It was only a matter of time for the dhimmi British government caved. "Britain backs Palestinian trust fund," from Reuters, with thanks to the Constantinopolitan Irredentist:
A PROPOSED trust fund for donors to pay overdue Palestinian salaries would undercut Hamas, not strengthen it, says a British document meant to increase pressure on the US to drop objections to the plan.Britain circulated the memo on the proposal, aimed at averting a collapse of basic services provided by the Palestinian Authority, to major donors before tomorrow's meeting of the Quartet of Middle East mediators.
The four-page document argues, in response to US efforts to block creation of such a fund, that it "will not undermine the diplomatic effort" to persuade Hamas to renounce violence, recognise Israel and abide by interim peace accords.
The US is concerned that allowing the international community to pay Palestinians' salaries would take pressure off Hamas, Western diplomats said.
But Britain argues that if Palestinians end up receiving crucial aid through channels other than Hamas, the Islamic militant group stands to lose "a big part of its street credibility and hence have an incentive to come closer to what the international community wants".
Let me get this straight: if we resume paying them after making the payments conditional on their changing, even though they haven't changed, they will be compelled to change in the future?
What utter, stupid, suicidal nonsense.
"What utter, stupid, suicidal nonsense."
Indeed. They still think that they can trust Hamas to keep their word. A word that they refuse to give. Sheer stupidity.
Spineless bastards. How long can this self-delusional insanity go on?
Is there no limit this fiction? Soon we must muster sufficient will to finally give this gastroilamimc gas bubble that's poisoning us its true name.
My Goverment is too PC, i dont no wot its going to take to make em wake up.
I guess im going to have to vote BNP :(
(im not a racist but wot else can i do?)
Palestinians voted in terrorists, then fine let them suffer the consequences.
Saudi Arabia alone takes in nearly $1 billion a day. Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, and the other seven Muslim or Muslim-ruled states in OPEC -- 10 of the ll fall into that category -- could with a snap of one Al-Saud princeling's finger pay the $55 million, that Arabs have pledged to the Hamas government.
It is madness for Infidels, now spending hundreds of billions of dollars (the figure for the American taxpayers alone, in Iraq alone, is now close to $400 billion if we include as sunk costs that of treatment for wounded veterans and replacement of desert-degraded equipment), to continue to pay what is a Jizyah. It is not sort of, or kind of, a Jizyah. It is a classic Jisyah. It is payment, from Infidels, to Muslims, who take the money in a spirit not of gratitude, but as of right, infuriated that the Infidels would dare not to continue such payments, wherever they have been instituted (just look at the howls of indignation over the past few months from the Hamas government, and from other "Palestinians," other Arabs, and from their supporters and collaborators all over Europe -- such people as Alistair Crooke, the former British agent who became such a supporter, cheerleader, praiser and promoter of Hamas).
The West has got to kick the Jizyah habit. It is absurd that hundreds of billions are spent to counteract, however clumsily, the Jihad by attempting to create this impossible dream of Iraq the Model, Iraq the Light Unto the Muslim Nations, to risk lives all over Afghanistan to make that country safe for non-Taliban Muslims who would, nonetheless, condemn an apostate to death, and who have no love for Infidels at all. And on top of that the entire Western world now must spend gigantic sums, everywhere, and permanently, to secure churches, synagogues, Hindu temples, Buddhist temples, airports, metro stations, railroads and railroad stations, sea ports, bridges, government buildings, brave and outspoken political figures (see Geert Wilders, see Ayaan Hirsi Ali), all because of the Muslim presence in those countries. And yet, on top of it, the longsuffering Western taxpayers are now asked to support the shock troops of the Jihad against Israel -- to so-called "Palestinian people," even thought the billions (and where did those billions go? And why does Sura Arafat apparently have hundreds of millions of dollars in her Parisan posseession), that simply disappeared when Arafat died have yet to be recovered? Why are Infidels supporting Musliims anywhere, when those Muslims by their behavior and clearly expressed attitudes of menace and hate are costing hundreds of billions, and at the same time, through no effort on their own part, the rich Arabs have been, and continue to b, the recipients of the largest transfer of wealth in human history?
