Jihad Watch Vice President Hugh Fitzgerald reflects on recent Muslim complaints that they are unfairly suspected and discriminated against: "We Muslims living in America are getting sick of this crap."
There is no Muslim contribution to the American polity, not to the entire edifice of the American political system. The Shari'a flatly contradicts, in every way, the American Constitution. The economic views encouraged by Islam -- a combination of relying on booty from the conquered Unbelievers (attacked purely for that booty, beginning with the inoffensive Jewish farmers of the Khaybar Oasis), and on jizyah (or disguised "jizyah" as in the Bumiputra system in Malaysia, or the way in which non-oil Muslim states such as Egypt have managed to extract from the endlessly naive Western world tens of billions of dollars in Infidel aid, repaid not with gratitude but with ratcheting up the level of hate), and with a heavy dose of inshallah-fatalism, is completely the opposite of American notions of self-reliance, individual effort and achievement.In social matters, Islam is as absurdly reactionary -- "honor" killings, the oppression of women, the Total Reliance on the Authority of Books Concocted between the 7th and 9th centuries (Qur'an, Hadith, and Sira) possibly in Arabia, possibly to its north, in present-day Iraq, Syria, or Jordan. which, as an ideal to be encouraged, even if it is hardly the whole story -- as it is possible to be. That some people who claim to be Muslims still function in the modern world is a tribute only to their ability to ignore much of Islam.
In intellectual matters, no sculpture, no painting of living creatures save for Mughal miniatures, that were despite, not because, of Islam, no music (hence the attacks in Algeria on those singers of Rai), no real science (weapons technology -- ah, that's a different thing).
And yet this primitive system, simply by dint of the utter foolishness, sentimentality, mental laziness, and above all ingratitude of the inhabitants of the Western world for what they have inherited as a civilizational legacy, could by force of numbers -- sheer overbreeding -- and Da’wa appeals to the psychically and economically marginal (always ready to try on anything that may Explain The Universe and Get Back at The System) -– conceivably prevail.
Look at how, in the last two days, all sorts of newspapers have fallen all over themselves with pictures of Muslims sweetly celebrated the Eid al-Adha -- in North Dakota, for god's sake, not to mention elsewhere. The word seems to have gone out to the American press: Make Islam Look Good.
And since what is Bad about Islam are the actual tenets, and those, assimilated into the brain, cannot be shown in pictures -- though the murderous results of Islamic beliefs, and the results, too, of Islamic practices over 1400 years, can be seen in the reduction of ancient Mesopotamia, and its once-entirely non-Muslim population to what is now an almost entirely Muslim population -- like what you see? would you like America or Europe to turn into that, over time? it won't take 1400 years, but less than a century to throw out all of Western civilization because "we all want the same thing" and "we all share the faith of Abraham, Sarah, and Hagar" and...oh good god, fill in the rest of the nonsense yourself, culled from the paper, or some idiotic NPR news program, or something on the Lord Haw Haw broadcasts from the BBC, where the likes of Judy Swallow or Robin Lustig, marionetted from above by the sinister John Simpson (#3 at Bush House), have created a special BBC house blend of anti-Americanism, antisemitism, and therefore, of course, islamophilia, that has by degrees helped to mentally disarm tens of millions of listeners.
No, it is we Infidels who are getting "sick of this crap."
No, it is we Infidels who are getting "sick of this crap."
You got that right.
Bravo Hugh!
OT
Here is a good example of muslim denial
Manslaughter charge over thief's death
http://www.expatica.com/source/site_article.asp?subchannel_id=19&story_id=15965&name=Manslaughter+charge+over+thief's+death
Motorist denies killing thief on purpose
http://www.expatica.com/source/site_article.asp?subchannel_id=19&story_id=15909&name=Motorist+denies+killing+thief+on+purpose+
ot
Bag thief death fans Dutch racial tensions
http://www.swisspolitics.org/en/news/index.php?section=int&page=news_inhalt&news_id=5484956
If you are so sick of it than blame the human debris responsible for it, not the ones who are grieving and upset at the loss.
Get real.
I absolutely concurr with this article, and the article published by Mr. Spencer regarding CAIR strong arming FOX.
Well said. The question is, how to educate enough of those who are not members of the choir.
"We Muslims living in America are getting sick of this crap "
Yeah, and if we don't stop, what, you'll slaughter us like chickens?
We will not be forced to ignore the hemorrhaging truth of Islaam for political correctness or because you can't handle the heat in our kitchen.
As long as innocent human beings are routinely slaughtered by adherents of your 'religion of peace' there will be someone with the guts to speak out.
