Another convert who misunderstands the Religion of Peace™, and the respect it commands for the People of the Book. From the TimesOnline, with thanks to Beaglehound:
A SPEECH by an extremist Muslim cleric praising the London bombers and mocking victims of suicide attacks has been broadcast on the internet to coincide with the anniversary of the July 7 attacks.The audience laughs as Omar Brooks, a British Muslim convert who also uses the name Abu Izzadeen, makes fun of non-Muslims as “animals” and “cowards”.
Brooks — who has previously described the London bombers as “completely praiseworthy” — identifies with the views of Mohammad Sidique Khan, the ringleader of the London attacks.
He contrasts the supposed bravery of Khan’s suicide to the “kuffar” (non-Muslims) who are characterised as debauched binge-drinkers who vomit and urinate in the street.
The speech is peppered with jokes that bring laughter from his audience at the Small Heath youth and community centre in Birmingham, where it was filmed last Sunday.
At one point he announces dramatically that the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center “changed many people’s lives”. After a pause, he brings the house down by adding: “Especially those inside.”
What a card. Why is he still in Britain? Why is he preaching openly?
He may have been born a British citizen but he should be stripped of his citizenship and sent packing. If he loves the Muslim world so much, let him go live there. It's time to get tough with these people.
He's been described as "of Jamaican origin" but presumably now has British citizenship.
More on the thug in question:
http://www.westernresistance.com/blog/archives/002009.html
His organization is so extreme that it has issued a fatwa against George Galloway. So naturally, given the state of modern Britain, this psychopath is walking round on the loose.
Galloway was at a meeting for his Respect party, which is a Far Left/Islamist party. Death threats were made to him by Muslims who objected to his pursuing the Islamist agenda through parliament, since they say "voting is un-Islamic and sinful". According to the (London) Times, he fled, leaving his "distraught daughter" at "the scene", and arrests were later made.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,19809-1577749_2,00.html
http://www.hindu.com/2005/04/22/stories/2005042200861700.htm
l wonder how long it will take before the Brits get tough with these losers. either send them back home packing or a muslim country of choice!
IMO this man should just suffer a KGB style "disappearance" and stupidly emotional or not the time has come to silence people like this and forget their human rights, as there wont be any if he has his way.
If it makes him a martyr, so what? So is bin laden and the 7/7 homicide bombers. What difference will it make? What we need is a LOT more muslim martyrs.
I have always been for free speech, the abolition of censorship of any kind and I have both believed in and defended human rights.
But I now see this as a war of extermination where defeat will make all of these forever impossible for mankind to attain ever again.
So I am prepared to sacrifice the human rights of any Muslim who praises or supports sedition,
let alone talks of it or conspires to commit it. I want him disposed of and his entire family deported immediately. It is only tactics of this nature which will give us a chance and it must be soon.
We can always create a "state of emergency" to do just this and we can always reverse it. If sharia law comes this will never be possible.
Islam has turned me into an absolute hardliner.
Not even communism could do that. That is a measure of my hatred not my fear.
Of course Britain is full of Muslims who have no allegiance to Britain whatsoever. The tolerance in a free and open society that allows the "enemy within" to speak the way Omar Brooks does; still amazes me.
At what point do the British authorities determine that he and his followers have crossed the line? Does it take the next explosion that occurs in downtown London? Anybody who speaks this way is clearly in support, if not complicit in the advocating of violence towards the British people and thus the British Crown.
Can any of our British followers quote an appropriate penal code violation that can be applied to Omar Brooks and those who follow his thinking because he should not be allowed to stay in your country.
Imagine what would happen if a priest said during a sermon that Islam is a violent religion, and that Muslims should either integrate 100% or get out of Britain.
There would be the usual shitstorm of Islamophobia, racism and hate speech. What will happen to this Muslim cleric? Nothing, I imagine.
It always amazes me how they can cover up the truth about the origins of these thugs by calling them "British-muslims" or "Frenchmen" or "Germans" who are really Africans or Arabs.
Why isn't this being treated as hate speech.
Why isn't this being treated as racist propaganda?
Oh yeah, he's bashing whites and non-Muslims, so that's allowed.
Is this Omar Brooks video online somewhere ? I would love to see it.
A well AIG, they call them(selfs) "Palestinains" to.. so calling them(selfs) British or French isn't a big deal then... is it ?
Re: The audience laughs as Omar Brooks, a British Muslim convert who also uses the name Abu Izzadeen, makes fun of non-Muslims as “animals” and “cowards”.
This reminds me (and is very similar to) the joking speech Hitler made before the Reichstag in January 1939 in respone to an FDR letter asking for guarantees that Hitler would not attack a list of specific countries. Hitler spent the speech mocking Roosevelt and the US. The Reichstag was a roar of laughter. One can actually see Herman Goring rolling with laughter on the dias behind Hitler as Hitler spoke. However, six years later Germany, and the Reichstag where Hitler gave the speech had been bombed into the stone age by US bombers.