Our goal, the Infidel goal, should be to diminish that Arab and Muslim "money" weapon that helps fund the Jihad. One way is to reduce the sums received. Another way is to make sure that claims to part of that money is made, and made moisily, by the poor Arabs and Muslims. Let the rich Muslims share their wealth with fellow members of that supposed umma al-islamiyya. Let them pay for the "Palestinian" Arabs. Psychologically it is important to break the notino that we Infidels owe them, owe any Muslims, a thing. We don't. And if we can cause a little internecine rancor, as usually happens when the donor does not give the donee what he think he deserves, or the donee is never quite satisfied, and if both donor and donee are Arab Muslims, isn't that a good thing for Infidels? Don't we wish for dissension and division in the cmap of Islam? Or are we still merely fighting a "war on terror" that has really very little to do with the tenets or promptings or attitudes that Islam contains or fosters?
No Jizya. Not to Hamas, and not to the "Palestinians" who may wish for the Slow Jihad rather than the Fast JIhad. Not to any Muslim state or people. The Saudis can take care of them. They have plenty of money.
Let them ask the Saudis. Let all the poor Muslims ask the Saudis. That's it.
Please all good people of Britain. Walk to your local cemeteries. Watch the British Jacks fly above the graves of heroes of Britain who gave their lives to save England from the tyrants that came in the form of political fascists. Maybe some of that spirit will enter into your souls as you face the religious tyrants that which to consume you and whom your government seeks to give aid.
God bless the BNP! From your American friends in this struggle.
Hamas has the money. They have the connections (after all, there's that conference in Qatar that's set to issue a fatwa). And they're holding their own people hostage to try to force the West to keep footing the bill.
Said people, of course, stupidly voted Hamas into office in the first place, thinking that either 1.) their Arab brethren, wallowing in oil wealth, would provide the funding to keep them afloat, or 2.) Europe, if not the US as well, would cave as usual and not cut into their precious jihad money.
I'd say they've been proven wrong on point #1. And things were looking up until now on point #2. I just hope the rest of Europe doesn't fall like dominos now that the UK has relented.
Berf,
Voting for the Conservatives - even with all their faults - would be a much more constructive use of your vote.
Hamas has not renounced violence so what can possibly be gained by giving the "Palestininans" money?What has been gained from 60 years of "aid" to the "Palestinians"? If the PA needs cash there are plenty of Muslims and Arabs to support them.Wasn't a fatwa just issued obliging all Muslims to pay for Hamas? Given the fatwa I'm sure Muslims will immediately come to the aide of their Muslim brothers.I fail to see where we in the West have an obligation to support a terrorist regime.
Why do we keep supporting people who refuse to take responsibility for themselves and want to kill us in return. We're so nice we're stupid.
Nah conservatives are just as PC as labour, all the main partys are almost the same just with different names.
Just because the Palestinian people joyfully danced in the streets on 9-11, doesn't mean they aren't our friends.
Just because they elected the proud mother of 3 successful suicide bombers who's only regret was she didn't have more sons to sacrifice, doesn't mean they are not worthy of our charity.
Just because the widely supported ruling authority considers Jews as sub-human and not worthy of existence, doesn't mean they are not reasonable, dignified, exemplar models of civility.
These situations have obviously been taken out of context.
haha Oh man, the dhimmi mentality is alive and well! People need to understand that you can't make deals with Islam.
oh, don't put too much hope on "conservatives" in europe. They are as liberal as it gets. Europe has lost its backbone, and it's a land waiting to be claimed.
Berf from across the atlantic it looks like the BNP maybe your only choice for survival. Until any of the other parties can admit that Islam is at war with them, the BNP are the clear party of choice.
Dont be cowed by liberal loonies that tell you anything but the BNP. If you are a patriot and want to protect your heritage from the onslaught of multiculturalism and PC then it is the only way to go.
What more can be said?
As Hugh put it, "the longsuffering Western taxpayers are now asked to support the shock troops of the Jihad against Israel ..."
Don't like it, don't like it one little bit. Can there ever have been such perverse stupid ill-informed people in charge of so many polities throughout in the West ever before? As was said the other day, John Adams would have seen through all the nonsense in short order.
But what can one do about it? The next general election is some way away in the UK. And, frankly, I agree that Cornelius is being far too hopeful: any Conservative Administration is very unlikely to behave any differently. So we, the people, are stuck with financing the murder of the innocent, because that is what our rulers, who don't, apparently can't, understand the situation want.
