Iran becomes UN disarmament leader

'Jordan's representative added that Israel's refusal to renounce nuclear weapons is a major source of tensions in the Middle East...'

Yes. It must be very upsetting to not be able to stomp a people who are only 1% the size of their entire faith.

The Persian “Aryans” have spoken. There was no German Aryan holocaust. If the Persian "Iranians" annihilate the Jewish race, it will be no holocaust either.

Posted by Frank:

"(had we)been converted to Mohammedanism, that cult which glorifies the heroism and which opens up the seventh Heaven to the bold warrior alone, then the Germanic races would have conquered the world." Adolph Hitler.

Another "You couldn't make this stuff up" moment.

In the words of the prophet MO (Howard) of the Trinity, Mo, Larry & Curly (pbuh):

"Knuckleheads!"

I believe the world is in its worst situation since pre-WWI.

The League of Nations is looking quite inviting at this point.

The EU and UN are not only ineffctive, but de jure advocates of genocide. What could be worse? Russia and China helping the process along.

Who takes the UN seriously anyway? Except from European governments, ofcourse :P

Why are we suprised? What do we expect elected committees, conventions, membership appointments, committee rotations, and commission reports of the United Nations today to read when we give thirty votes to Islamic nations each of which was has never had a democratic government or a democratic election? This is why Iran gets this type of appointment or the U.N. human rights commission has been headed up by Libya, Syria and others. This is why the U.N. can only agree on one thing that Zionism is terrorism and racism. Throw out U.N. members who are not democratically elected. Why give a vote to those whose only claim to vote is that they were violent, corrupt and deceitful enough to murder and mayhem and dominate and control a modern cesspool country? Throw out these scoundrel members or shut the U.N. down. This esteemed body has already set in motion a process to criminalize, sanction and punish the leaders of the U.K., U.S., Israel and others as war criminals for overthrowing the charitable humanist and prior member Sadaam Hussein (after all his largesse to U.N. administrative leaders and other member who showed Hussein appropriate loyalty in vouching for him) and other kindred corrupt criminals who keep power in unimaginably despicable ways. The U.N. legitimizes some of the worst ills in the modern world. Why do we give more than one vote to the Caliphate?

Giving Iran a seat on the UN Disarmament Commission is like giving Sudan, Syria, Libya, Cuba et al seats on the UN Human Rights Council, formely Commission. That is, par for the internationalist course.

Are these assigned alphabetically? If yes, next month, Rebecca can write the same article, substituting Iraq for Iran.

Now that Iran is the chair, look forward to the UN Disarmament Commission demanding that the US, Israel and UK disarm, followed by other infidel countries like India (whom Iran very generously offered to supply gas via a pipeline through Pakistan.)

All these jokes about the UN are worth their own hadith.

David England sez:

"...Throw out U.N. members who are not democratically elected. Why give a vote to those whose only claim to vote is that they were violent, corrupt and deceitful enough to murder and mayhem and dominate and control a modern cesspool country?"

According to that we would have to deal with Hamas. We would also have to deal with the Muslim brotherhood in Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Syria (?) Afghanistan, Pakistan, Indonesia (?)

Seriously:

Most, if not all of these places would vote one time, and they would vote for Islam. Then what?

So for the next decade you would still be better off with the 'plucky little King' in Jordan, with a dictator in Egypt, with the military preventing a Muslim-brother-takeover in Algeria.

None of these countries should be taken seriously. None of these countries should have a say in how we are to conduct our affairs.
The 'Ummah' should have only one voice, but in the security council?

I've said it here before and I'll repeat it until I turn blue. We need to get out of the UN (Useless Nations), and get someone with backbone in the White House. We need a new organization of nations that includes at least two other true democracies and form something else. This of course will not include the Islamic pseudo-democracies like Afghanistan. I think that the US, India, Israel, and Japan would be a good start. If the Japanese can be made to understand just how the Muslims would treat Buddhist and Shintoists they might join. The Hindus should understand this; the Muslim bloodletting in 1948 is a good reminder. We also need to make the Chinese understand that an Islamic victory means that there will be no Western consumers with any money to buy their exports. Our military intervention in Yugoslavia spoiled our relationship with Russia for many years to come. The next President should explain just how short sighted we were.

But, I realize that none of this will ever happen until we finally use up every drop of Arab oil. Hey - "Arabhouse Oil, Good to the Last Drop."

geesh if we get rid of the UN, what will the US democrats ie, Kennedy, Kerry, Clinton cling to! l mean a lot of libeals would lose their best friends!
Jimmy Carter just loves rubbing elbows with the UN elites! you know how the UN harbours terrorist nations, when BinLaden chose the Twin Towers over the UN buildings! Terrorist nows about a terrorist hangout, the UN!

Just when you think the United Nothing has reached the pinnacle of wretched incompetence and corruption, it only gets worse. Why does the U.S. tolerate and finance this asinine assembly of pompous imbeciles?

The UN serves only one actual purpose. As a Leftist clearinghouse for nations to triangulate against the US. Rather than oversee human rights around the globe, as was its mandate in 1946, the UN today is nothing more than a political body, led by corrupt Africans, making deals with corrupt Islamics, with the assistance of corrupt Russian and corruption Chinese governments, none of whom have any interest in human rights. The UN today serves exactly the opposite purpose for which it was founded.

David E quotes Hitler's praise of Islam above. In fact Hitler directly discussed jihad with a Muslim theologian, `Inayat Khan, who was an Indian Muslim and an advocate of the Pakistan idea. See link:
http://ziontruth.blogspot.com/2006/01/islamic-influence-on-hitler-can-it-be.html

Infidel Pride:

Israel has never been allowed to take up any significant positions in the UN even though it has been Israel's "turn" many times. The usual suspects always block the process with objections. The same usual suspects also support putting Libya and other failed Muslim states into key positions.

The UN has no moral authority and it should be seen --must be seen-- to have no moral authority. It is a dangerous entity. If Bush wants to save money for America, he can stop the UN subsidies after stopping those to Egypt, the palestinian authority, Saudi Arabia, etc.

of course iran wants the jews to tell were they keep there nukes the better to destoy them befor there used but of couse iran has no nukes its not a nucular weapon untill you put the trigger in it so when they say that there not makeing nucular bombs thirs technacly right

Wait a minute..

Isnt this the same Useless UN that

Swore Iran didnt have any nukes
Swore Iraq was telling the truth about wmds
Swore that sudan could be trusted with darfur
Swore that lybia didnt have anything to do with the locerbee bombing?

Now they put IRAN in charge of weapons inspections...

Who arranged this?

Jimmy the peanut farmer Carter?