In the future when America has finally 'had it,' set aflame with hatred and loathing of Muslim bloodshed, and no longer willing to separate the wheat from the chaff you will be sorry you didn't make your voice heard loud and clear ...
In regards to "auld aunt beeb" (aka The BBC)... someone in the UK should set up a BBC Watch website. The average Brit needs to be educated how far the bias of the BBC actually goes. Apart from that another excellent posting by our friend Hugh. My compliments.
And when the killer or killers turn out to be Muslim and motivated by Islam, then what will the media say?
Oh, I know know what you'd say Mr. Fitzgerald:
Aww, wait. That's the wrong Fitzgerald.
I could actually feel my blood pressure rising when I read the quote, "We Muslims living in America are getting sick of this crap." My heart bleeds, pal. Especially in comparison to the little girls so brutally slaughtered, and their parents.
Re BBCWatch -- Trevor Asserson in England is already conducting a kind of BBC monitoring service, and has produced excellent papers which can be found on-line. Google his name. Of course the BBC does nothing.
It is partly a generational thing. The people running the place are Guardian readers, or perhaps a few read The Independent. They do not know history, especially the history of the Middle East. What is worse, they do not think they have anything to learn.
Listen to their self-assured, idiotic voices. Listen to Judy Swallow. Now compare that voice, and the kind of mind she has, with -- let us say -- an announcer for Gaumont News from, say, 1947. There was a lot to be said for limiting BBC hirings to a small group.
The accents, the language of the BBC speakers and speakerines, is excruciating.
Of course, someone or some group is calling the shots. I have mentioned, and will continue to mention, John Simpson, who is the head of the BBC World Service (reputedly run by the Foreign Office, or at least dancing to its tune). A close friend of Peter Hounam, who has a -- how shall I put this --- a "thing" about Israel, as his absurd conspiracy theory book about the Israeli attack on the U.S.S. Liberty (favorite topoic of antisemites in the U.S. as well -- you know, those pilots, on a windless day, should have been able to figure out, in the heat of battle, the ship's flag was American. And those silly cockpit tapes that recorded the pilots' conversations, and showed clearly their mistake, which were finally released? Oh, those mean nothing to the Peter Hounams, John Simpsons, and James Bamfords of this world). Google "John Simpson" and "Peter Hounam" and see what the former is all about. And he's the man in charge of the BBC World Service.
So let Asserson do his stuff. And another resident of England (hard by Trumpington, like Chaucer's miller, I believe), the acute Vladimir Bukovsky, tried a few years ago to get a campaign going to stop forced payments for television licenses that support the BBC. Bukovsky, who knows about propaganda, found the BBC absolutely intolerable.
Bring back Huw Weldon. Michael Grade -- remember Potter's famous speech about "Occupyiing Powers." Islam, and its vast army of apologists, are now occupying much of the Western world. They have crept into positions of power. They are helping to create the reading lists for American generals. They have scared politicians who know better to make public pronouncements on the wonderfulness of Islam, and its "moderate" face -- as compared to that handful of presumably "immoderate" Muslims.
Hey, hey, ho, ho, ho,
The BBC -- in its present form -- has got to go.
Sorry. These kind of couplets for simple-minded chanters are not in my line, and I had to borrow one from the enemy camp. Damn the scansion, and full speed ahead.
Well if they're so "sick of this crap", why the hell don't they pack up their filthy Qur'ans and leave!
I hope Ted Kennedy is happy with his third world immigration policy and what it is doing to America. But since he lives in an ivory tower, protected from the inconveniences and perils that average Americans must endure every day, I'm sure he hasn't even noticed and probably never will. I would like for him to spend a week in Dearborn on the periphery of a muslim ghetto, with no bodyguards, no booze, in a Motel 6.
I want him to enjoy the sights, stench, and cacophony emanating from the third-world, muslim slums that have consumed this once civilized, quiet area in Michigan. Maybe he would even have the thrill of watching a poor animal die in agony as it is slaughtered in the most inhumane and painful way, just like muslims slaughter people. I guess meat isn't tasty unless the animal writhes in agony by slowly bleeding to death.
These filthy barbarians do not deserve to live here, but they're still coming and there appears to be no end to it.
We must do something to stop this insanity before we end up like Europe. The brutal murders of the Copts in New Jersey has yet to be mentioned on the MSM, at least I haven't heard it. Why? Why do they protect savages?
Bad Muslim, saying "crap"......How unholy. The liberal media can try to protect these beasts of burden all they like. It's not working. Most people these days are gathering their news from the Internet anyway, as it is available to them all day and all night, even while they're at work.
The left wing media can split their time between protecting these heels, and wondering why their market share ratings are on a continual decline.
The rat is out of the sewer, is exposed, and far outnumbered.
