8 Terror Suspects Appear in British Court

The names of a couple of these turds was on C4 news this dinnertime, the 9th guy is has a british name and was found in possession of a converted rifle (but apparently has nothing to do with terrorism), but because the conversion wasn't complete he was bailed, but all 8 of the others are most certainly muslims.

I'll try and get the names in the next hour or so, they're out there somewhere.

They're going Down,Down,Down!!!

And many others will soon be joining them.

Rikki, I hope that they keep their names & faces in the news over there to constantly remind people of the evil in their midst & just maybe they will wake up! I also hope that the apologists don't manage to turn this around somehow & let these vermin back on the street - unless there's an angry crowd waiting outside to dispense justice properly..........

Motivated by "a strong and deeply held ideology." Come on Sue, use the "I"-word.

Great point Mike! More hemming & hawing trying to avoid the real issue. They are NOT an aberration, they are obeying the tenets of ISLAM.

There, Jim, you said it!! You ISLAMOPHOBE!!

Rottweiller - HAHAHA! I would wear that title with pride, however, any word with "-phobe" in it includes fear & I am most definitelt NOT afraid of islam or it's adherents. How about "militant anti-islamic" or "warmongering islam hater" or "homo-hammed's declared enemy"?

We need more Infidel pride!

http://www.celticandmore.com/infidel.html

I have a better looking "American Infidel" t-shirt but I don't see it offeren on the web anymore. I think I bought it from the osamayomama.com when it was still alive.

(It is unfortunate that the latin word Infidel most commonly today refers to non-muslims, when historically it actually refered to non-christians, so maybe a "Kafir" t-shirt would be better - try http://www.cafepress.com/riceski for kafir gear)

On Monday a man in Hamilton was arrested for fire-bombing 3 Government buildings,these attacks follow a building being hit with a raw egg twice in three weeks.
Oh,did I forget to mention the building is a
un-assuming Mosque but CAIRdid demand the prank be treated like a Islamophobic "Hate-crime".
As if the Police have the time to photograph the "Egg" from the infidel,or dust for fingerprints.
The local media still hasn't given the name or discription of the fire-bomber,seems his house had bomb making materials and he may be linked to previously reported vandalism.
Wanna bet if the guy end up being a Muslim CAIR will denounce these acts as un-Islamic and not the actions of a true Muslim.
--------------------------------------------------
Here's a portion of a news item from Hamilton about two years ago,take note that when a Hindu temple burned down from a suspected arson attack,Muslims layed claim to the "hate-crime"
by insisting it was intended for a Mosque and an Islamophobic racist attack.

Below is the story.
**************************************************
Last weekend, a mosque was vandalized and a Hindu temple was burned down. Police say the temple burning was arson and was related to terrorist attacks in the United States last week.

Javid Mirza, the president of the Muslim Association of Hamilton, thinks the arsonists meant to burn down the mosque. This, combined with other attacks, has him fearing for the safety of anyone who is not white.

******************

Well that's enough proof for me,a Mosque has the exact appearance as a Hindu temple since Allah is the God of all faiths.
The follow-up story CAIR failed to post on their site was that the Hindu temple wasn't insured because of some upgrading that was still in progress. But Hamilton is a working class town of tradesmans that were irate at the attack on a fellow residence,several men showed up to volunteer to rebuild the temple and local suppliers dropped off materials and the City waved the permit rules to allow for faster completion.
Take a guess what group of people sat in the corner still wanting sympathy and didn't help the Hindu's,yes the Muslim Cleric's,still waiting for an arrest to prove they're "Victims" of Islaomohobia and a global plot to oppress Muslims.

BTW
The Hindu's cried while on TV to thank the
neighbours for making them feel welcomed as part of the community. Now if only the Muslims had a God that taught them to see the good in mankind and foregive the misguided that can be good people that do bad things.

NO ISLAM - KNOW PEACE

Jim,
I'd prefer to be called the Anti-Allah.

Go with warmongering islam hater - lock and load.
DEATH BEFORE DHIMMITUDE!!

