"If the Zionist regime commits another stupid move and attacks Syria, this will be considered like attacking the whole Islamic world and this regime will receive a very fierce response," said Ahmadinejad.
That means the dhimmi nations of Europe (which has been set against Israel for years as it is), with their large and restive Muslim populations, as well as the countries of the OIC.
Ahmadinejad may see this as his big chance to unite the Islamic world behind Iran, positioning the Shi'ite mullahocracy as the best candidate to lead the jihad against the Great Satan. Did he set Hizballah loose on Israel with particular virulence in recent weeks in order to provoke Israeli attacks against civilian targets -- which jihadists have for years tried to provoke from Israel by launching attacks from areas heavily populated by civilians? Perhaps he was hoping to unleash the full force of the world's dhimmi leftist media against Israel, and to shame Europe, if not America, into refusing to lift a finger in Israel's defense -- and/or to provoke Europe's Muslims into full-bore jihad against the dhimmi non-Muslim Europeans.
Perhaps we are witnessing an attempt to resurrect the Shi'ite Fatimid caliphate.
I am not saying that Israel should not retaliate strongly. Just the opposite. I am saying that President Bush and others should not be fooled into playing into the hands of the Thug-In-Chief by portraying Israel as indiscriminately killing civilians in its response to Hizballah acts of war. Bush, Blair and the rest should stand up at the upcoming G8 Summit and say forthrightly that they stand with Israel against the global jihad that targets their countries as well as Israel, and that they recognize that Israel is not targeting civilians but is doing what it must do in order to destroy the jihadists' ability to continue to wage war against them.
But they won't.
We have to wait and see. All this MSM talk of World War III is premature. Israel has done enough measured response to already have Lebanon and Syria begging for relief from the UN. And Ahmadinejad is probably climaxing in orgasmic joy at the thought of his bringing forth the 12th Imam the Great Cthulhu.
What has fascinated me, struck me yesterday, is that the governing infrastructures of Syria, Lebanon and Palestine seem to have absolute NO control over the Jihadist groups. Both sides know it.
And the Jihadists can't give up because this fight is sacramental to them.
Caliph Ahmadinejad would cause the world to recognize the necessity of real defense.
They might next year.
"A struggle against the Kufr colonialist states which have domination and influence on the Islamic countries. The challenge against colonialism in all its intellectual, political, economic, and military forms,..."
All at:
www.hizb-ut-tahrir.org
While I'm sure the Lebanese don't have much control over their country what with Syrian and Palestinian interlopers in their midst, I'm convinced that Syria and the Palestinian Authority have full control over the Jihadis. They will pretend otherwise, but I'm sure if Syria and the PA want it to stop it will.
Right now, I believe Syria and the PA want this Jihad, they want to rouse Muslims everywhere because they are convinced the Israelis are weak due to their withdrawl from Gaza. They know the Europeans will blindly support them and their growing numbers in Europe will keep the Eurocrats in line. And with the US heavily committed to Afghanistan and Iraq, it will be hard to provide support to Israel.
Dangerous times.
I too, have noticed everyone (except Iran)clamoring for relief from the Israel response to the kidnapping of their soldier and ongoing rocket attacks.
I too, agree the world should stand up and say out loud, "yes, there is a problem---and it is Islamic terror"
The Islamic madman from Iran seems too giddy--he definitely has something up his sleeve. We will not have long to wait to see just what that is.
As usual when pushed to fight the Islamic thugs cry foul and have difficulty engaging in a real slugfest. As others have noted, they prefer to hide behind women,children and civilians , then pretend to be horrified when Israel finally gets around to retaliating and some collaterial damage occurs.
This outrage may never cease unless The Peaceful Religion of Islam and its evil text the Qu'ran is destroyed.
Of course, we probably already have designated targets plotted in Iran. Let Aminigonad push the wrong button and he will take the eternal dirtnap.
