MI5 told MPs day before 7/7 'no terrorism threat'

Keystone Kops Alert from the UK, via the Daily Mail (thanks to Sr. Soph):

The head of MI5 told Labour MPs the day before London’s 7 July bombings that there was no evidence of an imminent attack in Britain, it emerged today.

Dame Eliza Manningham-Buller gave the assurance at a private meeting of Labour whips at the Commons less than 24 hours before four explosions killed 52 people on Tube trains and a No 30 bus.

She also reportedly said that the security situation was under control.

Although the revelation that the security services were caught unawares by the attack is no surprise, the MI5 director general’s apparent confidence will add to pressure on the security service over its failure to prevent the bombings.

Details about how much MI5 knew about the bombers’ ringleader, Mohammad Sidique Khan, and fellow bomber Shehzad Tanweer, which cannot be disclosed at the moment for legal reasons, are expected to be made public in the next two months.

It is already known that officers had listened in to conversations involving the pair, although neither man had been identified prior to the bombings because investigations had focused on others who were thought at the time to be a greater danger.

Instead, the pair were only known as unidentified males of Pakistani origin. It was only after the bombings that the connection was made.

| 24 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

24 Comments

Sometimes, timing can be everything.

Hear no evil, see know evil...but speak plenty of it. Everything is safe, there are no Al-qaida in Iraq (Nancy P)...'they are just mothers and fathers like the rest of us' (Rosie O}...we have nothing to fear, Eliza gives us assurance...BOOOOM....Well, almost nothing...

In the words of the Donald...Ms. Manningham-Buller.....YOU'RE FIRED!!!!!!!!....and stripped of your knighthood......Why must we be surrounded by friggin idiots????......

Was that Dame Eliza or just Dumb Eliza?

This just goes to show that Dame Buller was given some bad advice probably by Jiahd sympathizers within her own organization. The corrupt Labour bureaucrats were happy to accept the see no evil, hear no evil philosophy as this is what their multi cultural sensitivities expected.

The BNP election will quickly expose the rats that have seeped into British national security circles because they are well aware of the multi cult facade and the the fangs of Islamist penetration into their society.

"Dame Eliza Manningham-Buller "


.....is she elected or appointed?....

"It is already known that officers had listened in to conversations involving the pair"
May be who ever was listening was muslim and of course no muslim will ever tell about another muslim No MATTER WHAT

"Whooopsss, sorry all, think I will go soon," she says in her resignation letter, "thanks for the job but I gotta go play Dame".
What a bloody shambles, for the past few months we have been under a "hightened security alert".
Now they pretty much keep the alert level high so that when the next attack comes they can say, we knew that was going to happen, good eh. May I please have my Knighthood now please. You could not make uo stuff like this. We are DOOMED I tell you.

Strangely enough, this coincides with news today that MI5 will give terror alerts to people by text or email if they so wish and register via their website.

they are just mothers and fathers like the rest of us' (Rosie O}


oh and when did Rosie [go Donald!] have kids? Or did she go to Africa to 'borrow' a kid over there?

"It is already known that officers had listened in to conversations involving the pair,"


....There are those in America, like Pelosie, Boxer, Dean, Murtha, Kennedy, and such who would make such intellegience gathering illegal. We would not want to know what Muslims are up to, now would we.........

There was a time when the UK had the some of the most respected intelligence sevices in the world!

I think part of the problem is that no one allows them to come forward with anything that is not totally provable. So they don't.

No hunches or gut feelings allowed.

If WWII was prosecuted this way, the world would be a very different place.

The fact that the Muslims all seem to be working their own individual agendas is a problem for counter-terrorism.
It's like having a disease with many different viruses or no known cause. How do you stop it when there is no rhyme or reason to it popping up?

If you think about it, it could be their (muslims) Unmaking as well. All the separate parts doing their own thing does not promote unity. Nor does it get the job done.

The British need to pay less attention to 50 letter named knighted Dames and serving liberal Tony Blair and more on keeping Britain for the British anglo saxon with their limp form of Christianity.
Of course Dame Eliza Manningham-Buller lied and saw no problem as it would be a problem for liberal Tony Blair. The same events happened in America before 9 11 in you had Clinton liberals wanting to look security minded still in power while letting terrorists run around they thought they could monitor like chickens in a pen.
Liberals pull this same garbage in every government. It is a little hard to tell President Bush when you are Richard Clintonista Clark, "Oh sorry W, we let all these terrorists into America", because then President Bush would fire people and Hillary wouldn't get her chance to be Queen.
Remember Sandy Berger stealing government documents? The fact is Bill Clinton signed the release form for Burger to go in and destroy evidence.
77 and 9 11 is what happens when you have liberals thinking they can play with terrorists and those pesky elected Republicans, Tories and citizens just won't understand their pristine motives.

Clearly, the MI5 were involved in 7/7, in fact it is obvious they set the whole thing up and this is proof! The four bombers were actually made of tofu, too.

