Muslim teacher in veil row's link to 7/7 bomber

anyone who wears that getup needs a brain transplant. she is lacking in vitamins with her brain dead demands to teach students with a full headgear. they need to deport her or place her in a hosptial for the insane. retardation is highest among her types of muslims. humans are supposed to have fresh and sunshine as God intended humans to live.

Sounds like what you get when you have mohammadians around ,It wouldnt suprise me if she
cooked up the bombs herself.

Where do these lies come from? She is a victim and deserves respect. I am going to go and burn my own truck in rage (ok, I made that up) but is anyone really surprised that she had a hidden agenda?

Wonder how long befor they try this crap in the Public School system, in America. Seems to me the English are screwed.

No, but they are now teaching Muslim inception in American schools. You can no longer associate Christ whith Christmas, or say, Under God. Or say any of the Ten Commandments, or read from the Bible, or have a nativity scene. Yet they are implementing wearing burgas, jihabs, whatever you call them, and praying to Allah, and fasting wilst in Ramadan.

And it is called cultural awareness, while we stomp, our own culture and awareness.

No one in any western country should be allowed to walk around like this,,,if for no other reason than security.

On a local 'blog someone had the cheek to compare this get-up to what nuns wore in the fifties - yeah ,,right! Don't know of any nun who was a terrorist.

If I had a child at a school whose teacher looked like that I would remove them asap,,and get all the parents to do the same.

Also, I wonder does she drive a car? If yes her peripheral vision would be limited and she would be a hazard on the road.

In Australia you can't even go into a bank with a motor cycle helmet on, for obvious reasons.
Personally, this "fashion statement" scares the S*** out of me!

Since you can't identify them at a glance, maybe they should be required to have their names on the back like football jerseys, or a big bar code label.

Let he (or she) who is without Islam cast the first stone at this dingbat so that something other than her feelings may be hurt.

Are we certain that this is NOT a Black Septemberist? Probably wouldn't matter anyway-pigs will be pigs.

Greetings in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, the Lamb of God that taketh away the sins of the world.

A nun does not hide her face.

I still say she's showing too much skin -- cover up that sexy nose!

Do nuns wear black? Maybe they do on Halloween.

Put a damn bag over her head and get her a seeing eye dog" -

She probably also learnt to walk ten steps behind her man. What a waste. These people don't belong in the West.

Have you seen a Arabic striptease? The Muslim men shout 'show us your face'.

There's no telling if them there eyes actually belonged to, say, Adel al Jubeir.

That school should be shut down. If it is a kind of madrassah no good can come of it. Apparently, in Britain schools like this are held to low standards.

Given the predilection of the British government to cave in to these savages, the U.K. is in deep trouble with the three-headed Hydra: jihad, hudna, and taqiyya.

A Cult of Reluctant Killers
The 'black widows' of Chechnya -- suicide bombers who stalk Russia -- are driven by hatred, ideology, coercion and fear.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-kmurphy020404_latpul,1,5604271.story?coll=la-home-headlines.

Re: "The Muslim teacher suspended for refusing to work without her veil is connected to a hardline mosque where the ringleader of the July 7 bombers worshipped, it has emerged."

The wearing of the vail is a hostile act, probably as much a hostile act as a cross or a Hindu symbol openly worn in Saudi Arabia. The arrogant supremacist nature of the Islamic belief-system prevents them from seeing reality, of seeing how non-Muslims see them as selfish and childish in their demands. The Koran has warped their sense of reality, as it has drained them of their creativity. (Muslims: tiny Israel produces more excellent creative science (including the invention of the cell-phone) than all of the Muslim world. You don't see that its the demented nature of your belief-system that causes that. If they are "apes and pigs"-what are you?)

Muslims don't see that in the not too distant future they are going to be invited and then told to leave the lands of the unbelievers because of their selfisness and their childishness. They are not avant-garde, they are rear guard of a civilization that is in its last stages.

The BNP lies in direci descent from the British Union of Fascists, whose leader, Oswald Mosley, was interned as an enemy sympathiser during WWII. It was originally an anti-semitic organistion but with 'new commonwealth' immigration after the war it became more generally racist and xenophobic. As it became obvious that a multicultural society was working reasonably well in the UK, except for the hostile, almost malevolent, attitude of sections of the Muslim population, the BNP decided to play the Muslim card. The fact that they were using the word Muslim (a religion and not a race) to mean coloured immigrants (attacking whom would have been against the racial hatred laws) was one argument used to justify the abortive 'incitement to religious hatred act.'
People of all political persuasions should be made aware of the dangerous, dark side to Islamic religious ideology. Association with this political group will only weaken the credibility of those who seek to spread the word.

