Abbas picks Hamas leader to form new government -- but it's OK, he's "pragmatic"

Go back to sleep, everyone. Nothing to be concerned about here. The new PA PM is a "pragmatic former university administrator." Probably he's a gentle cuddly fellow, a lot like his fellow university prof and jihad supporter Sami Al-Arian. I'm sure that when he shouts "Death to America! Death to Israel!" he does it with the sweetest smile on his face.

Pragmatic? Haniyeh said after the Hamas victory that the Palestinians would "complete the liberation of other parts of Palestine." That means the destruction of Israel. Whether he means to accomplish this through the slow attrition of negotiated concessions, or violence, or both, the outcome is the same.

"Abbas Picks Hamas Leader to Form New Govt," from AP, with thanks to JE:

GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip - Hamas presented its choice for Palestinian prime minister — a pragmatic former university administrator — and the Islamic militant group reached out to other factions, including Fatah, to join a broad-based Cabinet that might stand a chance of gaining international approval.

Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas and Ismail Haniyeh met for more than two hours late Monday, but the expected official designation of the Hamas leader as prime minister was put off until Tuesday, when the two are to speak again.

Haniyeh's appointment is just a formality, since Hamas won last month's election by a landslide and has an absolute majority in the new parliament.

| 3 Comments
Print this entry | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

3 Comments

SORRY ABOUT LENGTH BUT WHEN I READ THIS I HAD TO CUT AND PASTE IT. SHOULD BE SHOWN TO ALL WHO APPEASE.

'Whoever insults the one true Church deserves to be killed.' (News report)
David Aaronovitch

“EUROPE MUST LEARN to live in and with the world, not to dominate it, nor to assume it is superior or more virtuous. Any continent that has inflicted such brutality on the world over a period of 200 years has not too much to be proud of, and much to be modest and humble about.” Martin Jacques, The Guardian, on the cartoons row.
Meanwhile, in a parallel universe . . .

From a Reuters report, Rome, some time around now

The Vatican has protested in “the strongest possible terms” against the publication in paperback of Dan Brown’s bestselling novel, The Da Vinci Code. Cardinal Loopi, of the Office of the Defence of the Faith, condemned the book for defaming Catholicism and, in its suggestion that Jesus Christ was married, of heresy. “We demand that the book be destroyed and that the author be punished,” said Loopi, “otherwise we cannot be held responsible for how Catholics throughout the world may react.”

Excerpt from a speech by Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor

Merkel: “The affront to the honour of the one true Church is in fact an affront to the worship of God, and to the seeking of truth and justice, and an affront to all the prophets of God. Obviously, all those who harm the honour of the one true Church . . .”

Crowd: “Death to Dan Brown.

Death to Dan Brown.

Death to Dan Brown.

Death to Dan Brown.”

From the Paris correspondent of al-Jazeera

A Lyons priest today offered half a million euros and a top-of-the-line Toyota as a reward to anyone who killed Dan Brown or any executive of the Da Vinci Code publishers, Jonathan Cape. Speaking to a 1,000-strong crowd gathered after Mass outside the church of St Marie-la-Vierge, Fr Jules Monbiot announced that the offer was “a unanimous decision by all bishops that whoever insults the one true Church deserves to be killed, and whoever will take this insulting man to his end will get this prize”.

News stories in al-Ahram (Cairo)

Bookseller shot dead in Poland, by teenager shouting: “For God, and the Pope!”

Ten killed in Lisbon Dan Brown riots, when police opened fire on mob ransacking the Canadian Embassy. “We thought he was Canadian,” says riot leader.

Violence in northwest London as Jews go on rampage against Holocaust denial in Muslim countries. Kebab restaurants and curry houses ablaze from the Finchley Road to Edgware.

Iranian and Syrian embassies and consulates attacked in 20 cities worldwide. Iranian Embassy destroyed in Canberra. Australian Government describes violence as “regrettable, but understandable”.

Speech by Angela Merkel, about the convening of an international conference in Berlin to “investigate” Islam

“We propose the following to the Muslims: if you are not lying, allow a group of neutral, honest researchers to come to Mecca, and to talk to people, examine documents and let people know the findings of their research about the Muhammad myth. You have even prevented your own scholars from researching this issue. They are allowed to study anything except for the Muhammad myth. Are these not medieval methods?”

Reuters report from Berlin

“German Chancellor Angela Merkel today caused alarm in diplomatic circles when she called for the Netherlands to be ‘wiped from the face of the earth’.” She went on, “The establishment of the Dutch regime was a move by the world oppressor against the Catholic world.”

Summary of an article in French government newspaper, Le Monde

The Netherlands may have created the avian flu virus in order to damage the economies of Europe, and cleverly planted it first in the Far East to divert attention away from the real plan.

