Australia: Australian flag banned for fear of offending Muslims

What a pity that the West is committing suicide so quickly and readily. I think future generations will look back fondly upon what was lost. "Council bans Australian flag," from News.com.au, with thanks to News4u:

PLANS to fly Australian flags over the famous Bondi Beach pavilion were vetoed because of fears the symbols could incite more racial violence on Sydney's beaches.

In a decision met with outrage from locals, returned servicemen and ethnic groups, Waverley Council voted 6-5 against the proposal, declaring the popular beach should remain clear of flags to "remove provocation"....

The Australian flag and an Aboriginal flag were to be provided by Liberal MP Malcolm Turnbull, who yesterday led a chorus of opposition to the decision.

He described the decision as "ridiculous" and remained hopeful council would do a backflip in the face of public backlash.

"I just don't understand why such an iconic building on such an iconic location shouldn't have the Australian flag flying," he said.

"It was just politically correctness which is sadly what you get often from the Left on councils."

But an unapologetic Mr Copeland said the council remained concerned about a repeat of the Cronulla racial violence.

"The Australian flag was used by both sides as a symbol around which to perpetrate racial violence," Mr Copeland said.

"The people from Lakemba burnt the flag and the Cronulla people swathed themselves in it while pounding people. We didn't want to wave a red rag in front of either side on New Year's Eve."

Muslim leaders yesterday described the council's stance as misguided and presumptuous.

Islamic Friendship Association of Australia founder Keysar Trad said decisions made on behalf of Muslims with no consultation only caused further division.

"To suggest that Muslims would be offended at the sight of the Australian flag is naive. A great deal of Muslims call Australia home and they are just as happy to see the flag flying high," he said.

The council has also offended community organisations which proudly fly the national flag.

Police Association president Bob Pritchard said he could not envisage any context under which the Australian flag would incite racial tensions.

"It (the flag) represents us all - it should not represent any separation of race or instil any feelings of racial tension," he said.

"This is political correctness taken to the extreme and is wrong."

UPDATE: The News.com.au story has been revised to remove all mention of Muslims and Keysar Trad's comments.

| 43 Comments
Print this entry | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

43 Comments

Australians need to wake up and realize that the problem is not "racial violence" but religious violence. Muslims immigrants are attempting to make their belief system dominant over that of the native Australians. Kowtowing to these thugs will only embolden them to acts of greater violence and intimidation.

It's slightly more subtle a move than just putting up a white flag.

This kind of thing says more about the peasant class we vote into power than anything else. for instance, not in my wildest dreams, did i make a link between bananas and black people. They banned bananas at a local UK council because when you eat bananas you think of monkeys and when you think of monkeys you think of black people.

ha ha ha. No normal person thinks like that. peasant class in power do. There is something wrong with them; really wrong. They have sick minds.

Note also that it is always the majority that won't be offended. If they are offended, "we have a solution," thinks the peasant ruler, "we will use a few words of rhetoric like "bigot" "islamophobe" "homophobe" "sexist" "racist" "fascist" etc, and thank allah our state schools ensure no one can see through this type of speech."

These are the same people who say islam is the religion of peace. ha. Normal people despite state schools don't believe them.

When I am suggesting or offering something to anyone and want to ensure them they are not under obligation, I say "there is no compulsion in Islam" sarcasticly.

Guarantees a laugh every time.

How come the PCG (Politically Correct Gestapo) don't ban islam because everyone associates islam with violence and compulsion?

This association is not because of a "biased" media or ignorance? If it was then people would not laugh at my compulsion of islam jokes.

Ah, yes, the Do Gooders at work again, deciding WHAT *should* offend WHOM.

People working in local government should be required to pass a basic IQ test, thereby guaranteeing that we don't get local government simians.

I think the Australian Labor Party and the Greens are running their own agenda on this issue and they certainly don't enjoy the support of the ratepayers judging by a straw poll on talkback radio. The ALP and Greens are very embarrassed about our history. According to them, in 1788 the 'Empire' sought to expand its real estate holdings and 'invaded' Australia. That is what they have allowed to creep into the classrooms of primary schools. When the ALP came to power in NSW, the leader of the upper house made good on her promise. She took down the portrait of the queen and said something like "it's good to remove that old hag" or something derogatory.

The ALP and Greens have views and goals that are coterminous with those of Mr Trotsky

My God.

Yes indeed...if we're patient enough, the Left can be brought on board to join us in defense of our civilization...(cough, cough).

