Jihad Watch Board Vice President Hugh Fitzgerald discusses the failures at the top in strife-ridden France:
The large-scale presence of Muslims in France, as in other countries of Western Europe, has resulted for Infidels in a world that is far less pleasant, far more expensive, and far more physically insecure than it would be without such a Muslim presence. There is no French non-Muslim who could deny the truth of this assertion. And there are very few who, if asked their real opinion, and if they could give it behind closed doors, would not devoutly wish that the clock could be turned back 40 years, so that large-scale Muslim migration into France had never been permitted.Such large-scale migration began with the Harkis at the end of the Algerian War; these were the local Arabs and Berbers who had fought on the side of the French, and who were rescued from murderous retribution by being allowed to settle in France in the early 1960s. Then came the boom years, all over Europe. Everywhere Muslims were allowed in to work. In France, they came from North Africa -- the maghrebins. At first men came alone to work. Then, because of their antisocial -- their criminal -- behavior, Giscard d'Estaing accepted the argument that if only they had their families with them, they would quiet down. So families were allowed to join the men. But how many wives came, and how many children came, or were born in France itself, was not something that Giscard d'Estaing had thought much about.
For a while, the numbers were small, and the Islam that remained undeclared in the mental baggage was never completely unpacked. The first generation of immigrants consisted of those eager to leave the hell of the Muslim countries from which they came. They did not quite so easily create those all-Arab or all-Muslim communities, no-go for the Infidels, that required certain numbers, and more than numbers, the attitude to take on the Infidel authorities. When mosques and madrasas were built, often with money supplied by Arabs from abroad, when a whole network of Arabic-language radio and television stations were established, and are now supplemented by satellite television, this made it easier to create a self-contained Muslim environment, naturally hostile to the Infidels who, in the case of this circumambient incidental France, were the incidental French. Now millions of Muslims can be geographically in France, but not of France. And they do not want to be "of France" because France is currently run by Infidels. Its laws, its customs, its manners, are those of the Infidels. This is not right. This is contra naturam. The world ultimately belongs to Allah, and therefore to those, and those only, who accept the message of the Prophet. All others are usurpers, and eventually will be removed from power -- they are merely temporarily powerful, in Europe in what is still Dar al-Harb. It will not require military conquest from without: Da'wa and demographic conquest from within will eventually allow Islam to dominate, and Muslims to rule. It is only right, it is only just.
Nowadays, of course, there is no such need for such unskilled workers, inculcated with hostility toward the French authorities, toward the authority of the Infidel nation-state and toward its Infidel people. The aggression and hostility, the indifference to study, the belief that Infidels should support them (which is more rooted a belief than the mere desire, in any situation where benefits can be obtained, of some recipients to exploit whatever is there to be exploited). Inshallah-fatalism and sheer unwillingness to work (what Saudis, what Kuwaitis, what rich members of the Emirates put in more than 2 taxing hours a day?) explain the miserable performance of Arab and Muslim oil states, the states and peoples that have been the beneficiaries of the largest transfer of wealth in human history -- some $10 trillion since 1973 -- and yet have failed in every case to create modern economies (the Shopping Mall that is Dubai does not count), but instead rely on foreign wage-slaves for almost everything. And the same inshallah-fatalism and the same conviction that Infidels have a duty to support Muslims, and that what is infuriating is not Muslim "poverty" so much as is the failure of Muslims as yet to assume their rightful place, as Islam insists, as those who should dominate, should possess the power and wealth even of, or perhaps especially of, the countries still being run by Infidels. The integration of all others, including black but non-Muslim Africans and immigrants from the Caribbean, and once-impoverished Vietnamese and Chinese immigrants, undercuts the insistence that Muslim economic underperformance is the result of French indifference. It is hard to integrate people whose attitude is one of inculcated hostility, and a sneering theoretical superiority (as Muslims) to their Infidel surroundings that, of course, makes their fury at having to learn or mimic or yield to Infidel laws and manners and ways even more maddening. Why should Muslims, those who by right should be ruling, have to yield or adjust in any way to Infidels, wherever those Infidels may be? And even the most successful, most seemingly integrated, among the Muslim immigrants turn out, when one examines their views, to reflect attitudes that suggest that many or most of them continue to owe their allegiance to the umma al-islamiyya, the Community of Believers, and not to their fellow Infidel citizens. Surely the failure of Muslim states to create economies from the most fabulous unearned wealth in history tells us someting about inshallah-fatalism, lack of industry, lack of motivation.Surely the failure of Muslims not only in France, but everywhere in Western Europe where the welfare state offers means of support, to perform even close to the level of all other immigrant groups, should suggest that the problem lies in Islam itself, its tenets, and the attitudes and atmospherics it naturally gives rise to. This is what Sarkozy and others, seen as comparatively resolute(and compared to that former Howard Johnson's soda jerk, Chirac, or the comical D. de V., who would not seem resolute?) are unable to see, unable even to discuss: what it is about Islam that explains the behavior, the performance, the attitudes of Muslims not only in France, but everwhere in the Bilad al-kufr, the Lands of the Infidels.