The mocking speech of Hitler in 1939 was yet another wake-up call to Americans . The Brooks speech and the laughing crowd is another wake-up call to non-Muslims in our time.
The difference between now and pre 911 is that Americans and more and more non-Muslims elsewhere take seriously the extermination threats implied in Muslim cleric speeches. When non-Muslims watch Muslim crowds laughing and cheering as clerics make threats and jokes re Infidels-the non-Muslims are not afraid-more often than not the non-Muslims are thinking.
Hitler discovered what non-Nazis were thinking about his threats and jokes of 1939 in 1945.
Keep it up Izzadeen.
You and your partner in hate Choudry are the best thing that is happening regading Islam. Your apparent "invincibility" is granted only to allow you to act as a beacon to alert people to the perversion you believe in.
>>>Islam has turned me into an absolute hardliner.
Not even communism could do that. That is a measure of my hatred not my fear.
Posted by: Zathras
"Oh yeah, he's bashing whites and non-Muslims, so that's allowed."
Yeah, that's how it goes. Yesterday I read a forum post where someone was disgusted at white people for going after Middle-Eastern people in Australia, during the Cronulla riots. He did not in any way mention the events and circumstances that led to the riots. Well, it was the same with the cartoon riots... all blame fell on white people.
It cannot be long now when Infidels take matters into their own hands as the 'authorities' fail act against the obvious crimes these animals advocate and perpetrate...
Re other headlines:
"Iran's Ahmadinejad calls for 'removal of Zionist regime'"
"Syrian officials: Golan Heights offensive possible"
I'm sure there is a whole lot of thinking going on in the Infidel World re threats and jokes regarding the extemination of "cowards and animals". Times have changed.
I'm noticing that the Islamists living in Britain and North America are becoming increasingly more brazen. Time was when they spoke furtively behind closed doors, or wrote their tracts in Arabic so that it was unlikely Westerners could read them. Now they openly publish calls for violent jihad in English, on North American websites or in press interviews.
I think they believe they have tested to see if there are any limits to the patience of the West and have found none. They're probably surprised (but pleased) at how much they can get away with.
Futher thoughts: Many Muslims don't seem to realize that people are watching and thinking about the constant threats (often implying extermination) that come from the clerics, the silence of the so-called moderate Muslims, and then the insulting attempt of groups like CAIR to make ordinary folks feel shame, of being bigots, intolerant, "islamaphobe" when they note the hate, intolerance, sadism (Brook, e.g.) and murderous intentions of so many Muslim clerics and their flocks.
Most folks don't voice anger because they now think its useless to argue with people who are dishonest (CAIR, e.g.). So they write their Senators and other reps and express their thoughts about what they see in the real world. I'm sure there was a similar reaction to the Nazis in 1939-six years after Hitler began his rants to the Non-Nazi world. By 1939 ordinary folks had learned to take Hitler at his word-and believed that he meant to impose his creed on the rest of the world.
We live in times similar to 1939.
Remember, these are the same folks who would go balistic when those harmless cartoons of Muhammed came out. Folks, be ready when this same person makes jokes in a few months about 9/11 and its victims.
The above article shows the hypocracy of this man and those who follow him.
The worst bit of the article, is the statement of Rachel North
"His comments were condemned by Rachel North, a survivor of the King’s Cross bomb. “It’s clearly calculated to upset people and is pretty disgusting. I would imagine these statements are something that the police would be interested in because they might encourage other people to get involved in terrorism.”
She disclosed that she had received abuse from supporters of the terrorists. “I’ve had abusive e-mails from people saying that I am part of a government conspiracy, that it’s a shame I didn’t die in the bombings. It’s pretty low, but I have chosen not to publish these e-mails because I don’t want to give them publicity.”
Miss North is presumably targeted because her BBC diary gave her a more public profile.
Personally I think these outrageous offensive e-mails should be given as much publicity as the media can muster.
So far as criminal proceedings are concerned at the very least it is Behaviour likely to cause a Breach of the Peace. That does not carry much of a penalty. I would prefer something like Threats to kill, contrary to section 16 Offences Against the Person Act 1861. Or something under the Public Order Act 1986 which covers minor scuffles while drunk and disorderly right up to riot and affray. The Crown Prosection Service are looking at it, although I have less faith in them than I did in the old system when each Police Force had its own prosecuting solicitors.
VOICEOVER
RW: "Abu Izzadeen comes from a Christian Jamaican family living in London. He converted to Islam aged 17. This is not the first time he has courted controversy. This previously untransmitted film, obtained by Newsnight, shows him, albeit face covered, just before the attacks on the Twin Towers in New York.
