) weary of fighting you, had Allah had willed, He could have given them power over you, and they would have fought you. Therefore if they withdraw and wage not war, and send you (guarantees of) peace, then Allah has not given you a way (to war) against them.” [The purpose of terror is to cause people to become so “weary of fighting” they surrender.]
Qur’an 4:91 “You will find others who, while wishing to live in peace and being safe from you to gain the confidence of their people; thrown back to mischief headlong; therefore if they do not withdraw from you, and offer you peace besides restraining their hands, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them; and against these We have given you a clear sanction and authority.” [So if you wish to live in peace, but are perceived as being mischievous (i.e., non-Muslim), Allah has given his Jihad warriors “a clear sanction and authority to seize and kill” you.]
[top] [toc] [quotes main]

Fool me once shame on you Fool me twice shame on me!! I think this is what I call Twice!!

U.S., IAEA demand Iran come clean on nuke plans
14 Jun 2004 17:29:29 GMT
(Adds details)
By Louis Charbonneau and Mark Trevelyan
VIENNA, June 14 (Reuters) - Iran is not fully cooperating with U.N. inspectors and must come clean about the full extent of its nuclear programme, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the United States said on Monday.
IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei said Iran's cooperation has been "less than satisfactory" and warned that clarification of unresolved issues -- particularly Iran's uranium enrichment activities -- could not be allowed to drag on forever.
"It is essential for the integrity and credibility of the inspection process that we are able to bring these issues to a close within the next few months, and provide the international community with the assurances it urgently seeks regarding Iran's nuclear activities," he told the IAEA's board of governors.
Washington, which accuses Iran of developing weapons under cover of a civilian atomic energy programme, echoed these words.

Time for Israel to show the video of the U.N. useing their Ambl.s for the Terrorist?
U.N. Survey – Staff Blasts Organization
Stewart Stogel
Tuesday, June 15, 2004
United Nations -- "Staff members feel unprotected when reporting violations of codes of conduct," is just one of the findings contained in a survey of United Nations employees conducted by Deloitte Consulting.
The survey entitled United Nations Organizational Integrity Survey 2004 (Final Report), is a compilation of responses to a e-mail query of more than 18,000 U.N. staffers worldwide. Deloitte claims more than 1/3 of all U.N. employees answered the e-mail.
A copy of the narrowly circulated report was obtained by NewsMax.
U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan, seeking to spin the survey's findings, says in a letter to staffers (dated June 4); "staff believe that not enough action is taken to investigate and address instances of unethical behavior and that those who expose such breeches may put themselves at risk of reprisal."
Annan added: "Few staff think that there is widespread fraud or financial corruption in the Organization."

Diplomats: Iran Wanted Parts for Covert Nuke Program
NewsMax Wires
Friday, June 11, 2004
VIENNA, Austria — Iran told a black market supplier it was interested in "tens of thousands" of parts for its covert nuclear program, diplomats said Thursday, as the U.N. atomic watchdog prepared to rebuke Tehran for hindering an agency probe of its activities.
The diplomats, who spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity, said the revelation about Iran's offer was made at a closed-door meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency.
An IAEA report leaked last week mentioned that Iran had acknowledged inquiring about 4,000 magnets needed for uranium enrichment equipment with a European black-market supplier and had dangled the possibility of buying a "higher number" of such markets.

the U.N. is making a poor distraction From the Real issue the U.N. is run by mulsums!!! and the world is paying their dimmi tax well the USA and Israel said I aint Paying no more so stuff that in your pants!!!

In WW2 look who was on the side of the USA yes we were at war with the whole world and Russia and England and Astreila was on our side and we kicked ass well the mulsums are no match that is why they have made this stupid court?

Isreal SHOW the Video to the World!!!

Part of the American Tribe
God Bless the USA and her Fighting Forces and All who Fight with her give them Strength and Courage to stay the course to Victory[FREEDOM] Amen

Addendum to the above:

While listening to a news report on NPR this morning, at 11:01:30, I heard the following from the newscaster (I think it was Carl Castle, or Cassill, the man whose voice is put on your answering-machine if, on a weekend program, you answer a question or two correctly):

"Despite a unanimous UN ruling" Israel will....

