Jihad Watch Board Vice President Hugh Fitzgerald offers his (and our) services to all those Barbra Streisands and Alec Baldwins out there:
One has read that the modern celebrity in Hollywood has an extensive retinue. There are the bodyguards, and the chauffeurs, and the double, and the cooks (one for low-carb, one for high-carb, depending on the day's whim), the resident doctor, the two personal trainers (one for the family, the other for the pets), the astrologer, the gardeners (some of them with green-cards, some without), the Opener of Mail, the five Repliers to Same, the public relations firm on retainer, the agent, the high-tech expert for the home. But there is also, among those who are famous for having so much money that they can spend some of it in understanding what is going on in the world, the better to identify the proper objects of their "commitment" and "compassion," yet another necessary member of the staff. That fashionable accoutrement is known as the "policy adviser."Barbra Streisand and Richard Dreyfus are unsurprisingly among those said to have such well-paid advisers who keep them abreast of everything -- you know, wasshappenin in the big world. Apparently these advisers get to sit around, and read lots of newspapers, and clip articles from "The Nation," and take notes while watching the high-cheekbones of Katrina van den Heuvel on the Charlie Rose show, and read (and take seriously) articles by Tom Friedman and Zbigniew Brzezinski, and even, if they are very ambitious, buy a coffee-table guide to Islam by John Esposito and look at the pretty pictures.
But these are different times. Just a bit more is now required of such advisers. One suspects that the degree in social relations or psephology, that stint working for McGovern, fundraising with the Democratic National Committee, and a friendship with someone who writes for Tikkun, just won't cut the mustard any more. And if you are not used to reading real books without pictures, how likely is it, as you supply "opinions" and "you know, stuff to back up those opinions, like facts" that you will have the time to wade through all those daunting texts about Islam? I mean, just trying to pronounce the names "Bat Ye'or" and "Ibn Warraq" is hard enough. But "isnad"? And "Al-Hudaibiyya"? Hey, I'm outta here. And am I expected to follow demographic trends in Europe, or to understand what Islam has to do with southern Thailand, or the situation in the Philippines, or what the phrase "les deux rives" now means in France?
Yes, those "foreign policy advisers" must be getting just a bit anxious. Time to leave, time to find other employment -- perhaps at some university where an old pal from fundraising days can ease you into a sinecure. The students will never know that you know nothing -- and you've got the power of the grade over them, anyway, and besides, they will be thrilled to be taught by someone who actually worked with Hollywood stars. Call the course "The Uses of Fame: Compassion and Commitment Among the Stars." Enrollment will be huge; everyone wants to find out what these people are "really" like -- you know, behind all that irksome falsity, and the makeup?Besides, the islamization of Europe just may have an effect on what really counts -- foreign and residual rights. You know how those matter these days. More than 30 years ago, during filming of Harry Craig's script about the life of Muhammad, a single phone call made by some Saudi to the King of Morocco forced the film crew to decamp overnight from that country, though luckily that wild-card Qaddafi offered them his cinematic desert ("mazza che spiaggia"-- "wow, what a beach" as the old joke has it) instead. Don't count on the world of Islam to support the current standard of living in Malibu, or Bel Air, or those away-from-it-all 3,000 acre spreads that offer you the simple life in Wyoming and Montana.
So which Hollywood celebrity out there would like to trade in his or her "Nation" reading adviser for someone who will actually promise to have read, predigested, made sense of, Qur'an and hadith and sira, as well as many of the books and articles, even by long-overlooked scholars of Islam -- texts that would take you, busy celebrity, ten years to plow through, and you haven't time? It isn't your highest and best use. But you need someone to make matters plain -- and please don't think hiring one of those "experts" -- Arab and Muslim – who are all over the airwaves is the way to go. You might just as well hire Karen Armstrong, or John Esposito between coffee-table books (mosques, Iznik tulips, magic carpets qibla-aimed), and what good would that do you? And don't think there is anywhere in the press you can turn to -- Tom Friedman et al are looking sillier and more irrelevant every day.