A banner top right of screen displays the words: January 2001. Abu Izzadeen speaks
AI: Because I believe America is one of the places where we should be bombing those...er, the Government. There are some Muslims that go to America, because obviously, you know, like firearms is available inside America, to be trained legally. So why not take that opportunity to use, the heart of the enemy that's attacking us."
Image changes, a scene of people in combat uniforms in open scrubland with guns. Top right a banner reads "Library Pictures". These continue as Richard Watson continues narration:
RW: "Today, he doesn't want to answer any questions about Jihad training or the seven months, he says, he spent in Pakistan and Kashmir. He knows he's a target for the intelligence services and, with us, tried to tread a careful line."
Image: Graphic of two portraits. One is of Abu Izzadeen, the other Abu Uzair. Beneath, the words: The British Jihad?. Music: slow chord, synth pad.
Richard Watson narrates above.
RW: "That didn't stop him expressing views that most people in this country would find abhorrent."
Image of Police, ambulance and fire emergency services in immediate wake of London bombings. Scene returns to London park, present day, with Abu Izzadeen in close-up. Richard Watson asks him:
RW: "Are you willing to denounce, right now, the London bombings which killed so many people?"
AI:"No".
RW: "Why not?"
AI: "I would never denounce Muslims".
RW: "This was murder"
AI: "No. Mujahadin activity."
RW: "It's murder. Innocent people have died."
AI: "I'm sorry- when you bomb Muslims in Afghanistan, and I saw houses....I saw women and children murdered, on a huge scale. Not fifty, there was carpet bombing in Afghanistan. Nobody called for the denounciation (sic) for the murder of Muslims."
Image of emergency services in London. Back to Abu Izzadeen's face.
RW: "People like you, with the views you hold, you're vulnerable to becoming suicide bombers. What do you say about that?"
AI: "Vulnerability, I believe it's a weakness as long as understanding. What would I say about those who do suicide operations - or martyrdom operations - 'cause suicide is a term coined by the media - they're completely praiseworthy. Martyrdom operations are commonplace - fifteen every day in Iraq ag-"
RW: "Not in Britain."
AI: "Against the British and Americans every day in Afghanistan, all around the world, in Palestine. So it's not something that's unusual. What's shocking, for many, is that it took place on their own doorsteps. But hopefully, that will make many, wake up, and smell the coffee...
SCENE CHANGE. Abu Uzair is shown in front of a black flag, with Allah's name in white letters on it, from the first footage in the programme.
http://216.239.51.104/search?q=cache:rMbgaG4lCbEJ:www.westernresistance.com/blog/archives/000202.html+%22Omar+Brooks%22+jamaica&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=5
We had Dizzy Dean. Moos have Izzadeen
Someone should send this to the 9/11 Commission and the organization of the Families of 9/11. I'd like O'Reilly to do this on his show and ask CAIR to explain. Get some of the families on also. This guy wouldn't show I am sure.
Steven L- I don't think the Islamists are in touch with reality. They don't seem to use reason very much.
The work ethic is still very strong in the West (particularly in America) and most people are busy working and have no time to waste on these frauds. But people are begining to put a lot of pressure on elected officials and politicians re contoling borders, etc. I would not be terribly surprised (maybe in 5 years) to see groups in America (CAIR, e.g.) and elsewhere have their assets seized in the future. People are fed-up with the threats, the sick intolerance, the attempts to shame non-muslims re their concerns-and the politicans are begining to feel the pressure from ordinary people.
The politicians pay close attention to polls. Public opinion has changed in the past 5 years and will harden in the next 5 years on this matter.
I'm trying to find the actual recording/video of this but without much luck so far.
Omar Brooks, look under your car, keep checking behind you, take a different route home from the Mosque each day. You take comfort in the fact that you are taking steps to protect yourself, however this will be to no avail, we will get you, it won't be quick and it won't be clean. Omar Brooks, the police can't save you, you will be caught and you will suffer the consequences of your words. You have just crossed the line. Say goodbye to your family while you can.
Steven L-
Almost all the folks killed on 7/7 in Britian and at the WTC were on their way to work or at work. The folks who create the wealth are the targets of the Islamists (though I think they may target schools in the future).
It's time to seize the assets of groups like CAIR (especially the money coming from Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States), and end all social services to non-citizens or anyone convicted of incitement to violence (that's coming in the future).
These people (Islamists) are not in touch with reality. They are too arrogant to see reality. They literally live in their own world.
Here's a female Muslim convert so brain washed with hatred she endorses the killing of civilians and child in the name of Islam.
http://www.hizb.org.uk/multimedias/uk/march10122005/talk2.ram
Ala-sux, that woman is an idiot. The only reason she's standing there speaking is because she's not in an islamic country. She has gall alright. She's whining about how the poor muslims have been killed by the occupiers and yet, the muslims are killing themselves!! And each other!!!