Apparently, for those who write the news at NPR, the lopsided vote was not sufficiently lopsided; they wanted unanimity; they wanted to ignore the six countries, including their own (in the house view -- akin to "house wine" -- of NPR, one suspects that the United States is the coutnry whose vote we are most entitled to ignore, the vote entitled to the least respect, the vote that is -- unlike those votes cast by the ambassadors of Syria or Algeria or Saudi Arabia or France or Belgium or Pakistan or Indonesia --the most biased.

So, why bother even informing listeners that six states voted against, and nearly a dozen countries were brave enough to abstain? Why indeed? NPR is learning from its handmaiden the BBC as to how to present the news. Just write what you want. By the time anyone notices (I noticed at 11:01, and nearly three hours have gone by), it will be too late; the damage, as desired, will have been done.

Mr. Spencer wrote: "The whole world has voted for terrorism — except for Australia, Israel, the US, the Marshall Islands, Micronesia and Palau. More evidence of the rank corruption and utter worthlessness of the UN."

The delegates are voting according to their governments wishes, not according to some sinister group of plotters in the UN. Do you really mean that the 150 countries (including all EU countries) who voted in favor of the resolution are corrupt and in favor of terrorism?

"Foreign Minister Alexander Downer defended Australia's opposition to the resolution.

"We believe that taking this matter of the security barrier to the International Court of Justice was the wrong decision," Mr Downer said.

"Israel must find ways of defending itself against terrorists and it isn't reasonable to tell the Israelis that they can't erect a security barrier to protect the people of Israel from suicide-homicide bombers.

"That is not to say we approve the particular path of the security barrier - we do not think it should transgress the green line and wander off into the occupied territory." "

So even Australia thinks building the anti-fascist security fence on occupied land is a bad idea. I guess we have to write them of as crypto- terrorists after all.

Marshall Islands is "constitutionally in free association with the United States". They do seem to be a quite unfree when voting in the UN though.

I guess this means its really only USA and Israel against the hordes of darkness then.

Reza
Actually come from this part of the World, so can refute your lies AT ONCE! Australia
has one of the toughest Immigration Policies in the World with comparatively few Muslims even if they are gathered and making a lot of noise in Sidney.Not to mention contributing to the crime rate.Also Oz Citizens don't take kindly to your sort of threats. Notice there have been a number of Mosques burnt down and while I don't condone this, it should be a warning that your religion isn't popular any more than Sharia Law.If it ever came to the crunch, expect Ockkers to take the Law into their hands without government approval.
Certainly not PC correct. As to the bit about horses....Reza, you do talk a lot of horse shit.

"Do you really mean that the 150 countries (including all EU countries) who voted in favor of the resolution are corrupt and in favor of terrorism?" --Curious Citizen from Sweden

Are they in favor of terrorism?

Against themselves, decidely not. Against the Semites of Israel...

The majority of world nations, suffice it to say, and increasingly in the EU, are anti-Semetic. Killing Jews in Israel keeps enraged Muslims focused there, so that they won't start blowing up the citizens of Stockholm instead. If Muslims can't find easy targets in nearby Israel, Europe is the next best thing. So removing the wall to keep terroists happy is in the best interests of the EU, and the rest of the Muslim-fearing appeaser nations. Cowardly, but temporarily effective, wouldn't you agree?

Perhaps there is a better way to frame this question:

Can you come up with a more practical non-violent way to provide safety to both Israeli and Palestians than a safety barrier? If you can, I'd love to hear it.

Indeed, so would the rest of the world.

Until then, thank Israel for playing nice and trying to use non-lethal methods to contain the terrorists thant want them elimiated from the face of the earth. If most EU nations faced assaults from isolated enclaves like Gaza within their territory, they would have started carpet bombing long ago.

And as the citizens of Middle Eastern coutries have repeatedly made clear since 1948, carpet bombing is about the nicest thing thing on their Israeli agenda.

Care to respond?

Remind me, my memory is fuzzy.
What was it that Arafat do and say at Camp David
while they were negotiating a lasting peace
(the Oslo Accords)?

They had a chance then to negotiate a lasting
peace but; instead what was it he said?

Just wondering if anyone here remembers.

