Islamic jihadists attack Catholic school in Kashmir

This type of news needs to get out into the mainstream media somehow. There is a change coming, and the sleeping giant will awake soon and the Islamofascists will be stepped on.

When will we wake up ?
When will we react to all the violence that islam DAILY shoots at us ?

Questions, questions...

The burning down of a Hindu Temple not far from Dearbornistan in the good old USA.

Coming to a theatre near you, the local jihad.

Close the border to all muslims. Internment and deportation.

Hear that Ibrahim and your snake, petro dollar funded, organization cair.

I thought that Islam was suppose to be a religion of peace and tolerance.

Not even close.

I am sure that this story won't be widely covered in west.

The western media doesn't like to portray Christians as victims of hatred.

Also on 9/11 this year, in the german city of Kassel a 70year old katholic Priest was attacked by a 28year old Turk with a knife who stabbed him 3 times. The priest survived but is in intensive care. The Turk has been arrested later that same day.
It seems to be another case of SJS (sudden jihad syndrome), the Turk is "mentally not stable".

GOES to show, these crazed Muslims cannot stand to see the truth being distributed, cannot stand to see lessons being taught that are not theirs,cannot stand people who do not submit. The crazed Muslims will kill those who do not obey their every command. It is Islams stated goal to kill the infidel.

The Muslims prove it every day.

ot, but here is some breaking news:
UNITED NATIONS -- U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan, who will end his 10-year term on Jan. 1, 2007,

I sure hope they find a better replacement.

exsgtbrown,

A better replacement would be with nobody. The UN is one of the most corrupt institutions in history. It is past time that it were simply abolished. I speak from personal experience since I "worked" as a UN official in the late '80s. What I saw would shock you.

The UN has been worthless since its inception.
I agree, disband the UN.

OT..but everyone should read this..........Islamic History Expert: Never Will be Moslem Peace With Israel.....Sharon’s assessment focused on the danger posed by Iran. From studying Iranian culture, literature, newspapers, broadcasts and interviews with major players in the Islamic regime, Sharon concludes that a deep belief in a Shiite messiah is at the root of Iran’s nuclear project. “They truly believe that the Shiite messiah, the twelfth Imam (also known as the Mahdi), is here, and that he will reveal himself…What moves the Iranian government and leadership today is first and foremost the wish to bring about the twelfth Imam."

Addressing the theological doctrine of how exactly the 12th Imam will be revealed, Sharon explained: "How will they bring him? Through an apocalypse. He (the Mahdi) needs a war. He cannot come into this world without an Armageddon. He wants an Armageddon. The earlier we understand this the better. Ahmadinejad wants nuclear weapons for this!"
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/news.php3?id=112066

Here's a fact that you shouldn't know.

Terrorist pilot Mohammad Atta blew up a bus in Israel in 1986. The
> > Israelis captured, tried and imprisoned him. As part of the Oslo
> > agreement with the Palestinians in 1993, Israel had to agree to release
> > so-called "political prisoners."
> >
> > However, the Israelis would not release any with blood on their hands,
> > The American President at the time, Bill Clinton, and his Secretary of
> > State, Warren Christopher, "insisted" that all prisoners be released.
> >
> > Thus Mohammad Atta was freed and eventually thanked the US by flying an
> > airplane into Tower One of the World Trade Center . This was reported
> > by many of the American TV networks at the time that the terrorists
> > were first identified.
> > It was censored in the US from all later reports.
> >
> > If you agree that the American public should be made aware of this
> > fact, pass this on.

Muslims-

It's time to face reality. There is a connection between Islam and violence against unbelievers. The denial of this reality is starting to look silly. "The cognitive dissonance here is becoming increasingly obvious to the general public". I

Denying the connection between Islam and violence against unbelievers is like watching folks steal from a Department Store and then hear them claim that they are not stealing, but just taking a "five fingered discount" because it says "Discount" on the store window.

Patriot17:

If true, that is very explosive information re: Atta. Your source?

Such gallantry... attacking a school used by children and ran by an aged priest. I bet they kick puppies to build up their courage.

Waterdragon and Patriot 17: that story came up in I think Little Green Footballs a few weeks ago and was quickly rumbled as a hoax. I wish I could find the exact entry, but finding stuff in the enormous back threads of LGF is beyond me. But I am sure of what I say.

ot, but here is some breaking news:
UNITED NATIONS -- U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan, who will end his 10-year term on Jan. 1, 2007,

I sure hope they find a better replacement.