The principals at Jihad Watch proudly announce that the services of its "private opinion" advisers can now be engaged -- to provide, everything from at-table or post-prandial disquisitions on Islam and the World, Saving the Environment and Fighting the Jihad, Women in a Muslim World, and other topics, some not quite so fashionably titled. Having such an improvisatore on hand, ready to make sense of arrests in Europe and the Philippines, future warfare in East Africa over Nile waters, massacres in East Timor and the Moluccas, Turkey's application to the EU, the rate of demographic conquest in Western Europe, the relation of Islam to science and art -- these, and many more topics to enlighten your guests, instead of having those tired old political hacks tell them yet again about their candidates' vision for a "new America." Whether star or starletta of the big or little screen, agent or director or producer, you can become the cynosure of all eyes at dinner-parties, the astonishingly well-informed guest on Leno or Letterman or Charlie Rose. All for less than you pay that personal trainer for your pets.
You will be able to beat the salon bolsheviks, in the usual salons, at their own game. And what's more, you will actually be able to make sense of the world. Your adviser will be able to beat their adviser -- this we can guarantee. Money back if not fully satisfied with opinions (and evidence, and logic) provided.
Special discounts available for bulk purchases of opinions (political, literary, historical-pastoral-tragical).
Oh, and if you are not a Hollywood celebrity, but want someone's akin to Pushkin's improvisatore (see "Egyptian Nights") at your next professional meeting, feel free. You need not be written up in those check-out counter newspapers to be eligible for our services.
It’s simple. Just contact director@jihadwatch.org.
One feels like adding: Operators are standing by. Calls may be monitored for quality control.
But that would be silly.
Very good, Mr. Fitzgerald. Makes them look like the Ninni Dhimmis they are. They make all of this money, and use it against the country that gave them the opportunity to make it in the first place. Kooks.
Why worry about hollywood?
We probably could find writers, actors, producers etc among our JW's right here.
Why don't we start scripting our own movies?
Attempts have been made to make films and create other mass media that is critical of Islam. We could very well produce our documentaries and films. However, all that create something critical of Islam will suffer the same fate as Theo VanGogh and many other artists, authors, publishers, distributors, and so on: bodily harm or death.
Isn't Barbra Jewish? What is a Jew doing supporting Islam who wants to KILL ALL Jews?
I have always felt hollywood was just a bunch of ill- informed and ill-read CELEBRITIES. They should stick to what they are good for....pretending and entertaining. And keep their motor mouths quiet so their very ignorance is not showing.
Of course, if Islam is successful and does take over the world, why would anyone associated with hollywood ASSUME that Islam will allow them to continue to make the movies they currently make? To allow the women to continue dressing provocatively? To allow blatant homosexuality, adultery, or promiscuity?
Nope, Islam will SHUT ALL THAT DOWN. They are NOT a tolerant religion. In essence, these idiots are supporting a religion and people who will DESTROY their livelihoods. They are supporting their own destruction. Ummm, maybe that isn't such a bad thing.......
"Hollywood. You can always blame everything on Hollywood. That's the nicest thing about Hollywood." - Irwin Shaw
Robert--
The Chateau Marmont is fully booked, I believe, for the next few months, but Billy Crystal insists he can put me up, as long as I agree to put up with his reminiscences about meeting Louis Armstrong at his uncle's seder. I don't see that as a problem -- do you?
Hugh,
No, but if I were you I would draw the line if he insists on dragging in Mickey Mantle.
As ever
Robert
Right on Robert!!
I am a member of the Hollywood Prayer Team. I sent this to them in hopes that along with the prayers we have for those in the industry, we can also heighten the awareness of false teachings.
I am grateful to have found this website. People who want the truth can find it here.
YBIC,
RLG
Tom Friedman is a bit superficial, but I thought Zbig was considered serious.
Anyhow, there are more beautiful women in Bollywood, though that is allegedly controlled by a Muslim mafia. (And the intellectual caliber of the Bollywood movies would be no more satisfactory to Hugh than the Hollywood ones.)
conservativebynature:
As a Jew from the pro-regime change centre/left, I can tell you that lib/left Jews spent decades in denial about Stalin until Kruschev outed him.
