Iran would 'use nuclear defense' if threatened

Thank you Robert, Hugh and Jihad Staff for telling the world about Jihad and what Iran really wants.

typical islamic bluster

When they threaten to use nukes, it's because they don't have them and are scared of getting hit themselves. It's only when they cease to use this kind of bluster that we know that they have finally got them. The time is running out.

Georgie, clobber those bastards while their pants are down.

Reminds me of the character, General Turgidson, in Doctor Strangelove, played by George C Scott, urging the milquetoast president Muffley to swat the Russians before they inevitably launched their attack on the US. The president balks.

"I won't go down as the greatest mass murderer since Adolf Hitler."

To which Turgidson replies:

"Perhaps it might be better, Mr. President, if you were more concerned with the American people, than with your image in the history books."

Yes, George. Do America, and the whole world a favor, grow some balls, and do something about Iran, BEFORE they inevitably strike us with their nuclear "deterent".

Betting the nation's security that the islamics will never use their nukes is criminal negligence as president, protector of the nation, and it is also dereliction of duty as commander-in-chief.

Wot nuclear defense, iran claims its only pursuing peacefull applications.

Ill bet the world still dosent wake up.

Wot nuclear defense, iran claims its only pursuing peacefull applications.

When pressed on this, they'll claim their "nuclear defense" will involve microwaving Hot Pockets to a very high temperature and loading them into a catapult.

Because Islam is not a Race.....From JPOST............Because of the Egyptians' open racism and brutality against black Africans, according to two Darfur refugees who went to Egypt before escaping to Israel. One of them, whom I'll call "Noah," and who is now in the custody of a humanitarian couple at Kibbutz Tze'elim after spending six months in Israeli juvenile detention, told me:

"When Egyptian people saw us on the street, they'd call us names. 'Chocolate' and things like that. In Egypt they think of black people as slaves. They call you 'slave' to your face. In Khartoum it was the same for people coming from Darfur. Arabs think they are white people and we are their slaves."

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1150191582022&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

Unfortunately for Iran's mullah-monsters, they have ALREADY PLAYED the nuclear card. Iran has clearly stated its intent on the international stage to use nuclear weapons against Israel and anyone who gets in their way. There is no choice but to believe them in a case like this. I doubt this is a bluff. And I doubt North Korea is bluffing either.

Because Iran is plotting to use nukes as an attack mode it follows that Iran will use them for retalliation as well.

The mullah- monsters and their "mighty nut job" prime minister (or whatever the He$% he is) aren't fooling anyone.

Nope, the world will not wake up. I can see more "incentives" offered though.

"When Egyptian people saw us on the street, they'd call us names. 'Chocolate' and things like that. In Egypt they think of black people as slaves. They call you 'slave' to your face. In Khartoum it was the same for people coming from Darfur. Arabs think they are white people and we are their slaves."
-- from a posting above

Similar stories are told by black Africans about Arab masters, or quasi-masters, in Mali, Mauritania, the southern Sudan, and Libya (where a black diplomat was lynched in Tripoli a few years ago, during anti-black riots), in Egypt (the Nubians, and even the students who come to study Arabic or Islam, are the witnesses to this), and of course in Saudi Arabia, where there is a sliding scale of mistreatment and contempt exhibited by the Saudis.

Eric "Erfan" Vickers might possibly look into this. So might Mahdi Bray. But they won't. How can they? They chose Islam thinking it would be vehicle to properly express their alienation from American "white" society, and they are not about to admit that Islam not only legitimizes slavery, but that blacks in Africa, seized and many of them castrated, were among the chief victims of Arab supremacism. It wasn't their land that was coveted; it was they, taken as slaves, who became so useful in the harems that were hardly limited, as Westerners apparently believe, to the caliphs and local rulers.

Yes, Storagemanager, the Iranians have a misplaced sense of racial supremacy, too. The Iranian woman I dated for a bit, was an atheist, an apostate, she left Iran and came to Canada. But she was still an anti-semite, anti-American, and believed all that crap about the Jews running the world. So even without islam as their religion, they still contain that poison in their veins. More to my point that it is culture, more than religion, that makes those people behave and think the way they do.

But what was interesting was that she was very quick to point out to me that she was NOT an arab. No, not her. She was an "Aryan". "Oh, in Iran, we have many blond haired, blue-eyed people." Yah, okay. When we first met online, she wouldn't tell me her race. But as soon as we met, she was quick to point out that, being an iranian, she was an "Aryan".

So yes, even the Iranians pretend to be some superior race to their other muslim brethern. They hate the west, but they all want to be white. Like them, she was seriously screwed up.

Hugh:

As I lack any historical information on this matter I'll ask you about this--did Muslim invaders eliminate the Nubian civilization of what is now Sudan? Where might I find some information on the ultimate fate of the Nubians? I tend to think that Muslims ended the Nubians' reign but do not know this for sure (the fact that Islam is dominant there now to me is suspicious).

"nuclear defense?"

Where, pray tell, would the Iranians get such a device? Surely they have none, and want none, as they have repeatedly told us that they only pursue nuclear energy, and not weapons.

And certainly we here at JW believe that, don't we?

- recalled

Penraker has some late-day 15 June comments ...

( http://www.penraker.com/ )

... on Iran's attempt at united front with Saudi Arabia:

http://www.arabnews.com/?page=4§ion=0&article=83773&d=14&m=6&y=2006

When will the western civilizations wake up and realize that iran, islam and the mos intend on destroying Israel and defeating the west with all means possible including the nukes that no one admits that iran has.

Continued success in iraq in destroying the insurgents helps to free iraq?? but will it release the terror in America as retaliation??

Prepare, be armed, be ready for the war for it is coming.

