Welcome, Counterpunch readers!

We're getting a lot of referrals from Shahid Alam's sleazy Counterpunch piece in which he slanders Jihad Watch, LGF and other sites as "hate sites."

Welcome, friends!

To make it easier for you, here are my comments on Shahid Alam's first piece, and here is my response to the piece in Counterpunch that brought you here.

Make yourselves at home. Read some of the other articles. Get back to me with any questions: director@jihadwatch.org.

Cordially,
Robert Spencer

| 31 Comments
Print | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

31 Comments

Mr. Spencer:

You see? Even bad publicity is better than no publicity. The more the Islamists fulminate against you and mention you and your site by name, the more chances you have to make your case to a new audience.

Making Mr. Shahid so angry that he castigates you by name and mentions your site is a master stroke. Let's hope that other Islamists are as "generous", shall we say, with their "praise".

Keep up the good work!

Professor Shahid Alam,

Please know that your article would in a healthy America be both allowed, which it is but ALSO rejected by most, if not all free-thinking people of good will and conscious. But America is being undermined by people just like you such that we cannot hope that your deadly poison will go away, rather it can only grow and become more destructive as time goes by.

In just a few short years, the crazy views you assert have become all but mainstream in America and Europe as greater numbers of Moslems pour into Western societies. You and the many like you are dangerous and in a position to spread the view that you share with many in the Islamic world which has brought much destruction to so many-- that is the objective, isn't it?

You can create myths and fables as well as delusional comparisons using metaphorical language designed to compare Moslem mass murders to our own historical figures. But the reality is that you are a product of the culture you are promoting, you cannot be expected to see what the belief system you are stealthy spreading really is because you are not exceptional, you are in fact very typical of what one can expect from the Moslem intellectual community and that is indeed a shame. When debate gets too hot, Islamic intellectuals and the rest cry "Hate" and "Islamophobia"!

There can never be a compatible version of Islam to the West because most of Islam's adherents are not capable of genuine intellectual objectivity or rigor and prefer rather to acclimate the West to slowly accept Islam as is, not bring human rights or justice to a supremely intolerant religion.

Many Moslems leaders choose instead to create, fabricate and manipulate, apparently a cultural trait-- all with the long term object to steal what it is that does not belong to them, that includes history itself.

They create fantastic stories such as Moslems came with Columbus to America, or early Indian tribes were Moslem influenced or Islamic Spain was an Islamic paradise, and believe the lies.

After Arabs voluntarily fled Israel almost on the day of its founding, it took some time, but the world was conditioned and made to accept the new "palestinian" people created to justify the endless violence of the jihad whose objective of course is the extermination of the Jews and the insertion of an Islamic state in the place of their historic homeland which predates Islam my thousands of years.

And the Europeans think their Moslem partners in the new Euro-Arab entity known as Eurabia can long be accomplices to the charade that multicultural thinkers have flim-flamed the citizens of post-Christian Europe to believe, that Moslems can emigrate to Europe and co-exist peacefully with their non-Moslem fellow citizens (they are sheeps to the slaughter and they don't seem to be aware of this despite the abundance of clues), please show me evidence of where this has ever worked and don't say Al- Andalus, I'm not a dhimmi yet.

All the while their Arab "brothers" looked the other way rather than accept these people as refugees, war and death preferable to joining the ranks of the human race as decent equals, not imperial conquerors hell bent on world domination.

Yet, you are called a "professor" and employed by Northeastern University and Islam is unbelievably accepted as the "Religion of Peace". Adolf Hitler said it best, "The bigger the lie, the more people will believe it."

I dare ask, how does it feel to be a fraud, a charlatan whose true feelings must be hidden as you go through life an operative to a fascist ideology whose world-wide acceptance defies logic, whose roots are drenched in blood and injustice and deception and whose legions have created a bloody world? Europe as well certainly is headed towards enslavement, starting with France, in the quest for a revival of a medieval Islamic empire. This is your great hope I would imagine.

You "Professor" Alam, should examine your conscious, but that exercise would only reinforce what you believe, that Islam has the right to enslave (to you enlighten) and convert by force all who do not abide by its more hateful, contents.

You are again a product of your civilization, you are not the exceptional, genuinely intellectual scholar and disciple of truth and knowledge as sadly few other courageous Moslems have demonstrated by HONESTLY looking at Islam.

The standard expectation that many have of Moslems is that most act in the spirit of jihad even if not engaging in acts to directly overthrow non-Moslem governments. You would agree that many would not lift a finger to prevent those acts that are committed in the name of Islam almost daily.

You partially fit that category by being a deceptive agent of corruption, BUT masquerading as teacher of knowledge. There is much for you to be ashamed of here and more for us to fear.

I hope you have what we call an epiphany as only Moslems themselves can begin to attempt to re-route Islam from the course which is taking all the world towards the abyss.

We have some extremely intelligent and articulate authors here who do not stoop to anything like the level of the professor above who displays little but the vileness and ignorance of an uneducated peasant. Truely, in the marketplace of ideas, the professor's work belongs in the day-old fruit bin. And the professor himslef, if I may indulge a literary leaning, would look better in what John Gay calls a "Newgate Garland."