Take a good close look at the visage of Aishah Azmi and see the ugliness of this demented belief-system. This belief-system is not worthy of hatred. It is natural to feel pity and contempt for this childish belief-system.

I had never thought about the voter identity card till I saw her (supposed) picture.

A couple of years ago one of these sows wanted to get her picture with the mask on for her Florida Drivers License. It was turned down.

Now I see that there may be some good in the voters identity card. It will have to have a picture on it.

I wonder how the Eisenhower Strike Force is doing?

God willing, of course.

She was either put up to it, or is on her own personal jihad. There was another case recently, of a young school girl who demanded the school uniform be changed to suit her "modest" Islamic needs. Turns out she was put up to it by some jihadi-types.

She had no business demanding a Christian school put up with her Islamic requirements. If her "religion" were so important to her, she should have found a job in a Muslim school. And it wasn't so important that men not see her when she went for her interview, was it? No, she had her interview, with a man, dressed normally. And neither did she mention she'd be needing to dress in that hideous outfit. She plotted this whole drama. It's part of the jihad. Keep pushing us, keep stomping on our own culture and values, keep demanding we change to suit their backward barbarity. She's a terrorist.

I think that the real problem in this case happened to be that the Christian school was foolish enough to employ a Muslim woman for the role of teacher's assistant.

To keep this case in persepective, this woman is not a teacher. Her role as assistant was to be a translator. She was not there to teach the children.

However, I cannot see why the role had to be filled by a Muslim. That role was one that should have been given to a Christian woman from the same background.

It is a bad idea to bring the Muslim children into the Christian schools. The demands get a little bit too ridiculous. I do not believe that it is discriminatory to refuse to take these children into a Christian school.

As for this woman receiving compensation for hurt feelings, well I think that she should return the money because it has been received under false pretences. It seems that she deliberately set out to deceive her potential employers regarding her own religious views, and that she did not tell them that she had a problem working with males, at the time of her interview. She practised deception, therefore she should be dismissed from the job without any compensation.

It doesn't surprise me that this teacher [indoctrinator] would have ties to jihadists, the cancer in the UK creeps along. Ban that hideous symbol of oppresion everywhere, except in their homes and mosques, for the simple purpose of identification therefore security. The Brits are trying to fight off the cancer, but is it too late already? My favorite talk show host Neal Boortz likened Islam to a mold on your wall, you see that little spot in the corner, do you clean it off now or do you ignore it. If you ignore it, it slowly creeps over the wall until you have to tear out the wall to get rid of it. The brits are gonna have to tear out a few walls to cleanse their house, not to mention the French would need to demolish the whole house but they must like mold.

First and foremost, this person is NOT a teacher, he/she/it is a teaching assistant - there is a world of difference.

Secondly, the volutary adoption of this garb in twenty-first century Britain makes several statements:

1) Look at me; I am different; oh please look at me (the exact reverse of the modest moslem woman's stance, perhaps)
2) Look at me; I am better than you; I dress in this way to prove it; oh please look at me and see me as superior (the exact reverse of the modest moslem woman's stance, perhaps)
3) Look at me; I am ashamed to be a woman in the presence of men; oh please look at me and tell me that I am doing the correct thing
4) Look at me; there is nothing wrong with me so I must hide from the world in a black tent so that you know that I am perfect and pure; oh please look at me and tell me that I am perfect and pure
5) Look at me; men are so evil and wicked that I have to hide away like this so that I don't inflame their passions and their ardour; oh please look at me and see that I am so ravishingly beautiful under this tent
6) Look at me; I am the epitome of a moslem woman - hidden, powerless, needing to be guided by a man; oh please look at me and see that I am subservient to the great and beneficient male in my life.
7) Look at me; please don't look at me; look at me; please don't look at me; look at me; please don't look at me...

In this woman's case it is all about 'look at me'. That is all that she is interested in. If you had seen her on television you would realise that she is just another front in the war. 'Look at me' and let me be like this - you lose!

The mode of dress as shown in the picture posted above, quite apart from being the most base of all the insults which could be offered to a male in modern European society, is, also, a statement about the psychological well-being of the wearer. In our society it says 'look at me' - the precise opposite to that which is intended. It says that she is ashamed to be a woman. It says that she is uncomfortable being visible or being taken into account. It speaks volumes about her state of mind and says precisely nothing about western society.

It is my opinion that any woman who voluntarily adopts this mode of dress is mentally ill. This type of dress bears the same relationship to privacy and modesty that anorexia, and bulimia, bears to food. It is a derangement, a psychological disorder, a fundamental personality defect probably brought about by too much exposure to the evil perniciousness of islam. The treatment of this singular complaint is probably best left to the professionals.

