Saudi double game update from Spiegel Online, with thanks to Jeffrey Imm:
The Bin Laden family disowned black sheep Osama in 1994. But have they really broken with the mega-terrorist? Recently revealed classified documents seem to suggest otherwise. Osama's violent career has been made possible in part by the generosity of his family -- and by his contacts with the Saudi royals.Osama bin Laden remains at large. More questions are now being asked as to exactly how much help he has received from his family.
In early spring 2002, American intelligence agents tipped off authorities in Bosnia-Herzegovina that something wasn't quite right with the "Benevolence International Foundation." Their reaction was swift; special forces stormed eight offices of the Islamic foundation in Sarajevo and in Zenica. They found weapons and explosives, videos and flyers calling for holy war. More importantly, however, they discovered a computer with a mysterious file entitled "Tarich Osama" -- Arabic for "Osama's Story."After printing out the file -- close to 10,000 pages worth -- the intelligence experts quickly realized they had stumbled upon a true goldmine. They were looking at nothing less than the carefully documented story of al-Qaida, complete with scanned letters, minutes of secret meetings, photos and notes -- some even written in Osama Bin Laden's handwriting. CIA experts secured the highly sensitive material, dubbed "Golden Chain," and took everything back to the United States. To this day, only fragments of the material have been published. Now, however, SPIEGEL magazine has been given complete access to the entire series of explosive documents dating from the late 1980s to the early 1990s.
Read it all.
Moderate or Extreme, all Moslems play for the same team!
When an extreme Moslem is caught before his jihadist act or found dead after, we never really hear the moderate Moslems decrying the barbaric actions of their brothers. We hear from the moderate Moslems, but they only cry about their perceptions of Americans becoming equal opportunity employers, a wage Moslems are all to willing to pay, but not to receive.
"American intelligence agents tipped off authorities in Bosnia-Herzegovina that something wasn't quite right with the "Benevolence International Foundation."
--- from the article above
In Bosnia, heh? Well, that's no surprise, because Osama Bin Laden met secretly with Izetbegovic, the man who planned to impose the Sharia in Bosnia on Muslims and on non-Muslim Serbs alike.
AND have you all heard that Osama's NIECE is in this country seeking a singing career? She was interviewed on FOX.
"Although Scheuer is no wild-eyed conspiracy theorist, he also believes that the US government was "unusually" accommodating to the bin Ladens."
Before Giaur joins the feeding frenzy, I would like to point out that the writer betrays a poorly-informed Eurocentric view of the same guy who descirbes the Holocaust Museum in Washington D.C. is part of a Jewish plot to manipulate Americans into supporting Israel (I take Sheuer to task on his recent bestseller in an article titled "Crackpot Hubris." It is posted here: http://www.6thcolumnagainstjihad.com/).
In the final analysis, the state department has a long history of going easy on the Saudis. Steven Emerson documented in the 1980's how they tried to persuade PBS not to air "Death of a Princess" (In his book titled "The American House of Saud"). Furthmore, why would Richard Clark, one of Bush's most fervent critics, take full responsibility for this the evacuation of the Bin Laden family? It just doesn't add up.
If this has anything to do with influence of the Bush family, I am more inclined to believe that Bush the father is to blame. After all (unlike his father) no president since Nixon has done more to displease the Saudis than George W. Bush.
Oops! I accidently incorporated the bracket into the web address. This should work better:
http://www.6thcolumnagainstjihad.com/
Of course, since Osama works for the Mossad, all we have to do is ask them.
Or is he George W.'s secret Skull & Bones 'brother'?
I sure would like to hear someone in the government give an extended briefing on this captured material.
Just to keep the dozing public a little galvanized before they head to the beach.
As the assassin in "Apocalypse, Now" aptly put it:
"Every day I am here... I am getting softer, while every day (the enemy) is in the 'bush', he's getting stronger."
About time for the lawmakers in D.C. to take a vacation, isn't it?
(Thank God I have a lot of hair, otherwise all the pulling it out in maddened frustration would have rendered me another Kojak by now.)
OT: I wanted to ask if anyone has viewed a muslim channel called bridges tv in the US. Well the channel is going to be launched here in the UK and we already have an islam channel on, which uses the British publics ignorance to spew out propaganda.
Singh
http://www.islamundressed.com
Osama bin Laden is just one side of the islamic coin Kamal Nawash is another ,same goals different approach
The only differance is you can trust Osama bin Laden
Goal=Triumphalism of Islam, diminishing of non-believers. Strategies=anything necessary.
P.S.-
Why were all of Osama's relatives who were IN the U.S. at the time or 9/11 NOT held as material witnesses until the capture of Bin Laden?
Letting them leave the country and continue 'business as usual' IS A BIT UNUSUAL. Strategically, at the very least.
(Or was it just demented?)
It began with the toppling of the Shah of Iran by the Ayatollah Khomeini. The most ignorant of all US presidents to date, the former babtist preacher-idiot come president' Peanut-Carter' stood by and allowed toe US to be humiliated and grins to this very day...
This 'great victory' and later the 'victory of the Mudjaheddin over the Russians' emboldened them to attck the 'great Satan' the USA.
Bin Ladens 'great victory' of 9/11 leads them to believe that we are a bunch of imbeciles waiting to lay down to have our heads chopped off by Mohammdan morons or to convert to the blood-cult. As bizarre as it may sound, we see it confirmed daily...
As for the 'moderates'. they don't exist. I remind you of the trolls that used to post here on JW/DW, they all considered themselves 'moderate', but they want nothing other than the Khalifate ruled by the Sharia. For that, they live and die. I guess we don't want to die for that, so once again:
Let the deportations begin!
Well, the Sa'udi "Royals" are so numerous that if a mad muezzein decided to throw and egg through the air of Riyadh while giving the azzan, it would surely splatter a "Royal" (provided it wasn't cooked in the hot air first).
that article is a joke filled with inaccuries
i have browsed through all the anti-islam articles and i cant understand why the author has to use anti-islamic sources
islam in the end will prevail
falsehood shall vanish forever
www.islamicboard.com
elijah-
Your statement: "falsehood shall vanish forever" would nullify your previous sentence: "islam in the end will prevail".
You can't have them both.
The rest of your statement is a bit incoherent, but that may have to do with either your not being a native English speaker, or with not completing your thought processes.
By "the author", do you mean Mr. Spencer, Ms. Bynum or Mr. Fitzgerald?
By "anti-Islam articles" do you mean things that show an apect of the faith that reveals its darker nature? (Acid disfigurement and murder of Muslim women, honor-killings, atomic secrets theft, beheadings, mosque bombings by jihadists, terrorist plots, etc.)
And by "anti-Islamic sources" do you mean the AP (Associated Press), Reuters, Al-Jazeera, the BBC, The New York Post or The New York Times?
Please expound on what you are getting at.