Bill Petersen at Faith Freedom (thanks to JE) recounts a particularly successful media appearance by my old friend Ibrahim Hooper of CAIR, relating to CAIR's successful intimidation campaign against Boeing:
For anyone that had the misfortune of witnessing the Tucker Carlson “interview” with CAIR mouthpiece Ibrahim Hooper on MSNBC Tuesday night, several things were readily apparent. To the uninformed, naïve middle-American, it should now be obvious not to expect any mercy from the proponents of the “most merciful Allah”. But to those of us burdened with greater insight into the Islamic hate machine, this exposition served as yet another reminder that CAIR’s vision of “American-Islamic Relations” amounts to nothing more than unconditional dhimmitude here in the USA. The CAIR-free days of years past are indeed a distant memory.Carlson’s brief segment dealt with CAIR’s recent uproar over a recent Boeing print ad featuring their Osprey aircraft “attacking” a fictitious mosque. Pathetically, Boeing has apologized and retracted the ad in response to the deafening Muslim whining. Hooper’s unbridled arrogance in suggesting that Boeing must now investigate and find introspection regarding its motives had Carlson’s (and my) blood well beyond the boiling point. Over and over again, Carlson demanded that Hooper answer one simple question: What is the bigger crime, Boeing’s ad or the fact that Muslim insurgents are using mosques as military strongholds? Yet time after time, Hooper dodged, weaved and denied that any such practice exists, even in the face of hard evidence delivered by the increasingly agitated host. Class, you have just completed a crash course in “Islamic Deceit and Arrogance 101” delivered to your television in a bite-sized 5-minute package.
Read it all.
Ibrahim Cooper has said he wants the Constitution to be replaced by islamic law through `peaceful means`.
Robert,
I respectfully disagree.
By pure luck of the draw (channel surfing), I did watch that show.
While the Hoopster is pretty adept at dodging questions, it was obvious that he wasn't prepared to handle Carlson's agitated inquisition.
I felt fortunate to have withnessed the spectacle.
I also caught Carlson's similarly toned interview with Azzam Timimi, in London, just after the bombings.
Best
Ooops.
I should be disagreeing with Bill Petersen.
Ibrahim Hooper has said he wants the Constitution to be replaced by islamic law through `peaceful means`.
Don't you feel the chilly wind of Islam blowing down your neck??? Islamic law is death to all in the West regardless of whether the implementation if violent or by peaceful means -- oppose Hooper!
Islamic law i.e. Sharia, is more frightening than any bomb or weapon that Islam could come up with.
We need to get Tucker over to Fox News. Whoops. That one's got partial Moslem ownership now in the person of Saudi Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal's 5% stake.
Here's a question for Ibrahim: Do you endorse and/or practice clitorodectomy? Reason I ask is that I know from police and fire service sources that Moslems are afforded unequal protection under the law by not prosecuting Moslem Men when 911 gets called to help deal with the out-of-control blood spurting when a good old fashioned Moslem clit-snip party gets all wet right here on American soil.
Protected cultural heritage?