My vote goes to Alfred E. Neuman

My mistake. That post pertained to another Mohammed Atta who was a Jordian native, not Egyptian. It was posted in The Australian,The Boston Globe,and The San Fransico Chronicle, but then they realized the truth. Sorry.

Many of us are awake. But there is a concerted effort in this country and in Europe to keep us in the dark, even though the evidence of the consequences of Islam piles up day after day.

Who is behind this concerted effort and who among us is getting a reward for their collusion? That is what we really need to find out. Someone amongst us is backing our enemies. Who is it/who are they and what are we going to do about it?

The Sharon article to which a link is given above states what \apparently will be news to some in Israel, such as Olmert and Peres and all those who have a stake in denying it, but should come as no surprise at all. The entire history of the negotiations and agreements and accords and treaties between Israel and Muslim states, and such political incarnations of the recently-invented "Palestinian people" shows that nowhere will the Muslim side ever fulfill its solemn obligations, and will only fulfill those parts that it would have had to fulfill anyway, without such a treaty. Egypt, for example, has failed entirely to do what it was committed to do, by way of ending hostile propaganda and other acts just as hostile as what the Russians did during the Cold War, and Egypt has permitted the smuggling of large amounts of weaponry to the "Palestinians" in Gaza, has refused to encourage tourism, has promoted in its media an antisemitic campaign apparently beyond Western belief (so little attention does it get), and yes, Egypt maintains its "peace" -- that is, is not actively attacking Israel, but not becuase of any treaty. Egypt does not attack Israel for the same reason that Syria, which has no "peace" treaty with Israel, does not attack. It fears the consequences, fears that it might lose the Sinai and not get it back again, fears the effect on the Mubarak regime if such a defeat were to be inflicted.

The Lesser Jihad against Israel should long ago have been recognized by the Israelis. They did not do so for many reasons. One is that the ruling elites in Israel during the first few decades of the existence of the state were largely from Europe, and did not know anything about Islam. They were content not to know anything, and indeed too busy to find out, for they were trying to resettle huge numbers of refugees from all over, including Arab lands. And those refugees, in turn, were sometimes simple people. Some remembered their treatment at the hands of Muslims, but were in no position to identify the source of that mistreatment save as an example of what "the Arabs" do. Even keen-minded Jabotinsky, who died in 1940, and who had recognized that the Arabs would never acquiesce in the Jewish state unless an "Iron Wall" were constructed, in other words unless it was made clear that the Jewish state would not yield, and was here to stay, did not understand the Islamic basis for the refusal to accept Israel.

Finally, as long as there seemed to be some hope of appealing to the shared interests that Israel and some non-Arab Muslim states, those of Turkey and of Iran, in particular, the Israelis for a while kept hoping that they could reach out to those states. And for a while it worked. The Shah of Iran's regime did have, in some ways, an alliance of mutual interest -- here and there -- with Israel. So too did the generals in Ankara, those whose commitment to secularism, joined to the general Turkish distaste for the Arabs, for a time promised an alliance that, nowadays, has been shown to be a temporary and forlorn hope, given the resurgence of Islam, and with it, a natural resurgance of anti-Infidel hatred that has so far been focussed on the United States and on Israel.

The Israelis in power may continue to deny the obvious truth of what Moshe Sharon writes in the article above. They may continue, some of them, to ignore what Islam is all about, or to prefer some Lewisian view, without quite comprehending how much Lewis scants the subject of the dhimmi, and how wrong he has been, consistently, both in his enthusiasm for the Oslo Accords and for his dreamy suggestions (the restoration of a Sunni, Hashemite monarch), and hopes for Iraq, where he apparently foretold, the "liberation of Baghdad [by the Americans] would make the liberation of Kabul look like a funeral procession." They may prefer to learn about islam from those who are acolytes of Lewis [it is a sign not of success but of failure as a pedagogue when one produces not intelligent colleagues but rather worshipful acolytes]. They may ignore Sharon, and Raphael Israeli, and Robert Wistrich, and many others.

But in the end, the evidence for Muslim behavior, not only toward Israel, but within Western Europe, and in the Sudan, and Thailand, and Indonesia, and Malaysia, and Kashmir, and indeed everywherre that there exists a significant Muslim presence anywhere, around the world, can properly be explained only by one explanatory model, a model that both explains past and present data, and has predictive value as well: the model provided by Islam.