And archival material from the former Soviet Union and Dalton Trumbo's diary indicate the extent of Stalin's influence on Hollywood probably exceeded anything Joe McCarthy could have contemplated. And it still lingers on.
An American psychiatrist, Kenneth Levin, recently published, ‘The Oslo Syndrome: Delusions of a People Under Siege’ that speaks to the phenomenon of Jewish anti-Semitism, wherein Jews blame Jews for causing hatred of Jews. Babs Streisand and so many others like her would know nothing about the tenets of Islam or the real history of Mohammed's "career". They only have this misguided understanding of what tolerance is and fail to see that tolerating intolerance does not lead to harmony, but rather to the disaster we have on our hands now.
Hollywood elites, far too many of them to mention, talk crap all day long. Isn’t it obvious that people that make their living pretending to be someone else, would need
a political advisor to help them get in character, pretending that they have a clue about things which they are simply clueless
about. If Bush was totally for Islam, then they would read authors like Sina, Spencer and Warraq. These people should be seen for what they are, Faustians, just fulfilling their side of the bargain to the Devil. In many ancient cultures actors were not allowed vote, they were viewed as lowly as prostitutes and criminals in ancient Rome and beyond. I would say that people
have not changed much throughout History, the only difference being now is that many of us now view actors lower than Crack Whores and the lowest form of intelligence that seeks to preach
their coked up Ideology to us. Islam is making so many gains daily within the west, we the people have almost nobody looking out for us within main stream society, the very people we make famous by going to their crap movies would like nothing better than to see the US Army defeated in the war on terrorism, as they
view it as Bush’s war, not Americas. Four years on from 9/11 nothing has changed in the public discourse, Hollywood and the White House are still chirping on about the religion of peace,
without educating themselves to the reality which is facing us all.
LOL... what a laugh.
Yeah, Barbara Streisand REALLY has more influence in America than certain people at 1600 Penn Ave.
Hugh, you really need to write a letter to those elites in DC. THEY are the ones that really make a difference--or don't. You know, the State Departement, the Whitehouse, the Congress (where Denny Hastert killed the Bill that would acknowledge the Turkish genocide of Armenians in WW One.)
Did the Hollywood elite send the Palestinians 50 Million dollars?
Did the Hollywood elite send the Taliban 43 Million dollars in April 2001?
Did the Hollywood elite say that they would catch Bin Laden "dead or alive" no less--and then promplty invade Iraq?
Are the Hollywood elite braying on and on ad infinitum about "Freedom's On The March" and the "democracy in Iraq" that is really--as has been pointed out here many times by JW staff--going to be just another lousy Sharia hellhole, a clone of Iran?
Did the Hollywood elite....aw, never mind. I could go on and on, but it's not like it'll make any difference.
It's amazing to me that anyone thinks that Barbara Streisand and Alec Baldwin (you forgot to mention the oft-cited Sean Penn btw) have more pull and more influence in America or the world in general than Bush, Condi, etc. But then again, I always question.
The Hollywood elite (Charlie Daniels calls them "mugwumps"... but he means "liberals") can SAY what they want to SAY; they still can't DO much. Which reminds me: didn't I see here recently that Bush has excuse Saudi Arabia from culpability in their slave trade? Man, I wonder who made him do that: Richard Gere or Richard Dreyfuss?
No, I am not writing this letter to "defend" the Hollywood elites. Anyone that uses the opinions of a spoiled millionaire actor to form their own opinions is a fool. Ascribing and inordinate amount of influence to them is a two-way street though.
This is especially the case for actors with no real life experience outside of acting itself.... how are we supposed to know whether they are really leveling with us, of just acting like they are honest and sincere? This is what got us in trouble back in 1980, and what got Californians to believe that Arnold would really make a good governor.
As for trust-fund babies the likes of Paris Hilton, Richard Scaife Mellon, etc. they can all go take a long walk on a short pier.
You can say what you want about Fred Thompson (who BTW voted against "impeaching" Clinton) but he DID have a real job prior to his acting stint, and was a pretty decent actor to boot. This despite what must have been a minimal amount of training.