Of course, of course; Iknow that there is a suspicion that this person belongs to a group which seeks to challenge the norms of everyday British behaviour all the time - to wear us down little by little. I know that she isn't the first,nor will she be the last, to seek to challenge the normative values of our free western society. However, that does not invalidate my point. Any woman who voluntarily chooses to wear the garb of oppression is probably mentally ill. In this case? Certainly so.

Dominic.

Look at her eyes. She's not a sow a dog or a pig. She's probably drop dead gorgeous under that get up.

No the issue here is, her will. As Ronin said above, "is anyone really surprised she had a hidden agenda?" This chick believes in what she's doing, is backed up by the other Muslims at her mosque and look at what she's achieved in such a short period of time:

1) Everyone has been talking about her for days.

2) She reinforced the pathetic belief that all Muslims are misunderstood victims, that they really mean well, and that they get their feelings hurt very easily but can be soothed with a free hand out. (This reminds me of when my kids were five year olds. Whenever they pulled this kind of crap they either got a spanking, were put to bed or both.)

3) She has succeeded in wearing down an established institution in a western country, putting the westerners on the defensive and extracting some sort of reward for her incessant whining.

4) She has succeeded in tying up the British legal system with this frivilous lawsuit and scaring, I'm sure, some police, some judges, some politicians and anyone else who will now be abusing the native born Brits rather than risking hurting a Muslim immigrants feelings.

5) She has succeeded in using taqiyya to get a bogus reward for a bogus offense that she knows damned good and well has nothing to do with equal rights. They must be laughing their asses off tonight at her mosque.

Yes, Aishah has been a busy little bee. Multiply her case by millions of other Muslim whiners around the world and we can see why we've got a hornet's nest on our hands.

Mother Ecclesiastica/

I both agree and disagree with you. WallyUK is too simplistic in his analysis but, despite that, many, many British people remain deeply distrustful of the BNP even though they may agree with their stance on moslems.

For example, you could not expect me, a gay man, to support the BNP given their stance on homosexuality. You could not, for example, expect a Hindu to support the BNP given their stance on immigration and non-white people.

The BNP is not the answer - but it may well be part, a small part at the moment, of the solution.

Dominic.

I don't think it's as much of a "look at me" statement as it is a testing of the waters. The quiet spread of islam is probably more dangerous than the in your face arrogant jihadist spread of islam, this is just one issue that they are finally getting called on. As for her being a translator in the classroom at a christian, I wonder what the kids were actually told. The deceptive and self serving nature of islam makes me not want to trust any muslims, including "moderates".

"Do nuns wear black? Maybe they do on Halloween.

Posted by: champ "

Actually, most nuns in the Western world now wear everyday, if modest, clothes most of the time, including the ones who taught me way back when. To its everlasting credit, back in the 1960s the Catholic Church made the decision to move from the Middle Ages into the late 20th century, and one of those many revolutionary decisions involved allowing nuns to wear comfortable functional clothing rather than having to run around after children while wearing floor-length black sacks. And no, they never covered their faces. They were intimidating enough as it was.

I agree with the point that the face-covering is about intimidation. And why the hell would this woman feel compelled to cover even her face in a classroom full of children? I thought the whole thing about covering up is to keep herself away from the lustful eyes of men. Is she afriad some randy little 6-year-old will be overcome with lust at the sight of her naked face?

I am an ESL teacher and have taught many women wearing hijab (the Muslim veil or scarf, that leaves the face uncovered), but I would never teach a woman with her whole face covered. The idea is ridiculous. I wonder if there are teachers who have been confronted with that situation? How did they deal with it?

BTW, this woman wasn't working at a "Christian" school, as some posters have stated. It was a British public school, which are officially secular.

Isabellathecrusader/

She did not tie up the British legal system - just an Industrial Tribunal. Of course, she may go on to tie up the legal system but that is a different argument and for the future.

She didn't get a 'bogus reward for a bogus offence'. Regrettably, the offence she got compensation for actually does exist in British Industrial Law and her employers did, indeed, break that Industrial Law. All people are equal under the law and I don't care whether or not they are moslem or anything else - I will not throw the baby of freedom out with the bathwater of discontent. The rule of law matters to us even if it does not, and we know it does not, matter to moslem immigrants.

I define myself and my freedoms by my support for the that most basic of all freedoms (and the very one that moslems can't understand - which makes us absolutely superior in every way to them) - equality of everybody before the Law.

The Law may be an ass; it may be badly drafted; it may contain legislation which we would rather it didn't but is all that we have got and it is a good thing and infinitely superior to anything which the barbarian moslem hordes can offer.

But, and this, I think, is what sticks in your craw, it applies to all on our lands - irrespective of religion, race, colour, sex, or sexual orientation. It applies to all equally.

Lose that and we lose our very soul.

Dominic.

