Well, yes, but they plan to use them only as minarets. From Reuters, with thanks to JE (both for link and quip):
JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Iran has received a first shipment of missiles from North Korea that are capable of reaching Europe, Israel's military intelligence chief was quoted on Thursday as saying.Known in the West as BM-25s, the Russian-designed missiles have a range of around 1,500 miles, giving them a longer reach than the Iranian-made Shihab-4 missiles which are capable of hitting Israel.
The intelligence chief, Major-General Amos Yadlin, was quoted by Israel's Haaretz newspaper as saying in a lecture on Wednesday that some BM-25s had arrived in Iran.
More big boys toys for the little man....they'll look pretty when the real missiles destroy them along with the nuclear facility.....ah well, they have to spend all those oil trillions on something I guess.
A friend sent this to me this morning: Please read, and arrive at your own conclusions.
How Long Do We Have?
About the time our original 13 states adopted their new constitution, in 1787, Alexander Tyler, a Scottish history professor at the University of Edinburgh, had this to say about the fall of the Athenian Republic some 2,000 years prior:
"A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury.
From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, (think universal health care, stable school spending, SSI, tax cuts, hurricane & flood relief, f arm subsidizes, spending pork,etc )with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship."
"The average age of the worlds greatest civilizations from the beginning of history,has been about 200 years. During those 200 years, these nations always progressed through the following sequence:
1. From bondage to spiritual faith;
2. From spiritual faith to great courage;
3. From courage to liberty;
4. From liberty to abundance;
5. From abundance to complacency;
6. From complacency to apathy;
7. From apathy to dependence;
8. From dependence back into bondage.
Professor Joseph Olson of Hamline University School of Law, St. Paul, Minnesota, points out some interesting facts concerning the 2000
Presidential election:
Population of counties won by: Gore: 127 million; Bush: 143 million;
Square miles of land won by: Gore: 580,000;
Bush: 2,427,000
States won by: Gore: 19 Bush: 29
Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by: Gore: 13.2 Bush: 2.1
Professor Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory Bush won was mostly the land owned by the tax-paying citizens of this great country.
Gore's territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in government-owned tenements
living off government welfare..."
Olson believes the United States is now somewhere between the "complacency & apathy" phase of Professor Tyler's definition of
democracy, with some 40 percent of the nation's population already having reached the "governmental dependency" phase.
Pass this along to help everyone realize just how much is at stake, knowing that apathy is the greatest danger to our freedom.
The reason this info has been disclosed is so the Iranians know that the Israelies know they have them and I suspect the Israelies also know where the missiles are.
So having them and getting a chance to use them are
I suppose the difference between a dream and a fantasy.
It's hardly a nightmare.
And why are we not stopping these shipments?
In December of 2005 the German secret service claim that Iran bought 18 disassembled BM-25 missiles from North Korea. The BM-25 was actually a rocket launched Russian missile, vintage late fifties with a 30 kilometer range.
The BM-25 missile is based on the Soviet SS-N-6 (R-27) submarine-launched ballistic missile. the missiles Iran purchased have a range of 2,500 kilometers, North Korea, with the help of Russian specialists developed two new versions of the R-27 with extended ranges. Analysts believe the land-based version has a range of 2,500 to 4,000 kilometers. Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad wanted the missiles' range "extended to 3,500 kilometers." The German secret service warned that "with a longer range, and the probability that (Tehran) would try to equip the missiles with nuclear warheads, there is the risk that Iran could strike at Israel and parts of central Europe."
The BM-25 missiles that Iran purchased] can easily be launched from [a] freighter modified with launch tubes and blast channels. They give Iran a projection of force capability far beyond the 2000-3000 km range of the missiles. It is possible -- though not confirmed -- that Iran may not use the BM-25's but only bought them to get the R-27 rocket motors for a missile of their own design.
The countries most concerned about these developments are Israel and Turkey. Israel's concern is obvious: Anytime a country whose president has vowed to wipe you off the map improves its ability to strike is of serious concern. Turkey's concern stems from three major factors. First, it shares a large border with Iran. Second, Iranian missiles can reach vital Turkish military and industrial targets. Third, the NATO treaty obligates Turkey to treat any attack on another NATO country as an attack on its own territory. In the event this were to occur, we may see the use of Turkish ground forces.