Considering the two sponsors of this are Syria and Iran, I was thinking this is actually an ideal time logistically with a US presence in the region SyriaIran
I'm convinced that this entire uprising, especially the dramatic escalation by Hezbollah, is tied to Iran's dispute with the West over her nuclear program. The Western powers had asked Iran to respond to their proposal by July 13. Ahmadinejad refused, and insisted he wouldn't respond till August 22. Well, now we can see what he had secretly planned (perhaps together with Syria) for the interim period. If nothing else, this makes it harder for the Western powers to keep Iran on the diplomatic defensive, while the news from the Israeli fronts occupies the world's headlines. The G-8 summit was supposed to focus on Iran. Now it's going to end up being sidetracked by the Israeli military operations.
This crisis may even enable Iran to get support from the Muslim world for her development of nuclear weapons, and even support for her announced stand to destroy Israel.
The Telegraph argues that Iran has deliberately provoked Hezbollah's attacks as a smoke screen to hide its nuclear ambitions:
COULD IT BE IRANS THUG IN CHIFE,S JUST MIGHT HAVE MANAGED TO OBTAIN FROM UNDER THE TABLE A FEW OLD USSR NUKE WARHEADS AND BE CANNY ENOUGH TO KEEP QUITE UNTILL HE LANCHES THEM AT ISREAL THE FORMER USSR STILL CAN NOT ACOUNT FOR ALL THE WAR HEADS IT HAD AND WHO IS TO SAY THE INSANE MADMAN OF KOREA MIGHT OT HAVE SOLD TERAN A FEW NUKE WAR HEADS WITH ITS IRBM IT SOLD AND HOW DO WE KNOW THEY GET THE RAW MATRAIL FROM PACKISTAN A NOTHER ISLAMIC NATION THAT HAS THE BOM
Iran will never launch a weapon against Israel or the USA. Never. We all know that. A direct missile attack would result in justified obliteration.
They will attempt to use willing agents of Hezbollah and Hamas to smuggle a weapon into Israel or strap a radiological bomb onto someone.
But never a direct attack. it is not the way of islam.
GreatShaitan writes: "I keep hearing people say the US is military is overstreched. Correct me if I am wrong, but AFIK we are currently using using a cutback peacetime militray and we havent even began consription to a wartime military."
For that you can blame Rumsfeld. After the Cold War ended, Clinton had disbanded three Army divisions. After 9-11, with the U.S. rushing to war, the Bush Administration had an opportunity to reconstitute those divisions and rebuild the Army to something like the strength it had during the 1991 Gulf War. But Rumsfeld said no, believing that high-tech could substitute for boots on the ground. As a recent PBS Frontline documentary showed, originally Rumsfeld wanted to invade Iraq with fewer than 100,000 men! He only agreed to 150,000 as a compromise with his generals.
If there is one lesson we've learned the hard way from Iraq, is that this jihad cannot be fought with high-tech alone.
As I pointed out on some other post. Could the recent North Korean missile tests been done for the Iranians? There were Iranian missile technicians in North Korea at the time. The range of the missiles that fell into the Sea OF Japan show these missiles have sufficient range to satify Aminigonads ambitions.
Remember when Cuba had missiles and Russian missile technicians?
First of all, thank you for your work.
Thank you for your movie:
"Islam:What the West Needs to Know"
I saw it yesterday.
I took the liberty of posting a copy of the article "Islamic Strategy for the West" from IslamReview.com on a blog I started yesterday. I hope to not only expand the audience but drive readers to Jihadwatch.com and IslamicReview.com.
I see this also, as an opportunity for Ahmadinejad to consolidate the many fractions of Islam behind Iran. Alone, Iran would be a narrow target. With the consolidation of many Muslim "units" he will have virtually assembled an army overnight, already in place in Europe, US, the Orient, Pacific Rim, etc. This diffuses the focus from Iran and activates immediately many remote but united Muslims to responsiveness and action.
Further, to quote GreatShaitan above: "the governing infrastructures of Syria, Lebanon and Palestine seem to have absolute NO control over the Jihadist groups. Both sides know it." demonstrates the ability of Islamic groups to act independently of any government wherever they are.
Anywhere.
With no regard for any government, other than Islam, it will continue to appear.
Thanks again for opening this venue and taking the risks to expose the myths and truths about Islam.