And what when President Bush is gone? As has been said here before, he is a stubborn man. If he's said something, he won't go back on it. On this particular issue, this is a good thing. But who will follow? What would a Democratic administration do? Jimmy Carter is already, in LGF's words, "shilling for Hamas":
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=20436&only
Doesn't look like the BNP is admitting it either - I perused their entire website, and nowhere did I find anything from them that spells out Islam as the threat facing Britain. In fact, in their manifesto section, they specifically mention that "This does not, however, mean that we are against Islam per se" (Read the section called "Clash of Civilizations".) In fact, here's what they think about Islam outside Britain:
In other words, Shariah loans, honour killings, murder of apostates, slavery, polygamy et al. are all fine, as long as they are practiced outside the United Kingdom.Besides, look at their sections on Foreign affairs - they would have no quarrel with any nation that doesn't threaten British interests. Translate that into their policy on Iran's nukes. In the National Defence section of the manifesto link above, they specifically mention
In other words, don't count on their military support if the beneficiaries of such an operation would be the US or Israel.However, are we in the US out of their plans totally? From the horse's mouth
Translation: The only reason to have US bases in Britain is to stick a finger at the EU. Also, no problem if Russia tries to transform countries like Ukraine, Belarus and who knows what else into client states. (Why not suggest that Russia do such experiments in Tajikistan and Azerbaijan?)Yep, this is the party that will show Islam its place in the world.
I'm too disheartened to go look it up; was it even one month that they held out? And mark my words, the U.S. will soon be resuming payments to Hamas, because it will be better to be engaged than to be on the sidelines, we would only be hurting the vast majority of moderates, we have to respect the democratic choice of the "Palestinian" people, etc. etc. etc. But we'll probably hide the payments through NGO's, to save "flip-flop" face.
Gut wrenching stupidity.
> >What utter, stupid, suicidal nonsense.
They're not stupid, as in the sense that they don't know what they're doing. In fact, they know *exactly* what they're doing.
What they are is corrupt, traitorous Quislings.
> What more can be said?
That there's no reason to consign yourself to inevitable slavery and the oblivion of dying with tubes up your nose.
It never ceases to amaze me how these lying, swindling, strutting mountebanks continue to walk around un-shot.
There is little to add to what Infidel Pride says.
The way the BNP characterizes the Iraq war is essentially no different from the way the left does. It's a fantasy involving "neoconservatives" (meaning Jews), something called "Zionism" (with special meanings attached to that word) and oil. The thought that the French attitude may have had more to do with oil (and weapons sales) apparently never crosses their minds.
Nick Griffin, their leader, referring to Ahmadinejad's apocalyptic nuclear dreams, said that it was "up to Iran and Israel to sort out their problems between them". That this is a bizarre, and unjust, way of describing Ahmadinejad's unprovoked threats to another nation, and indeed a whole people, on no other or better ground than that he, and the the ayatollahs he serve, have an ideologically motivated (and perhaps also quasi-racial) animus against them hardly needs underlining. But I couldn't resist doing it anyway.
There is much to be said for a foreign policy that looks to the national interest and doesn't overreach itself in projects for "promoting democracy". There is also, Infidel Pride notwithstanding, much to be said for "sticking two fingers up to the EU". However, so far as I can see, taking out Iran's nuclear weapons capability is not overreach but plain sense. It need not be expensive in terms of blood or treasure; it can hardly be said to conflict with the UK's national interest; and it is the right thing to do.
The phrase "simply another foreign mindset" as a description of Islam is absolutely priceless. This shows the BNP are as ignorant of the real nature of Islam - and consequently, of the very grave threat it poses - as so many others.
But this is somewhat academic, because the BNP is not going to be forming the next adminstration in the UK. Indeed, under the UK's "first past the post" election system it is inconceivable that it will have any representation in the national parliament at all.
What is important is what policy Labour and the Conservatives will follow. It's probably also relevant whether any prime minister would have the strength of character to break away from whatever the EU wants. Readers should note that both parties collude in hiding the extent to which policy is now made in Brussels:
See here for more on that.
All in all, it is difficult to remain optimistic.
Speaking of such matters, here is Sir Winston Churchill making just such a gesture:
http://212.84.179.117/i/Sir%20Winston%20Churchill.jpg
Wonderful man.
I think the problem is that technically speaking, western politicians are very well educated and professional, they just don't understand the depht of the Islamic conviction to a devoted muslim. They are trained in rational problemsolving and simply do not comprehend something so profoundly irrational as a religion, especially not Islam. RATIONALLY speaking these payments ougtht to have the desired effect; However we are not dealing with rational peopel and our leaders don't understand that.
Game theory, or what homo economicus would do, and suchlike niaiseries certainly can't predict the behaviour and responses of people like Hamas. The politicians and civil servants might start by reading Hamas's creepy covenant, go on to make a serious study of Islamic texts, and take a look at the historical record. If they did that thoroughly and conscientiously, they would come to see that ideas do matter and that any abstract picture of what a notional "rational actor" would do is less than helpful and a belief in such things is hardly indicative of an truly educated mind.