In fact, as I write this, on the John Stanley afternoon show, from radio 2UE, Sydney, http://www.2ue.com.au/, they're talking about this very issue.

Stanly just had a Muslim guest who said of the Australian flag: "We're not offended by the [Australian] flag", and said the flag celebrates Australia's pluralistic society.

The show further suggested that this is merely an effort by a local council to avoid paying for a NEW flagpole at the pavillion. The host reiterated that there are plenty of flags flying at the beach, and this is not an effort to ban the flag.

This sounds very unfair dinkum to me...

The banana thing: What the @#$$? Did they put together a focus group?

What else can they ban?

1. Prunes: eaten by old people. May also lead to fart jokes.
2. Apples: evoke the sin of Adam, and original sin, a politically incorrect, Judeo-Christian concept.
3. Oranges and grapefruit: carry the risk of squirting someone across the table, an unacceptable act of violence.
4. Cherries and watermelons: pits/seeds may become projectiles. We can't afford the eye protection liability.
5. Apricots, dried: Look like earlobes. May offend descendants and fans of Vincent Van Gogh.
6. Peach: descriptive of the skin color of the Western oppressors.
7. Grapes: Could be distilled into wine in a particularly long meeting. Haram. Out with them.
8. Coconuts, mangoes, papayas, pineapples: All the spoils of prior imperialist conquests.
9. Elderberries: Discriminatory against Youngerberries
10. Ugli fruit: May offend ugly people, hence the entire council.

11. Books by Jeannette Winterson. Too fruity by half.

exposethelords,

I'm a little confused about the bananas.

Were they previously provided as complimentary snacks at council meetings?

If this involves a council that represents you, could you attend a meeting with your own bananas and force the issue?

Better yet, any black aquaintences/friends who would be willing to go along with you for same?

I can envision a roomful of constituents eating their own bananas during a council meeting.

As with the Australian flag issue, who suggested that?

What was the vote? Any dissenters? Any discussion? Any guffaws?

exposesithlords writes:
"They banned bananas at a local UK council because when you eat bananas you think of monkeys and when you think of monkeys you think of black people. "

Do you have a reference for that? That's so
stupid I laughed myself into a coughing fit.

Actually, bananas remind me of hispanics, there
was this old commercial, what was her name,
cute "south of the border" singer, my head cold
medicine is fogging the wetware.

Are they going to ban blues and jazz music too?
Why not just ban people, because if I see a
black guy, he'll make me think of black people,
and if I see a white guy, well, you follow. I
call my kids "little monkeys" sometimes. But
they're white. Man, all of this PC crap has me
tied in knots!

You mean Chiquita Banana?

Man, if you sell it right, there's a whole semester on post-modern racial subtexts in fresh fruit!

This is just and example of small business worrying about their potential profits (or losses) and probably has nothing to do with PC or political cowardice and everyhting to do wioth "business".

I doubt that the Islamic infiltration of councils has reached Waverley although I have not checked this.
Councils here like elsewhere are run by small businessmen with a sprinkling of local party candidates in the bigger ones. Like all small businessmen their own profit/loss possibilities are all that they are interested in.

Their reasoning = Oz Flag>>> P*ssed Muslim morons>>Islamic unrest>>natural Oz response>> increased violence and potential property damage>> police and politicians move in>>beaches closed >>profits down etc.

It is no more than that and these small minded sorts are not capable of seeing let alone caring about the "big picture".

In a decision met with outrage from locals, returned servicemen and ethnic groups, Waverley Council voted 6-5 against the proposal, declaring the popular beach should remain clear of flags to "remove provocation"....

If the Australian flag is "provacative" to muslims, what in the hell are they doing in Australia?! The flag represents the country they CHOSE to live in, presumably because they considered it a better place than their nations of origin.

Instead of worrying about provoking militant immigrants into more violence and destruction by flying the flag, they should be focused on protecting their community from criminal immigrants who were born and bred to wreak havoc and spread dissent. What will they do next, close the beaches entirely so muslims won't be offended by women in bathing suits?

It's really pathetic that people are denied the simple pleasure of a day at the beach because of muslim jerks, who have the option of staying away from places that "offend" them.

It's no wonder that muslims go on destructive rampages and gang-rape Western women. They have no fear of reprisal and every uncivilized act of wanton destruction is rewarded with mea culpas and concessions instead of arrests, restitution, and punishment. Appeasement of these vile creatures is a recipe for utter disaster.

