Kashmir: Burqa-clad jihadist strikes on highway

I have said this before and I'll say it again, the West has no idea what we Hindus have been facing for centuries. There is nothing more frightening than an angry Drag Queen.

Obviously Cross Dressing is not forbidden during Jihad, I guess this would be in tune to an Islamist version of La Cage Au Folles.

These savages has been brainwashed in Pakistani madrasas that those who become martyr in this holy month of ramadan will go staright but nowhere to heaven. If the earthquake has not happened, the terror strikes could have been much more.

HE was wearing a burqa?! Sounds like he not only has anger issues, but gender issues as well (Maybe that's why he's so angry.)

The most famous cross-dresser in recent Muslim history was "strong-man" (that was the Homeric epithet, if you agree that Homer could not only nod off but fall into a deep, heedless sleep) Nuri al-Sa'id, who during the 1958 coup of Colonel Qassem (k-k-k katy) attempted to flee Baghdad dressed as a woman. He didn't make it. He was caught, killed, his body mutilated and dragged through the streets of Baghdad, so that everyone could enjoy the spectacle.

This story does illustrate the need not to allow burqas in Western Europe nor, for that matter, any Muslim garb that can conceal weaponry.

Quake seems to have given an impetus to Jihad in Kashmir... with all those IA's bunkers destroyed and 700000 armymen out there to "win hearts and minds" (as if its possible). Just the other day i saw those lil' princelings on TV shouting "India Murdabad" complaining about slow (gasp) distribution of relief. The amount of coverage given to Kashmir quake by Indian press is sickening. Lets see how much money did central govt hand out to different states struck by calamity.

Tsunami affected states: $100 million
Maharashtra Floods (which killed as many ppl in the quake): Not a freakin dime.

Kashmir Quake: $150 million

The BBC's John Simpson liberated Kabul wearing a burkha, or so he claimed.

Muslim means a person who has surrendered himself including his brain to Mohammad and Allah. A person without brain is already an animal and does not need any wash. Muslims right from inception of Islam are nothing but terrorists. Hindus know it very well, western countries have started realizing only after 9/11. What a shame- US President,most powerful,informed and committed for the freedom of human beings calls Islam is religion of peace. This $150 million quake aid is jizia imposed on Indian hindus.

"I have said this before and I'll say it again, the West has no idea what we Hindus have been facing for centuries."
-- posted by Gorkhali

Actually, I do. But you're right.

Some visits to voi.org and some free-of-charge books printed, bound and read from the likes of Sita Ram Goel and Suhas Majumdar quickly disabused me of my ignorance on this critical history (that is yet underway).

I discovered what great and good fighters Hindus can be.

The West could learn valuable lessons from Hindus on how to survive in the Face of Hate.

This is the vermin we are fighting, and the Guardian has been emblazoned for two days with a storyline about American soldiers supposedly burning similar dead carrion and treating it like the epitome of US barbarism... Where is the leftist storyline recounting the perpetual dismemberment of humanity that is rife in the Muslim world?

Talk of being "Dressed to Kill".

One mujahideen to another, "Hey Ahmed,that's a killer Burqa".

jlsa says

"This is the vermin we are fighting, and the Guardian has been emblazoned for two days with a storyline about American soldiers supposedly burning similar dead carrion and treating it like the epitome of US barbarism... Where is the leftist storyline recounting the perpetual dismemberment of humanity that is rife in the Muslim world?"

I agree with you wholeheartedly that they are vermin, and I think that the psyops campaign of calling them cowards on loudspeakers is just great, however I demur from your usual rant against leftists, as in "where is the leftist storyline".

It's not that I defend leftists, but this "leftist media" is a ruse, (oh self described "rightists" really believe that the media is leftist, after all the likes of Ann Coulter, and Limburger say so, but the truth is the media is conservative, it knows where it's bread is buttered, and if it wants access to power it best not piss of power, and if it wants to pay the bills it has to please the advertisers, and the advertisers are the corporations that elect politicians, and keep the engine running.

I'll truncate the rant, there is no Liberal or leftist media, except for small circulation periodicals, there is only corporate media, and the nation marches to the drum beat of the corporate media, the bottom line is profit and stockholder value.. Wall Street, money, profits drive the economy and hence politics and hence the reporting, and that includes the New Duranty Times and the Bandar Beacon..

"The Leftist media is not going to report the "dismemberment of Humanity in Muslim lands", when el President handholder, Boeing, Haliburton, Exxon, Bechtel are friends and business partners with Iranian Mullahs, the Saudis, the Emirs of Kuwait, Gulf States and Musharaff is esteemed to be a partner in the phoney war on terrorism.

You would do well to take off your blinders.

