Something for just about everyone in this message. "Purported al Qaeda message: Unite with Taliban," from CNN:
(CNN) -- In a message released Monday, al Qaeda's No. 2 leader called on Muslims to unite under Taliban leader Mullah Omar and stop attempting to form secular governments.
They should follow only the strict Islamic Sharia law, said Ayman al-Zawahiri.
The remarks were delivered in a message on an Islamist Web site. The video contained a still picture of Zawahiri with English subtitles over Arabic remarks in audio. CNN has not independently confirmed the authenticity of the tape.
A text translation also accompanied the tape and was provided to CNN by lauramansfield.com, a Web site that analyzes terrorism.
Zawahiri pledged allegiance to Mullah Omar and called on all his followers to reject animosity and differences and come together under Mullah Omar's banner.
Mullah Omar is the elusive, shadowy Taliban leader who slipped away in the early days of the war in Afghanistan. Before the U.S.-led invasion, the Taliban held Afghanistan with an ultra-conservative government and sheltered al Qaeda.
Calling the governments of Iraq and Afghanistan, allied with the United States, "traitors," Zawahiri warned the United States "is about to depart and abandon them, just as it abandoned their like in Vietnam."
But Zawahiri did not reserve his venom only for the "Crusaders" and "Zionists."
He also targeted the "charlatans" of Islam, saying their "long beards, huge turbans, majestic titles, purported lineages and popular myths are no substitute for the truth."
He called on Palestinians to drop their secular government and instead govern themselves by Sharia (Islamic) law.
"A sovereign government will only be achieved if you liberate Palestine from the Jews and their agents, and only if you set up a government which rules by Sharia," he said. "Otherwise, the soap opera of embargoes and pursuits and killings and denunciations will just go on and on."
Like Zawahiri's last message released on January 22, this message contains harsh words for President Bush and the United States.
Zawahiri said Bush was "addicted to drinking, lying and gambling" and that "the American people are the ones who chose him twice, out of greed for the Muslims' treasures and in animosity to them."
"That's why the intelligent person does not absolve them, the British people and all peoples of the Crusader Alliance from responsibility, for they are the ones who elected Bush, Blair and their allies and supported them in their aggression against Afghanistan and Iraq," he said.
Zawahiri also took aim at Democrats, directing a part of his message to them.
"The people chose you due to your opposition to Bush's policy in Iraq, but it appears that you are marching with him to the same abyss, and it appears that you will take part with him in the defeat and certain failure, with God's permission," he said. "And the American people shall discover that you are all one side of the same coin of tyranny, criminality and failure."
Another rambling communique from Dr. Evil and Number 2.
Zawahari references God in every one of his messages. Catholics of the Church Militant can wage war against Al Qaeda on the spiritual level with the rosary. How many would like to commit to saying five decades for Zawahari and Al Qaeda?
OK I am a dim witted Mulsim wanna be. So I send out messages in a foxhole. Just keep eating your Mars bars, and lobster tails, while thinking you are the next Mahdi. Keep running your mouth, it gives us intelligence. We let you run your trap, so we can attack your followers. Let the sheep call out his followers, so we can slaughter them.
Say some more dumb shit, please.
What a joke, I laugh at you Zawahiri! You were righteous at one point. The Russians without God or book. But the Americans have Gods, Books, And Guns! You must have barked up the wrong tree!Cause the help we gave you, slapps you in your dumb face.
"OK I am a dim witted Mulsim wanna be."
- from taowarrior.
Well if that is what you want, I think all you need to do is say the "Shehada" and then you can delete "wanna be".
Good luck with that.
"the American people are the ones who chose him (Bush) twice, out of greed for the Muslims' treasures and in animosity to them."
......................
Sure, the election in 2004 was largely about the "War on Terror", but this issue was barely on most American's radar back in 2000.
As to acting "out of greed for the Muslims' treasure", this is mere projection. Muslims have very little in the way of "treasure", being, in general, a singularly unproductive people. The only "treaure" they have is oil, and we have bent over backwards to set up oil revenue sharing plans between Shia, Sunnis and Kurds in Iraq (whether this is a wise idea is another question).
As to the reference to "charlatan" Muslims, this may be in part a reference to corrupt, autocratic regimes. I wouldn't be surprised, though, if "moderate" Muslims are considered "charlatans" by this lot also.
More Jihadi ravings.
.
"And the American people shall discover that you are all one side of the same coin of tyranny, criminality and failure."
Well he got THAT part right.