I expect to soon see (yet) another article lambasting the other perfect scapegoat: the university professor. They can't make kids study, can't make kids comb their hair, can't make them read, can't make them pull their pants up, can't make them take of their sports caps.... but we are supposed to believe Limbaugh, Beck, Slutssinger, and the rest of the right-wing "high-morals" cheerleaders that THESE are the guys that are going to make our kids gay commie Muslims? Okaaaay.
Actors have their place: entertain us, then shut the hell up. That goes for Arnold, Mel Gibson, Reagan, and the rest of the Hollywood elites.
Hugh, Spencer, et al.: I am less worried about the tendency of actors to highlight the "plight" of "oppressed" people than that of a certain administration to lie, shill, and dissemble about a certain "peaceful" "religion." I think that you should feel the same way. Instead of wasting time making up stuff about France, liberals, teachers, etc., why not focus on the people that actually influence and make our foreign policy? I think you know who I'm talking about.
It really is worth reading the article over at www.wikipedia.com about Fred Thompson. They couldn't find an actor that could portray him, so he acted the part himself. Not even Roger Waters-* could do that!
* Pink Floyd, "The Wall"; you know?
"You omitted from your list the psychiatrists for their pets..."
-- from a posting above
And the gourmet meals for pets. And the plastic surgeons for pets. And the grief counsellors for pets. And the marriage counsellors for pets. You are right: the subject of the treatment of Hollywood animals did not receive its deserved full-throated Peter-Singerish musical accompaniment, its didgery-due.
Hugh, you really must hold the line on animal jokes. Beau (aka "Opry Dog") was not amused. He is sulking as we speak and that despite the digerydoo joke, which I had to explain to him.
Lucky for you, he's not one to hold a grudge.
Bravo Hugh.
Great write.
Great chortle.
It would be great if these sorry assed ignoramuses in la la land actually took you up on this and gave more purpose and direction to their lives and
ACTUALLY GOT HOLLYWOOD TO SUPPORT WHAT IS VITAL IN OUR CULTURE, WHO WE ARE, WHAT WE STAND FOR, AND WHAT WE NEED TO DEFEND OURSELVES.
God bless the West.
To US-Infidel your comment on Barbara streisand confused me"She is thoroughly westernized and hellenized, and she doesn't have a clue about Islam."
Arent we all westernized and hellenized. I dont know about you but that is what I hope people on this site want to fight for. Being westernized and hellenized is the complete opposite of being Islamic. I think Barbara Streisand is a pinko and a leftist lunatic. But I think being westernized and hellenized is a good thing.
"I think being westernized and hellenized is a good thing." - pissedoffcanadian
I second that sentiment and raise you, that one reason for sites like this one is to raise consciousness of the value of civilization, western, Judeo-Christian, thoroughly hellenized civilization and philosophy. This civilization transcends the boundaries of our modern nation states. So, just like the Islamic threat we face, our cause also transcends the state and goes straight to the people, who will respond to the "cause" of civilization or they won't. But we can't be ambiguous about what we are fighting for, just as we cannot be ambiguous about what we are fighting against.
Good post.
Wonderfull, Wonderfull article.
Way to go Hugh!
Way to be typical kj!
Amazing. Voskhititel'no.
We can only hope things change in LA. For Hollywood's influence on the Americans, who don't normally research on Islam, is profound. The Dhimmi Kingdom of Heaven did its job pretty well — pro-Islamist sympathy that suffered a serious setback as a result of 9/11 began to regain momentum in the U.S. in the days after the movie's premiere. It's just about time to reverse the trend.
-----------------------------
dolphin, CAGE co-founder.
http://www.acage.org
I don't have a problem with Barbara Streisend and her ilk being anti-American leftist dhimmis. I have a problem with them being that while claiming to be Jewish.
