Spain Links Family to Madrid Bombings

Wait a minute. I thought CAIR told us that families involved in jihad was an idea "not based on any reality of what we are going through." I sure hope Ibrahim Hooper will explain this one for us. What's that, Ibrahim? More "Islamophobia"? Ah. I should have guessed.

From AP, with thanks to Jeffrey Imm:

MADRID, Spain — Spanish police arrested on Tuesday a family of four Moroccans suspected of having links to the Madrid train bombings of last year, the Interior Ministry said.

The four — a married couple in their 40s and their two sons — were arrested in Leganes, a suburb of Madrid, the ministry said in a statement.

In the March 11 train attack, a series of backpack bombs went off on the Madrid commuter rain network, killing 191 people and wounding more than 1,500. In videos, militants claimed to have carried out the attack on behalf of Al Qaeda.

| 8 Comments
Print | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

8 Comments

Douglas 'Doogie'/'Ibrahim' Hooper will run away from this just like he runs away from any other truth about the "He Man Woman Haters Club" he so proudly pretends to defend.

Hooper is nothing but another punk mouthpiece who cherry picks his battles.

Gives a new meaning to what we see as 'crime families'-
Family terror, Terror families, all 'good' Muslims of course...
just keep 'em coming...

This demonstrate's the hypocrisy of the attack on Fox and "24". Of course individual families can be engaged in terrorism. In fact, there would be fewer security problems involved in using loyal family members. For this reason we find family link among terror suspects and suicide bombers.

Why do they think we can't connect the dots anf see the pattern?

Ibrahim hooper is quite akin to the few islamopologists and dhimmis we occasionally chance upon on JW. A certain naseem immeidately comes ot mind. These drumbags can't face hard facts and will choose to open their traps if and only if they can spin the concerned subject out of proportion and control.

Show the finger to Dhimmis, folks. They probably ensoi it.

February 1, 2005
News Mac .com
Michael and Osama Attack American Symbols
Pat Boone
Friday, Jan. 28, 2005
What was it about the World Trade Center that attracted Osama bin Laden and his al-Qaida killers – not once but twice? And why attack the Pentagon? And why was one of the skyjacked planes headed toward another Washington target, possibly the White House or the Capitol Building?

Why? Because they're more than inviting targets; they're highly visible symbols of American life. They represent free enterprise and our successful commerce throughout the world; they represent our supreme military might; and they represent our free democratic government, the envy – and fear – of the rest of the world. Some of our own top leaders have referred to Osama bin Laden as a "worthy adversary," a "brilliant strategist" and "the most dangerous enemy in the world." From his dank cave in Northern Afghanistan (or more likely a sumptuous air-conditioned apartment in Pakistan, provided by Saudi Arabian friends) he orchestrated a fiendishly effective campaign to hit America where we live – not just to attack our people, but our precious symbols.
Enter his twin in attacking America's symbols, one Michael Newdow, the atheist lawyer from San Francisco. While Osama and al-Qaida attack our physical symbols, Michael Newdow is busy attacking with all his ferocious bile the precious symbols of our religious freedoms and our freedom of expression.
Although these freedoms are guaranteed in the First Amendment, Newdow cleverly quotes only the first part, "Congress shall make no laws respecting the establishment of religion," and attacks the two words "under God" in our Pledge of Allegiance"; in God we trust" in our currency; our national motto, "One Nation Under God" – and most recently walked the streets of Washington, importuning at least two Supreme Court justices, trying to suborn them into preventing the prayer of a minister in the inauguration or any mention by the President of God in the inaugural proceedings!
And of course he never mentions the next phrase in the First Amendment: "nor restricting the free exercise thereof." As a trained lawyer, he selects only passages that he feels support his assault, and conveniently leaves out those that refute him.
And what Osama is still conniving to do from without, Newdow is energetically campaigning to do from within. It's not enough for him that neither he nor any other nonbeliever is constrained to say the Pledge as we have been saying it since 1954, and which President Eisenhower and both houses of Congress approved at the will of the American people in 1954.
That's not enough for him. He is so blinded by his evil rage that he says, in effect, that he is offended by any mention of God in public life, so you 260 million Americans shut up!
I so wish I could obtain H. G. Wells' time machine and transport Newdow back to Thomas Jefferson's second inauguration, and let him hear the man who coined the phrase "separation of church and state" not just refer to God in his acceptance speech, but actually write and publish a national prayer in 1804, as president, imploring the blessings of God and expressing his dependence on the Son of God, Jesus.
And let him also be reminded that, for years after the ink was dry on the Bill of Rights and the Constitution itself, the oath of office in a number of our states still required newly elected officials to express their belief and dependence on "God the Father, Jesus the Son, and the Holy Spirit." And while that was eventually declared unconstitutional, and rightly so, it was only because some new office holders didn't believe those things, and objected to having to profess them.
Nobody is requiring Newdow or anyone else to say things they don't believe. So his vicious and unrelenting attacks have another motive. And it's the same as Osama bin Laden's. It is the tearing down and destruction of the very symbols of America's greatness, her DNA, those distinctive traits and practices that have lent us our strength and national identity.
He keeps claiming that he "loves this country" and the Constitution and only wants to defend "equality." What's equal about silencing 260 million Americans who want to retain these symbols because he and a pitiful few others don't like them?
He has been spouting his atheistic beliefs (and I confronted him with the fact that his atheism is a faith system, built on the premise that there is no God, which can't be proved, versus faith in God, for which evidence exists everywhere) on all the cable and news programs, but doesn't want the rest of us to express our faith even in hallowed institutions like the inauguration!
Newdow doesn't like what America has been for over 200 years and wants to deface and erase all open expressions of faith in God. Osama hates us and calls us "infidels" and worse because we acknowledge a different God than he does.
I try to read Edward Everett Hale's classic, "A Man Without a Country," every year. I wish every American would do the same. In this wonderful short novella, a young lieutenant has been convicted of treason against his country and when asked to make his final statement, he exclaims loudly in the court: "Damn the United States! I wish I might never hear of her again!"
In the stunned silence that follows his outburst, the judge quietly sentences him to that very thing. He is remanded to a ship at sea, and strict orders are given that he never be able to hear the name America or discuss with anyone the United States for the rest of his life. And that sentence is carried out.
I and most Americans would urge Michael Newdow to join his brother Osama, wherever he is, and we will happily buy his first-class ticket. He needs to be with others who think like he does. I think we would far rather contend with people like these two and their vicious attacks on America and her symbols and not have them coming at us from our more vulnerable underside, from within.
Just some of the headlines of today??
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,145967,00.html
Iraqi President: Foreign Troops to Stay
Tuesday, February 01, 2005
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,145997,00.html
U.N. Didn't Ask Volcker to Disclose Finances
Tuesday, February 01, 2005
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,145998,00.html
Kuwait Terror Suspect's Family Denounces Him
Tuesday, February 01, 2005
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,145980,00.html
Spain Links Family to Madrid Bombings
Tuesday, February 01, 2005
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,145871,00.html
Prof Resigns as Department Chair Amid Furor Over 9/11 Remarks
Monday, January 31, 2005
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,145978,00.html
Car Bomb Targets Police Station in Georgia
Tuesday, February 01, 2005
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,145991,00.html
U.N.: Sudan Not Genocidal, but Still Bad
Tuesday, February 01, 2005
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,145931,00.html
Free Speech? High Schoolers Say, 'Whatever'
Monday, January 31, 2005
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,144226,00.html
Men Arrested for Telling Lawyer Jokes
Thursday, January 13, 2005
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,145761,00.html
Official Sues to Stop Recall Over Refusal to Say Pledge
Saturday, January 29, 2005
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,145988,00.html
N.Y. Teen Charged With Killing Actress
Tuesday, February 01, 2005
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,145985,00.html
Rebel Attack Kills 9 Soldiers in Colombia
Tuesday, February 01, 2005
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,145972,00.html
U.N.: Tsunami Worst Catastrophe for Tourism
Tuesday, February 01, 2005
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,145801,00.html
Portland Struggles With Terror Threat
Saturday, January 29, 2005
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,39555,00.html
Portland Police Told to Cooperate with Fed Terror Investigation
Tuesday, November 27, 2001
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,35734,00.html
FBI: Cameras Place Hijackers in Portland Before Attack
Thursday, October 04, 2001
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,110893,00.html
Final Three Members of Portland Terror Group Sentenced
Monday, February 09, 2004