Angela Merkel on German attempts to produce a nuclear weapon

“Those who oppose us should be grateful that our people has acted nobly towards you so far, and has been patient. We want to remain patient. Don’t make us lose our patience. The peoples have awakened. The world of Christendom has awakened. Do not make us reconsider our policies.”

Reuters reports from Munich

Fr Rudiger Schlitz, the assistant to the head of the Catholic Church in Germany, has said that it is doctrinally permissible for nuclear weapons to be used. “When the entire world is armed with nuclear weapons, it is permissible to use these weapons as a counter-measure. According to church law, only the goal is important . . .”

Al-Jazeera News. Mark Seddon reporting . . .

These are the pictures of Our Lady’s Church in Shoreham, following the explosion in which 31 parishioners died, along with the suicide bomber, who is believed to belong to the majority Anglican community. This is the fourth such bomb attack on a Catholic church in the last two years.

Statement from Human Rights Watch . . .

Calling on the Italian authorities to order an immediate, independent investigation into the violent suppression of an apparently peaceful demonstration by Seventh Day Adventists in Naples on February 13, 2005. Hundreds of demonstrators, including women and children, were injured when police and armed militia from the Catholic Enforcement League broke up the protest, apparently using excessive force, and as many as 1,200 protesters are believed to have been arrested. A year later 200 of those detained are still being held without trial.

Report from al Quds-al-Arabi

Finland. Mr X, a local celebrity and Muslim, was exhumed after his funeral and given a Christian burial, despite his widow’s objection that he had not been to Church since he was a child, and had converted to Islam at the age of 15. A church court had considered the case following a complaint from a local Lutheran preacher, and ruled that Mr X should be treated as a Christian.

Excerpts from Amnesty International Report for 2006

In Newcastle, England, a special court sentenced a Gateshead woman to be burnt to death for witchcraft. Betty Spencer, 53, was immolated in front of a crowd that had gathered in the Newcastle United football stadium. It was the sixth such execution since the year 2000.

In Idaho a teacher was killed and three of his pupils badly injured when militia members of the “Party of Christ”, who object to girls being educated on the same premises as boys, fired into a packed schoolroom.

And finally, the good news . . .

From hiding, somewhere in Pakistan, Dan Brown apologises to the Judaeo-Christian world for the publication of The Da Vinci Code, promises to donate the proceeds from all his books to any charity nominated for the purpose by Opus Dei and undertakes to become a monk in a silent order at a monastery atop a high mountain in the Apennines.

"Pragmatic"? Why he's practically an Arab version of William James, clutching his well-thumbed copy of "The Varieties of Religious Experience." Or Percy Bridgman. Yes, every inch the Pragmatist is this believer in the Complete Regulation of Life and Total Explanation of the Universe that is Islam.

What "pragmatic" means here is that he is prepared to lie and lie in wait, like Muhammmad, the Model for All Time who counselled that "War is deception" and signed a ten-year hudna with the Meccans in 628 A.D., observed it for a little less than 18 months, and then broke the agreement just as soon as he felt powerful enough to do so. That agreement, the Treaty of al-Hudaibiyyah, has entered Muslim lore as the model of how to make agreements with Infidels. No permanent peace is possible, only the "truce" or hudna of precisely the kind Hamas is talking about. After all, Al-Hudaibiyyah is the model for all agreements between Believers and Infidels. See "War and Peace in Islam" by Majid Khadduri, himself a Muslim, but one writing at a time, and for a scholarly audience, that it would have been impossible to fool.

No longer. Now Infidels, including those who claim to be "scholars of Islam" -- can easily be fooled. Why that great scholar Mark LeVine, a week or two ago in The Boston Globe, tossed off a reference to the Treaty of al-Hudaibiyya and, completely ignoring how Muslims celebrate the cunning Muhammad demonstrated in making and then breaking that treaty, implies that it stands for quite a different proposition, that Muslims make treaties with Infidels in order not to break but to keep them, for LeVine, surely one of the most ignorant "experts" on Islam who has managed to get himself a unversity post (a disgrace to the University of California at Irvine that filled a postiion that might have gone to a worthy researcher and teacher, and instead has been handed over to a transparently foolish and self-promoting clown), said that it was the "Meccans who broke the treaty." This is nonsense. The flimsy pretext offered by Muhammad was not felt by him, once he had conqured the Meccans 18 months later, nor by any Muslim commentator, such as Majid Khadduri, since, has never been taken seriously. In fact one can see in the commentators their praise of this brilliant move, this splendid tactic by Muhammad to deal a death-blow to the Meccans who until then had successfully resisted him and his followers, but were undone by putting their trust in the Treaty of al-Hudaibiyya. Muslims have been crowing about this for 1350 years; apparently such crowing has managed to escape that polymath Mark LeVine.

I heard that *Hamas* means *violence* in Hebrew. Can anyone verify that?