Vote: American Anti-Dhimmi of the Year 2005

Tom Tancredo should win this by a long shot, he has not backed down from his stance even in the face of diversity, I applaud his efforts and would even vote for him as President of these United States.

I don't recall Thomas Klocek being nominated on the other thread. Why is his name on the ballot?

Rox:

Look again.

He was, and he deserves to be.

http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/005308.php

Cordially
RS

Thanks, Roxane for the info.

Klacek got my vote.

We need more teachers like him.

I vote for Robert Spencer.

I think all of the American Anti-Dhimmi award candidates should be confirmed into a sort of "Anti-Dhimmi" council in order to take up the fight in this country against appeasment and self-immolation

I nominated Klocek and I am happy enough to see him listed as a nominee to set an example for the small acts of anti-dhimmitude that need to take place everywhere and most especially in our academic institutions. He's the "quiet anti-dhimmi", displaying small, everyday heroism in the face of the jihad.

But I had to give my actual vote to Tancredo because of the very large public stage he occupies, which requires a proportionally larger display of courage. And he made the news in a major way in the year 2005. His "courage...refusal to blink, and steadfastness" in the face of an international storm of criticism sets an example of anti-dhimmitude that all western leaders should aspire to.

All of these are great nominations, which makes
the pick harder.

Despite his pacifistic stance (IMO we already owe the mohammadans a few) I'll probably give the nod
to Tom Tancredo. Hey, if they want nukes so badly, why don't we oblige?

I didn't even think of Debbie Schlussel. It would be a shame to see her covered up in a burka.

Of course, the JW team is too classy to put themselves on the list. And, of course, they'd
be ringers.

It doesn't look to me that Tom Tancredo should win. Just take the following:

"AP: DENVER — A Colorado congressman told a radio show host that the U.S. could "take out" Islamic holy sites if Muslim fundamentalist terrorists attacked the country with nuclear weapons.

Rep. Tom Tancredo made his remarks Friday on WFLA-AM in Orlando, Fla. His spokesman stressed he was only speaking hypothetically."

That's a squirmy backdown right there.

He makes an if...then..statement and then he says: well it's only a hypothetical. That tells me it's really : "if this and then that and something else maybe well THEN we'll really might do something."

That's f...ing wortheless other than grabbing cheap headlines.

Well I voted for Tom based on his Immigration views which he has pushed at no little cost to himself.

Unfortunately I can't honestly say I know ANYTHING about the other candidates. Anyone willing to educate the rest of us ignorant types?

About 2years ago I found this site and the road to true freedom. Robert Spencer is not on the vote list, but should be. In lieu of that I vote for all of the above. They have all stood up when it really mattered.

Tancredo is running away with this for his stance on the border I guess.

Governor of Massachusetts Mitt Romney gets my vote for saying what needed to be said (mosques should be monitored, Muslims watched), and standing up to the full weight of the media and every Muslim pressure group after he said it.

Tancredo, by contrast, said we could nuke Mecca. Which is obvious, but not something I want a policymaker to say.

KuhnKat, Whitehead is the founder and president of Anti-CAIR, an organization in America that is dedicated to showing the islamism of the CAIR organization. Whitehead has been in a legal battle for a few years with CAIR. He refuses to back down, no matter what CAIR dishes out at him. He's a model of anti-dhimmitude, especially in America.

templar above is right: here, the best candidate is not on the list.
I agree that Robert Spencer deserves the title.

My friend, Andrew, deserves all the votes he can get. This man has stood up to be counted when the rest of us would have asked, "Just how much sacrifice for a cause is too much?"

Stay the course, Andrew.

As ashamed as I am to admit this, I have never heard of Graham, Klocek, or Schlussel. Who are they?
but, I still vote for Spencer.

Few have done more to fight jihad in America than Robert.

I voted Tancredo, and I will vote for him at every chance I can get--hopefully for president one day. He is a savior.

Though I am certain that, if he runs, he will be demolished for his "hateful, vicious, hurtful, bigoted, racist, blah blah blah..." remarks regarding Islam and illegal immigrants.

Such a tragedy that truth has become hate speech in America.

I quote:

Mohammad Noorzai, coordinator of the Colorado Muslim Council (search) and a native of Afghanistan, said Tancredo's remarks were radical and unrepresentative but that people in Tancredo's position need to watch their words when it comes to sacred religious sites and texts.

Let me think.... Oh yes, there are some large bhuddist statues. ooops were some large bhuddist statues, in Afghanistan once upon a time, not so long ago...

ha ha. I bet Noorzai didn't object to them being destroyed.

Maybe the bhuddists will stop killing Christians in Burma, Thailand, and Ceylon and target the holy shites of their real enemy.

"(Tancredo)has not backed down from his stance even in the face of diversity."
-- posted by chuck

Haa.

Why isn't that Robert Spencer fellow's name here?

Mr. Spencer, you've done more for me to bring awareness of the pitfalls of modern fascist islam than any other single source/person.

Thank you for your efforts.