Part of the American Tribe
Squirrel Hunter
Spider Killer
God Bless the USA and her Fighting Forces and ALL who Fight with her give them Strength,Wisdom,Sight, and Courage to Destroy ALL Islamic Terrorist and ALL who Support them Amen

This is a very unusual war, in the sense that it is a real physical war about the method or manner by which an individual can achieve metaphysical bliss or paradise. If it was not so real, one would have thought that this was a Monty Python parody. But to get back to practicality, I think we need to realise, that this war we are in, can be considered a private and personal war, that each Muslim is waging on us non-Muslims. The most important aspect of this war, is to get Islam accepted as the pre-eminent social ideology in the West. In this aspect of the war, we as individuals can fight right back.

How do we take the war can be taken to the enemy. So far we have relied on the government to wage war on our behalf. But the nature of this war is such, that the 'official' war so to speak, can only a be a side issue. To really win this war we, and I mean WE the People, have to wage war right back. We have to fight back by showing Muslims the error of their ways in holding to Islam. Show them that Islam is perverted. Tell them, that the fact they are here in the West, is proof enough that Islam is a failure. Why else would they have come, if not fleeing from the economic and social failure of Islam.

We can fight this war as individuals, one-to-one with any Muslims we know, or as groups. For instance, if Muslims turn up at your local or Church, as part of an interfaith thing, take it as an opportunity to show them the error of Islam. Engage Muslims in conversation and tell them of the success of the West and why it is so. Tell them, that by leaving Islamic nations and coming to the West, they have taken the first step towards freeing their souls/life from the subjugation/slavery of Islam. The next step is the final step to Freedom - to take Islam out of their lives and become Christians or humanists or Whatever. It does not matter as long as you weaken the Islamic base.

This war is not going to be won by our soldiers or by relying on our government. We have to fight this war on our own. In a way, that is to be thankful for. We have grown too complacent, and accepted that the freedoms we have, were almost a state of nature. They are not. We had to fight for them, and we have to fight for them again, to appreciate what we have.

How touching to catch a glimpse of Islamic family values, one of Islam's most touted virtues. It is indeed impressive in these times of rampant sexual promiscuity and corruption to realize that muslim familial ties are strong and cohesive, and that each family member plays an integral role in maintaining pious Islamic family values. What could be more pleasing to their god of hate and blood-lust than family terrorist cells? How pleased demon allah must be with these exemplary muslims!
Seems like the controversial Fox program might not be entirely fiction, but we knew that.

The defence of Fox and 24 would be more pleasing if they had not themselves rushed to bow down and grovel as soon as Islam's advocates started squealing. Bear in mind that Fox means Rupert Murdoch - the most corrupt, unprincipled and damaging media baron in the free world. Islam may be the worst evil we have to face, but it is hardly the only one.