"Islamic Friendship Association of Australia founder Keysar Trad said decisions made on behalf of Muslims with no consultation only caused further division.

"To suggest that Muslims would be offended at the sight of the Australian flag is naive. A great deal of Muslims call Australia home and they are just as happy to see the flag flying high," he said."

This is the most direct admission I have seen in any news source that parties to one side of these 'riots' are Muslim pure and simple. And the admission comes from a Muslim spokesman himself.

Can we now begin speaking about Australian-Muslim conflict rather than a 'racial divide', 'tensions with immigrants' and such like?

Susanp:

"...The flag represents the country they CHOSE to live in, presumably because they considered it a better place than their nations of origin..."

Should read:

"...The flag represents the country they successfully managed to invade, because they need better, wealthier and more civilized places than their nations of origin in order to pervert them into Islamic hell-holes..."

Allabubusnackbar!

I can understand Waverley Council's concerns that muslims may be offended by the Oz flag (all those crosses in top, left-hand corner, not to mention the Southern Cross)but what about the Aborigine flag? Are they suggesting moslems are racists? Are these councillors some kind of islamophobes?

This is how it all started in Eurabia. A little here a little there and now the Muslims want it all. Australia hold on to your flag and be proud of it. If you want to annoy the Muslims put a cross on it.
Don't allow the politically correct to usurp your God given right to fly your country's flag any place you please.
This is not a Muslim country - yet. I hope it will never be. Put a stop to Muslim immigration into Australia now, if you wish to avoid what is happened to Europe.

"Chiquita" Banana was a brand name that came naturally to the United Fruit Company with its holdings in Central America. The singer-dance-actress Carmen Miranda used to do the chicachoca samba and other dances with a veritable CostCo fruit-basket (suitable for holiday giving) on her head. She then discovered that she was allergic to raw (when cooked it was another matter) peaches and pears and apples, and insisted on being informed in advance of the precise makeup of the fruit she would be wearing, so that she could remove anything she thought might lead her to break out in a rash, or a fit of itching and sneezing and eye-rubbing -- and that was in the pre-histamine period of civilization. The itemized list that her contract specified had to be provided for her before the first day's shooting became known, in the industry, as the Miranda Warning.

Gee, you think if I go to a Muslim country or even one equally disgusting, lets say, England or France that they will take down their flags so I won't be offended? Maybe the Germans can take down their flag so Jews that live there won't be offended.

Why don't they fly the Lebanese flag - that would assuage their teeny weeny little bitty hurt feelings, hmmmm?

Bondi council have received hundreds of angry disgusted emails, including one of mine. They have turned more Australians against them than they could ever imagine.

Weak-kneed moronic cowardly dhimmis. Lets see how they fare at the next election.

Carmen Miranda used to do the chicachoca samba

Ai, ai, ai, ai, ai, I like you veery much,
Ai, ai, ai, ai, ai, I think you're grand.....

We have had all this already in the UK, St George flags, Union flags (aka Union Jack), china pigs, Christmas...... Some true, some a hoax. Keep flying it wherever, whenever.
BTW what does the aborigine flag look like?

Granny,

The aborigine flag, Black on the top half, Red on the bottom half, big yellow spot in the middle. I've no idea what the various colours mean, dame memory has failed me again, but it's something we all learn in infants school over here.

As for this story, it's too stupid for words. Maybe we should try to get a Muslim version of Carmen Miranda. Of course, she would advertise vegetables rather than fruit (replacing the fruit-laden headgear for a potato sack with an eyeslit).

I saw something yesterday which cheered me up...a POLICE car driving around Cronulla, Sydney, with an Australian flag flying proudly above the passenger window.

I couldn't believe my eyes.

Come Mr Taleban, tally me banana...

faqi said "This is how it all started in Eurabia. A little here a little there and now the Muslims want it all." Isn't that how terminal cancer starts out also?

Heheh

MikeW thats bloody great to hear really great, put a big smile on my face..

i have been so spun over the cops, i been putting posts around suggesting the Aussie Military to come in n lockdown Lakemba next multicult resistance riot that sparks up.

buy an aussie flag sticker for all yur friends. :P

Deecha
whats the addy you used for Bondi, be great if some Overseas people wrote to Bondi in disgust as well as its Sydneys main tourist spot.

The banana thing i remember from talking to people in the '80s from sheffield council (producer of david blunkett).

I think that has passed but you still can't ask for a black coffee, etc, etc.