As for Robert Spencer and crew, good on ya! Some time soon the whole of the foul rag and bone shop that is islam and its toadies too, will be seen as a pig that's worn off its lipstick, if I may be forgiven for mixing up my metaphors. No? Well, send me to an Islamic country and cut off my head, cause I don't care: The professor is a Islamo/Nazi--

Hi, Counterpunch readers. :)

Please don't be put off by the sometimes extreme views expressed by some members until you've gone through this all; there's some really shocking news in here.

Stick around, browse, read, get the other side of the story.

If anyone doubts that Muslims are fixated on blood and carnage, look at the names they choose for their offspring. Muhammad, Jihad, Shahid, Osama, Saddam, to name a few. Professor Shahid Alam is one of many primitive Muslim academics who hides behind impressive credentials but has the mentality of a scimitar-weilding jihadist. It is easy to visualize him in full Arab regalia astride a handsome steed, poised to fulfill his Islamic destiny. No matter how educated Muslims are, they're all jihadist savages at heart. He is out of his element in America---why is he here?
His prime task is to poison young American minds, as if our own distinguished, Marxist academia are not already doing an excellent job of that. His job is to plant seeds of hate and confusion, to propagate his disdain for the country in which he chose to reside, and to promote the fallacies of Muslim victimization and persecution. He and his many Saudi- funded colleagues, who are planted all over the country in our most prestigous universities, were sent here to spread their vile religion and promulgate revisionist Islamic history. Why would someone who hates America so intensely choose to live here?
This insidious charlatan should be deported. Let him teach Economics to Muslims in an Islamic country. They are in dire need of education and no American university needs a radical Muslim professor to teach Economics or anything else.

I personaly belive every word on the page at the following link. And I refer back to it, ocasionaly.
Please read the whole page.

http://jihadwatch.org/spencer/

Thank you.


There are Ten animals in Muslim Heaven, and these are: The Ram sacrificed by Abraham.
Solomon's Ant.
The Lapwing of Balkis.
The Camel of the Prophet Saleh.
Balaam's Ass.
The Ox of Moses.
Jonah's Whale.
Muhammed's faithful Steed Al Borak.
The Dove of Noah
A dog called Katmir or sometimes Kratim which belonged to Seven Youths who got walled up in a cavern and fell asleep. They woke up 200 years later, broke out to get some provisions, decided nothing much was happening and went to sleep again. They are still asleep. The faithful dog must have got very bored and was let into Heaven.
I feel vey sorry for these creatures when they are surrounded by the likes of Muhammad, Jihad, Shahid, Osama, Saddam and all the other islamic reptiles

From "Susanp":

If anyone doubts that Muslims are fixated on blood and carnage, look at the names they choose for their offspring. Muhammad, Jihad, Shahid, Osama, Saddam, to name a few

Saddam is actually a very rare name. There were a number of incidents of people calling their children Saddam Hussain after the Gulf War when he was seen as sticking up to America. But not much else before or since.

Osama is a long-established, perfectly respectable Arabic name.

Shahid (long a, short i) means one who bears witness (to the truth). Shahid (short a, long i), meaning martyr, isn't a very common name. Neither is Jihad.

As for Muhammad, the Prophet (peace and blessings upon him) is associated with many and varied virtues, not just fighting. I'm sure that for most Muslims who name their children this, they could be thinking of many things besides jihad (if the latter at all) when they name their children this.

sonofwalker wrote: "the vileness and ignorance of an uneducated peasant. "
------------------------
Hmmm...
------------------------


Websters 1913--
Definition: \Peas"ant\, n. [OF. pa["i]sant (the i being perh. due to
confusion with the p. pr. of verbs), pa["i]san, F. paysan,
fr. OF. & F. pays country, fr. L. pagus the country. See
{Pagan}.]
A countryman; a rustic; especially, one of the lowest class
of tillers of the soil in European countries.

Syn: Countryman; rustic; swain; hind.


\Peas"ant\, a.
Rustic, rural. --Spenser.


------------------------------------------------------------------
Websters 1913--
Definition: \Snob\, n. [Icel. sn[=a]pr a dolt, impostor, charlatan. Cf.
{Snub}.]
1. A vulgar person who affects to be better, richer, or more
fashionable, than he really is; a vulgar upstart; one who
apes his superiors. --Thackeray.

Essentially vulgar, a snob. -- a gilded snob, but
none the less a snob. --R. G. White.

2. (Eng. Univ.) A townsman. [Canf]
-----------------------------------------

Nathan wrote( or copied and pasted):

"The truth of these works show that Muhammad was no prophet, but rather a pedophile, a bandit, a rapist, a murderer, A truely evil man, who's inspiration was Satan himself, admitted to have shown himself to Muhammad as an angel of light, a form within the capabilities of Satan..."

"For him to be an educated man as he claims, yet fail to see the obvious fraud Muhammad and the koran and the entire cult of Islam is proves he is not capable of rational thought, and therefore rational debate on any subject."
----------------------------

Hmmm...
For some reason I think rational debate should be based on concrete evidence and facts proven by accepted scientific criteria only.
I think injecting a competing religious dogma(satan etc) into the argument is counter-productive. And if it is a dominant theme in the argument it calls into question the credibility of the "research". For some that is enough to reject the conclusions, based on a knee-jerk reaction of which leftists are known to have concerning religious belief. Whether that is wise or justified is irrelevant.
I know that leftists are prisoners of their own dogmatic thinking, and that leftist theories cannot stand up to objective scientific scrutiny either. Except for one aspect--- Marx was right about the "opiate of the masses".