What are these Muslim treasures he speaks of? Do you mean the curse of not being able to support yourself, relying on a natural resource? Oh, now it is clear, Muslim's have no way of making a living except what is given to them. Worthless pretty much. I mean what can a Muslim give to the free world, OH, a bomb
Good thing aQ#2 has set the record straight by slamming the democrats. For a while it seemed they were on the same side ... .
Turns out - democrat's placation and appeasement has got them nowhere with the islamofascists. No doubt they will now try even harder to "have meaningful dialog", etc., with the jihadi. Let's see, next step - conversion to islam and official name change to dhimmicrat party, Hollywood moved to Pakistan, full scholarships and professorships at "Ivy-league", ...
Nice to see you are on the same page as bullshit1
I do believe it is genious to elect Obama for President. I mean come on, a former Muslim praying to the East. He would most certainly sort out all of these middle east issues. Right? Or will he fuel them? What is his standpoint on Jews? He probably hates them as much as being black.
Muslim's have no way of making a living except what is given to them.
Yes, the only type of "work" they like to do is the work of subjecting others to their whims. No thank you.
I can't think of a people who has done less in this world and claimed so great a share of God's beneficence. Collectively, they are worth less than the crusty scrapings off a single pig's *sshole, yet, somehow they deserve to rule the world. Yeah, rule it back into barbarism. They don't seem to understand that our society is so far ahead of theirs, they are coming across, to me, at least, as being from another, much less valuable, species. I truly know how the Greeks felt when they heard the "bar bar" of the Persians and saw how ugly and discordant everything that stood behind those noises was.
Homo sapiens, meet homo Islamus.
gravenimage,
Looks to me like the reference to "charlatans of islam" is a dig at the shiite hojatoleslams, ayatollahs, grand ayatollahs etc. (the titles and turbans and myths about the mahdi).
From Brigitte Gabriel's group, American Congress for Truth. This is a fabulous article on the duplicity of Islam and why it so difficult for those of us in the west to try and understand it logically. 'Sorry it is so long but read it because it will blow your mind and turn some lightbulbs on. I joined her group and now she sends me information like this on a regular basis.
The Study of Political Islam
"The history of political Islam is the destruction of Christianity in the Middle East, Egypt, Turkey and North Africa. Half of Christianity was lost. Before Islam, North Africa was the southern part of Europe (part of the Roman Empire). Around 60 million Christians were slaughtered during the jihadic conquest."
The Study of Political Islam
By Jamie Glazov
FrontPageMagazine.com | February 5, 2007
FP: Bill Warner, welcome to Frontpage Interview.
Warner: Thank you Jamie for this opportunity.
FP: Tell us a bit about the Center for the Study of Political Islam.
Warner: The Center for the Study of Political Islam is a group of scholars who are devoted to the scientific study of the foundational texts of Islam-Koran, Sira (life of Mohammed) and Hadith (traditions of Mohammed). There are two areas to study in Islam, its doctrine and history, or as CSPI sees it-the theory and its results. We study the history to see the practical or experimental results of the doctrine.
CSPI seems to be the first group to use statistics to study the doctrine. Previous scientific studies of the Koran are primarily devoted to Arabic language studies.
Our first principle is that Koran, Sira and Hadith must be taken as a whole. We call them the Islamic Trilogy to emphasize the unity of the texts.
Our major intellectual breakthrough is to see that dualism is the foundation and key to understanding Islam. Everything about Islam comes in twos starting with its foundational declaration: (1) there is no god but Allah and (2) Mohammed is His prophet. Therefore, Islam is Allah (Koran) and the Sunna (words and deeds of Mohammed found in the Sira and Hadith).
Endless ink has been wasted on trying to answer the question of what is Islam? Is Islam the religion of peace? Or is the true Islam a radical ideology? Is a moderate Muslim the real Muslim?
This reminds a scientist of the old arguments about light. Is light a particle or is light a wave? The arguments went back and forth. Quantum mechanics gave us the answer. Light is dualistic; it is both a particle and a wave. It depends upon the circumstances as to which quality manifests. Islam functions in the same manner.
Our first clue about the dualism is in the Koran, which is actually two books, the Koran of Mecca (early) and the Koran of Medina (later). The insight into the logic of the Koran comes from the large numbers of contradictions in it. On the surface, Islam resolves these contradictions by resorting to "abrogation". This means that the verse written later supersedes the earlier verse. But in fact, since the Koran is considered by Muslims to be the perfect word of Allah, both verses are sacred and true. The later verse is "better," but the earlier verse cannot be wrong since Allah is perfect. This is the foundation of dualism. Both verses are "right." Both sides of the contradiction are true in dualistic logic. The circumstances govern which verse is used.
For example:
(Koran of Mecca) 73:10: Listen to what they [unbelievers] say with patience, and leave them with dignity.