For 1350 years the Jizyah demanded of non-Muslims supported the Muslim state; slaves seized from various Infidel populations were also a source of labor, of wealth, of soldiers. Even today, if one looks closely, one can see under the surface of things a disguised "jizyah" -- that is, a payment forcibly extracted from the Infidels for the benefit of Muslims. In Malaysia, where the population is half-Muslim, it is the non-Muslim Chinese and Indians who are forced to share the fruits of their industry and entrepreneurial activity with the less successful Muslim Malays. This "Bumiputra" system, whereby Muslims must be brought into all non-Muslim enterprises, is one example of the disguised jizyah. So to are the many billions in foreign aid from Infidel countries that is lavished upon all those Araband Muslim states that happen not to possess oil wealth. No matter how hostile these recipients remain, or how even more hostile they become, they continue to receive such aid because the Infidel donors are terrified of what might happen if they cut off such aid. But they haven't thought it through. What, after all, would Egypt, that center of anti-Americanism and antisemitism, do to the United States that it is not already doing, if the $60 billion sent so far were not to be added to by the American taxpayers? What would or could the "Palestinian" Authority do? What could Pakistan, whose national hero is the sinister Dr. A. Q. Khan, do if the Americans ceased to supply them with debt relief, favorable trade treatment, and military equipment at concessionary prices?
In the countries conquered by Muslims, non-Muslims could live and even practice their religion so long as they fulfilled a number of onerous conditions, including payment of the Jizyah. If they ceased to pay, they lost all their rights, and became fair game. Something like that attitude appears to have affected the Infidel countries of Western Europe and North America, in their fear of cutting off all such aid to those who, as a matter of belief, must regard them with permanent hostility, and worse.
Today, in France, there is no attempt as yet to shut off all sources of future Muslim population growth, for fear of offending the North African states that may, as members of the Francophone nations, offer a little boost to French pride, but otherwise are an economic, diplomatic, and political drag, and ultimately menace, to France. Should from now on the French ever need outside workers again, they must never again go to the Maghreb for such workers. The real cost of the maghrebins, if properly internalized, is too high. Instead, should workers be needed, they can be imported from Eastern Europe or Russia, or China or the Philippines or Latin America. And with black African Christians, or Caribbean blacks, the French experience has been clear: people with the blackest skins, if not Muslim, are able to integrate into French society without difficulty, while the Arabs and Muslims, no matter how light their skin, are far more difficult to mold into loyal citizens of France. If workers are now readily aviailable from non-Muslim countries to meet any new needs, this will make it easier for the French government to now repatriate all those Muslims who have not yet attained citizenship. They have no moral or other claim to French citizenship. Their presence is, for those who see clearly, a present and a growing future threat to France and to its non-Muslim population. Why should that population be forced, for an abstraction, to endure a threat that can only grow? The real price of the Muslim immigrants in France -- the price paid in social peace, the price paid in monitoring their mosques, their madrasas, their movements, the price paid in supporting their deliberately gigantic families, the price paid in repairing or replacing what they destroy or torch to teach the "French a lesson" -- that price far outweights any imaginary advantage to France and French foreign policy in the Arab countries. The French still continue to pay the same market price for oil and gas that everyone else, even the United States, has to pay. But that, of course, is not something that those who have as individuals been the recipients of favors, of business contracts, of bribes, as "recyclers of petrodollars," wish the French public to know about.