Kentim
The vileness and ignorance of an uneducated peasant,smells better than the stench,of a right wing snob.
Akbar Karl Marx,the greatest friend you right wingers ever had

Of all the inappropriately named articles, M. Shahid Alam's "Testing Free Speech in America", takes the Holiday fruitcake.
Apparently Mr. Alam needs reminding that the promotion of his theories on the examination of the 9-11 attacks in Dissident Voice and Counterpunch in no way constitutes "testing free speech" in America - this is a free country where people have the right to criticize the state and its policies, no matter how ridiculous or disingenuous they may be.
As far as being "shut out" by the mainstream media, Mr. Alam's inflated sense of intellectual merit blinds him to the realization that perhaps his theories and positions simply do not merit the attention of the mainstream media. For all its failings, the media has at least shown here that it has the good, common sense to turn a deaf ear to the displacement, moral equivocation and nihilistic propaganda coming out of the mouths of pseudo-intellectuals such as Mr. Alam.
Sahid Alam imagines himself a victim of some self-imagined conspiracy to silence his "radical" positions, all the while slandering the same rights and freedoms of others to express their own positions as "hate". It is remarkable, for someone who fancies himself as an intellectual colossus, how he foolishly reveals himself, not the mainstream media or Jihad Watch or Little Green Footballs, as the TRUE enemy of free speech.
Little wonder no one is buying what he is selling.

What ever happened to that professer Sami Al Aryan?Didn't he get fired?

I wonder if Bill O'Rielly knows about this Shahid Alam?


JLP

To go to a dictionary to find the meanings of my comments that alam is a vile and ignorant peasant, et c. is to miss the point so entirely that I'm not going to respond at any length. If he claims our mythologies as a way of insulting us, which seems to me to have been his purpose, then I respond by likening him not to some Marxist parody of the Nobel Savage but by refering to Alam in terms he will hate because he recognizes himself in them. If you're so free with your time that the result is leafing through your dictionary for pendantries, why not use your time instead to pas out leaflets to your neighbors to show them what the professor says about those who murdered ours? Or, if you really must pick pedantically, figure out the purpose of the post before you do so. You got the diefinitions right but you missed entirely the meaning. So what's your gain? And what more do your neighbors and community members know about this monster in there midst? all you've done is piss me off.

Hawkwind-
Do you have anything besides childish name-calling to contribute to this forum? Perhaps you would care to comment on Mr. Alam's remarks?

"As for Muhammad, he is associated with many and varied virtues, not just fighting."
Posted by: Yusuf Smith at January 3, 2005 07:49 AM

Ah yes, Mr Smith, like burning alive the muslims who commited the grave sin of missing a prayer time.

Bukhari:Volume 1, Book 11, Number 626;
“The Prophet said, ‘No prayer is harder for the hypocrites than the Fajr. If they knew the reward they would come to (the mosque) even if they had to crawl. I decided to order a man to lead the prayer and then take a flame to burn all those who had not left their houses for the prayer, burning them alive inside their homes.’

A "mercy to mankind" indeed.

Regards,
Kc

Mike
I do not have so much to add to this thread as Sonofwalker and nathan say it all for me
Now kindlly read kentims remark above,and previous posting and you will find that kentim is lashing out at a lot of posters for being leftist,and it is about time that kentim should realize that religion is not so popular amongst the left,and this includes islam

As for my Akbar Karl Marx jibe

According to Marx, religion is an expression of material realities and economic injustice. Thus, problems in religion are ultimately problems in society. Religion is not the disease, but merely a symptom. It is used by oppressors to make people feel better about the distress they experience due to being poor and exploited. This is the origin of his comment that religion is the "opium of the masses"
I will not go into the cuddly relationship the right has had with islam,the main point is the
islam is the enemy

IAIN-HOOK-MURDER-COMPLICITY –COMPLICITY—COMPLICITY

IAIN-HOOK-MURDER-Complicity –Complicity—Complicity
By Dr. Jack Shepard

The worse crime-is silence! It gives people a feeling of hopelessness.

Why do Mr. Blair and Mr. Straw continue in their silence! Their silence only makes the problem worse! Would they be as silence if Iain Hook was their Father or Brother or Son?

The murder of Iain Hook an unarmed well known British UN Staffer shot in the back after being trapped in his UN Compound in Jenin for 3-4 hours, with 64 UN Foreign Staffers saying it was Cold-Blooded-Murder in their UNWRA open letter, DESERVES AN ANSWER.

Mr. Blair’s and Mr. Straw’s Silence is at this stage HAS BECOME COMPLICITY, and it makes the violence go on. That is why people cry and scream ONLY for fairness.

Complicity in the killing of UN Staff Foreign or Palestinian and the killing of now over a thousand Palestinian Men, Women and Children by the IDF is the best recruiting device that Bin Laden could dream for.

GOOD SHOW MR. BLAIR AND MR. STRAW YOU ARE HELPING BIN LADEN’S RECRUITING OF NEW TERRORIST BY GIVING THE ARAB PEOPLE IN THE MIDDLE EAST, EUROPE AND THE REST OF THE WORLD THE REAL FEELING THAT ARAB'S WILL NEVER GET JUSTICE OR FAIRNESS.