ICBMs capable of reaching the USA are not too far off. We essentially have two choices:
1) Attack Iran within a brief timeframe.
The repercussions will be far and wide. America's standing in the world will plummet to new depths. Islamic terror will likely rise to new heights. Oil prices will shoot through the roof, precipitating a world-wide recession. And the military value of such an attack may be of only marginal effectiveness.
2) Let the diplomatic process play itself out.
Iran will undoubtedly use this time to construct atomic weapons. There is every possibility they will use these weapons to attack Israel or even the USA, most likely by use of terror proxy so they can maintain a degree of plausible deniability. They have already expressed an intention to proliferate these weapons throughout the Muslim world.
Take your pick.
I pick:
1) Attack Iran within a brief timeframe. Either way is bad,BUT with the first choice we dont get nuked,and have a chance.If we let them build the bomb were screwed,so i would rather have the world be pissed at us(whats new) than give them time to destroy us.
One thing is sure. We have to do something. We have to do the best we know how at the moment...
if it doesn't turn out right, we can modify it as we go along-Franklin Roosevelt
Would Mahmoud and the mad mullahs want to be able to hit Europe just in case the Jews actually listened to them and moved out of Israel and into the geographical EU?
Or, more likely, this arsenal addition would be to add that one little bit more of blackmail worry to weaken the European will (from flaccid to quasi-vaporous) -and be able to move onward with their Shi'ite apocalyptic goal: raising the 12th [hidden] Imam, their Mahdi [messiah] and bringing about the Muslim Endtimes?
I hope Condoleeza Rice mentions how "holy" the Koran is, again, in order to calm this all down in time.
(I sure wish she would fall for Hirsi Ali. It might be the one move that could really help our cause against Imperialistic Islam... not that I'm implying anything, mind you...)
DC Watson:
Excellent post with interesting and provocative information, although it is a bit off-topic. Could you clarifiy some points please.
"Population of counties won by: Gore: 127 million; Bush: 143 million;"
As to this comment, I was given to understand that Gore won the popular vote in 2000. If so, Bush's carrying of counties, in which the population totaled 143 million, obscures the possibility that he may have done so by a thin margin, while Gore's carrying of the other counties may have been decisive. And then, there is always Florida to talk about. At any rate, the fact that we are talking about red and blue counties these days speaks to the ambiguity or indecisiveness of the American electorate, dosen't it?.
"Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by: Gore: 13.2 Bush: 2.1"
On this point, is it Professsor Olson's position that the murderers came out to the polls in force to vote for Gore, or is it possible that the people living in those areas viewed Gore as better able to handle the policing issues to address crime? Moreover, in many American cities, there are "good" neighborhoods situated cheek-by-jowl with "bad" neighborhoods, but both in the same county. Are you or Professor Olson suggesting that the people in the "good" neighborhoods are on welfare and don't pay their taxes?
" Between the complacency and apathy phases..."
On this point, I am afraid that I agree with you.
The US is supposed to be one country, under God, indivisible. We've got to get past this left-right, red-blue stuff. Personally, I am suspicious of politicians no matter what their putative leanings may be. I suspect (and that's all it is at the moment) that ordinary people are being played like a violin throughout all of this "War on Terror," while "remedies" to these problems are vetted and implemented that defy logic. For instance, I agree with Hugh Fitzgerald's position that Iraq is a huge waste of time, money, materiel and unnecessary risk to service personnel. And you remember, of course, the proposed managements takeover of US portlands by Dubai business interests.
If responsible citizens really want to see their taxes used effectively, then they have to make it their business to stay in close contact with their elected representative. Many of the posters here already know this, but Americans can use the following web site, http://www.congress.org/congressorg/home/, to contact their Congressional representatives.
Watson l also enjoyed your information. The constitution is a brilliant piece of paper, in that it does not allow total control of highly populated over the whole country..ie fly over country, as they are (RedStates) are the true engine of the country's wealth.