There's one thing I don't get, Hugh... you may be right in saying that it's a generational thing but I guess it's more than that. When did being PC start to be fashionable in the UK?
I don't remember (I was born in 1966) Enoch Powell's "Rivers of blood" speeches but that was more or less the last speech he made. Some people may say he had a racist agenda but I don't believe he did.
Powell made these speeches in the late 1960s but Britain was already PC back then. When and why did the majority of intellectuals in the US stop reading The Times and The Daily Telegraph? Why did they start reading the Guardian - I remember the first issues of the Independent so this one's a rather new paper.
I've yet to understand why it's so fashionable (especially to young people) to be leftist whereas being conservative (in the most positive sense of the word) puts you in the same bracket as Adolf Hitler (at least over here in Germany).
Read "UK" instead of "US"!
Is Islam on trial, or is a killer on trial?
Well, Mr.Shedeed, it IS f***ing time to put Islam on trial. Otherwise, you will keep brainwashing Muslims into killing us. And thank you, we're not interested.
It is time to address the parts of Koran that teach hatred, violence, and deceit against non-Muslims, instead of saying, "Oh, that's not what Islam is about. Don't be biased, don't be intolerant, and hateful, and bigoted" And then you go back to your mosque, and tell your people to hate, deceive, and kill us. F*** that.
We will judge your actions, and we will judge your beliefs. We will judge your death-cult religion, as long as people are killed in the name of Allah. And as long as you try to shift the focus from the actual problem, we will be after your politically correct, lying, blood-thursty ass. We will give you enough crap, as you say, to consider moving the hell out of this country, whose freedoms you take advantage of, but don't respect. We will do that, so we and our children can be free from your barbaric nonsense and violence.
I'm waiting for a "Quran burning" protest to see exactly how tolerant those self-professed tolerant Muslims are,I'd even throw in some bacon strips for a grease-fire to really make-em go up in flames.
I saw a protest by Muslims where they spit on Police and burned a Bible and a small Israeli flag,this was in Ottawa Canada where CAIR has a office,they stayed mute on the issue as usual.
Well lets see, I just spent quite some time commenting, previewed some and couldn't post as the post button doesn't appear. Gee this really sucks.
Rebuted Hughs lies about the attack on the Liberty. The flags were clearly visable, the wind was strong enough, etc. Hugh, you just can'd believe the Isrealis would lie do you?
You need to read 'Assault on the Liberty' by James M. Ennes, Jr. Ivy Books, New York. 1979.
See pages 56 to 61 and pages 180 to 181.
Well lets see, I just spent quite some time commenting, previewed some and couldn't post as the post button doesn't appear. Gee this really sucks.
Rebuted Hughs lies about the attack on the Liberty. The flags were clearly visable, the wind was strong enough, etc. Hugh, you just can'd believe the Isrealis would lie do you?
You need to read 'Assault on the Liberty' by James M. Ennes, Jr. Ivy Books, New York. 1979.
See pages 56 to 61 and pages 180 to 181.
Well lets see, I just spent quite some time commenting, previewed some and couldn't post as the post button doesn't appear. Gee this really sucks.
Rebuted Hughs lies about the attack on the Liberty. The flags were clearly visable, the wind was strong enough, etc. Hugh, you just can'd believe the Isrealis would lie do you?
You need to read 'Assault on the Liberty' by James M. Ennes, Jr. Ivy Books, New York. 1979.
See pages 56 to 61 and pages 180 to 181.
Well lets see, I just spent quite some time commenting, previewed some and couldn't post as the post button doesn't appear. Gee this really sucks.
Rebuted Hughs lies about the attack on the Liberty. The flags were clearly visable, the wind was strong enough, etc. Hugh, you just can'd believe the Isrealis would lie do you?
You need to read 'Assault on the Liberty' by James M. Ennes, Jr. Ivy Books, New York. 1979.
See pages 56 to 61 and pages 180 to 181.
Well lets see, I just spent quite some time commenting, previewed some and couldn't post as the post button doesn't appear. Gee this really sucks.
Rebuted Hughs lies about the attack on the Liberty. The flags were clearly visable, the wind was strong enough, etc. Hugh, you just can'd believe the Isrealis would lie do you?
You need to read 'Assault on the Liberty' by James M. Ennes, Jr. Ivy Books, New York. 1979.
See pages 56 to 61 and pages 180 to 181.
What the heck does the USS Liberty have to do with this subject? Blame ex-President Johnson if you have a burning need to affix some - that ship should not have been in the war zone.
Regardless, that is SO far from the topic at hand that there is only one logical conclusion, namely that you are an inveterate anti-Semite.
You sound just like a dissimulating Muslim. Don't look for sympathy here.