The primary issue in this election is who is better equipped to fight back against the global jihad. The key word here is better. It makes little sense to eschew voting on the grounds that one candidate may be better than the other, but still not perfect.
Every other issue — the Supreme Court, taxes, Social Security reform — depends upon our national survival. Prescription drug costs will matter very little if the Sears Tower is a smoking hole in the ground or if a large portion of Los Angeles is replaced with a radioactive crater.
Why did it take vast amounts of public pressure to force ABC News to air the tape of 'Azzam the American'? Today Thomas Sowell has an excellent piece on the disgraceful performance of the media in this election. “The issue is whether their main function -- supplying information to the public -- is corrupted by double standards in how they report or withhold news that could help or hurt their favorite causes and candidates.” It is clear that ABC News has a quite definite opinion on which candidate is superior on the issue of national security. Whether you agree or disagree with their backhanded assessment, you should be aware of what the stakes are in their coverup. The less Americans know about what we are up against, the less they will be able to make an informed choice on Tuesday.
It is also clear that the useful idiots in the media have learned nothing from the kidnapping and murder of Daniel Pearl. Perhaps they believe they will be safe if they carry their dhimmi clippings in their wallet. No doubt they are in denial about the realities of the jihad ideology; many clearly believe that we can go back to September 10, 2001 if we just get rid of that awful George W. Bush. But whatever you think of Bush, there is no way to sustain the argument that the global jihad began with him.
The media has been quick to attack any use of 9/11 in the Bush campaign despite the fact that it is clearly the most important issue facing us today. They are quick to warn him not to “wave the bloody shirt.” (No report yet on what they think of Curt Schilling appearing with Bush today in New Hampshire to wave the bloody sock.) But whichever candidate you vote for, remember: basing your vote on prescription drug costs or taxes or anything but the reality of global jihad is tantamount to voting for September 10. It would be to pretend that a world that has vanished forever is still with us, or can be easily recovered.
UPDATE: Todd from Manchester tells me that Schilling had to cancel his planned appearance.
a 3rd ID Soldier removed and destoryed the explo at al-kac-kac on 04/13/2003 Just the Facts Man!!
Kerry is saying to Gen.Tommy Franks he was imcompant cause it was his plan??
Part of the American Tribe
Squirrel Hunter
Spider Killer
God Bless the USA and her Fighting Forces and ALL who Fight with her give them Strength and Courage to stay the course to Victory Amen
Related! Definitely Related:
Whose mistakes are worse?
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/monacharen/mc20041029.shtml
The Left's real issue:
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/davidlimbaugh/dl20041029.shtml
Kerry's evolution:
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/charleskrauthammer/ck20041029.shtml
Our Troops vs. Kerry's Global Test:
http://www.nationalreview.com/mccarthy/mccarthy200410291005.asp
As Mr. Spencer says: Read it All.
(and hundreds more articles to boot)
Q: What do French children do on Halloween?
A: Trick or Retreat.
Too late! I already voted...for GWB. And Tuesday I will be working as a poll-watcher for my party. It took 9/11 to finally convince me I am a Republican.
Carol
The challenge we face on Election Day is "who will take Islamist Extremist Jihad seriously"? Because of course it will still be with us long after the election is over. And all of the other issues pale in importance, if the terrorists destroy America.
The past 3 years have really changed much of my life. Especially since I have been a life-long committed Democrat. But absolutely my country and my family comes first. Of all the things I have heard, Zell Miller put it best for me.
So I am going to vote for George Bush on Tuesday, and I voted for Al Gore in 2000 (yes, I realize after hearing Gore talk these past 3 years, in retrospect how dumb that was). President Bush is not perfect in my eyes, and he has a long way to go on getting serious about Homeland Security. But I think, political correctness comments aside, that President Bush does get it about the Islamist Extremist threat and Jihad.
My problem with John Kerry is:
1. John Kerry has stated that threat of terrorism is "exaggerated"; I heard him say this myself.
2. John Kerry views terrorists as a "nuisance". per his interview with NYT.
3. John Kerry seeks a "global test" for our decisions on national security
4. John Kerry views the United Nations as an answer, not a problem.
5. John Kerry thinks "law enforcement" will defeat Jihadists who are paramilitary soldiers.
6. John Kerry offered to provide Iran with nuclear fuel to test their intentions to build a nuclear weapon.
7. Out of 100 senators, 99 senators voted to support the Bioshield bill to protect us from biological terrorism. 1 senator (John Kerry) did not. He was just down the street that day.