The Texican.
Freedom, the only choice at any cost and the cost will be immense

alShaytan-

No doubt whoever left the signs will feel the FULL wrath of the US justice system.

So there you have it. If you tape a poster denouncing islam, or a pedophile murderer, you are subject to increased police patrols. You are "ignorant" and you need to be "educated".

I am glad to see, however, that in America, it is not a criminal act. Yet.

What is vexing though, is that any of the things said here about islam, if written onto a poster and taped to a waste bin outside, would constitute a hate crime in some jurisdictions. In any jurisdiction, they would call the police and the police would question you.

Orwell was right. Eventually, in a well ordered society, tolerance takes on a fascist extremes, and you have the creation of the thought crime law.

Ironic as it is, for it is no doubt the fascist Julius Streicher, publisher of Der Sturmer magazine, that was the inspiration for the fear which enacts such non-tolerant laws. Oh, how the left misses the delicious irony.

Here it is, on June15th,2006, the Iranian nuclear red herring for apologists.The peaceful nuclear program nonsense is officially off the table courtesy of Najjar. We can all sleep better knowing the cat's out of the bag, right? Score one in the court of public opinion, Now regarding appropriate action..................

sarc

somethingaboutislam: "...it is culture, more than religion, that makes those people behave and think the way they do."

I have wondered about that, too. No doubt that Islam fulfilled a need to justify and rationalize a brutal way of life at the time of its inception. But now there is no separating the two. Islamic society is monolithic and it is not a religion in the western conception, as it pervades everything.

pythagoras, Yahoo!ing "Sudan Nubian Islam" finds this article with the following quote:

What is now northern Sudan was in ancient times the kingdom of Nubia, which came under Egyptian rule after 2600 B.C. An Egyptian and Nubian civilization called Kush flourished until A.D. 350. Missionaries converted the region to Christianity in the 6th century, but an influx of Muslim Arabs, who had already conquered Egypt, eventually controlled the area and replaced Christianity with Islam.

O.T.

"Educational" system rots from the inside:

Teaching packs entitled 9/11: The Main Chance, which invite pupils to imagine organising a terrorist attack, have been distributed to schools running the [British] Government’s much-vaunted citizenship classes.

One worksheet asks the pupils to imagine what terrorist targets there are in their neighbourhoods. They have then to suggest what weapons and methods should be used to ensure the most effective results.

Also included are references to conspiracy-theory material that suggests that the USAF shot down Flight 93 and Mr. Cheney directed the attack on the Twin Towers.

http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/06/15/british-civics-class-encourages-kids-to-think-like-terrorists/

"alShaytan-
From your link; Islamophobic posters found at mosque:

"It's really unfortunate. It's sad to see such ignorance lingering in the community," Elatari said."

Sorry, but quite the opposite; it's only those ignorant of Islam who believe it's tolerant. Even a casual reading of the Qur'an will quickly show intolerance towards non-believers and women as well.

"alShaytan-
From your link; Islamophobic posters found at mosque:

"It's really unfortunate. It's sad to see such ignorance lingering in the community," Elatari said."

Sorry, but quite the opposite; it's only those ignorant of Islam who believe it's tolerant. Even a casual reading of the Qur'an will quickly show intolerance towards non-believers and women as well.

americaningermany
"They are monitoring everything we say here..."

I certainly hope so.I wouldn't want them to think that everyone is asleep.

After reading Irshad Manji's book this is what I learned:

Arab muslims HATE non-arab muslims.
Arab muslims see non-arab muslims as lesser beings and that would apply to Indonesian, pakistani muslims - any other muslims!

Of course black muslims would therefore be lesser people also. (Are you listening Kofi?)

Sunni's hate shia's and vice versa.

At the bottom of their "foodchain" are us kafir infidels.
We should exploit their division.

Americaningermany,
I hope they are reading this but I am concerned about the hate mail and gaining access to our emails. How would they do this?
So far I have not received anything and recommend mailwasher if you haven't already got it.I allows you to bounce spam and other unwanted stuff.

What else is there to say but this: the Islamic leadership needs to be forcibly removed from Iran and it needs to happen soon.

Then, unlike in Iraq, a secular government without ANY Sharia Law influences must be allowed to grow in place of the maniac mullahs. Given that and enough time, I think Persia will deal with the Muslim "problem" themselves.

special_guest:

Thank you very much! This is precisely what I wanted to know.

Sincerely,

Pythagoras.

americaningermany

I hope I have made their list but unfortunately my posts are not exactly blockbusters and alas may have been overlooked. I don't want email from any of them because they have nothing to say that I want to hear except maybe...goodbye..I go home now.

somethingaboutislam-

If you want to rile and get responses from our Mohammedan brethren, try commenting on various Muslim sites, like MUSLIMSwakeUP, etc. or doing searches of mixtures of words like "jihad lion of islam infidel victory honor killing Mohamnmed" and you'll find you way to a host of pro-Islamic Imperialism sites, jr. jihadi blogs and Islamo-comments sections of other web hosed pages.

But, as my Grandmom used to say: "Don't water dead plants."

Or, in laymen's terms: "Don't get tangled up in trying to reason with those whose minds are as made up as a mental hospital's model bed."

Here's one for you to check out:

http://www.historyofjihad.org/

(Although they'll have to update the site soon and put their Zarqawi reference in the past tense.)

americaningermany,
We all know there is much unsecured info floating around out there. More than likely, it was as you suspect-just a few isolated malcontents who are trying to mess with certain posters who stood out to them. I doubt some worldwide antijihadist database is being formed by these people, and if so, for no other purpose than intimidation. Remember that is their primary method. They are the ultimate trash talkers. Be vigiliant,but you still have a better chance of being a random victim at a market, then being personally stalked. Still, I understand if that's less than comforting. Hang in there and keep those good posts coming!