Most of Europe is at 8
D.C. Watson;
Your post is dead on. Very informative. Alexander Tyler was very insightful. Everything that he said in his paper is absolutely right. The Founding Fathers tried to install the perfect fail safe, the Constitution of the United States. The Bill of Rights.
But look at how the times have changed to bring about the welfare state. Look at the government take over of the schools in our country.
The dumbing down of the American youth. The villifying of the Founding Fathers by the liberal establisment. Abortion on demand, unwedded mothers/fatherless children, Insane taxes on everyday items. The totally illegal income tax on our personal wages. The liberalizaton of higher learning. All of this leading to voter apathy.
I see all of this played out in the Black community. Not to say that there aren't whites on welfare, because there are. But the face of the welfare state is always black. Blacks are more dependant on the government that any other ethnicity in this country. Blacks vote overwelhemingly for democrats. the only thing that an AlGore or a Hillarity Clinton has to do is mention "cuts to Welfare" and the "African Americans" will come out in droves. Back in 1980, when Ronaldus Magnus was elected president, all of the lazy folks got off their half moons and looked for work. They knew that the party that the "Milksop in Chief" Jimmy Carter had invited them to was over. No more government check for lazy "niggers." We's gots to find work! Dems Republicans done gots da Whites House back! But that didn't stop the poverty pimps. Jesse "Jackass" Jackson just stepped up the game a bit by running for the democratic nomination for president. The fact that he didn't get the nomination should have opened the eyes of black voters. After the shock of "Jackass" Jackson winning the Michigan primary took the democrats by surprise. All of a sudden it's possible for Jackass to win. Of course the democrats circled the wagons and made sure Jackass didn't win from that point on. But Jackass did get to deliver a keynote address at the 1986 Democratic Convention.
Thus sealing the deal delivering the black vote to the Walter Mondale camp. And it's been a mess for the Black community since.
Professor Olson's findings are no surprise to me. In 2000 & 2004, "African Americans" voted 98% in 2000 for Gore. And 96% for John F. Kerry. Democrats play the race card in the black community more than in any other community because "African Americans" are up on the issues as they should be. Blacks tend to vote more on race than issues. Blacks tend to watch the mainstream media more than listen to conservative talk radio. Those of us that are in the know are usually called names like "Uncle Tom" or "sellout" by "African Americans." Black such as myself tend to vote on the issues. There are some knowledgeible blacks that vote demcratic, but are mostly influenced by "Jackass" Jackson and Operation P.U.S.H./Rainbow Coalition. Mostly made up of black bussiness men and preachers that benefit from "Jackass'" threats to boycott big corporations. They always are the ones that lead the ignorant masses to be apathtic until the Republican threat is more real than thought. Then come the "they're going to take away your benefits unless you vote!" more than likely for the democratic canidate.
Alexander Tyler's theory is fact in the Black community. Which is why I hold dear to the liberties that make me free. Civil Rights is now big business. And I refuse to give up my rights so easily to the likes of Jesse "Jackass" Jackson, Al "Slim Shady" Sharpton, and "Calypso" Louis FarraConman. I have to study more now than ever to keep ahead of the tricks these charlatan pull on the masses. I'm usually the lone voice in the wilderness but at least I know where I stand.
I won't sell myself or my country to the lowest bidder or the highest.
Freedom, It may free,
But it aint cheap!
In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock.-
Thomas Jefferson
Re: How Long Do We Have? posted by DCWatson.
Seen it before. This has been wandering around the internet for quite a while.
Reference my post above. The email concerning "How Long Do We Have?" posted by DCWatson has been disproved by Snopes. See http://www.snopes.com/politics/quotes/tyler.asp for details. Its just another urban legend that has been floating around the internet for six years.
Cornelius said that we face two choices: Either 1) Attack Iran within a brief timeframe, with all the disastrous implications; or 2) Let the diplomatic process play itself out. He votes for 1). But I vote for 2), and I would like to explain why.