Kafir gear? AWESOME!!!!

August 18, 2004
Yesterday stock down cosmedictics then in Algeria Factory explodes ?
John Kerry Confuses Himself With Bob Kerrey
Of course John Kerry is afraid to run on his left-wing Senate record, but does that mean he should pose as a colleague?
Imagine the screaming headlines and nationwide media ridicule if President Bush confused himself with another pol. But don't expect the New York Times and company to report this:

In trying to defend his horrendous record on intelligence "and spin their way out of his lousy committee attendance record," Kerry's campaign "claimed on its website Monday, 'John Kerry served on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence for 8 years and is the former Vice Chairman of the Committee.' Fact is John Kerry has never – ever! – served as vice chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence," the Republican National Committee noted today.
"Turns out, there as a senator named Bob Kerrey from Nebraska who was vice chairman for a while. Kerry’s website later pulled the plug on the page, which might be construed as a metaphor for the whole campaign."
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/8/17/90351.shtml

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,129268,00.html
Yea everyday people try to buy hand held missiles in the USA?
http://www.indystar.com/articles/9/171265-1029-102.html
Yea why is Medineta still there? Have to be PC and now you have a mulsum who never got on the plane?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/08/15/wmex15.xml
Yea we get to go Squirrel hunting soon? See you in England do not understand the USA we have our guns and like to play cowboys?

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/8/17/163454.shtml
Sorry for you people in N.J. seams that your Democrats do not really care about your safety as long as they get their COOKIES? The bad thing is it affects more then you we are all connected so get your selfs together and get some people who care about the safety of the USA not only their own BUTTS ?
Why do the Democrats want us out of Iraq and want us to stay in Germany and S.Korea are not those wars over like 60yrs last time I checked? The world is changing and they are not changing with it let the S.Koreans protect themselves and the Germans have lost of money to protect themselves?

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/8/18/100454.shtml
Wednesday, Aug. 18, 2004
Kerry Sneered at VFW but Now Wants Its Votes
When Sen. John Kerry goes grubbing for votes today at Veterans of Foreign Wars' convention in Cincinnati, let's hope the members recall the nasty things he said about them.
"While young John Kerry was the poster boy for Vietnam Veterans Against the War back in the 1970s, his band of VVAW buddies was busy bashing the VFW and the American Legion for promoting a an agenda of 'world domination'," Republican National Committee pointed out today.
And once again Kerry's foolish words come back to haunt him. Here's what he himself wrote about these genuine war heroes:
"We will not quickly join those who march on Veterans Day waving small flags, calling to memory those thousands who died for the 'greater glory of the United States.' ... We will not readily join the American Legion and the Veterans of Foreign Wars."

Just thought I get the libs worked up today? After all they are funding getting mulsum terrorist out of jail they are now working for free for all jailed mulsums[ACLU] and it is the libs who fund that!!!

Part of the American Tribe
God Bless the USA and her Fighting Forces and All who Fight with her give them Strength,Wisdom and Courage to stay the course to Victory Amen

Catherine,
I've missed you baby!!!

Rikki
Thanks Had some party's to do? and had to work on my tan! Not like the mulsum women all cover-up God I love the USA and her beauty!!

Part of the American Tribe
God Bless the USA and her Fighting Forces and All who Fight with her give them Strength,Wisdom and Courage to stay the course to Victory Amen

Ps
Sitting here in a short skirt all bronze with hair down my back!! about to go in the garden to pick some tomatos!!

Catherine,
Please send me some photos!!!

PS-Muslim women don't need to get tanned, the 100+ layers of dirt on their skin from lack of baths make 'em dark enough.

Obviously trying to make a dirty bomb and kill off as many Innocents as possible. Their lawyer whines that ' these Muslims have been psychologically abused by being held in solitary
confinement and - sob, boohoo-some were EVEN stopped reading the Koran!!

Morgane
This is a good thing that they are trying to make a change to freedom!

To bad they will have to pay for their crimes!!