They also banned all rowntree products from vending machines including schools because rowntree's had no comment when asked to provide a racial profile of their workers.

I say the same when cops, councils, etc start things by asking me to choose my race. I say I am human full stop and stop bringing race into it.

The whole PC thing is funny because changing language does not change attitudes: It just masks them.

A bit like covering women up doesn't stop men being full of lust and sexually abusing anything they have the chance to and then blaming that woman, dhimmi, child, camel, or woman on bondi beach, for their own lack of self control.

Black on the top half, Red on the bottom half, big yellow spot in the middle.
Perhaps the sun rising over the good red earth, bringing light to the blackness?
I'm not Cornish but the Cornish flag, which I rather like, http://www.cornwall-calling.co.uk/cornwall-history.htm is being seen about more in recent years, especially at events such as Live8 or the proms at the Eden Project. If you follow the link do read about the history of the Cornish emblem, when the Duke of Cornwall was enslaved during the crusades.

The other reason the PC brigade urged that Rowntrees be boycotted (and Nescafe and Nestles) was because the parent company provided free baby milk to African countries and were thus believed to be undermining breastfeeding, and by extension babies health.

That's it, Carmen Miranda, Chiquita banana!

What a great country. Just think, when sharia
comes it'll just be babes in burkhas.

"Council bans Australian flag
01 January 2006

A SYDNEY council voted against flying the Australian flag at Bondi Beach because of fears it would incite more race-fuelled violence on the city's beaches.

HERE WE GO
Australian flag stickers can be purchased from your states Australian National Flag Association office http://www.flagaustnat.asn.au/

To Razorskarr.
The Aboriginal Flag was designed by Harold Thomas, an artist and an Aboriginal, in 1971. The flag was designed to be an eye-catching rallying symbol for the Aboriginal people and a symbol of their race and identity. The black represents the Aboriginal people, the red the earth and their spiritual relationship to the land, and the yellow the sun, the giver of life.

Why not fly the New South Wales flag all over?

http://www.ausflag.com.au/flags/images/nsw.gif

I love the cross on it.

Andrew Bolt from the Herald Sun seems to get it. He's not quite there yet, but he is starting to make the 'right noises', here's an excerpt from 14th of December:

See how many jobless and broken-homed youths were in the Kelly Gang and Macquarie Fields Boys, which rioted at Sydney's welfare ghetto in Macquarie Fields last February. See how many Aborigines, ditto, pelted police with rocks, wood and molotov cocktails in the equally tribal riots last year in drug-riddled Redfern, also in Sydney. Or burned down a police station on jobless, booze-soaked Palm Island.
See also the rise of ethnic gangs, such as the lethal Telopea Street Boys, drawn largely from Sydney's Lebanese -- so many without jobs or a sense of home.
The we-own-the-beach Bra Boys are not half as dangerous, but are notorious for a riot in 2002 in which they attacked off-duty police at a party and hurt 30. After all, tribes owe their first loyalty to their own and not to us.
Abberton is not a thug himself, but awaits sentencing for telling lies to protect his brother Jai, then charged with killing gangster Tony Hines at Maroubra with three shots to the head. Jai was found not guilty on the grounds of self-defence.
ISN'T Abberton's background only too familiar? That's just one thing that must change: how much harder must we work to make parents responsible, families strong and children safe, and to put young men in work and traffickers in jail?
Abberton's peace talks this week started with Keysar Trad, whose own background worries me, too.
Trad has been adopted as the voice of Sydney's Muslim Lebanese by a media too timid or incurious to ask whether he really represents them at all, or whether he even should. That careless irresponsibility is another thing that must change.
Trad was once head of the Lebanese Muslim Association, but was dumped and now trades as head of a thing he's called the Islamic Friendship Association.
But what friendship does he really offer?
Trad was once a translator of the pro-bin Laden Islamic Youth Movement, which ran appeals for violent jihad overseas and which has since been investigated for alleged terrorism-related offences.
He himself publicly rejects terrorism, but sneeringly wrote, for instance, that "the criminal dregs of white society colonised this country, and now, they only take the select choice of other societies, and the descendants of these criminal dregs tell us that they are better than us".
He was also the spokesman of the radical Mufti of Australia, Sheik Taj el-din El-Hilali, who preaches at Lakemba mosque, Australia's biggest and dominated by Muslim Lebanese.
Hilali, you'll recall, has praised suicide bombers as heroes and called the September 11 terror attacks "God's work against oppressors" and "the work of 100 per cent American gangs". When Lebanese Muslims pack-raped non-Muslim girls, Hilali blamed "Australian society". But again and again Trad defended him. Spin, spin, spin.
Trad is one of a generation of Muslim "leaders" who have, in effect, preached an us-against-them rhetoric that has only made tensions worse, which is one more thing to change. The academics and writers who feed such men their lines in anti-American and anti-Western hatred need challenging, too.
What makes a Trad a problem is that well before Sunday's riot, Australia, like so many Western countries, was already struggling to integrate Middle Eastern immigrants and, more worryingly, their born-here children.
For too long, thanks in part to a media often too scared to face ethnic truths, we fooled ourselves into thinking we were actually doing this integrating thing well.
We looked at the Muslim riots in France and smirked. If only the French had learned from our multicultural magic. We saw British-born Muslims exploding themselves in trains and a bus and said ... well, too little.
True, there were some reasons to think we could more easily embrace Muslims. Hadn't we taken in wave after wave of people from everywhere without one riot, until Sunday?
But this time it's different. We are different and some of these immigrants are, too.
We are different, in part, because we are less sure about ourselves and about what really unites us. Instead of being proud enough to expect immigrants to assimilate, we urge them to stay apart through multiculturalism. Indeed, we pay them to do so, giving three grants even to the jihadists of the Islamic Youth Movement.
What's more, we preach that this is a country that deserves little respect. Hear what is taught in schools, universities, theatres, films, books, galleries and museums: ours is a racist country with a child-stealing and genocidal past, led by a fascist voted in by rednecks. All this, so much of it built on deceits, must change as well.
Do I exaggerate this culture of contempt? Here, for instance, is part of a jeering email sent to me on Saturday by an employee of the rabidly anti-American and Leftist SBS: "Fact: migrants would rather die than assimilate to Australian culture. Why would anybody willingly assimilate to a culture that the entire world considers uncouth and un-cultured?"
You can imagine how the children react to this vision of Australia. Many would give their loyalty instead to something stronger: some ethnic tribe, perhaps, or they might revolt against the insult and, feeling threatened, chant Aussie Aussie Aussie and strike out.
But, as I said, the immigrants have changed, too.
Middle Eastern immigrants have brought with them a religion that too often preaches rejection of the very society they've joined and too often glorifies violence.
They also brought with them radical preachers, such as the Egyptian Hilali, the Lebanese Sheik Abdul Salam Zoud, the Jordanian Sheik Mohammed Omran and the Algerian Abdul Nacer Benbrika, the last now arrested, who spoke little English, but much hate. That, too, must change.
Many Muslims from Lebanon, in particular, were allowed in, even though some lacked the skills, let alone the culture, to fit in easily. That policy at least has been changed. But enough?
You can read the inevitable result in the statistics, with Muslim Lebanese at least twice as likely to be jailed, or jobless. No wonder the gangs had so many recruits.
Or you can measure the trouble in anecdotes. As long ago as 1999 (before the September 11 attacks, or Iraq war, on which so much is blamed) Lebanese gangs were harassing and attacking locals at Bondi beach. It took four years of hard policing to tame them.
In 2001 came the pack rapes, by mainly Lebanese men of girls still in their early teens and selected because they were "skips".
And a few Muslims, many Lebanese, drifted into extremist movements linked to terrorism. One is now in jail in Lebanon on terrorism-related charges, another in custody in Iraq and yet others face charges here.
As if that wasn't enough, Middle Eastern gangs become feared as drug traffickers and standover men.
Sadly for us all, their rise to power came just as police found it harder to uphold the law and their authority, or felt less inclined to. Just think how police at the Redfern riots stood for hours under a barrage of missiles without making arrests. More to change.
And so, two years ago, prominent whistleblower and retired detective Tim Priest warned that police had become too intimidated by these gangs and too exhausted by the poor-us complaints of ethnic "spokesmen" to uphold the law.
"In hundreds upon hundreds of incidents, police have backed down to Middle Eastern thugs and taken no action and allowed incidents to go unpunished," he said.
"Again, I stress the unbelievable influence that local politicians and religious leaders played in covering up the real state of play..." Here is more that needs changing.
All this and more needs to be known to understand last Sunday's riot, which is too easily dismissed by the usual sloganeers as just a belch of white racism.
We must understand also that Lebanese gangs or groups had invaded the beaches of Cronulla for some time, with many locals reporting punch-ups, foul abuse and sexual harassment of women. Two lifeguards were last week attacked by up to a dozen Muslim men, one punched unconscious, forcing a nippers' carnival to be cancelled.
Despite many credible claims of gang strife at the beaches, claims backed by the local state MP, police reportedly arrested just one man all this year. When Premier Morris Iemma went to Maroubra last week to promise action to the TV cameras, locals heckled him, one calling: "The locals respect police. The gangs do not." Yet one more thing to change.
SO it all came together on a hot Sunday. A hot and thirsty Sunday and how many other beer-fuelled riots have we seen in these coarsened days, like the huge and boozy Australia Day brawl in Perth last year?
Add the elements. A local surfing tribe. Beach invasions by another, more violent tribe. Weak policing. Handwringing politicians. A lookaway media. Feeble loyalties to authority. Beer. A particularly outrageous bashing. Fear.
Don't forget that fear and how much the locals had to be scared of. The reprisal attacks since Sunday show how dangerous the Lebanese gangs truly are. A man has been stabbed, a woman hit in the face with a baseball bat, another woman attacked in a pizza shop, a dozen other people hurt, more than 100 cars trashed, shop windows smashed in, women terrorised, police pelted with bottles and stones, guns brandished and reportedly fired, and it isn't over. At all.
So does Sunday's riot add up to a simple case of damn-us white racism, or to something far more complex and human? Oh, yes, the rioting was cowardly, vile and disgusting. Pack attacks are, which is why we must not merely condemn, but understand.
To prevent. Best start now. There will be more riots before we spruce up this home of ours and only quiet thinking, not screaming, will help us.
bolta@heraldsun.com.au