The French do not in any way need the goodwill of any Arab or Muslim state. There is nothing that the Maghreb supplies that cnanot be supplied elsewhere, even if Tunisian dates are considered preferable to those from California. It is possible to diminish the air and boat traffic between one "rive" or bank of the Mediterranean and the other "rive" so that the vast illegal migration will be brought under control or stopped altogether, even as illegal immigrants, or all those deemed more likely to constitute a security threat are, as a first step, sent back to their countries of origin. And since France's economy is now static, the more money that is needed to insure the social peace of those whose inshallah-fatalism and attitude that not the world, but the world of Infidels -- the very people whom their belief-system teaches them to hate -- owes them a living, the more that will have to come from the pockets of those same deplorable Infidels. And the Muslim presence in the state schools is now cause for permanent disruption of ministerial curricula (we won't read Voltaire, or Racine; we won't study the Holocaust or French history), and of classroom and schoolyard discipline. And that, in turn, causes the same French taxpayers to remove their children from public schools, and have to endure the added expense of private schools. And that, in turn, will make the native French non-Muslims, who themselves may have had to endure the aggression and violence of Muslim classmates, will in their own life-plans factor in the new cost of raising children in France, which rises as the need for private schools rises. And that, in turn, may cause the French non-Muslim birth rate to plunge even more. And so the Muslim proportion of the population rises, not only because of the large Muslim families, but because the expense of those families on the state, and effect on French public schools, necessarily act to shrink further the non-Muslim proportion of the population.
The French, the well-connected and carefully schooled rulers, and the ruled, both for a long time remained carefully uninterested in what Islam teaches, or what arises naturally from the tenets of Islam, to form what might be called the attitudes and atmospherics of a Muslim community. And then there is the matter of personal gain, which has caused so many to forget other allegiances in the rush to recycle petrodollars for their own benefit and that of their friends, their circle, those like them. Chirac over many years has been the recipient of many favors from various Arab tycoons and tyrants, including the late Rafik Hariri, who brought him nice presents and remembered him in other ways, and the soon-to-be-late Saddam Hussein. Rumors of a Parisian version of the Kniphausen Hawk, a jewel-encrusted falcon, one of only two commissioned by some Arabs, made by some master craftsmen (perhaps Cartier knows something about this) with one of them delivered to a French contractor with extensive interests in the Middle East, and the other, it is said, to Jacques Chirac himself (this would have been about 25 years ago), might help explain Chirac's behavior. His rumored recreations must run into money. As for the preening poseur and poetaster Dominique de Villepin, to date the funniest part of his routine is when he reads a speech in Cairo or Damascus or somewhere else in an Arab country, and in attempting to make the appropriate allusion, somehow mixes up the great Persian poet Hafiz with the "Palestinian" propagandist Mahmoud Darwish, and then just for ecumenical fun, throws in Maimonides. He, D. de V., may see himself as a blend of Chateaubriand, Talleyrand, Malraux, and most likely St.-John Perse. Others will think of Sacha Guitry at his silliest. As for as these statesmen’s performance over the last few days -- one suspects Annette Funicello could have done better.
Even Nicolas Sarkozy, who by comparison with Chirac and D. de V., appears to be a giant in the earth, has not yet gone far enough in his own understanding of Islam. Neither he nor others in his camp understand as yet the immutability of the canonical Islamic texts (so that no "reformation" of Islam is possible), nor have they realized that Infidels have no way to detect the real "moderate" from the feigning one. They do not understand that even the "moderate" Muslim, precisely because of his outward affability and seeming reasonableness, may help promote the Jihad by confusing Infidels, or delaying their own thorough comprehension of the matter. They do not understand, finally, that any "moderate" can metamorphose at any time in the future, for any reason, into an "immoderate" Muslim -- or for that matter, have children or grandchildren who will, out of all sorts of impulses, reasons, or setbacks, revert to the real, full-bodied Islam that remains a permanent menace to world civilization.
Sarkozy continues to speak as if he still believes in government-funded mosques instead of mosques that get no government funding, and are not permitted to get Saudi or other outside funding, and that are strictly monitored and closed if found to contain false papers, explosives, and hate-Infidel propaganda, or to preach hatred of the Infidels. And what is Islam without the strict division of the world between Believer and Infidel, and the hostility, or even murderous hatred, the former must necessarily have for the latter?
And yet for all his ignorance one must be grateful for Sarkozy. He gave Tariq Ramadan a television thrashing, and he is the only one who may help to save France. He, and such writers and journalists as Anne-Marie Delcambre, and Jean-Louis Brugiere, and Alexandre del Valle, and Yvan Rioufol, and Bat Ye'or, and a handful of others.