The phrase "simply another foreign mindset" as a description of Islam is absolutely priceless. This shows the BNP are as ignorant of the real nature of Islam - and consequently, of the very grave threat it poses - as so many others.
-Yojimbo
The BNP is well aware that the Muslim stranglehold is about to choke its country and its culture. They are trying to get elected by appealing to the hard working Britains who love their country despite the PC press and a decadent Labour government that fights them at every step including trying to overturn election results like in Birmingham or refute their gains in the recent elections. They are constantly attacked as racist. How much sucess would you think they would have if the came out an said that "Islam is the problem"? Look at the Dhimmi response of further aiding Hamas. This is the mindset in British politics right now. Such a philosophical and correct statement may get across in the U.S. but it would forever banish the BNP as loonies.
Europe's hatred of the Jews and contempt for the state of Israel (and increasing for Americans/America) is the root cause for this current policy of appeasement. They are so blinded by this irrational hatred that they cannot or will not see the evil before them.
tony Blair and his Labour party and the UK foreign office so much want to be seen as humane and humanitarian and concerned for the poor, the oppressed, the hungry, blah blah blah. Why don't they help the starving in Dar Fur or southern Sudan? Maybe helping the southern Sudan is out because it might draw too much attention to the mass murder crimes perpetrated by Arabs there [or arabized and islamized Blacks]. Instead, the UK helps the very clearly mass murderous Hamas, ideological and national brothers of the mass murders in the Sudan.
Meanwhile, in this difficult international situation, our Israeli govt is run by the hateful Olmert [also known as smolmert to the cognoscenti].
I'd like to come in here on the BNP (British National Party) and its attitude to Islam. About two weeks ago the BNP put a local council election leaflet through my letter box. This leaflet devotes a whole article to warning of the dangers of Islam. I don't have the article to hand but I can accurately quote from memory that it calls on local voters to make our votes on May 4th: 'A Referendum on Islam'. It shows a photo of the recent demonstration in London when masked Muslims, protected by the police, marched carrying placards threatening death to those who insult Islam and its Prophet. To those who think the BNP is the only political party offering hope to Britain let me say that despite my admiration for Jihad Watch I did not and will not vote for the BNP, even though it is the only party with the guts to identify Islam as Britain's greatest threat. I do not do so because I am a Jew and a supporter of Israel and a believer that Jews from anywhere in the world have the right to live in peace in Israel. I simply do not believe that someone matching my description on these matters would be welcome under a BNP government even though I consider myself a loyal and patriotic Englishman. There is no political party in England at the moment that I would vote for with any enthusiasm. Sadly there appear to be few strands of political reality in Israel either.
Berf said:
"Voting for the Conservatives - even with all their faults - would be a much more constructive use of your vote."
I don't want to turn this into a party political soap box, but...
From where I sit, a vote for the Conservatives isn't that much different than a vote for Labour. You still end up with a bunch of dhimmi-witted, multi-culti politicos who do not have the best interests of Britain or her people at heart.
The ONLY party that seems to understand the situation is the BNP. Dangerous times call for bold decisions. Even if you think they are racist, at least a vote for them sends a VERY strong message, whereas a vote for the Cons merely says you want more of the same, just with a different logo.
BTW, I am not British, or a member of any political party.
To all on this forum and across the world I apologise on behalf of the citizens of my country. Sadly we have a corrupt government who have shown time and again that they will do anything to line there own pockets and retain power. I truly believe that the decision to pay this jizyah is based on corruption which is rife in our government.
Moris 2, I won't ask where you live, but I used to live as described here.
BNP all the way but they will never make a breakthrough in PC britain where the people have become a bunch of f... cowards.
Xerxes
Just for the record i didnt say that :)
Moris2:
Check out this article by BNP chairman, Nick Griffin, it may make you feel better.
http://www.bnp.org.uk/columnists/chairman2.php?ngId=30
I simply do not believe that someone matching my description on these matters would be welcome under a BNP government even though I consider myself a loyal and patriotic Englishman.http://www.spiked-online.com/Articles/0000000CB044.htm
Wht don't you talk to them and find out what is going on. The mainstream parties just cannot be trusted. Look at the electoral fraud taking place in Birmingham right now. This is the kind of thing you expect from a banana republic not the seat of modern democracy.
