Saudi warns against extremism in education

Hypocrisy. Only after they were attacked did the idea that Islamic extremism become a danger. Have the changed their tune in the overseas Muslims schools? Have they given up funding Mosques manned by fiery extreme Wahabbist clerics? I bet they haven't. No, their political survival depends on controlling the extremists at home that could again unleashed after they have finished their plan of the triumphalism over the world. We see through their deception.

Hypocrisy. Only after they were attacked did the idea that Islamic extremism become a danger. Have the changed their tune in the overseas Muslims schools? Have they given up funding Mosques manned by fiery extreme Wahabbist clerics? I bet they haven't. No, their political survival depends on controlling the extremists at home that could again unleashed after they have finished their plan of the triumphalism over the world. We see through their deception.

"Saudi warns against extremism in education"

Only one problem with that press release meant to portray the Saudi Wahhabi regime as against islamic extremism. This regime supplies the school textbooks filled with the islamist/extemist ideas in the first place.

The Saudi's must think westerners are very dumb.

I'll go halfsies on that bridge with you. Mr. Spencer.

Dear me, teachers must be wetting their pants in apprehension! What kind of bad joke is this?? Bloody Saudis have been funding their extremism GLOBALLY FOR DECADES. Which is why there is GLOBAL JIHAD NOW - all funded by our back tracking, lying 'friends.'

About 300 years too late.

Some see the writting on the wall Can't eat the Black oil and We will find other Means and they will starve??

Yea wonder if they will meet their rock god if they don't stop ??

Don't think Saudi Arabia has a PC Problem??

Part of the American Tribe
Squrrel Hunter
Spider Killer
God Bless the USA and her Fighting Foces and ALL who Fight with her give them Strength,Wisdom,Sight and Courage to Destory ALL Islamic Terrorist and ALL who Support them Amen

PS

Or could it be all the Signs are against them??

I like this part of their Book because they can see they have chose the wrong Path??

Qur’an 74:31 “We have appointed nineteen angels to be the wardens of the Hell Fire. We made a stumbling-block for those who disbelieve and We have fixed their number as a trial for unbelievers in order that the people of the Book may arrive with certainty, and that no doubts may be left for the people of the Book, those in whose hearts is a disease. And for those to whom the Scripture Book has been given, and the believers, there should be no doubt. The unbelievers may say, ‘What does the Lord intend by this?’ The Lord will lead astray whomever He pleases, and He will guide whomever He pleases: and none can know the armies of your Lord except He, and this is no other than a warning to mankind.”

This can be broken by Yes it is the Army of the people of the Book who he has chosen to Free [USA] the Iraqi people as it says

He will guide whomever He pleases: and none can know the armies of your Lord except He, and this is no other than a warning to mankind.”

Yes he has chosen the USA!!

And let’s look at another part?

The Lord will lead astray whomever He pleases,

Ubl,saddam,zawari,all who Kill and destroy mankind?

There will be no more warnings?

Earthquake in Iran kills 30,000 who harbors ubls son and wife’s??

and now LOCUS in egypt!!

and this week-end an Earthquake where Iran meets with others to plot?

This is as good a place as any to comment on yet another concern of mine: Until recently I had supported school vouchers. But now I wonder, with public schools floundering, and with continuing funding shortfalls (supposedly) it seems if we let private schools play more and more of a role, we will be opening ourselves up to the growth of Muslim schools here in the US. After all, the Saudis let this happen because they didn't want to spend their riches on public schools, right?

Something to think about.

Does this mean Israel will make it into their geography books? I'll take one of those suspension bridges as well, thank you.

"Extremism" to these people means anyone who dares repudiate "mainstream" doctrines like violent jihad, misogyny, taqqiya, dhimmitude, etc.

After all the harm their ideology has inflicted on the world and continues to do do , these perverted hypocrites only care about what might happen in their little theocracy. Gee, this jihad might interfere with their ability to procure pubescent blonde females for their "orgy's for Allah...

I hope they get their kaffiyahs knocked to kingdom come and a woman takes over ...

A prominent Islamic civil rights
group today condemned an attack on a Baghdad mosque by U.S. and Iraqi forces that resulted in the deaths of at least four worshipers.

(Four what?)

This group of hypocrites said media reports indicate that soldiers opened fire when angry worshippers shouted ((("God is Great" and tried to beat back troops by throwing shoes at them.)))

Witnesses to the attack say soldiers denied Iraqi Red Crescent medical teams access to the mosque and said pieces of brain were splattered on one of the mosque's walls. (Article 63 of the Geneva Conventions prohibits blocking medical and relief activities.)

"As U.S. Forces Raided a Mosque"

"US, Iraqi Troops Raid Baghdad Mosque, Kill Four"

In its statement, said:

"An attack on worshippers after Friday prayers is an act of religious provocation and likely to be counterproductive. This incident may inflame Muslim public opinion at a time when all parties to the conflict should seek peace and reconciliation.

"Violating the sanctity of a mosque by firing on unarmed worshippers will
only help to reinforce the perception held by many in the Muslim world that
the war on terror is turning into a war on Islam."