From tolerance we move to the ultimate intolerance, not even the Lord of the Universe can stand the unbelievers:
(Koran of Medina) 8:12: Then your Lord spoke to His angels and said, "I will be with you. Give strength to the believers. I will send terror into the unbelievers' hearts, cut off their heads and even the tips of their fingers!"
All of Western logic is based upon the law of contradiction-if two things contradict, then at least one of them is false. But Islamic logic is dualistic; two things can contradict each other and both are true.
No dualistic system may be measured by one answer. This is the reason that the arguments about what constitutes the "real" Islam go on and on and are never resolved. A single right answer does not exist.
Dualistic systems can only be measured by statistics. It is futile to argue one side of the dualism is true. As an analogy, quantum mechanics always gives a statistical answer to all questions.
For an example of using statistics, look at the question: what is the real jihad, the jihad of inner, spiritual struggle or the jihad of war? Let's turn to Bukhari (the Hadith) for the answer, as he repeatedly speaks of jihad. In Bukhari 97% of the jihad references are about war and 3% are about the inner struggle. So the statistical answer is that jihad is 97% war and 3% inner struggle. Is jihad war? Yes-97%. Is jihad inner struggle? Yes-3%. So if you are writing an article, you can make a case for either. But in truth, almost every argument about Islam can be answered by: all of the above. Both sides of the duality are right.
FP: Why, in your view, is there so much ignorance about the history and doctrine of political Islam in the West?
Warner: First, let's see how ignorant we are about the history of political Islam. How many Christians can tell you how Turkey or Egypt became Islamic? What happened to the Seven Churches of Asia mentioned in Paul's letters? Find a Jew who can tell you the Jewish history of dhimmitude (second class citizens who serve Islam). What European knows that white women were the highest priced slaves in Mecca? Everyone knows how many Jews Hitler killed, but find an unbeliever who can tell you how many died in jihad over the last 1400 years.
We are just as ignorant about the doctrine of Islam. An FBI agent gets two hours of training on Islam and most of that is how not to offend the imam. We are fighting in Iraq. Who utilizes the political, military doctrine of Islam to plan strategy? Who can find a single rabbi or minister who has read the Koran, Sira and Hadith? What governor, senator, congressmen or military leader displays a knowledge of the political doctrine of Islam? Try to find a course available in a college about Islamic political doctrine and ethics. Graduates are schooled in Islamic art, architecture, poetry, Sufism, and a glorious history that ignores the suffering of the innocent unbelievers. Graduates read comments about the Koran and Hadith, but do not read the actual doctrine.
FP: So why this ignorance?
Warner: Let's start at the beginning. When Islam burst out of Arabia into a decaying Byzantine world, the unbelievers recorded it as an Arabic invasion. Similarly, the invasion of Eastern Europe was by Turks; the invasion of Spain was by Moors. Our scholars were incapable of even naming the invaders.
Mohammed killed every single intellectual or artist who opposed him. It was fear that drove the vast majority of the media not to reprint the Mohammed cartoons, not some imagined sensitivity. Fear is a fabulous basis for ignorance, but that is not enough to explain it all. What accounts for the almost psychotic aversion to knowledge about Islam? Beyond fear is the realization that political Islam is profoundly foreign to us.
Let's examine the ethical basis of our civilization. All of our politics and ethics are based upon a unitary ethic that is best formulated in the Golden Rule:
Treat others as you would be treated.
The basis of this rule is the recognition that at one level, we are all the same. We are not all equal. Any game of sports will show that we do not have equal abilities. But everyone wants to be treated as a human being. In particular, we all want to be equal under the law and be treated as social equals. On the basis of the Golden Rule-the equality of human beings-we have created democracy, ended slavery and treat women and men as political equals. So the Golden Rule is a unitary ethic. All people are to be treated the same. All religions have some version of the Golden Rule except Islam.
FP: So how is Islam different in this context?
Warner: The term "human being" has no meaning inside of Islam. There is no such thing as humanity, only the duality of the believer and unbeliever. Look at the ethical statements found in the Hadith. A Muslim should not lie, cheat, kill or steal from other Muslims. But a Muslim may lie, deceive or kill an unbeliever if it advances Islam.
There is no such thing as a universal statement of ethics in Islam. Muslims are to be treated one way and unbelievers another way. The closest Islam comes to a universal statement of ethics is that the entire world must submit to Islam. After Mohammed became a prophet, he never treated an unbeliever the same as a Muslim. Islam denies the truth of the Golden Rule.
By the way, this dualistic ethic is the basis for jihad. The ethical system sets up the unbeliever as less than human and therefore, it is easy to kill, harm or deceive the unbeliever.