"The head of MI5 told Labour MPs the day before London’s 7 July bombings that there was no evidence of an imminent attack in Britain, it emerged today. "


......SURRRRE, Muslims have been killing British soldiers and civilians abroad for many years, and constantly promising to kill more....How many times must you be hit on the head with a lead pipe before it hurts.........

And the SBS TV channel here in Australia was to screen on 9th July ,tne BBC documentary- "the Power of nightmares" which claimed that the threat of terrorist attacks was a figment of our imagination planted by the evil "neocon elites of America".
So they pulled it. How frutrating for them ! But they waited a "respectful period" and screened it anyway.
perhaps Lady Eliza ahd watched this BBC propaganda film which was screened a few weeks before the attacks in the UK.
I think not. However it is unlikely that she would have not included the possibility of "Home Grown" terrorists in her equations.
Whilst they were busy monitoring subversive element from abroad. they did not look in their own backyard. After All, how could good British muslims, brought up on fish and chips and supporters of british footbal teams-indeed, examples of the success of multiculturalism ever do such a thing?

Eliza was quite correct - there was no credible evidence of an imminent attack that MI5 had discovered by the 6th. July, 2005.

In exactly the same way that there was no credible evidence of an imminent attack upon the United States of America available to the American Intelligence services on the 10th. September, 2001.

Had there been credible, easily interpretable evidence available to the services beforehand then the attacks would not have been permitted to take place.

Intelligence services, just like all the other public services such as the police forces and the fire brigades, do their best. Sometimes their best is not good enough to protect all of us all of the time. That is inevitable. It is axiomatic that a planned terrorist attack which succeeds will be one not known about by our Intelligence services. Our Intelligence services have to get lucky every time whereas the terrorist need only be lucky now and again.

Griping and nit-picking about the shortcomings and failures of our Intelligence services with the perfect 20/20 vision of hindsight is profitless unless one can suggest, as Mr. Spencer and the others at JW/DW do, new and improved methods of thinking about the problem, researching the problem and solving the problem.

It is also deeply offensive to see so many of you being rude about the British Honours System - which most of you who are so rude obviously don't understand. How would you like it if I laughed at and were to be rude about the absolute plethora of USA Orders, Decorations and Medals, a list of which can be found at:

http://www.medals.org.uk/usa/usa-text.htm ,

which has always struck we Brits as being just a tad Ruritanian (not to mention the Orders, Decorations and Medals of all the various States of your Union which can all be found by following the links from:

http://www.medals.org.uk/usa/usa-states-text.htm )

A short biographical note on Eliza (Dame Eliza Manningham-Buller) can be found at:

http://www.mi5.gov.uk/output/Page413.html .

"Keystone Kops Alert..." indeed. Pots should beware of calling kettles black!

Dominic.

exsgtbrown/

""Dame Eliza Manningham-Buller " .....is she elected or appointed?...."

She was appointed to her salaried post as Head of MI5 in exactly the same way that any other civil servant is appointed, and I may add, after a distinguished career in the Irish Counter-terrorism Section.

She was not a Prime Ministerial crony filling a position at his behest - unlike some of the positions in the USA which the President fills with his cronies!

As I said (above) see her biog. at:

http://www.mi5.gov.uk/output/Page413.html .

Dominic.

By-the-way, there is a difference between 'honours' and 'peerages'. It seems that some here have got the two confused.

Eliza was awarded an 'honour'. She did nor inherit a Knighthood, Title or Peerage.

Anyway, one does not judge the quality of a man or woman by what they may or may not have inherited - wealth, land or titles - but the quality of their minds. After all, Sir Winston Churchill was an aristocrat born and bred yet none here would deny, surely, his supreme achievments.

Dominic.

Thank you for the update;

"exsgtbrown/

""Dame Eliza Manningham-Buller " .....is she elected or appointed?...."

She was appointed to her salaried post as Head of MI5 in exactly the same way that any other civil servant is appointed, and I may add, after a distinguished career in the Irish Counter-terrorism Section."


...."Although the revelation that the security services were caught unawares by the attack is no surprise, the MI5 director general’s apparent confidence will add to pressure on the security service over its failure to prevent the bombings"


....And just how to you prevent bombings???

.....welllll....you could start with "profiling, wiretapping, video surveillance, undercover agents, double agents, banking transaction surveillance....All of which the DEMS and Leftists in America object to. MIGHT anger the Muslims ya know.........

In the Free world, there's lots of garbage on the wires, and underground explosion can't be prevented; only careful screening before getting on board.

Dominic,

You have hit the nail on the head, and said exactly what I was thinking of saying. I'm just getting a tiny bit impatient with the knee-jerk reactions and not-so-thinly-veiled anti-Britishness of many of the posters on this site.

America and Great Britain share a common dilema...large Muslim neighborhoods. Muslim neighborhoods with large numbers of disenfranchised youths, unemployed adults, welfare grabbing families, hidden terrorists, and very violent clerics....

Ban Muslim Immigration NOW>>.

The MI5 must have consulted with the Democrats' Nancy Pelosi-Michael Moore(-on) Terror Prevention Institute on that day.

Site Meter