*********My question is this:

What possesses these ridiculous fools to throw their shoes? As Austin Powers once said "Who throws a shoe? Honestly"

I especially like the part of "violating the sanctity of a mosque", yet there's no mention of the barbarians who use them as armories****

*****pieces of brain were splattered on one of the mosque's walls. (Article 63 of the Geneva Conventions prohibits blocking medical and relief activities.)********Pieces of brain? From a Muslim?

And, it's Geneva Convention, not conventions.....

I, for one have become extremely sick and tired of Muslim groups inside the United States spewing anti-American and anti-American military bullshit, so if any of them are reading today, I'll ask that they stop before one day soon, before Americans become so fed up that something bad happens to them.

They should learn their place, and be lucky that their alive to even have their place, as unimportant as it is.

Mosques that become armories, places of refuge for insurgents, and launching places for attacks lose the status of holy and protected places in my book.

Yet when Muslim fighters in Bethlehem used and damaged the Church of the Nativity in the recent past, there was no outcry from in the Muslim world. Hmmmm. Such hypocrisy.

EPG: Satan and his worshippers make no apologies.

Education means different things, of course, partly the kind of education Spencer and Hugh and Catherine and others provide us with daily. Without the detailed analysis and deep background, without the clear light of reason shining on the obscurities of islamic behavior, Islam makes no sense at all to those of us outside it. Even being in the midst of an islamic culture for a long period doesn't begin to educate the visitor in the sense Spencer and Hugh and Catherine and others educate us here. Returning from Islamic lands to find out the histories and the whys of Islam is essential for the average man to make sense of his experience.

Education is also that experience of living with Islam. Witjhout that first-hand contact, without seeing and sensing and being in the matrix of islam, it's just a dirty heap of strangness from people who say and do things we don't like. Being there is educative in a sense no one can outside that experience can hope to match.

Someone here recently made an insightful remark that I wish I'd noted to give full credit: Military people are returning from Iraq in large numbers with first-hand experience of Islam. Their experience of Islam will stay with them for the whole of their lives, and they will come back hating it for the most part. That is not to say they'd know the difference between Ali and Mu'awiyyah. They likely had no time or inclination to learn the history of Islam, the nature of the beast at all beyond the facts of being shot at from mosques and bombed by sneaks.

One of my emphases here has been to ask us to join in a grass-roots leafleting campaign to spread the word about the details of islam throughout our communities, and to do so in a co-ordinated effort to show strenght and unity of purpose, to encourage our natural allies to join us, to further our own resolve in this matter. Aslo, I've cautioned many times against going onto the corner to pass out pamphlets if that might result in meeting a couple of Islamic converts recently out of prison and looking for an excuse to return. these people are dangerous, and there's no reason to die over a pamphlet.

Hugh and Benelux have suggested handing out business cards easily made on a home computer, cards listing Spencer's web site. Hugh claims one can do that by the thousands for minimal cost and effort. the solution, as I see it now, to giving out info-sheets without risking death at the hands of Moslems, is to do so at military meeting places. Soldiers coming or going will possibly welcome the idea of learning about Islam, whether they're on their way or whether they're returning. They are not people one would worry about turning violent at the sight of Islam exposed.

If we were to co-ordinate our efforts and attempt to contact soldiers across America, Europe, and the South, I think we'd find a mass of enthusiastic support from people who could also contribute to our education here.

As it stands, I see that the Moslem world has all the initiative. I think it's long past due for us to move toward organization rather than bluster and fume. i appreciate the frustration of not being able to do anything dramatic, but waqr is won in stages, and we aren't really making any moves on it at all. I suggest we reach out to our Comrades in arms, the Dutch, the Danes, the Spanish soldiers, the British, Australians, and American soldiers who are directly involved in the fight against Islam. We have a great deal to give to them, and they, in turn, can teach us things we would otherwise never really grasp. The education can be mutual.

I welcome comments and criticism on this topic. if there's a flaw, please let me know. I think it's practicable, but so far nothing seems to have worked on this line, and if there's more to do, let's work out the details ttill it actually happens.

OT, here's the link to the International Religious Freedom Report for 2004 issued earlier this year by the US Department of State:

http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2004/index.htm

The sidebar on the left is where your links are to specific regions, etc. in the report.

I still support vouchers, Cassandra. My son entered a public middle school this year (money, what else?), and the sanitized, romanticized picture of Islam his history book offers, compared to the distortions it has on Calvinism (in the sole paragraph it treats it) is strange to behold.

The problem is that American public schools are in the grip of a highly politicized teacher's union that sees leftwing activism as its chief calling. I have already begun harrassment by calling my son's teacher's attention to inaccuracies in the book she uses; and write letters to schoolboards (I'm also enlisting the aid of an attorney).

The fact of the matter is that our own liberal public school, in its effort to be all lovey-dovey and multie-cultie, becomes an enabler for Islamofascism.

"...and I expect no new revelation between the "Amen" at the end of the NT Apocalypse..."

My question is, why would you adhere to that stuff too?

The Bible, vis a vis, the Koran, is distinguishable only to the discriminating.

Is there a reason to believe in one and not the other?