Jordan: Muslim guardian discounts Christian mother's testimony

Siham Qandah update, from Compass Direct, with thanks to Nicolei:

March 16 (Compass) -- The Muslim guardian trying to wrest custody of two Christian children away from their widowed mother demanded yesterday that an Islamic court in Jordan discount the mother's testimony because she is a Christian.

But Abdullah al-Muhtadi's attempt to play the "religion card" against his own sister may represent the last card in his hand, one of the widow's friends told Compass today.

Under Islamic law statutes, the testimony of a Christian or any other non-Muslim carries only half the legal weight of a Muslim witness in a sharia court. So al-Muhtadi insisted that the judge must count his testimony as a Muslim to be stronger evidence than anything testified by his Christian sister....

The defendant was ordered on February 6 and again on February 20 to produce before the court documented evidence to disprove accusations that he had embezzled large sums of money from his wards' trust funds....

As Qandah's estranged brother who converted to Islam as a teenager, al-Muhtadi launched legal proceedings in 1998 to gain personal custody of her daughter Rawan and son Fadi, ostensibly to raise them as Muslims. The children are now 16 and 15, respectively....

Qandah was forced to find a Muslim guardian for her children after her husband died in 1994, while he was serving as a soldier in the U.N. Peacekeeping Forces in Kosovo. Local courts had produced an unsigned "conversion" certificate, claiming her husband had secretly converted to Islam three years before his death. Although her children were baptized Christians, Islamic law decreed that the document automatically made the "convert" father's children Muslims as well....

Non-Muslims are not allowed under Islamic law to control the financial affairs of Muslims, so Qandah had asked her brother to take on this court-appointed responsibility to receive and pass on their orphan benefits, never dreaming that he would turn against her and try to take custody of the children himself....

Despite assurances from King Abdullah II and other members of the Jordanian royal family who have pledged the children will not be taken away from their mother, the custody wrangle has yet to be resolved.

| 4 Comments
Print | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

4 Comments

Oh, but this simply doesn't happen! No, no, it must be all wrong. For I'm, er, "reliably" informed by some people I debate with that this kind of thing would NEVER happen, oh no, not NEVER.

More taquiyya.

It reminds me of that Michael Jackson joke: he used to call his ranch "Neverland", but now he's thinking about renaming it "Well-Maybe-Once-or-Twice-Land".

Geoff

As the apostate from Islam said in his cups down Mexico way: "No, no mas taqiyya -- mas tequila."

LOL Hugh.

Geoff

What kind of "legal" system has two forms of 'justice' depending on your religion... where one person is valued as half of another?

Half-justice for half-wits?

I hope the Christian women emigrates to a civilized country as soon as she wins custody.

Canada's maple needs some counterbalancing to its termite-like infestation by disingenuous Islamists.

But didn't she know that there was 'something slightly wrong' when her husband was declared a posthumous convert to Islam?

I guess being around a culture of juridicial imbeciles makes you a little goofy.

May the bracing climate of freedom, beyond corrupt Jordan, wake her and her poor kids soon.

In the words of a fine jurist:

"If you lose the power to laugh, you lose the power to think."
-Clarence Darrow.

(-who added: "You can only be free if I am free.")