So many Jews are not only anti-American Leftist dhimmis, and even anti-Israel Leftist dhimmis, they are also not really Jewish anymore but thoroughly secularized. Indeed, modern Western secularism owes a lot to Jewish culture from which, paradoxically, so much secularism has evolved. It's a paradox of health/disease, which not only Jews contribute to, but the West in general. At least we have our paradox; Islam has only its stark Either/Or. The day that we start seeing Muslim Woody Allens, Larry Davids, Howard Sterns, Barbra Streisands, Richard Dreyfusses, etc., is the day we start seeing an Islam that has the hope of joining the human race as a civil partner, though I doubt we'll see that day.
At least we have our paradox; though our paradox currently is meaning the death of our civilization, paradoxes are easier to extricate from in one piece than are stark, brute contradictions of Either/Or -- which are in the end easier to defeat.
Westernized and hellenized. I'm glad that it's acknowledged that our western civilization has a Greco-Roman base.
Calling our civilisation Judeo-christian isn't accurate. I'd call our civilisation Greco-Roman, because that's where our western civilisation springs from.
"Motown will release A TIME TO LOVE, by Stevie Wonder on October 18th.
"The highly anticipated new CD features 15 new Wonder songs and is a dedicated effort by the legendary artist to remind the world about the restorative power of love.
"Among the songs included on the new album... "Positivity," (featuring Wonder's daughter Aisha Morris)..."
Yes, I'm sure Mohammed's child bride new about the "power of love"...
Wow great posts from a lot of you. I do agree our civilization is more acurately described as Greco-Roman rather than Judeo-Christian. I do see both terms postively though. what I liked about going to San Fran this summer from Canada is that I realized America is still a western nation. there are a lot of monuments in San Fran that celebrate the greco-roman origins of western civilization. If you come to Canada you wont see anything that defines what civilization we belong too. I describe Canada as post-western. I think that is why it is so hard to convince people up here to one read a site like this and two to get them to understand what we are fighting. I think people dont understand what this site is about because people dont know what they believe in anymore and they dont know what there values truly are. People dont relate to any civilization up here and as a result there are no values that they are willing to fight for.
pissoffcanadian~ I find it hard to believe also, having moved up to Ontario (first to Sudbury, then Southern). I have a hard enough time getting it thru to my wife (who is Canadian). I do agree that people don't know what their values are anymore: the Left has been watering those down for decades in the US, and it looks to me like they've had a longer time to do it in Canada.
Everyone should take History courses, lots of them... and read the writers of each and every period of time. Not the obfuscations being passed off as history by most of today's writers... I wouldn't trust a history textbook written after 1980 (Unless Mr. Spencer or one of several others I know of wrote it).
pissoffcanadian~ I find it hard to believe also, having moved up to Ontario (first to Sudbury, then Southern). I have a hard enough time getting it thru to my wife (who is Canadian). I do agree that people don't know what their values are anymore: the Left has been watering those down for decades in the US, and it looks to me like they've had a longer time to do it in Canada.
Everyone should take History courses, lots of them... and read the writers of each and every period of time. Not the obfuscations being passed off as history by most of today's writers... I wouldn't trust a history textbook written after 1980 (Unless Mr. Spencer or one of several others I know of wrote it).
Oh my... no one "had the time" to answer a few simple questions:
Did the Hollywood elite send the Palestinians 50 Million dollars?
Did the Hollywood elite send the Taliban 43 Million dollars in April 2001?
Did the Hollywood elite say that they would catch Bin Laden "dead or alive" no less--and then promplty invade Iraq?
Are the Hollywood elite braying on and on ad infinitum about "Freedom's On The March" and the "democracy in Iraq" that is really--as has been pointed out here many times by JW staff--going to be just another lousy Sharia hellhole, a clone of Iran?
Maybe the diehard liberal hater, Gary, will find time in his oh-so-busy schedule to respond.
************************************************
Yes, by all means, let's go on and on and on about the pet psychiatrists, the pool cleaners, the letter-openers and -answerers.... let's pretend that only wealthy Hollywood lib'ruls have a retinue of hangers-on that assist them in their every whims.
After all, it is just sooooo g.d. funny! And exceptionally germaine to the topic at hand, which ostensibly is Jihad Awareness.
Meanwhile, a certain blueblood scion of Yankee old money is so dainty and needy that he can't even go on a bicycle ride at his prop "ranch" without having his doctor helmut up and tag along.