BTW, IMO, there really is no such thing as the "left", especially in American politics, as Gore Vidal said, America has one political party with two right wings (money and corporations) and Kurt Vonnegut says "we have only a one party government. It's the winners. And then everybody else is the losers. And, the winners divided into two parties. The Republicans and the Democrats."

"Two members of Skull and Bones at Yale, for God's sake. If I mean, that's what a charade the combat between the Republicans and the Democrats is. It's rich kids. Winners on both sides. So the winners can't lose. And, of course, the losers have no representation in Congress or whatever.

But look, yeah. We had to choose between two members of Skull and Bones? What about if we had to choose between two members of Sigma Chi at Purdue? Wouldn't somebody have said what a minute. What the hell happened here? "

BTW, Clinton was no liberuhl, a moderate Republican yes, his mouth paid lip service to liberal causes, but his actions were hard core corporate America. He threw all of his weight into passage of NAFTA and GAAT, hardly "liberal" or "leftist causes", in fact last time I looked the left was busy demonstrating against NAFTA,GAAT and WTO.

The only leftists and rightists, liberals and conservatives are the morons and sheeple at street level.

As Calvin Coolidge said, the business of America is business, and as the sage says to get along, go along.

The sooner us street level morons realize that, the better chance we have of saving our hides.

Who needs Burqas? Habib just hollows out that prosthetic leg of his and packs it with ten pounds of semtex and a few hundred fence staples.

Pardon me, but staff at the Guardian would be the first to admit that they are leftist -- "progressive" -- what have you -- it is a given that their platform is that of the socialist left, so I beg to differ -- the leftist attitude is REAL. Your points are lost on me as perhaps mine were on you...

I cited the example to illustrate the trends I see... While the world is absolutely replete with Islamic horrors and terrorist actions by pious Muslims, the leftist press is largely SILENT on these matters -- preferring instead to concentrate nearly EXCLUSIVELY on sometimes genuine but mainly concocted exaggerations of "transgressions" by the West against non-Westerners... why?

They sometimes mention in passing this event or that event in some context as having something or other to do with Muslims or Islam, but most often when they do, there is the exact same "anti-imperialist" blame-the-west-first-and-forever undertone that the Jihadis' themselves adopt as pretext for their actions. But to read most of the press in the West, you'd think that Abu Ghraib and this story about burning Muslim trash is the norm, and not isolated. Don't you see how insidious this kind of self-flaggelating exaggeration is for 'our side?' and how it feeds and bolsters the bald faced propaganda of the Islamists?

The terrorists who are beheading contractors, vote counters, and rival religious and ethnic sects in Iraq and Afghanistan are ubiquitously referred to as "insurgents" and even "freedom fighters" by these high priests of intellectualism. FREEDOM FIGHTERS????????????? The notion that Islam or the idea that Muslim religious sentiment has ANYTHING to do with the motivation of these viruses is altogether whitewashed out of the coverage. And the ubiquitous events of Muslim transgressions are far outweighed in the Western press by accounts attempting to create the impression that we are rampaging throught Muslim lands -- destroying like the moghul hoardes -- in short -- the Western press is filled with the same distorted propaganda as the Muslim propaganda organs... Again -- WHY?

What kind of febrile fantasist construct would contrue the notion that a head chopping, clitoris-carving, place-a-bomb-in-a-dead-body-by-the-road-near-the-market, drive-a-bomb-laden-fuel-truck-into-a-crowd-of-children-taking-candy-from-US-soldiers kind of guy should be referred to as an "insurgent?"

What kind of editorial board decides to run with the story about American soldiers supposedly torching a pile of Muslim filth in a pysops maneuver but ignore the Iraqi referndum (as they did) and not feature a single article about the 101 Islamic acts of terror visited upon countless hapless innocent bystanders across the globe. I AM CERTAIN that some Muslim somewhere burned SOMEONE alive today, but the Guardian would prefer to run with a story about 4 soldiers taunting a nest of Taliban cowards instead... Again -- WHY? What is the impression they wish to leave - What are they hoping to accomplish? What is the purport of their choices to cover this story, and never cover the other???

I feel a run-on sentence coming on...

In the face of nearly daily Islamic transgressions such as these and a million others too innumerable to count which are occuring around the world, and especially on the fringes of the Muslim world where they're enacting the time honored sequence of events to further Islam, why are the likes of the Guardian, the NYT, DEDICATED to telling "confessional" stories about extremeley isolated events and exaggerations such as Abu Ghraib, or this one involving the possible buring of human trash when Muslims are immolating (the burning alive) non-muslims and muslims alike across the globe? Clearly the coverage is intended to create a symmetry between the two "sides", and to paper over the offense of one side (the Muslims) and magnify and vilify the actions of the other (the Americans.)