THE BLACK WIDOW should pay back the cash,and totally banned from entering any school and scaring the shit out of kids

More about black widows

http://illustratedpig.blogspot.com/

"The BNP lies in direci descent from the British Union of Fascists, whose leader, Oswald Mosley, was interned as an enemy sympathiser during WWII. It was originally an anti-semitic organistion but with 'new commonwealth' immigration after the war it became more generally racist and xenophobic. As it became obvious that a multicultural society was working reasonably well in the UK, except for the hostile, almost malevolent, attitude of sections of the Muslim population, the BNP decided to play the Muslim card. The fact that they were using the word Muslim (a religion and not a race) to mean coloured immigrants (attacking whom would have been against the racial hatred laws) was one argument used to justify the abortive 'incitement to religious hatred act.'
People of all political persuasions should be made aware of the dangerous, dark side to Islamic religious ideology. Association with this political group will only weaken the credibility of those who seek to spread the word.

Posted by: wallyUK "

Excellent point about the BNP. I am sick to death of these ultra-rightwing fascist loonies who try to convince us that the only solution to Islamofascism is putting them at the helm. Don't insult my intelligence by trying to paint Nazis as saviours. They're just the other side of the ugly twisted jihadist coin. The hell with them. Shakespeare said it and still says it best: "A plague on both your houses!"

angloirishslav/

No, not a public school. A public school in the UK is a private school. She was working in a State school. I know this is confusing for everyone but we are not the USA we are the UK. Terminology is different - get used to it.

Dominic.

Posted by: credit man

A couple of years ago one of these sows wanted to get her picture with the mask on for her Florida Drivers License. It was turned down.

Very true.
Here is the lowdown on this Black Widow

Sultaana Lakiana Myke Freeman is a Muslim woman who sued the state of Florida in order to wear a face veil for her driver's license picture.

Born in 1964 as Sandra Keller, Freeman converted to Islam in 1997. That year, she was arrested in Decatur, Illinois on charges she abused one of her foster children. Freeman eventually pleaded guilty and served 18 months of probation. Illinois child welfare agents also removed the children from her house.

Freeman did not wear a veil when she was photographed by police for her mug shot. But later that year, she obtained an Illinois driver's license where she wore her veil.

In 2003, Freeman filed a religious discrimination lawsuit against Florida when the state's Department of Highway Safety revoked her license when she refused to be photographed without her veil. The department had previously allowed her to wear it, as seen in her license picture, but reversed its decision following the 9/11 attacks.

Freeman's lawsuit argued that sharia required her to wear a veil "in front of strangers and unrelated males." It also stated that other states allowed photo-free licenses for religious reasons. Judge Janet C. Thorpe denied her lawsuit that year, and a state appeals court later upheld her decision. Freeman has planned to continue her appeals.

Sorry Dominic,

If you want to split hairs then she tied up an Industrial Tribunal. The results are the same. There will now be people in positions of authority who will make your life and your fellow Brit's lives miserable rather than risk upsetting a Muslim.

And I'll stand by my comment that she received a bogus reward for a bogus offence. How was she offended and what law protects her from being so? Sorry, she was not sexually harrassed. She was not physically abused. She deliberately set out to cause problems inside this shcool by lying about wearing the veil in front of men. She had absolutely NO problem walking into the interview to get the job where a man was present, without her veil on. When the hand wringing and vapors and whining started, she eventually had to admit that, no, she didn't wear the veil the day she was interviewed. Since there doesn't appear to be anything in the Koran that says you don't have to wear the veil on a job interview but you do have to wear it on the job, we can safely assume that she was lying through her teeth. Therefore, no abuse, so she deserves, no reward.

Posted by: Isabellathecrusader

we can safely assume that she was lying through her teeth.

We can not assume she was lying through her teeth,as we cannot see her lips moving

Isabellathecrusader/

I agree with you in the main. But she got her award because her employers did not follow the law. It doesn't matter that she was attempting to make a mockery of the law, that still did not give her employers the right to do the same. Their fault for exposing themselves like that in the face of this little miss 'deception-out-of-islam-and-kitman'.

I hold no brief for her, nor do I defend her actions, but I cannot defend any employer who wilfully and deliberately disregards its legal obligations - or one that is, as on this occasion, woefully ignorant of them and seeks to pervert the course of justice by lying to the Tribunal. Disregard the fact that it's 'little miss jihadist-delusional-idiot' we are talking about here - it could just as easily have been you or me in different circumstances. The law, as agreed by Parliament, must be upheld. It is our only defense against chaos. It makes not one whit of difference if the plaintiff be moslem or martian, white or black, male or female, gay or straight, child or adult.

The law is the law. That you seek to vary it because the plaintiff in this case is a burkha'd idiot does you no credit. We are better than that.