I wonder if Barbara Streisand, Sean Penn, Richard Dreyfuss, Alec Baldwin, or Richard Gere (etc., tune into the Mike The Savage Weiner show for a more complete list of who-to-hate) ever have their doctors come along and hold their hands when they exercise?
I wonder where Clinton's jihad awareness was when they funded his library?
http://www.davidwissing.com/index.php/3085
Or where it was when he funded teaching of islam in our schools?
http://www.campus-watch.org/article/id/1148
http://www.blessedcause.org/proof/Islam%20induction%20mess.htm
Or shall we read his own words about muslims, which puts him right up there with Bush?
http://clinton4.nara.gov/WH/New/html/20000110.html
excerpt:
The Koran also teaches, in addition, to the fact that we should do unto others as we wish to have done to us, and reject for others what we would reject for ourselves, but we should also make a commitment to live in peace. There is a new moon that has risen at the end of Ramadan and a new millennium marked in many nations. And again, I say to you as we leave, in addition to your prayers and work for peace and understanding and reconciliation within the United States, I ask especially for your prayers for the current mission of peace in the Middle East.
------
'How Clinton sold our children to islam'
http://www.blessedcause.org/proof/Clinton%20Islam%20Sources.htm
The championship for Hollywood fatuity is held, in my view, not by Babs but by Richard Gere. He came to Israel dripping with buttermilk and peace-honey last January before the "Palestinian Authority" staged its "elections" for chairman that made Chicago's elections under Dick Daley seem like paragons of the democratic process [spare voters bused from polling place to polling place to fill in where needed by Mr Abbas]. Anyhow, Richard Gere did Hollywood proud. He came here for the sake of peace and to help Abbas turn out the vote. Addressing the local Arabs from Ramallah, he declared: "I speak for the world. We want you to get out and vote." I-speak-for-the-world is an exact quote, I believe. Now, eons ago, when we all lived on a different planet, that was called megalomania.
Hugh, Spencer, et al.: I am less worried about the tendency of actors to highlight the "plight" of "oppressed" people than that of a certain administration to lie, shill, and dissemble about a certain "peaceful" "religion." I think that you should feel the same way. Instead of wasting time making up stuff about France, liberals, teachers, etc., why not focus on the people that actually influence and make our foreign policy? I think you know who I'm talking about.
Posted by: kj at September 26, 2005 04:02 PM
THIS IS WHERE YOU ARE A FOOL??
WHY BECAUSE THE MAN IN THE STREET KNOWS WHO THE PEOPLE OF HOLLYWOOD ARE BUT NOT WHO SITS IN THE WHITE HOUSE??
IF YOU WANT TO BE SAFE FROM THE INVADING ARMYS IT will TAKE THE WHOLE COUNTRY WORKING AS A TEAM!!
LETS NOT FORGET THE JEWS WHO SAW IT COMING IN EUROPE IN WW2 AND DID NOTHIING?? and what happen to them KJ you are like those who supported hitler and in the end were gas all the same??
KJ
ONCE AGAIN YOU SHOW YOU ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM NOT THE ANSWER??
Part of the American Tribe
Squirrel Hunter
Spider Killer
God Bless the Countries who have Heros Pity NOT the Countries who Need them Amen
Right with you, Cath.
Instead of wasting time making up stuff about France, liberals, teachers, etc
Especially since this line is half a hint that Mr. Spencer would make things up. Especially with all the proof Mr. Horowitz provides on a Daily basis. Especially with....
But you get the idea. kj's still a LIAR.
Damn.... Gary "forgot" to answer my questions yet again. I'll try posting them one more time. (Gary, if you still can't answer, feel free to call me a liar again.)
Did the Hollywood elite send the Palestinians 50 Million dollars?
Did the Hollywood elite send the Taliban 43 Million dollars in April 2001?
Did the Hollywood elite say that they would catch Bin Laden "dead or alive" no less--and then promplty invade Iraq?
Are the Hollywood elite braying on and on ad infinitum about "Freedom's On The March" and the "democracy in Iraq" that is really--as has been pointed out here many times by JW staff--going to be just another lousy Sharia hellhole, a clone of Iran?