I imagine one inference they wish to be drawn is that nobody has clean hands...
"See -- ! -- Our side is JUST AS BAD AS THEIR SIDE..."

But this peculiar disease only exists on our side -- mainly among the left, (although it sometimes includes the radical right fringes as well....) Nevertheless, WHAT GIVES?

I see no such "truth telling" and confessionalism on the Muslim side, if truth telling is the name for these distortions.

Muslim coverage is famously geared to depict the West as being COMPLETELY at fault...

On "our side" the coverage is becoming famously geared to depict the West as being COMPLETELY at fault...

what's the difference between a burqua and a huge pile of steaming and festering un-flushed filth ?

if I said "nothing," would I get in trouble ?

Pakistani police on Tuesday arrested two suspected Islamic militants with explosives and bomb-making literature near the industrial city of Faisalabad.

The report received on Tuesday said that one of the bearded men was wearing a head-to-toe veil, (burqa) worn by many conservative women in Pakistan.

http://www.irna.ir/en/news/view/menu-239/0509215161141741.htm

As usual the West will not learn till there is an incident.
Well so be it.

@Crunchy Jello:

That reminded me of a joke I read on a Gurkha forum, it went:

To all Muslims, Yo Mama is so fat, Yo mama is so fat that she is the local mosque. Everytime She farts, it is a call to to prayer.

Cheers

Pyaar mein twist in Pakistan

.

Here's a story of pyaar mein twist and its interesting sequels. Liaquat Ali, a 42-year-old Afghan refugee in Pakistan's Khyber region, till recently blissfully married and proud of siring a brood, set eyes on a 16-year-old lad, Markeen, and sparks flew.

The affair resulted in what is being billed as Pakistan's first gay marriage, with Liaquat paying doe-eyed Markeen's parents a "bride price" of Rs 40,000 and celebrating the nuptials with traditional tribal feasting and revelry.

Tirah Valley boomed with gunshots as a coy Markeen was led by a beaming Liaquat to their marital home. Elsewhere in San Francisco, a gay pride group voiced its outrage by denouncing such crass "buying of a male order bride".

The story, however, does not end with the two living happily ever after. The tribal council, whose members had partaken of the wedding feast, realised to its horror the day after that Liaquat and Markeen had "violated tribal values and ethics". Accordingly, the couple was asked to leave the region, or else.

The subsequent whereabouts of Liaquat and his "bride" are not known. What is known, however, is that a mullah in earthquake-devastated Pakistan-occupied Kashmir believes that the terrible destruction is divine retribution for Liaquat's 'deviant' lust.

"Has it occurred to you," he asked the wretched few who survived the killer quake, "that the most severe earthquake in Pakistan's history has struck just five days after the first gay marriage in the country?"

Razi Azmi, a brilliant polemicist who writes for The Daily Times of Pakistan, had a swipe at this and other obscurants - another mullah had blamed the quake on people watching cable television - with a retort that merits reproduction.

"Has it occurred to you that this may not have been the first gay marriage in Pakistan? Have you cared to look at the map before trying to enlighten us with your brilliance?" Azmi asks, adding, "If you did, you would have noticed that the earthquake devastated the Kaghan Valley and Azad Kashmir, whereas the reported gay marriage occurred in the Khyber Agency on the Afghan border, a few hundred kilometres away?"

Logic, however, is not the strong point of those who see a twist where none exists. Or else piouspaki would not have posted this message on a discussion forum: "This is another Zionist-Christian lie! There are no gays in Pakistan." Pity the man for he knows not what he says.

Although Pakistan takes a dim view of same-sex relations, gay couples and details of their intimate lives are not unheard of in Pakistan. Tehmina Durrani's books unveil the fondness some Pakistani men have for others' derrières, and not necessarily of women. Earlier this month, a young child slit the throat of a fellow taliban to draw the attention of authorities to rampant sexual abuse in a madarsa.

A rather droll sequel to Liaquat's paid-for-union with Markeen comes in the form of a post on another discussion forum. "If the mullah blaming Liaquat and Markeen for the devastation is right," says the message posted by happytobepaki, "then little of Pakistan would have existed today!"

http://www.dailypioneer.com/indexn12.asp?main_variable=front%5Fpage&file_name=story5%2Etxt&counter_img=5?headline=Pyaar~mein~twist~in~Pakistan

To make the matter worst, eminent high court judges and religious leaders have urged the citizens to kill blasphemers on the spot. One of them is a judge of the Lahore High Court, Justice Nazir Akhtar. He said that anybody accused under blasphemy charges should be killed on the spot by Muslims as their religious obligation.
http://www.faithfreedom.org/oped/StephenGill51020.htm