Muslims condemn woman's plan to lead prayers

"Woman leads Muslim prayer service in New York City despite criticism in the Middle East," from AP, with thanks to all who sent this in:

NEW YORK (AP) A female professor led an Islamic prayer service Friday with men in the congregation despite sharp criticism from Muslim religious leaders in the Middle East who complained that it violated centuries of tradition.

Amina Wadud, a professor of Islamic studies at Virginia Commonwealth University, said the service she was leading helped emphasize ``the belief in the reality that women are equal'' under Islam.

Oh really? "Women are equal" under Islam? Since when? "Men have authority over women because Allah has made the one superior to the other" (Qur'an 4:34).

She addressed a congregation of between 80 to 100 men and women attending the service at Synod House at the Cathedral of St. John the Divine, an Anglican church in Manhattan.

Many of the women in attendance were modestly dressed and, in accordance with Islamic tradition, covered their hair with the hijab, or head scarf.

Wadud conducted the service primarily in English with verses of the Quaran [sic] read in Arabic.

``Women were not allowed to (have) input in the basic paradigms of what it means to be a Muslim,'' she said, adding that while the Quran puts men and women on equal footing, men have distorted its teachings to leave women with no role other than ``as sexual partners.''

Of course, the Qur'an itself gives rise to this ambiguity. It says that men are superior to women, as I quoted above, and also says this: "O mankind! reverence your Guardian-Lord, who created you from a single person, created, of like nature, His mate, and from them twain scattered (like seeds) countless men and women" (4:1). Many use that verse and other similar ones to argue that men and women are equal in dignity in Islam. They do not, of course, mention 4:34.

Then there's this from CNN, with thanks to Mediawatch:

There was a brief outburst from some protesters outside the building at the start of the service, but they were kept from entering by a heavy police presence. One young U.S.-born, bearded activist, who only gave his name as Nussrah, said Wadud was not representative of Muslims.

"She is tarnishing the whole Islamic faith," he said.

CNN for whatever reason doesn't tell us everything this man said. From Knight-Ridder, with thanks to LGF:

Only a handful of protesters showed up outside the event and they conducted a counter prayer service on the sidewalk, led by a young American man who would only give his name as Nussruh. "These people do not represent Islam," said the clearly furious Nussruh. "If this was an Islamic state, this woman would be hanged, she would be killed, she would be diced into pieces."

That's true.

| 15 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

15 Comments

The Cathedral of St.John the Divine has a number of interesting features about it. It is the biggest church in the world. There is a convention among churchmen of all confessions that nobody builds a church bigger than St. Peter's Vatican; when this vainglorious edifice was started, it deliberately violated this piece of ecclesiastical good manners, showing that the builders thought that the Anglican Episcopalian diocese of New York City was more important than the Church of Rome.

Of course, the Episcopalian Church has become the empty, shapeless, thing we are familiar with, and is on the verge of being expelled from the Anglican Communion. In America, Episcopalians are barely 2,400,000 - less than the Catholics or Orthodo in single archdioceses. This church is rich in money (since most of its members belong to the irreligious upper crust of society) but hollow. There is nothing strange about it lending its biggest building to rootless Muslims trying to subvert their own religion. Not that I am making any comparison between the Catholic Church and Islam; but the relationship of the pseudo-Christian Episcopalians of New York to both is the same - that of failed subversives.

I included links to some more articles about Amina Wadud in this post:

http://fjordman.blogspot.com/2005/03/woman-leads-muslim-prayer-service-in.html

Of course the woman in question has a distinctly imperfect command of orthodox Islam, and it is the enraged Muslims who have it right. There is a large dose of publicity-seeking here, which is part of a pattern, discernable among some of those disoriented or worried Muslims who allow themselves to believe, or pretend to believe, that Islam is capable of real reform. It isn't. Neither this "professor of Islamic studies" nor her supporters can tell us how the Qur'an, Sunna, and Sira will be changed, which verses eliminated or interpreted out of existence. They won't; they can't. But they may persuade some non-Muslims that "see, things are changing in the Muslim world" and we need only hang on a bit, and relax, and not do anything serious to protect ourselves.

And then, of course, there are those "reformists" who will issue their own meaningless "fatwas" in the spirit of the Spanish Muslim group. Whether out of a spirit of pure taqiyya, or in order to promote the political or professional ambitions of its members in the Infidel world, we will be led down a garden path about "reform" in Islam, and the Macmillanesque winds of change, and so on.