Dominic.

Dominic,

What are you talking about? I don't seek to vary the law. You pontificate eloquently about your defense of your laws but that's really not what we are talking about here, is it? The point is this Muslim chick is using YOUR laws to change YOUR laws. I'm not sure what you mean by the Tribunal not following the laws but even if they didn't you are missing the point here. She was trying to set a precedent.

Maybe I can wear my scapular on the outside of my clothes and then pitch a bloody fit when some supervisor tells me I'm not allowed to. After all, I'm just expressing my religion. But then it might be that doing so is not just me quietly practicing my religion but me sticking my religion in your face. Now if Aishah really did feel that strongly about her religious obligation to wear her veil at all times around men, she would have worn the veil to the interview. But being Muslim and watching what her fellow Muslims get away with on a daily basis, she probably felt safe in not wearing the veil to the interview, which she knew would probably mean her not getting the job, because she also knew she could wear it later and when the school made an issue of it, then she could put on her crybaby face and get them to back down on the subject so she could have her way. And that is exactly what Aishah was doing, and she was doing it at the urging of others. I don't feel sorry for her because she is a conniving, two faced opportunist. And contrary to what you think, if she was black, white, green or purple I would still think the same thing.

Please, stay on the subject.

Everyone has seen pictures of muslims at prayer and all i see is sheep and a sheepdog.
Servile,indoctrined sheep.
That is the real problem here,this woman is not
the antagonist , it is either her family or her
friends pulling her strings.
After all she doesn`t appear to be the sharpest
tool in the box.

Veils only say that you are someones property...
"Men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other" (4:34)

Muslim women may wear it like a recent fashion
fad or more likely , thier brothers tell them to.

Isabellathecrusader/

Whoops! Sorry! Completely misunderstood your point. I really should read what you wrote instead of what I expected. Given your last posting then, of course, I agree with you - in the main.

I think I would argue about her trying to CHANGE the laws, I would say rather that she is trying to change the USE and APPLICATION of the laws. I don't think that she succeeded. You may, of course, disagree.

Look, I have to go to bed because I'm due in work in nine hours time. Thanks for the debate. I'll catch up with anything else you post when I get back from my shift. Week-ends are important in my line of work, so I really don't want to miss this one.

Dominic.

Dominic, I also see this garb as something to mess up Muslim males' minds, even more than they already are. It labels women who do not wear Islamic tents, as immoral, sluts who do not deserve respect, and even deserve rape. We've seen that mental mindset being developed here in Oz, by even 2nd- & 3rd-generation "Australian"-Muslim males. And we've seen the results of that mindset - brutal, sadistic gang-rapes at the worst. And threats, intimidation, harrassment, at best, simply for enjoying the beach. Hence the Cronulla riots - an embarrassing display by some Australians, but a result of having to put up with years of messed-up Muslim males. And Muslim women's minds are no less messed up. I don't feel sorry for them.

I am outrageously offended by that horrid outfit, because I view it as a personal threat to my and my daughter's well-being, in my own country.

I don't know the ins and outs of the British law, but I think a thousand pounds is cheap to rid one's institution of this pig. Money well spent, and let it serve notice on other employers to be more careful in their hiring decisions.

In the meantime, the money should be paid to this woman's LAWYER. Then there is a good chance that the lawyer will take half. The client and the lawyer can argue about who is more entitled. Maybe the lawyer is a man, maybe a muslim man, which will make things more interesting. Let the two of them fight for the spoils.

Money well spent. LESSON: Don't hire muslims.

And don't help muslims. Don't open the door for them, even the women. Don't say "please" and "thank you" but act as though you EXPECT them to do your bidding.

We are engaged in a war. In some places it is a shooting war, with machine guns, hidden bombs, eye-gouging, torture and mutilation. The shooting may not have started everywhere, but the fact that we are at war has immediate implications for each of us, everywhere. The most basic implication is that there is an ENEMY. We must live accordingly. Every day, in every way.

Train yourself.

Don't step out of the way if you meet a muslim coming on the sidewalk. Stand your ground. Don't avoid looking directly at them. Scan them from head to foot and back to head again. Let them know they are being watched. Don't smile. Let them meet your gaze, then smile really big to let them know you are not intimidated, and that you are not ashamed of being discovered watching them.

Wear pigskin. In cold weather, wear pigskin gloves. Wear a cross. Small, discrete, not gaudy. Carry a revealing book about islam, jihad, mohammad. You can't do any better than Robert's books, but others are fine, too.

In the supermarket, politely ask them where the bacon/Spam/sausage is. Put a jar of pigsfeet in their basket when they aren't looking. Write down the license numbers of their vehicles. Let them see you do this. If they are speaking arabic, tell them to speak English in public.

