
Too much Cola Turka, Chevy?
The Washington Post (thanks to the Constantinopolitan Irredentist) reports that has-been comic Chevy Chase said of President Bush: "This guy started a jihad."
Whatever one may think of the President, it would seem that Chevy has forgotten about 9/11. And the attack on the USS Cole. And the destruction of the Marine barracks in Beirut. And the Khomeini regime and the hostage crisis. And thousands of other incidents, stretching back in time to when Muhammad led the first Muslims in the first jihad. All Bush's fault, I guess. All of them.
This isn't really about Bush at all. It's about the fundamental myopia shared by all too many analysts: that we have caused all this somehow, and if we adjust our policies in some way, it will all go away. Whatever pretexts those analyses fasten upon, that's all they are: pretexts. Whatever one points to as having caused a jihad is sure to have been preceded by another jihad, all the way back to Muhammad -- thus giving the analysis the lie. Yet for all their vaunted multiculturalism, most Western analysts don't seem to be able to cast the noble Third World in anything but a reactive victim mode. The idea that Muslims might be fighting for reasons of their own, that ultimately have little or nothing to do with George Bush or the other pretexts of today, never seems to occur to them.
Chevy chae is just another ignorant, self-important Hollywood boob.
He's not even worth listening to, but I can assure you he won't ever get another dime from my entertainment dollar.
This brings to mind David Horowitz's comment, which I am paraphrasing, that the war between the Arabs and Jews is not the cause of the war on terror, it IS the war on terror. The same thing could be said of President Bush's post-9/11 initiatives in the so-called War on Terror - they are not the cause of the War on Terror, they ARE the War on Terror.
Too bad this is lost on Mr. Chase - this might damage his reputation as the world's foremost authority on Jihad.
PRECEEDED BY KORANIC VERSES
"The main statement was preceded by Koranic verses, a rhetorical device typical of bin Laden."
www.usatoday.com/news/world
P.S. To the muslim "they do it too" crowd: Christians do NOT follow the OLD Testament. The Old Testament is the foundational historical record, scripture, and prophesy on which the New Testament relies.
After "Christmas Vacation".....this guy's done diddle dick with his career.
His opinion matters, and the Grand Canyon is a ditch.
What the leftists say about Bush is of course, nonesense, but it is also naive to think pretexts do not exist either. One mistake made by both sides of the debate is that pretexts are not the same as justifications. You bring up the pretext to understand the process and reactions, even if those results are entirely unjustifiable. The question is that whether the US would have been better off if stayed out of the political arena of the Middle east except for US national interests and for protection of Israel. But the US administration involvement went beyond these interests in the past.
Prior to 1953, the United States was perceived as the "good power" among Iranians. The US had helped us save the Iranian province of Azerbayejan from the Soviet aggression, had helped social and economical progress through many programs, and has acted as counter balance against the British and the Russian who, for over a century, had played an imposing negative role in Iranian politics. America was the "good guy" who everybody loved.
Then in 1953, the Eisenhower's administration orchestrated a coup against the nationalist prime minister Mosaddeq. Why? I am not sure. There was indeed pressure from the British, and the US administration was very suspecious toward the third world nationalist movements. But Mosaddeq was not a communist neither were his cabinet and administration. And he had successfully supressed early radical Islamist groups.
In numerous meetings with the US officials, Mosaddeq had indicated that with proper support from the US he was going to move Iran toward the west. But his overturns went unnoticed and he was toppled. For a quarter of a century afterward, the Shah's regime involved the Americans in everything, from the creation of his brutal secret service (SAVAK) to suppress of every single voice of democracy and reform.
The hostage crisis in Iran in 1979 was in fact orchestrated and supported by a coalition of leftist and so-called revolutionary groups, Khomeini later on took advantage of it. Among the most vocal supporters of that stupid act were secular leftist or nationalist groups who now yearn for the American support. The hostage taking would not have been possible if the public was not so mad at the US policies in Iran between 1953 and 1979. It is a fact of history that Khomeini himself at first was not sure whether to support the act or stop it. But after consulting with his advisors and gauging the public opinion, he decided that it would give him the chance to push the moderate nationalist groups out of power. Which indeed happen.
These actions are indeed unjustifiable, but they do not happen in a vaccum. One would want to ask what would have happened if the US had supported and cooperated with Mosaddeq, the only democratic and nationalist leader in the region who had successfully blocked both communists and Islamists. the world might have looked quite different today.
You mean that for all those years, Chevy Chase portrayed Dickheads, he was not actually acting at all ?
By the way, Bush indeed started a Jihad. A jihad to spread democracy and freedom in the world. What's wrong with that?
SeenathePersian: Was he another "moderate"? Anything that keeps musulmans from gaining economic and military influence is fine by me.
Aw, all this is a mere ruse to attract publicity. Like hjas been nted, tyhe guy's a 'has-been comic'. Now there're other ways to attract publicity - like telling and showing the truth about jihad and jihadis. But then thats risky, right? I mean just look at poor Van Gogh.
Its sooo much easier to strut around the stage like a hero calling Bush and by extension America names, no?
Reminds me of some leftie loony students in italy out protestiung against the barbaric US practice of capital punishment... Well, why not also protest similar practises by their own home grown Naples mafia? Coz the mafia will likely finish you off while there're no consequnces to swearing at America, huh?
Pathetic bunch of loony losers these are! Never mind them.
CY,
He's not even worth listening to, but I can assure you he won't ever get another dime from my entertainment dollar.
this is about the only way we can make a difference with these people ($$). unfortunately, due to selfishness, until they are being threatened or worse, they will never learn what we are dealing with... I think part of it is a serious mis-education on history. And they are the "elite"?
This may affect the choice of old films that Jihadwatch may recommend. What cheerful upbeat movies shall it be (nothing scary or depressing --no "White Zombies" from 1932, please) instead of Chevy Chase's summer or Christmas or other vacation en famille, where pratfalls and runaway cars are standard,and nothing goes right? "Lo sceicco bianco", or "Lo scopone scientifico," both with Alberto Sordi, or something with that cinematic prince, Toto, after the pasta but before the secondo? Groucho Marx lying back in that canoe, singing as a banjo is strummed, whilehis female companion (Margaret Dumont) dutifully paddles him along? Jeanne Moreau singing to Jules and to Jim, the words of that songwriter who even makes an appearance in the film: "on s'est connu, on s'est reconnu, on s'est perdu de vue, on s'est reperdu de vue.....pourquoi se separer" or Irene Dunne, in her attempt to embarrass Gary Grant in front of a salon-full of stuffed-shirt potential in-laws (if Cary marries the other girl), singing and swaying that song in "The Awful Truth"? Chaplin, as the singing waiter who in shooting his cuffs loses the lyrics he had just a moment before so laboriously lettered on them, and for his first uttered words on film, those words, fittingly, are his own invention and gobbledygook: "Voulez-vous le taximeter" etcetera, for divine Paulette Goddard, years later shaking her bracelet of diamonds at the inquiring Martin Dine of the House Un-American Activities Committee, by way of showing him and Nixon, and the whole damned committee, that by god she was no Bolshevist.
Any or all of the above. But Chevy Chase -- I'm afraid that you and I, and all of us at Jihadwatch, are no longer an item, buster. Now that you've joined the Moore-Streisand brigade, we've had it.
