Were Pakistanis involved in the Egypt bombings? "The involvement of the Pakistanis, if proven, would also increase suspicions that Osama bin Laden's al-Qaida may have been involved in the attacks." Or at least that Pakistanis with an ideology similar to that of Osama, of which there are very many, were involved. From AP, with thanks to Jeffrey Imm:
Police investigators said Monday that they are searching for six Pakistani men as the probe into the weekend's Sharm e-Sheikh bomb blasts widened.The investigators, who declined to be identified because of the sensitivity of the inquiry, said they are looking into whether the six men had any involvement in carrying out Saturday's attack, Egypt's deadliest ever. Pakistani officials had no immediate comment....
The investigators declined to be identified -- so difficult would their work become in Pakistan if it were known that they were working against the jihad.
If independently confirmed, any involvement of Pakistanis would suggest that those behind Saturday's bombings belong to a much wider terror network than previously thought.Until the latest news broke Monday, suspicions had primarily focused on a Sinai-based network thought responsible for bombings in the area last October, also targeting tourist sites.
The involvement of the Pakistanis, if proven, would also increase suspicions that Osama bin Laden's al-Qaida may have been involved in the attacks. The Saudi-born bin Laden is popular among militant Pakistani groups and is known to enjoy support in tribal areas close to the Afghan border.
Dear Robert, I was at Barnes and Noble yesterday and was pleasantly surprised to see your new book "Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (And The Crusades) on sale. I bought it and will say with all the current events, especially in the past few weeks, it is required reading.
This is the book that will make muslims and their leftist allies cringe.
Thank you so for your work.
I'm getting mine from Amazon. Free shipping on orders over $25, and I have a "wish list" that is currently 32 books long! (Not all are about islam or jihad, however. : - D )
I was watching the CBC last night, and they had a clip of an interview with an Egyptian, who claimed that this could not be the work of Muslims. Then the reporter went on to say "however, it is not unfathomable that the attack could have been perpetrated by Muslims..." I almost fell out of my chair laughing. I guess the interviewee was convinced it was the work of Mosaid. What else is new?
Oh, it's wide all right, and it has an arabic name: ummah.
Mix-n'-match:
Saudis in the Balkans, spreading the Wahhabi gospel, and helping to massacre Serbs.
Pakistanis in Egypt, bombing hotels in the Sinai.
Egyptians in the United States, hijacking planes, assassinating political figures (Meir Kahane) and would-be passengers (LAX terminals).
Moroccans in Madrid, bombing the subway station of Atocha.
Algerians in the United States, planning to bomb Seattle to mark the Infidel millennium.
Moroccans, Algerians, Tunisians in France, plotting to bomb the Strasbourg Christmas market, the Parisian metro, and many other targets.
Assorted Arabs in Afghanistan, killing an Afghani guerilla leader, and providing spiritual guidance, and military assitance, to the mad-dog Taliban killers.
PLO members in Iran, the key supporters of Khomeini when he first came to power, helping carry out the sentences of the assorted executioners, from Judge Khalkhali on down.
Saudis, Jordanians, "Palestinians," Syrians, Egyptians, and others in Iraq, making sure that Iraq remains safe for Sunni Arab supremacists, by massacring Kurds and Shi'a.
And a thousand other examples. The particular passports they may hold do not matter. What matters is the fervency of their belief -- not in some "perversion" of Islam, but in Islam. Many Muslims support the Jihad through other means, other instruments. And some are willing to sacrficie themselves, to enter directly into combat. Both are engaged in the same kind of activity, directed to the same end. And it does not matter from what nation-state they happen to be from -- nation-states do not matter. Islam matters. And only Islam.
The Saudi-born bin Laden is popular among militant Pakistani groups and is known to enjoy support in tribal areas close to the Afghan border.
Geez they're making it look like as if its a small area. actually Balochistan,NWFP and NA compromise 75% of Pakistan btwn them. Moreover why do these guys call these Pakis as members of Al-Qaeda?? Face it its handiwork of JeM,LeT et al. which are still described by Bismillah Broadcasting Corpo as "sepratists organisation fighting Indian rule in Kashmir" ignoring the facts that LeT aims to bring wholeof South Asia under Dar-ul-Islam. London bombers were more likely to be LeT guys than Al Qaeda.
India must not negotiate with Pakistan over anything. There is nothing to negotiate. If it were to hand over even more of Kashmir (remember that much of Kashmir is already ruled by Pakistan's Muslims), the demands would start up again: this time for India itself, fomerly ruled by Muslims, and therefore, like Spain, like Israel, like Sicily, first on the list of places that deserve to be re-folded into the dar al-Islam (in the end, the entire world belongs to, must belong to, dar al-Islam, but some lands are to be attened to first, whenever possible).
No "territorial compromise" can be made. There is nothing in the Qur'an or Hadith or in the example of Muhammad that says you can have a permanent compromise with Infidels, so that they may remain outside of dar al-Islam forever. Just can't happen.
The Israelis, with their deplorable media reflecting the views of those who do not know, or do not want to know, about Islam, and who keep telling themselves that the way to achive peace is "compromise" (that is exactly the way, in fact, to ensure war with any Muslim enemy), should be a monitory example for India, and for Western Europe. Do not behave as, unfortunately, the Israelis have behaved (in large part, of course, because of the hugely successful campaign of hatred and misinformation directed at them, whereby the entire demographic and cadastral and agronomic and political history of the area is omitted or distorted, in order to promote the Arab Muslim propaganda now centered, for the time being, on the supposed rights of the supposed "Palestinian" people.
India should not behave in the suicidal fashion of the Israeli governments that have been so incapable of articulating their own case, so incapable of seeing the problem as the unending one it is, and so prodigal with the lives of Isareli citizens, both military and civilian.
Nor should the nation-states of Europe, who bear a great responsibility for the terrible pressuress that the Israelis have felt, and which in turn have led them to their crazed, ill-thought-out responses, follow the example of the appeasement forced on Israel. For reasons not hard to comprehend, the peoples of Western Europe prove more sensible politically within their own nation-states than as the citizens of the European Community, a politico-economic undertaking that dampens awareness and love of all that is most precious in Europe -- national languages, national literatures, national histories, national identities -- trading it all for the mess of pottage that is the Big Market of the E.U., with its disastrous policy of promoting the policies of what many now call, following Bat Ye'or -- Eurabia.
Pakistanis involved in Muslim terror attacks, where would anyone get that idea from?