There is no one currently in politics, save possibly for the unacceptable Le Pen and Megret, who dares to articulate the problem. Everyone is waiting. Who will do it? Who will admit that the French establishment, the French elites enjoying their lunches at Arpege, have done terrible things to France and to the people of France, in their immigration policy, in their Euro-Arab Dialogue, in their mad pursuit of an impossible identity of interest between "les deux rives" of the Mediterranean?
In the 1930s, in direct violation of the Treaty of Versailles, Hitler reoccupied the Rhineland. The French army at the time was the equal of the German army, and had it taken a stand, had it marched, things later might have been headed off, and the world had been different. But all sorts of things had happened. A particularly gifted French minister, who took Hitler's measure early, had been assassinated in 1934 when an attempt was made on the life of the Serbian king. The government of Leon Blum was under constant attack from the right; even the Assemblee Nationale had been attacked by cagoulards. Strong measures were not to be taken.
It is now time to wake up, and no army of occupation will march in to arouse citizens to their duty. The whole thing is different, insidious, slow, and there is always at the ready some slightly plausible explanation or justification that allows for temporizing -- until it is too late. During that other Occupation, the German one, the more obvious one, employees of the Musee de l'homme at Trocadero, many of them immigrants, proved themselves ready to die for France, instead of working to destroy it. There is a plaque to Boris Vilde and other Russian Jewish immigrants, morts pour la France, somewhere at Trocadero -- unless the Muslim rioters and vandals have torn it down. There are those who can become French, despite everything that is done to them, and those who cannot become French, despite everything that is done for them.
And now France itself appears to be slowly coming unhinged. Voila, deux-rivistes of the world. The riots, the arson and other attacks all over France are the world you have made. There it is, messieurs et mesdames, voila la France out of its depth, and in too deep. But who needs La Fontaine, or the pride of France, the dictee, as long as the oil flows, the petrodollars are recycled to the right swine, and everyone continues to bear burnt offerings -- cars, houses, schools, a civilization -- to the untouchable and implacable Idols of the Age, those Articles of Faith about tolerance, diversity, what is thinkable and what "unthinkable," which were only creations of fallible humans in the first place.
Satisfied?
Today I am feasting on a lump of foie gras and ritz crackers... Not to celebrate, mind you, just for a snack... I'm allergic to alcohol, and therefore won't imbibe liquor -- if I could, I'd probably have some beer, or maybe a couple fingers of scotch to go along...
I try to shy away from fantasist constructs and won't allow myslelf to hope or imagine a scenario where the French address this calamity in a productive and mature manner... They are cowards.
I AM enjoying it as high opera though -- literature and art can serve to warn the wary and the watchful.... Educating while simultaneously entertaining the crowd is very often the very best way... And the French are putting on a splendid show...
I am satisfied with your assessment, in fact it is succinct and poetic. But I hate the reality, what it means to the world and Western Civilization.
As timely coincidence would have it, and as we discussed a couple of weeks ago, I am bringing Andre Servier's book Islam and the Psychology of the Musulman online. I have 5 chapters online now, 10 more to go. I read a Chapter as I check the output.
Here it is:
MusulmanBook
Published in French in 1922, and in English in 1924, Andre Servier has zero political correctness. What is also fascinating is how prescient he is of the danger Islam is to France. Servier would be banned from all of university campuses today and no one would dare interview him. hmmmmmmmm...
Once unavailable except for a few university libraries, now everyone can read it in English. Any Frenchmen or women reading this, go and listen to a long forgotten French scholar of Islam. It is written as an education book for the French elite, the politicians and decision makers of his day. I guess the French elite of his day have all died. Also my knowledge seeking Frenchmen, check your University libraries. WorldCat show the French version at these Universities:
ON MCMASTER UNIV MUX
QC MCGILL UNIV LGG
AS TOKAI UNIV LIBR TOK
EU BIBLIOTHEQUE UNIV DE HAUTE ALSACE Z2A
EU UNIV LIBR DE BRUXELLES EQY
EU UNIV OF OXFORD EQO
EU UNIVERSITE DE HAUTE ALSACE FHA
Some French copies in the US as well, and 64 English copies.
Save France from Islam!
John Sobieski, PI
The Pedestrian Infidel Blog`
I screwed up that address. This is the correct one, it is Blogspot MusulmanBook not Musulman.
