And what is the message the portly cleric wishes to convey? Why the glorification and urging of jihad, of course. From the Times Online:
THE exiled radical Islamist cleric Omar Bakri Mohammad is continuing to reach his followers in Britain through websites and internet chatrooms. After a period of silence that came after Bakri Mohammad’s decision to leave Britain for Lebanon to avoid the threat of arrest and deportation, his followers have re-emerged online.They have been detected using a chatroom labelled “Muslims in the UK” to deliver lectures that deliberately challenge proposals in the Terrorism Bill to outlaw the glorification of terrorist acts.
The nature of the material suggests that Bakri Mohammad’s movement is prepared to be more explicit in its preachings and teachings.
In one session a man calling himself Mizaan, who spoke with an English accent, said: “We should all of us glorify terrorism and we should incite religious hatred.
“Don’t worry, it’s not illegal for us to say that the Mujahidin on 9/11 were the magnificent 19, and it’s not illegal for us to say that Mohammad Sidique Khan (July 7 ringleader) and the four on 7/7, that they were the fantastic four.”
Speaking animatedly, Mizaan stated that the world was divided into two camps — Islam and kuffar — which would always be at war. He repeatedly urged his listeners to take part in that war.
He said that he was in contact with Bakri Mohammad. but it was not possible to determine from where in the world the lecture was being broadcast.
The chatroom appeared on the Paltalk internet network which is run by a New York-based company. In January The Times revealed that Bakri Mohammad used the same network to declare Britain a “land of war” and encourage his followers to join al-Qaeda.
What did they expect? And we still have most of our citizens in the West objecting when we handle these types a little roughly, or attempt to treat them in a fashion which falls outside or normal "legal" modalities. They are not like regular criminals... They are true human perverts -- more dangerous than any criminal or typical pervert... They are ENEMIES -- but unlike any enemy we have ever faced before. Their indoctrination is nearly complete. Their programming to damage us and further their "religion" is paramount -- there's no negotiating - there will be no "final settlement" or document of unconditional surrender with them -- THEY ARE FIGHTING FOR KEEPS! FOREVER! FOR THEIR PERVERTED IDEA OF "RELIGION..."
We must be prepared to come up with new 'methods' and 'techniques' to deal with them -- deportations to areas where they can cause more mayhem is unacceptable -- incarceration where they can spread their malignancy is unacceptable -- allowing access to our judicial system so they can turn another of our valued institutions into a weapon against us (as they have done with freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of assembly, the privilege of immigration...etc) is unacceptable...
I have some ideas, but I'm interested in what others think...
The Times article is based on a JW linked article a couple of days ago. The Times though has removed the really vile bits from its own article.
Still, better then nothing.
"Speaking animatedly, Mizaan stated that the world was divided into two camps — Islam and kuffar — which would always be at war. "
The jihadists make a statement like this, and nobody says a word. The "moderate" Muslims like CAIR (heh) don't deny it, the MSM doesn't report it, the world leaders don't denounce it, peace activists don't rally against it.
Yet, let one infidel politician or commentator say the same statement, and he or she is immediately labeled a racist and an Islamophobe by all those groups listed above. Regardless of how well documented that statement is.