But we will give you a chance. You play the fool, and do it well, but you are under no obligation to be one. Where do you think the word "jihad" comes from? And what do you think, C.C., is in the Qur'an and hadith and sira? Some here, too, are underwhelmed by the analysis performed hitherto by the Administration, but it is nonsense on stilts to suggest that this has all been started by George Bush. It was started, 1400 years ago, by someone in the Arabian desert (or, at least, so Muslims believe, and have led others to believe).
Here's the offer. We don't expect you to send us a Christmas present, although residuals and foreign rights sent our way will not be turned down. No, all we ask is that you accept, with our good wishes, one book, one book to read in whatever paradisiacal location you may be spending the Christmas vacation, while we ink-stained wretches plod on with our lucubrations by lamplight -- a light which, we allow ourselves to believe, is akin to the one, or was it two, that signalled to Paul Revere, who in turn, when riding, riding, riding through the glen -- no, that was Robin Hood, and his Merry Men. Well, you get the idea.
We choose one book about Islam. We send it to you. You promise to read it. What's more, you keep your promise. All you have to do is have your agent (he might like this idea, what with our boycotting you and all) send the mailing address, and one informative and well-written book, coming right up. And then you can tell all of Beverly Hills about what you learned -- or, alternatively, about the narrow-minded freaks at Jihadwatch. Besides, if they prefer Alberto Sordi or Toto or Groucho Marx or Charlie Chaplin to you, Chevy Chase -- well, what kind of taste do they have, and what can you expect, anyway?
Deal?
chavey chez?? who that????
Bit of OT
ATHENS, Greece -- The Greek government has appealed for calm, fearing a public backlash against immigrants living in Greece following Wednesday's bus hijacking by two Albanian gunmen.
Whats the odds that they are mussies
Thanks Mike I not know there was already a thread going for:-UK court rejects terror detentions.
I still think lynching these nine Law Lord Haw Haws is in order.
Thanks cathy for the Slobo transcript.
good morning Terminator,now you can breath in.Now it is time to turn the light out.Have a good day,
the same for all you JW;ers,and you to nassem
Goodnight
Ahhh, Chevy Chase.
This is priceless, "Cola Turka" HAHAHAHA. I forgot that Dhimmi Chase promoted this cola in Turkey in a spoof of European Vacation in Turkey or something like that.
I saw this and really thought he was a jerk. But what do you expect, from the Hollywood elite? They don't live in the real world and probably cannot see the reality of unrestricted immigration. Or, if they do, they don't care because they can afford to "feel" the pain of the "discriminated"(boo-hoo BALONEY) against masses for a few moments before they get back in their limos and high-tail it back to their gated communities and Beverly Hills mansions.
The fact that the former "Conehead" (Not "Dickhead" George, but it certainly fits better!)has some vocabulary of Islam, i.e.,"Jihad', means that he at least listens to the news. But to blame Bush for a strategy which is as old as Islam itself is plain ignorant and has earned him the name DHIMMI CELEBRITY HACK OF THE YEAR AWARD.
Dhimmi Putz, thy name is Chevy Chase.
This little article really warms the cockles of my heart, modesty at last for the little mermaid of Denmark . This is what Eurabia has to look forward to.
Perhaps the EU should vote favorably on the Turkish admission later this week. It is important to note that the vote is not for admission cut only to determine if negotiations for admission should commence. Actual admission, if approved, is still at least ten years away.
Those next ten years would be telling. Could Turkey ever conform its constitution and laws to the European constitution and create a schism in the islamic world, perhaps even coming up with a new benign religion "turkslam" that is really just another religion without pretensions of world conquest and domination, totaly divorced from mecca and mohammedism. IF so, Turkey would become another "honeypot" for the islamic jihad. Otherwise Turkey would show its colors as just another islamic jihad society intent on domination of the Eurabia. In either event, Turkey's fate would be sealed.
LISA
Thank you for that link to the little Murmaid in Denmark. I posted it over at LGF. I think it is important that people know that many hare having serious reservations about Turkish EU membership into the "Christian Club" and they are being ignored.
I saw a brief clip of Mr. Chase uttering similar stuff; I remember vividly how he kept on repeating about George Bush, "I don't like him. I just don't like him. I just don't like him.", as if he had found a buzz line in a comedy routine that roused the audience.
I imagine it would be difficult while having coffee in Cannes with European friends, having just seen the 'daring, courageous' Fahrenheit 911, to say something even mildly neutral about George Bush. The ad hominem reasoning, the irrationality of opinion, the judgment clouded with bias, you would think, would somehow tug at the consciousness of a not-unintelligent person, until that person at least reconsidered a few things. But that seems to be an unwarranted expectation.
Well, we know that Jihadists have been crossing and attempting to cross the Mexican border; emergency procedures for the San Diego school system were found on a CD confiscated in Iraq; and, of course, so-called 'al-Qaeda' is doing the best it can to acquire bio-chemical weapons and get access to crop dusters. These are all irrefutable facts. Mr. Chase has reason to be concerned about Jihad in his own backyard.
And what does George Bush have to do with these things? Does Mr. Chase know how Jihadists and even 'moderate Muslims' feel about Hollywood-the 'Jew infested' propaganda monster at war with Islam--an opinion encourage by 'enlightened' media sources like the BBC, that did a special piece on 'American soft power', that surely includes a few of Mr. Chase's own films? Does he really think that George Bush has anything to do with these kinds of opinions?
It must be very difficult to say words or think thoughts that are positive of someone you simply 'don't like'. But, Mr. Chase must entertain this thought: As far as hatred, disgust, aggression, and the potential for violence, I mean 'indiscriminate murder' kind of violence, against people and localities related to Mr. Chase's vocation, comedy in Hollywood film and American television, George Bush is not his problem. Islam is his problem, and the problem existed long before George Bush even considered running for president.
Perhaps Chevy can jump start his non-existant
career (after sobering up and throwing out that
vial of coke in his pocket) by joining up with
that other 5th Column filmmaker Michael Moore.
"Iraq Vacation: The Griswolds go to Zarqawi World"
December 15, 2004
Fire at gas station in Huston and the Woman saves the pumps!!
Fire starter on the loose in Washington DC??
Michigan rash of gun shop robberies Could we are stopping their flow of guns from across the border?? And now they have to make do?? 35 gun stores 300 guns stolen??
Dropped bomb on Islamic terrorist dump!! Mosque attack in Iraq??
Bruce Taft on Fox?? Guy pulled no punches!!
Sunday Bombing in Philippines at a Christmas market?? 2 blasts in Spain?? Guess running away does not help??
Pallis in Israel blew up a tunnel at ck point?? Guess Abbas doesn’t care never heard a sorry we didn’t mean for that to happen?? When we will we let Israel have the war that has been declared against her??
Cairo Egypt bans book life of mo-ham-od written in English in the 1800s by George Bush??
Dec 13 van takes out gas pump??
Bus and car crash in Maryland??
Mussis take bus in Greece and want 1million dollars??
Crocodile caught in Fla.??
2 Churches hit this week in Indonesia?? Indonesia says it will increase security around Christian churches?? For the Christmas season? What was it about some mussi saying that they get along so well in Indonesia??
275 candidates summit in Iraq?? Even the Sunnis say they want to play!! And YES THE IRAQI PEOPLE WANT FREEDOM!!