The BNP's anti-Americanism leaves a lot to be desired, but is acceptable. They have the right to defend their culture as they see fit. It is my view that they reperesent the majority of the working class in that country, I am not alone in this.
http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2006/04/most_britons_ac.php
I agree with xerxes who said:
The ONLY party that seems to understand the situation is the BNP. Dangerous times call for bold decisions. Even if you think they are racist, at least a vote for them sends a VERY strong message, whereas a vote for the Cons merely says you want more of the same, just with a different logo.
The people who object to the BNP on this forum in my opinion have failed to realise they are at war. This is kind of ironic seeing as how this forum is based on the premise of disseminating information about the global jihad and Britain and Europe are the front lines of this Jihad.
Johnmac has summed up the situation spectacularly. The people of Britain have turned into cowards and are unable to fight for their own identity. Multiculturalism has so destroyed the fabric of society that even faced with its own extinction it worries about offending other people’s sensibilities.
But they are not alone the US is going that way as well. Unless we finish this war on our terms the prospects are bleak for our long term survival. Say good bye to Israel and Europe and say hello to the Eurabian axis.
Whoops the italics got a bit out of hand there, appologies. :-)
Actually, I think this is what Berf said:
"My Goverment is too PC, i dont no wot its going to take to make em wake up. I guess im going to have to vote BNP :( "
Apologies Berf, may the fleas from a thousand camels infest my armpits, and may the prophet (please be seated upon him) not grant me 72 versions (this, I think, is the correct translation, but then, I'm no expert in the holy Arabic language) in paradise.
"What utter, stupid, suicidal nonsense."
What more can be said?
LOTS MORE: this is NOT "stupid nonsense", this is conspiracy. Not only is the entire American Establishment is pro-Islamic, so is the European Establishment, so is the UN, & the Communist world amd their allies in the west.
PS there are people who want world govt! The Reds and the Mohammedans admit it. The UN & the US liberals want world govt but don't admit to it. The World Federalist Assn (a meaningless non profit) admits to it. The Council on Foreign Relations (a large group of movers and shakers) does not.
And here's another article for the enjoyment of all:
http://www.bnp.org.uk/columnists/chairman2.php?ngId=27
Yojimbo
Agree with all of what you said. However, you seem to be under the impression that I'm pro-EU. I'm not, I know it's a mega bureaucracy that wants to micromanage the lives of Europeans; I'd normally be against them if I was a resident of Europe; however, not being a resident of Europe, I don't have strong opinions of it one way or another. I do however thing that dissing the US in everything else, but wanting it only to show the EU its place, is something that those of us across the pond have no interest in doing.
moris2
Why do you think that JihadWatch has an official position that is pro-BNP? I don't recall ever seeing anything to that effect from Robert, Hugh or Rebecca.
km
I know where you are coming from re: Islam inside UK. However, do you think Britain being neutral in the Jihad between Islam and the Infidel world (e.g Israel/US vs. Iran) outside Britain is something worth rooting for?
I know where you are coming from re: Islam inside UK. However, do you think Britain being neutral in the Jihad between Islam and the Infidel world (e.g Israel/US vs. Iran) outside Britain is something worth rooting for?
Posted by: Infidel Pride at May 8, 2006 02:43 PM
Infidel (cool handle BTW) I think your point in the long term will be a moot one. The Jihad is spread across europe and should the war of words escalate to the point where blood is shed (between Israel, Iran & USA)then I am sure we will see an increase in Jihadic activity like we saw in France last fall across Europe. Britain as well is subject to this kind of unrest look at Bradford and Oldham. Once this turns into an all out shooting war the BNP would side with the US and Israel. This is a global war and the BNP's isolationist agenda is just not going to be feasable, it will be impossible to remain neutral.
But the issue here is one about getting the majority of the population in the UK to realise Islam is at war with them and the BNP for the moment is the only party to do this. I have been arguing this point for many months now on JW.
I am not resident in the UK so my opinion about their other policies is irrelevent, what is relevent is that I see them as a political party which recognises the current jihad threat.
I agree that the staff of JW should remain out of the argument as to which political party is the best for any country. They should stick to the job they are doing which is reporting the global jihad. Let the people decide what party is best for them in combating this threat when they have all the availiable facts.
km
I tend to agree with Yojimbo about there being little to be optimistic about, but I do think that Cornelius has a point - if one wants to use their efforts constructively, they might as well try to effect change with the Tories. In the elections last week, the BNP gains were not interpreted as the public wising up to Islam - instead, it was interpreted as working class Whites expressing their discontent at the current state of things.
