Sudan's Beshir: "The door of the jihad is still open and if it has been closed in the south it will be opened in Darfur"

I'd like to admire Robert's insight on the problem and remedy.
Somehow I come to realise that Kofi Annan is a worthless puppet. Nothing he says is worth believing. Who's the one that puts all the twaddle in his mouth, I wonder?

The Sudanese are saying to the world: Mind your own business. we plan to annihilate these people. There will be no one left to save. The Sudanese army will continue to slaughter, committing genocide while the U.N. prattles on in interminable discussions and commissions.

Frankly, the scandal-filled U.N. has more problems than Kofi Annan, but he indeed is useless. If the U.N. is unable to be peacemakers or peacekeepers, they have no need for an army.

I, for one, would love to see Britain or another European power step forward and take the lead on this, perhaps Poland.

I fear, though, nothing will happen until another 30,000 are dead. To Arabs and Europena Elites, what's another 30,000 dead Africans?

Wow! ANOTHER Mohammed! Imagine that! I'll bet the peaceful loving caring prophet Mohammed is rolling in his grave!

Beshir and his Bastards have been doing this for a long time now. Note how he claims' to be under
attack' from wicked West. Usual Muslim ploy of presenting themselves as victims whilst
REAL VICTIMS, THE BLACK AFRICANS, die in huge numbers every day, just as Killers in Khartoum and Janjaweed intended. Personally would like whole Khartoum govt and Janjaweed flattened by
bombing but this remains a not PC correct dream...

Nikoz, expressing his justified contempt above for Kofi Annan, the man responsible for more black African deaths than anyone since King Leopold of Belgium, asks a question in his posting above: "Somehow I have come to realise that Kofi Annan is a worthless puppet. Who's the one puts all the twaddle in his mouth, I wonder?" A good question.

Kofi Annan works for an organization that over the past 30 years has been infiltrated, and more or less taken over, by what ought be called, on the model of the Comintern, the International Islamic Conspiracy, or Islamintern. By no means all of its members are Muslims. Non-Muslis who are viscerally anti-American, or antisemitic, or who hate the West or "The System" generally, or have a variety of tiersmondisme that has left them unhinged, are all natural allies of the Islamintern, and have been exploited by Muslims.

The Director of Communications at the U.N., and Kofi Annan's Chief Speechwriter (and also his "Senior Adviser") is one Edward Mortimer, formerly with the Euro-Arab Dialogue branch of the E.U., and before that, a journalist with a variety of English newspapers. He is most famous, among those who remember what he wishes they would forget, for the absolute delight with which he greeted that primitave pro-fascist and mass-murderer, the Ayatollah Khomeini, the man who in his writings carefully explains to whom it is licit to serve the cooked remains of a goat, a camel, a sheep with which you have had sexual intercourse, and then killed and cooked that allows one to deal with that famous problem immortalized in song -- "breaking-up-is-hard-to-do" -- and at the same time thriftily observing the ethic of "waste not, want not." And then, of course, there are the Ayatollah's remarks on the absolute necessity of making war on the Infidels (see, for bloodthirsty samples, Ibn Warraq's "Why I Am Not a Muslim," pp 11-12)

Here is what Edward Mortimer, the man who puts the words in Kofi Annan's mouth, and therefore helps to mold what pass for Kofi Annan's "thoughts" wrote when the Ayatollah Khomeini first came to power, as reported by the English writer Anthony Howard:

Way back at the start of 1979, when the Iranian people took to the streets and the late Shah was overthrown, the media - as I recall - did not so much give a shudder of horror as heave a sigh of relief. Indeed, one London periodical (the ultra-respectable, middle-of-theroad Spectator) went almost overboard in its exultation. Writing from Teheran, one of its contributors, Mr. Edward Mortimer of The Times of London, actually went so far as to begin his article with Charles James Fox's comment on the fall of the Bastille: ''How much the greatest event it is that ever happened in the world, and how much the best!'' Those words, added Mr. Mortimer, seemed to him ''entirely apposite.''

That is Mortimer on Khomeini's resistible rise: "How much the greatest event it is that ever happened in the world, and how much the best" are words, he wrote, that seemed to him "entirely apposite."

And not surprisingly, Mortimer is venomous on the subject of Israel. Now the real antisemites, as is known, have a few topics that they cannot leave alone, that haunt them, that they love to discuss, endlessly. For some, it may be the supposedly "deliberate" attack by Israeli planes on the U.S.S. Liberty in June 1967 -- despite the careful analyses and now the released tapes, that show conclusively that it was, of course, a mistake, friendly fire of the most understandable kind. (This does not prevent the likes of James Bamford in one of his books of claiming, without the least evidence, that Israel did this in order to "cover up" its crimes of executing Egyptian prisoners--but then Bamford, of course, is the kind of man who pretends to be a tough, no-nonsense clear-eyed defender of America when he insists that there is no problem with Islam or a JIhad, no, of course not -- the problem is America's unreserved and total (!) "support of Israel." (tell that to the Christians in East Timor or the Southern Sudan).

Now there is one other favorite topos of the convinced antisemite. And that is that the "Zionists" collaborated with -- the Nazis. This nauseating charge is made, in fact, by among others, one Lonnie Brenner. No serious reviewer would bother with such trash. But Edward Mortimer found the thesis of a Zionist-Nazi collaboration so convincing, so meritorious, that he wrote a rave review that was then used as the introduction for a new edition of the book. That tells one all one needs to know about Edward Mortimer's deepest impulses, and not only when it comes to Israel.

