UK: 'Wave of hatred' warning as attacks on Jews hits record high

Deport any caught and convicted of hate crimes, give at least a life sentence to crimes resulting in death...get these morons off the streets....

It appears that 205 of the 594 attacks have physical descriptions of which about half the attackers were white, 28 black, 16 arab and 60 asian. However there is no breakdown of the asians into Japanese, Tibetan, etc. I expect the majority of whites are followers of Ken Livingstone and UAF rather than the much maligned BNP types.

So when will the peaceful ones have their Night of Broken Glass? Might as well walk in every Nazi footstep if you're going to emulate your hero.

grobari,

Usually when Brits refer to "Asians" they're not talking about "oriental" Asians (as in those from Japan, Korea, etc.) but "South Asians" (those from India, Pakistan). So, whenever there's a newspaper report from the UK about "Asians" going on riots, it's usually in reference to Pakistanis (South Asians) rioting.

Labours little fantasy is coming back to bite them on their self righteous arses.

THey didn't mind looking the other way when the islamists started infiltrating UK colleges & universities.
Votes thats all they wanted, who cared the only people being duffed up were the Jewish and Hindu kids.

Must be those "Asians"
I will discuss this with the Chinese family that run the local chippy or maybe the folks at the local Sikh/Hindu/Buddhist temple.

It's only the Jews..then the Christians,...then the atheists,..then you. No need to worry.

grobari said:

"It appears that 205 of the 594 attacks have physical descriptions of which about half the attackers were white, 28 black, 16 arab and 60 asian. However there is no breakdown of the asians into Japanese, Tibetan, etc. I expect the majority of whites are followers of Ken Livingstone and UAF rather than the much maligned BNP types."

Firstly, I concur with J.S.'s observation regarding the term "asians" as it is used in the UK.

Bear in mind that in the UK - and I'm sure this is the case in all European countries although we seem to suffer from it the most - there is an underclass of mindless white thugs who will attack anyone who looks a bit different, just for the fun of it.

A lone, orthodox Jew on a Friday or Saturday night would be like a red rag to these drunken cowards. And I would guess that the culprits are of all political persuasions.

Watling-

"Bear in mind that in the UK - and I'm sure this is the case in all European countries although we seem to suffer from it the most - there is an underclass of mindless white thugs who will attack anyone who looks a bit different, just for the fun of it."

Sadly, this is all too true. It's one of the main reasons that I am all for the reintroduction of National Service. It would teach the little sods discipline and respect.

"I am all for the reintroduction of National Service."
-- from a posting above

Universal military service needs to be introduced in the countries of Western Europe so that a minimum familiarity with discipline, and the use of weapons, and a new less hedonistic attitude, can be instilled in those who, if they wish to hold on to their own countries, have to learn certain skills, and see the world, see themselves, a bit differently. Army service, not for a long time -- a year will do -- which includes American-style basic training -- would do it.

How long will it be before the Jews of Europe depart for elsewhere and in mass? Some will probably go to Israel, but I would guess that many will also try for the US, Canada or Australia. Israel's future, unfortunately, looks just about as bleak as the future for European Jews.

grobari wrote:
"It appears that 205 of the 594 attacks have physical descriptions of which about half the attackers were white, 28 black, 16 arab and 60 asian. However there is no breakdown of the asians into Japanese, Tibetan, etc. I expect the majority of whites are followers of Ken Livingstone and UAF rather than the much maligned BNP types."

So the attackers appear to be about 50% 'white' British. We can assume that most of the rest were Muslims, as their 'religion' promotes anti-semitism.

Grobari - isn't it a comically macabre (but no less sinister for that) slander to blame anti-fascists for attacks on Jewish people?

Isn't it more likely that the 'white' thugs in question were influenced by, connected to, or members of, the avowedly anti-semitic BNP?

And it's worth reiterating that supporters of the explicitly anti-semitic BNP constitute a large and vocal faction of the commenters on JW/DW.

It's also worth reiterating that this faction are a genuine menace to the anti-jihad cause, monopolising this cause for the extreme (openly racist) right, and closing off the possibility of finally awakening the mainstream of public opinion to the urgency of the jihad threat.