While I don't follow UK politics closely, note that the Tories don't have allies like Qaradawi, or leaders like Ken Livingstone. And immigration has been a major difference between them and Labour. While they may have nobody of the calibre of Thatcher, the chance that a Churchillesque or Thatcheresque leader to lead the UK would emerge is most likely from the Tories, than any of the fringe parties.
Since I'm not a resident of the UK either, I won't say more about what they ought to be doing. Ultimately, it's their call.
Infidel:
"In the elections last week, the BNP gains were not interpreted as the public wising up to Islam - instead, it was interpreted as working class Whites expressing their discontent at the current state of things."
Well, that is how the MSM, PC commentators and politicians would interpret it. But the "current state of things" is largely a result of increasing Islamisation. I think the cartoon protests showing placards promising death and destruction to Britain did a lot to wake people up. At least I hope so.
I don't really think that the BNP will come to power, but if the numbers voting for them continue to grow it may scare the other parties, particularly the Conservatives, just ebough to bring about meaningful policy change, rather than just empty promises.
Watch this space.
Xerxes I agree with you and have been advocating for many months on this site for exactly the same thing. If the British people stood up on mass and said we want the same immigration policies that the BNP is advocating then I would expect the other main parties to respond.
Until that happens the UK will continue its inexorable slide to dhimmitude.
Why do you think that JihadWatch has an official position that is pro-BNP? I don't recall ever seeing anything to that effect from Robert, Hugh or Rebecca.
Posted by: Infidel Pride
-----------------------------
I did not say or imply that JihadWatch has an official position that is pro-BNP. I was simply stating that despite my admiration for JihadWatch I am not following the voting or political support habits of some of our fellow members. I don't think the BNP addresses the broader issues of jihad facing the world and while I am no 'neo-con' supporter I don't feel anti-American. Without a strong and out-going America the world would be in an even worse mess than it is now. The whole non-Islamic world is threatened by Islam and that is something that no individual country can afford to view from a lofty stance of isolation. The BNP says it sees the coming conflict between Iran and Israel as something that is no concern of the UK: 'let them sort it out themselves' seems to be the line. That seems to me to be a myopic response, however comforting it will be to some ears. I always enjoy reading Granny Weatherwax and have never disagreed with anything she says that I've read (on the contrary I usually give a silent cheer when I've finished reading her comments). Yes, Granny Weatherwax, I do understand that the main British political parties have abandoned and betrayed the white working class but it is the unfortunate case that I cannot feel any enthusiasm for any British political party at the moment.
I don't think the BNP addresses the broader issues of jihad facing the world ......
But they are speaking about the jihad, which is a hell of a lot more than all the other parties.
In order to combat the global jihad it will be necessary to purge non Muslim lands of the Islamic presence.
If you clean up at home first the rest will surely follow.
My final point will be this, we are already engaged in a major conflict, to procastinate about whether survival will appear racist to certain groups is to loose the war from the start.
Pick the weapons that are going to give you the best chance for survival!
Sofia Wrote:
"What a shame. Are there not a single British male with testcles? Chee!!"
A very poor attempt to get the British posters on this site to start arguing with the US etc. posters on this site. You are undoubtedly a muslim troller.
We all come here because we have a common problem which we can only overcome by combining our energies. Attempting to drive a wedge between us is a very mohammed like strategy.
As far as British mens testicles are concerned I would stop dreaming about them if I was you.
I have come to support and vote BNP as the only party willing to stand against Islam, even though having now looked to them I find many of their policies to be good. Why should our troops be protecting muslims in foriegn lands whilst our governments are busy surrendering our homelands to their every whimm. Bring our troops home and sort our own countries out. Then any future nonsence and threats can be dealt with in a safer homeland.
It's so kind and moral to be funding the Hamas. Poor souls humiliated by the lowest of dhimmis. Tony and his friend under the skin, George al-Gazoli, should be happy. Indeed, the UK, and USA and France were subsidizing purchases of Arab oil to help out the poor downtrodden sheiks of Araby way back in the 1950s. The subsidies through the tax system started back in 1951. See links below.
http://ziontruth.blogspot.com/2005/09/kindly-making-arabia-rich.html
http://ziontruth.blogspot.com/2005/09/what-does-left-really-mean-in-2005.html
I agree that 'Sofia' is most likely a Muslim troll but she never said that she was from the US that I recall. Anyway, I do think it is utterly ridiculous that the UK or any Western country gives money to these people. It's money that the UK, US or wherever should be spending on its' own people.