The Lesser Jihad has no end, anymore than does the Greater Jihad. It can be contained. The camp of Islam can be divided and demoralized. What must first occur is for a sufficient number of non-Muslims to learn as much as they can about the tenets of Islam, and especially about the worldview that divides, in Islam, Believer and Infidel, and the duty of Jihad, and the unalterable opposition of dar al-islam and dar al-harb. Once Infidels demonstrate that taqiyya and tu-quoque, and all the ways in which infidels are to be silenced, or their language severely curtailed -- from death threats and actual murder, to appeals not to "offend" all the "good Muslims" who are somehow likely to become fiercely and murderously hostile unless all "offensive" language -- that is, any intelligent and well-founded criticsm -- of Islam is permitted anywhere in the Infidel West.

Those in Israel, or anywhere else, who wish to ignore Moshe Sharon -- feel free. Ignore him. But don't ignore what Majid Khadduri wrote about the Treaty of Al-Hudaibiyya in his "War and Peace in Islam." If you won't believe Moshe Sharon, then read what Muslim commentators have to write about the model for all subsequent treaty-making between Muslim states and non-Muslims.

That should do you.

That should convince.

They've broken into Christian schools before in India - the last one I recall reading about in Religion of Peace's files, they murdered six children, and four female staff (it was a missionary boarding school for orphans, I think).

They are ANIMALS!

They certainly aren't what we would understand by the term "human".

All I want to do now is eliminate the entire ideology from the face of the planet. It is even worse than Naziism. Yes, that's right - WORSE than!

Give me the means and I'll do the dirty work. Then willingly submit to war-crimes trial afterwards. They don't understand the concept of mercy, so all I can suggest is that in respect of Islam, we should put aside the concept ourselves, until Islam is dead and buried.

I'm afraid that by reading those RoP Islamic Terror Attacks worldwide, in their entirety, I may have upset my own psychological balance.

"Who is behind this concerted effort and who among us is getting a reward for their collusion?"

IsabellaTheCrusader,
This may be one of the most pertinent question of this age. I would recommend the old axiom about following "the money trail." I have a hunch one can locate(with a little homework) various Western corporations which have sweetheart deals with islamic nations and businesses. The reality is this issue is becoming more vital to our daily survival than just somebody's "bottom line." Regrettably, some industries are too far intrenched in their Dhimmi status.(not just politicians) Accountability is forthcoming.

"Here's a fact that you shouldn't know.
Terrorist pilot Mohammad Atta blew up a bus in Israel in 1986. The"

This "fact" seems to be disputed on this page:

i always enjoy Hugh's comments, mainly because they are so clear and informative, but also because i agree with him about Lewis and his very selective ommissions.
fortunately, one does not need to read very widely to become aware of them, and i hope that more people are doing that. learning quickly is going to be very important for the British people if Gordon Brown becomes Prime Minister.
For anyone who missed it, his 23 March 2005 speech on Islam can be found at:

http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/newsroom_and_speeches/press/2005/press_34_05.cfm

the bit which really stunned me was 'What we share in common is the belief in fair play, in social justice and in the equality and potential not just of some but of all'.
after a period of deep espair, i am now feeling more cheerful, as it becomes clear that a large majority of the British population understand that to be complete nonsense, and dangerous nonsense too.

Obviously this Catholic school must have something to do with the presence of Crusader troops in the Middle East and the Zionist takeover of the Palestinian homeland. (Sarcasm off.)

I wonder why Islamic schools are not attacked.
These vandals have been using provocation for too long.
When will they get what they rightly deserve?

They will get what they deserve if we wake everyone else up NOW and fight this fight the way it needs to be fought. Has anyone in our sophisticated and oh so logical age ever considered the idea that Islam may be a punishment for the way we now live? The penalties enforced by this godless ideology surely warrant a moment or two of contemplation about it. And if it is so, then we have the power to turn this thing around.

Isabella:

Re your question about who is behind this:

I know you are Catholic . . . look a little deeper. Does the name Lucifer ring a bell?

Allah is Satan.

CGW,

I know that. It's getting everybody else to comprehend that and the magnitude of what it means that is so difficult, especially here. I remember hearing somewhere that the most amazing thing Satan did in the last century was convince people that he doesn't exist. If there is no Satan, then there's no retribution, right? We can do anything we want because we will not be held accountable. Well, I say we are being held accountable, by a topsy-turvy ideology that says up is down and black is white. We argue and complain and wring our hands, but we don't look inside to see the cause of our troubles is within ourselves.

The pope is being lambasted now by these Muslim liars, saying that how dare he say that Islam is a religion spread by the sword. Its time for us to stand up and say, actually SHOUT it, that the emperor has no clothes on.

Isabella:

St. Michael the Archangel is the head of all the Angels and the leader in the fight against Satan (witness the image of him fighting the dragon). Throw in a few prayers to him while you're at it. (I do.)