MusulmanBook
John Sobieski, PI
The Pedestrian Infidel Blog`
John Sobieski,
Thanks for that info. If you could provide a complete bibliography of all books Andre Servier has written, I'd be interested to see what other books he wrote.
Interestingly, abebooks.com, a large repository of out-of-print books, has zero books by Andre Servier.
The library of my university in a state in the USA (this library is supposed to be one of the largest and best in the western part of the USA) has only one copy of that Servier book you mentioned, and no others by him.
Here you go Doc. I use Worldcat at my libraries online site. It is under Web Resources, but every library site will be different. Mine requires my library membership card # to access.
French Mind of Musulman -
L'Islam et la psychologie du Musulman.
Author: Servier, André.
Publication: Paris, A. Challamel, 1923
Document: French : Book
Libraries Worldwide: 16
And these 2 French books -
Le nationalisme musulman en Egypte, en Tunisie, en Algérie
le péril de l'avenir /
Author: Servier, André.
Publication: Constantine : M. Boet, 1913
Document: French : Book : Microform
Libraries Worldwide: 5
Guide de l'agriculteur en Algérie et en Tunisie
résumé des principles agricoles dans l'Afrique du nord /
Author: Servier, André.
Publication: Paris : Challamel, 1897
Document: French : Book : Microform
Libraries Worldwide: 1
The only English translation is The Mind of the Musulman.
John Sobieski, PI
The Pedestrian Infidel Blog`
John:
Thank you so much for undertaking to put the book on line. I bookmarked it immediately.
Thank you for this public service.
We must all stand together now against the Mobots; the battle for Europe has begun.
I never thought it would start so soon. The Mobots are too impatient. Now they will have trouble taking over since these riots have woken up so many people.
I echo thanks to John Sobieski for putting the book online. It is thereby made accessible to thousands who do not have access to the university libraries. Moreover, many of those universities have large Muslim student populations (and apparently about to become larger by 10,000 more from Saudi Arabia) and there is the ever present danger that such books could dissappear from those libraries forever.
"these riots have woken up so many people."
I don't think so, Mentat. The last four years since 911 have shown how amazingly the PC majority in the West can assimilate the avalanche of Islamopathological data pouring in from around the world, and screen it through PC filters that turn shit into whitewashed purity, exonerating Islam from all complicity and responsibility.
Are a few riots on the edge of Paris going to change that? I doubt it. We already see how these data get filtered, as "poverty-afflicted North African youths taking out their frustrations".
Only a number of cataclysmic attacks, as well as riots by millions of Muslims (not just a few hundred), will, alas, finally shake up the dominant PC paradigm.
de Villepin is the ultimate poseur. This quote about de Villepin and his book "The Shark and the Seagull" where he fancies himself a poet:
"As he struts the corridors of French power, de Villepin is, they say, as likely to be turning over in his premier cru mind some nugget of literature or philosophy as he is to be concentrating on the ephemeral crisis of the hour. He fancies himself as a long-game man, a man for the history books rather than the news pages.
In an echo of the philosopher-footballer Eric Cantona, he has compared Europe to a seagull and America to a shark. "The seagull," he wrote, "is intoxicated by the sky. She turns, carried by the winds, with undulating wing, uttering from time to time her agonising peal of laughter. She watches, soars, comes closer, climbs, descends, turns suddenly. The straight line is rarely her course. She listens to the world."
BTW - in North America the seagull is oftened referred to as the "shithawk".
http://telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2005/06/05/do0510.xml
jsla:
Re: "I'm allergic to alcohol, and therefore won't imbibe liquor -- if I could, I'd probably have some beer, or maybe a couple fingers of scotch to go along..."
How, sad. Would you mind if I toasted you with a twelve year old Canadian Club?
It's too bad that the French elections aren't next week. Maybe they'd throw out the multiculturalist imbeciles who rule them now. Then again, look what happened in Spain, where the response to Muslim terror and violence was to elect a pro-Muslim government. If the French still had any honor, they would see these riots as a reason to expel every one of these Muslims back to Algeria. Unfortunately, there is no modern Louis IX in France today.
Provoslavni: "If the French still had any honor".
If pigs could fly... If clouds are made of cotton candy... Don't you read history books!
Let's not pronounce the post-mortem just yet folks. These riots will eventually subside, probably sooner than later...just as they did in Northern England 3 years ago.
The questions are, how much of the store will the French give away in order to buy time?...What will be the lessons for France and all of Europe?...Will dhimmitude be accelerated or reversed?