The Iraqi people want to come out of the 7th century??
Islamic terrorist working in mosul killing Iraqis?? Remember where saddams[ FOUND IN A HOLE DON’T SHOOT I’M A YELLOW COWARD ] sons were found and killed!! It is easy for them to run across the border to Syria?? All THE ATTACKS in Baghdad are to make us leave the Border because we have cut off their escape!!
French build a huge bridge to the Spanish border??
Aid workers killed in the Sudan??
S court rules that if a lawyer concedes guilt of client it can stand!!
Kerry still lost Ohio!!
General Tommy Franks for Homeland Security !!
I am sick of people blaming everybody for fault but who is really at fault THE ISLAMIC ETRRORIST AND THEIR SUPPORTERS!!!
French shut down an arab channel? WOW!! They almost get it?? They are worried GOOD!! Maybe they will shut up and help now?? How easy it was [and is] to dupe Europeans research Spain when the [USA Today] when the Movie Trailer played “Independence Day” with Will Smith Played?? Not a pretty picture??
Been making peanut butter cookies with kisses!!
Fire in Ga. Apartments?? Factory mishap in Ga?? Lot’s of mussis there ??
December 16, 2004
Someone burned down the Lov Shack in Ga?? THIS IS WAR!!
I think this New tape by ubl[ YELLOW COWARD WHO RUNS AWAY ] is because he is losing?? There were Protest in Saudi A. today but they were not in support of ubl[ YELLOW COWARD WHO RUNS AWAY ] they were for more FREEDOM from islam??
If you want to see what Islamic Terrorist bring and the Moderates bring?? Buy and watch” Buried in the Sand the Deception of America” This is not what the Iraqi People want they have been living with the MONSTERS FOR TO LONG AND WANT TO BE FREE!!
http://www.beecy.net/frank/
Qur’an 74:31 “We have appointed nineteen angels to be the wardens of the Hell Fire. We made a stumbling-block for those who disbelieve and We have fixed their number as a trial for unbelievers in order that the people of the Book may arrive with certainty, and that no doubts may be left for the people of the Book, those in whose hearts is a disease. And for those to whom the Scripture Book has been given, and the believers, there should be no doubt. The unbelievers may say, ‘What does the Lord intend by this?’ The Lord will lead astray whomever He pleases, and He will guide whomever He pleases: and none can know the armies of your Lord except He, and this is no other than a warning to mankind.”
This can be broken by Yes it is the Army of the people of the Book who he has chosen to Free [USA] the Iraqi people as it says
He will guide whomever He pleases: and none can know the armies of your Lord except He, and this is no other than a warning to mankind.”
Yes he has chosen the USA!!
TO FREE THE IRAQI PEOPLE FROM THE MONSTER saddam [FOUND IN A HOLE DON’T SHOOT I’M A YELLOW COWARD]
And let’s look at another part?
The Lord will lead astray whomever He pleases,
Ubl,saddam,zawari,all who Kill and destroy mankind?
There will be no more warnings?
Earthquake in Iran kills 30,000 who harbors ubls son and wife’s??
And now Locus in Egypt
NOW IF THAT IS NOT TELLING YOU ARE ON THE WRONG PATH NOTHING WILL??
Kazakhastian Blast in mine??
Islamic terrorist- killing Iraqis??
Earthquake in Algeria??
The typhoon in Philippines Remember they ran away from the Fight in Iraq??
http://www.onlypunjab.com/fullstory1104-insight-Pink+Locusts+from+North+Africa-status-15-newsID-503.html
Pink Locusts from North Africa Swarm Through Cairo
Publish Date : 11/18/2004 5:09:00 PM Source : Science and Technology News Onlypunjab.com
Swarms of pink locusts swept through the Egyptian capital on Wednesday, evoking the biblical description of the plagues which struck in the time of Moses.
The swarms of millions flew high above tall towers or swooped down onto treelined streets, where scared pedestrians stamped
on them or ran for cover.
The flying insects arrived from neighboring Libya after devouring the countryside in central and western Africa in past months.
YES I SAY ubl[YELLOW COWARD WHO RUNS AWAY] is losing and trying to regain control??
What verses did he say in his rambling and to say about the people of the book?? The people of the book didn’t lose their crops??
Qur’an 9:38 “Believers, what is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allah (i.e., Jihad) you cling to the earth? Do you prefer the life of this world to the Hereafter? Unless you march, He will afflict and punish you with a painful torture, and put others in your place. But you cannot harm Him in the least.”
YEA more Islamic terrorist dead TODAY BY THE USA & NEW IRAQI ARMY NOW WHO IS ON GODS SIDE?
Qur’an 9:43 “May Allah forgive you (Muhammad). Why did you grant them leave (for remaining behind; you should have persisted as regards to your order to them to proceed on Jihad), until you had known the liars.”
YES STOP SUPPORT OF THE ISLAMIC TERRORIST OR IT WILL BE THE DOOM OF ALL IRAQI PEOPLE REMEMBER 5:32 AND THE DEATH OF THE PEOPLE OF THE BOOK WILL BE THE DEATH OF ALL MANKIND AND WHO IS IT WHO LEADS YOU TO THIS DEATH BUT YELLOW MEN COWARDS WHO WILL NOT SHOW THEMSELVES LIKE ubl NO SEE SINCE TORA-BORA AND SADDAM FOUND IN O HOLE “ DON’T SHOOT I’M A YELLOW COWARD”
Qur’an 9:45 “Only those ask for exemption (from Jihad) who believe not in Allah and whose hearts are in doubt, so that they are tossed to and fro. If they had intended to march out to fight, they would certainly have made some preparation and readied their equipment; but Allah was averse to their being sent forth; so He made them lag behind. ‘Sit you among those who sit.’ If they had marched with you, they would not have added to your (strength) but only (made for) discord, spying and sowing sedition. There would have been some in your midst who would have listened to them. But Allah knows well those [peace-loving Muslims] who do wrong and are wicked.”
YES WHY DO THE SAUDIS SEND OTHERS TO FIGHT AND KILL THE IRAQI PEOPLE?
Qur’an 9:48 “They had plotted sedition before, and upset matters for you until the Decree of Allah [to fight] became manifest, much to their disgust. Among them are many who say: ‘Grant me exemption to stay back at home (exempted from Jihad). And do not tempt me [with promises of booty].’ Have they not fallen into temptation already? Indeed, Hell surrounds them.”
WHO ARE THESE MONSTERS WHO SAY IT IS OKAY TO KILL IRAQI CHILDREN? FROM SAUIDI ARABIA EGYPT JORDAN PALESTINIANS SYRIA?
Qur’an 9:75 “Some of you made a deal with Allah, saying, ‘If You give us booty we shall pay You the tax.’ But when He gave them booty, they became greedy and refused to pay. As a consequence of breaking their promises, Allah filled their hearts with hypocrisy which will last forever.”
COULD THIS BE THE UN AND THE OIL FOR FOOD OR THE ARAB LEAGE WHO HOLD THE IRAQI PEOPLE PRISNOR TO THE YELLOW COWARDS?
Qur’an 9:77 “He punished them by putting hypocrisy in their hearts until the Day whereon they shall meet Him, because they lied to Allah and failed to perform as promised. Allah knows their secrets. Those who slander and taunt the believers who pay the zakat (for Allah’s Cause) voluntarily and throw ridicule on them, scoffing, Allah will throw back their taunts, and they shall have a painful doom. Whether you ask for their forgiveness or not, (their sin is unforgivable). If you ask seventy times for their forgiveness Allah will not forgive them.”