She needs to go spend a few years in an islamic country to make her come to her senses.
I wonder if she's had FGM performed on her yet?
Would it be okay with the 'cleric' if I did an audiobook version of the Koran, spoken in an outrageously "gay" accent, like the fruitiest of voices -from the kind of self-parody done by the lavender brigade themselves of their most mincing, limp-wristed flagrant 'faggy' queenspeak?
Sura 9:29 becoming:
"Oooo, I'll scratch your eyes out you silly savage!"
But, because I wouldn't want to insult gays by associating them with Mohammad, I'll have to do the Koran audiobook in a movie cartoon moron's voice (something from the 1940's, like a cretin-from-the-backwoods tone, pastiche-ing Lon Cheney, Jr.'s "Lenny" character from "Of Mice and Men".)
"Dis b-book is not to be doubted. Huh-huh!"
Islamo-idiocy must be met with satire's fire.
(I know, it's Lon Chaney, Jr.
Just a little Dick Wolfman Cheney kidding.)
The UK has fairly robust counter-terror legislation. I had thought the UK had successfully introduced a "glorification of terrorism" provision, that would see Muslims leaders detained and deported at the very least. In my view, this man should be not only be arrested but executed for his remarks. Having lost two people very close to my on 11 September, there is no more appropriate of a penalty for this man and any other who supports and/or propagates it. This story has truly sickened me, but has not surpised me.
The reason they get away with this sort of thing is that all Muslims have a large amount of informal power in a country like the UK. Government has far less impact on everyday life than it likes to think.Islam provides its followers with an endless supply of hoteaded fanatics and lone nuts willing to enforce the general will of their community (or that of sub-groups) through open or implied threats of violence - this must give them a tremendous sense of invulnerability. Besides the self imposed constraints of multiculturalism, people are genuinely afraid to take them on. Their particular loonies have little regard for punishment - in fact they probably rather like the idea of being 'victimised' by the kaffir. As for deportation - that gives them the opportunity for endless fun and games manipulating the legal system. The Danes and, to an extent, the Dutch, have finally got wise to this game and are imposing damage limitation measures. Since these are the two continental countries most closely resembling the UK in outlook, I'm optimistically assuming the tipping point will come her as weel - the sooner, the better. The only problem is that Muslims have acquired representatives and lobby power as a voting constituency and may be able to emasculate any sensible polies on immigration and terrorism.
There is nothing funnier than taqiyya and non-taqiyya factions of Mohammedans at each other's throats. Sure beats things like Shia-Sunni, Arab-Farsi, and other such intra-Islamic jihads.
Maybe some brave Brits will applaud him with cricket bats to send congratulatory pats his head and body? Should be hilarious!
The only thing the UK anti terrorism is good for is arresting people who walk on cycle lanes look at this...
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1829289,00.html
"Ms Cameron was being hailed yesterday as Scotland’s answer to Walter Wolfgang, the 82-year-old heckler manhandled out of the Labour Party conference last month. She was arrested under the Terrorism Act for walking along a cycle path in the harbour area of Dundee.
"
As you see, we all sleep safely in our beds in the UK!
Oreilly (or any "conservative", e.g. Coulter, or Limpballs) take on CAIR or the Muslims? LMAO. What alternate universe do you live in, the only real enemy in the world, by their and thus your lights, are "liberuhls", homosexuhls, feminazi's...these traitors have plenty to say about the "liberuhls and gays, but nary a thing to say about Islam and Muslims, and do you know why? Because Muslims have oil and money and are prime business partners and financiers of the Bush Family Dynasty, Cheney Haliburton, and in my opinion, one of the real reasons we invaded Iraq was to haul the Saudi and Iranian irons out of the fires..But that is a longer discussion (which I can back up with facts).
Unpalatble or not Nariz I doubt whetehr you will find many here (other than myself who agrees to a degree) who will agree with you.
I have brought this up on not a few occasions and been met with a stony silence here. No nasty criticism , mind you, just silence.
It is the ONLY view which can explain the obseqious need that western governemnts have to bow to saudi wishes and to totally disregard the role theat the saudis play in the cancerous spread of militant islam.
I wondered why the Bush regime consistently refused to acknowledge the true role of Islam as no one could be that stupid. The discovery that Bush senior worked for the Saudis and that Bush junior had similar post office aspirations told me much.
Oil, it seems, does more than power western civilisation, it dirties the hands of and renders blind all who touch it.
Ann Coulter, who wrote in a syndicated column on September 12 that in responding to terrorists "we should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity."
Love her or hate her, she at least does get it.