The very fact that you can not stand up to the deliberate murder of a British citizen Iain Hook who headed the UN relief efforts at the Jenin Refugee Camp; let alone criticize the Sharon Government for its brutal policies that has lead to the present Israeli and Palestinian conflict;
which has now spread worldwide is the very fact that complicity is so one sided and unfair it is driving extremists and fanatics out of hopelessness to BECOME suicide bombers.

THEY ARE ALSO VICTIM OF HOPELESSNESS.

WHY SHOULD THE SHARON GOVERNMENT EVER LISTEN TO YOU, YOU ARE SCARED TO TELL THE TRUTH AND BE CRITICAL OF MASS GENOCIDE, WE SEE EVERYDAY THE NEWS.

LIKE THIS YOU WILL NEVER HAVE ANY CHANCE TO MAKING PEACE IN THE MIDDLE EAST, IF YOU REMAIN SILENT YOU WILL NEVER HELP!

MR. BLAIR; JUST STAY AT HOME.

YOUR SILENT COMPLICITY IS WORSE.

DO YOU THINK THAT THE ISRAELI DEFENSE FORCES WOULD SHOOT AN AMERICAN UN EMPLOYEE OR AMERICAN GOVERNMENT SERVICE OFFICIAL IN THE BACK THE WAY IAIN HOOK WAS KILLED.

PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH WOULD HAVE REACTED LIKE A STRONG WORLD LEADER TAHT YOU WILL NEVER BE!

IF THAT HAPPENED TODAY TO AN AMERICAN SERVICE OFFICER; PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH WOULD HAVE GOTTEN IMMEDIATE ANSWERS, NOT LIKE YOU.

MORE IMPORTANT NOW IF THIS HAPPENED TO AN AMERICAN, PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH IS SUCH A STRONG LEADER THINGS WOULD CHANGE.

ISRAEL KNOWS THAT HE IS DETERMINED TO HAVE THE TWO STATES OF ISRAEL AND PALESTINE LIVING SIDE BY SIDE AND VERY SOON YOU WILL SEE HIM TAKE URGENT ACTION AS A MAN OF GOD, PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH DOES NOT LIKE THINGS THAT ARE DISPLEASING TO GOD, LIKE THE PRESENT POLICIES OF ARIEL SHARON TOWARD THE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE.

YOUR TWO YEARS OF COMPLICITY AND SILENCE HAS ONLY GIVE BIN LADEN A GREAT YEAR FOR RECRUITING.

WITH PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH, THE ISRAELI DEFENSE FORCE WORKING FOR THE SHARON GOVERNMENT WOULD HAVE NEVER HAD THE COURAGE TO KILL AN AMERICAN GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL. THE ISRAELI GOVERNEMT KNOWS YOU ARE WEAK AND USED YOUR COMPLICITY TO GET AWAY WITH THE KILLING OF IAIN HOOK!


KNOWING THAT YOU ARE AND WILL BE TOO WEAK TO BE CRITICAL OF IAIN HOOK'S MURDER. THE SHARON GOVERNMENT JUDGED YOU CORRECTLY.

WHERE ARE THE RESULTS OF THE INVESTIGATIONS YOU PROMISED, WHERE ARE THE ANSWERS, WHERE IS EVEN A COMMENT AFTER OVER TWO YEARS FOR IAIN HOOKS FAMILY.

YOUR COMPLICITY AND SILENCE IS WELL KNOWN BY THE ISRAELI DEFENSE FORCE. IT COST IAIN HOOK HIS LIFE.
THE SHARON GOVERNMENT KNOWS YOU ARE WEAK, AND THAT YOU WOULD REMAIN SILENT ON THE TRUTH.

If this murderer who planned and killed Iain Hook is brought to Justice. Maybe GOD willing someday VERY SOON Israel and Palestine will SOON BE living in peace.

THIS KILLING HAS TO STOP SOMEWHERE, AND BY BRING THE COLD-BLOODED-KILLER OF IAIN HOOK TO JUSTICE IS THE FIRST STEP ON THE ROAD MAP TO PEACE.

THAT IS PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH MAJOR CONCERN AT THE MOMENT, BECAUSE PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH KNOWS THAT WE WILL NEVER HAVE A FREE AND DEMOCRATIC IRAQ UNTIL THE STATES OF ISRAEL AND PALESTINE ARE LIVING SIDE BY SIDE IN PEACE.

Until this happens the message that goes out to every Israeli soldier is "it is OK to even kill British UN staff". This is what Mr. Blair and Mr.Straw are tell the Sharon Government by not saying anything after 2 years, COMPLICITY- without a word, breaking their promises to the British People and THAT TO the FAMILY of Iain Hook for an immediate investigation.

MR. BLAIR; Why are you so concerned to tell the world the truth. Because by saying the truth the Israeli government of Ariel Sharon would get mad, and say you are anti-Semitic.

IF YOU ARE STRONG ENOUGH TO BE CRITICAL ABOUT THE PRESENT POLICIES OF THE ARIEL SHARON GOVERNMENT TOWARD THE UN FOREIGN STAFF, PALESTINIAN PEOPLE, THE ROAD MAP, THE CREATION OF PALESTINE AND THE PRESENT INHUMAN TREATMENT OF THE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE IN THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES BY THE ISRAELI TROOPS; you are just ANTI-SHARON and HIS GOVERNMENTS policies of violence that have made the environment where terrorism can rapidly grow.

I ASK ARIEL SHARON; are YOU a believer in GOD and HOW CAN YOU ORDER such evil THINGS THAT DISPLEASE GOD.