YES THE ONES WHO CALL FOR THE MURDER OF THE PEOPLE OF THE BOOK WILL BURN IN HELL READ 5:32 AND THE USA WHO SAVED THE IRAQI PEOPLE FROM SADDAM AS IF THEY HAVE SAVED ALLMANKIND?
Qur’an 9:81 “Those who stayed behind rejoiced in their inaction behind the back of the Messenger. They hated to strive and fight with their goods and lives in the Cause of Allah. They said, ‘Go not forth in the heat.’ Say, ‘The fire of Hell is fiercer in heat.’ If only they could understand! So let them laugh a little, for they will weep much as a reward for what they did. If Allah brings you back (from the campaign) to a party of the hypocrites and they ask to go out to fight, say: ‘You shall never go out to fight with me against a foe. You were content sitting inactive on the first occasion. So sit with the useless men who lag behind.’ Do not pray for any of them (Muhammad) that die, nor stand at his grave. They rejected Allah and disbelieved His Messenger. They died in a state of perverse rebellion.”
SAUDI ARABIA WHO WILL NOT COME TO THE AID OF THE IRAQI PEOPLE WHO FIGHTS THE YELLOW MONSTERS WHO CUT OFF AMERICANS HEADS AND IRAQI CHILDRENS HEADS BUT SUPPORT THE MONSTERS?
Qur’an 9:85 “And let not their wealth or (following in) sons dazzle you or excite your admiration. Allah’s plan is to punish them with these things in this world, and to make sure their souls perish while they are unbelievers. When a surah comes down enjoining them to believe in Allah and to strive hard and fight along with His Messenger, those with wealth and influence among them ask you for exemption from Jihad. They prefer to be with (their women), who remain behind (at home). Their hearts are sealed and so they understand not.”
YES THE WEALTH OF EGYPT AND ALL THE OTHERS WHO FIGHT AGAINST PEACE? FOR HAVE THEY REWRITTEN THE BOOK?
Qur’an 9:90 “And there were among the wandering desert Arabs men who made excuses and came to claim exemption (from the battle). Those who lied to Allah and His Messenger sat at home. Soon will a grievous torment seize them.”
WHO COULD THIS BE THE ONES WITH ALL THIS MONEY THAT THEY HAVE USED FOR EVIL AROUND THE WORLD?
Qur’an 9:93 “The (complaint) is against those who claim exemption [from fighting] while they are rich. They prefer to stay with the (women) who remain behind (at home). Allah has sealed their hearts. They are content to be useless. Say: ‘Present no excuses: we shall not believe you.’ It is your actions that Allah and His Messenger will observe. They will swear to you by Allah, when you return hoping that you might leave them alone. So turn away from them, for they are unclean, an abomination, and Hell is their dwelling-place, a fitting recompense for them.”
YES WHO ARE THESE MONSTERS ONES WHO BRING A LIVING HELL? WHAT COUNTRYS DO THEY BRING THEIR MISTUFF FROM? NOW THE PEOPLE FROM THE BOOK FIGHT BACK AND GOD GIVES THOSE WHO FIGHT WITH THEM TRUE PEACE AND FREEDOM!!
Qur’an 9:97 “The Arabs of the desert are the worst in unbelief and hypocrisy, and most fitted to be in ignorance of the command which Allah hath sent down to His Messenger. Some of the Bedouins look upon their payments (for Allah’s Cause) as a fine and wish disasters to fall on you (so that they might not have to pay). Yet on them be the disaster of evil.”
THIS IS WHAT ubl[yellow coward who runs away] IS USEING AND HE FORGETS HE IS DOING JUST THAT WORKING AGAINST GOD!!
Part of the American Tribe
Squirrel Hunter
Spider Killer
God Bless the USA and her Fighting Forces and ALL who Fight with her give them Strength,Wisdom,Sight and Courage to stay the course to Victory[FREEDOM] to Destroy ALL Islamic Terrorist and ALL who Support thm Open the Worlds Eyes to their Threat and help them Stand against this Evil with US Amen
PS
If you think about it is pretty lame for ubl[YELLOW COWARD WHO RUNS AWAY] who could only get a few MONSTERS to attack in the land of mussis?? This does say something for Saudis hate to say it but true??
After "Christmas Vacation".....this guy's done diddle dick with his career.
His opinion matters, and the Grand Canyon is a ditch.
Posted by: Prickzilla at December 16, 2004 02:11 PM
LOL You get a gold Star for the Day!!
Part of the American Tribe
Squirrel Hunter
Spider Killer
God Bless the USA and her Fighting Forces and ALL who Fight with her give them Strength,Wisdom,Sight, and Courage to Defeat ALL Islamic Terrorist and ALL who Support them Amen
Chevy Chase is but another elitist of the same ilk as Penn,Clooney etc..Who when not in the Headlines will make every desperate attempt to transplant themselves where they feel they need
to be 'The Centre of The Universe'.
The Celebrity - so magnificent -all knowing.To many of us who back in the good old days could spare a frivolous moment reading a tabloid,
we are left with many Questions after Chases rantings - Like how dare this cocaine addicted
loser moralise to straight thinking people about
the true nature of Jihad.
Prepare for the biggest laugh of all when Chase
claims later on in his miserable addicted life that his outspoken politics wrecked his career.
Chevy Chase you insult all of the men and women
fighting and dying for YOUR COUNTRY when you do
not even question the true motives of the jihadist's.
And Aykroyd used to call JANE CURTIN an "ignorant slut". Chase's political acumen is just as impressive as his talk-show hosting skills.
Chevy who ?
SeenathePersian
[[but it is also naive to think pretexts do not exist either. One mistake made by both sides of the debate is that pretexts are not the same as justifications]]
Seena, what was the pretext when the army of barbarians swept into Persia, destroyed the Zoroastrian faith, looted, massacred, raped, defiled and spat upon the ancient and most refined culture and civilisation of that time, and imposed the Arab religion on the people and the land of your ancestors?
I am constantly amazed that Persians who suffered the full brunt of the psychopath Jihad sit and make excuses for this barbarity and its codified Arab dogma that calls itself Islam. No doubt, those naughty devious Persian ancestors of yours were 'asking for it'.
Wake up, for Zarathrusta's sake. Your people were ruthlessly assaulted by the same lunatic Jihadi impulse that is make itself known today. Craven cringing in the face of this mad doctrine makes it more bold. Your apologia for them is pathetic.
SeenathPersian
My last post was written in haste and may have been harsh on you. But the general point remains. I pray for the day that the Persians reclaim their culture and religion. Imagine the effect it could have on the entire house of Islamic cards. I can never understand how enlightened Persians or Hindus can ever give the slightest inch to the Jihadi philosophy.
SeenathePersian
I want to retract this sentence in my first post:
[Your apologia for them is pathetic]
Sorry. That is unfair and I apologise.
Kaffir boy,
My posting was not in defence of Arabs or Islamists, but about the recent history of my own nation and the relationship between the US and Iran, as wellas the context of the alleged animousity of early 80s. Very little of that hostility is left and the Iranian nation is, by all account, the most pro-western people in the Middle East. the rulers are, of course, a different story.