"It appears that 205 of the 594 attacks have physical descriptions of which about half the attackers were white, 28 black, 16 arab and 60 asian

Of the whites,how many of these are white muslims?

Of the Blacks,how many of these are black muslims?

Of the arabs,how many of these are arab muslims?

Of the asian ,how many of these are asian muslims?

-------------------------------------------------
Posted by: schmegel

Isn't it more likely that the 'white' thugs in question were influenced by, connected to, or members of, the avowedly anti-semitic BNP?

Show us a link to support your claim

http://illustratedpig.blogspot.com/2006/12/jews-are-nation-of-liars.html

""The identity of Muslims in the U.K. is Muslim first and foremost and British second," .... a recent Pew global survey of Muslim attitudes that found that 81 percent of British Muslims who responded agreed with that sentiment. Only Pakistan had a higher percentage of people who considered themselves Muslims first, the survey showed."

....The Muslims do not want to assimilate, they want to conquer..

Shiva

I don't know about these attackers, but it's a fair assumption that white anti-semites support a white supremacist anti-semitic party.

As for my claim that the BNP is anti-semitic, check this ('Griffin' is the current BNP leader):

http://www.s-light.demon.co.uk/presspack/bnp4.html

'When the former MP Alex Carlisle reported Griffin for inciting racial hatred and Holocaust denial, Griffin commented: "This bloody Jew, our local MP who organised the raid whose only claim to fame is that two of his parents died in the Holocaust".

Griffin wrote in Spearhead: "Some 'anti-semitism' may be provoked by the actions of certain Jews themselves and thereby have a rational basis". '

From the same:

"The Group Development Officer of the BNP, Tony Lecomber, is a convicted bomber who also has an assault charge under his belt for attacking a Jewish schoolteacher on the underground."

grobari said:

"It appears that 205 of the 594 attacks have physical descriptions of which about half the attackers were white, 28 black, 16 arab and 60 asian. However there is no breakdown of the asians into Japanese, Tibetan, etc."

Actually, the report (which is here: www.thecst.org.uk/docs/Incidents_Report_06.pdf) specifically refers to just 1 "Far Eastern" perpetrator. It is a very small number, but it does make clear that the "Asian" category does NOT include Chinese, Japanese, Tibetans, etc.

schmegel:

thanks for outing the BNP. There are a lot of bloggers here who are foolish enough to think they are any different from Jean Marie LePenn's movement in France.

I would also like to thank Paul for providing the link to the actual report in pdf form.

Whenever a report is published, one must be extremely careful when assessing what the numbers mean. For example, a poster above wrote about "205 of the 594 attacks have physical descriptions". ACTUALLY, the 594 figure refers NOT to attacks. The 594 figure is the TOTAL figure (this includes property damage, and thus, won't necessarily have identified a person, so there will be no "physical description" of the perpetrator(s).) Of the TOTAL number of incidents, 205 carried a "physical description" of the perpetrator. The report reads: "Physical descriptions of incident perpetrators were provided in 205 of the 594 incidents reported to the CST. Of these, 96 were White (47 per cent), 4 East European (two per cent), 28 Black (14 per cent), 60 Asian (29 per cent), 1 Far Eastern (one per cent) and 16 Arab (8 per cent)."

Actually, a better indicator of who's doing the attacking would have been to look at the category of "assaults" or "total number of assaults" which, btw, equaled 112 (and of the 112 assaults, what were the descriptions of the perps? but such a figure is not provided). The people who gathered the stats chose instead to include as the "total" -- the total number of "incidents" -- as 594 incidents with 205 perps being able to be identified...

James Baker and former Prez Jimmy should get on over there and join in on the Jew-bashing. Ironically, Noam Chomsky might wanna join them on the Saudi-funded private jet flight.

It is late Friday afternoon here in the part of the US where I spend part of each year. We have neighbours who are white, Hindu, Mexican and black. My wife will soon be lighting our Sabbath candles and later we will be going to synagogue. I have very limited fears (although it could happen) that we will be attacked this evening.
I contrast this with England which is my home country and where I regard myself as a loyal and patriotic Englishman. I live in England in fear of attack by Muslims and by a small minority of white thugs should they realise I am a Jew.
When the next election comes I simply don't know who to vote for, but anyway, whoever wins the next British general election or two can be no more than a caretaker waiting for the real blood to start flowing.