Nonsense. Of course the spectacle, which made the menfolk in attendance most nervous, may make it harder for those other, phony "feminists" in Islam -- or Muslim women who claim to be working for "women's rights" but have backed far away from what they were once able to do, which was to connect the mistreatment of women in the Muslim countries with the teachings, and atmospherics, of Islam itself. One thinks of Leila Ahmed, now enjoying tenure as a "brave reformer" and "feminist" at Harvard Divinity School, of Fatimia Mernissi, and of Shirin Ebadi, who no doubt is brave with the kind of enemies she faces, but not intellectually brave enough to connect Islam with the problems of women in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Even the remarkable bestseller (that bestsellerdom owes a lot to the word "Lolita" in its title), Azar Nafisi's "Reading Lolita in Tehran" steeres clear, while so obviously furious at the current police state, never comes out, Ibn-Warraq style, to connect what goes on with Islam itself. She can't bring herself to do it, Ms. Nafisi, and so the book in the end is bought, and read, and understood, as a kind of feelgood book -- literature as salvation, with a moral in tow -- even the moral of inner freedom.

While Fatima Mernissi, and Leila Ahmed, and Shirin Ebadi, represent the "fighters-for-women's-rights" in Islam who now choose not to blame Islam for the problem (culture, culture, culture), and have rallied round the Qur'an, and the attractive and charming Aziz Nafisi refuses (and mentioning a sign outside an Armenian-owned restaurant about the "najis" or "unclean" nature of the establishment because it is Infidel-owned, does not amount to coming to grips with Islam) to engage in anything like what Naipaul or Ibn Warraq offer by way of relating the moral desarroi of Muslim societies to Islam itself (Nafisi might ask herself if she has found anything wrong, deeply wrong, with Islam -- something that overcomes her embarrassment, or her filiel piety, which always hold even the most intelligent and perceptive Muslims back, until they make that fateful decision to finally jump ship).

Some Muslim women have advanced professionally in this country by presenting themselves, to their trusting Infidel colleagues, as brave Muslim women "fighters for human rights." Their colleagues accept this at face value (though on the websites of some of these "brave fighters" they do not always show the faces of other Muslim women who apparently have succumbed to Muslim strictures about full facial nudity -- see Aziza al-Hibri's website, for example). But these people are engaged in what is really an effort not so much to fight for women, as to protect the "good name" of Islam (again, see the writings of Azizah al-Hibri, or her performance at the U.N. "Islamophobia" Day, and ask if her colleagues at the University of Richmond School of Law are not being mislead as to her "fight" for "women's rights" (not to mention Condoleeza Rice, who once addressed al-Hibri's groupuscule).

Perhaps the most telling part of this was not the the men in attendance, looking distinctly uneasy and nervous about the whole thing, nor the role of the Cathedral of St. John the Divine offering itself as the only place where "reformist" Muslim women could gather in safety, and get lots of good publicity. No, the most telling thing was Amina Wadud's language, the undigested leftovers from some MLA gala, where the speakers were, no doubt, Gayatri Spivak Chakravarty, Homi Bhabha, and Fredric Jameson:

``Women were not allowed to (have) input in the basic paradigms of what it means to be a Muslim,''

"Input." "Basic paradigms." And in a newspaper report on the event, Wadud even suggests, in pure businessese, that women in Islam should be able to assume "leadership positions."

This is what happens when you allow mass education, and deprive it of all meaning.

O God, or Samuel Johnson, or Jacques Barzun, or somebody, we humbly implore you: Protect our language from all who do it harm.

Islamic theology:

It slices.

It dices!

And you can almost cut your way out of a paper bag with it.

Geoff

I'm sorry, but I am not going to take sides here. The UPCI (United Pentecost Church International) is just as guilty as islamic treatment of women. And they should be rebuked and be ashamed of themselves. I should know because I used to belong to this cult.

What's the problem?,females have their own enterance,own prayer romm,segragated washromm areas,own parking spaces for those allowed to drive,free Hijabs upon entry,and own access to Allah.

Plus,they should be thankfull that the sex-starved men that can't keep their dicks in their pants because of no self-control,are given a prayer area with a thick wall that keeps them contained.

A wall or fence has two purposes,to keep something out,orto keep something in.

Perception can become reality,Palestinians need to look at their fense/wall as keeping those "Jews" out, rather than the protest to remove it to let THEM enter Israel.