God will judge you how you judge others. EVERY TIME IN THE OLD TESTAMENT WHEN THE LEADERS "KINGS" DID THINGS THAT WERE DISPLEASING TO GOD, THE JEWISH PEOPLE WERE PUNISHED.

PROPHET WERE THE SEERS AND WARNER IN THE OLDEN DAYS, TODAY WE HAVE TO LEARN FROM OUR PAST, READING THE OLD TESTAMENT, HOW GOD PUNISHED THE JEWISH PEOPLE EVERY TIME THEY DISPLEASED HIM.

GOD USED THE JEWISH PEOPLE AS AN EXAMPLE TO OTHER NATIONS, I PRAY YOU REMEMBER THAT YOU ARE DOING THINGS THAT DISPLEASE GOD; THIS YOU CAN NOT DISPUTE.

I WOULD ADVISE MR. ARIEL SHARON TO THINK ABOUT GOD AND HOW HE AND ISRAEL WILL BE JUDGED BECAUSE OF THE THINGS THE PRESENT SHARON GOVERNMENT POLICIES TOWARD YOUR NEIGHBORS.

YOU HAVE FORGOTTEN THAT "WE SHOULD LOVE OR NEIGHBORS AS WE LOVE AND SERVE GOD." THAT WAS GOD'S CHIEF COMMANDMENT, I PRAY YOUR EYES WILL BE OPENED AND YOUR EARS WILL HEAR THESE THINGS BECAUSE YOU ARE PLACING THE JEWISH PEOPLEìS FUTURE IN THE HANDS OF A GOD WHO YOU HAVE FORGOTTEN AND ARE DOING THINGS THAT DISPLEASED HIM.

I PRAY THAT YOU CHANGE YOUR PRESENT POLICIES AND START TO DO THINGS THAT PLEASE GOD, AND ONCE AGAIN LEARN "TO LOVE YOUR NEIGHBORS AS YOU LOVE GOD; " BEFORE GOD WILL ONCE AGAIN PUNISH THE JEWISH NATION LIKE MANY TIMES THROUGHOUT ANCIENT HISTORY; IN THE OLD TESTAMENT; WHEN THE JEWISH LEADERS DID WHAT WAS DISPLEASING TO GOD.


MR. SHARON do YOU not think maybe the majority of the Israeli' PEOPLE wish YOU TO STOP YOUR VIOLENT POLICIES AND LIVE IN PEACE WITH YOUR PALESTINIAN BROTHERS.

THE MAJORITY OF ISRAELI CITIZENS PRESENTLY ARE VERY DISPLEASED WITH THE PRESENT SITUATION THAT IS CAUSED BY YOUR EXTREME VIOLENT POLICIES TOWARD THE PALESTINIAN MEN, WOMEN AND CHILDREN.

General Sharon's PRESENT POLICIES NOW HAVE stimulated the Terrorist to recruit more and more suicide bombers. ( also 99.9% of the World Leaders are very concerned about the Israeli treatment of the Palestinian people); especially the world leaders clearly see the stimulation the Sharon Policies are HELPING Terrorists to recruit more and more suicide bombers.

Mr. Blair your silence only continues to let General Sharon kill and be as violent as he wishes without having to ANSWER TO ANYONE, BUT GOD SOONER OR LATER.

LIKE SOME OF ISRAELS KINGS OF OLD ARIEL SHARON'S PRESENT POLICIES AND ACTIONS DISPLEASE GOD AND ARIEL SHARON IS GAMBLING WITH THE FUTURE OF THE JEWISH PEOPLE IF HE CONTINUES TO DO THINGS THAT DISPLEASE GOD.

Complicity is a crime.

Complicity in the cover-up of killing of innocent Palestinians or British UN staffers, only make the Arab Street (Billions of People is every country in the world) FEEL more and more help
less and see and feel more and more injustice.

Hear– Hear: Mr. Blair speak-up– the War on Terrorism can be won only if you tell the truth and everyone in the world is treated equally.

MR. BLAIR, YOU KNOW BUT YOU STILL REMAIN SILENT THE WAR ON TERRORISM IS BASED IN INJUSTICE, AND UNFAIRNESS AND WAS STARTED BY MR. SHARON'S TERROR POLICIES TOWARD THE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE, WHEN MR. SHARON VISITED THE TEMPLE MONT WITH 5,000 HEAVILY ARMED ISRAELI SOLDIERS WHICH STARTED THE PRESENT WORLD ON A CIVIL WAR. WHAT WAS HE THINKING? WHAT WERE HIS GOALS? TO PLEASE GOD? HIS ACTIONS FOR OVER 20 YEARS HAVE DISPLEASED GOD BUT NEVER IN RECENT HISTORY HAS ONE MAN DISPLEASE GOD ON SUCH A SCALE TO STIMULATE A WORLD CIVIL WAR.

MR. BLAIR, May God give you the courage to expose THE injustice and once again become a world leader, who can tell the Truth and be known because of YOUR fairness.

YOU WILL BE DOING THE JEWISH PEOPLE A BIG FAVOR BECAUSE OF YOU TELLING THE TRUTH ABOUT THE TERROR THAT HAVE BECOME THE PRESENT EVERYDAY POLICIES OF ARIEL SHARON'S TOWARD THE UN STAFF AND THE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE IN THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES, YOU JUST MAY SAVE THE JEWISH PEOPLE BY MAKING THEIR LEADERS DO WHAT IS PLEASING TO GOD.