If you see one outside, hold up your hand and shout "Taxi!"

If a muslim asks for directions, be polite and helpfully send them in the wrong direction.

Muslims just HATE to be insulted and humiliated. Therefore, insult and humiliate them at every opportunity where you can get away with it. Make up muslim jokes and tell them to your spouse or friends in public.

Treat the enemy as an enemy. Never treat the enemy as a friend. For Christians raised to "love your enemy" I say go ahead and love them. Maybe they will be saved and converted. But don't treat them as having already become your brothers and sisters in Christ. They are still the enemy, and will eventually want to kill you. Understand that they are ALL dangerous.

Remember: the enemy has avoided the civilized practice of equiping its army with an identifiable uniform and insignia of rank as required in the Geneva Conventions. This is a warning that they are hiding among the civilian population, which is outlawed by the Conventions.

Therefore: you must assume that all muslims are soldiers of islam.

Dominic,

Apology accepted and just in the nick of time because I was really getting ready to slap you around! But seriously, it's not that Aishah will change the laws by herself. It's that ALL the Muslims filing ALL the lawsuits and doing ALL the whining will wear down court/Tribunal and county or local officials, especially the ones who have no understanding of the long term goal of these people. Someone here may give in while someone over there does too, because neither of them has heard of the atrocities that we who study here at Jihad Watch University understand. You get enough of these little isolated incidents and pretty soon you've got Sharia pariahs telling us we can't go swimming at the beach. (And being originally from the sunny state of California I can tell you that if that ever happens, somebody is going to die, and it's not going to be me!!!) These guys know that we are not paying attention on all fronts because there are too many quarters that still lull themselves to sleep everynight with everybody's favorite, "Let there be peace on earth and let Islam begin with me."

Get some sleep. I'm going too. We'll catch up with this tomorrow evening. : )

Feralee,

I agree with you. And it irritates me to no end that as a middle aged, middle class American woman who works all the time and dresses conservatively because it's comfortable and I'm too tired to wear anything else, (although my girlfriends say I dress real cute,) I resent the idea that I would be labeled a slut in that culture. But it really has nothing to do with how they dress, does it? The Sharia pariahs could say that if you eat apples on Tuesdays your a slut. No, this is really a license to rape. And think about that...if this culture is so demented that it has to engage in gang rape to achieve some sort of satisfaction, we are dealing with something much worse than we've even imagined here at JW, and those running our governments couldn't begin to have a clue what we are up against, much less, how to deal with it.

Have a good night.

Here's another idea Texan:

Save all of your bacon coupons and put them inside the korans at libraries and bookstores!

Thought this Burka Babe was MARRIED with two children??Who is her husband-why is she being let out of Purdah into the Wicked World of Infidels-presumably to get cash out of 'em.Noting her eagerness to get 'full exposure' from media [more cash ],this 'modest'
Muslimah makes sure her eyes are heavily outlined
& bats her lashes coyly at every interview...
SHE IS LYING THROUGH HER TEETH {even if we can't see them}WHEN SHE SAYS SHE WANTS TO HIDE FROM MALES.What a pity she isn't in Saudi Arabia where
she'd be jailed or worse for working in a CHRISTIAN school.

No, this is really a license to rape.

Isabelle, that's all I can see it as. A license to rape, or at best to treat with vile, unwarranted disrespect. And not just by men either. Muslim women arrogantly view themselves as so pious and moral by wearing that get-up, and look down on non-Muslim women who don't. They look aside as their sons commit vicious, brutal rapes against the kafir sluts. And spew awful, hateful insults at the traumatised girls and their family when their spawn are on trial.

It's a method of control - Muslim men over Muslim women (their breeders), and Muslim men and women over the rest of us. They're all in it together. I do not feel sorry for Muslim women. They are just as dangerous, if not more.

This pestiferous lady was/is a language support assistant at Headfield C of E (Church of England) Jumior School, Dewsbury.

Church schools are a bit of an oddity. They are effectively part of the state education system and do take pupils of all religions and none. I know it sounds odd, but that's the way it is.

A quote from this week's Church Times :-

"The area the school is in is one of the most most conservative Muslim communities in Britain. Near Holy Innocents Parish Church is a conservative Muslim College the largest in Europe, a magnet for zealous students from several countries. A Muslim court which applies shariah law to matrimonial and other issues meets near by."

I gave up reading the article shortly after getting thus far. It simply became too depressing!

The England I was born into and grew to love has gone for ever.

David, I'm not English , but the England I grew up knowing, through literature, the media, English friends, comradery with the U.S, etc. seems to be giving itself (it's culture) away, by the p.c.'s to people who don't appreciate it. Keep in mind, when people get mad enough, they will take action.

How can she breath in that thing? She must have to repeat everything she says too.