Now mind you, unbelievers have frequently failed at applying the Golden Rule, but we can be judged and condemned on its basis. We do fall short, but it is our ideal.
There have been other dualistic cultures. The KKK comes to mind. But the KKK is a simplistic dualism. The KKK member hates all black people at all times; there is only one choice. This is very straightforward and easy to see.
The dualism of Islam is more deceitful and offers two choices on how to treat the unbeliever. The unbeliever can be treated nicely, in the same way a farmer treats his cattle well. So Islam can be "nice", but in no case is the unbeliever a "brother" or a friend. In fact, there are some 14 verses of the Koran that are emphatic-a Muslim is never a friend to the unbeliever. A Muslim may be "friendly," but he is never an actual friend. And the degree to which a Muslim is actually a true friend is the degree to which he is not a Muslim, but a hypocrite.
FP: You mentioned earlier how logic is another point of profound difference. Can you touch on that?
Warner: To reiterate, all of science is based upon the law of contradiction. If two things contradict each other, then at least one of them has to be false. But inside of Islamic logic, two contradictory statements can both be true. Islam uses dualistic logic and we use unitary scientific logic.
Since Islam has a dualistic logic and dualistic ethics, it is completely foreign to us. Muslims think differently from us and feel differently from us. So our aversion is based upon fear and a rejection of Islamic ethics and logic. This aversion causes us to avoid learning about Islam so we are ignorant and stay ignorant.
Another part of the aversion is the realization that there is no compromise with dualistic ethics. There is no halfway place between unitary ethics and dualistic ethics. If you are in a business deal with someone who is a liar and a cheat, there is no way to avoid getting cheated. No matter how nice you are to a con man, he will take advantage of you. There is no compromise with dualistic ethics. In short, Islamic politics, ethics and logic cannot be part of our civilization. Islam does not assimilate, it dominates. There is never any "getting along" with Islam. Its demands never cease and the demands must be met on Islam's terms: submission.
The last reason for our aversion to the history of political Islam is our shame. Islam put over a million Europeans into slavery. Since Muslims can't be enslaved, it was a white Christian who was the Turkish sultan's sex slave. These are things that we do not want to face.
Jews don't want to acknowledge the history of political Islam, because they were dhimmis, second class citizens or semi-slaves, just like the Christians. Jews like to recall how they were advisors and physicians to powerful Muslims, but no matter what the Jew did or what position he held, he was still a dhimmi. There is no compromise between being equal and being a dhimmi
Why should a Hindu want to recall the shame of slavery and the destruction of their temples and cities? After Hindu craftsmen built the Taj Mahal, the Muslim ruler had their right hands cut off so that they could not build anything as beautiful for anyone else. The practice of suttee, the widow throwing herself on the husband's funeral pyre, came about as a response to the rape and brutality of the Islamic jihad as it sweep over ancient Hindustan.
Blacks don't want to face the fact that it was a Muslim who rounded up their ancestors in Africa to wholesale to the white slave trader. The Arab is the true master of the African. Blacks can't accept the common bond they share with whites: that both Europeans and Africans were slaves under Islam. Blacks like to imagine Islam is their counterweight to white power, not that Islam has ruled them for 1400 years.
Dualistic logic. Dualistic ethics. Fear. Shame. There is no compromise. These are the reasons we don't want to know about Islam's political history, doctrine or ethics.
FP So is there such a thing as non-political Islam?
Warner: Non-political Islam is religious Islam. Religious Islam is what a Muslim does to avoid Hell and go to Paradise. These are the Five Pillars-prayer, charity to Muslims, pilgrimage to Mecca, fasting and declaring Mohammed to be the final prophet.
But the Trilogy is clear about the doctrine. At least 75% of the Sira (life of Mohammed) is about jihad. About 67% of the Koran written in Mecca is about the unbelievers, or politics. Of the Koran of Medina, 51% is devoted to the unbelievers. About 20% of Bukhari's Hadith is about jihad and politics. Religion is the smallest part of Islamic foundational texts.
Political Islam's most famous duality is the division of the world into believers, dar al Islam, and unbelievers, dar al harb. The largest part of the Trilogy relates to treatment of the unbelievers, kafirs. Even Hell is political. There are 146 references to Hell in the Koran. Only 6% of those in Hell are there for moral failings-murder, theft, etc. The other 94% of the reasons for being in Hell are for the intellectual sin of disagreeing with Mohammed, a political crime. Hence, Islamic Hell is a political prison for those who speak against Islam.
