"White person," of course, is shorthand for any non-Muslim. They would not have preferred to kill Ibrahim Hooper over, say, Ayaan Hirsi Ali. From the Telegraph, with thanks to Cindy:
Any white person is a target. Avoid hotels because they are too well protected. Carry the bombs in small knapsacks to avoid suspicion. And don't worry about your escape route because you will become a "martyr".These guidelines for suicide bombers were found on a computer captured by Indonesian police during a raid in November, and are believed to have been written by the British-educated bomb-maker Azahari Husin, who died during the attack.
Azahari, in his mid-40s when he died, studied for a doctorate at the University of Reading, and was a leading Malaysian member of Jemaah Islamiah, the South East Asian terrorist group that has close ties to al-Qa'eda.
Azahari, nicknamed the Demolition Man by Malaysian newspapers, earned a Phd in property valuation at Reading and was an associate professor at the Malaysian Technology University. But in 1998 he took a sabbatical after falling under the influence of a radical preacher, and then trained in explosives with the Taliban in Afghanistan.
Azahari had been the prime suspect in a campaign of bombings against western targets including two attacks on the tourist resorts of Bali in 2002 and 2005, killing 202 and 20 people respectively.
The 34-page document on his computer set out the meticulous planning and execution for the second Bali attack, including a minute-by-minute timetable culminating with the triple suicide bombing on Oct 1. The blasts were set for 7.34pm when the restaurants would be full, and the entry read: "Allahu Akbar" (God is great).
The document, entitled The Bali Project, was obtained by the New York Times after it was first reported in the Indonesian magazine Tempo.
It begins by asking: "Why Bali?" Because it will have a "global impact". The author explained: "Bali is known around the world, better than Indonesia itself. An attack in Bali will be covered by the international media."
Section 2, headed "Method of attack", argues that the plan had to be different from the first Bali bombing, in which a mini van loaded with explosives was detonated in front of two nightclubs, because "security is tighter".
The author notes that the police chief in Bali had increased the number of intelligence officers from 70 to 256, and it would have been too risky once again to bring in a large amount of explosives and more difficult to rent a house with a garage to assemble a bomb. Instead, the document said, "the bomb must be smaller, and brought in ready to use".
It advocated attacking "foreign tourists from America and its allies" - including all Nato countries, as well as Australia, New Zealand, South Korea, Japan, Thailand and the Philippines. But given the difficulty in distinguishing different nationalities, the author concluded: "We will consider all white people the enemy."
In that respect the attack largely backfired: 15 of the victims were Indonesians, some of them Muslims, with four victims from Australia and one from Japan.
What will we learn from this report? Shouldn't this be front page/headline news in the MSM today? What would we do without JW?
Azahari, in his mid-40s when he died, studied for a doctorate at the University of Reading, and was a leading Malaysian member of Jemaah Islamiah, the South East Asian terrorist group that has close ties to al-Qa'eda.
Sounds disenfranchised and strikened in lots of unfortunate ways to me.To stupid to grasp the meaning of the Quran I suspect.
"It begins by asking: "Why Bali?" Because it will have a "global impact". The author explained: "Bali is known around the world, better than Indonesia itself. An attack in Bali will be covered by the international media."
Will the NYT or MSM finally get the message that thier manipulation is a primary goal of jihad? Even after publishing this story themselves I highly doubt it, though they will pat themselves on the back for publishing it.
Just proves that a good education and lots of degrees do not guarantee a decent human being.
Allah produces the 'hive' effect in muslims. The only decency is within the hive. Everything outside the 'hive' is not decent and subject to destruction. Allah hates everything not of his 'hive'. For muslims, Allah is decency itself, and it is an obligation to follow his rules and orders as written in the Quran. It is mind bending that 'decency' itself would order the murder and torture of beings, it is even more mind bending that legions of 'decent' robots would carry out the orders. Only a mind afflicted with Mohammads demon could see beheadings, or bombings of non combatants, as a 'decent' activity. Allahu Akbar (God is Great-er-est). In the name of 'decency, I behead you with a rusty and dull knife. Allah loves this kind of stuff, the more pain and misery heaped upon his foe, the better he likes it. The twisted jihadist loves it too, after all, blowing up school buses or pizza parlors is the only decent thing to do...if you are a lunar-tic.
"after all, blowing up school buses or pizza parlors is the only decent thing to do...if you are a lunar-tic."
I think duh_swami has figured out why there is a moon on the muslim flag. It's probably a crescent moon to remind the lunatics to use the scimitar to smite non-mo's at the neck, etc.
This article surely blows apart the myth that it is the ill-educated and underprivilaged only that seek jihad.
aig, you said it.
Why isn't the dinosaur media yelling about racism (the worst thing anyone can do, oooohhh) at the top of their collective voices? Oh yeah, it's whites that are the target.
/nevermind (Emily Latella)
Perpster sez: I think duh_swami has figured out why there is a moon on the muslim flag. It's probably a crescent moon to remind the lunatics to use the scimitar to smite non-mo's at the neck, etc.
The scimitar! Why didn't I think of that. Thanks... It's a logical extention of Moon symbolism...a magick weapon so to speak. Another moon symbol is reproduction, something muslims can really relate to.The Magical Moon is sometimes refered to as the 'treasure house of images'.To a muslim, these are Allahs images. Allah created every image by use of the Pen of Destiny. These images are written on the moon. They are expressed in the Quran. The Quran is mostly a Moon book. Thats why muslims cant relate to the Bible because it is mostly a Sun/Son book. Sun/Son symbolism is quite beyond them.