If Israel just sits back and waits for it's death fewer (muslims) will die. That's the way you want it, moderationist? BTW, they are worse than the Nazis. Did you watch the video of the brutalization of our two soldiers? While our country is busy protecting prisoners at Gitmo, jihadis butcher our guys, they don't worry about panties on the head or a dog barking at the prisoners. They don't let our prisoners live!
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is the man with the master plan.
from above.
Iran will never launch a weapon against Israel or the USA. Never. We all know that
I do not know that to be a fact.
From above
Far few people will die if Israel plays the victim to the hilt, and endlessly accuses the others of genocide worse than the Nazis???
If Israel plays the victims--the only victims will be Israelies. Accusations do not slow down bombs or suicide attackers.
from above
What has fascinated me, struck me yesterday, is that the governing infrastructures of Syria, Lebanon and Palestine seem to have absolute NO control over the Jihadist groups. Both sides know it.
They don't, You will note these countries have be paying the terrorists. Call it Muslim Jiyzah if you will. They terrorists have bombed these countries when payment was late.
Ahmedinejad on current events 1130EST:
"The west does not even have the power to give Iran a bad look."
This guy's baiting Israel. What's he up to?
All I can say is Woo-Hoo! It's about time this war got started. Go Israel, Go! I feel like a kid cheering on my high school basketball team. Go team, Go! I hope that Israel's determination stands fast and they keep pounding Lebanon to rubble. If civilians don't want to die, they can flee their forsaken country. But don't flee to Syria or Iran, cuz they're next! After Israel has wiped it's bottom with the turbans of dead militant jihadists, I hope they don't stop in Lebanon. They should roll right through and onto Damascus.
The root of evil in the Arab world is in Damascus and in Tehran. Once they start crapping on Syria, that idiot in Iran will likely jump into the fray, wild foam flaring from his mouth... okay, maybe HE won't fight, but he'll tell his people to go be religious martyrs. How nice to use a religion to wage war on people. Now if we can just convince the pope... I digress.
So, if Iran jumps into it, the US is bound to get onboard with Israel. This is my ideal outcome. Israel and the US pounding the crap out of Iran, Syria, and Lebanon. Shock and awe the bacon out of these jihadist, so they'll think a good long time before screwing with the west again. The west is the best... the west is the best! Go Team, GO!
But they won't......No they wont Robert...Israel will stand alone at the end of the day....AND WIN!
Israel is coming down somewhat hard. And the Eurodhimmis are wringing their hands, making it as though Israelis are deliberately targeting civilians. (The muslims do like using this word, even though they themselves kill civilians all over.)
http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/global-outcry-at-bombing/2006/07/14/1152637872409.html
Don't get me wrong Sarge =)
I'm not saying Iran would never attack the US or Israel, its just the means of attack, a missile attack, that I think we all know they will never do because it would be identifiable and there would be swift retaliation. So instead they will find a way to smuggle a weapon into a country and have a willing jihadist volunteer(s) be the "human missile" Then they have an alibi. "He was a Palestinian. Iran does not condone terrorism. Islam is a religion of peace."
The reason Iran and North Korea want missiles is because they both have learned that if they play the nuclear nations game like Pakistan and have nuclear weapons capable of being delivered to the US or a US ally then they can keep the US out. N. Korea really need not hit the continental US, it can use Japan as a hostage. The point is missile programs are bargaining chips so these nations can say we have the weapons and we have the delivery means so you wont be invading us or pressuring us.
Slightly OT:
One of the biggest problems that we have currently is the close relationships, both personal and corporate, between the Bush family and the Saudis -- especially the bin Ladens. Members of Congress are also "on the take."
I firmly believe this is clouding reason, lining pockets with millions and quite probably billions of dollars, and in general, corrupting the vision of our leadership. We need a fresh start in Washington with the next election; we need Rudy Giuliani.
Rudy told that Saudi prince where he could put his dirty donation money after 9/11. Rudy lead NYC better than George W. Bush could ever imagine doing under any circumstances. Rudy is the only man for the job in 2008. I pray that he runs.
What we need is clear leadership with a steel backbone. Someone that understands force and how to deal with it. Someone that will stand behind Israel 100%. Someone that will tell the American people and the West and the MUSLIMS(!), what the real score is if these aggressive acts continue.