As for reclaiming the past, we never lost the Persian culture and it remained alive and well. In defence of my ancestors I should say that they always picked from the invading cultures what they thought was better than their own at the time: Arabic writing but not the Arabic language, the religion of Islam but not the Arab customs, etc. The fact is that Zoroastrianism was, at the time, as ruthless and corrupted as Islam is today. Iran of Sassanid was ruled by corrupt Zoroastrian clerics, who were brutally repressing every opposition, including massacres of Mazdakists and Manavists, Christians in Armenia etc, all well documented.
In response, the repressed Persian nation did not resist much the invading Arab army in 7th century, in the same way that it offered little resistence against the Alexander army 800 years before. In our culture, we never sacrificed ourselves for the rulers who were not worthy of defending. Our sense of nationalism never blinds us to the harsh realities. That's why many believe that an invading US army will also be welcomed by Iranians.
kaffir boy,
No reason for apologies. There was nothing offensive in your post and your points are valid and well taken. I was just trying to offer a different angle.
I didn't even think Chevy Chase was still alive...haven't heard anything from/about him for years...too bad it didn't stay that way.
I am watching O'Reilly on FNC right now. Chase said a lot worse about the POTUS. He called the Prez a "dumb f#&k".
I`m wondering if chevy took way to much pain medicine for his bad back
A PERSONAL MESSAGE FROM PYTHAGORAS:
Dear Chevy Chase,
Where did you get your information from? Do you truly, sincerely believe that President George Bush, Jr. is responsible for an Islamic jihad war being waged against the United States of America? If so, you are not alone. But you are disastrously misinformed, my dear entertainer-friend.
Since you (clearly) do not have your information straight, as is also the case of much of the world, I have provided some information below which I hope will enable you to make more accurate (and intelligent) statements in the future.
1-) The Ottoman Empire, seat of the Islamic caliphate at that time, attacked the United States in 1794 and 1801 (chiefly cargo ships in the Mediterranean with the American passengers on board being massacred and sometimes taken as slaves into North Africa). Here was a jihad pronounced by Islamic leaders over two centuries ago AGAINST THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Therefore, Islamic leaders do NOT require what western and Christian people believe to be provocation to attack. Islam CAN attack without any provocation at all on the part of those being attacked. That someone is non-Muslim is all the provocation Islamic militants require. Remember that in 1801 there was NO Israel, NO petroleum cartels, NO World Trade Center, NO Bush Dynasty.
2-)The current conflict between America and Islamic nations was begun after the first Gulf War by none other than Saddam Hussein. Mr. Hussein told the Arab media in 1991, the Americans "are going to be swimming in blood." So, from a chronological perspective you have not even a leg to stand your commenary on.
3-)The current Islamic jihad is GLOBAL. India for instance was the first target of al-Qaeda, which was founded in 1988 (In Pakistan) to attack and destry India with. America might well have been attacked for no other reason than this. After all, what are India's transgressions in the Middle East? Yet, it has faced a twelve centuries-long jihad with the Middle East. And Yugoslavia has had a similar conflict raging for at least eight centuries. Greece was attacked similarly and lost most of its territory. The Islamic march toward global subjugation (NOT DOMINATION---- WE MEAN SUBJUGATION!!!)might well have reactivated on its own devices. There is no need to blame Americans, or their current president.
Please get your facts together, Mr. Chase. Your attempt at a talk show some years did enough damage to your faltering image as it is without this.
Sincerely,
PYTHAGORAS.
Chevy Chase,Susan Sarandon,Tim Robbins,Alec Baldwin,Sean Penn,Leonardo di Caprio,Cameron Diaz,Barbra Streisand,Bruce Springsteen,Ben Afleck,Matt Damon,Julia Roberts,Michael Moore....
A dolphin is more intelligent than all these morons put together.
Instead of lecturing the american people about politics,environment,elections,animal rights,global warming,etc,they should try to make a decent movie,once in a while,for a change.
These drug adicts,alcoholics,uneducated,amoral idiots, push the socialist,left radical wing agenda,they glorify homosexuality,while trashing our cultural heritage,our religion,our history and our traditions.
They are biting the hand that feeds them, of more than 80%of the american people and by doing so,they are playing with fire....
The only movie i went to see lately,was "I am David",a beautiful story of a young boy that risks his life to find freedom...not accidentally,Jim Caviezel (Mel Gibson`s Christ)also played in this movie.
Everybody left the theatre with teary eyes,including myself.
It will probably be a long time until i`ll go see another movie,and it`s not going to be one that features any of the idiots that i mentioned before;my money will not go to those morons.
And if i had their e-mail adresses i would send them a message,to let them know how i feel.
I do enjoy the Christmas Vacation movie, but as in all the Vacation movies, chevy was upstaged by Randy Quaid as Eddy, he is the true star of those films...I notice that most of the so called stars (with the exception of Julia Roberts, who I absolutly cannot stand) who speak out against America are pretty well washed up and most likely looking for publicity. I will make every effort not to support the "stars" who speak out against America (although I am a huge RHPS fan and unfortunatly Susan Sarandon is in that film) One other that bothers me is Madonna...remember her comments not long ago wherein she demanded that Pres Bush INSTANTLY pull the troops out of Iraq (to which Jay Leno replied that Pres Bush was just waiting to hear what Britney Spears had to say on the matter before he made any decisions...lol) Madonna would be better off filling her days accepting that she is no longer 25 and practicing her fake British accent...the loudmouth-know nothing-hollywood windbags such as the ones mentioned are better off ignored...and unsupported by our money.
I almost cried reading this article. Is our country this blind and this hopeless? Keep up the good work Robert.
RevBenny
All the leftist political correctness, or as I call it Western self-hate.... is sinister.
A Conspiracy theory.... such as 9/11 was really done by the USA etc play strait into the hands of Jihad. Do the Western self-haters realise what they are doing.
The West where they are privileged to be educated enough to form an opinion and have a critical say and not be beheaded.
This self-loathing by people like Michael Moore and now Chevy Chase is so selfish,
No one likes war crimes or conspiracy… but tell me which side has more inclination and chance of taking it all to trial in the aftermath?
Surprise surprise...a muslim charged with the firebombing of a Jewish school in Montreal....and his father is begging for his freedom, wanting the court to "give him a harsh and difficult probation" even though this is absolutly a hate crime, he also left a letter threatening further terrorism against the school if Isreal did not stop the so called "occupation" ....wonder what old khalid would want against a person that firebombed a muslim school??? Thin he would accept the perpetrator only getting a "really difficult" probation...likely not, he would be screaming for a beheading.....this scumbags mother is also charged as an accesory, gee I sure hope she was veiled whilst helping her son commit this hate crime....the max penalty is 14 years...lets hope he gets the max, and a big tough amourous cell mate!
http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1103197300284&call_pageid=968332188492&col=968793972154&DPL=IvsNDS%2f7ChAX&tacodalogin=yes
Way OT, but please accept my apologies:
Attention AOL users:
You are being monitored. After 9 years, I cancelled my account. The problem seemed simple enough.. I wrote a "ditty" re: "the Night Before Christmas" and sent it to myself from my AOL master screen name, to another screen name on the same AOL account. The intent was to post it to both the Jihad and Dhimmi boards. When I switched screen names, I could see 2 unread email messages but was unable to view or open either one of them. Very strange.