Rikki
sorry don't know how to do that? Not that computer smart!

God Bless the Countrys who have Heros!! Pitty the countrys who need them?

Part of the American Tribe
God Bless the USA and her Fighting Forces and All who Fight with her give them Strength,Wisdom and Courage to stay the course to Victory Amen

More Kafir gear:

http://www.cafepress.com/rightthings/263341

http://www.boffensive.com/offensive_tshirts/new_shit.htm

some shirts that put out the Infidel message in arabic:

http://www.rokemneedlearts.com/abrahamicapparel/infidel_apparel_designs.htm

Mike which "I" word could you possibly mean word ….lets see:

ignorant ignoramus, ill bred, ill-advised, illegitimate, ill-humored, ill-favored ill-founded, illicit, ill-mannered, ill-tempered, illiterate, ill-natured, illogical, ill-willed, imaginary, imbalanced imbecilic, immature, immaterial, incessant, incestuous, incoherent, incompetent, incongruous, incontinent, incorrigible, incredulous, incurable, indecent, indecorous, indefinable, indelicate, indescribable, indistinguishable, indulgent,
ineffectual, inelegant, inexperienced, inexplicable, infamous, infantile, infected, inferior, infernal, infirm, inflammable, infuriating, ingrown, inhumane, inhuman, injurious, inmate, inquisitors, insane, insect-like, insecure, insensible, insidious, insignificant, insolent , institutionalized, insufferable, insulting, insurgent, insurrection, intemperate, interfering intimidating, intolerable, intrusive, invalid. invasive, invertebrate, irrational, irreconcilable, irregular, irreligious, irreparable, irresponsible, irritating, Iraq, Iran

Yep seems to me that all these "I" words can all be replaced with one word “ISLAM”

No Islam, Know Peace

Toro

All but one are of Pakistani descent, according to police.

Ah yes it must be either Zionists or Buddhists of Pakistani descent.

Our governments in the West just do not want to mention Islam or Muslim in this context. There almost seems to be an OECD fatwa for this.

In a way, given our own religious wars of the past, I can understand the reluctance to mention a religion as the cause of the war. The powers that be in the West, the media and everything else, is just not ready yet to go down that road. They would much rather that it could be solved in the usual way. I hope they are right and their optimism and hope is not misplaced.

Morgane:

How goes it in the Bjorn blog on banning Islam?

From http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3573704.stm

"Terror suspects charges in full
Eight terror suspects arrested in raids across England two weeks ago have now been charged.
Here are the charges in full:

DHIREN BAROT, 32, OF WILLESDEN, LONDON
Conspiracy to murder.
Conspiracy to commit a public nuisance by the use of radioactive materials, toxic gases, chemicals and or explosives.
Possessing a reconnaissance plan of the Prudential Building in New Jersey.
Possessing reconnaissance plans of the International Monetary Fund in Washington, the stock exchange and Citigroup, both in New York, and two notebooks with information on explosives, poisons, chemicals and related matters.

MOHAMMED NAVEED BHATTI, 24, OF HARROW, MIDDLESEX
Conspiracy to murder.
Conspiracy to commit a public nuisance by the use of radioactive materials, toxic gases, chemicals and or explosives.

ABDUL AZIZ JALIL, 31, OF LUTON, BEDFORDSHIRE
Conspiracy to murder.
Conspiracy to commit a public nuisance by the use of radioactive materials, toxic gases, chemicals and or explosives.

OMAR ABDUL REHMAN, 20, OF BUSHEY, HERTFORDSHIRE
Conspiracy to murder.
Conspiracy to commit a public nuisance by the use of radioactive materials, toxic gases, chemicals and or explosives.

JUNADE FEROZE, 28, OF BLACKBURN, LANCASHIRE
Conspiracy to murder.
Conspiracy to commit a public nuisance by the use of radioactive materials, toxic gases, chemicals and or explosives.