No one has ever fired a nuclear ICBM in anger at a real target, and Iran has done much less R & D on this scenario than either the U.S. or Russia. And how would Iran test their ICBMs without the world noticing it? Are they going to set up a testing range in Indonesia like the one we have at Kwajelein Atoll?
There's no reason to believe that Iran's first attempt to attack us with their first-generation, largely untested, missiles would succeed. It might end up like Iraq's Scud missiles during the Gulf War--the missile will miss its target by a country mile and the nuclear warhead will detonate over the ocean or maybe in a relatively unpopulated area of the U.S. Casualties may well be light (by nuclear standards). And if Iran uses its BM-25s to hit Europe, so much the better since Europe had it coming anyway.
If so, giving Iran a free shot at us has tremendous benefits, as President Franklin Roosevelt noted in 1941 when he cabled Pearl Harbor that "It is desired that Japan commit the first overt act."
First, if we make that policy public, it puts the antiwar Left completely on the defensive. If Bush were to announce "Kerry, Kennedy, Jimmy Carter are right after all--I'm giving Iran and North Korea a free nuclear shot at us, just like they suggested to me"--it would put them on the spot with the public.
Second, it would unequivocally establish Iran as the worst aggressor in world history--the first one to initiate the use of nuclear weapons against a nation that had not attacked them. It would force Muslims to face what their religion, carried to the extreme, has wrought.
Third, it would give the U.S. license to do whatever it needed to do militarily. It would be impossible for even the most confirmed antiwar activists to claim the U.S. should accept a nuclear attack on its soil without taking action. For years they said that we did not need to pre-empt because we had a nuclear deterrent. But deterrence depends on the willingness to actually use it in retaliation if attacked. Anyone who dared to say publicly the U.S. should not respond to this nuclear attack on our soil with nuclear retaliation of our own would likely be ruined politically (and maybe even have to fear for their lives).
Iraq's Scud missiles during the Gulf War--the missile will miss its target by a country mile and the nuclear warhead will detonate over the ocean or maybe in a relatively unpopulated area of the U.S. Casualties may well be light (by nuclear standards).
i bet the family's that would get hit in the relatively unpopulated area ,would be comfirted to know we were willing to let them get bombed when we could have stopped it.
Islam is a Religion of Peace, so there's absolutely no need to worry. Iran will use their nuclear power for peaceful purposes, they will hug Israel, cure cancer, end hunger and poverty, and establish a colony on Mars.
Israel has superior defense capabilities already in deployment. The Patriot missiles the US supplied during the first Gulf War have been modified greatly for Israel to fire off as a "Search and Destroy" guidance system. Most likely with the stoneage missiles Iran has would be taken out before they hit their intended mark. Then retalliation would obliterate Iran's major cities and military bases. That my friends would surely be the turning point for Islam as that's the only thing Islam understands is futility and violent outcomes.
Let's face the truth that the UN and the IAEC are worthless entities that are corrupt and money eating machines with greedy and non functioning leaders like Kofi Anonymous.
LOL. This report is weeks behind my own analysis.
Also do not forget, for everything that we know, there are the elements that we do not. It's more than likely that Russia and China have already sent weapons tech to Iran or are preparing to in absolute secrecy that will be far superior to what we BELIEVE that Iran has.
I'm convinced that power players in both China and Russia look at this scenario as the perfect way to bring the U.S. military into a fight that will be so escalating that it will weaken our economy and our will -- at least, that's what they believe will happen on the table.
Looking more and more like a Clancy novel, isn't it?
I'd love to get Tom's take on the current affairs as they stand, as a matter of fact.
DC Watson - Assalamau Laikum, You say...
"The average age of the worlds greatest civilizations from the beginning of history,has been about 200 years.
1. From bondage to spiritual faith;
2. From spiritual faith to great courage;
3. From courage to liberty;
4. From liberty to abundance;
5. From abundance to complacency;
6. From complacency to apathy;
7. From apathy to dependence;
8. From dependence back into bondage.
Your information above is very interesting and relevant particularly w.r.t. Islam which has lasted (and becoming stronger) after 1400 years, compare that to weak democracies which last less than 200 years.