I believe AOL is censoring mail. After a 23 minute call to AOL (which by the way was routed to India), I had to say "cancel my account" 10 times before they agreed to do so. They continued to insist that this was a technical problem, but I must say my inability to read email which is clearly in my mailbox has been a cause of concern for about the last 4 months. My son and my husband love AOL. I can do without it.
Not sure how many of us/you are AOL subscribers, but since accessing this site www.jihadwatch.org or www.dhimmiwatch.org, through AOL, each and every time I "sign off of AOL", my computer goes into a download mode with AOL with a "security update" message. I think I'm being monitored.
Mr. Spencer, I hope you get this, and if you do not, I hope that one/some of the readers will get this to you.
I fail to see the point of an ISP like AOL forcing downloads whenever I sign on to or off of this site, and wonder how many other kind users are unwittingly subjected to the same type of tracking.
Just Linda
SeenathePersian
Interesting Post! Am also sorry Mosaddeq was replaced by Shah - by now Iran could be very prosperous and happy. We don't deny our leaders make [and have made] mistakes and obviously this is one of them. A personal thing but much prefer name of PERSIA to Iran , one day maybe...
OT - But relevant
UK Action Alert: Bishop Richard Harries of Oxford
On this morning's 'Thought for the Day' on BBC Radio 4 (For those of you not in the UK - this is BBC Radio's flagship current affairs programme) the Bishop of Oxford saw fit to discuss the merits of Turkey joining the EU. With entirely predictable results.
According to him (wait for it) - It's the Christian thing to do! Apparently respect for the 'other' demands it. Oh yes and it would strike fear in the heart of Islamists as it will show them what Islam 'properly understood' really is. Besides, said the bishop, no disconnect whatsoever between Islam and European values.
It is especially the Islam 'properly understood' bit that got me. Besides this 'proper understanding' leading him to ludicrous positions on the effect of Islam on the West; it is just plain arrogance! What he is basically saying is: "I have seen Islam and it is fuzzy, warm and kind. Just like me in fact." No matter that those who study Islam all their lives come to totally different conclusions. I'll be the arbiter. Case closed.
The clincher was that he used Kemal Ataturk's magnanimous statement to mothers of dead allied soldiers after WW1(They are our sons...) as proof of how 'properly understood' Islam looks. No mention of the fact that Ataturk is the 'bogeyman' of the majority of those who claim to 'properly understand' Islam in Turkey.
People (especially those who should know better!) should not be allowed to get away with this kind of insipid nonsense anymore. They either need to be challenged or educated.
Please help me in doing the following:
* Write the Bishop a respectful letter challenging his position.
* Send him a copy of 'Islam unveiled'.
If you want to listen to what he said, you can follow this link (should be updated later today):
http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/programmes/thought/index.shtml
A written version will be added during the next few days, probably also to this own website.
Here is his contact details:
The Rt. Rev. Richard Harris
Bishop of Oxford
Diocesan Church House
North Hinksey
Oxford
Oxon
OX2 0NB
There is also a web form, here:
http://www.oxford.anglican.org/contact.php?PHPSESSID=05a10e9ea3dc559cd4ffa1f4bdd43849
(Select 'Bishop of Oxford')
Please keep letters short, to the point and above all respectful.
I've always wondered why celebreties insist on cutting their fan base in half by taking a political stand.
OT.
Catherine sent this in. It's a good idea.
FYI. Here's a way to help brighten wounded GI's spirits at Walter Reed.
Many of you have requested ways to help the returning wounded from Iraq. I'm sending a recent request received from Walter Reed Army Medical Center.
Bruce G. Nitsche
Veterans Liaison to the Secretary
Department of Veterans Affairs
The number ONE request at Walter Reed hospital is phone cards.
The government doesn't pay long distance phone charges and
these wounded soldiers are rationing their calls home.
Many will be there throughout the holidays.
Really support our troops --Send phone cards of any amount to:
Medical Family Assistance Center
Walter Reed Medical Center
6900 Georgia Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20307-5001
They say they need an "endless" supply of these -- any amount
is greatly appreciated.
Many of the discount warehouse stores such as Walmart, Costco, BJ's Wholesale, etc. have good prices on phone cards.
Please pass this request on to others.
WAR ON ISLAM = WAR ON TERROR
Another OT item, but..........................
After reading several post that referrenced Bosnia and Kosvo, a member e-mailed with this question:
Maybe we can answer it. The member is e-mailing from Europe and experienced some of the brutality from Muslims.
He has very legitiment questions. Don't take offense, just remember, he was on the recieving end of these policies and knew it was wrong at the time that we were bombing the Serbs.
---------------------------------------------------
some questions on US intelligence and policies on the
balkans
and I want answers form americans.
What happened ? Are your intelligence services mad? or fool? or idiot?
You
can not make the same mistake for years ! Something is wrong here. I
can not
understand the trend of US policies in the Balkans, why did you back
muslim
fighters and mujahedeens ?
I have no answers, and the answer of a site like emperors cloths is
astounding - the infer the US are making hidden policies and the battle
against terror is just a fake ... could that be true ?
if you have time, and I believe you are devoted to truth in those
matters,
pls dig into the emperors clothes materials over US policies on the
balkans
and toward Israel also ... they are well documented and if only a bit
of it
is true I don't know what to think ...
Yes, Chevy Chase is just another self-important Hollywood denizen.
For some odd reason, much as Leftist analysts insist we respect non-Westerners, they don't seem to think that anybody but America has an agenda, interests, and motivations for action of any kind. It's as if unless a white man speaks first, nobody else would do or think a thing! How racist can you get!
Yes, Robert, these people forget not only a long string of events; they also forget that they themselves decided to call the Islamofascists "fundamentalists" back in 1979 in order to make us Evangelicals look un-American. They forget as well that Islam has long been an actor rather than a re-actor (albeit not the only one in history) when it comes to war, terrorism, and political violence.
By the way, Report, we Chrstians do indeed follow the Old Testament. Maybe we don't think the civil or ceremonial laws of ancient Israel still apply (apart from the general equity thereof), but the Ten Commandments and the Love the Lord your God and Love your neighbor as yourself verses were in the books of Moses last time I looked; and neither Jesus nor the apostles had any compunction about quoting the Old Testament to substantiate an doctrinal or ethical point.
Old Testmant prophecies have taught us all to hope--and even our whole Western idea of progress, including Marx's linear view of history, ultimately was culled from the prophets via Augustine and the New Testament (Bertrand Russell once accused Marx of a cosmic optimism which only theism could justify--and I think Lord Russell was right). The Psalms gave taught us to prayand sing since apostolic times. The Proverbs and Ecclesiastes have taught us wisdom for just as long.
Also, I, for one, think if we dusted off the Old Testament penalty for theft--restituion with interest to the victim (it's in Exodus) rather than incarceration--we might do a lot to discourage a lot of petty crime.
I'll bet you thought Islam's hudud punishment of amputating the thief's hand was in the Old Testament rather than something inherited from Arabian tribal custom or invented by Islam itself. But it isn't in the Old Testament.