ZIA UL HAQ, 25, OF PADDINGTON, LONDON
Conspiracy to murder.
Conspiracy to commit a public nuisance by the use of radioactive materials, toxic gases, chemicals and or explosives.

QAISAR SHAFFI, 25, OF WILLESDEN, LONDON
Conspiracy to murder.
Conspiracy to commit a public nuisance by the use of radioactive materials, toxic gases, chemicals and or explosives.
Possessing an extract of the Terrorist's Handbook containing information on the preparation of chemicals, explosive recipes and other information about explosives

NADEEM TARMOHAMMED, 26, OF WILLESDEN, LONDON
Conspiracy to murder.
Conspiracy to commit a public nuisance by the use of radioactive materials, toxic gases, chemicals and or explosives.
Possessing a reconnaissance plan of the Prudential Building in New Jersey.
The eight men will appear in custody at Bow Street Magistrates Court, sitting at Belmarsh prison, south-east London, on Wednesday.

A ninth man, Matthew Monks, 32, of Sudbury, London, is charged with possession of a prohibited weapon. "

-----------------

My don't their names just sound so British, eh ?

To those unfamiliar with British Geography, all of those places except Blackburn are in North West London. Paddington is pretty much Central London, Willisden and Harrow are c.10 miles from central London and about a 15 min ride on the subway away from Central London, Bushey is near Watford (about 20 miles NW of London) and Luton is about 40 NW of London.

Blackburn is in the North East of England, over 200 miles from London.

All of the places mentioned are very Islamic. Luton for instance has a huge Mosque, and Harrow and Willisden are in the London Borough of Brent where Islamic Asians outnumber natives. All of these places are complete dumps.

Conspiracy to commit a public nuisance by the use of radioactive materials, toxic gases, chemicals and or explosives

You Brits sure have a funny way of putting things I really like the public nuisance thing with gases couldn't you just give them mulsums over ther some BENO !!

and for Gods Sack give your non-mulsums some guns!!!

Part of the American Tribe
God Bless the USA and her Fighting Forces and All who Fight with her give them Strength,Wisdom and Courage to stay the course to Victory Amen

PS I liked this one so here it is again!
For all of us in the West, the following details what is at stake--if we were to lose.
This is a letter written by a father to his sons:
This dad, a retired attorney, wrote it May 19, 2004.