8. John Kerry has a 20 year Senate voting record against national defense initiatives (including the current Iraq war funding).
9. John Kerry told Arabs that the Israeli wall was a threat to peace, in effect, saying Israelis don't have a right to defend themselves from terrorists.
10. Regardless of the flip/flops on the current Iraq war, in 1991, when Saddam Hussein was invading Kuwait, John Kerry voted against stopping Saddam Hussein then.
11. John Kerry has the illusion that France and Germany share our national values and interests in fighting terrorism.
12. John Kerry collaborated with the enemy (North Vietnam) during war time while he was a soldier, and was viewed as a hero by the Communist North Vietnamese.
I could go on for pages like this. Again, I think there are many areas where President Bush needs to improve. But I don't know how I could believe in good conscience that John Kerry is a person who will take terrorists and Islamic Jihad necessary. It does not matter that Theresa Heinz has funded groups that are anti-Israel for years. It does not matter that John Kerry claims to be for oil conversation while he owns 2 SUVs.
The point is at the end of the day, who views Islamic Jihad as a real threat, and who wants to look the other way? And if I view Islamic Jihad as the most serious challenge to this nation, how then could I logically vote for other than George Bush. Other issues, and life-time Democratic affiliation aside, November 2 is about my country's safety, about my family, and about the war that will be waged against us - whether we are in Iraq or not.
I need to vote for someone who will recognize the threat, and who understands in this world of moral relativism - that there is genuine EVIL in this world. That is why I have no other option than to vote for George Bush's re-election.
A Democrat for Bush,
Jeffrey Imm
http://www.unitedstatesaction.com
October 29, 2004
Un release false report to change our President? Who al barrdi an arab? A mussi?
Why do the arabs want a change?
Maybe because President Bush has put a SPIKE in their wheel?
Major Pearson was in charge of the 24th csg and Destoryed @ dogwood the explovises was called forward by to 101 to pick up and destroy the stuff from al-kac-kac [al poop-poop] there were tons of bad stuff found also in schools and in one mans house in the walls?
9 Trucks were sent to retrieve and return to dogwood to destroy [trucks carry 200 to 250 tons]
There has been over 10,000 ammo dumps have either been destroyed or sucured and marked for destruction!! Over 4000 have been destroyed!
Now we look at how did saddam [found in a hole don’t shoot I’m a yellow coward] get all that stuff with all those UN sactions ???
IAEA reports dog don’t hunt !! Not even with their own reports?
Is the UN trying to give False info to change the outcome of our election? Why didn’t the IAEA destroy this stuff has been asked to destroy it since the 90s??
IAEA works with the press ABC,CBS,NYTs not telling the American&the world peoples of the True Danger we the People and our country is in??
Remember Iraq had over 400,000 tons of bad stuff and this is just what we have found and have control over? How could saddam get this stuff if he was in his box with the UN saction??
We Know what we Know!! We don’t Know what we don’t Know??
The Press keeps getting dumber for kerry every day??
Kerry is saying that Gen.Tommy Franks and ALL under him were incompant no matter how you turn that page this is what he and the press are saying!!
Kerry doesn’t see the chess board the hole country was an ammo dump!!
Once again Kerry calls the troops incompant, If a fire fighter in your town can’t save your house is it gour Governers Fault?
Wait a min how and why did saddam[founding a hole don’t shoot I’m a yellow coward] have explovies with nuke alapactions? Thought he was not trying to get nukes and was it not the IAA job to destroy this stuff IE Scott Ritter??
TRAIN DERAIL IN CT?
Man steals womens pantys gets caught? Was he a mussi?
Could the palis have infected Arafat [yellow coward full of worms?] lets say small pox or something eles so he would die the Monster he has always been? Just a throught?
Shame on the arab countries who would not take in Arafat? Thought they had a good healt care system? And after all he[Arafat] is the grandfather of terrorizm !!