Mohammed preached his religion for 13 years and garnered only 150 followers. But when he turned to politics and war, in 10 years time he became the first ruler of Arabia by averaging an event of violence every 7 weeks for 9 years. His success did not come as a religious leader, but as a political leader.
In short, political Islam defines how the unbelievers are to be dealt with and treated.
FP: Can you touch briefly on the history of political Islam?
Warner: The history of political Islam starts with Mohammed's immigration to Medina. From that point on, Islam's appeal to the world has always had the dualistic option of joining a glorious religion or being the subject of political pressure and violence. After the immigration to Medina, Islam became violent when persuasion failed. Jihad entered the world.
After Mohammed's death, Abu Bakr, the second caliph, settled the theological arguments of those who wished to leave Islam with the political action of death by the sword. The jihad of Umar (the second caliph, a pope-king) exploded into the world of the unbelievers. Jihad destroyed a Christian Middle East and a Christian North Africa. Soon it was the fate of the Persian Zoroastrian and the Hindu to be the victims of jihad. The history of political Islam is the destruction of Christianity in the Middle East, Egypt, Turkey and North Africa. Half of Christianity was lost. Before Islam, North Africa was the southern part of Europe (part of the Roman Empire). Around 60 million Christians were slaughtered during the jihadic conquest.
Half of the glorious Hindu civilization was annihilated and 80 million Hindus killed.
The first Western Buddhists were the Greeks descended from Alexander the Great's army in what is now Afghanistan. Jihad destroyed all of Buddhism along the silk route. About 10 million Buddhists died. The conquest of Buddhism is the practical result of pacifism.
Zoarasterianism was eliminated from Persia.
The Jews became permanent dhimmis throughout Islam.
In Africa over 120 million Christians and animists have died over the last 1400 years of jihad.
Approximately 270 million nonbelievers died over the last 1400 years for the glory of political Islam. These are the Tears of Jihad which are not taught in any school.
FP: How have our intellectuals responded to Islam?
Warner: The basis of all the unbeliever's thought has collapsed in the face of Islamic political thought, ethics and logic. We have already mentioned how our first intellectuals could not even name the invaders as Muslims. We have no method of analysis of Islam. We can't agree on what Islam is and have no knowledge about our suffering as the victims of a 1400-year jihad.
Look at how Christians, Jews, blacks, intellectuals and artists have dealt with Islamic doctrine and history. In every case their primary ideas fail.
Christians believe that "love conquers all." Well, love does not conquer Islam. Christians have a difficult time seeing Islam as a political doctrine, not a religion. The sectarian nature of Christian thought means that the average non-Orthodox Christian has no knowledge or sympathy about the Orthodox Christian's suffering.
Jews have a theology that posits a unique relationship between Jews and the creator-god of the universe. But Islam sees the Jews as apes who corrupted the Old Testament. Jews see no connection between Islam's political doctrine and Israel.
Black intellectuals have based their ideas on the slave/victim status and how wrong it was for white Christians to make them slaves. Islam has never acknowledged any of the pain and suffering it has caused in Africa with its 1400-year-old slave trade. But blacks make no attempt to get an apology from Muslims and are silent in the presence of Islam. Why? Is it because Arabs are their masters?
Multiculturalism is bankrupt against Islam's demand for every civilization to submit. The culture of tolerance collapses in the face of the sacred intolerance of dualistic ethics. Intellectuals respond by ignoring the failure.
Our intellectuals and artists have been abused for 1400 years. Indeed, the psychology of our intellectuals is exactly like the psychology of the abused wife, the sexually abused child or rape victim. Look at the parallels between the response of abuse victims and our intellectuals. See how violence has caused denial.
The victims deny that the abuse took place: Our media never reports the majority of jihad around the world. Our intellectuals don't talk about how all of the violence is connected to a political doctrine.
The abuser uses fear to control the victim: What was the reason that newspapers would not publish the Mohammed cartoon? Salman Rushdie still has a death sentence for his novel. What "cutting edge" artist creates any artistic statement about Islam? Fear rules our intellectuals and artists.
The victims find ways to blame themselves: We are to blame for the attacks on September 11, 2001. If we try harder Muslims will act nicer. We have to accommodate their needs.
The victim is humiliated: White people will not talk about how their ancestors were enslaved by Islam. No one wants to claim the victims of jihad. Why won't we claim the suffering of our ancestors? Why don't we cry about the loss of cultures and peoples? We are too ashamed to care.
The victim feels helpless: "What are we going to do?" "We can't kill 1.3 billion people." No one has any understanding or optimism. No one has an idea of what to try. The only plan is to "be nicer."