Deuteronomy 17's stricture on the king being subject to Torah was a favorite quote for those Westerners who opposed royal absolutism and advocated the political supremacy of law back in the 16th and 17th centuries; while the observation that wicked Nimrod was the first one called a king in Scripture (rather than Noah or Shem, who may have been alive at the time) was one of their other favorite texts quoted against people who declared kingship by primogeniture the only legitimate form of government. The same early constitutionalists made much hay out of David covenanting with the elders of Israel before he could take up rule, too (II Samuel 5). Ultimately, our Western costitutionalism rests on the Old Testament's ambiguous attitude towards earthly power-holders.
I do get tired of people who know the OT only second-hand, and usually from professional disparagers at that, declaring it "inferior". For this Christian, it remains four-fifths of the Bible (much as I love the New Testament, too); and some marvellous literature to boot.
Since it's Friday night here in Far Formosa, I wish all "Saturday people" a happy commemoration of God's resting from creating all things. Since Sunday's following that, I wish all "Sunday people" a joyous commemoration of Jesus' resurrection (and in so doing, I confess as well his death on the cross for our sins--another reason why I can't believe the Qu'ran).
As for me, I'm taking this Friday night to have a stroll, some late night snack (a fine Taiwan custom), and maybe wrap myself around a book).
This is one of the best articles I could find on the subject in the question raised above:
http://www.balkanpeace.org/hed/archive/july02/hed5089.shtml
antiwar.com, July 11, 2002
"Srebrenica" - Code Word to Silence Critics of US Policy in the Balkans ANTIWAR
by Stella L. Jatras, Special to Antiwar.com
The Bosnian Serb military stand accused of committing some of the worst human rights crimes since World War II during and following the battle for Srebrenica in 1995. HOLOCAUST! GENOCIDE! ETHNIC CLEANSING! Claims of 7,000 (or 8,000, or 10,000, or whatever figure is needed to elicit the desired response) Muslim men and boys slaughtered and Dutch troops accused of failing to stop the slaughter! Five year later the allegations not only persist, but are accepted as fact by a compliant and unquestioning media. Yet in five years fewer than 2000 bodies have been discovered in an area where war raged for four years and even those bodies have not been identified as Muslim or Serb, nor how they died.
Why then has there been a flurry of articles in recent days regarding the alleged massacre of thousands of Bosnian Muslim fighters that occurred over five years ago? Articles such as, "Holbrooke Mourns Srebrenica, urges Reconciliation," (Reuters, 11 July); "The Battle of Srebrenica Is Now Over the Truth," by David Rohde (New York Times, 9 July) and "Harrowing pilgrimage for Srebrenica Muslims," by Rory Carroll (Guardian [London] 12 July), are all spewing their anti-Serb bias.
The Code word is "Srebrenica." Srebrenica equates to holocaust. Srebrenica equates to genocide. Srebrenica equates to ethnic cleansing. And because claims of mass graves and genocide in Kosovo are being discredited, what better way to continue to demonize the Serbs than for the American people to be reminded of Srebrenica? After all, there is still the unfinished business of dismembering Yugoslavia by amputating Montenegro, Sanjak and Vojvodina. The New World Order beast will not be satisfied until its belly is full and that requires the American people to accept NATO´s next intervention in the Balkans; however, the American people must again be prepared mentally to accept more military action just as they accepted 78-days of dropping bombs on an innocent people. They have to be conditioned to say once again, "After all, the Serbs deserve it!"
During his visit to Washington, D.C. to attend a Congressional briefing in the office of Congressman Dennis Kucinich of Ohio on 19 July, I had a chance to speak with former Canadian Ambassador to Yugoslavia, James Bissett, who has been openly critical of his country´s participation in the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia. Last year, he received a phone call from three Dutch military historians who wanted to meet with him to talk about Srebrenica. Ambassador Bissett informed them that he had not been at Srebrenica and could not, therefore, speak as an eyewitness on the subject. However, because of his broad knowledge of the area and the circumstances of the Bosnian War, the Dutch historians still wanted to meet with him. Among other topics, they spoke about Nasir Oric, the dreaded Muslim commander in Srebrenica who had mounted commando raids against surrounding Serbian villages whose remaining population were mainly elderly Serbs, many in their 80s, who refused to leave their homes. Even these poor souls were not spared, but were slaughtered by having their throats slit. Bill Schiller wrote of Oric in the Toronto Star, 16 July 1995, "On a cold and snowy night, I sat in his living room watching a shocking video version of what might had been called Nasir Oric´s Greatest Hits. There were burning houses, dead bodies, severed heads, and people fleeing. Oric grinned throughout admiring his handiwork. ´We ambushed them,´ he said when a number of dead Serbs appeared on the screen. The next sequence of dead bodies had been done in by explosives: ´We launched those guys to the moon,´ he boasted. When a footage of a bullet-marked ghost town appeared without any visible bodies, Oric hastened to announce: ´We killed 114 Serbs there.´ Later there were celebrations, with singers with wobbly voices chanting his praises."
The three Dutch military historians and Ambassador Bissett recalled that Serbian General Radko Mladic has protested the misuse of the so-called "safe haven" of Srebrenica by Oric and warned that continued attacks on surrounding villages would bring a response from the Serbian forces. Forewarned, Oric had pulled his armed troops, including Mujahedin soldiers who had been imported from many of the Islamic countries, out of Srebrenica three days before the final push began. According to the Ambassador, when Serbian General Mladic entered Srebrenica, he entered a city that was mostly devoid of its fighting men. Accused of attacking a "safe haven" by the media and Muslim propaganda, the Serbs were even vilified for putting refugees, mostly women and children, from Srebrenica on buses and sending them to Muslim-held territory. The tragic scenes of the refugees were shown over and over again on TV; yet within a few days, the refugees were seen eating fruit, smoking cigarettes, washing clothes and being housed - thanks to the UN. The Bosnian government refused to provide humanitarian assistance for its own people, preferring that the world see a suffering Muslim population as part of their propaganda ploy.
Tim Butcher of the Daily Telegraph, London (24 July 1995), wrote regarding Srebrenica, "After five days of interviews the United Nations chief investigator into alleged human rights abuses during the fall of Srebrenica has not found any firsthand witnesses of atrocities."
An International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) report, document #37, dated September 13, 1995 states: "Approximately 5,000 Srebrenica Muslim troops left the enclave prior to its fall. The Muslim government has admitted that these men were reassigned to other units of its armed forces. The fact that family members were not informed of it was justified by the obligation to keep it a military secret." The ICRC further reported that there were indications that sporadic clashes broke out between the Muslim soldiers who wanted to stay and fight and other soldiers and civilians who wanted to flee. In some cases, the names of "missing" soldiers are listed as many as two and three times. As previously stated, approximately fewer than 2,000 bodies have been found in graves. Considering that the civil war in Bosnia had lasted over four years, this could not exactly be called a "genocide" when compared to other massacres taking place all over the world such as in Sierra Leone, Rwanda, Zimbabwe, and the Indonesia.
A representative in the Bosnian and Federal Parliaments, Ibran Mustafic, gave an explosive interview on Aug. 15, 1996, to Slobodna Bosnia ("Free Bosnia," A Sarajevo newspaper). Mustafic was quoted as saying that the betrayal of Srebrenica "was consciously prepared and that the Bosnian president and the army command were involved in this business," and that was to sacrifice Srebrenica in order to gain the sympathy of the West. Of his internment in a Serbian jail, he writes, "I should have died. They [the Bosnian Muslim authorities] don´t appreciate living people. They appreciate the dead because they cannot talk."