Professor Amina Wadud claims that she was trying to convince infidels that women are equal under Islam, it is clearly backfiring all over the world. The story of her leading muslims in prayers has picked up legs and has spread to media outlets everywhere. By the anger that is being directed by this male manipulated and directed religion , I would say that her life could be in as much danger as the Netherlands Ayaan Hirsi Ali. What was the good professor thinking? Had she fallen into the trappings of the western world and a modern and more civilized apostatic thinking among muslims? There is no question that Her efforts to attempt to practice taquiyya may have not been well thought out. You can speak taquiyya and kitman, but if you act it out as a woman and expect that the ummah is going to go along with you, than you are sadly mistaken. Are there those that are asking here the questions as to why she thought she could mislead infidels into believing what she was saying and doing? Did she think 4:34 and other surahs and hadiths where going to ignored by the ummah?

Amina Wadud probably loves Islam for letting her know that there is a God and that there's more to life than what can be counted and touched. She probably also greatly appreciates the liberal culture of the American academy. There are probably thousands of people like her; and while I think it's a pity they don't all convert to my religion, I still respect the sort of struggle through which they are going.

Maybe we are seeing the emergence of a "liberal Protestant" Islam that will look like the American Episcopal Church in forty years' time; well-endowed and empty, its people gone to other religions. Hence, I'm not surprised why Muslim "Old Countries" aren't buying into the project.

Then again, I've been told that when someone asked some female Reconstructionist rabbis what they needed to make their work more credible, they replied, "beards".

Frankly, much as I think wife-beating is shocking and criminal and believe in equal pay for equal work (woman suffrage, too), I still don't accept female ordination (Paul spoke on it to the Corinthians and his young colleague Timothy; the issue's settled) and belong to a Christian church that doesn't practice it. Yet while I believe that I've got the truth here, another BIG part of that truth is that the weapons God has given for his "holy war" are spiritual rather than carnal--prayer, preaching,ethical example, the Scriptures, and the Holy Spirit rather than guns and bombs.

Paolo, you are on the target about American Episcopalians. A number of their more traditional dissidents have already sought care from Anglican bishops in Africa (Nigeria and Kenya, especially), where Anglicanism is strongly Bible-oriented. When I was in the State Department, I recall some of my Episcopalian colleages shocked out of their heads by a "fundamentalist" Singaporean Anglican bishop who preached to them one Sunday. As a non-Episcopalian, I would've liked to have been there (I learned of it from my flabbergasted, gentlemanly liberal colleagues).

As for St. Peter's, are you sure it's larger than the Hagia Sophia? And didn't the late Pres. Hoiphuet-Boigne of Cote D'Ivoire build a slightly bigger Roman Catholic basilica in his hometown of Yamasoukrou, C. D'I.?

Professor Amina made a fatal intellectual mistake:

she forgot to read the Koran ("Qur'an", "Quaran", whatever) before she spoke out.

If she had, she would have realized that it cannot be reformed (by its own 'eternally true' rules), and that she should just risk the sentence of death it imposes on all apostates who leave its clutches and come join the sane branch of the human race beyond its patriarchal cage.

(The Catholic Church many be 'unchristian'* and supernaturally silly for not allowing 'priestesses' in its pulpits, but its leaders and followers do not threaten to hang, kill, and slice and dice non-traditional women for simply trying.)

The professor's act is as absurd as Blacks trying to reform the KKK from within -or Jews attempting to modernize the Nazis.

The Koran, like these hate cults, is a document of war against human intelligence.

The professor's irrational example only proves my point.

* "...there is neither male nor female, for you are all one in Christ..."

Excellent point BigSleep.

One might complain (endlessly, it seems) about inequalities in the religious heirarchies of the Christian denominations (which are not uniformly observed, at any rate), but they don't seem to be killing women for taking scriptural matters into their own hands.

But it's a religion of peace, of course.

Geoff

Here is an excerpt from the March 19 article that ran in the Richmond Times-Dispatch (Wadud's hometown newspaper) - notice the lack of support she is receiving from local Muslim groups:

Some area Muslims are unhappy with a Richmond woman who led an Islamic prayer service attended by both men and women.

"Most Muslims would not agree with a woman leading prayers attended by men," said Malik Khan, president of the Islamic Center of Virginia. "I have nothing personally against Dr. Wadud, but I cannot accept what she has done."

Islamic law "clearly says this does not happen," he added. "The Prophet Muham- mad did not allow it."

"It's a matter of modesty," added Muhammad Sahli, acting director of A More Perfect Union, a Richmond-area group aimed at building bridges of understanding and respect across faiths, races and cultures. "It's not because she's a woman. It's because of the exposure of her buttocks to men who are praying behind her. That's what I object to."