Will we make it to 2008 unscathed though? At this rate, it's looking unlikely. Considering that the world is on the brink of world war, do you really want to consider having someone like Hillary Clinton in office (more ties to the Bush family) or worse, Jeb Bush (not another one)? The very thoughts make me cringe.
http://www.draftrudygiuliani.com/
Food for thought.
Foehammer,
He has admirers here also.
This ahmadinejad was the foul, vile creature who let the assault on our embassy in 1979, and the torture and imprisonment of our citizens. He correctly perceived carter as someone weak and unworthy of his office. He has since correctly perceived the West as weak and unwilling to fight for its values. He was allowed to travel to NYC, to spout and hallucinate at Turtle Bay, and to be treated as a diplomat instead of the psychopathic criminal that he is. He should have been arrested in NYC and put on trial for crimes against this country in 1979. If the officials lacked the simple moral wherewithal to do this, than some unofficials should have assassinated him. That's exactly what the Israelis should do now. To hell with what Eurabia thinks. Should a German Jew have assassinated hitler in 1935?
from above
The west does not even have the power to give Iran a bad look."
Our Iranian maddog has no idea of the look a boomer sub lurking nearby can give him.
Giuliani graduated from the same Alma Mater as me and I am a fello NYer, but I would never vote for him as prez. Trust your gut instincts on this one, and never ever vote for a New Yorker for President. If you think Bush family politics are corrupt, well you ain't seen nuthin' yet. Look at Kerrick. lol I'm teasing a bit.
Just curious, what's so bad about McCain in people opinions?
Arabs are poor fighters. That's no secret. They just charge at the enemy and get cut to shreds. Their greatest victories are against unarmed civilians, or when they greatly outnumber their enemy.
The Persians are historically better, but they've become so arabized that they're probably just as effective.
"Now I want you to remember that no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country." - Gen. Geo. S. Patton, Jr., USA.
yes sir!! Could not agree more, Foehammer... The Bush's and the Bin Laden's are very much in bed with each other... Rudy Rudy Rudy!!!
as sung by GW
Bomb, bomb, bomb... bomb, bomb Iran!
Bomb, bomb, bomb... bomb, bomb Iran!
Go bomb Ira-a-an... we'll take their la-a-and.
Go bomb Ira-a-an...
Because the drop in all my polling
Has my party reeling; bomb Iran!
Bomb, bomb, bomb... bomb, bomb Iran!
Iran's leader rants, giving me my chance.
Gonna bomb Iran, and overrule those smarty-pants;
We'll bomb Iran,
Bomb, bomb, bomb... bomb, bomb Iran!
Bomb, bomb, bomb... bomb, bomb Iran!
Because the drop in all my polling
Has my party reeling; bomb Iran!
Bomb, bomb, bomb... bomb, bomb Iran!
Bomb, bomb, bomb... bomb, bomb Iran!
Bomb, bomb, bomb... bomb, bomb Iran!
Bomb, bomb, bomb... bomb, bomb Iran!
Me and my crew... here's what we will do...
War to pursue... Iran's oil, or I'm through;
Let's bomb Iran,
Bomb, bomb, bomb... bomb, bomb Iran!
Bomb, bomb, bomb... bomb, bomb Iran!
Because the drop in all my polling
Has my party reeling; bomb Iran!
Bomb, bomb, bomb... bomb, bomb Iran!
Bomb Iran, bomb Iran!
Bomb Iran, bomb Iran!
Bomb Iran, bomb Iran!
Bomb Iran, bomb Iran!
(fade)
paleos blow a hole in the wall,
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=21536_Hamas_Blows_Hole_in_Egyptian_Border&only
UGH
"A McCain nomination would sunder the GOP between corporate conservatives and populist conservatives, and might generate a third party movement that could return the country — to Bill and Hillary."
A McCain nomination and you have better start learning to speak Arabic and figuring out how to pay your Jiyzah.
Memo to Israel: GO GET THEM ISLAMIC APES!!!!!
LOL,
Pythagoras
To above posters:
I also do not support McCain for President. I once did, and quite staunchly. But when given new information, I am given to change my mind. I have come to witness McCain do things in recent years that have left me cold. The biggest problem I have with McCain is his immigration policies. There is no damn way I want him in the office of President. Perhaps VP, but I doubt he'll go for that.