Apologies for being to simplistic, but it would be inadvisable for anyone seeking to influence majority opinion in the UK to be associated, in any way, with a party about whose leader, Nick Griffin, you can read such things as:

"He soon announced himself as a Holocaust denier and, in a 1997 booklet entitled Who are the Mind Benders?, Griffin outlined a Jewish conspiracy to brainwash the British people in their own "homeland"."

on a BBC page, but accurate enough:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1412785.stm

wallyUK

Not disagreeing but I find it hard to believe any sane person would be a Holocaust denier in 1997. I know David Irving is doing time for it in Austria but I did say sane person. Any details of what Griffin actually said/wrote?

Second thoughts on the subject of veils.

I live in an area with a high muslim population and 4/5 years ago veiled women were a very rare sight, you might see one in a year. Now you see 5 or 6 a week and most of them are under 30. I cannot help but think they are using them to say "Up yours".

DEPORT HER.

wow I see my comment was erased but I understand why I called the "lady" muslim there a bad name. Sorry it is I cant stand to see all our freedoms being twisted by these types of people. Meanwhile in otherplaces nonmuslims suffer for worse (getting killed for being nonmuslim) and she is getting paid $$$ for having her feelings hurt?

I dont know if you are allowed to post this here but here is a site that documents real persection (not whining about veils but the deaths of nonmuslims for being nonmuslim):

www.mychristianblood.org

If I am not allowed to post that site link here my apologies in advance and of course erase the link.

Fred,
For Nick Griffin and holocaust denial
see:

http://www.stopthebnp.org.uk/uncovered/pg08.htm

also the section on anti-semitism and holocaust denial in the "Nick Griffin" article in Wikipedia

wallyUK

Very informative many thanks. It is a pity that the cowardice of our "leaders" has given them credibility. Having said that, I have posted this before but I belong to a 100% non-political club that was infiltrated by anti-BNP group and I cannot say I liked them either. Apart from the longer hair they were just as crazy and one was quite nasty. One of our members, a professional man, was a BNP activist but we had no reason to know it. Our President knew but he would not expel him because we are non-political.

The first I knew was when a long-standing invitation to address a businessman’s club on local administration was cancelled at short notice - annoying but no great loss. More seriously a young graduate had an application to join the police repeatedly deferred without reason until she gave up. The BNP man left when he was "Outed" but I wonder if we are all on someone’s watch list.

david/

No, oh so very no! The England (Britain) you know and knew is still very much alive and kicking - it's just that no-one is listening to us at the moment, but we are still the huge majority.

Take comfort, my friend, you are not alone - as many others on this site will testify.

Dominic.

Posted by: wallyUK

For Nick Griffin and holocaust denial
see:

http://www.stopthebnp.org.uk/uncovered/pg08.htm

Well we can see where the STOP the BNP red acists are coming from if we just see another link from the same site,

The BNP claim that it is not Asians but only Muslims they have a problem with. This is not true. ‘Muslim’ is often used as a codeword for ‘Asian’ precisely because of gaps in the law.

Nick Griffin pretended that he was not blaming ordinary Muslims, but expressed horror when Tony Blair pushed the same message. “Blair and Bush lie about Islam”, Griffin declared, claiming that is was an attempt by Blair to “Curry favour with Britain’s three million angry Muslims”.

MORE HERE

http://www.stopthebnp.org.uk/uncovered/pg09.htm

For heaven's sake, do we have to keep on about the BNP. They are a tiny - very tiny - party. It doesn't matter that some of us might agree or disagree with them. That is irrelevant. What matters is that whilst we are talking about them (the BNP) we are not talking about how we can influence any of the parties that are likely to form the next government - how do we get to them is more important than what we feel about the BNP.

The BNP is a side issue - an important side issue I'll grant you - but a side issue none-the-less.

Dominic.

Hi Dominic,

I agree with you. The England of old cannot be dead, maybe sleeping. There is too much strength and courage in the blood of your people and too much blood that was spilled in your land to be taken over by the likes of Islam. But it's getting late so just like here in America, you guys need to get on with it. It seems when the sleeping giant awakens, and it appears to be doing so right now, it is something that a counterfeit "religion" with nothing to tempt the human heart will not be able to conquer, if the English warriors of old re-emerge. God willing.

Isabellathecrusader/

Hello there, again. You're correct. The England of old isn't dead - but it is, still, asleep. I pray God that my countrymen (and women) will wake up in time.

There are, I agree, signs that we may be beginning to wake up. Let us both (all) hope that it is not a false dawn!

Dominic.

Isabellathecrusader/

I'm on
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/013687.php#comments
at the moment where I have made a few posts on what has proved to be an intriguing thread - Robert sure knows how to post them! Join us?

