A call for some sanity at the UN from the Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights: Petition to the United Nations Against Religious Apartheid
To: H.E. the Secretary-General of the United Nations, Mr. Kofi Annan;
The Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights is an umbrella coalition representing various organizations from the following communities: Arab-Christian, Armenian, Assyrian, Bahai, Buddhist, Copt, Hindu, Humanist Muslim, Ibo, Maronite, Nubian, secular intellectuals, Southern Filipino, Slavic-Christian, Southern Sudanese, Syriac, West African, and women's groups.
We gather to demonstrate our determination to protest the treatment of religious and ethnic minorities, as well as women and moderate and secularized Muslims in Islamic lands. We are here also to cry out against the murderous ideology of radical Islamism, which, by dividing humankind into worthy Muslims and inferior "infidels" is wreaking havoc throughout the world.
In the face of growing attacks and oppression of religious and ethnic minorities in Islamic lands, we respectfully make the following two demands upon the appropriate organs of the United Nations:
1. We call upon you today to appoint a Special Rapporteur to investigate the status and conditions of non-Muslim minorities, women, and humanist, moderate Muslims in states ruled by Islamic majorities. Such a rappoteur must investigate the following conditions.
Equality Under Law: What is the status, both in law and in practice, of these groups, and of individuals belonging to these groups? Do the laws in these nations discriminate against religious minorities? Do members of these groups have the same rights to assemble, speak, publish, and associate as those in the majority? Can members of these classes be elected to governmental and representative bodies? Is there a government policy of discriminating against the hiring of members of these classes? Does the government allow or encourage radical anti-minority organizations to abuse, threaten or otherwise oppress minority populations? Do the agencies that enforce the laws represent all groups in society?
Religious rights and freedom: Do members of minority faiths have the right to practice their faiths freely? Do they have the right to proselytize? Do members of the majority faith have the right to choose another faith?
Cultural equality: Are the rights and cultures of national, religious, and ethnic minorities respected?
Teaching of hatred and contempt: What is the view of these classes promoted by the government and the general culture?
2. We call upon the United Nations to condemn the ideology of Jihad-Islamism as a form of religious apartheid, which divides humankind into exalted Muslims and inferior "infidels."
Radical Jihad-Islamism is a supremacist, quasi-racist ideology that is now waging terrorist war worldwide against innocent men, women and children it labels "infidels." This ideology is supporting religious wars against non-Islamist Muslims and non-Muslim infidels worldwide. It is seeking to establish Apartheid-like regimes similar to those in Afghanistan, Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Sudan, to subjugate and control "infidels." It legitimizes and extends human rights abuses - including slavery - on a massive scale. It employs a global economic resource (oil) as a weapon against non-Muslim nations in the service of its goals. It is the duty of the United Nations, which came into being as a result of racist Nazism, to condemn and to combat any ideology which defines some part of the human race as inferior.
Radical Jihad-Islamism must be condemned as a form of cultural, racial, religious and ethnic discrimination, and the United Nations should equate it with Colonialism and Imperialism. It should condemn its teaching to any community or school and it should call for a "corrective teaching" to seek to undo the hatred that it has engendered in peoples who have been taught the ideology. Further, the U.N. should condemn all current Jihad wars and call on nations waging such wars to cease violating the rights of ethnic and religious minorities and peoples. Finally, the U.N. should intervene to protect the rights and lives of religious and ethnic minorities and non-Islamist Muslims in Afghanistan, Algeria, Egypt, Indonesia, Iraq, Iran, Lebanon, Mauritania, Nigeria, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia Sudan, and Syria.
We would like to meet with you about our concerns, and we wait with hope and prayer, your considered response.
Sincerely,
Fr. Keith Roderick
Secretary General
Click here to sign the petition.
"Religious Apartheid"
I like the term...words that clearly mean what they say. If we can get even a fraction of the international response that resulted to the "racial aparteid" in South Africa we will be getting somewhere.
This is a bit like the hen petitioning the fox for more secure accommodations.
Number 585. Will check back to see how far it went, later.
Interesting how the wording is only for "Radical Islam", not Islam. Who are we kidding here?
In either event, it is some progress, but it does not explain how to pick and choose from the Koran.
I'd really like to see a motion like: "Delete the third verse, second line. Insert in its place...."
I signed, under my real name.
Signed.
(Thanks for the link Mr. Spencer.)
At least as a notice to this body against the fallacious U.N. declaration, just passed, 'decrying the rise of anti-Islamic sentiment'
Tit for tat.
Until rat-a-tat-tat, if needed.
A petition to the UN? What a joke - you may as well send one off to the Mafia.
Remember, this is the organization that hosted a conference on Islamophobia and that conference degenerated into Jew bashing.
signed, only 616 signatures though.
Good luck.... unless is specifically targets Israel, the United Nothing won't lift one finger.
So rewrite it to say "Israel", then change it back once the signatures are in.
Seems fair. Taquiyya, anyone?
Geoff
What are the odds Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch will back this?
Let's contact them and find out, shall we?
True. The UN being infested with tin pot dictators and theocratic dominated states will do nothing, but the term "religious apartheid" I think is the most media savvy word to use. At least the term might help identify us with the racial apartheid of the past which got a bucket full of media coverage and mass global sympathy. These sorts of petitions I think need to be presented to the leaders of the world, one by one (dictators not included).
The other more specific terms (e.g. Dhimmitude) can then be shared with the masses when we have got peoples full attention and sympathies.
typo...meant: "At least the term might help identify the islamic oppression of minorities with the racial apartheid "
Thank you Britain once again for giving the world Pakistan. Instead of a slightly larger Muslim minority within the secular democracy that is India, we and the world face an unstable, despotic Islamists nation with nuclear weapons.