MAY GOD BLESS ISRAEL AND PALESTINE WITH PEACE AND HAPPINESS, ONCE THEY LEARN TO ONCE AGAIN "LOVE THEIR NEIGHBORS AS THEY LOVE GOD." AND BOTH THE ISRAELI'S AND THE PALESTINIANS LEARNING TO DO THING THAT ARE PLEASING TO GOD AND BE REWARDED WITH PEACE AND HAPPINESS AND A PLACE IN PARADISE FOREVER.

Dr. Jack Shepard

Mike/sonofwalker
A Newgate Garlamd for Mr Alam
An old turkish saying------- use an english rope,

Thanks for your reply, Hawkwind. I won't go into the Left's cozy relationship with Islamists either.

http://www.nrbookservice.com/bookpage.asp?prod_cd=c6544

So we have snakes in both camps so lets tread carefully together as our enemy is the same

Thanks for link

I'm with you there, Hawkwind.

Hawkwind wrote:
"I do not have so much to add to this thread as Sonofwalker and nathan say it all for me
Now kindlly read kentims remark above,and previous posting and you will find that kentim is lashing out at a lot of posters for being leftist,and it is about time that kentim should realize that religion is not so popular amongst the left,and this includes islam".
---------------------------------

Duh, that was the point I was making-- the left is basically anti-religion. Therefore saying islam is evil in the biblical sense; Satanic-- looks to them like just two wacko religious fanatics in competition, and what they say is not worth listening to.
I am anti-leftist, very. To bad. And I won't give leftists a pass when they talk sh-t, like tired old Soviet-inspired propaganda that is taken as conventional wisdom by many today.

I'm also a frik'in apostate unbeliever.

The ideas and actions of the left today cannot be separated from or considered neutral in this war, it is intrinsicly tied in with jihadist strategy. And the left has far more influence and power than some right-wing fringe elements. Denial is delusion.
-------------------------------

Oh, and sonofwalker can't take a jab... poor baby.

Left, right, center...
Rare is the person who totally agrees with one part of the political spectrum.
I have right wing friends who smoke weed, take x, and voted Bush; i have left wing friends who are very religious and others who are totally non-religious.
Things are just not that neat and it helps to remember, i think, that each fingerprint is different. No two of us are alike, and our understandings or awarenesses of reality are equally diverse; categorization into left, right and center, while useful, is also deceiving.

We have found common cause, an enemy that we all, from our various places, recognize, and together we will fight, and win.

Let's cut each other some slack, give each other some respect, and appreciate those, from wherever they are on the political spectrum, who are with us in this defining battle for the future of civilization on this planet.

I'll second what dby said. I'm a bit tired of the left/right bashing. There are those so far right/left of me that I disagree with them on almost every other issue who are in on this cause. Lay off your reflexive conservative/liberal bashing and let's stand together on at least this one thing. Fight them on the rest, of course...

Kentim, jab all you like. Today I've been railed at by a moron at another thread who calls me a Right-wing religious bigot, and often I'm accused of being a Left-wing lunatic. All I make from that is that idiots abound, and there's nothing much for me to do but get pissed off for an hour and then carry on because it really doesn't mean much other than that I put in a lot of my time here trying to organize some concrete resistence to the enemy we all share, and that on rare occassions I get some semi-literate screaming and name-calling in response to things they obviously don't have the brights to grasp but feel compelled to write something-- anything-- anyway. (Pedant!)

For anyone who didn't understand the phrase from Gay, a "Newgate Garland" is from Newgate prison: a noose. It's likely an obscure reference. I didn't realize that. Yes, truly one would have to use English rope because our Ottoman brothers were so busy doing nothing for 500 years they didn't have a rope industry. Even Turkish carpets, as I understand it, came from everywhere else. But feel free to flame me if I'm wrong there. Pedant!

Can't take a jab, huh? Pedant!

Take that, pedant.

I'm tired of that now.

Grrr.

Cute.

Here's the full text of an email I sent the good professor on 12/30.04, chastising him FROM THE LEFT.

Granted, bits my own response border on the hyperbolic: the PUK ought to be as subject to ethical criticism as any other band of angry men with guns. Nonetheless, there are still startling differences between them and Al-Qaeda, and the differences are a direct consequence of their governing ideologies. The point I'm trying to get through to the good professor here is that not all violent movements are created equal, nor are all responses to "oppression," whether real or perceived... a principle I've always thought was self-evident, speaking from the left.

I keep making this distinction to my fellow leftists, asking the same leading questions I ask the professor, and none of them ever seem to get it. There is something terribly wrong in my house...

Figgered y'all would find it interesting.
---------------------------
12/30/04
Professor,

In light of your recent article drawing a comparison between the 9/11 hijackers and America's Founding Fathers, I'm curious how you feel about the Kurdish resistance movement in Iraq, Iran, Syria, Jordan and Turkey? In case you're not familiar with their cause (and I suspect you aren't), I'll let you in on a little secret. They've been doing exactly what you demand; that is, they have been acting against "American surrogates in their own countries," and doing so "politically and with courage" for almost 30 years now. Their plight as the largest population of displaced Muslims in the Middle East is a direct consequence of Ottomon, British and French colonialism. Arguably, they have every reason in the world to consider the West an adversary; after all, we supported (and continue to) many of the regimes that have been oppressing them. Especially in Iraq; we were backing Saddam when he gassed their people at Halabja, and we double-crossed them by reneging on our pledge to back their revolution in 1991. So, if any group of oppressed and impoverished Muslims has just cause to be mad at us, it's the Kurds.