I think Tancredo would make a tremendous choice for VP. Aren't we all sick of doublespeak? Tancredo is a straight shooter who not only understands the Muslim enemy but also the Drug Cartels from Mexico.
In response to the poster that claimed voting for a NY're is not a good idea, I would just say this: isn't it time we stopped classifying Americans as anything other than American when it comes to international priorities. The Presidency is about far more than what state the candidate comes from. And anyway, if you think the Giuliani is corrupt compared to Bill Clinton and George W. Bush and John McCain, then you have a lot to learn about the 4 men in question. My gut instincts are usually close to the mark and right now I am pushing for Giuliani and no other.
Everyone will have their own vote eventually. All that matters is making sure we have a President that can handle the War with Islam and protecting our borders. Everything else is moot if those two things aren't dealt with properly from 2008-2012. As we can see, we're going to be damn lucky to make it to 2008 without another 9/11 as it is.
As for the whining people in the ME and Europe crying about the "brutal"
tactics of Israel, all I have to say is that's the other half of asymmetrical
warfare. The muslims were more than happy to turn that page and reap the
benefits threatened by this tactic. Now let them feel the other half.
OK, thanks for that article AIG. I'm still not sure yet. Still waiting for a mature and responsible candidate to arrive on the scene. All I know for sure is no more Clinton's, no more Bush's. This dynastic crap really irks my American bones. I'm on the out's with my former Republican party since Iraq and the whole putting non-issues on the agenda in the last election.
Let's see who steps up to bat.
...and that they recognize that Israel is not targeting civilians but is doing what it must do in order to destroy the jihadists' ability to continue to wage war against them.
But they won't. ---Robert
Bush and Harper have at least both defended Israel's right to defend itself, and Harper has specifically condemned Hamas and Hezbollah, blaming them for the conflict and demanding that they release the Israeli soldiers taken captive.
Whether they follow this up with strong words at the G8 summit remains to be seen.
For once, I think CNN is trying at times to be balanced. For example, yesterday they showed clips from Lebanese TV showing the propaganda programming which is directed twoard Israel, and then discussed the lies.
This morning, they actually showed a 'launch room' in a hizbollah family's home. This is one room of their home dedicated to launching missiles, in the samde house as their little children! CNN showing that may have actually made people start to think about the enemy Israel has to face on a daily basis.
On the other hand, if my support for Bush was waning before, I now consider him not just dim but actively involved in Israel's destruction. I'd love to see the restraint the U.S. would show if we were bombed all the time.
And for the CAnadians, did you hear our PM?? OMG! Harper actually said to a reporter that in his opinion, Israel was being *too* restrained- I am still in shock! He gets it. Maybe the threat of being beheaded made him rethink the whole multicultural thing?
GNETLEMEN
yes sir!! Could not agree more, Foehammer... The Bush's and the Bin Laden's are very much in bed with each other... - eloivsdiablo
Gaaaaah! What would their kids look like? ;)
Anyway, if Ahmadinejad and his Hojjatieh pals are looking for chaos in the world to bring back the Mahdi, they must be almost too excited to sleep. And the more over-confident they get in that department, the more prone they'll be to mistakes.
And "uncalculated adventures."
wow, I had a whole screed attached to the word Gentlemen, but it disappeared, what gives?
OneEyedJackJack wrote:
>"wow, I had a whole screed attached to the word Gentlemen, but it disappeared, what gives?"
Less-than symbols are not allowed. They will be stripped out, including everything that comes after.
Hizbullah opened up a second front with kidnappings and rockets. Thank God another kidnapping failed today
Ariel Cohen was just on Limbaugh and he said, same as have some others have, that Iran has directed Hizbullah to take action so that Iran's nuclear program isn't discussed at the G8 Summit. Iran want this distraction so that G8 discusses Israel-Palestinian war rather than Iranian nuclear bombs.
http://www.heritage.org/About/Staff/ArielCohen.cfm
I think Robert is right on this one -- the attacks on Israel are essentially just part of the fourteen hundred year old global jihad based in the Quran's verses, and on the whole have nothing in particular to do with Israel or Israel's actions. This is Muslim imperialism and supremacism in action. That is why the Muslim leadership in Palestine have refused all compromise, even when Clinton and Barak offered them virtually everything the Palestinians requested. But Arafat not only rejected the offer, he didn't even make a counteroffer. He walked away and started another intifada. The Qur'an, especially the Medina verses that came last and have the last word, is not about compromise and the things that make up egalitarian and free civilization; it's about the totalitarian intolerantarian character of the Qur'an, which book is the reason for the virtual absence of democracy in Muslim-majority countries despite an age of instantaneous communications.