Deep down, we all know the answers.
Cornelius:
Buy time they will, but it will register on the muslim's demographic clock as well. Any time bought is for both sides, the one with a practically null birthrate and the prolific one.
The day comes when it won't matter what the infidel French offer, the believer French will be entitled to just take it.
muslim impatience is their weak suit.
The PC media brigade who filter shit into whitewash as one poster imaginatively said like al Beebieceera and al Guardianistan are doing right now don't actually live in those kinds of areas so they can afford to look down their sniffy noses at the ordinary folk who complain about it. Believe it or not, there are non Muslim people living in those communities too who are deeply angry about having their nurseries and businesses burnt. One woman commentated that the the Muslim businesses have been left undisturbed but the non-Muslim premises atttacked and destroyed. That, of course, doesn't get reported by the BBC and the al Guardianistan.
I read Voltaire's "Candide" just yesterday. It was one of the most interesting (and smartly written) books I have ever read. In it, Voltaire criticizes practically everything and everyone. He also gives a very clear impression that even in his days, the North Africans and the Turks were seen as some sort of "Big Bad Wolf" (the chapters of the misfortunes of the "Old Lady" under the barbary coast pirates are particularly telling).
Hugh, excellent as always! Only, take it easy on the reference to the sweetest mousketeer. . .Annette Funicello. :)
Wow! And a big THANK YOU to John Sobieski for undertaking the monumental task of placing the english translation of Servier's important work , Islam and the Psychology of the Musulman, online! I look forward to reading every word.
The internet . . .what an amazing resource!
Dr. Pepper:
[[["these riots have woken up so many people."
I don't think so, Mentat. The last four years since 911 have shown how amazingly the PC majority in the West can assimilate the avalanche of Islamopathological data pouring in from around the world, and screen it through PC filters that turn shit into whitewashed purity, exonerating Islam from all complicity and responsibility. ]]]
I can confirm that totally for the German press. Reading the Spiegel reporting (and the Spiegel is considered the best-informed, most impartial source), one would the rioters could be Buddhists, Hindus, Christians, or any mixture thereof. They are are just French youth, and they are only protesting against unemployment and poverty. Poor things.
I don`t think the "I" or the "M" words are even mentioned once.
Don`t celebrate too soon... the PC self-censorship is still firmly in place.
T-HAM: "Buy time they will, but it will register on the muslim's demographic clock as well. Any time bought is for both sides, the one with a practically null birthrate and the prolific one.
"The day comes when it won't matter what the infidel French offer, the believer French will be entitled to just take it."
CORNELIUS: No question about it. The French buying of time is definitely a short-term proposition, i.e., the re-establishment of social order.
You couldn't be more right about the long-term. Should this unrest occur 50 years from now when they are a majority (or even before then when they are close to a majority), no amount of concession short of abject surrender will mollify.
I've been thinking...why are we so sure France will cave and try to buy its way out of the predicament? Answer: because we know the mind of the Left, the way it works, its self-recrimination, its permissiveness and indulgence, its absurd belief that poverty is the root of all social contradictions.
Never mind that the French President AND Prime Minister are both "conservatives." The culture of the Left has so pervaded France and the rest of Europe that, excepting for economic policy, Left and Center Right are now distinguishable only by nuance.
Hugh is right, how utterly pathetic that the racist Le Pen is the only voice courageous enough to speak the unspeakable and broach the concept of repatriation. It's the same in Sweden, where only the neo-Nazis dare suggest such things, where one can actually be arrested and prosecuted for publicly suggesting that immigrants are disproportionately responsible for crime.
Europe is a goner. I've been using those exact words for 3 years. A fool can see it. Demography doesn't lie.
Unlike some others here, I don't relish the prospect...I don't take a perverse pleasure in roosting chickens. Europe's fate is a tragedy and bodes ill for the future of mankind.
johnb:
LOL Just read you link,
"Blessed with a silvery, luxuriant mane and a lean, muscular physique, this adonis might have been mistaken for a film actor, a protocol flunkey, or possibly a male model in one of those health-affirming adverts for French mineral water."
>vomits
Pedestrian Infidel you have my undying gratitude for putting Servier's book on line. I just wish I could find a hard copy somewhere, as I like to keep printed copies arounds,so I can hilite and mark them up for quick reference.