Why were the palis covering arafats hands did you see them?
Once agan France shows its support for terrorist by bring the Grandfather of Islamic Terrorist to their country so we have to [sorry Hugh] French wine and art??
Again a Soilder was called in to remove the explovies Major Pearson and he took over 200 tons out and destroyed the explovies!! From al-poop-poop!!
Ruckers Universty Fire?
Russia’s FBE head said over 80 Russians had been trained in Terrorist camps?
Govener of N.J homosexual told FBI he was being Blacked mailed turns out he [governer] was the aggresser!!
Guy in Ohio had some big fire power in his house? Was he a mussi or just a good boy scout?
Mussis Mussis everywhere?
Mussis Mussis do we care?
Mussis Mussis make a scare?
Mussis Mussis Beware?
Part of the American Tribe
Squirrel Hunter
Spider KILLER
GOD BLESS THE USA AND HER FIGHTING FORCES AND ALL WHO FIGHT WITH HER GIVE THEM STRENGTH AND COURAGE TO STAY THE COURSE TO VICTORY TO DEFEAT ALL ISLAMIC TERRORIST AND ALL WHO SUPPORT THEM AMEN
PS
Did you see the stupid ? by the Press??
http://headlines.agapepress.org/archive/10/282004g.asp
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/10/29/MNGQD9I69P1.DTL
Jeffrey,
It would be marvelous if this letter could make it into a major newspaper in Ohio or Pennsylvania.
Anybody out there?
Awww, Infidel!
It should be:
LETS GET READY TO RUMMMMMMMMMBLLLLLLLE!
Let's talk about the Global Jihad.
Why in the world are the neo cons,the administration,past and present supporing Muslims
and creating Islamic states?
Facts:
The U.S. (and Saudi Arabia) used Jihadi's to fight the Serbs and backed the Muslims in Bosnia and Kosovo, and to this day are still there backing the Muslims. Kellog Brown and Root, a Haliburton, facility has built and maintains the most expensive military installation in Kosovo (Camp Bondsteel), and has another at Camp Monteith, and one in Bosnia Camp Eagel.
On top of that: We have created Islamic theocracies in Iraq and Afghanistan, as the administration helped draft their constitutions.
. [Iraqi Interim Constitution
Article A makes clear that Shari'a is the law of the land
Article B makes clear that Iraqi Arabs are part of the pan Arab or Arab Nationalist movement (Nasser or the Ba'aths)
Afghanistan and Islamic Nation
Afghanistan Draft Constitution
Compare the above to the Taliban Constitution
Is this how The Administration fights Islamic Terrorism? By creating Islamic theocracies and supporting and funding Jihadi's like al Qaeda, Ansar al Islam etc.
Here's a great article on Al Qaeda's strategy and why they want Bush defeated. Use the link to read the rest of the article.
Al Qaeda's Plans for an American Chaos
By Walid Phares
FrontPageMagazine.com | October 29, 2004
Read the rest here
When Mohammed Atta slammed his fleet of hijacked planes into the Manhattan skyline on September 11, his masters expected that such a wound would unravel the “façade” of American strength. Beyond three thousand Americans and others massacred horribly, Usama Bin Laden believed that the attacks would expose the soft underbelly of American power, implanting systemic paralysis on all US war efforts. Thus, the final goal of the war on the Infidels has always been to crush America’s institutions and way of life so that Americans would ultimately surrender to the marching Caliphate-to-be. From this perspective the September 2001 attacks aimed at igniting three fires.
One was to create deep fears in the hearts of Americans, so that they would revolt against their government. The Salafi strategists thought they would apply the Madrid paradigm two years earlier in New York and Washington. The essence of this attempt failed, as the US unified its ranks and declared a War against Terrorism. A second fire was expected to be a major backlash against Muslims and Arabs within the US. Despite claims of many incidents, the American ethnic structure remained intact. The third sought fire by Bin Laden was to drag the US into the battlefield of al Qaida's choosing, that is everywhere and nowhere.
But such a scenario was not to be: the Jihadi project failed to attain these objectives, and America and its allies emerged strengthened with a new resolve out of the fires of Islamist hatred, removing the Taliban, the world Jihadi fortress, and reaching the borders of Pakistan from the West. Another major blow was the removal of Saddam Hussein, the potential projected ally against the United States. But even though al Qaida's initial plan fell short, America cannot afford any complacency in the face of terror, for a second generation plan has been erected on the ashes of the first.