Ali Sina, the ex-Muslim Iranian, in a recent article at his website www.faithfreedom.org, argued that the Muslims may well overcome Europe in part because Islamic morality lacks the scruples that restrain the West.
And for the CAnadians, did you hear our PM?? OMG! Harper actually said to a reporter that in his opinion, Israel was being *too* restrained- I am still in shock! He gets it. Maybe the threat of being beheaded made him rethink the whole multicultural thing?
I hadn't heard that before, but it sure is a heartening sign when even a Canadian PM can make such a STRONG statement. As for the beheading bit, sadly many people even when they are faced with the threat of being beheaded, don't shed their pacifist views... so I find a lot of reason to applaud Harper. Who knows he might be reading JW ;-)
Every Muslim is a Jihadist at heart, unless they are proving otherwise by actions. Written texts train them from birth. A "moderate" is simply refraining from puting into practice what they've been taught from birth. Muslims and Muslim groups look the other way when "Jihadist" groups are doing their dirty work. When does Islam ever citicize ITSELF?
traeh;
Western scruples will adapt as the enemy becomes empowered by better weapons. I can't imagine Hezballah using restraint if they had nerve gas. I also can't imagine Israel (or Europe for that matter) exercising restraint when they do.
The 'proportional response' blather being spouted now will be the basis of the new rules of engagement.
Iran, Russia, Saudi Arabia Call for a Global Move against Israel
Ummah News Links
What about this??
More than 500 rockets have hit dozens of Katyusha hit towns and villages of northern Israel in 48 hours leaving 2 women dead, scores injured, between 1-2 million people in shelters and heavy damage.
You gotta wonder about these Muslim Missilemen--500 rockets and only two old women dead. What is the cost ratio on this?.
You gotta believe if Israel sent 500 rockets, the tally would be better.
Sgt;
To add to your submarine reference, we could end the Farsi language with one missile.
Latest: 'All Out War' declared by Shiek Chubby-Cheeks
Re: Tancredo, I read the chapter in his book 'In Mortal Danger' titled 'The Clash of Civilizations'. One of the revealing things I read there (to paraphrase):
While he may not have been admitting it in polite company, I do think Tancredo meant to state "we are at war with Islam". (I didn't realize I'm in an impolite crowd here - shame on us!) Robert gets a cameo reference at the end of the chapter re: Tancredo's 'Nuke Mecca' comments.Tancredo has said he will only be a presidential candidate if none of the serious candidates (read: Allen, McCain, Frist) take up his issues, namely immigration. I haven't followed whether Allen has or not, so I think that's open to conjecture.
On the presidential candidates, McCain is unacceptable - he's the Republican at the forefront of the al-Qaeda Bill of Rights. He is part of the reason that the Administration finally decided to accord Geneva convention rights to al Qaeda - never mind the fact that even Muslim armies don't respect it in the slightest.
Giuliani might be, but he too has been mouthing platitudes about the terrorists distorting Islam. And I'm in no mood to make flatteringly optimistic assumptions about whether or not he really means it, or what he really knows.
Razdan l was thoroughly pleased with Harper's words of wisdom! now if Bush can say the same! many Canadians feel the same way as our PM Harper, like all in the West, the very liberal media has such a hold that the majority are thinking am l the only one who thinks otherwise. so just a few words of wisdom, and the ball can start to roll!
Tancredo: A Colorado congressman told a radio show host that the U.S. could "take out" Islamic holy sites if Muslim fundamentalist terrorists attacked the country with nuclear weapons.