Note that as result of the order & descipline of merciful Allah... Islam is at levels 3 and 4. With black holyland (oil) ofcourse Islam is abundant.
However large parts of Islam are not...this policy by Allah is deliberate. Allah wants his chosen peoples to learn to do with less and therefore adapt better to the coming of judgement day. Muslims therefore eat less, and are thinner peoples...keeping them lean & mean.
Amrika on the other hand is the land of the plenty (for now) and is reflected in disgusting obese peoples & dogs.
These peoples cannot do without, they have poor survivability and will fare very badly in the run in to judgement day.
Amrika is in the 6-8 bracket and will fall spectularily when the time comes.
My recommendations are that you (quickly)look at the successes and ethos upon which Islam is built on.
Teach your fat childrens & dogs to do with less...feed them less and excerise them more.
Give your childrens less spending power...they are to inherit your $9 trillion trade deficit..., they MUST learn to do with less.
The only extra bit worth spending on is high quality big speakers for faithful reproduction when listening to the Koran, because that is where success lies.
naseem,your so clueles.Liberty in islam?i bet aisha dont think so.From spiritual faith to great courage in islam?aisha's dad was real courageous when he let a pervert marry his daughter.
Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway.
John Wayne
maybe if he met a REAL man like John Wayne,he wouldnt have lost his daugheters inosence.Courage is NOT flying planes into buildings,haveing babies so you have more bombers,was it courageous when they attacked American troops that were giveing out candy to children,killing scores of them.
was that courageous naseem?
SCHOOLGIRLS DIE IN BURNING BUILDING FOR LACK OF HEADSCARVES
When fire broke out in Saudi Arabia’s Mecca Intermediate School No. 31,
both teachers and students began to flee from the burning school
building. The morality police, known as the muttawwai’, forced back into
the burning building all the girls who “were not wearing the headscarves
and 'abayas' (black cloaks) that women must wear in public” (Washington
Post through Manila Times, 21 March 2002)
was that courageous naseem?
"When I was three years old my father died, and after a year my mother married again, but her second husband didn't want me," says Gulsoma. "So my mother gave me away in a promise of marriage to our neighbor's oldest son, who was thirty."
or that?
I do believe that SOME verses of the Koran are not true ...but the Majority of them are.
Posted by: Naseem at April 9, 2006 04:00 PM
What mohd. did by marrying Aiesha at 6 & consumating at 9 was nothing short of disgusting.
Posted by: Naseem at March 18, 2006 07:17 PM
we know you have doubts,and plus you are NOT a real muslim naseem
Congratulations Naseem - you're an apostate!
"I do believe that SOME verses of the Koran are not true ...but the Majority of them are."
Posted by: Naseem at April 9, 2006 04:00 PM
I started reading something VERY VERY STUPID and I smelled naseem (goats smells bad, remember) and I look down the post and BINGO, it was nasemm
"Your information above is very interesting and relevant particularly w.r.t. Islam which has lasted (and becoming stronger) after 1400 years, compare that to weak democracies which last less than 200 years."
Hinduism, buddism, christianity, judaism lasted more than 1400 years and guess what, they will still be here when pisslam will disappear.
"Note that as result of the order & descipline of merciful Allah..."
misery, famine, flood, earthquakes, murdering each others within tribes.
I wish you more order and discipline from allah
"With black holyland (oil) ofcourse Islam is abundant. "
according to recent studies oil will disappear very soon, so what will muslim do? sell your sorry ass on the streets naseem?
"Muslims therefore eat less, and are thinner peoples...keeping them lean & mean."
according to studies, when someone eats considerabily less, there is less income of proteins and sugar which are essential to brain developing.
that explains a lot
"Amrika on the other hand is the land of the plenty (for now) and is reflected in disgusting obese peoples & dogs."
I have failed to see a muslim cow (woman) in europe below 100 kilos (see yourself for pounds)
Allah's diet is not working
"My recommendations are that you (quickly)look at the successes and ethos upon which Islam is built on."
murder, rape, rob... unfortunately for you those stuff were known even before pisslam existed therefore we have knowledge of it, then we later decided to become human and not remaining sub-humans like yourself
"Teach your fat childrens & dogs to do with less...feed them less and excerise them more."
the "exercise" preached in the koran is strapping a bomb on yourself. I bet the kid doing it ends up with less flesh and fat on himself.
thanks always for the good laugh and the portray of the real stupidity of pisslam.