Dominic.

shiva

Not wishing to go on about the BNP but one of them was prosecuted for saying the people your second link calls "Ordinary Asians in Bradford" had done something. It was true but the judge said it would cause racial hatred, was illegal and jailed him for 6 months.

I wonder if there will ever be a crime of "Jihad denial".

It just boggles the mind how such stupidity can be praised.

The number of walking death shrounds wandering around greater London is clearly alarming. Its like walking through Riyad these days, although Riyad is a little warmer.

I have to say, though, that the MSM have parodied this quite hard - all the newspapers show this black triangle, saying its a photo of her/him/it.

And all the photos are different.

If the 'insurgents' can impersonate the Iraqi police why can't our military exploit the burkha for their optimum cover to subdue the enemy?

Stealth is the ultimate weapon; tariqya masters who mouth platitudes, religious clerics who preach a political ideology of domination and oppression under the guise of religion, women who subjugate themselves to tyranny while feigning victimization by our culture and freedoms.

Yes, terrorists already know how to conceal themselves. The police should be conducting mandatory burkha checks for wanted terrorist. And, if the Burkha is their weapon of choice, then we should exploit this also. Somebody should clue Rumsfeld in.

"angloirishslav/

No, not a public school. A public school in the UK is a private school. She was working in a State school. I know this is confusing for everyone but we are not the USA we are the UK. Terminology is different - get used to it.

Dominic."

OK, mea culpa - State School. I actually knew that, having been born and spent my early childhood in Britain. Now however, having gone back and read the original post, I remain a mite confused, because it says it was a "Church of England" school. Was it then a non-State (what we in NA would call private) Christian school? If that was the case, why were there so many Muslim kids there? (I'm assuming here that most of the non-English speaking immigrant kids there were Muslims). And if so, what on earth were they thinking, hiring a niqab-wearing teaching assistant? Or did she take the thing off for the interview? Someone please enlighten me...

angloirishslav/

It was a Church of England school which is state funded and takes pupils on a geographical basis not a religious basis. This type of school is a hangover from the days when the status of the C. of E. as the official version of the state religion (Christianity) actually meant something. The C. of E., incidentally, is still the established state church in England as the Church of Scotland is in Scotland. (The Church of Scotland is not Anglican, by-the-way, but presbeterian - a bastard by-product of the stinking calvinism of the satan-inspired violence of the covenanters - the Anglican Church in Scotland being the Scottish Episcopal Church, which is a completely different animal.)

These schools make it possible for the government to maintain the fiction that state education is available free to all without having to build and equip proper schools - they just take over existing Anglican schools and claim that the provision of universal free education is thereby provided. In doing so the government invariably destroys, deliberately, the Anglican Christian ethos of such schools - obviously the case here.

Dominic.

necessitasnonhabetlegem

Your post explaining the system is about a accurate as you can get without writing a book. Like everything else in England the Education system was made up as they went along and making sense of it is impossible.

When the state took over in 1944 they agreed that ALL schools would start each day with a short Christian service. Not a problem in 1944 but being quietly forgotten now by secularists as much as anyone else.

angloirishslav

It may amuse you to know that 20 years ago our local Muslims tried to force the Church to allow Muslim prayers on the school premises but it did not get much publicity then.

BTW some C of E High Schools are the best free schools in the country and not suprisingly regular Church attendance is a condition for entry. The MSM led by our old friends the BBC have been running a campaign for years to force them to drop this rule and admit other faiths - guess which one?

One last thing T Blairs children went to a first rate Catholic school anyone know if they admit "Other faiths"?

The Catholic schools I went to as a kid all admitted kids of "other faiths," or no faiths. But they were always a tiny minority. Religious instruction was mandatory for all students until senior high school, Catholic or not, so parents pretty much had to be O.K. with that if they wanted to send their kids to a Catholic school. This didn't just mean non-Catholic kids had to sit in on the lessons. They had to participate, do the assignments, and write the exams. Non-Catholics who send their kids to Catholic schools generally do so because of the better discipline, teachers, small classes, higher academic standards, whatever, be they real or perceived, and presumably just tell their kids to suck up the religious stuff as a part of the package.

Back to the main subject, I too was surprised when I visted London in 2002 to see how many niqab-wearing women were there. I was told that nearly all these women would be from Saudi Arabia. I've seen exactly 1 woman in a niqab in Western Canada, and I saw 1 woman in a burqa once in Toronto.

The sight of these women is disturbing because of what it represents. If no acts of violence were ever committed in the name of Allah I think that the response of the enlightened west would mostly be bemused tolerance. Sure, let them walk around in tents if that makes them feel comfortable. Nobody would really care.

BTW, they kind of remind me of ninjas. And we know those dudes were rarely up to anything good.