"Of these, 96 were White (47 per cent), 4 East European (two per cent), 28 Black (14 per cent), 60 Asian (29 per cent), 1 Far Eastern (one per cent) and 16 Arab (8 per cent)." --from a posting above

...one also needs to take into account baseline proportions. We don't have a count or percentage of Muslims in this report, but we do have an estimate that the Muslim population in Britain is about 3%. This means that in all likelihood (given the high percentage of Muslims in "Asian" and "Arab" categories, and the fact that there are some Black and some white Muslims), there is a disproportionately high number of Muslims committing crimes against Jews. In addition, because a large majority of British are Whites, this means that there is a disproportionately low number of Whites committing crimes against Jews.

Note. From the CIA Fact Book online:
Britain, religious composition:
"Christian (Anglican, Roman Catholic, Presbyterian, Methodist) 71.6%, Muslim 2.7%, Hindu 1%, other 1.6%, unspecified or none 23.1% (2001 census)"

Moris2, I hope you are considering living full time in the US. Be safe (at least, for as long as we remain so).

Mother Ecclesiastica.

Here are some links I posted on a previous thread:

A link here about Nick Griffin (BNP leader) and his KKK connections (and other Nazi groups.)

http://www.stopthebnp.org.uk/uncovered/pg06.htm

"David Duke, a former Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux, is very close to Nick Griffin and the BNP. Griffin has regularly shared platforms with Duke and the American’s antisemitic and Holocaust denial material is sold through the BNP."

The highly respected documentary series, Channel 4's 'Dispatches', which exposed the preachers of hate in Mosques recently, had also earlier exposed the BNP for what they are.

http://www.stopthebnp.org.uk/uncovered/pg01.htm

' Recently Mark Collett, leader of the young BNP was shown by channel 4’s Despatches to be an out and out Nazi sympathiser: “National Socialism was the best solution for the German people in the 1930s”, he told the cameras. “I honestly cant understand how a man who’s seen the inner city hell of Britain today cant look back on that era [Hitler’s Germany] with a certain nostalgia”. Despite the BNP’s public denunciation of Collett, he remains a full-time party worker and Yorkshire Regional Organiser. '

Fascists and Islamo-Fascists have a lot in common, as Nick Griffin, BNP leader, once recognised.

http://www.stopthebnp.org.uk/uncovered/pg09.htm

"Griffin’s anti-Muslim stance is hypocrisy. In the mid-1980s when he was a leading officer in the National Front he openly cavorted with Islamic extremists. He supported the Ayatollah Khomeini’s fundamentalist regime in Iran, and sought backing from Libya’s Colonel Gaddafi "

http://www.stopthebnp.org.uk/uncovered/pg03.htm

"Griffin’s BNP may hate Islamic fundamentalists now. But this has not always been the case. After his faction took control of the NF, they began to make some strange alliances. They met with representatives of Colonel Gaddafi’s regime through the Libyan People’s Bureau in London, and expressed support for Iran’s Ayatollah Khomeini.

Rank and File members of the NF were not too pleased when Griffin, in 1985, praised the black separatist Louis Farrakhan: “White nationalists everywhere wish (Farrakhan) well, for we share a common struggle for the same ends: Racial Separation and Racial Freedom”.

Nick Griffin (left) in Libya

During this period, Griffin and other NF leaders took an all-expenses paid trip to Libya, as guests of the Gaddafi regime to obtain funding.

National Front News wrote at the time: “Common interest must be turned into practical cooperation. Those involved must work to nail the media lies which are used by our enemies to try and divide us and make us afraid to be seen standing side by side with Third Way nations such as Libya and Iran”.

Sorry to anyone who's seen that stuff before. It's for the benefit of 'Mother Superior'.

That 'Mother' wrote:
"Members of the British National Party are proud to be of Ancient British Stock.

Why should they not be?
Why should not British Christians be proud of all their people have achieved over the past 5,000 years?