Also, apostate & housewife Naseem who runs a furniture store in Lahore .... you should go to bed... it's either 2:15 or 3:15 in the morning where you're at by my reckoning ( I work with your smarter cousins - the hindus - whom your ancestors used to pray with )... you have better things to do as a wife and business owner later on Friday morning.
I don't think a woman with a sick husband and a business to run would be posting in the small hours of a Friday morning, but what do I know?
I don't think you are who you claim to be. I think you're someone named:
Abdullah bin Malak al Zalam or something to that effect.... slave of Allah - son of the Angel of Darkness.
Hate to say that I actually agree with Nas about something. That huge debt is terrible.
Ah-hah! I've got it.
Wipe out foreign aid!
Anyone want to place bets on how long the food will last in the mohammedan countries, pay attention Nas, when the US stops giving these savages money? Oh, I forgot about those vast tracts of farmland all over the ME, N. Africa, and non-Hindu southern Asia.
Hope you know how to cook sand, Naseem.
My suggestion, use lots of salt.
Naseem..You have no idea what you are missing not having a BLT sandwich. They are the best!
Convert to Christianity before it's too late and Satan aka Allah takes you to Hell.
Where's that belly dance you promised?
Here is a site devoted to missile stats..Very interesting site.
http://www.missilethreat.com/missiles/
Ironman Hondo,
I believe your figures for the black vote going Democrat in 2000 (98%) and 2004 (96%) are erroneous. Bush won 8% of the black vote in 2000 and 11% in 2004.
Naseem,
The annual US trade deficit is close to $700 billion. You keep confusing the trade deficit with the national debt, which is 9 trillion dollars.
Steven L,
I presented options 1 and 2. I didn't endorse either.
Iran is testing nukes underground already.
If we dont do something quick, there will be big trouble. We have to act against the Iranian idiots. I dont understand why nothing serious is happening to protect the US military in Iraq from Iran's overtures, and Israel and the Middle East.
Nassem, you dont know the difference between a political form of government and a religion? Understandable since Islam blends the two, I guess.
And why is it okay for a black man to say "nigger" but not a white person? Never understood that double standard.
Too funny that someone proselytizing her cult as the best example of a religion would be so intolerant towards fat people and dogs and all that.
They just don't see that they are so transparent, so see through. So full of themselves I guess they are like naked Emperors.
The Muslim propaganda machine needs more Madison Ave. in it too because it's messages are so "out there." To say that people who have sand to eat because of 1400 years of ineptitude are so thin because it is the will of Allah is as inaccurate as saying saying Islam wasn't made up 600 years ago by some mad Arab, in fact Adam & Eve were practicing Muslims. Uh huh, and the word is still flat...and Allah speaks to people...and so on.
Lahore, hehe..Isalmisbad..Carbomba...these Islamic city names speak volumes of truth on a so many different levels.
Naseem:
No matter what thread you leave a posting on, you always manage to unify the rest of the posters against the silly claims and expectations you express for Islam. Surely it's clear to you by now that most of the people here are getting informed about the details of Islam and the baggage all-too-frequently that frequently accompanies it. Then again, maybe you don't have clue.
Like others here perhaps, I frequently am awed by your breathtaking, death-defying leaps of "logic." According to you Allah favors some relative few of the Saudis -for some virtue yet to obe identified- and seems to forget the rest of his slaves -for some short-coming that none can name, aside from perhaps being Moslems in the first place.
Anyway, keep posting. Each of your posts helps the rest of us hone our understanding of the threat such primitive thinking presents to the unwary. And it's good fun, too.
Naseem:
Do you work as a clown when you're not in your burka, because you certainly amuse me.
"Amrika, Amrika, Amrika"...I mean seriously, lady, you are one classless circus act. How many letters are you going to drop next month --- how about just move ahead and just refer to the United States of America as "A", if it's taunting, insulting abbreviations that you're after.