When Muslims pray, they form ruler-straight lines. Resting on their knees, they lean forward until their foreheads touch the floor. Both the worshipers and the prayer leader face toward Mecca.

Sahli said he has no problem with a woman leading other women in prayer.


A More Perfect Union is a very interesting group. Note how they characterize themselves as a "group aimed at building bridges of understanding and respect across faiths, races and cultures."
Sound familiar?
Last year, the former head of this organization, Jonathan Zur, portrayed CAIR as ³Muslims who are promoting values of peace and compassion². Another member of this group, who I spoke with at an event in Richmond, was a Syrian expatriate who was a hardcore anti-American Chomskyite.

Here's the story that ran today on this today in the Richmond Times-Dispatch:

Mideast Muslims Condemn Service
The Associated Press
March 20, 2005

Cairo, Egypt - Muslims in the Middle East yesterday angrily denounced a mixed-gender Islamic prayer service led by a woman in New York as a violation of their religion.
Amina Wadud, a professor of Islamic studies at Richmond's Virginia Commonwealth University, led the service on Friday before a congregation of 80 to 100 men and women at Synod House at the Cathedral of St. John the Divine in Manhattan, an Episcopal church.
Three mosques had refused to hold the service, and an art gallery backed out after receiving a bomb threat. Organizers said the service was intended to draw attention to the inequality faced by Muslim women.
The Egyptian newspaper Al-Messa reported the service on its front page with the headline: "They are tarnishing Islam in America!" It referred to Wadud as "the deranged woman."
A female Islamic law professor condemned the act as apostacy, explaining that a woman's body "stirs desire" in men. Some suggested the event was a U.S. conspiracy to mold traditional Islam into a secular American religion.
Muslims are required to pray five times a day. On Friday, the Muslim holy day, many try to perform their midday prayers at a mosque. A male imam leads the prayer, followed by lines of men and, behind them, women. Most mosques have different halls, or different floors for the women, as well as separate entrances.
Sheikh Sayed Tantawi, head of Egypt's Al-Azhar mosque, the leading Sunni Muslim institution, said Islam permits women to lead other women in prayer but not a congregation that includes men.
Many of the women who attended the service in New York were modestly dressed and, in accordance with Islamic tradition, covered their hair with the hijab, or head scarf. Wadud conducted the service primarily in English with verses in the Quran read in Arabic.
In Saudi Arabia, Grand Mufti Abdul-Aziz qal-Sheik spoke out against it in Friday prayers at a Riyadh mosque.
"Those who defended this issue are violating God's law," he said. "Enemies of Islam are using women's issues to corrupt the community."
Soad Saleh, who heads the Islamic department of the women's college at Al-Azhar University considered the act apostacy, which is punishable by death in Islam.
"It is categorically forbidden for women to lead prayers [if they include men worshippers] and intentionally violates the basics of Islam," she said. She said women should not lead prayers because "the woman's body, even if it is veiled, stirs desire."
Abdul-Moti Bayoumi, of the Islamic Research Center at Al-Azhar, said Wadud had carried out "a bad and deviant innovation" that contradicted the Prophet Mohammed's sayings and deeds.

Interesting how it all becomes a question of Muslim men not being able to concentrate on the Divine -all because of the proximity of a woman's magnetically alluring "buttocks".

And disappointing that even the brainwashed Muslim female Soad Saleh goes along with this 'he-man' rationale for her second class status in the eyes of Allah... since, 'even veiled, a woman's body stirs desire'.

Don't any Muslim men have bodies that stir the desire in Islamic women? (Not to mention gay Muslim men.) If so, how can anyone ever lead ANY prayers anywhere in Islam?

They're all too busy getting hot and bothered in the mosque, each trying to picture what the other looks like without their clothes on, to take the time to penetrate the holy idea of their God.

Pathetic.

Maybe they need some saltpeter in their Zam Zam water.

Hugh and all,

It's safe to assume al-Hibri's colleagues at the University of Richmond have bought into her act - I personally know members of the faculty of UR, and they're the types who buy into her ideas in the concluding paragraph here:

http://chronicle.com/free/v48/i05/05b00501.htm

Fortunately she receives no media attention in this area. The Richmond Times-Dispatch is a decidedly right wing newspaper that has been outspoken regarding issues concerning jihadism and other indelicate issues concerning Islam. The TV stations don't bother with this spewing fountain of misinformation, either.

Interesting post, Mike.

Question: how did other muslims get wind of this professor wanting to hold the event in the art museum?

Methinks her supporters infiltrated with non-supporters be.

Geoff







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
Crucified Again by Raymond Ibrahim
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
David LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter