Anti-dhimmitude yes. But why is this listed under "Showbiz News?"
Leaflets showing a Muslim fighter holding a rocket launcher outside 10 Downing Street are being probed by detectives amid claims they are linked to exiled preacher of hate Sheikh Omar Bakri.
The sickening pamphlets shows a black Islamic flag flying over Parliament and invite people to a rally in east London.
But shocked council officials and police discovered that the hall booked for the meeting was made under a false name apparently to celebrate the religious festival of Eid.
From the article:
Well, at least he's telling the truth.
On the same page, something really important:
I didn't know that there was a 'mounting tax'. Perhaps it's a higher rate if you mount a royal.
The newspaper. Karl Kraus couldn't stand them and started his own one-man journal, "Die Fackel," in which sometimes he smote them hip and thigh, and sometimes he merely reprinted, without comment, some idiocy from the Viennese equivalents, back in 1910 or 1920 or 1930, of The New Duranty Times and The Bandar Beacon.
How are journalists educated? What tests must they pass -- in history, in litarature, in language? In most Western countries, there are no such tests. There is no need to have studied the subjects upon which you presume to pontificate. One could make up, right here, a little test on the history of the Middle East and of Islam, an elementary test, and give it to Tom Friedman, or to any of his colleagues, or to any of those who on NPR report from the area, and they would fail it -- completely. They do not have to know anything about anything. They are mere reporters. No context, no history, no larger sense of things in time and space.
And here is the Kiss-and-Tell Lover, or More-Than-Kiss-and-More-Than-Tell Heel, given equal time with, oh, something about millions of Muslims and whether or not they really could, as many of them devoutly wish, take over all of England.
In equal scale weighing, or at least presenting, not delight and dole, but the trivial and the tremendous.
Good news.
And they said they were only going to celebrate Eid, my my my.
Don't they know islam means peace?
/sarc off
LMAO!
Prophet Geoff
And this is the way of islam. Move into a nation, breed like rats, riot, then take over when the natives are too apathetic toward the situation. Then after you have the country, claim that it has always been islamic and always belonged to muslims, and therefore no one has a right to come in and take it from them. They done the same thing all over the middle east. Muslims have no land that is strictly their own. All the lands they have, they stole: Egypt, Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Persia, Babylon/Mesopotamia, Assyria, and now they're trying it with Israel, Sudan, Ethiopia, etc. The problem is, they're succeeding. Why? Why do we sit by and just let them steal land? Personal freedoms are a great thing, but part of that freedom is knowing that you can be relatively safe from outsiders, or at the least knowing your government will take care of things like this. But it's not that way anymore. And it's all because western governments are not willing to go after the source, which is islam. Islam is the problem, not a few islamists who have "hijacked" a "peaceful" religion. But it's our very freedom of religion that does not allow our governements from even saying this is the problem, much less going after it. We have to realize, first of all, that islam is not a religion, it's a socio-political cult, and that we have always tried to shut down such idealologies, such as communism, socialism, nazism. The only way we can reclaim our rights and freedoms, and see the beginnings of world peace, is to realize that our enemy is not a handful of nutcases, but their idealology itself, islam.
Hmm, at least one paper was on the ball here:
http://aawsat.com/english/news.asp?section=1&id=2698
Imli
I didn't know that there was a 'mounting tax'. Perhaps it's a higher rate if you mount a royal.
Posted by: Interested
Interested, you've done it again! LMAO
Appears under "Showbiz/Lifestyle"
Seems apt given the bamboozlement of the Muslim and non-Mulsim world by Muhammad, and his sloppy moist neurosis is definitely a lifestyle choice...
Related, I think .. "The journal contained the heir to the throne's views on the 1997 hand-over of Hong Kong to China, including one describing Chinese government people as "appalling old waxworks".
Prince Charles' scrupulous sensibilities concerning Muslims apparently does not extend to varied (or multi-cultic groups). In fact, it seems rather specialized, I think.
Any word from him yet on the fatwah issued against his Mom?
I'm shocked. SHOCKED, by the revelation that British Muslims believe that dissembling is appropriate. No, this is to be expected, they are doing what comes naturally.
The hall booked for the meeting is about 10 minutes walk from where I used to live from age 8. I no longer feel at all "at home" on my old manor.
BTW scroll down a little on the link to the story to "Evil "Bin Laden" Rapist Caged for 14 Years" He terrified his victims with claims that he worked for Osama. He didn't (so far as we know) but it's a pertinent, if OT story.
I'm genuinely aghast to read above that there are 2,000 mosques in Britain..WOW!..must be annoying as hell listening to the whining muzzein
or are there noise ordinances..Europe is toast.
SHOCKED? Why should you be shocked?
Is it because you've been locked
in a mindless pursuit of folly,
self absorbed and deluded?
They've told you along,
they sing the same song,
they have to, it's in the book.
Take a look and then you won't be shocked.
Is it5 possible to put a copy of this threat on thr internet so it can be used as proof with a translation of course. We need hard proof.