Just what we need. And what will American immigration authorities do about this? "5000 Islamic Clerics to be sent to the US: Iran's Ayatollah," from the Spirit of Man blog, with thanks to DC Watson:
According to BBC Persian and Persian service of IRNA, the hardline ayatollah Mesbah Yazdi has announced that the Iranians living in the US need 5000 Islamic clerics for their religious services.Mesbah Yazdi asks the new Iranian government to finance their trainings!
This hardline ayatollah is known as the founder of the shiite version of Taliban in Iran.
Wow, and I wonder as well, what exactly is the American government going to do? I pray to God that it's not to let them in. They can just turn around and go back to Iran. We don't want them or need them here. This is a disaster waiting to happen. I can't see any reason at all to let them in. There are plenty, too many actually (one is ten too many) islamic clerics in this nation. The ones we have now aren't worth the welfare we give them. If anything more comes of this, it is our right and our duty to protest, and contanct our goverment officials to put an immediate hault to this.
Simply words, from Mesbah Yazdi, who belongs to the same group, or groupuscule, as does Ahmadinejad himself. Even among the prmitives of the Islamic Republic of Iran, these primitives are unusually troglodytic. Cavemen with cannons are bad enough. Cavemen with nuclear weapons -- not conceivably to be tolerated.
And Chuck Hagel, a worrisome and dangerous figure, whose long history of antipathy to Israel appears mirrored in his stated reasons, --all the wrong reasons --for wishing America out of Iraq (his reasons being the need to make nice to the world's Muslims, not to withdraw in order to more effectively and cleverly deal with the world-wide Jihad, by dividing and demoralizing those same Muslims) has announced today that he thinks the American government should talk to the Iranian government. That means Ahmadinejad, and those who think like him -- including Ahmadinejad's spiritual guide, Mesbah Yazdi.
Look him up, Mesbah Yazdi. See if you think it is worth time further delaying action against Iran's science project in order to engage in a dialogue, as Hagel preposterously calls for, with "the government of Iran."
One more reason to leave Iraq quickly is so that the Hagels of this world do not gain in popularity. Leave, for the right reasons, with the right measures being taken elsewhere to show, to semaphore, to hint, that what is being done is not because we have given up trying to deal with Islam, but because we now understand the need to be far more ruthless and cunning in the way in which we deal with it. No more favors to the 'reformers" and "moderates" within Islam. From here on out, the attempt will be to take away all major weapons, and reduce Muslim economic power, and reduce the presence of Muslims within Western Europe and elsewhere in Dar al-Harb. That's it.
There are already way too many Islamic clerics living here in the U.S. We don't need 5,000 more from Iran. No thanks Iran.
The hardline Iranian government is obviously controlled by Islamic fanatics. They are crushing any secular resistance movement that opposes their hardline religious stance.
The radicals in the Iranian governement will only like America if it becomes a Shiite Muslim country. This is not likely to happen.
Iran obviously realizes that they are backed into a corner with their current hardline administration. Most of the world is now critical of their efforts to develop nuclear weapons and bellicose threats to destroy Israel. Surprisingly, even Russia and China are voicing their discontent against the hardline regime in Iran.
Perhaps this is Iran's final move to declare war on the U.S. Five thousand Iranian Islamic clerics on American soil all calling for a jihad in America.
If the 5,000 clerics are granted visitation priviliges in the U.S, then I say that the U.S. governement should send these clerics to the wildlife reserve in north Alaska where they can work on converting wild animals.
We have a right to know: what is the INS doing about Muslim immigrants? Is it doing anything? Have any policies changed since 9/11/2001? What about since the seizure of the theatre in Moscow or the school in Beslan, with nearly 400 dead children and teachers? Have there been any changes since the killing, in Holland, of Pim Fortuyn? Of Theo van Gogh? Since the threats to kill Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Geert Wildres? What changes have been made in our immigration policies since the threats to the head of a Christian political party in Norway? Since the threats to a newspaper in Denmark? Since the virtual takeover of much of Malmo, Sweden, as a no-go for non-Muslims area? What changes in immigration policy have resulted from plans to bomb the Strasbourg Christmas market, or the Vatican, were foiled? What changes in immigration policy have followed upon the bombing of the subway in Madrid? The underground in London? What changes in immigration policy followed the three weeks of Muslim riots, in which a dozen churches were attacked and set ablaze, and tens of thousands of cars set on fire, and a Frenchman beaten to death, and others critically wounded, and cries of Allahu Akbar were heard all over the land?
Any changes? Any?
Will someone in Congress please do something to protect us, to make us safer, to make sure that the mistakes that the Europeans made in their own immmigration policy, or that the Province of Quebec made in encouraging immigration by "francophones" including Muslim maghrebins who have become a permanent security problem, not only for the government, but for all sorts of inoffensive Canadians, beginning with the Jews, the Hindus, and the Maronites in Quebec who regard with horror that what they tried to escape has been allowed to follow them right to l'Amerique septentrionale.
We want to know who is learning about Islam, who is studying what Islam tells its Believers to think of Infidels, and what, over 1350 years, the historical evidence for these teadchings being taken seriously, and put in to practice, reveals.
This isn't a matter for emptily respectful treatment of a belief-system that, because it contains rituals of worship, is called, just a bit too quickly, a "religion." This isn't the time to invoke, without any basis, the notion that Islam stands for "peace" and "tolerance." The "peace" is the peace that follows upon Islamic conquest; the peace that follows when war to spread Islam is no longer necessary. The "tolerance" is the tolerance, extwended onlyto fellow monotheists, of the dhimmi system, a system which condemns non-Muslims to a status of permanent humiliation, degradation, and physical insecurity.
This is not a joke. This is not rhetoric. Our government's legitimacy comes primarily from its ability to protect us. If it will not, or cannot protect us -- its first duty -- it loses all legitimacy.
What is being done?
Yet more Islamic clerics to be admitted to the United States??? I don't think so!! In fact, a reverse migration should be enforced of those already here as the ideology they espouse is treason. One would hope that the State Department and Congress would have the sense not to follow through and allow such an idiotic scheme.
the hardline ayatollah Mesbah Yazdi has announced that the Iranians living in the US need 5000 Islamic clerics for their religious services.
Send them to San Francisco...