So, Nikoz, you asked quite correctly who puts the "twaddle" in Kofi Annan's mouth -- the mouth of the man who heads an organization that has been taken over by the Islamintern? Why, it is Edward Mortimer, the Man Who Loved Khomeini and is willing to believe the most intolerable calumnies against Israel and the Zionists.

Mortimer deserves the U.N.; the U.N. deserves Mortimer. What a mix, what a continuous Witches' Sabbath on the East River.

Meanwhile, a million black Christians in southern Nigeria died, many of them killed by Egyptian pilots bombing civilians -- and the U.N. did nothing. The U.N. did nothing when 200,00 Christians in East Timord died; it was the Australians who had to rescue the rest, with their own troops. In 20 years of genocidal attacks, the U.N. has done nothing effective to help the Christians of the southern Sudan, despite the superb and anguished reports of its Special Rapporteur Gaspar Biro. Kofi Annan went out of his way to prevent General Romeo Dalaire from acting to intervene and head off the Rwanda Genocide (the Hutus, incidentally, had earlier received arms from Egypt; at the time, the Secretary-General was the sad-eyed Boutros Boutros Ghali, a man deeply afraid of the Egyptian Government, and Kofi Annan was in charge of peacekeeping).

The discussions about Darfur are farcical. The U.N. will not and cannot act, because the Arab League, and many other Muslim countries, will simply not permit any intervention to save either non-Muslims, or non-Arab Muslims, when they are under attack by Muslim Arabs. Only against Iraq, in the past 30 years, has the U.N. authorized military force against a Muslim power. And it was not to rescue the Kurds during the Al-Anfal Operation against them. No, it was only in response to the invasion of Kuwait, and threatened invasion of Saudi Arabia -- for there, other Muslim powers were directly threatened. And the resolutions left over from the end of that first Gulf War were the only reason the United States obtained some half-hearted backing this time around.

But unless it is other Muslims who are being threatened, the U.N. will never, ever, take the side of intervention. It has been thoroughly infiltrated by pro-Islamic, and anti-Israel and anti-American forces. And Edward Mortimer beautifully exemplifies all three strands. He deserves special attention, and no doubt a special prize from Muslim sources -- for efforts that surpass even what they expected.

Well done, Edward Mortimer.

"What is needed in Sudan and elsewhere is a reform of jihad theology"

By the time there is a reform of the theology of Jihad in the Sudan or anywhere else for that matter, the bones of the black Africans in Dafur will have been bleached white by sun.

While the political leaders and intellectual elitists of world debate and philosophize, the innocents contuine to be massacred.

This whole idea that Islam will somehow be reformed, is absurd.

If anything , over the past 14 centuries Islam has become more violent and Wahabbism the brand of Islam that is fueling the current global Jihad of today, grows stronger.

The Islmaic government of the Sudan has a bloody history going back to 1989. Over the past 17 years approximately 2 million Christian and animist Sudanese in the south have been slaughtered by the Muslims in the North.

If the US and other nations do not act military aganist the Islamic-butchers of Khartoum, the people of Dafur will be annihilated.

Typo: The "Islamic" government

So what this dick-head is saying basically is that the bloodbath he's drenching Sudan in is OK because it's Jihad. Oh well, why didn't he say so before, that makes all the difference now(sarcasm off)?
This is what they have in store for Europe and America, you liberals should be noting this.

There seems little doubt, when examining the history of the UN interventions over the last thirty years or so, that it is controlled by the Islamist factions nd rogue states.
whenever Islam causes murder and mayhem throughout the world no action is taken.
I'm sure Hugh could point to many such events.
almost as bad , there is an active effort to actually conceal such murder and mayhem from public view.
See Bat Ye'ors examples of the swiss NGO.s barred from reporting to the UN on slavery and abductions of children by Islamists on the African continet .
There is a continual push to condemn Israel so as to divert piblic attention from the real Issues of promoting islamic domination throughout the world.

Whenever there is UN action it is mostly to protect Muslims from attack
As in Bosnia and the earlier Iraqi war.

THE UN is now firmly an enemy of western civilisation and the democracy and human rights we value so highly.

The clash between Islam and western civilisation can never be resolved by negotiation.
we must one day form our own UN to represent our western values.

st george,

As far as forming a new oganization, which countries would you approach?

If you haven't noticed much of Europe (Eurabia) is now infected by the politically correct liberal socialists and as such the Islamo-fascists are gaining ground.

Bat Ye'or is a very prolific writer on this subject below is the link for her site.

http://www.dhimmi.org/

Son of Infidel

We live in times of change.
Eurabia may yet reverse its trends towards islamification .
perhaps another spate of attrocities will do it.
perhaps changes in governments.
In the meantime the old eastern block is still not suffering from the dhimmitued of the western countries.
there are signs that Norway is waking up.
Russia has had its fair share of islamic terror and Putin knows the score.
Perhaps even the Chinese need wooing.
And of course us, the Australians who are struggling against the leftoid propaganda.
Something must be done to produce a united front of countries to resist what will be a descent into the dark ages if Islam continues its onslaughts.
And of course America must lead the way to forming such a Union.