Well, that's awesome. So he's the guy who made that comment =) Good for him! I'm going to have to check out his book
"President Bush and others should not be fooled into playing into the hands of the Thug-In-Chief by portraying Israel as indiscriminately killing civilians in its response to Hizballah acts of war."
They have already been fooled and continue to fall for it . This is like watching a Charlie Brown skit where once again Lucy snatches the ball away at the last moment.
Remember during the last world war that the two main players on the axis side, Germany and Japan, lost over 5 million soldiers along with 2.5 million civilians before they got the message.
http://web.jjay.cuny.edu/jobrien/reference/ob62.html
This war will be no different. If the Palestinians the Lebanese and the surrounding Arab nations think that Israel is being harsh they would only need to look to history to see what the true definition of destruction is. Dresden and Tokyo are good object lessons for those that need an example. These two countries have been remarkably quiet since the end of WW2. The same will need to happen in order for the Muslims to get the message and once and for all change their behavior.
Where is Curtis Emerson LeMay when you need him?
Go Harper!! I wish Comrade Blair would show a little more backbone but then I suppose even if he wasn’t happy to wallow in his Dhimmitude, he’s too busy clinging on to his job to go rocking the boat now.
So President Amiinagonad of Iran declares an attack against Syria by Israel will be met by the ferocity of the entire Muslim World. I am no armchair general and I am sure that the man with the Hitler complex in Iran as a few tricks up his sleeve that will be unpleasant in the extreme, but I do think the guy as issues. For a start, the House of Saud as nothing to gain by the prospect of open warfare engulfing the Middle East. King Abdullah II of Jordan is no friend of Al-Qaeda. Kuwait offers no resistance to Western troops and contractors in their country. Oman as an agreement with the British and even allows the MOD to stage training exercises. Yemen? Am I supposed to quiver at the thought of the Yemen fielding troops in battle?
Iran and Syria are the main players in this jihad. But is every Muslim in the Middle East just waiting to start WW3? They are disparate peoples in countries often unable to agree amongst themselves, with no reputation for putting up a fight. If they thought they could beat us in a straight fight then why are they using guerrilla tactics?
They know what the West is capable of when directly threatened by a force capable of destroying it. All the Thug in Chief needs is access to the internet and he will find millions of pages about total war. If we were prepared to do so much damage to each other in Europe, then why not Iran?
The worry for me is that they will use nuclear weapons and force us to retaliate in kind. The idea that a Palestinian with a Bomb will detonate in London or New York is chilling. The idea that the West will hold off from flattening Iran because a Palestinian detonated the bomb is absurd.
What about the wild cards of Russia and China? Russia is steeped in shit thigh high fighting the Jihad all by themselves and China? God knows what they are thinking but their textile industry is going to suffer if the world ends up wearing sandals and dressing their women up like ninjas. There is only so many factories that can specialise in black and white table cloths.
I think the short fella with problems is trying to buy time, but he’s also gauging the response.
You are correct.
Until Japan lost about 300,000 people (mostly civilians) in one week, they were happy to keep on fighting. Had they not surrendered, there would be decidely few live Japanese today.
Sometimes you gotta do what you gotta do.
Japan lived to see another day and has become wealthy off of US dollars for cars, radios, toys, electronics, and the list is long. Japanese are better off since we put an end to their saber rattling heroes.
OOPS I forgot, the Muslims do not have anything to offer. They never bothered to learn any job skills.
I met a person a few days ago and I was commenting about an un-acceptable behviour displyed by one of the cultural groups. They were trying to stop the celebration of one of the FM radio stations 5-yr completion celebrations saying the kind of things they do is against Indian culture. Anyway, that person seemed to think that such an action should have been taken a lot earlier about the changes happening in the city. I was shocked for a while, but, my anwer came a little later when he mentioned about how girls of his community don't wear the burquas anymore and I realized he is a muslim. He had looked educated and well mannered until that moment to me. This was a few days before the Mumbai blasts. In retrospect, I probably should have just jumped all over him. It is always the religion that guides these vile creatures. Never an independent thought or no scope for analytical reasoning. Amazingly stupid...
Foehammer
You need your own fan club!!
Where do I join?
>>>So the time is approaching when we will NEED to use nuclear weapons but will anyone have the courage to use them?
Posted by: Zathras