Muslim bigots impose blasphemy laws on Victoria

Gerard Jackson
BrookesNews.Com
Monday 19 December 2005

At the behest of Muslim bigots and multiculturalist fanatics the Bracks Government suspended free speech in Victoria by imposing a blasphemy law dressed up as an anti-vilification law. This has given Islamo-fascists a freehand to attack critics of Islam.

In a ruthless attempt to intimidate critics Muslim fanatics reported two pastors to Diane Sisely, the Equal Opportunity Commission boss, for criticising the Koran. This enemy of free speech and her fellow Stalinoids on the commission then launched proceedings against the pastors for exercising their fundamental and inalienable right to free speech. So far these pastors have had to pony up more than $100,000 to defend themselves against Bracks’ obscene blasphemy law and these lefty zealots.

However, circumstantial evidence suggests that members of the Equal Opportunity Commission entered into a conspiracy to prosecute these pastors in order to intimidate potential critics of Islam into remaining silent.

Diane Sisely hired May Helou, a Muslim bigot, to help her identify people criticising Islam. True to form, this Muslim Torquemada quickly swung into action. Helou incited several Muslim converts to attend a seminar on jihad that had been organised by a Melbourne Pentecostal church. As a result three Muslims attended. About 250 Christians were present.

Pastor Danny Nalliah and Pastor Daniel Scot addressed the crowd. Pastor Daniel Scot, who had been sentenced to death in Pakistan for his Christian beliefs, accurately cited passages from the Koran and the Hadith, pointing out that these had been used by fanatical clerics to justify jihad against the West, lying for Islam, murdering apostates, raping female prisoners, etc. (Tell me, little Miss Sisely, do these passages make the Koran hate speech?)

The Pastors’ response to this barbarism was that Christians should pray and that Muslims “should be loved”. (This just goes to show how viciously intolerant these Christians really are). Well, this was just too much for our freedom-loving Muslim converts. Seething with trumped-up indignation, these monuments to the unquestionable benefits of multiculturalism complained, surprise, surprise, to May Helou who immediately brought the EOC down on the heads of our oh so dangerous Pastors. As a member of the commission this Muslim bigot even got to sit in judgment on its religious victims. (Talk about acting as judge, jury and executioner).

There is no doubt in my mind that some
EOC
Did Sisely plot
to persecute
Christians pastors?
members of the commission conspired with May Helou to engage in the religious persecution of these Christian critics of Islam. Given the nature of the evidence there should be an immediate and independent investigation of Sisely and Helou. As the EOC has been compromised by religious bigotry and its obvious contempt for Australian values, it should be abolished.

Under Bracks’ blasphemy law these victims of Muslim intolerance were ordered by the Orwellian Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal to publicly apologise and humiliate themselves by spending $23,000 on ads. Furthermore, the Tribunal’s commissars ordered the pastors to submit to a form of re-education. They bravely refused to kowtow to these intellectual thugs.