Of course we must not overlook Pulitzer Prize winner David Rohde, who was given a 15-day sentence for entering into Serbian territory with forged documents. He should thank his lucky stars that he was not captured by Muslim fighters or he would have been just another dead journalist, as was ABC´s producer David Kaplan, who, according to Yossef Bodansky ("Offensive in the Balkans") was out of range of Serbian forces when he was killed. Regardless, Kaplan´s death was blamed on the Serbs. And what earned Mr. Rohde his coveted award? It was based merely on the discovery of "a pair of glasses, a walking stick and a putrefying leg sticking out of the ground," according to his book, "End Game," in an area where men had fought for over three years. Some genocide!
The mind set of U.S. officials who were in charge of "peacekeeping" efforts might best be understood by considering the view of our current U.N. Ambassador, Richard Holbrooke, who spoke of "The 1995 massacre of thousands of Bosnians Moslems in the U.N.-proclaimed ´safe area´ of Srebrenica." (Holbrooke mourns Srebrenica, urges reconciliation, Reuters, July 11). Mr. Holbrooke fails to mention that the so-called "safe area," which was supposed to be demilitarized, was used by the Bosnian Muslims as a staging area to attack surrounding Serbian villages.
The same diplomat, Mr. Holbrooke, said during an interview with Ted Koppel on November 6, 1995 (New Yorker), "The Vietcong were dedicated ideologues, committed to a long-term struggle. These guys [the Serbs] aren´t ideologues; they´re just murderous assholes." [Those are not my offensive words, but the words coming from the bigoted and racist mouth of our well-seasoned US diplomat who represents us at the UN!). Mr. Holbrooke praised the communist Vietcong, who killed over 58,000 Americans and denigrated the brave Serbian people who fought, suffered and sacrificed as our Allies during two world wars.
Yasushi Akashi, former UN Representative in Bosnia, admitted in the Washington Times of 1 November 1995, that "it is a fact that the Bosnian government forces have used the ´safe areas´ of not only Srebrenica, but Sarajevo, Tuzla, Bihac, Gorazde for training, recuperation and refurbishing their troops." In other words, the so-called safe areas were used as military posts to train Mujahedin fighters from Afghanistan, Iran, Syria, Turkey and the entire Islamic world, free to commit their treachery by attacking Serbian villages and returning like thieves in the night back to the safety of their UN protectors who conveniently looked the other way to these violations. Prior to the events at Srebrenica, these "Holy Warriors of Islam" had attacked 42 surrounding Serbian villages and over 3,000 Serbian villagers had been slaughtered without fear of being reprimanded or punished by the UN Yet, when Serbs were provoked to retaliate against these Muslim assaults from these so-called "safe-areas," they were condemned by the entire world.
Further proof of the violations of proclaimed "safe areas" by Bosnian Muslim forces was provided by Lt. Gen. Sir Michael Rose, former UNPROFOR commander who stated that Muslims "shoot on the Serbs to step up the pressure and to obtain a fresh intervention from NATO."
Yossef Bodansky, Staff Director for the Republican Task Force on Terrorism & Unconventional Warfare, US House of Representatives, writes in his book, "Offensive in the Balkans" that "The UN concluded that a special group of Bosnian Muslim forces, many of whom had served with Islamic terrorist organizations, committed a series of atrocities, including ´some of the worst recent killings,´ against Bosnian Muslim civilians in Sarajevo [another designated "safe area"] as a propaganda ploy to win world sympathy and military intervention. These attacks escalated into premeditated attacks and atrocities committed against Bosnian Serb civilians trying to flee contested areas." Furthermore, Michael Evans and Michael Kallenbach write in the Times (1995), "Thousands of ´missing´ Bosnian Muslim soldiers from Srebrenica who have been at the centre of reports of possible mass executions by the Serbs, are believed to be safe in the northeast of Tuzla." The question that no one seemed to ask was what were armed Muslim troops doing in an area that was supposed to be a demilitarized zone. Instead, the American media bombarded us with images of then US Ambassador to the United Nations, Madeleine Albright in August 1995, as she frantically waved the satellite photo over her head of the plowed field that was the alleged mass grave of 7,000 Muslim men. Proof positive! she claimed, of those who had been slaughtered and whose bodies were lying there only waiting to be exhumed.
While the world´s attention was deliberately focused on Srebrenica by such theatrical antics by Madeleine Albright, real ethnic cleansing of Serbs was taking place in the Krajina where, in August of 1995, over 250,000 were being driven from their ancestral homes, thousands slaughtered, and those too old or infirm to flee, remained only to have their throats slit. Approximately 650,000 Serbs have been driven out of Croatia since 1992 with little prospect of ever returning. It was US military aid and technology that made it possible for Croatian forces to conduct "Operation Storm" in order to achieve their goal of a pure Croatian state that Hitler could only promise. There was no outrage from Congress when Croatian jets bombed and strafed Serbian refugee columns. No outrage to what Charles Krauthammer described in Newsweek (April 5, 1999) as "the largest ethnic cleansing of the entire Balkan wars. Investigators with the war-crimes tribunal in the Hague have concluded that this campaign was carried out with brutality, wanton murder and indiscriminate shelling of civilians.... No denunciation. No sanctions. No bombing. No indignant speeches about ethnic cleansing and the slaughter of innocents. In fact, in justifying the current bombing of Serbia, Clinton made an indirect reference to this Croatian campaign when he credited the ´courageous people in Bosnia and in Croatia´ who ´fought back´ against the Serbs and ´helped to end the war.´ Indeed, they did. Croatia´s savage ethnic cleansing so demoralized the Serbs that they soon agreed to sign the Dayton peace accord of 1995." But where were the media when all this was happening?
"As the media diverted themselves with satellite photos, the fate of the Serbs from Krajina is being forgotten. The search for mass graves was stepped up last autumn. Journalists from all over the world came to Bosnia to look for bodies. Crews from CNN, CBS, BBC, France II, TG1 (Italy), Dutch Television and from elsewhere arrived in August 1996. But they found very little. Some crews did not bother at all to find the soccer field from the satellite photo, because the journalists had already come to believe that there was no mass grave there anyway. However, it was not reported. Moreover, the said photo is being used as alleged evidence of the existence of a mass grave in many articles even today." ("Missing Evidence," by Linda Ryan, Nova, Frankfurt o/m, March-April, 1996).
So why, after five years of unsuccessful efforts to turn the casualties of a tragic civil war, one less bloody than numerous conflicts around the world, into claims of holocaust and genocide, is the specter of Srebrenica being raised again? The answer is that this is an attempt to intimidate and silence the "revisionists" who are questioning our failed foreign policy in the Balkans, a policy based on lies about atrocities in Bosnia and Kosovo and executed in violations of international law, the NATO treaty and the US Constitution.
SUSAN_B
Read the Auster article under the title "Kosovo Disaster" for additional perspective, i.e., his "zero sum" observations of the conflict until upset by the Clinton adminstration's actions.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=16266
Actually, there is a film out there I'd highly recommend that stars Alec Baldwin, Sean Penn, Susan Sarandon, Matt Damon, Martin Sheen, Tim Robbins, and Michael Moore. Team America, World Police.
"A-me-e-erica, A-me-e-erica, AMERICA, F--K YEAH!"