From the review:
And there in lies the crux of the matter and the REAL problem with Islam, Muslims live in their heads, not in the world, and in their heads they live in some mythical pure state of the murderous Caliphates.
I am accustomed to gleaning my news and knowledge of the mid east from their own media (print and TV, where English versions and translations are available such as Mosaic
I am hopefully intelligent and mature enough to filter out the hyperbole, read between the lines and grab bits and pieces of information that is inadvertently blurted out... and what I grab is that in the Islamic (Arab world and it is the same, even for Iran which vigorously denies their Arabization), the peoples are fed and housed through subsidy.
Our troops are dying in Iraq, and our treasury plundered. so the Iraqi's can get free food, free utilities, free water and subsidized housing.
The copies of the Constitution were distributed from government food distribution sites, when they show up to vote they produce their welfare food ration cards as proof. There is over 60% unemployment because of the so called "insurgency", and Iraqi's are bitching because the "occupation" authorities haven't provided them full subsidized services, as their uncles, brothers, sons, cousins and fathers interfere with reconstruction by assassination, IED's and suicide attacks.
60% unemployment, yet they are all (to a person) nice, fat and healthy, and the same with the so called "Palestinians", no jobs, no work, no employment yet they are all fat, dumb and healthy as they get free food and subsidy from ...grants and aid from the US, UN and the Saudis.
Skip over to Egypt and the same, skip over to Syria and the same..They live on subsidy (welfare) as is their "right" a legacy of the ghazi raiders and the labor of slaves and dhimmi's. In the Arab (Muslim) mind "Work" is indeed a four letter word, and manual labor is considered unmanly, beneath the muruwwa (manhood) dignity of the Arab.
And that is the real reason why Arabs in France, and throughout Europe are unemployed, they are too good to work, it is below them, beneath their dignity as men and as emulations of the perfect man -al-insan al-kamil
As Muhammad and his band of pirates, and the successors (Caliphs) lived like parasites off the labor of kufr, so today do the Muslims live like Parasites off the labor of the kufr.
Were it not for European and American capitalists, selling arms, munitions, cars, satellite dishes, TV's and nuclear production capability to the Muslims.. they would be living in their 9th century paradise.
And the profits they make are only a portion of the recycled Jizyah we citizens of Bilad al kufr pay for our addition to black crack.
It is time to don the mourning clothes of black, to mourn the passing of western civilization. Europe is gone, lost and America will be surrounded, forced into submission as the price of appeasement of Muslims, whose hands control the oil spigots, and whose dollars (ours) prop up and support our export industries, be they industrial, aviation, defense, chemical,agricultural.
And if the west does not submit, then it will be blackmailed by violence, threats of violence and of course our own worst enemy our sense of Judeo Christian guilt.. of which the Muslim is immune, and where cognizant puzzled, as to how peoples can be so weak and stupid.. for guilt is alien to Islam, save fear of punishment by Allah in the afterlife.
John Sobieski
Thank you for the great work you have done in bringing this book online.
OTH, this means long hours in front of the monitor.
Still, Thanks.
I will have a Word doc with all chapters available early next week. You can print that out as a 'transcript' book. It also eliminates the monitor issue.
You can email me at johnsobieski@Hotmail.com and I will put you on a list for a copy of Musulman in Word doc format.
I will distribute soon by email.
John
MusulmanBook
John Sobieski, PI
The Pedestrian Infidel Blog`
John Sobieski has performed a great service by putting Servier on-line which will give people a chance to read him, not necessarily because everything he says is brilliantly exact, not because he is never offensive, but because there is a good deal in what he writes that corresponds to the truth, about the psychology of Muslims, that is to say how, as the result not of individual experience or training, but because of the overwhelming fact of Islam itself, its teachings and what it stands for and the attitudes it gives rise to even among those who never attend a mosque, Muslims are taught to see the universe, and Believers, and Infidels. Not every Muslim will necessarily reflect what Servier identifies as common features of Muslim psychology. Exposure to Infidel education, ignorance of Islam even as one proclaims oneself a Muslim, even emotional ties to non-Muslims, can all have their effect. But a great many Muslims will retain enough of those attitudes that Islamic tenets, or identificaion with Islam, naturally give rise to, to be cause for permanent alarm. Judging by evidence of both history and the present moment of the re-appearance of old, never-fallen-into-desuetude but not always-acted-upon attitudes, Servier's book -- in English and in French -- which does not date, can only help to clarify.