From the BBC:
A masked man - believed to be one of South East Asia's most wanted Islamic militants - has appeared in a video threatening attacks against the West.The video singles out the US, the UK, Australia and Italy as targets.
Officials believed the man was Noordin Mohammad Top, a key figure in Jemaah Islamiah, the radical group blamed for bomb attacks on Bali and elsewhere.
Police found the video in a house they raided last week, when Noordin Top narrowly escaped being captured.
A near-simultaneous raid on another house, in East Java, ended in the death of his associate, Azahari Husin.
"As long as you keep your troops in Iraq and Afghanistan and intimidate Muslim people, you will feel our intimidation and our terror," the man in the video said.
Pointing at the camera, he said: "America, Australia, England and Italy. You will be the target of our next attack."...
"Especially for Australia, as long as its troops are in Afghanistan and Iraq and engage in intimidation there, you will also feel our intimidation," the man said....
Not only do we have to worry about mad muslims outside Oz but we have a policy of quislingism at both a federal and state level of government.
This from the esteemed premier of NSW:
Premier quizzed
November 17, 2005
NEW South Wales Premier Morris Iemma wrote a reference in 1999 for a Senegalese man with terrorist links, the NSW Opposition alleged in Parliament today.
Http://www.dailytelegraph.news.com.au/story/0,20281,17276983-5001022,00.html
WWW.ANSWERING-ISLAM.COM IF YOU ARE UP FOR A REAL CHALLENGING DEBATE, ALL ANSWERS SHOULD BE RESPONDED THERE.
Do not enter the above site unless you open a new window. In fact, don't even bother.
And run your adware killers afterwards, if you do open it.
Gunfight at the OK corral.
There should be a contest to see who wins the privilege of taking this guy out.
What do you do with a mad dog ?
These faceless cowerdly terrorists threaten every non muslim nation . They think it is heroism of islamic brand. This is the main reason, every muslim is a suspect in western and christian countries. They cry out and complaint there is discrimination in the west towards them. It is but natural public are afraid to employ,be friendly,or even sit in a subway train by the side of a muslim. If we see a woman with hijab,our eyes automatially goes to search whether she is carrying some backpak,or some bulge around her waist as we are accustomed seeing pictures of the hijab clad Amman suicide Woman bomber, who killed 60 people, or the hijab clad Russion school woman bomber who mercilessly killed 200 school children. Unless the good muslims distance themselves from this scum , comeforward ,and protest againt every suicide bombing,people will definetly suspect all muslims. They must know that by threatening common people, they cannot at anypoint bring Islam to west or any non muslim country.
Bro. Ro Ro thinks that I'm too indecent to challenge his grotesque assumptions about merit. Unfortunately for him, he's wrong. I guess I should start by saying that he is firmly convinced that we should derive moral guidance from his glitzy, multi-culti, hip-hop, consumption-oriented opinions. His belief is controverted, however, by the weight of the evidence indicating that when Bro. Ro says that everyone with a different set of beliefs from his is going to get a one-way ticket to Hell, that's just a load of spucatum tauri. His argument that violence and prejudice are funny is hopelessly flawed and thoroughly circuitous. My love for people necessitates that I find the inner strength to identify, challenge, defy, disrupt, and, finally, destroy the institutions that make it virtually impossible to fire incompetent workers. Yes, I face opposition from Bro. Ro. However, this is not a reason to quit but to strive harder. He is capable of only two things, namely whining and underhanded tricks. We must answer the coldhearted spivs who control, manipulate, and harm other people. Our children depend on that. Unfortunately, I can already see the response to this letter. Someone, possibly Bro. Ro Ro himself or one of his foot soldiers, will write a disorderly piece about how utterly immature I am. If that's the case, then so be it. What I just wrote sorely needed to be written.
Gunfight at the OK corral.
There should be a contest to see who wins the privilege of taking this guy out.
What do you do with a mad dog ?
Posted by: dgene at November 17, 2005 09:08 AM
Gold star for you today!!
After all Old Yeller is a great American story even though you love him in the end you have to do what is best for the Family!!!
Part of the American Tribe
Squirrel Hunter
Spider Killer
GOD BLESS THE USA AND HER FIGHTING FORCES AND ALL WHO SUPPORT THEM GIVE THEM STRENGTH, WISDOM, SIGHT, AND COURAGE TO STAND UP AND DESTROY ALL ISLAMIC TERRORIST AND ALL WHO SUPPORT THEM AMEN
PS
Remember against enemies Forgion and Domistic!!!!
This rabid lunatic [don't insult dogs] can threaten as much as he likes, Infidel Countries
won't buckle under usual promises of 'rivers of blood etc' unless he is describing his own...
Hope he realises balaclava is another 'Western Invention'. Reminds me of what Le Pen said when asked what he thought of the veil. 'It protects us from seeing ugly women,'he replied. Suggest the same of Mr Noordin Top: we don't have to see
his ugly face. BUT WE WILL TOP HIM!!