A point a little off topic:

When the Declaration of the
United States of Europe (EU)
is signed by all 'states'.

Will the representation of the
United States of Europe (EU)
become one vote and one vote only,
in the United Nations?

The world will be very different in a decade
alone. Where will the chips fall and how
minimized will the American Influence on the world be?

J ust
A nother
F *in
O bserver
R ight
'Ere

I see the United Nations going the way of it's predecessor The League of Nations as the UN is becoming increasingly irrelevant.The US provides the majority of financial support for the UN and hosts the organization in NY. How about we let France provide the majority of the financial support for the UN and move UN headquarters to Saudi Arabia or Syria? If that happens watch as the organization crumbles within months.

The recent UN vote against Isreals security fence is somewhere beyond ridiculous as a sovereign nation has every right to protect itself against mass murderers.As Isreal has pointed out the security fence exists because of Palestinian terrorists. If Palestinians were not engaging in violence there would be no fence, if Palestinians stop the violence then the fence can eventually be removed. Palestinians object to the barrier for one reason,because it works. The security fence makes it much more difficult for Palestinians to infiltration into Isreal. One result is what we are seeing now, with Palestinians turning on each other in Gaza and the West bank.I suspect Islamofascists are also concerned that other western governments may follow Isreals example and construct barriers both real and political to effectively keep Muslim fanatics out.If Muslim immigration is drastically reduced and Muslims can no longer come to the west for education, health care, business and pleasure but instead have to stay in their own miserable countries. Then what will Islamofascists do?

Roxane,

There already are other nations building those
walls to do just what you talk about. They are not all 'westernized' nations but they are
taking action none the less.

Link to the article:
http://www.imra.org.il/story.php3?id=21439

contents of article:

UNILATERALLY CONSTRUCTED BARRIERS IN CONTESTED AREAS

PEACEWATCH
THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE'S SPECIAL REPORTS ON THE ARAB-ISRAELI PEACE PROCESS
Number Four Hundred and Sixty-Five July 8, 2004
www.washingtoninstitute.org/distribution/PCE465.doc
UNILATERALLY CONSTRUCTED BARRIERS IN CONTESTED AREAS
By David Makovsky and Ben Thein

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague is expected to issue
an advisory opinion this Friday, July 9, on the international legality of
Israel's security fence.

Although advisory opinions are often sought from the ICJ before an
international body has made up its mind on an issue, the United Nations (UN)
General Assembly referred the matter to the ICJ after it had already
condemned the Israeli move. Given the UN General Assembly vote on December
8, 2003, by a ninety-to-eight margin with seventy-four abstentions, a
comparable number of states were expected to offer briefs to the ICJ.
However, this was not the case. All major industrial countries opposed
referral and many issued written statements basically arguing that the IJC
should not adopt an advisory opinion, including the United States, United
Kingdom, France, Germany, the entire European Union (EU), Japan, and Canada.
Although many of these countries expressed their opposition to the fence-or
its route-in their written submissions, they also pointedly stated that the
Israeli-Palestinian issue was a political problem that should be addressed
through political rather than legal means and that, therefore, the ICJ was
not the correct venue for addressing the question. In contrast, of the
forty-nine states that submitted written statements, only a minority
supported ICJ referral, including nine Arab states, the Palestinian
Authority, North Korea, and Cuba.

Ironically, three countries-India, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey-condemned Israel
at the UN General Assembly and voted to refer the Israeli fence to the ICJ
for an advisory opinion even though they had themselves built barriers in
areas contested by their neighbors. India is just completing a 460-mile
barrier in the contested Kashmir to halt infiltrations supported by
Pakistan; within the last two years, Saudi Arabia built a sixty-mile barrier
along an undefined border zone with Yemen to halt smuggling of weaponry; and
Turkey built a barrier in an area that Syria claims as its own. Of the three
countries, Saudi Arabia also submitted a written statement to the ICJ
directly, while the other two-India and Turkey-did not. The Arab League and
Organization of Islamic States submitted statements to the ICJ condemning
the Israeli barrier, but they did not condemn the Saudi barrier when it was
being built. The ICJ has not been involved in any of the other barrier
disputes.