Yet, isn't it curious that they've never done any of the things that the people you're defending did? They never hijacked airplanes. They never issued fatwas calling for the death of all Americans everywhere. They never made or distributed snuff films of the gruesome execution of their captives. They never targeted humanitarian aid workers or election organizers. They never claimed their plight was the result of a Zionist conspiracy. They never made the arrogant claim that they spoke for all Muslims everywhere. They never tried to export their revolution to Western streets; no, instead, they sent emissaries to the West, begging for help from both private sector and government quarters. They saw outsiders as potential allies, not metaphysically evil demons. In the areas of Iraq they managed to take over, they didn't create a police state, like al-Sadr and Zarqawi did; rather, they created a multi-party secular democracy with free speech rights, secular government and equality for women.

In other words, they behaved in every regard like a band of true freedom fighters, having much more in common with America's Founding Fathers than did the 9/11 hijackers (who in fact had absolutely nothing in common with them, except perhaps for their endorsement of slavery).

Now, professor, remember -- the Kurds are all Muslims. They've been directly oppressed for nearly a century by the forces of colonialism, and after that, by Western support of Arab dictators. Yet, they don't act like the hijackers of 9/11 or the throat-slitting butchers of Fallujah.

And my question to you is, why? After all, if your analysis is correct, the two groups would seem to have much in common. Yet, there is a stunning contrast in their tactics and their rhetoric. What is the source of that contrast, professor? Have you even noticed it?

It's also worth remembering that other liberation movements by oppressed people did not act like your heroes. South Africans didn't do any of this. Neither did Europeans under communist rule. Or the Indians under British rule. Nor are the Tibetans doing it today.

Again, I ask you, why? What is the cause of this stunning difference, professor?

There's a simple answer: the cause is ideology. Genuine liberation movements like the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan are galvanized by progressive ideals, and they act accordingly. Death squads like those you defend are motivated by reactionary ideals, and they, too, act accordingly.

The only political movements that have ever engaged in the kinds of violence you defend are right-wing ones. The Nazis did this, both before and after they seized power. The Ku Klux Klan did this sort of thing. The 9/11 hijackers and "insugents" of Iraq are just the same.

THEY ARE RIGHT-WINGERS, professor. Autocrats and fascists commited to a reactionary ideology of the Master Faith. I daresay, they have duped you with their taqqiya.

The 19 men who hijacked those planes were not the Jeffersons and Madisons of Islam. No, professor, they were its Nathan Bedford Forrests and its Adolph Hitlers. So are the false "insurgents" of Iraq, who never showed any courage when there was a real tyrant running the place. The fact that you seem unable to distinguish right-wing death squads (the people your article defends) from genuine freedom fighters (the civilized Kurdish resistance you ignore) discredits anything you have to say on the subject of politics. Perhaps you should stick to teaching economics.

outfidel:

Great letter! And I LOVE your screenname!

dby
Left, right, center...
Rare is the person who totally agrees with one part of the political spectrum
Kathy K
Lay off your reflexive conservative/liberal bashing and let's stand together on at least this one thing. Fight them on the rest, of course...

Agreed

outfidel:
Great letter!

Some good work through this thread, but in the end it was wasted. The point as it began was that Alam is festering because of what he percieves as personal criticism,and his spewing was generating some publicity. In my own cute little way I tried to turn up the pressure on him since he obviously reads comments here to fuel his rage. It would have been lovely if others had built up the fury for him so he continued to rant in public. instead, off we went to the dictionary to quibble, leaving the professor to find something to scream about somewhere else. So, at the end of the day, what did we gain?

Dr. Jack Shepard

Posted by: Dr. Jack Shepard at January 3, 2005 03:58 PM


You are a FOOL for you have not read wht they teach their children??

DECEPTION:

Bukhari:V7B67N427 “The Prophet said, ‘If I take an oath and later find something else better than that, then I do what is better and expiate my oath.’”
Qur’an 9:3 “Allah and His Messenger dissolve obligations.”
Qur’an 66:1 “Allah has already sanctioned for you the dissolution of your vows.”
Bukhari:V4B52N268 “Allah’s Apostle said, ‘War is deceit.’”
Qur’an 4:142 “Surely the hypocrites strive to deceive Allah. He shall retaliate by deceiving them.”


THEY THE MUSSIS DO NOT WANT PEACE THEY WANT IT ALL!!!

Bukhari:V4B52N260 “The Prophet said, ‘If a Muslim discards his religion, kill him.’”

Qur’an 5:51 “Believers, take not Jews and Christians for your friends.”

Qur’an 74:31 “We have appointed nineteen angels to be the wardens of the Hell Fire. We made a stumbling-block for those who disbelieve and We have fixed their number as a trial for unbelievers in order that the People of the Book may arrive with certainty, and that no doubts may be left for the People of the Book, those in whose hearts is a disease.”

Bukhari:V4B54N487 “The Prophet said, ‘The Hell Fire is 69 times hotter than ordinary worldly fires.’ So someone said, ‘Allah’s Apostle, wouldn’t this ordinary fire have been sufficient to torture the unbelievers?’”

