Militants said to have killed 2 hostages

Yet more deaths. From AP, with thanks to Jeffrey Imm:

BAGHDAD, Iraq -- A militant group claimed Monday to have killed two hostages, one a Turk and the other an Iraqi who was a longtime resident in Italy, the Arab news network Al-Jazeera reported. Two abducted Indonesian women, meanwhile, were freed, diplomats said.

The station said it had received video footage from a group calling itself the Salafist Brigades of Abu Bakr Al-Sidiq accusing the Turkish and Iraqi hostages of being spies. A segment broadcast on the network showed four armed militants dressed in black standing behind two kneeling men.

Al-Jazeera identified the Iraqi as Anwar Wali but did not give the Turkish man's name.

In Italy, Wali's family said the Italian Foreign Ministry had notified them that his death was confirmed. The Foreign Ministry told me that my brother was killed," the victim's brother, Emad Wali, said by telephone from the family's home in Castelfranco Veneto in northeast Italy.

| 8 Comments
Print | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

8 Comments

The turkish guys name was in the Sun this morning, but I can't remember it, therefore this is perhaps the most pointless post I have ever posted in the history of this site (no mean fete).

With each day, the body count rises. The jihadis are cynically exploiting the western media (whose leftist elements are falling over themselves offering to be exploited) using the kidnappings as a tool to weaken an enemy who can only be defeated psychologically in America, not militarily in Iraq itself.

The press ought to change sides on this war and aid the US forces instead of aiding islamocancer.

OT and PS: Saw BBC world last nite prominently featuring a Rumsfield off-the-cuff remark that he had seen no hard evidence of an Al-Qaeda-Saddam nexus. Pray will Rumsfield talking about the CNS revelations get even a fraction of the same coverage? The BBC is truly the pits, on par with The NY Slimes.

We must expect that all captives will now be killed as the Koran instructs. One-by-one we will all die, or perhaps by the use of weapons of mass destruction until we take remorseless action against the vile and murderous ideology. They pull no punches against infidels and feel no pity for we are only dirty kuffars, worthy of death. Don't expect moderation or change as it hasn't happened in more than 1350 years. Islam will be the same until we are all dead or converted UNLESS we take action. This isn't rocket science folks!

Four more beheaded bodies in Mosul today. Is there no end to islam's bloodlust ? When are the liberal-Left going to wake up and realise that the scum doing this aren't fearless freedom fighters but cowardly sadistic butchers . islam is a deathcult NOT a religion. For idiots like Blair to say "Islam is a religion of peace" is like saying that "Nazism was an ideology of racial harmony."

Posted by: Son Of Albion at October 5, 2004 11:56 AM


Fear makes people do stupid things!!


Elect people who will give you back your guns!!


This is why cair is playing their game here in the USA not working we love archer bunker??


We love our trucks and Love our Tractors we like to say take this job and suve-it so Cair don't scare us we still have our guns and will keep them Mater of a fact where we let people carry there is less crime? Like before Englands law in what was it 98 that took your guns remember how you could walk in the square with your purse well now?


Part Of the American Tribe
Squirrel Hunter
Spider Killer
God Bless the USA and her Fighting Forces and ALL who Fight with her give them Strength,Wisdom,Sight and Courage to Defeat the Islamic Terrorist and ALL who Support them Open the Eyes of the World to their Threat Amen

PS
Reason for the ransom for Bigley is the mulsum MONSTERS think England is weak?
For every kidnapped victim that the Monsters kille or take we need to destory a city block!!

So what is the difference between the Iraqi resistance and the Palestinian liberation struggle and the American Revolution?

Were George Washington, et al. terrorists? I'm sure we British thought they were, but back then the great imperial power was Britain, now the great imperial power is America and America is calling people who resist occupation "terrorists".

Didn't I here about Americans murdering a black man by dragging him along behind their pickup until his head came off? How is this any different to what the Iraqi resistance is doing? Were these men who did that Christians? Did those hateful verses of the Old Testanment bible which tells Christians to slaughter all men, women, children, animals and leave no living thing alive in Canaan, just because they were different and had a different culture, inspire these men to drag this black man until his head came off? So is Christianity and all Christians to blame when one of them kills someone?

Iraq has one thing in common with America: Gun ownership. Every household in Iraq has at least one AK47 assault rifle, a Russian weapon by the way that is infinitely better than anything the Americans have developed, despite being a 50-year old design, a gun that is killing Yankee imperialist bastards at an impressive rate.

We all know that you need someone to hate, before it was the communists, now it is the Muslims, now the communists are our friends, even if America said everything it said about communists that it is now saying about Islamic "terrorists". If the Soviet Union had invaded America, would America just roll over and let the Soviet have it's way? Or would America fight back? I'm sure many Russian engineers, helping rebuild the new Soviet America, who would say "We're just trying to help these people!" would be kidnapped and dragged to their deaths behind pickup trucks until their heads come off. I'm sure many Russian workers would have there throats cut by the American resistance, who wouldn't even waste a bullet on them, bullets that would be needed in a firefight, when life is a constant struggle for survival and supplies are hard to come by. America is a nation of self-righteous hypocrites who would have done to Soviet occupiers what Iraqis are doing to them.

Son of Albion,
I agree with you, the left seem to have this confusing opinion that terrorists are fighting for freedom.

To quote Matthew Wright ( that condesending arse-witted, public school, batty rider who presents the "Wright stuff"):

" One mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter."

.....Yeah right you friggin' moron, this coming from a bloke who didn't realise that boys and girls kiss at school (I shit you not), has now also proven that he can't tell the difference between soldiers fighting for freedom, and religiously obsessed psycos who blow themselves up in a crowd of innocent people.

To my knowledge the only thing these tit-wanks want is islamic law the world over, which would be about as far from freedom as you can possibly get.

Karl:

If your definition of a freedom fighter is one who:

Hides behind women and children;

Blows up or shoots women and children, old people, anyone who believes differently from him;

Believes he has the allah-given Right to rape women and children (especially children);

Believes that he can divorce a women at the drop of a hat;

Believes that anyone and EVERYONE not: muslim and/or arab (ethnic white) is inferior and should be removed from the planet;

Then I pity you. *thinks a moment* No, I don't pity you. Not at all. How can one pity scum that needs to be scraped off their shoe?