India
To halt infiltrations from Pakistan, India has almost completed a
twelve-foot-high fence in the contested area of Kashmir. Straddling 460
miles of territory known as the Line of Control (which divides both
Kashmirs), the fence reportedly looks comparable to other sections of the
India-Pakistan border. The issue of Kashmir goes back to the India-Pakistan
partition of 1947. Because a majority of Kashmir residents were Muslims, in
1947, Pakistan seized part of Kashmir. In the late 1980s, it sought to
obtain the rest of Kashmir by supporting an insurgency movement. Last year,
India began constructing a fence to halt the infiltrations. Construction of
the fence was at first hampered by shelling between Pakistan and India.
However, it has been aided by a ceasefire worked out late last year between
the militaries of both countries. Pakistani leaders pledged early this year
not to allow their territory to be used as a springboard for attacks.

The Pakistani government has accused India of violating the UN charter as
well as the ceasefire agreement. The spokesperson for the Pakistani
military, Major General Shaukat Sultan, said that "the border in Jammu and
Kashmir remains undemarcated. It is a working boundary and a ceasefire
line. . [A]ny measure to alter the status of [the boundary] and any attempt
to erect a new impediment is a direct violation of international
commitments, and Pakistan opposes it. Border fencing is not allowed."

General Nimal Chand Vij, India's Army chief, claimed in May 2004 that the
barrier was constructed to decrease the number of attacks of invaders coming
from Pakistan into India: "The number of terrorists inside Jammu and Kashmir
has dropped to nearly 55 percent to 60 percent of what it was last year."
General Vij added that the fence had stopped almost 90 percent of
infiltration attempts, but about 3,000 militants are still waiting for the
best chance to invade.

Saudi Arabia
In a twenty-four-page statement available on the ICJ website (
www.icj-cij.org/icjwww/idocket/imwp/imwpstatements/iWrittenStatement_02_King
domofSaudiArabia.pdf), the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia issued a blistering
attack against the Israeli security fence, which it called an
"internationally wrongful act" and called for the "destruction" of the
barrier.

Yemeni officials have publicly charged that Saudi Arabia, within the last
two years, constructed sixty miles of barrier in an undefined zone along the
Saudi Arabia-Yemen border. The barrier is ten feet high. Saudi Arabia claims
that the disputed area is part of its territory and asserts that the move is
defensive to stem the flow of Yemeni smuggling of militants and weaponry.
Yemen claims that the Saudi move violates the Jeddah Treaty, which the two
countries reached in 2000. Amid continued Yemeni protest and just days
before the ICJ convened in February, the Saudis and Yemenis held a
high-level bilateral meeting in Riyadh. As a result of the summit and the
ICJ, the Saudis have agreed to pause construction-at least for now. However,
they have not done what they advise the Israelis to do-namely, to take down
the barrier.

Turkey
Turkey's control of the southern province of Alexandretta, which was
formerly in Syria, is accepted internationally, but it remains disputed by
Damascus. Turkey patrols the border area, which it calls Hatay Province.
Syria, however, calls it the Sanjak of Alexandretta Province.
Alexandretta was part of France's mandate for Syria after World War I, but
the French-Turkish Treaty of Ankara also guaranteed the Turks living there
cultural autonomy. In 1936, as France took early steps toward Syrian
independence, Turkey sought a revision of Alexandretta's status. It appealed
to the League of Nations, claiming that the privileges of the large Turkish
minority there were being infringed and would be further infringed if
Alexandretta were part of an independent Syria. The League of Nations
decided in 1937 that the area should be a separate, self-governing state,
and indeed, it was an independent state for a year. France ceded the area to
Turkey in 1939, hoping to coax the Turks away from Nazi Germany. Justifying
its move, France cited a freshly formed local parliamentary vote of the new
state of Hatay to join Turkey. However, the move created disturbances in
Syria. Syrian maps still show the region as part of Syria. Hence, Turkey
constructed a barrier in the disputed area. Also, since the late 1980s,
Turkey has fenced and mined almost 500 miles of other parts of its border
that are not disputed by Syria because of infiltration of Kurdish
insurgents.

David Makovsky is the director of the Project on the Middle East Peace
Process, and Ben Thein is a research intern at The Washington Institute.