Ro, I looked at that site you have above, and in (The Noble Quran, 4:19)" it says, 'Ye are forbidden to inherit women against their will'. Oh Yea, I can sure see all the women that Mohammad took after killing their husbands, would willingly become his wives??? this Quran seems to be full of contradictions, but of course that is because we the infidel don't understand, and it is because Allah doesn't allow many of the infidel's eyes to be open, but he then will put them into hell because they wont submit. hmmmm. I cannot see how anyone can believe in something that tells them to go and slaughter anyone who doesnt believe. They are the only religion who says that. Mohammad raided, slaughered took bootie, took towns, etc, all because he said that Allah had told him to.
Why can't they see that he was just a man who had lost a very rich wife and who didnt want to work, so using revelations for a god and religion to get the people to do his plundering for him, which eventually became a power thing. He started off just like home invaders or bank robbers do today, instead he raided caravans first. Eventually when people tried to stop him, Mohammads army had grown tooo big, just like we are having happen today.
In the report I saw, Top accused us of "colonising" Iraq and Afghanistan, which implies that we're sending Aussies over there to live and take over the place. LOL! Who in their right mind would want to go there to live? It's the other way around. We've got way too many Iraqis and Afghanis wanting to come here to colonise Australia. And Algerians, Moroccans, Somalians, Iranians, Indonesians, Syrians, Lebanese, etc., etc., etc. Who's doing the "colonising" again?
And he says Howard and Downer are "killing Australia". Sorry, Top, but most of us believe Howard and Downer are saving us from the fate of France and the UK. And Peter Costello's doing a good job too, by telling your ilk "if you don't like it here, leave!" But of course, to Muslims this is an "attack" against Islam. We're supposed to just lie back and let you troglodytes do what you want, without complaining. Pffft!
Ho hum.
Catherine, your copy and paste posts, despite your best intentions of supporting this site, constitute SPAM, and they take up bandwidth, are off topic.
You have something to say, start your own website, stopping clogging this one with SPAM.
I don't know about others, but I scroll through your stuff, and I suspect others do as well.
Maybe MSSR Spencer, can provide you your own sub forum, where you can copy and paste to your hearts content.
Muslims target us because in their eyes, we are evil, immoral, infidels and won't submit to allah, the god of agriculture, war and the sword.
Now, If Muslims are really against immorality, why don't they target the main cause of the west's immorality, 'Hollywood', instead of preschools, shopping centres, schools etc. They must know the massive horrific and effect that destroying Hollywood would have on the world. Hollywoods intention has been to have an profound influence on the morals of the world, through TV and films, causing people to become complacent about immorality and to make people except homosexuality, they have slowly pushed their disgusting morals on the world helping to push our morals into the gutter, and we are no better, as we have let them. Hollywood is in effect the main source of most of the worlds worst immorality and even half an hr of these films have a profound effect on our society. Even though non sexual non violent movies and films have been proven to be far, far more popular than sexual ones, Hollywood still insists in giving us sex, homosexuality, violence, murders, rapes, etc etc, instead. Muslim men obviously love the immorality that is done by the actors on our immoral TV and films. Does it not seem strange that Muslims have not targeted Hollywood instead of little children in preschools etc. great religion eh... I would love to know others thoughts on this.
Gaye: "Does it not seem strange that Muslims have not targeted Hollywood instead of little children in preschools etc. "
If Hollywood ever starts making patriotic movies again (don't hold your breath) then Hollywood will certainly become a Muslim target, especially if they begin showing true to life depictions of the acolytes of the Religion of Peace. But as long as Hollywood keeps making propaganda movies like Kingdom of Heaven, they are providing a dual service to the jihadists. First, they weaken the West by undermining its culture and sense of legitimacy. Second, they broadcast to the world venality, depravity, and perversion that validates the jihadists' world view and provides justification for their vicious attacks.
I note also that Las Vegas, an internationally known center of depravity, is frequently on the Islamic target list. It is probably one of their nuclear targets, when the Muslims get around to using that technology.
As for hitting pre-schools (in France and elsewhere), I have often wondered why they see those as a threat. My guess is that for Islamic programming to work, the mind of the child has to be closed. That is the purpose of the madrassas. Pre-schools that introduce recoginition and tolerance of other cultures and belief systems attack Islam at its psychological roots.
Nariz,you posted a nasty remark about Catherine.
One of the reasons that I have come onto this site is because of the degree of intellectual thinking, plus because it lacks the nasty remarks that some other sites do. On the whole, this site doesn't seem to lower itself into sarcasm, it is a site where all points of views can be put, without nastiness. Isn't this what hearing others opinions is all about. Just because I might not agree with you, does not mean that I have to be nasty about it, in fact I would hope by listening to you that I might learn something in our debate.
Stendec you are so right, and thankyou for your excellent reply, I found it very informative and had never thought of all that... but what you say is logical. I gather that terrorists don't care if they kill a few or many, as one of their aims is (as in the beginning of Islam) to cause the infidel to be full of terror which weakens not only the people mentally but also the immune system, and hitting preschools will cause this perhaps more than anything. All we can do is hope that our leaders wake up before it is toooo late, and learn from places like France etc where it is more than likely to late. Their aim is to also get into governments to change the laws...
I sure dont understand, now we have a Victorian MP, Adem Somyurek, who is a labor member. I am now so confused, they try to tell us that they are for morality, (their form) and he becomes a member of party which promotes homosexuality, gay marriages, defactos, abortion, etc etc. hmmm .