The disgusting Stalinoid behaviour of Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal perfectly mirrors the behaviour of communist parties. Those who dissent from the party line are ordered to attend a meeting of party members where they are then humiliated and verbally abused. This continues until the victims submit*. Fortunately for Victorians, though they don’t know it yet, these pastors are determined to see that justice is done and the fundamental rights of Victorians are restored.

The riots in Sydney are revealing what happens when Australians get sick of a minority trying to impose, with the tacit agreement of cowardly politicians and half-witted multiculturalists, its reactionary Muslim beliefs on them

How does the slimy Mr Bracks view the riots that were incited by Lebanese Muslim thuggery? “Similar violence against ethnic minorities could occur [here]” (The Age, Attacks possible here, 12 December). Now you have it, Muslim thugs provoke riots and the lying Bracks smears the locals as racists.

Although it is something of mystery why Bracks is determined to impose a blasphemy law that favours Muslim bigots, what is not a mystery is the man’s contempt for the truth. Last September this mountebank met with several bishops. He looked them in straight in the eye and promised to make his blasphemy law less onerous. The lying creep then went about subverting our liberty by further strengthening this vicious law.

As a member of the Liberal Party I am outraged that Robert Doyle has supported Bracks’ anti-free speech laws. There are those of us in the Party who are sick of his moral cowardice and his lack of principles. We are also sick of Michael Kroger’s political string-pulling. Thanks to this power mad Brahmin the Party has been lumbered with the likes of Boyle, Sheezel and Helen Kroger.

Rumour has it that Kroger’s number is up. In the meantime the Party’s real liberals, liberal in the classical sense of the word, need to take a stand. Now Brookes has never bothered with religious matters, but when a bunch of theocrats, irrespective of their religion, succeed in limiting our freedoms then it is time to act.

It genuinely grieves me to have to do this because the Muslims I have known and worked with have always been decent to me and never raised the question of religious beliefs. But Bracks’ vile laws and the totalitarian behaviour of EOC and VCAT officials have left me with no alternative. So here goes:

The Koran is crap and Mohammed was a child-molestering, thieving, lying, murderous sadistic misogynist who couldn’t even spell his own name. How anyone with half a brain could be taken in by this loathsome thug beats me.

Now the law is the law, Bracks: So prosecute me. If you haven’t got the guts get the conspiring Diane Sisely and May Helou to send in their religious police. But if you think for one moment that a man like me would politely stand by and allow your two-faced commissars or some Vishinski-like judge to lecture me on tolerance and freedom, then you really are stupid.

While leftwing journalists and slimy politicians like Bracks and NSW Premier Morris Iemma smear Australians as racists, I should like to draw attention to what Professor von Mises had to say on the clash of values, which is what this is really all about:

In an Australia governed according to [classical] liberal principles, what difficulties could arise from the fact that in some parts of the continent Japanese and in other parts Englishmen were in the majority? (Liberalism: A Socio- Economic Exposition, Sheed-McMeel, 1978. Originally published as Liberalismus, Jena: G. Fischer, 1927).

But the treacherous likes of Sisely, Bracks and the bigoted Helou despise classical liberal values, preferring instead the heavy hand of the police state. These people and their admirers have clearly demonstrated their tyrannical inclinations, revealing once and for all that they are not to be trusted with any degree of political power.

*This is how the Hollywood branch of the Communist Party of the United States disciplined writers, producers and actors who challenged the party line. See Kenneth Lloyd Billingsley’s Hollywood Party, Prima Publishing, 1998. Also the God that Failed, Columbia Press 2001, reveals just how vicious this mentality is. Mao’s Red Guards took this procedure of public confession, guilt and humiliation to its logical and gruesome conclusion. Mao: The Unknown Story, Jung Chang and John Halliday, Jonathan Cape London, 2005.

Gerard Jackson is Brookes’ economics editor

Couldn't they just fly a BIG Red Cross flag over a lifeguard stand and call it even?

Whinging knuckleheads.

Ridiculous. Proudly fly those flags, boys. You can't let a tiny minority run roughshod over you...