The victim turns the anger inward: What is the most divisive issue in today's politics? Iraq. And what is Iraq really about? Political Islam. The Web has a video about how the CIA and Bush planned and executed September 11. Cultural self-loathing is the watchword of our intellectuals and artists.
We hate ourselves because we are mentally molested and abused. Our intellectuals and artists have responded to the abuse of jihad just as a sexually abused child or a rape victim would respond. We are quite intellectually ill and are failing at our job of clear thinking. We can't look at our denial.
FP: So summarize for us why it is so crucial for us to learn the doctrine of political Islam.
Warner: Political Islam has annihilated every culture it has invaded or immigrated to. The total time for annihilation takes centuries, but once Islam is ascendant it never fails. The host culture disappears and becomes extinct.
We must learn the doctrine of political Islam to survive. The doctrine is very clear that all forms of force and persuasion may and must be used to conquer us. Islam is a self-declared enemy of all unbelievers. The brilliant Chinese philosopher of war, Sun Tsu, had the dictum-know the enemy. We must know the doctrine of our enemy or be annihilated.
Or put another way: if we do not learn the doctrine of political Islam, our civilization will be annihilated just as Egypt's Coptic civilization was annihilated.
Since unbelievers must know the doctrine of political Islam to survive, CSPI has written all of its books in simple English. Our books are scholarly, but easy to read. As an example, anyone who can read a newspaper can pick up A Simple Koran and read and understand it. It is not "dumbed down" and contains every single word of the original.
Not only is the language simple, but logic has been used to sort and categorize. Context and chronology have been restored. The result is a Koran that is an epic story ending in triumph over all enemies of Allah. All of our books and philosophy may be found at our center's website.
Islam declares that we are the enemies of Allah. If we do not learn the political doctrine of Islam we will end up just like the first victims of Islam-the tolerant, polytheist Arabs of Saudi Arabia who became the Wahabbis (a very strict branch of Islam) of today, the most intolerant culture on the face of the earth.
FP: Bill Warner, thank you for joining us today.
Warner: Jamie, thank you for your kindness and efforts.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Muslim Treasures????????????????????
Oh he must mean Koran,the handbook of terrorism.
Or did he mean the hatred or venom for other religions.????
Or did he mean the stupid beards they grow,I mean the world considers clean shaven men handsome and hygienic and they are opposed to it??
But anyway,these guys do exactly opposite of whatever the civilized world considers good.
The only treasure Muslims have is OIL but on second thoughts their intellectual level is so low that unless we had not invented methods to use it and drill it out for use in cars and planes(again ---our inventions) they would have just stayed on top of the OIL without ever realizing its value.
Treasure indeed????? Boy oh boy these guys really will say anything to justify their blabber.
The scary thing about this is that the dhimmis will find a way to agree with this drivel.
Look for something like this: (sarc on) "Mr. Zawahiri's remarks prove that Bush's policies are the sole cause of conflict between the oppressed populations of the Middle East and the imperialist policies of the West. Peace can only be achieved by dialogue and compromise and it is the moral duty of the West to establish a dialogue and make the necessary compromises. There can be no hope of peace until reactionaries like Bush are thrown out of their offices and more enlightened leaders take their places." (sarc off)
The even more scary thing is that Zawahiri's remarks will be totally ignored.
Why hate just the Americans? Become a muslim and you can hate everybody!
Has anybody noticed the following:
The remarks were delivered in a message on an Islamist Web site. The video contained a still picture of Zawahiri with English subtitles over Arabic remarks in audio. CNN has not independently confirmed the authenticity of the tape.
Zawahiri pledged allegiance to Mullah Omar and called on all his followers to reject animosity and differences and come together under Mullah Omar's banner.
This isn't Zawahiri's MO. First, Zawahiri makes live-action videos in which he speaks directly, not audio recordings featuring a still image of him. Second, when was the last time Zawahiri (or anybody in al-Qaeda) pledged loyalty to any specific Islamic figure, let alone Mullah Omar? Third, why is Zawahiri asking "all his followers to come together under Mullah Omar's banner"?
Is it possible that...
1. Bin Laden is fundamentally incapacitated, if not dead?
2. Zawahiri knows that al-Qaeda doesn't have near the resources (let alone the credibility or popularity) it did when it attacked on 9/11?
3. Mullah Omar is in an equally precarious situation, and needs a united front with al-Qaeda to have any hope of reconquering Afghanistan?
Frankly, I think this is good news. This means that al-Qaeda is more on the wane than we think. If so, we have one less terrorist organization to worry about.
One thing for sure. He thinks almost as highly of our politicians as we do. heh heh
Ally Ally OOpihiri said--"All peoples of the Crusader Alliance".