THE WORLD SITUATION
Dear Tom, Kevin, Kirby and Ted,
As your father, I believe I owe it to you to share some thoughts on the
present world situation, We have, over the years, discussed alot of
important things like going to college, jobs, and so forth. But this really
takes precedence over any of those discussions. I hope this might give you a
longer term perspective that fewer and fewer of my generation are left to
speak to.
To be sure you understand this is not politically flavored, I will tell
you that since Franklin D. Roosevelt, who led us through pre-and WW II
(1933-1945) up
to and including our current president, I have, without exception,
supported our presidents on all matters of international conflict. This
would include,to name a few:
President Truman - Korean War 1950,
President Kennedy - Bay of Pigs 1961,
President Kennedy - Vietnam 1961,
Eight presidents (5 Republican and 4 Democrats) - the Cold War 1945-1991,
President Clinton's strike on Bosnia - 1995 and on Iraq - 1998.
So be sure you read this as completely non-political or otherwise you will
miss the point.
Our country is now facing the most serious threat to its existence as we
know it that we have faced in your lifetime and mine (which includes WWII.)
The deadly seriousness is greatly compounded by the fact that there are very
few of us who think we can possibly lose this war and even fewer who realize
what losing really means.
First, let's examine a few basics.
1. When did the threat to us start? Many will say September 11, 2001. The
answer as far as the United States is concerned is 1979, 22 years prior to
September, 2001 with the following attacks on us:
Iran Embassy Hostages, 1979:
Beirut, Lebanon Embassy, 1983:
Beirut,Lebanon Marine Barracks, 1983;
Lockerbie, Scotland Pam-Am flight to New York, 1988:
First New York World Trade Center attack, 1993:
Dhahran, Saudi. Arabia Khobar Towers Military complex, 1996:
Nairobi, Kenya U S Embassy, 1998:
Dar es Salaam, Tanzania US Embassy, 1998:
Aden, Yemen USS Cole, 2000:
New York World Trade Center, 2001:
Pentagon, 2001.
(Note that during the period from 1981 to 2001 there were 7,581 terrorist
attacks worldwide.)
2. Why were we attacked?
Envy of our position, our success, and our freedoms. The attacks happened
during the administrations of Presidents Carter, Reagan, Bush 1, Clinton,
and Bush 2.
We cannot fault either the Republicans or the Democrats as there were no
provocations by any of the presidents or their immediate predecessors,
(Presidents Ford or Carter,)
3. Who were the attackers? In each case, the attacks on the US were
carried out by Muslims.
4. What is the Muslim population of the world? 25%.
5. Isn't the Muslim religion peaceful? Hopefully, but that's really not
material. There is no doubt that the predominantly Christian population of
Germany was peaceful, but under the dictatorial leadership of Hitler (who
was also Christian) that made no difference. You either went along with the
administration or you were eliminated.
There were 5 to 6 million Christians killed by the Nazis for political
reasons
(including 7,000 Polish priests).
(http://www.nazis.testimony.co.uk/7-a.htm).
Thus, almost the same number of Christians were killed by the Nazis as the
6
million holocaust Jews who were killed by them and we seldom heard of
anything
other than the Jewish atrocities. Although Hitler kept the world focused
on the Jews, he had no hesitancy about killing anyone who got in his way of
exterminating the Jews or of taking over the world - German, Christian, or
any others. Same with the Muslim terrorists. They focus the world on the US
but kill all in the way - their own people, the Spanish, French, or anyone
else. The point here is that just like the peaceful Germans were of no
protection to anyone from the Nazis, no matter how many peaceful Muslims
there may be they are no protection for us from the terrorist Muslim leaders
and what they are fanatically bent on doing, by their own pronouncements,
killing all of us infidels. I don't blame the peaceful Muslims. What would
you do if the choice was shut up or die?
6. So who are we at war with? There is no way we can honestly respond that
it is anyone other than the Muslim terrorists. Trying to be politically
correct and avoiding verbalizing this conclusion can well be fatal. There
is no way to win if you don't clearly recognize and articulate who you are
fighting. So with that background, now to two major questions: 1. Can we
lose this war? 2.What does losing really mean? If we are to win, we must
clearly answer these two piviotal questions.
We can definitely lose this war, and as anomalous as it may sound, the
major reason we can lose is that so many of us simply do not fathom the
answer to the second question - what does losing mean? It would appear that
a great many of us think that losing the war means hanging our heads,
bringing the troops home, and going on about our business as we did
post-Vietnam. This is as far from the truth as one can get. What losing
really means is: We would no longer be the premier country in the world.
The attacks will not subside but rather will steadily increase. Remember,
they want us dead, not just quiet. If they had just wanted us quiet, they
would not have produced an increasing series of attacks against us over the
past 18 years.
The plan was clearly to terrorist attack us until we were neutered and
submissive
to them. We would of course have no future support from other nations for
fear
of reprisals and for the reason they would see we are impotent and unable
to help them.They will pick off the other non-Muslim nations, one at a time.
It will be increasingly easier for them. They already hold Spain hostage. It
doesn't matter whether it was right or wrong for Spain to withdraw its
troops from Iraq. Spain did it because the Muslim terrorists bombed their
train and told them to withdraw their troops. Anything else they want Spain
to do, will be done. Spain is finished.
The next will probably be France. Our one hope in France is that they
might see the light and realize that if we don't win, they are finished,
too, in that they can't resist the Muslim terrorists without us. However, it
may already be too late for France.
France is already 20% Muslim and fading fast.
If we lose the war, our production, income, exports, and way of life as we
know it will all vanish. After losing, who would trade or deal with us if
they were threatened by the Muslims? If we can't stop the Muslims, how can
anyone else?
The Muslims fully know what is riding on this war and therefore are
completely committed to winning at any cost. We better know it, too, and be
likewise committed to winning at any cost.