Islam is stuck in moon sybolism because its god Allah is a moon god. 'Stuck' is the right word.
Thats why you only see loudmouths for clerics, but no saints. A saint would abandon the Quran and apostate himself upon sainthood due to enlightenment. You cant see the light if you cant see the Sun/Son.
'Let those who can see,'see'. This was not directed at submitters. Untill they raise their eyes, and 'see' the Sun/Son, they will not 'see' anything but the moon and its god Allah. Like 'gunbarrel vision', reality is defined by a small circle of light at the end of a long tube. A limited perspective. Not a good path, but it is the one muslims are on...
I guess we are safe in So California, as we are now over 1/2 hispanic. I would be worried if I lived in St Paul Minn.
But then maybe I am wrong, I think they just like to blow up whatever and whomever gets in their way whatever the color or creed.
"They would not have preferred to kill Ibrahim Hooper over, say, Ayaan Hirsi Ali."
The Ibrahim Hoopers and Ayaan Hirsi Alis of the world remain a microscopic dot, statistically.
99.9% of Muslims (outside of a few of those central Asiatic tribes who look like Yul Brynner) worldwide remain non-white and 99.9% of whites worldwide remain non-Muslim.
So when Muslims who heed Azahari's advice would start murdering whites, most of the time they would be successfully targeting non-Muslims (as for the tiny percentage of Muslims they might accidentally hit -- since when are Muslims worried about collateral damage?).
Whites have another advantage as a target besides being mostly non-Muslim: most of them belong to the West (and worse yet, to America), which is (in the Muslim mind) causing more suffering for Muslims than any other culture.
Television wrote: "Whites have another advantage as a target besides being mostly non-Muslim: most of them belong to the West (and worse yet, to America), which is (in the Muslim mind) causing more suffering for Muslims than any other culture."
--
Ironically, if that ever proves to be true, I would wear that responsibility like a Badge of Honor. The Muslims should fear the United States, because it harbors men and women like myself that are young enough to outlast them and old enough to think clearly.
"I have not yet begun to fight!" - John Paul Jones
It's actually very insulting to Muslims when claims like this are made, it only confirms that the Civil/Democratic/peaceful/productive Nations and mainly non-Muslim/White society.
Every time Hooper screams "Racism" he only re-enforce how pathetic Islamic base Countries are ,while some Oil rich Countries have bought modernization externally they haven't really produced much in centuries of the Islamic intelligence.
In fact , I came across a story about those great islamic societies that gave us advanced Math and the Sciences and as I dug deeper I found that the surviving Jews and Christian within these Caliphates .
So when Muslim boast about the contributions
Islam has made , ask for proof and demand the names of the persons and their religion to make sure a actual Muslim discovered the breakthrough.
Do albino Muslims count?
I'll have to go ASK THE IMAM.
TV
They have no problems targetting non-White infidels wherever they happen to be - Black Christians in Sudan, Copts in Egypt, Maronites in Lebanon, Assyrians in Iraq, Christians in Pakistan and Indonesia, Hindus in Bangladesh and Malaysia, et al.
Despite your stats, 99.9% of non-Whites aren't Muslim, and 99.9% of non-Muslims aren't White.
"just proves that a good education and lots of degrees do not guarantee a decent human being"...duh swami... Yep, Paul Joesph Goebbels, Ph.D., Univ. of Heidelberg, 1921 comes to mind.
Infidel Pride,
"They have no problems targetting non-White infidels wherever they happen to be - Black Christians in Sudan, Copts in Egypt, Maronites in Lebanon, Assyrians in Iraq, Christians in Pakistan and Indonesia, Hindus in Bangladesh and Malaysia, et al."
That's irrelevant to my point. Of course they target Infidels in general, and there are millions of non-white Infidels. But most whites are Infidels, and most Muslims are non-whites. Ergo, there is a factual racial component that is regularly skirted with a disingenuous waltz step by many, if not most, anti-jihadists. The only reason I can see for this waltz step (other than stupidity, which cannot explain it for the obviously more intelligent) is the anxious desire to be liked by the pathologically anti-racist (as opposed to rationally anti-racist) PC majority.
"Despite your stats, 99.9% of non-Whites aren't Muslim, and 99.9% of non-Muslims aren't White."
I didn't say 99.9% of non-whites are Muslim; I said 99.9% of Muslims are non-whites. Ditto for the second half: I didn't say 99.9% of non-Muslims are white; I said 99.9% of whites are non-Muslims. Big difference. I'm surprised you use the same bass-ackwards logic that the PC crowd uses when they obtusely misinterpret us:
"You Islamophobes are saying that 99% of Muslims are terrorists!"
"No, we are saying that 99% of terrorists are Muslims."
Big difference in wording.
What I was implying was that Muslims don't use race as even the main criteria for their targets. In the case of Indonesia, they may use race as a catch-all to target all Aussies, but they go well beyond that when they target Indonesian Christians, Dayaks, Hindus, Confucians, et al. None of the latter categories are white - in terms of race, they are indistinguishable from Indonesian Muslims.
This is obvious from the above article
Here, "white" is a misnomer - Thai or Filipinos aren't white. While they may be using a racial descriptor, the criteria they are using, unlike the Janjaweed in Darfur, ain't race.They simply target everybody they think are infidels.