Now this is interesting. It will be even more interesting to see what becomes of this suggestion. "International meeting discusses terrorism," from UPI, :
Algerian Interior Minister Noureddine Zarhouni called for denying political asylum right to any person linked to terrorist activities...."Combating terrorism dictates on countries of the Mediterranean to cooperate more closely in intercepting the tools of terror, drying up the sources of financing and exchanging logistical support," Zarhouni said.
He called on the countries of the group, which also includes Morocco, Tunisia, Mauritania, Libya, Italy, France, Spain, Malta and Portugal, to deny political asylum to any person proved to be linked to terrorist activity.
Its about time.
Like for instance in Spain. Might have saved themselves a lot of blown up train pain.
Perhaps his remarks could be extended to Quebec - where idiots like Rassim could have been turned away (Islamism on provincial welfare) and a Montreal university could have been prevented from becoming a hotbed of offensive and disgusting Islamism.
Asylum, the right to enter a country, should be denied, at least in all countries where Infidels rule, to all those who claim to be adherents of Islam. For one has only to look at what those adherents, by their own admission (in continuing to identify themselves as Muslims), regard as the immutable word of God, and that tells them, among other things, to slay the Unbelievers whenever they come across them, and in a slighly less chilling vein, to not take "Jews and Christians for friends, for they are friends only with each other" though, of course, feigned friendship to protect or promote Islam, and the Believer himself, can be justified.
And there are at least another 100 so-called Jihad verses in the Qur'an. And did we mention the Hadith? The Sira?
Why should any Infidel wish, on any grounds, to admit to his country people who are taught to hate him, and to work against his own laws, customs, and understandings? What does this conceivably have to do with "tolerance"? Are we to tolerate those who wish us evil, who wish to promote a deceptive view in order to remain, tos settle, to throw down roots or rather tentacles, who wish to change what is taught (in France, refusing to read Voltaire, or permit discussion of the Holocaust or of Jews, or Isarel; in England, wishing to ban pigs or change the flag; in Canda, to institute the Shari'a as the famil law for Muslims; in the United States, in demanding time off from work, and prayer-rooms, and all sorts of special accomodations for Muslims, not to mention what has been happening throughout the Infidel lands -- the successful pressure to have people fired such as Will Cummins in England or the Washington radio host, or to sentence people to die -- Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Geert Wilders are protected now by a phalanx of bodyguards, and forced to change lodgings every few nights, or to kill them (Pim Fortuyn, for whom a demented "animal-rights" activist was the impressionable agent, Theo van Gogh, and the Japanese translator of Rushdie's offending text).
Why, with all this, with what appears in the archives of JW, the thousands of stories of outrage after outrage, would any non-Muslim in his right mind contemplate further incursions of Muslims, a further or enlarged or more powerful and therefore dangerous, Muslim presence, anywhere in any Infidel land?
Why?
Men are from Mars Muslims are from Uranus.
The main terrorists in 3/11 aren´t muslims. It was a coup d´etat of the left.
Oh, Hugh, just imagine the howling we'll hear from Amnasty (misspelling intended) International for refusing to give refuge to some rabid member of the Muslim Brotherhood who fears for his life if he stays in Egypt or Algeria.
As you are aware, the Canadian Branch of AI, jointly with CAIR-Canada plans to import Tariq Ramadan into Ottawa to lecture Canadians on our abusive human rights practices when it comes to persons who were jihaddists in Afghanistan, where a number of our troops were just wounded in a roadside bombing intended to stop the elections.
What is terrorism? Only a tactic in Jihad. Terrorism is frightening, but more frightening is the prospect of having to submit to Sharia, the long-range goal of the "terrorists," i.e. Jihadists, Islamists, or any sympathizing Muslim.