Why do I go on at such lengths about the results of losing? Simple. Until
we recognize the costs of losing we cannot unite and really put 100% of our
thoughts and efforts into winning. And it is going to take that 100% effort
to win.
So how can we lose the war? Again, the answer is simple. We can lose the
war by imploding, that is, defeating ourselves by refusing to recognize the
enemy and its purposes and by really digging in and lending support to the
war effort.
If we are united, there is no way that we can lose. If we continue to be
divided,
there is no way that we can win. Let me give you a few examples of how we
simply don't comprehend the life and death seriousness of this situation.
President Bush selects Norman Mineta as Secretary of Transportation.
Although all of the terrorist attacks were committed by Muslim men between
17 and 40 years of age, Secretary Mineta refuses to allow profiling. Does
that sound like we are taking things seriously? This is war. For the
duration, we are going to have to give up some of the civil rights we have
become accustomed to. We had better be prepared to lose some of our civil
rights temporarily or we most certainly will lose all of them permanently.
And don't worry that it is a slippery slope. We gave up plenty of civil
rights during WWII and immediately restored them after the victory and, in
fact, added many more since then.
Do I blame President Bush or President Clinton before him? No, I blame us
for blithely assuming we can maintain all of our Political Correctness and
all our civil rights during this conflict and have a clean, lawful,
honorable war. None of these words apply to war. Get them out of your head.
Some have gone so far in their criticism of the war and/or the
administration that it almost seems they would literally like to see us
lose. I hasten to add that this isn't because they are disloyal. It is
because they just don't understand what losing means. Nevertheless, that
conduct gives the impression to the enemy that we are divided and weakened.
It concerns our friends and it does great damage to our cause.
Of more recent vintage is the uproar fueled by the politicians and media
regarding the treatment of some prisoners of war that perhaps best
exemplifies what I am saying. We have recently had an issue involving the
treatment of a few Muslim prisoners who just a few months ago were throwing
their own people off buildings, cutting off their hands, cutting out their
tongues and otherwise murdering their own people just for disagreeing with
Saddam Hussein. And just a few years ago these same type prisoners
chemically killed 400,000 of their own people for the same reason. They are
also the same type enemy fighters who recently were burning Americans and
dragging their charred corpses through the streets of Iraq. And still more
recently, the same type enemy that was, and is, providing videos to all news
sources internationally of the beheading of an American prisoner they held.
Compare this with some of our press and politicians who for several days
have thought and talked about nothing else but the "humiliating" of some
Muslim prisoners - not burning them, not dragging their charred corpses
through streets, not beheading them, but "humiliating" them. Can this be for
real? The poliiticians and pundits have even talked of impeaching the
Secretary of Defense. If this doesn't show the complete lack of
comprehension and understanding of the seriousness of the enemy we are
fighting, the life and death struggle we are in, and the disastrous results
of losing this war, nothing can. To bring our country to a virtual political
standstill over this prisoner issue makes us look like Nero playing his
fiddle while Rome burned - totally oblivious to what is going on in the real
world.
Neither we, nor any other country can survive this internal strife. Again,
I say, this does not mean that some of our politicians or media people are
disloyal. It simply means that they are oblivious to the magnitude of the
situation we are in and into which the Muslim terrorists have been pushing
us for so many years. Remember, the Muslim terrorists' stated goal is to
kill all infidels.That translates into all non-Muslims, not just the US but
throughout the world. We are the last bastion of defense.
We have been criticized for many years as being "arrogant". That charge is
valid in at least one respect. We are arrogant in that we believe that we
are so good, powerful, and smart, that we can win the hearts and minds of
all those who attack us, and that with both hands tied behind our back, we
can defeat anything bad in the world. We can't. If we don't recognize this,
our nation as we know it will not survive and no other free country in the
world will survive if we are defeated.
And finally, name any Muslim countries throughout the world that allow
freedom of speech, freedom of thought, freedom of religion, freedom of the P
ress, equal rights for anyone, let alone everyone, equal status for women,
or that have been productive in one single way that contributes to the good
of the world. This has been a long way of saying that we must be united on
this war or we will be equated in the history books to the self-inflicted
fall of the Roman Empire. If, that is, the Muslim leaders will allow history
books to be written or read.
If we don't win this war right now, keep a close eye on how the Muslims
take over France in the next 5 years or less. They will continue to increase
the Muslim population of France and continue to encroach little by little on
the established French traditions. The French will be fighting among
themselves over what should or should not be done which will continue to
weaken them and keep them from any united resolve. Doesn't that sound eerily
familiar?
Democracies don't have their freedoms taken away from them by some
external military force. Instead, they give their freedoms away, politically
correct, piece by politically correct piece. And they are giving those
freedoms away to those who have shown, worldwide, that they abhor freedom
and will not apply it to you or even to themselves once they are in power.
They have universally shown that when they have taken over, they then start
brutally killing each other over who will be the few who control the masses.
Will we ever stop hearing from the politically correct about the "peaceful
Muslims"? I close on a hopeful note by repeating what I said above.
If we are united, there is no way that we can lose. I believe that after
the election,
the factions in our country will begin to focus on the critical situation
we are in
and will unite to save our country. It is your future we are talking
about. Do whatever you can to preserve it.
Love, Dad