Qur’an 72:15 “The disbelievers are the firewood of hell.”

Qur’an 72:17 “If any turns away from the reminder of his Lord (the Qur’an), He will thrust him into an ever growing torment, and cause for him a severe penalty.”

Qur’an 72:25 “Whoever disobeys the Lord and His Messenger then there is for him the fire of Hell where they shall abide forever.”

Qur’an 88:21 “You are not a warden over them; except for those who turn away and disbelieve, in which case, he will be punished with the severest punishment. Verily to Us they will return.”

Qur’an 90:19 “But those who reject Our Signs, Proofs, and Verses, they are the unhappy Companions of the Left Hand. Fire will be their awning, vaulting over them.”

Qur’an 95:4 “We have indeed created man in the best molds. Then do We abase him, reducing him to be the lowest of the low, except such as believe.”

Tabari VIII:130 “The Messenger said, ‘Two religions cannot coexist in the Arabian Peninsula.’ Umar investigated the matter, then sent to the Jews, saying: ‘Allah has given permission for you to be expelled.”

I SEE NO OFFER OF PEACE HERE??

Qur’an 2:64 “But you [Jews] went back on your word and were lost losers. So become apes, despised and hated. We made an example out of you.”

SO IT IS A LIE WHEN THEY SAY IT IS NOT IN THE QU-RAN??

Qur’an 60:1 “Believers, take not my enemies and yours as allies, offering them love, even though they have rejected the truth that has come to you, and have driven out the Prophet and you because you believe in Allah! If you have come out to struggle [fight jihad] in My Cause, and to seek My Pleasure, (take them not as friends), holding secret converse of love with them: for I am aware of all you conceal. And any of you that does this has strayed from the Straight Path. If they were to get the better of you, they would be your foes, and stretch forth their hands and their tongues against you with evil (designs).”

SO THEY HAVE TURNED YOU IN TO A FOOL BECAUSE YOU BELIEVED THEIR LIES??

Qur’an 60:5 “We reject you. Hostility and hate have come between us forever, unless you believe in Allah only.’”
Qur’an 48:13 “If any believe not in Allah and His Messenger, We have prepared a Blazing Fire for them!”

IN CASE YOU CAN'T MAKE THIS OUT IT MEANS WAR!!

Qur’an 48:28 “It is He Who has sent His Messenger with guidance and the Religion of Truth (Islam), that he may make it superior to every other religion, exalting it over them. Allah is a sufficient Witness. Muhammad is the Prophet of Allah. Those who are with him are severe with Infidel unbelievers.”

YEA AND THIS MEANS THEY CAN MAKE SLAVES IN TO YOU AND YOURS!! OPEN YOUR EYES AND LOOK AROUND THE WORLD THEY DON'T ONLY KILL JEWS BUT ALL WHO WILL NOT CONVERT ??

NO DR. YOU ARE THE FOOL AND HAVE FELL FOR THEIR LIE AND THEIR DISTRACTION TO THEY CAN OVER THROW THE WORLD AND THEY ARE DOING SO THROUGH THE UN JUST LIKE THEY USED THE LONs THANK GOD THAT AMERICANS WOKE UP BEFORE IT WAS TO LATE!!

IT IS ISRAEL WHO IS THE VICTIM OF THE MONSTERS AND MUST BE SAVED OR IT WILL BE THE DEATH OF ALL MANKIND JUST LIKE IT SAID IN THE QU-RAN 5:32!!!

Qur’an 9:30 “The Jews call Uzair (Ezra) the son of Allah, and the Christians say that the Messiah is the son of Allah. That is their saying from their mouths; they but imitate what the unbelievers of old used to say. Allah’s (Himself) fights against them, cursing them, damning and destroying them. How perverse are they!”
Qur’an 9:33 “He has sent His Messenger (Muhammad) with guidance and the Religion of Truth (Islam) to make it superior over all religions, even though the disbelievers detest (it).”

SO YOU SEE IT IS NOT JUST THE JEWS IT IS ALSO CHRISTIANS THEY WANT TO KILL AND STEAL FROM AND TURN INTO SLAVES !! SO DR. EITHER YOU ARE A FOOL OR A MUSSI!!!

Part of the American Tribe
Squirrel Hunter
Spider Killer
God Bless the USA and her Fighting Forces and ALL who Fight with her give them Strength,Wisdom,Sight and Courage to Victory to Crush ALL islamic Terrorist and ALL who Support them Open the Worlds Eyes to their Threat give the World Courage to Stand and Fight them Amen

PS

Ecclesiastes5:14
14] Therefore he says
AWAKE, You who sleep arise from the Dead
And the Lord your God will give you light in the Darkness
6:10] Finally my Brethren be strong in the Lord your God and in the Power of his might
11] Put on the whole armor of God, That you may be able to Stand against the wiles of the Devil
13] Therefore take up the whole armor of God, that you may be able to with stand in the Evil day and having done all to Stand.
16] Above all, taking the Shield of Faith with which you will be able to quench all the Fiery Darts of the Wicked ones.
REMEMBER
Luke 22:36] Then he said to them,” But now, he who has a moneybag let him take it and like wise a knapsack and he who has no SWORD let him sell his garment and Buy one.
37] For I say to you that this which is written must still be accomplished to me and he was numbered with the transgressors”
REMEMBER
Jesus did not come to change the laws of the prophets before him?? You can not understand the New without knowing the old!!!