**********************************************
Clinton's comments were made on January 10, 2000... a full 20 months before the Saudis destroyed the WTC (it even describes the date in the link.) But nice try though.
************************************************
Get back with me on the presidential libraries when we find out how much Saudi gives to Dubya... btw, since you are so good with your search engine, can you… aw never mind. You won’t “have time” so let me just do it for you: here’s a site that breaks down the 1.4 BILLION dollars funneled from Saudi Arabia to the Bush family:
http://www.newsaic.com/f911chap3-2a.html
...The figure also contains $1.5 million in donations to charities affiliated with George H.W. Bush (including his high school, Phillips Academy, which I also attended), $1 million to George H.W. Bush's presidential library, and a $1 million gift to George W. Bush's eventual presidential library...
“Eventual” presidential library? (This is almost as ludicrous as Bush Sr. pardoning the Iran-Contra conspirators to keep them from testifying against him before they even stood trial...for crimes "They may have committed" but hey, let's talk about Marc Rich instead....)In other words, they’ve already given a million dollars for a library that hasn’t even been built! Perfect republican crap, Gary. It seems to me that the Saudis give a million dollars to every presidential library, but true to rep-con form, you pretend that they only did it for Clinton.
It’s right out of the Limbaugh Institute playbook: take a flaw in someone you support, ignore it, and point out similar flaws in his opponent. It almost becomes a case of “everybody’s doing it”… except—and this is a key point here—Clinton is NO LONGER IN POWER… Clinton’s not the one poo-pooing the Saudi slave trade. Clinton hosted Ramadan “Feasts” too, but he didn’t do so while the towers were still on fire after 9-11.
And Clinton doesn’t work for a company (The Caryle Group) that is basically owned by Saudi Arabians (unlike Bush Sr. and James Baker.)
This is EXACTLY like the right-wing outrage over “Blackhawk Down”… they got all worked up because Clinton inherited a quagmire from Bush Sr… and where are all those “pro-troop” patriots now, that thousands GIs have been killed, maimed, etc? Towing the party line, of course. All so that Sharia can take over Iraq.
Or Gary, do you say that democracy in Iraq will be a good thing? I don’t think that you should call Mr. Spencer and Mr. Fitzgerald liars like that. I think that THEY are probably right and YOU are wrong.
Read the whole page, there are some good criticism of Clinton there…. I never said Slick Willie was an angel; the fact is that Bush is the one that has the influence NOW, and Bush is the one in bed with the Saudis NOW. And the “war on terror” is going on NOW. And thousands of other-than-mexicans are sneaking into America NOW.
*******************************************
Clinton “funded the teaching of Islam in our schools”…. So when is Bush going to UN-fund it? I’ll hold my breath.
****************************************
Clinton “sold our children to Islam”… and he cites townhall.com, blessedcause.org, and the Drudge Report no less. Maybe I should cite some articles from mikemoore.com; I’m sure that would really make a difference.
Now Bush sends the Army and Marine Corps to Iraq to overthrow the haram government make a Shi'ite-dominated, Iran-influenced, Sharia-based, Islamicly-pure, Koran-approved, theocratic hellhole. Yet it was Clinton who "Sold our Children to Islam"???? Another classic example of "accuse the other guy of what OUR guy's doing." Remember, people.... THOUSANDS of American GI's have had been killed and thousands more have had traumatic amputations, eyes blown out, faces burnt off, etc. Many thousands more have seen their best friends blown away right in front of them and will suffer from PTSD for the rest of their lives. Every one of them has a family that's been ruined.
And for what? To impose Sharia law in Iraq.
But Clinton's the one that "sold our children to Islam." Just keep repeating that, and eventually you'll believe it. Right, Gary?
*******************************************
Oh no Gary, you don’t hate liberals. You just looooove the people you claim hate America, hate the troops, love Islam, hate capitalism, etc. You don't hate Mike Moore, now do you? And Barbara Striesand, and Cindy Miller, right? Oh don’t tell me: you hate the sin but love the sinner, right? LOL.