Posted by: unicorns62000 at August 15, 2004 07:04 PM

God Bless the Country who has Heros !!!! Pitty the country who needs them?

I wonder how is the book
'The Sword of the prophet' by Trifcovic.

Anyone read the book ?

DP111
Have left another comment on Bjorn Blog for 'Salahudin'. Makes you sick at some of the fawning posts, doesn't it?? Keep up the good work.
Cheers

Catherine,
Thats okay the pictures of you in my head are even better!!!
You're a real cyber-flirt!!!(and I love it,my lady-friend is really starting to bore me).

Yeah, I liked the bit about their lawyer complaining that they were kept from being able to read their Koran - their war manual. Seems like a good thing to me. Afterall, that's where they get these sick and evil ideas from. They're certainly not getting them from reading Harry Potter. But of course, some braindead Muslim might come along here and dispute what I've said. It's just "stereotyping". Islam is Peace, doncha know? Sorry, we're kinda over that one. Those of us with functional brains, that is.

As I commented before on this issue, here these pukes are, in Britain, plotting murder and destruction on another country. They're nice and safe and warm and well-fed in good old Britain. I wonder if they actually had jobs or whether the Brits subsidized these insects with nice welfare and state housing? Think of how much money and productivity is being wasted on this scum, this vermin, not just in Britain, but in many Western countries. It just irks me to no end.

Toro,
Great post.

Tranmere Rovers,
Thanks for printing those names out.

The towel-head bitch defending these lice on the arse of humanity said that :
"Obviously , my defendants are shocked at these allegations...blah-di-blah-di-bollocks!!!!"

Shocked? Shocked at what?That they didn't get their chance to please their demon-king allah, by launching a chemical attack on the british public?Or shocked that their rights as "british citizens" have been breached in that they won't be allowed to go to a mosk again for the rest of their lives, well their funerals may not be far away if they are tried and found guilty in the states.

Naresh C:

"I wonder how is the book
'The Sword of the prophet' by Trifcovic.

Anyone read the book ?"

Yes, it's very good.

People, a small, if repetitive point, BUT:

Let's stop using the term "Islamophobe." My rationale is this: A "phobia" is an IRRATIONAL FEAR, A FEAR NOT BASED IN REALITY.

Islam is a perfectly reality-based entity which has supported and committed acts which are perfectly reality-based reasons to be afraid.

Since the threats are completely reality-based, then hatred, as well as fear, are reasonable and reality-based responses.

Our fear of Islam is NOT PHOBIC!

Does anyone (except Reza and Naseem etc.) disagree?