Andrew Bolt on Keyzar Trad:

Trad has been adopted as the voice of Sydney's Muslim Lebanese by a media too timid or incurious to ask whether he really represents them at all, or whether he even should. That careless irresponsibility is another thing that must change.
Trad was once head of the Lebanese Muslim Association, but was dumped and now trades as head of a thing he's called the Islamic Friendship Association.
But what friendship does he really offer?
Trad was once a translator of the pro-bin Laden Islamic Youth Movement, which ran appeals for violent jihad overseas and which has since been investigated for alleged terrorism-related offences.
He himself publicly rejects terrorism, but sneeringly wrote, for instance, that "the criminal dregs of white society colonised this country, and now, they only take the select choice of other societies, and the descendants of these criminal dregs tell us that they are better than us".
He was also the spokesman of the radical Mufti of Australia, Sheik Taj el-din El-Hilali, who preaches at Lakemba mosque, Australia's biggest and dominated by Muslim Lebanese.
Hilali, you'll recall, has praised suicide bombers as heroes and called the September 11 terror attacks "God's work against oppressors" and "the work of 100 per cent American gangs". When Lebanese Muslims pack-raped non-Muslim girls, Hilali blamed "Australian society". But again and again Trad defended him. Spin, spin, spin.
Trad is one of a generation of Muslim "leaders" who have, in effect, preached an us-against-them rhetoric that has only made tensions worse, which is one more thing to change. The academics and writers who feed such men their lines in anti-American and anti-Western hatred need challenging, too.
What makes a Trad a problem is that well before Sunday's riot, Australia, like so many Western countries, was already struggling to integrate Middle Eastern immigrants and, more worryingly, their born-here children.
For too long, thanks in part to a media often too scared to face ethnic truths, we fooled ourselves into thinking we were actually doing this integrating thing well.
We looked at the Muslim riots in France and smirked. If only the French had learned from our multicultural magic. We saw British-born Muslims exploding themselves in trains and a bus and said ... well, too little.

Hi everyone,

Could anyone with a spare few minutes please write to the Waverly Council, they are the Council that Bondi Beach is within.

Please let them know all your holiday plans are off to Sydney Beaches especially Bondi and Waverly areas as you find their shame of the Australian flag intolerable. Give em some of that lovely USA patriotism and pride.

Here is some background info:
http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/turnbull-flies-the-flag/2006/01/02/1136050394337.html


Here is their Email:
http://www.waverley.nsw.gov.au/talktous/email.asp

Or if you can on paper:

Waverly Council
PO Box 9,
Bondi Junction,
NSW, Australia 2022

Telephone: +61 2 9369 8000,
Facsimile: +61 2 9387 1820


Thanks heaps, even if you cant write just talk about it to your friends.

Yes Sheik,


We have to hammer the sly moderate agenda all we can.

I think the Red Supremacists have finally realised that terrorism is not an equal right.

Now we can move on to unveiling moderate islam to them. Shouldn’t be too hard.

Also just PC itself, I see people saying the PC is worse than islam it took me a while to get the point, but I am agreeing more and more these days.

When I imagine any civilized country being free of PC, it’s so easy to see how islam may fall very quickly with out it’s PC co-workers and more so some of the more bizarre PC rights.

It would become unprotected and forced into accountability.

me again


heres a poll on the Aussie flag. takes one second to vote....

http://www.smh.com.au/polls/national/form.html

Sheik Yer Mama,


This link is to the full essay Andrew Bolt is talking about, when he refers to Keyser Trash Trad.

It's from 1996/7.... its so vile, pleae post it far and wide, lets show people what these moderates are up to.

For those of you not in Australia, Keyser is a well known moderate muslim these days, often on tv talking about the misunderstood islamic youth and possible solutions...bleat bleat

From the pen of Keyser, Aussies friendly muslim spokesman:

"our ideology is the best salvation for the people of Australia, and the people of the world in general. Yes, we are a threat to the culture of drunkenness, paedophilia, and mostly we are a big threat to the culture of ELITISM."


"In a way, they feel safe because of the quantity of water which surrounds this country, so they feel fortified behind this great body, it gives them a feeling of security. But the reality is, the land belongs to God, not to them, and if those foreigners, whom they fear as migrants are not permitted to enter as migrants, they will come as settlers, in numbers so large that they will not be able to process them, hold them, or stop them. What will they do then? If these foreigners who are restraining themselves, because they see a legal hope, that they can come to this vast mainly uninhabited land for whatever reason, are told that there is no longer a legal way to come here, what will they do?"

Sounds like the answer to Keysers Question is Jihad on Australia.

http://www.islam.org.au/articles/16/RACISM.HTM