I am of Ancient British Stock.
I am a Proud Briton.
I am a Christian.

Mother Ecclesiastica. "

You are a 'Proud Brition', yet on a previous thread you engaged in a shameful anti-British rant.

You are a 'Christian', yet you voice support for racists (the BNP), who explicitly want to deport and discriminate against people on the basis of the colour of their skin (not on the basis of whether they are Muslim or not). Members and associates of the BNP are often linked to violent racist attacks.

'Christian' is not a mere label to mark out some tribal identity, without any moral or spiritual content. I suggest you read the Gospels and then try to square what Jesus says with race-hatred.

The BNP is an utterly un-British continental style Fascist party. Their un-Britishness is exemplified by the fact that they get less than half a percent of the national vote (despite the noise their supporters make on this site). Compare that with their French sister party, Le Pen's 'National Front', who get 15% of the vote.

Maybe you think the BNP is merely a 'conservative' party, because you haven't lived in Britain for over 40 years, where the BNP is well-known as a lunatic-fringe racist party, who don't need 'outing'.

You also don't know anything about British history, or history in general. '5000 years of British Christians'!!? Christianity has only existed for 2000 years. You said you were 'English'; the English (Anglo-Saxons) came to Britain less than 1500 years ago (from northern Germany and what is now southern Denmark). The 'ancient Britons' were the Brittonic Celts, whose only descendents nowadays are the modern Welsh. Even they have not lived on the island of Britain for 5000 years. 'Stonehenge', which is 4500 years old , was built by pre-Celtic inhabitants.

Isn't it time those who follow the (anti) fascist movement stop trying to fool us ?
These people are the same anti democratic group who attacked little Simone Clark (ballet dancer)for daring to believe she had the right to be a member of whichever legal political party she wanted .If these nasty evil people wanted to stop the BNP why do they not use the proper democratic process? ie: stand in elections ?I'll tell you why .Because no one would vote for them ,the 100 milllion or so murdered by those they hero worship would go along way towards that plus the rather unsavory crimes (related to young boys) their leaders have committed wouldn't help now would they?
As for the BNPs membership policy ,British people of the Jewish faith are more than welcome to & have joined the party in fact one is a BNP councilor .

Schmegel,

Unlike some (too many) posters who are always prating about their Christian identity, you have a true knowledge of the history of the people of our country, as your last post shows. Good work.

See Melanie Phillips's superb comment on this bit of Muslim grotesquerie (and accompanying Guardian lick-spittling) at:

[url]http://www.melaniephillips.com/diary/?p=1456[/url]

In the face of this cowardly violence,the option open to any human being is self defense, which pre-dates any legislation on earth. An eye for an eye,may be quoted as biblical law, but in reality it pre-dates any existing legal code. Jews must defend themselves from this outrage and the rest of us must be proactive in our dealings with these animals.

Schmegel/

To be precise, in as much as we can be, about the monument known as Stonehenge I have to tell you that what you see today is merely the last in a fairly long series of usages on this site dating from 3000BC - or perhaps a tad earlier. The stones and the remnants above ground that you see today are no older than, at the very outside, 3,600 years - in other words they date from about 1600BC - although some of the menhirs may have been positioned much earlier than that. Granted, you're in the right ballpark but in archaeology we can be slightly more accurate than you have been and the ongoing investigations at the Great Henge are telling us more and more as the years go by.

By-the-way, modern DNA evidence does not support your contention that the early peoples of these islands are not part of the genetic make-up of modern Britons - quite the reverse, actually. The Britonic Celt being the modern Welsh is a comprehensively demolished myth now. We have all interbred so much - and right from the beginning - that it is now only possible to speak about statistical liklihoods of origins. Every single 'native' white person, and a substantial number of non-white people, on these islands are related to each other within the last four generations (five at the outside for some particular bloodlines such as the small numbers of Cape Dutch (Boers) who have settled here).

Dominic.

This is something that I dont understand and I am hoping that someone can hlep me...
Muslims terrorise, slaughter, rape, riot, hate, etc in all the countries that they live in world wide, and Jews are the ones who have hate crimes against them, come on world wake up...I beg you please please wake up...