That would be us now wouldnt it? Us Christians and Jews united together in a Holy Crusade to rid the world of the UNTEACHABLEY STUPID!!
There, I said it! On a crusade to rid the whole world of the most ignorant belief system ever devised by man in his many thousands of years on this planet.
The Bible says--"In all your getting, get Wisdom". Not--"Stay as stupid as you can for as long as you can".
God help us one and all!
Oh dear,Dr No is suffering from OVER EXPOSURE.
Another Video clip showing an old man with a towel around his head,glaring at decadent West through his specs just makes me YAWN.Do us all a favour & explode YOURSELF SOON.Strange that guys always preaching young Muslim men should become 'martyrs' ARE SO RELUCTANT TO LEAD BY EXAMPLE...
I agree, we're outright "dumb" when it comes to Islam and the Free world. But the threat is real, and still many just act like, "Oh, it'll go away eventually." I've been watching it grow since the 70's, and many times, I've tried to find compassion for them, but it all ends like a business failure. I've learned to keep my distance and don't accept gifts.
the littel man in the cave Zawahiri must be wishing to be back in his little jailcell in egypt right abut now. hey Zawahiri how many more tapes do you need to make? l mean those muslim boys just not hearing you right, not exploding themsevles fast enough for you? yes this man preaches the brainwashed muslim and he is still not satisfied, maybe he should show them how to do it right the first time eh Zawahiri! no no? you only want them to explode themselves, you can see your allah babba man in your own time. okay brainwashed islamist get your exploding going now its almost St.Valentines day!
"The only treasure Muslims have is OIL but on second thoughts their intellectual level is so low "
........And the Muslims did not discover their oil, It was discovered by an Australian in 1908..back then as it is now.."Persia was devoid of infrastructure and politically unstable."...The Muslims were never stable , being basically a bunch of 7th century nomads and perverts...same as today...nothing has changed...Through the centuries, Muslims never developed a viable social order....their leaders were always the most bloodthirsty and ruthless...Muslims have always been a thrill kill machine....
....Maybe back in 1908 had someone thought to change the social infrastructure and bring the Muslims into the 20th century instead of prioritizing the bringing of oil to the surface, things would be somewhat better today.....
....Muslims have always been a violent people and it is oil that has made them extremely violent.....They have always hated the Jews too...Now the Muslims want no Jews and all the oil....
I found the following info interesting:
"BP originated in the activities of William Knox D'Arcy, an adventurer who had made a fortune in Australian mining. In 1901 D'Arcy secured a concession from the Grand Vizier of Persia (now known as Iran) to explore for petroleum throughout most of his empire. The search for oil proved extremely costly and difficult,
since Persia was devoid of infrastructure and politically unstable.
Within a few years D'Arcy was in need of capital. Eventually, after intercession by members of the British Admiralty, the Burmah Oil Company joined D'Arcy in a Concessionary Oil Syndicate in 1905 and supplied further funds in return for operational control. In May 1908 oil was discovered in the southwest of Persia at Masjid-i-Suleiman, the first oil discovery in the Middle East. The following April the Anglo-Persian Oil Company was formed, with the Burmah Oil Company holding most of the shares."
....And the rest, as they say, is history.....
It is sad that the Egyptians released Zawahiri from the jail...I have seen films of him ranting and raving behind iron bars....Now he does all his ranting and raving from a cave....But Muslims like ranters and ravers.....the louder the better.....silly 7th century morons....
Genesis 16: 11&12----
"A wild-ass of a man he will be against every man, and every man against him, setting himself to defy all his brothers".
From Ismael, to Mo., to al Zawahiri---Like father like son! Chips off the same old block!
BLOCKHEAD is more descriptive.
Zawahiri sounds more shrill, even frantic, than usual these days. Sounds like desperation, not confidence to me.
This odious dog just rants on.
Think of how his ranting must grate on his fellow cave dwellers and his captive family.
Think of the homicidal dreams of these associates.
We keep telling this runt that we are ready to follow him, omar, and bin laden, if only they'd show up to lead us.
... charlatan Moslems...
--- Vice Caliph Zawahiri
Dar al-Islam, O ye countries of Charlatans!
A charlatan is a person fraudulently claiming knowledge and skills not possessed.
For example, an individual charlatan might be a person who's obtrusively holier-than thou, yet at the same time is unable to be honest with himself or others, is incapable of moral and ethical behavior, and is basically just a tiresome pompous bullshit artist in a funny costume.
On a higher level, a charlatan nation might be a society just as obtrusively holier-than thou, but this time with guns, tanks and bombs, and a seat at the UN, yet at the same time cannot govern itself, provide for its own, educate its children, met out justice, or maintain a standard of living.
