OK, let me get this straight: Iran says it is not going to resume its uranium enrichment program unless the IAEA tries to stop that program. This makes about as much sense as those who tell me (and they are many) that I should not talk about the Islamic roots of modern jihad violence, for doing so will make more Muslims into terrorists -- as if all we have to do to solve this problem is pretend it doesn't exist (which is indeed the recommendation, in effect, of many learned analysts today).
"Iran warns IAEA against Security Council referal," from AP, with thanks to Kemaste:
Iran said Sunday that the resumption of its uranium enrichment program is not on its agenda but warned that it may change its mind if the International Atomic Energy Agency refers Iran to the U.N. Security Council for possible sanctions."Enrichment is not on the agenda for the time being but if the IAEA meeting on Monday leads to radical results, we will make our decision to correspond to that," Foreign Ministry spokesman Hamid Reza Asefi said.
"In a radical atmosphere, there is the possibility of any decision (by Iran)," he added, without elaborating.
The Vienna-based IAEA is scheduled to take up the Iran issue in a Monday meeting. The United States is seeking support from board members to refer Iran to the UN Security Council for possible sanctions.
The only thing recognized by the Iran thugs is force.
A bomb a day keeps the Mullahs away - hit strategic targets to degrade their war machine and their economy.
A few small targeted bombs TODAY is worth an atomic bomb and many lost lives later.
iran will be even more difficult if not impossible to deal with once they reach thier nuke goal. What's worse, it's a safe bet Iran will use these weapons against Israel as soon as possible. Prevention is best cure in this case.
whats so hard to understand here? i know im not the only one to see this. Iran is going to start it up again already, and to be honest, i beleive they have sites the UN and NATO intelligence organs do not know about where such things are already going on, on a much smaller scale at each location but at several other sites.
Iran has one and only one goal here: to acquire nuclear weapons at the earliest possible date, and to mate them with their existing delivery systems to give them a credible nuclear arms capability.
they are looking at maritime deployment, Ballistic missile capability, and cruise missile capability as well as aircraft delivered weapons.
lets be CLEAR here, Iran is now the sponsor and protector of Al qaeda and its leadership. they are also directing to a large degree al qaedas operations in iraq and elsewhere around the world, including agent placement and planning for attacks here in the US mainland.
IRAN WILL RESTART IT ANYWAY, AND THE RESULTS ARE GOING TO BE NUCLEAR ARMED IRAN AND NUCLEAR GIFTS TO AL QAEDA.
eff
GBU-28. The Bunker Buster.
America has a classified amount of them, Israel has 100 of them.
I would urge both countries to check the "USE BY" date.
After watching Iran's new thug in chief at the UN, it is obvious even to a blind monkey with learning difficulties & special needs that this guy is a full on fascist.
I have posted here before asking why he looks so confident, so assured.....now I know.
He truly believes in Allah, or God, & like all other religious maniacs of any denomination who achieve power he KNOWS its Gods will that he be in power to carry out Gods Plan.
Princess Blair & his media induced Catholicism & Bush's dalliance with born again illiteracy are no match for this man.
The Western God squad are a positive hindrance to what needs to happen with regards to Iran.
We need Churchill & bomber Harris like never before.
no no no, we need curtis lets drop the bomb on every red everywhere lemay. you know, the guy who INVENTED STRATEGIC AIR COMMAND, the guy whos brainchild was the bomber offensive against japan with the b-29, and the guy who desperately wanted to make soviet russia a self-lighting, glow in the dark parking lot.
i think we need to come up with a very good way to take down the leadership in iran. i do not necessarily think it will be conventional in how we do it either. thats kind of out. i think low-intensity conflict is the way to go. theres LOTS of things we can do with that.
eff