Iran Attempts to Pull Plug on Web Dissidents

Could the Internet bring down the mullahocracy? The mullahs are trying to make sure there's plenty of harm in trying. And note well: these guys were the "children of the revolution." From the LA Times, with thanks to Anthony:

After toiling for years to silence dissent within the Iranian republic, the mullahs have turned their war against free press to the last reserve of open political debate: the Internet. Since the summer, Iran's Web loggers, or bloggers, and online journalists have been demonized as CIA collaborators, their work whitewashed from many Iranian computers with filters....

"They suddenly felt that we were using the Internet as an alternative to the papers they'd shut down," said Hossein Derakhshan, a 28-year-old Iranian pioneer who took the groundbreaking step of publishing online instructions in Persian to teach Iranians how to post Web logs. He moved to Toronto five years ago with his wife, a Canadian citizen. "Blogs are the only uncontrolled and totally free medium, so they have the potential to attract many people, even people who are apathetic."

The arrest of online journalists and bloggers began last fall. The writers say they were tortured and forced to publicly denounce their work. Even technicians who worked on Web pages have been imprisoned. President Khatami has ordered an investigation into the reports of torture.

"They think that now that they've closed the papers they should concentrate on the Web logs," said Ali Mazroui, Hanif's father and a former reformist lawmaker. "They think if they close this new source of information, they'll have control."...

Another Internet writer, who agreed to an interview shortly after his release on the condition that neither his name nor any revealing details be given, said he'd been interrogated mercilessly, beaten and held in solitary confinement until he became suicidal.

Remembering it, his features twisted together, and his eyes brimmed with tears that soon spilled over....

"We were the children of the revolution," he said. "We weren't asking for radical change. We wanted to work within the system."

| 4 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

4 Comments

I think that a lot of Muslims believe naively that they can change these Islamic systems.

To suggest change - many times is to become shut out.

I think these reformist Muslims do not understand - how much the Mullahs and Islamic officials are trying to protect. These reformists are innocently trying to reform things – but the Islamic establishments are desperately trying to hold things together – that is why you will have this conflict.*

Like the Russian or the French revolutionists - at first - were all calling for reform - in the way of peaceful protest and comment - it only turned into the revolutions that they did, because these ideas of freedoms and the people who held them were so violently suppressed.

Islamic Governments are making these same mistakes. The problem that I see is that unlike the French and Russian Revolutions - were the people remained either Russian or French citizens - after this Islamic revolution, which appears inevitable - will these Islamic reformist want to remain under the same religion - will they wish to continue to be Muslim.

Blog This

*The question to the reformers should be what are the Islamic establishments so worried about – what are they trying to keep the people away from or hide from their people?

In truth the very authenticity of the Islam is at stake!

Silencing people is necessary for the religion’s survival.

Islam’s origins are just one angle – which the religion is feeling the pressure of a more educated and freer thinking world.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubal

What was all that fuss in Iran about with Salman Rushdie?

The Mad Mullahs of Iran to stone 13 year-old girl to death.

This is an enlightened religion, yes?

See my recent post over at Roger L. Simon's containing this essay and several others:

RLS Link Here

Site Meter