This why Moslems all either have emigrated or are would-be emigres.
Mr. D'Hippolito,
You're right. This is unusual for him. But I don't think it's a sign of weakness. One of the stated goals of the Muslim Brotherhood (an organization which many terror leaders are affiliated with) is to bring back the Caliphate and implement sharia law. To bring everyone under one ruler is the first part of this new process. He's trying to rally everyone against the U.S. but more than that, he needs all the terror/fundamentalist groups and lone wolves to curb the internal fighting and join under the same banner. This is why he's asking his followers to follow Mullah Omar.
-TheStudent10048-
Isabellathecrusader,
Thank you so much for posting the frontpage article: "The Study of Political Islam."
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=26769
This is the best explanation of the incompatibility of the Islamic world with the rest of the world that I have ever read.
There never has been, and there is not now, any possibility of us co-existing with the Islamic world.
One or the other--the Islamic world or our world--will have to win this struggle to the death. This is the only way to end hostilities and allow for one of two types of "peace."
The difference is that if we win, Islam beaten back to the impotence from which it emerged, its population decimated, there will be an uneasy peace--with us ever vigilant that Islam does not rise again. If Islam wins, then there will be "peace," for us that of the grave or as subhuman dhimmis or the unacceptable conversion to this irrational ideology based on the confused babbling of a severely impaired personality.
This guy is growing tiresome. When is someone going to place a .50-cal round right through that stupid prayer-rug bump on his forehead?
Unicorns62000,
You are welcome. And thanks for posting the link. I tried to do that last night but when I went to Front Page it said that article wasn't available and I thought it was too important not to share here. That's why I printed the whole darn thing.
The thing that really blew my mind was the concept that in the west if two views contradict each other, one of them has to be false, which makes sense, but in Islam, if two views contradict each other then they can be reconciled. Huh? Talk about newspeak.
I like things that are logical and Islam isn't. But then if one's political system's enforcement of belief in it's doctrine depends on what way the wind is blowing on any particular day, or the hormone level of the reigning psycho in charge, then it makes sense that if I say up is down and then I say up is up, it is up, especially if I'm willing to cut off your head to get you to believe me. So is Islam's contradictory doctrine reconcilable or does it not matter because Moslems are willing to kill you to get you to agree with them, whether it's true or not? I guess a knife on your throat solves a lot of disagreements.
The evil Dr. Z proclaims of the Democrats :
" And the American people shall discover that you are all one side of the same coin of tyranny, criminality and failure."
Well guess what Dr. Z ? You and your fellow jihadist are on the other side of that SAME COIN!
No way Bush would have won re-election if not for you guys. Osama himself put out a last minute tape to try and swing votes over to the Bush Boy like a good boggy man would do.
The diffrence being in this coin is that you and your fellow Al Queda queers are on the LOSING side of the coin! Try staging your murder plots against the working class of the West WITH OUT the millions and millions of dollars pouring in from the Saudi Arabians. With out the millions of dollars, no jihad. Suddenly the so-called will of Allah would not manifest it's self.
When you can think that far then you start to encounter a thing called reality. Without millions of dollars Allah's will can not be implamented? What kind of " All powerfull , all knowing " God is that? If you are still thinking then it sets in that there is NO Allah. Allah is for mentally deranged losers like you.
" Collected millions of dollars, kill thousands of people. Allah akbar! " That is a real lump of shit you are bowing to. Oh by the way Dr. Z say your prays. You are going to die soon.
----Nossy
----Nossy
TheStudent10048, you make some very good points. But why would Zarahiri ask al-Qaeda's followers to unite under Mullah Omar rather than, say, the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt (which has actual influence thanks to its large plurality in parliament)? And why no reference to uniting under bin Laden, who likely views himself as the Caliphiate's presumptive head (and has far better organizational skills than Mullah Omar)?
IF YOU REALLY WANT TO WATCH JIHAD, THEN YOU REALLY DON'T WANT TO SIT IN FRONT OF YOUR COMPUTER AND ONLY TYPE YOUR OPINIONS, BECAUSE THAT IS NOT HOW JIHADISTS ARE ATTACKING YOU. IF YOU DO NOT KNOW HOW TO FIGHT JIHAD, THAN KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT AND IF YOU WANT TO WATCH SOMETHING, GO WATCH YOUR TV OR GOOGLE ON THE INTERNET OR GO SOMEWHERE WHERE BRAVE BLAH-BLAHBERS STAY OR LIVE . (DO YOU NEED ANY SIMPLIER EXPLAINATION?)
THIS WEBSITE IS BURNING HELL FOR THE FOOLS!