'The U.S. (and Saudi Arabia) used Jihadi's to fight the Serbs and backed the Muslims in Bosnia and Kosovo, and to this day are still there backing the Muslims. Kellog Brown and Root, a Haliburton, facility has built and maintains the most expensive military installation in Kosovo (Camp Bondsteel), and has another at Camp Monteith, and one in Bosnia Camp Eagel.'
I never knew Clinton was a Neo-con, giaour.
I also have to wonder- if Cheney was on board at Haliburton during the Clinton years, then Clinton made Cheney many of his millions, during the 8 times Clinton used Haliburton.
One wonders why you guys leave out pertinent details. Like all the Democrats from the Clinton/Carter admins, on the board of Carlyle. Not to mention Soros, one of kerry's biggest donators.
Gary,
Giaour is a coward who specializes in "drive by postings" of the same rehashed propaganda.
Even though she never responds to our rebuttals, some of the die-hard Bush haters here still take the bait, so we've got to keep putting her in her place.
Anyway, keep up the good work. I can't be here everyday!
" Prescription drug costs will matter very little if the Sears Tower is a smoking hole in the ground or if a large portion of Los Angeles is replaced with a radioactive crater. "
That quote says it all. Let me add:
People who are voting against Bush because of his stance on stem-cell research should spend a year at a charity clinic in Khandihar.
People who are voting against Bush because the judges he appoints might make futher restrictions on partial-birth abortion should be made to watch a trial of an unmarried Nigerian woman who becomes pregnant under sharia law.
People who are voting against Bush because of his stance on gay marriage should witness the execution of gays in Iran.
People who are voting against Bush because of his constant reference to God should witness the flogging of foreign workers in Saudi Arabia who had the misfortune of being found with a Bible.
People who are voting against Bush because of his faith-based initiatives should make a field trip to the dozens of churches that were destroyed by Muslim zealots in Kosovo.
Yes, I don't care for many of the comments and views of the religious right, but people who cannot take their eyes off their navels MAKE ME SICK!!!
Gary and Rublev -
Sometimes, pictures speak louder than words . Here is a link to some photos of destroyed churches in Kosovo:
http://www.kosovo.com/pogrom_march/prizren1/page_02.htm
I hope this link helps military leaders to recognize:
> The word 'mithrab' or 'mihrab', the so-called prayer niche in a mosque, translates as 'place of war'. It is from there the iman makes his calls for jihad at Friday 'prayers'.
>
> I think that tells us all we need to know about the 'holiness' of mosques!!
> as Posted by: Setanta at October 12, 2004 07:02 PM
The Law of War grants protection to hospitals, zones of safety for civilian, places of worship, and undefended places of cultural significance. Any breach is considered a war crime. If however, any such protected place is used for military purposes those protections are abdicated under the Law of War and they become legitimate targets. So if belligerents use mosques, hospitals, cultural sites, or ambulances for military purposes, the International Law of War provides immunity to the forces under fire to do whatever it takes to neutralize the transgressors, even if the complete destruction of the site is the result.
as Posted by: Hulegu Khan at October 12, 2004 10:56 AM
The Law of War grants protection to hospitals, zones of safety for civilian, places of worship, and undefended places of cultural significance. Any breach is considered a war crime. If however, any such protected place is used for military purposes those protections are abdicated under the Law of War and they become legitimate targets. So if belligerents use mosques, hospitals, cultural sites, or ambulances for military purposes, the International Law of War provides immunity to the forces under fire to do whatever it takes to neutralize the transgressors, even if the complete destruction of the site is the result.
as Posted by: Hulegu Khan at October 12, 2004 10:56 AM
formerly that may be true - but for the left - any assault on any thing by the West is ILLEGAL!
period - but if done by Muslims - they are freedom fighters defending themselves against the warmongering West!
jihan
Even over here in the UK we have Right-wing biased media.
Mr.Spencer, who do you think is best equipped to fight the global jihad??? Seriously, I'd like to hear what you think!!!