You will never be taken seriously in any debate as long as you choose to "debase" things worth respecting. I, at least, refrain from calling Muslims names, despite the fact that I have a laundry list of them in my head and you and others like you would more than deserve them.
Do you work as a clown when you're not in your burka - Foehammer
That brings to mind the image of one of those red, honkable clown noses affixed over a niqab...
All,
I don't work or think for you. I only do Allah's SWT humble work. Champions are made out of adversity and fruitful causes and Islam has their fair share of Saladins and Zorros.
I am of Allah's peoples...such an honour bestowed upon an Ahmadi is a blessing indeed.
Everyday while I have the energy I will spread the good news for Islam and Allah....and everyday ...you shall see more of the mighty minerates and speakers blare "Allahu Akbar" from them at 5am in the morning like they do in your town of Hamtrack.
Calling me little names and quoting out of context texts to me is like another of Allah's great inventions...Teflon.
Meanwhile each day through peaceful dawa muslim peoples are successfully converting the name to one.. ISA.
On Allah's map of the flat earth, he has shown muslims everywhere.
Understand that Islam is dynamic, 50% of Pak is less than the age of 30, 65% of Iran is less than the age of 25...meanwhile Amrika is becoming full of geriatrics. If peoples are getting old....nothing wrong with that...have a happy life....but if peoples are getting old & ill...let them go, Allah SWT will recieve them.
Spend your dollars on educating the young...if they need discipline away from everyday partying...open up an Islamic "sobering" centres in every town....the responsible imam there will put your childrens on the right path.
Your national debt is $9 trillion....don't build it up any more...this is making you weaker everyday...you will fall...life will become harder...and you are not equipped to deal with that.
Bring Allal Ta'ala into your life ...your whole outlook to life will change...you will become more balanced...I mean look at me....a more mentally balanced person you will not find.
Teflon was created by Roy J. Plunkett, an American chemist, in 1938 while working at DuPont.
It was not invented by allah, you silly girl.
Naseem
Read my latest blog "Will Islam be Outlawed?" at http://the-gathering-storm.blogsource.com/post.mhtml?post_id=317959
and see the future of your socio-political ideology you call a religion.
Naseem, you're so confused with governments and religions.
We Americans are the most compassionate and merciful people on earth. Where would you people be after your earthquakes and tsunamis and your famines?
You people should be praying,
"Oh America (peace be upon you), most merciful, most compassionate, please keep giving us life".
On allah's map of the flat earth, he has shown muslims everywhere.
its not flat there Einstein
Naseem you are such a mindless dolt.
I'll still go for the bellydance sweetie...only if you've worked off the spare tire around the waist.
Naseem!
Where do you come up with these idiotic ideas about Americans? Seriously! You continue to lose your audience every time you throw your ridiculous accusations our way.
It's time to grow-up and make an honest effort by discovering what Americans are REALLY about!!!!
Muslims are cowards or they would use their weapons aganist europe.
Actually some of us Europeans are way past 8 - and working our way around the circle back to 1 ....
Where I live its quicker to travel to Tangier than London ... but I don't see any Mosques in any of my local towns ....
Cornilius;
My numbers could be wrong. But when you're the only Black conservative waiting to vote in the "hood" and you listen to the masses and how they claim to have voted, you would've come to the same conclusion that I did. Non-scientific, but still the same conclusion. African-American voters are the most illinformed voters in America. But using your numbers (2004 11%) gives a little hope. The conservative message is starting to reach a few.
ASA
Any attack on Iran would result in the desruction of American Superpower status. This is sad that people are 'down' for this such violent behavior.
The use of Nukes by the US will only attract worldwide support or should I say "coalition" against the US.
Already Russia and China are allied with Iran and both of them already have nuclear missiles. Unless you want your children in the US to grow up to be Russian or Chinese speaking, I suggest you try your hardest to keep WW3 from happening.
If you want to read about Iran's Nuclear Energy program, here is a great source: http://www.iranatom.ru/indexen.html